1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:04
Peter, Jonathan, Jonathan, you want to share your screen or
2
0:00:04 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction] conversation?
3
0:00:06 --> 0:00:08
Well, I will share my screen when I get get to the relevant
4
0:00:08 --> 0:00:08
part.
5
0:00:08 --> 0:00:12
All right, I'll make you I'll make you a co host. Yeah.
6
0:00:21 --> 0:00:23
Welcome, Jonathan. Thank you for coming on.
7
0:00:25 --> 0:00:28
All right, everybody. Welcome to medical doctors for COVID
8
0:00:28 --> 0:00:32
ethics international in today's discussion with Dr. Jonathan
9
0:00:32 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ephen Frost and Stephen
10
0:00:36 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction] government over the years and has been a
11
0:00:40 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction] his medical specialties radiology
12
0:00:43 --> 0:00:46
don't come back with this ideas.
13
0:00:47 --> 0:00:50
I'm Charles Coviss, the moderator of this group on
14
0:00:50 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ralasias passion provocateur. I wear red because
15
0:00:55 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]iced law for 20 years
16
0:00:59 --> 0:01:01
before changing career 30 years ago.
17
0:01:03 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction] 12 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to
18
0:01:06 --> 0:01:10
strategize remedies for vaccine damage and damage from bad
19
0:01:10 --> 0:01:15
medical advice. I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company
20
0:01:15 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]e want me to do a presentation on industrial
21
0:01:18 --> 0:01:21
hemp as an enabler of getting off the grid. So we might do
22
0:01:21 --> 0:01:21
that one day.
23
0:01:22 --> 0:01:23
Yeah, sure.
24
0:01:24 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction], Charles for getting up at
25
0:01:27 --> 0:01:29
five o'clock in the morning twice a week.
26
0:01:30 --> 0:01:32
Yes, it's not it's not fun.
27
0:01:32 --> 0:01:36
In your winter as well. Yeah, great. Terrible. I couldn't do
28
0:01:36 --> 0:01:36
that.
29
0:01:38 --> 0:01:41
So we comprise lots of professions like me, including
30
0:01:41 --> 0:01:43
idiots, you get up at five o'clock in the morning,
31
0:01:43 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ors, lawyers, homeopaths, journalists, scientists,
32
0:01:46 --> 0:01:49
filmmakers, professors, peacemakers and troublemakers
33
0:01:50 --> 0:01:51
from all around the world.
34
0:01:52 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction] time here, welcome and feel free to
35
0:01:55 --> 0:01:59
introduce yourself in the chat and where you are from. If you
36
0:01:59 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction] a radio or TV show or
37
0:02:02 --> 0:02:06
you've written a book, put the links into the chat so we can
38
0:02:06 --> 0:02:12
follow you and promote you and find you just by the by Daniel
39
0:02:12 --> 0:02:16
Estreland got a big review somewhere I was watching another
40
0:02:16 --> 0:02:21
video, Daniel Estreland has spoken to us twice before. And I
41
0:02:21 --> 0:02:25
bring to your attention his book on the Tavistock Institute, we
42
0:02:25 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction] remind me to talk about it. The
43
0:02:29 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]itute, I think he gave us a link to his book. It's
44
0:02:33 --> 0:02:34
for it's for free.
45
0:02:36 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction] of us, I think these days we have, I haven't read it.
46
0:02:41 --> 0:02:44
And I, I don't know anybody who, who hasn't done your
47
0:02:44 --> 0:02:48
work, but Daniel Estreland plays everything down. So I think he's
48
0:02:48 --> 0:02:50
sitting on a lot of information.
49
0:02:51 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]and we're in the middle of World War Three,
50
0:02:54 --> 0:02:57
that there are various battle lines in this war. Most of us
51
0:02:57 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]and the development of science and that the science is
52
0:03:00 --> 0:03:04
never settled. Mr. Beding runs for two and a half hours. After
53
0:03:04 --> 0:03:07
which for those with the time Tom Rodman runs a video telegram
54
0:03:07 --> 0:03:12
group, Tom puts the links into the chat if you can join. We will
55
0:03:12 --> 0:03:15
have Jonathan Engler, our guest presenter for as long as Jonathan
56
0:03:15 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] Q&A. Stephen Frost, by long
57
0:03:19 --> 0:03:21
established tradition, asked the first questions. There's no
58
0:03:21 --> 0:03:26
censorship. It's a free speech environment. If you're offended
59
0:03:26 --> 0:03:32
by anything, be offended. We don't care. This meeting that
60
0:03:32 --> 0:03:35
we're not, we reject the offence industry that requires nobody to
61
0:03:35 --> 0:03:40
say anything that may offend another. That is the classic way
62
0:03:40 --> 0:03:44
speech and the attack on free speech in Australia that's now
63
0:03:44 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] as it has been in a number of other countries is, is
64
0:03:48 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction], evil of the highest level. We come with an
65
0:03:52 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ive of love, not fear. Fear is the
66
0:03:56 --> 0:03:59
opposite of love. Fear squashes you. Love, on the other hand,
67
0:03:59 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] a solution or product or links or
68
0:04:02 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]e put the details into the chat,
69
0:04:05 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]oaded onto the Rumble channel.
70
0:04:09 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] presenter, Jonathan Engler. And
71
0:04:13 --> 0:04:15
we thank you, Jonathan, for giving us your time. And thank
72
0:04:15 --> 0:04:18
you, Stephen Frost, again, for creating this group and for
73
0:04:18 --> 0:04:22
organising Jonathan to speak to us today. Jonathan, welcome and
74
0:04:22 --> 0:04:23
over to you.
75
0:04:24 --> 0:04:29
Thanks very much. It's a pleasure to speak to such a large
76
0:04:29 --> 0:04:32
international, internationally diverse group. I've been to one
77
0:04:32 --> 0:04:37
of your meetings several years ago, but had no exposure to it
78
0:04:37 --> 0:04:41
since then. So it's really great to get to know you all. I
79
0:04:41 --> 0:04:45
haven't prepared any specific slides today, because obviously,
80
0:04:45 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]and in for somebody
81
0:04:50 --> 0:04:53
I think who'd let you down. So it's going to be relatively
82
0:04:53 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]art off by just telling you a
83
0:04:57 --> 0:05:04
little bit about myself. Obviously British, I studied
84
0:05:04 --> 0:05:10
medicine originally, in Scotland in Abedin University, I then was
85
0:05:11 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ising medicine for a few years before I got actually
86
0:05:13 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ry. And I've been I was involved in drug
87
0:05:17 --> 0:05:22
development in the big bad world of pharma, which wasn't quite as
88
0:05:22 --> 0:05:30
bad or big, you know, 30 years ago. And I set up a business,
89
0:05:30 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ually an IT business with a colleague, which
90
0:05:33 --> 0:05:36
we grew into quite a large international business, which was
91
0:05:36 --> 0:05:43
involved in clinical trial management. And we then sold that
92
0:05:43 --> 0:05:47
business. And during my period in pharma, I actually had quite
93
0:05:47 --> 0:05:51
a bit of regulatory experience, putting together submissions for
94
0:05:51 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ually presented to regulatory
95
0:05:54 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]andards, and so on.
96
0:05:59 --> 0:06:03
After we sold the business, I actually retrained became a
97
0:06:03 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]er, of all things, that's a lawyer who talks in
98
0:06:08 --> 0:06:11
court, for those who don't know the difference between solicitors
99
0:06:11 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] in the UK. And did that for a few years,
100
0:06:16 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ually went back into into business after a few years. And
101
0:06:22 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] of business, I've been
102
0:06:24 --> 0:06:29
involved in a number of sort of healthcare related ventures. My
103
0:06:29 --> 0:06:33
sort of involvement in what we're going to talk about today
104
0:06:33 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]arted in in May 2020, when I thought this is really,
105
0:06:40 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] what is going on. It was Hancock standing up in
106
0:06:45 --> 0:06:50
the British House of Commons saying, we are going for maximal
107
0:06:50 --> 0:06:53
suppression until we can roll out our vaccines, which I think
108
0:06:53 --> 0:06:58
was either the end of May or beginning of June. And that got
109
0:06:58 --> 0:07:02
me really thinking that's something really, really weird.
110
0:07:02 --> 0:07:06
Up to that point, I have to say I was late compared to some of
111
0:07:06 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]e here, I did not see the scam that was unfolding
112
0:07:10 --> 0:07:15
before us. And, you know, I was one of those people who stayed
113
0:07:15 --> 0:07:19
home like a good person, I even clapped for the NHS once on a
114
0:07:19 --> 0:07:24
Thursday night. And, you know, and that but that was all that
115
0:07:24 --> 0:07:31
all turned in about May slash June 2020. And then I got in
116
0:07:31 --> 0:07:36
involved, we formed the in the UK, we formed heart, which some
117
0:07:36 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] of, I co chair heart with Claire Craig
118
0:07:41 --> 0:07:45
that many of you will will know, Claire and I speak on a daily
119
0:07:45 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] the I know here tonight is is Anna
120
0:07:50 --> 0:07:53
Anna Rainer, who is the I believe was assisting you with
121
0:07:53 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]ination. She's coordinating helps us with our publications.
122
0:07:58 --> 0:08:04
She without her there would be no heart bulletins, or emails go
123
0:08:04 --> 0:08:10
out at all. And so in heart, we we produce regular bulletins.
124
0:08:11 --> 0:08:15
But I'm also on the exec committee of Panda, which also
125
0:08:15 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction] of, which is the South African
126
0:08:19 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ance movement, want a better phrase, based out or
127
0:08:26 --> 0:08:31
which is chaired by Nick Hudson, out of he's based in Cape Town.
128
0:08:33 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]anding of many of the issues that we
129
0:08:42 --> 0:08:48
face at the moment. And I could talk about many of them. I could
130
0:08:48 --> 0:08:53
I can talk I can bore for hours, as I say, but I've decided to
131
0:08:53 --> 0:08:55
sort of focus it in. I was trying to I was trying to work
132
0:08:55 --> 0:09:00
out in short notice. How what how can I put some focus on what
133
0:09:01 --> 0:09:03
on what I want to speak about? And so what I've decided to do
134
0:09:03 --> 0:09:08
was I decided to show you a tweet that I tweeted yesterday,
135
0:09:09 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]ain to you what my thinking was behind it and why I
136
0:09:13 --> 0:09:17
tweeted what I did, because some people will find what I tweeted
137
0:09:17 --> 0:09:21
controversial, they may not agree with it. And Alex, and we
138
0:09:21 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction] a talk about about the merits of what I said. So I'm
139
0:09:23 --> 0:09:29
going to share my screen now. And yeah, so it all started off.
140
0:09:30 --> 0:09:36
We can see that Jonathan good. Let me get rid of the videos.
141
0:09:36 --> 0:09:42
Yeah, it all started off with me watching yesterday. You may know
142
0:09:42 --> 0:09:46
this gentleman's JJ Cooey. Yes, he's absolutely brilliant. Yes.
143
0:09:47 --> 0:09:49
So I watched him and you can see in the middle as Peter McCullough.
144
0:09:50 --> 0:09:54
And this was an hour long interview with Peter, which was
145
0:09:54 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction] from from a week ago. And I watched this this interview. And
146
0:10:00 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]urbed by the content of it. And I'll go on to
147
0:10:07 --> 0:10:11
show you, you might say to me, why was I disturbed by it, I'm
148
0:10:11 --> 0:10:15
going to show you the tweet that I tweeted, having watched this
149
0:10:15 --> 0:10:20
video. And then we can talk further about the meaning of it.
150
0:10:20 --> 0:10:26
So here we are. This is this is the tweet. This interview. I'll
151
0:10:26 --> 0:10:28
read it out to you. This interview is, I'm afraid, an
152
0:10:28 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]e of well meaning, but inadvertently unhelpful noise.
153
0:10:33 --> 0:10:37
Peter McCullough is quite clearly a really lovely guy and a
154
0:10:37 --> 0:10:40
brilliant physician. I certainly want him as my doctor if I was
155
0:10:40 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction] from this interview, however, that he
156
0:10:44 --> 0:10:48
has never entertained the notion that the shocking excess death
157
0:10:48 --> 0:10:53
curves observed in New York City and northern Italy, which were
158
0:10:53 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]iving the scary virus narrative, were entirely or
159
0:10:57 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ed from the direct effects of the
160
0:11:01 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]anding, he acknowledges
161
0:11:05 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ices carried out, he just
162
0:11:08 --> 0:11:12
isn't joining the dots. He is clearly a true believer in the
163
0:11:12 --> 0:11:17
need for pandemic preparedness. From minute 24, he even quotes
164
0:11:17 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]os Gates, Hotez and Fauci, all saying that COVID-19 was a
165
0:11:23 --> 0:11:27
warm up for the next bigger pandemic, which is bound to come
166
0:11:27 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction] While he clearly does not express full enthusiasm for
167
0:11:31 --> 0:11:34
these individuals, he goes on to say that we should take those
168
0:11:34 --> 0:11:39
utterances seriously. And we should formulate an approach
169
0:11:39 --> 0:11:44
with four pillars of pandemic response, with committees to
170
0:11:44 --> 0:11:50
advise on one contagion control, then talks a bit about nasal
171
0:11:50 --> 0:11:55
sprays, two early treatment protocols, three hospital care, I
172
0:11:55 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction], and four vaccination. All
173
0:12:01 --> 0:12:06
the time, this kind of talk reinforces the need for
174
0:12:06 --> 0:12:10
preparedness. And the idea that the only problem was that we
175
0:12:10 --> 0:12:14
didn't do it right last time. So what do we need if we didn't do
176
0:12:14 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction] time? More control, more planning, better
177
0:12:18 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ually need to prevent the next
178
0:12:23 --> 0:12:29
pandemic is decentralization, governments getting the leap out
179
0:12:29 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]aying out. I then followed that up with two
180
0:12:34 --> 0:12:40
follow up tweets. I doubt Peter sees the similarities between the
181
0:12:40 --> 0:12:44
COVID event and what happened a mere decade before. I then refer
182
0:12:45 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ually from Forbes
183
0:12:49 --> 0:12:54
magazine from 2009, which talks about basically the fake swine
184
0:12:54 --> 0:12:58
flu pandemic. And I also then refer to an article that somebody
185
0:12:58 --> 0:13:01
brought to my attention in German, the English language
186
0:13:01 --> 0:13:05
version of Spiegel, a German magazine, which is
187
0:13:05 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction]eria, the swine flu panic of
188
0:13:09 --> 0:13:12
2009. And I've actually never seen this quote before. This is
189
0:13:12 --> 0:13:19
Tom Jefferson, who you will know works with Carl Hennigan, was
190
0:13:19 --> 0:13:21
formerly Cochrane collaboration. I think he's fallen out with
191
0:13:21 --> 0:13:27
Cochrane. But he says here, quote from Tom Jefferson,
192
0:13:27 --> 0:13:30
sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry
193
0:13:30 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] waiting for a pandemic to occur. And so that's really the
194
0:13:37 --> 0:13:40
sort of background to what I wanted to talk about. So
195
0:13:40 --> 0:13:47
basically, I am of the view that we need to challenge extremely
196
0:13:47 --> 0:13:52
vehemently the whole basis that there has been a pandemic. I'm
197
0:13:52 --> 0:13:56
going to talk now about how how I came to that view. But before I
198
0:13:56 --> 0:14:00
do that, I just want to acknowledge the fact that you
199
0:14:00 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]
200
0:14:02 --> 0:14:03
Yes, yes.
201
0:14:05 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] say it's very important what you're saying. So
202
0:14:08 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]e to hear. And for some reason, at least my when
203
0:14:13 --> 0:14:17
I'm listening to your voice is very, very low. I can I can make
204
0:14:17 --> 0:14:17
it out.
205
0:14:17 --> 0:14:22
No, no, no, Stephen. It's fine for me. Totally normal. So my
206
0:14:22 --> 0:14:27
speaker, totally good. Yeah, yeah. Okay. Keep going. Jonathan.
207
0:14:27 --> 0:14:32
Yeah. Check your speakers, Stephen. Yep.
208
0:14:33 --> 0:14:39
I'll have a normal be here. Danny rankers website, can you?
209
0:14:39 --> 0:14:39
Yep.
210
0:14:40 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]ain how I reached these conclusions, I
211
0:14:48 --> 0:14:54
need to acknowledge that Danny ranker basically worked this all
212
0:14:54 --> 0:15:00
out in June 2020. So this is basically, we're going to go
213
0:15:00 --> 0:15:04
through this paper, you can go to it, Danny ranker dot ca. He's
214
0:15:04 --> 0:15:09
got loads of papers there. And basically, in June 2020, he
215
0:15:09 --> 0:15:13
published this paper, all cause mortality during COVID-19, no
216
0:15:13 --> 0:15:17
plague, and a likely signature of mass homicide by government
217
0:15:17 --> 0:15:24
response. Okay, so I'm going to talk to you now about how I came
218
0:15:24 --> 0:15:28
to the conclusion that I came to. And I'm going to through a
219
0:15:28 --> 0:15:32
series of take you through a series of thought processes that
220
0:15:32 --> 0:15:37
I went through. And this is pandas, substack page. And this
221
0:15:37 --> 0:15:44
is, I started working with a rather brilliant guy in Panda,
222
0:15:45 --> 0:15:50
who is a geographer. And he alerted me to a few things. He
223
0:15:50 --> 0:15:54
doesn't wish to be in the forefront of things and wish to
224
0:15:54 --> 0:15:58
be in the limelight. So he's fed me some information, a lot of
225
0:15:58 --> 0:16:01
we've worked on together, and I formulated into a number of
226
0:16:01 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]art off here in where the
227
0:16:07 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]y, in 2020, this is a
228
0:16:14 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]y and the total number of
229
0:16:22 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]y. And what I will say, say to here is that
230
0:16:26 --> 0:16:30
there's two two very, very weird things looking at these
231
0:16:31 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction] one is that all these regions here, the
232
0:16:38 --> 0:16:41
excess deaths kick off basically, similar completely
233
0:16:41 --> 0:16:45
simultaneously. And that is not at all what you'd expect with
234
0:16:45 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction], with something spreading, you'd
235
0:16:49 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction] one region to light up, then the neighboring region to
236
0:16:52 --> 0:16:55
light up, then the neighboring region for that and then to all
237
0:16:55 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]art burning at different times and
238
0:16:58 --> 0:17:02
then then basically fizzle out at different times. But here you
239
0:17:02 --> 0:17:06
have this incredibly narrow sharp peak of deaths, which
240
0:17:06 --> 0:17:10
occurs simultaneously. The other point is that the amount of
241
0:17:10 --> 0:17:14
death that's actually occurring is absolutely huge. So if you go
242
0:17:14 --> 0:17:17
back here, this this goes back obviously to 2017. So you can
243
0:17:17 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]rage kind of winter death here. And I think one of
244
0:17:22 --> 0:17:26
these was probably what they called a bad flu season. And you
245
0:17:26 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] look at the number of deaths there are happening here
246
0:17:29 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]ually what happened in spring 2020.
247
0:17:33 --> 0:17:37
It's completely off the charts. And in fact, if you look
248
0:17:37 --> 0:17:42
specifically at Bergamo, this is just total number of daily
249
0:17:42 --> 0:17:45
deaths in Bergamo, which is obviously the worst, said to be
250
0:17:45 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] hit region. Again, you can see that the variations in
251
0:17:49 --> 0:17:53
the total number of deaths that happen in an average winter are
252
0:17:53 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] minuscule. That they're, they're very, very low.
253
0:17:58 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] this event here in spring 2020, which is
254
0:18:04 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]etely off the charts. And as I point out in the article, so
255
0:18:08 --> 0:18:12
the daily deaths in Bergamo usually bottom out in in the
256
0:18:12 --> 0:18:18
sort of 20s, going to 30 or maybe up to 40 in the winter.
257
0:18:19 --> 0:18:24
But in spring 2020, in the in three weeks after the start of
258
0:18:24 --> 0:18:29
this pandemic, [privacy contact redaction]e died in a week. And this is this is
259
0:18:29 --> 0:18:32
it presented in percentage terms. So you can see there was
260
0:18:32 --> 0:18:39
basically 1000% excess deaths in a number of weeks in spring
261
0:18:39 --> 0:18:49
2020. And of course, in these terms, the flu, bad flu seasons
262
0:18:49 --> 0:18:58
are basically invisible. And what the Panda colleague pointed
263
0:18:58 --> 0:19:02
out was he said that he said the only other time when he has seen
264
0:19:02 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually in France here in
265
0:19:08 --> 0:19:11
2003. And I don't know who remembers it. I remember it was
266
0:19:11 --> 0:19:16
actually in France [privacy contact redaction]
267
0:19:17 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction] that killed 1000s of people. It is
268
0:19:24 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction] killed 1000s of people. And in fact,
269
0:19:27 --> 0:19:34
here, here is the excess deaths for France. And this is 2003
270
0:19:34 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually there is excess death
271
0:19:37 --> 0:19:41
here of around 80%. So that stands out like a sore thumb,
272
0:19:41 --> 0:19:47
but that's only 80%. What happened in Lombardy was 10 times
273
0:19:47 --> 0:19:54
that. Okay, so that was barely doubling 80% excess death. We
274
0:19:54 --> 0:19:58
had basically between eight and 10 times normal death in
275
0:19:58 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]y. Yet this was a national scandal in France.
276
0:20:03 --> 0:20:08
Because what they discovered is that basically, the deaths here
277
0:20:08 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]e dying from neglect. This was
278
0:20:12 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] blocks, who
279
0:20:16 --> 0:20:21
had been left by relatives. There was clear association with
280
0:20:22 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]e who were in the upper floors, people with
281
0:20:24 --> 0:20:27
comorbidities, and people basically died of neglect, they
282
0:20:27 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]roke. And all that was needed to save
283
0:20:31 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]e, many of whom anyway,
284
0:20:34 --> 0:20:37
would be pretty frail, but that's not the point. But many
285
0:20:37 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] needed to be saved were
286
0:20:39 --> 0:20:44
basically regular fans cooling, and just normal social care and
287
0:20:44 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]inking water. And if the
288
0:20:52 --> 0:20:57
reason I point this out is the point that this was basically
289
0:20:57 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] and a change in the normal social care
290
0:21:02 --> 0:21:07
and healthcare apparatus, which keeps elderly people functional
291
0:21:07 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]etely disturbed. And my
292
0:21:14 --> 0:21:19
hypothesis is, well, this is maybe what happened in the UK and
293
0:21:19 --> 0:21:24
many other countries in that terrible period in April, March
294
0:21:24 --> 0:21:30
and April 2020. I then wrote, we then wrote together we wrote
295
0:21:31 --> 0:21:35
another article a few weeks later with the rather prosaic
296
0:21:35 --> 0:21:39
title, with the unprecedented excess death curves in northern
297
0:21:39 --> 0:21:43
Italy caused by the spread of a novel deadly virus. And in this
298
0:21:43 --> 0:21:48
we went into a deeper dive in the in the actual data in northern
299
0:21:48 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]ing, it has a
300
0:21:51 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]ics department in Italy where you can actually download
301
0:21:56 --> 0:22:01
daily death data, all cause daily death data in very, very
302
0:22:01 --> 0:22:05
small region, very, very small towns, cities and villages. And
303
0:22:05 --> 0:22:08
this is quite unusual. I don't think they realize the Italian
304
0:22:08 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ics authority does not realize the power of this data.
305
0:22:12 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction] granular, all cause mortality
306
0:22:16 --> 0:22:22
data that there is anywhere in the world. We've got a raised
307
0:22:22 --> 0:22:24
hand. Peter, do you want to ask a question?
308
0:22:25 --> 0:22:30
Oh, no. So we have a queue, Jonathan, I should have told you
309
0:22:30 --> 0:22:34
that. And, but it doesn't mean to say that people aren't
310
0:22:34 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]uff going on doesn't
311
0:22:39 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]e aren't listening to you. Okay, fine. I
312
0:22:42 --> 0:22:43
can't read the chat.
313
0:22:43 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ions come after your presentation. You can speak for
314
0:22:46 --> 0:22:47
as long as you like.
315
0:22:47 --> 0:22:53
Fine. So in this presentation, I thought we did was we downloaded
316
0:22:53 --> 0:23:02
all the daily death data. And we put it into this in northern
317
0:23:02 --> 0:23:07
Italy. And we represented it in this graphic here. And this graph,
318
0:23:07 --> 0:23:11
the idea of this analysis was to work out whether or not there
319
0:23:11 --> 0:23:18
was any evidence of the spread of a phenomenon. If you have a
320
0:23:18 --> 0:23:22
hypothesis that a virus spread through northern Italy, causing
321
0:23:22 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]s of excess deaths, you should see what is called
322
0:23:26 --> 0:23:29
autocorrelation. And autocorrelation is actually a
323
0:23:29 --> 0:23:35
mathematical measure of the degree of clustering that takes
324
0:23:35 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]aw in this article is if you
325
0:23:40 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction], it looks like a
326
0:23:47 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction], everything's burnt. If I said, did that
327
0:23:51 --> 0:23:58
happen through the imposition of an event where everything burnt
328
0:23:58 --> 0:24:01
at the same time? Or did it happen through the spread of
329
0:24:01 --> 0:24:04
somebody leaving a barbecue lying about and then it spreads
330
0:24:04 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ils and one bit fires up and then the next bit fires up,
331
0:24:08 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ering. And so we thought to
332
0:24:13 --> 0:24:17
do the same analysis with all the data in northern Italy. And
333
0:24:17 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction], if you look here at this data here, this is the
334
0:24:21 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]e dying from all causes in February. And it's the
335
0:24:27 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ed. So based on what has happened over the last
336
0:24:32 --> 0:24:35
few years, and you can see here that the colour, the way we've
337
0:24:35 --> 0:24:38
chosen the colours here, these are the sort of light, bluey,
338
0:24:38 --> 0:24:43
greeny colours are basically within what you, within a small
339
0:24:43 --> 0:24:50
amount of what you'd expect. And if you go on to, I'm just going
340
0:24:50 --> 0:24:55
to go on here, to what happened in March, you see this effect
341
0:24:55 --> 0:24:59
here. And you might see what you might think is some clustering,
342
0:24:59 --> 0:25:03
see some regions here with a high degree of number of deaths
343
0:25:03 --> 0:25:10
with up to three, 400 times, 400% increased deaths. So at first
344
0:25:10 --> 0:25:12
glance, you might think that this is clustering. And if
345
0:25:12 --> 0:25:15
there's clustering, this supports the view that something
346
0:25:15 --> 0:25:22
spread as opposed to something being imposed. But if you what
347
0:25:22 --> 0:25:26
we did here was we created a mathematical model, we actually
348
0:25:26 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]ing to the provincial border, the
349
0:25:33 --> 0:25:38
provincial area in which each small area resided. And when you
350
0:25:38 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction], you basically take away virtually all the
351
0:25:41 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]e. But I'll just explain
352
0:25:46 --> 0:25:51
this again, is that when you analyse, you look at the deaths
353
0:25:51 --> 0:25:55
that occurred in March, in northern Italy, it looks like
354
0:25:55 --> 0:25:58
there's a degree of clustering. But actually, when you account
355
0:25:58 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ers, there is no that cancels out the
356
0:26:03 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ering. What this means is that the number of deaths that
357
0:26:07 --> 0:26:13
occurred in one of these small blobs was related, basically
358
0:26:13 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ed from the provincial area in which that
359
0:26:17 --> 0:26:22
blob resided, and had much less or very, very insignificant
360
0:26:22 --> 0:26:25
amount of relationship to the neighbouring districts around it,
361
0:26:26 --> 0:26:29
which is the opposite of what you would expect if something had
362
0:26:29 --> 0:26:32
been spreading across, across Italy, across northern Italy.
363
0:26:33 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]rongly that it was the
364
0:26:36 --> 0:26:43
imposition of a set of protocols, a policy response,
365
0:26:43 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ually resulted in the deaths. I mean, this is aside
366
0:26:46 --> 0:26:50
from obviously the, you know, the humongous scale of the number
367
0:26:50 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] been reported, which is another point
368
0:26:54 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] that what happened here was highly
369
0:26:58 --> 0:27:03
unusual and nothing to do with the spread of a virus. Okay. And
370
0:27:03 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction], this is, this is, this was May, and you can see what,
371
0:27:07 --> 0:27:09
if you remember, I said at the beginning that if you had a
372
0:27:09 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction] fire, where everything started at a different time,
373
0:27:13 --> 0:27:16
you'd expect everything to burn out at a different time. And in
374
0:27:16 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction], what we see here is that all the fires basically go out
375
0:27:21 --> 0:27:24
at the same time. Well, that's very weird. You'd expect some
376
0:27:24 --> 0:27:27
areas to linger on, you'd expect some areas to have been untouched
377
0:27:27 --> 0:27:32
by the virus until later on and then be touched by, you know, a
378
0:27:32 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ed person in another region, and then to be a little
379
0:27:36 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]er somewhere else. That's not what happens at all in
380
0:27:39 --> 0:27:42
northern Italy. Basically, everywhere lights up at the same
381
0:27:42 --> 0:27:45
time, and everywhere goes out at the same time. And that is, is
382
0:27:45 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction] not at all what you'd expect from the spread of
383
0:27:48 --> 0:27:54
a virus. I'm going to show you now the next article that I
384
0:27:54 --> 0:27:59
wrote, which I wrote here, article here with Martin Neil,
385
0:28:00 --> 0:28:03
Norman Fenton, and Nick Hudson, we co authored this together.
386
0:28:03 --> 0:28:05
I'm not going to go into it in detail, I'm just going to show
387
0:28:05 --> 0:28:12
you New York, because New York followed on from obviously from
388
0:28:12 --> 0:28:16
what happened in there's the Bergamo data again, this is this
389
0:28:16 --> 0:28:21
is New York here, but I'm going to show you another New York,
390
0:28:21 --> 0:28:23
I'm going to show you this New York, because it's much more
391
0:28:23 --> 0:28:29
impressive. So this is, this is basically excess mortality in
392
0:28:29 --> 0:28:36
New York City, going back to 2015. And again, it's exactly
393
0:28:36 --> 0:28:43
the same pattern, which is that your winters barely register.
394
0:28:43 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]e die in the winter, that's a lot
395
0:28:45 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]e. But this here is a humongous number of people. And
396
0:28:50 --> 0:28:56
again, we've got sort of excess death up to 600 700%, completely
397
0:28:56 --> 0:28:59
unnatural. And the thing that you've got to think about when
398
0:28:59 --> 0:29:04
you see a curve like that is what could spread if it was that
399
0:29:04 --> 0:29:10
lethal, and that contagious? First of all, how can there be
400
0:29:10 --> 0:29:15
any evidence of any spread prior to the emergency being declared?
401
0:29:16 --> 0:29:19
And of course, lots of people have now written about the
402
0:29:19 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]ence of this, of the signature of this virus being
403
0:29:22 --> 0:29:28
found for months before this time. And also, why if it was
404
0:29:28 --> 0:29:31
this lethal, this contagious, why wasn't that repeated in other
405
0:29:31 --> 0:29:37
cities? And take another example, basically one on one
406
0:29:37 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]er, I the US side, there were there
407
0:29:41 --> 0:29:44
was very, very significant excess death in spring. On the
408
0:29:44 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]er, which has a lot of traffic over,
409
0:29:47 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction], and it's an airborne virus, there was virtually no
410
0:29:51 --> 0:29:55
there was no excess death at all in spring 2020. How on earth
411
0:29:55 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]etely contradictory. And of
412
0:29:59 --> 0:30:03
course, we also know from Ian, Ian, it is his work, John Ian
413
0:30:03 --> 0:30:07
it is his work, which has looked at serial prevalence, we know
414
0:30:07 --> 0:30:14
that the lethality of whatever it is, is in the same ballpark as
415
0:30:14 --> 0:30:19
seasonal flu. But how can something that is in the same
416
0:30:19 --> 0:30:24
ballpark seasonal flu result in these kind of curves, it just
417
0:30:25 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]ack up. So this is what how the theory sort of came
418
0:30:31 --> 0:30:35
to be to be formed. I'm just going to show you a bit just
419
0:30:35 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction] in if any of you don't subscribe to Bill
420
0:30:39 --> 0:30:42
Rice, Jr. newsletter, that's worth sub stack, it's worth
421
0:30:44 --> 0:30:47
subscribing to and there they talk here, he's got an article
422
0:30:47 --> 0:30:51
here on officials intentionally concealed evidence of early
423
0:30:51 --> 0:30:56
spread because his theory is that US officials knew there was
424
0:30:56 --> 0:31:00
evidence of early spread. And they knew the significance of it
425
0:31:00 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]e knew this had been spreading for
426
0:31:06 --> 0:31:10
months before the emergency was declared, they would ask the
427
0:31:10 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]ion, how come this this virus could spread globally,
428
0:31:15 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]etely unnoticed? And why do all the excess deaths kick off
429
0:31:21 --> 0:31:27
at the time that the emergency is declared? So this is the key
430
0:31:27 --> 0:31:30
point is why do all the excess death curves only kick off when
431
0:31:30 --> 0:31:35
the emergency is declared? And of course, the Occam's razor is
432
0:31:35 --> 0:31:39
that, you know, we look to parsimony in science, we look to
433
0:31:39 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]anation to be the default hypothesis. And the
434
0:31:44 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] be that it was the declaration of the
435
0:31:47 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]ituted at the at that
436
0:31:52 --> 0:31:56
time, which actually resulted in the excess deaths themselves.
437
0:31:57 --> 0:32:00
And that is rank or theory, obviously as well. And just a
438
0:32:00 --> 0:32:04
little bit of sort of back chatter here is that that we
439
0:32:05 --> 0:32:12
having published our article, this article here, this is the
440
0:32:12 --> 0:32:18
myself with Norman and Martin, Neil and Nick, we then had a
441
0:32:19 --> 0:32:27
article from in the Daily Skeptic from Will Jones, a
442
0:32:27 --> 0:32:35
defense of the virus theory. And following that, we actually
443
0:32:35 --> 0:32:42
published a rebuttal to that that will just refuse to publish
444
0:32:42 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]urbed by. And on the same
445
0:32:46 --> 0:32:52
in the same vein, we've actually published an article on flu,
446
0:32:52 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ory. And again, immediately steps in.
447
0:33:00 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]eps in with how do we know flu really did
448
0:33:03 --> 0:33:09
disappear. And we wrote a, a, he refused to publish our
449
0:33:09 --> 0:33:12
rebuttal to that but published an article that we put so we
450
0:33:12 --> 0:33:15
we published our own article, the Daily Skeptic are absolutely
451
0:33:15 --> 0:33:18
sure flu vanished, but they didn't actually look at any of
452
0:33:18 --> 0:33:24
our any of our evidence. And so, so that's kind of sort of, I'm
453
0:33:24 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]op sharing now. I think I've set out, in a sense,
454
0:33:30 --> 0:33:35
I've set out the the thesis. And why I'm going to go back now to
455
0:33:36 --> 0:33:46
the tweet, Peter McCullough tweet. So my point is that the
456
0:33:46 --> 0:33:48
excess death curves in particularly in Northern Italy
457
0:33:48 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]ove this narrative of a scary virus. If
458
0:33:53 --> 0:33:58
they're not true, then really the the whole pandemic narrative
459
0:33:58 --> 0:34:03
sort of falls apart. And it doesn't really matter whether or
460
0:34:03 --> 0:34:09
not it's a leaked virus, whether it lab or it came from a
461
0:34:09 --> 0:34:13
zoonotic origin, it's kind of irrelevant, because it wasn't
462
0:34:13 --> 0:34:16
that dangerous. And I believe that this is what a lot of
463
0:34:16 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]e, some of the people even on our side
464
0:34:21 --> 0:34:25
either either deliberately or inadvertently are gatekeeping
465
0:34:25 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction], which is that it really wasn't that dangerous.
466
0:34:29 --> 0:34:32
And that's the core point that I'm trying to get across. And
467
0:34:32 --> 0:34:35
the reason why this is important to get across is
468
0:34:35 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction] a whole, as you must have spoken about on
469
0:34:40 --> 0:34:46
previous sessions is the whole WHO, the whole pandemic
470
0:34:46 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ry. So far, they they managed to siphon, you
471
0:34:50 --> 0:34:54
know, about three, four trillion out of taxpayers into private
472
0:34:54 --> 0:34:59
corporations, they want to do it again. And their main weapon
473
0:34:59 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]e that we had a
474
0:35:03 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction] escaped this pandemic, we've got another more serious
475
0:35:07 --> 0:35:11
one that could easily hit us. And for that reason, we need to
476
0:35:11 --> 0:35:19
be totally prepared. And well meaning though, he might be the
477
0:35:19 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]e like, like Peter, merely reinforce that
478
0:35:24 --> 0:35:27
narrative. So he basically talked about a pandemic, and
479
0:35:27 --> 0:35:32
he's talked about pandemic preparedness. And, you know, and
480
0:35:32 --> 0:35:38
he's even even that tacitly acknowledged the fact that the
481
0:35:38 --> 0:35:46
next one could be worse. And so, and of course, I saw this is
482
0:35:46 --> 0:35:50
the problem, I think, with a lot of the advocates of early
483
0:35:50 --> 0:35:56
treatment, who say things like, they say, early treatment, if
484
0:35:56 --> 0:35:58
only we had had early treatment, we could have saved
485
0:35:59 --> 0:36:03
millions of lives. I mean, this is really a nonsense, because
486
0:36:04 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]e, the lethality of this virus wasn't
487
0:36:07 --> 0:36:12
so such that it could cause on its own, millions and millions
488
0:36:12 --> 0:36:16
of deaths. Those deaths were caused by dystopia, a series of
489
0:36:16 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]opian treatment policies. So to say that early treatment
490
0:36:20 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] prevented a pandemic is, in my opinion, is the
491
0:36:25 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]ete nonsense and quite a dangerous trap to fall into.
492
0:36:28 --> 0:36:30
Because of course, there wasn't really anything that really
493
0:36:30 --> 0:36:33
needed early treatment, all that all that we needed to do was
494
0:36:33 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]e with respiratory illnesses, as we've
495
0:36:37 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction] And so that's really what led to
496
0:36:43 --> 0:36:48
the trying to call out this whole notion that there was a
497
0:36:48 --> 0:36:52
scary virus, and we need to be better prepared in in in future.
498
0:36:53 --> 0:36:58
And so that's really kind of basically where I wanted to
499
0:36:59 --> 0:37:03
end what I say, I have to take some questions. I'm not talking
500
0:37:03 --> 0:37:08
about I've deliberately stayed completely off talking about
501
0:37:08 --> 0:37:15
vaccination. I've got a lot I could say about that, happy to
502
0:37:15 --> 0:37:18
come back and maybe talk a bit about what we've been doing on
503
0:37:18 --> 0:37:21
vaccination. And the reason is because I'm really particularly
504
0:37:21 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]ed in this spring 2020. That is the genesis of the
505
0:37:27 --> 0:37:30
narrative. And so I would say the phrase I would just say is,
506
0:37:31 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]op searching for the origin of the virus and start
507
0:37:37 --> 0:37:41
searching for the origin of the narrative. That's really where
508
0:37:41 --> 0:37:44
and on that note, I think I'll stop talking for a bit and we
509
0:37:44 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]ions.
510
0:37:46 --> 0:37:50
So Jonathan, what you've said is really important. You've come to
511
0:37:50 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]ablished that in emails
512
0:37:55 --> 0:37:59
today. But I've come at it from a different route from the way
513
0:37:59 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]iced. And I knew, as you said, you know,
514
0:38:03 --> 0:38:09
you're not is published the famous October 2020 paper, which
515
0:38:10 --> 0:38:14
as far as I was concerned was proof that this I knew before,
516
0:38:14 --> 0:38:21
you know, just from feeling that it was proof that this so-called
517
0:38:21 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ess was not not a concern, nevermind deadly.
518
0:38:33 --> 0:38:37
And so in my opinion, what you've outlined is, is a kind of they
519
0:38:37 --> 0:38:41
created a narrative to create fear. They deliberately
520
0:38:42 --> 0:38:45
psychologically tortured populations around the world into
521
0:38:45 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ome. And this is pure evil, as I see
522
0:38:50 --> 0:38:55
it. And as you say, the deaths were due to the measures after
523
0:38:55 --> 0:39:00
the emergency was declared by the WHO of all organisations. We
524
0:39:00 --> 0:39:03
can't trust them. We couldn't trust them in 2009. We still
525
0:39:03 --> 0:39:06
can't trust them. Everybody forgot 2009.
526
0:39:06 --> 0:39:10
Yeah, it's absolutely I would. I mean, I'll circulate the links
527
0:39:10 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]s. And I'm sure Stephen will
528
0:39:15 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] it on. But it is worth reading the Forbes article from
529
0:39:19 --> 0:39:24
2009 because it is absolutely uncanny how similar they were.
530
0:39:24 --> 0:39:28
It seems to me that the the main differences between 2009 and
531
0:39:28 --> 0:39:36
2020 were that they basically they they had there weren't the
532
0:39:36 --> 0:39:41
deaths that occurred in 2009. So they were unable to scare people
533
0:39:41 --> 0:39:45
sufficiently. In 2020, because the degree of dystopia and fear
534
0:39:45 --> 0:39:48
was that much greater, they obviously started to have these
535
0:39:48 --> 0:39:52
huge numbers of excess deaths. And that may be related to I
536
0:39:52 --> 0:39:57
mean, obviously, you can be very conspiratorial about it and say
537
0:39:57 --> 0:40:01
that they fixed the problem in [privacy contact redaction]e die,
538
0:40:01 --> 0:40:05
died, or you could take a more charitable approach and say that
539
0:40:05 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]opia and fear was that much greater
540
0:40:09 --> 0:40:12
because the PCR technology, I mean, one point I haven't heard
541
0:40:12 --> 0:40:15
anybody say, which I think is important is that the PCR
542
0:40:15 --> 0:40:23
technology was has come on hugely since 2009. And so is that
543
0:40:23 --> 0:40:26
much more dangerous when misused. So they were able to
544
0:40:26 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]y, although it still cost a fortune,
545
0:40:31 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]y and much more quickly, which, of
546
0:40:35 --> 0:40:38
course, enabled them to roll out this asymptomatic mass
547
0:40:38 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ing, which has been falls into the category of pure, pure
548
0:40:44 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ing.
549
0:40:47 --> 0:40:52
Yes, I agree. Yeah. And so and I think in 2009 as well, another
550
0:40:52 --> 0:40:56
difference was that they hadn't got control of the doctors, they
551
0:40:56 --> 0:41:00
hadn't realized that Wolfgang Wodarg, who was a not only a
552
0:41:00 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]or in Germany, but he was also a politician. And he
553
0:41:03 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ually heading the Council of Europe's health
554
0:41:10 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ion, as I understand it at the time, and he made sure the
555
0:41:13 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]igated the 2009 swine flu pandemic. And
556
0:41:18 --> 0:41:22
the report is I sent it to you today. The report is there on
557
0:41:22 --> 0:41:22
the internet.
558
0:41:24 --> 0:41:28
Yeah, I mean, there's also you can find clips from, you know,
559
0:41:29 --> 0:41:32
channel four, which is a British television channel, you can find
560
0:41:32 --> 0:41:36
their documentary about it. Basically, you can find that on
561
0:41:36 --> 0:41:40
YouTube, you can, as Stephen said, and I'll circulate this as
562
0:41:40 --> 0:41:44
well, you can find this this European Parliament report,
563
0:41:45 --> 0:41:48
actually European Commission report, I should say, which was
564
0:41:48 --> 0:41:53
chaired by Paul Flynn, the Labour MP, who was actually the
565
0:41:53 --> 0:41:57
Labour MEP, who was the what they call the rapporteur of that
566
0:41:57 --> 0:42:01
committee, and that and was responsible for that report. It
567
0:42:01 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]onishing reading.
568
0:42:04 --> 0:42:07
Yes, exactly. So it looks to me that Wolfgang Wodog
569
0:42:07 --> 0:42:15
single handedly broke the spell, if you like in 2010, and, and
570
0:42:15 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]igation and the and the
571
0:42:19 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]awn. But very interestingly, I
572
0:42:25 --> 0:42:29
didn't know about the report. I knew I remembered the swine flu
573
0:42:29 --> 0:42:32
pandemic experience, I knew it was a fraud. I remember
574
0:42:32 --> 0:42:36
thinking, why on earth we got a respiratory pandemic, you know,
575
0:42:36 --> 0:42:40
respiratory viral pandemic in the middle of summer. And I was
576
0:42:40 --> 0:42:45
working for the military at the time. And, and somebody was
577
0:42:45 --> 0:42:48
telling us to remove blue tack from from the walls one
578
0:42:48 --> 0:42:52
afternoon. And I went I decided, you know, because it was
579
0:42:52 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction] the narrative in the military,
580
0:42:55 --> 0:42:59
because if you did openly, you you maybe marched off the camp
581
0:42:59 --> 0:43:03
later that day, you know, so I just decided to get myself lost
582
0:43:03 --> 0:43:07
in the in the toilets for the afternoon, and nobody found me.
583
0:43:07 --> 0:43:10
Yeah, I mean, another way of thinking about what happened in
584
0:43:10 --> 0:43:14
spring, which is which I do lay out in one of those articles, I
585
0:43:14 --> 0:43:19
said, imagine there was no virus at all. And but imagine for some
586
0:43:19 --> 0:43:25
other reason, a government said, we are going to tell
587
0:43:25 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]ay home, we're going to tell them not to attend
588
0:43:30 --> 0:43:33
hospital for any reason, because those are really dangerous
589
0:43:33 --> 0:43:37
places. And we've got to save resources for the NHS. We're
590
0:43:37 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]op you from exercising, we're going to leave
591
0:43:41 --> 0:43:44
you cooped up, we're going to stop eating normal food, but you
592
0:43:44 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]er takeout, and you can drink as much alcohol as
593
0:43:46 --> 0:43:52
you want. We're going to put the fear of God in you. And we are,
594
0:43:52 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] any form of respiratory symptoms, you're not
595
0:43:55 --> 0:43:58
going to get any antibiotics, because it's almost certainly
596
0:43:58 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] wait till you go blue before you come into
597
0:44:02 --> 0:44:06
hospital. We're going to not let you visit any of your elderly
598
0:44:06 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]e who you know, who normally rely on you for the
599
0:44:08 --> 0:44:12
social outrageous. Yeah, I agree with you. And we're, and we're
600
0:44:12 --> 0:44:16
going to only talk to elderly, frightened, demented patients
601
0:44:16 --> 0:44:19
with masks on one at a time and only for as little time as
602
0:44:19 --> 0:44:23
possible because they are bio weapons. And imagine if you did
603
0:44:23 --> 0:44:28
that, without mentioning a virus, people would be out on
604
0:44:28 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]s saying, this is outrageous, tens of 1000s of
605
0:44:31 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] from these measures. Absolutely. And of
606
0:44:36 --> 0:44:38
course, 10s of 1000s of people did die from those measures.
607
0:44:40 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] of looking at things in in terms of whether we think
608
0:44:45 --> 0:44:49
it's measures or virus is if you think about what the only
609
0:44:49 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ant in what has happened is meant to be the virus. So the
610
0:44:54 --> 0:44:57
virus is meant to spread across the world from Wuhan or
611
0:44:57 --> 0:45:01
wherever. And that's that's the only constant thing. And yet we
612
0:45:01 --> 0:45:05
see these massive differences, even in neighbouring towns,
613
0:45:05 --> 0:45:07
neighbouring cities, neighbouring countries, we see
614
0:45:07 --> 0:45:12
these huge divergences of, of how people of how they performed
615
0:45:12 --> 0:45:17
in the pandemic. Well, I'm sorry, it's if we've got one
616
0:45:17 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]ant there, and we've got incredibly variable, social,
617
0:45:22 --> 0:45:27
cultural, healthcare systems, attitudes, the amount of panic,
618
0:45:27 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]eria, etc. different political systems,
619
0:45:30 --> 0:45:33
those are entirely variable, the amount of healthcare capacity
620
0:45:33 --> 0:45:37
was important. Those are entirely variable things. So if
621
0:45:37 --> 0:45:41
you've got these huge differences in outcomes, to my
622
0:45:41 --> 0:45:44
mind, the starting point is that you've got its differences in
623
0:45:44 --> 0:45:49
the responses, which account for the differences in outcomes, not
624
0:45:49 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]e who who come up with the the
625
0:45:53 --> 0:45:58
virus, the scary virus theory for all you, they are they are
626
0:45:58 --> 0:46:01
contorted, they have to go into contortions of explanations,
627
0:46:01 --> 0:46:05
such as there were susceptibility triggers that hit
628
0:46:05 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]s in different times, there were maybe genetic
629
0:46:08 --> 0:46:11
variations in different populations that make them
630
0:46:11 --> 0:46:14
differently susceptible. Well, I'm sorry, but no evidence of any
631
0:46:14 --> 0:46:17
of these has ever been has ever been presented. No, absolutely.
632
0:46:17 --> 0:46:21
The null hypothesis is that it is differences in the responses
633
0:46:21 --> 0:46:24
between different locations, which resulted in different
634
0:46:24 --> 0:46:26
amounts of excess deaths.
635
0:46:26 --> 0:46:30
Oh, that's a wonderful summary, Jonathan, we'll make a
636
0:46:30 --> 0:46:31
transcript of what you've just said.
637
0:46:34 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction] what I got wrong first.
638
0:46:36 --> 0:46:38
Yes, we'll give you the chance to correct.
639
0:46:39 --> 0:46:41
So take them. Yes, sure.
640
0:46:41 --> 0:46:43
Absolutely. So go ahead, Charles.
641
0:46:44 --> 0:46:45
All right, Jonathan.
642
0:46:46 --> 0:46:49
I'm I've got some hands up on to go to the other one of the
643
0:46:49 --> 0:46:52
issues I do want to talk about is going to be the the
644
0:46:53 --> 0:46:57
observations as a medical as a pharmaceutical export and as a
645
0:46:57 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]em. But I'll talk about that later.
646
0:47:00 --> 0:47:04
Let's go to other questions. And then we'll we'll come back to
647
0:47:04 --> 0:47:08
enforcement of our freedoms, because I liked what you said at
648
0:47:08 --> 0:47:11
the end of your tweet, government get the fuck out of
649
0:47:11 --> 0:47:15
our lives. But we'll talk about that in more particularity.
650
0:47:15 --> 0:47:19
Peter Herger from also a lawyer and many other things from
651
0:47:19 --> 0:47:20
Wales.
652
0:47:22 --> 0:47:25
Yeah, thanks, Charles. I think I fit Jonathan into the
653
0:47:25 --> 0:47:29
troublemaker category as well. A former police officer as a
654
0:47:29 --> 0:47:32
sergeant walked out and discussed the figures game that
655
0:47:32 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction] the public sort of ear as a
656
0:47:36 --> 0:47:39
police service. We are now more a police force.
657
0:47:41 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]e of things I'd like to bring up with you and stop me if
658
0:47:45 --> 0:47:49
I've gone too far. But really interested in your background
659
0:47:49 --> 0:47:52
like mine. I'm an electrical electrical engineer as well before
660
0:47:52 --> 0:47:55
I joined the police and then latterly a lawyer.
661
0:47:56 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]itude tests and was all
662
0:48:00 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ems go but I got involved in a case and I saw how corrupt
663
0:48:05 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]em is and I think that might be a chat for another
664
0:48:08 --> 0:48:12
time. If I told you what I experienced, I think you'd be
665
0:48:12 --> 0:48:17
quite shocked. But tonight, I'd like to take the focus really
666
0:48:17 --> 0:48:21
from the search of origins or I've made some notes here on
667
0:48:21 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ination we hope to arrive at. And that
668
0:48:26 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]em, the judiciary and more
669
0:48:29 --> 0:48:32
with the rule of law. So I've got three points really. First of
670
0:48:32 --> 0:48:35
all, do you feel that the rule of law is dead or at least
671
0:48:35 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ayed played a blinder from
672
0:48:39 --> 0:48:42
Blair in the early 2000s introducing the judicial
673
0:48:42 --> 0:48:46
appointments committee and I've got a high ranking police officer
674
0:48:46 --> 0:48:48
who was involved in that. Next colleague of mine is quite
675
0:48:48 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ing. But weakened our separations of power together
676
0:48:53 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction] or previously robust House of Lords,
677
0:48:57 --> 0:49:02
which has been reduced to a joke at this moment in time. So the
678
0:49:02 --> 0:49:05
checks and balances on government, I'm sure you'll agree
679
0:49:06 --> 0:49:10
have all but disappeared. So I think that's one of the big
680
0:49:10 --> 0:49:13
problems we've got and I feel the rule of law is at very least
681
0:49:13 --> 0:49:18
compromised, if not destroyed. Secondly, as an example of
682
0:49:18 --> 0:49:22
judicial failings, the CQC reported two years ago, the Care
683
0:49:22 --> 0:49:26
Quality Commission in the UK, referring to your point about
684
0:49:27 --> 0:49:31
actions of government, etc. When they brought in the DNR orders,
685
0:49:31 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]ers for the elderly lock them in
686
0:49:34 --> 0:49:39
homes, refuse to send doctors, refuse to send paramedics, and
687
0:49:39 --> 0:49:42
they died. And I do agree with you. And I haven't really made
688
0:49:42 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] And I thank you for
689
0:49:45 --> 0:49:51
that. The spike in deaths at that time before the jobs were
690
0:49:51 --> 0:49:55
rolled out. Now the CQC normally that's the government's own
691
0:49:55 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]ioning rule of law, or
692
0:49:59 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] been acted upon. And I
693
0:50:01 --> 0:50:03
believe in our lifetime, we would have seen something come
694
0:50:03 --> 0:50:08
of it. Nothing has come of that. So I'm worried about that. That
695
0:50:08 --> 0:50:12
was my second point. And maybe it's something that we legally
696
0:50:12 --> 0:50:16
should be pushing the CQC to find out what the hell they are
697
0:50:16 --> 0:50:20
doing, and what their protocol is. And why are they there? If
698
0:50:20 --> 0:50:23
they're not doing anything when we've got the evidence we have,
699
0:50:23 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] from going through the courts, which at
700
0:50:27 --> 0:50:30
this moment, I feel is not an option. So for instance, the
701
0:50:30 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ream media leaking,
702
0:50:34 --> 0:50:39
Matt Hancock's bragging WhatsApp messages, Jonathan, that Bill
703
0:50:39 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]yle for putting his chips in people's
704
0:50:44 --> 0:50:48
arms. Dear God, if that isn't evidence of misconduct in public
705
0:50:48 --> 0:50:52
office, possibly even corporate manslaughter because people
706
0:50:52 --> 0:50:56
died from these jobs, I don't know what is but this week, they
707
0:50:56 --> 0:51:00
rolled him out in the COVID inquiry, bragging at the work
708
0:51:00 --> 0:51:03
he'd done and demanding earlier lockdowns, which caused the very
709
0:51:03 --> 0:51:07
spike you've referred to. So just shows the shit state our
710
0:51:07 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]em is in at the moment. And my fourth point and last point,
711
0:51:11 --> 0:51:14
have you looked into the precautionary principle which
712
0:51:14 --> 0:51:20
enshrines EU law, environmental law, and does not need a
713
0:51:20 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction] correlation between a result,
714
0:51:26 --> 0:51:30
which is possibly deaths, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood
715
0:51:30 --> 0:51:37
clots, etc. And stipulates, I think it's, is it article 77 in
716
0:51:37 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ioning on the Treaty of the EU, that if there is any
717
0:51:40 --> 0:51:45
likelihood of harm to the environment or people, whatever
718
0:51:45 --> 0:51:49
they're doing shall cease. And obviously it hasn't. Nobody I
719
0:51:49 --> 0:51:52
feel and I've spoken to many people in the EU lawyers,
720
0:51:52 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ine Anderson, Ivan Villebois Sincic, they should be
721
0:51:58 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e possibly as a vehicle
722
0:52:02 --> 0:52:05
to try and get governments to task.
723
0:52:06 --> 0:52:11
Right. I didn't, I didn't write those down. So if I miss
724
0:52:11 --> 0:52:13
miss answering one of these, just nudge me. Just dealing with
725
0:52:13 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction], while it's in my
726
0:52:17 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e, we've actually got a good
727
0:52:19 --> 0:52:23
article in heart this going out in the next few days on the
728
0:52:23 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e, which you might find
729
0:52:27 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e on its own is, of
730
0:52:34 --> 0:52:39
course, potentially dangerous, because it can be sort of
731
0:52:39 --> 0:52:45
weaponised and hijacked by some by our enemies in this process,
732
0:52:45 --> 0:52:50
because they will say, well, we're actually we're taking
733
0:52:50 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction] case scenario. And in fact, this
734
0:52:57 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]anning, which is tied into sort of
735
0:53:01 --> 0:53:06
safety ism, as a very dangerous cultural element in our society,
736
0:53:06 --> 0:53:10
is is to some extent, what what led people to to buy into and to
737
0:53:10 --> 0:53:15
agree to all these, these ludicrous measures. So it
738
0:53:15 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]e on its own is, basically, you have to
739
0:53:19 --> 0:53:22
sort of handle with care because it is easily inverted and used
740
0:53:22 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction] But but to answer your question is, is yes, I think
741
0:53:28 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]etely captured
742
0:53:32 --> 0:53:35
basically under political control, not doing its job
743
0:53:35 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction], I didn't add I didn't mention but
744
0:53:40 --> 0:53:47
I am also part of the Perseus group, we've written the report,
745
0:53:48 --> 0:53:54
which we've sent to, you know, all MPs and selected peers about
746
0:53:54 --> 0:54:00
the MHRA's woeful conduct during the conditional approval of
747
0:54:00 --> 0:54:05
these COVID vaccines. So yeah, I know how broken the regulatory
748
0:54:05 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] dealing with a few of your other questions
749
0:54:08 --> 0:54:11
briefly, because I think that's quite a lot of questions. The
750
0:54:11 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] point you talked about rule of law, yes, rule of law
751
0:54:15 --> 0:54:21
seems to be kind of suspended. But the I would also observe
752
0:54:21 --> 0:54:28
that what has happened across the world seems to have happened
753
0:54:28 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] independent of the legal systems. So you've got
754
0:54:33 --> 0:54:37
you know, constitutional, strong constitutional system in the
755
0:54:37 --> 0:54:41
states, you've got sort of codified European style legal
756
0:54:41 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]ems, you've got despotic dictatorships, and I'm not
757
0:54:45 --> 0:54:50
talking about the UK there, but it, you know, it, in some parts
758
0:54:50 --> 0:54:53
of the world, and you've got our, you know, common law system,
759
0:54:53 --> 0:54:58
the parliamentary sovereignty, and so on. And basically, all it
760
0:54:58 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ream media with a fear
761
0:55:01 --> 0:55:05
narrative to get everybody to do whatever they wanted. So we
762
0:55:05 --> 0:55:09
can't, it, law is important, obviously, in the functioning
763
0:55:09 --> 0:55:13
civilised society. But at the moment, looking to different
764
0:55:13 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ems is probably not the answer that the answer to
765
0:55:19 --> 0:55:23
what has happened is to dismantle the propaganda machine.
766
0:55:24 --> 0:55:27
I don't have an answer to how to do that. But I'm just pointing
767
0:55:27 --> 0:55:31
out that the same thing, basically the same playbook played
768
0:55:31 --> 0:55:35
out across the world, irrespective of the prior
769
0:55:37 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction] had for separation of powers and how
770
0:55:41 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]em was, and so on.
771
0:55:45 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ions?
772
0:55:48 --> 0:55:52
I think you've touched upon most of them there, Jonathan, very
773
0:55:52 --> 0:55:57
well. And I think we're of the same mind. And I think we, as
774
0:55:57 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]s, like Charles there, with all his experience,
775
0:56:00 --> 0:56:03
myself, as you know, I was a CPS gatekeeper. So I've seen the
776
0:56:03 --> 0:56:06
police side of it. And I've seen how to put a case together. And
777
0:56:07 --> 0:56:11
latterly, as a lawyer, I've been involved in many cases of
778
0:56:11 --> 0:56:15
differing kinds, we need to look for a way to circumvent the
779
0:56:15 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]ep that you refer to there, that the whole world is in this
780
0:56:19 --> 0:56:22
this they've played a blinder, we've got to put them on the
781
0:56:22 --> 0:56:25
back for what they've done to bring in this total stranglehold
782
0:56:25 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]ems throughout the world, whether it is in an
783
0:56:28 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]itution like ours, one of only three,
784
0:56:31 --> 0:56:34
ironically, there's New Zealand ourselves, and of all people are
785
0:56:34 --> 0:56:38
all countries, Israel, unwritten sort of common law
786
0:56:38 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]itutions. It's amazing that they've managed to have a
787
0:56:42 --> 0:56:46
stranglehold on everything. And you are right, it's fear. And the
788
0:56:46 --> 0:56:50
problem we've got is that MSM is part of their stranglehold. And
789
0:56:50 --> 0:56:54
how the heck when GB News are now being taken to court again,
790
0:56:54 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] supporting cash. It looks like Ofcom are going to go
791
0:56:58 --> 0:57:01
for them as an entity now having got rid of you know, their
792
0:57:02 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]ay presenter who was on our side. So and so so you
793
0:57:07 --> 0:57:10
know, we're having these conversations every week and
794
0:57:10 --> 0:57:13
thoroughly enjoyed yours and it's put a totally new slant on
795
0:57:13 --> 0:57:14
many things for me.
796
0:57:14 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction], I will I will just mention you. I know you talked
797
0:57:17 --> 0:57:24
about Matt Hancock and the lockdown files. Well, I am a bit
798
0:57:24 --> 0:57:27
cynical about the lockdown files. So you know, I see that
799
0:57:27 --> 0:57:32
as very much as a limited a limited hangout. Absolutely.
800
0:57:33 --> 0:57:40
Yeah, it is notable, isn't it that the only mention of the of
801
0:57:40 --> 0:57:46
the vaccines in these files was apparently that comment that was
802
0:57:46 --> 0:57:50
meant to be a subtle dig at the mad anti vaccines, which is about
803
0:57:50 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]e's arms. And that's clear. That's the
804
0:57:53 --> 0:57:59
only mention really, I mean, that it is just ridiculous. So I
805
0:57:59 --> 0:58:03
see the those ads very much as that's a sort of controlled
806
0:58:03 --> 0:58:08
release, and very much is is wanted. What they you know,
807
0:58:08 --> 0:58:11
that they seem quite happy at the moment for people to talk
808
0:58:11 --> 0:58:16
about lockdowns. But they're not happy at all for people to talk
809
0:58:16 --> 0:58:21
about novel pharmaceutical interventions that may have been
810
0:58:21 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]e. So I you know, I see very much it's and
811
0:58:26 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction], that it's I feel the same way about the whole
812
0:58:30 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction] So you've got this whole situation at the
813
0:58:34 --> 0:58:39
moment where suddenly, everybody is apparently able to talk about
814
0:58:39 --> 0:58:42
or even encouraged to talk about the lovely as like they're trying
815
0:58:42 --> 0:58:45
to convince you that suddenly you've discovered something that
816
0:58:45 --> 0:58:48
you've discovered that something you always suspected was true
817
0:58:48 --> 0:58:50
when you've discovered it. You know, you've thought about it
818
0:58:50 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]ream media are
819
0:58:53 --> 0:58:57
confirming it's true. Well, don't be taken for a fool. They
820
0:58:57 --> 0:58:59
haven't lost control of the mainstream media, they've still
821
0:58:59 --> 0:59:03
got it. And if you're reading, reading about lab leak in the
822
0:59:03 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]ream media, that is because the perpetrators of this
823
0:59:06 --> 0:59:10
want you to read about that. And the reason they want you to read
824
0:59:10 --> 0:59:13
about that is because that's plan B, they don't really care
825
0:59:13 --> 0:59:18
whether you are afraid of pandemics, because it came from a
826
0:59:18 --> 0:59:21
lab or it came from a zoonotic origin. They just care that you
827
0:59:21 --> 0:59:22
are afraid.
828
0:59:22 --> 0:59:25
Yeah, I agree totally. And I think they're still playing a
829
0:59:25 --> 0:59:29
blinder, because they're feeding us bits. And as we jump up and
830
0:59:29 --> 0:59:32
down there, they're just rubbing their hands. And it's a lot of
831
0:59:32 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] from the things they're doing, you know,
832
0:59:35 --> 0:59:39
the other day, the Wagner thing 6.2 billion going missing.
833
0:59:39 --> 0:59:42
Jonathan, thank you so much for all you're doing. And thank you
834
0:59:42 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]essing the points. Thank you, Charles.
835
0:59:45 --> 0:59:49
Thank you, Peter. Jonathan, did you the article that you mentioned
836
0:59:49 --> 0:59:53
is coming out in hearts? Could Anna put the title of the
837
0:59:53 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] asked to be able to find
838
0:59:55 --> 0:59:56
it?
839
0:59:57 --> 1:00:00
I don't think we've is Anna still here, but I'm not sure I
840
1:00:00 --> 1:00:03
don't think we've actually published that one yet. Okay,
841
1:00:03 --> 1:00:07
we'll have is Anna actually still here? Not sure she is. Oh,
842
1:00:07 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction] So she's going to put it in.
843
1:00:09 --> 1:00:14
Terrific. Thank you, Jonathan. Thank you, Peter. Albert, welcome
844
1:00:14 --> 1:00:16
the eagle Benavides.
845
1:00:17 --> 1:00:23
Hey, Jonathan, it's pleasure to meet you. My name is Albert
846
1:00:23 --> 1:00:29
Benavides. I created the VAERS aware dashboard. There's
847
1:00:29 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]
848
1:00:31 --> 1:00:35
I saw you speak at that in one of the Panda presentation.
849
1:00:35 --> 1:00:38
Great. Thank you, Jonathan. No need to then I don't need to
850
1:00:38 --> 1:00:43
enter introduce myself any further. God bless you. Keep
851
1:00:43 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ion. Did you? Do you
852
1:00:52 --> 1:00:57
know that? Are you aware that in in VAERS and with vaccines,
853
1:00:58 --> 1:01:02
that they are taking like up to two years to publish death
854
1:01:02 --> 1:01:10
reports? Yeah, broadly. Okay. Because with that, I was I don't
855
1:01:10 --> 1:01:13
know if you're familiar with this new Denmark study with the
856
1:01:15 --> 1:01:20
blue, green, yellow dots. And some people have been a great.
857
1:01:20 --> 1:01:24
It's a great analysis, a great study, but people have been
858
1:01:24 --> 1:01:30
throwing a little bit of shade on it. And myself included only
859
1:01:30 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction] that the only only problem with it
860
1:01:34 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]ually highlights the amount of throttling that
861
1:01:39 --> 1:01:42
the purposeful delay of reports that are going on in VAERS
862
1:01:42 --> 1:01:46
because now in hindsight, when you look at the yellow dots, the
863
1:01:46 --> 1:01:50
place, the placebos, you say, Oh, my gosh, there's, there's
864
1:01:50 --> 1:01:54
actually a lot of adverse events in there now. But they, those
865
1:01:54 --> 1:01:58
reports weren't in there. When in the snapshot that they took
866
1:01:58 --> 1:02:03
when they took a snapshot of VAERS and their analysis at that
867
1:02:03 --> 1:02:10
time. So that's what I was trying to point out. But yeah,
868
1:02:10 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]s to Peter McCullough, who I love the
869
1:02:16 --> 1:02:20
gentleman as well. I asked him the same question here here in
870
1:02:20 --> 1:02:27
this space. If he was familiar with the 65 oral polio death
871
1:02:27 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]op, all in one update, but
872
1:02:32 --> 1:02:38
it was in 2009. When when polio when death when deaths meant
873
1:02:38 --> 1:02:43
something in [privacy contact redaction] it from, you
874
1:02:43 --> 1:02:46
know, when there's 50 deaths, they'll pull a product off the
875
1:02:46 --> 1:02:53
market. Which reminds me is that do you know if that's 50 deaths,
876
1:02:53 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction] on paper, they'll pull it off the market? Is that like
877
1:02:56 --> 1:03:00
per year? Or could that be just as soon as it gets to 50 deaths,
878
1:03:00 --> 1:03:02
no matter how many years?
879
1:03:03 --> 1:03:09
I'm not aware of the the particular rule or policy or
880
1:03:09 --> 1:03:13
procedure that says that it's however many it's meant to be.
881
1:03:13 --> 1:03:18
And of course, in I mean, unless people want to talk a lot about
882
1:03:18 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]anning to to focus in on the
883
1:03:25 --> 1:03:27
on the narrative origin.
884
1:03:27 --> 1:03:29
Okay, another time.
885
1:03:29 --> 1:03:34
I think we're all on the same page here that, you know, that
886
1:03:34 --> 1:03:39
we've had some, basically some very dangerous gunk being
887
1:03:39 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]e times into billions of people. And it's,
888
1:03:42 --> 1:03:47
it's, you know, a terrible, terrible thing that's happened.
889
1:03:47 --> 1:03:51
But we could we could if we go down, talking about those
890
1:03:51 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]s, we could spend many hours talking about those. I
891
1:03:53 --> 1:03:56
don't know if people want to talk about those or what people
892
1:03:56 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]ick to talking about?
893
1:03:58 --> 1:03:59
Yeah, no, another another time.
894
1:03:59 --> 1:04:03
No, I agree with you, Jonathan. It's very important that you
895
1:04:03 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]ly what you've identified. I agree with
896
1:04:07 --> 1:04:07
you.
897
1:04:08 --> 1:04:12
Pleasure to make your Queens Jonathan say hi to Dr. Clare
898
1:04:12 --> 1:04:13
Craig for me.
899
1:04:13 --> 1:04:14
Will do.
900
1:04:15 --> 1:04:15
Thank you.
901
1:04:16 --> 1:04:19
Thank you. Thank you, Albert. And Claire Craig has presented
902
1:04:19 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] and her presentation to us be
903
1:04:23 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]ing to go back, Stephen and maybe get Claire to come and
904
1:04:26 --> 1:04:30
update her presentation to us. Jack from the US of A.
905
1:04:33 --> 1:04:34
Yeah.
906
1:04:36 --> 1:04:39
I wonder Jonathan, if you had considered an alternative
907
1:04:40 --> 1:04:46
hypothesis, which I, I am considered closely. First of all,
908
1:04:47 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]ate of artificially induced
909
1:04:53 --> 1:04:59
terrorism since World War Two. Here in the US anyway, we were
910
1:04:59 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]ed with the image of the mushroom cloud.
911
1:05:03 --> 1:05:07
And and kids were taught to hide under their desks in school and
912
1:05:07 --> 1:05:11
all this kind of nonsense. And then of course, we had the
913
1:05:11 --> 1:05:13
McCarthy hearing. So we're supposed to be terrified of
914
1:05:13 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]s, we're supposed to be looking for communists. And a
915
1:05:18 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] their careers through McCarthy's insanity.
916
1:05:23 --> 1:05:32
Then you move on up to 9-11 to the terrorism that was induced
917
1:05:32 --> 1:05:37
by this false flag operation called 9-11. And then that was
918
1:05:37 --> 1:05:43
immediately followed by what? By the anthrax scare, where several
919
1:05:43 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]e died from anthrax being mailed in letters and two of
920
1:05:48 --> 1:05:56
them were mailed to Senators, Michelle and Leahy, who were the
921
1:05:56 --> 1:06:01
co-chairs of the committee looking at, guess what, the
922
1:06:01 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] So that intimidated them into withdrawing their
923
1:06:06 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] And of course, Francis Boyle,
924
1:06:13 --> 1:06:18
the international attorney who wrote the implementing
925
1:06:18 --> 1:06:21
legislation for the bioweapons treaty in the United States, he
926
1:06:21 --> 1:06:24
immediately said, Hey, wait a second, this anthrax didn't come
927
1:06:24 --> 1:06:29
from Saddam, it didn't come from Bin Laden. And the only place in
928
1:06:29 --> 1:06:32
the world that has that kind of weapons-grade anthrax is Fort
929
1:06:32 --> 1:06:38
Dietrich, Maryland. So he was promptly prohibited from ever
930
1:06:38 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ream television again, and has not
931
1:06:41 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ill. So this has been one terror stimulus
932
1:06:50 --> 1:06:59
after another. And the terror, and fear, fear of death, is the
933
1:06:59 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction] you can basically control a population. You panic
934
1:07:04 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ate of mortal terror, and they'll do any damn
935
1:07:08 --> 1:07:13
thing you say. And the US government has used that
936
1:07:14 --> 1:07:21
throughout my long life to keep the population under a state of
937
1:07:21 --> 1:07:26
terror. So when I looked at your spikes, the spikes in your
938
1:07:26 --> 1:07:32
graph, what they did was, obviously, I think, was to
939
1:07:32 --> 1:07:39
concentrate the deaths, and I suspect it was something,
940
1:07:39 --> 1:07:45
probably, some viruses, not the actual eventual virus, but
941
1:07:45 --> 1:07:47
something else. There's no reason to assume this is all
942
1:07:47 --> 1:07:51
from one source. There's something that happened in both
943
1:07:51 --> 1:07:57
New York, and Milan, or Lombardy, more generally, which
944
1:07:57 --> 1:08:06
are very dense populations that concentrated the deaths in that
945
1:08:06 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction] And of course, it was exacerbated by all the isolation
946
1:08:11 --> 1:08:15
and the non-treatment and so forth. But still, that continued.
947
1:08:15 --> 1:08:19
That continued. But the real deaths were concentrated at that
948
1:08:19 --> 1:08:23
one moment. See, that's the kind of immediate event where you
949
1:08:23 --> 1:08:30
have over-flooded, overcrowded and flooded hospitals, and not
950
1:08:30 --> 1:08:34
enough ambulances and so forth. That's that single event, like
951
1:08:34 --> 1:08:38
9-11. It was sufficient to scare the hell out of everybody.
952
1:08:38 --> 1:08:42
Yeah, and actually, there is some, you could find some
953
1:08:42 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]iovascular mortality following terrorism
954
1:08:46 --> 1:08:51
incidents. They've analyzed, certainly, it has a high rate of
955
1:08:51 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]ion, just from the stress following 9-11, for
956
1:08:56 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]e. And if you think about this going on for weeks and
957
1:09:01 --> 1:09:07
weeks, and on and off for years, actually, I think we have
958
1:09:07 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]s of this on health.
959
1:09:12 --> 1:09:19
Yeah. And we know that the CIA can deposit anything it wants,
960
1:09:20 --> 1:09:24
anywhere it wants, anytime it wants. And one of the things
961
1:09:24 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]ruck me immediately is that this thing first broke out
962
1:09:27 --> 1:09:32
in China, which is our number one economic rival, and then in
963
1:09:32 --> 1:09:39
Iran, our number one target for regime change at that time. And
964
1:09:39 --> 1:09:43
so I looked at Italy, because why Lombardy? Why would it break
965
1:09:43 --> 1:09:48
out in Italy? It turns out at that time, the Italian government
966
1:09:48 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]e who were talking about breaking
967
1:09:52 --> 1:10:00
out of the, leaving the EU and also leaving NATO. And Italy has
968
1:10:00 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] economies in Europe. And if they
969
1:10:04 --> 1:10:08
left the EU, it could probably collapse the EU, which is pretty
970
1:10:08 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] So I was one of the things I was looking at. So
971
1:10:15 --> 1:10:19
I'm a psychologist. And so I wanted to look at that kind of
972
1:10:19 --> 1:10:22
same kind of data that you gathered, I wanted to look at in
973
1:10:22 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ates. And I was looking particularly, we have a
974
1:10:28 --> 1:10:37
fairly, I guess, unusual degree of rebelliousness among at the
975
1:10:37 --> 1:10:42
state level that other developed so called developed countries
976
1:10:43 --> 1:10:46
we've got 52 states, they all have governors. And it turns out
977
1:10:46 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ates that did not comply with our
978
1:10:49 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ates of comparable
979
1:10:55 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]y with the lockdowns. And
980
1:11:02 --> 1:11:06
we had, we had data on the deaths from the New York Times.
981
1:11:07 --> 1:11:11
And we had data on whether or not and when they locked down or
982
1:11:11 --> 1:11:15
didn't. And so I when I looked at that, I could not find any on
983
1:11:15 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] where there were contiguous states, which did and
984
1:11:21 --> 1:11:24
didn't because they all did the ones around New York. But I
985
1:11:24 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]ates half of our country, where there were 13 and
986
1:11:29 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]y and 13 that didn't. And I looked at that.
987
1:11:35 --> 1:11:39
And this is clear in May now when the so called the the the
988
1:11:39 --> 1:11:45
fervid flattened and the 90 day thing had passed. So I found
989
1:11:45 --> 1:11:49
there were there was no difference whatsoever in deaths
990
1:11:50 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]y and the states that did
991
1:11:53 --> 1:11:58
not. And the total death toll for those [privacy contact redaction]rage
992
1:11:58 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction] three deaths per 100,[privacy contact redaction]e. So they had to
993
1:12:05 --> 1:12:10
have that spike to terrorize the population into what they
994
1:12:10 --> 1:12:10
wanted to do.
995
1:12:11 --> 1:12:14
Are you talking there, by the way, about what we might call
996
1:12:14 --> 1:12:16
COVID labeled deaths or all causes?
997
1:12:16 --> 1:12:19
Yes. Well, that's what I'm talking about. Yeah. So I mean,
998
1:12:20 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]ionable.
999
1:12:22 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction] a few of the things you've just
1000
1:12:25 --> 1:12:28
said that I think need that you need to take caution over?
1001
1:12:29 --> 1:12:29
Yeah.
1002
1:12:30 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction] point is that I don't believe that looking at
1003
1:12:37 --> 1:12:42
any official COVID numbers is worth it.
1004
1:12:42 --> 1:12:44
No, I'm more aware of that. Yes.
1005
1:12:44 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]e are on that on the
1006
1:12:46 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]e may not be on the same page here is
1007
1:12:50 --> 1:12:56
that it may be that it is not beyond the possibility that even
1008
1:12:56 --> 1:13:00
the total death numbers are massaged and are not true. They
1009
1:13:00 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]s from dealing with the way that
1010
1:13:03 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ration delay. They could outright
1011
1:13:09 --> 1:13:14
delete data, add data, move data. And the reason I say this is
1012
1:13:14 --> 1:13:17
because, and I'm not giving anything away here, because it's
1013
1:13:17 --> 1:13:19
a work in progress. If you follow on Twitter, you follow
1014
1:13:19 --> 1:13:24
Jessica Hockett on Twitter, who I work with in Panda quite a
1015
1:13:24 --> 1:13:32
lot. She set out a few weeks ago with the objective of actually
1016
1:13:32 --> 1:13:37
finding out where all the bodies went in New York. So she's been
1017
1:13:37 --> 1:13:44
FOIing various funeral homes and whether there were contracts
1018
1:13:44 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ore bodies and everything. And this
1019
1:13:49 --> 1:13:58
is not a final view. But so far, it doesn't add up. So nobody's
1020
1:13:58 --> 1:14:04
saying that nobody died in New York. But the numbers of deaths
1021
1:14:04 --> 1:14:08
that were reported in those spikes, we're talking, you know,
1022
1:14:09 --> 1:14:12
eight to 10 times the normal number of deaths, the amount of
1023
1:14:12 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]ics involved in handling those dead bodies would have
1024
1:14:18 --> 1:14:24
required huge efforts and huge changes, and huge co opting of
1025
1:14:24 --> 1:14:27
resources. And there doesn't seem to be any evidence that that
1026
1:14:27 --> 1:14:33
happened to that extent. And so there is a suspicion that those
1027
1:14:33 --> 1:14:39
spikes that I showed you before are massaged or untrue in some
1028
1:14:39 --> 1:14:42
way. So total even total death numbers may not be that that
1029
1:14:42 --> 1:14:45
reliable. I mean, we know that basically, virtually every
1030
1:14:45 --> 1:14:49
single piece of data point is curated in some way before it is
1031
1:14:49 --> 1:14:52
released to the public for some purpose. So I don't know why we
1032
1:14:52 --> 1:14:55
would necessarily think that all cause mortality would be would
1033
1:14:55 --> 1:14:57
be reliable, necessarily.
1034
1:14:58 --> 1:15:01
There are all kinds of manipulations went on with the
1035
1:15:01 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ions from our national data reporting system
1036
1:15:05 --> 1:15:10
and so forth. Very obvious manipulations for a tendentious
1037
1:15:10 --> 1:15:11
manipulations.
1038
1:15:11 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction] wanted to make was this
1039
1:15:15 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction] that you can compare lockdowns versus no
1040
1:15:23 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ringency index and try and correlate it
1041
1:15:28 --> 1:15:31
to this that the number of deaths and this idea, I would just
1042
1:15:31 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]e that whether you had there was a lockdown or was
1043
1:15:38 --> 1:15:42
not a lockdown is not necessarily relevant. And I'll
1044
1:15:42 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ain why. So it's not lockdowns that kill people. It's
1045
1:15:47 --> 1:15:49
not it wasn't in spring. I'm talking about spring 2020
1046
1:15:49 --> 1:15:51
specifically, I'm not talking about the longer term effects.
1047
1:15:51 --> 1:15:55
I'm talking about spring 2020. It wasn't telling people that
1048
1:15:55 --> 1:16:01
they can't go to the gym or they can't the New York Mets game
1049
1:16:01 --> 1:16:05
is cancelled. That's that's not what killed people. That doesn't
1050
1:16:05 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]e. It's the specific ways in which the vulnerable
1051
1:16:10 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]e, i.e. the elderly and frail were actually treated that
1052
1:16:15 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]e. That's what you need to look down. And these are
1053
1:16:18 --> 1:16:21
not necessarily it is sometimes correlated to the societal
1054
1:16:21 --> 1:16:23
lockdown response, but isn't always. I'll give you an
1055
1:16:23 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]e say things like, oh, well, Sweden, Sweden
1056
1:16:30 --> 1:16:34
had no lockdowns and look at them look at their excess deaths.
1057
1:16:34 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] didn't. And look, they had much lower excess
1058
1:16:38 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]ill into that in detail, you
1059
1:16:40 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]ually in terms of the way it
1060
1:16:45 --> 1:16:50
handled its elderly in care homes was basically very similar
1061
1:16:50 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]opian. And that's what
1062
1:16:55 --> 1:16:58
actually matters because that's what accounted for the deaths.
1063
1:16:58 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction], they were more in more sort of a
1064
1:17:02 --> 1:17:04
Germanic approach where you might say, well, they did they
1065
1:17:04 --> 1:17:08
bought into the lockdown thing, but they had a more enlightened
1066
1:17:09 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction], in Germany, for
1067
1:17:12 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]e, Germany said, well, people say, well, they panicked
1068
1:17:15 --> 1:17:17
and they didn't have excess deaths in 2020. But the fact is
1069
1:17:17 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction] this incredibly decentralized, very well funded,
1070
1:17:21 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]em with huge overcapacity. And so
1071
1:17:25 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]ress on them would not have been
1072
1:17:30 --> 1:17:33
anywhere near anywhere else. And they wouldn't have felt the need
1073
1:17:33 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction] that for example, we did in
1074
1:17:36 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]s in terms of treatment of the
1075
1:17:39 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction] saying that the picture is quite
1076
1:17:42 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]ex.
1077
1:17:44 --> 1:17:49
Yeah, that's why I used and my analysis I used states that were
1078
1:17:49 --> 1:17:55
contiguous, that had very similar demographics. And the
1079
1:17:55 --> 1:17:59
point was that the lockdowns did not help. There was no difference
1080
1:17:59 --> 1:18:00
whatsoever.
1081
1:18:01 --> 1:18:01
Yeah.
1082
1:18:02 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]ates. And with very, very low
1083
1:18:08 --> 1:18:14
rate of death, I mean, two, three people per 100,000, even
1084
1:18:14 --> 1:18:15
even with the phony reporting.
1085
1:18:17 --> 1:18:17
Yeah.
1086
1:18:19 --> 1:18:20
Yeah.
1087
1:18:22 --> 1:18:26
So I think, I think that the point is that they were very
1088
1:18:26 --> 1:18:32
successful at creating an emergency, the appearance of an
1089
1:18:32 --> 1:18:36
emergency, just like the mushroom cloud, just like 911,
1090
1:18:37 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]artling them with these, these
1091
1:18:42 --> 1:18:43
grim
1092
1:18:45 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]acked up and can't get into
1093
1:18:49 --> 1:18:54
the hospital, etc. And I immediately, I immediately as a
1094
1:18:54 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction], a long critic of American foreign policy. I just
1095
1:19:01 --> 1:19:06
saw it as a as a PsyOps right from the beginning. And started
1096
1:19:06 --> 1:19:09
accumulating lots and lots of evidence about that I have a
1097
1:19:09 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ers long just a
1098
1:19:13 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction] two years.
1099
1:19:17 --> 1:19:18
Wow.
1100
1:19:19 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ual documents.
1101
1:19:20 --> 1:19:21
I'm blocking it so early.
1102
1:19:21 --> 1:19:22
Yeah.
1103
1:19:23 --> 1:19:25
Yeah. Thank you. Thank you, Jack.
1104
1:19:26 --> 1:19:29
Jack, do you have a you have a military background? Yeah.
1105
1:19:30 --> 1:19:35
Yeah, I was an army psychologist right out of grad school during
1106
1:19:35 --> 1:19:36
the Vietnam War.
1107
1:19:36 --> 1:19:37
Yeah.
1108
1:19:38 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction] And that's, that's
1109
1:19:42 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction] professional paper from
1110
1:19:48 --> 1:19:51
clients there who were sent for evaluation.
1111
1:19:53 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction] martial.
1112
1:19:55 --> 1:20:00
I learned a lot there in that population about the military
1113
1:20:00 --> 1:20:05
and how it works and, and how it doesn't work. And I mean, that
1114
1:20:05 --> 1:20:09
that whole Vietnam War was another did I may even mention
1115
1:20:09 --> 1:20:14
that I mean, the Gulf of Tonkin never happened. And even if it
1116
1:20:14 --> 1:20:18
had what were what were our warships doing the Gulf of
1117
1:20:18 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction], you know, and had this our involvement
1118
1:20:23 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]arted [privacy contact redaction] Lansdale long
1119
1:20:29 --> 1:20:35
before we ever declared war. I mean, it's I am so used to this
1120
1:20:35 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ete deception, nothing but deception, nonstop deception by
1121
1:20:41 --> 1:20:44
our government throughout my entire life.
1122
1:20:44 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction] to make it clear to the people listening,
1123
1:20:47 --> 1:20:50
you do not hate America quite the opposite. That's why you're
1124
1:20:50 --> 1:20:51
pointing it out.
1125
1:20:53 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]
1126
1:20:54 --> 1:20:58
Wait, what was the verb again? I don't do what I said you do not
1127
1:20:58 --> 1:21:02
dislike America or hate America. You're pointing these things out
1128
1:21:02 --> 1:21:03
because
1129
1:21:04 --> 1:21:08
I hate the government. Yes. And you know, people say, well, why
1130
1:21:08 --> 1:21:12
don't you leave? My rocket ball partner just said that last night
1131
1:21:12 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction], I said, because it's my country, and I'm
1132
1:21:16 --> 1:21:19
responsible. Yes. And who the hell else is going to do it?
1133
1:21:19 --> 1:21:24
There's not very many people that are. And we have been totally
1134
1:21:24 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction] few years, we have been gaslit
1135
1:21:29 --> 1:21:33
ever since World War Two and probably and before that, look
1136
1:21:33 --> 1:21:39
at Smedley Butler's book. General Smedley Butler, we we
1137
1:21:39 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction] of all committed massive ethnic cleansing of our native
1138
1:21:44 --> 1:21:49
population called Indians. And then we expanded overseas with
1139
1:21:49 --> 1:21:53
the Spanish American war and it's gone on and on and on. You
1140
1:21:53 --> 1:21:57
know, we just had Fourth of July this week. And on my radio show,
1141
1:21:57 --> 1:22:03
I said, you know, the US may have been born in 1776 on this
1142
1:22:03 --> 1:22:09
day. But we were born into a family called the British Empire.
1143
1:22:10 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] never, never outgrown that family. We're still
1144
1:22:17 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] basically taken over the role of the global empire. It's
1145
1:22:25 --> 1:22:28
it was said, you know, that the sun never sets on the British
1146
1:22:28 --> 1:22:32
Empire. Well, right now we have the entire planet divided into
1147
1:22:32 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] Northcom and Southcom for the
1148
1:22:37 --> 1:22:42
Americas, we have Eurocom, we have Centcom for Asia, we have
1149
1:22:42 --> 1:22:47
Afrocom, we have Pacificom to try to surround China, try we
1150
1:22:47 --> 1:22:53
have surrounded China with unfriendly countries. We've
1151
1:22:53 --> 1:22:56
basically taken over the British Empire and done it even better
1152
1:22:56 --> 1:23:01
than they did. Or worse than they did. Anyway.
1153
1:23:02 --> 1:23:06
Yes, but what's going on is treason, both in the US and in
1154
1:23:06 --> 1:23:09
the UK, and many other countries.
1155
1:23:09 --> 1:23:14
Yeah, I know. Now they're even wondering whether it was MI6 or
1156
1:23:14 --> 1:23:20
the CIA that blew up the pipeline. And hardly tell them
1157
1:23:20 --> 1:23:28
apart. After all, James Bond was an agent of the Her Majesty's
1158
1:23:28 --> 1:23:29
Foreign Service, right?
1159
1:23:31 --> 1:23:33
Thank you. Thank you, Jack.
1160
1:23:33 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] see the video if you weren't present
1161
1:23:35 --> 1:23:38
at the meeting, because it doesn't sound as though you were
1162
1:23:38 --> 1:23:42
of Hans, what's his name? Hans Jonathan?
1163
1:23:42 --> 1:23:44
Hans Benjamin.
1164
1:23:44 --> 1:23:46
And sorry, yes, Benjamin.
1165
1:23:47 --> 1:23:47
No, I don't think so.
1166
1:23:47 --> 1:23:49
Benjamin Braun worth having a look at.
1167
1:23:49 --> 1:23:51
Well, you must have a look at that, Jack, you'd be absolutely
1168
1:23:51 --> 1:23:52
fascinated by it.
1169
1:23:53 --> 1:23:55
Is that one of your Tuesday meetings?
1170
1:23:55 --> 1:23:56
Yes.
1171
1:23:56 --> 1:23:58
He was on Sunday.
1172
1:23:59 --> 1:24:01
And he was also on Tuesday.
1173
1:24:01 --> 1:24:02
Both are worth watching.
1174
1:24:03 --> 1:24:07
OK, Jack, if you put your link into your radio program, because
1175
1:24:07 --> 1:24:09
I didn't know you had a radio program, so put that in there
1176
1:24:09 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]e can also follow you.
1177
1:24:11 --> 1:24:12
Jonathan, you OK?
1178
1:24:12 --> 1:24:14
We've got plenty of questions coming.
1179
1:24:14 --> 1:24:17
So, you know, we'll keep you a good barrister, you know, with
1180
1:24:17 --> 1:24:18
with a judge, you're the barrister.
1181
1:24:19 --> 1:24:19
Janet.
1182
1:24:22 --> 1:24:22
Thank you.
1183
1:24:23 --> 1:24:28
I've just got a couple of anecdotes and then a couple of questions.
1184
1:24:29 --> 1:24:31
Yeah, March 2020.
1185
1:24:32 --> 1:24:32
Excuse me.
1186
1:24:33 --> 1:24:35
I I thought immediately it was a scam.
1187
1:24:35 --> 1:24:38
I'm a retired GP in the UK.
1188
1:24:38 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]
1189
1:24:40 --> 1:24:42
And I got in touch with
1190
1:24:42 --> 1:24:47
a medical school friend of mine, I've known him ever since we qualified in
1191
1:24:48 --> 1:24:55
79, and he was in charge of looking after an old people's home in East England.
1192
1:24:56 --> 1:24:57
And I said, I think this is a scam.
1193
1:24:57 --> 1:24:59
And he said, well, you could be right.
1194
1:24:59 --> 1:25:04
He said, but normally at this time of the year, we expect four deaths
1195
1:25:04 --> 1:25:05
in the care home.
1196
1:25:05 --> 1:25:11
And he said, this year we've had 20, which is a 400 per cent increase.
1197
1:25:11 --> 1:25:14
And he couldn't explain that.
1198
1:25:14 --> 1:25:18
And he, you know, he's a very caring person who loves old people.
1199
1:25:18 --> 1:25:21
And I can't imagine he was writing up, you know,
1200
1:25:21 --> 1:25:23
prescriptions to kill them.
1201
1:25:23 --> 1:25:26
So something was going on and I don't know what.
1202
1:25:26 --> 1:25:28
And he couldn't explain it either.
1203
1:25:29 --> 1:25:31
My son,
1204
1:25:32 --> 1:25:36
one of his school friends was a hospital doctor in London at the same time.
1205
1:25:36 --> 1:25:40
And he because I was saying, Pete, this is a scam.
1206
1:25:40 --> 1:25:42
He got in touch with his friend.
1207
1:25:42 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]or.
1208
1:25:43 --> 1:25:47
And this this lad said, I've never seen so many deaths.
1209
1:25:48 --> 1:25:51
Obviously, I don't know what was going on in the hospitals,
1210
1:25:51 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]ors were seeing things
1211
1:25:53 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]etely outside their experience and they couldn't explain it.
1212
1:25:59 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] to to brief anecdotes.
1213
1:26:01 --> 1:26:06
I mean, in terms of saying that there was no pandemic,
1214
1:26:06 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]ually there were no excess deaths.
1215
1:26:09 --> 1:26:11
On the other hand,
1216
1:26:11 --> 1:26:15
it seems to be said that there were excess deaths
1217
1:26:15 --> 1:26:18
because of the lockdown and the other measures.
1218
1:26:18 --> 1:26:22
So I guess I'm just wondering, so were there excess deaths
1219
1:26:23 --> 1:26:25
due to lockdown or the measures or?
1220
1:26:26 --> 1:26:31
So if there were excess deaths, then it doesn't that falsify
1221
1:26:31 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]atement that there weren't excess deaths because there was no pandemic.
1222
1:26:35 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] a sort of a slightly confusing thing.
1223
1:26:38 --> 1:26:40
And the other side, the last the last point is,
1224
1:26:40 --> 1:26:44
are you saying that there was a SARS-CoV-2 virus
1225
1:26:44 --> 1:26:47
or were you saying that there wasn't a SARS-CoV-2 virus?
1226
1:26:47 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] other respiratory viruses that were mislabeled
1227
1:26:52 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]
1228
1:26:55 --> 1:26:56
Right.
1229
1:26:57 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] ask you the anecdote when you referred to the care home person?
1230
1:27:04 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]e died?
1231
1:27:07 --> 1:27:10
Yeah, it was it was around March, because as soon as I heard all this nonsense,
1232
1:27:10 --> 1:27:18
because I was awake with I mean, when when the swine flu pandemic started
1233
1:27:18 --> 1:27:24
or whatever it was, I remember going on to one of the doctors net forums
1234
1:27:24 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]e, saying to this is when I was allowed on before I was banned.
1235
1:27:29 --> 1:27:32
I went on there and I said I said to the people that were on there,
1236
1:27:32 --> 1:27:35
I said, are any of you seeing these people?
1237
1:27:36 --> 1:27:38
You know, if you're on call, are you seeing any of these?
1238
1:27:38 --> 1:27:39
And they weren't seeing them.
1239
1:27:39 --> 1:27:41
They weren't seeing anybody with swine flu.
1240
1:27:41 --> 1:27:44
You know, that was my first kind of wake up because it was obvious
1241
1:27:44 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]ually what people were seeing on the ground.
1242
1:27:49 --> 1:27:55
So as soon as this March thing happened, I just thought it's just this is just nonsense.
1243
1:27:55 --> 1:27:59
You know, I mean, the first point I make is that
1244
1:27:59 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]e either died in care homes or presented to hospital very ill,
1245
1:28:03 --> 1:28:06
it doesn't mean to say that that's the tip of that.
1246
1:28:06 --> 1:28:12
That's the end point of the of the terror that happens in the community.
1247
1:28:12 --> 1:28:16
So if you've got all these people who switch light on here, it's a bit dim.
1248
1:28:17 --> 1:28:20
Yeah. If you've got
1249
1:28:20 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]e who are terrorized for a few weeks in the community
1250
1:28:24 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]ors and are not being prescribed,
1251
1:28:27 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]e, broad spectrum antibiotics, if they have incipient chest infection
1252
1:28:31 --> 1:28:34
or something of that nature, then they're going to get they're going to get very ill
1253
1:28:35 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]y and then they're going to present into hospital.
1254
1:28:37 --> 1:28:40
So what presented in hospital doesn't necessarily mean
1255
1:28:40 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction] presented in hospital in that way.
1256
1:28:43 --> 1:28:46
That's just the that they're the people who have been
1257
1:28:46 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]reated by by the measures in society.
1258
1:28:51 --> 1:28:54
So that's the first point I make about about hospital presentations.
1259
1:28:55 --> 1:28:57
In terms of excess excess deaths.
1260
1:28:57 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction] you were
1261
1:29:03 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]es.
1262
1:29:06 --> 1:29:09
And the reason I put the New York and Lombardy,
1263
1:29:09 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]es is because.
1264
1:29:12 --> 1:29:16
Those were used, they were very, very short,
1265
1:29:16 --> 1:29:20
narrow spikes of huge numbers of deaths.
1266
1:29:20 --> 1:29:26
And that was not repeated in the majority of other places, in hardly any other places.
1267
1:29:26 --> 1:29:30
But the point I'm I'm alerting you to is the fact that those were used
1268
1:29:30 --> 1:29:36
and propagated by media, you know, mainstream media to drive a narrative.
1269
1:29:36 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]ually in raw numbers, those numbers of deaths that happened there,
1270
1:29:41 --> 1:29:46
they went into all the scary calculations of case fatality rates and so on.
1271
1:29:46 --> 1:29:49
And of course, if those were largely iatrogenic deaths,
1272
1:29:49 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]imation of of case fatality rates.
1273
1:29:55 --> 1:29:59
And we know that that's the case anyway, because we know that the the infection
1274
1:29:59 --> 1:30:04
fatality rate, even taken at its highest by the IANIDIS paper,
1275
1:30:04 --> 1:30:07
is in the region of seasonal flu.
1276
1:30:07 --> 1:30:10
I showed you what seasonal flu looks like.
1277
1:30:10 --> 1:30:13
If you look at those, you hardly see it happen.
1278
1:30:13 --> 1:30:18
If you look at a graph of total all cause mortality, you have it hardly figures.
1279
1:30:19 --> 1:30:20
And yet we see these spikes.
1280
1:30:20 --> 1:30:24
So the reason I pointed the spikes out was not to say there must be a virus.
1281
1:30:24 --> 1:30:26
They're causing that excess deaths, but to show that something very,
1282
1:30:26 --> 1:30:33
very unnatural happened there overall, of course, in certainly in the the UK
1283
1:30:33 --> 1:30:37
and Sweden, I mean, the levels of excess death that happened in 2020
1284
1:30:37 --> 1:30:41
are different across it, obviously across different countries.
1285
1:30:41 --> 1:30:44
But in the in Sweden
1286
1:30:46 --> 1:30:49
and I think also in the UK, I think definitely in the UK, actually,
1287
1:30:49 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ed all cause mortality in the UK
1288
1:30:56 --> 1:31:00
was, I think, the eighth worst
1289
1:31:00 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction] century, in the 20 years.
1290
1:31:06 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]ive, it was only the eighth worst total.
1291
1:31:12 --> 1:31:16
And Sweden, you'll have seen graphs of Sweden total,
1292
1:31:16 --> 1:31:19
you know, age adjusted all cause mortality in Sweden.
1293
1:31:19 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]e do things like, you know, jumble up the years and say,
1294
1:31:22 --> 1:31:23
which is the pandemic year?
1295
1:31:23 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction] can't tell.
1296
1:31:26 --> 1:31:28
I remember seeing that.
1297
1:31:28 --> 1:31:30
Yes. So 2020.
1298
1:31:30 --> 1:31:33
Yes, in some places, there were huge numbers of deaths
1299
1:31:33 --> 1:31:36
or should I say huge numbers of reported deaths
1300
1:31:37 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction] a narrative.
1301
1:31:41 --> 1:31:44
Then there were
1302
1:31:44 --> 1:31:48
there were a large number of deaths attributed to Covid.
1303
1:31:49 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]ure in terms of the amount of excess mortality
1304
1:31:53 --> 1:31:57
was, of course, not that great because the vast majority of people dying
1305
1:31:58 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ancy
1306
1:32:02 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]e comorbidities and so on.
1307
1:32:04 --> 1:32:08
And that's why the total number of the excess mortality
1308
1:32:08 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ually that great.
1309
1:32:11 --> 1:32:14
So are you therefore saying that the lockdowns and the masks
1310
1:32:14 --> 1:32:18
and the social isolation, so on, didn't cause excess mortality?
1311
1:32:18 --> 1:32:20
Because that's the bit that I'm confused about,
1312
1:32:20 --> 1:32:23
whether it did cause excess mortality or it didn't.
1313
1:32:24 --> 1:32:29
In 2020, the lockdowns did cause
1314
1:32:30 --> 1:32:35
it did cause a small amount of unnecessary unnecessary deaths,
1315
1:32:35 --> 1:32:39
and it probably caused the premature deaths of quite a lot of people.
1316
1:32:39 --> 1:32:45
But within the overall, the amount of excess death in the UK was in 2020
1317
1:32:45 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ually that great.
1318
1:32:48 --> 1:32:51
Right. And was there a new virus?
1319
1:32:51 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction] other things mislabeled?
1320
1:32:54 --> 1:32:56
I mean, do we do we have any any sense on that?
1321
1:32:57 --> 1:33:01
Well, they're really what it boils down to is the fidelity of PCR testing
1322
1:33:03 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]ion.
1323
1:33:04 --> 1:33:06
And I don't myself have a firm handle.
1324
1:33:06 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]n't got to the bottom of of
1325
1:33:10 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]ly how specific and sensitive PCR testing was.
1326
1:33:14 --> 1:33:17
My own view is that
1327
1:33:17 --> 1:33:21
we're dealing with endemic, an endemic coronavirus,
1328
1:33:21 --> 1:33:25
a sort of swarm of endemic coronavirus, which is constantly mutating.
1329
1:33:25 --> 1:33:31
And what we did by the PCR technology is effectively we kind of
1330
1:33:31 --> 1:33:35
it's a bit like a light beam
1331
1:33:35 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]reaming in.
1332
1:33:40 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction], you know, you suddenly reveal dust, which was always there,
1333
1:33:43 --> 1:33:44
but you don't normally see it.
1334
1:33:44 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction] light up
1335
1:33:48 --> 1:33:52
and light up endemic coronaviruses, which are always present,
1336
1:33:52 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]s going in and out of animals, into humans and back again.
1337
1:33:56 --> 1:34:01
And we normally they normally express themselves as either asymptomatically
1338
1:34:01 --> 1:34:03
or very, very mild illness.
1339
1:34:03 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]
1340
1:34:07 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction] of all, we damaged the immune system of the population hugely
1341
1:34:11 --> 1:34:15
in 2020 with the measures and then obviously the pharmaceutical measures
1342
1:34:15 --> 1:34:17
damaged them even further.
1343
1:34:17 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]ively lit up endemic coronaviruses,
1344
1:34:22 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]s evolving.
1345
1:34:26 --> 1:34:31
And that SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction] the name given to
1346
1:34:32 --> 1:34:37
the that virus, which has been mutating constantly.
1347
1:34:37 --> 1:34:39
And it was the name given at that time.
1348
1:34:39 --> 1:34:40
And of course, I should.
1349
1:34:40 --> 1:34:41
It's worth noting that
1350
1:34:41 --> 1:34:44
at it there, you know, there is considerable overlap
1351
1:34:44 --> 1:34:48
between this and other and SARS viruses and
1352
1:34:49 --> 1:34:49
SARS virus.
1353
1:34:49 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]ingly, there was they stopped PCR testing.
1354
1:34:53 --> 1:34:58
They've nobody's done any testing for SARS viruses, no PCR testing at all
1355
1:34:58 --> 1:35:02
since 2010 when they declared that pandemic over.
1356
1:35:02 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]ually that's been circulating and causing
1357
1:35:06 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]ess, being contributory to flu, causing some cold, some flu,
1358
1:35:10 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]ions in elderly and immunocompromised people.
1359
1:35:16 --> 1:35:19
And there was also a rage,
1360
1:35:20 --> 1:35:25
quite a vehement debate in 2020 in the International
1361
1:35:27 --> 1:35:29
Taxonomy Committee, I can't remember its exact name,
1362
1:35:29 --> 1:35:31
but there is a committee that is set up
1363
1:35:32 --> 1:35:35
where they decide to name viruses and
1364
1:35:35 --> 1:35:41
that it it was by no means a slam dunk that this would be called SARS-CoV-2.
1365
1:35:42 --> 1:35:44
There was sufficient similarity that some people said
1366
1:35:44 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] an evolved version of SARS.
1367
1:35:47 --> 1:35:51
And there was clearly there were elements within that committee
1368
1:35:51 --> 1:35:56
that were pushing for this to be called to because they wanted it to be
1369
1:35:56 --> 1:36:01
probably because they wanted it to be regarded as a novel as a novel virus.
1370
1:36:02 --> 1:36:06
So the genome, the genome was investigated,
1371
1:36:07 --> 1:36:10
genome of the virus, as it leaving aside the PCR test,
1372
1:36:10 --> 1:36:14
which we know was was set at too high a level and therefore gave nine.
1373
1:36:14 --> 1:36:17
Yeah, well, there's there's some weird,
1374
1:36:17 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction] things about the genome as well.
1375
1:36:19 --> 1:36:23
I mean, you know, the story is that they took some bronchiola
1376
1:36:23 --> 1:36:27
lavage fluid from a man in Wuhan
1377
1:36:28 --> 1:36:31
in on about December the 20th, I think it was.
1378
1:36:31 --> 1:36:33
Twenty nineteen.
1379
1:36:33 --> 1:36:35
And that's where they sequenced the virus.
1380
1:36:35 --> 1:36:37
Well, I mean, this just doesn't really make any sense.
1381
1:36:37 --> 1:36:39
I mean, if you think about it, because
1382
1:36:39 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction] of all, the man in their 40s, this is not a man who would be ill
1383
1:36:43 --> 1:36:44
from this at all.
1384
1:36:45 --> 1:36:49
And secondly, why choose?
1385
1:36:50 --> 1:36:53
What is it that I mean, is it in somebody, particularly somebody
1386
1:36:53 --> 1:36:57
that age, the illness is kind of indistinguishable from any other respiratory
1387
1:36:58 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]ion and
1388
1:37:01 --> 1:37:04
I'm calling bullshit on this story because I just can't think of a reason
1389
1:37:04 --> 1:37:07
why they should choose one person and take
1390
1:37:08 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]e of bronchiola lavage and then sequence that.
1391
1:37:12 --> 1:37:15
And then, of course, this sequence gets sent around the world.
1392
1:37:15 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]ually died outside China,
1393
1:37:18 --> 1:37:21
they apparently sequenced this in early January.
1394
1:37:22 --> 1:37:26
And it's just it's kind of science fiction type of story.
1395
1:37:26 --> 1:37:30
So I don't really know
1396
1:37:30 --> 1:37:34
the link between the sequence and this particular virus
1397
1:37:34 --> 1:37:36
and the PCR technology.
1398
1:37:36 --> 1:37:39
My sense is the PCR
1399
1:37:40 --> 1:37:44
technology, particularly cranked up to these kind of levels
1400
1:37:44 --> 1:37:48
that it was, is probably picking up all manner of genetic material.
1401
1:37:48 --> 1:37:55
And I'm yet to be convinced that it was picking up a discreet virus at all.
1402
1:37:55 --> 1:37:58
I mean, the other point worth making is that
1403
1:37:58 --> 1:38:03
and I will put the links into the material I circulate after.
1404
1:38:03 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ory?
1405
1:38:05 --> 1:38:07
Because the whole
1406
1:38:08 --> 1:38:12
narrative, one of the planks of the narrative is that flu
1407
1:38:13 --> 1:38:16
sort of disappeared from the face of the earth.
1408
1:38:16 --> 1:38:19
And that is due to this viral competition.
1409
1:38:19 --> 1:38:23
Again, I find this a bit sort of science fiction.
1410
1:38:23 --> 1:38:26
So you've got some some sort of in vitro.
1411
1:38:27 --> 1:38:28
You've got some
1412
1:38:29 --> 1:38:33
studies in individuals, which suggest that maybe the
1413
1:38:33 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ion prevents
1414
1:38:37 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ion at the same time.
1415
1:38:39 --> 1:38:40
It's actually quite weak.
1416
1:38:40 --> 1:38:44
If you if you read the articles that we wrote myself and Martin
1417
1:38:44 --> 1:38:49
Neil, you'll see that we've listed the holes in the story about disappearing flu.
1418
1:38:50 --> 1:38:51
And
1419
1:38:51 --> 1:38:54
even if this viral competition
1420
1:38:55 --> 1:38:58
theory in an individual whereby somebody says,
1421
1:38:58 --> 1:39:01
oh, you know, there's only room for one virus in the nasopharynx
1422
1:39:01 --> 1:39:04
and it takes over and wipes out the other, even if that's true,
1423
1:39:04 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction]ill don't understand how that is meant to extend to whole populations
1424
1:39:09 --> 1:39:11
across the whole world.
1425
1:39:11 --> 1:39:14
All their noses are interlinked so that it wipes out the flu virus
1426
1:39:14 --> 1:39:16
from everybody's nose simultaneously.
1427
1:39:16 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction]etely nonsensical to me.
1428
1:39:19 --> 1:39:23
The other point is that we make in the in the articles.
1429
1:39:23 --> 1:39:27
It's very important is that basically what people don't understand
1430
1:39:27 --> 1:39:32
is the extent to which the flu numbers is a completely
1431
1:39:33 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction]
1432
1:39:35 --> 1:39:41
So every every year they say how many people died from flu or whatever.
1433
1:39:41 --> 1:39:45
It's not that we never test for PCR test people for influenza viruses.
1434
1:39:46 --> 1:39:47
It's just complete guesswork.
1435
1:39:47 --> 1:39:54
And so it we've coined the phrase or actually to give full credit,
1436
1:39:54 --> 1:39:58
it's Jessica Hockett coined the phrase that it's not viral interference,
1437
1:39:58 --> 1:40:00
it's human interference.
1438
1:40:00 --> 1:40:03
So, you know, I find the notion that
1439
1:40:04 --> 1:40:06
the flu disappeared
1440
1:40:08 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]arted diverting all the resources
1441
1:40:14 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ing for SARS-CoV-2.
1442
1:40:16 --> 1:40:20
And flu disappeared, but SARS-CoV-2,
1443
1:40:20 --> 1:40:23
which is minting trillions for certain groups,
1444
1:40:23 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ing as well,
1445
1:40:25 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ed from the biological reality.
1446
1:40:30 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]inary.
1447
1:40:32 --> 1:40:36
Something very, very odd has gone on with the testing, in my opinion.
1448
1:40:36 --> 1:40:39
So and of course, there is a possibility there's co-infection.
1449
1:40:39 --> 1:40:42
I don't there's no seems to be no real argument against the flu.
1450
1:40:42 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]e viruses that are causing that regularly cause respiratory illnesses.
1451
1:40:48 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction] for SARS-CoV-2 and you find that ka-ching,
1452
1:40:51 --> 1:40:53
we've got SARS-CoV-2 positive here,
1453
1:40:53 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ed or even considered co-infection with an influenza virus.
1454
1:40:58 --> 1:40:59
So, yeah.
1455
1:40:59 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]ing is a valid method of testing for infection?
1456
1:41:07 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction] of finding matching genetic materials.
1457
1:41:11 --> 1:41:16
But I don't know whether that to what extent that reflects infection.
1458
1:41:17 --> 1:41:18
I don't really know.
1459
1:41:18 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction], I think we know so little about viral disease,
1460
1:41:24 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction] with humans,
1461
1:41:27 --> 1:41:30
that I don't even know that we know really what an infection means.
1462
1:41:30 --> 1:41:36
So, you know, most people fight off respiratory infections at the mucosal level.
1463
1:41:36 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]ing is,
1464
1:41:39 --> 1:41:40
is probably nonsense.
1465
1:41:40 --> 1:41:41
Absolutely, Jonathan.
1466
1:41:42 --> 1:41:43
Yeah, it was on the wrong side.
1467
1:41:44 --> 1:41:49
I wrote a rapid response to the British Medical Journal about the PCR testing
1468
1:41:49 --> 1:41:55
because I'd actually had a look at the manufacturer's instructions on the packets.
1469
1:41:55 --> 1:42:01
And they said it wasn't specific for a particular virus for SARS-CoV-2.
1470
1:42:02 --> 1:42:04
And it couldn't tell whether anyone was infected or not.
1471
1:42:04 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]ete, as far as I was aware, the ones that were infected were all infected.
1472
1:42:08 --> 1:42:11
As far as I was aware, the ones that I'd seen were all completely useless.
1473
1:42:12 --> 1:42:17
Yeah, I mean, it's probably true to say that there was,
1474
1:42:18 --> 1:42:25
there was some link between positivity and symptoms.
1475
1:42:25 --> 1:42:28
You know, just talking to people around you,
1476
1:42:28 --> 1:42:33
when they got what I would call, you know, regular seasonal illnesses,
1477
1:42:33 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction] positive, but I'm actually more thinking about it.
1478
1:42:38 --> 1:42:42
I'm more talking about the, you know, the home tests, the lateral flow tests, the antigen tests.
1479
1:42:43 --> 1:42:49
So certainly it is measuring something, whether or not it is clinically useful, relevant,
1480
1:42:49 --> 1:42:53
and how sensitive, how specific it is for whatever virus,
1481
1:42:53 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction]aw these overarching global conclusions that they wish to draw from this data is a totally different question.
1482
1:43:00 --> 1:43:06
Well, Jonathan, the inventor of the PCR technique, Kerry Mullis, was absolutely clear.
1483
1:43:06 --> 1:43:11
And he absolutely hated Fauci and challenged him to meet him.
1484
1:43:11 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction], sorry, it wasn't the test he invented.
1485
1:43:15 --> 1:43:18
He invented the technique. He won the Nobel Prize for it.
1486
1:43:18 --> 1:43:23
It was a brilliant advance. And he got the Nobel Prize 10 years later.
1487
1:43:23 --> 1:43:29
I think it came into being 1983 and he got the Nobel Prize in 1993.
1488
1:43:29 --> 1:43:42
But the point is that he said that my these the PCR technique should never be used as a diagnostic tool for viral illnesses.
1489
1:43:42 --> 1:43:50
So he was on to Fauci. He said about Fauci, Fauci knows nothing, doesn't know anything about anything.
1490
1:43:50 --> 1:43:52
And I would say that to his face.
1491
1:43:52 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction]erious pneumonia.
1492
1:43:58 --> 1:44:16
Yeah. So one of the other points that we make in the articles about the iatrogenic harm that I wrote with Martin and Norman and Nick Hudson is that never before have we used technology like this,
1493
1:44:16 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction] of all, you know, not really understood, well understood what it means, particularly when we're sort of cranking it up to these these levels, cycle threshold levels.
1494
1:44:26 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction] using a readout from a technology like that to actually guide individual treatment.
1495
1:44:36 --> 1:44:47
It's it's it's basically it's just completely giving up the role of the doctor and completely severing the doctor patient relationship.
1496
1:44:47 --> 1:44:53
Absolutely, Jonathan. That's that's consistent with their wish to impose artificial intelligence on population.
1497
1:44:54 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]ors.
1498
1:44:56 --> 1:45:14
The point the point the point I'm going to make is that we must consider the possibility that as some of the respiratory deaths occurred actually occurred through bacterial pneumonia.
1499
1:45:15 --> 1:45:33
So we know that we know from even Fouchy wrote an article about the 1918 outbreak in which he said that or whether they dug up a load of bodies and did autopsies on them.
1500
1:45:33 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]e who had died who had been who had been buried in very, very cold places like in northern Canada, but a well preserved tissue.
1501
1:45:40 --> 1:46:05
And they basically found that virtually all the deaths were due to secondary bacterial pneumonia and Fouchy wrote a paper which basically said that this is an important finding and means that antibiotic storage provision is the word should be a part of any future pandemic planning.
1502
1:46:05 --> 1:46:22
Now, the interesting thing about what happened in the last three years was if you had a positive test, you of course then went down a pathway where you basically depending on your doctor, but if the doctor was basically bought into the whole thing, it stay at home till you go blue.
1503
1:46:22 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction] been you've either got some incipient bacterial infection, or this will act to prevent secondary bacterial infection give you broad spectrum antibiotics.
1504
1:46:35 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]rum antibiotic prescription halved in the places where I've seen data, which is UK and US.
1505
1:46:42 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]rum antibiotic prescription.
1506
1:46:47 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction] that in the UK certainly towards the end of [privacy contact redaction]arted becoming obsessed with face masks.
1507
1:46:57 --> 1:47:20
Now there's a study as a Japanese study in about 120 volunteers, where they took the cloth face masks from volunteers, and they grew potentially pathogenic bacterial colonies in something like 95% of cases and actually potentially pathogenic fungal
1508
1:47:20 --> 1:47:32
colonies in in virtually in 99% or it might even be in 100% nearly all the all of the face masks from this hundred and [privacy contact redaction]es from.
1509
1:47:32 --> 1:47:51
So it's sort of occurred to me potentially that, of course, by the way, these, but these organisms were all commensal organisms and we know that virtually all bacterial pneumonia are originate from the, from the mouth or nose, and they are bacteria that normally we live in
1510
1:47:51 --> 1:48:11
with, which have become pathogenic for some reason. So the situation in particularly it towards the end of 2020, particularly when masks started to be used where you've got people breathing in this through this damp mask with all these colonies potentially coming from their, you know, their own commensal organisms.
1511
1:48:11 --> 1:48:40
And then of course you've got weakened immune systems for all the reasons we've given to do with psychological factors etc etc not going out vitamin D deficiency and so on and so forth. And then of course you've got the fact that if they test positive, which of course they might well do incidentally or the cycle thresholds, or it could be just a, it could genuinely be this coronavirus lighting up positive, they would not be given antibiotics, because it's assumed to be a viral illness.
1512
1:48:40 --> 1:48:55
And so, you know, we don't die. The classical pathologies that that viral disease, you know, respiratory viral infections are not what kill people, it is secondary bacterial infection that kills people.
1513
1:48:55 --> 1:49:19
So, I think we must face the possibility that in, you know, particularly past the acute phase, particularly into what we might call a second or third waves of whatever we're talking about, is that bacterial pneumonia kill improperly treated or not treated at all responsible for a large number of deaths.
1514
1:49:20 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ingly, Jonathan, as I remember it, not only did flu disappear, but bacterial pneumonia disappeared too. That was the official story.
1515
1:49:30 --> 1:49:37
And, sorry, how could, how could bacterial pneumonia actually disappear. I didn't know about that.
1516
1:49:37 --> 1:49:44
It couldn't. How could they only by only by relabeling them as COVID.
1517
1:49:44 --> 1:50:05
So, the withholding of antibiotics was consistent with the previous war on antibiotics, you know, telling doctors to be over cautious in my opinion I always felt that in giving antibiotics to someone who is frail with a viral illness which could easily turn into a bacterial pneumonia.
1518
1:50:05 --> 1:50:25
So, I used to give prophylactic antibiotics broad spectrum as you said, that was reasonable as a medical doctor, and it's not reasonable for doctors to stop doing things that they think are reasonable, just because the authorities say that they shouldn't when they are the authorities.
1519
1:50:25 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction], I have heard it, you know, hypothesized that, you know, the whole super bug story is, is another piece of propaganda.
1520
1:50:40 --> 1:50:41
Yeah.
1521
1:50:41 --> 1:50:42
Yeah.
1522
1:50:42 --> 1:50:51
Because if you are, you're then basically inventing the need for expensive new antibiotics all the time.
1523
1:50:51 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction]ing.
1524
1:50:54 --> 1:50:58
Let's keep going. Stephen because we're Janet we done with you.
1525
1:50:58 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]ions, Janet. They're brilliant questions, Janet.
1526
1:51:02 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] Janet I mean are we done with you.
1527
1:51:07 --> 1:51:10
Thanks.
1528
1:51:10 --> 1:51:19
Jeremy from Canada now Jonathan.
1529
1:51:19 --> 1:51:23
You muted Jeremy.
1530
1:51:23 --> 1:51:37
Sorry about that. Thank you again Charles and thank you Jonathan for your great presentation and your analysis of what actually took place in 2020, and things related to that.
1531
1:51:37 --> 1:51:39
Let me say off the top.
1532
1:51:39 --> 1:51:47
I fully agree with your description or tweet about Peter McCullough.
1533
1:51:47 --> 1:51:53
It's unfortunate that he always seems to have been three months behind.
1534
1:51:53 --> 1:52:13
Not that I'm qualified to assess that but after three years, he still is reluctant to take a stand against vaccines in general and particularly childhood vaccines, which I don't think is going to stand them in good stead for much longer.
1535
1:52:13 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction], which I think came on the scene in 1983, and it took him 10 years to achieve the Nobel Prize in [privacy contact redaction]ry.
1536
1:52:30 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]om and Ceptra. I believe when I, now in the interest of full disclosure I should tell you that my career was as a pharmaceutical sales representative for 34 years.
1537
1:52:44 --> 1:52:49
So in this group of luminaries I'm kind of like a paperweight or a doorstop.
1538
1:52:49 --> 1:53:12
And so I'm not sure why they put up with me but I do believe that when I started in 1984, Backdrom and Ceptra, trimethyprim, sulfamethoxazole, were genericized already, and had the potential to cause Stevens-Johnson syndrome, blood disorder, and kill a few people here and there.
1539
1:53:12 --> 1:53:19
But I guess the risk-benefit ratio was acceptable.
1540
1:53:19 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction]ick my oar in here was to give an anecdote which addresses the question as to how many people need to die before you pull something off the market.
1541
1:53:35 --> 1:53:41
So here's my experience. I spent my last [privacy contact redaction]e sclerosis.
1542
1:53:41 --> 1:53:54
So that sort of began for me in 2021. By 2009 we had a competitor come on the market. It was a product of Biogen called Tesabri.
1543
1:53:54 --> 1:54:01
I think on this zoom I can name names. Nataluzumab, which is a monoclonal antibody.
1544
1:54:01 --> 1:54:24
Unfortunately, it had the potential to awaken the J.C. virus, the John Cunningham virus, which could lead to what we could call turbo MS, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, which is an accelerated form of brain wasting or multiple sclerosis itself.
1545
1:54:24 --> 1:54:39
Now what happened was within about, as I recall, within about three months, this was interesting because it wasn't people who were getting Nataluzumab after the approval.
1546
1:54:39 --> 1:54:55
It was going back to the trials where it became evident that three people had, well, at least two had died and one had survived PML or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, but was a vegetable.
1547
1:54:55 --> 1:55:06
So at that point, when they became aware that there were at least two deaths likely attributed to the drug, it was pulled from the market.
1548
1:55:06 --> 1:55:17
So that was two. That's probably the low end of when you pull things. But that was about three months after the marketing and the release into the market.
1549
1:55:17 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]e evidently had died and one was reduced to a vegetable.
1550
1:55:23 --> 1:55:33
So it became a numbers game after that. Like how many people would you would be acceptable to get PML?
1551
1:55:33 --> 1:55:41
Now, to be fair, they were only going to use this product in people who have very accelerated MS.
1552
1:55:41 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]ing therapies wouldn't likely do much for them, including the one that I had.
1553
1:55:49 --> 1:56:04
So eventually it did come back on the market and there was kind of an acceptable level of people who might succumb to PML in the neighborhood of about one in 500 to one in a thousand.
1554
1:56:04 --> 1:56:13
So it really depends on the situation. And I believe in this case, it only took two before they pulled it.
1555
1:56:13 --> 1:56:31
But I think my experience over all those years within the first year, if you saw 20 to 25 deaths, which could possibly be associated with drug, it got pulled in usually forever at that point.
1556
1:56:31 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]ing.
1557
1:56:33 --> 1:56:40
Thanks. Thanks, Jeremy. Yeah, I think we're way past the point.
1558
1:56:40 --> 1:56:50
It's quite obvious that the regulators are completely captured and acting under orders of their governments, not independently.
1559
1:56:50 --> 1:57:00
Well, it's interesting that this happened in 2009 when the when the previous horny virus problem arose.
1560
1:57:00 --> 1:57:02
Yeah.
1561
1:57:02 --> 1:57:13
Thank you. Thank you, Jeremy. All right. I'm next. My hand was up. We'll go Sandra first and then me.
1562
1:57:13 --> 1:57:18
Hi, everybody. I want to thank you for that fabulous presentation.
1563
1:57:18 --> 1:57:[privacy contact redaction]s learn a lot on these I'm really appreciative.
1564
1:57:22 --> 1:57:[privacy contact redaction]urbs me that I hear I heard in this presentation, as well as in other ones, is that this was just a regular seasonal flu.
1565
1:57:34 --> 1:57:42
As a physician who's been in practice for over 30 years. This was not a normal seasonal flu.
1566
1:57:42 --> 1:57:58
How do you I'm so my question is this from what my observations were with my patients, the strokes that were induced the clotting issues the amputations, their neurological damage and the
1567
1:57:58 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]ion that were associated with the seasonal flu. If that's what people are calling it.
1568
1:58:05 --> 1:58:14
I think that was part of it but I do think there was something else that was released, leashed, whatever you want to call it under the public.
1569
1:58:14 --> 1:58:21
And so I'd like to know, Jonathan, what you think about that. Thank you.
1570
1:58:21 --> 1:58:48
So, the, I mean the first point to make is, we're dealing with, we're dealing with a population that has been, you know, treated tremendously differently to the host population has been abused effectively psychologically and physically for weeks and months.
1571
1:58:48 --> 1:58:57
Before the, you know, which change changes the situation completely in terms of what presents to the doctors.
1572
1:58:57 --> 1:59:08
The other point I'll make is that there is a history, what in swine flu and both swine flu and avian flu.
1573
1:59:08 --> 1:59:18
They were absolutely convinced during those episodes that they were dealing with a completely different virus.
1574
1:59:18 --> 1:59:38
And only to find that the, all the papers that said that it was completely different over the ensuing years were retracted or clarified. And in the end it settled down to, oh, it was a respiratory virus, like the other respiratory viruses.
1575
1:59:38 --> 1:59:51
And much of the data in relation to the clotting abnormalities, etc. has come from, has come from the illest patients of all in ICU.
1576
1:59:51 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction], for the vast majority of people, either asymptomatic or very, very mild, effectively like any other respiratory illness.
1577
2:00:02 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]e in Africa outside of South Africa and Zimbabwe, they really have no idea what you're talking about.
1578
2:00:11 --> 2:00:17
So they basically, they call it, the whole thing they call white man's disease.
1579
2:00:17 --> 2:00:29
Or they say, we don't have that because we can't afford all those PCR tests, so we didn't have that pandemic.
1580
2:00:29 --> 2:00:39
So it's kind of confusing me how, if it's something so distinct and novel, how it can not affect certain regions of the world, but affect other regions of the world.
1581
2:00:40 --> 2:00:47
And to my mind, it must be something to do with the regions of the world, how they treated people.
1582
2:00:47 --> 2:00:54
Well, I mean, I've been treating patients, like I said, for over 30 years, and these were my patients. These are my personal experiences.
1583
2:00:54 --> 2:00:59
They were not given horrible treatments. Most of my patients did really, really well.
1584
2:00:59 --> 2:01:03
But we did, you know, I did see some of these very unusual symptoms.
1585
2:01:03 --> 2:01:05
And they're not.
1586
2:01:05 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]a, they were all terrified. All the patients were terrified when they came to see you.
1587
2:01:11 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] to deal with a little bit with novelty as well.
1588
2:01:16 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]e ascribe, people are making a jump.
1589
2:01:21 --> 2:01:44
Okay, so under what I think is happening is that we basically we've we have had a is that the coronaviruses, which have always caused illnesses, they have always caused respiratory disease and some and have killed substantial numbers of people, usually elderly and frail people in the past.
1590
2:01:44 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]e, AC 43, which is common cold virus for most, there are you can read outbreaks of AC 43 in which, you know, quarter the residents of nursing homes have died just because of their frailty.
1591
2:01:55 --> 2:01:59
So coronaviruses kind of come and go in cycles and waves.
1592
2:01:59 --> 2:02:14
And I don't necessarily think that just because the symptoms of something are particularly novel, it means that we have been under some sort of bioterrorism attack.
1593
2:02:14 --> 2:02:16
I'll explain what I mean.
1594
2:02:16 --> 2:02:26
What I mean is, people are making this this jump between unusual symptoms, and therefore there must be something completely novel on the block.
1595
2:02:26 --> 2:02:30
Well, I mean, if you think about it in, in the past.
1596
2:02:30 --> 2:02:46
So, you know, five years ago, you would speak to people, they would say, I had this really weird bug laid me low, it gave me this symptom or whatever and said the symptoms of different viruses they think they do.
1597
2:02:46 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]e in different ways and they come in cycles. So I don't necessarily think that just because there was something appeared to be different it necessarily means that it is that unusual within the grand scheme of the
1598
2:03:03 --> 2:03:18
And there's a huge amount of observation and confirmation bias in what whether we consider think novel things to be that novel depending on the time frame you look at.
1599
2:03:18 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]e, at the moment we've got, you know, having these reports from all over the world of the most extreme weather people have ever experienced, but we all sit here knowing that that's all around the world at any one time, you could find hundreds of people who are
1600
2:03:34 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] extreme weather they have ever experienced. If you, if you take those people and amplify their voices and say, this is really really unusual, you will think that the whole climate is just collapsing around us but we are more enlightened and
1601
2:03:50 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]ory of observation and confirmation bias. So those are kind of my responses to what you said is that, yes, there may have been something novel and unusual but the actual data in terms of infection fatality rates does not suggest it was particularly
1602
2:04:11 --> 2:04:13
harmful.
1603
2:04:13 --> 2:04:22
Okay, I think there were probably multiple types of things going on and it all got lumped together. But anyways, that's my experience I appreciate you responding.
1604
2:04:22 --> 2:04:31
I mean I don't rule out by the way I don't rely I know that JJ Coons theory is that there was some sort of some
1605
2:04:31 --> 2:04:34
releases of something. I don't know it seems.
1606
2:04:34 --> 2:04:47
I don't think that the story requires that necessarily so it doesn't meet the requirements of parsimony in terms of explaining I think it can all be explained by, by testing dystopia.
1607
2:04:47 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]ains some of what we've observed.
1608
2:04:52 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction] that properly treated as we have always treated the respiratory viral infections that this was particularly dangerous.
1609
2:05:06 --> 2:05:15
Well I agree overall the situation was unusual but they're in my experience there was some very unusual cases that didn't fall into the norm.
1610
2:05:15 --> 2:05:18
But thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it.
1611
2:05:18 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]a and you raise a point that's relevant I think, you know this this conversation these these meetings.
1612
2:05:28 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]oration of potential ideas and, you know, this is real, I formed a view and I have to fight for it.
1613
2:05:36 --> 2:05:49
You know, and really, this is, this is a wonderful opportunity to express views express if you don't get the real challenge is not to get upset because people have different views about this stuff and we explore it.
1614
2:05:49 --> 2:06:02
That's what these meetings are leading to Jonathan and others and Sandra go, that's my view. Okay, that's an interesting one. And we get a gloss on it and no one's got the mortgage on truth.
1615
2:06:02 --> 2:06:13
That's why the failure of parliament in Australia, and many places around the world shutting down leaders made decisions without having dialogue.
1616
2:06:13 --> 2:06:19
And that's the that's the value of dialogue because not one of us knows all the answers.
1617
2:06:19 --> 2:06:22
So,
1618
2:06:22 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]a now, Jonathan I've got [privacy contact redaction]ions for you but I'm only going to do a couple.
1619
2:06:29 --> 2:06:37
So, so the crucial element, so I was partly.
1620
2:06:37 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction], I helped create the health Alliance, Australia.
1621
2:06:43 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction] you been successful in shifting the average doctor's views.
1622
2:06:51 --> 2:07:06
Okay, so you shifted you were in a particular way then you shifted and a female hot so just did a tour in Australia, and he's been criticized roundly by some people in this group because he, how could he be smart and fall for the narrative but you're smart and you fell for the
1623
2:07:06 --> 2:07:12
narrative and then you woke up only briefly though in the case of Jonathan.
1624
2:07:12 --> 2:07:19
It's time is an illusion said Albert Einstein. Now, the, the question.
1625
2:07:19 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ralia but around the world you know the, the cat Lindley has produced a video Jonathan to help doctors come to this view that this was, you know this that that they said the way to get doctors to understand to be open to the possibility that they've been
1626
2:07:39 --> 2:07:56
scammed. They produced this video of other doctors and and not coming out harshly and saying oh you know perhaps. So, my question is, what have you found to be successful, if anything, because I can't see much evidence that most of the doctors are willing to admit that they
1627
2:07:56 --> 2:07:58
were wrong.
1628
2:07:58 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ion that ties into your closing point on governments.
1629
2:08:07 --> 2:08:25
And I want to mention a book, which I will after your answer, which CEOs in the UK or anywhere of major corporations have you seen come out like you have and I never I was always against the many people in this group always against and Stephen included,
1630
2:08:25 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction] come out and said the government was built was bullshitting us was gaslighting us. They're the two questions.
1631
2:08:34 --> 2:08:46
Alright, so what narrative have you found to be successful in shifting views, and have you found any CEOs because I've been looking and I can't find any
1632
2:08:46 --> 2:08:59
I mean, it's sort of a depressing answer to both questions really is that, I mean in personal in terms of narrative that's been successful in shifting opinions amongst doctors.
1633
2:08:59 --> 2:09:02
I'm not really aware of one.
1634
2:09:02 --> 2:09:11
It's, it's actually quite depressing and that most doctors in the UK, just, they don't want to know.
1635
2:09:11 --> 2:09:27
I think there's an element of, you know, they were complicit in it so they have an automatic psychological defense mechanism stops them from admitting it. If they admit it to themselves and not saying it publicly, because a lot of, of, you know, they encouraged people
1636
2:09:27 --> 2:09:42
to dive into the lockdowns the scare, you know, being terrorized and then being injected. So they're going to be very reluctant to admit, admit wrong. And of course they've got, they've still got in the UK.
1637
2:09:42 --> 2:10:00
And you know, you're employed by the NHS directly, and people you know you've seen what's happened to people that have spoken out. So, I'm not really aware of that much that has helped in terms of UK doctors, although it's possible that the patient pressure from
1638
2:10:00 --> 2:10:13
might be causing them to change their mind slightly. I think on the, it seems that the profession is a long way behind the general public, actually in the UK in terms of what of their view of things.
1639
2:10:13 --> 2:10:21
I was quite surprised. I read an article yesterday as somebody tweeted an article remember this from two years ago.
1640
2:10:21 --> 2:10:34
It's not relevant what the article was it was something to do with vaccination, but it was in the Daily Mail and I always, whenever somebody sends me an online article. I always like to look at the comments underneath, because they are usually absolutely fascinating
1641
2:10:34 --> 2:10:50
you can see public opinion evolving over time. And even two years ago, it's only in the Daily Mail which is a, you know, pretty middle of the road Middle England, very popular newspaper here. I know you've got the Australian version as well.
1642
2:10:50 --> 2:11:11
But the UK one, you know, the vast majority of people were deeply cynical and suspicious about the vaccination program that's two years ago. If you look at it now, you know, there is virtual, you know, ridicule of the government in every single comment in under any Daily Mail article or any
1643
2:11:11 --> 2:11:16
Daily Telegraph article. So it's moved to the Daily Telegraph.
1644
2:11:16 --> 2:11:26
Even the times, people have started to speak out. The Guardian, the readers are obviously a lost cause forever.
1645
2:11:26 --> 2:11:45
So, the, so I'm saying is I think the, what is going to happen is that it is people on the ground who are going to, they're the ones waking up and it's pressure from them that's going to cause any change in opinion within the profession, the profession won't lead it.
1646
2:11:45 --> 2:11:51
And then, and then, thank you for that and then CEOs of any major corporations.
1647
2:11:52 --> 2:11:54
I'm not either.
1648
2:11:54 --> 2:12:01
Yeah, I mean, because of course, major corporations have generally benefited hugely from what happened.
1649
2:12:02 --> 2:12:23
So, and major corporations generally are public companies and they have duties to their shareholders to increase shareholder value so it would be very difficult for them to speak out when actually they're basically they're at a party and they don't want the party to stop.
1650
2:12:23 --> 2:12:36
Yes, very good. Agree. So here's the book that I recommend to everybody called The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty by Michael Reckton-Wald, amazing background.
1651
2:12:36 --> 2:12:41
I'll put the chat in.
1652
2:12:41 --> 2:13:02
It's a masterful analysis of the last 506070 years and in relevance to what we're talking about today is in the last and the 360 pages, the great, he calls the grand refusal I call it the do not comply we in this group so do not comply that's the only way we're going to stop this fascism of the
1653
2:13:02 --> 2:13:10
of the collusion of government and big business, plus the ESG scam. Michael goes through this beautifully.
1654
2:13:10 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]ing thing that he says, Jonathan is to create your own communities which this is and many people on these calls are creating their own communities to be able to be independent of government.
1655
2:13:26 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]ing, he said, put extreme pressure on government representatives to do the following. Protect national sovereignty and individual rights will Peter who has already told us as we know in same in Australia, you know the courts are not protecting us but we need to pressure the representatives
1656
2:13:44 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction] from the World Economic Forum and all these tentacles, withdraw from the UN and the World Holocaust Organization, withdraw state pensions from ESG index stocks.
1657
2:14:01 --> 2:14:22
So I encourage number eight encourage the defection of elites that we're talking to the CEOs, encourage the defection of elites from the globalist agenda. So here's a challenge for all of us identify elites who might oppose the agenda for moral, ethical or economic reasons, and appeal to them by writing
1658
2:14:22 --> 2:14:40
emails letters, and by putting this book into their hands. Interesting comment because, Jonathan you pointed I think a lot of these elites are horrified by what's happening. And so, perhaps we can identify them but that's what Michael rectonwald is suggesting I love it.
1659
2:14:40 --> 2:14:56
And then, number nine, Stephen you'll love this network with like minded individuals and spread this plan digitally and analog, analogically analogically analog and analogically.
1660
2:14:56 --> 2:15:19
So, very, very sensible plan and, and the communities that we build but but the globalist agenda is so clear. And it is, it is up to us we are in World War Three and this linkage is Jonathan that are happening from this meeting, a quite remarkable over the two years really
1661
2:15:19 --> 2:15:36
Yeah, people say, hey, this is just a talk fest. No, it's not, because none of you know and I don't know, Stephen doesn't know all of the stuff that happens because somebody has a conversation with somebody on this group and Jonathan, what you've shared here could lead to an amazing you could be the match that
1662
2:15:36 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]s. So, thank you.
1663
2:15:41 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]ions I've lost count of the number of introductions. And I don't know what's happened as a here occasionally of six months down the road that something's come of those introductions.
1664
2:15:55 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction], the famous Buckminster Fuller said it's the precessional impact of what you do the [privacy contact redaction] when you're heading down a track, you don't know what that ripple effect is of what you do so [privacy contact redaction]ions to to Stephen Jonathan and thank you so much for being with us.
1665
2:16:15 --> 2:16:37
Thank you for those insights. So I would add one thing to the nine things I think you said, I think it's, I've only realized this recently, I was doing it, but I didn't realize why I was doing it so I was, but I've been very very careful to think about what I be honest about what I really think is the truth
1666
2:16:37 --> 2:16:41
about what and change my mind as necessary.
1667
2:16:41 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]ates and and also to bring to the foreground things which I think are important I think it's really important that everybody on this group and this group is very well educated, not by Charles and me but but by all of us you know, but they haven't possibly realized it so.
1668
2:16:59 --> 2:17:15
So we've heard all kinds of people in this group, and that is very helpful, but the point I was trying to say is that by speaking our honest perception of the truth at the time, and not being afraid of speaking it loudly.
1669
2:17:15 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] a certain power, and you found your allies, you find and your allies are extremely important in this.
1670
2:17:23 --> 2:17:33
So, um, but, so I don't do it so that I do think that's important but anyway, to get back to you, Jonathan.
1671
2:17:33 --> 2:17:37
In your opinion, it doesn't matter if you don't answer these questions.
1672
2:17:37 --> 2:17:39
For whatever reason.
1673
2:17:39 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] say, prefer not to add.
1674
2:17:41 --> 2:17:43
Was there a pandemic.
1675
2:17:43 --> 2:17:47
Yes or no.
1676
2:17:47 --> 2:17:49
Not a viral pandemic.
1677
2:17:49 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] Yeah.
1678
2:17:52 --> 2:17:55
Yeah. So I agree with you.
1679
2:17:55 --> 2:17:58
So, there was no pandemic.
1680
2:17:58 --> 2:18:03
And this is what they, of course, are saying all the time.
1681
2:18:03 --> 2:18:12
How to manage the future pandemic so the next question is, just to qualify also that there wasn't even a pandemic.
1682
2:18:12 --> 2:18:24
Even, you know, if you accept the face value what happened, it had they use the definition that was in this is we've used for you know for time immemorial until they changed it for the swine flu.
1683
2:18:24 --> 2:18:27
Yes, exactly.
1684
2:18:27 --> 2:18:29
Yeah.
1685
2:18:29 --> 2:18:33
Yeah. So that's very important. What you've just said.
1686
2:18:33 --> 2:18:55
Are deadly viral pandemics or even pandemics of international concern, even possible given that at medical school I can remember being taught by professors that a deadly pandemic or even a, you know, a dangerous pandemic viral pandemic would kill its host.
1687
2:18:55 --> 2:19:01
So, our deadly viral pandemics possible.
1688
2:19:01 --> 2:19:05
I mean, in my opinion, no.
1689
2:19:05 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]ly, because deadly viral and pandemic seem to be mutually exclusive to me.
1690
2:19:13 --> 2:19:17
Yeah, anyway, it's just food for thought.
1691
2:19:17 --> 2:19:32
Is there a wish from our enemies to kind of push a narrative, which says that few that deadly viral pandemics are not only possible, but they are the biggest threat to mankind ever.
1692
2:19:32 --> 2:19:42
And that we're going to have a succession of deadly future deadly pandemic this is really important because this is what we're being told now I think it's nonsense.
1693
2:19:42 --> 2:19:45
But
1694
2:19:45 --> 2:19:49
it's complete nonsense. And in fact,
1695
2:19:49 --> 2:20:17
even if you believe in the sort of pandemic potential of viruses, the dangerous pandemic potential viruses, they seems to me logical that the amount of population movement and intermixing and travel would by kind of spreading immune response and immune memory would actually
1696
2:20:17 --> 2:20:21
reduce the potential for future pandemic to not increase it.
1697
2:20:21 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]ly.
1698
2:20:23 --> 2:20:38
So if you spread, if you spread people across, and everybody has some degree of immune memory and meets more antigens all the time to generate more immune response so it seems to me to reduce pandemic potential, whereas they keep on saying the amount of travel will increase
1699
2:20:38 --> 2:20:41
pandemic potential but I think that's the wrong way around.
1700
2:20:42 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]ly, I agree with you. So, so, and what happens in viral, you know, epidemic, should we call it, or viral outbreaks well allegedly we were told that the virus becomes less less pathogenic, but more transmissible.
1701
2:20:57 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction]s less dangerous than the original, whatever that was.
1702
2:21:05 --> 2:21:11
But we were left with, we were being fed this narrative in the UK. First of all, Delta.
1703
2:21:11 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction]ually since you mentioned Peter McCullough, he was one of the most most responsible I'm not attacking him, because I agree with you, if you want a doctor, then Peter McCullough is exactly the kind of guy you want as your doctor.
1704
2:21:25 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction], he was talking about Delta and Omicron.
1705
2:21:29 --> 2:21:44
I asked him, how are you diagnosing that, and he said something I could see he was discomforted but I, you know, he was the guest so I didn't want to kind of push it but he just said sequencing, and I just thought, wow.
1706
2:21:44 --> 2:21:59
And so, how are you dying. So, why would you be afraid of Omicron do you remember we didn't have a Christmas in in the UK. It took our Christmas away from us in. Well, they didn't take it away from us but yes, that was the threat.
1707
2:21:59 --> 2:22:13
You should remember the rule of six or the non we didn't observe, and never observed any of these measures. But anyway, poor population did, and they were wronged of their Christmas in 2020.
1708
2:22:13 --> 2:22:20
And then because of the Omicron variants and we've had Delta before that.
1709
2:22:20 --> 2:22:38
Allegedly, they were saying oh we're going to have to cancel this Christmas too and they were gearing up to to cancel Christmas and then along came, Mark Sexton the police officer and presents a report to the Metropolitan Police in London, which later they said they weren't going to
1710
2:22:38 --> 2:22:52
But the point of that in my opinion, because the whole atmosphere in the UK, in my opinion, change from before Christmas to after Christmas. Now that could have been the huge amount of alcohol I drank over Christmas now I'm joking there.
1711
2:22:52 --> 2:23:07
But it, I don't think I was imagining it, it was real, and indeed in January or February they announced in the UK. It was one of the first countries in the world to say that they were going to get rid of all the measures that was March 2022.
1712
2:23:07 --> 2:23:20
And I think there was a, there's a real possibility there was a connection between that report of 1000 pages which went of crime, which went to the Metropolitan Police.
1713
2:23:20 --> 2:23:31
But, you know, obviously what would the Metropolitan Police, they'd go to the first people they go to the government say we've got this report we're going to have to do something. So you're better, you know, we're up against people here.
1714
2:23:31 --> 2:23:43
They would never admit it of course we'll never find out. But I think there's a real possibility that that report was absolutely crucial in getting not only the UK out of this nonsense, but the whole world.
1715
2:23:43 --> 2:23:48
Having said that Denmark was very early out. So my friend Matt Spalsby.
1716
2:23:48 --> 2:23:57
He tells me that they were out in January of 2022. We were March.
1717
2:23:57 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction] ahead of a lot of countries. And so anyway, so, um, I just wanted to ask you a couple more questions.
1718
2:24:05 --> 2:24:16
You don't need to answer this one because this is could be very controversial but I just want to ask you anyway. Do you think that the NHS now, and maybe has been for a long time.
1719
2:24:16 --> 2:24:21
Do you think it's a cult.
1720
2:24:21 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction] it is treated is like a cult.
1721
2:24:26 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]ly.
1722
2:24:28 --> 2:24:31
I'm not. I don't work for the NHS.
1723
2:24:31 --> 2:24:44
Obviously, and so I think I think it is, you know, I mean you only had to look at the opening of the 2012 Olympics.
1724
2:24:44 --> 2:24:46
Yes.
1725
2:24:46 --> 2:25:03
To see the, you know, prime example of the relationship to that to the NHS as a cult. So yeah, it's just completely above any discussion about whether it's the right structure to deliver health and might, you know,
1726
2:25:03 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction] large, you know centralized organizations ever delivered things better than small local organizations, never.
1727
2:25:14 --> 2:25:19
We've got one of the biggest organizations in the world.
1728
2:25:19 --> 2:25:25
So, in December of sorry I think it was November of 2020.
1729
2:25:25 --> 2:25:31
I had been talking to this person for a while I'm not going to mention his name but he's a very prominent journalist.
1730
2:25:31 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction] been October 2020.
1731
2:25:35 --> 2:25:45
I used to ring him to cheer myself up because I had kind of inflated idea that he might, you know, be the one person to move things.
1732
2:25:45 --> 2:25:53
And, but I just wanted to hang on to something as an individual myself and also to support my own family and.
1733
2:25:53 --> 2:26:00
And in one of these calls, which was intended to cheer me up he just said, Stephen.
1734
2:26:00 --> 2:26:03
In March 2020.
1735
2:26:03 --> 2:26:09
There was a global coup d'etat, and we can't do anything about it.
1736
2:26:09 --> 2:26:16
And then I, if you remember the fresh fields lecture of Lord Jonathan assumption.
1737
2:26:16 --> 2:26:18
Yeah.
1738
2:26:18 --> 2:26:27
The, the wonderful. I thought that was what I watched that I think about 10 times.
1739
2:26:27 --> 2:26:39
I've heard a lot of quotes from it, but some, but he didn't, he didn't say, you know, he was careful to not to say, well, not to say that it was planned.
1740
2:26:39 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction] that this was not planned.
1741
2:26:44 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]anned it was pure evil.
1742
2:26:48 --> 2:26:53
What do you think.
1743
2:26:53 --> 2:27:02
I'm not sure.
1744
2:27:02 --> 2:27:20
There's a number of conversations that are difficult to answer difficult to address the other one is who is controlled opposition and who is not controlled opposition it's not black and white answer that there are people who are inadvertently helping the other side.
1745
2:27:20 --> 2:27:25
They're supporting certain narrative, the same in this question.
1746
2:27:25 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]e jumping on the bandwagon and propagating the story for their own benefit. It doesn't necessarily mean that they were involved in planning it or it was, it was planned.
1747
2:27:40 --> 2:27:45
I mean, the other thing is, take for example, things like event 201.
1748
2:27:45 --> 2:27:54
You know, one view of it is they, what that shows you that they were, they were clearly planning it.
1749
2:27:54 --> 2:28:07
The contrary view to that would be something that goes along the lines of, well hang on. Firstly, they were actually planning something like that criminally, why would they tell everybody about it and make it so public.
1750
2:28:07 --> 2:28:28
Number two is, have you thought about the possibility that instead of that, actually being indicative of their plans that actually their participation in an event like that, and the participation of all the actors around that lays the groundwork for a situation in which something like this can catch fire.
1751
2:28:28 --> 2:28:37
So, you know, we've suddenly told all these people how important they are and how they can save the world from this deadly pandemic. We've got to do this. It's very important to counter misinformation.
1752
2:28:37 --> 2:28:46
And then we get a viral, an outbreak of something. And then once the conditions, yes, it will then just take off.
1753
2:28:46 --> 2:29:02
So they maybe use the cult problem, you know, the cult mentality, which operates apparently in just those circumstances. So you present the idea, they're in a crowd, people lose their heads in crowds because they want to be popular or whatever.
1754
2:29:02 --> 2:29:15
And, and, and, and then, you know, they, but the psychologists would have known ahead of that event [privacy contact redaction]an which you brilliantly have outlined now, it could well have been like that. Yeah.
1755
2:29:15 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So, in my, so was the, so I'm asking these questions, I know the answers in my mind, and I think you do too, but I want to help the people watching you know, now and in the future.
1756
2:29:32 --> 2:29:52
So, was the purported pandemic, a Trojan horse not only, you know, was it a Trojan horse to impose global totalitarianism. There are of course other Trojan horses.
1757
2:29:52 --> 2:30:08
I don't know. Well Michael, Michael rectum walls is absolutely yes so let's leave it at that. We have two and a half hours is up, and I, I, anyone watching this recording, I will come out and I'll argue in any court of law that it's absolutely deliberate, and the
1758
2:30:08 --> 2:30:25
evidence is absolutely clear. And Daniel Estrel and that's why we started Jonathan I don't know if you've seen his stuff but his book on the Tabberstock Institute, and the evil that has been led from that including the current, the whole, the transgender
1759
2:30:25 --> 2:30:39
bullshit that's happening, and the transitioning. So Daniel Estrel and I think he told us, Stephen he sold 8 million books I'd like to sell 8 million books, but quite frankly I must say. So look at that.
1760
2:30:39 --> 2:30:48
Well he's becoming Charles he's become a good friend of mine so I can introduce you to him, and also to Jonathan if you wish.
1761
2:30:48 --> 2:31:03
I answered on Jonathan's behalf because we don't. Thank you Jonathan so much. Our two and a half hours is up. It was brilliant to have you and Stephen thank you for organizing everybody thank you for being here thank you for all of the, all of the insights, Jonathan
1762
2:31:03 --> 2:31:[privacy contact redaction]d the chat for yourself and Anna if she's still here but anyway save the chat because there's a lot of good, a lot of good stuff.
1763
2:31:11 --> 2:31:18
Thank you for having me I apologize if I didn't have a slide.
1764
2:31:18 --> 2:31:31
No, Jonathan you were, you were brilliant. So, you and I knew I was going to say thank you so much for answering the questions so conscientiously. It says a lot about you.
1765
2:31:31 --> 2:31:39
So this shines out you know your humanity to anybody listening to this I hope. So great. Thank you very much.
1766
2:31:39 --> 2:31:[privacy contact redaction]ause everybody then Tom Rodman's group the telegram. The links are in the chat save the chat you can go to that Tom Rodman group for those who have more time.
1767
2:31:48 --> 2:31:53
Thank you see you again on Tuesday, and we'll look forward to being with you.
1768
2:31:53 --> 2:31:[privacy contact redaction]ephen. Bye everybody.
1769
2:31:56 --> 2:32:00
Bye Jonathan. Thank you, Jonathan. Thank you. Thank you, Charles.
1770
2:32:00 --> 2:32:03
And everyone.
1771
2:32:09 --> 2:32:12
Thank you.
