1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:10
Anna is a senior lawyer and crucially she's a former military officer, UK military officer,
2
0:00:10 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ine. And she's been speaking, how long have you
3
0:00:16 --> 0:00:20
been speaking out Anna, early in 2020?
4
0:00:20 --> 0:00:29
Yeah, well publicly, I guess for about 18 months or so, but before that obviously within
5
0:00:29 --> 0:00:31
my own networks, yeah.
6
0:00:31 --> 0:00:40
Sure, yeah. So when I saw a video of you talking on the streets for half an hour without any
7
0:00:40 --> 0:00:47
problem to whomever, was that October 2020?
8
0:00:47 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ly can't remember Stephen because I've been out on so many streets and I've
9
0:00:50 --> 0:00:54
had so many conversations I can't remember.
10
0:00:54 --> 0:01:02
Yeah, okay. So Anna if you run out of steam, you know, if you said an hour, you need an
11
0:01:02 --> 0:01:10
hour to tell us the gravity of the situation. And I agree I would need an hour as well.
12
0:01:10 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]eam, just let us know and we'll ask you some questions.
13
0:01:15 --> 0:01:22
Okay, fantastic. Thank you. So hello everybody and lovely to see you all, those faces I can
14
0:01:22 --> 0:01:30
see. And sorry for those of you who already know me, but brief introduction. Yeah, Stephen
15
0:01:30 --> 0:01:37
says I'm a senior solicitor. I've been studying law since I was 22 and I'm now 56. And I've
16
0:01:37 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]icing it since I was about 25, 26. So that's how long I've been doing this thing.
17
0:01:45 --> 0:01:53
But at the same time, I was also an army officer, a lieutenant in 51st signals unit in territorial
18
0:01:53 --> 0:02:00
army throughout my 20s. So I was a survival instructor. And my job obviously was to assess
19
0:02:00 --> 0:02:05
risk and look at potential threats and work out what on earth to do about them all. But
20
0:02:05 --> 0:02:11
I also spent [privacy contact redaction] I was also practicing as a lawyer,
21
0:02:12 --> 0:02:21
running my own consultancy, advising companies on flexible working. And one of my clients was
22
0:02:21 --> 0:02:28
Pfizer. So I worked with Pfizer for two years. And one of the jobs that I had to do within Pfizer
23
0:02:28 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]and why it took so long from the scientists in the laboratory
24
0:02:34 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction] and getting it out onto the shelves as a fully licensed,
25
0:02:40 --> 0:02:44
approved, marketed product. And part of my brief was to see if there was any way we could
26
0:02:44 --> 0:02:51
cut down on those timescales. So I worked with the scientists and the regulators, etc. And
27
0:02:52 --> 0:02:59
was taught the whole process about the clinical trials and the hoops that they have to go through.
28
0:02:59 --> 0:03:06
And obviously learned that it was years and not the few months that has been subsequently claimed.
29
0:03:06 --> 0:03:13
So I'm also a mother of three children. So I come to this whole situation with those sort of main
30
0:03:13 --> 0:03:19
skill sets, if you like. And what happened with me was that I actually got diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2
31
0:03:20 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ually think I was going to die, I was really ill.
32
0:03:25 --> 0:03:32
But in hindsight, it was probably just a really bad out of a chest infection or flu, I don't know.
33
0:03:32 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction], it meant that I was laid up for six weeks. And I spent those six weeks researching
34
0:03:38 --> 0:03:43
everything I possibly could about what this so-called virus was and how it was released.
35
0:03:43 --> 0:03:49
And immediately my hackles went up because I suspected it was a bioweapon. And I suspected
36
0:03:49 --> 0:03:57
that it was biowarfare to introduce a whole load of agendas that I was already acutely aware of,
37
0:03:57 --> 0:04:06
such as the Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 with the UN, the World Economic Forum agendas, etc.
38
0:04:06 --> 0:04:13
So my hackles were up very early on. And I contacted a retired army officer that I trained with
39
0:04:14 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] all those years ago. And he was on the ground in Beijing and had lived in China for
40
0:04:20 --> 0:04:27
10 years. So he knew what the China propaganda machine was like, etc. So we spent about four
41
0:04:27 --> 0:04:35
hours swapping intel and comparing notes and agreed, this was in about mid-January, I think,
42
0:04:35 --> 0:04:42
agreed that we needed to raise the alarm bells within the military network, because all the
43
0:04:42 --> 0:04:46
flags were there that this was biowarfare and a bioweapon had just been released.
44
0:04:47 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]ive networks. One of the people I contacted was a captain in the
45
0:04:54 --> 0:05:01
SAS. And I briefed him for an hour and a half. And at the end of that, he said, two or three other
46
0:05:01 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ed him with their concerns. And most of what I said had told him he
47
0:05:08 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ed sources. And some of it was new to him. But the we agreed
48
0:05:14 --> 0:05:20
at the end of the conversation that he would take it into the intelligence network in the military
49
0:05:20 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]igating the concerns. In the meantime, I raised my concerns with various
50
0:05:27 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]e in the military as well. But didn't really get got anywhere. It was kind of falling
51
0:05:32 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]age were saying, oh, don't be so stupid, Anna. It was a pangolin.
52
0:05:36 --> 0:05:43
It was a pangolin and it's all completely natural. So then what happened was that the Coronavirus Act
53
0:05:43 --> 0:05:53
came out and that put massive flags up for me as a lawyer, because it was a [privacy contact redaction]ex piece of law
54
0:05:53 --> 0:06:01
that you don't draft in a couple of days. And so I went on having seen that they'd downgraded the
55
0:06:02 --> 0:06:09
having seen that they'd downgraded the virus to a non-infectious disease on the 19th of March.
56
0:06:09 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] that they were talking about locking down the country and producing this, you know,
57
0:06:13 --> 0:06:20
emergency law didn't add up. So then when I looked on Hansard to see about the debates in Parliament,
58
0:06:20 --> 0:06:28
I saw that I think it was the second debate, Matt Hancock let slip that it had taken the months
59
0:06:28 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]aft that piece of law. So again, that was another flag because I thought, well,
60
0:06:33 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]afting this before they even knew that this virus existed? And indeed,
61
0:06:39 --> 0:06:46
I'd already been concerned about noises being made from Hancock the previous year, because in around
62
0:06:47 --> 0:06:55
May or June 2019, Hancock had taken had sought and received legal advice on mandating vaccines.
63
0:06:55 --> 0:07:00
Something I had raised with a judge at the time and saying, why on earth is Matt Hancock trying
64
0:07:00 --> 0:07:06
to seek advice on mandating vaccines? So clearly, flags were going up about whether this was a
65
0:07:06 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]anned, etc. I then heard Lord Sumption speaking out. He was the
66
0:07:13 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] speak out, I think in about end of March or April. And he was saying that,
67
0:07:18 --> 0:07:24
and he was saying that, you know, the Coronavirus Act was ultra virus, in other words,
68
0:07:24 --> 0:07:32
outside the powers that Parliament has, because a, they already had the necessary powers contained
69
0:07:32 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] 2004, which indeed the government did already have those powers.
70
0:07:39 --> 0:07:47
And B, the Public Health Control of Diseases Act 1984 also covered the situation. And it doesn't
71
0:07:47 --> 0:07:53
allow the powers that the government were claiming it was allowing, and the basis on which they were
72
0:07:53 --> 0:08:00
claiming the right to create this coronavirus act. So when I heard Lord Sumption, who's a former
73
0:08:01 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction] judge in the UK, give his analysis, which unbeknownst to him was exactly the same as
74
0:08:07 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction] me confidence that my legal analysis was correct. And I then started reaching
75
0:08:14 --> 0:08:19
out to other lawyers who at that time were raising concerns, one of whom was Francis
76
0:08:19 --> 0:08:26
Haw, the barrister who was instructed by Simon Dolan, to bring a judicial review of the Coronavirus
77
0:08:26 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]arted to work with a team of lawyers, I think in around, oh, May, June, July time,
78
0:08:37 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]orm, you know, what was going on and what legal action we could
79
0:08:43 --> 0:08:51
bring to claim the, as we saw them, ultra virus powers and the massive overreach of the government.
80
0:08:53 --> 0:09:01
And then the face masks regulations came out in July, as did the armies, the army going into
81
0:09:01 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction] And those, both of those really raised alarm bells for me, because they were both
82
0:09:08 --> 0:09:18
bio weapons on the evidence. And so once again, I reached out to the military. I was, I trained with
83
0:09:18 --> 0:09:26
at University and at Santos with the then back in July 2020, standing the commander of the British
84
0:09:26 --> 0:09:32
standing army, Colonel H Jones. And I reached out to Reaper and I said, you know, you've known me
85
0:09:32 --> 0:09:38
all my life, and you know that I'm not lying to you. I'm telling you that if you go into the
86
0:09:38 --> 0:09:44
schools and you, you know, aid in a bet or perpetrate the testing of these children,
87
0:09:44 --> 0:09:50
it is not going to be with their informed consent. They cannot consent to these measures.
88
0:09:50 --> 0:09:55
And therefore it's a breach of their bodily and psychiatric integrity. It will harm them
89
0:09:55 --> 0:10:01
and you will be held liable for any damage that's caused to them. And I sent him a whole
90
0:10:01 --> 0:10:07
load of evidence about the harms of masks and the harms of testing, et cetera, and the hydrogel and
91
0:10:08 --> 0:10:14
the ether oxide. And I warned him off and said cease and desist. Do not deploy the military.
92
0:10:14 --> 0:10:17
If you do, you'll be held responsible. It's a breach of the Nuremberg code.
93
0:10:19 --> 0:10:23
I didn't hear anything from him. I then sent him more evidence and another cease and desist.
94
0:10:23 --> 0:10:31
Didn't hear anything. The army went ahead and deployed, as you know. So then I reached out to
95
0:10:31 --> 0:10:37
various other pressure groups. And the first one was called recovery. And they said, oh, well,
96
0:10:37 --> 0:10:42
we're going to deal with the politicians about all of this. And I said, no, no, no, these are
97
0:10:42 --> 0:10:47
breaches of the Nuremberg code. They're now talking about injecting people with an experimental
98
0:10:47 --> 0:10:53
bioweapon. And we've got to bring serious legal proceedings now to stop all this.
99
0:10:55 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ed out of those groups because I was told that nobody wanted to take legal action
100
0:11:01 --> 0:11:07
and they certainly didn't want the lawyers to. And I said, you don't get to tell me that because
101
0:11:07 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So I then found another group. The health advice research team
102
0:11:15 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction], Mike Keaton was already a member, Dr. Claire Craig,
103
0:11:22 --> 0:11:30
Joel Smalley, Jonathan Engler, a number of very serious, you know, experts had got together and
104
0:11:30 --> 0:11:36
said, we need some legal minds on this as well. Please join us and give us an analysis on our
105
0:11:36 --> 0:11:42
evidence about what's going on. So by this time I was pretty much seething because I could see
106
0:11:42 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]e breaches of the Nuremberg code, multiple breaches of human rights,
107
0:11:48 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ic and international, civil and criminal. So I was pulled no punches when I joined heart.
108
0:11:54 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction] that this was a breach of the Nuremberg code and that we needed
109
0:11:59 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ion. And Mike Keaton and various others messaged me and said, thank you so much.
110
0:12:04 --> 0:12:11
We've been saying the same, you know, what can we do about it? Now that was, I would say, December
111
0:12:11 --> 0:12:20
2020, January 2021. And then I joined the Lawyers for Liberty. And ever since then, basically,
112
0:12:20 --> 0:12:27
I've been working in these teams, both here and abroad, looking at all the different legal issues
113
0:12:27 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction] been raised from all these different measures, looking at whether they are civil,
114
0:12:33 --> 0:12:38
criminal breaches, whether the burden of proof has been satisfied in relation to each of the
115
0:12:38 --> 0:12:44
civil and criminal offences, and, you know, basically what we can do about it as lawyers,
116
0:12:44 --> 0:12:50
you know, what our plan of action is going to be. Now, at the same time, clearly, working within
117
0:12:50 --> 0:12:55
the military network, what we've been trying to do is raise the alarm bell within all the military
118
0:12:55 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] that these are breaches of not only the Nuremberg code, but of the war
119
0:13:02 --> 0:13:10
conventions, because each of these experimental measures amounts to a breach of someone's
120
0:13:10 --> 0:13:17
psychiatric or bodily integrity. And they are not being, you know, people's informed consent
121
0:13:17 --> 0:13:23
is not being obtained, typically, and I'll go into more detail about that. And in fact, because
122
0:13:23 --> 0:13:28
these go to the right to life and the right not to be tortured or receive cruel, inhumane,
123
0:13:28 --> 0:13:36
or degrading treatment or punishment, not only does it breach all the civil human rights laws,
124
0:13:36 --> 0:13:44
but it breaches the warfare conventions. Specifically, it breaches the Geneva conventions,
125
0:13:45 --> 0:13:52
common Article 3, and amounts to the great, the grave breaches. These are prohibited acts of
126
0:13:52 --> 0:13:59
unlawful warfare. And again, I'll go into that in more detail. But given that,
127
0:13:59 --> 0:14:05
clearly, the alarm bells were ringing amongst all of us, military people who actually understood
128
0:14:05 --> 0:14:11
that situation. Now, what alarmed me when I went to the military and said, listen, you know, these
129
0:14:11 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] breaches being committed by our own police force, our own military, our own government,
130
0:14:17 --> 0:14:21
and not only here, but abroad, and all governments are doing this. And so therefore, the whole
131
0:14:22 --> 0:14:30
framework is a joke, because nobody's upholding it. And to my horror, as I dug down more and more
132
0:14:30 --> 0:14:36
and more into this, what I came across was that none of the lawyers I spoke to had actually read
133
0:14:36 --> 0:14:45
any of the warfare conventions, not a single one. Now, when I spoke to my, the soldiers that I've
134
0:14:45 --> 0:14:51
been working with, and I took them through my examination of their evidence, not a single one
135
0:14:51 --> 0:14:57
of them had read the warfare conventions either. And in fact, when I said to them, well,
136
0:14:58 --> 0:15:05
the Joint Services Manual [privacy contact redaction] read all of these conventions. And in fact,
137
0:15:06 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction] read this book here, which is back to front, but it says it's the manual of the
138
0:15:13 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction] And that's the Ministry of Defence's own book. And what that does
139
0:15:18 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]er 7, is it deals with medical treatment. And what it says is that this is the
140
0:15:26 --> 0:15:36
UK's interpretation of the law. Okay. And Chapter 7, the Wounded, Sick and Dead and Medical Services
141
0:15:37 --> 0:15:46
sets out, first of all, introduction 7.1, definition of wounded and sick 7.2, protection
142
0:15:46 --> 0:15:55
of and care of wounded and sick. And that goes into permitted medical treatment, which is in
143
0:15:56 --> 0:16:03
paragraph 7.5. Now, the reason I'm going to start here before I go into more detail about
144
0:16:03 --> 0:16:11
the informed consent is because I want to make it very clear to people that this is a prohibited
145
0:16:11 --> 0:16:20
act of unlawful warfare that we are talking about here. Okay. So civil human rights, yes,
146
0:16:20 --> 0:16:25
it's breaching all of those, but this is how serious it is. Permitted medical treatment,
147
0:16:25 --> 0:16:32
okay. The physical or mental health and integrity of persons who are in the power of an adverse party
148
0:16:32 --> 0:16:39
or who are interned, detained, or otherwise deprived of liberty as a result of armed conflict
149
0:16:39 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]ified act or omission. Okay. Well, that's the same for
150
0:16:45 --> 0:16:50
everybody. We can't harm each other by any unjustified act or omission, whether you're in
151
0:16:50 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction] or not. Okay. But it goes on to say, any medical procedure, which is not indicated by
152
0:16:57 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]ate of health of the person concerned, and which is not consistent with generally
153
0:17:03 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]s, which would be applied under similar medical circumstances
154
0:17:09 --> 0:17:14
to persons who are nationals of the party conducting the procedure and who are in no way
155
0:17:14 --> 0:17:19
deprived of liberty is prohibited. Now, I know that's a horribly long-winded sentence,
156
0:17:19 --> 0:17:28
and basically what it's saying is, unless the state of the person necessitates medical treatment,
157
0:17:28 --> 0:17:33
so it has to be absolutely necessary for that individual. So not for the collective,
158
0:17:33 --> 0:17:40
not for anybody else's benefit, but for that individual. And it has to be given with generally
159
0:17:40 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]s, i.e. the Nuremberg Code and the informed consent process, which would
160
0:17:47 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]ances to persons who are nationals of the state. So in other
161
0:17:53 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]s, it doesn't matter who you've got in your custody or detained, you must treat them to the
162
0:17:59 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]s as you would to nationals of your own state. Okay. So that provides some
163
0:18:04 --> 0:18:11
kind of check on it. And it says, if they are not deprived of liberty. Okay. So what it also
164
0:18:11 --> 0:18:18
recognizes there is that if you are a prisoner of war and deprived of your liberty, your ability to
165
0:18:18 --> 0:18:24
give freely voluntary consent is very, very limited. And therefore, even if a prisoner is
166
0:18:24 --> 0:18:30
apparently consenting, the chances are they're not. And that's why there's this limit there,
167
0:18:30 --> 0:18:39
that it has to be necessary, etc. Now, the point about all of that is it goes on to say that in
168
0:18:39 --> 0:18:43
dealing with medical treatment on the basis of real medical need on the part of the patient,
169
0:18:43 --> 0:18:51
the law repeats fundamental medical ethics. The aim is to prevent experiments or unjustified medical
170
0:18:51 --> 0:18:58
operations on persons who are in no position to give their free consent. This protection extends
171
0:18:58 --> 0:19:03
to all those in the hands of the enemy or other party, and even to citizens of the detaining power
172
0:19:03 --> 0:19:08
who are interned for reasons related to the armed conflict. In the absence of real medical
173
0:19:08 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ification, all persons are protected from physical mutilations, medical or scientific
174
0:19:14 --> 0:19:21
experiments, or removal of tissue or organs for transplantation, even with their consent. And
175
0:19:21 --> 0:19:28
that's put in italics, you know, emphasized, unless these acts are justified under the general
176
0:19:28 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]es outlined in paragraph 7.5, which I've just read out. So now, it also goes on to say the
177
0:19:35 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction] the right to refuse any surgical operation. In cases of
178
0:19:41 --> 0:19:46
refusal, medical personnel must try to obtain a written statement to that effect, etc. The
179
0:19:46 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]s to carry out surgery necessary to save life in an emergency, but otherwise than
180
0:19:51 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]etely prohibited. And it goes on to say non-renunciation of rights. The wounded and
181
0:19:57 --> 0:20:04
sick, as well as medical personnel and chaplains, may in no circumstances renounce in whole or in
182
0:20:04 --> 0:20:12
part the rights secured to them by the convention or by the additional protocol. Okay, now, if I
183
0:20:12 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]ep back from all of that, the reason I start there, as I say, is because if you don't get
184
0:20:19 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] medical experimentation on your enemy prisoners, the idea, and you don't get to give them
185
0:20:27 --> 0:20:33
medical treatment, even with their consent, unless it's necessitated by their own health,
186
0:20:33 --> 0:20:39
and you don't get to do that to your enemy prisoners, the idea that governments or anybody
187
0:20:39 --> 0:20:44
does it to anybody else in a so-called public health emergency is completely ridiculous,
188
0:20:45 --> 0:20:52
as you can see. And the whole point about that is that, and this is why it's so personal to me,
189
0:20:52 --> 0:20:56
because my own uncle was in one of those German prisoner of war camps. He was an
190
0:20:56 --> 0:21:03
infanteer, and he was caught. And he, I don't know to what extent he personally was experimented on,
191
0:21:03 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] witnessed all those other people being experimented on. And he escaped
192
0:21:08 --> 0:21:14
with two of the other, you know, prisoners, and they escaped back through France and Germany,
193
0:21:14 --> 0:21:19
Spain, rather. And because he knew it was so horrific, once he got back to England,
194
0:21:19 --> 0:21:26
he went back over there to release them. And my father, aged 18, was sent to Berlin to release
195
0:21:26 --> 0:21:31
them as well. And when I was a child, I was dragged around Auschwitz. I was dragged around
196
0:21:31 --> 0:21:38
the fields of the Somme and the battlefields, and I was made to promise never, ever, ever to forget
197
0:21:38 --> 0:21:45
what happened in those camps, how those people were treated, and the Nuremberg trials. And I
198
0:21:45 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]udy the Nuremberg trials to understand exactly why it was so important
199
0:21:52 --> 0:21:59
that those trials were held, why the Nuremberg code was created, why we must never, ever forget,
200
0:21:59 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction] make sure it never happens again. And, you know, Stephen pointed out in one of our
201
0:22:06 --> 0:22:11
meetings that, you know, he was told at medical school that it was the most important document
202
0:22:11 --> 0:22:18
of the century. And I agree as a lawyer, because when you look at the historical context legally,
203
0:22:18 --> 0:22:26
what happened up until that point was this. We already had our civil laws and our criminal laws,
204
0:22:26 --> 0:22:33
which prohibited killing each other clearly and maiming each other. So, for example, in the UK,
205
0:22:33 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction] God's laws, thou shalt not kill. We had the Magna Carta, which prohibited harming each other.
206
0:22:40 --> 0:22:45
We had the Bill of Rights. We had the law and ordinances of war, if it was a warfare situation.
207
0:22:45 --> 0:22:51
And then in 1861, we had the Offenses Against the Person Act, which details things like administering
208
0:22:51 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ance or wounding with intent, etc. Right. So we had a whole body of laws
209
0:22:59 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction] and don't wound, harm, kill each other. But when it came to warfare,
210
0:23:07 --> 0:23:15
what happened was that that was expanded upon. So in 1863, Abraham Lincoln instructed, I think
211
0:23:15 --> 0:23:22
Charles Lieber, it was his name, to draft a, I think it was General Regulation 100, the Lieber
212
0:23:22 --> 0:23:30
Code, after the author, to the American soldiers to ensure that they did not behave like savages,
213
0:23:31 --> 0:23:38
even in times of war. And so there are several prohibitions placed on the soldiers, including
214
0:23:38 --> 0:23:43
that they weren't allowed to administer a poison and they weren't allowed to give medical treatment,
215
0:23:43 --> 0:23:49
etc. without consent. And the whole idea of the Warfare Convention was that you aimed to disable
216
0:23:49 --> 0:23:58
your enemy, not to go on a wanton killing spree. So there then came out various other war regulations,
217
0:23:58 --> 0:24:03
including the Hague Convention, the Hague Regulations, and I think 1906. And that was
218
0:24:03 --> 0:24:10
what the Germans were accused of breaching in the First World War, those warfare conventions that
219
0:24:10 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ed up until that point. But due to the horrors of the First World War, they started
220
0:24:16 --> 0:24:22
introducing weapons conventions, because means and methods of warfare are not unlimited, including
221
0:24:22 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So in 1925, they came out with a convention against asphyxiating
222
0:24:28 --> 0:24:35
gases, etc. And the intention was that any weapons that caused unnecessary suffering
223
0:24:35 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction] the Second World War. And what wasn't expected were all of those
224
0:24:43 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction] humanity that weren't specifically necessarily covered under the
225
0:24:51 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ing war regulations, may have been covered under the individual countries criminal or civil
226
0:24:58 --> 0:25:05
codes, but weren't necessarily encapsulated in a single sort of treaty type document that everybody
227
0:25:05 --> 0:25:13
could refer to. So what the lawyers did before Nuremberg was that they sat down and they drafted
228
0:25:13 --> 0:25:19
out definitions of crimes, so war crimes, crimes of aggression, crimes of humanity, crimes against
229
0:25:19 --> 0:25:25
humanity rather. And I think it was genocide was the other one. And then they tried the war
230
0:25:25 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction] those definitions of those crimes. Those definitions of those crimes have
231
0:25:32 --> 0:25:38
now become Article 678, and I think it's nine of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
232
0:25:39 --> 0:25:45
Okay, but the first charter governing it was the London Charter. And that's what governed the
233
0:25:45 --> 0:25:53
trials held at Nuremberg. Now what happened at Nuremberg was that the medics were brought to
234
0:25:53 --> 0:25:59
trial, as well as the judges and the lawyers, as well as the military people and the media and
235
0:25:59 --> 0:26:04
bankers, various people were brought to trial. But the medics were brought to trial under a series
236
0:26:04 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ively as the medical cases. And in the first set of medical cases, what happens
237
0:26:11 --> 0:26:20
is that the tribunal goes through what was already the accepted medical standards. So the bit I just
238
0:26:20 --> 0:26:24
read out to you here where it says that it has to be medical treatment has to be given in in
239
0:26:25 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ance with generally accepted medical standards. That point was picked up by the
240
0:26:31 --> 0:26:40
tribunal before going on to assess the crimes. And what you'll find, I think it was at page 181 or
241
0:26:40 --> 0:26:48
182 of the medical cases judgment, the first one is it says permissible medical experiments.
242
0:26:49 --> 0:26:56
And what it does is it says that there is already a body of medical ethics and criminal law that,
243
0:26:56 --> 0:27:03
you know, binds the physician, which sets out how a physician is meant to conduct medical treatment
244
0:27:03 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ing with generally accepted medical ethics. And I think I'm correct in saying that
245
0:27:08 --> 0:27:13
there was already a code of generally accepted medical ethics produced by the American Medical
246
0:27:13 --> 0:27:20
Association in around 1847, which was what the tribunal was referring to and saying, look,
247
0:27:20 --> 0:27:24
you know, there's already been a huge body of medical ethics, notwithstanding, we've had the
248
0:27:24 --> 0:27:30
Hippocratic oath since, you know, 500 BC, which also says you shall not administer a poison,
249
0:27:31 --> 0:27:38
and you shall not encourage such a course, etc. Right. First do no harm. So there's been a body
250
0:27:38 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction] [privacy contact redaction] So they go through that at the beginning, and then
251
0:27:45 --> 0:27:50
they look at the medical experiments and the medical treatment that was being inflicted on
252
0:27:50 --> 0:27:59
the prisoners of war and other nationals in various hospitals, etc. And they judged the medics that
253
0:27:59 --> 0:28:04
were brought to trial on the basis of whether or not they'd uphold those laws and those medical
254
0:28:04 --> 0:28:09
ethics. And of course, several of them were found guilty and the death penalty was handed down,
255
0:28:09 --> 0:28:15
and they were executed. Some of them were imprisoned, some of them were found not guilty.
256
0:28:16 --> 0:28:20
But what it does on that page, permissible medical experiments, is it sets out 10,
257
0:28:23 --> 0:28:30
you know, principles that must be applied in all cases. And that becomes known as the Nuremberg
258
0:28:30 --> 0:28:37
Code. And the Nuremberg Code itself was published in 1947 as a separate code,
259
0:28:37 --> 0:28:44
saying this is binding on all physicians. Now bearing in mind the Nuremberg Code itself arose
260
0:28:44 --> 0:28:51
out of those medical trials, which were and are international binding criminal case law.
261
0:28:52 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction] that those medics were up were held to those standards at that time,
262
0:28:59 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]s at that time to a criminal level, such that they were
263
0:29:05 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction] humanity because they had not obtained informed consent freely given,
264
0:29:12 --> 0:29:20
etc. Now what happens after the Nuremberg Code is published in 1947 is that the World Medical
265
0:29:20 --> 0:29:26
Association does an audit of the medical schools of the Third Reich and finds out that most of them
266
0:29:26 --> 0:29:34
had not required their graduates to swear an oath of any form. And indeed the evidence showed
267
0:29:34 --> 0:29:40
that the graduates didn't know the law and were blindly following orders. And as far as they were
268
0:29:40 --> 0:29:45
concerned, they were perfectly entitled just to blindly follow orders. And that was obviously
269
0:29:45 --> 0:29:50
part of their defence, which was rejected ultimately because following orders is no defence.
270
0:29:50 --> 0:29:59
Sorry, Pete, I'm right in the middle of something. Yeah, sorry. So then what happens is that the
271
0:30:00 --> 0:30:07
Universal Declaration of Human Rights is issued in 1948, which specifically says that everyone
272
0:30:07 --> 0:30:14
has the right to life and everyone has the right not to be tortured or given cruel, inhumane,
273
0:30:14 --> 0:30:22
degrading treatment or punishment. And then it sets out all kinds of other rights. But then in 1950
274
0:30:22 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction] the European Convention of Human Rights, which also enshrines the right to life and the
275
0:30:27 --> 0:30:33
right not to receive cruel, inhumane, degrading treatment or punishment, etc., including medical
276
0:30:33 --> 0:30:40
treatment without consent. In 1950, the World Medical Association produces the Declaration of Geneva,
277
0:30:40 --> 0:30:48
which binds all physicians. It specifically says it binds all physicians. And it is basically the
278
0:30:48 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]eroids, together with a whole bunch of other human rights and criminal code
279
0:30:55 --> 0:31:04
points that governs a physician. And it's pages long. And then in 1964, the Hippocratic Oath was
280
0:31:05 --> 0:31:12
updated. And in 1964, the Declaration of Helsinki was put in place. And the Declaration of Helsinki
281
0:31:12 --> 0:31:20
is the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Geneva on steroids. And so it's pages and pages
282
0:31:20 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] human experimentation on live human subjects in
283
0:31:27 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]ance with international ethics and the law, both criminal and civil law, and clearly
284
0:31:34 --> 0:31:41
getting informed consent, fully informed consent, freely given, is a critical part of all of that.
285
0:31:42 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966,
286
0:31:49 --> 0:31:53
which again, enshrines the right not to receive medical treatment without consent, the right to
287
0:31:53 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] the International Covenant on Economic and Civil and Cultural Rights, which
288
0:31:59 --> 0:32:06
again, enshrines those rights. And then you have the Oviedo Convention in 1997, which again,
289
0:32:06 --> 0:32:12
provides even more detail about the informed consent process and live human experimentation.
290
0:32:12 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction] the Human Rights and Bioethics Act of 2005, which again, enshrines the Declaration of
291
0:32:19 --> 0:32:26
Helsinki and all of those other declarations. And in the UK, we have the Human Medicines for
292
0:32:26 --> 0:32:33
Clinical Trial, used 2004, which specifically enshrines the Declaration of Helsinki, which
293
0:32:33 --> 0:32:41
specifically enshrines the Nuremberg Code, etc. So when you actually look at those on top of the
294
0:32:41 --> 0:32:47
Geneva Conventions and all the additional protocols that came out after the Second World War,
295
0:32:48 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]s absolutely no doubt whatsoever that those fundamental principles of
296
0:32:58 --> 0:33:05
the Nuremberg Code, i.e. the informed voluntary consent freely given, etc., forms part of domestic
297
0:33:05 --> 0:33:12
and international law across the world. And I challenge any lawyer to say that it doesn't,
298
0:33:13 --> 0:33:18
and to prove to me in which part of all of those laws that it specifically says it doesn't.
299
0:33:19 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]ephen and I were talking about this earlier, because there's a whole load of
300
0:33:22 --> 0:33:26
misinformation going around the internet about people saying, oh, the Nuremberg Code doesn't
301
0:33:26 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]y. But that's just nonsense. And it sounds like controlled opposition to me, because
302
0:33:34 --> 0:33:40
the Nuremberg Code is at the heart of this pandemic, because all of the measures have been
303
0:33:40 --> 0:33:49
experimental, apart from hand washing. On the empirical evidence of the public health studies
304
0:33:50 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction], well, since 1890s, I've gone back to 1870, and I've actually done the due diligence
305
0:33:58 --> 0:34:04
myself, and I've searched for all the research studies on hand washing, on lockdowns, on masks,
306
0:34:04 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction] of it. And the only measure that consistently shows reduction in viral spread is
307
0:34:12 --> 0:34:21
hand washing. Right? So that means all the rest of these measures are live human experiments using
308
0:34:21 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]s. And the evidence shows that people are not giving their informed consent
309
0:34:27 --> 0:34:33
being locked down, to being socially distanced, to being masked, tested, injected,
310
0:34:34 --> 0:34:41
denied early medical treatment, etc. We could go on. These are all experimental measures.
311
0:34:41 --> 0:34:47
And therefore, on the analysis, what that means is that not only are these grave breaches of the
312
0:34:47 --> 0:34:56
warfare conventions amounting to prohibited acts of unlawful warfare, okay, but they also amount
313
0:34:56 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]er if it's with intent. Now, on the analysis, when you, for example, inject someone,
314
0:35:08 --> 0:35:16
you intend to break their skin. That is a wound. So therefore, under section [privacy contact redaction]
315
0:35:16 --> 0:35:23
the person at 1861, you've wounded that person with intent. Anything that flows from that wound,
316
0:35:23 --> 0:35:30
because that wound has included a whole vial of substances that you've just injected into that
317
0:35:30 --> 0:35:37
person, anything that flows from that wound is your liability, the individual who has wounded
318
0:35:37 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ance. Now, if they are maimed or injured or died, die from it,
319
0:35:46 --> 0:35:51
it only won't be your criminal responsibility. If you have obtained prior
320
0:35:51 --> 0:36:01
freely informed, freely given rather, fully informed consent. Now, on the evidence, that's
321
0:36:01 --> 0:36:09
not happening with any of these measures. If we go to the injections in particular, on the evidence,
322
0:36:09 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]ions because the, in this country, June Raine of the MHRA
323
0:36:18 --> 0:36:26
has confirmed that she accepts Pfizer's submission, that they are entitled to withhold
324
0:36:26 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] of ingredients on the basis that it's a commercial trade secret.
325
0:36:32 --> 0:36:38
Therefore, de facto, we do not know what are in those injections. Therefore, de facto,
326
0:36:39 --> 0:36:46
you cannot give informed consent and you cannot obtain informed consent. So if you're not telling
327
0:36:46 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]e what's in the injections because you don't know, it doesn't matter if they're consenting,
328
0:36:51 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]n't obtained lawful, legal, moral, ethical consent. Therefore, anything that happens to that
329
0:36:57 --> 0:37:04
person will be your personal, civil and criminal liability. And this is a serious point I've been
330
0:37:04 --> 0:37:11
trying to get across to anyone who's conducting these injections because the evidence is that
331
0:37:11 --> 0:37:17
none of us are taught law at school. The medics are not taught law at medical school apart from
332
0:37:17 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]ering the injections aren't necessarily even medics.
333
0:37:23 --> 0:37:35
So the NHS apparently gives three hours of training on informed consent before these people are
334
0:37:35 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]ions. But in fact, the application form from the NHS
335
0:37:41 --> 0:37:48
for the vaccinators specifically says you can assume informed consent has been obtained.
336
0:37:50 --> 0:37:55
And when you go into these clinics and the evidence from the clinics is that these
337
0:37:55 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ors are therefore assuming informed consent has already been obtained. They don't run them
338
0:38:01 --> 0:38:06
through the individuals through an individual clinical risk assessment to find out their
339
0:38:06 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ying with the requirements of the patient information leaflet,
340
0:38:12 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction] give this leaflet to somebody several weeks before because they must
341
0:38:19 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction] to all the ingredients. And these leaflets are not even being given to people
342
0:38:27 --> 0:38:31
or if they are there being given after the injection, the allergy tests aren't being
343
0:38:31 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ed, I could go on. But basically the informed consent procedure is not being followed.
344
0:38:39 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]e of the Nuremberg Code is being breached. And that applies also to the
345
0:38:47 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]s. And so what this means is that these are on an international
346
0:38:56 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] humanity. They are causing genocide and they are bio warfare using bio weapons.
347
0:39:04 --> 0:39:11
And that's on the definitions of Article 6, Article [privacy contact redaction]atute of
348
0:39:11 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] So that's how serious this is. And as I say, the evidence is
349
0:39:19 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]ering these injections or putting masks on children or,
350
0:39:24 --> 0:39:30
you know, the companies telling their staff that they have to test and mask, none of these people
351
0:39:30 --> 0:39:39
know the law. And they're not reading the law. And when you point the law out to them, they simply go
352
0:39:39 --> 0:39:44
into, oh, it's government guidance, it's company policy, we're doing as we're told, we're following
353
0:39:44 --> 0:39:50
orders basically. And they think they're entitled to absolve themselves of any responsibility or
354
0:39:50 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]y parroting that. And the rude awakening that many, many, many people are having
355
0:39:57 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction] is that no, no, no, no, no, this is an individual, civil and criminal, personal
356
0:40:05 --> 0:40:12
and private liability that you will bear as the individual who is either perpetrating,
357
0:40:12 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]icit in these crimes. Because either you are demanding that someone
358
0:40:19 --> 0:40:24
has these measures or you're the person putting the mask on someone or putting the test up someone's
359
0:40:24 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ing them. So either you're the person committing the actual act in law, we call it the
360
0:40:31 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction] the necessary intent, the mens rea, then you know, you've committed the
361
0:40:40 --> 0:40:47
crime on the face of it. So this is where people are really seriously falling down because they have
362
0:40:47 --> 0:40:52
not been taught law at school, they haven't taken responsibility to teach themselves law when they
363
0:40:52 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] school. And so they're walking around clueless. And the point I made to Stephen earlier is this,
364
0:41:00 --> 0:41:06
and it's a very crucial point, because I'm an employment lawyer as well. Now, any employment
365
0:41:06 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] specifically says you must uphold the rule of law. And yet most people
366
0:41:14 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]oyer, yes, I can accept this contract. And yes, I can comply with my your code
367
0:41:21 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction], because yes, I know the law and I can uphold it. Whereas in fact, they've just committed
368
0:41:27 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]oyer and misrepresented their capability and competence to their employer.
369
0:41:33 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction], if they've taken money from the public purse, they've defrauded the public purse
370
0:41:37 --> 0:41:43
on the evidence, because they knew damn well that they weren't taught law at school.
371
0:41:44 --> 0:41:48
They knew damn well, for example, they didn't learn much school at medical school.
372
0:41:49 --> 0:41:54
And so what the hell are they doing? Saying, yes, I can do that. I can do that job, give us a job,
373
0:41:54 --> 0:42:01
give us the money, and I won't bother telling my employer I don't know the law. I won't then bother
374
0:42:01 --> 0:42:06
teaching myself the law. And I'll just carry on doing this job as a lawless individual.
375
0:42:08 --> 0:42:13
And unfortunately, that's what the evidence is showing is coming out of most professionals,
376
0:42:13 --> 0:42:18
including the MPs, including the medics, including the teachers, including all these people,
377
0:42:18 --> 0:42:25
they don't know the law. And so what we have is an absolutely tragic situation,
378
0:42:26 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction] a society full of people who don't know the law and who are committing
379
0:42:32 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]s of unlawful warfare on each other in grave breach of the warfare conventions.
380
0:42:42 --> 0:42:51
And not even realizing. And I laugh because it's just so crazy to me that actually we went through
381
0:42:51 --> 0:42:58
all of that Nuremberg trials, we went through all of those years, 70 odd years since, of bringing
382
0:42:58 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]e to trial, even in the 60s, nurses and doctors were brought to trial for the crimes
383
0:43:03 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]e in the third right. Right. And we've had 70 years more evidence
384
0:43:09 --> 0:43:15
and law to make sure this never happens again. And here we are with the worst set of crimes
385
0:43:15 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] humanity ever committed in the history of humankind, literally repeating the Nuremberg trials
386
0:43:21 --> 0:43:28
all over again, because clearly nobody's learned anything and they've forgotten the whole lot.
387
0:43:29 --> 0:43:35
So what I would like to do at another time, because I'll wrap up now and we can take questions,
388
0:43:35 --> 0:43:43
but I've been drafting and I continue to draft this huge long notice of liability,
389
0:43:43 --> 0:43:50
which I've been sending out for people. And in that I can take you through all the law in more
390
0:43:50 --> 0:43:58
detail in a separate session for those who want to go through it. But what we found was that if we
391
0:43:58 --> 0:44:04
serve short form notices of liability to people saying you're breaking the law, stop it. Well,
392
0:44:04 --> 0:44:09
as I've just shown you, people don't know the law. So they just think, oh, well, this is all silly.
393
0:44:09 --> 0:44:14
It means nothing. And that's what they're saying. These notices have no legal meaning. They're a
394
0:44:14 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ete nonsense. Well, you would say that, wouldn't you, if you had no idea about the law
395
0:44:18 --> 0:44:25
and you read it and it meant nothing to you. So I've been a big fan of actually, this is 170 or
396
0:44:25 --> 0:44:33
pages, my notice of liability, because this sets out the law in black and white with hyperlinks
397
0:44:33 --> 0:44:40
and all the references so that nobody can deny, having read this, that they didn't know the law.
398
0:44:41 --> 0:44:46
But also, of course, our job is to educate people and to do try and save people from
399
0:44:46 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] everyone else from being harmed by those people. So obviously,
400
0:44:50 --> 0:44:55
it's a huge educational document as well. And for those people who have actually read it,
401
0:44:55 --> 0:45:03
they've been gobsmacked because they really didn't know the law that's contained in this document.
402
0:45:04 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]e so that the good people read it,
403
0:45:08 --> 0:45:12
realising, realise they're breaking the law, they will cease and desist.
404
0:45:14 --> 0:45:21
Right. But the bad guys will either put it in the bin or they'll read it and think, well, I don't
405
0:45:21 --> 0:45:26
care. I'll carry on doing it anyway. But then we've gradually found out who the people are
406
0:45:27 --> 0:45:32
who are intending to carry on committing these horrendous crimes and who are those who are
407
0:45:32 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] ignorance of the law is no defence, and it won't defend them from
408
0:45:38 --> 0:45:45
what they've done to date, at least they could then stop killing and harming people going forward.
409
0:45:45 --> 0:45:53
And that's the intention. So I've said an awful lot. As I say, I haven't gone into the actual
410
0:45:53 --> 0:46:02
real details of the case law and the articles, etc. to cite them at you in detail. But I'm happy
411
0:46:02 --> 0:46:07
to send out this notice to any of you so that you can read it all for yourself. And as I say,
412
0:46:08 --> 0:46:14
reconvene for another session where we go through the finer detail of the law if people are interested.
413
0:46:16 --> 0:46:23
So, yes, there we go. I'll take a breath. Wonderful, wonderful, Anna, for you.
414
0:46:25 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction] 10 o'clock on Sunday night. Thank you for that masterful expose. And I got this quote for
415
0:46:35 --> 0:46:43
your notice of liability, which I've shared with people. Detail prevents denial. There you are.
416
0:46:43 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ice law for [privacy contact redaction] want everybody, you know,
417
0:46:50 --> 0:46:57
I've shared this numerous presentations and what Anna has taken us through is a frame is a framework
418
0:46:57 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ors and others, they just want simple answers. Well,
419
0:47:04 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ex and so is the law. And there are seven layers. So just to summarize
420
0:47:12 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction] said and her notice of liability goes through this. I'm just giving you a chance
421
0:47:16 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ions are coming. There are seven layers that apply. There's God's
422
0:47:21 --> 0:47:26
law or natural law. Then there's international treaties. Then there's a nation's constitution.
423
0:47:26 --> 0:47:30
Then there's national laws. Then there's state laws. There's regulations. And then there's
424
0:47:30 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction] law. Seven layers of laws. And people are gaily going along and absolutely ignoring them.
425
0:47:37 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ically this operates. Someone came to me and said,
426
0:47:41 --> 0:47:47
I was injured by the jab. And I said, okay, how were you injured? I said, well, I suffered this.
427
0:47:47 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ered the jab? I don't know. Where did you do it? At some centre. People have
428
0:47:54 --> 0:48:00
got no idea who's administering. I haven't read the notice of the informed consent document.
429
0:48:00 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction] urge all of us on this call to take what Anna says on board and start recording
430
0:48:07 --> 0:48:14
details. And everyone you speak to, get them to record details. Because the first thing a lawyer
431
0:48:14 --> 0:48:18
says to you is, well, what happened? And people say, I don't know, I got jabbed. And that's all
432
0:48:18 --> 0:48:24
they know. So over to you, Stephen, for your first questions. Anna, Stephen, as we know,
433
0:48:25 --> 0:48:30
it's a first go at the questions here. As the convener of this wonderful group.
434
0:48:34 --> 0:48:37
And if you unmute yourself, Stephen, that would be grand.
435
0:48:39 --> 0:48:44
No, I'm just having it says low system resources. So it's keeping I was just trying to close a few
436
0:48:44 --> 0:48:51
things because you keep breaking up. Okay, Stephen, are we still breaking up on it?
437
0:48:52 --> 0:48:54
No, that's better. I've closed out a few things now.
438
0:48:55 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] presentation we've had, I think we've had some really good ones,
439
0:49:02 --> 0:49:10
including from Robert Kennedy. And he was pretty good. So it was absolutely brilliant what you said.
440
0:49:10 --> 0:49:21
And I wonder whether if we edit it and edit the video of you speaking, and, and then offer it to
441
0:49:21 --> 0:49:31
you to okay, would you agree to us publishing? You know, that presentation or? Oh, yes, please. Yes.
442
0:49:31 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] asked me to try and sum it all up. And quite often when I'm out and
443
0:49:36 --> 0:49:41
about on talks, they can't hear what I'm saying very well. So it's wonderful that we've been able
444
0:49:41 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]atform like this. And also, in the camera as we as discussed this
445
0:49:51 --> 0:49:57
morning, could could we work together? Because I would really, I can see that, you know, your
446
0:49:57 --> 0:50:04
notices of liability extremely detailed and and Charles has explained why that's important. I
447
0:50:04 --> 0:50:11
I agree. And but I think that we ought to serve them on the police, who are conducting a criminal
448
0:50:11 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]igation. And they've also been put on notice on the 20th of December, that they are to stop,
449
0:50:18 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]op the vaccination program in the UK, while they investigate while they conduct a
450
0:50:25 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]igation. And the intent from us is to drown them with evidence every week,
451
0:50:33 --> 0:50:38
so that they can never finish their criminal investigation. But obviously, they should have
452
0:50:38 --> 0:50:43
stopped the vaccination program and they haven't. Now we need to really put pressure on them
453
0:50:43 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]op it once and for all in the UK to show the rest of the world how to behave.
454
0:50:50 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]e on that, actually, is that basically one of the things
455
0:50:57 --> 0:51:03
we've been doing as veterans is engaging with local stand in the park communities and other
456
0:51:03 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]e and going to local police stations to try and obtain crime references
457
0:51:11 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ations, because the point we're making to the police is this, you know,
458
0:51:16 --> 0:51:23
if you're injured in Wales or Dundee or whatever, you can't travel all the way down to Hammersmith
459
0:51:23 --> 0:51:29
in London to report your injuries to the Metropolitan Police there. And yet that's
460
0:51:29 --> 0:51:36
the Metropolitan Police's strategy that they're saying, that they've told other police stations
461
0:51:36 --> 0:51:41
around the country not to get involved and not to accept reports of any injuries, etc., because
462
0:51:41 --> 0:51:46
it's all being dealt with out of Hammersmith. Well, of course, that's a nonsense. You know,
463
0:51:46 --> 0:51:52
that doesn't work for people. So what people have been doing is going to various, you know,
464
0:51:52 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ations around the country and West Yorkshire has now issued a crime reference.
465
0:51:59 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]er has. Northumbria. Northumbria were issuing an incident reference. They said it wasn't
466
0:52:10 --> 0:52:16
a crime reference. And what you'll hear from all of these pieces of evidence that the community
467
0:52:16 --> 0:52:21
are gathering from when they go to all these different police stations is the same script
468
0:52:21 --> 0:52:27
being read out essentially by the police, which is, oh, we see you're here to protest, and the
469
0:52:27 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e say, no, we're serving notices of liability and we're asking you to close down the injection
470
0:52:33 --> 0:52:37
clinics. And then they say, well, this is your opinion. No, no, no, this is a live criminal
471
0:52:37 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]igation being run by the police. And we're demanding that you close the clinics down. No,
472
0:52:42 --> 0:52:46
no, no, we're not going to do that. We're not going to do that. And anyway, it's not a live
473
0:52:46 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]igation. It's just a crime reference that's been issued. And so they're trying to
474
0:52:53 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]ay it, minimise it, and they are refusing to close down the clinics.
475
0:52:58 --> 0:53:01
So then what's happening is that the people are trying to close them down themselves.
476
0:53:02 --> 0:53:07
And then the police get called out by the clinic staff and the police turn up,
477
0:53:07 --> 0:53:12
having refused to go down there and close them down. They then turn up and carry on facilitating
478
0:53:12 --> 0:53:19
the clinic remaining open typically. So they are then actively aiding and abetting these crimes
479
0:53:20 --> 0:53:25
happening, which is just shocking. And most of them won't stand under their oath, can't cite
480
0:53:25 --> 0:53:31
their oath. So again, we have a serious problem because these individuals are therefore not
481
0:53:32 --> 0:53:39
legitimately uniformed and weaponised. They are merely men and women impersonating legitimate
482
0:53:39 --> 0:53:47
police officers. And so again, that's part of the process that we're going through is proving on
483
0:53:47 --> 0:53:53
evidence to therefore report it to the police standards and also to the Ministry of Defence,
484
0:53:53 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]anding under their oath, they're not standing under their code of
485
0:53:57 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] They are perverting the course of justice, et cetera. So that's what groups have been,
486
0:54:04 --> 0:54:09
in terms of evidence, have been gathering for the last two months around the country.
487
0:54:10 --> 0:54:16
Anna, how can the police get away with saying, yes, there is a crime reference number, but
488
0:54:16 --> 0:54:18
there's no criminal investigation. That's just nonsense.
489
0:54:20 --> 0:54:27
Agreed. Agreed. Do you know that Savage, Javid's brother is also-
490
0:54:27 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]s at the Metropolitan Police.
491
0:54:31 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]
492
0:54:33 --> 0:54:38
He's had to recuse himself, I believe. I'm not, I mean, I don't know that,
493
0:54:38 --> 0:54:40
but I've been told that by Mark Sexton.
494
0:54:40 --> 0:54:46
Yeah, he certainly should. So a deplorable, you know, conflict of interest. So yeah, basically,
495
0:54:46 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]e here are trying everything they can to ensure that everybody knows that this is a live
496
0:54:51 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]igation, because the police were meant to have made a public announcement, they
497
0:54:55 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]n't. The press are doing everything to deny that it's happening, but yes, it is absolutely
498
0:55:02 --> 0:55:07
happening. And as you say, as we were saying, Stephen, earlier, it's about, you know, making
499
0:55:08 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction] as much evidence as possible, so they can't possibly try and close
500
0:55:14 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]igation or claim that they didn't have sufficient evidence, et cetera.
501
0:55:19 --> 0:55:24
But as you know, Mark and Philip are saying that, you know, the police have literally got a tsunami
502
0:55:24 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction] be the case. Isn't it interesting that Sad- what's his name?
503
0:55:33 --> 0:55:40
I can never remember his name. His brother is the head of professional standards at the Metropolitan
504
0:55:40 --> 0:55:47
Police and the head of the Metro- sorry, the head of professional standards is a key position in any
505
0:55:47 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction] police force in the UK by a long way. And absolutely, yeah. So
506
0:55:54 --> 0:56:01
it looks to me, it's either a massive coincidence that he's been the Home Secretary in the past
507
0:56:01 --> 0:56:10
for about six months, I think, and he's now the Health Secretary. And yet his brother
508
0:56:10 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]um job and a key job at the Metropolitan Police because the head of professional
509
0:56:16 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]igate any complaints to the police that they haven't
510
0:56:22 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]igated properly after the issuing of a crime number. So it looks to me like they've planned it,
511
0:56:30 --> 0:56:36
or there's been a huge coincidence, you know. Somehow or other, Javid's brother had the
512
0:56:36 --> 0:56:42
capability to become head of the professional standards department. I think it's 31,000 police
513
0:56:42 --> 0:56:50
officers, is it Peter? Wow. He gets to be the head of professional standards. And that's a key
514
0:56:50 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]igation. David, that ties into- you mentioned conflict of
515
0:56:58 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction] And Anna, it's worth getting your view on this issue. Just because there is a conflict
516
0:57:04 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction], unless there's contractual provisions or legislative provisions, that doesn't actually
517
0:57:10 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]e. You know, we talk about conflicts of interest. It's useful to know, but unless it's
518
0:57:17 --> 0:57:25
legislated, it doesn't have any consequence other, really, other than not believing somebody. So,
519
0:57:25 --> 0:57:27
Anna, what does- you okay?
520
0:57:30 --> 0:57:37
Oh, actually, sorry. I've just, yeah, I've got a client here, funnily enough. He's got a-
521
0:57:37 --> 0:57:40
we've got a four-day tribunal hearing starting at 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. So I've just got to
522
0:57:40 --> 0:57:47
say goodbye to him. Can you give me two minutes, please? But yeah, I'm not entirely sure that
523
0:57:47 --> 0:57:52
I can answer that right this minute. But if you- let me just say goodbye to this person,
524
0:57:52 --> 0:58:02
and then I'll come back. Okay. Okay. Okay. So, Peter, sorry, while we're waiting for Anna to
525
0:58:02 --> 0:58:07
come back, Stephen, I think we can we get an update from Sam Dubay on what's happening in Ottawa?
526
0:58:08 --> 0:58:16
Sure. Sam, are you there? Ready to give us- I haven't prepared him for this.
527
0:58:16 --> 0:58:20
Yes. Hello, Charles. Hello, Stephen. I'm here. Sorry, I'm just sitting like-
528
0:58:22 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction] from the computer. But I'll just tell you what I do know. So the police violence
529
0:58:29 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]ers and supporters is real. I've seen it myself. They've overreached significantly.
530
0:58:39 --> 0:58:44
They're going after businesses today. I heard they're entering businesses trying to arrest
531
0:58:45 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction] been servicing the supporters. There was an internet cafe,
532
0:58:51 --> 0:58:57
it was reported this morning, where police entered and attempted to shut the business
533
0:58:57 --> 0:59:02
down until they realized they were being videotaped. And then they walked out. Police
534
0:59:02 --> 0:59:06
are being imported, or at least people are being imported from elsewhere, as far as we can tell.
535
0:59:07 --> 0:59:14
There are some hopeful videos online of people actually talking to police officers, and some
536
0:59:14 --> 0:59:20
police officers offering sympathy. There's some videos of a police officer hugging individuals.
537
0:59:20 --> 0:59:25
And then shortly thereafter, there was a video of the same police officer fainting,
538
0:59:25 --> 0:59:32
like literally fainting, falling back and fainting. And I saw that myself on two videos. But
539
0:59:33 --> 0:59:41
in terms of the sympathy from the police, it's very hard to quantify. It's very hard to quantify.
540
0:59:41 --> 0:59:48
Now, you may have heard media reports that somebody threw a bicycle at a police horse,
541
0:59:48 --> 0:59:52
a woman threw a bicycle at a police horse. So there may have been two separate incidents,
542
0:59:52 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]etely true. I'll just tell you that right now.
543
0:59:58 --> 1:00:05
So there was a woman, there's two separate videos that I saw, and she was an older woman,
544
1:00:05 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]eading with the police. The camera was literally feet from her. She was expressing,
545
1:00:12 --> 1:00:18
she said, there's nothing but love here, and there's nothing but hope here. And then the
546
1:00:18 --> 1:00:23
police horses came charging out. And it was pretty clear from the way the police horses charged out
547
1:00:23 --> 1:00:28
that they didn't care about hitting anybody. And there was already a track of space between
548
1:00:28 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ers and the police. The horses came out, and one of the people that got trampled was
549
1:00:33 --> 1:00:40
this lady. So if you look at the video, when you look at the photos, you'll see that she is an older
550
1:00:40 --> 1:00:47
woman. She was using a walker. That may have been the bicycle that the police were reporting.
551
1:00:48 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ually a First Nations, full-blooded Mohawk clan mother.
552
1:00:56 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]s, she's a First Nations elder. And there's an interview of her. Her name is Candy
553
1:01:02 --> 1:01:07
that appeared, I believe, yesterday, and she seems to be okay. She's got a sore shoulder,
554
1:01:07 --> 1:01:13
and she expressed nothing but love and hope in that short interview. And I'm quite sure the
555
1:01:13 --> 1:01:17
interview occurred after the incident. So the media is doing its best to cover this up,
556
1:01:18 --> 1:01:23
because not only was she physically challenged and in her walker, but she was older, and she is a
557
1:01:23 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction] Nations elder, which is a terrible combination for the WOCUS and for the regime.
558
1:01:32 --> 1:01:39
So hopefully, we'll see that come out. Mainstream media in different parts of Canada are being
559
1:01:39 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction] by RCMP, because people are screaming at them, fake news, fake news, fake news.
560
1:01:46 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]ly like Kerry says, terrible optics. That's right. So I don't think the horses are
561
1:01:51 --> 1:01:56
anywhere to be seen right now in downtown Ottawa. They definitely have towed trucks.
562
1:01:57 --> 1:02:03
There's video of trucks having their windows smashed and the police pulling protesters out.
563
1:02:03 --> 1:02:09
There's a video of police using what appears to be excessive force with individuals who are not
564
1:02:09 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ing. There was a claim by the police that they were not using tear gas. And then when videos
565
1:02:14 --> 1:02:19
surfaced showing them launching tear gas, they came out saying that the protesters were using
566
1:02:19 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction] them. And then video surfaced of them launching tear gas canisters and the
567
1:02:25 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ers kicking the cans back at the police. And as Anne mentioned here in the chat, they did
568
1:02:31 --> 1:02:38
free 76 bank accounts that they're admitting to of protesters. And I didn't know about the
569
1:02:38 --> 1:02:47
extended family. I don't know how deep that's gone. There may be many more. And TD Bank also
570
1:02:47 --> 1:02:53
has frozen two accounts that had significant funds in them over a million dollars from what's been
571
1:02:53 --> 1:03:02
reported. There was video of two videos of the United Nations plane at Canadian Forces base
572
1:03:02 --> 1:03:08
North Bay that was sitting there without snow on it. We just recently had snow, so it would have
573
1:03:08 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction] arrived recently or it was cleaned off. But that base is known to repair United
574
1:03:14 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]ed Nations planes in regularly. So I'm not convinced that that's an
575
1:03:19 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction] Nations troops have entered the country via those
576
1:03:26 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]s. But there's other concern about foreign troops. People on the scene have said that
577
1:03:33 --> 1:03:39
they're not acting like normal police. Many of the people there in the uniforms don't have any
578
1:03:39 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction] been removed. There was messages allegedly leaked from police on
579
1:03:46 --> 1:03:53
the scene who are being held in residence at the Chateau Laurier, one of our big hotels downtown,
580
1:03:53 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]oric hotel. And the dialogue between the police and the messages, some of it is quite
581
1:04:00 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] that they're belittling the protesters and the violence, unfortunately.
582
1:04:08 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] put up something in the chat about Dr. Paul Alexander. Poor Paul has been publishing
583
1:04:13 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]ack. He still doesn't know whether there's a warrant out for his
584
1:04:18 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] I know that he's moved location with his family. They got him out of the red zone.
585
1:04:24 --> 1:04:29
Roger Hodkinson is not in town, I can tell you that. I don't know where Byron Bridal is right now.
586
1:04:31 --> 1:04:37
Deanne has mentioned here that we got a third police chief. So there was a second interim
587
1:04:37 --> 1:04:42
chief that came in and I believe he quickly resigned and I don't know why. But then we have
588
1:04:42 --> 1:04:49
a new police chief who said that they're going after any protesters financially and will lay
589
1:04:49 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]igation May last months. And he didn't specify how they were going
590
1:04:54 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] they're probably going to look at cell phone records and video. Oh yeah,
591
1:04:59 --> 1:05:09
he did mention the use of video. I've heard rumors of more trucks coming in but they've established
592
1:05:09 --> 1:05:17
checkpoints in town where on major intersections they've established checkpoints coming into town
593
1:05:17 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] to declare what your business is coming into Ottawa. I've spoken to friends who
594
1:05:22 --> 1:05:33
were coming in and one was coming to visit her son. So apparently they seem to be quite nice
595
1:05:33 --> 1:05:38
at the checkpoints as long as they think you're telling the truth. But I haven't spoken to anyone,
596
1:05:38 --> 1:05:45
any officers at a checkpoint. Yes, and Daria just put up a Rebel News article about
597
1:05:46 --> 1:05:52
one of the messages in the leaked police discourse there was about
598
1:05:54 --> 1:05:58
time they hear our jackboots or something like that. As I said, the police were really,
599
1:05:59 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ers and it was quite alarming to see that attitude.
600
1:06:06 --> 1:06:18
And Sam, that's fantastic. Anna's back, that is wonderful. We'll have the opportunity to ask
601
1:06:18 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ions a bit later. Sam is on the ground in Ottawa with that truckers convoy giving us
602
1:06:24 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ephen, now that Anna's back, Stephen, do you have any questions
603
1:06:31 --> 1:06:39
for Anna before we go to Heiko? I've asked the ones I actually had an opportunity this morning
604
1:06:39 --> 1:06:47
as well. So yeah, go ahead, Heiko. Wonderful. And everybody please note what Anna has shared with us
605
1:06:47 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]antly hammering in all of these meetings is no informed consent.
606
1:06:54 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] keep saying there's no informed consent, no informed consent, no, and you just keep because
607
1:06:59 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction] doesn't matter. No, keep hammering it. You know, Anna, I haven't heard a single doctor
608
1:07:05 --> 1:07:10
making that point and I cannot believe that I'm the only doctor in the world who's been saying
609
1:07:10 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction] cannot believe it. It's so basic to me as a doctor. You're not the only one.
610
1:07:18 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]on? You're not the only one. Heiko is another doctor in, he's, I think you're from Germany,
611
1:07:24 --> 1:07:33
Heiko, but you're in Norway. Yeah, spreading the grief. I was recording it from several other
612
1:07:33 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ors that they don't have a clue what's in the jab. That's why I tried to steal my jab.
613
1:07:41 --> 1:07:48
Yes, Heiko's, he took the jab, which was intended for him and walked out with him.
614
1:07:49 --> 1:07:57
Yeah, you got arrested for that, didn't you, Heiko? No, I got a fee and then there was a trial and
615
1:07:58 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]ering the ticket online, I got the text that my,
616
1:08:07 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]opped.
617
1:08:09 --> 1:08:21
Yeah, well, that would have been a super- I tried again together with 15 others.
618
1:08:22 --> 1:08:29
You can hire Anna next time, Heiko. So you can barogue them and then hire Anna and
619
1:08:30 --> 1:08:37
break them with the Nuremberg code. They don't catch him. Well, they better start catching it.
620
1:08:38 --> 1:08:47
Yeah, I tried, as I said last time also, together with [privacy contact redaction]
621
1:08:47 --> 1:08:54
get some jabs to deliver to the police and the police, we called the police and they came and then
622
1:08:56 --> 1:09:00
because we didn't leave, you can protest outside. No, that's not a protest. We have to,
623
1:09:00 --> 1:09:06
it's a crime scene and we have to collect evidence. No, you're crazy. Get out of here.
624
1:09:06 --> 1:09:08
And I didn't and so I got arrested.
