1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:12
exorbitant privilege as the gold called it in 1967, I think, of the reserve currency,

2
0:00:12 --> 0:00:20
which has been squandered by the USA. I think these are known facts. I think these are facts

3
0:00:20 --> 0:00:26
that certain things are moving. Now, the question is how will America react to it? That's an

4
0:00:26 --> 0:00:32
opinion, or rather the various ways is opinion. But I think there's little doubt that we are

5
0:00:32 --> 0:00:36
heading away from the unipolar world and the hegemony of the American

6
0:00:37 --> 0:00:45
might. I disagree with Glenn on that. There are facts that are indisputable.

7
0:00:47 --> 0:00:52
Well, there's a whole definition of what hegemony means in here. I'm simply pointing out-

8
0:00:52 --> 0:00:54
Well, let's not split hairs. We can split hairs all day.

9
0:00:55 --> 0:01:03
Hold on. Hold on. I don't think we all know what it is. But my point in it is,

10
0:01:05 --> 0:01:13
in this particular case, in a situation we're in, where there is no other free willed country in the

11
0:01:13 --> 0:01:21
world, one better hope that some of the grounding points that the USA has had over the last 50 year

12
0:01:21 --> 0:01:28
return, at least to stabilize us, away from the massive globalization that's occurred,

13
0:01:29 --> 0:01:35
and where I would claim that's been the plan all along by the Satanists and their minions.

14
0:01:37 --> 0:01:42
That needs to be reversed first to stabilize. And then, yes, I'm completely open to there being

15
0:01:42 --> 0:01:51
fair and balanced influences throughout the world, where each nation makes its decisions on its own

16
0:01:51 --> 0:01:56
around how it wants to proceed, as long as we have to, at this point, take down the globalists.

17
0:01:56 --> 0:02:03
Yeah, but you see, that's an example there of an opinion of American exceptionalism,

18
0:02:03 --> 0:02:10
that somehow or other America is exceptional. I would say that there's many, many people that

19
0:02:10 --> 0:02:19
argue that the Chinese system suits huge proportions of the Chinese people. The Russian system,

20
0:02:20 --> 0:02:27
with it now it's returned to sort of Christian or the Russian Orthodox Church, suits the Russian

21
0:02:27 --> 0:02:31
people. I'd say they're very, very happy. So the important thing is, are the people content and

22
0:02:31 --> 0:02:37
happy within their state? And the idea that the American system is superior.

23
0:02:37 --> 0:02:42
Jerry, it's more complicated than that. Jerry's right. Glenn's right. So in my opinion,

24
0:02:43 --> 0:02:53
the Western Europe in particular, but the UK also has just lost itself. And the only common sense

25
0:02:53 --> 0:02:59
you can see in the world at the moment for the people brought up in the West is from Trump's

26
0:02:59 --> 0:03:04
America. Well, not Trump's America, but Trump himself. So he's got a lot of faults, in my opinion,

27
0:03:04 --> 0:03:09
but he shows the way and we need to rebalance. I think we've been taken away from our countries,

28
0:03:09 --> 0:03:19
from ourselves as human beings by these idiots in Europe. And essentially what we've got in Europe

29
0:03:19 --> 0:03:25
is not only a government, but a government that governs the government. And no wonder we've lost

30
0:03:25 --> 0:03:30
our way. That's globalism. All right, let's get this show on the road. We've got our guest here,

31
0:03:30 --> 0:03:35
David. Cheryl Ambers, how lovely to see you in red. I love it. I love it. I love it.

32
0:03:35 --> 0:03:45
Hello, sir. I'm mute. There you are. How are you? Excellent. Excellent. Thank you for

33
0:03:46 --> 0:03:50
coming in. So let's get this show on the road. Thank you for coming in. So Jerry, if we're

34
0:03:50 --> 0:03:56
a bit away from America, then we've completely lost our way in the process. I'm not saying that

35
0:03:56 --> 0:04:02
America is a big showcase, but there is a little bit of hope now, because I think that what happens

36
0:04:02 --> 0:04:07
in America happens in the rest of the world or in the Western world anyway. But anyway.

37
0:04:07 --> 0:04:14
All right. And let's hope these two alleged astronauts with the news coming out this morning,

38
0:04:14 --> 0:04:20
that some NASA guy says we faked everything. So SpaceX allegedly, the two guys are coming down

39
0:04:20 --> 0:04:24
from the International Space Station, but we shall see. But welcome to today's discussion

40
0:04:24 --> 0:04:30
of medical doctors for COVID ethics, international doctors for COVID ethics.

41
0:04:31 --> 0:04:36
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost almost four years ago with a desire to pursue truth,

42
0:04:36 --> 0:04:41
ethics, justice, freedom and health. Stephen has stood up against government and power over the

43
0:04:41 --> 0:04:46
years and has been a whistleblower and activist, his medical specialty is radiology. We remember

44
0:04:46 --> 0:04:53
right now a freedom fighter who was unlawfully jailed in Germany, Reimer Fulmich, German and

45
0:04:53 --> 0:05:00
US lawyer. He was unlawfully kidnapped in Mexico in October 2023. And anything you can do to shine

46
0:05:00 --> 0:05:06
a light on his case is much appreciated. Reiner should not be in jail and what's being done to

47
0:05:06 --> 0:05:14
him by the German government is simply criminal, unlawful, outrageous. I'm Charles Coviss, the

48
0:05:14 --> 0:05:20
moderator of this group. I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago. And

49
0:05:20 --> 0:05:24
over the last 14 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine damage

50
0:05:24 --> 0:05:30
and damage from bad medical advice. Medical advice, bad medical advice is now the number one

51
0:05:30 --> 0:05:39
killer in the USA ahead of heart attacks, cancer, diabetes. I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp

52
0:05:40 --> 0:05:45
company and industrial hemp is going to be a savior for the planet. Mark my words.

53
0:05:46 --> 0:05:49
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world.

54
0:05:50 --> 0:05:54
Many of us thought that vaccines were okay. Now many of us proudly say, including me,

55
0:05:55 --> 0:06:02
yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers and anybody who thinks that that is now a criticism

56
0:06:03 --> 0:06:09
is ignorant. Dr. Stanley Plotkin has confirmed that no vaccine in history has ever been properly

57
0:06:09 --> 0:06:16
tested for safety and efficacy. Anyone who cares to provide evidence to the contrary is most

58
0:06:16 --> 0:06:21
welcome to do so. If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in

59
0:06:21 --> 0:06:27
the chat and where you're from. Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War

60
0:06:27 --> 0:06:33
Three, that the medical science battle is only one of 12 battlefronts. The psychological operations

61
0:06:33 --> 0:06:41
are another battlefront and our guest today, David Charalambas, is all about the mental battlefront

62
0:06:41 --> 0:06:46
that we are in. We also have a spiritual battlefront. There's no time to be tired.

63
0:06:46 --> 0:06:52
We're five years, I assess, into a seven-year war. The next two years are crucial, so look after

64
0:06:52 --> 0:06:55
your health. There are many health tips you can get from people in this group.

65
0:06:57 --> 0:07:01
Most of us understand the development of science and the science is never settled. Anyone who

66
0:07:01 --> 0:07:10
tells you the science is settled is exercising a psychological operation on you. The meeting runs

67
0:07:10 --> 0:07:15
for two and a half hours after which, for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram

68
0:07:15 --> 0:07:19
meeting. Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join. We'll listen to our guest

69
0:07:19 --> 0:07:23
presenter, David Charalambas of the UK, for as long as David wishes to speak. And then we have

70
0:07:23 --> 0:07:30
Q&A. David, you'll be able to share your screen if you wish. I'm sure you will, following your long

71
0:07:30 --> 0:07:35
established tradition. And Stephen, by long established tradition, asked the first questions

72
0:07:36 --> 0:07:42
for 15 minutes. This is a free speech environment with appropriate moderating. Free speech is

73
0:07:42 --> 0:07:48
crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms. I saw a good quote yesterday that

74
0:07:48 --> 0:07:53
if there's any suppression of free speech, then you know it's a psychological operation, a PSIOP.

75
0:07:55 --> 0:07:59
If you're offended by anything, be offended. We are lovingly not interested. We reject the

76
0:07:59 --> 0:08:05
offense industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another. We similarly

77
0:08:05 --> 0:08:13
reject the triggering industry. Both are attacks on free speech. We come, however, with an attitude

78
0:08:13 --> 0:08:18
and perspective of love, not fear. Fear is the opposite of love. Fear squashes you and enslaves

79
0:08:18 --> 0:08:24
you. Love, on the other hand, expands you and liberates you. These twice weekly meetings are

80
0:08:24 --> 0:08:30
not just talkfests. An extraordinary range of actions and initiatives have been generated from

81
0:08:30 --> 0:08:35
linkages made by attendees in these meetings. The meeting is recorded and is uploaded onto the

82
0:08:35 --> 0:08:40
Rumble channel if you have a solution or a product or links or resources that will help people put

83
0:08:40 --> 0:08:45
the details into the chat. And now welcome to our guest presenter, David Sherrill-Ambus,

84
0:08:45 --> 0:08:50
and who has presented on two previous occasions. We thank you, David, for giving us your time and

85
0:08:50 --> 0:08:58
for the purposes of the recording. I would like to share some aspects of your bio. You are a behaviour

86
0:08:58 --> 0:09:04
and communications expert and the founder of ReachingPeople.net. Could somebody put that in

87
0:09:04 --> 0:09:10
the chat, please, David, if you could? ReachingPeople.net. This project is dedicated to helping

88
0:09:10 --> 0:09:14
people communicate with those of differing views and showing how institutions and corporations

89
0:09:14 --> 0:09:21
influence to gain greater autonomy over us. David's background involves over 30 years of consulting

90
0:09:21 --> 0:09:25
with multinational clients and one-on-one with individuals from all walks of life.

91
0:09:26 --> 0:09:32
With over 25 years extensively studying psychology and the mind, he has extensively studied NLP,

92
0:09:32 --> 0:09:38
behavioural science, behaviour and communication. David has spent the last few years assisting many

93
0:09:38 --> 0:09:41
groups in understanding how governments and institutions have used behavioural science

94
0:09:41 --> 0:09:47
knowledge to influence people. He also runs regular workshops and presentations on communicating,

95
0:09:47 --> 0:09:51
messaging and understanding behaviours. He's been on numerous podcasts and presented at

96
0:09:51 --> 0:09:56
conferences on influence, behaviour and communications. David believes we can

97
0:09:56 --> 0:10:01
significantly improve our effectiveness by understanding key principles of behaviour

98
0:10:01 --> 0:10:06
and communications. So thank you, David, for being here and thank you, Stephen, for us to

99
0:10:06 --> 0:10:11
gain for creating this group and for organising David to speak to us today, albeit a little bit

100
0:10:11 --> 0:10:16
at the last moment, but here we are. This is the tradition of this group. We flow with,

101
0:10:17 --> 0:10:24
we move with the waves. David, welcome. Thank you. Yes, pleasure to be here. Timing's actually

102
0:10:25 --> 0:10:32
very good. We just finished a few projects on psychological operations and warfare and a few

103
0:10:32 --> 0:10:38
other things. And what I want to do tonight, I didn't have the time to get the slides together

104
0:10:38 --> 0:10:43
as perfectly as I wanted to, but the information is still going to be there. So there's going to

105
0:10:44 --> 0:10:49
be a little bit more text than I normally like, but I want to get three really key points across

106
0:10:49 --> 0:10:56
tonight. And once you understand these, basically, I mean, we all know we're being played. That's

107
0:10:56 --> 0:11:01
very clear. But when we understand how we're being played, which buttons are being pressed,

108
0:11:01 --> 0:11:05
then we can actually start to get a very different response than the people that we're talking to.

109
0:11:08 --> 0:11:13
So I'm ready to go. So let me just. Okay, share your screen. You should be able to

110
0:11:13 --> 0:11:26
share it. Okay. Awesome. If you give me a nod, Charles, that you can see my. All good. Can see

111
0:11:26 --> 0:11:36
well. Awesome. So today, I really wanted to talk about how the pandemic was sold. Because as you,

112
0:11:36 --> 0:11:42
many of you know, 2009, they tried a pandemic and it failed miserably. And of course, a lot of

113
0:11:43 --> 0:11:49
dangerous people learn from their mistakes and don't tend to make the same mistakes as many times.

114
0:11:49 --> 0:11:54
So obviously, this is an experience that we're all having continuously. There's an elephant in the

115
0:11:54 --> 0:12:01
room. It's so obvious it's standing there, but people cannot see it. So this was a very interesting

116
0:12:01 --> 0:12:06
study just to lead up to how people can have their opinions changed without their knowledge

117
0:12:06 --> 0:12:16
and without their consent. In April, sorry, in December, I think it was 19, they ran a large

118
0:12:16 --> 0:12:22
scale study survey asking people whether they would take the vaccine. And then they followed

119
0:12:22 --> 0:12:29
up in two, two times. And of the people that said no, and at beginning, it was the majority of people,

120
0:12:29 --> 0:12:38
the propaganda was able to flip 86% of the people from not taking the vaccine to taking the vaccine.

121
0:12:39 --> 0:12:43
And that's quite an astonishing number. And it's the propaganda that did that. And what we're going

122
0:12:43 --> 0:12:49
to look at today is a few elements of our mind that are really key to understand how they achieve

123
0:12:49 --> 0:12:56
that. So this is a slide I like to show people to really explain some of the depths of what's going

124
0:12:56 --> 0:13:04
on. You've got Jane blogs on the left, Joe blogs on the right. Jane understands the manipulation,

125
0:13:04 --> 0:13:09
she sees the propaganda, and she knows that we're being lied to. Joe, on the other hand, her brother

126
0:13:09 --> 0:13:15
is a maths professor and is so entrenched in the system that he pretty much just bought everything.

127
0:13:15 --> 0:13:23
Now, on the surface, these represent magnifying glasses, which are the filters by which people

128
0:13:23 --> 0:13:29
see information. So we're so educated from a scientific standpoint, logically,

129
0:13:30 --> 0:13:36
that we think that facts exist in a vortex, that they are their own volition and truth is like this.

130
0:13:37 --> 0:13:43
And once that occurs, in our mind, it's far different. So there is many a study where if

131
0:13:43 --> 0:13:49
you change a headline or fact from one magazine to the next, the believability of that fact

132
0:13:49 --> 0:13:57
changes significantly just because of where that fact occurs. So all the context actually has more

133
0:13:58 --> 0:14:02
effect and influence on whether someone believes something than the fact itself.

134
0:14:03 --> 0:14:11
Now, the magnifying glass represents a person's perspective on looking at that fact. So it becomes

135
0:14:11 --> 0:14:18
very obvious when we look into Joe's soapbox that Joe believes the media reports the truth,

136
0:14:18 --> 0:14:23
he thinks government serves him, he believes that science is this wonderful unicorn,

137
0:14:23 --> 0:14:27
he believes if someone says it's safe, it must be, he trusts that there's oversight,

138
0:14:29 --> 0:14:33
checks and balances, and he believes, and this is a really powerful one, that there's a

139
0:14:34 --> 0:14:40
consensus that everyone agrees and anyone that doesn't is just a tin hat wearing mad person.

140
0:14:40 --> 0:14:45
Jane, on the other hand, she knows censorship is rife, she knows there's conflicts of interest,

141
0:14:45 --> 0:14:49
she knows the NGOs have got their fingers in all the pies, she knows that media is effectively now,

142
0:14:49 --> 0:14:54
or certainly the big media, is just a corporation and corporations really will do anything to make

143
0:14:54 --> 0:14:59
money. She distrusts government, she's probably read a history book, and she knows that science,

144
0:14:59 --> 0:15:04
just like any other industry, can be influenced by many biases and particularly incentives.

145
0:15:04 --> 0:15:08
So now it becomes very obvious, and this is something that I've shown many times in the past,

146
0:15:08 --> 0:15:16
but really just to set the frame, that we look at everything from our own personal perspective,

147
0:15:16 --> 0:15:21
but when we're talking to people, we often don't take that into consideration, and it's known as

148
0:15:22 --> 0:15:29
the curse of knowledge, whereas when we talk about something, we have privy to all the information

149
0:15:29 --> 0:15:36
in our mind, but the other person doesn't. So if we have a completely different foundation for that

150
0:15:36 --> 0:15:41
fact, it's going to have a completely different meaning to these two people. So that's something

151
0:15:41 --> 0:15:46
we've discussed in the past, and what we're going to go on to now is three really key elements,

152
0:15:47 --> 0:15:54
and then look at how that relates into behaviour. So the first one is, what are classical and

153
0:15:54 --> 0:16:00
operant conditioning? Because effectively, these are the two main ways that everyone is conditioned

154
0:16:00 --> 0:16:05
to believe lies. Now when you understand how these function, not only are they conditioned for you

155
0:16:05 --> 0:16:11
to believe lies or people to believe lies, but these are the two ways that really affects people's

156
0:16:11 --> 0:16:17
behaviour. So many, many people don't behave in the way that they would want to if they were not

157
0:16:17 --> 0:16:24
conditioned to do that. What is a reticular activating system? Now we've really dived in

158
0:16:24 --> 0:16:31
deep to this. Now this is the key. The reticular activating system is the gatekeeper. It is the

159
0:16:31 --> 0:16:36
filtering sensory information within the brain, and it focuses attention. It regulates consciousness

160
0:16:36 --> 0:16:43
effectively. So if the person has a faulty belief in that RAS system, it doesn't matter whether you

161
0:16:43 --> 0:16:49
show them 10,000 facts that disagree with that. It will not change anything. Once the RAS changes,

162
0:16:49 --> 0:16:56
everything will change. And what is IOED? So IOD effectively is the illusion of explanatory depth,

163
0:16:56 --> 0:17:01
and it's the effect that you've all come across a thousand times when you're talking to someone

164
0:17:01 --> 0:17:06
that believes the nonsense that they've been told, and they are under an illusion that they

165
0:17:06 --> 0:17:12
can explain what they're talking about. And the truth is that they have been given conclusions,

166
0:17:12 --> 0:17:18
and those conclusions have been placed into their RAS system, conditioned into their RAS system,

167
0:17:19 --> 0:17:24
and that person thinks that they understand that concept. But effectively, their mind is a house of

168
0:17:24 --> 0:17:29
cards. And as you notice, when you push against that house of cards, it gets stronger. But once

169
0:17:29 --> 0:17:34
you understand where the weak points is in that system, then you can actually really destabilize

170
0:17:34 --> 0:17:39
it. And that's what we're going to talk about tonight is what are some of the elements. Really,

171
0:17:39 --> 0:17:42
we're going to talk about what are these three things. And when you understand these three things,

172
0:17:42 --> 0:17:47
you're going to be much better equipped that when you talk to someone that you're not actually going

173
0:17:47 --> 0:17:52
to strengthen their delusion. Because inadvertently, what a lot of people are doing in the truth

174
0:17:53 --> 0:17:56
movement without realizing it, is they're actually strengthening the other person's

175
0:17:56 --> 0:18:02
delusion by the questions that they're asking. And it's just a factor that because the people

176
0:18:02 --> 0:18:08
pushing the propaganda and the narratives understand us so deeply that they can set that up,

177
0:18:08 --> 0:18:13
and they can also create delusions very clearly. But when we understand it, we can actually start

178
0:18:13 --> 0:18:19
to break that delusion. And that's the key thing. So we're going to look at conditioning.

179
0:18:20 --> 0:18:24
Okay, now, there's really two types of conditioning. Many of you would have heard of

180
0:18:24 --> 0:18:31
Pavlov's dogs that probably rings a bell. And that was basically associating two things together.

181
0:18:32 --> 0:18:36
Okay, so children when they eat the ice cream van, then they fancy an ice cream,

182
0:18:36 --> 0:18:42
they probably salivate. That's classical conditioning. And it's very, very simple.

183
0:18:42 --> 0:18:48
It's just the linking of two things together. So for those of you in the UK, if I said have a break,

184
0:18:48 --> 0:18:53
you would probably respond with have a KitKat. Now that's the risk. And that's pretty much

185
0:18:53 --> 0:19:00
happens. I gave a live talk a few weeks ago, and I said those words and the whole audience in unison

186
0:19:00 --> 0:19:05
answered have a KitKat. That's the power conditioning, linking two things together.

187
0:19:05 --> 0:19:10
And that's pretty much most of advertising is to link those two things together and elicit a

188
0:19:10 --> 0:19:17
strong emotion. Now, operating conditioning is subtly different. And that's basically

189
0:19:17 --> 0:19:22
associated voluntary behavior and a consequence basically is saying, well, if I do this, that's

190
0:19:22 --> 0:19:27
going to happen. But if I do that, that's going to happen. And then basing your decision on that.

191
0:19:27 --> 0:19:35
But again, most of that will happen unconsciously. So that's first have a look at classical

192
0:19:35 --> 0:19:40
conditioning just briefly to see how it was used in the pandemic, pretty much how the pandemic was

193
0:19:40 --> 0:19:45
sold. The pandemic, obviously, you know, that's a very loose word, because a lot of us here

194
0:19:45 --> 0:19:51
wouldn't call it that. But there's a very sad story about where scientists were first studying

195
0:19:51 --> 0:19:56
this. And what they did was that there's only two natural fears we're born with, and one of them is

196
0:19:56 --> 0:20:04
loud noises. So what they did was they paired a loud noise with a rat. And when they did that,

197
0:20:04 --> 0:20:10
only a few times, then little Albert developed a phobia of the rat. So basically, the fear response

198
0:20:10 --> 0:20:17
from loud noises was paired to the rat. And it got to the point where he even feared Santa Claus,

199
0:20:17 --> 0:20:24
because he generalized that the beard was similar to the fluffy animal. Now, the fears and emotions

200
0:20:24 --> 0:20:31
can be installed so quickly, it is unbelievable. And the media has got that down to an art form.

201
0:20:31 --> 0:20:36
So when you think about the fear response to the word corona, which is one of the when you,

202
0:20:36 --> 0:20:42
you know, I ran a query to look at the ways that classical and operatic condition was used during

203
0:20:42 --> 0:20:47
the pandemic. This was one of the things fear response to the word corona, which obviously,

204
0:20:47 --> 0:20:52
we all saw or remember the people dropping dead in the street, which is almost definitely

205
0:20:52 --> 0:20:58
with staged. But that's to really create an emotional, automatic reaction to this.

206
0:20:59 --> 0:21:05
There was all of these things like COVID toe. Now, it's the study show that when you use disgusting

207
0:21:05 --> 0:21:14
images, the person is affected very emotionally, and it drove uptake of the vaccine significantly.

208
0:21:14 --> 0:21:20
So none of this was by accident, in my opinion, they were very clear and understanding on what

209
0:21:20 --> 0:21:26
drives the average human being. So then there was lots of numbers, large numbers about everything.

210
0:21:26 --> 0:21:34
And this was salience, it had to affect everyone. So then Joe is watching this. And he's literally

211
0:21:34 --> 0:21:38
getting a lot of fear. So there was cases jump and whatever it was, none of it made any logical

212
0:21:38 --> 0:21:46
sense, but it didn't need to. Because conditioning works on an unconscious level. And we are under

213
0:21:46 --> 0:21:50
this, you know, the way that we're educated, we think that we have full conscious control of

214
0:21:50 --> 0:21:56
ourselves. And anyone that's ever tried to lose weight or drink less or eat healthier,

215
0:21:56 --> 0:22:02
knows that that's not the case. Okay. If your unconscious mind has a craving for something,

216
0:22:02 --> 0:22:07
and you can't control it, then we're not in full conscious control. So the public is having their

217
0:22:07 --> 0:22:11
unconscious mind hijacked. And the conscious mind is really going along for the ride.

218
0:22:12 --> 0:22:19
The next bit of rank conditioning, this is where it gets even more devious, is that this was really

219
0:22:19 --> 0:22:25
studied by Skinner. And it's effectively rewards and punishment. So it's carrots and sticks. So the

220
0:22:25 --> 0:22:29
rat in a box learned that when it pressed a certain button, it would get some food, and then it

221
0:22:29 --> 0:22:33
literally would influence its behavior. So it would press the button to get food. And they had

222
0:22:33 --> 0:22:39
ones where it would be electrocuted. So it would literally move towards pleasure and away from pain.

223
0:22:40 --> 0:22:44
Now, I won't go into that today. But that effectively is the most important thing to

224
0:22:44 --> 0:22:49
understand about human behavior, that people always move towards pleasure and away from pain.

225
0:22:49 --> 0:22:55
Now, it's not actual pleasure and pain. It's perceived pleasure and pain. So if we're

226
0:22:55 --> 0:23:03
conditioned at school to associate pleasure to complying and pain to not complying, then that's

227
0:23:03 --> 0:23:09
what people are going to feel compelled to do. And that's why for a lot of people standing up

228
0:23:09 --> 0:23:13
would create a lot of stress because it went against their conditioning.

229
0:23:13 --> 0:23:19
Now, if we look at what Joe incurred during the pandemic, there was a bunch of adding carrots,

230
0:23:19 --> 0:23:24
which was jabs for kebabs and all these nonsense policies. And then of course, they removed the

231
0:23:24 --> 0:23:30
carrot, which is if you don't get the vaccine, then you're not going to be in shops, bars,

232
0:23:30 --> 0:23:35
shopping, some places you couldn't even get the things you needed to survive.

233
0:23:36 --> 0:23:40
So this next table, and I'm putting it up just so you can see it, but this is in an article on our

234
0:23:40 --> 0:23:50
website, is just a brief overview of how the carrot and sticks was used. So pretty much

235
0:23:50 --> 0:23:56
every policy fell into one of the four categories. And if you look through the document Mindspace,

236
0:23:56 --> 0:24:01
and then combine it with this, you'll get a real deep insight into how people felt compelled to do

237
0:24:01 --> 0:24:07
what they did. Now, the amount of people that said to me, I just felt so much pressure, I had to do

238
0:24:07 --> 0:24:17
it. That's effectively applying so much emotional pressure via these carrot and sticks that the

239
0:24:17 --> 0:24:22
person just gives in. And that's what an animal will do, particularly horses that in fact,

240
0:24:22 --> 0:24:27
what they do is that they apply pressure to the horse, and then they release it when the horse does

241
0:24:27 --> 0:24:33
as it's, you know, wanted to do. And that becomes one of those powerful. So this removing stick down

242
0:24:33 --> 0:24:37
at the bottom left, that's very powerful. And that's why a lot of people couldn't take the

243
0:24:37 --> 0:24:43
pressure anymore. And then you would have seen it's the only way out. That was a very much a

244
0:24:43 --> 0:24:48
hypnotic command, which is you're not going to get your life back unless you do as you're told. So

245
0:24:48 --> 0:24:53
I'm pretty much going to remove this boot from your throat when you do as I asked you to do.

246
0:24:55 --> 0:24:59
So hopefully that summarizes the conditioning. And there's a lot more we can go into there,

247
0:24:59 --> 0:25:06
but it's really to understand that conditioning is really drives so much of our behavior.

248
0:25:07 --> 0:25:12
And if you are not conditioned yourself, then you've been conditioned by someone else.

249
0:25:13 --> 0:25:18
So if somebody is unable to do the things that they want to do, that is a sign that they've

250
0:25:18 --> 0:25:24
been conditioned to not associate pleasure with it. Now, there's a lot of information here that

251
0:25:24 --> 0:25:30
when they as well as the teaching people to comply, people are also taught to live in

252
0:25:30 --> 0:25:36
sort of poverty and not strive for things and then allow billionaires to have all the money.

253
0:25:36 --> 0:25:42
All of these things are really conditioned into us at our schooling. Now, there's this thing

254
0:25:42 --> 0:25:48
that I'm going to touch on, which is called NTT. And that is narrative transformation,

255
0:25:48 --> 0:25:54
transportation theory. Now, that is the art and science of conditioning. That is how they know

256
0:25:55 --> 0:26:01
that within a movie and TV, which is pretty much how most people are getting their information now,

257
0:26:02 --> 0:26:07
is how they can implant an idea and condition that idea into someone's mind.

258
0:26:07 --> 0:26:13
And an example of this, which I've touched on before, is designated driver. So what happened was

259
0:26:14 --> 0:26:22
the Harvard Alcohol Project got together with ABC Studios and they wrote this into the storylines

260
0:26:22 --> 0:26:27
into Dallas, Cheers, LA Law and all of these. So then it entered the collective consciousness.

261
0:26:28 --> 0:26:35
Now, they've been doing that for decades from what I can see with terms like vaccination, deniers

262
0:26:36 --> 0:26:43
and conspiracy theorists, incidentally, appears many, many, many times in TV shows.

263
0:26:43 --> 0:26:49
And whenever there is a conspiracy theorist, he's generally always a person with low IQ,

264
0:26:50 --> 0:26:55
generally unhealthy, usually walks with a stick, etc. So what they're doing is they're

265
0:26:55 --> 0:27:02
conditioning unconsciously the public to associate a conspiracy theorist to a low IQ person. And

266
0:27:02 --> 0:27:07
that's why people automatically associate, oh, you've got to be an idiot if you're a conspiracy

267
0:27:07 --> 0:27:13
theorist. And that's not an accident. That has been done on purpose. And the people, when they

268
0:27:13 --> 0:27:19
say the term conspiracy theorists, they do not realize that they've had their mind programmed

269
0:27:19 --> 0:27:25
to associate these things. The power of conditioning is really incredible. I mean,

270
0:27:25 --> 0:27:29
it's how we learn. So it's not necessarily a negative thing. It's just when you've got

271
0:27:29 --> 0:27:33
a group of psychopaths using it to condition the public, that's when it becomes problematic.

272
0:27:34 --> 0:27:41
Now, if you look at any remake of any old shows, such as Quantum Leap, which I used to love in the

273
0:27:41 --> 0:27:48
80s, the new one generally has, I mean, you pick out any narrative that's going on now,

274
0:27:48 --> 0:27:53
and there will be it is absolutely flooded with it. For instance, the person who's the software

275
0:27:53 --> 0:27:59
engineer in it is a man that dresses as a woman that dates a woman that like I mean, it's so you

276
0:27:59 --> 0:28:06
don't know where he's coming or going. But it's normalizing all these things. Now, so hopefully

277
0:28:06 --> 0:28:14
that really gives you a taste of how people are just being unconsciously programmed to associate

278
0:28:15 --> 0:28:21
conspiracy theorists to a certain thing. For instance, when you take 5G, for instance,

279
0:28:22 --> 0:28:28
the amount of news articles and TV that go 5G conspiracy theorists, 5G conspiracy theorists,

280
0:28:28 --> 0:28:34
5G conspiracy theorists, and the minute you talk to someone about 5G, they're going to parrot

281
0:28:34 --> 0:28:41
conspiracy theorists, just like, you know, the KitKat example, but they won't know why they've

282
0:28:41 --> 0:28:48
done that. It's just this constant unconscious reinforcement. And they say it. And if you ask

283
0:28:48 --> 0:28:54
them politely, what did I say that was conspiracy, you will get a blank look most of the time,

284
0:28:54 --> 0:28:59
because they actually don't know why they said what they said. So on to number two,

285
0:29:00 --> 0:29:05
the reticulant activating system. Now this, I mean, the more and more we understand this,

286
0:29:05 --> 0:29:12
this is really one of the most important things to understand. So these magnifying glasses,

287
0:29:13 --> 0:29:20
this is the RAS. The RAS is the gatekeeper. The RAS is the security man at the front door.

288
0:29:21 --> 0:29:28
If you say something to someone, which the RAS has got on his no entry list, that information will

289
0:29:28 --> 0:29:34
not get into the person's mind. But the minute that RAS changes, all of the information around

290
0:29:34 --> 0:29:40
that subject will. Now, you know, there's very common examples of this, that when you buy

291
0:29:40 --> 0:29:45
a different car from previous ones you've driven, you suddenly notice that car much more often than

292
0:29:45 --> 0:29:52
you did previously. That's because that car now is in your awareness. Now I'm pretty sure that when

293
0:29:52 --> 0:29:59
you think about when Steve Kirsch talks about how he became aware, the story that he told was in

294
0:29:59 --> 0:30:05
Geneva was a few people that he knew, all on the same day, he found out that they had adverse

295
0:30:05 --> 0:30:12
reactions. So his RAS is now hypervigilant to look for that. And then, you know, he saw it everywhere.

296
0:30:13 --> 0:30:17
And that's the thing, if those two things would have happened 30 days apart, they wouldn't have

297
0:30:17 --> 0:30:21
made it to the RAS. But when they happen on the same day, when lightning strikes on the same day,

298
0:30:21 --> 0:30:27
the RAS kind of takes notice. Now what the RAS notices is things that are new and novel,

299
0:30:28 --> 0:30:36
which in my opinion is why they constantly use that term a novel virus. Okay, that's

300
0:30:36 --> 0:30:43
alerting the RAS system. So pretty much from what I could tell, all of the propaganda was planned to

301
0:30:43 --> 0:30:50
hit the RAS, to hit the condition, etc. The terms were very, very specific, just like the new normal.

302
0:30:50 --> 0:30:57
It's all new, novel, surprise, therefore the RAS will then take notice of it. Now this is a bit

303
0:30:57 --> 0:31:01
where I didn't have enough time to get the sort of pictures together, so I'm just going to have to

304
0:31:01 --> 0:31:06
put a bit of text on the screen. But when you realize how important it is, it's so key. Now

305
0:31:06 --> 0:31:11
Richard Shudden wrote a book called The Choice Factory, which is a really good book. The guy is

306
0:31:11 --> 0:31:17
totally on board with all pro narratives. So, you know, a lot of the examples he gives are not,

307
0:31:17 --> 0:31:24
in my opinion, particularly good. But they did run a study in 2015 on the UK election,

308
0:31:25 --> 0:31:31
and they asked about a policy to raise VAT by 1% to fund 10,000 extra nurses. I mean,

309
0:31:31 --> 0:31:36
a completely fabricated study. But what they found was, and what they were testing was,

310
0:31:36 --> 0:31:44
how Labour supporters would support the policy more if it came from their own party, and conversely

311
0:31:44 --> 0:31:50
would the Conservatives do the same. But as it turns out, it was like 500% more that they would

312
0:31:50 --> 0:31:55
support it when it came from their own party. So what you find is that most people are making

313
0:31:55 --> 0:32:01
their political decisions by the colour of the tie. And this is why if you look in the US,

314
0:32:02 --> 0:32:06
you know, whatever side of the political debate people are, they never see the same event the

315
0:32:06 --> 0:32:13
same way. And they see it through the coloured glasses of the particular party. Now obviously,

316
0:32:13 --> 0:32:18
at the moment, we've got quite a strange political landscape, because, you know, part of the

317
0:32:18 --> 0:32:23
political divide has gone completely mad, in my opinion. But particularly in the UK, it really,

318
0:32:23 --> 0:32:27
in my opinion, doesn't really matter who you vote for, because the same parties are basically have

319
0:32:27 --> 0:32:34
the same puppet masters. But the key thing is that all of the information this person was witnessing

320
0:32:34 --> 0:32:38
was really much governed by the reticulate activating system. Now, how did it affect that

321
0:32:38 --> 0:32:45
study? So basically, the RAS filters out all information that doesn't match what it believes

322
0:32:45 --> 0:32:51
to be true. It also matches out unimportant information, which is why it explains the

323
0:32:51 --> 0:33:00
cocktail party effect, which is you're at a party, there's maybe six or seven conversations going on

324
0:33:00 --> 0:33:06
around you. But the minute someone mentions your name, you notice. Why do you notice? Because it's

325
0:33:06 --> 0:33:14
important because it's flagged in the RAS system to you. But if you notice your name being mentioned

326
0:33:14 --> 0:33:21
in one of those six conversations, what does that assume? That assumes that part of your brain must

327
0:33:21 --> 0:33:27
have been listening to all of those conversations. And it was only at the point where the RAS system

328
0:33:27 --> 0:33:33
said, look, consciousness, you need to know this is because someone's mentioned your name. So

329
0:33:34 --> 0:33:41
what the narrative and the propaganda does is it conditions the RAS to see what it wants them to see.

330
0:33:41 --> 0:33:47
And they won't see anything other. So it really is you see what you believe, you don't believe what

331
0:33:47 --> 0:33:55
you see. And the RAS is the instrument that makes that happen. So once these beliefs in there, it

332
0:33:55 --> 0:34:01
ends up in a reinforcement lock, which is, you know, my party equals good, two legs are bad,

333
0:34:01 --> 0:34:07
four legs are good. It's effectively the gatekeeper, the filter system, an emotional

334
0:34:07 --> 0:34:13
priming as well, that integrates with the limbic system. And this is why the minute you mention

335
0:34:13 --> 0:34:19
any of the trigger words, and we are in a massive trigger society at the moment, as Charles mentioned,

336
0:34:20 --> 0:34:25
it literally triggers that person into a guerrilla state. They go completely emotional because in the

337
0:34:25 --> 0:34:31
RAS, it's effectively saying this person is a threat to me. And then they respond emotionally.

338
0:34:32 --> 0:34:36
And that's why it's so key, because in fact, what the RAS is doing is it's monitoring threats. And

339
0:34:36 --> 0:34:40
if there's a threat, then it shuts down the rational mind and it goes into the emotional mind.

340
0:34:40 --> 0:34:47
And the reason for that is the fight or flight. But it's been it's been conditioned to trigger

341
0:34:47 --> 0:34:52
whenever we might, you know, we say something that threatens the narrative or any one of them.

342
0:34:52 --> 0:34:57
So what are the practical implications? So this was literally the recommendations from Richard,

343
0:34:57 --> 0:35:04
which I wouldn't always agree with. But basically, what it leads to is that when that person you're

344
0:35:04 --> 0:35:11
talking to labels you as a conspiracy theorist on anti facts or any of those things, they are

345
0:35:11 --> 0:35:18
going to ignore everything you say. So it's really important to break that caricature.

346
0:35:19 --> 0:35:23
And that's fairly straightforward to do, but you just got to ask the right questions in the right

347
0:35:24 --> 0:35:29
order, which is just a little bit outside of tonight. But I do we are writing some articles on this.

348
0:35:30 --> 0:35:34
And then what Shodham suggests is targeting auditors when distracted or using subtle

349
0:35:34 --> 0:35:40
emotion driven cues. Now, I wouldn't necessarily say that's a good thing. But what I would do is

350
0:35:40 --> 0:35:46
I'd use stories and metaphors because that makes it into the past the RAS and into the unconscious

351
0:35:46 --> 0:35:53
mind. But what Shodham two other things that he recommended, which are quite really poor ethics,

352
0:35:53 --> 0:36:00
in my opinion, was one, he said, if you're worried about trust in your product, use the radio,

353
0:36:00 --> 0:36:06
because when people listen to the radio, they're generally distracted. And two, he recommends that

354
0:36:06 --> 0:36:12
if you have an unsafe drug, then name it a specific way. And he gives the reasons for that. So

355
0:36:12 --> 0:36:17
obviously, if you've got marketing people, they're quite happy to put ethics to one side.

356
0:36:18 --> 0:36:23
And then the people pushing the narrative get that because Shodham's an absolute genius in this in

357
0:36:23 --> 0:36:30
this information. Then of course, once you've got a person with no ethics, and the information and

358
0:36:30 --> 0:36:37
the skills and the resources, then we end up with the problems that we have today. So this

359
0:36:37 --> 0:36:43
interplace between confirmation bias and RAS really underscores why logical arguments will fail

360
0:36:45 --> 0:36:49
when the person has an entrenched belief, especially emotional one. So logic isn't really

361
0:36:49 --> 0:36:55
going to get us the answer. You can put the logic into a story. And when that story gets delivered

362
0:36:55 --> 0:37:01
to the unconscious mind, it will change the RAS and that person will literally see a different world.

363
0:37:02 --> 0:37:06
Now, for those of you that can recall when you started realizing the world didn't work out,

364
0:37:07 --> 0:37:12
you thought it worked. That's what happened. Your RAS was changed. Something happened that changed

365
0:37:12 --> 0:37:18
the information in the RAS. And it's usually a contradiction that's so strong that the RAS has

366
0:37:18 --> 0:37:23
to accommodate. Now, that's really key. I won't go into it now, but there's basically two processes

367
0:37:23 --> 0:37:28
that are taking information in. One's assimilate and the other one's accommodate. Now, assimilation

368
0:37:28 --> 0:37:32
just keeps the structure of the model the same. You're just putting the information into the

369
0:37:32 --> 0:37:37
structure you have. However, when you can no longer do that, you have to accommodate and that's

370
0:37:37 --> 0:37:44
when your model has to change. Now, if you get exposed to the right information or the truth

371
0:37:44 --> 0:37:49
for a series of stories and experiences, that literally will collapse your model of the world.

372
0:37:49 --> 0:37:55
That's pretty much what I would imagine that's happened to all of you. There'd be some strong

373
0:37:55 --> 0:38:00
story or experience that you could no longer assimilate that information.

374
0:38:01 --> 0:38:08
So, onto the third thing. IOED, which is the illusion explanatory depth. Sounds complex and

375
0:38:08 --> 0:38:14
most of these psychological concepts, they do like complex names, but all it is is a false sense of

376
0:38:14 --> 0:38:20
security. The person thinks they know what they're talking about much more than they do. Now, one of

377
0:38:20 --> 0:38:24
the simplest ways of highlighting this is like even if someone calls you an idiot, ask them to

378
0:38:24 --> 0:38:30
explain how they came to that conclusion and then you're just going to get a blank look most of the

379
0:38:30 --> 0:38:37
time. So, what it is that when Jane says, have you seen the reactions, you're just going to get this

380
0:38:37 --> 0:38:45
conspiracy theories. It doesn't fit and then here's what's fascinating. Joe will then think he knows

381
0:38:45 --> 0:38:50
why he's called you a conspiracy theorist and he thinks he can prove it. But I've been debating

382
0:38:50 --> 0:38:54
with someone online recently who is the most delusional person I've ever spoke to in my life

383
0:38:54 --> 0:38:59
and that's saying something because I spoke to a lot of them. But I've asked him nine times because

384
0:39:00 --> 0:39:05
literally I've only been called a conspiracy theorist once in the last two years and it's

385
0:39:05 --> 0:39:10
by this guy because I now know with my questions how not to trigger that response. But this guy

386
0:39:10 --> 0:39:16
called it me and I've asked him nine times now to explain why he called me yet and he just ignores

387
0:39:16 --> 0:39:24
the question because he doesn't know. He's literally like a pigeon in a box from Skinner's

388
0:39:24 --> 0:39:31
studies. He's just pressing these buttons but he doesn't know why. But on rational people or people

389
0:39:31 --> 0:39:39
that are not completely totally delusional, if you're very calmly just ask them politely,

390
0:39:39 --> 0:39:46
may I ask what did I say that came across as conspiratorial? A lot of the time they will

391
0:39:46 --> 0:39:51
soften and they'll suddenly realize that they don't know what they're talking about. And that's the

392
0:39:51 --> 0:39:57
thing with IOED that all you generally have to do to get someone to shut up is ask them to explain

393
0:39:57 --> 0:40:01
themselves. But if you want to go a little bit deeper then you have to do some other things.

394
0:40:02 --> 0:40:08
But here's what's really interesting. Now this is just for an example of this.

395
0:40:09 --> 0:40:16
There's questions that strengthen someone's delusion. So if you ask someone why they believe

396
0:40:16 --> 0:40:23
what they believe, we are inadvertently getting them to believe what they believe even stronger.

397
0:40:25 --> 0:40:31
We think that that's a question that will help them understand why they believe something

398
0:40:31 --> 0:40:38
that's complete nonsense. But it has the completely opposite result. Now this was done on a big study

399
0:40:39 --> 0:40:44
where they went up to people and they said why do you support the party you support?

400
0:40:45 --> 0:40:52
The person then gave a series of rationalizations and you know rather nicely social sounding answers

401
0:40:52 --> 0:40:57
and then they said to that person, oh can I donate to that party on your behalf as a thank you?

402
0:40:57 --> 0:41:03
The person then said yes that would be nice. When they changed the question they said can you explain

403
0:41:03 --> 0:41:11
the policies of the party you support? The person then had that goldfish look and they realized they

404
0:41:11 --> 0:41:17
didn't know and that completely undermined their confidence. And obviously when the people are

405
0:41:17 --> 0:41:21
doing the study they're going to have a certain authority as well. And then they said to them,

406
0:41:22 --> 0:41:27
can we donate to that party on your behalf? And it was a completely different answer in many cases.

407
0:41:27 --> 0:41:32
The person would say actually no I need to think about this a bit more. So the questions that we

408
0:41:32 --> 0:41:40
ask, so I think a lot of us would say questions is just one big sort of subject. But when you drill

409
0:41:40 --> 0:41:45
into the details, into the weeds and the devils in the details, the actual structure of the question

410
0:41:45 --> 0:41:50
you ask will get a completely different response. So when you understand which questions you ask

411
0:41:50 --> 0:41:56
and which not to ask, you can go from strengthening someone's delusion to actually starting to clap

412
0:41:56 --> 0:42:02
someone's delusion. Now these questions are just very sort of related to the political sphere but

413
0:42:03 --> 0:42:11
we're developing a lot of ones for you know any of the narratives really. And then obviously you can

414
0:42:11 --> 0:42:15
I'm sure you can see the power of this that when you will really understand at a deep level

415
0:42:16 --> 0:42:21
the question you're going to ask, what it's going to trigger in that person from a psychological

416
0:42:21 --> 0:42:25
mindset is going to be actually more important than what their answer is going to be.

417
0:42:26 --> 0:42:32
So you know environments dominated by partisan cues or emotional appeals perpetuate shallow

418
0:42:32 --> 0:42:38
decision making. So what we found from looking into all the studies on political voting,

419
0:42:39 --> 0:42:43
it just appears that not many people know why they're voting for who they're voting for or

420
0:42:43 --> 0:42:49
anything that's really important. For generally it appears that they only vote for the same

421
0:42:49 --> 0:42:55
people that their parents voted for in most cases and that's obviously quite alarming but that tends

422
0:42:55 --> 0:43:01
to be the reality of things from looking at the studies. And obviously some people then go against

423
0:43:01 --> 0:43:06
their parents exactly but it's often a reference point. So what are the effects of these three

424
0:43:06 --> 0:43:13
things? So here's one particular study that's taken from the science of practice of influence

425
0:43:13 --> 0:43:17
and according to Cialdini who's you know labeled as the godfather of influence, this was the

426
0:43:17 --> 0:43:26
scariest study he'd ever seen. So the question is what percentage of nurses would prescribe

427
0:43:27 --> 0:43:34
a drug which was transmitted over the phone, okay, which violated hospital policy. It was actually

428
0:43:34 --> 0:43:42
a fake drug and it wasn't approved for use. The actual doses they were asked to give, so this was

429
0:43:42 --> 0:43:49
doses they were asked to give, so this was literally a person phoning a nurse, right,

430
0:43:49 --> 0:43:54
and just saying he's a doctor. She had never met the doctor before, he just said he was over the

431
0:43:54 --> 0:44:01
phone. The dosage was actually twice which was on this bottle because they created a fake bottle

432
0:44:01 --> 0:44:07
so it was literally twice the actual maximum daily dose and the nurse had never met or spoken to this

433
0:44:07 --> 0:44:14
physician. So the question is how many nurses would then go and give that drug to the patient?

434
0:44:15 --> 0:44:23
So these are the options, okay. Now the answer is, I mean any of those is disastrous but the answer

435
0:44:23 --> 0:44:31
was 95%. Now when you see the effects of this study, how people have been conditioned for the

436
0:44:31 --> 0:44:38
white coat bias and all these things, not many people are thinking. They're just reacting to

437
0:44:38 --> 0:44:44
the environmental cues that are going on which have been created via classical and operant

438
0:44:44 --> 0:44:50
conditioning and there's so many studies like this. I mean the reason they ran this study was

439
0:44:51 --> 0:44:56
was just incredible. A nurse had actually put a

440
0:44:58 --> 0:45:07
ear drops, they had administered them in a suppository way because on the thing it said our ear.

441
0:45:09 --> 0:45:17
So the nurse had read it as as rear and she put the ear drops in the person's rectum, okay. That is how

442
0:45:18 --> 0:45:24
so many people are just acting in just an automatic way. So I'm just going to touch on this

443
0:45:24 --> 0:45:30
because I did show this last time I was here but what you can see is now that all of these things

444
0:45:30 --> 0:45:38
in green are beliefs that have been conditioned via the media and the TV shows as belief systems

445
0:45:38 --> 0:45:45
into a person's unconscious mind that when you create a stimulus they end up with the answer

446
0:45:45 --> 0:45:52
safe and effective. All of this on the left happens automatically outside of awareness.

447
0:45:52 --> 0:45:59
The person then comes to the conclusion oh it's safe and effective and they trust that that's

448
0:45:59 --> 0:46:06
their thought but that has been programmed into them. So how it affects behavior and I'm only

449
0:46:06 --> 0:46:15
going to touch on this but really the unconscious mind's main goal other than the pain of pleasure

450
0:46:15 --> 0:46:21
is actually to conserve energy. So people will always take the path of least resistance, okay.

451
0:46:22 --> 0:46:27
So many people took the jab because it was the path of least resistance but for anyone here

452
0:46:27 --> 0:46:33
that pathway wasn't the least resistance because we knew the consequences so it actually became

453
0:46:33 --> 0:46:40
the path of most resistance. So it's really the obstacles placed in here really key. So if we look

454
0:46:40 --> 0:46:47
at the path of least resistance and we use the picture of Joe here as the conscious mind,

455
0:46:47 --> 0:46:54
the horse is the unconscious mind and this map as the computer which represents all the knowledge

456
0:46:54 --> 0:47:01
that person has and combine it with what you've just seen. What they did was they

457
0:47:01 --> 0:47:08
conditioned people to move away from pain towards the comply and then what they did was they removed

458
0:47:08 --> 0:47:15
all the obstacles, okay. Now this here which I won't go into now because it's

459
0:47:17 --> 0:47:22
will take a bit of time but it's known as self-perception theory which is once you get

460
0:47:22 --> 0:47:29
someone to do one thing which they can't object to they when update their belief system and that's

461
0:47:29 --> 0:47:36
how you can take someone step by step or goose step by goose step from being maybe a liberal or

462
0:47:36 --> 0:47:43
left to actually having fascist ideas but they won't even know it's happened. So they would go from

463
0:47:43 --> 0:47:49
being maybe a pro you know my body my choice to then supporting holding you down and you know

464
0:47:49 --> 0:47:55
injecting you with a pathogen. So it's really you know this model I could talk about a bit to

465
0:47:56 --> 0:48:03
really show out of all those previous points how it literally conditions a person to behave a certain way.

466
0:48:04 --> 0:48:10
So that brings us to the end so really just in summary the first thing was conditioning so

467
0:48:10 --> 0:48:16
that's really really key that's how people feel compelled to do things. So we've been conditioned

468
0:48:16 --> 0:48:21
to go on a Facebook but most people that use Facebook hate Facebook but that's because they

469
0:48:21 --> 0:48:27
feel the unconscious compelled to do so. We've also then got the RAS which is the gatekeeper.

470
0:48:27 --> 0:48:32
This is the key to getting through to people. Once we start to shift the RAS people will literally

471
0:48:32 --> 0:48:36
change their mind so quickly and the third thing was that illusion of explanatory depth

472
0:48:37 --> 0:48:43
which was the really the deception that people have about how the world works

473
0:48:44 --> 0:48:51
and that effect will go away once you know how to to quickly or very eloquently challenge it

474
0:48:51 --> 0:48:55
and then if you can get someone to change their RAS their mind will change.

475
0:48:56 --> 0:49:03
So that brings me to a close you can reach me at this email or that web address and I will open it

476
0:49:03 --> 0:49:14
up for Q&A. Beautiful so David great great job now I've got a couple of key questions for you

477
0:49:14 --> 0:49:25
before while Stephen's getting his thinking together. What's two questions? What is the

478
0:49:25 --> 0:49:33
most surprising belief that you have changed in your life and as you're thinking about that I'll

479
0:49:33 --> 0:49:40
remind everybody about the four stages of life. First stage is when you believe in Santa Claus,

480
0:49:40 --> 0:49:46
the second stage is when you don't believe in Santa Claus, the third stage is when you are

481
0:49:46 --> 0:49:52
Santa Claus and then the fourth stage is when you look like Santa Claus but anyway belief in

482
0:49:52 --> 0:49:57
Santa Claus so my question is a serious one what's the most surprising belief that you've changed and

483
0:49:57 --> 0:50:04
secondly who are the brilliant guys who wrote yes minister and yes prime minister because the

484
0:50:04 --> 0:50:09
PsiOps that they described in those TV programs was simply magnificent. So those two questions

485
0:50:09 --> 0:50:14
David and then we'll go to Stephen for his 15 minutes. The first one is that I can make a

486
0:50:14 --> 0:50:21
difference okay we're all conditioned to think that the world is this big powerful thing that's

487
0:50:21 --> 0:50:25
going on and we're a little tiny piece of sand in it and we can't make any difference that's

488
0:50:25 --> 0:50:31
conditioned into us on purpose but when you start to realize you can do some things that can really

489
0:50:31 --> 0:50:37
change some big things and everyone has that power that's the thing that I found really key. Now

490
0:50:37 --> 0:50:44
I've just finished I'm just going around the second time there's a thing called the Lefko

491
0:50:44 --> 0:50:51
method which is a way in how to change beliefs so we can literally change any belief in about 30

492
0:50:51 --> 0:51:03
minutes now and it's incredible. How do you spell Lefko? L-E-F-K-O? K-O-E. L-E-F-K-O-E. So what's

493
0:51:03 --> 0:51:07
interesting is that I went I literally paid about six thousand to do the three courses

494
0:51:08 --> 0:51:15
they were incredible it's all homework based etc now I only got the homework in on time 10% of the

495
0:51:15 --> 0:51:24
time okay so I had lots of conditioning to hold myself back to really not like homework all of

496
0:51:24 --> 0:51:31
these things anyway we've developed some processes to recondition ourselves I used it on that and on

497
0:51:31 --> 0:51:38
the second time round after four weeks I've got the homework in 100% of the time totally unrelated

498
0:51:38 --> 0:51:43
to whatever I wanted to the intention was always there but it's not about what you can do or want

499
0:51:43 --> 0:51:53
to do it's what how you can really program yourself to do what you want to do. Nice nice that's really

500
0:51:53 --> 0:51:58
bindable the Lefko method. Yeah that's brilliant I mean there's loads of this I mean we've got lots

501
0:51:58 --> 0:52:03
of things that we basically we've built a series of processes and some of them already built

502
0:52:03 --> 0:52:10
obviously to change belief systems to decondition to break programming all these things now we

503
0:52:10 --> 0:52:19
envisage that it's possible to do it on a large scale via documentaries because it's all about

504
0:52:19 --> 0:52:25
the order in which you do things yeah Maldi Lefko was the guy he's passed away now but basically

505
0:52:25 --> 0:52:30
once you understand how the brain works and all these things that are going on then effectively

506
0:52:30 --> 0:52:36
you can learn to control yourself but that's what they've done to us you understand they literally

507
0:52:36 --> 0:52:41
they are the people pushing the propagandas and the people in power they understand this much

508
0:52:41 --> 0:52:46
better than we understand ourselves and yes Prime Minister just on a note have you seen the yes

509
0:52:46 --> 0:52:54
ladder example? Yeah. The yes ladder so basically there's a two minute clip and I can find it and

510
0:52:55 --> 0:53:01
send it if you want it's a great demonstration on how to lead someone up the garden path and he does

511
0:53:01 --> 0:53:07
it in two minutes and he gets the person to two completely different conclusions. Was that the

512
0:53:07 --> 0:53:12
trident nuclear exercise because that was the one that sticks in my mind from the 70s you know?

513
0:53:13 --> 0:53:20
It was the one where he said should we bring back compulsory entry into the army. Yeah

514
0:53:21 --> 0:53:27
yes it's just just spectacular so who are those authors I mean they're so clever to analyze that

515
0:53:28 --> 0:53:33
anyway I bring everyone's attention Stephen must have watched yes Minister and yes Prime Minister

516
0:53:33 --> 0:53:37
but thank you David most interesting lots of other questions we'll get to Stephen for the

517
0:53:37 --> 0:53:48
next 15 minutes and then others will have plenty of questions I'm sure. So David how did they

518
0:53:50 --> 0:53:58
get the whole world to do and say the same stuff you know all around the world in your opinion?

519
0:53:58 --> 0:54:04
Have you got any closer to identifying people responsible? Well that's orchestration so what

520
0:54:04 --> 0:54:11
you've got is that once you understand incentives and there's a book on this called mixed signals

521
0:54:12 --> 0:54:19
so incentives is one of the nine elements of mind space so you can pretty much control

522
0:54:19 --> 0:54:24
billions of people by just incentivizing them to do what you want them to do.

523
0:54:25 --> 0:54:30
You just create the right incentive structure so you so look at all the councils in the UK they

524
0:54:30 --> 0:54:35
pretty much bankrupted them all and they said right well you've got to implement these policies to get

525
0:54:35 --> 0:54:43
the money okay and that's it you've got them controlled I mean basically so via that classical

526
0:54:43 --> 0:54:48
the operant conditioning look what happened to Andrew Bridgen when he stood up okay so that was

527
0:54:48 --> 0:54:53
an example of everyone else you stand up you're going to get that stick okay and you're going to

528
0:54:53 --> 0:54:59
lose all your carrots so that's how so much of this is controlled people are aware that there's

529
0:54:59 --> 0:55:06
consequences to their behavior and you set up the right incentive screen uh straight uh incentives

530
0:55:06 --> 0:55:13
you can pretty much predict with really accurate perspective on what people will do for instance

531
0:55:13 --> 0:55:19
they now know via various studies that there's four elements that under the right conditions you

532
0:55:19 --> 0:55:27
can move the moral compass of 70 percent of the population okay now most companies have those

533
0:55:27 --> 0:55:33
four elements present so basically if you look at the banking system there was a study run out of

534
0:55:33 --> 0:55:39
switzerland that was testing the honesty of all different professions and they did it via getting

535
0:55:39 --> 0:55:44
them to flip a coin in private and then just uh stating how many was heads and tails and they

536
0:55:44 --> 0:55:49
got bonus when it was heads turns out that when bankers are at home they don't cheat but when you

537
0:55:49 --> 0:55:55
remind them about being bankers not only do they cheat but they cheat more than prison inmates

538
0:55:56 --> 0:56:05
okay so what you've got is the norms within a uh society or the norms within a business or whatever

539
0:56:05 --> 0:56:10
is what conducts already influences a lot of people's behavior so yeah to get everyone to

540
0:56:10 --> 0:56:15
do everything it's relatively straightforward you set up the right incentives you condition in the

541
0:56:15 --> 0:56:21
right uh things that if you stand up you get silence and all these things so yeah there's a whole

542
0:56:21 --> 0:56:27
series of things that you do and then you'll get a load of compliance yeah so how do they get people

543
0:56:27 --> 0:56:34
all around the world certainly in western europe to believe that and america um that ucraine could

544
0:56:34 --> 0:56:45
defeat russia well which never made any sense yeah well i i it is pretty amazing um but you see

545
0:56:45 --> 0:56:51
it's not done by logic it's done by emotion but where's the emotion in a country like ukraine

546
0:56:52 --> 0:56:59
well if you look right so if you look at something like jack reacher okay so the scene is jack walks

547
0:56:59 --> 0:57:05
into the the new town gets off the bus walks into the new town a couple comes out the store

548
0:57:06 --> 0:57:11
and the the man looks like he's just about to hit the woman and then you get jack to intervene and

549
0:57:11 --> 0:57:17
save the day what do you think about jack jack's a good guy what do you think about the guy about

550
0:57:17 --> 0:57:23
he's why he's the bad guy it's literally just that's how they do filmmaking so every picture

551
0:57:23 --> 0:57:28
of one guy is bombing a score when every picture the other guy is receiving an oscar off of

552
0:57:30 --> 0:57:37
some actor it's basically it's just advertising put product next to good emotion put other product

553
0:57:37 --> 0:57:42
next to bad emotion if you look at any movie where you've got a villain and a hero it's actually the

554
0:57:42 --> 0:57:50
scenes that get you to feel so in jack reacher they have him save a dog i'm a dog lover okay

555
0:57:50 --> 0:57:57
so i'm looking at that and i just instantly feel a connection to jack okay when jack goes off and

556
0:57:57 --> 0:58:01
killing people in cold blood without justice or the rule of law then i feel a little bit

557
0:58:02 --> 0:58:06
but you see that's what they're doing they're using the emotion yeah it was a good point don't

558
0:58:06 --> 0:58:12
watch any hollywood they're using the emotion to get you to like something and dislike something

559
0:58:12 --> 0:58:17
and if you're a conscious person a lot of time i'll see you'll see through it but you can't decide

560
0:58:17 --> 0:58:25
how you respond to that you pretty much have to not watch it okay so that's literally and and

561
0:58:26 --> 0:58:30
and the because they've you know because i think that most people would think

562
0:58:31 --> 0:58:35
that ukraine's got a bunch of other countries behind them so it's almost like oh it's not just

563
0:58:35 --> 0:58:40
the little person being bullied they've got their dad and their brother behind them but it won't

564
0:58:40 --> 0:58:45
make any logic but it doesn't have to because they're not based in the decision on logic

565
0:58:45 --> 0:58:50
they're based on their decision on emotion and then what the brain will do is rationalization

566
0:58:50 --> 0:58:57
yeah so david do you think that the they actually tried to destabilize people by

567
0:58:57 --> 0:59:05
by um getting them to believe in things that they they wouldn't normally believe you know so

568
0:59:05 --> 0:59:10
look at the ukraine war the whole thing was mystifying to me from the people it appeared

569
0:59:10 --> 0:59:17
in early 22 i think it was climate change same and covid the same there was no pandemic

570
0:59:17 --> 0:59:25
no pandemic and that took a bit more work working out for most people but the ukraine war and

571
0:59:25 --> 0:59:33
climate change just staring in the face of its fraud um so and they got people to believe you

572
0:59:33 --> 0:59:38
know the people who were trying to influence they got them to believe all three of those

573
0:59:38 --> 0:59:47
and there were more things which didn't make sense and so was the idea to get them to believe stuff

574
0:59:47 --> 0:59:52
that actually deep down they knew they shouldn't believe but they they there was so much pressure

575
0:59:52 --> 0:59:58
on them that they actually sold their soul in the end and they and the idea was to get them to

576
0:59:58 --> 1:00:03
not respect themselves was that part of it at all well that is there is some evidence to suggest

577
1:00:03 --> 1:00:12
that so there was a very famous asian warrior that would bring a horse in and say this is a deer

578
1:00:13 --> 1:00:16
and anyone that disagreed he just murdered because they were not compliant to him

579
1:00:17 --> 1:00:23
okay so some of this stuff is a compliance test but it's a very slippery road that the minute you

580
1:00:23 --> 1:00:30
take a few steps down that yes your belief system will change but it there's many different types of

581
1:00:30 --> 1:00:35
self-image that we have so there's one that we project to the world and there's a real one that

582
1:00:35 --> 1:00:40
governs our behavior so the person will go right okay well in order to survive i'm going to have

583
1:00:40 --> 1:00:46
to just concede and do as i'm told because it just seems so overwhelming and you know people want to

584
1:00:46 --> 1:00:53
be on the side that wins etc so there is evidence to suggest that steven and the belief system the

585
1:00:53 --> 1:00:57
way that this and it's known as self-perception theory the way that the belief system will change

586
1:00:57 --> 1:01:06
according to someone's behavior is really struck me as being startling so what happens is that our

587
1:01:06 --> 1:01:13
belief system drives our behavior and it's a kind of reinforced loop so it's a two-way street so if

588
1:01:13 --> 1:01:19
we do something different we're actually monitoring our own behavior and then our belief systems will

589
1:01:19 --> 1:01:26
change so by forcing a person to take a mask you're forcing them into a false choice where they know

590
1:01:26 --> 1:01:31
it's not going to work so they either push back against it or they change their belief system but

591
1:01:31 --> 1:01:37
when they're forced to do so and they don't have the record belief systems or courage then what

592
1:01:37 --> 1:01:43
happens is they will change their belief system but it does it happens unconsciously so when you

593
1:01:43 --> 1:01:47
talk to people and you hear people say oh my parents talk it and then i asked them why they

594
1:01:47 --> 1:01:53
say oh i just want a quiet life they don't realize that wanting a quiet life is a result of learned

595
1:01:53 --> 1:02:01
helplessness from a decades and decades of conditioning then i want a quiet life is pretty

596
1:02:01 --> 1:02:07
much saying there's this group of people that run this country and i just have to appease them as

597
1:02:07 --> 1:02:13
much as possible so they let me at least live a quiet life that makes sense we're not aware that

598
1:02:13 --> 1:02:19
the the levels of condition that have to go on that if you take a child that has total confidence

599
1:02:19 --> 1:02:24
in themselves and you put them in a classroom where there's a strong person at the front and says

600
1:02:24 --> 1:02:30
what you have to do everything as i say that for me is is designed to break the spirit of the child

601
1:02:30 --> 1:02:36
to get them to comply and then you've got 20 you know whatever years of conditioning every time you

602
1:02:36 --> 1:02:41
do as i say you get a gold star every time you don't do as i say you go in the corner or you get

603
1:02:41 --> 1:02:47
the cane or whatever it is and and it goes from being physical you know years ago to now be an

604
1:02:47 --> 1:02:56
emotional blackmail but decades of that literally will wear a person down if they don't have you

605
1:02:56 --> 1:03:01
know something about them that can push against it so in 2020 david did they deliberately

606
1:03:01 --> 1:03:08
upset the world in the view of most people you know so it created chaos and that nothing made

607
1:03:08 --> 1:03:16
sense and um and that was disturbing enough but then people because nothing made sense they were

608
1:03:16 --> 1:03:20
fearful yeah and then they realized that they couldn't actually talk to anyone because

609
1:03:20 --> 1:03:26
people became their fearful state their perceptions were all different they couldn't connect with

610
1:03:27 --> 1:03:32
anyone and then they found that they were breaking up with friends and family members

611
1:03:33 --> 1:03:40
and that kind of spooked them even more was it a kind of vicious uh circle going round and round

612
1:03:40 --> 1:03:45
and getting worse and worse in order yeah in order to create a new society you effectively have to

613
1:03:45 --> 1:03:51
disrupt the old one so they disrupt in a pattern of behavior they disrupt in thought patterns etc

614
1:03:52 --> 1:03:57
but that question i mean that would take hours to answer because there's so many elements to it

615
1:03:58 --> 1:04:06
that you know you create a huge amount of emotion okay and then you take away everything that

616
1:04:06 --> 1:04:10
someone values and you say right you can have this back when you do as i say

617
1:04:11 --> 1:04:19
and then what they did was they gave everybody a buffet of excuses okay and of course you know it

618
1:04:19 --> 1:04:24
was herd instinct it was basically you know herd instinct historically developed as a survival

619
1:04:24 --> 1:04:29
strategy in a survival mechanism so when you look at an antelope if it's on its own it's pretty

620
1:04:29 --> 1:04:35
screwed but if it's in a big group you know not everyone has to look out so pack behavior is one

621
1:04:35 --> 1:04:40
of the ways that we evolved but then you get a few people that peel off and then understand how the

622
1:04:40 --> 1:04:48
pack operates and then uses its behavior against it is what we've witnessed so the the consensus

623
1:04:50 --> 1:04:57
belief system is really really really powerful yes and so human beings operate they have habits

624
1:04:58 --> 1:05:05
and the habits normally would carry on and on but then they disrupt the habit and the habit can

625
1:05:05 --> 1:05:12
once the habit is broken like over a week it's very difficult for them to resume the habit is

626
1:05:12 --> 1:05:17
that correct so well oh sorry yeah well that's that's a difficult question because it needs a

627
1:05:17 --> 1:05:23
bit more specific but i think to to i think what you're touching on is heuristics so basically

628
1:05:23 --> 1:05:29
we've got loads of rules of fun that we have in our mind for instance if let's say you was in

629
1:05:29 --> 1:05:33
holiday in spain and you walked past two restaurants and one of them was really busy and the other one

630
1:05:33 --> 1:05:42
was empty which one do you think was better me personally well not your but what like what would

631
1:05:42 --> 1:05:47
you think was the better restaurant the busy one would be the general populace would say a lot of

632
1:05:47 --> 1:05:52
some people might go in the quiet one because they they want to be in and out but generally

633
1:05:52 --> 1:05:58
most people would think the busier one would be better but this is how they hack our minds so

634
1:05:58 --> 1:06:05
let's say the restaurant on the left that's a busy one the owner has got all of his cousins down to

635
1:06:05 --> 1:06:11
sit there to make it look busy and then what he's done is he's put some you know dog poo on the

636
1:06:11 --> 1:06:18
other one's you know doorstep so what they're then doing is they're manipulating people's

637
1:06:18 --> 1:06:23
natural instincts and that's what a salesman do is they know what's going on so then they

638
1:06:23 --> 1:06:29
appear to be something other than they are so the person perceives it as they want them to be

639
1:06:29 --> 1:06:36
perceived very good so charles i'll give someone else a chance to do it very good that's you're

640
1:06:36 --> 1:06:41
perfect 15 minutes precisely steven yeah well done didn't even look at my watch well done

641
1:06:42 --> 1:06:48
subconsciously we've trained you well all about feelings joss not logic

642
1:06:51 --> 1:07:00
jessica love to have you here and love it i've seen you in dublin recently yes likewise and

643
1:07:00 --> 1:07:07
you look stunning much this doesn't do you justice on here i must say thank you very impressive

644
1:07:08 --> 1:07:11
i'll do anything for a fiver charles you know that

645
1:07:13 --> 1:07:19
david i had to take care of a phone call during that so if you've already covered this i'll watch

646
1:07:19 --> 1:07:26
it on catch up and won't take more time from you but the question i really want to ask your

647
1:07:26 --> 1:07:35
opinion on is we know a lot these days about why people do things how it's done how we manipulated

648
1:07:35 --> 1:07:40
and in my way of looking at it i always just tell people watch the commercials with the sound off

649
1:07:40 --> 1:07:51
and you can just see exactly what's going on then but my question is about the people who don't do

650
1:07:51 --> 1:07:57
it because i know it's not upbringing or conditioning because you know i've got siblings

651
1:07:58 --> 1:08:05
why are there those people who simply don't who just who just see it see through the illusion

652
1:08:06 --> 1:08:14
yeah i this is literally the first question that we all have okay now i could talk about hours

653
1:08:14 --> 1:08:22
about this but it's really there is something about it's they they pretty much label it as

654
1:08:22 --> 1:08:28
prior experiences so whilst you might have shared the same upbringing as your brothers and sisters

655
1:08:29 --> 1:08:33
you would have had distinctly different unique experiences and there'd be something in there

656
1:08:34 --> 1:08:39
that space is almost like an algorithm that would have alerted you and that would have been that

657
1:08:39 --> 1:08:48
razz that's filtering the world has literally been able to see what they can't see okay so if you get

658
1:08:48 --> 1:08:53
two people with different razz watch the same film or watch the same experience they literally see

659
1:08:54 --> 1:09:03
different things okay that doesn't rule out potential aspects of spirituality and all the

660
1:09:03 --> 1:09:08
other things because you can you know that's definitely possible and if you look at morphogenic

661
1:09:08 --> 1:09:15
fields with sheldrake that's always that's also possible but if we stayed strictly scientific and

662
1:09:15 --> 1:09:22
physical it's your prior experiences okay there's just something about what you noticed

663
1:09:22 --> 1:09:28
yeah for me there was a lot of things as a kid but there was an experience i had as 19 where

664
1:09:28 --> 1:09:33
i got rushed in the hospital and i suddenly realized the doctors had no clue what they were

665
1:09:33 --> 1:09:39
doing they literally scared the shit out of me telling me there was all these things wrong with

666
1:09:39 --> 1:09:43
me and then another doctor come in and say there's nothing wrong with him he's got a chest infection

667
1:09:43 --> 1:09:49
that sent me home that contradiction that experience was so strong that it broke that model of the

668
1:09:49 --> 1:09:56
world okay so when you look at people that have gone into natural health the majority of those

669
1:09:56 --> 1:10:04
people now know that the pharmaceutical companies are absolute you know total criminals so most of

670
1:10:04 --> 1:10:10
those would have known something was up for some reason the yoga community didn't okay no

671
1:10:12 --> 1:10:20
they met see what it is that we we generally take a lot of advice from the people with influence

672
1:10:21 --> 1:10:27
okay so that's why they paid a lot the influences because the influences will really affect the

673
1:10:27 --> 1:10:33
their followers so a lot of the yogis and the people at the yoga institutes and whatever were

674
1:10:33 --> 1:10:37
you know paid a lot of money to take the jab and believe in it and then of course they got to the

675
1:10:37 --> 1:10:42
churches so a lot of the people in the church would be affected and all this thing so what they did

676
1:10:42 --> 1:10:49
was they looked for all the influence in pillars of power and affected those but once you have

677
1:10:50 --> 1:10:57
epic meaning or purpose nothing will work on you okay once you know what you're here to do

678
1:10:57 --> 1:11:03
once you know that you've got a place and you've got a role to do none of that stuff works on you

679
1:11:03 --> 1:11:10
anymore yeah it just won't have any effect you know they will be able to get suddenly things

680
1:11:10 --> 1:11:15
at you from certain conditionings but as a general rule once you know once the game's up it's up

681
1:11:15 --> 1:11:23
yeah that makes total sense and i can imagine as well i mean we had a very rough childhood a lot

682
1:11:23 --> 1:11:32
of homelessness and very very very rough sort of experience yeah but i was i was the one that

683
1:11:32 --> 1:11:38
that didn't buy into this but everyone i was nothing i can do about it and and then you know

684
1:11:38 --> 1:11:46
even down to yeah well people like you are the problem yeah yeah well you see the that come from

685
1:11:46 --> 1:11:51
yeah well yeah the thing is though you would have lost a lot of confidence in the system

686
1:11:51 --> 1:11:56
from your experience oh certainly but it sounds like the others literally because

687
1:11:57 --> 1:12:04
to the four f's is fight flight freeze and form and what happens is a lot of people

688
1:12:04 --> 1:12:10
are just falling as the way to survival yeah you decided to fight it's like screw this okay a lot

689
1:12:10 --> 1:12:15
of people were just trying to escape but you couldn't really with a pandemic because it was global

690
1:12:16 --> 1:12:21
and then of course most of the population are stuck in freeze so those four f's are pretty

691
1:12:21 --> 1:12:26
pretty important but this is why you see a lot of people just fall in oh if i just do as a good

692
1:12:26 --> 1:12:32
little boy or girl then i'll be okay and that's the stage that most people seem to be in their

693
1:12:32 --> 1:12:36
freeze because a lot of the people you know if we use the truth movement as a loose term

694
1:12:37 --> 1:12:43
they are stuck in freeze at the moment yeah i'll get that traumatized beyond belief yeah it's

695
1:12:43 --> 1:12:48
really understandable but if we're to get out of this we've got to move that freeze into fight and

696
1:12:48 --> 1:12:54
action and other things yeah and i think fear and trauma does infantilize people as well and they'll

697
1:12:54 --> 1:13:00
just go back to where they think it's the safest place to be so put the news on or something you

698
1:13:00 --> 1:13:08
know because it's the comfort zone yeah fear is very paralyzing probably the second most

699
1:13:08 --> 1:13:14
powerful emotion but it easily overrides the others if you're not careful yeah totally well

700
1:13:14 --> 1:13:19
thanks very much for that i really appreciate it thank you jesse here everyone look check out

701
1:13:19 --> 1:13:24
jesse's book the topic of cancer great title not the topic of cancer but the topic of cancer

702
1:13:25 --> 1:13:32
um which i have in my hand cancer is by henry miller yes the topic of cancer is by jessica

703
1:13:32 --> 1:13:38
richards much more important now um before we go to glenn steve i just want to point out john

704
1:13:38 --> 1:13:45
baudwin is available to present to us so you get in touch with him um john's got some great stuff

705
1:13:45 --> 1:13:53
by just bringing it to your attention yes i have that that that happens so i i um i i sent an email

706
1:13:53 --> 1:13:58
to john today yeah that's so just organize i'm just bringing to your attention so that

707
1:13:58 --> 1:14:08
um i don't forget it glenn is next and then it's me hi david uh i listen i've uh listened very

708
1:14:08 --> 1:14:16
intently to both your prior presentations here um what i'd like to do is postulate something i mean

709
1:14:16 --> 1:14:21
to some extent your layout describes what happens in group psychology and and where you're dealing

710
1:14:21 --> 1:14:26
with large groups of people and sometimes those can be large groups on both sides i'm going to

711
1:14:26 --> 1:14:33
postulate that that's not true here that what we have now is a very tiny number of trillionaires

712
1:14:33 --> 1:14:40
that are simply looking to enslave the rest of humanity uh and they have used the techniques of

713
1:14:40 --> 1:14:48
lie cheat steal and murder in order to get control over the institutions a variety of of

714
1:14:48 --> 1:14:56
leaderships and whether it's church or or or uh political positions and once they've trapped those

715
1:14:56 --> 1:15:02
people uh in those techniques they they have to go along with whatever the criminal syndicate is

716
1:15:02 --> 1:15:09
telling them to do i actually in agreement by the way i i i think what you've got is the man behind

717
1:15:09 --> 1:15:15
the curtain you know from the wizard of oz yeah once they get everyone else believing in what

718
1:15:15 --> 1:15:21
they're doing but one of the techniques i believe they're using constantly is that they are finding

719
1:15:22 --> 1:15:28
uh people that are of of pure content and pure interest and and in favor of humanity

720
1:15:28 --> 1:15:34
and they're sabotaging them yes exactly so so let me give you a couple of examples

721
1:15:35 --> 1:15:43
yeah um uh the canadian truckers they developed through their own communication linkage and their

722
1:15:43 --> 1:15:50
own style a group think and and when they once they got that rolling they got a huge amount of

723
1:15:50 --> 1:15:57
the public endorsement so what happened the elites the trillionaires they had to send in their

724
1:15:57 --> 1:16:04
saboteurs so they they they found their people to go in and join join the truckers be one of them

725
1:16:04 --> 1:16:09
help you know say you want to help with their leadership offer lots of services maybe offer

726
1:16:09 --> 1:16:15
money and and they worked themselves into those groups and then they basically tore them to shreds

727
1:16:17 --> 1:16:22
another example of this in in people that we have seen right here in this particular

728
1:16:23 --> 1:16:28
zoom call arrangement i'm going to point out two of them one of them

729
1:16:30 --> 1:16:38
four four or five months ago came in and spoke about how his daughter was poisoned in in uh in

730
1:16:38 --> 1:16:45
in a hospital and uh how he was defending her and taking that um and he went through that high

731
1:16:45 --> 1:16:52
entire discussion but then when he got to the next part of it he said and he he invoked his religious

732
1:16:52 --> 1:17:02
background to it and then said i can't defend i i won't agree to the issue of voting for uh the

733
1:17:02 --> 1:17:11
the less worse of two evils and he basically encouraged everyone don't vote now anyone that

734
1:17:11 --> 1:17:18
ever compared trump to biden says well i may not like trump but i can't see him as being anywhere

735
1:17:18 --> 1:17:24
near as evil as biden and so once you convince people not to vote that's what they wanted they

736
1:17:24 --> 1:17:31
didn't want good people to be in fact voting for someone that may not been their best choice but

737
1:17:31 --> 1:17:37
was better than the other choice i'm going to give one other example and then let you comment

738
1:17:37 --> 1:17:44
on it and this was just a couple weeks ago uh we had patrick wood on now patrick wood has done some

739
1:17:44 --> 1:17:49
brilliant work of of tracking down through the trilateral commission uh things going back to the

740
1:17:49 --> 1:17:58
30s and especially later on with with the rockfella foundation 70s and the 80s but i contend and i and

741
1:17:58 --> 1:18:04
i said this openly that that he got tricked later on and he got fooled into believing

742
1:18:05 --> 1:18:13
that uh that that there were a variety of corrupt elements to the uh to trump and to a range of the

743
1:18:13 --> 1:18:21
trump uh uh designees to be in his his government um and that he basically got tricked into thinking

744
1:18:21 --> 1:18:29
oh trump's a bad guy so i i gotta warn people about that uh so that they so the whole world

745
1:18:29 --> 1:18:34
doesn't join in even though every single theme when you bring up a single topic like the trans

746
1:18:34 --> 1:18:41
world 80 of the public believes in that and and they think the democrats are idiots for for standing

747
1:18:41 --> 1:18:48
behind that theme even even as their whole party is is collapsing so uh that's my question to you

748
1:18:48 --> 1:18:55
do you see that same kind of thing where very good honest good intent you know intentioned people

749
1:18:56 --> 1:19:02
that are very morally grounded end up being tricked into uh confusing the public

750
1:19:03 --> 1:19:10
simply so that the the broad-based humanity can't come back in mass and and undo the trillionaires

751
1:19:11 --> 1:19:19
well there's well there's so many different elements to that the the one of the things is

752
1:19:19 --> 1:19:27
that there's a lot of mercenaries out there mercenaries such as um what's his name piers morgan

753
1:19:27 --> 1:19:33
that we got in the uk right and steven and anyone in the uk would know that man is the armpit of

754
1:19:33 --> 1:19:41
society is a toenail on the end of scum he literally but you see he doesn't necessarily

755
1:19:41 --> 1:19:48
believe in the ideology but he will do whatever he's paid to do okay and this is where incentives

756
1:19:48 --> 1:19:54
are really really key so there's a lot of people like for instance when you look at all the

757
1:19:54 --> 1:19:58
and i'm sure i certainly know a lot of the countries i've visited over the last two years

758
1:19:58 --> 1:20:05
have a real big problem in immigration and it tends to be men of a fighting age etc etc

759
1:20:05 --> 1:20:15
now if they those men end up joining the army they have no loyalty okay and anyone that has a power

760
1:20:15 --> 1:20:20
and and wants to do things not very good if they've got an army that will do anything because they're

761
1:20:20 --> 1:20:28
mercenaries versus an army that will only do what's right then you know so mercenaries a lot are very

762
1:20:28 --> 1:20:34
powerful to anybody that wants to do anything so certainly the elites then what you've got is

763
1:20:34 --> 1:20:43
ideologies and belief systems and we had a massive problem over here where people you know and and

764
1:20:43 --> 1:20:48
the talk the truth movement was really torn between people that saying well we have to vote even if

765
1:20:48 --> 1:20:53
we just try and get some independence in and there was a lot of people that said there's no point it

766
1:20:53 --> 1:20:59
makes no difference okay now both schools of thought you can understand why they've come to

767
1:20:59 --> 1:21:06
that conclusion but it really doesn't solve anything yeah so that's that's another piece

768
1:21:06 --> 1:21:12
and then this thing about controlled opposition is really problematic because one of the biggest

769
1:21:12 --> 1:21:20
psyops is thinking everything's a scion okay so the salem witch stuff where they've had professor

770
1:21:20 --> 1:21:25
and the thing is nearly every concept i'll talk about has been well studied and they know what

771
1:21:25 --> 1:21:31
effect they will get so if you get 40 students in a class and you tell them what we're going to do

772
1:21:31 --> 1:21:37
today is that i'm going to whisper in your ear whether you're a person or a witch and your job

773
1:21:37 --> 1:21:42
is to work out who the witches are okay so they say right at the end of the day all the people

774
1:21:42 --> 1:21:47
that have been accused of witches go to one side and like 25 percent of the room goes to one side

775
1:21:47 --> 1:21:52
and then they say right put your hand up if you're a witch no one puts their hand up because they

776
1:21:52 --> 1:21:57
were all people but they were looking for witches now there are controlled opposition that's almost

777
1:21:57 --> 1:22:04
guaranteed we know of brigade 77 etc etc but nowhere near as in the level in which people

778
1:22:04 --> 1:22:09
are accusing others so pretty much i'm pretty sure that nearly everyone on this call has been

779
1:22:09 --> 1:22:14
called a shill or something of some description at some point when you said something that somebody

780
1:22:14 --> 1:22:21
else didn't agree with their go-to is to call you controlled opposition or a shill so that's very

781
1:22:21 --> 1:22:29
problematic and the people pushing the agendas they can do so much damage by making up all memes

782
1:22:29 --> 1:22:35
and false accusations by somebody that's telling the truth that makes sense so that's very

783
1:22:35 --> 1:22:39
problematic and i you know i've thought about this a lot and i spoke to people about it how we

784
1:22:40 --> 1:22:47
combat this you know we get around it because i got called all sorts of names just because i

785
1:22:47 --> 1:22:53
agreed to be a referee on a zoom call with two groups that were fighting each other literally

786
1:22:53 --> 1:23:00
unpaid just agreed to try and make everyone as impartial as possible the amount of abuse i got

787
1:23:00 --> 1:23:06
from doing that i'm like what the hell like if we have see because the thing is when people get

788
1:23:06 --> 1:23:13
emotional they want to be judged red okay they want to be the judge the jury and the executioner

789
1:23:13 --> 1:23:18
right i know what's right and this is how it's going to be but of course a society functioning

790
1:23:18 --> 1:23:23
community can't act that way right so especially when we know how we function so

791
1:23:24 --> 1:23:32
they you know and to touch on the point look at the canada i spoke at the we unify conference

792
1:23:32 --> 1:23:39
last year where if you were waving the canadian flag you were a nazi okay they they paid a bunch

793
1:23:39 --> 1:23:44
of trans protesters to go down and say we were spreading hate nobody knew why even they didn't

794
1:23:44 --> 1:23:49
know why because the media went out and asked them why are you here they're spreading hate what did

795
1:23:49 --> 1:23:59
they say oh we don't know like what the hell so but but clive do something um he he went there

796
1:23:59 --> 1:24:03
week ago because i spoke to him on sunday and he said right they're all flying the canadian flag now

797
1:24:04 --> 1:24:08
right because what they've done now the propaganda says right well we've got to fight trump

798
1:24:09 --> 1:24:13
so now we're canadians let's fly that so literally they just flip from one to the other

799
1:24:15 --> 1:24:23
um but we do have a real challenge because due to the curse of knowledge when we're on the same

800
1:24:23 --> 1:24:28
on this like say all of us here we just assume that we all believe the same things

801
1:24:29 --> 1:24:33
but if we had a checklist of all the different narratives and all the different belief systems

802
1:24:33 --> 1:24:39
which would be a very interesting thing to do and then we all state what we believe and then we were

803
1:24:39 --> 1:24:44
able to have a sort of imminent critique of that and and look at it i think it would be a very

804
1:24:44 --> 1:24:50
enriching process i know that i don't know everything in fact i know very you know i

805
1:24:50 --> 1:24:56
concentrate on the psychology i don't have my finger on the pulse so you know we've got to

806
1:24:56 --> 1:25:03
find a way to solve a lot of these things um but certainly you know the comments you made is you

807
1:25:03 --> 1:25:09
know very valid in many areas and it's to understand that you know the mercenaries are a real big

808
1:25:09 --> 1:25:14
problem because they don't have any allegiance they don't have any ideology they just do whatever

809
1:25:14 --> 1:25:21
they're told to do and as an example in wells fargo they set up their incentive program

810
1:25:21 --> 1:25:29
um incorrectly the member of staff would get a bonus if their existing customer opened a new

811
1:25:29 --> 1:25:37
account 5200 of employees committed fraud i mean that's astonishing you set up the right

812
1:25:37 --> 1:25:45
environment for people to do wrong and they will do wrong okay hopefully that sheds a few thank you

813
1:25:45 --> 1:25:51
one quick follow-up and i want to i think it may lead to you steven your concern will g why

814
1:25:51 --> 1:25:57
why did uh zelinski ever think he could win against putin um you have to understand the

815
1:25:57 --> 1:26:07
motivations uh neither putin nor zelinski wanted to win they just wanted to fight because that's

816
1:26:07 --> 1:26:15
where the most money comes to them is when somebody else is funding the war so that's that's

817
1:26:15 --> 1:26:22
why it went on and has gone on for so long simply both sides both putin uh was making money on it

818
1:26:22 --> 1:26:28
and zelinski and by the way if you haven't seen him yet take a look at the pictures that are tying

819
1:26:28 --> 1:26:36
zelinski back and he may be the son of george soros wow love it okay love it thank you glenn

820
1:26:37 --> 1:26:44
who's saying that thank you who's saying that if you haven't seen the photos i'll post it

821
1:26:46 --> 1:26:53
all right thanks thanks post it where i'll put the pointer in the chat okay very good okay um

822
1:26:53 --> 1:27:03
thank you thank you glenn before we go to john david um i've been an executive coach for 31

823
1:27:03 --> 1:27:11
years i've been a professional speaker for 31 years and in my experience of one-on-one coaching

824
1:27:12 --> 1:27:18
and i challenge the people on this call and anyone watching this recording in my experience

825
1:27:19 --> 1:27:25
the vast majority of people have no conscious idea of what they believe and i'm sure you've

826
1:27:25 --> 1:27:32
found the same thing i have no idea what they believe they are unable to articulate what they

827
1:27:32 --> 1:27:37
believe and yet you have pointed out and i reinforce it that their decisions are based

828
1:27:37 --> 1:27:43
on these beliefs they're not even conscious they've got and so all of you watching all of

829
1:27:43 --> 1:27:48
you here you know what david's telling us and all what i'm telling you all it is to wake up

830
1:27:48 --> 1:27:53
to understand what you believe and then when you look at it to question so what do i actually

831
1:27:53 --> 1:28:00
believe about that and you will be stunningly surprised the second issue is david you said hey

832
1:28:00 --> 1:28:05
i don't know at all each one of us knows the best metaphor i have for this

833
1:28:05 --> 1:28:11
is that if you imagine the volume of knowledge on the planet as an olympic-sized swimming pool

834
1:28:11 --> 1:28:15
and by the way talking about referees david i was an international water polo referee

835
1:28:16 --> 1:28:22
so every time i made a decision half the thousands of people would call me a prick the other ones

836
1:28:22 --> 1:28:26
would say i'm brilliant and then make another decision then the other half would say i'm

837
1:28:26 --> 1:28:32
brilliant and now i'm a prick and so being a referee is interesting in the psychology of

838
1:28:33 --> 1:28:38
umpires in you know international games they soccer matches and the like it's it's quite

839
1:28:39 --> 1:28:43
it's quite um interesting i don't know where i was going with that i was going to say something

840
1:28:43 --> 1:28:53
um no i lost it doesn't matter so so i'll take oh sorry the swimming pool analogy

841
1:28:55 --> 1:29:00
if that's that's why i thought of water polo an olympic-sized swimming pool has a million

842
1:29:00 --> 1:29:08
liters of water if you picture that as the sum total of all human knowledge the smartest guy

843
1:29:08 --> 1:29:16
in the room might know 10 000 liters of the million liters the smartest guy in the room

844
1:29:16 --> 1:29:22
each one of us knows maybe a thousand liters of the million liters 0.1 percent

845
1:29:23 --> 1:29:31
and this idea that an anthony de mello beautifully says beautifully points out in his book awareness

846
1:29:31 --> 1:29:35
i'm sure you've read de mello's book awareness it's wonderful he says each one of us is just an

847
1:29:35 --> 1:29:41
idiot and when you accept that you're an idiot then you stop trying to walk around impressing people

848
1:29:42 --> 1:29:51
that you know it all because the smartest guy in the room might know one percent of the stuff

849
1:29:51 --> 1:29:57
one percent of the stuff and so voltaire's got a similar quote isn't he he says the more the study

850
1:29:57 --> 1:30:04
the more i realize i know nothing yeah we know nothing and so and so in the con in the conversations

851
1:30:04 --> 1:30:11
that we have here the views the opinions the upsets and all of that so picture that olympic

852
1:30:11 --> 1:30:19
size swimming pool everybody and you know and and be hungry to learn so um find understand you know

853
1:30:19 --> 1:30:26
i just urge everybody and the issue the question that challenged us david it's a big question

854
1:30:26 --> 1:30:31
steven and i have talked about it here many times is the psyop that has been exercised on the medical

855
1:30:31 --> 1:30:39
fraternity since 1910 all right and so the the the your chart of questions was very good and

856
1:30:39 --> 1:30:44
one of the challenges that we have is my view in australia is the 20 percent of doctors

857
1:30:44 --> 1:30:51
would tend towards we call them the truth seekers and the freedom fighters 80 percent are totally

858
1:30:51 --> 1:31:01
lost same in the uk 20 would question the system but insufficient are doing it publicly and and

859
1:31:01 --> 1:31:06
david one of the things we have to do is to if the medical profession and lawyers are the same by the

860
1:31:06 --> 1:31:14
way the question is the psyop that's been exercised on them how what are the questions that we can

861
1:31:14 --> 1:31:25
ask our doctors and doctors can ask of each other to shift this mad this may all the doctors have

862
1:31:25 --> 1:31:31
become mercenaries as we know you know it was my mortgage or your health clearly paying my mortgage

863
1:31:31 --> 1:31:37
is more important than your health so that's the question that i have of you you know have have you

864
1:31:37 --> 1:31:43
thought about how we break through this side yeah yeah well a lot i mean it would take hours to

865
1:31:43 --> 1:31:47
literally go through it there's a number of solutions one of them is we really need a

866
1:31:47 --> 1:31:53
knowledge base okay for anyone that's working big corporations what a knowledge base is imagine

867
1:31:53 --> 1:31:59
everyone on this call all the implicit knowledge in their heads if we could get that implicit

868
1:31:59 --> 1:32:05
knowledge into an explicit system where everyone else could access it then all we we pretty much

869
1:32:05 --> 1:32:11
have that hive mind in all accessing the top information so i'm talking with a couple of

870
1:32:11 --> 1:32:15
people in canada at the moment to try and build one about vaccination so then when you're going

871
1:32:15 --> 1:32:19
to talk to someone you can destroy their argument very quickly because you've got the information

872
1:32:19 --> 1:32:23
but it's not the information that's going to do it you're going to be able to tell them stories

873
1:32:23 --> 1:32:29
and get their mind open and when it's open then you've got the info so that's one thing but there's

874
1:32:29 --> 1:32:34
a whole bunch of different solutions i mean one of the biggest pressures is the finance system

875
1:32:35 --> 1:32:40
okay because there's a thing law of the commons which is pretty much people and families will

876
1:32:40 --> 1:32:44
look after themselves first which is why you see those doctors are looking after their

877
1:32:45 --> 1:32:49
their families and their mortgage and their income first because of the system that they're stuck in

878
1:32:50 --> 1:32:55
this is the problem the systems are so degenerative they're so problematic and it's

879
1:32:55 --> 1:33:01
pretty much the incentives that's a problem we will consciously say oh no no corruption doesn't

880
1:33:01 --> 1:33:08
operate that but all the studies show opposite four list of behaviors 65 percent of people's

881
1:33:08 --> 1:33:14
moral compass will move stanley milgram showed that up to 65 percent of people will literally

882
1:33:14 --> 1:33:20
press a button to kill another person just because someone in a white coat told them to do so

883
1:33:20 --> 1:33:26
so we've got to transcend all of these things but in terms of solutions i think it's you know

884
1:33:26 --> 1:33:33
there's a lot of brainstorm that needs to happen and then there's a lot of people where so many

885
1:33:33 --> 1:33:38
different people have a piece of the puzzle and you get those people together so they can build

886
1:33:38 --> 1:33:43
the solution together is one of the things i'm literally yeah there's yeah there's so many

887
1:33:43 --> 1:33:50
bit there's so much so it's so complicated but okay there's some good thoughts there i will

888
1:33:50 --> 1:33:55
yeah we've got to collaborate basically and we work out where we're going and then find a way to

889
1:33:56 --> 1:34:03
find a way to train ourselves to go there yeah so you're an international water polo referee

890
1:34:04 --> 1:34:10
and you're hung well from hungary originally and i had a friend in sweden who i used to play tennis

891
1:34:10 --> 1:34:19
with and his name was gula gal and he was a water polo international from hungary and then came to

892
1:34:19 --> 1:34:24
sweden and became a water polo international for sweden i wonder whether you know him gula gal he

893
1:34:24 --> 1:34:30
was a he was a doc medical doctor radiologist event ended up as a radiologist the question is

894
1:34:30 --> 1:34:45
had how how you write his name steven because g u y l a was it gal g a l g u y a l yeah he was

895
1:34:45 --> 1:34:49
so he was in hungarian team and hungary are very good at water polo hungary is the preeminent

896
1:34:49 --> 1:34:55
nation in water polo everybody's won eight olympic gold medals since 1896 the near next

897
1:34:55 --> 1:35:01
nearest is three yes the hungarians are by far the best and it's a very interesting issue on culture

898
1:35:02 --> 1:35:06
great example of a particular culture by the way hungary's won more noble laureates per

899
1:35:06 --> 1:35:10
capita than any nation on the planet just bring that out to you steven well i'm not sure that's

900
1:35:10 --> 1:35:15
true i think uh uk is pretty higher but having said that what do we think of noble prizes

901
1:35:16 --> 1:35:19
no that's correct good question not not not much these days

902
1:35:21 --> 1:35:29
um so john baudwin with his french origins here david bow well he thinks french what is it french

903
1:35:29 --> 1:35:38
and mixture of everything john yeah i'm um uh three quarters french one quarter irish so the

904
1:35:38 --> 1:35:44
french is really quebecois so i say i come from quebec not france because i don't like them but

905
1:35:44 --> 1:35:51
anyway uh actually with names uh charlambou is is that kind of like uh harlem bay is it are you greek

906
1:35:51 --> 1:35:59
greek yeah is it is it a version of harlem bay just a different spelling i'm not aware but it is

907
1:35:59 --> 1:36:07
from cyprus okay um so charles uh most of water polo is played under the under the water is that

908
1:36:07 --> 1:36:13
correct that's correct people don't realize that you get slammed in the balls all the time and uh

909
1:36:13 --> 1:36:19
it hurts and when they push off they push off with something with their feet the other thing is um

910
1:36:19 --> 1:36:24
so if people have different the numbers of leaders when we talk about biden would would you say biden

911
1:36:24 --> 1:36:33
has um one liter two liters or no i think biden just peed in the pool um he paid in the cup very

912
1:36:33 --> 1:36:41
good so salem witch trials uh david you mentioned the first article i ever wrote in substack i it's

913
1:36:41 --> 1:36:48
called the value of contrarianism in the time of witchery and um i went through that everybody's

914
1:36:48 --> 1:36:53
talking about nazis all the time right everybody's talking about 1930s germany and i just didn't want

915
1:36:53 --> 1:37:00
to follow the trends so i did that and and what i learned was that there's a war that occurred well

916
1:37:00 --> 1:37:04
first of all why do people act the way they do uh like you said there's a number of things you know

917
1:37:04 --> 1:37:12
fear of impending war poor crop growth prolonged cold temperatures um charismatic leaders so it

918
1:37:12 --> 1:37:17
could be anything i mean if you look at salem it kind of all almost happened at the same time

919
1:37:17 --> 1:37:21
everybody was afraid of being attacked by uh soldiers coming down from the north who had

920
1:37:21 --> 1:37:27
just gotten beaten but the war that had just happened was father baudouin's war and uh that's

921
1:37:27 --> 1:37:33
my name and it turns out father baudouin's first name was jon so same i have a war named after me

922
1:37:33 --> 1:37:42
first and last name it's pretty cool um you mentioned something that might um like why do

923
1:37:42 --> 1:37:48
people like how do you get people to do stuff and i have this um i've adapted everything i do is from

924
1:37:48 --> 1:37:52
engineering david because i'm an electrical engineer that's my career and i've learned systems

925
1:37:52 --> 1:37:59
when i think about economic systems even um behavioral systems financial everything

926
1:37:59 --> 1:38:04
it one of the things that we used to do is called topping off you get as much as you can with the

927
1:38:04 --> 1:38:09
first set of tests on a chip right because it costs money to be on a tester it's a high capital

928
1:38:09 --> 1:38:14
equipment cost so you throw the chip on there and your first test will get like 60 percent

929
1:38:15 --> 1:38:21
your next next uh test might get another 30 or up to 90 and then you you keep doing that your goal

930
1:38:21 --> 1:38:27
depending on the chip if it's military grade something you're looking at 99.99 percent

931
1:38:27 --> 1:38:33
99.99 fault coverage if it's a cell phone 98 percent's fine if two percent escaped to the

932
1:38:33 --> 1:38:37
to the public so they don't work they bring them back right it depends on whether it's not it's

933
1:38:37 --> 1:38:44
life involved so imagine um you get 60 percent of people through solicitation financial incentives

934
1:38:44 --> 1:38:51
as you mentioned you still don't have uh 40 percent of the people and you need to get maybe 95 percent

935
1:38:51 --> 1:38:57
so then you use coercion so with solicitation from the cares act that got most of the hospital

936
1:38:57 --> 1:39:03
administrators to lean on the doctors using coercion you're now up to like 90 percent and

937
1:39:03 --> 1:39:07
you want you still need more people so what do you do you make public examples out of people like

938
1:39:07 --> 1:39:16
meryl nass and uh mark trossy up in canada um daniel nagase uh john latel down in florida

939
1:39:17 --> 1:39:21
you get another five percent of the doctors around the country to phone

940
1:39:21 --> 1:39:26
online now you're up to 95 the other five percent marginalize them to you know suppress their voices

941
1:39:26 --> 1:39:33
in social media so i'm agreeing with you and all that stuff uh dogma um what didn't i agree with

942
1:39:33 --> 1:39:40
you on um because that's where the interesting part comes in and dialogue right um i'm trying

943
1:39:40 --> 1:39:44
to find it i have it here well let me just comment on critical thinking i don't know what you think

944
1:39:44 --> 1:39:50
about how colleges think they can teach critical thinking you can't teach critically they can try

945
1:39:51 --> 1:39:55
but really if you want to teach critical thinking have the professor uh come up and whack somebody

946
1:39:55 --> 1:39:59
in the back of the head from then on they'll be worried about somebody whacking them in the back

947
1:39:59 --> 1:40:07
of the head and thinking isn't enough either so yeah it's just take out critical just think go

948
1:40:07 --> 1:40:12
ahead sorry well you see the thing is well we're actually doing um i'm gonna be teaching a series

949
1:40:12 --> 1:40:20
of workshops on this with dr david funder and shanae stringer so david's a political philosopher

950
1:40:20 --> 1:40:26
and and shanae to behavioral scientist and critical thinking is really key but the problem

951
1:40:26 --> 1:40:31
is that if you've got a faulty variable it doesn't matter how critically you think so basically

952
1:40:32 --> 1:40:38
the adaptive unconscious is a really key piece of this and and charles was touching on it when he

953
1:40:38 --> 1:40:42
said there's pretty much most of your beliefs are hidden in the adaptive unconscious and you

954
1:40:42 --> 1:40:49
don't have access to it but you can infer what's in there so you know i was fortunate enough to

955
1:40:49 --> 1:40:53
work with bruce lipton on a project for a couple of years and he he wrote the biology belief and

956
1:40:53 --> 1:40:57
he said if you want to know what your beliefs are just look around if you've got no money then

957
1:40:57 --> 1:41:02
you've got a poor belief around money if you're single you've got like so you can infer what's

958
1:41:02 --> 1:41:06
in the adaptive unconscious because you can't see what's in there and that's what's really key

959
1:41:06 --> 1:41:12
and with critical thinking i've pretty much tried to read every book on behavioral science

960
1:41:12 --> 1:41:20
and perception and pretty much they all will talk about blind spots and will say that everyone's

961
1:41:20 --> 1:41:29
got them but they will somehow find a way to ignore their own so in nearly every single one

962
1:41:29 --> 1:41:36
of those books they use vaccination as an example of when people don't critically think because they

963
1:41:36 --> 1:41:44
don't believe in it which is absolutely absurd and even the guy that book i mentioned earlier

964
1:41:44 --> 1:41:50
mixed signals a really key book because he that guy ewey genese is probably the world expert on

965
1:41:50 --> 1:41:56
incentives and how poor incentives create poor outcomes now there can't be any worse industry

966
1:41:56 --> 1:42:00
for poorly designed incentives than the pharmaceutical industry but in the book

967
1:42:00 --> 1:42:05
ewey makes the blanket statement i took the vaccine because i believe in science

968
1:42:06 --> 1:42:14
now that is the biggest condition bullshit in history yeah so yes so i think what you said

969
1:42:14 --> 1:42:22
was really important and completely correct around it's not just one thing okay so when someone wears

970
1:42:22 --> 1:42:27
a mask somebody's wearing it because they're scared somebody's wearing it because they want

971
1:42:27 --> 1:42:31
to conform somebody's wearing it because they don't want to be confronted something and somebody's

972
1:42:31 --> 1:42:36
wearing it because two of those three another person so you've almost got this many-to-many

973
1:42:36 --> 1:42:45
relationship because of that now one thing that's interesting is that engineering you can predict

974
1:42:45 --> 1:42:50
things very accurately because you've got all the known variables don't you really you can you can

975
1:42:50 --> 1:42:56
flush most of them out from what i can see but with human behavior there's always this little bit

976
1:42:56 --> 1:43:03
of even the person doesn't know themself so there's so many studies on this for instance

977
1:43:04 --> 1:43:11
they gave people three washing powders and they said right tell us which one is the best one and

978
1:43:11 --> 1:43:15
they said oh the number one's the best and they said why is number one the best they said oh it

979
1:43:15 --> 1:43:20
was just better for this reason that reason and that reason all the washing powders were the same

980
1:43:21 --> 1:43:26
the only thing that was different was the box so what you've got is that people are

981
1:43:26 --> 1:43:32
not in general very good at articulating why they've done something because for the most part that

982
1:43:32 --> 1:43:38
why is hidden from their conscious mind and this is the real challenge with this because

983
1:43:39 --> 1:43:49
to show people this effect they won't believe it until they see enough studies okay but that means

984
1:43:49 --> 1:43:56
that that particular thing ends up being is one of the greatest stealth weapons that the people

985
1:43:56 --> 1:44:03
pushing the narrative have and i said yeah can i add to that because this is a this is really important

986
1:44:03 --> 1:44:12
this is really important what you just said is it can't agree more so inferential statistical

987
1:44:12 --> 1:44:20
methods are used improperly by many purviews within engineering and i use an example in my own career

988
1:44:20 --> 1:44:28
because it's easy you have complete control over all the variables in a plasma chamber and along

989
1:44:28 --> 1:44:33
the 400 steps of bringing a semiconductor wafer toward being chips the manufacturing of

990
1:44:33 --> 1:44:40
semiconductors you control the pressure temperature the frequency of light 493 nanometers or now the

991
1:44:40 --> 1:44:50
near the euv extended ultraviolet so you control every every aspect physically and so if you want

992
1:44:50 --> 1:44:57
to increase yield which means fewer bad chips on a wafer and this translates to billions of dollars

993
1:44:57 --> 1:45:03
in profit your profits are at the margins of failure aware you can get you can get your yield

994
1:45:03 --> 1:45:09
from 95 percent and 99.5 that's a huge amount of money so you control all that now the use of

995
1:45:09 --> 1:45:16
statistics inferential statistical methods in that case where it costs you two million dollars every

996
1:45:16 --> 1:45:22
every time you do a prototype run so you tweak the process and spend two million bucks and you run

997
1:45:22 --> 1:45:28
it's like oh it went down not up you know but so using statistics when you have control over all

998
1:45:28 --> 1:45:33
the variables great it's great for engineering but now this epidemiology bullshit profession

999
1:45:33 --> 1:45:39
sorry if any epidemiologists are here but it's not a science it's a social science it's all it's all

1000
1:45:39 --> 1:45:43
full of crap with all their confidence intervals and p values they use a normal distribution for

1001
1:45:43 --> 1:45:49
everything they have no idea if they have a normal distribution it could be bimodal polymodal and

1002
1:45:49 --> 1:45:55
they're talking um say there's another example i use prostate cancer right happens in old people

1003
1:45:55 --> 1:46:01
the average age of prostate cancer is in i think it's uh it's like 67 or 73 or something like that

1004
1:46:02 --> 1:46:09
hardly anybody gets it before they're 50 right testicular cancer the average age is 30 you get

1005
1:46:09 --> 1:46:16
it from like 18 to 40 so this these are both male cancers and from 40 to 50 you're not getting

1006
1:46:16 --> 1:46:21
either one of them not happening but if you take the two data sets throw them together and say male

1007
1:46:21 --> 1:46:26
cancers you'll find that the the uh the mean is is right where it will never happen and if you

1008
1:46:26 --> 1:46:32
look at a normal distribution and apply that to the data set you'll find that oh that's the most

1009
1:46:32 --> 1:46:37
likely place it's going to happen no it's not you've created a bimodal distribution and so all these

1010
1:46:37 --> 1:46:45
papers of all this bullshit with um and and i'm working on right now is a certain guy and that

1011
1:46:46 --> 1:46:51
nobody's heard his name before here i guarantee it he is responsible for some of the most dastardly

1012
1:46:51 --> 1:46:55
things that killed hundreds and thousands of people in the last five years and i'm putting

1013
1:46:55 --> 1:47:01
together the timeline he creates a paper anytime the government needs a paper and by doing so all

1014
1:47:01 --> 1:47:07
these rules and edicts that came out that are used around the world not just the u.s the cdc is

1015
1:47:07 --> 1:47:14
adopting it based on his findings right um killed a freaking ton of people why because none of this

1016
1:47:14 --> 1:47:22
shit should be done uh using these methods and and these poor distribution functions and lastly

1017
1:47:22 --> 1:47:29
i'll close by saying um the masking you know engineers develop the specification for the mask

1018
1:47:30 --> 1:47:37
they design the mask they develop the manufacturing process for the mask they develop the uh the um

1019
1:47:37 --> 1:47:44
quality testing um and then they develop the failure analysis uh stuff and the doctor

1020
1:47:45 --> 1:47:49
might read the spec on the box before he puts it on his face and yet how many doctors around the

1021
1:47:49 --> 1:47:55
world are commenting on masks and doing randomized controlled double blind placebo you know whatever

1022
1:47:55 --> 1:48:01
trial bullshit we had 17 people in denmark who wore a mask and 34 didn't and they have no control

1023
1:48:01 --> 1:48:07
over all the variables none it's a stupid method evidence-based medicine is a fucking crock of

1024
1:48:07 --> 1:48:14
shit sorry everybody hope i didn't ruin your podcast here charles um the it so you see where

1025
1:48:14 --> 1:48:18
i'm going with all this i think you're going to agree with me what do you think well i think

1026
1:48:19 --> 1:48:23
mathematics there's a guy called rory suverland and he's written a book called alchemy and i'd

1027
1:48:23 --> 1:48:30
highly recommend everyone read it and he said that when it comes to statistics he said the

1028
1:48:30 --> 1:48:36
difference between a competent mathematician and an excellent one is that they're living in two

1029
1:48:36 --> 1:48:44
different worlds so the average mathematician is going to make so many mistakes that so it's going

1030
1:48:44 --> 1:48:51
to be horrendous so the one of the stories actually in that book was a guy that was designing

1031
1:48:51 --> 1:48:59
the cockpit for pilots in the ref and he came up with an average size of all the dimensions of the

1032
1:48:59 --> 1:49:05
pilots and he realized that actually no one was the average size so if he'd actually lose the

1033
1:49:05 --> 1:49:11
average size he could only guarantee that it wouldn't be nice for anyone okay so that's where

1034
1:49:11 --> 1:49:20
i would agree with you on those numbers but i'm not a competent statistician so in terms of

1035
1:49:20 --> 1:49:27
mathematics so so this is where it gets really complicated that you know when you know what

1036
1:49:27 --> 1:49:31
you're talking about to find a way to explain it to people in a way that they can get it

1037
1:49:33 --> 1:49:38
that's the challenge and that's where metaphors become very important so does it give you a

1038
1:49:38 --> 1:49:44
example i was on a panda call and i think i've come across you a few times john i'm sure i've

1039
1:49:44 --> 1:49:50
heard you speak i'm well aware of the work you've done i was on a panda call

1040
1:49:52 --> 1:49:57
and there was one of the i won't say she was but brilliant scientist presented for two hours

1041
1:49:59 --> 1:50:03
incredible information and the next day i couldn't tell you a single thing that she said

1042
1:50:04 --> 1:50:09
but mark jurido come on i mean at the time you know it's all going in it makes sense or whatever

1043
1:50:09 --> 1:50:18
but i couldn't retain it mark jurido comes on and tells a metaphor and i can still tell you today

1044
1:50:18 --> 1:50:24
what he said and what it meant so the information the way it moves between people is so important

1045
1:50:24 --> 1:50:29
and people like yourself where you got that information it's literally the question is how

1046
1:50:30 --> 1:50:35
do you get that in someone else's head because the truth movement you know that term loose

1047
1:50:38 --> 1:50:42
doesn't have an information problem it has a communication problem

1048
1:50:43 --> 1:50:50
and that's the thing we have to solve and and that's really really key and coming back to that guy

1049
1:50:50 --> 1:50:59
that wrote the papers i call that deaf by protocol so when you look at the the the nurses 95

1050
1:50:59 --> 1:51:05
of them would have given that drug yeah when everyone's been so conditioned to follow protocol

1051
1:51:05 --> 1:51:12
and not their own intuition what they've done is they've basically there's a saying there's a very

1052
1:51:12 --> 1:51:20
good quotation i think it comes from persia where it was like you you build the child for the road

1053
1:51:20 --> 1:51:26
not the road for the child okay now what we what the world is doing is it's taking all the power

1054
1:51:26 --> 1:51:31
away from the individual and it's making everything and what it is it's about us responding to our

1055
1:51:31 --> 1:51:37
cues in society so when i drive to the traffic lights and it's red i automatically stop if i'm

1056
1:51:37 --> 1:51:45
around about i give way to here now the one of the towns i think is in belgium they did away with

1057
1:51:45 --> 1:51:49
all signage and all traffic lights and the injuries and the crashes went down significantly

1058
1:51:50 --> 1:51:53
because everyone had to be conscious and aware of what they're doing

1059
1:51:53 --> 1:51:58
we're living in a world where everyone's responding to their external cues and they're

1060
1:51:58 --> 1:52:03
not thinking and people have been so educated that when someone releases a paper like that

1061
1:52:04 --> 1:52:06
everyone's just relying that it's the truth

1062
1:52:08 --> 1:52:13
they said so what you've got is that you've got effectively policies driving decision making

1063
1:52:14 --> 1:52:21
and no one's really questioning or thinking about it because we're constantly told trust the experts

1064
1:52:21 --> 1:52:25
the new york times is running articles which is critical thinking is dangerous

1065
1:52:27 --> 1:52:35
i mean yeah so that's why i'd add today i i think that there's a lot of we agree on what david i mean

1066
1:52:35 --> 1:52:40
we agree on basically yeah i think there's a lot of interesting conversations we could have around

1067
1:52:40 --> 1:52:45
this and and certainly around the knowledge base i think that's a key piece to this but if we could

1068
1:52:45 --> 1:52:53
build some systems some intranets and internets of the collective information translate that into

1069
1:52:53 --> 1:52:58
metaphors and stories and get that out there then i think we could shift a lot more belief systems

1070
1:52:58 --> 1:53:04
a lot quicker the book of proverbs proverbs still works today it's a guide for life i don't care

1071
1:53:04 --> 1:53:10
what religion you are half of the proverbs proverbs in the book of proverbs are the same

1072
1:53:10 --> 1:53:16
exact things in other religions and cultures that that collective wisdom is amazing and what

1073
1:53:16 --> 1:53:22
we're doing now is we're killing people we're not we're not saving people no no what's what

1074
1:53:23 --> 1:53:29
they're so key playdo said those that tell the stories rule society now if you think about you

1075
1:53:29 --> 1:53:36
know 10 000 years ago right you'd have to learn that fire is dangerous that a tiger can kill you

1076
1:53:36 --> 1:53:41
and all these things it's my opinion in all the study and look at the research we develop the

1077
1:53:41 --> 1:53:47
ability to tell stories to transfer information without having to learn it the hard way so the

1078
1:53:47 --> 1:53:51
brain when you look at lisa crone i think it is she wrote a book she's a neuroscientist she wrote

1079
1:53:51 --> 1:53:59
a book wide for story story is the single most important thing to all of this now i just you

1080
1:53:59 --> 1:54:03
just reminded me of something i had meant i had meant to put in the presentation but i didn't it's

1081
1:54:03 --> 1:54:11
okay there's a concept called deep canvassing and it's literally how they can move someone's

1082
1:54:11 --> 1:54:17
belief system in about 20 minutes on a topic but what they found was that when they took the story

1083
1:54:17 --> 1:54:26
out it stopped working so story was the essential ingredient to change someone's mind so whenever

1084
1:54:26 --> 1:54:30
we're imparting information unless we use a story or a metaphor we can pretty much guarantee it's

1085
1:54:30 --> 1:54:35
only going to stay in the cerebral part of that person you should look at a couple articles i've

1086
1:54:35 --> 1:54:43
written johnny and the crossing guard tommy and the berry bush the link put the link in the chat

1087
1:54:43 --> 1:54:49
john just to know that and david to reinforce what you just said and again all of us i

1088
1:54:50 --> 1:54:57
listened to a podcast a second time and just test this on yourself that you won't have any

1089
1:54:57 --> 1:55:02
troubles remembering the story that was told by the presenter you will have no ability to

1090
1:55:02 --> 1:55:08
remember the data yes and so we are hardwired for that and the second david after 31 years in

1091
1:55:08 --> 1:55:13
fact more than that 40 years of presenting i'm constantly working and all of us should be

1092
1:55:14 --> 1:55:22
i urge us to keep honing our stories and our messages because it to two for two reasons one

1093
1:55:22 --> 1:55:27
because every person interprets it differently it's literally like me speaking hungarian to

1094
1:55:27 --> 1:55:33
someone who can't understand it it just doesn't compute in their mental framework and each one of

1095
1:55:33 --> 1:55:38
us can get better and better at explaining ideas and john from your perspective as the data you

1096
1:55:38 --> 1:55:47
know i i did math science before i did law and most people don't don't understand what 10 of

1097
1:55:47 --> 1:55:54
something is like it's quite remarkable i remember one time in college cnn used to have something

1098
1:55:54 --> 1:56:00
called headline news and they would replay all the headlines every every half hour and they had this

1099
1:56:00 --> 1:56:05
thing um where they would put on percentage something to try to get people oh my god look

1100
1:56:05 --> 1:56:11
at that so i had a guy in my fraternity say it said like 63 percent of people do x he said oh

1101
1:56:11 --> 1:56:19
my god i can't believe 63 percent i said that means 37 don't and he looked at me he was like

1102
1:56:19 --> 1:56:24
oh that's even worse like yeah they just they just made you think one thing by putting a big number

1103
1:56:24 --> 1:56:30
up you didn't take the compliment of it and this is back you know i'm like 19 years old and i was

1104
1:56:30 --> 1:56:34
thinking like that because this goes back to the beginning how do people get to think like this

1105
1:56:34 --> 1:56:42
if and i it's not it's not a rule but a lot of people who've been harmed by somebody whom they

1106
1:56:42 --> 1:56:48
trust whether it's inadvertent or or on purpose um those are the people who are acutely aware

1107
1:56:48 --> 1:56:53
without necessarily high intelligence but they're acutely aware of what humans can do to each other

1108
1:56:53 --> 1:56:59
and they're they're very wary of things that happen like wear a mask or take a vaccine because

1109
1:56:59 --> 1:57:05
their their uncle or their you know priest or you know what i'm talking about you know um it doesn't

1110
1:57:05 --> 1:57:10
have to be that bad it could be just like your dad just doesn't show up after you're 10 years old he

1111
1:57:10 --> 1:57:15
lives a mile away down the street you don't see him once a year at the grocery store um that's me

1112
1:57:15 --> 1:57:21
by the way so when you're harmed in that way you lose trust in those uh for whom you should trust

1113
1:57:21 --> 1:57:25
the most and so you just don't trust anybody for the rest of your life and you don't trust when

1114
1:57:26 --> 1:57:33
president whatever says something or newscaster whatever i mean so yeah that's how i think um

1115
1:57:34 --> 1:57:38
and i've talked to a lot of people who a lot of people not very bright at all but they figured it

1116
1:57:38 --> 1:57:43
out right away why they were harmed somewhere back in their life by somebody they whom whom they

1117
1:57:43 --> 1:57:48
should have trusted so sorry for talking so much no that's a really key point actually because

1118
1:57:48 --> 1:57:55
because there was some somebody uh i can't remember who it was now but some expert in

1119
1:57:55 --> 1:58:00
trauma who somehow believed in the jabs a turn around and said oh the people that are not taking

1120
1:58:00 --> 1:58:05
it is because they're traumatized and blah blah blah and it was partly true you're correct like

1121
1:58:05 --> 1:58:11
once you've been once you because here's the thing the way i see it if we're educated to think that

1122
1:58:11 --> 1:58:15
the government gives a shit about us and then we suddenly realize that they couldn't care less

1123
1:58:15 --> 1:58:20
whether we live to die that's traumatizing because you know it's the collective society

1124
1:58:21 --> 1:58:26
but that realization is very key but the thing that you touched on there john that's really

1125
1:58:26 --> 1:58:34
important is that a child will often self-orientate the meaning of something whereas adults tend to

1126
1:58:34 --> 1:58:40
externally blame it okay so as adults everyone's blaming you know the the lefties are blaming trump

1127
1:58:40 --> 1:58:44
and the right and all these things so basically they're blaming the external for their situation

1128
1:58:44 --> 1:58:51
but as a child if the mother doesn't come home then the child will go well i can't be important

1129
1:58:51 --> 1:58:57
i'm not worth it or whatever and this is one of the clients i had a client yesterday where this

1130
1:58:57 --> 1:59:03
is where this lefkoe is so powerful she had two belief systems which she had got we managed to

1131
1:59:03 --> 1:59:08
change him in an hour and one of them was i'm not worth it because her parents were raising five

1132
1:59:08 --> 1:59:15
children so she didn't have the the the time the parents didn't have the time to look after her

1133
1:59:15 --> 1:59:21
so she had believed i'm not worth it but we managed to create alternative realities and

1134
1:59:21 --> 1:59:27
then she realized actually no they were just busy and of course what happens is that that belief

1135
1:59:27 --> 1:59:32
system stored in the adaptive unconscious and when that changed the person's behavior will change

1136
1:59:33 --> 1:59:39
okay so it really is i think you're absolutely spot on around once that model is broken because

1137
1:59:39 --> 1:59:45
that's what it's about the model breaks trauma is one of the way it breaks but if someone's

1138
1:59:46 --> 1:59:53
utmost belief system is truth and then they see lies that will break it and i also think that the

1139
1:59:53 --> 1:59:57
a lot of the reason that people in the truth movement have religious belief

1140
1:59:58 --> 2:00:04
is because they have a moral code okay they literally from a young age this moral code is

1141
2:00:04 --> 2:00:09
installed and the things that they were doing in moral and then they they chose got over

1142
2:00:09 --> 2:00:15
biden or whatever and that's why biden turned around and made that rather ludicrous comment

1143
2:00:15 --> 2:00:20
is that jesus would have took the vaccine right he literally said that and of course you like so

1144
2:00:20 --> 2:00:28
a man that can turn water into wine would need a vaccine like it doesn't make any sense but you see

1145
2:00:28 --> 2:00:35
but yeah i think your point around that trauma is very um very true all right we're gonna we're gonna

1146
2:00:35 --> 2:00:40
we've got it we're gonna move on um but that trauma john that you're talking about in fact

1147
2:00:40 --> 2:00:46
steven reminds me of another presenter we're going to have here that i'll introduce you to it's now

1148
2:00:46 --> 2:00:56
david suggested an experiment done on mice that trauma now can go back 14 generations

1149
2:00:56 --> 2:01:07
yes all right so john your salem witch hunt ancestors it's impacting on you now um but

1150
2:01:07 --> 2:01:12
david that's an interesting idea isn't it seven so it's seven generations now go back 14 generations

1151
2:01:12 --> 2:01:18
so jim it's a wonderful explanation for why you and i might be considered pricks by some people

1152
2:01:18 --> 2:01:25
will blame our ancestors okay john you can do the same thing jim over to you hey thanks very much

1153
2:01:25 --> 2:01:31
great presentation um looking forward to how we can prevent the next one it looks like things are

1154
2:01:31 --> 2:01:42
being geared up for anything from bird flu to uh or avian flu to plague ebola marburg mers you name

1155
2:01:42 --> 2:01:51
it or they can throw all of it at us um how do we number one if we know our enemy we know we can

1156
2:01:51 --> 2:01:58
stop it is there any chance uh what are your thoughts about declassifying this project if

1157
2:01:58 --> 2:02:05
this is a classified intelligence op we're supposed to get the jfk files released what does the what

1158
2:02:05 --> 2:02:13
will the jfk files if it if it reveals exactly who did the uh the shot from the front of the

1159
2:02:13 --> 2:02:22
head and why that was done and what it has to do with um uh who really orchestrated the rfk shooting

1160
2:02:22 --> 2:02:33
and the mlk and and and other things um how do we uh how does that help us that's a very complex

1161
2:02:33 --> 2:02:39
question um there's so many elements to that a lot of it's going to be how the media frames it

1162
2:02:40 --> 2:02:45
so john actually touched on something really important is that how you phrase the statistics

1163
2:02:45 --> 2:02:49
or what's happened actually makes a really big difference on how people interpret the information

1164
2:02:49 --> 2:02:57
that's really really key i think a big part of the problem is the passiveness that people

1165
2:02:58 --> 2:03:05
now experience so what you've got is you've got people and charles made the rather excellent

1166
2:03:05 --> 2:03:09
observation that most people actually don't know what they believe about the world and in fact they

1167
2:03:09 --> 2:03:16
even know less about what they believe about themselves so a lot of people have been so

1168
2:03:16 --> 2:03:22
conditioned to be in a passive state it's my belief that when people become aware of that and

1169
2:03:22 --> 2:03:29
that's been done to them then they will see a road back to power that's my belief so i think

1170
2:03:29 --> 2:03:35
a lot of the work has to be done internally but i certainly don't i don't think it would take long

1171
2:03:35 --> 2:03:39
i've also i think that we theorized that we could do it for a series of movies

1172
2:03:41 --> 2:03:49
and that's just in a theoretical stage at the moment um it really is i think a lot of people

1173
2:03:49 --> 2:03:56
we've been so conditioned to look to leaders so if somehow a few leaders were able to get together

1174
2:03:57 --> 2:04:04
and you know make certain statements about how we've all been misled etc etc that could have a

1175
2:04:04 --> 2:04:12
very big effect um outside of that i i think it would be a lot of brainstorming gem i think

1176
2:04:12 --> 2:04:17
there's a lot of things that i can you know i could if i i could get through to a single person

1177
2:04:17 --> 2:04:23
i think relatively quickly and i have done um and then that single person will completely

1178
2:04:23 --> 2:04:28
change their belief system but they won't necessarily become a freedom fighter

1179
2:04:29 --> 2:04:33
in a sense a lot of the time they will go to lengths to protect themselves etc

1180
2:04:34 --> 2:04:38
so i think what has to happen is i think a large group of people need to get together

1181
2:04:39 --> 2:04:45
and make a plan and and look at the things that you know i think in a few months we're going to

1182
2:04:45 --> 2:04:54
have it down relatively well about how to shift someone's belief system with external data

1183
2:04:55 --> 2:05:00
you know via the stories etc so then that could be done but i don't think that's enough

1184
2:05:01 --> 2:05:07
i think that a lot of the truth movement is under the illusion that when people know what's going on

1185
2:05:07 --> 2:05:13
then everything's going to change i don't think that's true i could be wrong but i when you look

1186
2:05:13 --> 2:05:22
at communism a lot of people knew before it collapsed and yeah i think there's a lot of

1187
2:05:22 --> 2:05:29
other factors to it um i think it would be a very interesting process there's a term that i came

1188
2:05:29 --> 2:05:35
across this week called imminent critique which i think was toby was it toby young to be one of the

1189
2:05:35 --> 2:05:41
the guys who i monitor i get his sub stack and when i started researching it it's pretty profound

1190
2:05:41 --> 2:05:47
it's it's a way it's imminent critique and it's a way that you and i don't know if you've come

1191
2:05:47 --> 2:05:51
across this john but i think your mind would be very good at it it's it's a way to map out a

1192
2:05:51 --> 2:05:57
system's contradictions so you don't need any external data so the system will literally

1193
2:05:57 --> 2:06:05
collapse its own contradictions um and it looks a very very good method because when you play it

1194
2:06:05 --> 2:06:12
back to the person you're not giving them criticism you're just showing them the flaws in the system

1195
2:06:13 --> 2:06:19
um so that's that's one thing that i think would be very useful well i think that's what we kind of

1196
2:06:19 --> 2:06:25
all did we figured out what the flaws in the system were and especially if you know any biochemistry

1197
2:06:26 --> 2:06:32
you rapidly figure out that yeah well most physicians who understand biochemistry would

1198
2:06:32 --> 2:06:40
rapidly figure out that anti-parasitics are antivirals in many cases and that's why

1199
2:06:40 --> 2:06:48
hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were very useful yeah and and and so then you once you figure out

1200
2:06:48 --> 2:06:56
that that's a real flaw in their their system you know that you know who's lying by the biochemistry

1201
2:06:57 --> 2:07:01
well you see what to add to that because that's a really good point but when

1202
2:07:03 --> 2:07:08
when somebody might suspect that their partner's cheating on them they don't want to believe that's

1203
2:07:08 --> 2:07:16
true so the ability for people to put their head in the sand and do other things there's there's a

1204
2:07:16 --> 2:07:22
lot of i don't know i could explain this in a short term because there's basically that adaptive

1205
2:07:22 --> 2:07:29
unconscious that has a series of processes that are running that literally distorts someone's

1206
2:07:29 --> 2:07:37
perception so if somebody has a real deep need for survival it will literally distort their

1207
2:07:37 --> 2:07:42
perception and the amount of studies they've done in it that they can really predict what's going

1208
2:07:42 --> 2:07:49
to happen when you put enough pressures on the system so you've seen the line length studies

1209
2:07:49 --> 2:07:55
with trying to think of the gentleman that ran those now basically it was a compliance study

1210
2:07:55 --> 2:08:02
have you heard about those jim so i didn't miss the words there was a line length study and i'm

1211
2:08:02 --> 2:08:07
trying to think i've quote with this study so many times but they're late at night the man's name is

1212
2:08:08 --> 2:08:15
but the original studies were done by omar shereef and what it was that they were testing how many

1213
2:08:15 --> 2:08:22
people would answer incorrectly just because the group had answered incorrectly okay so if

1214
2:08:22 --> 2:08:27
you put five actors in a room john do you remember that yeah i don't remember the name i know exactly

1215
2:08:27 --> 2:08:33
one if you can watch the video of it it's pretty i recall what you're saying people in a room

1216
2:08:33 --> 2:08:39
and complying with the lie with the false statements and lines lines on a piece of paper

1217
2:08:39 --> 2:08:46
yes yeah yeah so basically what what you need to do ash that's it thank you lisa jane so basically

1218
2:08:46 --> 2:08:52
solomon ash now solomon ash actually ran those studies because he didn't believe it to be true

1219
2:08:54 --> 2:09:00
which was really incredible so it was by accident that he stumbled across that because shereef had

1220
2:09:00 --> 2:09:07
run a study showing that when people don't know the answer they converge on other people's answers

1221
2:09:07 --> 2:09:11
so they were literally converging on an answer which wasn't true because someone had been placed

1222
2:09:11 --> 2:09:17
to pretend it was that number so ash had theorized that the reason that people were doing that is

1223
2:09:17 --> 2:09:23
because they didn't know the answer so he set up a study where the answer was so obvious and then

1224
2:09:23 --> 2:09:29
he got five people to lie as actors to see if the sixth person would comply and what he found was

1225
2:09:29 --> 2:09:34
that most of the time they did they answered incorrectly just not to be kicked out the tribe

1226
2:09:35 --> 2:09:40
so when john was talking about the different reasons that people would do it and get the

1227
2:09:40 --> 2:09:46
numbers up we've mapped out all the the the unconscious drives for this and it's effectively

1228
2:09:47 --> 2:09:57
approval control survival protection to be part of groups to reproduce all these things these are

1229
2:09:57 --> 2:10:03
the unconscious drives and what it is if you tap into enough of those the person will just comply

1230
2:10:04 --> 2:10:09
in a sense so that's what we we need to understand that unless we tap into those drives people

1231
2:10:09 --> 2:10:17
won't won't literally take control of themselves and i'm feeling and and um we there are many

1232
2:10:17 --> 2:10:22
physicians in this group i'm feeling that there is there may be a way out and i wanted to ask

1233
2:10:22 --> 2:10:32
your opinion about a uh are you familiar with a broad spectrum anti-viral medication that

1234
2:10:33 --> 2:10:41
stops the the replication of that's fda approved and stops the replication of norovirus rotavirus

1235
2:10:41 --> 2:10:51
flu virus even ebola virus and is and is safer than placebo it's called it's called nitroxin and i've

1236
2:10:51 --> 2:10:58
been talking to the group about it quite a bit because it's quite it's quite fantastic how many

1237
2:10:58 --> 2:11:03
of the physicians that i've spoken with don't know about it and i'll put it in the chart

1238
2:11:03 --> 2:11:12
and the thing right now and um and it's it's quite fantastic because um we know we talk about and

1239
2:11:12 --> 2:11:21
this is the ultimate anti-parasitic as well um and it looks like it's kind of being if the intelligence

1240
2:11:21 --> 2:11:27
communities and that's who i believe is behind all this stuff including the manipulation the uh

1241
2:11:28 --> 2:11:35
of the media and all that and and that's the glue that holds the finance the the intelligence finance

1242
2:11:35 --> 2:11:40
guys as well and when they and the little hint is we don't know who did it means the intelligence

1243
2:11:40 --> 2:11:46
guys did it uh we don't know who invented the sars-cov-2 spike protein well they did we don't

1244
2:11:46 --> 2:11:51
know who invented bitcoin well they did we don't know who uh blew up the nord stream 2 pipeline

1245
2:11:51 --> 2:11:59
well they did and we don't know the uh cocaine in the white house well i mean uh if i had cocaine

1246
2:11:59 --> 2:12:06
in my house i'd be arrested and uh if they can't figure it out then uh that means they did it so

1247
2:12:06 --> 2:12:10
our intelligence community really should be held to the carpet here but they also are preventing

1248
2:12:11 --> 2:12:17
the uh treatments from being used and this nitroxinite is really quite quite amazing

1249
2:12:18 --> 2:12:26
because yeah yeah well you see there's a there's a number of biases so we we we're just finishing

1250
2:12:26 --> 2:12:32
an article that is if that was true it'd be on the news so which i'm sure you've all heard a

1251
2:12:32 --> 2:12:43
number of times from people the the availability bias is huge the people and and this sentence

1252
2:12:43 --> 2:12:48
really comes from behavioural science is that thinking to humans is like swimming to cats

1253
2:12:48 --> 2:12:53
they can do it but they'd rather not so basically people take this heuristic that

1254
2:12:53 --> 2:12:59
if it's on the news then it's valid okay so if they haven't heard it on the news then it's not

1255
2:12:59 --> 2:13:08
valid and so this is such a weird thing that the availability bias most people only reach for the

1256
2:13:08 --> 2:13:15
available information that's there so if it's not there to them it doesn't exist so that's why

1257
2:13:15 --> 2:13:20
censorship was such a big problem and that's why the ivomet and everything else that because it

1258
2:13:20 --> 2:13:28
wasn't in their direct focus or availability they didn't look for it okay now anyone with critical

1259
2:13:28 --> 2:13:33
thinking then starts to you know look and starts to look around and ask questions all those things

1260
2:13:33 --> 2:13:37
but that's why no one i mean i hadn't heard of that thing but unless it's on the media

1261
2:13:39 --> 2:13:44
which is pretty much the the corporate media is the main way that people get their information

1262
2:13:44 --> 2:13:50
that for me is the single biggest thing that we can break okay is the people's rely on corporate

1263
2:13:50 --> 2:13:58
media so one of the guys that i managed to wake up he was a member of mensa which i'm sure you

1264
2:13:58 --> 2:14:04
guys know it's like you know you have a super high high q to be there he had enrolled to be

1265
2:14:04 --> 2:14:11
a guinea pig in the jab program okay that's how gone this guy was did he do his membership

1266
2:14:13 --> 2:14:19
maybe uh he then he was arguing with me all the time and he says i'm informed i watch the news

1267
2:14:19 --> 2:14:26
all day well you're misinformed then so i went home and i thought about it and then i i got

1268
2:14:26 --> 2:14:31
together a few true stories on how the media lies and withholds information and all i did was

1269
2:14:31 --> 2:14:37
told in them stories the next time i saw him and then a good few months later i get an email from

1270
2:14:37 --> 2:14:44
him where he says david i owe you an apology he said i thought you were a crank but i was completely

1271
2:14:44 --> 2:14:52
wrong and i've 180'd on all my views and i don't know how much that story had an effect but it was

1272
2:14:52 --> 2:14:57
designed to have an effect but that's why i think shara atkinson's book slanted is really

1273
2:14:57 --> 2:15:02
important and someone did mention something about her that if you can undermine people's

1274
2:15:02 --> 2:15:08
trust in the corporate media and they no longer trust them then that's in my opinion a big part

1275
2:15:08 --> 2:15:13
the job done they're no longer being continually misinformed they're probably going to turn it off

1276
2:15:13 --> 2:15:18
and then all the new conditioning is going to stop working or certainly from the media because a lot

1277
2:15:18 --> 2:15:27
of it's written into the tv shows all right let's move on can i ask one more question about the

1278
2:15:27 --> 2:15:33
smith munt modernization act in the united states are you familiar with the smith munt modernization

1279
2:15:33 --> 2:15:42
act it allows propaganda on the united states citizens and it was sent in by obama in 2013

1280
2:15:42 --> 2:15:49
but trump hasn't revoked it yet well no because well basically propaganda is such a powerful tool

1281
2:15:49 --> 2:15:56
now so there's we did a whole paper on this recently on psychological operations psychological

1282
2:15:56 --> 2:16:01
warfare there's three types of propaganda you've got white gray and black and the black one is when

1283
2:16:01 --> 2:16:06
they lie and that's the most insidious and problematic so when they've got people dropping

1284
2:16:06 --> 2:16:14
dead in the street that really affects people but yeah the obama in 2008 did change the law

1285
2:16:14 --> 2:16:20
to allow psychological operations on the public and i spoke to one of the a guy that was in the

1286
2:16:20 --> 2:16:27
army and that was his job to do that yeah and he he basically spoke a lot about that stuff so he

1287
2:16:27 --> 2:16:33
couldn't he literally couldn't tell any details but what he had to do was talk about that act

1288
2:16:33 --> 2:16:40
because it was all released all right so trump's not going to do everything at once and i'm happy

1289
2:16:40 --> 2:16:49
if that's 51 good now let's move on jim by the way i think this whole issue of getting us to

1290
2:16:49 --> 2:16:57
argue about stuff we can't see including spike protein including viruses is a psyop so jim all

1291
2:16:57 --> 2:17:02
the stuff that you've written all of the the whole game plan it's wonderful because all of

1292
2:17:02 --> 2:17:08
the experts can absolutely obfuscate and we make no progress and we're having a shit fight amongst

1293
2:17:08 --> 2:17:14
each other instead of dealing with the real issues and i remind you of what judy mikovic said to this

1294
2:17:14 --> 2:17:21
group and david i just you know you can quote her on this don't jab anything into your bodies

1295
2:17:22 --> 2:17:26
don't don't you don't need to prove whether spike protein or this or that

1296
2:17:26 --> 2:17:31
unless of course it's an intravenous vitamin c which is a great thing to do which i've done

1297
2:17:31 --> 2:17:40
numerous times so steven we got uh 10 we're finishing in a few minutes david um david i'm

1298
2:17:40 --> 2:17:49
going to quote monty python here and and i'm going to say you're a very naughty boy

1299
2:17:52 --> 2:17:56
i'm going to say you're a very naughty boy because you clearly have not been drinking

1300
2:17:56 --> 2:18:00
enough water because you've been able to sit here for two hours and 20 minutes without going to the

1301
2:18:00 --> 2:18:06
toilet and so there you are i again admonish you for not drinking enough water we're finishing

1302
2:18:06 --> 2:18:11
in 10 minutes steven's going to ask the last couple of questions it's wonderful to have you

1303
2:18:11 --> 2:18:16
i've taken a note there of matt hoye steven this was a suggestion made that chase hughes we come

1304
2:18:17 --> 2:18:22
here on beliefs you know i think beliefs is such a wonderful process david the other thing i want

1305
2:18:22 --> 2:18:27
to mention talking about your note on the mainstream media bobby kennedy told us

1306
2:18:27 --> 2:18:37
steven you will recall this back in 2021 december 2021 it takes five five contrary bits of

1307
2:18:37 --> 2:18:44
information sorry five contrary statements to a belief from five different sources and it was

1308
2:18:44 --> 2:18:51
really struck struck me that idea that if i speak to steven on a new idea and it's the first time

1309
2:18:51 --> 2:18:57
he's heard it no bullshit the fifth time he hears that idea from a fifth source says bobby kennedy

1310
2:18:58 --> 2:19:03
you know that can be so we never know what role we're playing as i've often said in my speeches

1311
2:19:03 --> 2:19:10
people come to me say i changed their lives no i didn't you heard that idea and that just you'd

1312
2:19:10 --> 2:19:15
heard it four times previously what do you think of that proposition of the same message five

1313
2:19:15 --> 2:19:22
different places then enables us to shift that perspective repetition is really key but emotion

1314
2:19:22 --> 2:19:30
trumps repetition hmm yeah no we're on board on board with that but it's very yeah okay because

1315
2:19:30 --> 2:19:36
what happens is it's all to do with the way that the connect and nuance happens so basically

1316
2:19:37 --> 2:19:41
when you're thinking a thought for the first time or really entertaining the thought for the first

1317
2:19:41 --> 2:19:47
time it's a bit like walking through a field so you imagine you've got two foot of grass the more

1318
2:19:47 --> 2:19:51
you walk that path you lay the grass down it becomes easier once that thought has happened a

1319
2:19:51 --> 2:19:56
number of times then there's a thing called ltp which is long-term potentiation which it receives

1320
2:19:56 --> 2:20:02
no resistance so you're not pushing through the grass anymore that makes sense so that's why you

1321
2:20:02 --> 2:20:06
know the third yke and everything else they knew that repetition was really really key

1322
2:20:06 --> 2:20:10
you keep repeating you keep repeating the keep repeating the person has that thought and then

1323
2:20:10 --> 2:20:18
it suddenly feels familiar and true okay but add in emotion and that path gets walked much quicker

1324
2:20:18 --> 2:20:24
so yeah the repetition is real and jason talks about jason bristoff talks about that a lot but

1325
2:20:24 --> 2:20:30
it really is it's about making the pitches in your mind and the more you do something the easier it

1326
2:20:30 --> 2:20:35
gets and that's why these people i mean you know i'm talking to someone that's literally brain

1327
2:20:35 --> 2:20:40
dead at the moment on facebook and and the nonsense he's coming out with but because it's been so

1328
2:20:40 --> 2:20:47
repeated into his mind he's absolutely convinced it's true you know so yeah but yeah repetition but

1329
2:20:47 --> 2:20:53
this is this could play into our hands really importantly orchestration is one of the five

1330
2:20:53 --> 2:21:00
rules of propaganda if everyone that knows what's going on could literally and we we literally wrote

1331
2:21:00 --> 2:21:06
a plan on this where if you could get a group of people group of experts with the data and you come

1332
2:21:06 --> 2:21:11
up with just one or two really key important facts you stick it in a story then you have a

1333
2:21:11 --> 2:21:16
distribution unit and you can get that to millions of people at the same time and everyone's sharing

1334
2:21:16 --> 2:21:22
that same piece of information at the same time in the same day someone's going to get exposed to

1335
2:21:22 --> 2:21:27
it multiple times and then it will hit them that makes sense so you could really hit that five

1336
2:21:27 --> 2:21:31
times the problem is at the moment it's so fragmented and there's so many thousands of

1337
2:21:31 --> 2:21:38
pieces of different information that it's not hammering that five times correct yes that's

1338
2:21:38 --> 2:21:47
right it's a it's a fire hose of it's a fire hose of of information all right steven last

1339
2:21:47 --> 2:21:53
questions to you we're finishing five or six minutes yep so david um are you a psychologist

1340
2:21:53 --> 2:21:59
i can't remember uh no i basically studied a number of other subjects so i described

1341
2:21:59 --> 2:22:06
myself as a behavior and communication expert and there was someone on the call earlier but

1342
2:22:06 --> 2:22:13
has gone now i wanted to ask him so ray fenandes i seem to remember that he presented to us and

1343
2:22:13 --> 2:22:22
he was an expert on mk ultra and so it would so i have noticed he he hasn't been on for quite a

1344
2:22:22 --> 2:22:30
while now he came on tonight i think because in the invitation i mentioned mind control so um but

1345
2:22:30 --> 2:22:35
i don't know can you remember that charles whether ray fenandes raised raised raised from sydney by

1346
2:22:35 --> 2:22:40
the way the um those two astronauts splashed down safely i just saw about six seven minutes ago

1347
2:22:41 --> 2:22:48
what in the studio so ray fenandes he's a sydney guy i thought was a radiologist steven

1348
2:22:48 --> 2:22:54
and certainly interested in all sorts of interesting things he's not the mk ultra guy i was

1349
2:22:54 --> 2:23:02
i was no i think i think so good job i didn't ask them um and uh so uh david i just wanted to ask

1350
2:23:02 --> 2:23:09
you uh so you're interested in psychology and you know a lot about um uh mind control and the

1351
2:23:09 --> 2:23:15
conditioning what was the worst thing in your opinion about 2021 i think that was when we first

1352
2:23:15 --> 2:23:23
met and um you you kind of presented to us in 2021 from memory but it certainly seems a long

1353
2:23:23 --> 2:23:31
time ago but um what was in your opinion what was the most uh the worst thing they did the the people

1354
2:23:32 --> 2:23:36
what was the name of that the nudge unit in the uk was the behavioural insights team

1355
2:23:37 --> 2:23:48
the kids they basically so i interviewed uh gary sidley dr gary sidley he had a paper published

1356
2:23:49 --> 2:23:54
on they basically did lots of freedom of information requests to the sage and the

1357
2:23:54 --> 2:24:01
nudge units and all those things and the it's a it's a sickening read they were basically saying

1358
2:24:01 --> 2:24:05
the children and the young are not scared enough so we need to really scare them

1359
2:24:06 --> 2:24:13
that for me is the most sickening thing is that they they're basically screwing up that they see

1360
2:24:13 --> 2:24:17
they don't really realize you traumatize people in that way you're going to change the course of

1361
2:24:17 --> 2:24:24
their life forever absolutely and and they how many people lost the key years of their life where

1362
2:24:24 --> 2:24:32
were they right where was this being said in emails or what uh yeah they i've got the um let

1363
2:24:32 --> 2:24:41
me find the paper um because gary did a really in fact i could gary did a really

1364
2:24:41 --> 2:24:46
important piece of work on it and it got published um

1365
2:24:55 --> 2:25:02
so yeah so there were some really horrible um pieces of information that were in that

1366
2:25:03 --> 2:25:10
so i'm going to pop that into the chat so is anyone um recording all this somewhere david i

1367
2:25:10 --> 2:25:16
mean is it just kind of do people find this and then it gets lost in the future or is it being

1368
2:25:16 --> 2:25:21
kept by someone well that's a good question i think there i think that you know as we've

1369
2:25:21 --> 2:25:29
matured um we need to start building this you know we need to have most organizations to uh

1370
2:25:30 --> 2:25:40
to record all this well arguably that's our primary duty to record history yeah so then

1371
2:25:40 --> 2:25:44
and there is a chance that i think what behavioral science has done

1372
2:25:44 --> 2:25:51
that i think what behavioral science has done is it's it's revealed the shadow and a lot of

1373
2:25:51 --> 2:25:58
its functions that people like young and foyd theorized about and it's been proven in study

1374
2:25:58 --> 2:26:03
after study and i think that information could actually be for the first time that

1375
2:26:03 --> 2:26:04
humans could learn from history

1376
2:26:07 --> 2:26:12
if that happens then we can stop repeating the same mistakes over and over again

1377
2:26:14 --> 2:26:21
so david um i don't know can you explain so when people are so when people are going through

1378
2:26:21 --> 2:26:26
trauma they might not realize they're being traumatized is that correct so they kind of

1379
2:26:26 --> 2:26:34
there's a survival instinct and yeah well that's the adaptive unconscious we adapt to situations

1380
2:26:34 --> 2:26:39
very quickly so if you if you adapt to a constantly stressful environment you will

1381
2:26:39 --> 2:26:46
adapt to survive in that so when human beings observe the world that doesn't make sense like

1382
2:26:46 --> 2:26:54
the world of 2020 you know um and you're actually living in 2020 then your duty to yourself is to

1383
2:26:54 --> 2:27:01
kind of normalize things as as far as possible so you may not be very happy but you might not

1384
2:27:01 --> 2:27:08
realize how badly you're being traumatized is that correct survival first i'm sorry it's always

1385
2:27:08 --> 2:27:16
survival first so maybe later you do realize and then you think whoa that was a bit scary

1386
2:27:16 --> 2:27:23
a bit more scary than i thought at the time and um so i'm seeing people around me who are

1387
2:27:23 --> 2:27:28
i i didn't realize what was wrong with them but i think they're damaged you know and um but i think

1388
2:27:28 --> 2:27:35
we're all damaged to some extent yeah well you see they've been traumatizing people for decades i

1389
2:27:35 --> 2:27:43
mean watching bambi is traumatizing okay people don't realize the the little things that can

1390
2:27:43 --> 2:27:51
traumatize people sure so so so we're all going through little traumas all the time in in normal

1391
2:27:51 --> 2:27:57
circumstances is that right yeah but there's also a lot of good solutions now that i've been using

1392
2:27:57 --> 2:28:02
a lot of these techniques the last year i have to say i've found more peace than i've ever had

1393
2:28:03 --> 2:28:09
okay in the most disastrous world that i've lived in see the outer world is obviously going to have

1394
2:28:09 --> 2:28:15
effect on our inner world but we can find peace and that was you know somebody put about frankl's

1395
2:28:15 --> 2:28:22
book in there there is a way to basically you know just find a certain level of peace and i think

1396
2:28:22 --> 2:28:28
that has to happen i think there was one quote that said the problem with humanity is that people

1397
2:28:28 --> 2:28:33
can't sit in a room quiet yeah so they don't have that level of peace where they're not causing

1398
2:28:33 --> 2:28:39
problems and you know when you look at modern day society people are going out and spending

1399
2:28:39 --> 2:28:44
money to buy things they don't want to impress people they don't like exactly that's a result

1400
2:28:44 --> 2:28:54
of our conditioning yeah so so what what's the what's the most important thing for us to do then

1401
2:28:55 --> 2:29:00
in your opinion as well you're not a psychologist but you are certainly interested in psychology

1402
2:29:00 --> 2:29:06
well i think understand how we function exactly i've said that i've articulated that and i'm not

1403
2:29:07 --> 2:29:14
it's about having a manual for yourself show if now something works then it's very hard to deal

1404
2:29:14 --> 2:29:18
with it when you then understand how it works then you can fix a lot of any of the the things that

1405
2:29:18 --> 2:29:25
aren't working as you want them to work so david it seems to me that people say we need to kind of

1406
2:29:25 --> 2:29:31
work out what's going on but it seems to me that we need to understand first of all how human

1407
2:29:31 --> 2:29:37
beings function and until we do that we can't really make sense of what's happened yes and

1408
2:29:37 --> 2:29:41
i think it goes even further than that i think that we've been educated

1409
2:29:41 --> 2:29:50
we've been misinformed how we operate sure and i think you know there's a lot of compelling

1410
2:29:50 --> 2:29:56
evidence that has been done on purpose but even if it's done accidental if we're working if you

1411
2:29:56 --> 2:30:03
have a faulty map you're never going to get where you need to get yeah that's the key so the big

1412
2:30:03 --> 2:30:10
part of what we're doing is to to basically give a map of what's going on when you understand that

1413
2:30:10 --> 2:30:15
then literally just as a simple example you know what question is going to get a good response and

1414
2:30:15 --> 2:30:22
what question is going to get a bad response you start but if you don't know what effect any

1415
2:30:22 --> 2:30:28
question will have you can't you know you you can't criticize yourself because you you didn't know so

1416
2:30:29 --> 2:30:36
to a lot of this is is that manual yeah so um about three years ago we met for the first time

1417
2:30:36 --> 2:30:42
and i think we agreed then that the most important thing we could do in the future was to make sense

1418
2:30:42 --> 2:30:50
of it all and we had been propagandized subjected to propaganda all of us and so we needed to

1419
2:30:51 --> 2:30:57
destroy the false narrative which had been created with counter propaganda and so my question is

1420
2:30:57 --> 2:31:04
how much nearer are we three years later or more than three years later actually to getting the

1421
2:31:04 --> 2:31:12
propaganda which is the counter propaganda which is necessary um much much closer okay i'm now

1422
2:31:13 --> 2:31:21
in a position where theoretically where i think we can now make documentaries are much better

1423
2:31:22 --> 2:31:28
to shift people's views um so i've got a couple of filmmakers i'm talking to etc i think there's a

1424
2:31:28 --> 2:31:33
series of things that we can do so we're theorizing you know a knowledge base would be very useful

1425
2:31:33 --> 2:31:40
to know how to um to present the information in a film or short story or whatever for it to be

1426
2:31:40 --> 2:31:45
effective so it's really to take the good information everyone on this call no doubt they have some very

1427
2:31:45 --> 2:31:51
valuable information and it's literally the ability how to get that information in someone's head

1428
2:31:52 --> 2:32:00
and we're really close to being able to explain that in a fine detail yeah so to me it's very

1429
2:32:00 --> 2:32:07
surprising that more people didn't realize that actually uh creating our own propaganda was

1430
2:32:07 --> 2:32:12
important to counter the propaganda to which we've been subjected and which has done so much damage

1431
2:32:13 --> 2:32:19
and um and also as you say i think we need to understand human beings and how they function

1432
2:32:19 --> 2:32:26
how they work and all right they're big questions come on we're going let david go david thank you

1433
2:32:26 --> 2:32:31
so much for for speaking to us and especially that's such short notice like a couple of hours

1434
2:32:31 --> 2:32:38
before wasn't it yeah um yeah it's a pleasure to see you all again um you know great work david

1435
2:32:38 --> 2:32:39
fantastic to have you

1436
2:32:42 --> 2:32:47
yes brilliant and steven well done for organizing thanks everybody and go to tom rodman

1437
2:32:48 --> 2:32:53
video meeting for those of you who have the time david we'll see you next time there will be a next

1438
2:32:53 --> 2:32:58
time lots to talk about because we're going to solve all these problems ha ha absolutely

1439
2:32:59 --> 2:33:10
all right thanks steven thanks everyone bye thanks thank you thank you david