I've got some updates on the book. Archbishop Vigano wrote a new preface to the book. This
book on the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the final analysis. So the book has been very
well. It got to number seven on Amazon and it's now at about, oh, I think about 2000
something the last time I looked, which is very good for a book that's almost eight weeks
into publication. It's holding very strong in the ratings. I did three interviews on
it today. The good news, the developments from the book are not only Archbishop Vigano's
introduction but the major Catholic site, this life site news picked up on it in a major
way and is going to do a published, the archbishop's preface, published articles on the book and
invited me to write an article about Robert Kennedy Jr. The campaign, Robert Kennedy's
campaign, Robert Kennedy got very interested in the book and he is James Lyons Wheeler,
who's been my contact, selected a radiologist to proof out the book before the campaign
embraced the book. And the radiologist, Ted Fogarty, is very well known, gave the book
a hundred percent clearance. He said everything in the book was accurate and it was rock solid
and it was extremely detailed and he encouraged Robert Kennedy to get involved with it. And now
I'm being put in touch with the campaign media and so the book is having a massive impact.
I've got publishing offers on the book from Spain, from Italy and from Hungary. And just
this afternoon, in fact just before I came on the call, I have created at Archbishop Vigano's
wishes the Anti-Globalist Alliance, LLC. And Steve Bannon just agreed to publish the Anti-Globalist
Manifesto, which I'm an author and I've got a contract for that now today. And Bannon will
publish it and exclusively promote it and it'll be extremely useful to advance the cause of this
Alliance. So I've had so many things happening in the last 48 hours, my head is spinning. I mean,
it's been one thing after another getting these programs launched and that's why I've been a bit
negligent being on this call. But what's happening with the book is that there's getting to be a
global recognition that the deep state has been in control of the United States since at least the
Kennedy assassination. And we have a president in office who is the perfect choice for the deep
state. In other words, if you can't do a weekend at Bernie's and have someone dead be president,
the next best thing for this deep state is to have someone who is so mentally incompetent
suffering from senior dementia that could not be prosecuted by the special prosecutor for possibly
criminal misuse of classified documents. Now how we can have someone who is that mentally
deranged being president of the United States only because he's not doing anything but what
he's told or being a figurehead or what he cannot even remember doing. Well, the deep state,
largely the CIA and military industrial complex with Obama's assistance is running the country
and we just passed this disgraceful $90 billion military aid to foster war in Ukraine and fuel
the war in the Middle East. So these demons are going to their continuous series of perpetual wars
and that it's just been terrible. So hold on, I'll put that to voicemail. So I mean,
my days have been like this today. I've been very, very busy but all very successful.
And so now James Lyons-Wheeler just put me in touch with Senator Johnson and probably with Senator
Rand Paul and we're going to start getting congressional support for the book because
this is now considered of enough significant interest that it could compel the release of
the remaining JFK files. So it's been a very busy time but this book is going to be an historic book.
Jerome, do you get the feeling that people understand what happened in
63 was it? Or 62, 63, yeah. That was a coup d'etat, it was treason. Yes.
The people who covered up what happened. Yeah, that's being understood and that's propelling
the book. Sure. And I even got an inquiry from Russia. So evidently Putin's caught on to it too
and I think Russia might publish the book. So I'm going to respond to that tomorrow. Excellent.
So it's drawing international attention, far exceeding what I anticipated. And it's got only
the initial levels of impact because as the book gets read and seen and the book is substantial,
this is the book, it's 560 pages long. It's densely illustrated all the way through. It's
illustrated with everything we're talking about is pointed out in diagrams, etc. So
even the medical diagrams are in here extensively. I'll show you a couple pages what they look like.
But it's very, very heavily illustrated. And so therefore, and all the sciences and the appendices,
so the book is just solid. It's one of the most solid books I've ever written. David Mantick,
also his science is solid. So this is a game changing book and it's going to, I think,
have an international impact. And it's impacting the things I'm saying. Why did we get a vaccine
that didn't prevent people from getting the disease? Why does the government create all
these narratives that are lies? We're living in a Jim Carrey Truman show, like the movie, where
we're living a CIA written script. It's not reality. And it's the deep state is manipulating
things with psychological operations and people are beginning to see it. I'm saying the
JFK assassination is the Rosetta Stone of how the deep state operates. And the pandemic and the
WHO grab for power. These are only further indications that we're still under the grip of
the deep state. And we have the deep states. I don't know that we've had a president since
Kennedy with the possible exception of Trump who wasn't selected by the CIA or part of the CIA.
And it's one of the reasons I've been so busy is that this is taking up a lot of time, the book,
and then also my telemarketing programs are launching right now too. And they're
doing quite well with building alliances here, which the anti-globalist alliance
now also looks like it'll be built. So I mean, I've been extremely busy,
but it's succeeding. It's like the hand of God is on these things because
everything I'm launching is an initiative. Usually it's hard to make them work. I've
gotten more two years to get to this point with telemedicine to a year to write that book.
And now it's suddenly all making an impact at the same time. And so I think next I think I'll begin
organizing a congressional effort to get this book made to wear in Congress. And I'll probably write
an article about Bobby Kennedy Jr. and say that the deep state killed his father and his uncle,
and there's probably nobody better in the country if he ever were to be president to go after these
people than Bobby Kennedy. So it's going to propel Bobby Kennedy's campaign on that dimension.
So do you think you can do a follow-up book when you've got a bit more time, Jerome?
Well, certainly not. I'm not contemplating it right now because I don't think, except for this
short book on the anti-globalist manifesto, and I will get some help with that. And by the way,
Stephen, this group is who put me in touch with Vigano. You specifically, Steve. I've been looking
way to get in touch with Vigano for three years, and it was this group and you that got me in touch
with him. And so I want to acknowledge that and I want to thank you. So we have some, yes, we have
been useful in some respects, although sometimes it's hard to see it. So, Jerome, I meant to ask
you, have I put you in touch with Ahmed Malik? Yes, in fact, he's supposed to be interviewing
me here in a few days. I was going to say that he should be interviewing you about this book.
Well, I think he is. I don't remember. He's on my schedule. I just don't remember exactly when,
but he is on my schedule. And it's later in May that he's on my schedule. And I will look
forward to doing that. Sure. But he is a good way to. There are lots of people in the United
Kingdom who are very interested in what happened to President Kennedy. Yes, I think that's the case.
That's around the world. There's a lot of around the world. There's a lot of interest in this book
is drawing attention around the world. Yeah. I think it'll take all this year for this book
to play out. I think the book will be a bestseller through the year and have different impacts as
different things happen. If Robert Kennedy starts talking about the book, that's going to be another
wave of interest in the book will skyrocket back up to the top of the charts. And it's just doing
that on a consistent basis. And so therefore it drops down and then I get the right interview.
And suddenly it's back near the top. And so Robert Kennedy stays in the race of your own.
Yes. It's going to have another go. And unbelievably, it seems he seems to be the
Democrats candidate and then Trump as well. How does that play out? So they're going to be
is Kennedy going to keep going until the end? And what happens when there are three candidates?
Well, Trump, first of all, I believe Bobby Kennedy is going to get on the ballot in all 50 states.
That's what they're working on right now. And I don't and he's going to stay in the race.
And so he's got sufficient funding. And this woman is his vice presidential candidate has
sufficient funding herself to get this continued. So when you have a three person race, the last one
we really had of any significance was when Bill Clinton ran first against George H.W. Bush and
what's his name? I was thinking of his name for a minute. The guy who
had all the charts, third party candidate. I'll get his name in a second.
Been so many things I've been thinking about today. Hold on. But Ross Perot, Ross Perot,
so Ross Perot drew a lot of votes from both candidates. I think Bobby Kennedy is going
to draw a lot of votes, mostly from Biden. Good. The people who do not like the woke
and consider themselves more traditionally liberal will go with Kennedy.
The Trump people are not going to go with Kennedy, especially after you pick this woman who's very,
very leftist to be his vice presidential candidate. So my guess is that that Bobby
Kennedy's presence in the race benefits Trump. And it looks to me like Trump is gaining.
The polls, I think, are still biased and giving Biden too much of a percentage and
is not really there. But I think that Trump has now solid support from the mega group
because of all these trials he's going through. And these are boosting Trump's popularity rather
than diminishing it. And it appears that all of these trials are flawed and will be reversed on
appeal. It looks also, as I looked at the Supreme Court on this immunity case, I do not think that
the I think Trump is going to get some grant of immunity as president because if every president
is subject to criminal investigation and impeachment and hearings, it'll destroy the presidency
because no one will be wanting to be president. No one will be able to do the job if they're
constantly under threat of an impeachment hearing or a criminal indictment as president.
You've got to be able to do the job. You have to be able to make executive decisions. I mean,
presidents have to almost be judged by history. Now, I guess if the president took a gun and
shot somebody, you'd have a problem. But for policy crimes or the kinds of indictments that
Trump is getting, which are highly lawfare and political, these are just patently politics
and not legitimate practice of law. And our Justice Department is completely partisan these days.
So I just see the internal politics of the United States are in disarray. And the economies of the
world are headed towards a massive crash with the amount of deficit spending that we're doing and
Western Europe is doing. The position of Russia right now has actually been strengthened under
the sanctions. Russia's created its own alternative to the swift system. Russia's having an increasing
percentage of its international trade conducted in either Rupols or in Yuan or other currencies,
but not the dollar. The dollar is losing fast its role as a reserve currency. And the war in Ukraine,
Putin is continuing to back channel and signal that if NATO starts putting in advanced weapons,
or NATO troops are directly committed, it will no longer be a proxy war. It could lead into a
nuclear conflict. And I don't think that's going to happen. At the moment, I think they're going to
mostly the money that was just issued by Congress will go to the American arms dealers.
The weapons that are going to be delivered are going to be sophisticated weapons and the
Ukrainians will not be trained to use them. So they may have to be used by American advisors,
which would be a problem. But also Russia is going to interdict a lot of these weapons.
Russia is in a very, very strong position right now. There's no way to dislodge Russia. Russia,
I think, could take Kiev in June. They decide to do so. So, you know, Russia needs at this point
to make clear that they're going to they do not have aggressive intents on Poland,
or any of the other Eastern countries. And they should start engaging in discussions, mutual,
you know, trade discussions, other discussions with Finland, Sweden, and Poland, to make it clear
that they do not want to be the aggressor is NATO. And Putin has been stating, increasingly,
that NATO had a coup d'etat by our State Department, our military intelligence,
George Soros, and the Maidan rebellion that overthrew Yanukovych in 2014. So this whole theme
of intelligence agencies in the military industrial complex running these Western European countries,
and having perpetual wars to the detriment of the citizenry with these false narratives,
like the climate change, and net zero, are going to bankrupt the middle class in Europe and the
United States, and throw these countries into financial crisis. We just had another bank fail
here in the United States this past week. And bank failures are going to start again,
as interest rates do not lower. And we have refinancing of commercial real estate, which
is largely unoccupied in our cities, our cities are deteriorating with mobs, with homeless and
with other problems. So we're in a very dark period of time right now that could go into a world war.
And I see Putin is actually trying to restrain it and not take steps that would inflame the violence
and to try to back channel to say to the world, you know, let's not take this to the next level.
I was encouraged to see that Iran did not retaliate on Israel for the strike, the
counterstrike that Israel just did after the drone attack from Iran. But Israel right now is also
attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon and the war is expanding in Lebanon. So these are very
dangerous situations. And in the meantime, our Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken went to China
and got treated miserably because China did not agree to a single thing he wanted to do. He's
down to begging China. And when he arrived in China, when he left China, they sent a lower level
political official to greet him and escort him. So it was almost an insult diplomatically. And China
seems to be in a position of really not regarding the United States as a serious power at the moment.
And I think quite frankly, with the Biden administration in power, the deep state running
the country, we're not a serious power. This woke is designed to do to damage the country, the
DEI and the ESG. And I think our military could do better running a transgender parade on Fifth
Avenue these days than it could fighting a war. And I think NATO is equally ineffective.
Even if they wanted to fight Russia, I don't think we could.
And so watching all of this, it's easy to get discouraged. But I do also at the same time see
an increasing awareness, especially as the economies harden, of people even in the UK
being aware that this extremism needs to be stopped. And I was seeing a statement this morning
the British health authorities is trying to rein in this woke language into medical care,
because it's just gotten to be insane the degree to which they say men can breastfeed and
men can menstruate and we can have babies and the language has to be written for medical care
in this gender neutral way. And so the health officials and even the Great Britain are reacting
against us saying this is nonsense. Get this gender confused language out of medical care.
That's a positive step. But at the moment, I think the UK with the hate crimes and the hate
speech definitions, Europe and the UK and the US are all going into the censorship very strongly.
But I think it's being rejected by the people. I think as people become increasingly aware of it,
it's not going to succeed as easily as I think these New World Order demons think it will.
So that's kind of my rundown of where I think we are today. And I'm encouraged to see that
the Santa Globus Alliance is formed, the book is going to get published and Bannon's going to carry
it. The Kennedy book is doing as well as it's doing and what I'm trying to do is to establish
a strong intellectual basis of truth for exposing the deep state and putting into place some measures
where people can start buying energy directly, not having to go through the utilities
in the United States and in Europe, where we can get back to more communities. I think the
tractor revolts throughout Europe have been very effective in pushing back the agenda against farms.
So I do see growing resistance. I'm watching the countries one after the other in the EU reject
the net zero approach. They just can't afford to do it. The courts which are demanding these
governments as matters of health impose net zero requirements, governments are saying,
you know, we'll be we'll be bankrupt, which of course is what they intend. But I think some
sanity is coming back into the picture where people are realizing these windmills and these,
you know, the wind turbines and the solar panels don't generate reliable energy.
Electric cars don't work. And this agenda is failing because for the same reason the
Kennedy agenda failed is that the government was flying and its evidence doesn't fit together.
And when you can expose that, people see it, they're first shocked. And then they open their
eyes to that they've been lied to. And then they see the depth of the lying. And they realize that
they're not going to just give up their freedoms because they've been made the object of a
psychological operation run by the intelligence agencies in conjunction with the mainstream media.
And perpetual wars is not a way for us to live. So I think ultimately this agenda fails. Sure,
I think we're still going to go through a very dark period. And I think we're going to have an
economic global crash before we get to sanity. Yeah. So the moral of the story seems to me to be
if you live in a world of lies endlessly, then there will be a reckoning. And we're seeing that,
I think it's becoming at least in the UK, there's definite feeling that everything is going wrong
and nobody knows what the heck is happening. The world doesn't make sense anymore. So and I think
people who went along with what happened in 2020 and 2021, they're beginning to realize that,
better start thinking about the truth pretty soon. Because if you don't, it's like if you're in
danger on a mountain, if you don't search for the truth, then you get into a worse mess.
I think that's right. I think the key point that is being realized when we see our universities
out protesting for Hamas and not understanding what this means that, you know, Hamas has no
interest in these students. And Hamas is a radical Islamic group that even in the Middle East is
feared. They have not treated the Palestinian people with respect. Palestinian people are used
as shields. They're used as props in the Hamas game. Saudi Arabia, the UAE would want to get
rid of Hamas. No country, even Egypt has erected a wall preventing the Palestinians from
seeking refuge in Egypt. They've been thrown out of Jordan. They were thrown out of Egypt.
They were thrown out of Lebanon. And so therefore, the attempt to save Hamas is, you know,
on our campuses, these students are not realizing that they're embracing terrorists. And of course,
the Jews who supported the Democratic Party and funded these institutions, higher learning,
are saying if they become anti-Semitic, why are we supporting them?
And so you're finding that increasing percentages of minorities, you know, racial minorities in
the United States, increasing percentages of women, increasing percentages of Jews are moving away
from the Democratic Party. It's losing a lot of its traditional support because everyone in the
streets and the universities are starting to arrest these protesters and say, no, you don't
have free speech. You know, this is not a, this is a protest that is aimed at anti-Semitism
and supporting terrorism. Well, you can't support terrorists. And that's the issue of,
you know, the incentive, they're supporting Hamas because Hamas hates America. And these
protesters are out there in the college campuses chanting death to America as if they were in
Tehran. And, you know, there's a limit to how much the American people are going to tolerate this.
You know, the universities are going to find out that their pocketbooks are going to get
hurt here pretty soon. And they're going to lose a lot of their supporters
and their disgrace in terms of generating constantly this radical intellectual output.
And the universities have been doing this since the 1930s when they were supporting
Mussolini and Hitler as Hitler made the trains run in 1930s. There was massive support in the
universities for fascism. And they've always had the wrong side of these causes going back,
you know, through the last century. So the universities are not gaining the respect
that they should have when they're not producing an educated group ready to go to work
productively in professions that require advanced knowledge. These kids can't read,
they can't do math. All they can do is protest. And that's not the basis for a productive life.
So I think the society is going through a massive transformation right now. And what I've been
trying to do is write books in a massive way to show the truth, the truth about energy,
global warming, climate change. I wrote a book on the truth about neo-Marxism, cultural Maoism,
and anarchy pointing out that what we've got is not a deep state, but a counter state,
like Mao created to destroy the Chinese government during his long march,
and was very successful with a counter state. And the point is, the great awakening has got to occur
because I think these demons would have uninhibited, would have nuclear war within two years,
would be their way to depopulate, which is part of their ultimate objective.
Sure. So Jerome, thanks for talking to us. So this won't be wasted. I'll ask,
Charles wasn't here today, so I was trying to moderate anyway. And so-
People have their hands up. I did not mean to come in and monopolize the conversation. I apologize.
But if anybody's got questions, I'll be happy to answer.
Go ahead, Amy. Amy only just put her hand up, but she did have it up before, I think.
Amy, go ahead.
Yeah, I did have it up before, but I just wanted to comment on the claim about the students and
what the university should be doing. I myself was arrested on a public sidewalk by MIT in what,
2004 or something like that, 2003, for protesting a bioterror lab. As a matter of fact,
they were building a bioterror lab in Roxbury, Massa, kind of a poorer neighborhood in the Boston
area, in a very populated area without a lot of evacuation potential. So four of us protested
by just having little leaflets on a public sidewalk as parents and visitors were coming
to the graduation ceremony. And we weren't disrupting, we weren't blocking, we weren't
harassing. Most people weren't interested. That's pretty normal. They're coming to take pictures and
see a graduation. We get it. But for anyone interested, we wanted to say something because
the speaker was from the NIH and we thought this was a very concerning, important political issue
of our time. And we got, the cops called on us by the university administration of MIT, and I was
arrested. And, you know, so what, how is that possible? I mean, first of all, it wasn't even
the campus property, but even if it was, why is it possible on a university campus that people
don't have the right to share their opinion? I did a lot of activism at MIT, but I did finish
my PhD. I did do my studies. I was a responsible student for the most part, but we did a lot of
anti-war work, a lot in the buildup to the war on Iraq. Now everyone seems to be against it, but
I wonder who really was at that time that understood the way that the neocons and the
pro-Israel lobby got the U.S. to target all of Israel's regional competitors. And so I think
that some of those college students would be aware of these kinds of things and they are being
indoctrinated with a DEI training that says colonization is bad on the one hand, and then
they're being punished for standing up and speaking out about colonization on the other hand.
And the way that the university here where I live has been cracking down on people compared to other
things shows duplicity. And I would hope that someone who cared about America would understand
the importance of academic freedom in the universities coming back all the way from the
founding of universities during Christendom back in the cathedrals. A Christian should know that
history. And the First Amendment, of course, of the U.S. Constitution. These are heavily taxpayer
funded institutions, public property in many cases, not at MIT, but my sidewalk was and I still got
arrested there. So I think it's very, very important to not get emotional and not just pick aside,
but to stand up for these principles of academic freedom, which clearly we saw during COVID was
attacked when doctors and people with different medical opinions, different research opinions
were censored from places like YouTube by, you know, 25 year old coders who know nothing about
that topic. You know, it's bizarre. That's not how science can be done. So I hope people see the
danger to that. And I hope people see the danger to calling on universities to crack down on student
voices, whatever their opinion, even if you don't like their opinion, it's very important to have
spaces where people can share different opinions and let the correct one prevail. Many of mine
have held up. I was protesting genetic engineering and, you know, at MIT in 2000, that held up well.
I'm still against it. I still think that we're totally over our skis to think we can
tinker with the genetic code of any living thing, let alone human beings. So that's
timely. So let people have their say and let other people have their other say and stand up
for American principles. Don't put Israel first, put America first for once. Okay. How about the
freedom of speech, freedom of assembly that is a time honored right and especially on college
campuses. And this repression is really ugly. And we need to be honest about it because even though
you don't care about that opinion, it may come back to be an opinion you do care about at some
future time. And without these principles, we have no civilization anymore. So if you actually care
about Western civilization, America, and the principles America was founded on, then I hope
you will stand up for truth seeking, stand up for, you know, looking in all directions,
dispassionately not letting your emotions sway you, including if Israel had a role in the JFK
assassination, which I think there is quite a bit of evidence it did, and stand up for,
you know, science and inquiry. Anyway, thank you. Have a great day.
Very well spoken. Yes. Thank you. What'd you say, Jerome?
Well, I'm not sure there was a question there. But free speech is very important. And there
should be a space for people to say virtually whatever they want to say and argue it. I think
that's indisputable. What my point was on the student protests was specifically,
the anti-Semitic nature of the supporting of Hamas is having a reaction to the Jews
who have supported the universities. And this is going to be a problem for the universities
and for the Democratic Party. And that a support of Hamas, which is an anti-American organization
and hatred of America, is going to be advancing not a positive America First agenda, but a
death to America agenda. So that's the agenda. Now, do they have a right to do it?
First Amendment? Yes. I'm saying, though, the dynamics and politics of that
are going to be ultimately destructive to the very principles we're trying to support here,
because certainly under Hamas, there's not going to be any free speech.
And certainly under Hamas, there's not going to be any welcoming of Jews. And so therefore,
some of the, while they're free to say these and free to express these, etc., the logical consequences
of supporting or these various movements for support of Hamas winning are not positive for
the advancement of freedom. That's my point. I'm not saying they should be arrested. I'm not saying
they shouldn't be allowed to express themselves. I think, again, in the study of free speech,
there's rules for it and the building of camps and the occupying of university buildings, etc.
There are boundaries and rules that if you follow them, you should be able to say whatever you want
to say. There's other boundaries that if you are destroying property or occupying property, etc.,
there's other complications to how you're protesting. But the fundamental values of free
speech have to be reduced to imminent danger. Publishing troop movements in a newspaper that
could jeopardize the lives of military, that's probably can be prohibited. But again, the issue
of free speech is different from whether or not it's wise to support these groups or not.
It's wise to go along with the anti-Jewish sentiment of Hamas. That's my point.
Many more complications of issues, Israel's responsibility in the JFK assassination has
been debated. Do you go to any of those protests? I've gone to so many protests. You have no idea.
I went to one on Thursday. Well, I'm 77 years old, so I'm probably not going to very many protests.
How do you know that they're there to support Hamas? They're supporting Hamas. That's the message.
They support the right to resist occupation, which is in international law. That is what you could
probably generically say. Maybe not to a person, though. I would encourage you to continue.
Maybe you can continue to make some good points, but you destroy it all by being personal.
You guys have your fun with your lies and your slander and your personal attacks on people that
are standing up for free. Why do you react like that? Yeah, so you get a bit of resistance and
then you react like that. Crazy. Okay, Glenn has a question. Glenn?
Glenn? Not so much a question on a topic. I just wanted to enter into it that most everything I
would indicate here would support you, Jerome, that clearly the ability to speak is absolutely
there. The ability to assemble is, but the ability to bully other people, to bump the Jewish students,
to make up tents, which is basically creating a fort and saying that they somehow own that space
within, even within the university or outside on public areas. Those are all not part of our freedom
base. They're not part of our constitution. And so it's reasonable for us that do believe in freedom
and the precision and the rule of law associated with our constitution that we defend that.
And there's just a variety of things that have been said that somehow
where the infringements have been. And this is not anything like the Vietnam War protests that
occurred in the 60s. It simply isn't. And this is the oppression is what we're seeing against
Jewish students and the anti-Semitism associated with that. And yes, the other side can certainly
make their opinion. They can voice it to their politicians, but they don't have a right to
break down buildings. They don't have the right to bomb things. They don't have any of those
destructive parts are not part of a civilized environment and what we want for our country.
Thank you. I agree. Also, there's so many of the narratives now, so many of the,
okay, so they're saying, you know, from the river to the sea and that they chant this.
Well, this means Israel doesn't have a right to exist. And the argument behind that is that this
is genocide of the Palestinian people. Well, first of all, the Palestinian people were never a state.
We had the British were there with their protectorate. In 1948, when Palestine was
partitioned, it wasn't really a Palestinian state as such as just a designation of the British
protectorate, which is now being partitioned. And there would be spaces created for the state
of Israel to exist. That was the part that was the whole purpose of the partition.
Now, if we want to start arguing about who has the right to the Middle East,
we're going to be arguing about 3000 years worth of history, which is a pointless exercise.
This is part of the narratives that get developed, saying, okay, well, the Europeans
came to America and killed the indigenous tribes. So this was a great crime against the indigenous
tribes. Well, unfortunately, human migrations have had this inevitable consequence from time
and memorial. What happened to the Neanderthals? Was it right that the Neanderthals all died?
You know, these kinds of questions really are beyond adjudication because they're too complex
and there's no side that's right. And so the idea that this is a colonization and that
they'll the Palestinians should be the legitimate owners of Israel, that the Jews ought to be gone.
These are questions which are have a shallow understanding of the nature of history,
or the nature of what the dynamics were. The Jewish people were being exterminated
during the Holocaust. And if Hitler had his right, his ability to, we would have killed every Jew in
the face of the earth. And the Jews that did escape, the Jews that claimed back to the covenant
with Abraham, and by the way, all this statements back to Abraham. And if we're going to try to sort
all that out, it's a waste of time. But the point is that, you know, the attempt to say,
the Jews are always wrong. The Jews killed Kennedy, the Jews are now doing genocide against
the Palestinian. The Jews are preventing, causing starvation. They're killing thousands of
Palestinians. All these narratives are constructed by a group of people whose real motive is to get
rid of the Jews. Okay, and that's, this is a sickness has been at the heart of human existence
now for maybe 3000 years. We've got to stop it. The Jewish people have a right to a state.
State was legitimately created. We're not going to restore the problems with the Indian tribes.
We're not going to send the slaves back to Africa. And things happen in human history
that are irreversible. And they're often great crimes that cause great injustices. But we cannot
go back and resolve all the injustices of history. We have to do it today as resolved to live civilly.
You know, so Martin Luther King had an argument that he wanted to get rid of racial prejudice,
give everybody an opportunity. Well, that's different than DEI, which is now racial
prejudice against whites. And it's a narrative constructed to be destructive. It's not,
it's a psychological operation. Some of these thoughts are destructive,
because they're like a mind virus. And I say that some thoughts that work and some thoughts that
don't work. The idea that the Jews and Mossad killed Kennedy, the evidence for it is very
minimal. Kennedy did not want anybody to have nuclear weapons at that time. He was trying to
get rid of nuclear weapons. He didn't want Israel to have nuclear weapons. He didn't stop Israel
from having nuclear weapons. Israel did it anyway. And Mossad was not trying to kill Kennedy over
that. You know, the Jews were pretty perfectly happy. The Democratic Party at that point
was supporting them in a continuous series of wars that went on and even until 1967, the 67 war.
You know, Kennedy
the seizure of the Suez Canal. He lived through all these things. Kennedy was against
colonialism. The only speeches he gave of any value in the Senate were against France for Algeria.
He did not want to fight in Vietnam because he was there in 1950. And he didn't want to become
the next colonial power ruling Vietnam, which was a corrupt country. CIA wanted to be in Vietnam
because they were running the drug trade. They're still running the drug trade. And so,
you know, when Kennedy's like this woman,
my phone has been like this all day long. I may have to take this one. I think I've made my point.