1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:06
Well, I'll lose the spontaneity then, but yeah, okay, I'll say it then.
2
0:00:06 --> 0:00:13
So John Lukacs was talking about this guy, I can't remember his name now, but who they
3
0:00:13 --> 0:00:16
couldn't have done it had he been alive.
4
0:00:16 --> 0:00:22
And that's exactly the case with Carey Mullis, who's the inventor of the PCR technique, not
5
0:00:22 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]
6
0:00:24 --> 0:00:29
And he won the Nobel Prize for that, whatever you think of the Nobel Prize, but anyway,
7
0:00:29 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction] 2019.
8
0:00:36 --> 0:00:44
And they couldn't have done what they did in 2020 now, up to now, with him alive, because
9
0:00:44 --> 0:00:51
he knew that you shouldn't, that no one in the world should use his technique to create
10
0:00:51 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ess.
11
0:00:54 --> 0:00:59
And so in my opinion, until proved otherwise, they killed him.
12
0:00:59 --> 0:01:06
And they also killed, I think, Luke Montagnier, who said in Milan a week before he died, I
13
0:01:06 --> 0:01:10
think it was a week or less than a week.
14
0:01:10 --> 0:01:14
He said in Milan, that the unvaccinated would save humanity.
15
0:01:14 --> 0:01:18
That's a big statement from a very famous Nobel Prize winner, Luke Montagnier.
16
0:01:18 --> 0:01:23
You know, I have something that maybe you didn't know.
17
0:01:23 --> 0:01:24
But what is it?
18
0:01:24 --> 0:01:28
Don't drag it away from those two characters, because they are absolutely central.
19
0:01:28 --> 0:01:30
No, this is as important.
20
0:01:30 --> 0:01:40
The current [privacy contact redaction] won his Nobel Prize in error.
21
0:01:40 --> 0:01:41
In error.
22
0:01:41 --> 0:01:47
He was lauded for, I'll bring it up.
23
0:01:47 --> 0:01:48
I got to bring it up on a separate thing.
24
0:01:48 --> 0:01:54
But he was given a Nobel Prize for like some kind of vaccine concoction, which is an if
25
0:01:54 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ion of alien form protein into the bloodstream.
26
0:01:57 --> 0:02:04
And it says in the little description about it that I read that it was an effective solution
27
0:02:04 --> 0:02:06
that cannot be.
28
0:02:06 --> 0:02:08
John, stop there.
29
0:02:08 --> 0:02:10
John, you've done exactly what they want.
30
0:02:10 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]agged attention from Carey Mullis and Luke Montagnier to this guy who no one ever
31
0:02:15 --> 0:02:16
thought about.
32
0:02:16 --> 0:02:21
You dilute the message, which is exactly what the lawyers tell you not to do, or told me
33
0:02:21 --> 0:02:22
not to do.
34
0:02:22 --> 0:02:25
I wanted to say, and by the way, this as well.
35
0:02:25 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction], you did.
36
0:02:26 --> 0:02:27
They did this.
37
0:02:27 --> 0:02:28
The M.O.D. did this.
38
0:02:28 --> 0:02:29
The British M.O.D. did this.
39
0:02:29 --> 0:02:30
And they did this.
40
0:02:30 --> 0:02:35
And the lawyers finally persuaded me, because I realized that they were trying their best
41
0:02:35 --> 0:02:37
for me.
42
0:02:37 --> 0:02:44
They said, Stephen, it's very important in law not to dilute your most important point.
43
0:02:44 --> 0:02:45
All right, we got it.
44
0:02:45 --> 0:02:47
The future will belong to the unvaccinated.
45
0:02:47 --> 0:02:48
That's the point.
46
0:02:48 --> 0:02:53
John is on our side, but he drags us away from a very important point there to something
47
0:02:53 --> 0:02:55
that nobody knows about, even in the group.
48
0:02:55 --> 0:02:56
Never mind.
49
0:02:56 --> 0:02:57
Yeah, OK.
50
0:02:57 --> 0:02:58
That's good.
51
0:02:58 --> 0:02:59
All right, everybody.
52
0:02:59 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ors for COVID Ethics International.
53
0:03:02 --> 0:03:07
In today's discussion, this group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost, who you just heard talking
54
0:03:07 --> 0:03:14
over three years ago with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.
55
0:03:14 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower
56
0:03:19 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]
57
0:03:20 --> 0:03:22
His medical specialty is radiology.
58
0:03:22 --> 0:03:27
At this time, we remember Ryan Oformick, who is undergoing a show trial in Germany.
59
0:03:27 --> 0:03:31
It's up to day 29.
60
0:03:31 --> 0:03:33
More and more information is coming out on the Internet.
61
0:03:33 --> 0:03:39
I urge all of you to share information about Ryan Oformick in this show trial by a corrupt
62
0:03:39 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]em in Germany and the corrupt German government that is out to shut Ryan Oformick,
63
0:03:46 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] like they did with Kerry Mullis and Luke Montaner and others.
64
0:03:52 --> 0:03:54
I'm Charles Covets, the moderator of this group.
65
0:03:54 --> 0:03:59
I'm Australasian passion provocateur, and we love passionate people in these meetings.
66
0:03:59 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]iced law for 30, 20 years before changing career 31 years ago.
67
0:04:05 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] 14 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine
68
0:04:09 --> 0:04:14
damage and damage from bad medical advice.
69
0:04:14 --> 0:04:18
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.
70
0:04:18 --> 0:04:22
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world.
71
0:04:22 --> 0:04:27
Many of us thought that vaccines were okay, and many of us proudly say, yes, we are passionate
72
0:04:27 --> 0:04:33
anti-vaxxers and I'm certainly one of those and proud to be one.
73
0:04:33 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat.
74
0:04:38 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] or you have written a book, put the links in
75
0:04:42 --> 0:04:45
the chat so we can follow you, promote you and find you.
76
0:04:45 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]and we're in the middle of World War Three and that the medical science
77
0:04:49 --> 0:04:54
battle is only one of 12 battle fronts of this World War Three.
78
0:04:54 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]and the development of science and the science is never settled.
79
0:04:59 --> 0:05:03
This meeting runs for two and a half hours after which for those with the time, Tom Rodman
80
0:05:03 --> 0:05:05
runs a video telegram meeting.
81
0:05:05 --> 0:05:07
Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join.
82
0:05:07 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction] presenter, Mr. James T. Royal with a R-O-Y-L-E, not an R-O-Y-A-L.
83
0:05:16 --> 0:05:20
To James, for as long as James wishes to speak and then we have Q&A.
84
0:05:20 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction], by long established tradition, asks the first questions for 15 minutes.
85
0:05:24 --> 0:05:27
There's a free speech environment.
86
0:05:27 --> 0:05:32
Free speech is critically important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms and we
87
0:05:33 --> 0:05:39
do not allow ad hominem attacks unlike what they do in parliaments all around the world.
88
0:05:39 --> 0:05:41
If you're offended by anything, be offended.
89
0:05:41 --> 0:05:44
We're lovingly not interested.
90
0:05:44 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another.
91
0:05:50 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ry.
92
0:05:52 --> 0:05:55
Don't you dare say anything, James, that may trigger somebody.
93
0:05:55 --> 0:05:58
Total BS.
94
0:05:58 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ive of love, not fear.
95
0:06:01 --> 0:06:03
Fear is the opposite of love.
96
0:06:03 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]s you.
97
0:06:05 --> 0:06:09
Love expands you and liberates you.
98
0:06:09 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] talk-fest.
99
0:06:12 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ions and initiatives have been generated from linkages made by
100
0:06:17 --> 0:06:19
attendees in these meetings.
101
0:06:19 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] or links or resources that will help people put the
102
0:06:22 --> 0:06:27
details into the chat, the meeting is recorded and is uploaded onto the Rumble channel.
103
0:06:28 --> 0:06:31
And now everyone, welcome to our guest presenter, James Royal.
104
0:06:31 --> 0:06:35
And we thank James for giving us his time, wisdom and insights.
105
0:06:35 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ing, let me give you a short, quick
106
0:06:44 --> 0:06:48
intro into James.
107
0:06:48 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] one second.
108
0:06:49 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]iced as an attending general and colorectal surgeon in northeast
109
0:07:00 --> 0:07:02
England since 2015.
110
0:07:02 --> 0:07:05
He graduated from University of Birmingham Medical School and completed his surgical
111
0:07:05 --> 0:07:11
training, developing his interest in teaching and training, completing a master's in medical
112
0:07:11 --> 0:07:14
education after working as a teaching fellow at Warwick Medical School.
113
0:07:15 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] Midlands Research Collaborative, designing and conducting
114
0:07:22 --> 0:07:27
trainee-led multi-centre studies that have inspired similar collaboratives across UK
115
0:07:27 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction], changing the face of clinical surgical research.
116
0:07:31 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]lling fellowship in robotic surgery in Hong Kong in 2013 before
117
0:07:37 --> 0:07:46
becoming a national program advanced laparoscopic fellow in Newcastle in 2014.
118
0:07:47 --> 0:07:47
Sorry, James.
119
0:07:48 --> 0:07:49
Well done.
120
0:07:49 --> 0:07:50
Laparoscopic.
121
0:07:51 --> 0:07:57
His surgical expertise is in minimally invasive surgery, complex hernia, including abdominal
122
0:07:57 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ion and laparoscopic techniques.
123
0:08:00 --> 0:08:06
He's now a trainer for the Sunderland Da Vinci Robotic Fellowship Program with an
124
0:08:06 --> 0:08:11
ACP, GBI, FC, UK, now that included in that.
125
0:08:11 --> 0:08:17
Since June 2021, James has been an active member of HART Group, H-A-R-T Group, writing
126
0:08:17 --> 0:08:21
and contributing to articles and open letters, particularly challenging COVID vaccination
127
0:08:21 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]en and vaccine mandates.
128
0:08:24 --> 0:08:27
He's now on the Executive Committee of Doctors for Patients UK.
129
0:08:27 --> 0:08:33
James has published papers on informed consent and recently contributed to an article on
130
0:08:33 --> 0:08:37
medical ethics and informed consent and the link was shared with people.
131
0:08:37 --> 0:08:40
We'll put that link into the chat.
132
0:08:40 --> 0:08:42
James, thank you for being here.
133
0:08:42 --> 0:08:46
We are in your hands for as long as you wish to speak.
134
0:08:46 --> 0:08:47
Welcome.
135
0:08:47 --> 0:08:54
And James has been a visitor previously, so he's not unused to the eclectic group of people
136
0:08:54 --> 0:08:55
that meet here.
137
0:08:55 --> 0:08:56
James?
138
0:08:56 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction], Charles.
139
0:08:57 --> 0:08:59
Thanks, James, for coming.
140
0:08:59 --> 0:09:02
If you need any help, just let me or Charles or both of us know.
141
0:09:03 --> 0:09:04
That's great.
142
0:09:04 --> 0:09:05
Thanks very much.
143
0:09:06 --> 0:09:07
Good evening, everyone.
144
0:09:08 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]ephen invited me to speak a few weeks ago, but I think actually a few weeks before
145
0:09:13 --> 0:09:19
that, if people remember Ian McDermott was on and talking about the NHS and working in
146
0:09:19 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]ions, I didn't really have time to stay and answer.
147
0:09:24 --> 0:09:26
So we may get to some of that, I guess.
148
0:09:27 --> 0:09:28
May I share my screen, Charles?
149
0:09:29 --> 0:09:30
Yes, one moment.
150
0:09:30 --> 0:09:34
You certainly may.
151
0:09:39 --> 0:09:40
Done.
152
0:09:43 --> 0:09:44
Thank you very much.
153
0:09:44 --> 0:09:45
Let's try that one.
154
0:09:52 --> 0:09:52
Great.
155
0:09:53 --> 0:10:03
So apologies if some of my slides are obscured by your little windows and things.
156
0:10:03 --> 0:10:04
I don't know whether you can...
157
0:10:04 --> 0:10:05
No, you can change that.
158
0:10:05 --> 0:10:10
Everyone, top right corner, depending on your view, click on the view and everyone can choose
159
0:10:10 --> 0:10:11
their own view, James.
160
0:10:11 --> 0:10:14
I've got a tiny little picture of you and I've got your whole screen there.
161
0:10:15 --> 0:10:16
That's fine.
162
0:10:16 --> 0:10:16
That's fine.
163
0:10:19 --> 0:10:20
And I've lost it now.
164
0:10:20 --> 0:10:21
I don't want to get that back then.
165
0:10:22 --> 0:10:28
So James, some people like signing things, so I'm in this group even, and the Hope Accord,
166
0:10:29 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]ill going?
167
0:10:33 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]ill going?
168
0:10:34 --> 0:10:36
Yeah, the Hope Accord, yeah.
169
0:10:36 --> 0:10:38
So how do they find that?
170
0:10:38 --> 0:10:42
I'll probably do that at the end, actually.
171
0:10:42 --> 0:10:43
All right, yeah.
172
0:10:44 --> 0:10:47
I thought I'd bring some of my own experience and observations.
173
0:10:49 --> 0:10:59
Working as a surgeon in a national health system during the COVID era, I'm going to very,
174
0:10:59 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction] our minds back.
175
0:11:02 --> 0:11:06
And then I want to talk about really my observations over the last two or three years
176
0:11:07 --> 0:11:10
and the sort of clinical concerns that I've had.
177
0:11:10 --> 0:11:13
And then not necessarily shared by others.
178
0:11:15 --> 0:11:21
And I think possibly we all bring our own biases and possibly that influences the fact
179
0:11:21 --> 0:11:25
that I'm looking for things that other people aren't looking for, if you catch my drift.
180
0:11:26 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ively as I can.
181
0:11:33 --> 0:11:34
All right.
182
0:11:35 --> 0:11:38
James, I'd just like to say there's a very important group in the UK for doctors,
183
0:11:39 --> 0:11:43
which was formed by Ayesha, who I think is on the call now.
184
0:11:43 --> 0:11:50
But I'd like the group to know that James was one of the most common sense voices in this group.
185
0:11:50 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction] to add generated an atmosphere of where people, doctors, very surprising to me,
186
0:11:57 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction] thoughts.
187
0:12:00 --> 0:12:07
Okay, it's only doctors, UK doctors, but that's, I've never seen it before, open discussion about
188
0:12:07 --> 0:12:11
everything. And the openness is encouraged.
189
0:12:11 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]n't seen any bad words exchanged between, I think it's [privacy contact redaction]ors.
190
0:12:16 --> 0:12:17
Is that right, James?
191
0:12:17 --> 0:12:21
And James is one of the reasons that everything is so important to me.
192
0:12:21 --> 0:12:24
And I think that's the reason why I'm so excited to be here.
193
0:12:24 --> 0:12:29
And James is one of the reasons that everything is so reasonable, but it's not too reasonable,
194
0:12:29 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]and me.
195
0:12:30 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]e are pushing the boundaries.
196
0:12:33 --> 0:12:38
But there's, I have to say, great decency in the group.
197
0:12:39 --> 0:12:41
Very angry, but very decent.
198
0:12:41 --> 0:12:43
And it's a joy to see.
199
0:12:43 --> 0:12:48
And it's great credit to Ayesha and others who,
200
0:12:49 --> 0:12:51
well, I don't think there's been much censoring.
201
0:12:52 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ick together and pull together to defeat what has happened.
202
0:12:59 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction], I wanted to say that James, you were one of the most reasonable voices, always have been.
203
0:13:04 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction]s and as far as I could see, and had an opinion on each post,
204
0:13:10 --> 0:13:11
which you voiced.
205
0:13:12 --> 0:13:13
No, thank you very much, Stephen.
206
0:13:13 --> 0:13:14
Thank you.
207
0:13:14 --> 0:13:15
You're very kind.
208
0:13:15 --> 0:13:15
I noticed that.
209
0:13:16 --> 0:13:22
And so I'd just like to obviously present a disclaimer first that these are my own views,
210
0:13:22 --> 0:13:27
my own opinions based on observations, experience and external data and evidence.
211
0:13:27 --> 0:13:31
And I may well be influenced and informed by others and data and our data sources.
212
0:13:32 --> 0:13:36
And these views are not necessarily acknowledged or endorsed by my trust or the NHS.
213
0:13:36 --> 0:13:38
I'm not representing my trust tonight.
214
0:13:38 --> 0:13:40
I'm here in my own time in my own home.
215
0:13:40 --> 0:13:45
No, I'm not speaking on behalf of the NHS in this presentation, but I am speaking as a fully
216
0:13:45 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] general and colorectal surgeon.
217
0:13:50 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] briefly an overview.
218
0:13:51 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] on service and health from my own perspective.
219
0:13:58 --> 0:14:04
Obviously, this is only a kind of bird's eye view of my practice and my experience during COVID,
220
0:14:04 --> 0:14:11
not necessarily of other areas of hospital or other organizations in different parts of the country.
221
0:14:11 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] 21, what I've seen, what I'm concerned about, new pathology.
222
0:14:18 --> 0:14:21
And this phrase canaries in the coal mine, which obviously is
223
0:14:22 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] lots of coal mines.
224
0:14:25 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] lots of coal mines.
225
0:14:27 --> 0:14:30
But essentially, the canary was the one that smelled the gas before anyone else.
226
0:14:31 --> 0:14:34
And were they they were the warning sign, really.
227
0:14:35 --> 0:14:40
And then in summary, I'll just try and wind up some of some of what we've
228
0:14:40 --> 0:14:54
said. So looking back to March 2020, when the pandemic was declared and then shortly after that,
229
0:14:54 --> 0:14:55
lockdowns were declared.
230
0:14:56 --> 0:15:01
And I had I was very fortunate that I was able to get in my car every day and drive to work.
231
0:15:01 --> 0:15:04
And it was a very surreal experience because I was driving on empty roads.
232
0:15:05 --> 0:15:10
And then I arrived in a hospital and I was largely walking down empty corridors,
233
0:15:10 --> 0:15:13
which was quite an eerie experience.
234
0:15:15 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction] admit that contrary to the perception that was portrayed
235
0:15:20 --> 0:15:25
relentlessly in the media, most of which was fear, porn, propaganda.
236
0:15:27 --> 0:15:32
I didn't feel any sense of overwhelming panic when I was in hospital.
237
0:15:32 --> 0:15:33
And I don't think most of my colleagues did.
238
0:15:35 --> 0:15:40
There were certain areas of the hospital, such as the elderly care wards,
239
0:15:40 --> 0:15:43
that were converted to dedicated Covid wards.
240
0:15:43 --> 0:15:47
And then a whole floor of our hospital was dedicated to Covid wards
241
0:15:47 --> 0:15:50
for a short period of time during that first and second wave.
242
0:15:51 --> 0:15:54
And obviously, ICCU was very busy and expanded its footprint.
243
0:15:54 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction] on my own work and what I was able to do and not able to do.
244
0:16:02 --> 0:16:07
So initially, all elective surgery was stopped, including day case surgery.
245
0:16:07 --> 0:16:10
And we were required to do everything over the telephone.
246
0:16:10 --> 0:16:17
And face to face clinics, without seeing patients face to face,
247
0:16:18 --> 0:16:25
it's extremely restrictive as a doctor in your ability to diagnose problems and to assess patients
248
0:16:25 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]ically.
249
0:16:26 --> 0:16:27
You can't examine people.
250
0:16:27 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]ive surgery because I can't consent
251
0:16:31 --> 0:16:33
to them for hernia repair if I've not examined them.
252
0:16:34 --> 0:16:42
So we moved really to focus primarily and only on our triage of urgent referrals.
253
0:16:42 --> 0:16:44
So in my specialty, that's colorectal surgery.
254
0:16:44 --> 0:16:47
I'm interested in diagnosing colorectal cancers as soon as possible.
255
0:16:49 --> 0:16:53
And for that reason, because most of our working resource was devoted to that,
256
0:16:53 --> 0:16:55
we certainly didn't switch that pathway off.
257
0:16:55 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction], we probably saw and diagnosed more colorectal cancers during that lockdown period
258
0:17:02 --> 0:17:05
than we normally would because that was where our focus was.
259
0:17:05 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] accessible to our GPs.
260
0:17:08 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] been referred on a more routine basis were going,
261
0:17:12 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] on through this pathway as well.
262
0:17:15 --> 0:17:16
The GPs had adequate concern.
263
0:17:19 --> 0:17:24
We did, in my trust, not cancel many cancer operations at all.
264
0:17:24 --> 0:17:26
I didn't cancel any of mine.
265
0:17:26 --> 0:17:30
One or two were deferred for one or two weeks when there was no HDU bed available.
266
0:17:31 --> 0:17:33
That means a high dependency care bed or a level two bed.
267
0:17:35 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] majority of our cancerous sections in my hospital were done laparoscopically,
268
0:17:39 --> 0:17:40
which is keyhole surgery.
269
0:17:40 --> 0:17:44
So we routinely don't send our patients to high dependency post-op.
270
0:17:44 --> 0:17:47
And that was great because it meant that we could carry on working.
271
0:17:47 --> 0:17:49
We could carry on doing the cancer operations.
272
0:17:50 --> 0:17:55
In other areas of the country where their policies were that all cancer operations go to HDU,
273
0:17:55 --> 0:17:56
they had a big problem.
274
0:17:57 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] that in other areas of the country,
275
0:17:59 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] had a much more significant disruption to their ability to operate on cancers.
276
0:18:03 --> 0:18:05
But we didn't cancel many at all.
277
0:18:06 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]ing in that period was where on earth did all the general
278
0:18:10 --> 0:18:11
surgical emergencies go?
279
0:18:11 --> 0:18:14
And it felt very quiet even on the emergency front.
280
0:18:14 --> 0:18:18
Because if you remember, the public were relentlessly being told,
281
0:18:18 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]ances unless you are at death's door.
282
0:18:22 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] symptoms of COVID, you're not to come in until you're really desperate.
283
0:18:28 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]e very dutifully followed the rules, followed the guidance and didn't present.
284
0:18:34 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]andably, people with belly ache and abdominal pain didn't come to hospital.
285
0:18:39 --> 0:18:45
And prior to COVID, the vast majority of our emergency admissions were probably
286
0:18:45 --> 0:18:50
nonspecific abdominal pain that usually didn't end up requiring surgery and was usually nonspecific.
287
0:18:50 --> 0:18:52
And there was no clear diagnosis.
288
0:18:52 --> 0:18:58
That whole cohort of patients disappeared and doesn't seem to have come back since,
289
0:18:58 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]ingly.
290
0:18:59 --> 0:19:03
But we were scratching our heads wondering where all the appendicitis was, where all
291
0:19:03 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]itis was, where the diverticulitis was.
292
0:19:06 --> 0:19:11
And a fair chunk of those usually need an operation during that admission.
293
0:19:13 --> 0:19:16
And I think the conclusion was that perhaps the GPs are managing these patients over the
294
0:19:16 --> 0:19:18
telephone with antibiotics.
295
0:19:18 --> 0:19:18
Reasonably successfully.
296
0:19:21 --> 0:19:27
We were able to develop a green and red zone, which meant that we could ring fence our
297
0:19:27 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction], our elective beds for the first time ever.
298
0:19:30 --> 0:19:37
And that was a bonus as we saw it because we previously always had potential pressures
299
0:19:37 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ive patients being canceled because there was no beds because
300
0:19:41 --> 0:19:42
it was filled with medical patients.
301
0:19:42 --> 0:19:45
We didn't have that anymore because of this ring fence.
302
0:19:45 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]s.
303
0:19:47 --> 0:19:50
We managed to retain that for quite some time afterwards.
304
0:19:50 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually, our practice probably has changed a little bit.
305
0:19:52 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]reamlined.
306
0:19:55 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually a bonus.
307
0:19:58 --> 0:20:02
But what we did notice, obviously, was that it was a significant disruption to our preop
308
0:20:02 --> 0:20:07
assessment, our ability to assess patients preoperatively, optimize them.
309
0:20:07 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] on our operations and probably our outcomes.
310
0:20:13 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]ingly, comparing the following winter, there was no catastrophe.
311
0:20:17 --> 0:20:18
It was very quiet.
312
0:20:18 --> 0:20:20
There was no need to expand the ICCU.
313
0:20:20 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] November, December time, the first wave was that
314
0:20:28 --> 0:20:31
as ICCU expanded because they were admitting a lot more patients and putting them on
315
0:20:31 --> 0:20:37
ventilators, that took a lot of our theatre staff because they had the the the the the
316
0:20:38 --> 0:20:46
skills to manage ventilators and support ICCU.
317
0:20:46 --> 0:20:50
And so we weren't able to operate as much.
318
0:20:50 --> 0:20:51
We couldn't do as much.
319
0:20:52 --> 0:20:56
A lot of our theatres were shut down, but then we cancelled all our elective operating
320
0:20:56 --> 0:20:57
apart from cancer.
321
0:20:57 --> 0:21:00
So it kind of evened itself out.
322
0:21:01 --> 0:21:07
So obviously, as predicted, as many of us would try to to suggest at the start and we
323
0:21:07 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]e, medical and non-medical, that became experts
324
0:21:12 --> 0:21:14
on this very quickly.
325
0:21:14 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]rating, actually.
326
0:21:16 --> 0:21:21
I found that really difficult that I'd have trying to have conversations with friends
327
0:21:21 --> 0:21:23
and say, how on earth can lockdown be a good idea?
328
0:21:23 --> 0:21:25
It doesn't make sense to me.
329
0:21:25 --> 0:21:26
It's going to be all hard.
330
0:21:26 --> 0:21:27
No benefit.
331
0:21:27 --> 0:21:32
But and I think that's obvious now to most people who are willing to acknowledge that.
332
0:21:32 --> 0:21:34
But at the time, it was really difficult.
333
0:21:36 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]e realize and now I think they're recognizing that it was disastrous
334
0:21:41 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]s, as we all know.
335
0:21:44 --> 0:21:47
But from a physiological point of view, this is how it affected our patients.
336
0:21:47 --> 0:21:48
It made them anxious and made them afraid.
337
0:21:50 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]ivity to a house bound.
338
0:21:53 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] of the patients we operate on are already not healthy.
339
0:21:58 --> 0:22:00
They're all we have an obesity epidemic.
340
0:22:00 --> 0:22:00
We know that.
341
0:22:01 --> 0:22:06
So they've already got metabolic syndrome and this just made everything worse.
342
0:22:07 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ress, anxiety and fear affects our immune system, doesn't it?
343
0:22:11 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ion.
344
0:22:14 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ioning healthily.
345
0:22:17 --> 0:22:20
So that's the reason why we're so worried about this.
346
0:22:20 --> 0:22:26
It's going to have a knock on impact on anyone we try to operate on.
347
0:22:26 --> 0:22:29
There was no exercise, fresh air and social isolation led to
348
0:22:31 --> 0:22:34
physiological and psychological deconditioning.
349
0:22:34 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]e weren't able to go outside,
350
0:22:37 --> 0:22:40
even though it was lovely sunny weather at the time, if you remember.
351
0:22:40 --> 0:22:43
So many of us did go out and enjoy it as much as we could.
352
0:22:43 --> 0:22:47
But I think there was already a chronic vitamin D deficiency in the UK, certainly.
353
0:22:48 --> 0:22:49
So lockdown certainly made that worse.
354
0:22:49 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction] on immune function.
355
0:22:53 --> 0:22:57
And we weren't able to pre-op assess and optimize our patients properly either.
356
0:22:57 --> 0:23:01
So all in all, it was pretty catastrophic.
357
0:23:02 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ome, which I've learned quite a lot about over the last few years and
358
0:23:06 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction] in nutrition and all things, holistic is obviously been one of the
359
0:23:14 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ing and more enjoyable parts of things about the last few years.
360
0:23:19 --> 0:23:24
So I've learned a lot from lots of colleagues in different specialties.
361
0:23:24 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ephen mentioned, Dr. Spaces UK has been a lifesaver for me and for many others
362
0:23:31 --> 0:23:36
who find themselves in these same positions of being a bit odd with the majority of people
363
0:23:36 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction], but actually finding a lot of encouragement from
364
0:23:41 --> 0:23:43
one another and learning a lot from different specialties.
365
0:23:44 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ome, basically the analogy is if the patient can walk to a wall and their tummy
366
0:23:52 --> 0:23:56
touches the wall before their nose, then they have metabolic syndrome.
367
0:23:56 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction] central obesity, hydrocholesteroids, hypertension, and insulin resistance, all of which
368
0:24:01 --> 0:24:04
are bad for surgery and health in general.
369
0:24:05 --> 0:24:12
So consequently, I think most of that explains why I had five non-COVID elective mortalities.
370
0:24:14 --> 0:24:17
Over that period, which was a huge shock, it was difficult to deal with.
371
0:24:18 --> 0:24:25
I'd always had a very, very, very good mortality rate in my elective practice.
372
0:24:25 --> 0:24:30
I'd only had one elective cancer death in the first five years as a consultant.
373
0:24:30 --> 0:24:33
And this was six deaths within about six months.
374
0:24:34 --> 0:24:36
One of them was attributed to COVID.
375
0:24:36 --> 0:24:40
That was quite ironic because she successfully got through her cancer operation.
376
0:24:41 --> 0:24:45
And after a few days in hospital, tested positive and was sent up to the COVID ward.
377
0:24:45 --> 0:24:46
And I don't know what happened after that.
378
0:24:46 --> 0:24:50
Well, I do know some of what happened after that, but obviously I wasn't able to be directly
379
0:24:50 --> 0:24:51
involved in her care.
380
0:24:54 --> 0:25:00
So three of those were classed as sudden post-doc cardiac deaths.
381
0:25:04 --> 0:25:04
Right.
382
0:25:04 --> 0:25:11
So now I'd like to talk about my observations since a certain time, which
383
0:25:11 --> 0:25:14
was probably around March 2021.
384
0:25:15 --> 0:25:21
And one of my secretaries came up to me one day and said,
385
0:25:21 --> 0:25:23
why are all our scans coming back with clots?
386
0:25:24 --> 0:25:30
And this was something I'd noticed, but I was pleased that someone else had noticed
387
0:25:30 --> 0:25:33
because I didn't feel quite so on my own.
388
0:25:33 --> 0:25:36
So one of my secretaries to see that was quite interesting.
389
0:25:36 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction] scans as a follow-up for our cancer patients.
390
0:25:41 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction] two years after an operation.
391
0:25:45 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction] scans were coming back reporting bilateral,
392
0:25:51 --> 0:25:59
so both lungs, clots, multiple vessels, sometimes quite often not symptomatic.
393
0:25:59 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ress, but lots of clots on their scalp.
394
0:26:05 --> 0:26:11
And these were usually referred to as pulmonary emboli because that's what people talk about
395
0:26:11 --> 0:26:12
when they see clots in the lungs.
396
0:26:12 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ually they weren't embolic because there was no DVT.
397
0:26:15 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] spontaneous thromboses in the lungs.
398
0:26:20 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]arted seeing was lots of ischemic bowel.
399
0:26:23 --> 0:26:26
And ischemic bowel is a difficult condition to diagnose.
400
0:26:27 --> 0:26:31
And we often diagnose it late after the patient's been in for a day or two
401
0:26:31 --> 0:26:33
because it's not that easy to diagnose.
402
0:26:33 --> 0:26:38
The signs are quite subtle, but it's quite a rare condition as well.
403
0:26:38 --> 0:26:41
But it was becoming surprisingly common.
404
0:26:42 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]enic bleeds
405
0:26:45 --> 0:26:48
and had a lot of deaths associated with those presentations.
406
0:26:50 --> 0:26:55
And over the next few months and into 2022 and 23,
407
0:26:56 --> 0:27:00
we've observed really, I think, different waves or clusters of things.
408
0:27:00 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction] was these thromboses and these bleeds.
409
0:27:03 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]y inflammatory and infective conditions.
410
0:27:08 --> 0:27:12
So common conditions as emergencies in general surgery,
411
0:27:12 --> 0:27:17
thinking things like abscesses, bendositis, colicistitis,
412
0:27:17 --> 0:27:20
which is inflammation of the gallbladder, and pancreatitis.
413
0:27:21 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]y, severe cases of those.
414
0:27:26 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]er age group than I would normally have seen it.
415
0:27:31 --> 0:27:33
I'll talk a bit more about that in detail in a bit.
416
0:27:33 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction], which we're now seeing, is cancer.
417
0:27:37 --> 0:27:42
And my impression is that this is cancer,
418
0:27:42 --> 0:27:46
which looks very different from the colorectal cancer
419
0:27:46 --> 0:27:47
that I'm very, very familiar with.
420
0:27:48 --> 0:27:49
It's more aggressive.
421
0:27:49 --> 0:27:51
It's a different biology.
422
0:27:51 --> 0:27:52
It's affecting younger patients.
423
0:27:53 --> 0:27:55
But across all age groups, including very elderly patients,
424
0:27:55 --> 0:28:00
it's also very aggressive, which is not typical.
425
0:28:02 --> 0:28:05
And also what isn't typical is recurrence,
426
0:28:05 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]ion, two or three years down the line.
427
0:28:08 --> 0:28:11
Successful operation, didn't need chemotherapy,
428
0:28:11 --> 0:28:14
and then suddenly they're coming back in and it's everywhere.
429
0:28:14 --> 0:28:21
So the case patterns, firstly the thrombotic ones,
430
0:28:21 --> 0:28:24
these are often incidental findings on surveillance scans.
431
0:28:25 --> 0:28:28
Some presented with symptoms, but often it was unprovoked.
432
0:28:29 --> 0:28:32
And that's odd in itself, unusual, without any risk factors,
433
0:28:32 --> 0:28:36
without any obvious cancer or something else in the background.
434
0:28:37 --> 0:28:41
Sometimes a huge DVT, which is a clot in the leg, deep venous thrombosis.
435
0:28:41 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]arts in the leg goes all the way up into the abdomen and the P.
436
0:28:48 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]e bilateral thrombosis with no obvious source of embolus.
437
0:28:53 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]riking, really obvious.
438
0:28:56 --> 0:28:59
And they normally would happen with an obvious underlying cause.
439
0:28:59 --> 0:29:02
And we were not finding an obvious underlying cause in these patients.
440
0:29:08 --> 0:29:10
I'm just going to talk about mesenteric ischemia.
441
0:29:10 --> 0:29:15
So mesenteric ischemia is where the blood supply is inadequate.
442
0:29:15 --> 0:29:19
And mesenteric ischemia is inadequate blood supply to the bowel.
443
0:29:20 --> 0:29:26
So if that happens, the patient gets really severe abdominal pain and very unwell.
444
0:29:27 --> 0:29:29
And it's a life-threatening condition generally.
445
0:29:32 --> 0:29:34
But it's quite difficult to diagnose.
446
0:29:34 --> 0:29:37
It's not always that obvious.
447
0:29:37 --> 0:29:38
Sometimes the signs are subtle.
448
0:29:38 --> 0:29:40
Sometimes it's not seen on CT that easily.
449
0:29:41 --> 0:29:47
But these patients would come in very commonly and they'd have small bowel ischemia.
450
0:29:48 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]y into the bowel was not affected.
451
0:29:54 --> 0:30:00
So these were not big clots from the main three vessels into the bowel,
452
0:30:00 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]inal tract.
453
0:30:02 --> 0:30:05
These were ischemic bowel with no obvious clot.
454
0:30:05 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]e abdominal venous clots in the same patient.
455
0:30:09 --> 0:30:14
And the triad that I was seeing was superior mesenteric, portal, and splenic vein thrombus.
456
0:30:14 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction] patient I saw, 31.
457
0:30:17 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]ors, no obvious predisposing cause.
458
0:30:22 --> 0:30:25
And they'd often have PE as well, or some thrombus in the lung.
459
0:30:28 --> 0:30:31
And a lot of those patients we could manage conservatively,
460
0:30:31 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction] use bandages.
461
0:30:33 --> 0:30:37
Conservatively, meaning we could just use anti-corregulation and dissolve the clots.
462
0:30:37 --> 0:30:39
And they tended to get better over a few days.
463
0:30:39 --> 0:30:41
So some of those didn't need operating.
464
0:30:42 --> 0:30:47
But the typical biochemical features that were the hematological features we find would be
465
0:30:47 --> 0:30:48
raised D-dimer.
466
0:30:48 --> 0:30:50
That was something that I'd started looking for.
467
0:30:51 --> 0:30:53
Raise fiber engine, low platelets.
468
0:30:54 --> 0:31:01
And that in itself was something that had been identified as something called vits,
469
0:31:01 --> 0:31:06
which was, I'll talk about in a second.
470
0:31:07 --> 0:31:09
But these patients were having normal thrombovillia and hepatitic screens.
471
0:31:09 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]anation for it, essentially.
472
0:31:13 --> 0:31:16
No insummuligacy, no pancreatic abnormalities.
473
0:31:17 --> 0:31:23
So there was some research done.
474
0:31:24 --> 0:31:28
There's a paper describing vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.
475
0:31:29 --> 0:31:35
And there were specific criteria that were stated by the American Society of Hematology,
476
0:31:37 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] some of these blood tests showing these particular
477
0:31:43 --> 0:31:45
values to classify this condition.
478
0:31:45 --> 0:31:55
And it was acknowledged that this might be a very rare side effect of the COVID vaccines,
479
0:31:55 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]raZeneca vaccine.
480
0:31:58 --> 0:32:00
That was the one that they did the research on.
481
0:32:00 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ome.
482
0:32:08 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]udy, for example, there were 200 night 4 patients evaluated, 170 definite,
483
0:32:14 --> 0:32:17
50 probable cases of it.
484
0:32:17 --> 0:32:21
All the patients who'd received the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
485
0:32:23 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction], but the overall mortality was high.
486
0:32:27 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction] common cause of death was cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,
487
0:32:32 --> 0:32:38
clots in the lungs, legs, and in the gut, as I've been describing.
488
0:32:41 --> 0:32:44
And there are one or two very well-known examples.
489
0:32:45 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]ing was, I was seeing it, but no one else seemed to be recognizing
490
0:33:01 --> 0:33:02
that this was happening.
491
0:33:03 --> 0:33:13
Now, I think that in particular, I think what we've seen more later since this was all
492
0:33:13 --> 0:33:24
discussed and in the press was that if people remember, we in the UK particularly, they
493
0:33:25 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]raZeneca vaccine for younger patients, particularly females.
494
0:33:34 --> 0:33:40
But they continued to say that there was no such issue with the Pfizer and the mRNA vaccine.
495
0:33:40 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]raZeneca that had this clotting problem.
496
0:33:45 --> 0:33:46
But I think that's not the case.
497
0:33:46 --> 0:33:47
I think we know that.
498
0:33:48 --> 0:33:50
But I think that's not the case.
499
0:33:50 --> 0:33:51
I think we know that.
500
0:33:53 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]rate this mesenteric ischemia that I was seeing,
501
0:34:02 --> 0:34:08
where the conclusion of these authors was the same, that they were seeing segmental
502
0:34:08 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]omach or colon, where there was no obvious occlusion of the vessel.
503
0:34:16 --> 0:34:20
So this wasn't a typical thrombus that we were used to seeing.
504
0:34:21 --> 0:34:22
And the cause was quite different.
505
0:34:22 --> 0:34:28
So what we're talking about really is lots and lots of micro thrombi in small vessels
506
0:34:28 --> 0:34:31
that isn't seen in the big vessels on the scans.
507
0:34:32 --> 0:34:41
And if you recall, that would fit with the pathological mechanisms that have been described
508
0:34:41 --> 0:34:43
with COVID and spike protein.
509
0:34:43 --> 0:34:45
It's micro thrombi.
510
0:34:46 --> 0:34:47
It's lots of inflammation.
511
0:34:47 --> 0:34:50
Lots of micro thrombi can lead to end organ dysfunction.
512
0:34:51 --> 0:34:55
And that was described for the respiratory illness.
513
0:34:55 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ually, it's probably more relevant where there's potential production of spike
514
0:35:00 --> 0:35:05
protein across the entire body with a high affinity for the ACE2 receptor
515
0:35:06 --> 0:35:08
and endothelial inflammation and clotting.
516
0:35:08 --> 0:35:16
So it's a wild leap to suggest that that's not a very plausible mechanism
517
0:35:16 --> 0:35:17
for the things that we're seeing.
518
0:35:19 --> 0:35:21
Now, we've all been accused of this.
519
0:35:21 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ruggle in discussions all the time where you can't possibly say it's due to the
520
0:35:29 --> 0:35:31
vaccine because you can't prove it.
521
0:35:31 --> 0:35:32
And you're never going to be able to prove it.
522
0:35:33 --> 0:35:35
And correlation isn't causation.
523
0:35:35 --> 0:35:37
Well, I'm quite happy to accept that.
524
0:35:37 --> 0:35:38
And that's not what I'm saying.
525
0:35:38 --> 0:35:44
I'm saying that I'm seeing unusual clinical case presentations that I can't explain
526
0:35:44 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]
527
0:35:45 --> 0:35:50
And there's an obvious change that happened that does have a very strong, close temporal
528
0:35:50 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ion of experimental injections and sequelae.
529
0:35:59 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] been used for a long time in epidemiology to try and determine
530
0:36:05 --> 0:36:11
whether it's just a correlation or whether there's actual enough strength findings to
531
0:36:11 --> 0:36:13
attribute causation.
532
0:36:13 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] Peter McCulloch and many others have looked carefully at the Bradford Hill criteria
533
0:36:18 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]ated publicly on many occasions that these criteria are more than adequately
534
0:36:25 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] that there is a causal link between the injections and the sorts of pathologies
535
0:36:32 --> 0:36:34
that we're seeing that we've never seen before.
536
0:36:36 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]ive of that, early on, we were encouraged to fill in yellow cards.
537
0:36:43 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] been reluctant to do that simply because they thought they
538
0:36:49 --> 0:36:50
had to prove causality.
539
0:36:50 --> 0:36:53
And if they couldn't prove causality, they didn't think we need to fill in a yellow card.
540
0:36:53 --> 0:36:55
That's not true.
541
0:36:55 --> 0:37:01
If you've got any concern or you noticed something unusual and it could be related,
542
0:37:01 --> 0:37:02
then you're supposed to report it.
543
0:37:02 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]art reporting them.
544
0:37:05 --> 0:37:07
In the end, I reported about 20.
545
0:37:07 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction] up because it became abundantly clear in public discussions and discourse and
546
0:37:14 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]s were largely being ignored by the MHRA.
547
0:37:18 --> 0:37:23
We've written multiple public letters and largely been ignored.
548
0:37:23 --> 0:37:27
And I was getting no feedback from any of the ones that I submitted.
549
0:37:27 --> 0:37:30
But these are a summary of my early ones that I submitted.
550
0:37:31 --> 0:37:32
Lots of the thromboses.
551
0:37:34 --> 0:37:36
In five patients, multiple vessels affected.
552
0:37:37 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]ed.
553
0:37:40 --> 0:37:44
So lung wedge, infarct, small bowel ischemia, half of them resected.
554
0:37:46 --> 0:37:50
Colonic ischemia, just spontaneous out of the blue after a hernia repair.
555
0:37:50 --> 0:37:52
Next day, whole colon's gone.
556
0:37:53 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]anation for it.
557
0:37:55 --> 0:37:58
There was a patient who spent many weeks in the ICU.
558
0:37:58 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ain what happened to him.
559
0:38:00 --> 0:38:05
He became rapidly and progressively sicker and more ill.
560
0:38:06 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]emic inflammatory response, end organ failure.
561
0:38:10 --> 0:38:12
But his whole, he went to the theatre.
562
0:38:13 --> 0:38:19
And the findings were that the entire retrobaroneer was just infarcted.
563
0:38:19 --> 0:38:19
Both kidneys gone.
564
0:38:22 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ed.
565
0:38:24 --> 0:38:27
So very, very odd and unusual case.
566
0:38:27 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ain it.
567
0:38:28 --> 0:38:30
I had a conversation with ICU colleagues, couldn't explain it.
568
0:38:31 --> 0:38:35
I felt there was probably enough to suspect the obvious cause,
569
0:38:35 --> 0:38:39
but no one else was willing to go there and consider that.
570
0:38:40 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ion.
571
0:38:41 --> 0:38:43
That's very, very odd and unusual.
572
0:38:44 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ions.
573
0:38:47 --> 0:38:51
They're probably slightly less uncommon, but there was,
574
0:38:52 --> 0:38:54
these were happening in quick succession.
575
0:38:54 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]enic artery rupture,
576
0:38:57 --> 0:38:59
spontaneous rupture in young patients.
577
0:39:00 --> 0:39:03
One I had to take to the theatre and do an splenectomy on.
578
0:39:04 --> 0:39:09
And I did keep an eye on the D diamonds, platelets, APTT, vibranogen.
579
0:39:10 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] of these cases did fit the WITS criteria, at least some of them.
580
0:39:17 --> 0:39:21
And when I reported them, obviously I had to get the details of their vaccinations.
581
0:39:21 --> 0:39:23
I got the batch numbers.
582
0:39:23 --> 0:39:26
And I'd come across a website called How Bad Is My Batch?
583
0:39:26 --> 0:39:29
So I thought I'd have a look and see the batches that I was,
584
0:39:30 --> 0:39:33
the patients I was identifying with problems, what their batches were,
585
0:39:33 --> 0:39:37
and whether they were high on the league table for causing problems.
586
0:39:37 --> 0:39:39
And sure enough, the vast majority of them,
587
0:39:41 --> 0:39:47
the patients that I'd seen have adverse events,
588
0:39:47 --> 0:39:52
the patients that I'd seen to have batches that had scored very highly for that.
589
0:39:54 --> 0:39:56
Six patients shared seven high-risk batch codes.
590
0:39:56 --> 0:40:01
And five patients was one, and one patient or three doses of high-risk batches.
591
0:40:06 --> 0:40:09
The next case pattern that I found interesting was
592
0:40:10 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]eens and kidneys.
593
0:40:12 --> 0:40:15
Splenic artery rupture requiring laparotomy and splenectomy.
594
0:40:15 --> 0:40:16
I mentioned that already.
595
0:40:18 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ion.
596
0:40:20 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ing was huge clots,
597
0:40:23 --> 0:40:30
saddle embolus in the aorta, or clot that lodged itself on the side of the aortic wall
598
0:40:30 --> 0:40:32
and propagated from there.
599
0:40:33 --> 0:40:34
I've never ever seen that before.
600
0:40:35 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]rikes me as incredibly odd that where you've got a systemic blood pressure
601
0:40:40 --> 0:40:46
of 120 milligrams of mercury and the blood flowing directly down the aorta,
602
0:40:47 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ually form a clot on the side of the aorta that propagated.
603
0:40:54 --> 0:40:56
But we saw quite a few of those on scans.
604
0:40:59 --> 0:41:00
I mentioned that case already.
605
0:41:02 --> 0:41:06
So I wanted to look for mechanisms of this because this is very bizarre.
606
0:41:06 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ausible mechanism to explain what was happening.
607
0:41:10 --> 0:41:15
And these mechanisms were proposed by the late Dr. Arnett Burkhart,
608
0:41:15 --> 0:41:17
who many of you will be familiar with.
609
0:41:18 --> 0:41:20
And his great work on
610
0:41:23 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ric specimens of patients who sadly died and
611
0:41:29 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ed on independent postmortems because they felt that it was linked
612
0:41:34 --> 0:41:35
to the vaccine.
613
0:41:35 --> 0:41:40
And he'd initially gone to do this work to disprove the link and actually completely
614
0:41:40 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ausible mechanisms.
615
0:41:46 --> 0:41:52
Some of the things he'd seen, he shared with [privacy contact redaction]s and all acknowledged
616
0:41:52 --> 0:41:54
that these were things that they'd not seen before.
617
0:41:54 --> 0:41:58
So I borrowed some of his slides because I think they're quite interesting from a lecture
618
0:41:58 --> 0:42:00
that is in the public domain.
619
0:42:01 --> 0:42:02
There's screenshots.
620
0:42:03 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]ion, March 22.
621
0:42:06 --> 0:42:14
So they essentially developed an assay where an antibody would attach itself to the spike
622
0:42:14 --> 0:42:19
protein antibody and they labeled that with immunohistochemistry so they could see it.
623
0:42:19 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]ribution of spike protein in various different tissues
624
0:42:23 --> 0:42:23
and organs.
625
0:42:23 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]rated that spike protein was present and highly concentrated in virtually
626
0:42:32 --> 0:42:37
every organ of the body, which again was completely at odds with what we were told that it would
627
0:42:37 --> 0:42:38
stay in the arm.
628
0:42:38 --> 0:42:43
Of course, we know the technology was actually designed to distribute very easily through
629
0:42:43 --> 0:42:46
the body as lipid nanoparticles inevitably will.
630
0:42:46 --> 0:42:49
So it's no surprise really to those of us that are open minded about that.
631
0:42:50 --> 0:42:54
And this is some of the tissues that were affected by his spike protein being deposited
632
0:42:54 --> 0:42:59
in various different organs, particular blood vessels.
633
0:42:59 --> 0:43:01
So coronary arteries.
634
0:43:02 --> 0:43:04
This one you've never seen before.
635
0:43:05 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]een central artery with absolutely teeming with lymphocytes
636
0:43:12 --> 0:43:14
there, which are the purple cells.
637
0:43:16 --> 0:43:18
And then onion skin inflammation in the spleen arteries.
638
0:43:18 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] like a vasculitis kind of picture.
639
0:43:24 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]ains the aortic phenomena where there was inflammation
640
0:43:32 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]ing all layers of the aortic wall with disruption, inflammation and risk of rupture.
641
0:43:39 --> 0:43:42
And I know Brian Cole presented some cases of that.
642
0:43:43 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]e who died of aortic rupture, which is again very unusual phenomenon.
643
0:43:49 --> 0:43:54
Dr. Burkhart presented this diagram of inflammatory pseudo aneurysm, which was a nice way of showing
644
0:43:54 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]enic artery patients that I'd seen where they were
645
0:43:59 --> 0:44:03
getting an inflammatory pseudo aneurysm, which then spontaneously ruptured.
646
0:44:09 --> 0:44:13
This slide I'm sure many of us are familiar with, but it just shows
647
0:44:13 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] a problem.
648
0:44:13 --> 0:44:22
There is a huge signal compared to all previous reports in the alert systems, both the VARS
649
0:44:22 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ems compared to previous adverse events.
650
0:44:33 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] been saying is that there is a huge signal in the alert
651
0:44:41 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]em.
652
0:44:41 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ed is that self-reporting is unreliable.
653
0:44:46 --> 0:44:52
Well, this argument has been made before, but essentially it takes a long time to do.
654
0:44:52 --> 0:44:54
It's a federal offensive found fraudulent.
655
0:44:54 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ors can beat over 80 percent, although it can be done by patients.
656
0:44:58 --> 0:45:04
So yes, it's self-reporting, but I don't think it's unreliable because I don't think people
657
0:45:04 --> 0:45:07
do it unless they're very certain that it needs to be done.
658
0:45:08 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] from doing it.
659
0:45:10 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] that we've got that many completed should carry weight, really.
660
0:45:15 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] system.
661
0:45:18 --> 0:45:26
You can see how many events were flagged up to the MHRA compared to all of the vaccines
662
0:45:26 --> 0:45:27
combined previously.
663
0:45:32 --> 0:45:35
So moving on, we've talked about clots.
664
0:45:36 --> 0:45:40
We're going to talk about another group, another wave, as it were, that I've seen
665
0:45:41 --> 0:45:42
since the vaccine rollout.
666
0:45:43 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]itis, perforated infarctal gallbladers.
667
0:45:47 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]itis is a common condition.
668
0:45:49 --> 0:45:50
We see it all the time in general surgery.
669
0:45:53 --> 0:45:58
Sometimes it's severe and we use intravenous antibiotics to get things to settle down.
670
0:45:58 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ion is relatively uncommon, but we were seeing lots of infarctal gallbladers
671
0:46:03 --> 0:46:08
that perforated patients became quite sick, needed emergency surgery.
672
0:46:10 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]er of those that hadn't been seen before.
673
0:46:14 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ing middle-aged patients.
674
0:46:17 --> 0:46:22
Again, patients presenting quite well, but actually surprisingly nasty appendix when
675
0:46:22 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ually had their operation.
676
0:46:25 --> 0:46:27
Quite a lot of perforations, lots of abscesses.
677
0:46:28 --> 0:46:33
And then a group of patients that seemed to come in with what was a sort of malcolytis.
678
0:46:33 --> 0:46:36
So the left side of the colon inflamed, no obvious explanation.
679
0:46:38 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction] settled down on its own.
680
0:46:43 --> 0:46:49
There's a few references there for proposed mechanisms for that.
681
0:46:49 --> 0:46:53
This is the group that I want to talk about, which I found most striking.
682
0:46:53 --> 0:46:59
So pancreatitis is a life-threatening condition for a minority of patients.
683
0:46:59 --> 0:47:05
It's not common, but it's quite severe in a minority.
684
0:47:06 --> 0:47:13
Majority of patients, it's quite mild until they're in a state of panic.
685
0:47:13 --> 0:47:20
Majority of patients, it's quite mild until this era.
686
0:47:20 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ones and alcohol.
687
0:47:23 --> 0:47:26
About 50% were gallstones, 50% were alcohol.
688
0:47:27 --> 0:47:31
They accounted for well over 90% of presentations of pancreatitis.
689
0:47:31 --> 0:47:33
There are a number of rare causes that we learned at medical school.
690
0:47:33 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ugs, dyslipidemia, various other things.
691
0:47:46 --> 0:47:54
But only about 2% to 5% were what were known as idiopathic, meaning there's no cause.
692
0:47:55 --> 0:48:00
We've done a recent audit in our hospital and idiopathic cases have changed to around 30%.
693
0:48:01 --> 0:48:09
So we've started looking at the causes for those in more detail, looking for the lipids, looking for IgG4, autoimmune causes and so on.
694
0:48:09 --> 0:48:14
But that's a significant change. So there's more idiopathic pancreatitis.
695
0:48:15 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]riking change is that necrosis in pancreatitis used to be quite rare.
696
0:48:24 --> 0:48:28
A minority of patients, as I say, would develop severe pancreatitis.
697
0:48:28 --> 0:48:36
They developed severe pancreatitis and over the course of a few days deteriorate and require ICCU support as they developed organ failure.
698
0:48:37 --> 0:48:44
A small proportion of patients that go to ICCU with severe pancreatitis used to get pancreatic necrosis.
699
0:48:44 --> 0:48:48
But it usually develops [privacy contact redaction]art of their admission.
700
0:48:49 --> 0:48:56
What we're seeing now, what I'm seeing now, is a high proportion of patients that on admission,
701
0:48:56 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction], they have necrosis on their CT. Even if they look clinically well, it's been reported as necrosis on their CT.
702
0:49:05 --> 0:49:15
James, could you just define, you know, I know you imagine that all the people in the group and the people watching the videos understand words like infarction, thrombosis, necrosis.
703
0:49:16 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]e about particularly infarction, necrosis, that would really be helpful.
704
0:49:23 --> 0:49:29
Yeah, infarction means death of an organ or a tissue in the body.
705
0:49:30 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]ies fail to that organ and it's died.
706
0:49:35 --> 0:49:40
Thrombosis is a blood clot and that's usually the cause of infarction.
707
0:49:41 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] for dead tissue.
708
0:49:46 --> 0:49:52
So an embolus comes off the thrombus and causes infarction, correct? And necrosis?
709
0:49:53 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] So an embolus is where a bit of clot breaks off the thrombus in the leg and sails up to the lungs and then causes problems in the lungs.
710
0:50:02 --> 0:50:10
So necrolic pancreatitis means a portion of the pancreas has died or has been necrosed.
711
0:50:11 --> 0:50:16
And sometimes it's recoverable and you don't normally even fight the entire pancreas.
712
0:50:17 --> 0:50:22
But it's unusual, whereas now it's not so unusual.
713
0:50:23 --> 0:50:27
And what's odd is seeing it on the scan as they first come in.
714
0:50:30 --> 0:50:34
Yeah, I've talked about that, mentioned most of that.
715
0:50:34 --> 0:50:41
And then a few of those patients die within 72 hours of admission, even though they look quite well and stable, just suddenly go.
716
0:50:43 --> 0:50:45
Before they even really get to ICCU.
717
0:50:47 --> 0:50:50
One recently did that.
718
0:50:52 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ruck out was a lady in her 80s.
719
0:50:57 --> 0:51:07
She did go to ICCU with necrosis on the pancreas, but she also had necrosis of a large part of the stomach, small intestine on the scan.
720
0:51:10 --> 0:51:18
And I checked her spike antibodies and they were sky high, over 2500 on the titer.
721
0:51:19 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]er was, and it was less than two weeks prior to her presentation.
722
0:51:25 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction] on that one and I thought that that was worth raising the concern about that that might be a plausible pathological mechanism there for that widespread ischemia that led to quite sudden deterioration.
723
0:51:38 --> 0:51:49
So that's the thing I want to talk about is my observations of cancer and how that's changed since probably mid to late 21, I suppose.
724
0:51:52 --> 0:51:54
The changes I'm seeing is that.
725
0:51:56 --> 0:52:02
I'm seeing patients between one or three years after a curator resection suddenly coming back with aggressive multicycle occurrence.
726
0:52:02 --> 0:52:06
It's not normal. It's certainly not common.
727
0:52:08 --> 0:52:14
Obviously, patients do develop metastases later after you operate on them. I'm not disputing that at all.
728
0:52:15 --> 0:52:22
It's the way it's happening. It's the aggressive nature of it. It's the fact that it seems to be everywhere, just out of the blue.
729
0:52:22 --> 0:52:30
Unusual sites like a humoral head that just almost completely disintegrate with tumor with a CA of well over 5000.
730
0:52:33 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction] operated on three under on the age of 14 2022.
731
0:52:40 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]s aggressive. It's always a different biology to the older patients for obvious reasons.
732
0:52:49 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]em and for young patients develop cancer. It's got to be a pretty aggressive tumor.
733
0:52:56 --> 0:53:03
It's got to be a pretty aggressive cellular biology disruption that's going to be a pretty aggressive tumor.
734
0:53:03 --> 0:53:06
That's not unusual.
735
0:53:06 --> 0:53:13
But I'm seeing the same aggressive abnormal biology in older patients as well.
736
0:53:13 --> 0:53:22
Typically a patient in their 70s or 80s might develop high deficiency anemia and you'd investigate them and you might find a tumor in the right place.
737
0:53:23 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction] any symptoms other than the anemia.
738
0:53:28 --> 0:53:36
They usually wouldn't have metastases and you could offer it on them if they were fit and well enough or perhaps offer them best supportive care if it wasn't going to.
739
0:53:36 --> 0:53:39
They weren't going to be fit enough surgery.
740
0:53:39 --> 0:53:44
But we're seeing quite regularly now that the cancer is getting worse and worse.
741
0:53:45 --> 0:53:49
Where the liver mess are huge.
742
0:53:49 --> 0:53:54
Where there's half the liver completely taken over by tumor.
743
0:53:54 --> 0:53:58
And that's strikingly different from what I've seen before.
744
0:53:58 --> 0:54:02
It's very depressing to see that happen.
745
0:54:02 --> 0:54:06
And I think that's a very important point.
746
0:54:06 --> 0:54:10
And I think that's a very important point.
747
0:54:10 --> 0:54:12
And that's strikingly different from what I've seen before.
748
0:54:12 --> 0:54:19
It's very depressing to see that every week in the MDT.
749
0:54:19 --> 0:54:23
And often, not often, but quite a few patients I've seen with synchronous cancers.
750
0:54:23 --> 0:54:29
We had three at the same MDT where there were two cancers.
751
0:54:29 --> 0:54:35
So synchronous means you get not one bowel cancer but two in the same colon in the same patients at the same time.
752
0:54:35 --> 0:54:38
That's what synchronous means.
753
0:54:38 --> 0:54:41
Now that was usually quite rare.
754
0:54:41 --> 0:54:45
It's the main reason we would do a colonoscopy after making a diagnosis of a tumor.
755
0:54:45 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] of the colon for a synchronous cancer.
756
0:54:49 --> 0:54:56
But the recognized rate of that was usually around 3%.
757
0:54:56 --> 0:55:00
So it's not common for this becoming common.
758
0:55:02 --> 0:55:04
And there has been some work on this.
759
0:55:04 --> 0:55:07
There has been some observational data.
760
0:55:07 --> 0:55:19
There's been some research studies that have been presented looking at these changes in cancer that people have observed or noticed.
761
0:55:19 --> 0:55:26
And one of my colleagues who's actually here tonight, obviously many people know Professor Angus Douglas.
762
0:55:26 --> 0:55:35
He described his own observations of this where after patients having the booster, they were getting late recurrences.
763
0:55:35 --> 0:55:38
Having been in remission for melanoma for many years.
764
0:55:38 --> 0:55:40
And this was a new pattern that he'd not seen before.
765
0:55:40 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ruck him as quite odd.
766
0:55:45 --> 0:55:51
But I think he felt that it was related to the boosters.
767
0:55:51 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] outspoken on this topic has been Dr. William Maccas, many of you will be familiar with, but also Dr. Ron Cole, pathologist in the US.
768
0:56:00 --> 0:56:08
And he's presented multiple plausible mechanisms as to why this might be occurring.
769
0:56:08 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] Paul Alexander as well.
770
0:56:12 --> 0:56:23
Sadly, I clicked on this link earlier to check that it still worked and I discovered that this paper that I referenced has been retracted.
771
0:56:23 --> 0:56:32
Also, I'd been quite hopeful that Curious was perhaps a different journal that was possibly more independent, but it looks that it's part of springing nature.
772
0:56:32 --> 0:56:42
And attached to the website is an expression of concern that editors in chief have been made aware of several concerns regarding the scientific credibility of this article.
773
0:56:42 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] publication editor review has been conducted to determine if any action is required.
774
0:56:48 --> 0:56:52
So unfortunately, that's happened.
775
0:56:52 --> 0:56:58
Because I think I'd certainly read that paper and I thought it helped.
776
0:56:58 --> 0:57:04
It certainly provided some supportive evidence that there may be something going on.
777
0:57:06 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]ed, James?
778
0:57:09 --> 0:57:12
Well, I think it came out in April. I think it was retracted in June.
779
0:57:13 --> 0:57:17
So, yeah, it certainly had a lot of downloads by then.
780
0:57:19 --> 0:57:29
But there are lots of potential mechanisms for why these particularly mRNA injectables might be causing cancers.
781
0:57:31 --> 0:57:36
Or not necessarily causing cancer, but probably contributing to this accelerated biology.
782
0:57:37 --> 0:57:43
And I don't think I'm necessarily seeing more cancers through the MDT or the MDT has got very busy.
783
0:57:44 --> 0:57:49
The thing that's different for me is the different biology, the more aggressive nature of these cancers.
784
0:57:50 --> 0:57:58
And these are lots of proposed mechanisms, but these are just some examples of what might be causing them.
785
0:58:07 --> 0:58:10
I think probably you were familiar with that. We can talk about it later.
786
0:58:11 --> 0:58:17
And this is why there's a problem. And if you look at graphs and trends over time, it's becoming chaotic.
787
0:58:17 --> 0:58:23
And it's really the inflection is drifting from baseline and just seems to be going in the wrong direction.
788
0:58:24 --> 0:58:30
And it's all coming at the same time period where that inflection, that change has happened.
789
0:58:31 --> 0:58:33
There's no denying that this is happening.
790
0:58:34 --> 0:58:38
There's no denying that this is happening. And even the mainstream media can't deny it.
791
0:58:40 --> 0:58:42
But they're suggesting that there's no explanation for it.
792
0:58:48 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction] want to go through some of the more common things that have been proposed.
793
0:58:54 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]ion is that lockdown has caused the change.
794
0:58:59 --> 0:59:03
In my specialty, I don't think that's the case, because I think as I outlined, we didn't change
795
0:59:04 --> 0:59:11
our two-week wait pathway. We saw and diagnosed probably more cancers during lockdown.
796
0:59:11 --> 0:59:17
We operated on as many. We probably didn't operate in the same way. We didn't take as many risks.
797
0:59:17 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] we operated, but we still treated cancer.
798
0:59:22 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]age migration concept that they're presenting late,
799
0:59:30 --> 0:59:35
it doesn't really fit because what I'm seeing is they're presenting late now,
800
0:59:36 --> 0:59:42
but lockdown was a long time ago. And these patients are presenting out the blue
801
0:59:43 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]age four cancer and then dying within weeks, having had no symptoms prior to that.
802
0:59:48 --> 0:59:52
So it's a different biology that I'm seeing. I don't think lockdown really satisfactorily
803
0:59:52 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]ains it. And switching off screening programs, we're talking about cancer in young patients.
804
0:59:57 --> 1:00:02
Well, screening programs don't start till age 60. So stopping screening programs,
805
1:00:02 --> 1:00:09
it doesn't explain it either in the younger cohorts. There's a lot of interest in genetics
806
1:00:09 --> 1:00:17
in the NHS and worldwide. Obviously, this is driven by the fact that we're seeing a lot of
807
1:00:17 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ant searching for novel therapies and immunotherapy and lots of interest in different
808
1:00:23 --> 1:00:31
chemotherapies. But it's been certainly proposed that cancer is a complex disease.
809
1:00:32 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ays a role, but multiple toxic environmental toxins seem to be the main driver
810
1:00:42 --> 1:00:52
for development of cancer. And typically, these inherited syndromes are around 3% of all
811
1:00:52 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]al cancer, 8% of colorectal cancer in young people. So the genetic inherited syndromes
812
1:00:59 --> 1:01:07
don't really explain this significant increase in my view. Poor diet has been proposed and sugar
813
1:01:07 --> 1:01:12
and ultra processed foods seems to be talked about in the media at the moment. But
814
1:01:13 --> 1:01:17
none of that is significant. In my view, none of that significantly changed.
815
1:01:18 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction] of our patients already had a poor diet and sugar and ultra processed foods are not new.
816
1:01:26 --> 1:01:33
The obesity epidemic isn't new. So again, major contributors to cancer, not denying that at all,
817
1:01:33 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]r of cancer. But it's not new. So it doesn't really explain
818
1:01:40 --> 1:01:46
a new significant change, temporal change. And then obviously, we've all seen the headlines of
819
1:01:47 --> 1:01:51
every other possible thing that they can think of to cause it to explain it.
820
1:01:52 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction] sounds ridiculous. So yeah, in summary, we've accepted that lockdown harms
821
1:02:01 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ened scope. And we're also concerned that these novel mRNA vaccines, it's
822
1:02:07 --> 1:02:15
now, I think it's fair to say that it's abundantly clear that they're not safe. Now, correlation isn't
823
1:02:15 --> 1:02:20
causation. But as I've tried to outline, I think there's enough of a temporal association to at
824
1:02:20 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ions and concerns. It's also clear that they don't do what they promised.
825
1:02:26 --> 1:02:33
And they've changed, they constantly change the tune and the narrative on what they are
826
1:02:34 --> 1:02:38
supposed to do. But it's quite clear they don't do that either. So it doesn't make any sense to
827
1:02:38 --> 1:02:47
continue to encourage them or push them. It's quite clear there's data to suggest that the
828
1:02:47 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction], the less effective and the more likely you are to get COVID anyway. So
829
1:02:55 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ill pushing them if we've got clinical concerns?
830
1:03:01 --> 1:03:04
There's unexplained ongoing excess mortality, which
831
1:03:06 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]ill don't want to consider or look at. It's been going on since early 21. It's not
832
1:03:13 --> 1:03:19
stopped. And surgical teams need awareness, increased awareness of it and early recognition
833
1:03:20 --> 1:03:25
of acute mesenteric ischemia, complicated inflammatory emergency general surgical cases,
834
1:03:25 --> 1:03:27
and early aggressive cancers and recurrences.
835
1:03:36 --> 1:03:42
So yeah, that's all I've got really. But I'm happy to talk about the hope called again. So this is
836
1:03:43 --> 1:03:52
something that we founded a few weeks ago. It's an international group of founders.
837
1:03:53 --> 1:03:58
And we've really put together a document. We've written it quite carefully that we feel is
838
1:04:02 --> 1:04:08
essentially doing three or four, five things. The first thing is to call out the immediate
839
1:04:08 --> 1:04:14
suspension of the COVID-[privacy contact redaction]s for the reasons I've just outlined. And that there's
840
1:04:14 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]s that they are contributing to an alarming rise in
841
1:04:19 --> 1:04:26
disability and excess deaths. And that the association observed between these concerning
842
1:04:26 --> 1:04:31
trends is now supported by additional significant findings. Second point is
843
1:04:31 --> 1:04:43
that there needs to be an independent and thorough research done on the mechanisms and looking at
844
1:04:43 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]ly and doing some research to try and work out why this is happening
845
1:04:49 --> 1:04:56
and work out potential treatments. The third point we wanted to make is that the vaccine
846
1:04:56 --> 1:05:01
engine needs to be recognised in the gas light. It needs to stop. And we need to try and provide
847
1:05:01 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]inary clinics to support those that have been injured.
848
1:05:07 --> 1:05:15
And then fourthly, we need to acknowledge that medical profession has failed significantly over
849
1:05:15 --> 1:05:22
the COVID period in basic medical ethics, particularly around informed consent
850
1:05:25 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]s, but also why did the medical
851
1:05:33 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] go along with lockdown and all the other policies that had such a weak evidence
852
1:05:38 --> 1:05:45
base or no evidence base with all the obvious harms of those interventions. And the fifth point
853
1:05:45 --> 1:05:52
is about why did this happen? Why are we in this position? And what can we do about it?
854
1:05:52 --> 1:05:58
And what should we be calling governments to do about it? So it's essentially a petition. It's a
855
1:05:59 --> 1:06:05
public website that's dedicated for people to sign. You can sign it as a scientist. You can
856
1:06:05 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]or or as a member of the public. We're just hoping that we get enough signatures
857
1:06:10 --> 1:06:18
that really the media eventually can't ignore. And we can then use it to try and
858
1:06:21 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] us some much needed change. So yeah, that's all I've got. Thanks very much.
859
1:06:28 --> 1:06:37
Very good. James, just keep that slide up there with the supporting organisations,
860
1:06:37 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] a look at that. Everybody take a look.
861
1:06:54 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]op sharing your screen, James, and we have Steven first.
862
1:07:02 --> 1:07:10
As you know, Steven, we are in your hands. Yeah. So I've got 15 minutes, James. I'll try and keep
863
1:07:10 --> 1:07:16
to 15 minutes because Charles tells me off if I don't. So I have to say you're incredibly calm
864
1:07:16 --> 1:07:29
in your delivery. And it belies, I think, the passion, which I sense in your posts,
865
1:07:29 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction], it's great to have someone who's calm. You said that you were
866
1:07:35 --> 1:07:41
very, you felt quite calm in the hospital. Was that true of your colleagues? And eventually,
867
1:07:41 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ag you down to their level? Were you kind of, you did say that there was one point where
868
1:07:48 --> 1:07:52
you're getting questioned about everything and people who weren't doctors and even people who
869
1:07:52 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ors who didn't know what they're talking about and wouldn't admit that no informed consent
870
1:07:57 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]e were being deprived of the most basic things like their families with
871
1:08:06 --> 1:08:11
them when they're ill in hospital. I mean, if you want someone to die, just isolate them in hospital.
872
1:08:12 --> 1:08:18
That's a really good way to kill them. So the question is, why was that done? I just wanted
873
1:08:18 --> 1:08:24
to ask you, in your opinion now, do you have any idea as a medical doctor in the United Kingdom?
874
1:08:25 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction] any idea what is in these injections?
875
1:08:36 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction] point first or just just answer that question?
876
1:08:42 --> 1:08:49
So sorry, yes, if you can address, there were two questions, were there? I suppose
877
1:08:49 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]ed on that, I was calm and did I ever get dragged down and whatever, I suppose.
878
1:08:55 --> 1:09:00
Well, the more important question is the second question, what's in these vaccines? Do we know
879
1:09:00 --> 1:09:08
now? I don't think we do. No, I quite agree with you. I think we're only told what we're told,
880
1:09:08 --> 1:09:15
aren't we? And that's whether we believe what we're told and so on. So yeah, I think it's very
881
1:09:15 --> 1:09:20
difficult. I don't think anybody can give informed consent for something that they don't really know
882
1:09:20 --> 1:09:24
what it is they're giving. Absolutely. So I think that's the bottom line, isn't it?
883
1:09:24 --> 1:09:27
Yeah, exactly. That's the point. So don't you think it's a gross dereliction of any doctor's
884
1:09:27 --> 1:09:33
duty to not know what was in these vaccines, so-called vaccines, which weren't vaccines,
885
1:09:33 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]ill don't know. And yet they're able to say, oh, all these signals which are occurring,
886
1:09:38 --> 1:09:44
which you're observing, you know, and thinking of hypotheses as to why they may be occurring,
887
1:09:44 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]or should do. Oh, no, we don't need to look at this, you know, but they don't
888
1:09:49 --> 1:09:55
know what's in the vaccines. And they should have realised all these doctors in the UK and elsewhere
889
1:09:55 --> 1:09:59
around the world, they should have realised that there was absolutely no informed consent if no one,
890
1:09:59 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ors in the world, didn't know what was in the vaccines. So
891
1:10:07 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] wonder what you think. Yeah, no, I don't disagree with that. I did find it
892
1:10:14 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]urbing and quite concerning that people were just so easily able to just believe what they
893
1:10:22 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] go along with it. But I mean, people have talked about this as a military-grade
894
1:10:29 --> 1:10:38
psychological operation. I mean, the media that were so instrumental in this, the systematic and
895
1:10:38 --> 1:10:45
centralised control of messaging policy, and the fact that we're in a very, very constrained,
896
1:10:47 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]em by design, I think, but I mean, essentially, it is top down,
897
1:10:53 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]n medicine. And if you work in those systems, you follow whatever those
898
1:11:01 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] medics, when they're under pressure, and they're very busy,
899
1:11:10 --> 1:11:17
and they've been made very stressed and anxious themselves, possibly from a personal health
900
1:11:17 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]ive, or just because they're worried for their patients. Many of us were taken in by
901
1:11:23 --> 1:11:31
the potential threat of this pandemic early on, and that just continued. And I think people just
902
1:11:31 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] in their own systems and their own policymakers,
903
1:11:39 --> 1:11:43
that somebody had thought about it, somebody must have done the research, somebody must have done
904
1:11:43 --> 1:11:48
the work, somebody must know what they're doing, somebody must have checked this, somebody must
905
1:11:49 --> 1:11:55
have checked that. No, no, doesn't know, I've realised the last four years, you can quite easily
906
1:11:55 --> 1:12:01
go along with, as a human being with, oh, yeah, someone must have done it, but actually, no one's
907
1:12:01 --> 1:12:06
done it. And no one's taken responsibility in the whole wide world. And that's been a very big
908
1:12:06 --> 1:12:17
surprise to me. Yeah. So, yeah, so, so it is curious, isn't it, that some many of our colleagues,
909
1:12:17 --> 1:12:24
even now, don't want to ask any questions, when you've got a background of lack of informed
910
1:12:24 --> 1:12:29
consent on a worldwide scale in breach of the Nuremberg Code. And what was taking place,
911
1:12:29 --> 1:12:35
actually, was human medical experimentation, which was exactly, those are exactly the crimes
912
1:12:35 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]e, [privacy contact redaction]e were found guilty at the Nuremberg trials for the doctors,
913
1:12:43 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]ors trial, that was, and of course, they had the ordinary Nuremberg trial for everybody.
914
1:12:50 --> 1:12:56
Then they had the lawyers trial, the doctors trial was hidden, the lawyers trial was even less
915
1:12:56 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ors trial. Yes, the lawyers trial. And, but these were very important trials,
916
1:13:04 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ates of America, no less, who was actually running, prosecuting the
917
1:13:11 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ors trial. And so there was lots of talk of human medical experimentation,
918
1:13:19 --> 1:13:26
and how wrong that was. And yet, in 2020, that's exactly what happened. So how do we explain this?
919
1:13:26 --> 1:13:31
How did the world go, including all the doctors in the world, just about, apart from you, me,
920
1:13:31 --> 1:13:40
and a few others? How do we explain that everything went so wrong all at once? Was it fear? Was it
921
1:13:40 --> 1:13:46
the psychological operation was, which was aiming at the fear? Or was it the, it seems to me that
922
1:13:47 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction] important point looking back and isolation as well of lockdowns, you know,
923
1:13:55 --> 1:14:02
to isolate human beings, probably one of the most social animals on the planet,
924
1:14:04 --> 1:14:10
was clearly wrong. And everyone, but especially doctors should have been understood this,
925
1:14:10 --> 1:14:15
immediately. And felt responsible. The other thing, well, that's enough.
926
1:14:16 --> 1:14:20
Carry on. If you've got an answer. Or thoughts.
927
1:14:23 --> 1:14:30
The other thing James, to help me maybe, I, looking back, I look at evidence-based medicine,
928
1:14:31 --> 1:14:43
and what, what's that, the Ferguson, you know, the epidemiologist, so evidence-based medicine and
929
1:14:43 --> 1:14:50
epidemiology now look to me like they were constructs to allow what happened in 2020 to
930
1:14:50 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction] So evidence, oh, people say, oh, no, evidence-based medicine is great. No, it's not
931
1:14:55 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ually it leads to taking the autonomy away from individual good doctors.
932
1:15:03 --> 1:15:09
And that's exactly what happened. So I used to warn of this in 2015, even in 2010,
933
1:15:10 --> 1:15:16
you know, after the Shipman public inquiry, where they found Shipman guilty effectively of
934
1:15:16 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ead of 15, which he'd been found guilty of in a court of law in the United Kingdom.
935
1:15:23 --> 1:15:29
Dame Janet Jones ran that inquiry. I think I found out that it wasn't run under oath,
936
1:15:29 --> 1:15:34
which is surprising, isn't it? But effectively he was found guilty of 315,
937
1:15:35 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ers at the inquiry. So that's very interesting because Shipman was used as the
938
1:15:43 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]em and revalidation and for every doctor to have a portfolio, like a
939
1:15:51 --> 1:15:57
child at school. And I thought I was warning people there's something wrong here. I didn't
940
1:15:57 --> 1:16:03
know what it was. But I said these protocols are wrong too. They're going to lead to tyranny.
941
1:16:03 --> 1:16:09
And I was absolutely right, but I didn't realize how right it was. So do you see evidence-based
942
1:16:09 --> 1:16:16
medicine as the problem? Well, it didn't start off as a problem. I think evidence-based medicine is
943
1:16:16 --> 1:16:22
a good concept if you're actually asking, is there any evidence that what we're doing works,
944
1:16:22 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] the old days where you did it because you'd always done it or because you
945
1:16:29 --> 1:16:35
were told it was a good idea or you're actually trying to find the scientific evidence to support
946
1:16:35 --> 1:16:43
whatever intervention you wanted to. Yes, but if you've got people using evidence-based medicine
947
1:16:43 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] no idea about medical ethics or the importance of the autonomy of individual doctors
948
1:16:49 --> 1:16:55
as far as the patient goes, the safety of the patient goes, then it's going to lead to the
949
1:16:55 --> 1:17:01
medical tyranny which we saw. And it was always inevitable in my view. But anyway, it's a very,
950
1:17:01 --> 1:17:06
it's a very, it's a very long sort of progressive journey that's happened. But
951
1:17:08 --> 1:17:12
to continue on saying evidence-based medicine started right, but got hijacked and became
952
1:17:12 --> 1:17:18
policy-driven medicine, which was much more... Well, that was the aim all along. That's what I'm saying.
953
1:17:19 --> 1:17:26
You see? I mean, I think when I, you know, 20 years ago, when I was in training, we would enjoy
954
1:17:26 --> 1:17:31
taking a paper to pieces. And there was this thing called critical appraisal and critical appraisal
955
1:17:31 --> 1:17:38
of papers was something that you were examined on. And we made sports out of just trashing papers,
956
1:17:38 --> 1:17:41
you know, because a lot of research, we could see that we could see that, you know, people would
957
1:17:41 --> 1:17:48
write papers and there was flaws in the methods, there was flaws in the, you know, the research
958
1:17:48 --> 1:17:54
and the results and so on. So this concept of critical thinking was nurtured and was encouraged
959
1:17:54 --> 1:18:02
in medical training. And then that got lost. Exactly. It was always going to get lost.
960
1:18:02 --> 1:18:06
And as this evidence-based medicine was taken out of our hands and become more centralized and we trusted in
961
1:18:06 --> 1:18:12
organizations of professional researchers and NICE and these other institutions to do that
962
1:18:12 --> 1:18:17
critical thinking, doctors stopped doing the critical thinking themselves and left and
963
1:18:17 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]em. I think to pick up on why in this particular case it was so...
964
1:18:26 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]ep, I mean, everybody essentially went along with it. There are a couple of
965
1:18:31 --> 1:18:41
important things. One is obviously the scenario and the psychological effect of the, you know,
966
1:18:43 --> 1:18:48
the measures and the messaging and the narrative. But it's the fact that we're talking about
967
1:18:49 --> 1:18:56
so-called vaccines. And if I can just refer to our article that we've written on medical ethics and
968
1:18:56 --> 1:19:03
informed consent, my contribution to the paper is as a surgeon, I'm an expert in informed consent
969
1:19:05 --> 1:19:12
because I do it for anybody I operate on and it's a very, very in-depth process. And it's not just
970
1:19:12 --> 1:19:20
one conversation. It's not just a piece of paper. But what we're arguing in our article is that
971
1:19:20 --> 1:19:27
we're not sure the same rigor is applied for pharmaceutical products as it is for surgical
972
1:19:27 --> 1:19:35
procedures. And it's even less applied to this particular category of pharmaceutical interventions
973
1:19:35 --> 1:19:43
known as vaccines, where the mantra safe and effective has been used since the 1930s probably.
974
1:19:45 --> 1:19:50
Or even going back before then. So it's something that medical doctors have been indoctrinated
975
1:19:50 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction] that vaccines are safe and effective. You just assume they are
976
1:19:56 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]s are. That's what we've always been told. So nobody even considers questioning
977
1:20:01 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]roke of this. If you can call these mRNA injectables vaccines,
978
1:20:09 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]e won't ask any questions. Apart from the fact that you can avoid indemnity to prosecution
979
1:20:16 --> 1:20:26
and so on and so forth. That was the issue. Yeah. So it seems to me really dangerous, James,
980
1:20:27 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ors in the UK, let's keep it to one country, but it's happening all over the
981
1:20:32 --> 1:20:38
world, all the doctors in the UK that they've got to follow these guidelines and protocols,
982
1:20:38 --> 1:20:43
protocols in particular, because what happens then? Well, inevitably, depending on when you
983
1:20:43 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ly, you're going to follow the protocols and you stop thinking. And you don't
984
1:20:49 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]op thinking because one size does not fit all. And that's particularly applicable
985
1:20:56 --> 1:21:03
to medicine and treating the patient in front of you. So it always seemed inappropriate. I used
986
1:21:03 --> 1:21:10
to argue with one of the chief medical advisors of the medical defense union about this. And I
987
1:21:10 --> 1:21:17
didn't realize how right I was. And there was he helping me against the general medical council and
988
1:21:18 --> 1:21:24
trying to get me out of the general medical without it because I was terrified that they were going
989
1:21:24 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction]aint in before I left, before I succeeded in leaving, which I had heard they did.
990
1:21:33 --> 1:21:38
I wasn't terrified of them per se. I just wanted to live my life without the GMC
991
1:21:40 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction]opping me saying the things that I needed to say in 2020. So anyway,
992
1:21:48 --> 1:21:58
I'm just thinking, what about virology and immunology? So when I was at medical school,
993
1:21:58 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]s were the kings of medicine. Now, the immunologists knew about the immune system,
994
1:22:05 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]em. And then in the 80s, it was pointed out to me by
995
1:22:13 --> 1:22:21
one of the guys who's an expert in the UK. So he's a nurse. He's a very able nurse. His parents were
996
1:22:22 --> 1:22:30
very good nurses too. I can't remember his name now. Kevin Corbett. So he was telling me,
997
1:22:30 --> 1:22:37
so he's an expert on HIV. He's a nurse, but he was hanging around with the doctors, the HIV
998
1:22:37 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]ors in London, in the UK, when it was really big time. So he talks like a doctor. And he said
999
1:22:46 --> 1:22:54
that he'd observed that the virologists were on the rise in the 80s. And he one day mentioned
1000
1:22:54 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]s were on the decline, had been on the decline as the virologists.
1001
1:23:00 --> 1:23:06
So do you think that was a double necessary construct? They had to get rid of the
1002
1:23:06 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]ood how brilliant God was, if you like, in creating the immune system,
1003
1:23:12 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] for human beings, but for all animals. And the virologists were pushing that we're in
1004
1:23:17 --> 1:23:23
danger of endless deadly viral pandemics. So we needed to supplement the immune system because
1005
1:23:23 --> 1:23:32
God had forgotten about it. What do you think? Yeah, no, when I was at Medical Circle, I thoroughly
1006
1:23:32 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]icated, but fascinating. Absolutely. And it was,
1007
1:23:41 --> 1:23:46
it was, it was, yeah, it was one of those specialties that was really quite wonderful.
1008
1:23:47 --> 1:23:55
And one of the sort of discovery specialties, virology probably passed me by really, because
1009
1:23:55 --> 1:23:59
I'd left medical school and I was focusing on surgical training. I hadn't really realised just
1010
1:23:59 --> 1:24:08
how, how big and enormous an industry was becoming and or specialty and how germ theory was becoming
1011
1:24:08 --> 1:24:14
increasingly important. I think what you said first was correct, James, that it was, it's an industry,
1012
1:24:14 --> 1:24:19
isn't it? And it was intended to be an industry. That's why they brought it in, in my opinion.
1013
1:24:20 --> 1:24:25
James, great. Thank you so much. It's very difficult for me to do this justice in a short
1014
1:24:25 --> 1:24:32
space of time. And I feel the pressure. And so I'll just let other people ask some questions and
1015
1:24:32 --> 1:24:37
then maybe I can think of some other ones. I'm just browsing through the chat. There's millions
1016
1:24:37 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]ions here. I'm not sure I can answer them all. Do you want me to just quickly flick
1017
1:24:42 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]ions or? Well, there are people with hands up. So maybe
1018
1:24:46 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction] If you could make a note of those in the chat, because otherwise
1019
1:24:51 --> 1:24:56
you'll have to go all the way back, you know, which is not easy. Make a note. I can answer them all.
1020
1:24:56 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]n't got time, but I'll try. Yeah. Okay. So I don't know why Charles is probably
1021
1:25:05 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]ion as far as I can see it is Dr. Felicity Lillingston.
1022
1:25:15 --> 1:25:18
Yeah, I think she's a British doctor, but I'm not sure about that.
1023
1:25:20 --> 1:25:23
You muted Felicity.
1024
1:25:25 --> 1:25:31
Hello. Can you hear me? Yes, we can hear you. Yeah. Hi, James. I don't know if you remember me.
1025
1:25:32 --> 1:25:37
I approached you a while back about my son, Anthony. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Great. Well, he had
1026
1:25:37 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] for everybody to be aware. My son after his booster developed severe anemia.
1027
1:25:46 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]ed he had colonoscopy. It was found that he had a, I don't know, carcinoma of his
1028
1:25:54 --> 1:26:00
transverse colon. They wanted to remove his whole colon because he was actually in America and
1029
1:26:00 --> 1:26:06
they're rather keen to get rid of everything there. But James very kindly talked me through
1030
1:26:06 --> 1:26:13
it all, calmed me down. And we only had the transverse colon resected. He then had follow-up
1031
1:26:13 --> 1:26:23
chemo and he's doing very well. I was able to obtain some samples of the tissue from the tumor,
1032
1:26:23 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] Burkhart. And the results were quite revealing. If I can just read to you.
1033
1:26:35 --> 1:26:40
In particular, the case the spike protein was detected in the tumor
1034
1:26:42 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]ry in tumor cells, the nuclear capside being negative,
1035
1:26:49 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] to assume that the spike expression was due to the two coronavirus vaccines and not due
1036
1:26:57 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] Burkhart was able to say that the tumor cells contained these
1037
1:27:06 --> 1:27:13
spike proteins, which indicated to me that it was more than likely due to the booster vaccination
1038
1:27:13 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] you had any more patients having this done, having the tumor cells
1039
1:27:22 --> 1:27:29
analyzed? In the UK, it's very difficult because it's difficult to get anybody to even
1040
1:27:30 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]ate that there might be a problem or association with these mRNA shots.
1041
1:27:36 --> 1:27:43
And we've had discussions on our UK doctors groups. We've got a few pathologists in the group and
1042
1:27:43 --> 1:27:48
it's difficult for them to get permission from their seniors, their departments to even do
1043
1:27:48 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]udies into this. It gets shut down very quickly. You're just fighting red tape in a system
1044
1:27:55 --> 1:28:02
that doesn't want to contemplate there might be a problem. Are they doing it in America?
1045
1:28:02 --> 1:28:11
Is it Peter Cole? Ryan Cole has done quite a lot of work.
1046
1:28:14 --> 1:28:18
You don't know, you haven't heard any more. Or who else might be doing it?
1047
1:28:18 --> 1:28:22
Yeah, it seems extraordinary. I mean, I've kept the results in the hope that it's all going to
1048
1:28:22 --> 1:28:29
come out and we'll be able to prove this. Unfortunately, my son is still a little bit
1049
1:28:29 --> 1:28:37
in denial about it, which is very sad. My worry today was that you did mention that these cancers
1050
1:28:37 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction] few years tend to have a recurrence rate, which is worrying,
1051
1:28:44 --> 1:28:50
obviously, as a mother. Well, yeah, I don't know that we're going to see more recurrence.
1052
1:28:51 --> 1:28:58
And, you know, some of the aggressive recurrences I've seen have been in patients who had previously
1053
1:28:58 --> 1:29:03
had their primary cancers prior to vaccination. So they may be getting the recurrence as a result of
1054
1:29:03 --> 1:29:16
Oh, right. Okay. rather than. But yeah, I don't know that. Yeah.
1055
1:29:16 --> 1:29:22
Okay, thanks. I just wanted to know, you mentioned in your talk that these were coming back with
1056
1:29:22 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]s like, you know, the head of that, what was it you said, the, what is
1057
1:29:28 --> 1:29:33
it, the humerus, head of the humerus or something, you said there was an unusual metastatic,
1058
1:29:34 --> 1:29:39
you know, cancer there. So I'm just sort of, you know, obviously concerned and worried that
1059
1:29:40 --> 1:29:46
this might happen with my son or anyone I know. And I'm just, you know, I'm just, you know,
1060
1:29:46 --> 1:29:50
anyone else who's any of my patients who've recently been diagnosed with cancer.
1061
1:29:53 --> 1:29:56
Yeah. Okay. Well, thank you very much. And thank you for all you're doing.
1062
1:29:56 --> 1:30:01
Really admire you greatly. And thank you. No, thank you. Thank you.
1063
1:30:02 --> 1:30:10
Yeah. So Felicity is much more reasonable than I am. So it gets people to follow him.
1064
1:30:10 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction], Mark, who I think is fair to describe you, you're a kind of
1065
1:30:16 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction], are you Mark? Sure. Absolutely. Thank you very much, James.
1066
1:30:27 --> 1:30:37
Right. I'm an IT. I was in, I worked for an international electronic test equipment company.
1067
1:30:37 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] job was quality assurance. And I have a book here, Reckoning with Risk. I'll
1068
1:30:47 --> 1:30:56
put it in the chat by Geert Gieckrenser. And in that book, he explained that you needed to look
1069
1:30:56 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]ion, not the relative risk reduction. So I actually took the Pfizer
1070
1:31:04 --> 1:31:17
information and I calculated it at 0.83%. Later, I spotted that in the Lancet, it was 0.84%.
1071
1:31:19 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]or prescribe any vaccine or supposed vaccine or a medication that would only
1072
1:31:30 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]ion of 0.84%? That's just a, well, one question. I would like
1073
1:31:41 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]s came out, I went to see my GP because the GP surgery
1074
1:31:52 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]er. I have in front of me the spike facts leaflet.
1075
1:32:02 --> 1:32:09
You can't really see it, but anyway, I have it. And I challenged my GP and I said to my GP,
1076
1:32:11 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]e that you have jabbed? I wanted to know how did you get
1077
1:32:17 --> 1:32:25
informed consent? His reply to me was, Mark, I got the booster and I got the leaflet after I got
1078
1:32:25 --> 1:32:37
jabbed. I then said, this doesn't make sense to me. The leaflet has got 2,[privacy contact redaction]s. It would take
1079
1:32:37 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]rage adult 12 minutes to read and they wouldn't understand everything because it's
1080
1:32:43 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ual document, it talks about an increased risk of myocarditis
1081
1:32:56 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]itis. And I challenged him. I asked him, what is the increased risk? He didn't know.
1082
1:33:03 --> 1:33:10
He then, I then went on to the duration of the product of the protection and it said,
1083
1:33:10 --> 1:33:16
as with any vaccine, the booster dose, blah, blah, blah, may not fully protect all those
1084
1:33:16 --> 1:33:22
who receive it and it is not known how long you will be protected. So I said to him, why the hell
1085
1:33:22 --> 1:33:29
would you give it to anybody if you don't know any of these answers? He walked away. I'd love your
1086
1:33:29 --> 1:33:43
comments on that. James, are you happy to answer that? I'm really trying to find words, to be honest.
1087
1:33:45 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]and, yeah. I followed it up, James, with a letter to the two GPs complaining about this and
1088
1:33:56 --> 1:34:04
telling them that the GP surgery had a responsibility to ensure that they could not be
1089
1:34:04 --> 1:34:10
sued because we need the GP surgery and that they should not be administering these jabs.
1090
1:34:12 --> 1:34:17
Yep. It's pretty disappointing, isn't it, James?
1091
1:34:17 --> 1:34:28
It is. I think this all goes back to a period of time where people were not thinking rationally.
1092
1:34:28 --> 1:34:33
They were under immense fear, immense pressure, immense stress. They'd all been taking in,
1093
1:34:35 --> 1:34:39
they'd all been watching the news. They'd lost their ability to think critically. They weren't
1094
1:34:39 --> 1:34:45
thinking rationally. Well, I wasn't. They took the jabs themselves out of personal fear and then now
1095
1:34:45 --> 1:34:51
many of my colleagues, I think most people are in the position, unfortunately, that they've
1096
1:34:51 --> 1:34:55
jabbed themselves, they've jabbed their families, they've jabbed their children
1097
1:34:56 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]s, as well as their patients. To face the horror of the reality that they might
1098
1:35:05 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]ake is too big for them to contemplate, it's too big to deal with. So
1099
1:35:10 --> 1:35:16
they're doubling down and they're not able to engage, they're not able to see this rationally
1100
1:35:16 --> 1:35:20
and see this as you. We've always seen it objectively, but they haven't.
1101
1:35:20 --> 1:35:30
James, I even asked, have they actually filled in any yellow cards? The answer was no, but
1102
1:35:31 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]e had a neurological issue. They sent them to Peter
1103
1:35:39 --> 1:35:47
Borough Hospital, but they didn't fill in the yellow card. They basically said that was the
1104
1:35:47 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] can't understand how you could be so damn callous.
1105
1:35:57 --> 1:36:02
No, no, you didn't mean you, James. You're on our side. But Mark is saying how the doctors
1106
1:36:02 --> 1:36:12
could be so callous. But I think you're saying that the doctors had allowed themselves to be
1107
1:36:12 --> 1:36:16
raped essentially by these vaccinations, so-called, which weren't vaccinations,
1108
1:36:18 --> 1:36:25
and no one knew what was in them. I think the best thing to say, James, it was just an outrageously
1109
1:36:25 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]ors around the world, and God help them, because
1110
1:36:33 --> 1:36:38
they've got to live with it for the rest of their lives. People are going to be talking about this,
1111
1:36:38 --> 1:36:45
and the longer it takes to come over to our side, the worse it's going to be for them.
1112
1:36:46 --> 1:36:53
Yeah, but Stephen, we've had Alex Mitchell on the video, right, who had his leg amputated after
1113
1:36:53 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]raZeneca. I showed him the injury to the doctor, and he said, how do we know that's
1114
1:37:04 --> 1:37:11
the vaccine? And yet he'd got a vaccine injury payment. You can't make this stuff up.
1115
1:37:12 --> 1:37:19
So Mark, it's a good doctor's job to hypothesise. You don't need quantities of scientific evidence
1116
1:37:19 --> 1:37:26
or legal advice to form an opinion as a doctor. It's very important with a sick patient that you
1117
1:37:27 --> 1:37:34
are able, as a doctor, to form a medical opinion so that you can act without looking for masses
1118
1:37:34 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]ors are trained in hypothesising, or should be, but of
1119
1:37:39 --> 1:37:47
course the evidence-based medicine took that all away. And so the real scandal is that doctors
1120
1:37:47 --> 1:37:54
allowed themselves to be lulled into a sense of security by evidence-based medicine, and they were
1121
1:37:54 --> 1:37:57
actually saying it was a good thing. No, it wasn't. It was always a bad thing, and it was always going
1122
1:37:57 --> 1:38:02
to lead to medical tyranny, which has been proved by the last four years. So sorry about that. If you
1123
1:38:02 --> 1:38:09
want to say anything more, James. Well, Stephen, let me just say, look, when I was working for IT,
1124
1:38:10 --> 1:38:18
I was, part of my job was to do a root cause analysis of any major incident that we had.
1125
1:38:19 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction] thing you would do is ask, has anything changed? Did anything change? Did you
1126
1:38:27 --> 1:38:34
change the programme? Did you change the material? Did you change, right? And if it's as plain as the
1127
1:38:34 --> 1:38:41
nose on my face, the thing is everyone was being jabbed. You cannot say there's no, you know, this
1128
1:38:42 --> 1:38:50
idea that there's no correlation is madness. It's total madness. The thing that changed is people
1129
1:38:50 --> 1:38:57
got vaccinated. Sure. And then they were raped, and then they couldn't recover from that rape.
1130
1:38:57 --> 1:39:03
That's my opinion. They couldn't recover from the rape. They had been compromised, and they lost
1131
1:39:03 --> 1:39:08
their self-respect, and they couldn't lead their own family out of it, never mind the British
1132
1:39:08 --> 1:39:13
population or the world population. And that's the truth. They were in a cult, and they couldn't get
1133
1:39:13 --> 1:39:19
out of the cult, and they still can't get out of the cult. And I hope they did this. But Stephen,
1134
1:39:20 --> 1:39:27
in the... But the reason I interrupted there, because I don't, I know you don't intend that,
1135
1:39:27 --> 1:39:34
because I know you're a good person, but it may look to some people that, you know, we're blaming
1136
1:39:34 --> 1:39:40
James for all. He's our guest. We're not. No, no, no, no, no. We're not blaming James. We're not
1137
1:39:40 --> 1:39:46
blaming James. We're not blaming James. But the problem is that the gaslighting that continues
1138
1:39:46 --> 1:39:53
to happen is having a mental problem, a mental issue on those that have been injured, and they
1139
1:39:53 --> 1:40:01
are taking their lives because they feel abandoned. And I'm so upset that we haven't actually got
1140
1:40:01 --> 1:40:08
anywhere with the government. I met with Stephen Barclay. James showed the graph, right, James,
1141
1:40:08 --> 1:40:15
you showed the graph where you had the great big spike. I showed that to Stephen Barclay. He wasn't
1142
1:40:15 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ed. He poo-pooed it. And in the end, he wasn't prepared to talk to Dr. Claire Craig about
1143
1:40:23 --> 1:40:35
the Pfizer trials, about the misinformation of the actual trial data. And I had to leave him by saying,
1144
1:40:36 --> 1:40:41
I'm looking you in the eyes. Any child that dies is down to you. And he just said,
1145
1:40:41 --> 1:40:48
I disagree. And that was the end of the conversation. And he is my constitutional MP,
1146
1:40:48 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]ituency MP. I felt I'd let down the youth because I was unable to get him even to talk to
1147
1:41:00 --> 1:41:04
anybody who had an inkling of what was going on.
1148
1:41:04 --> 1:41:14
Yeah. So as you can tell, James, Mark couldn't tell a lie if he was trying to tell a lie. He's
1149
1:41:14 --> 1:41:21
incapable of telling a lie. He's a very good guy, straight down the line. And so is his wife, who
1150
1:41:21 --> 1:41:28
is Dutch. And they've attended, I think, all these meetings, haven't you, Mark? You must be the best
1151
1:41:28 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]e in the world about what's happened. But the thing is, the cult is not confined to
1152
1:41:37 --> 1:41:44
COVID and these vaccinations, Mark. You've got the Ukraine thing. People are so certain about
1153
1:41:44 --> 1:41:51
that Russia's terrible. Trump's another one. Oh, they hate Trump. How can you possibly support Trump?
1154
1:41:52 --> 1:41:58
Got all these, and then the climate change. And then you've got the number of cults going around.
1155
1:41:58 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom, look at the mess the United Kingdom is
1156
1:42:03 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]etely compromised prime minister who looks, he's always terrified of his own
1157
1:42:09 --> 1:42:14
family, never mind the British population. And now I heard the other day from the chief
1158
1:42:14 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]igations officer, a journalist of the Daily Mail, what's his name, Kirstama Angela Rayner,
1159
1:42:24 --> 1:42:31
and what's the name, Yvette Cooper, who's married to Ed Balls, the ideal relationship
1160
1:42:31 --> 1:42:41
in inverted commas. They're all politicians, but those three families have got children who've been
1161
1:42:41 --> 1:42:48
taken over by the trans agenda, just like Elon Musk, except one of them is prime minister of
1162
1:42:48 --> 1:42:54
our country. I had no idea about that. So that has been kept very quiet, but clearly they know
1163
1:42:54 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]n't reported it to the British people. So we've got
1164
1:42:59 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction]er level when it comes to the trans agenda. It's absolutely
1165
1:43:05 --> 1:43:10
outrageous. Why do I mention trans? Well, because these are Trojan horses for totalitarianism,
1166
1:43:10 --> 1:43:18
as was COVID, as is the Ukraine war, NATO, all the rest of it, pipeline explosion, energy crisis,
1167
1:43:18 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction] of living crisis, the BBC, they're all cults and they're Trojan horses for totalitarianism.
1168
1:43:23 --> 1:43:29
Sorry, James, I just wanted to help you a bit because I think I thought you were taking it a
1169
1:43:29 --> 1:43:33
little bit personally what Mark was saying, but I don't think he meant it like that. No, I didn't.
1170
1:43:33 --> 1:43:39
It's fine. And, you know, I completely hear what Mark's saying and his exasperation and his
1171
1:43:39 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction]ration. I think we could spend all night discussing the in-depth complex psychology of
1172
1:43:44 --> 1:43:49
all of this. And I think we all know it. And we've been round and round and round and round
1173
1:43:50 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction]anations. And I don't think we can really, you know,
1174
1:43:58 --> 1:44:03
personally account for anybody else's motives or thoughts or make any judgments at all. I think
1175
1:44:03 --> 1:44:10
the entirety of society has been deceived and has been led astray in one way or another. And
1176
1:44:11 --> 1:44:16
and it's very difficult to stay objective and see the reason all sorts of different areas. So
1177
1:44:16 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]ray and he's not medical. I was never led astray. I knew straight
1178
1:44:24 --> 1:44:31
away that, OK, maybe I had a good training through my case, but I knew straight away.
1179
1:44:31 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction] There are other people in the group who knew straight away. And so,
1180
1:44:36 --> 1:44:42
you know. But, Steve, we're a very tiny minority compared to the majority of the population.
1181
1:44:42 --> 1:44:45
I think where we're at now, and I think I'll probably just bring it back to
1182
1:44:46 --> 1:44:53
the article that we wrote that's trying to restore medical ethics and talk about these issues as to,
1183
1:44:53 --> 1:44:58
you know, looking at pharmaceuticals and vaccines in the same way that you would look at an operation
1184
1:44:58 --> 1:45:03
in terms of informed consent. I think it's just been a blind spot for medics for too long.
1185
1:45:03 --> 1:45:08
So, James, I hope you don't think I've made it difficult for you by saying the things I have
1186
1:45:08 --> 1:45:15
said today, but I'm very aware that people like John Lukacs and other people whom I work with,
1187
1:45:15 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]ors now and with good reason, in my opinion. So the medical profession
1188
1:45:22 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]ors need to apologize for what has happened. Oh, what's happened now?
1189
1:45:29 --> 1:45:34
Yeah, that's true. Well, I'm just going to share this in answer to all of that, really,
1190
1:45:34 --> 1:45:42
because I think this is our attempt to try and answer it. So,
1191
1:45:44 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction] to come round. But it's not easy because psychologically,
1192
1:45:50 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction] made a mistake or an error,
1193
1:45:55 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]ually this is a key part of it, in my view, is to try and.
1194
1:46:01 --> 1:46:05
James, I don't understand why people find it so difficult to admit they were wrong. Why can't
1195
1:46:05 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction] say I was wrong? It's human nature, Stephen. It's human nature. And I think there's
1196
1:46:10 --> 1:46:17
also this great fear that, you know, for many people, it's thinking that actually
1197
1:46:18 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]e might not be on your side. The authorities, the government, they might actually be
1198
1:46:25 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction] incompetent. They want to hope that it's just incompetence, but it's way beyond that. We
1199
1:46:31 --> 1:46:38
know that. But it's too much for people. It's just too much. Yes, but the problem is if we don't get
1200
1:46:38 --> 1:46:44
them out of this damned cult, they're going to take us down with them in the next Trojan horse,
1201
1:46:44 --> 1:46:50
and the present Trojan horses for that matter. And I just give up, you know, because education
1202
1:46:50 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]e are so illiterate and innumerate. It's not just illiteracy.
1203
1:46:56 --> 1:47:04
It's innumeracy. They have no concept of what a billion is or a trillion, you know, so 90
1204
1:47:04 --> 1:47:09
billion. They don't know how many zeros are in 90 billion. They should do, in my opinion, or at
1205
1:47:09 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]e who've been to university should know what 90 billion is, but they haven't got a
1206
1:47:17 --> 1:47:22
clue. They don't know how far it is to the sun. I don't know for certain. I've been told how far it
1207
1:47:22 --> 1:47:29
is, and it never changes. It's 93 million miles. Well, of course, it's always changing, but 93
1208
1:47:29 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]rage. The moon is 250,[privacy contact redaction] don't understand how people can operate
1209
1:47:35 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]ually having a picture, some kind of picture, of the planetary
1210
1:47:41 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]em in which we live, the solar system in which we allegedly live, because I'm not sure that we do
1211
1:47:47 --> 1:47:53
you know, whether the whole thing, life is maybe a succession of illusions. Anyway, let's get the
1212
1:47:53 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction]ad, he's in Norway. He's a 5G expert, James. Okay.
1213
1:48:03 --> 1:48:08
Anders, you're muted. Still muted.
1214
1:48:08 --> 1:48:15
Yes, we can see you, Anders, but we can't hear you. You're muted.
1215
1:48:18 --> 1:48:26
Hello, can you hear me now? Yes. Very good. So, I thank you, James, for a really brilliant
1216
1:48:26 --> 1:48:32
presentation of your research. I'm sitting here now with my
1217
1:48:33 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction], and he started to work for me for about 25 years ago.
1218
1:48:42 --> 1:48:49
So, we have a long history, and he got,
1219
1:48:52 --> 1:48:55
I would say, rather seriously wounded
1220
1:48:56 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction] jab.
1221
1:49:03 --> 1:49:10
And my other friends, two, three others, they got really bad wounded
1222
1:49:12 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction] jab in Poland. And I, you know, I tried to warn my boys, my girls,
1223
1:49:21 --> 1:49:32
my friends, but you know, there is a strong story that they trust the government, they trust the TV,
1224
1:49:33 --> 1:49:38
okay, I don't want to go there. Thank you for this presentation, James. I have,
1225
1:49:41 --> 1:49:45
I think you see more than 50%,
1226
1:49:48 --> 1:49:52
but I think you use the glasses of the medical doctors,
1227
1:49:55 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction], maybe, then you need to clean them.
1228
1:50:02 --> 1:50:14
I believe that it is good advice to look at
1229
1:50:16 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction]ory of, if you go into cancer, if you go into many diseases, I will follow my,
1230
1:50:27 --> 1:50:37
I would say, my really good friend, Robert Oldham Young, in his statement that you really need to
1231
1:50:37 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction]and beyond the observation what you see to understand what is behind what you see.
1232
1:50:49 --> 1:50:56
And I cannot speak
1233
1:50:59 --> 1:51:07
really out of my own research on everything, I can speak a lot out of Robert Oldham Young research.
1234
1:51:08 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] observed with vitamin D and these other related causes of
1235
1:51:24 --> 1:51:29
increased risk of disease is really accurate.
1236
1:51:30 --> 1:51:39
Corresponding, correlating to what was told us to be the type of correlation to
1237
1:51:40 --> 1:51:55
COVID, which is a joke. What you really saw is a correlation, in my opinion, to the dramatic fall
1238
1:51:55 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]e who got vaccinated, who got poisoned, who got radiated by 4G, 5G.
1239
1:52:09 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]and what you may not maybe understand, is to look into,
1240
1:52:17 --> 1:52:25
let's say, the science of what you may not be aware of, which is that
1241
1:52:26 --> 1:52:37
these poisoning of the jabs, of food, of so many different vectors are causing your blood,
1242
1:52:37 --> 1:52:45
your body to become not alkaline, the opposite. You get into the lower pH.
1243
1:52:48 --> 1:52:59
And I would say to you all, and in particular to Angus, that if you study the basic knowledge of
1244
1:52:59 --> 1:53:15
the book, the pH miracle of Dr. Robert Oldham Young, you will find that there is a very strong correlation
1245
1:53:16 --> 1:53:25
from pH to cancer to diabetes to many diseases. And these diseases like cancer are growing
1246
1:53:26 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction]ops below seven.
1247
1:53:36 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction]isz, can I ask a question?
1248
1:53:40 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction]ion is, please, can you, along with the best specialists in the world, investigate
1249
1:53:49 --> 1:54:00
the role of the pH as the cause of growth of cancer and diseases? The body
1250
1:54:01 --> 1:54:07
does not want to be less than seven pH. This is measured not in the blood, but by the
1251
1:54:07 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]itial fluid. And do you consider that the combination of the poisoning from
1252
1:54:16 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]ors, from let's say radiation, which is 4G, 5G, which is my specialty, to the
1253
1:54:27 --> 1:54:35
role of the vaccine, to the role of the bad food, everything. But what really happened?
1254
1:54:35 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]amatically, and the bodies of those who dropped are having a big risk of
1255
1:54:46 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]er two to four, meaning you go from
1256
1:54:58 --> 1:55:05
a cancer which can be cured to a cancer which is almost not curable. Do you consider that
1257
1:55:05 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]ors are really material in why the super cancer is happening?
1258
1:55:16 --> 1:55:23
I think that the body is under an assault, an onslaught of multiple environmental
1259
1:55:23 --> 1:55:28
things all at the same time, which is creating a very complex mix, which is very difficult to
1260
1:55:28 --> 1:55:34
tease out, which is the most important factors. And so on, you mentioned radiation, obviously
1261
1:55:34 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction] 10, 20 years, particularly with the mobile phones and the 5G
1262
1:55:39 --> 1:55:45
masks going up everywhere. I hate them. They just look evil and demonic. They just look
1263
1:55:45 --> 1:55:52
threatening. So I'm not disputing that 5G and 4G may well play a role in toxicity and tissue damage
1264
1:55:52 --> 1:55:58
and cellular damage. There are all sorts of factors that are involved in pathogenesis and
1265
1:55:58 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]ial dysfunction and cellular radicals and so on and so forth.
1266
1:56:07 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]ays a role, no doubt. I don't think there's one thing that you can correct or fix.
1267
1:56:12 --> 1:56:17
I don't think that there's any appetite or interest in identifying the correct cause
1268
1:56:17 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]opping it. And one thing is not going to stop cancer. Correcting one thing isn't going to
1269
1:56:21 --> 1:56:29
stop cancer. This is a whole problem that our society faces, that we have this massive onslaught.
1270
1:56:29 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]art by sorting out diet. We can start by sorting out obesity epidemic,
1271
1:56:34 --> 1:56:38
start by sorting out ultra processed food and so on that Callie and Casey
1272
1:56:38 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction] talked about. So I think they're great places to start. We can reduce people's exposure
1273
1:56:43 --> 1:56:50
to radiation and mobile phones and masks and so on. Absolutely. But I do think there's a step
1274
1:56:50 --> 1:56:55
change with the mRNA. I don't know why. I don't know all the mechanisms, but there's multiple
1275
1:56:55 --> 1:56:59
potential mechanisms for how they might be causing the problems they're causing. It's not all about
1276
1:56:59 --> 1:57:05
spike protein at all. It's far more complicated and there's far more things that potentially
1277
1:57:05 --> 1:57:[privacy contact redaction]ing on it. I don't think that's necessarily an answer, but I don't
1278
1:57:12 --> 1:57:18
think that it's all about pH either. If a patient has a pH of 7.0, they'll be very ill and they'll
1279
1:57:18 --> 1:57:25
be in ICCU because they'll be that acidotic. Normal physiology, the pH of the body will be
1280
1:57:25 --> 1:57:33
maintained very, very tightly in homeostatic mechanisms. If your pH starts to drop to 7.2,
1281
1:57:33 --> 1:57:38
7.1, you're very ill, you're very sick, you know about it. So you're not going to be walking
1282
1:57:38 --> 1:57:43
around normally with a pH of 7.0. That's not going to be what drives a cancer, for example.
1283
1:57:45 --> 1:57:51
I'm just thinking off the cuff. It's not something that I've ever considered, but you're describing
1284
1:57:51 --> 1:57:57
a condition where the entire body is very acidotic and inevitably your body systems are going to be
1285
1:58:00 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]ruggling in those conditions. Thank you, Anders. Short comment, Steven.
1286
1:58:09 --> 1:58:20
As long as it's short, Andrew. Most people consider pH to be 7.2, 7.4, which is the level of the pH
1287
1:58:20 --> 1:58:28
in the blood. If you took the pH in your urine in the morning, you would find in many cases
1288
1:58:28 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]e don't realize that the blood is protected zone. They are really
1289
1:58:37 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]e, they have a pH below 7 in the urine. And this is something
1290
1:58:46 --> 1:58:55
which it is very important to inform about because it's very easy to treat your pH to go up
1291
1:58:56 --> 1:59:01
to a healthy level, but you need to know about it and no doctor tells you about it.
1292
1:59:01 --> 1:59:18
Okay, thank you, Anders. We'll go on to the next and that's Daria, who, James, is our resident
1293
1:59:18 --> 1:59:29
neurosurgeon. Daria, and I think I'm right in saying she has re-found God in these times.
1294
1:59:29 --> 1:59:35
Is that right, Daria? That is correct. Oh, good. I had to get to the menu where I could unhook
1295
1:59:35 --> 1:59:43
everything. So, thank you. Daria is American. No, I live in Indiana. Thank you so much. I was very
1296
1:59:43 --> 1:59:[privacy contact redaction]ed to see that you were presenting because I was hoping to hear from a practicing surgeon
1297
1:59:49 --> 1:59:52
about what your experience had been. And I really appreciate you sharing that because
1298
1:59:52 --> 2:00:00
I know our local physicians at my hospital were very distressed that their livelihoods were
1299
2:00:00 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]ive surgeries for months on end. I believe my eye
1300
2:00:08 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]or told me he was not allowed to bring an elective surgery patient in for six months.
1301
2:00:14 --> 2:00:19
And he was pretty fuming mad by the time I went in to get my contact lens prescription renewed.
1302
2:00:19 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]ions for you specifically, and I believe Fizzy already asked
1303
2:00:26 --> 2:00:33
one of them. And I think Rose put a really helpful link in the chat about answering this
1304
2:00:33 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]ion, but it was what markers should be checked in every patient given the mRNA shots
1305
2:00:40 --> 2:00:47
for this COVID-19, supposedly, to prove the more causal relationship than just correlation.
1306
2:00:48 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]s, if you have a clot or some unexpected or previously, like you were showing
1307
2:00:54 --> 2:01:02
on that graph, above the precedent of previous trends in a particular disorder to prove the more
1308
2:01:02 --> 2:01:11
causal relationship between the mRNA shots and the disease you're treating, like the cancers.
1309
2:01:11 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] Burkhart was proving this, and likely that is why he is no longer alive.
1310
2:01:21 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]s ever getting done? Is there any resistance on the part of clinics, labs,
1311
2:01:27 --> 2:01:36
and hospitals to obtain the clinical evidence? And if so, do the patients have alternative
1312
2:01:36 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] results on their own? For example, like Fizzy was saying,
1313
2:01:43 --> 2:01:49
get the pathology and get it to a pathologist who is willing to run the tests. We're definitely
1314
2:01:49 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] to go with freelance clinicians like Dr. Ryan Cole here in the USA, who is currently
1315
2:01:55 --> 2:02:02
under prosecution, by the way, for persecution, I should say, by the Washington State Licensing
1316
2:02:02 --> 2:02:06
Agency. And they want to put him through a struggle session and everything else for him
1317
2:02:06 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]ease keep him in your prayers. But this is happening to far more doctors
1318
2:02:11 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]e are aware. But that was the main thing, is people aren't even asking here in the USA.
1319
2:02:19 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]e, I talked to a lady who is a nurse at a breast cancer clinic, and I asked her if she's
1320
2:02:25 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]ories from women and their young women who are showing up with double
1321
2:02:32 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]s. And she goes, No, we don't ask. I'm like, oh, he is so exasperating,
1322
2:02:39 --> 2:02:45
because you know, there has to be some link. And that along with that, and this is something to
1323
2:02:45 --> 2:02:52
think about, I'm, I bet we'll see more if we ask orthopedic surgeons. But since the mRNA shots are
1324
2:02:52 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]ered in the deltoid muscle, are we seeing a disproportionate number of primary or metastatic
1325
2:03:00 --> 2:03:07
tumors in the humerus bone, as you said, was quite rare, because of the proximity to the injection
1326
2:03:07 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] intra vascular injection into the supply, the arterial supply to the humeral
1327
2:03:17 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]s, that could easily happen, because most injectors of these shots
1328
2:03:23 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] basic safety habit of withdrawing on the syringe to make sure
1329
2:03:31 --> 2:03:36
blood was not filling the syringe before injecting. And that was by design as well.
1330
2:03:37 --> 2:03:44
Clinicians were told and caregivers not to aspirate, just jab and move on. And that's why
1331
2:03:44 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]opping dead right there in the vaccine clinics at a high rate in some locations.
1332
2:03:50 --> 2:03:54
So thank you so much. But those were my specific questions. And just,
1333
2:03:54 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] carrying on and persevering and being so stoic about it. Because
1334
2:04:00 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]eve and a lot of us are very passionate and angry and emotional, and it's definitely
1335
2:04:07 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]ifiable anger in this case. But to prevent it from happening again, somehow we've got to
1336
2:04:12 --> 2:04:18
break through the craziness and not let these totalitarian monsters continue on with their
1337
2:04:18 --> 2:04:24
democide. Thank you. It's not just that our biggest enemies are not the monsters themselves,
1338
2:04:24 --> 2:04:29
because they're ridiculous, but the reasonable people who go along with it and stay in the cult.
1339
2:04:29 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]inary people who don't understand, who can't be bothered to
1340
2:04:34 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]and in many cases, or face up to reality, they are the problem. They are keeping us in this
1341
2:04:42 --> 2:04:47
tyranny, and they will get us into a full blown tyranny if we're not careful. And we need to call
1342
2:04:47 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]e out. We've had enough time for us to be kind to them. We need to get them out by other
1343
2:04:54 --> 2:05:01
means. It's not working. We're not breaking the cult. Well, you know, they're going to self select
1344
2:05:01 --> 2:05:08
themselves to death if they keep consenting to these vile treatments. So those that are
1345
2:05:09 --> 2:05:16
comfortable being gaslit and comfortable being brainwashed, it's like, okay, go ahead,
1346
2:05:17 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction] from me, or, you know, you'll get a bigger hole in as a reward. So I
1347
2:05:24 --> 2:05:28
don't know what else to say. I mean, it's getting to the point where we have to fight for our lives
1348
2:05:28 --> 2:05:33
in some cases. But I don't know if they're going to be able to pull this off again, because now the
1349
2:05:33 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]an has been exposed by their behavior and also by all the Freedom of Information Act
1350
2:05:43 --> 2:05:48
releases a document, which is probably just the tip of the iceberg of what's really out there.
1351
2:05:49 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction], that's kind of my two cents right now. And I want to thank you very much. And hopefully
1352
2:05:54 --> 2:06:00
that fits in with what everybody else has been contemplating. But we definitely need to keep
1353
2:06:00 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction] as far as the evidence based research. I think there is merit when it's done
1354
2:06:05 --> 2:06:13
with proper scientific method and academic and research scientific integrity. And both of those
1355
2:06:13 --> 2:06:19
things were flushed down the toilet because of grant money dictating a particular outcome of a
1356
2:06:19 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]udies I looked at was the data was completely not showing
1357
2:06:27 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]ed in the final publication. So the conclusions is what most
1358
2:06:35 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction] jumped to. And they won't even look at the research and see that the methods and
1359
2:06:41 --> 2:06:47
the results did not comport with conclusions drawn. And I've seen that over and over and over again.
1360
2:06:47 --> 2:06:53
And I barely scratched the surface of those studies. So I want to thank everybody. And Dr.
1361
2:06:53 --> 2:06:59
Herbie Rish can really pick those apart like butter. But to me, I'm flogging through them and
1362
2:06:59 --> 2:07:04
eventually go, wait a minute, that's not what this says. It's kind of the same exercise I do
1363
2:07:04 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]udy. It's like, what does the Bible really say? Have you got a question for James?
1364
2:07:09 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ion? Yeah, I did several. So I'll go ahead and mute my mic and
1365
2:07:15 --> 2:07:20
you guys go ahead and let's get some answers. Thank you. Thanks very much for your comments.
1366
2:07:20 --> 2:07:29
I hadn't really thought about whether that particular case with a humerus metastasis was
1367
2:07:30 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ion. It's possible. But the mechanism of actual what's causing the
1368
2:07:40 --> 2:07:49
cancer that I was assuming that some cells of the primary have got into the humerus to then develop
1369
2:07:49 --> 2:07:53
the change. But it may be that it was a sarcoma or something completely different that was just
1370
2:07:53 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ion of the mRNA. I don't know. Very good. But it's
1371
2:08:00 --> 2:08:07
usually hypothesized about. Good, James. So Bobby Bounds, who is a data analyst,
1372
2:08:07 --> 2:08:17
and I'm not sure which country you're in, Bobby. Go ahead. I think you're unmuted.
1373
2:08:19 --> 2:08:25
Sorry, we can't hear you, Bobby. I don't know. You're unmuted, but we can't hear you.
1374
2:08:34 --> 2:08:40
Yeah. Do you want to sort that out and we'll go to John Lukacs and come back to you, Bobby? We can't
1375
2:08:40 --> 2:08:46
hear you and you are unmuted. Oh, now we can hear you. Yeah, sorry. I just switched to a different
1376
2:08:46 --> 2:08:57
microphone. Expensive one. This doesn't work. Yeah. James, given your experience, say you're a
1377
2:08:57 --> 2:09:03
curious person and you've got a little free time and you've got every death certificate for nine
1378
2:09:03 --> 2:09:12
years up through [privacy contact redaction]ion, a US state or country, what have you. And you have
1379
2:09:12 --> 2:09:20
all the ICD-10 codes for every death and you want to see, you do a time series analysis
1380
2:09:21 --> 2:09:27
and you're curious. You just want to see if there's a pattern in the death certificates
1381
2:09:28 --> 2:09:34
that would support your clinical findings. You talked a lot about pancreatitis.
1382
2:09:35 --> 2:09:41
Can you tell me what sort of a query would be the first query in your mind that you'd like to query
1383
2:09:41 --> 2:09:45
ICD codes to see if it matched your clinical experience?
1384
2:09:51 --> 2:09:56
I'm not quite sure I understand your question or where you're going with this or what you're
1385
2:09:56 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]y. Well, you know, death certificates are just records of those who died and
1386
2:10:11 --> 2:10:18
the progression of disease that led to the demise of the decedent. And so, you know,
1387
2:10:18 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction] thing, but a lot of times that's all we've got when we're trying to see if
1388
2:10:25 --> 2:10:35
there's any kind of a pattern or, you know, based on what you've seen of those people in 2020, 2021,
1389
2:10:35 --> 2:10:46
2022 who died in your care. Could there be an interesting question in your mind that could be
1390
2:10:46 --> 2:10:52
answered by querying the death certificate ICD codes? I mean, you obviously have seen all of this
1391
2:10:52 --> 2:10:59
upfront and personal, so you may not have an interest in this, but people like myself, I don't
1392
2:10:59 --> 2:11:04
have the clinical experience, but I have access to the death certificates.
1393
2:11:04 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ion? So Bobby, it's a really valuable resource to have that,
1394
2:11:10 --> 2:11:17
the death certificates. So as far as I know, you and John Bodwin are the only one who got death
1395
2:11:17 --> 2:11:24
certificates in the world. Is that right? I don't know. He's got several states. I have several
1396
2:11:24 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ates. But you're right. It's just a handful of independent researchers
1397
2:11:32 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction] petitioned in the U.S., have petitioned U.S. states, health departments to obtain death
1398
2:11:39 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction] did, while I was listening to James's excellent presentation,
1399
2:11:48 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction] ran some queries on pancreatitis, for example, for Nevada. And so is that the main
1400
2:11:58 --> 2:12:05
thing that you might, James, be interested in querying on to see if there was an unduly rise
1401
2:12:05 --> 2:12:13
of death due to pancreatitis beginning in 2021? Is that of any, would that be of any interest?
1402
2:12:13 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction]and the context of what you're asking now. That makes sense.
1403
2:12:19 --> 2:12:30
Yeah, pancreatitis would be a good one to look for. I'm not sure the incidence or the mortality
1404
2:12:30 --> 2:12:34
rate has increased or whether it's just, you know, the presentation is different. You know,
1405
2:12:34 --> 2:12:45
the mechanism of, you know, the progression of the disease is different. It might be worth
1406
2:12:45 --> 2:12:50
interrogating that one, actually. It might be worth interrogating that one. I think the problem with
1407
2:12:50 --> 2:13:00
the ICD codes or the certification and so on and so forth is if you've got a medical establishment
1408
2:13:00 --> 2:13:04
that has a huge blind spot for the potential cause, then you're not going to get accurate
1409
2:13:04 --> 2:13:09
death certificates. Absolutely. In the sense that, yes, they might have written pancreatitis down,
1410
2:13:09 --> 2:13:14
death certificate, but they're not going to give you any more than, oh, they were gallstones or
1411
2:13:14 --> 2:13:20
alcohol or idiopathic. They're not going to say pancreatitis secondary to mRNA because they don't
1412
2:13:20 --> 2:13:27
recognise that that's a cause. And we haven't proven it as such. It's just correlations and
1413
2:13:27 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]ing patterns that we're observing. So that's the problem with interrogating that sort
1414
2:13:31 --> 2:13:41
of data is it's generated by a system with its own biases and its own interests and conflicts and so
1415
2:13:41 --> 2:13:49
on. But on the other hand, James, it's a pretty dramatic diagnosis, isn't it? So even if it's,
1416
2:13:49 --> 2:13:53
you say that it's much more aggressive in pancreatitis, the presentation is much more,
1417
2:13:53 --> 2:13:58
so lots of necrosis which never used to be there. Well, that suggests to me that actually,
1418
2:13:58 --> 2:14:04
if he did interrogate the death certificates and yeah, it was a reliable resource, but I think
1419
2:14:04 --> 2:14:10
pancreatitis is much more likely to be reliable because it's a very dramatic diagnosis, isn't it?
1420
2:14:10 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]ors get excited with pancreatitis. It's a very, so I don't know. Anyway, are there any other
1421
2:14:20 --> 2:14:28
things that you think he should look into, Bobby should look into in your experience?
1422
2:14:31 --> 2:14:37
Yeah, I mean, I think, you know, look at certainly look at cancer, look at death rates,
1423
2:14:37 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]ed and see if there's any obvious trends happening.
1424
2:14:43 --> 2:14:48
Yeah, well, that's interesting. Diagnosis to death, I think, as well, because I think what
1425
2:14:48 --> 2:14:52
we're seeing is that patients are dying within weeks, whereas they used to die, you know,
1426
2:14:52 --> 2:14:56
months or years after diagnosis, but because they're presenting with this aggressive stage four
1427
2:14:56 --> 2:15:01
dying very quickly. So there may be interesting trends to develop there.
1428
2:15:03 --> 2:15:09
Yeah, we've got data, as you may know, from the Czech Republic that allows us to quantify
1429
2:15:10 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So I don't know if that would be of any interest
1430
2:15:17 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]e in the Czech Republic died on the same day they took the injection,
1431
2:15:25 --> 2:15:28
would you in your professional opinion, would you attribute
1432
2:15:30 --> 2:15:37
knowing knowing nothing else about the patient's file, would you say, you know, almost all of those
1433
2:15:37 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]ion? And then the same question for day one after the injection
1434
2:15:44 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]ion, day two, day three, and so far out to 31 days, you know, and is that that
1435
2:15:52 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction] to you. But, you know, obviously, the debate rages on and we don't have
1436
2:16:00 --> 2:16:07
the evidence that we need. If we had the patient chart, wouldn't that be the gold standard? I mean,
1437
2:16:07 --> 2:16:12
if we had every patient chart of somebody who died after taking a COVID injection,
1438
2:16:14 --> 2:16:27
we could really narrow down and quantify the level of the level of harm caused by the vaccine.
1439
2:16:28 --> 2:16:35
So that's kind of the endless search here is to we don't have the data that we need. So we try
1440
2:16:36 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]and better what happened.
1441
2:16:45 --> 2:16:54
So, you know, I'll give you one example real quick. So GI bleeds went way up in [privacy contact redaction]ayed high
1442
2:16:54 --> 2:17:02
in 2021. This is this isn't a vaccine thing necessarily, but this is a hospital iatrogenicide
1443
2:17:03 --> 2:17:10
concept. So there's a strong belief that patients who are hospitalized
1444
2:17:12 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction]eroids, which made them die from a GI bleed.
1445
2:17:19 --> 2:17:23
So that's something you can flesh out in death certificates. Perhaps you could comment on that.
1446
2:17:23 --> 2:17:34
Yeah, I think the temporal association is the quickest reason people would discount the vaccine.
1447
2:17:34 --> 2:17:37
So if it wasn't within two weeks, they'll say it's not, it can't be the vaccine.
1448
2:17:38 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction]ion of this mRNA is we don't know enough.
1449
2:17:43 --> 2:17:47
But I think what we are observing is that people seem to be able to get all sorts of pathology
1450
2:17:47 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction]ion. And I suspect that's going to continue. So
1451
2:17:54 --> 2:18:00
I don't think that's a good enough excuse. But the most of the profession will
1452
2:18:02 --> 2:18:07
will not want to consider a correlation if there's no close temporal association with that
1453
2:18:07 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]ion. It's just part of unfortunately, it's a part of a blind spot there.
1454
2:18:13 --> 2:18:17
I would definitely look at ICD-Co's instance of mesenteric ischemia because
1455
2:18:17 --> 2:18:21
as I say, this was quite a rare condition, but it seems to become really common.
1456
2:18:21 --> 2:18:25
So that would be one that you could definitely. Sorry, which ischemia?
1457
2:18:27 --> 2:18:34
Yeah, mesenteric ischemia. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Thanks so much, Bobby.
1458
2:18:37 --> 2:18:41
John Luca. Bobby, if you want to email me and then maybe I can.
1459
2:18:42 --> 2:18:44
Steven, I've really got to go. I'm afraid.
1460
2:18:45 --> 2:18:50
We've only got six minutes left. Okay.
1461
2:18:51 --> 2:18:55
Well, I'd appreciate the meeting finishes at 1030. But unfortunately, I can't be here till
1462
2:18:55 --> 2:19:02
1030. I've got a lot of going on in the background right now. So I'm going to have to go. I'm afraid.
1463
2:19:02 --> 2:19:06
I've got I can do it in one minute. I could do it in one minute.
1464
2:19:06 --> 2:19:18
I'm sorry, James. Right now, you know how to get the chat. All right. I'll put it right there. So
1465
2:19:18 --> 2:19:24
it's real easy. Take those two things and make something count with it. That's all you need.
1466
2:19:25 --> 2:19:26
Okay. Show me you can do that.
1467
2:19:29 --> 2:19:35
Take that book and take that short summary that mostly I've posted in little bits and pieces
1468
2:19:35 --> 2:19:43
because it doesn't fit. Do something with that. Anything. Okay. Anybody but you. Thanks.
1469
2:19:44 --> 2:19:52
So, James, thank you so much for coming on. Yeah, really appreciate it. And I think it's really
1470
2:19:52 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]atform or whatever you want to call it. We've got access to
1471
2:20:01 --> 2:20:07
the very important language English, which goes all around the world. And, you know,
1472
2:20:08 --> 2:20:12
rightly or wrongly, a lot of people, although we have Britain hasn't got the power,
1473
2:20:13 --> 2:20:18
military power that once had, it still retains the influence despite the fact that we've got the
1474
2:20:18 --> 2:20:23
clown, Keir Starmer, as our prime minister and the rest of the government, not that the last
1475
2:20:23 --> 2:20:28
government was any better, but well, actually was slightly better than this law. But anyway,
1476
2:20:28 --> 2:20:36
thank you so much. Thank you everybody for listening. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
