1 0:00:00 --> 0:00:09 I've got some updates on the book. Archbishop Vigano wrote a new preface to the book. This 2 0:00:09 --> 0:00:19 book on the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the final analysis. So the book has been very 3 0:00:19 --> 0:00:25 well. It got to number seven on Amazon and it's now at about, oh, I think about 2000 4 0:00:25 --> 0:00:29 something the last time I looked, which is very good for a book that's almost eight weeks 5 0:00:29 --> 0:00:34 into publication. It's holding very strong in the ratings. I did three interviews on 6 0:00:34 --> 0:00:41 it today. The good news, the developments from the book are not only Archbishop Vigano's 7 0:00:41 --> 0:00:49 introduction but the major Catholic site, this life site news picked up on it in a major 8 0:00:49 --> 0:01:01 way and is going to do a published, the archbishop's preface, published articles on the book and 9 0:01:01 --> 0:01:07 invited me to write an article about Robert Kennedy Jr. The campaign, Robert Kennedy's 10 0:01:07 --> 0:01:15 campaign, Robert Kennedy got very interested in the book and he is James Lyons Wheeler, 11 0:01:15 --> 0:01:24 who's been my contact, selected a radiologist to proof out the book before the campaign 12 0:01:24 --> 0:01:32 embraced the book. And the radiologist, Ted Fogarty, is very well known, gave the book 13 0:01:32 --> 0:01:37 a hundred percent clearance. He said everything in the book was accurate and it was rock solid 14 0:01:37 --> 0:01:45 and it was extremely detailed and he encouraged Robert Kennedy to get involved with it. And now 15 0:01:45 --> 0:01:52 I'm being put in touch with the campaign media and so the book is having a massive impact. 16 0:01:52 --> 0:02:03 I've got publishing offers on the book from Spain, from Italy and from Hungary. And just 17 0:02:03 --> 0:02:08 this afternoon, in fact just before I came on the call, I have created at Archbishop Vigano's 18 0:02:08 --> 0:02:17 wishes the Anti-Globalist Alliance, LLC. And Steve Bannon just agreed to publish the Anti-Globalist 19 0:02:17 --> 0:02:24 Manifesto, which I'm an author and I've got a contract for that now today. And Bannon will 20 0:02:24 --> 0:02:33 publish it and exclusively promote it and it'll be extremely useful to advance the cause of this 21 0:02:34 --> 0:02:39 Alliance. So I've had so many things happening in the last 48 hours, my head is spinning. I mean, 22 0:02:39 --> 0:02:44 it's been one thing after another getting these programs launched and that's why I've been a bit 23 0:02:44 --> 0:02:50 negligent being on this call. But what's happening with the book is that there's getting to be a 24 0:02:50 --> 0:02:56 global recognition that the deep state has been in control of the United States since at least the 25 0:02:56 --> 0:03:05 Kennedy assassination. And we have a president in office who is the perfect choice for the deep 26 0:03:05 --> 0:03:10 state. In other words, if you can't do a weekend at Bernie's and have someone dead be president, 27 0:03:10 --> 0:03:17 the next best thing for this deep state is to have someone who is so mentally incompetent 28 0:03:17 --> 0:03:24 suffering from senior dementia that could not be prosecuted by the special prosecutor for possibly 29 0:03:24 --> 0:03:31 criminal misuse of classified documents. Now how we can have someone who is that mentally 30 0:03:31 --> 0:03:36 deranged being president of the United States only because he's not doing anything but what 31 0:03:36 --> 0:03:42 he's told or being a figurehead or what he cannot even remember doing. Well, the deep state, 32 0:03:42 --> 0:03:48 largely the CIA and military industrial complex with Obama's assistance is running the country 33 0:03:48 --> 0:04:00 and we just passed this disgraceful $90 billion military aid to foster war in Ukraine and fuel 34 0:04:00 --> 0:04:08 the war in the Middle East. So these demons are going to their continuous series of perpetual wars 35 0:04:09 --> 0:04:18 and that it's just been terrible. So hold on, I'll put that to voicemail. So I mean, 36 0:04:18 --> 0:04:24 my days have been like this today. I've been very, very busy but all very successful. 37 0:04:24 --> 0:04:34 And so now James Lyons-Wheeler just put me in touch with Senator Johnson and probably with Senator 38 0:04:34 --> 0:04:40 Rand Paul and we're going to start getting congressional support for the book because 39 0:04:40 --> 0:04:45 this is now considered of enough significant interest that it could compel the release of 40 0:04:45 --> 0:04:52 the remaining JFK files. So it's been a very busy time but this book is going to be an historic book. 41 0:04:54 --> 0:04:57 Jerome, do you get the feeling that people understand what happened in 42 0:04:58 --> 0:05:06 63 was it? Or 62, 63, yeah. That was a coup d'etat, it was treason. Yes. 43 0:05:08 --> 0:05:14 The people who covered up what happened. Yeah, that's being understood and that's propelling 44 0:05:14 --> 0:05:22 the book. Sure. And I even got an inquiry from Russia. So evidently Putin's caught on to it too 45 0:05:22 --> 0:05:27 and I think Russia might publish the book. So I'm going to respond to that tomorrow. Excellent. 46 0:05:28 --> 0:05:37 So it's drawing international attention, far exceeding what I anticipated. And it's got only 47 0:05:37 --> 0:05:46 the initial levels of impact because as the book gets read and seen and the book is substantial, 48 0:05:48 --> 0:05:56 this is the book, it's 560 pages long. It's densely illustrated all the way through. It's 49 0:05:56 --> 0:06:01 illustrated with everything we're talking about is pointed out in diagrams, etc. So 50 0:06:01 --> 0:06:07 even the medical diagrams are in here extensively. I'll show you a couple pages what they look like. 51 0:06:08 --> 0:06:15 But it's very, very heavily illustrated. And so therefore, and all the sciences and the appendices, 52 0:06:16 --> 0:06:22 so the book is just solid. It's one of the most solid books I've ever written. David Mantick, 53 0:06:23 --> 0:06:29 also his science is solid. So this is a game changing book and it's going to, I think, 54 0:06:29 --> 0:06:36 have an international impact. And it's impacting the things I'm saying. Why did we get a vaccine 55 0:06:36 --> 0:06:41 that didn't prevent people from getting the disease? Why does the government create all 56 0:06:41 --> 0:06:49 these narratives that are lies? We're living in a Jim Carrey Truman show, like the movie, where 57 0:06:50 --> 0:06:57 we're living a CIA written script. It's not reality. And it's the deep state is manipulating 58 0:06:57 --> 0:07:05 things with psychological operations and people are beginning to see it. I'm saying the 59 0:07:06 --> 0:07:12 JFK assassination is the Rosetta Stone of how the deep state operates. And the pandemic and the 60 0:07:12 --> 0:07:19 WHO grab for power. These are only further indications that we're still under the grip of 61 0:07:19 --> 0:07:25 the deep state. And we have the deep states. I don't know that we've had a president since 62 0:07:25 --> 0:07:31 Kennedy with the possible exception of Trump who wasn't selected by the CIA or part of the CIA. 63 0:07:31 --> 0:07:40 And it's one of the reasons I've been so busy is that this is taking up a lot of time, the book, 64 0:07:41 --> 0:07:44 and then also my telemarketing programs are launching right now too. And they're 65 0:07:45 --> 0:07:51 doing quite well with building alliances here, which the anti-globalist alliance 66 0:07:51 --> 0:07:55 now also looks like it'll be built. So I mean, I've been extremely busy, 67 0:07:56 --> 0:08:02 but it's succeeding. It's like the hand of God is on these things because 68 0:08:03 --> 0:08:09 everything I'm launching is an initiative. Usually it's hard to make them work. I've 69 0:08:09 --> 0:08:13 gotten more two years to get to this point with telemedicine to a year to write that book. 70 0:08:14 --> 0:08:23 And now it's suddenly all making an impact at the same time. And so I think next I think I'll begin 71 0:08:24 --> 0:08:31 organizing a congressional effort to get this book made to wear in Congress. And I'll probably write 72 0:08:31 --> 0:08:39 an article about Bobby Kennedy Jr. and say that the deep state killed his father and his uncle, 73 0:08:39 --> 0:08:45 and there's probably nobody better in the country if he ever were to be president to go after these 74 0:08:45 --> 0:08:53 people than Bobby Kennedy. So it's going to propel Bobby Kennedy's campaign on that dimension. 75 0:08:54 --> 0:08:59 So do you think you can do a follow-up book when you've got a bit more time, Jerome? 76 0:09:00 --> 0:09:06 Well, certainly not. I'm not contemplating it right now because I don't think, except for this 77 0:09:06 --> 0:09:14 short book on the anti-globalist manifesto, and I will get some help with that. And by the way, 78 0:09:14 --> 0:09:21 Stephen, this group is who put me in touch with Vigano. You specifically, Steve. I've been looking 79 0:09:22 --> 0:09:27 way to get in touch with Vigano for three years, and it was this group and you that got me in touch 80 0:09:27 --> 0:09:33 with him. And so I want to acknowledge that and I want to thank you. So we have some, yes, we have 81 0:09:33 --> 0:09:40 been useful in some respects, although sometimes it's hard to see it. So, Jerome, I meant to ask 82 0:09:40 --> 0:09:48 you, have I put you in touch with Ahmed Malik? Yes, in fact, he's supposed to be interviewing 83 0:09:48 --> 0:09:55 me here in a few days. I was going to say that he should be interviewing you about this book. 84 0:09:55 --> 0:10:02 Well, I think he is. I don't remember. He's on my schedule. I just don't remember exactly when, 85 0:10:02 --> 0:10:10 but he is on my schedule. And it's later in May that he's on my schedule. And I will look 86 0:10:10 --> 0:10:16 forward to doing that. Sure. But he is a good way to. There are lots of people in the United 87 0:10:16 --> 0:10:22 Kingdom who are very interested in what happened to President Kennedy. Yes, I think that's the case. 88 0:10:22 --> 0:10:28 That's around the world. There's a lot of around the world. There's a lot of interest in this book 89 0:10:28 --> 0:10:35 is drawing attention around the world. Yeah. I think it'll take all this year for this book 90 0:10:35 --> 0:10:43 to play out. I think the book will be a bestseller through the year and have different impacts as 91 0:10:43 --> 0:10:48 different things happen. If Robert Kennedy starts talking about the book, that's going to be another 92 0:10:48 --> 0:10:54 wave of interest in the book will skyrocket back up to the top of the charts. And it's just doing 93 0:10:54 --> 0:11:00 that on a consistent basis. And so therefore it drops down and then I get the right interview. 94 0:11:00 --> 0:11:07 And suddenly it's back near the top. And so Robert Kennedy stays in the race of your own. 95 0:11:08 --> 0:11:14 Yes. It's going to have another go. And unbelievably, it seems he seems to be the 96 0:11:14 --> 0:11:19 Democrats candidate and then Trump as well. How does that play out? So they're going to be 97 0:11:20 --> 0:11:25 is Kennedy going to keep going until the end? And what happens when there are three candidates? 98 0:11:26 --> 0:11:31 Well, Trump, first of all, I believe Bobby Kennedy is going to get on the ballot in all 50 states. 99 0:11:31 --> 0:11:35 That's what they're working on right now. And I don't and he's going to stay in the race. 100 0:11:36 --> 0:11:43 And so he's got sufficient funding. And this woman is his vice presidential candidate has 101 0:11:43 --> 0:11:50 sufficient funding herself to get this continued. So when you have a three person race, the last one 102 0:11:50 --> 0:11:58 we really had of any significance was when Bill Clinton ran first against George H.W. Bush and 103 0:11:59 --> 0:12:04 what's his name? I was thinking of his name for a minute. The guy who 104 0:12:06 --> 0:12:10 had all the charts, third party candidate. I'll get his name in a second. 105 0:12:11 --> 0:12:17 Been so many things I've been thinking about today. Hold on. But Ross Perot, Ross Perot, 106 0:12:18 --> 0:12:24 so Ross Perot drew a lot of votes from both candidates. I think Bobby Kennedy is going 107 0:12:24 --> 0:12:30 to draw a lot of votes, mostly from Biden. Good. The people who do not like the woke 108 0:12:30 --> 0:12:34 and consider themselves more traditionally liberal will go with Kennedy. 109 0:12:36 --> 0:12:41 The Trump people are not going to go with Kennedy, especially after you pick this woman who's very, 110 0:12:41 --> 0:12:48 very leftist to be his vice presidential candidate. So my guess is that that Bobby 111 0:12:48 --> 0:12:56 Kennedy's presence in the race benefits Trump. And it looks to me like Trump is gaining. 112 0:12:57 --> 0:13:01 The polls, I think, are still biased and giving Biden too much of a percentage and 113 0:13:02 --> 0:13:10 is not really there. But I think that Trump has now solid support from the mega group 114 0:13:11 --> 0:13:19 because of all these trials he's going through. And these are boosting Trump's popularity rather 115 0:13:19 --> 0:13:27 than diminishing it. And it appears that all of these trials are flawed and will be reversed on 116 0:13:27 --> 0:13:35 appeal. It looks also, as I looked at the Supreme Court on this immunity case, I do not think that 117 0:13:35 --> 0:13:40 the I think Trump is going to get some grant of immunity as president because if every president 118 0:13:41 --> 0:13:47 is subject to criminal investigation and impeachment and hearings, it'll destroy the presidency 119 0:13:47 --> 0:13:52 because no one will be wanting to be president. No one will be able to do the job if they're 120 0:13:52 --> 0:13:58 constantly under threat of an impeachment hearing or a criminal indictment as president. 121 0:13:59 --> 0:14:03 You've got to be able to do the job. You have to be able to make executive decisions. I mean, 122 0:14:03 --> 0:14:08 presidents have to almost be judged by history. Now, I guess if the president took a gun and 123 0:14:08 --> 0:14:15 shot somebody, you'd have a problem. But for policy crimes or the kinds of indictments that 124 0:14:15 --> 0:14:24 Trump is getting, which are highly lawfare and political, these are just patently politics 125 0:14:25 --> 0:14:31 and not legitimate practice of law. And our Justice Department is completely partisan these days. 126 0:14:33 --> 0:14:42 So I just see the internal politics of the United States are in disarray. And the economies of the 127 0:14:42 --> 0:14:50 world are headed towards a massive crash with the amount of deficit spending that we're doing and 128 0:14:51 --> 0:14:59 Western Europe is doing. The position of Russia right now has actually been strengthened under 129 0:14:59 --> 0:15:05 the sanctions. Russia's created its own alternative to the swift system. Russia's having an increasing 130 0:15:05 --> 0:15:13 percentage of its international trade conducted in either Rupols or in Yuan or other currencies, 131 0:15:13 --> 0:15:22 but not the dollar. The dollar is losing fast its role as a reserve currency. And the war in Ukraine, 132 0:15:23 --> 0:15:29 Putin is continuing to back channel and signal that if NATO starts putting in advanced weapons, 133 0:15:30 --> 0:15:37 or NATO troops are directly committed, it will no longer be a proxy war. It could lead into a 134 0:15:37 --> 0:15:44 nuclear conflict. And I don't think that's going to happen. At the moment, I think they're going to 135 0:15:44 --> 0:15:49 mostly the money that was just issued by Congress will go to the American arms dealers. 136 0:15:50 --> 0:15:53 The weapons that are going to be delivered are going to be sophisticated weapons and the 137 0:15:54 --> 0:16:00 Ukrainians will not be trained to use them. So they may have to be used by American advisors, 138 0:16:00 --> 0:16:05 which would be a problem. But also Russia is going to interdict a lot of these weapons. 139 0:16:05 --> 0:16:09 Russia is in a very, very strong position right now. There's no way to dislodge Russia. Russia, 140 0:16:09 --> 0:16:19 I think, could take Kiev in June. They decide to do so. So, you know, Russia needs at this point 141 0:16:19 --> 0:16:25 to make clear that they're going to they do not have aggressive intents on Poland, 142 0:16:26 --> 0:16:32 or any of the other Eastern countries. And they should start engaging in discussions, mutual, 143 0:16:32 --> 0:16:38 you know, trade discussions, other discussions with Finland, Sweden, and Poland, to make it clear 144 0:16:38 --> 0:16:48 that they do not want to be the aggressor is NATO. And Putin has been stating, increasingly, 145 0:16:48 --> 0:16:52 that NATO had a coup d'etat by our State Department, our military intelligence, 146 0:16:52 --> 0:17:03 George Soros, and the Maidan rebellion that overthrew Yanukovych in 2014. So this whole theme 147 0:17:03 --> 0:17:10 of intelligence agencies in the military industrial complex running these Western European countries, 148 0:17:11 --> 0:17:17 and having perpetual wars to the detriment of the citizenry with these false narratives, 149 0:17:17 --> 0:17:23 like the climate change, and net zero, are going to bankrupt the middle class in Europe and the 150 0:17:23 --> 0:17:29 United States, and throw these countries into financial crisis. We just had another bank fail 151 0:17:29 --> 0:17:34 here in the United States this past week. And bank failures are going to start again, 152 0:17:34 --> 0:17:40 as interest rates do not lower. And we have refinancing of commercial real estate, which 153 0:17:40 --> 0:17:46 is largely unoccupied in our cities, our cities are deteriorating with mobs, with homeless and 154 0:17:46 --> 0:17:56 with other problems. So we're in a very dark period of time right now that could go into a world war. 155 0:17:57 --> 0:18:05 And I see Putin is actually trying to restrain it and not take steps that would inflame the violence 156 0:18:06 --> 0:18:12 and to try to back channel to say to the world, you know, let's not take this to the next level. 157 0:18:12 --> 0:18:17 I was encouraged to see that Iran did not retaliate on Israel for the strike, the 158 0:18:17 --> 0:18:24 counterstrike that Israel just did after the drone attack from Iran. But Israel right now is also 159 0:18:24 --> 0:18:32 attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon and the war is expanding in Lebanon. So these are very 160 0:18:32 --> 0:18:40 dangerous situations. And in the meantime, our Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken went to China 161 0:18:40 --> 0:18:46 and got treated miserably because China did not agree to a single thing he wanted to do. He's 162 0:18:46 --> 0:18:53 down to begging China. And when he arrived in China, when he left China, they sent a lower level 163 0:18:53 --> 0:19:00 political official to greet him and escort him. So it was almost an insult diplomatically. And China 164 0:19:00 --> 0:19:06 seems to be in a position of really not regarding the United States as a serious power at the moment. 165 0:19:07 --> 0:19:10 And I think quite frankly, with the Biden administration in power, the deep state running 166 0:19:10 --> 0:19:17 the country, we're not a serious power. This woke is designed to do to damage the country, the 167 0:19:18 --> 0:19:24 DEI and the ESG. And I think our military could do better running a transgender parade on Fifth 168 0:19:24 --> 0:19:29 Avenue these days than it could fighting a war. And I think NATO is equally ineffective. 169 0:19:30 --> 0:19:32 Even if they wanted to fight Russia, I don't think we could. 170 0:19:34 --> 0:19:42 And so watching all of this, it's easy to get discouraged. But I do also at the same time see 171 0:19:42 --> 0:19:50 an increasing awareness, especially as the economies harden, of people even in the UK 172 0:19:51 --> 0:19:58 being aware that this extremism needs to be stopped. And I was seeing a statement this morning 173 0:19:59 --> 0:20:09 the British health authorities is trying to rein in this woke language into medical care, 174 0:20:10 --> 0:20:18 because it's just gotten to be insane the degree to which they say men can breastfeed and 175 0:20:18 --> 0:20:24 men can menstruate and we can have babies and the language has to be written for medical care 176 0:20:25 --> 0:20:32 in this gender neutral way. And so the health officials and even the Great Britain are reacting 177 0:20:32 --> 0:20:38 against us saying this is nonsense. Get this gender confused language out of medical care. 178 0:20:39 --> 0:20:50 That's a positive step. But at the moment, I think the UK with the hate crimes and the hate 179 0:20:51 --> 0:20:59 speech definitions, Europe and the UK and the US are all going into the censorship very strongly. 180 0:21:00 --> 0:21:04 But I think it's being rejected by the people. I think as people become increasingly aware of it, 181 0:21:05 --> 0:21:12 it's not going to succeed as easily as I think these New World Order demons think it will. 182 0:21:14 --> 0:21:19 So that's kind of my rundown of where I think we are today. And I'm encouraged to see that 183 0:21:20 --> 0:21:25 the Santa Globus Alliance is formed, the book is going to get published and Bannon's going to carry 184 0:21:25 --> 0:21:33 it. The Kennedy book is doing as well as it's doing and what I'm trying to do is to establish 185 0:21:33 --> 0:21:41 a strong intellectual basis of truth for exposing the deep state and putting into place some measures 186 0:21:41 --> 0:21:49 where people can start buying energy directly, not having to go through the utilities 187 0:21:50 --> 0:21:57 in the United States and in Europe, where we can get back to more communities. I think the 188 0:21:57 --> 0:22:03 tractor revolts throughout Europe have been very effective in pushing back the agenda against farms. 189 0:22:04 --> 0:22:12 So I do see growing resistance. I'm watching the countries one after the other in the EU reject 190 0:22:12 --> 0:22:18 the net zero approach. They just can't afford to do it. The courts which are demanding these 191 0:22:18 --> 0:22:24 governments as matters of health impose net zero requirements, governments are saying, 192 0:22:24 --> 0:22:30 you know, we'll be we'll be bankrupt, which of course is what they intend. But I think some 193 0:22:30 --> 0:22:35 sanity is coming back into the picture where people are realizing these windmills and these, 194 0:22:36 --> 0:22:41 you know, the wind turbines and the solar panels don't generate reliable energy. 195 0:22:41 --> 0:22:47 Electric cars don't work. And this agenda is failing because for the same reason the 196 0:22:47 --> 0:22:52 Kennedy agenda failed is that the government was flying and its evidence doesn't fit together. 197 0:22:53 --> 0:22:59 And when you can expose that, people see it, they're first shocked. And then they open their 198 0:22:59 --> 0:23:06 eyes to that they've been lied to. And then they see the depth of the lying. And they realize that 199 0:23:06 --> 0:23:13 they're not going to just give up their freedoms because they've been made the object of a 200 0:23:13 --> 0:23:18 psychological operation run by the intelligence agencies in conjunction with the mainstream media. 201 0:23:19 --> 0:23:25 And perpetual wars is not a way for us to live. So I think ultimately this agenda fails. Sure, 202 0:23:25 --> 0:23:28 I think we're still going to go through a very dark period. And I think we're going to have an 203 0:23:28 --> 0:23:36 economic global crash before we get to sanity. Yeah. So the moral of the story seems to me to be 204 0:23:36 --> 0:23:44 if you live in a world of lies endlessly, then there will be a reckoning. And we're seeing that, 205 0:23:44 --> 0:23:50 I think it's becoming at least in the UK, there's definite feeling that everything is going wrong 206 0:23:50 --> 0:23:57 and nobody knows what the heck is happening. The world doesn't make sense anymore. So and I think 207 0:23:57 --> 0:24:03 people who went along with what happened in 2020 and 2021, they're beginning to realize that, 208 0:24:03 --> 0:24:09 better start thinking about the truth pretty soon. Because if you don't, it's like if you're in 209 0:24:09 --> 0:24:15 danger on a mountain, if you don't search for the truth, then you get into a worse mess. 210 0:24:17 --> 0:24:25 I think that's right. I think the key point that is being realized when we see our universities 211 0:24:25 --> 0:24:34 out protesting for Hamas and not understanding what this means that, you know, Hamas has no 212 0:24:34 --> 0:24:42 interest in these students. And Hamas is a radical Islamic group that even in the Middle East is 213 0:24:42 --> 0:24:49 feared. They have not treated the Palestinian people with respect. Palestinian people are used 214 0:24:49 --> 0:24:59 as shields. They're used as props in the Hamas game. Saudi Arabia, the UAE would want to get 215 0:24:59 --> 0:25:06 rid of Hamas. No country, even Egypt has erected a wall preventing the Palestinians from 216 0:25:07 --> 0:25:11 seeking refuge in Egypt. They've been thrown out of Jordan. They were thrown out of Egypt. 217 0:25:11 --> 0:25:20 They were thrown out of Lebanon. And so therefore, the attempt to save Hamas is, you know, 218 0:25:20 --> 0:25:27 on our campuses, these students are not realizing that they're embracing terrorists. And of course, 219 0:25:27 --> 0:25:33 the Jews who supported the Democratic Party and funded these institutions, higher learning, 220 0:25:33 --> 0:25:39 are saying if they become anti-Semitic, why are we supporting them? 221 0:25:39 --> 0:25:46 And so you're finding that increasing percentages of minorities, you know, racial minorities in 222 0:25:46 --> 0:25:53 the United States, increasing percentages of women, increasing percentages of Jews are moving away 223 0:25:53 --> 0:25:58 from the Democratic Party. It's losing a lot of its traditional support because everyone in the 224 0:25:58 --> 0:26:03 streets and the universities are starting to arrest these protesters and say, no, you don't 225 0:26:03 --> 0:26:12 have free speech. You know, this is not a, this is a protest that is aimed at anti-Semitism 226 0:26:12 --> 0:26:19 and supporting terrorism. Well, you can't support terrorists. And that's the issue of, 227 0:26:19 --> 0:26:24 you know, the incentive, they're supporting Hamas because Hamas hates America. And these 228 0:26:24 --> 0:26:31 protesters are out there in the college campuses chanting death to America as if they were in 229 0:26:31 --> 0:26:37 Tehran. And, you know, there's a limit to how much the American people are going to tolerate this. 230 0:26:38 --> 0:26:41 You know, the universities are going to find out that their pocketbooks are going to get 231 0:26:41 --> 0:26:45 hurt here pretty soon. And they're going to lose a lot of their supporters 232 0:26:47 --> 0:26:55 and their disgrace in terms of generating constantly this radical intellectual output. 233 0:26:55 --> 0:26:59 And the universities have been doing this since the 1930s when they were supporting 234 0:26:59 --> 0:27:05 Mussolini and Hitler as Hitler made the trains run in 1930s. There was massive support in the 235 0:27:05 --> 0:27:12 universities for fascism. And they've always had the wrong side of these causes going back, 236 0:27:12 --> 0:27:17 you know, through the last century. So the universities are not gaining the respect 237 0:27:18 --> 0:27:23 that they should have when they're not producing an educated group ready to go to work 238 0:27:24 --> 0:27:29 productively in professions that require advanced knowledge. These kids can't read, 239 0:27:29 --> 0:27:35 they can't do math. All they can do is protest. And that's not the basis for a productive life. 240 0:27:37 --> 0:27:45 So I think the society is going through a massive transformation right now. And what I've been 241 0:27:45 --> 0:27:52 trying to do is write books in a massive way to show the truth, the truth about energy, 242 0:27:52 --> 0:27:56 global warming, climate change. I wrote a book on the truth about neo-Marxism, cultural Maoism, 243 0:27:56 --> 0:28:01 and anarchy pointing out that what we've got is not a deep state, but a counter state, 244 0:28:02 --> 0:28:10 like Mao created to destroy the Chinese government during his long march, 245 0:28:11 --> 0:28:20 and was very successful with a counter state. And the point is, the great awakening has got to occur 246 0:28:20 --> 0:28:26 because I think these demons would have uninhibited, would have nuclear war within two years, 247 0:28:27 --> 0:28:32 would be their way to depopulate, which is part of their ultimate objective. 248 0:28:33 --> 0:28:38 Sure. So Jerome, thanks for talking to us. So this won't be wasted. I'll ask, 249 0:28:39 --> 0:28:46 Charles wasn't here today, so I was trying to moderate anyway. And so- 250 0:28:46 --> 0:28:53 People have their hands up. I did not mean to come in and monopolize the conversation. I apologize. 251 0:28:53 --> 0:28:56 But if anybody's got questions, I'll be happy to answer. 252 0:28:57 --> 0:29:02 Go ahead, Amy. Amy only just put her hand up, but she did have it up before, I think. 253 0:29:02 --> 0:29:03 Amy, go ahead. 254 0:29:03 --> 0:29:09 Yeah, I did have it up before, but I just wanted to comment on the claim about the students and 255 0:29:09 --> 0:29:15 what the university should be doing. I myself was arrested on a public sidewalk by MIT in what, 256 0:29:15 --> 0:29:22 2004 or something like that, 2003, for protesting a bioterror lab. As a matter of fact, 257 0:29:22 --> 0:29:27 they were building a bioterror lab in Roxbury, Massa, kind of a poorer neighborhood in the Boston 258 0:29:27 --> 0:29:35 area, in a very populated area without a lot of evacuation potential. So four of us protested 259 0:29:35 --> 0:29:40 by just having little leaflets on a public sidewalk as parents and visitors were coming 260 0:29:40 --> 0:29:45 to the graduation ceremony. And we weren't disrupting, we weren't blocking, we weren't 261 0:29:45 --> 0:29:49 harassing. Most people weren't interested. That's pretty normal. They're coming to take pictures and 262 0:29:49 --> 0:29:54 see a graduation. We get it. But for anyone interested, we wanted to say something because 263 0:29:54 --> 0:30:00 the speaker was from the NIH and we thought this was a very concerning, important political issue 264 0:30:00 --> 0:30:07 of our time. And we got, the cops called on us by the university administration of MIT, and I was 265 0:30:07 --> 0:30:15 arrested. And, you know, so what, how is that possible? I mean, first of all, it wasn't even 266 0:30:15 --> 0:30:21 the campus property, but even if it was, why is it possible on a university campus that people 267 0:30:21 --> 0:30:27 don't have the right to share their opinion? I did a lot of activism at MIT, but I did finish 268 0:30:27 --> 0:30:32 my PhD. I did do my studies. I was a responsible student for the most part, but we did a lot of 269 0:30:32 --> 0:30:38 anti-war work, a lot in the buildup to the war on Iraq. Now everyone seems to be against it, but 270 0:30:38 --> 0:30:47 I wonder who really was at that time that understood the way that the neocons and the 271 0:30:47 --> 0:30:55 pro-Israel lobby got the U.S. to target all of Israel's regional competitors. And so I think 272 0:30:55 --> 0:31:00 that some of those college students would be aware of these kinds of things and they are being 273 0:31:00 --> 0:31:06 indoctrinated with a DEI training that says colonization is bad on the one hand, and then 274 0:31:06 --> 0:31:11 they're being punished for standing up and speaking out about colonization on the other hand. 275 0:31:11 --> 0:31:16 And the way that the university here where I live has been cracking down on people compared to other 276 0:31:16 --> 0:31:23 things shows duplicity. And I would hope that someone who cared about America would understand 277 0:31:23 --> 0:31:27 the importance of academic freedom in the universities coming back all the way from the 278 0:31:27 --> 0:31:32 founding of universities during Christendom back in the cathedrals. A Christian should know that 279 0:31:32 --> 0:31:38 history. And the First Amendment, of course, of the U.S. Constitution. These are heavily taxpayer 280 0:31:38 --> 0:31:44 funded institutions, public property in many cases, not at MIT, but my sidewalk was and I still got 281 0:31:44 --> 0:31:51 arrested there. So I think it's very, very important to not get emotional and not just pick aside, 282 0:31:52 --> 0:31:58 but to stand up for these principles of academic freedom, which clearly we saw during COVID was 283 0:31:58 --> 0:32:04 attacked when doctors and people with different medical opinions, different research opinions 284 0:32:04 --> 0:32:09 were censored from places like YouTube by, you know, 25 year old coders who know nothing about 285 0:32:09 --> 0:32:14 that topic. You know, it's bizarre. That's not how science can be done. So I hope people see the 286 0:32:14 --> 0:32:21 danger to that. And I hope people see the danger to calling on universities to crack down on student 287 0:32:21 --> 0:32:25 voices, whatever their opinion, even if you don't like their opinion, it's very important to have 288 0:32:25 --> 0:32:33 spaces where people can share different opinions and let the correct one prevail. Many of mine 289 0:32:33 --> 0:32:39 have held up. I was protesting genetic engineering and, you know, at MIT in 2000, that held up well. 290 0:32:39 --> 0:32:44 I'm still against it. I still think that we're totally over our skis to think we can 291 0:32:44 --> 0:32:51 tinker with the genetic code of any living thing, let alone human beings. So that's 292 0:32:51 --> 0:32:58 timely. So let people have their say and let other people have their other say and stand up 293 0:32:58 --> 0:33:03 for American principles. Don't put Israel first, put America first for once. Okay. How about the 294 0:33:03 --> 0:33:09 freedom of speech, freedom of assembly that is a time honored right and especially on college 295 0:33:09 --> 0:33:15 campuses. And this repression is really ugly. And we need to be honest about it because even though 296 0:33:15 --> 0:33:19 you don't care about that opinion, it may come back to be an opinion you do care about at some 297 0:33:19 --> 0:33:26 future time. And without these principles, we have no civilization anymore. So if you actually care 298 0:33:26 --> 0:33:31 about Western civilization, America, and the principles America was founded on, then I hope 299 0:33:31 --> 0:33:37 you will stand up for truth seeking, stand up for, you know, looking in all directions, 300 0:33:37 --> 0:33:43 dispassionately not letting your emotions sway you, including if Israel had a role in the JFK 301 0:33:43 --> 0:33:48 assassination, which I think there is quite a bit of evidence it did, and stand up for, 302 0:33:49 --> 0:33:53 you know, science and inquiry. Anyway, thank you. Have a great day. 303 0:33:54 --> 0:33:57 Very well spoken. Yes. Thank you. What'd you say, Jerome? 304 0:33:59 --> 0:34:04 Well, I'm not sure there was a question there. But free speech is very important. And there 305 0:34:04 --> 0:34:10 should be a space for people to say virtually whatever they want to say and argue it. I think 306 0:34:10 --> 0:34:17 that's indisputable. What my point was on the student protests was specifically, 307 0:34:18 --> 0:34:24 the anti-Semitic nature of the supporting of Hamas is having a reaction to the Jews 308 0:34:24 --> 0:34:31 who have supported the universities. And this is going to be a problem for the universities 309 0:34:32 --> 0:34:39 and for the Democratic Party. And that a support of Hamas, which is an anti-American organization 310 0:34:39 --> 0:34:48 and hatred of America, is going to be advancing not a positive America First agenda, but a 311 0:34:48 --> 0:34:51 death to America agenda. So that's the agenda. Now, do they have a right to do it? 312 0:34:52 --> 0:34:56 First Amendment? Yes. I'm saying, though, the dynamics and politics of that 313 0:34:57 --> 0:35:02 are going to be ultimately destructive to the very principles we're trying to support here, 314 0:35:02 --> 0:35:06 because certainly under Hamas, there's not going to be any free speech. 315 0:35:07 --> 0:35:13 And certainly under Hamas, there's not going to be any welcoming of Jews. And so therefore, 316 0:35:13 --> 0:35:19 some of the, while they're free to say these and free to express these, etc., the logical consequences 317 0:35:19 --> 0:35:28 of supporting or these various movements for support of Hamas winning are not positive for 318 0:35:28 --> 0:35:33 the advancement of freedom. That's my point. I'm not saying they should be arrested. I'm not saying 319 0:35:33 --> 0:35:40 they shouldn't be allowed to express themselves. I think, again, in the study of free speech, 320 0:35:40 --> 0:35:48 there's rules for it and the building of camps and the occupying of university buildings, etc. 321 0:35:49 --> 0:35:54 There are boundaries and rules that if you follow them, you should be able to say whatever you want 322 0:35:54 --> 0:36:02 to say. There's other boundaries that if you are destroying property or occupying property, etc., 323 0:36:02 --> 0:36:09 there's other complications to how you're protesting. But the fundamental values of free 324 0:36:09 --> 0:36:16 speech have to be reduced to imminent danger. Publishing troop movements in a newspaper that 325 0:36:16 --> 0:36:25 could jeopardize the lives of military, that's probably can be prohibited. But again, the issue 326 0:36:25 --> 0:36:30 of free speech is different from whether or not it's wise to support these groups or not. 327 0:36:30 --> 0:36:40 It's wise to go along with the anti-Jewish sentiment of Hamas. That's my point. 328 0:36:42 --> 0:36:47 Many more complications of issues, Israel's responsibility in the JFK assassination has 329 0:36:47 --> 0:36:54 been debated. Do you go to any of those protests? I've gone to so many protests. You have no idea. 330 0:36:54 --> 0:36:59 I went to one on Thursday. Well, I'm 77 years old, so I'm probably not going to very many protests. 331 0:37:00 --> 0:37:07 How do you know that they're there to support Hamas? They're supporting Hamas. That's the message. 332 0:37:07 --> 0:37:13 They support the right to resist occupation, which is in international law. That is what you could 333 0:37:13 --> 0:37:21 probably generically say. Maybe not to a person, though. I would encourage you to continue. 334 0:37:21 --> 0:37:26 Maybe you can continue to make some good points, but you destroy it all by being personal. 335 0:37:26 --> 0:37:31 You guys have your fun with your lies and your slander and your personal attacks on people that 336 0:37:31 --> 0:37:37 are standing up for free. Why do you react like that? Yeah, so you get a bit of resistance and 337 0:37:37 --> 0:37:46 then you react like that. Crazy. Okay, Glenn has a question. Glenn? 338 0:37:46 --> 0:37:57 Glenn? Not so much a question on a topic. I just wanted to enter into it that most everything I 339 0:37:57 --> 0:38:03 would indicate here would support you, Jerome, that clearly the ability to speak is absolutely 340 0:38:03 --> 0:38:11 there. The ability to assemble is, but the ability to bully other people, to bump the Jewish students, 341 0:38:12 --> 0:38:20 to make up tents, which is basically creating a fort and saying that they somehow own that space 342 0:38:20 --> 0:38:27 within, even within the university or outside on public areas. Those are all not part of our freedom 343 0:38:27 --> 0:38:34 base. They're not part of our constitution. And so it's reasonable for us that do believe in freedom 344 0:38:34 --> 0:38:40 and the precision and the rule of law associated with our constitution that we defend that. 345 0:38:41 --> 0:38:47 And there's just a variety of things that have been said that somehow 346 0:38:53 --> 0:38:59 where the infringements have been. And this is not anything like the Vietnam War protests that 347 0:38:59 --> 0:39:06 occurred in the 60s. It simply isn't. And this is the oppression is what we're seeing against 348 0:39:06 --> 0:39:13 Jewish students and the anti-Semitism associated with that. And yes, the other side can certainly 349 0:39:13 --> 0:39:19 make their opinion. They can voice it to their politicians, but they don't have a right to 350 0:39:19 --> 0:39:25 break down buildings. They don't have the right to bomb things. They don't have any of those 351 0:39:25 --> 0:39:32 destructive parts are not part of a civilized environment and what we want for our country. 352 0:39:32 --> 0:39:39 Thank you. I agree. Also, there's so many of the narratives now, so many of the, 353 0:39:40 --> 0:39:46 okay, so they're saying, you know, from the river to the sea and that they chant this. 354 0:39:46 --> 0:39:51 Well, this means Israel doesn't have a right to exist. And the argument behind that is that this 355 0:39:51 --> 0:39:57 is genocide of the Palestinian people. Well, first of all, the Palestinian people were never a state. 356 0:39:57 --> 0:40:07 We had the British were there with their protectorate. In 1948, when Palestine was 357 0:40:07 --> 0:40:16 partitioned, it wasn't really a Palestinian state as such as just a designation of the British 358 0:40:17 --> 0:40:23 protectorate, which is now being partitioned. And there would be spaces created for the state 359 0:40:23 --> 0:40:27 of Israel to exist. That was the part that was the whole purpose of the partition. 360 0:40:28 --> 0:40:32 Now, if we want to start arguing about who has the right to the Middle East, 361 0:40:33 --> 0:40:38 we're going to be arguing about 3000 years worth of history, which is a pointless exercise. 362 0:40:40 --> 0:40:46 This is part of the narratives that get developed, saying, okay, well, the Europeans 363 0:40:47 --> 0:40:53 came to America and killed the indigenous tribes. So this was a great crime against the indigenous 364 0:40:53 --> 0:41:00 tribes. Well, unfortunately, human migrations have had this inevitable consequence from time 365 0:41:00 --> 0:41:06 and memorial. What happened to the Neanderthals? Was it right that the Neanderthals all died? 366 0:41:07 --> 0:41:13 You know, these kinds of questions really are beyond adjudication because they're too complex 367 0:41:13 --> 0:41:20 and there's no side that's right. And so the idea that this is a colonization and that 368 0:41:21 --> 0:41:29 they'll the Palestinians should be the legitimate owners of Israel, that the Jews ought to be gone. 369 0:41:30 --> 0:41:36 These are questions which are have a shallow understanding of the nature of history, 370 0:41:36 --> 0:41:40 or the nature of what the dynamics were. The Jewish people were being exterminated 371 0:41:40 --> 0:41:44 during the Holocaust. And if Hitler had his right, his ability to, we would have killed every Jew in 372 0:41:44 --> 0:41:52 the face of the earth. And the Jews that did escape, the Jews that claimed back to the covenant 373 0:41:52 --> 0:41:57 with Abraham, and by the way, all this statements back to Abraham. And if we're going to try to sort 374 0:41:57 --> 0:42:04 all that out, it's a waste of time. But the point is that, you know, the attempt to say, 375 0:42:05 --> 0:42:12 the Jews are always wrong. The Jews killed Kennedy, the Jews are now doing genocide against 376 0:42:12 --> 0:42:19 the Palestinian. The Jews are preventing, causing starvation. They're killing thousands of 377 0:42:19 --> 0:42:27 Palestinians. All these narratives are constructed by a group of people whose real motive is to get 378 0:42:27 --> 0:42:33 rid of the Jews. Okay, and that's, this is a sickness has been at the heart of human existence 379 0:42:33 --> 0:42:38 now for maybe 3000 years. We've got to stop it. The Jewish people have a right to a state. 380 0:42:39 --> 0:42:45 State was legitimately created. We're not going to restore the problems with the Indian tribes. 381 0:42:45 --> 0:42:50 We're not going to send the slaves back to Africa. And things happen in human history 382 0:42:50 --> 0:42:58 that are irreversible. And they're often great crimes that cause great injustices. But we cannot 383 0:42:58 --> 0:43:04 go back and resolve all the injustices of history. We have to do it today as resolved to live civilly. 384 0:43:05 --> 0:43:10 You know, so Martin Luther King had an argument that he wanted to get rid of racial prejudice, 385 0:43:10 --> 0:43:15 give everybody an opportunity. Well, that's different than DEI, which is now racial 386 0:43:15 --> 0:43:22 prejudice against whites. And it's a narrative constructed to be destructive. It's not, 387 0:43:23 --> 0:43:27 it's a psychological operation. Some of these thoughts are destructive, 388 0:43:28 --> 0:43:33 because they're like a mind virus. And I say that some thoughts that work and some thoughts that 389 0:43:33 --> 0:43:38 don't work. The idea that the Jews and Mossad killed Kennedy, the evidence for it is very 390 0:43:38 --> 0:43:43 minimal. Kennedy did not want anybody to have nuclear weapons at that time. He was trying to 391 0:43:43 --> 0:43:48 get rid of nuclear weapons. He didn't want Israel to have nuclear weapons. He didn't stop Israel 392 0:43:48 --> 0:43:54 from having nuclear weapons. Israel did it anyway. And Mossad was not trying to kill Kennedy over 393 0:43:54 --> 0:43:59 that. You know, the Jews were pretty perfectly happy. The Democratic Party at that point 394 0:43:59 --> 0:44:05 was supporting them in a continuous series of wars that went on and even until 1967, the 67 war. 395 0:44:06 --> 0:44:07 You know, Kennedy 396 0:44:11 --> 0:44:17 the seizure of the Suez Canal. He lived through all these things. Kennedy was against 397 0:44:17 --> 0:44:24 colonialism. The only speeches he gave of any value in the Senate were against France for Algeria. 398 0:44:24 --> 0:44:29 He did not want to fight in Vietnam because he was there in 1950. And he didn't want to become 399 0:44:29 --> 0:44:35 the next colonial power ruling Vietnam, which was a corrupt country. CIA wanted to be in Vietnam 400 0:44:35 --> 0:44:39 because they were running the drug trade. They're still running the drug trade. And so, 401 0:44:40 --> 0:44:42 you know, when Kennedy's like this woman, 402 0:44:44 --> 0:44:51 my phone has been like this all day long. I may have to take this one. I think I've made my point.