You know, when you have to get tough, you get tough.
And again, we're seeing it done in a masterful way
and the art of the deal is going on in spades.
Hello everybody.
I don't want to be you later on.
Trump is doing some wonderful things.
Love it.
Hello, Daniel.
Hang on.
There he is.
Where's Daniel?
Hey, Daniel. Good to see you.
Welcome.
You're on mute, Daniel.
Still on.
Hello.
There you are.
Can you hear me now?
Yep.
We can hear you.
So we'll introduce you in a moment.
Good to see you again.
Wonderful to have you.
Daniel, this is Jerome Corsi.
I can only stay for a while this morning.
Hi, Jerome.
Good to see you.
My pleasure.
Hello.
I will listen to this on Rumble in its entirety,
but I can only stay with you for a few minutes this afternoon.
Okay.
And I apologize.
Nice to see you again.
Thank you very much.
Jerome, I can't imagine.
Yes, yes, absolutely.
Jerome, I can't imagine you've got anything else to do
than be here.
Come on.
Get serious.
I got to write two very important memos
that have to be read in Washington tomorrow.
Well, it was a nice bit of news with Venezuela
agreeing to take back all the illegals
that I just got in the email today.
Yes.
And Trump is making good progress.
I am wanting him to get in touch with Putin
quickly here because Putin is under internal pressure
that he waited until Trump was going to be president
and didn't retaliate when we launched
our long-range missiles into Russia
and when the British and the French were doing the same.
And now he's under pressure.
His hardliners are saying that Trump doesn't really care
and they want aggressive reaction in Ukraine
to push back Ukraine in a moment of weakness.
Trump doesn't seem to understand the urgency
of being in touch with Putin now.
And Putin last week even said that Trump lost the 2020 election
or the Ukraine war would never have happened if he had won.
Putin was signaling that he has information on that
and of course I've signaled back we don't want that information
but we understand the urgency of getting the talks going
because Putin was also an attempt
which even Tucker Carlson reported
which we knew in advance that there was an attempt on Putin's life
and he was warned about it and he increased his security.
Within Russia there are forces that do not want peace.
They want war just like there are forces in the United States that want war
and Putin has kept them in check but if Trump waits too long
it's going to be hard for Putin to stay in power
let alone prevent an escalation of the war.
So that's got to be communicated pretty quickly.
So Putin's patience up to the inauguration now was really his best play, right?
Yes, it was his best play and he was encouraged to take that play and he did.
That's right.
But now that Trump's been in power, I mean it's only, you know,
Trump's now had two full weeks, he's in 14 days, you know,
but again the way his speed is moving it appears that Russia and Putin
are not even on his radar and that impression can't be allowed to last.
Do you know that there's not aggressive open communication between Trump and Putin?
I would think there would have been day one.
Trump has neglected it.
Well, that's a pity.
I don't mean to take time from Daniel but that's where I'm going to...
That's very good. Thank you for letting Daniel know that.
We'll get the show on the road.
Jerome, that's a pity in my opinion.
He shouldn't use up his capital.
Well, that's why I'm going to not be able to hear all of Daniel's presentation today.
Okay.
We've got to get this word in there.
Good. Yeah.
All right. Let's get this show on the road and welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID.
Ethics International is today's discussion with Dr. Daniel Estulin.
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost almost four years ago
with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years
and has been a whistleblower and activist.
His medical specialty is radiology.
At this moment we remember Ryan Oformick unlawfully incarcerated in German jail,
also standing for the election in the German elections on the 23rd of February.
Let's do what we can to shine a light on Reiner's plight.
Let's get the message to President Trump if we can
to get the US administration to get Reiner to be freed.
I also at this moment point out to you that the value to Big Pharma
of each transgender or each gender transition person,
the lifetime value of one transition is between six to eight million dollars per person.
Right. When you understand the dollar value of a transition,
you understand the pressure for the transgender movement.
I'm Charles Coviss, the moderator of this group on Australasia's passion provocateur.
We love passionate people in these meetings and Daniel Echelon is certainly a passionate man.
I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago.
Over the last 14 years I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine damage
and damage from bad medical advice.
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.
Bad medical advice is now the number one killer of people in America.
More deaths than from heart disease and from cancer and from diabetes.
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world.
Many of us thought the vaccines were OK.
Now many of us proudly say yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers and I count myself amongst those.
I now consider it to be a compliment if someone says I'm an anti-vaxxer.
Yes, I am.
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat
and where you're from.
Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War III and the medical science battle is only one of 12 battle fronts.
The legal battlefront is another.
The spiritual war that we are in is another battlefront.
The trans-human agenda is another battlefront.
Most of us understand the development of science and the science is never settled.
Anyone who tells you the science is settled, reach for your wallet says Michael Crichton.
This meeting runs for two and a half hours after which for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting.
Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join.
We'll listen to our guest presenters today.
Daniel Estill and PhD for as long as Daniel wishes to speak.
And then we have Q&A. Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asks the first questions for 15 minutes.
This is a free speech environment with appropriate moderating.
That means don't waste time.
Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.
If you're offended by anything, be offended.
We are lovingly not interested.
We reject the industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another.
And we similarly reject the triggering industry.
Don't say something, Daniel, that might trigger someone.
We call bullshit.
We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.
Fear is the opposite of love.
Fear squashes you and enslaves you.
Love, on the other hand, expands you.
These twice weekly meetings are not just talkfests.
An extraordinary range of actions and initiatives have been generated from linkages made by attendees in these meetings.
If you have a solution or a product or resources that will help people put the details in the chat,
the meeting is recorded and is uploaded onto the Rumble channel.
And you can find recordings of Daniel's previous two or three.
I'm trying to remember whether it's two or three previous presentations, Daniel.
And welcome now to Daniel Estulin, our guest today.
And we thank you for sharing with us your time and wisdom and insights.
And for the purposes of the recording, I will share a short background of your extensive background
so that people who don't know you can understand a little bit.
The short version is that you're a doctor of political science, author of 18 books, your TV presenter, public speaker,
university professor, foreign policy advisor, the three presidents in Latin America.
Your books have sold over eight million copies in 68 countries, translated into 42 languages on five continents.
Your bestselling titles are The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, the Tavistock Institute, Global Projects at War.
You've spoken at 700 conferences, at least over one million people.
These include European Parliament speech, Schiller Institute Conference, United Nations Conference.
And you've won numerous awards and including you won the best program of the year at the New York Television and Film Festival in 2013 and many others.
Daniel, you're a superstar. Thank you so much for being with us.
And thank you, Stephen Frost, for starting this group and for getting Daniel to speak to us.
Daniel, we are in your proverbial hands.
I know you don't share your screen, but if you want to, you are able to.
Welcome to today's discussion.
Thank you so much for the invitation.
I'm a bit under the weather, so if I cough, I try not to do it often.
I got all my pills, my tea, my honey, my bronchitis spray, anything that can help me get through this, I have it on my table.
I think if we start with what happened over the last couple of days, specifically the Black Hawk helicopter ramming the American Airlines,
if I'm not mistaken, airplane with 60 something people on board.
What you're seeing is a war.
It's not a war between Russia and the United States or China and the United States.
It's the war between the deep state or the people representing the deep state on the one hand and Donald Trump and the forces that he represents on the other.
What we saw the other day is a response to Trump firing 51 top political advisors from CIA agents to FBI, et cetera, et cetera,
for all the shenanigans they've done, especially in his four years in office and then four years in Biden's administration.
And so this is just a response.
There's going to be many responses in the near future.
You're going to see planes go down.
You're going to see metro stations all over the country being blown up.
You're going to have long-gun shootings in schools and otherwise.
You're going to have a lot of people being killed, maybe tens of thousands, because this is a war of attrition.
This is the war to decide who's actually going to control the purse strings because you're looking at two different Americas.
And so today I want to talk about what a Trump is, not who is Donald Trump, but what is a Donald Trump?
What forces he represents, because again, you have to understand that Donald Trump is a face of a project.
He's not a person.
By that, I'm not insinuating that he's some extraterrestrial shape-shifter.
I'm not saying that at all.
He's a face of one of the global projects, just as Biden was a face of another global project, et cetera, et cetera.
But what's actually happening right now in the United States, we saw it back in Soviet Russia,
the post-Soviet Union back in 1999, 2000, when Putin became president.
So I want to go back to that period of time and show you the parallel.
Now, many believe that Yeltsin actually installed Putin, and so he was his successor.
Actually, that's not the case.
The global mafia's plan to take over Russia, this was a multivariate scenario.
So think of it this way.
We're the global mafia.
We want to take over Russia.
And we understand that to keep millions of people in obedience, we must give them some kind of a big idea.
Remember the big idea that George H.W. Bush talked about?
To give these people some kind of a big idea.
What idea?
Can we know which variant the Russians would accept?
Again, we're talking about 1999, the year 2000.
No, but we can guess.
First, tired of the madness of the insane Brezhnev era of the 1980s, like Biden in the United States.
Exactly the same thing.
The Russians may want democracy.
And so we, the global mafia, we don't really care who sits in the Kremlin, which party rules the country.
For us, what's important is that gas and gold and coal and oil and coal town and everything else flow to the West.
And therefore, we don't care who controls the Kremlin.
The important thing is that the objectives are met.
So who do we put in the democratic vein?
Well, we can put Jovlinsky, a member of the Bilderberg group, president of the Yabloko political party.
We try him, and if not, we have a few others who can replace him as a democrat.
Now, what happens if democracy doesn't work, asks the global mafia.
Because Russia is a country where Marxist sentiments are still strong.
Again, remember, it's only 10 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
And therefore, they say the second scenario is Marxism.
This means that if we want to bring back the Marxist past, we can bring in Zyuganov, the eternal leader of the Communist Party,
a traitor in the cellar who's been the leader for 30 years.
And if the Russians get fed up with the communism and Marxism, Russia is an orthodox country.
They might want a czar to reason the global mafia.
So we have this famous filmmaker Nikita Mikhalkov.
And if this doesn't work, then Russia will be converted to a strict fascism regime.
In addition, the global mafia wants to impose this harsh fascist regime on all the countries on the planet Earth.
And therefore, it's necessary to slow down the process of consumption of material goods.
And by the way, this was the base of the so-called revolution of 1917,
because the elite, they realized back at the end of the 19th century,
that capitalism lifted the ban on people's consumption of material goods.
In other words, the class system that existed before capitalism held back the feudal system.
And so the poor were poor and the rich were rich.
And under capitalism, merchants from the people began to appear who also wanted to be rich.
And so the elite understood that if things continue in this way,
there will be not enough for everybody.
And for this, the teachings of Marxism suited them very well.
And so the elite began to promote Karl Marx.
In other words, Russia was chosen as a starting point to launch a world revolution
and establish the pseudo-communist society throughout the planet Earth.
And in 1917, Lenin was brought to St. Petersburg in a sealed wagon, sealed train from Switzerland.
Trotsky was brought to St. Petersburg on a ship from the United States
and a passport supplied to him by the Rockefellers.
And this group of people launched the process of the world revolution.
And the revolution had to take place not only in Russia,
I want to remind you we had the uprisings in Mexico, in Hungary, in Mongolia, in Germany.
But then Lenin stopped the process of this revolution by concluding the Brest peace.
And so Lenin broke his promise to the global mafia,
limiting the revolution to one country, the Soviet Union.
And so he was assassinated by his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya, an agent of the Western elite,
just as Raisa Gorbachev, the wife of Mikhail Gorbachev.
They were both agents of the West.
And so Trotsky was supposed to continue his work, but then Trotsky fell ill and Stalin took over the country.
I repeat, the idea of the global mafia is Indian fascism. Why?
Because this is the hardest fascism. Where is this hardest form of fascism in India?
It's a rigid caste system. You have the Brahmans, the Kshatriyas, the Viches, the Shudras, a rigid caste system.
And so you see the chaos the world over, in every country in the world.
Look what's happening in England right now.
You have 100,000 people on the streets demanding the release of Tommy Robbins.
Whatever his name is, you have the same things happening in Spain, in Germany, in France, in Italy.
Look at the chaos in the United States and so many other countries the world over.
What do people want? People want order.
People want a mix of Mussolini, Hitler, Pinochet, Franco, and Stalin all in one.
And if you go back to Russia in the year 2000, Russia was completely out of control. It was chaotic, destroyed.
It just came out of the default in 1998. The country was on its knees.
Yeltsin passes the baton to Putin. Why Putin?
We're talking about small guy, discreet, no team, very modest, very hardworking.
And so the leaders saying we control him through the global mafia and through Putin we take control of Russia and it won't take more than a year.
And what did the year 2000 begin with? With the sinking of the Kursk submarine by the United States government.
And just a little bit before that, in late 1999, several explosions in residential blocks killed more than 300 people in three Russian cities, including Moscow.
And then in 2002 Chechen militants seized the Dubrovka Theater in Moscow, 130 dead, many caused by toxic gas used by Russian special forces after the hostage crisis lasted several days.
And then in 2004 there were several attacks, suicide bombers killed people in the center of Moscow Metro, blew up two airplanes.
The massacre in the school of Beslan shocked the country when the armed Chechen militant terrorists stormed a school on the 1st of September.
Okay, 334 dead, more than half of them are children, etc. etc. And people are saying, you know, God save us.
Okay, end this chaos, you know, give us order, you know, any system you can, anything. We will accept any system.
But please give us peace. And so this is exactly what we can expect in the United States.
Okay, Trump has just taken over the wars. It's for survival. It's life or death.
The liberal banking financiers, okay, because again you have to understand the United States is not a homogeneous country.
These are two countries, okay, divided literally in half. You have the red states, you have the blue states.
They hate each other. They're totally different in every possible way, shape and form.
Okay, and so you're going to have attacks and counterattacks, which is why again, I'm not at all surprised.
And it doesn't really make a difference if, you know, some, if the people on the plane, the pilots on the helicopter,
they were controlling, you know, the actual flight pattern or it was controlled, you know, remote control.
It doesn't make a difference. The point is this, you're going to see it all over the country.
Okay, you're going to have subway stations being blown up. You have tons of people are going to be killed.
You're going to have, you know, unnamed terrorists. They're going to blame it on Iran. They're going to blame it on Venezuela.
They're going to blame it on ISIS. It doesn't matter. You just have to understand the reason why this is being done.
And the reason this is being done, we have reached the end of a model, okay, model based on infinite growth.
You can't have infinite growth on a finite planet. Okay, and before you had two models, economic models, okay,
you had the Soviet socialist model and you had American capitalist model.
Okay, each had its own advantages and its own disadvantages, some strong points and so on and so forth.
But these two groups, they coexisted between the end of World War II and 1989 or 1991.
At that time, the Soviet model collapsed and the West took over the Soviet space, which was about 40, 45 percent of global economy.
Again, because capitalism is a very dynamic system, it expanded into the Soviet space and took it over in very few years, in 17 years.
But then in 2007, we had the beginning of the end. They called it the Lehman Brothers Collapse, a subprime crisis.
It wasn't subprime, wasn't Lehman Brothers Collapse. It was the beginning of the end of a model based on infinite expansion on a finite planet.
Okay, so I'm going to talk about that in a little while.
So that's a kind of a way of introduction. So again, be ready for a lot of violence in the United States, a lot of violence,
because it's a fight to the death and only one side can win.
And the liberal banking financiers, this is the global, you know, cartel, the global mafia, okay.
They've been painted in the corner. They have no way out. The only way out that they have is global war.
And this is what they're pushing as hard as they can. So let's talk about Trump. What is a Trump?
Again, it's important to understand that Trump is not a person. Okay, you can divide this into Republicans and the Democrats.
And the whole thing of dividing into, that's the devil's work, the devil divides. Okay.
And you have to understand that all the Republican presidents, whether we're talking about the Bushes,
whether we're talking about, it doesn't make a difference. We're talking about the Democratic presidents, Obama and company.
This is the same party. It's a global party. The only difference between the Republicans and the Democrats until the arrival of Donald Trump is the abortion.
Everything else was absolutely the same. Okay. So the idea is it's not a fight between the Republicans and the Democrats.
It's a fight between the global banking financier cartel, okay, who can survive only at the expense of others and isolationists,
nationalists, industrialists. These are the people in Trump represents. This is the face.
Now you have the IT sector. Well, that's a different story. We'll talk about this a little bit later again.
So again, so what is a Trump? Okay. You have to understand that beginning back in 1981,
the growth of global economy in one way or another was in essence driven by a redistribution of US dollars printed by the Federal Reserve
and passed through the Federal Reserve system. And that process is controlled by International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organization,
and other global Bretton Woods institutions. And so for all this talk about Bretton Woods system being abolished back in 1971,
the truth is this, International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, World Trade Organization, all of these are Bretton Woods created institutions.
The system is alive, albeit wearing a different mask. And so on the whole, everybody understood that money printing requires assets to back surplus money.
It's easy. You don't have to be an economist to understand this. And so in the 1980s, the role of assets was played by various newly emerging derivatives.
In the 1990s, at the beginning of the 2000s, those were assets that appeared as a result of the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
A proposal, the United States had two approaches at the time. The first approach implied using assets taken from the Soviet Union to cover debt accumulated in the 1980s
and then start from scratch. And that was the approach of the Bush administration, George H.W. Bush, who didn't want to dismantle the Soviet Union.
There was yet an alternative approach to embezzle everything and make good use of those assets.
And that was done by the Clinton administration, what became known as the Rape of Russia period of the early to mid 1990s.
And for that reason, people who emerged in Russia as affiliated units of the Clinton team, in other words, I'm talking about the entire financial and economic structure of today's Russia, today's Russia,
the financial block in Russia today in 2025, not 10, 20 years ago today, it's still under the control of the Democratic Party of the United States of America,
which is why Trump and Putin are on the same team. They may not need to be on the same team in every sense of the word,
but they're on the same team in a sense that they share the same enemy, global liberal banking, satanic cartel. And they are both and also Xi Jinping also is part of this team.
The three of them share the same enemy, which is stronger than each of them individually because it's a global mafia.
And that is why the three of them need to get together and solve that as the first issue of business.
And so in any case, to continue with our story, things were rolling along smoothly.
Are you OK, Daniel? I'm OK. I'm just, you know, I'm much better now. I had like 40 fever all week, but I'm fine. Just coughing. But I'm fine.
OK. But beginning in the early 2000s, it became clear that there were no assets left.
And so the United States government decided to print money back by completely fictitious assets, which they called subprime mortgages.
And by 2008, we know what happened. The entire system imploded. In fact, 2008 crisis was a twin of the pre-war Great Depression that began with the US stock market collapse in October 1929.
And then the spring of 1930 saw a deflation shock and the crisis itself commenced in 1930.
And further on, unlike the 1930 crisis, the American monetary authorities, mainly the Federal Reserve, for the first time openly started to issue an issue of money not supported by any asset at all.
But the question is, why did it not have any impact on inflation? Because the problem was caused by the changes in the structure of money supply.
In other words, the credit multiplier dropped by a factor of four between 2008 when it was 18 and 2014 when it was only four.
And so hard money supply subsequently soared four times from zero point eight trillion dollars to three point three trillion dollars.
That means that Washington simply printed two point five trillion dollars with no inflationary impact.
Now, in 2014, I want to remind you that Barack Obama stopped the printing presses. Why?
Because a fall of the credit multiplier to less than four would kickstart a process called nonpayment crisis.
After that, in 2012, Barack Obama won the election in early 2013.
For the first time in 35 years since the beginning of Reaganomics, he eliminated Barack Obama, all the representatives of Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan from his economic council.
And in 2014, Obama suspended money printing.
It's absolutely clear that the only chance for financiers to ensure money printing in this context is to control the Federal Reserve System of the United States or take control from the White House, which is what we're seeing right now.
The fight between Powell and President Donald Trump.
And that is when the bankers financiers going back to 2014 started to promote a certain person, Hillary Clinton, okay, to the post of president of the United States.
The alternative group, the isolationists behind Donald Trump, also began to position themselves for the coming 2016 general elections in the United States.
So the split, just so you understand, happened.
Hold on a second.
The split happened, not between the parties, as it was in 2014 or forever in the United States, but within the party.
And the Republicans won because the plan to switch on the printing press to save the global financial system was associated with the Democratic Party, while the plan to save the national economy was associated with the Republicans.
That was the case in 2016.
That's the case this year.
And the most prominent isolationist, that is the advocate of defending the national economy, was Rand Paul and Trump from the Republican Party and paradoxically now Bernie Sanders from the Democratic Party.
And that is why President Obama initially stood firmly behind Sanders. And then, you know, without much fan he decided to back Hillary Clinton.
And so the chronology of the events is simple to follow.
We had the Dominique Strauss con affair in 2011. We had Goldman Sachs scandal in 2013.
Obama stopped the printing of money quantitative easing in 2014 and 2016 we had Brexit in United Kingdom and Trump's victory in the United States.
And that brings us to the 2016 United States presidential elections.
The 2016 elections. So we understand what a Trump is was very different from the previous vote, because for the first time in many decades the contenders represented to completely divergent models, rather than slightly varying versions of the same economic model and such a model.
So you required a network of institutions that supported dollar denominated transactions and legalization of the amounts that were printed.
Generally speaking, the broader the dollar were used, the more dollars were needed, so more had to be printed.
And this is not a trivial job because you cannot entrust legalization to just anybody.
Okay, and the United States banks were banned from having subsidiaries, in other words, to support competition.
So this led to the establishment of special transnational financial institutions that would have offices in every city and every financial important street in major cities.
But it would take a lot of money to maintain such a vast network, while the profits they make are not sufficient, provided they engaged in ordinary commercial operations.
To put it crudely, the focus was made not on commercial viability, but instead on creating a presence that would cover all of the planet's economic areas.
And therefore, as long as the world was demonstrating economic growth, and more importantly, the money was printed, it made sense to preserve and develop the network.
And so the total profits, they were enormous and some of it could be easily diverted to general goals.
But in 2008, saw the start of a crisis that shrunk the bank's revenue significantly.
And in 2014, the United States cut its printing volumes.
It printed, in other words, just enough money to support its budget deficit.
And so the United States dollar couldn't expand further.
Inflation was inevitable, but the US couldn't allow it.
As a result, transnational banks ran into trouble.
So what we're seeing right now as well.
And they became aware of this issue back in 2011.
So the bankers and the financiers, what they did is they tried to take the issue of global currency out of the US hands.
In other words, they wanted to steal the US dollar from the US and give it to themselves.
Okay.
Through what became known as the Central Bank of Central Banks.
In other words, Bank of International Settlement in Basel in Switzerland.
And the idea was it would be a supranational institution that would have the exclusive right to print the global currency during the financial crisis.
Okay.
Now, the US dollar would remain a national currency and its issue would be limited by the amount set by the central banks of central banks.
And so at the G8 meeting at the time, at the G20 meeting, it was already everything was decided.
There's a whole bunch of documents which actually show the paper trail.
Okay.
It was all set up under the International Monetary Fund that the global financial institutions would take the whole thing of printing US dollars out of the Federal Reserve and give it to the international institutions.
But then came the Dominique Strauss scandal.
I'm not sure if you remember that scandal or not.
But Dominique Strauss count who was the general director of International Monetary Fund.
He was caught in the in the hotel in New York with some waitress or whatever or somebody who worked at the hotel some some black woman from Dominican.
It was the maid.
Yeah, whatever it was.
The whole thing was a setup.
Okay.
It was simply a message.
Of course, I let him go after a while.
Okay.
But it was simply a message to the international financial institutions that the United States government is not going to hand the control of the US dollar to them.
Okay.
And when that message became clear, they let Dominique Strauss come or can go.
Okay.
So that's that's a very important issue to keep in mind.
Okay.
If we talk about the elite and I think it's important to talk about the elite because we talk about the elite people think of the Bilderberg group.
Unfortunately, it's it's I'm very sorry.
I wrote that stupid book which sold millions of copies the world over in 70 countries because people understood for whatever reason it is.
Okay.
I guess you simplify things to lowest common denominator.
Okay.
That these people these they whoever these they are.
Okay.
We don't know who they are.
We don't see their faces.
Everybody talks about Jewish Masonic conspiracy, Illuminati all seeing eye all this all this stuff.
And when my book came out on the Bilderberg is back in 2005 suddenly these they had a name a face who could see what they did.
We got the record of their deliberations and stuff.
But the only reason I wrote that stupid book is because when I was coming out of the intelligence work with the with the Russian military counterintelligence, I needed to eat.
We had a lot of information on the Bilderberg is because you know back in the 50s when the group was founded, it was a fairly decent level influence group.
It wasn't it was never top of anything, but it was decent enough.
And so we had a lot of information on them, a lot of documents, a lot of photographs, faxes, everything.
And so I realized if I were to write this book, I'd need to show people photographs and all kinds of other things because otherwise they wouldn't believe it.
And suddenly when my book came out, we had like 200 pages of documents and photographs, all kinds of stuff, you know, faxes and handwritten notes from Prince Bernard, you know, to other government officials in other countries.
Suddenly people went ape shit and I said, ah, so these are the people who run the world.
It wasn't the case.
Anyway, the reason I'm saying this is because a lot of the times when we talk about the control mechanism, the people who really run the world from behind the scenes, the world's ruling class, we need to understand that it's not Bilderberg.
And so these real masters of history, masters of whatever you want to call them, they're high ranking officials, whether we're talking about, you know, their representatives, presidents, prime ministers, their representatives of the elite.
Okay, the think tanks, they clearly realize this fact.
Okay, what we're talking about, and they reacted the best way they could.
They realized the United States had absolutely no inkling whatsoever to hand over control.
And although Obama is a traitor, he realized that, you know, he'd be running into some serious issues with the people who run the United States if he were to hand over the control mechanism, which is the printing press to international global concern.
Okay, now, so some people believe that this global elite, only supranational structure of global coordination like the Bilderbergers or the Club of Rome or the Trilateral Commission of Council on Foreign Relations, because that's what they know.
Okay, we can also talk about the, you know, the famous Rothschilds or the Rockefellers.
Okay, so the thing is, as far as these two are concerned, despite all their wealth, their history, their power, they're not omnipotent.
These families, which have already become, you could say, had hierarchies, okay, are only one element, albeit very important, and deliberately demonstrate development of a much more complex whole.
And so supranational structures of this global coordination and management, despite their importance, are not so much subjects.
At best, you could say they're second level subjects, but tools, their platforms, local stand if you wish.
They can make certain decisions, but the basis of these decisions are the agreements previously reached between the main groups of the world elite and their environment.
And so the fact that we have, you know, airplanes falling out of the sky, then after, you know, the thing with in Washington, you know, a small plane allegedly fell out of the sky in Philadelphia.
I mean, I saw the debris. I didn't see an airplane. Okay, I also didn't see a hole. I mean, that thing traveling at that speed, you can easily calculate, you know, the size of the, there was nothing there.
So where is the airplane? What actually fell? What was that? Okay, we don't know.
They told us it was an airplane. There was no reason to believe it was an airplane. But this kind of stuff you're going to see happening all over the United States.
And so when you start seeing all that stuff, okay, don't be surprised. It's the war, because there's no agreement in place.
Sealed in blood. And so I guess in a simplified form, and Trump, of course, he understands that.
In a simplified form, the current global elite consists, you could say, of four large groups.
One of the monarchists and part of the aristocratic families of Western and Central Europe, led by the British and the Dutch monarchies.
Of course, I'm not talking about the Windsors, nor talking about the representatives of the House of Orange.
Can they compete with the really ancient dynasties represented by their descendants, the Arvignans, the Ruriki, the Genghis, for example.
That'll be the one group. Another group would be the Vatican, the Catholic religious orders.
We're talking about religious military intelligence. Whether we talk about Opus Dei, the Jesuits, the Knights of Malta,
and the aristocracies closely associated with them from Northern Italy, Southern Germany, Spain, Scotland.
The third group will be families of finite seers, bankers, and large industrialists of the United States and Britain.
In other words, the Anglo-sphere, or Anglo-American and American English clans.
And finally, the diasporas. Talking about the Jewish diaspora, the Armenian diaspora, the Lebanese diasporas are very powerful.
And the representatives of the four groups of the global elite, in one way or another, directly or indirectly, openly or secretly,
are present in most supranational structures. So let me give you a concrete example.
Both the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, they were both present in the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.
I've never been talking about the representatives of the diaspora.
And if you look, for example, at the current Capsaicin-inclusive capitalism, with the Vatican, you have the Vatican, you have the Rothschilds,
you have foundations, corporations, supranational structures, often express and represent the interests of certain global parallelogram of forces
that formulate the interests, which of course does not exclude their activity in any given situation.
And so also similarly, although not in equal proportions, you have four groups of globalists present on all the levels of the vertically integrated global economy.
The top floor, I guess you could call it, is the big tech. The next level, these are the capital management funds.
The next level, the financiers who make money out of nothing. And the fourth floor, the corporations, the military-industrial complex, etc.
And so the big tech, these are the owners of large social information platforms that control the main means of production of this post-capitalist system.
In other words, information flows, social networks, individual groups, behavior, for example.
We're talking about the Bethesda, the Zuckerbergs and company. And they strive to gain a foothold at the top of the world economic pyramid.
And they are the main enemy of industrial capital, or the part of the financial sector that this capital serves and the state of bureaucracy.
So these are the corporations that control the social media. In other words, we're talking about the Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, etc.
What are the goals of this war? Well, the first is the establishment of control over intangible factors of production.
Behavior, needs, value, image, for example. This is what's called the social digital, that's what the digital platforms do.
The second task is the expropriation of the embodied labor and capital that small and medium-sized businesses have.
Now how do they do this? It's done very simply with the help of one version of Schwab's stakeholder capitalism and the second is inclusive capitalism, which is the Rothschild program.
In other words, in fact, under the pretext of capitalism for all, capitalism itself is being nullified and some may say it's kind of a strange thing to do.
No, capitalists nullify capitalism. Yes, because capitalism as a system has worked on its own and in order to maintain power and privileges,
the current capitalist elite need to become something else because capitalism has reached the liberal and the liberalist level.
And that's why they become something else because capitalism has reached the limits of growth within this economic model called Bretton Woods.
There's nowhere to expand. And so they're dismantling capitalism as we speak. And that's what New World Order is all about.
Something else. It's about undermining the economic base of working class and the middle class through the green economy.
That's also a very important element of this deindustrialization.
And undermining the position of industrial capital, which is a competitor to financiers.
So the industrialists on the one hand, these are the people behind Donald Trump, and you have the financiers, these are the people who may create money out of nothing.
These are the people who are the enemies of Donald Trump.
And so again, remember that Trump's social support was first and foremost industrial capital.
And when Trump said, let's make America great again, he meant great America was the industrial America of the 1930s to the 1980s.
So you wanted to bring back the winning forces that came to power on the Roosevelt's New Deal.
So another question is, what world are the global elite building right now?
Well, so much has happened over the past 12 months, but I think the main event, the main one in terms of content, was and is the social war of the upper classes against the lower classes taking place on the global scale.
Back in the 1990s, Christopher Latch, an American sociologist, he coined the term the revolt of the elites and the title of his book, which is a very interesting book, The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy.
And his thesis is striking and quite accurate.
He said that after the offensive of the masses that started back in 1910 and ended with the Russian Bolshevik Revolution in October 1917, sometime in the late 1960s,
this offensive, this impetus of the lower classes began to stagnate.
And so the elite launched their own counteroffensive and it developed because in the 1960s and the early 1970s, the capitalist system had reached a dead end.
And this was well understood in the West.
They understood perfectly well that it was necessary to change the system, that further industrial and democratic development of the political system would lead to the strengthening of the working class.
And they needed to do something, but as long as the Soviet Union existed, it was impossible to solve this problem.
And therefore first the Soviet Union, the Soviet nomenclature, the greedy and stupid Soviet nomenclature, they were dragged into this global game through the Club of Rome.
And then in the 1980s, having found in the Soviet Union itself those forces that sought to change the socioeconomic system, the Soviet Union was destroyed from within.
And the destruction of the Soviet Union allowed the West and the entire capitalist system a grace period of 15 to 20 years between 1991 and 2008.
And within this 20 year period, the former socialist camp was plundered and the West profited from it.
But then again, 2008 crisis came and we know the rest is history.
And so the subprime crisis was flooded with money, which then ceased to be money.
Because after all, money is not paper, it's a kind of an instrument.
Money has five different functions.
And if I can print trillions of dollars out of nothing, that is no longer money or finance.
This is something else.
And it was in 2008 that financial capital was transformed into financialism.
In other words, it's something that no longer related to money, but to the will of those who turn the money making machine.
And so the fight right now, just so we understand what we're seeing between Jerome Powell and Donald Trump,
when Trump is saying, I'm going to get rid of this guy and, and, and Powell is saying, fuck you, you know, you can't do anything to me.
But the same thing is happening in Russia.
Putin has been trying for 12 years to get rid of the director of the Russia Central Bank and Vyacheslav Nabokov.
And he can't get rid of her.
Putin supposedly, you know, the world's dictator, he can't touch the director of Russia Central Bank.
For the same reason why Trump can't touch Jerome Powell, because they represent an alternative system.
Nervila Nabokovna, the director of Russia Central Bank, works directly for International Monetary Fund.
And her objective is to destroy Russia's economy.
And she's been doing this very effectively for the past 12 years.
For example, today, the interest rate in Russia is 27%.
Just so we have understand what I'm talking about.
27% has totally wiped out small and medium sized business.
And the United States, the Federal Reserve is doing everything it can to destroy the United States.
And Trump's, I'm going to get rid of this guy.
And Jerome Powell said, fuck you.
And so again, it became absolutely clear that capitalism over time had to become something else.
But this required a situation in which there are no competing forces.
But the Soviet Union no longer existed, which means that it was necessary to create something else, another point of tension.
While the Soviet Union existed, they were the point of tension.
But when the Soviet Union collapsed, they needed another, something else.
In 2007, 2008, an evolutionary plan for the transition to post-capitalism was developed in the West.
And the center of this plan was the United States of America, its preservation as a group of transnational corporations.
And the plan was, the execution of the plan was to create a new system of capitalism.
And it would take 16 years.
You would have eight years of Barack Obama's presidency and eight years of Hillary Clinton's presidency.
This plan was based on the creation of two transoceanic communities, transatlantic and trans-pacific.
These communities had to compete with each other and thus create a new dynamic for the development of the system,
which would eventually evolve from capitalism to post-capitalism.
And the elite would retain their dominant position as post-capitalist society.
But then in 2016, something unexpected happened. A Trump appeared on the scene.
And those forces that were not satisfied with this option, in which platforms such as Google and Microsoft,
Twitter, etc. They voted for their candidate, which was Hillary Clinton.
And Trump nullified the elite plan. They could not restore the transatlantic and trans-pacific communities.
And it became absolutely clear to the forces that brought Obama to power that the United States cannot be the basis of an evolutionary transition.
That something else was needed and the United States will have to be sacrificed on the altar of greed and power.
And the question arose of how to eliminate those contradictions that were usually resolved in the history of capitalism by world wars.
And again, world war is impossible from the point of view of the presence of nuclear weapons, but the world war is also a kind of a social catastrophe.
Nobody said that a war has to be a hot war. And in fact, speaking of eliminating the United States, sacrificing on the altar of greed and power,
this is exactly what we've been witnessing the four years of the Joe Biden presidency.
Exactly. They've tried, they've done everything in their power, the global elite, the liberal banking financiers during the four years of the first Trump presidency.
And then when Trump was eliminated in a fake election, the powers, the presidency was given to Joe Biden.
And this dismantling or sacrifice of the United States as a republic, it continued.
And so now we come to the point. So basically what has been happening in recent years is a form of, I guess you can call it social war between the upper classes and the lower classes.
And this is no longer just a revolt of the elite. This is a real social war.
And so a certain part of the world elite are, first of all, those who, this is absolutely new term called the accessity from the English word access.
And the accessity is these are the owners of large social and information platforms that control the main means of production of the post capital system.
In other words, information flows, social networks, individual group behavior through imposed needs, goals, opinions, etc, etc.
And so these accessities, they strive to get a foothold at the top of the world economic pyramid.
And they're the main enemy of the industrial capital of the part of the financial sector that this capital serve and of the state bureaucracy itself, which is one of the reasons again,
why Trump this time around, the first thing he did, he went after all these people, after all of them, after the financial system, after the bureaucracy, after the intelligence apparatus, because all of them are his enemies.
These are not Americans. These are the elements of the globalist controlled, globalist cartel, the global mafia that is destroying the United States from then.
These are the corporations that control the social networks. This is Microsoft, this is Apple, this is Amazon, this is Meta, etc, etc.
Now, what are the goals of this war? The first is the establishment of control over intangible factors of production, which are what? Behavior, needs, values, images.
And this is what so-called social digital platforms do. And the second task is the expropriation of the embodied labor and capital that the smaller medium sized businesses have.
Now, how do they do this? This is done very simply with the help of one version again, the Schwab stakeholder capitalism, and the second the inclusive capitalism, which is the Rothschild program.
And so in fact under the pretext of capitalism for all, capitalism itself is being nullified.
And that's something very important to understand. Now that takes me to the next subject I want to talk about.
Now, I'm sure you've heard recently that Trump has kicked off this new project called Project Stargate.
You have to understand that this Project Stargate sounds like something out of a dystopian nightmare.
A kind of partnership of mega corporations announced by US government to protect the national security of the United States and its allies and leverage the artificial intelligence for the benefit of all humanity.
Now this whole thing costs a lot of money. Okay, so you have to understand first of all, where's the money coming from?
What does it have to do with all the missing money that the United States government can't allegedly find? What does it have to do with the idea of digital ID?
I want to remind you that not long ago, American Congressman Tim Burschett, if I'm not mistaken, said that if anyone leaked where the money goes, it's going to be a disaster.
Tim Burschett, if I'm not mistaken, said that if anyone leaked where the money goes, when the Pentagon fails yet another audit, they will be killed immediately.
Right now, 52 trillion dollars is missing. 52 trillion dollars is missing from the US government coffers. The Comptroller General of the United States can't find the money.
How do you lose 52 trillion dollars and know not anything about it? It's not something you go to the beach and lose an earring or something. Where is it? It's somewhere in the sand of Cancun, Mexico.
It's 52 trillion dollars. I'm sure if they wanted to find that money, they'd know exactly where to look for it. That's on the one hand.
On the other hand, you had this thing called FASAB 56, which basically took all that missing money and drove it into obscurity. That was done under the first Donald Trump administration with bipartisan support from the House, from the Senate, and from the President himself.
FASAB 56 is called FASAB because it's Federal Accounting Standard Advisory Board.
FASAB basically allows the government agencies to alter financial statements to protect national security information.
If the US government is spending trillions of dollars to fund secret operations, my question is how do these secret operations fit in with Stargate and all those projects the American government has with Musk of going into space?
Another key piece in the puzzle is, remember Davos, I think it was last week or the week before, the delegates message was, in fact, Pedro Sanchez, Spanish President, he said that they wanted social media accounts to be linked to a digital ID wallet.
A wallet, not just a digital ID, which is what Trump has been pushing in the United States.
By the way, what Trump is doing is exactly what Biden was doing, except that you couldn't have Biden do this because we hadn't saw that tag before with the COVID thing.
People were watching very carefully, so they needed to change, get rid of Biden, put somebody else in his place, who actually could take this whole idea to fruition.
Trump is far more dangerous than Biden in that sense. Those people were saying, Daniel is pro-Trump. I can't be pro-Trump, I'm Russian.
I don't have a horse in this race. It's great as long as whatever these people do is good for us.
But you have to understand that Trump is far more dangerous and the team that he has in place and the team that he put together, that team's objective is to create a concentration camp without tears.
Needless to say, they're waiting for the backlash from the people that will try to convince them to do this.
They will convince the public to accept AI systems and all this digitalization by selling the benefits of AI and its supposed superiority over humans.
And in the meantime, they will continue to build the technological surveillance with AI serving to collect, to exploit, to weaponize data against us.
Against the Democrats couldn't have done this. You needed a Republican president to do this.
Yes, you can say, well, that's not really true because Trump banned all CBDC's project. Yes. So does that mean Trump is good? Let me explain to you.
This is what I think. Now if Trump banned CBDC's, if I am the big banking cartel, this is exactly what I would want him to do.
And so Trump's executive order is about using dollar stable coins to extend dollar hegemony and dollar stable coins are just as programmable, they're just as surveillable and just as cost confiscable as the CBDC's.
The only difference is that the central banks does not issue them directly and maintains what you can call a two tier banking system, which is what Wall Street has been pushing for to start discussions about the digital dollar in earnest.
Okay. Remember that in the United States, the digital currency is the most important asset in the world.
And the digital currency is the most important asset in the world.
Okay. Remember that in the United States, mass surveillance is a public private partnership. So the question is, why would surveillable digital money be any different?
You have $37 trillion in debt. How do you make that debt go away? Well, the easiest way, okay, is you have third thermonuclear war.
Okay. You have a third thermonuclear war. You have a third thermonuclear war.
You write off all debts and responsibilities through a big, big war. It's dangerous because everybody's got nuclear weapons these days.
What's the alternative? What's plan B? I think through the dollar stable coins, as many of them are at least partially backed by US treasury bonds.
In fact, in November, American Enterprise Institute, which is a conservative think tank,
in a very long article, they said exactly that.
Okay. And so the devaluation of the value of the dollar and most if not all fiat currencies will continue relative to gold and also real asset.
But most countries, they're in a dollar debt trap and there's no currency that offers an alternative to the dollar.
In terms of liquidity and size. And so you need a strong enough military to enforce the debt that the US dollar, that the United States of America has.
And so the dollar will remain dangerous and it will remain dominant.
But unless we the people take steps to own and invest in real physical assets, our value will continue to collect.
Okay. And also you have to understand if you look at the system, what they're doing as far as everything is concerned.
Okay. You have private cryptocurrencies, plus you have Stargate data centers, plus you have mRNA injections, plus you have immigration IDs, plus you have biometrics.
It's are simply a private cryptocurrency.
Okay. They don't need CBDC for that.
We already have a system in place.
Okay. Now, and that takes me to this whole thing about Stargate, which is a massive space strategy project.
They call this a Stargate strategy project.
about Stargate which is a massive space strategy project they call this a
Manhattan Project 2.0 and I think it's it's a lot more than Manhattan Project
2.0 okay because space is the final frontier for the first time in history
we have a chance to become an intergalactic civilization I'm not
talking about UFOs I'm not talking about you know Jedi you know expedition
reinforce from from you know Star Trek or Star Wars I'm not talking about that
at all I'm talking about real sense of the meaning of the space race and so
Musk is right when he says that it's not necessary to tackle the moon program
but to immediately tackle the Mars program you see in the 1960s when when
the United States of America lunar programs and the Soviet Union they were
competing both sides understood that Mars was the price of the lunar race now
Musk is right when he says that if we fly to Mars we will definitely be able
to satisfy our interests on the moon but the opposite is not necessary true and so
here you have two strategies okay accepted in the scientific community and
they collide you have the strategy of the slow gradual development and also
step-by-step strategy and Joe you have mastered the near-earth territory and
we're making a permanent station around the moon then we begin to explore the
moon and after that you know we eventually get to Mars and the work is
very slow it's arduous gradual it's low risk and must propose is a much riskier
strategy forget the moon go right to Mars because Mars requires a
fundamentally different spacecraft different landing takeoff modules
different life support system I would even set up a more global program to
reach the satellites of the large planets such as Jupiter or Saturn or
Uranian or Neptune starting probably with Saturn and for this we'll need an
inter-orbital ship with nuclear engines and we'll need to take take off and
landing systems that would be universal in fact you could even go further I mean
there's really no need to waste time now on the moon or even on Mars you know
with asteroids all this will fall into place eventually by itself when we have
the appropriate system to access to the satellites of larger planets and so we
talking about a system will explore the entire solar system as a whole and I
think actually it must mean something like that and for that you certainly
need a lot of money a lot of money which is again one of the reasons why when we
talking about the missing trillions you have to understand that these missing
trillions are gonna go some of them are gonna go towards color evolutions you
know changing governments you know coup d'etat but most of that money the you
know large bulk of that money is gonna go into space okay now about the moon
talking about it being possible to send helium-3 to earth from moon is
meaningless because we don't have the station that can operate on the
substance that they will not be one over the next decade and delivering cargo
from moon will be profitable if you assemble ships on the moon but they will
need to have a lunar base not a lunar not a lunar base sorry but a lunar
industrial city and this is a task comparable in complexity to exploring
exploration of Mars and the solar system and then of course the presence of water
and the moon as on Mars it allows for the establishing of bases there another
very important thing the cosmonautics can never be private it's only
conditionally private the state in the sense the United States or Russia is
managing space research badly because the state does not understand why it's
doing what it's doing this applies in the same way to the United States or
Russia and probably China the state is order okay in order is a waste of time
rather high overhead costs on the other hand private individuals cannot engage
in space research okay they can do so in low orbit which are you know already
well developed and where you have many different commercial opportunities but
private individuals cannot engage in space exploration not only because it's
expensive but also because it's impossible to predict the risks and
therefore collaboration between the public and the private sectors and space
programs are possible the state is strongly overlong strong over long
periods of time and with large amounts of money and private individuals work
better in management doing things you know quickly here and now and so making
a management decision throwing out strategies traditions and security
measures and if Musk accepts the job offered to him by Trump he'll first
demand a sharp reduction in security and inspecting requirement this inevitably
lead to many many many deaths for which Musk will be held responsible but it
will give him a head 10 to 15 years start on similar programs okay without
the government you know involved in the middle and all this great success in
space where you know it was achieved precisely thing thanks to these kinds of
structures for example in Soviet Union Karalev his design bureau was founded by
the Soviet government but kind of made decisions completely independently and
from this point he was the leader who took responsibility for everything that
happened but he was a thousand percent backed by the government and so this
type of construction has always worked you can talk about the Third Reich the
Messerschmitt design bureau only Messerschmitt made decisions and and and
only he could afford to say I myself will decide who's a Jew in my design
bureau okay and so here and company they paid you know for all the guarantees
what I see here is not a desire to transfer space into private hands but to
revive the structures that are characteristic of relatively totalitarian
a completely totalitarian regimes when you have a fusion of the state on the
one hand with private administrators and so you have the creation of structures
that take advantage of the capabilities of both and this is exactly what the
United States will do by the way this is an absolutely correct strategic decision
and they will get the results so Trump understands the importance of space okay
Trump understands the meaning of conquering getting there first while
Gorbachev for example in similar conditions he single-handedly destroyed
Buran program which by that time exist as a ready-made launch vehicle already
made reusable ship and the entire launch system that was created for this and he
destroyed this because he believed that space was no of no use to anyone with
the collapse of the Soviet Union it seems that Donald Trump has taken this
Gorbachev mistakes into account and he will continue to pursue space no matter
what and I want to remind you something else okay that for example Jules Verne's
novel from the gun to the moon okay takes place in the United States after
the Civil War and the main character is sent to the moon by by American gunners
who needed to find another use for it this is very interesting logic okay Jules
Verne talked about this way back then and so the United States of America is
now entering a period of internal Christ like the one for example that Russia
experienced back in the 1990s and it took Russia a long time to get out of
the crisis in fact more than 10 years and the system of government created
after the crisis in general and as a whole did not and does not have any
major innovations in relation to the former Soviet Union in other words we
the post-soviet Russia we have created nothing nothing zero and we still today
live at the expense of the Soviet Union especially the Stalinist Soviet Union
everybody talks about a Roshnik okay but that is you can fact was created by
Stalin in 1952 just to give you an idea how far ahead Stalinist Soviet Union was
towards today you know Soviet or opposed Russia okay the system is based
on hierarchy subordination personal loyalty which provides certain guarantees
of stability but on the other hand it creates many problems and war conditions
were not only loyal but also intelligent and loyal people are needed and so Russia
came out of the crisis of the 1980s and the 1990s in its traditional way okay
and we did not create any new structures and so now the question arises whether
new structures are needed in relation to management in relation to resettlement
in relation to urban skeleton of the country in relation to the infrastructure
and Trump again has learned well the lesson of the dismantling of the Soviet
Union he's following a different path okay and this brings me to the
theoretical part we have two main models we have the cosmo colonialism and we
have infra colonialism and the United States is very much in the issue of
cosmo colonialism so with China and I guess to a much lesser extent Russia and
the idea of the project of course is not to start transporting as I said helium
3 from the moon or diamonds from the asteroid belt it will still be more
expensive on finding them on earth but to create a colony it doesn't matter
it's on Mars it's moon the satellites were it's self-sufficient colonies which
would force us to radically transform our economic system and the reason I'm
talking about space in case someone is wondering why is this guy talking about
space what does have to do with Donald Trump it has to do with a with a fact
that we have reached the limit of growth on the planet earth which means that we
can't grow anymore here okay we've reached the limits of growth you can't
expand beyond the space of the planet earth itself they were able to do that
after World War one and World War two by destroying all these countries all these
contents and then rebuilding you can't do that right now because everybody has
nuclear weapons which means that there's a good chance that they'll kill each
other there'll be nothing left to you know to rebuild and that's why the whole
concept of space has become so important and that's why it's so necessary to have
all this stolen money which is now is gonna go towards this project now they're
talking about 500 billion dollars that's that's chicken feed that's nothing
that's nothing that's a drop in the bucket it's less than zero we're talking
about projects that are worth hundreds of trillions okay hundreds of trillions
of dollars they already have at least 52 trillion maybe more we don't know and so
the idea right now what we're seeing right now the Stargate project this is a
project for conquering space this is a necessary project because if we reach
the limits of growth on the planet earth and we need to find another model to
keep growing you can grow up or you can grow down growing down meaning you built
out infrastructure under the planet earth and that's what they're doing
underground bases underground cities all kinds of things but that's not enough
okay because the future of mankind is in space and this is the first chance we
really have to become an interplanetary civilization intergalactic and that's
why if you're the global elite their idea is deindustrialize and you
deindustrialize which is exactly what it means which is what we're seeing right
now you destroy industry okay you go back to the way things were a long long
long time ago which is why they're talking about saving the planet earth and
the animals and the whales and the Amazon rainfall at the expense of what
that humanity and the Club of Rome they came up with their own version of you
know the of back in 1972 with their report called the limits to growth
where they're talking about that you know the real enemy of humanities is is
all the planet earth and humanity itself okay and that's why again it's so
important right now that the next arms race is a space race and that's why the
fight for survival between the United States Russia and China Russia is way
behind on this way behind and the United States its main enemy is not even China
or Russia it's the global financial cartel and that's why it's so important
that this project actually gets somewhere okay now what is exactly does
it mean if we're talking about space we're talking about nuclear energy we're
talking about closed cycles and all a production form as automated robotic
mining complexes that find everything you need on Mars and you start working
on producing things there which is a closed biological cycles cycle system
absolutely clean using absolutely all the waste this is fundamental step in
development of humanity and the country that takes this step begins to receive
what in English is called easement in other words non-possessory right to use
or take advantage of another's property without owning it because if you can
make a base let's say in Mars okay and I mean all the natural resources there
etc and then extracting oil on earth is not a problem for you this can be done
at a level of small business because you become so advanced and the
capitalization of its entire territory increases the country becomes virtually
indestructible and a nuclear conflict because you can calmly place let's say
two dozen missiles on the asteroid belt and politely inform your potential
opponents of the consequences and the only drawback of this strong
construct construction called cosmo colonialism is that it's immensely
expensive how expensive I don't know but again they have 52 trillion dollars to
start with and this brings me to the last point we're talking about Cosmo as
well as our infra colonialism it requires a radical change in the world
financial system and obviously again we're talking about a lot of money
because these projects they will not give you any return on capital in four
years in ten years and 20 years this is a question of maybe a hundred a hundred
and twenty or hundred and fifty years after which you get a colossal step of
development but you need a financial instrument that will allow you to live
for those 100 years and this moment it doesn't exist let me explain simple
money is money you can freely convert as numbers complex or long money can have
many different components and some of these components are scaler in other
words the balance sheet currency and some are vector which is in other words
project money aimed at certain I guess you could say changes in the world in
other words money is used for accumulation the so-called long or
easement and for accounting issues which is a completely different thing so this
is a fundamental element of the financial system so instead there was
once the idea of creating derivatives but the derivatives economy because it
doesn't have a pronounced material carrier has the ability to separate from
the real and therefore doesn't really work because they turn into an object
of blatant speculation and we know what happened again we're talking about long
money which is pleased a hundred years or more but does humanity really need
space or cosmos because a lot of people say what what do images of distant
galaxies you know bring beside aesthetic pleasure answer spaces politics and the
United States of America has made it an intrinsic political necessity and even
if we go into astral politics we still remain tied to earth for a very long
time we can build colonies on Mars we can build colonies on the moon but these
will be colonies for hundreds of people I mean we really haven't gotten into
space I'm not saying this is a conspiracy theory theories who believes
into flat earth theory and so on and so forth but compared to billions of
Earthlings the fact that two or three hundred people have gone into space
doesn't really change anything at all okay but the realization that earth
ceases to be whole but becomes only a part of changes the picture of the world
enormously and so the United States does this because of the need for
ontological change in people because it changes the mythology and the ideology
of its part of humanity but the problem is this any culture that lives in linear
time and will live in linear time either develops and goes beyond the boundaries
of the borders or stops developing and enters into what's known as cyclicity
and even in this sense we need cosmos and if we talk about the applied sense
of space exploration then for example geology cannot be a normal science until
we have a comparison with other planets for example and so we're working with I
guess you could say unique object but we cannot draw conclusions based on this
unique object because the basis of this geological science is a little
spherical tectonic plates draw the planets for example have tectonic plates
or is this is only a feature we don't know this and therefore cosmos is
important for us as the only opportunity for the planetary reflection we're
really talking about a new step in civilizational development okay so again
to kind of summarize what I said so far I'm gonna just do it more I'll stop
Daniel Daniel Daniel your volume went down you touched something in your volume
went down on your mic how's this now is this better no still low well like the
mic switched to a different mic maybe hello hello is this better no you you
um your hand touch something Daniel and it suddenly went down so I don't know
what that was you you were throwing your hand about and you hit something
about this hello no hello could it be your headphones you I think we're
hearing you through a different mic like your laptop mic things Tom why not
no no that's but that is the problem Stephen be quiet so that Tom can hello
hello hello is it better now yeah if you go to the like you're gonna mute your
mic and you hit the little up arrow carrot but you might be able to select
the right mic how's it how's it now is it better yeah no yeah one two three four
yeah better yeah is that okay now yes well yeah even fire Stephen okay okay so
just to just to summarize what I said so far
Trump is a face of one of the two groups fighting in the United States for
control he may be the president of the United States but he's still not in
control there's a lot of never Trumpers in the Republican Party of the deep
state you have the you have all kinds of elements you know within the system
itself that are clearly against Donald Trump there's no guarantee at all that
he's gonna win this fight okay him being killed is still very much on the table
they're still gonna try you know to get rid of him one way or another okay this
is just the beginning I need this to say the biggest concern for the global elite
is that the Trump and Putin are gonna work together and so Trump has set
himself a goal but again all of this now the whole thing about space I hope it's
clear if you can't expand within this Bretton Woods economic model on the
planet Earth because you've reached the limits of growth you have nowhere to go
you need something else which means you need to go up or down and that's whole
thing about space exploration and artificial intelligence and everything
else that they're working on right now okay now that's it Trump speaking of
situation in Ukraine has set himself a goal of ending the war over the next 100
days now the end of 100 days comes in arm comes in early May which is good
sign for Russia because nine of Maine is the our victory day the victory parade of
the Red Square against the Nazi Germany I think it's a mistake to think that
Trump is on Russia's side okay he himself make it very clear that he is on
the side of the United States of America and every everything else are only
interests to him from the point of view of the American interest and so far the
territorial claims of the United States of America and Russia they do not
intersect in any way now Trump needs peace okay he will need to put pressure
on both sides of the conflict Ukraine has already made a number of statements
starting that you know for example that Europe must now pay for the maintenance
of Ukrainian army which has a million troops and at the same time Europe has
barely enough money to pay for the maintenance of its own army okay now both
Zelensky important they will be under a lot of pressure and I'm not so sure
about what Jerome Corsi said that you have internal pressure on Putin again I
come from Russia's military counterintelligence I know all these
people like the back of my hand okay you have two Russia's you have one Russia
does does not want anything to know about the war which are the oligarchs
most of people who live in the big cities you know war it doesn't touch them
in any way shape or form okay it has much impact on their lives as it does on
Stephen on your life which means zero and then you have people who are fighting
in the you know Ukrainian form of territories you know the Russia's
deplorables and which are the same as America's deplorables you know we're
giving a lot of little that they have you know to the front and to the army
okay and so you have two Russia's who absolutely are totally at odds with one
another they don't understand each other they don't like each other they live in
totally different galaxies okay and put this is basically a catty horn he is he
is an arbiter he was made an arbitrary was you know he was selected by by by
Yeltsin to be his his heir apparent and basically you know put his job was you
know to be the arbitrary an arbitrary in football between different fighting you
know groups that are fighting each other for control of Russia okay and he's been
able to do that fairly well but he is not really in control and that's
something you have to understand for as much as putting would like to do he's
not doing might because he can't there's just too much power in other people's
groups heads but that said okay his you know needless to say biggest support
group is the military and so to think that there's anyone out there who can
actually do something to put but he goes and tried that a couple of years ago in
2023 we know how that turned out okay but again the the situation will on the
front will determine that the you know the future of this war and more of a
Trump's Trump's pressure will be aimed at breaking the weak aside which is I
needless to say is Ukraine the situation in any case no matter what happens is
beneficial to the United States because by investing minimal resources in the
war okay which were invested by the Biden administration Trump can emerge as
you know as the one who dictates peace and Russia and especially Ukraine they
have nothing to counter with and Trump has already gained an advantageous
negotiation position the problem with us the problem with Russia we have no
ideology we have no idea who we are like the Soviet Union when you exactly we are
ideology you have conceptual base okay we have no idea who we are we have no
idea we were fighting this war we have no idea when this war ends we have no
idea how we can determine if we actually won this war okay in football a team
that scores more goals wins usually the game okay in the Second World War the
Soviet Union won the war how did we know that we won the war what's the is the
the image of victory the red flag and the Reichstag so what how do we know
when we win this thing we don't know no one knows nobody knows absolutely nobody
understands so all these questions have no answers so they have no answers
because nobody really knows beginning with the president himself and maybe he
knows but nobody else does so we have no idea where we're fighting this thing
we have no idea what people are dying oh then you know some some some very
diffuse ideas of you know of defeating Nazis if we are defeating Nazis now why
are we selling gas and oil and and and and aluminum and and nuclear energy why
are we selling this to our enemies why are we selling you know billions of
dollars worth of gas and oil and and and uranium to the United States if they are
our enemies why are we doing this because Russia is a quintessential
capitalist country and those people are saying Russia's common Russia's as
communist as I'm Chinese okay there's nothing communist or socialist about
Russia nothing at all zero okay the country's totally run by the people of
zero allegiance to Russia zero the same the liberal banking financiers who
control the United States absolutely the same and so we can't possibly win more
than the United States because it's a monetary proposition in a negotiation
the United States wins and so initially Ukraine's position is extremely
disadvantageous since it must accept any demand and rely on the protection and
interests of the United States that's not a good sign because the United
States of America will defend exclusively its own interests Trump for
example banned a to any country for 90 days including Ukraine for the exception
of Israel and I think Egypt and so again in such a situation the United States
wins no matter what Ukraine's loses no matter what and as far as Russia is
concerned it remains to be seen we cannot win more than the United States
and peace will depend on America's position so trouble create from his
personal point of view a world that is suitable for both sides the problem is
Trump has no idea what this war is about he relies on reports from the CIA from
his intelligence so that this report is garbage you know you stole a few days
away said so publicly that you know put things are not going well over a
million dead actually is about 250,000 dead maybe about another half a million
wounded there's a million dead in Ukraine another about two million wounded
but they're giving him false information on purpose or Trump really has no idea
what's going on and again at the same time these conditions will be completely
Trump's conditions unacceptable for both Ukraine and Russia and this is what the
conflict will develop on for the next you know three months another very
important thing to understand before Donald Trump came to power the winners of
the conflict was Xi Jinping and Erdogan and now Trump has joined them and the
position of Xi Jinping and Erdogan instantly you know vanished in other
words we have a clear loser which is Ukraine and the war will not end you
know it will not be ended by Ukraine but by the United States and Russia
Ukraine's position this war will play you know absolutely no no no what's the
what I'm looking for in the decision-making process itself no post
George is very interested in the northern Black Sea region which is very
important for its macro regional aspirations Erdogan is now the clear
winner in Syria another country you lost why did we lose Syria because we have
absolutely no idea what we're doing there in the first place why were we in
Syria in the first place what was our objective how do we define winning how
do we do all these different things if you can't answer this very basic
questions that there is no reason really to be anywhere and so where the God on
the other hand is very clear he solved the Kurdish problem and now he's
threatening Israel and everyone understand that's the length his days as
president unnumbered so talking to him absolutely makes no sense whatsoever and
is dramatically worsened his relationship with Russia okay and will
bring nothing to Erdogan also what about Europe Europe and exactly found itself
in the most unfortunate situation Russia and the United States are not allies
okay but ideologically Putin and Trump are enemies of transnational
corporations and they look at the world from the same point of view it's very
important to understand that okay wouldn't Trump they're not buddies okay
but ideologically they have the same enemy which is a very powerful enemy
transnational corporations problem with Europe is Europe has surrendered to
transnational corporations there are isolated attempts to fight the
transnationals in case such as the case of Austria the case of Slovakia the case
of Hungary but they met with harsh response okay even trying to ban for
example Germany's parliamentary party and the second most popular party in
the elections the alternative for Germany and so Europe should admit defeat
but instead it goes to Davos and chooses the date to coincide with Trump's
inauguration and response to Trump 71 or 81 however many executive orders they
express their regret that's all they could do okay and so Trump is brutally
destroying the entire globalist agenda and the only words they have is words of
regret and so the outlook for Germany for Europe it looks tragicomic the
transnationals are acting against Trump's line and the most tragic thing
that could happen is is for Germany to ban alternative for Germany this will
lead to massive protests in several regions of Germany the separation of
Bavaria is quite possible and will be necessary to respond to this with our
forces which they do not have in addition they will receive a simultaneous
harsh reaction from the United States and from Russia and so what my prediction
is that there is a distinct possibility that former East Germany is gonna go
back to being former East Germany okay they're gonna succeed from the rest of
the country and so Europe has already lost the conflict although not as much
as Ukraine but only because the fighting is not taking place on its territory and
Britain found itself in a completely ridiculous situation it's totally
isolated and in doing so it lost its role as an arbiter and was left as an
outcast and so if you look at Britain's relations with Russia they're completely
destroyed and the only thing left is war and the United States has shown that has
no intention of acting in accordance with the logic of the unity of the
Anglo-Saxon world we're seeing that right now the way it's treating Canada for
example and the point is that the United States through the NATO mechanism will
continue to rule Europe there's no strategic autonomy in sight for Europe
also because it's easy to steal from it this way and this also means that the
United States will not really get out of the war against Russia through Ukraine
because the actions of NATO and its allies determine it and there will be
okay public statements but the reality will be completely different and I'm not
even talking about the direct involvement of the American Armed Forces
in combat operations in the sight of Ukrainian Armed Forces through the
provision of intelligence data target designation guidance control of the most
complex weapon system etc etc you know combat operations of the forces as a
whole are carried out through US European command of the Joint Chiefs of
the US Armed Forces as well as NATO Supreme Allied commander in Europe
headed by US General Christopher Cavalli he's also the commander of the US Armed
Forces in Europe so forget about America leaving this conflict in peace
there's something else that needs to be understood even if the United States
publicly distances itself from the war with Russia over Ukraine and dumps the
problems of the European on the European NATO allies it will not relinquish
control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces combat operations and escalation management
why because in the event of a sharp escalation Russia for example could
resort to the use of nuclear weapons and who will clean up the mess in the end
because let's not forget the male look at Americans have many military bases in
Europe and needless to say they could also be attacked as a result of that and
finally again Britain finds itself unprecedented situation relations with
Russia worse than ever US have worsened tremendously conflict with Turkey has
arisen in the Middle East and now they're trying to pursue a somewhat
independent policy towards Europe and they have also failed to become an
independent power center it's not a question of the army the resources of
the economy it's a question of the elite Britain does not have a strong leader
who can even formulate goals and objectives of the state not talking
about the Prime Minister okay I'm talking about you know the Queen of the
King of England which means that the British deep state or deep powers and
complete disarray they were used to having the figure of Elizabeth II who in
critical situations was able to give the right advice using her knowledge and
70 years of long political experience today there is no such person in England
and it seems that the country cannot function without this individual and
it's not clear where Britain is heading and so Britain has lost eight years
since leaving the European Union has not solved any of its significant domestic
problems and has worsened its position in the economy and culture immigration and
all the other areas as well and so again Ukraine just to finish and I'm done will
be divided one way or another but the question remains as to at whose expense
this conflict will be ended and the moment the leading candidates are
Germany and France and then you know the third leading candidate is is is Britain
so again just to you know in a couple of sentences summarize everything I said the
arrival of Donald Trump on the scene okay a Donald Trump not the president
Donald Trump a Donald Trump okay as a face of an alternative global project
okay brings to light the war between two completely different camps the liberal
banking financiers on the one hand these are the global Satanists whose idea is
to live at the expense of the rest meaning destroy the rest and live at
their expense and Donald Trump as the face of industrialist isolationist
nationalists in 2016 okay Donald Trump was the representative behind Donald
Trump conceptually was the Vatican because Trump is not American president
okay remember he's part Scott if I'm not mistaken part German and so the idea
that behind me had Vatican conceptually and ideologically you had blood and soil
in other words the landed European aristocracy which is again in the United
States if you ask back in 2016 all the diocese okay the priests were telling
especially Latinos to vote for Donald Trump on the insistence of the Vatican
so was the Vatican that helped Donald Trump win the elections in 2016 because
he was their candidate okay he's not the candidate of the United States of
America's totally different concept not talking about you know a political party
I'm talking about conceptual global projects and today that fight is coming
to fruition to the point where there's no return it's now or never and the
fight is to the death and all this stuff we're seeing right now with airplanes
falling out of the sky sabotage operations that was a terrorist
operation I was absolutely whoever responsible for the black hog ramming an
airplane full of people we well saw the images made no intentions whatsoever to
veer out of the way whoever was responsible I was piloted you know by
remote control or the people on the airplane had resolved childhood issues I
don't know it doesn't make a difference it's absolutely irrelevant the point is
that you'll be seeing a lot more in the United States and so because you can't
expand on the planet Earth the dilemma for the elite how do we expand we expand
into space and that's what the Stargate project is all about the more technology
you have the more access you have to all the control mechanisms okay the easier
it is for you to create those global concentration camp without tears and
that's what's being done right now and Ukraine operation is one of the you know
key points on the planet Earth you have many others you have the Panama Canal
you have Canada you have Greenland you have Taiwan you have Russia Ukraine you
have Africa Southeast Asia you have a Latin America the entire world is that
war and that war okay is not the war between you know communists a capitalism
it's a war between the global cartels the global mafia okay on the one hand
and the forces representing again Trump is a face of an alternative global
project and this is a global war for survival unfinished thank you so much
thank you Daniel well done for getting your voice to go through okay Stephen
first set of questions to you so Daniel that was a heroic efforts with that
terrible cough you've got are you all right I'm fine I'm in seconds you know
it's if I don't talk I don't come not coughing what what was that spray you've
got as a matter of interest you don't have to tell us it's broncholine bronco
spray pro polio extract right very good does it help I don't know I don't know
I heard I heard bourbon works well but I don't drink alcohol so I would know
yeah Daniel do you know about proving causation it what do you know about
proving causation no all right no it's a difficult concept so anyway so Daniel
it's a bit difficult for me to know what questions to ask but I'll try and ask
the questions which ordinary people might ask so the thing about expanding
into space it's not a question like I think of you know human hubris thinking
they can conquer space you know how on earth are they going to travel 140 times
the distance to the moon to Mars so the moon is approximately quarter million
miles away apparently and Mars is say 35 million it's changing all the time of
course but say 35 million miles away so it's 35 times 4 it's 140 times the
distance to the moon and we don't even know whether we actually got to the moon
in was it the 1969 or the early 70s yeah it was 1969 the first moon landing
alleged first moon landing so so I've always I've been saying that you know
Elon Musk is going on about expanding going to space you know and I'm thinking
well where the hell is he going because you've got the moon our moon Earth's moon
and then the nearest is Venus or Mars and Venus is too hot and Mars is too
cold but of the two I think Mars is probably the one that you would go for
because Venus really is too hot and as far as I can tell anyway that's also
about 35 million miles away roughly so but you know so people seem to think and
I'm thinking that Musk is thinking to himself well we need to get to another
solar system but the nearest solar system apart from our solar system is is
serious which is four light years away which is an enormous distance so you
know in a man's lifetime we're never going to get there so unless we're
traveling at considerably greater speeds than we have been to the moon which was
approximately 18,000 miles an hour I think roughly so so I've been thinking oh
it's not possible it's just ridiculous you know it's human hubris but that's
not the point the point is that go trying to get to Mars will cost a lot of
money and thereby that will create a greater economy is that what you're
arguing I don't really understand the point is that it's again you you need to
you need to expand you need to evolve you if you get to eventually if you get
to the moon for example you have an isotope there called helium-3 and with
helium-3 using as the energy source you can get to you can get to Mars from the
moon in about 10 days or so right now it's over 300 days from planet Earth and
we can't get there because by the time we get there we have a problem of
gravitation basically get there as gelatin with ice okay and so there's
lots of things to consider but I think the point is again you need to start
thinking on these projects because eventually eventually okay you're gonna
want to become enough planet civilization but we're not there yet we
like in you know initial baby steps it doesn't mean we can't do this okay but
we certainly need to start thinking about this and one of the things that
these people are doing again is if you can't expand here and you can't expand
here anymore on the planet Earth because they have no model I think we talked
about this before the problem the problem the problem they have right now
is for the first time in history they have they have no language to explain
the future like what we're seeing right now Stephen we've seen twice in the past
two thousand years the first time on the old Roman Empire collapsed between the
fourth and the sixth centuries and it was replaced by feudalism and the second
time when feudalism a thousand years later between the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries was replaced by by modern-day capitalism which today is on
its deathbed which means that for the first and for the first time we have no
language to explain what's coming around the corner by language I don't mean
Russian or English or French or Spanish or Italian I mean the language of the
economy to explain to people what this new model is going to look like we have
no idea we don't have the language for it so we haven't even got the language
for it Daniel we don't have the language for it because again in the West like in
the Soviet Union we we had a totally different system which was based on
teachings of Karl Marx and Adam Smith and so I don't know if you remember when
Putin met Donald Trump in Helsinki he proposed to him to you know come up with
an economic institute and get American and Russian specialists to work together
on defining a new economic model and that's when American media went apeshit
because the people behind the media understood the consequences of that
because our system was very different and for all the stuff people are talking
about the Soviet Union was you know socialist was a was a garbage system
Soviet Union was growing 11% per year in 1991 11% okay and and Soviet GDP was
greater than today's America's global GDP okay and the Soviet Union the
especially the Stalinist model okay which over a 15 period between the the
mid-20s of the 20th century to 1940 the beginning of the Second World War the
Soviet Union went from being you know 90% agrarian 90% you know illiterate to 100%
illiterate and the second technological industrial power in the world in 15 years
okay and in fact the Soviet Union by mid 1970s had already won of the Cold War
but then anyway so it's a long story I want to get into this right now but the
point is is that the Soviet Union we had the language to explain a totally
different model which worked okay and if you combine the two models and get the
American system of economics with the Soviet system the two of them can come
up with a new model alternative model which would be the new model post
capitalist model and that's one of the reasons why you know the takedown of
Trump began when it when it began I think was in 2018 or more or less when
they met in Helsinki because the idea was they couldn't under no circumstances
if you're the deep state allow the so it doesn't seem to make sense to me but
maybe I'm missing something so you say we haven't even got the language to
explain or nobody's got the language to explain what they want in the future so
how is that gonna end well for human beings because we have previously had
the language but we still make a mess of things and and an almighty mess of that
well that's why that's why you're seeing what you're seeing Steven that's why
we're seeing what we're seeing total global chaos because nobody has the
language to explain because what's worked before okay is global thermonuclear
war global war okay that's what the Second World War was about you destroy
and then you rebuild and that's why 1945 to 1975 were the glorious 30 years you
know of tremendous growth why because you have to rebuild the entire world but
you can't do the right now because everybody has nuclear weapons so the
danger is if you actually go that way okay they're gonna wipe out the entire
world yeah absolutely what I'm trying to say Daniel why why is there this
compulsion to expand somewhere you don't ask a fully grown a human being to grow
a bit more do you the problem Steven is that the way things if you if the
system stagnates okay that it collapses onto itself so which out right now is
we can't grow any more on the planet Earth within this particular model and
this one of a good model and was it Daniel it wasn't a very good model was
a model that existed called bread and wood it has existed since the end of
World War two until pretty much more or less now it doesn't work anymore okay
because you can only expand as long as there's somewhere to expand but as you
can't expand the problem is what do you do with eight billion people so Daniel
if you had wise men why couldn't you work out a way to adapt the system we've
got so that it doesn't need to expand I just don't understand my last conference
I talked about you know this kind of thing okay so this system is a good
system let's all work together okay let's help the old grow old and you know
in peace and then and tranquility let's help the young become stronger and
wiser and more intelligent let's help each other you know to be better and
this model is the elite saying you are gonna work for me and you are gonna be
my slave and I'm gonna take you know advantage of everything that's all that
you have and what I'm done taking I'm gonna kill you I'm gonna do that with
someone else these are the systems okay they're mutually exclusive systems why
can't we it's a good question human nature against even so so we just go
headlong into a into a new world that we can't even describe at the moment not
even you can describe it Daniel well I can describe it but the problem is that
we have no language to to do something about this yeah okay Charles thank you
thank you Stephen I have a stack of questions Daniel we've got hands up so
we'll go to those first and I think we had Anders on first then John but maybe
not yes that's right Charles that's right and then Jeremy yeah Anders John
Dave and Jeremy well I've got Jeremy Dave for some reason that weird yeah go
ahead and thank you Daniel it was a great presentation and analysis superb I
would say I didn't agree with all of it but you are very close to it I think and
I would like to make a comment and then some questions okay the language is
English and the currency is gold oil gas wheat corn and collateral I'm Norwegian
scientist economist businessman turned into scientists with 30 years of living
experience in Poland and Ukraine 1992 2023 my claim the World Economic Forum
global elite is collapsing or rather splitting up a USA US dollar America
first linked to industrial and bank owners of the Fed reserves B UK City
of London EU Titanic ship without comments see Russia India Briggs China
etc the missing money I think is at Basel BIS Switzerland but the remaining
question is who owns it and controls it that's a good question I don't think
anybody really it's a good question who controls the debt I don't know yes okay
my friend I don't know my friend let me just run through so Jerome Powell is
controlled by the commercial bank owners of the Fed and he is controlled by
Trump and I will go into this but it's linked to Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan
Chase which is let's say an ally in an economic warfare between let's say USA
and the rest of the world and number one for a long time the China production
sourcing limited inflation India is next on the line and they have really a lot
of possibilities to supply cheap goods so this is not a real problem the Kovac
entered massive printing and supply chain problem problems which caused
inflation it could be fixed the Green Revolution added a massive to it a
problem easy to solve drill baby drill for there is a huge new change now since
September 22 with a blowing up of Nord Stream which is creating a massive
support for the US dollar selling US LNG gas to Europe the Ukraine War is
something which has been explained by let's say Lindsey Graham as well as Bobby
JFK jr. and it is a way to create collateral for the London EU side of
the globalist and they need that to survive okay I think the USA will be
fighting hard to keep the US dollar hegemony to engage in economic war with
Canada Mexico India and EU the owners of the US question yes I will very shortly
and the US dollar more is linked to gold and gold now is leaving London to USA
Russia is already deep into gold EU is and UK is about to go down really really
really bad like UK after World War two now I come to the questions the leaders
in EU and UK are insane into the green movement killing the business model
totally what is your comment to this analyst Daniel and finally Elon Musk you
know his main vehicle in this kind of spaceship story is his starship and I am
pretty sure that this is about launching 20,000 5g satellites into orbit low orbit
to create a matrix on order of USA Department of Defense which is run by at
moment okay it's enough Anders enough Danny there's a lot of stuff came out at me I
don't I I think I agree with you as far as Musk is concerned but again in any
intelligence operation you have you have a lot of different angles a lot of
different players because a lot of money is involved and so if we're talking about
low orbit yeah I think totally agree with you okay because again the idea of
what we're seeing right now is a global concentration camp you couldn't have
done this with the Democrats okay because people were on to them and so
they're doing the same thing with the Republicans only a lot worse okay I mean
Trump is doing exactly what you know people were afraid of except people for
whatever reason I've been totally blinded by his changing the you know
Gulf of Mexico into Gulf of America get rid of the LGBT crowd doing all these
popular stuff which is easy to do okay but if you're not paying attention to
the bigger issues and these are the bigger issues that you're talking about
okay it's you know a universal digital ID that's absolutely you know front and
center as a trap is a far more dangerous individual as far our rights and
liberties are concerned than then what's his name Joe Biden is concerned all
right thank you Daniel thank you Anders John
you mean I don't I'm struggling no not I'm struggling Daniel a little bit with
how to formulate this question I I have a unique expertise I think I'm the only
one in this room who is well read enough to teach what was left behind by dr.
I don't know if you've ever heard of him most people haven't and I'm wouldn't be
surprised if you're one of them but I'm gonna leave all the politics to
everybody else who could do an equally good job as I could ask and questions
about that and I'm gonna I'm gonna cover something that I think only I can answer
I'm gonna talk about the space like John want questions yeah I'm gonna have a
question okay I'm gonna ask you though faces the answer what is the question
dr. Jerry Brady brought up in the chat this Malafuzian idea I'll let him speak
to that that you know it's always wrong that can we be isolationist in space or
do we need someone out there to trade with that's actually a very good question
Catherine my friend Catherine Austin Fitz she's a former sub secretary of of
HUD with George HW Bush government she yeah so she and I talked about this
quite a bit a few years back I took you know how we trading within space okay
who owns the dead on the planet Earth who we're trading with in space I don't
know the answer to that question I don't know if we're trading with anyone it's
like you know there's there's evidence according to her I don't know anything
about UFOs and nothing zero but according to her and her sources okay
we're actually trading with of planetary civilization whoever these they are I
don't know I have no idea I'm not getting into it because I don't know not
because I'm afraid talk about it because I know anything about it okay so these
are good questions I can't answer them I can I can provide a parameter and
you'll just have to maybe give me some some rope here in I'll take your word
for areas I'm well yeah I'm not gonna talk about UFOs or space aliens or any
that stuff however how does this picture change if I could tell you and guarantee
you like authoritarian Lee authoritarian with authority and to your satisfaction
everybody's satisfaction that Mars is a total dead end that it is a dead planet
with nothing whatsoever to offer how does that change the picture if that
were true improvable I don't think it does because as I said in my
presentation I mean you don't in the end you go straight to Mars and then after
going to Mars you can go to you know you can colonize the moon but the idea is if
you go into even further into space then whatever further you into space you go
into you can colonize the rest on the way back so I don't think it really
changes anything at all because the idea Trump is not the you know it's not the
end of it's just you know it's a step in the right direction okay I'm gonna
leave it there because anything else I say is gonna take us off into some kind
of space that's but if you would be open to you know an offline conversation with
me we could connect through Charles I'd love to have that I think I could
areas that voice absolutely just not today you to get over my bad voice thank
you John thank you guys a couple of my questions not really feeling well
please you've done you've done well for two hours Daniel will let you go in a
moment Dave and Jeremy and then we'll finish with Stephen Dave column moving
your yeah I Jeremy first I listen all this it seems to me we're looking at an
Easter Island kind of model we're trying not to starve ourselves to death so I
saw comments at the Club of Rome was wrong I would say they were
potentially premature where does Orban fit into this story you mean the the
president of Victor yeah yeah what says he seems to have a minister of Hungary
Orban behind him is the Vatican okay which means that he is the in my last
book which came out like three years ago called global projects at war I explained
that the fight is not so much between countries between global projects and a
global project is defined by several characteristics one has to have its own
conceptual base very clear to us it has to have its own economic model and and
its own intelligence apparatus which is one for example countries like Germany
and and and Japan could never be our global projects because they're
controlled by the United States so right now you have six global projects at war
with each other one is working on you know call a new Babylon this is the
liberal banking financiers for the capital in New York another one is
global project is a great Jerusalem New Jerusalem that's based out of London
with the Cabalists the Rothschilds the British Royal Family another one is the
great European project conceptually it's the Vatican ideologically it's the
landed aristocracy and so Orban and company they're the representatives of
this global project so when Orban speaks he speaks not as the leader of Hungary
but as a representative of one global project and which in cases in this
particular case is great European global project conceptually led and controlled
by the Vatican
that it seems to me anytime you need to bring in new players this idea of
infinite growth it ultimately is you're describing a Ponzi scheme and so when I
hear about the United States that's a group growing its its population I just
don't buy that model because I think what we have to do is figure out a not
not have to expand a Mars not have to expand to the moon warning about using
money as a metric money's just a way of keeping track of who has claims to
wealth and so the question is do we have the wealth in terms of resources in terms
of manpower in terms of brain power to do things so I just want to mention that
totally yeah that's one of the reasons there's there after dismantling Russia
because it's the wealthiest country on the planet Earth and it seems to me that
the most logical pairing would be the United States plus Russia that to me
seems like a logical pair there's a seemingly you find which United States
because it's not a homogeneous country the Trump version the Trump version yeah
I'm not convinced Trump knew what he walked into but there was a trivial
thing that happened trivial on the scales you're talking about but not
trivial necessarily in terms of a move where a ton of gold moved from London to
the to I believe the United States has claimed but there's some who say it moved
to China this month big huge wad that London and there's gold defaults and
that suggests gold is still playing a role any thoughts yeah absolutely it's
a United States and London and they're at war these are two totally different
projects so for example if you look at the Middle East you have London behind
Hamas you have the United States behind Israel you look at who's behind Turkey
London is behind Turkey look at who controls the levers of power and in your
Ukraine it's the London intelligence who is controlling the levers of power in
Serbia with the color revolution in place right now London okay so the idea
is that London although they're out of Europe you know post-brexit they're
still trying to control the leaders of power in Europe okay so right now the
whole idea of the Paris-Berlin axis that's been broken and London isn't you
know taken over they don't have the problem with London as I said earlier
they've spent eight years doing nothing so they lost eight years of time which
is a big period of time to lose they don't have their own economic region
post-brexit the idea was the idea in 2016 was globalization is dead you have
regionalization of global economy and each region for it to work a macro region
you need a minimum three to five hundred million people so you'd have one region
Canada the United States and Mexico that's about five hundred million people
currency dollar Central America Latin America or South America and the
Caribbean islands that would be another region whatever they want to call it you
have the Paris Berlin axis that's European region yep China would be a
region of its own India would be a region of its own Russia would be divided
into two by the Ural Mountains I don't know if you remember back in I think it
was 2018 they were talking about having a second capital in Russia one in Moscow
one in Siberia and people didn't understand what that meant well what it
meant was is that the world was getting ready for regionalizing its economies
and because Russia is very large if you divide Russia you know by the Ural
Mountains so you have Western Russia would join Turkey and and and the the
the former Yugoslavia and Iran and then the the far eastern Russia with a
capital in Siberia would join the two Koreas in Japan and that would leave
London and the Arab world and the only way you could actually join this Sunnis
and the Shiites together is if you offer them something on a platter and the idea
London's idea was to offer these people Israel on the platter which is why if
you remember back in 2012 in an interview within your post a lady
journalist asked Henry Kissinger he said that Israel in 10 years is going to be
you know disappear that was 10 2012 and so she you know asked a question again
she said she misunderstood and he repeated the you know his answer and
then Lord Lord Jacob Rothschild somebody who's also very well informed he
basically said the same thing and the idea that Israel is gonna you know
disappear in 10 years time and so the idea in 2016 was to join the Sunnis and
the Shiites with London and you know Israel would disappear and the whole
thing with Hillary Clinton winning the elections in the United States okay was
part of the plan but she lost and so London came up with plan B that plan B
was was Macron was literally a carbon copy of Napoleon the third I'm not gonna
explain it right now who and why it's in I go and talk about in my book but it
says I think was the like the only person in the world who said Macron is
Napoleon the third and then about a year later the economists had it on the cover
you know Macron looking like Napoleon the third okay so I was dead out on that
and so the idea is again you separate the world into in two regions and
that's and and that's the idea behind what we're seeing and again going back
to our bond or bonus is a representative is the face is the face of the Jesuit
structures which is part of the Vatican conceptually and part of the landed
aristocracy ideologically in Europe.
All right Dave we're gonna get moving one more question or you're done?
No I'm done.
Okay thank you Dave excellent questions.
All right we'll save we'll save Daniel. Jeremy then finish with Stephen.
Okay great talk Daniel just a quick few things I'm just wondering whether you
wanted to comment on the mass migration that's occurred into Europe and into the
UK and UK just seems like a dumping ground now and also wondered if you I
mean Dave asked about Auburn and Hungary I was wondering what your views were on
Turkey because I don't think people are thinking about Turkey at all and how
this fits into into all of it and obviously in the UK we didn't get
Brexit we've not had nothing it's we know better Brian no no Brexit whatsoever
I think like a drug addict with these things actually make me feel better for a
few moments it's it's it's organic so it's it's you know it's it's honey thing
based but anyway it's still disgusting so if you really look at it from my high
up in our vantage point that there's similarities in in all these migrations
in from Latin America into the United States and from the Middle East into
into Europe England and Spain and France and Germany and and so on and so forth
it may surprise you but in fact behind all these migrations is the Vatican okay
the Vatican has the power structures which has been around for 2,000 years to
move anything you want now why would they be doing this exactly if you think
about it the Vatican is is Vatican is a think of Vatican is black international
okay it's the rise of the fourth right okay we're talking about right-wing
conservative structures today's Europe is pussy lanimous you know homosexuals
LGBT plus all these kinds of things where men wear skirts and you know so on
and so forth and high heels shoes and the idea is you can move into Europe all
these masses of very angry very young very hungry very religious young men
they're not families they're men young men who are absolutely appalled by what
they're seeing and through them using them you destroy all this pussy lanimous
Europe okay which has forgot to recreate and procreate and you know at least
these people have it and then what you do is the mass comes off and you have
the fourth right hardcore dictatorship okay the idea is as once you use the
North Africans on the Africans and the Muslims and the Arabs to destroy this
pussy lanimous Europe then the mass comes off and you have this hardcore you
know Hitler Mussolini Franco Stalin Chinggis Khan dictatorship which is
going to kill all these people across Europe and so the idea is that future
Europe okay is going to be and the same and the same forces are moving these
people into the United States the ideas is that Europe itself is going to be
broken up into three parts you can have you know the the First Division Europe
which is going to be again conceptually the Vatican is going to be Bavaria it's
going to be you know former East Germany it's going to be northern Italy you know
European black nobility okay that will be one and an Austro-Hungarian Empire
that's where Orban fits in as well okay because you're looking at the rebirth of
the fourth right the second Europe with the Hansa League okay Hansa 2.0 so
that would be the Scandinavian countries Holland Belgium and England
unless they you know find their own economic region which they haven't thus
far okay they try to wiggle their way back into Europe okay if they don't do
that maybe they have aukkus in Australia but then again the problem
there the main competitors the United States so you know it you don't really
know and right now the United States and England they're there at war okay it's
it's it's a war of attrition and it's it's a it's a real war because Trump
understands that you know whether we're talking about Canada whether we're
talking about England these are the enemies these are his enemies okay these
are the liberal banking financiers and so the war is is on that end and the
third division Europe we were talking about you know former pigs south of
France Spain south of Italy you know a former countries of the Warsaw Pact such
as Bulgaria Romania and as Russia takes them over which there's a really good
chance that it will okay after they win the war and so on and so forth so you're
going to be seeing a division of Europe into into three European Union is
dead I think it's clear to everybody England's elite you know there's just
too much inbreeding and so they don't really have a model they can call their
own another idea that they've had is again joined forces with with India but
that hasn't really worked out very well and so they're between you know the
hard place they don't have a model that have a language to describe their own
future okay and so I think they're gonna have a hard time and and and King
Charles III he's an income poop really you know whoever is gonna take over
afterwards I think it's gonna be too late so that's the problem that's the
problem as far as the immigration into Europe which it's an absolutely organized
system absolutely organized because it takes a lot of money and a lot of
structure to be able to move so many people across the entire continent and
you know you're talking about millions of people being moved into Europe and I
think that's I hope that answers your question as far as Turkey is concerned
Turkey is one of the six global projects okay it's the great to run it's the it's
the Sufi Tariqati project okay of the red project the so you had you have New
Jerusalem that's London you had New Babylon that's New York the financial
capital of greater Europe you have the Tehran project you have that tune that's
the Chinese global project and you have a Eurasian project with the capital of
Moscow that's not that's not putting okay it's Eurasian project it's the
rebirth of the third horde of Chinggis Khan okay these are different global
projects so one of the problems we have in Russia right now is Horton doesn't
like the idea like none of us like the idea of any kind of a union with China
okay put this spend his entire life as a colonel in Russian KGB in Dresden okay
he's absolutely he loves Germany so his idea is to turn Russia into Moscow third
Rome project okay if we become part of Moscow third Rome project over a
generation and a half European landed aristocracy will destroy our country
from within I will stop being Russian Orthodox will be something totally
different okay and he doesn't really want to go to you know to the east
although we are Asians we're not Europeans who are Asians if you look at
the size of the Soviet Russia okay and so the idea here is would be to repeat
the the Chinggis Hans project okay the first you know a grand a grand horde
project was the Chinggis Hans the second was the union between Stalin and Mao
Tse Dung which was short-lived because Stalin was killed in 1953 okay and so the
ideal before the rebirth of that project and turning the Russian-Chinese alliance
into the third horde of Chinggis Han but Putin doesn't want anything to do with
the Chinese okay most Russians don't either the problem we have we have no
ideological base so we really can't define what we are okay which means that
the Chinese will lead us which means that the Chinese have no friends they
have poodles or slaves and I don't think Russians want to be poodles Chinese
poodles or Chinese slaves and that's our biggest problem okay we have no project
of our own although we should really have one because we've always had one
okay and Russian Orthodox project is a very strong project ideologically based
but because ideology has been erased from Russian Constitution by the people who
wrote so a Russian post-soviet Constitution which has a bullet the
boys from Harvard University just to give you an idea who wrote our
Constitution okay that Constitution hasn't been changed the Constitution was
written by the boys from Harvard in the period of rape of Russia and so we have
a problem and that problem is we need to define who we are until we do all these
other global projects are gonna have ideological base and advantage over us
I mean to me Russia seems like the last bastion of Christian Europe really at
the moment well the problem is is that the idea of Moscow third Rome is that's
what they're pushing us you know and towards towards this European based
statement and put likes that idea he loves Germany because he's been agent
there all his life you know the the you know Schiller etc etc but the point is
that we're not we're not European and I've always thought the Americans have
been trying to keep the Russians and the child Germans apart because you've got
resources and manufacturing capability that's also true but it's a very very
powerful nation though the idea of Moscow third Rome there'll be a but that
would be a conceptually speaking a Vatican project okay but because Germany
is part of again we're talking about we're talking about the rebirth of you
know the the the the fourth Frank okay the Roman Empire of German nations of
Germanic nations and that's the project that Putin wants to be a part of except
we are not European we are Asian okay and there is this part of me between
exactly who we are and who we should be
all right Jeremy thank you so Daniel's voice thank you Jeremy
Stephen last couple of questions and then we'll go can I ask one simple question
did Trump know what he was getting into or did I don't know this is the guy who
said the other day that Spain is part of bricks okay this is the guy who
absolutely convinced that the one World War two he doesn't know anything about
history of jar he's a businessman he doesn't need to know I mean bush was a
need he was the president of the United States you don't need to be smart to be
president is a good negotiator he doesn't understand Russia's history has
no idea what this war is about and if you look at the minimal requirements of
you know of Trump's you know white paper and the minimum that Russia is he's
asking for which is one of the reasons we went to war in the first place
there's not one point that they have in common okay and unfortunately the
argument we have a bigger button that you do then and it works and you know
the argument they used with North Korea doesn't really work in the case of Russia
because our button is bigger and we have a lot more nuclear weapons we don't want
to go that way and put said he doesn't want to do that okay but then you also
said that what's the world about Russia all right
Stephen yeah so um Daniel so looking at Trump I think that he has an amazing
ability to connect with people he's a great storyteller you never know what
he's gonna say next so people are completely including me completely
fascinated and get drawn in and it seems to me that it doesn't really matter
whether he knows what he's talking about rehistory and all that because he has
pretty good instincts about what is wrong at least they kind of coincide
with mine but not on everything and so a lot of people are briefing against
Trump before he's had a chance to you know he's only been in power for two
weeks but they're still saying he's not the real deal you know we can't trust
Trump but who the hell can we trust you know so do you think that if you're a
reasonably decent human being that actually who do worse and follow Trump I
don't think we have a choice he's the president of the United States this is
the guy that you know the Americans decided to lead the country I think it's
a much better choice than anything else out there there's no doubt about that
okay but Trump is America first which the way it should be if you know he's a
populist candidate but America first the works in it you know in the in the
linear fashion okay Russia is a very old country we've been around for over a
thousand years okay which means you know you know the Bolshoi theater is older
than the United States of America just to give you an idea okay you know time
wise you know frame it this way okay so we have a very long history very deep
history okay we're not you know a country in in Western Africa would you
know that was some African tribal chief as its leader and so Trump you know
trying to manhandle Russia that's not gonna work okay the problem with Trump
is that you know his team he was never very good at picking the right people
and the first in his first term he had two people that he could trust General
Flynn and Steve Bannon and you know the deep state got rid of these people in a
matter of months and then everyone else on the team was you know his enemy and
Trump was unfortunately was not very good you know at picking his picking his
team it looks better this time around okay he had all these IT guys on his side
by IT guys on his side they're not his people they're traitors
unfortunately they realized you know where the power base is right now so the
kids does ring but doesn't mean that they trust them these are the people of
you know stabbing in the back time and again and then everything in their power
to to you know limit the free speech etc etc and that the same could be said for
for Elon Musk I mean these people who are traditionally from the Democratic
Party and so it remains to be seen because some of the hardcore people in
I know like really hardcore people went to bat for Trump they've been marginalized
okay like for example there what's her name Laura Loomer engaged a good friend
of mine she didn't totally marginalized she's been one of the most effective
fighters going way back okay my like nobody was on Trump's side she was like
you know right there and now she's been marginalized and so many other very
important people will be like cogs in the machine and getting Trump elected
like you know I don't know you and so that's not a good sign okay again being
president of the United States is probably the hardest job in the world
and the problem is is that Trump and Putin they can have a very good working
relationship if Trump understands that okay and he doesn't doesn't get you know
distracted but by all these other side deals which there's a good chance he
might be okay because as you said he's very entertaining but you know being a
leader and being an entertainer these are two different things so it's easy to
sit there just talk shit as we are but it's you know being actually president
of the United States it's a hard thing to do so remains to be seen okay but if
you can impose his will on the rest of the team and actually get everybody
working you know on the same team together towards you know the objective
of working with Russia because Russia is not America's enemy historically we've
saved America's ass in the Civil War had it not been for us may not have the
United States of America and the United States must never forget that okay
Daniel was JD Vance a good choice as vice president again there's there's a
lot of you know pros and cons you can you know he's invested in things which
are questionable as far as some of this you know technology is concerned but
then again I think it's too you know too early to tell I think when you know for
me the the marker is that you know when you have all these people supporting
Israel first agenda it's not America first Israel first and that's the case
then my question is what do you exactly whose interest do you really represent
okay so that for me that's a red flag more than anything else that's what means
the red flag they have all these people you know swearing their allegiance to
It's like wait a minute aren't you the you know you president of the United States
shouldn't be doing that to the United States allegiance not naturally in a
foreign country so that's one of them and the other the other is them because
remember sorry to interrupt you like you know London is very much looking for
London is actively working to destroy Israel okay absolutely actively working
to destroy Israel and the idea is to get all the Israeli money into London's
banks okay so London is absolutely behind Hamas it's absolutely behind
Hezbollah it's absolutely like London has been you know part of the Middle
East game for for you know for over a century okay go back to the creation of
the Sauds in Saudi Arabia the same could be said for Latin America before the
United States and Monroe doctrine you had London there now I want to remind
you that that Simon Bolivar the great El Libertador he forever was an agent of
the British Empire until he finally realized that in his dying days and
became the great libertadon okay but he was a Freemason working you know for the
British Empire people mustn't forget that so London a lot of interests in
the same areas of the world of the United States and then fighting them
Daniel so overall so there are a lot on our side briefing against Trump at the
moment when he hasn't really had the chance to prove it but I agree with you
that Israel's Bivoured like to say the least and also the mRNA the half a
trillion dollars which has been promised to the mRNA technology apparently I
think there was an executive order about that but anyway um what do you think of
the press secretary of the White House I don't know I mean these people are not
that these people are nothing she's very good-looking when I would I go out with
her no you know you know I like these kinds of girls I don't I can't stand
them hey I don't like these kinds of people I know what you mean yeah but but
what do you think of her competence and confidence I mean it's I don't think
it's really difficult to be competent can all things considered only she needs
to do is to tell things as they are which is a you know breath of fresh air
it's funny I think it's really funny that we're talking about you know this
and yeah I agree with you yeah but I come from a different world
Steve when I come from yeah but what amazes me is that so she what's the
name Kath no no Kathleen I have no idea what I mean yeah so she is unashamedly
conservative as far as I can see absolutely unashamedly and the British
system for example could never and certainly not the Swedish system could
never produce that woman she's 27 years old I don't know I mean we're talking
about having Alex Jones as a press secretary for a while all right come on
let's go you've sacrificed your body for the good of the group Daniel thank you
so much for doing something happens whatever it is but anyway thanks guys I'm
sorry if I just not feeling well
and edit all the cops out Daniel that's about 90% okay unlikely
Daniel said all right thank you Daniel thanks everybody time you guys are
interested on my on my webpage on my yeah on my YouTube channel Astralin TV
there's a lot of amazing videos in English and most of it is in Spanish
we have an English channel there as well do YouTube in English is called
Spanish and we also have my private channel Astralin dot media where we have
interviews with amazing people in English and Spanish it's all dubbed and
then subtitled in both languages and we do our weekly conceptual intelligence
reviews we're analyze things from much high vantage point the webinars all
kinds of stuff anyway Astralin dot media or my YouTube channel and just go
YouTube that the last two and and you have the English and the Spanish
versions you know thank you Daniel fantastic analysis wonderful to work
great work thanks everybody bye for now he's gone thank you Charles thanks
thanks everybody bye bye bye