1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:01
Well, everybody.

2
0:00:01 --> 0:00:02
There will be an examination on this.

3
0:00:02 --> 0:00:05
Yes.

4
0:00:07 --> 0:00:08
That's that's it, Steven.

5
0:00:08 --> 0:00:11
Steven loves IT, Richard. He's very good.

6
0:00:11 --> 0:00:12
Oh, yeah, absolutely. Love it.

7
0:00:14 --> 0:00:16
Well, I always I always chuckle when

8
0:00:18 --> 0:00:21
I can't get something to work and I work with the anti-matter cameras

9
0:00:21 --> 0:00:24
and then people look at me and, you know, what's the issue?

10
0:00:24 --> 0:00:28
And I have to explain that it's probably self-evident to an elementary school

11
0:00:28 --> 0:00:31
student, but I'm not an elementary school student.

12
0:00:31 --> 0:00:33
So, you know.

13
0:00:33 --> 0:00:34
Yes.

14
0:00:36 --> 0:00:38
That's very good.

15
0:00:38 --> 0:00:42
Well, everybody, in my opinion, that is why God invented 11 year olds.

16
0:00:44 --> 0:00:47
I thought that's parents did that.

17
0:00:47 --> 0:00:49
OK, go ahead. Thank you so much.

18
0:00:51 --> 0:00:53
Well said, Rima.

19
0:00:55 --> 0:00:57
All right, everybody, welcome.

20
0:00:59 --> 0:01:01
I'm Charles Kervesh, your moderator.

21
0:01:01 --> 0:01:03
This is Stephen Frost's Medical Doctors for COVID

22
0:01:04 --> 0:01:06
Ethics Meeting.

23
0:01:06 --> 0:01:08
It is about ethics.

24
0:01:08 --> 0:01:10
I'm Australasia's passion provocateur.

25
0:01:10 --> 0:01:14
Here's my red jacket, red for the colour of passion, Richard.

26
0:01:14 --> 0:01:15
And we've had Richard before.

27
0:01:15 --> 0:01:17
It was a wonderful presentation.

28
0:01:17 --> 0:01:20
It's wonderful to have you again, Richard.

29
0:01:20 --> 0:01:22
There's lots of professions here.

30
0:01:22 --> 0:01:26
There are doctors, journalists, engineers,

31
0:01:26 --> 0:01:32
writers, researchers, nurses, data processors, lawyers, ex-lawyers.

32
0:01:33 --> 0:01:35
And we are here.

33
0:01:36 --> 0:01:42
In a true spirit of operation of exploration and discovery.

34
0:01:43 --> 0:01:45
Most of us understand we're in World War Three.

35
0:01:45 --> 0:01:48
That's why we're here. Stephen understood we're in World War Three.

36
0:01:48 --> 0:01:50
So that's why he created this group.

37
0:01:50 --> 0:01:52
We go for two and a half hours, Richard.

38
0:01:53 --> 0:01:55
You're most welcome for the full two and a half hours.

39
0:01:55 --> 0:01:57
But we know you have tight time limits.

40
0:01:57 --> 0:01:59
So you present, we ask questions.

41
0:01:59 --> 0:02:02
And when you have to go, you go.

42
0:02:02 --> 0:02:06
After two and a half hours, there is a telegram video chat

43
0:02:06 --> 0:02:09
available for you to go to a less structured format.

44
0:02:10 --> 0:02:14
We don't have censorship, but we have proper moderation.

45
0:02:14 --> 0:02:17
Free speech is crucial to this group.

46
0:02:17 --> 0:02:19
But that doesn't. But we have proper moderation.

47
0:02:19 --> 0:02:23
So just because you have you don't have unlimited time to speak,

48
0:02:23 --> 0:02:25
unlimited time to talk about whatever you want.

49
0:02:26 --> 0:02:28
That's what moderation is all about.

50
0:02:28 --> 0:02:31
So I tried to apply the rules of Parliament.

51
0:02:32 --> 0:02:35
Now, one of the elements of this, Richard speaks.

52
0:02:35 --> 0:02:38
There are other speakers who speak.

53
0:02:38 --> 0:02:41
And the challenge for each one of us in this exploration

54
0:02:41 --> 0:02:45
is to understand your beliefs, how they impact on what you hear.

55
0:02:45 --> 0:02:48
And I urge you to be aware of that.

56
0:02:48 --> 0:02:51
We welcome all new members, all new attendees.

57
0:02:51 --> 0:02:53
Sorry, if this is your first time, welcome.

58
0:02:53 --> 0:02:56
Please introduce yourself in the chat.

59
0:02:58 --> 0:03:01
We are interested in the development of science and necessarily,

60
0:03:01 --> 0:03:05
as Richard, you as a scientist know, that means there's going to be

61
0:03:05 --> 0:03:10
disagreements and we try our best to keep those disagreements

62
0:03:10 --> 0:03:12
in true exploration of science.

63
0:03:13 --> 0:03:18
We come from love, not fear, but we come from tough love.

64
0:03:18 --> 0:03:20
So we do care about humanity.

65
0:03:20 --> 0:03:23
We wouldn't be doing this if we didn't care about humanity.

66
0:03:23 --> 0:03:27
It's much easier to be asleep and go along with the government narrative.

67
0:03:27 --> 0:03:29
None of us are doing that.

68
0:03:29 --> 0:03:32
And so have an open mind.

69
0:03:32 --> 0:03:34
Enjoy the journey. Question and answer.

70
0:03:34 --> 0:03:38
If you put your hand up for reactions after Richard speaks.

71
0:03:38 --> 0:03:44
And Richard, we welcome you and we look forward to sharing your genius with us.

72
0:03:45 --> 0:03:47
And before you start, Stephen, is there anything else I've forgotten?

73
0:03:47 --> 0:03:50
No, that was pretty comprehensive, I think.

74
0:03:51 --> 0:03:53
Beautiful. Richard, over to you.

75
0:03:53 --> 0:03:54
Now, how long have we got you?

76
0:03:54 --> 0:03:56
Just so that, you know, when do you have to go?

77
0:03:56 --> 0:04:01
Actually, we have an hour because I get notified yesterday or the day

78
0:04:01 --> 0:04:05
before that there is an event going on here in Dallas.

79
0:04:06 --> 0:04:11
Unbeknownst to me, somebody, I guess, General Flynn had posted a video

80
0:04:12 --> 0:04:16
that included part of my deposition that got taken down immediately.

81
0:04:16 --> 0:04:21
Somebody else who's a film producer then put out a small video clip with me

82
0:04:21 --> 0:04:22
at the very beginning.

83
0:04:22 --> 0:04:27
And so now, interestingly enough, the people in Dallas want to actually

84
0:04:27 --> 0:04:29
see me in person. I'm not sure why.

85
0:04:29 --> 0:04:37
But the goal being to really promote the movement here going forward

86
0:04:37 --> 0:04:42
on these indictments that we have been working on, these grand jury indictments.

87
0:04:43 --> 0:04:50
And so if I can get any person to fulfill the tenletters.org approach,

88
0:04:50 --> 0:04:55
which is to go online to tenletters.org, it's a fairly simple approach.

89
0:04:55 --> 0:04:58
I mean, it's really designed for the United States.

90
0:04:58 --> 0:05:01
But I temper it with this statement.

91
0:05:02 --> 0:05:08
One of the considerations that we had in doing all of this was not only

92
0:05:08 --> 0:05:12
recognizing that these are crimes against America, but these are crimes

93
0:05:12 --> 0:05:13
against humanity.

94
0:05:14 --> 0:05:18
And while a number of nations have been actively involved in this,

95
0:05:19 --> 0:05:24
we recognize and I recognize as a scientist physician that this was my

96
0:05:24 --> 0:05:28
responsibility to have prevented this type of thing.

97
0:05:29 --> 0:05:30
And it got by me.

98
0:05:31 --> 0:05:33
And I take that on a very personal note.

99
0:05:33 --> 0:05:35
I very seldom have.

100
0:05:35 --> 0:05:37
I take that on a very personal note.

101
0:05:37 --> 0:05:43
I very seldom share my personal thoughts because there's a lot of people that want

102
0:05:43 --> 0:05:49
to do that. And the clarity of science is is tantamount to what I'm doing.

103
0:05:49 --> 0:05:56
But so the purpose of making these statements is that somebody had pointed out

104
0:05:56 --> 0:06:03
that there was an Australian clip where the people with lockdown were raising a

105
0:06:03 --> 0:06:05
question. Where are you, America?

106
0:06:05 --> 0:06:07
And the answer is we're here.

107
0:06:08 --> 0:06:14
And we are going to be coming for the rest of you as soon as we get this kicked

108
0:06:14 --> 0:06:15
off in this country.

109
0:06:15 --> 0:06:21
This is not just about us taking out the criminals in the United States, but it

110
0:06:21 --> 0:06:28
will be then coming to help our our friends in other countries to deal with

111
0:06:28 --> 0:06:34
the criminals in your countries that have abridged your rights and harmed you.

112
0:06:36 --> 0:06:41
I am very clear and crisp and concise.

113
0:06:41 --> 0:06:45
I would like to think in my approach to this, I know that there are a lot of

114
0:06:45 --> 0:06:49
things that people have concerns about, whether it's medical freedom, the

115
0:06:49 --> 0:06:53
practice of medicine, the quarantine and the vaccines.

116
0:06:53 --> 0:07:01
But all of this, everything that has happened is the result of a single series

117
0:07:01 --> 0:07:05
of activities that are criminal in nature.

118
0:07:05 --> 0:07:16
And those are the deliberate, intentional and knowing development of viruses that

119
0:07:16 --> 0:07:18
are being a function viruses.

120
0:07:18 --> 0:07:27
These viruses, when PCR is done correctly, it turns out that we have found at least

121
0:07:27 --> 0:07:38
three gain-of-function biological weapons that were built by Ralph Berrick from the

122
0:07:38 --> 0:07:43
University of North Carolina and Xi-Zeng Li at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

123
0:07:43 --> 0:07:51
The PCR data looking at some eight to 10 segments of three different viruses that

124
0:07:51 --> 0:07:56
I have documented and others have documented, paid for by the U.S.

125
0:07:56 --> 0:08:06
military, paid for by NIAID, Anthony Fauci, paid for by NIH, violate the

126
0:08:06 --> 0:08:08
Biological Weapons Convention Treaty.

127
0:08:08 --> 0:08:14
They violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

128
0:08:14 --> 0:08:17
They violate the Declaration of Helsinki.

129
0:08:18 --> 0:08:22
They violate Nuremberg, which is in standing in the U.S.

130
0:08:23 --> 0:08:29
because a Southern District of Texas federal judge in the case of Jennifer

131
0:08:29 --> 0:08:35
Bridges versus Methodist Hospital defined that she could not win the defendant

132
0:08:36 --> 0:08:42
Methodist Hospital because Methodist Hospital was not a government, i.e.

133
0:08:43 --> 0:08:50
governments, including ours, the United States of America, are criminally culpable

134
0:08:50 --> 0:08:50
in U.S.

135
0:08:50 --> 0:08:56
federal courts for Nuremberg violations, which they have done.

136
0:08:57 --> 0:09:00
Everything else that has happened.

137
0:09:00 --> 0:09:09
The quarantining, the shutting down of businesses, the shutting down of schools,

138
0:09:09 --> 0:09:15
the shutting down of churches or synagogues or whatever your religious

139
0:09:16 --> 0:09:25
practice is, the interference with the practice of medicine, the use of vaccines

140
0:09:25 --> 0:09:32
that I'm still just stunned that so very few people have actually read the

141
0:09:32 --> 0:09:38
emergency use authorization documents, which clearly show no statistical benefit.

142
0:09:42 --> 0:09:47
I don't know of too many patients, although I should temper that.

143
0:09:47 --> 0:09:52
I know very few patients who if I told them I'm going to give them a drug, but it

144
0:09:53 --> 0:09:56
won't make any difference and if I don't give them any that they would take the

145
0:09:56 --> 0:09:57
medication.

146
0:09:57 --> 0:10:01
Now, unfortunately, when I first asked that of somebody in a group, they said,

147
0:10:01 --> 0:10:04
well, of course I take it because if you told me to take it, I take it.

148
0:10:05 --> 0:10:13
And where I was somewhat pleasantly delighted that they thought that much of

149
0:10:14 --> 0:10:21
my instructions, I was also a little struck by the fact that they would still

150
0:10:21 --> 0:10:22
have said yes to that.

151
0:10:23 --> 0:10:30
So our goal now after two and a half years and what this is now month eight.

152
0:10:30 --> 0:10:35
So we've got seven plus twenty four thirty one plus months and counting is to

153
0:10:35 --> 0:10:38
hold these individuals criminally accountable.

154
0:10:38 --> 0:10:45
And so ten letters dot org is a campaign that we've launched less than a week

155
0:10:45 --> 0:10:45
ago.

156
0:10:46 --> 0:10:48
That is a you simply go to that site.

157
0:10:48 --> 0:10:54
If you're in the United States, you can or if you're a citizen of the US and you

158
0:10:54 --> 0:10:59
have citizenship in any state, you can enter your name, your address, your state.

159
0:10:59 --> 0:11:05
It will put a cover letter together for you directed to your attorney general that

160
0:11:05 --> 0:11:09
you can then download along with the letter for indictment.

161
0:11:09 --> 0:11:14
And the letter for indictment doesn't provide all the evidence because it's it's

162
0:11:14 --> 0:11:21
too there's too much evidence to do, but it provides links to the evidence to

163
0:11:21 --> 0:11:27
show that the individuals in question of which we're fairly focused, we focused on

164
0:11:27 --> 0:11:36
Anthony Fauci, on Collins, on Gates, on the people in government positions that is

165
0:11:36 --> 0:11:43
is relatively focused that points out not only the the treaty law that has been

166
0:11:43 --> 0:11:51
violated, so therefore the US Constitution under Article six, but also the state laws

167
0:11:51 --> 0:11:55
and very specifically points out that these crimes amount to amount to murder,

168
0:11:56 --> 0:12:01
attempted murder, manslaughter, reckless manslaughter, false imprisonment, assault,

169
0:12:02 --> 0:12:07
battery, coercion and perjury and and in some cases treason.

170
0:12:07 --> 0:12:13
If you've taken a note to uphold an independent constitution, the purpose is

171
0:12:13 --> 0:12:17
for everybody to go to that site, download a cover letter, download the letter for

172
0:12:17 --> 0:12:20
indictment, which is no longer signed just by myself.

173
0:12:21 --> 0:12:27
It is signed by Kevin McCarran, who's probably one of the premier neuro biologist,

174
0:12:27 --> 0:12:30
animal biologists in the world with his knowledge of prion diseases.

175
0:12:31 --> 0:12:38
It is signed by Charles Rixie, who is an MA and former US Marine weapons of mass

176
0:12:38 --> 0:12:41
destruction facilitator and instructor.

177
0:12:41 --> 0:12:47
It is signed by Johanna Deiner, who is a German physician who's been dealing with

178
0:12:47 --> 0:12:53
this in Germany, and it is signed by Andrew Huff, who was the former vice president

179
0:12:53 --> 0:12:58
of EcoHealth, who has firsthand knowledge and information on the grants that were

180
0:12:58 --> 0:13:05
supplied, written by himself under the authority of Peter Daszak at EcoHealth to

181
0:13:05 --> 0:13:09
Anthony Fauci and others in the US federal government.

182
0:13:10 --> 0:13:11
The evidence is clear.

183
0:13:12 --> 0:13:18
These individuals have violated these treaty laws and have violated state criminal

184
0:13:19 --> 0:13:22
statutes. They need to be held criminally accountable.

185
0:13:22 --> 0:13:27
Everything else that has happened, while I know it brings a strong response from

186
0:13:27 --> 0:13:32
people, all of those actions occurred because of these gain of function

187
0:13:32 --> 0:13:33
biological agents.

188
0:13:33 --> 0:13:43
Now, the evidence suggests that these agents probably accidentally got released.

189
0:13:43 --> 0:13:49
And this does not release these people from their criminality.

190
0:13:49 --> 0:13:55
In fact, it doubles down on their criminality because they had an option at that

191
0:13:55 --> 0:14:01
point in time to come clean and say, as I told people, if I were running the

192
0:14:01 --> 0:14:07
program, look, people, we developed these weapons, OK, we thought it was the right

193
0:14:07 --> 0:14:09
thing to do. We did it for X, Y and Z reasons.

194
0:14:10 --> 0:14:14
All the people that are going to attack us and we have to be ready to attack them.

195
0:14:14 --> 0:14:17
But you would have come clean on that.

196
0:14:17 --> 0:14:22
And the fact that they did not meant that they doubled down and covered up their

197
0:14:22 --> 0:14:27
criminal actions, which holds them even more culpable.

198
0:14:28 --> 0:14:34
And if you watch the panicked emails, if you read through the panic emails, if you

199
0:14:34 --> 0:14:41
listen to the panicked depositions, Anthony Fauci before Senator Dr.

200
0:14:41 --> 0:14:44
Charles Rand Paul in the U.S.

201
0:14:44 --> 0:14:52
Congress, if you watch their behaviors, they are the behaviors of men and women who.

202
0:14:52 --> 0:14:55
Are struck by the fact that they have lost control.

203
0:14:56 --> 0:15:01
And anybody who thinks that we are coming out of a dark tunnel at this point in time

204
0:15:01 --> 0:15:04
is not paying attention to what's been going on around the world or in the United

205
0:15:04 --> 0:15:10
States. Now, all of you have firsthand information on what's going on in Australia,

206
0:15:10 --> 0:15:12
New Zealand and other countries.

207
0:15:12 --> 0:15:17
But here in Dallas, Texas, the CDC, about two weeks ago, wanted to turn this into a

208
0:15:17 --> 0:15:19
red zone to reinitiate masking.

209
0:15:19 --> 0:15:24
I can tell you going into my shops, places of business, I frequent people are beginning

210
0:15:24 --> 0:15:25
to wear masks again.

211
0:15:26 --> 0:15:32
I can tell you that the Nuclear Threat Initiative shows that they are playing the

212
0:15:32 --> 0:15:37
game of testing the waters to see what it takes to get the response that they want,

213
0:15:37 --> 0:15:42
which is a no regrets policy where countries, including the United States, will simply

214
0:15:42 --> 0:15:47
yield and say, look, you tell us there's an emergency, we will do what you tell us to

215
0:15:48 --> 0:15:53
do. Now, these games have been played before and very successfully, except that now they

216
0:15:53 --> 0:15:59
are watching and playing it around to may have accidentally been released.

217
0:15:59 --> 0:16:03
And you can argue with me about whether you think it's accidental or intentional.

218
0:16:03 --> 0:16:05
I would argue that makes no difference.

219
0:16:05 --> 0:16:09
Either way, they developed biological agents that are criminal actions.

220
0:16:10 --> 0:16:15
It's what they're doing now that tells us that they are proceeding forward, whether

221
0:16:15 --> 0:16:22
it be monkeypox or control of nitrogen for agricultural purposes or controlling the

222
0:16:22 --> 0:16:25
products on the shelves and the prices going up.

223
0:16:25 --> 0:16:32
The direct manipulations of every one of these components of our lives is an effort to

224
0:16:32 --> 0:16:39
put pressure on people to recontrol the population in all countries.

225
0:16:39 --> 0:16:44
And my argument right now is quite frankly that we have less than 90 days to do this.

226
0:16:44 --> 0:16:47
We have less than 90 days to turn this around.

227
0:16:47 --> 0:16:54
We have less than 90 days, in my opinion, to get these grand jury indictments moving

228
0:16:54 --> 0:17:00
forward, to stop them in their tracks because they have demonstrated that they will continue

229
0:17:00 --> 0:17:05
to push forward, whether it's masking in Dallas, whether it's masking of the public

230
0:17:05 --> 0:17:10
school children in the state of California after three cases of COVID were admitted to

231
0:17:10 --> 0:17:16
hospitals, whether is the legislation occurring in California right now where they are giving

232
0:17:16 --> 0:17:21
the authority to parents, or rather not to parents, but to schools, they have the authority

233
0:17:21 --> 0:17:27
for the schools to vaccinate children in the absence of the approval of their parents.

234
0:17:28 --> 0:17:32
There are many laws that they are attempting to pass right now.

235
0:17:32 --> 0:17:38
And I would argue that the newest thing that was just passed by the House with this, let's

236
0:17:38 --> 0:17:44
fight inflation nonsense, where they put together 87,000 new IRS agents to go after

237
0:17:44 --> 0:17:51
the people that are making minimum or moderate wages is nothing more than an attempt to

238
0:17:51 --> 0:17:55
recontrol the people and to install fear.

239
0:17:56 --> 0:18:00
If you're afraid of something, you are not reacting clearly and concisely.

240
0:18:00 --> 0:18:06
I used to tell students that I used to train for emergency scenarios, that when you walk

241
0:18:06 --> 0:18:12
into or come into an emergency situation, the first pulse to check is your own, because

242
0:18:12 --> 0:18:18
if you don't have control of your own emotions and behavior, you cannot possibly save

243
0:18:18 --> 0:18:20
somebody's life unless you're lucky.

244
0:18:20 --> 0:18:23
And luck is not the way we want to be going about this.

245
0:18:23 --> 0:18:26
We need to do this in a very controlled manner.

246
0:18:26 --> 0:18:30
And with that, with appreciation for the fact that I only have an hour and I want to make

247
0:18:30 --> 0:18:35
sure I answer questions, my plea is for people to get out there to make people aware of

248
0:18:35 --> 0:18:36
this. Ten Letters.org.

249
0:18:37 --> 0:18:42
The idea being that you fill one out and you submit it to 10 other people for them to

250
0:18:42 --> 0:18:45
fill one out and each of them submit it to 10 others to fill it out.

251
0:18:45 --> 0:18:50
And we produce an overwhelming effect.

252
0:18:51 --> 0:18:56
And the campaign, the little video that was put on that was the Harry Potter video where

253
0:18:57 --> 0:19:03
they were trying to get Harry into a wizard school, Hogwarts.

254
0:19:03 --> 0:19:10
And the owls were delivering letters and it was my youngest son, who's 28, so not that

255
0:19:10 --> 0:19:15
young, but who came up with that idea and said, you know, Dad, this is the type of thing.

256
0:19:15 --> 0:19:21
And it's the motivation that shows that if we inundate these individuals, these attorney

257
0:19:21 --> 0:19:26
generals in the United States, they will have to listen to the people.

258
0:19:26 --> 0:19:31
And we, the people in this country, still are supposed to be running it.

259
0:19:31 --> 0:19:35
And once we once we address this, we will be coming.

260
0:19:36 --> 0:19:37
I will be coming.

261
0:19:37 --> 0:19:39
I make this promise to you.

262
0:19:39 --> 0:19:46
I will be coming to your nations to help you get your criminals indicted and arrested

263
0:19:46 --> 0:19:49
and tried and imprisoned at a minimum.

264
0:19:52 --> 0:19:54
Well said, Richard.

265
0:19:54 --> 0:19:57
We in Australia will welcome you.

266
0:19:57 --> 0:19:59
We will welcome your strategies.

267
0:19:59 --> 0:20:03
And I'm sure many other countries will as well.

268
0:20:03 --> 0:20:06
We have numerous countries represented here.

269
0:20:06 --> 0:20:12
Now, traditionally, Richard Steven asks the first questions as the founder of the group.

270
0:20:12 --> 0:20:15
As you know, I remember that.

271
0:20:15 --> 0:20:22
Yes. And then anyone else, please put your hands up using the reactions tab for.

272
0:20:23 --> 0:20:24
Questions.

273
0:20:24 --> 0:20:28
Richard's we've got Richard for another 35 minutes.

274
0:20:28 --> 0:20:29
So that's excellent.

275
0:20:29 --> 0:20:31
Plenty of opportunities for questions.

276
0:20:31 --> 0:20:33
So, Stephen, over to you.

277
0:20:36 --> 0:20:43
Dr Fleming, could you so if Simon, the UK and there are people all over the world on this

278
0:20:43 --> 0:20:44
call now.

279
0:20:44 --> 0:20:47
And of course, there are all the others who are not here who are members of the group.

280
0:20:47 --> 0:20:52
So we've got 1300 members and they're all recommended.

281
0:20:52 --> 0:20:54
So it's quite an army.

282
0:20:55 --> 0:20:57
So I could.

283
0:20:57 --> 0:20:58
So what about all the.

284
0:20:58 --> 0:21:01
So can the foreigners, i.e.

285
0:21:01 --> 0:21:07
the non-Americans, write to write these letters or are you suggesting they write to their

286
0:21:07 --> 0:21:09
own attorneys general?

287
0:21:12 --> 0:21:17
So one thing I would recommend the way that the cover letter is set up is that if you

288
0:21:17 --> 0:21:21
enter your address and it has your state, it will give you an attorney general.

289
0:21:22 --> 0:21:28
But there's also the option of not having your address put on the letter if that's

290
0:21:28 --> 0:21:29
applicable to you.

291
0:21:29 --> 0:21:32
So I would argue both.

292
0:21:32 --> 0:21:36
This is not a one or other choice at this time.

293
0:21:36 --> 0:21:41
This is a let's act solidly across the board right now.

294
0:21:41 --> 0:21:47
So if you are outside of the United States and you would like to send these letters,

295
0:21:47 --> 0:21:53
you know, again, it's snail mail, but it's hard for them to ignore snail mail.

296
0:21:55 --> 0:21:59
And we've talked about getting emails, but we know that there's a tendency for them to

297
0:21:59 --> 0:22:03
kind of ignore or deflect those types of things.

298
0:22:03 --> 0:22:05
But hard copies are hard to get away from.

299
0:22:06 --> 0:22:12
So if you have a certain state that you think that it will be particularly advantageous

300
0:22:12 --> 0:22:20
to, please click down as your address for that state, get a cover letter sent with your

301
0:22:20 --> 0:22:23
name and anything else you want to put on it.

302
0:22:23 --> 0:22:26
Download that cover letter along with the letter for indictment.

303
0:22:26 --> 0:22:32
And please send those in to the United States, because this will, again, the impact of

304
0:22:32 --> 0:22:38
letting these people know we're no longer going to sit back and tolerate what's being

305
0:22:38 --> 0:22:44
done, that we understand that crimes have been committed and we demand that these people

306
0:22:45 --> 0:22:48
do their job that they have been elected to do.

307
0:22:48 --> 0:22:53
And I would also suggest that you do that in your own countries as well.

308
0:22:53 --> 0:22:59
You can take the format of you have my blessing to take my my letter for indictment,

309
0:22:59 --> 0:23:03
put a cover letter to your people and state this is what's being done in the United States.

310
0:23:04 --> 0:23:10
And these people are with us here in the UK, in Australia, because we are.

311
0:23:10 --> 0:23:15
I am. These other the other four people that I mentioned are.

312
0:23:15 --> 0:23:18
We are determined to hold these criminals accountable.

313
0:23:18 --> 0:23:23
And if we can do that by you sending it to your people as well, please do, because we

314
0:23:23 --> 0:23:25
will be coming.

315
0:23:25 --> 0:23:28
We were going to get our indictments in this country.

316
0:23:28 --> 0:23:33
We will probably also be coming for our enemies, you know, in the sense that even our enemies

317
0:23:33 --> 0:23:39
who have been put to test and suffer need our help at this point in time.

318
0:23:39 --> 0:23:45
This is the best opportunity humanity has to actually maybe become humanity again.

319
0:23:47 --> 0:23:51
Yeah. And so.

320
0:23:51 --> 0:23:57
And looking at the current situation, I think we're going to have to look at the current

321
0:23:57 --> 0:24:03
situation. Looking at the criminals, as I'm sure you are doing, do you detect signs that they are

322
0:24:03 --> 0:24:09
losing their nerve or they feel that maybe they've gone a step too far this time or too quickly

323
0:24:10 --> 0:24:15
so that they've actually got our attention, not just our attention, but many, many others around

324
0:24:15 --> 0:24:23
the world in a way that they wouldn't have got our attention had they not gone so quickly and

325
0:24:24 --> 0:24:25
done such outrageous things.

326
0:24:26 --> 0:24:31
Yeah, no, I do. I think that the fact that this accidentally occurred, and it's one of the

327
0:24:31 --> 0:24:36
arguments for being accidental watching their behavior, I think the fact that it accidentally,

328
0:24:36 --> 0:24:42
they accidentally leaked out, you know, and some of the video presentations I've done explain the

329
0:24:42 --> 0:24:48
fact that they, in September and October 2019, while they were worried about a computer failure

330
0:24:48 --> 0:24:53
and being hacked, they were also busily trying to change their incinerator systems and their

331
0:24:53 --> 0:24:59
air duct systems in an emergency mode. These are people that were panicked about something,

332
0:24:59 --> 0:25:05
and this is what was going on at the time. So I think it is a blessing, if we can take it that

333
0:25:05 --> 0:25:13
way, that this occurred in less of a controlled manner than they wanted. I think it exposed them,

334
0:25:15 --> 0:25:19
but again, it's taken two and a half years. Right now, I think they are doubling down

335
0:25:19 --> 0:25:26
with every step, because if you look at it from the perspective that I think they are looking at

336
0:25:26 --> 0:25:34
it from, criminals doing criminal actions, and they know it's being raised on accountability,

337
0:25:35 --> 0:25:39
there's a point in time that you either have, I mean, there's no place for them to run now.

338
0:25:39 --> 0:25:45
They either defend their positions and turn us around, potentially turn us against each other,

339
0:25:45 --> 0:25:53
or they're going to be caught and held legally, criminally accountable. I had somebody attack me,

340
0:25:54 --> 0:26:01
I don't need to mention the name of the individual, but said, Dr. Fleming wants blood.

341
0:26:03 --> 0:26:09
Make no doubt about it, I want blood. These are criminals that have killed millions of people,

342
0:26:09 --> 0:26:17
have harmed many, many more people, and have manipulated everybody on the planet to their own

343
0:26:17 --> 0:26:26
gain. Imprisonment and or blood, depending upon their role in this, is exactly what I'm going

344
0:26:26 --> 0:26:34
after. I didn't call this originally Operation Blutern by mistake. Blood Eagle has a specific

345
0:26:34 --> 0:26:40
meaning, which it was saved for people who committed the most egregious crimes,

346
0:26:41 --> 0:26:49
unacceptable to humanity. And let's not forget that in Nuremberg, blood was paid for blood that was

347
0:26:50 --> 0:26:59
due. Sure, seven doctors were hanged on the 2nd of June 1948 for human medical experimentation.

348
0:27:00 --> 0:27:10
Yes. And I was so, very quickly, if the so-called cost of living crisis, BBC I believe,

349
0:27:12 --> 0:27:21
and food shortages, inflation, the energy crisis in the UK, I don't know whether other countries,

350
0:27:21 --> 0:27:29
well, Germany, I think is going to have this. But so that to me is all part of what's going on.

351
0:27:30 --> 0:27:36
So are you going after just the people who are responsible for the vast array of Covid crimes,

352
0:27:36 --> 0:27:42
or are you going after the related crimes? Because ultimately, I think the financial

353
0:27:43 --> 0:27:51
cabal, if you like, is responsible for the whole thing. Are you going after the hidden guys,

354
0:27:51 --> 0:27:58
or are you just going after the obvious ones? All right. Well, I know everybody wants,

355
0:27:59 --> 0:28:07
everybody who's done something wrong to somehow pay a price. The way this is done legally,

356
0:28:07 --> 0:28:14
now I'm putting on my JD hat, is we want to go after the people that we clearly can prove

357
0:28:14 --> 0:28:20
have committed these crimes. From a JD's perspective, the real fun begins once the

358
0:28:20 --> 0:28:27
indictment occurs, because then you get to ask questions, then you get to get documents,

359
0:28:27 --> 0:28:35
then you get phone records and everything else. And anything that you pull out with that information

360
0:28:35 --> 0:28:42
now exposes new people to new crimes. It's the ability to start digging into these records and

361
0:28:42 --> 0:28:51
see just how deep and harmful this has gotten. We have to go after the people that we can prove.

362
0:28:51 --> 0:28:56
And once we start that, all the rest of the information that comes out,

363
0:28:56 --> 0:29:03
and the people who start throwing each other into the bus, that starts to expose new crimes.

364
0:29:04 --> 0:29:10
And then those people, now there's evidence that has been brought forward that cannot be ignored.

365
0:29:11 --> 0:29:17
And that's the way you dig into this. You start with the people that you have the data on,

366
0:29:17 --> 0:29:23
that you know you can prove it, that you can show to a grand jury. See, a grand jury is only about

367
0:29:23 --> 0:29:28
crimes. It's not about civil litigation. Civil litigation, any attorney can file on behalf of

368
0:29:29 --> 0:29:38
anybody to any court. But criminal requires that prosecutors, either federal or state prosecutors,

369
0:29:38 --> 0:29:45
take the evidence, go to a special group of people that are called a grand jury. They're

370
0:29:45 --> 0:29:49
sequestered. They're put in a separate room and they're provided the evidence and they're asked

371
0:29:49 --> 0:29:57
to question, does this evidence demonstrate that these people, these defendants, have actually

372
0:29:57 --> 0:30:06
committed crimes? And if that's the case, then the jury indicts them and says there will be a trial.

373
0:30:06 --> 0:30:13
And now all the evidence begins. But that is one of the major differences between civil and criminal

374
0:30:13 --> 0:30:20
processes. Just because you're an attorney, you can't file a criminal case. That requires a

375
0:30:20 --> 0:30:25
federal attorney or a state attorney, an attorney that works for the government,

376
0:30:26 --> 0:30:33
including state governments, to file that. Now we know that we have several state AGs that are

377
0:30:33 --> 0:30:38
very interested in what we're doing in the United States. We know the federal AG right now is not

378
0:30:38 --> 0:30:44
going to file that. However, elections are coming up. And with the elections coming up, a new era

379
0:30:45 --> 0:30:54
in the United States, I think, will emerge. But we have a 90-day window to get this going. And the

380
0:30:54 --> 0:31:01
first indictment puts a new light on what is happening. Because once an indictment occurs,

381
0:31:01 --> 0:31:10
just imagine this, an indictment occurs in any of the 50 states against Anthony Fauci and the others,

382
0:31:11 --> 0:31:16
there will be mainstream media coverage. Anthony and the rest are not going to get on a plane

383
0:31:17 --> 0:31:24
and come down to wherever we're at. But they won't be able to come to that area

384
0:31:24 --> 0:31:32
without being arrested if they don't come to court. So now we have a brand new scenario

385
0:31:32 --> 0:31:39
where they are now on the defense. And no battle was ever won on defense.

386
0:31:40 --> 0:31:46
Battles were only won on offense. Chamberlain is the classic example. And I hate to say it,

387
0:31:46 --> 0:31:52
I know, I mean, here in the UK, but it's a good example. Chamberlain came back and he said,

388
0:31:52 --> 0:31:59
waving from his paper that he had secured with Adolf Hitler that he had brought peace

389
0:31:59 --> 0:32:06
for the generation. And it wasn't, I mean, I don't remember how much, but it wasn't very long before

390
0:32:06 --> 0:32:12
England was in the war. He had not secured peace. Defensive postures don't secure peace.

391
0:32:12 --> 0:32:19
When people attack you, defensive postures do not encourage them to stop their attack. The only way

392
0:32:19 --> 0:32:26
you stop them is to take the battle to them. And that's what we're doing. We're taking the battle

393
0:32:26 --> 0:32:33
to them. Yeah, appeasement doesn't work. And to win a game of chess, you have to attack in the end,

394
0:32:33 --> 0:32:39
even if you defend most of the match. So can I just ask you very quickly,

395
0:32:40 --> 0:32:46
because there are other people who want to ask, who are you aiming to indict? Or who are you kind of?

396
0:32:47 --> 0:32:53
Oh, I knew you'd want that. It's not like I actually keep this list here. Let me...

397
0:32:57 --> 0:33:05
Okay, the specific people that are listed. Again, keep in mind, this is the original list.

398
0:33:05 --> 0:33:14
These are the ones that we can prove. And from there, it opens up. So I will read from top to

399
0:33:14 --> 0:33:21
bottom. Lloyd Austin, Secretary Department of Defense. Xavier Becquerela, Secretary of Health

400
0:33:21 --> 0:33:29
and Human Services. David Franz, former commander of Fort Detrick. Alejandro Marcos, Secretary

401
0:33:30 --> 0:33:36
Department of Homeland Security. Chris Hassel, Chairman of the HHS P3CO Review Committee.

402
0:33:37 --> 0:33:46
Rachel Walensky, Director, CDC. Janet Woodcock, U.S. FDA. F. Fleming-Krimm, Chief Operating Officer

403
0:33:46 --> 0:33:51
of National Science Foundation. Bear in mind, Fleming's not the last name, but even if it was,

404
0:33:51 --> 0:34:00
if this guy did it, I put him on there. Francis Sellers-Collins, Director of NIH. Anthony Stefan

405
0:34:00 --> 0:34:06
Fauci, Director of NIAID. Peter Daszak, EcoHealth. Ralph Berk, University of North Carolina.

406
0:34:06 --> 0:34:12
Shixing Li, Wuhan Institute of Virology. William Henry Gates III and the Bill and Melinda Gates

407
0:34:12 --> 0:34:21
Foundation. Yeah, and can we see that list anywhere, Richard? So it is actually...

408
0:34:21 --> 0:34:28
If you can either go to FlemingMethod.com and go to the indictment letter page or you can go to the

409
0:34:30 --> 0:34:39
10letters.org page and you can go on the links and find the affidavit

410
0:34:39 --> 0:34:44
Actually, what you do is you find the letter for indictment and it's the third listing on the

411
0:34:44 --> 0:34:54
affidavit, but in an effort to provide you with that actual... Let's see if I can do this.

412
0:34:57 --> 0:35:02
Do you want me to do this? Yeah, I think you can.

413
0:35:02 --> 0:35:05
Let's see if I can do this.

414
0:35:08 --> 0:35:13
Do you want to share something, Richard? Yeah, where's the chat?

415
0:35:13 --> 0:35:18
Because, Richard, don't you think it'd be a very good idea for all of us to share this list

416
0:35:18 --> 0:35:26
everywhere so that they know that we're coming for them? Oh yes, absolutely. Did I send that?

417
0:35:26 --> 0:35:33
Did that go through? Because as soon as they even suspect that we've got ourselves organized,

418
0:35:33 --> 0:35:39
we understand what's going on and we're going for an indictment, that is going to really put a spoke

419
0:35:39 --> 0:35:45
in. It hasn't come through yet, Richard, on chat. Okay, what am I doing wrong? So we have that.

420
0:35:48 --> 0:35:54
You have to add the, you know, the add a document or adding a connection. Right, I dropped it.

421
0:35:54 --> 0:36:02
So I dropped it on there and it looks like it wants to go through. Everybody, it's actually on

422
0:36:02 --> 0:36:09
your site. It's really easy. It's listed as a document. Don't spend time on that. We'll find...

423
0:36:09 --> 0:36:15
You got the two websites. Avery, can you get the link? Copy and paste the link into the chat?

424
0:36:16 --> 0:36:22
Yeah, I will. Yeah, I'm going to actually... If you don't mind, I'm going to gmail you right now,

425
0:36:22 --> 0:36:29
the link. No, I'll try to put it in chat. But I mean, I'll go around and paste it in the chat off

426
0:36:29 --> 0:36:36
this iPad. The websites are easy. Let's keep moving. Stephen? Okay, I finished, Charles.

427
0:36:36 --> 0:36:43
Excellent. Thank you very much. You're welcome. Thank you. They're also listed on the 10letters.org

428
0:36:43 --> 0:36:49
letter for indictment. They're specifically listed. Can I just ask one last question? Sure.

429
0:36:50 --> 0:36:55
So this list you have, I think it's really... I don't know whether you agree, but I think it's

430
0:36:55 --> 0:37:01
really important that we send this list around the world to everyone we know for the reasons I've

431
0:37:01 --> 0:37:08
just stated. Do you agree or not? No, clearly this is out there. I want these people to know.

432
0:37:09 --> 0:37:15
I've put this out. It's hard for me to be any more exposed than I am at this point in time.

433
0:37:16 --> 0:37:23
And I want them to understand that there is evidence. I mean, there's an affidavit on my

434
0:37:23 --> 0:37:28
website that goes along with this, that lays out. It's an affidavit. I mean, I can't file a

435
0:37:28 --> 0:37:33
complaint because I can't be the attorney because this is a prosecuting attorney. So I've laid out

436
0:37:33 --> 0:37:40
an affidavit, signature signed to it. I have provided deposition on the internet under oath

437
0:37:41 --> 0:37:48
on these individuals. I have provided the book, is COVID-19 a bioweapon, laying out the details

438
0:37:48 --> 0:37:53
of these people and their crimes that they have committed. It is time for them to know

439
0:37:54 --> 0:38:01
that the world is aware that these individuals have been criminally conducting gain of function

440
0:38:01 --> 0:38:09
research that has resulted in all of this harm. And there is a day of accountability that is coming.

441
0:38:10 --> 0:38:11
Yes, share.

442
0:38:11 --> 0:38:18
Exactly. So just to give a point for the people in the UK and in Europe, where jurisdictions are

443
0:38:18 --> 0:38:28
similar, I'm going to send this list and the evidence that you prepared to my MP. It's a

444
0:38:28 --> 0:38:33
pretty simple thing to do, but I'm sure that will get shared by him with others.

445
0:38:35 --> 0:38:35
Good.

446
0:38:35 --> 0:38:41
Very good, Stephen. Excellent. Okay, we've got five hands up. Richard,

447
0:38:41 --> 0:38:45
speed of your answer will determine the speed of handling questions. Matthew Crawford.

448
0:38:47 --> 0:38:54
Hi, Richard. Thanks for talking with us today. Question, what is your understanding of

449
0:38:55 --> 0:39:03
the approximate date of the actual origins of perhaps virus circulating? And when I say virus,

450
0:39:04 --> 0:39:11
perhaps more than one, perhaps there's a viral cloud. And did it include Omicron from the start

451
0:39:11 --> 0:39:17
or did they possibly escape from several places and were both circulating for some time before

452
0:39:18 --> 0:39:25
the official start of the pandemic? Right. So it's very clear that they were working on these

453
0:39:25 --> 0:39:32
viruses for the better part of 20 years. The actual, I'm just opening up this up so I can

454
0:39:32 --> 0:39:38
give you the dates. Omicron is just a specific, no, I do not think that this existed some time

455
0:39:38 --> 0:39:46
ago. I think part of what we've seen here is with the vaccines, what we have seen is pressure

456
0:39:46 --> 0:39:52
selection across the board. And it did a great job. We demonstrated that like antibiotics used

457
0:39:52 --> 0:40:01
indiscriminately, that the utilization of these vaccines have in fact resulted in the ability

458
0:40:01 --> 0:40:07
to put pressure selection on these viruses, the consequence of which is now we have 28 variants,

459
0:40:07 --> 0:40:14
including six Omicron variants that have occurred in a year and a half, which is somewhat unprecedented

460
0:40:14 --> 0:40:20
when you think about the fact that the influenza viruses typically will mutate sufficiently to

461
0:40:20 --> 0:40:29
require a new vaccine a year under the old school approach. If we look at the likelihood

462
0:40:31 --> 0:40:35
three, when I'm doing this simultaneously scrolling here to try to find these,

463
0:40:35 --> 0:40:43
if we get a rig on, if we look at three potential different gain of function variants, which

464
0:40:43 --> 0:40:58
the PCR data matches for what's called CoVRS SHC014, SARS-CoV-MA15, and SARS-CoV-RS3367.

465
0:40:59 --> 0:41:05
If those three and all three of those regaining function viruses that we've got the documents

466
0:41:05 --> 0:41:11
showing the papers showing the research over the last several years that Berrick and Xu-Zhang Li

467
0:41:12 --> 0:41:18
were working on, three viruses getting out all at once and they would have been all in the same

468
0:41:18 --> 0:41:24
containment system. And again, the activity in September and October, November of 2019

469
0:41:24 --> 0:41:28
at the Wuhan Institute of Virology showed they were panicked. They weren't just worried about

470
0:41:28 --> 0:41:33
computer preaches. They were worried about incineration methods. They were worried about

471
0:41:33 --> 0:41:42
the air filtration systems. They were a mass turmoil, particularly for a facility that was

472
0:41:42 --> 0:41:49
relatively new, that was built with the assistance of the French and as soon as the Chinese got what

473
0:41:49 --> 0:41:55
they wanted, they kicked the French out. And so we have all three of these viruses in this area

474
0:41:55 --> 0:42:02
that look like they simultaneously escaped, maybe more. But when you take three different viruses

475
0:42:02 --> 0:42:08
like this leaking out at the same time under pressure selection and exchanging genetic codes,

476
0:42:08 --> 0:42:13
which is what it looks like they did to get to the Omicron variant as a result of this pressure

477
0:42:13 --> 0:42:20
selection, you can see how we've ended up with 28 variants of what we're calling SARS-CoV-2

478
0:42:20 --> 0:42:29
in a year and a half. What do you mean exchanging codes? The Omicron has so many more mutations on

479
0:42:29 --> 0:42:37
the spike protein that it would have surprised me that if it were like a sudden selection pressure

480
0:42:37 --> 0:42:43
event, it looked like something very different from the other ones. But I want to hear

481
0:42:44 --> 0:42:50
your thoughts on, you know, are you talking about homologous transfer with other viruses

482
0:42:50 --> 0:42:57
or other organisms or? I think primarily, yeah, I think primarily with the other variants that got

483
0:42:57 --> 0:43:03
out there. Now, there's with each one of these variants, there were new changes that occurred

484
0:43:03 --> 0:43:10
and the variants are not just changes in the spike protein, although by and large, that's the largest

485
0:43:11 --> 0:43:16
region that has the changes, but the nucleocapsid and other ranges, the open reading frame 1A and 1B

486
0:43:17 --> 0:43:22
show these same types of changes. But what we've of course picked up on is the spike protein

487
0:43:22 --> 0:43:29
differences. It is true that the Omicron seems to have substantially more, although not enough to

488
0:43:29 --> 0:43:36
suggest that it's an independent virus that had been manufactured and released, because tracking

489
0:43:36 --> 0:43:43
through the changes, it looks like probably what happened is there were exchanges with the other

490
0:43:43 --> 0:43:51
variants and there's several different sites that are out there that provide the data for the specific

491
0:43:51 --> 0:43:57
site point mutations, whether it's spike protein or something else in a wet location and which

492
0:43:57 --> 0:44:05
amino acid got changed, hence which nucleotide base changed. And even though Omicron seems to

493
0:44:05 --> 0:44:13
be dramatically different than the others, there's enough reason to believe that it is the end result

494
0:44:13 --> 0:44:18
right now of all these mutational changes that occurred and viruses, whether they're naturally

495
0:44:18 --> 0:44:26
occurring or man-made, are very well adapted at figuring out how to survive and their goal

496
0:44:26 --> 0:44:33
is to not kill the host. Their goal is to, I mean obviously if they kill a host, they die. So their

497
0:44:33 --> 0:44:41
goal is to find that niche that allows them to have a distinct advantage, both infectivity,

498
0:44:41 --> 0:44:47
pathologically, but not so pathologic as to kill the host. So I understand your question. I just

499
0:44:47 --> 0:44:52
think that looking at when all the variants are looked at, there's enough overlap that you can

500
0:44:52 --> 0:45:00
start to see similarities between alpha, beta, lambda, mu, all the other variants that are just

501
0:45:00 --> 0:45:08
numbered and even the omicrons. Did you see the paper that suggested it? Charles, can I just say,

502
0:45:08 --> 0:45:12
Charles we've got four very interesting questions remaining. Matthew, it's not a conversation,

503
0:45:12 --> 0:45:16
it's a question. We've had a couple. We just got to keep moving. Matthew, if there's a chance at

504
0:45:16 --> 0:45:21
the end you can come back. Charles, so we've got 14 minutes and we've got four questions.

505
0:45:21 --> 0:45:30
And I'm, Stephen, I'm on to it. Okay, Lars. Yes, thank you very much. I came in a little late,

506
0:45:30 --> 0:45:35
so I apologize if my questions have been commented on earlier. My first question,

507
0:45:35 --> 0:45:41
I have two brief questions. Have you looked at and made an assessment of the process that Dr.

508
0:45:41 --> 0:45:51
David Martin is running in the U.S. and the background data that he is presenting in his cases?

509
0:45:52 --> 0:46:02
Okay, again, Dr. Who, because you flipped that out at that point. David Martin. Okay. He's a PhD.

510
0:46:03 --> 0:46:11
Right, he's a PhD in business. So I've looked at a lot of the, I won't say I've looked at all,

511
0:46:11 --> 0:46:16
because I know he listed quite a few patents. The fact that there's patents that are out there

512
0:46:16 --> 0:46:21
doesn't mean that there's a crime that has been committed. I think that one thing I emphasize to

513
0:46:21 --> 0:46:25
people is that when they look at a patent, don't look at the name, don't look at the information,

514
0:46:25 --> 0:46:32
look at the claims, because the claims are what the patent is being issued for. And the two patents

515
0:46:32 --> 0:46:41
that are critical, I think, for this particular scenario is the patent that shows that Ralph

516
0:46:41 --> 0:46:49
Berrick received a patent for altering the spike protein of coronaviruses. So that's a patent that's

517
0:46:49 --> 0:46:55
significant. And the other one is recognition that if you're in Cleavage site, the PRA patent

518
0:46:55 --> 0:47:01
was granted to the United States government. Those are the two that are critical. There's a lot of

519
0:47:01 --> 0:47:07
other information that's out there in patents, but it's really what do the claims state, not is there

520
0:47:08 --> 0:47:10
technology discussed in the patents?

521
0:47:11 --> 0:47:19
So are you suggesting that he is off the mark a little bit, or is it a productive process?

522
0:47:22 --> 0:47:29
Well, I think that anything that raises questions in a world where nobody's raising questions is

523
0:47:29 --> 0:47:35
probably good, but I think that by and large, the vast majority of the patents are not applicable

524
0:47:35 --> 0:47:41
to a crime being committed. There's simply recognition for work that's been done.

525
0:47:42 --> 0:47:50
Okay, my final question. Have you been working with Anna de Bissere? She's been a participant

526
0:47:50 --> 0:47:55
in these meetings. She's not here today, I think, but she is an expert in the war

527
0:47:56 --> 0:48:05
conventions and how what is now going on is actually war crime globally. And if you are

528
0:48:05 --> 0:48:08
not working with her, she's a sharp lady and you should be working with her.

529
0:48:09 --> 0:48:16
I would be happy to get communications to try to discuss with her what we can do. I have not had

530
0:48:16 --> 0:48:21
an opportunity to work with her. I can put you in touch with it, Richard.

531
0:48:22 --> 0:48:27
Perfect. Please do. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Lars, Glenn.

532
0:48:27 --> 0:48:38
Hi. My name is Glenn Macko. I'm the chairman of a non-profit group, Unity Against COVID. We have

533
0:48:38 --> 0:48:43
substantial international known doctors, including Dr. Urso, Dr. Cole, and Dr. Cat Lindley

534
0:48:43 --> 0:48:50
on our board, as well as association with Mary Holland, Jerry Brady, Leslie Manoukian, and Laura

535
0:48:50 --> 0:49:00
Logan. One of my past cycles was being heavily involved in getting comments into the FDA

536
0:49:01 --> 0:49:07
starting in October, again in February, and again in June, where we achieved well over 100,000

537
0:49:07 --> 0:49:13
submissions of public comments for which clearly the FDA ignored everything. But part of our intent

538
0:49:13 --> 0:49:19
is to engage the public and to move them forward. And so there's different areas where we'd be

539
0:49:19 --> 0:49:25
interested in both partnering with you or aligning in the same path and motivating the public.

540
0:49:26 --> 0:49:30
My first short question, and then I have a longer one. My first short question is,

541
0:49:31 --> 0:49:37
relative to the historic origin, recently Todd Callender has been making a strong case around the

542
0:49:37 --> 0:49:46
contracts and association, and much of the origin of the genetically designed COVID-19 started with

543
0:49:46 --> 0:49:53
the DOD. So I was wondering to what degree you've reviewed his recent material and found it to be

544
0:49:53 --> 0:50:02
well aligned with your findings. So I'm not sure I've seen some of the material that you're talking

545
0:50:02 --> 0:50:09
about. What we do have is a tremendous amount of data on the DOD. Those people who don't know much

546
0:50:09 --> 0:50:16
about my background, I'm originally a physicist, and Fort Detrick did reach out to me last year

547
0:50:16 --> 0:50:22
wanting to know if as a physicist I would be interested in working with them on infectious

548
0:50:22 --> 0:50:33
diseases funded by NIAID. Andrew Huff as well as Charles Rixey have additional documents to support

549
0:50:33 --> 0:50:40
and corroborate my documents for the involvement of the US DOD in the development of these biological

550
0:50:40 --> 0:50:48
weapons. Okay, my broader question is you've highlighted this 90-day concern. So a lot of

551
0:50:48 --> 0:50:54
people would have said, gee, we're likely to have a turnover in the election, and that can cause a

552
0:50:54 --> 0:51:03
lot of change to start occurring with the next US Congress in January of 2023. I have concerns also

553
0:51:03 --> 0:51:08
around whether or not we actually survive until that point. So could you elaborate on where you

554
0:51:08 --> 0:51:17
think the faults are that will, why 90 days is so crucial, and other thoughts you have besides

555
0:51:17 --> 0:51:24
this kind of court case that might lend itself to help engage more the public? In particular,

556
0:51:24 --> 0:51:30
do you have any thoughts toward impacting the US legislature prior to next year's recession?

557
0:51:30 --> 0:51:37
Mm-hmm. So we have communicated with certain individuals in the United States Congress

558
0:51:37 --> 0:51:49
as well as individuals within specific states. The 90-day proposal is something based upon the

559
0:51:49 --> 0:51:55
rapidity of the change of activities that I saw going on around the world as well as the United

560
0:51:55 --> 0:52:03
States. I think that if the individuals that we're concerned about have the ability to

561
0:52:04 --> 0:52:11
re-quarantine and re-lock down society, that we won't need to be worried about a new set of

562
0:52:11 --> 0:52:16
elections actually occurring or having the types of effects that people would like to see them have.

563
0:52:16 --> 0:52:27
Um, interestingly enough, that does bring us into a pre-election period of time. That was not my

564
0:52:27 --> 0:52:32
focus when I picked that date. It was simply watching the speed at which things were accelerating

565
0:52:32 --> 0:52:37
around the world. While many people were saying, gosh, things are opening up, I was watching

566
0:52:38 --> 0:52:45
behaviors in other countries and even in the United States, changes that showed that there

567
0:52:45 --> 0:52:50
was a doubling down. And the Nuclear Threat Initiative was certainly one of those

568
0:52:51 --> 0:52:59
precipitating events that I saw. The other one was the WHO, a vote that occurred on infectious

569
0:52:59 --> 0:53:08
diseases. And while the United States, based upon the treaties that we've signed, is not bound,

570
0:53:09 --> 0:53:16
given the understandings and reservations that were made, the result of that not passing was that

571
0:53:16 --> 0:53:23
the WHO did two things. They shortened the rapid response time from 24 to 12 months,

572
0:53:24 --> 0:53:29
which as a cardiologist, I would tell you rapid response in my brain doesn't hit 12 months,

573
0:53:29 --> 0:53:36
it's more like 12 seconds. But then they also funneled things out into committees where it

574
0:53:36 --> 0:53:42
would be more closer to and less well known as to what's going on. And I would argue as somebody

575
0:53:42 --> 0:53:53
who's been involved in this world that you carry out scenarios that you're looking for responses

576
0:53:55 --> 0:53:59
well in advance. And the fact that some of this has already leaked out shows that they've been

577
0:53:59 --> 0:54:05
working on it for a substantial period of time. If I were to be asked how I would have run the

578
0:54:05 --> 0:54:14
scenario that's been happening with a leaked virus, I can't think of too many major things

579
0:54:14 --> 0:54:18
that I would have changed compared to how they've been doing it. So the behaviors

580
0:54:19 --> 0:54:25
in my brain and my experience gave me a 90-day limit for that.

581
0:54:26 --> 0:54:34
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Glenn. Nick and then Charles and then Richard will let you go.

582
0:54:34 --> 0:54:39
Nick, go. I'll have to. Yeah, let's go. Thanks for inviting me on the call, Dr. Fleming. Thanks

583
0:54:39 --> 0:54:44
for the work you're doing. So my question, I don't know if you're familiar with the former

584
0:54:44 --> 0:54:50
feds group. When I was in conversations with them, they have successfully in the past initiated

585
0:54:50 --> 0:54:56
lawsuits against war crimes. And one of the components of their success was that they set

586
0:54:56 --> 0:55:03
up a whistleblower system or framework where as they turned the heat up, they were able to capture

587
0:55:03 --> 0:55:09
those whistleblowers to help strengthen their cases and blow more doors open. Have you guys

588
0:55:09 --> 0:55:17
thought about that? Is that something you're thinking about doing? Already activated. Okay,

589
0:55:17 --> 0:55:23
awesome. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Nick. Very efficient question. Richard.

590
0:55:26 --> 0:55:27
We've already activated.

591
0:55:28 --> 0:55:35
Thank you. Thank you, Nick. Charles. Hello there. Thank you very much. Can you hear me?

592
0:55:36 --> 0:55:44
Yes. Yes. No, I just wanted to make a comment that I entirely agree with you on the focus

593
0:55:45 --> 0:55:51
on the crime here. I'm in finance and I've been involved with the Conservative Party. I've been

594
0:55:51 --> 0:55:56
battling away behind the scenes with the Telegraph and the Times and various people and also talking

595
0:55:56 --> 0:56:01
to my MP and we've been involved with the various sort of interested groups behind the

596
0:56:01 --> 0:56:10
advice to the UK government. I think there's a huge danger and I do agree with you that one can get

597
0:56:10 --> 0:56:16
sort of a slightly, it's like mission drift here and get thrown off course with these other

598
0:56:17 --> 0:56:22
issues around inflation and ID cards and sort of personal control and all this other political

599
0:56:22 --> 0:56:28
nonsense. The experience that I've got dealing with government and dealing with people at the

600
0:56:28 --> 0:56:34
moment is that they are all prepared to hide behind plausible deniability. The doctors that

601
0:56:34 --> 0:56:43
I've seen and spoken to and the politicians as well. What I would ask is from this group

602
0:56:43 --> 0:56:48
and from the information and the activities that you're involved with in Texas, if there is any

603
0:56:48 --> 0:56:55
accurate and specific information of a scientific and legal nature that you could distribute it

604
0:56:55 --> 0:57:02
back to us because we can use it as a sort of a weapon to bash the people who are responsible,

605
0:57:02 --> 0:57:07
that would be very helpful. Who by the way Charles, in my opinion, think they're not in

606
0:57:07 --> 0:57:13
danger at all and they're very much in danger. But we do have a problem and there's now too

607
0:57:13 --> 0:57:18
much information out there and if we do have some real specifics around court cases and

608
0:57:18 --> 0:57:24
evidence that's being presented that would be really helpful. So on the letter for indictments

609
0:57:24 --> 0:57:33
that goes along with this 10letters.org campaign, in the letter for indictments there are three links

610
0:57:33 --> 0:57:39
including the affidavit. The affidavit I haven't updated in some time, I haven't needed to because

611
0:57:39 --> 0:57:45
it lays out the details sufficiently for what happened. But I think those three links, the

612
0:57:47 --> 0:57:56
affidavit, the deposition video, and the book. I'm not promoting my book, I don't promote books,

613
0:57:56 --> 0:58:02
I don't do that well. I get grief from the publisher and I just I'm not very good at that.

614
0:58:02 --> 0:58:09
All of those have the data that everybody needs. I mean the book was put together for three reasons.

615
0:58:09 --> 0:58:16
First off, to make all the data available to the general public. Secondly, to make the data available

616
0:58:16 --> 0:58:23
to any juries. And thirdly, to try to keep me from being killed because once you get the data out

617
0:58:23 --> 0:58:32
there, killing the guy doesn't do any good. It's almost an insurance policy in some ways.

618
0:58:32 --> 0:58:38
It's like, okay so you kill me but the data is still there. So not really a win-win for you,

619
0:58:38 --> 0:58:44
not a highlight for me, but not a win-win for you on the other side. So, c'est la vie.

620
0:58:45 --> 0:58:51
As everybody knows, I'm a pure blood Viking, a bloodline descendant. I have no problems taking

621
0:58:51 --> 0:58:59
this on. I didn't do this, they did it. I just have no plans of sitting around and watching them

622
0:58:59 --> 0:59:05
muck up the planet like they have been doing. And if you've got to go down, I'd rather go down for a

623
0:59:05 --> 0:59:14
good cause than stupid causes. Great, thank you very much and best of luck. Thank you, well you're

624
0:59:14 --> 0:59:23
all in it with me. So to all of us, okay with that I apologize. I have to take off before I get yelled

625
0:59:23 --> 0:59:30
at because I get yelled at by a lot of people already. I don't want to add the list. So I am

626
0:59:30 --> 0:59:34
delighted to have been here. Thank you for the invitation. Please pass the word around on

627
0:59:34 --> 0:59:42
10 letters. Thank you. Thank you Richard. Brilliant. Thank you.