So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International and welcome particularly
to our presenter speaker today, Amanda Vollmer, who I will welcome shortly.
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost of Wales in mid 2021, during the darkest days
of the COVID scam responses with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice, freedom
and health.
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower
and activist.
His medical specialty is radiology.
Sadly, the need for this group keeps increasing, not decreasing.
The forces of evil globally are not disappearing.
I'm Charles Cobes, the moderator of this group.
I am Australasia's passion provocateur, have been for the last 30 years.
And my jacket is red because red is the colour of passion.
The people who attend this group are indeed passionate about the aims of this group.
I practiced law for 20 years before changing my career.
And over the last 11 years, I have helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies
for vaccine damage and damage from bad medical advice.
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company based here in Australia.
We comprise lots of professions, doctors, lawyers, naturopaths, homeopaths, healers,
journalists, engineers, writers, researchers, scientists, filmmakers, dentists, nurses,
investors, financiers, patent experts, professors and educators.
I don't know why I make a distinction between professors and educators.
Maybe there is, there you are, you can think about that.
Primate experts, thinkers, philosophers, military, expilatory, police, peacemakers and
troublemakers. And we're from the UK, USA, Australia, Canada, Argentina, Sweden, Norway,
Borneo, Italy, New Zealand, South Africa, Czech Republic, Germany, Austria and from
other places. If you are from elsewhere, please put it in the chat.
Many of us thought that vaccines were OK and safe and effective up to three years ago.
But now many of us in this group proudly say yes, we are indeed anti-vaxxers.
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat.
We ask you show your name on the screen so we know who you are.
If you publish a newsletter or a podcast and you or you have a radio or TV show or you've
written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you and find you.
This group meets at least twice weekly in a true spirit of exploration and discovery
to increase our understanding of what's going on and how to more effectively preserve and
fight for truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.
Most of us understand that we're in the middle of World War Three and that there are various
battle lines as parts of this war. Some of us believe we are in a continuation of World
War Three or that we are in the 5G war.
Many of us have become friends offline through membership in this group and also have collaborated
to fight World War Three together in many different ways.
It's quite remarkable the groups that have formed as a consequence of meeting others.
This meeting runs for two and a half hours after which for those with the time, Tom Rodman
runs a video telegram meeting. Tom puts the links into the chat if you are able to join.
We will listen to Amanda Volmer, Amanda Dawn Volmer to be precise, for as long as she wishes
to speak and then we have Q&A if there's time.
If you wish to ask a question, raise your hand using the reactions tab on the bottom
of your screen further down the track.
Stephen Frost, via long established tradition, asks the first questions.
There's no censorship in this meeting. It's a free speech environment, but we have proper,
efficient and effective moderation. Be patient with the process of the meeting.
Different people have totally different views about what is important, what's relevant,
what is nonsense.
Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.
The tragedy these days is that a majority of people would choose security ahead of freedom
and then end up with neither. This group can help you identify your beliefs and perhaps
to help you change those that no longer serve you.
This group can help you raise yourself to wins, a crucial factor in your enjoyment and
experience of your life.
If you find yourself upset by anything that is said, look inside yourself. That's where
your upset originates. If you are offended by anything, be offended.
We are genuinely not interested. We reject the offence industry that requires nobody
to say anything that may offend another.
I have a list of nine standard responses to someone who claims to be offended by something
that I said. If you want to copy, I'm happy to share it.
I urge you to never apologise to someone who claims to be offended.
Decide to have an open mind is the fastest way to learn.
We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.
Fear is the opposite of love. Fear squashes you, suppresses you, depresses you
and indeed makes you very unwell.
Love, on the other hand, expands you, energises you, enhances you.
And just as I'm reading, as I was sharing this introduction with you from Melbourne
today in Melbourne, Dr Joe Dispenza is presenting an all day seminar on
Mind Matters. I'm sure you've heard of him, How to Get Out of the Habit of Being You,
Joe Dispenza. There are 4000 people who have signed up paying $300 each,
$1.2 million revenue for a one day program here.
Why am I telling you that? Because Joe Dispenza is put on by Hay House.
And for those of you who ever heard of Louise Hay, who wrote You Can Heal Your Life,
you start to understand the power of love and healing.
Loving those with different views to your own is a challenge and we encourage you to
embrace that challenge. If you have a solution or a product that will help people
put the details into the chat. If you have links and resources that will be helpful,
put them into the chat. The meeting is recorded and is uploaded within a few days
onto the Rumble channel. I'll put the link into the chat.
And now welcome to our guest presenter today, Amanda Dawn Vollmer.
You've seen all of her amazing links and videos and her amazing work over the years.
And we thank Amanda for giving us her time and wisdom and insights.
And thank you, Stephen Frost, again for creating this group and for organizing Amanda to be
with us today. Amanda, we are in your hands.
You are in charge. And Stephen, do you want to say hello to Amanda before she gets going?
Yeah, hi, Amanda. I saw the video which I included on the invitation, which was correctly
sent out in the end. And that wasn't a dig at you, Charles.
But and I don't know whether you've seen that, but I was really stunned by this video
that you were telling your followers, I think that there was no pandemic and you're not a doctor.
I noticed that. Oh, well, you are maybe a naturopathic doctor, but not a medical doctor anyway.
And I was think so I was kind of coming around to that realization.
I knew there was no medical justification for everything that's happened in the last three years.
But it took me a while to work out that actually the extension of that was that there was never a pandemic.
So I was stunned that you were saying so vigorously that there was no pandemic and you were talking
to your audience in such a kind of authoritative way.
And I was I thought I must try and get that lady onto our onto this channel.
So you're finally here today. So thank you very much and welcome.
Thank you, Dr. Frost. I really appreciate being here with you all today.
And I really resonated with Charles's statement and I kind of can fit into that rebel sort of big mouth agitator category.
Mainly from just growing up a little bit different maybe than some of the people around me and having a lot of
different experiences that helped me see that the world wasn't quite what they were telling me it was.
So I was always a little bit. Well, you know, thank you for your opinion.
I'll go do that research myself. And that's what I encourage everybody to do.
Although I do find it can be difficult to read through studies that are written with Latin terminology,
which is technically a dead language now.
And so one of the things that I like to do is try to translate a lot of studies for people.
And I think that's a very important thing that we need to get skilled at is really ripping apart methodologies of papers
and really understanding what's going on when they're performing certain scientific rituals.
You know, is it being done properly?
Because if we're in the midst of a paradigm shift, a scientific paradigm shift,
and I would say in all areas, there's a paradigm shift happening at once,
then we need to not only uncover the lies, which is what really we've been doing over the last few years.
I've been doing this for a lot longer.
That's why I knew there was no pandemic because I'd already looked at I've already been in health care for a very long time
from the natural side. And I knew that that's just not how it works.
And also that this was a testing pandemic anyway, because I knew it was fabricated from the get-go.
And but that we're really having to find truth and actually do science that wasn't done.
I mean, so we're getting rid of the lies.
But now what's the truth? And this is where people get stuck.
And I want to, you know, just caution people that it's okay if we don't have all the answers like right now.
It's okay that we have mysteries.
It's just what what's happened is we've been lied to so long that we're just trying to get our heads around this whole thing.
And it's not easy.
And I'm going to go through some of the tips that I want to share with you on how to sort of help yourself get clarity when you're
confronted with information that's very different than what you believe and how we work through that because we need to as a people.
But I would like to start off with just a little prayer.
Manda, could I ask you, so I don't know whether everybody else, but for instance, but your voice is slightly soft, which I'm sorry.
Oh, that's better. So maybe the volume is down.
I'll bring it up. I'll bring up my mic higher.
Yeah, sorry, it was too low.
Is that better?
Yep.
That's better, yes.
No, it's gone a bit soft again.
So maybe.
Okay, is that all right?
Yeah, it's okay.
Okay, good.
Sorry about that.
Okay.
So it's just a consideration.
So if you just want to take a deep breath and just it's very similar to what Charles was saying.
But I surrender my egoic need to be right.
I surrender myself to our Creator.
Please use me as your guide and allow me to serve you.
I offer the value of authenticity and I wish to honor myself and others by my own honesty.
May all who listen hear this and may this gathering be fruitful for all being graced with love and understanding.
Thank you.
So I have some notes that I'm just going to be following along with to guide me because I'm really going to try to plow through quite a bit of information if that's okay.
Because I'm assuming we can go back and people can listen to clips again if I've gone over something too quickly.
But the way I work is I just want to give it to you so that you can take it and pick it to pieces or run with the information.
But where I want to start with actually is about nonviolent communication and methods of communication because now that we're realizing how much we've been lied to,
we need to find resolution and you know, we're also deep diving into really big concepts.
So like I'm going to explain a huge concept in health in a short amount of time.
And so that means focus is needed.
You might want to take notes sort of thing.
But I really want to propose that we look into the Socratic method again.
I think we sort of dwindled away from it or it's only been put into certain school settings.
And it's a really helpful method if you want to really come to the table in like a true ethical debate fashion and wherever all parties are prepared with the
opposing debaters materials ahead of time and then they come in and present the materials.
And it's a series of questions that whittle it down to the essence.
And I think we've just lost a lot of our communication skills.
So I wanted to mention that.
I feel like we also want solutions.
Of course, we I'm very solutions based,
but we need to practice self-discipline and inner awareness as a general rule because we need a higher emotional intelligence so that we can become the witness,
but not necessarily be reacting to all the feelings that arise inside of us when we have conflicting disconflicting information.
So we should be considered considered of our own psychology because really the enemy has been very considered of our psychology.
They know how we take and they know how to manipulate us and they've been doing it for a very long time.
So we do have a lot of catching up to do as far as understanding ourselves and looking at our own triggers and wounds and issues because it's really about us getting ourselves right and becoming our own guardian of our own reactions.
I think the truth movements kind of broken.
I think we we need a power movement.
We need an energy movement.
We need something like we talk about the concepts of justice and righteousness.
But here we are still lending our power through all this chaotic emotional energy towards these people that we we don't want.
We don't want these people around who are doing this to us.
That's that's perfectly logical.
But what happens is we want to stop them.
So the energy is of stopping them and we want justice serve.
We want retaliation.
We want correction.
And I totally understand that.
I understand that need and from what's been done to us that we are rightfully angry about and what I am what I've uncovered and what a lot of people who are really deep diving into this material uncovered.
It means that the end injustices that we're upset about now as like skimming the surface.
There are so many that maybe our psyche couldn't even handle the amount of it.
And I think a lot of people also have self-protection mechanisms where they're not ready for certain material.
And I and I also we have to respect that too.
That there's people that are not ready for certain levels of information and we have to break it to them gently and we have to help them walk a path rather than just shock them with the material.
So I'm very conscious of that.
And I'm trying to present things that sometimes they have to do the blunt and the push.
But other times it's a teaching opportunity like here and I'm trying to guide people into the information.
But but I think that's where it's really hard emotionally is when you're like, well, that's a lie.
Now what else is a lie?
And then you find more and more and more and then you don't know who you are in your world anymore.
Your reality starts to change and that becomes painful for us and we need support systems for these kinds of things as well.
We need to be considerate of it.
So, um, so really it also comes hand in hand with knowing who you are in law.
And I do teach a lot about law.
I'm not bringing that to the table here today.
But as a living man or woman, not a corporate entity, that's very important for people to really understand you.
You have different powers.
It's really about becoming empowered and taking your power back from those we inadvertently are being tricked into giving it away to.
And that we have the awareness of the solutions inside of us that the divine guides us that we we can see through correction.
We want to work and understand that when we know who we are in law that these structures have been put into place for other people's benefits.
Then we we know we're working congruence with nature, nature's principles, nature's law and and God our creator.
And realize when we stop poisoning ourselves, we can feel that connection deeper and we can hone that.
So this is why this is great.
What's happening where this is all blowing up because people are skeptical of vaccines now.
You know, I was skeptical of vaccines and the medical system from my early childhood because I saw my grandparents routinely murdered at the hands of the system.
And I knew something was very, very wrong because these were not typical cases that I could see.
And I was just I was just a baby, a baby healer back then.
I was just reading random things and trying to throw them at problems.
I didn't know about the body yet.
But one thing I understood was that something was very wrong and I felt that inside of myself.
But I if I were really dulled down, I might not sense that inside myself.
So we this is why I focus on detox so much and cleaning up your body because then your mind becomes clear because this is one system.
Then you can see better. Then you can think clear.
Then you can contemplate deeper aspects of science or philosophy or whatever topic you're interested in.
But we need this to our faculties and everything they've been doing is death by a thousand cuts trying to diminish our faculties and our abilities.
And so if you're in a war, what's going to be the first thing you're going to need to do?
You're going to need to work on yourself.
You're going to need to remove yourself from their clutches every way you can.
And then help others do the same.
And the more we do it, the more we'll get there.
Right. So then, you know, there's lots of philosophical quandaries like who are we?
Are we is it within our purview to stop them to say to another person don't do that?
I don't want you to do that.
Stop doing that. Now, there's all kinds of ethical quandaries and things that could go here, but really comes down to are we God?
Are we like God?
Most of us would agree we carry the spark of God inside of us or we feel a connection to a prime creator.
But so the moral question becomes almost a spiritual one because are we really the ones to change others?
Like, have we have we ever experienced where we try to change someone else that blows back at us?
So the goal is to take charge of our instrument, of our master, our inner world, because if we we have free agency,
meaning we're allowed to do that and the focus on the other seems to be where we catch ourselves all the time.
If we transform through the self, then we have the liberated energy to work on our communities and whatever they're doing,
whatever they're up to when we walk away, we simply say no, we walk away.
They have no fuel.
It's like taking wood out of the fire piece by piece.
What do they have?
Nothing.
So and then later we can scoop them up and do what have our revenge.
You know, but what I'm saying is that people want to know how we're going to get this done.
But this is grassroots.
This is us.
But it's transformational through the cell.
It's not about going out and having enough guns that we can take care of these.
What the Council of 300?
How are we going to take care of how we're going to get rid of these these flying creatures that have them live underground?
So it really comes about empowering ourselves.
And also, you know, when we're trying to stop tyranny, there's a rate limiting step on stoppage because like on externally trying to change it
because I've been successful changing in my local governance, for example, going to my council and saying I don't like this.
This doesn't work for me.
I have a face I can talk to.
I have voice.
I can it's not just letters or whatever.
Then I can see change.
But so much protesting in my life.
I can't tell you how much I've done and I can't say like I can't say I'm ahead.
I think I did that because the world's a better place.
I it's just not there for me.
What does happen where I have seen effect is when we when we turn inward.
So what happens when we learn the truth about our bodies?
What happens when we understand how we really get sick?
What happens when we stop taking their poisons?
And I mean all of their poisons.
What happens when we no longer trust what they're teaching our children?
What happens on mass when we stop paying taxes?
What happens when people create their own homesteads?
People stop working for bad companies and start their own when they operate their businesses in the private, which is what I do.
What happens when people stop attending the doctors that are part of this pharmaceutical industry?
What happens when they turn off the TV because they actually have energy to live and garden and do all these other things?
What happens when people create their own local governance?
What happens when they make their own currencies?
Their own fuel, their own power grids, their own micro economies, their own free energy, their own electro culture, their own Internet.
Their own schools, you know, this is how we get away from them.
Now at that point we become stronger.
At that point we are not engaged in the public corporate system.
And then there are other layers to what has to happen there to protect ourselves from, you know, whatever fallout is going to happen there,
which might mean we have to physically protect ourselves.
And that's later.
That's after you've established your communities.
So I wanted to address that because trying to help people realize why it's so important that we get corrected on our understanding of how we're treating ourselves,
how what we're doing to ourselves and where our mind is coming at it from, because it's a worldview change.
It's not just, oh, you know, germ theories, false, okay, fine, whatever, or all of the different truths that are coming to light about vaccines and these sorts of things.
That's fine and well.
But what happens now is new questions emerge like, well, how do I take care of myself now?
Or what does this mean when this happens?
So it opens up a new area of exploration.
So the many, though, who change from within, not draining of the self or burning out the self to try to end or stop anybody else,
but from this inner guidance, those missions are very successful and we must remember how important our own souls are.
Because that's really I think thereafter our minds and our souls somehow.
Right. And that we're trying to honor life.
We're trying to remember that life is a gift and remember the preciousness of life in every aspect, which they're trying to take away from us.
And it's very once I realized that it's all there, most of it lies.
What I ended up doing was realize that they flip it 180.
So everything that they say, I would just go, well, the opposite must be totally true.
So if this is bad, then it's probably good.
So I'll go and research the goodness of it and sort of thing.
So it really helped me navigate through because I knew wireless headphones.
They were sorry. Sorry.
So someone was not muted. Sorry. Oh, so it wasn't a question.
Okay. Anyway, so that so we should be able to hold two opposing views and ideas in our heads at the same time.
That's that should be something like an exercise that we should do to train our minds, even just as a physical exercise for the brain.
What ifs, you know, and really explore these ideas rather than, you know, just blocking it because there's something emotional there that is preventing you from looking at it.
That means there's work to do for you and nothing on the outside is going to change until you do that work.
And it's just it's just the truth of the matter.
You know, a lot of people are very impatient and quite hostile and quite agitated.
And I mean, we've just been through like this huge gaslighting and hazing festival for the last three years and we're pretty tired and it's not over.
It's just the beginning, in fact, and we have to become more loving to each other.
We have to be able to communicate.
And so so let me get into into what I want to explain to Amanda.
Could I? Sorry. Remember what you're going to say.
So someone's asking in the chat exactly what I would say.
I think they're finding it difficult to hear you.
We can hear you, but but it's kind of you haven't just we haven't a strain to hear you.
So is it possible to bring the mic nearer to your?
Yeah, I'm not sure what's happening with my mic.
One second. Or is it turned down?
Maybe the volume? Maybe.
Okay. If I touch this, does it change it?
Monitor.
Yeah. Try it closer.
Second.
Yeah, let me check the battery strength.
We can hear you, but it's kind of.
Okay, so I bring it up here like that.
That's better.
Yeah, but can you hold it there?
Maybe it's difficult.
Yeah, I also haven't had a problem with hearing it, Stephen.
So I think it's okay, Amanda.
Don't stress.
Yeah, don't worry about it, Amanda.
We can hear you, but it would it be because I know you've got a powerful voice because I saw that video.
Yeah, well, I know.
I'll just I'll speak louder and then and then hopefully it doesn't.
I just don't want it to cap off.
That's better now, I think.
Okay.
So maybe speak a bit louder as long as you don't get a sore throat.
Yeah.
Then you might have a COVID test.
No, I'm joking.
We won't test you.
Oh, that isn't that isn't it often they moved on to Eliza now from from PC.
No, they're still doing it in British hospitals.
I heard today.
I was stunned.
I mean, I thought they were all excited about it.
It's still in the cult.
It's still in the deadly cult in the hospitals.
The NHS.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, like it's weird, isn't it?
It's like there's microclimates where it just stuck where the whole mind control just glued in.
So you'll go to different towns and stuff and they're all still wearing masks and like nowhere else.
They're wearing masks, but just this little town.
You know, it's very strange.
Parallel realities.
It really is.
It does feel like that, which can be a little bit disturbing too, because how are you supposed to communicate if you feel like you're in different worlds?
And it might be like what Dolores Cannon says, you know how she was saying about there's like going to be a split and you can't even really see one another.
That's how different the vibrations will be that you can't even see one another.
Wasn't there wasn't there a story told about Columbus and the the native Indians that only the chief could see that the boats coming to shore because of his inner vision.
But the no one else could see the ships, even though they were visible because they couldn't conceive that that could be a thing.
They couldn't they couldn't have conceptualized a ship in their mind.
And they couldn't see it.
That's the same.
Exactly.
So there's a blind spot.
Yeah.
Well, there's a lot of psychological stuff going on.
So or spiritual stuff.
So I'm learning to.
And by the way, we're all learning under what you're talking about.
It's very difficult to talk about, you know, in a monologue, as it were, in a lecture.
It's it's very difficult to articulate.
And and also, if you feel that you want to just fall back on questions, you're welcome to do that.
And that takes that was my that was my that was my prelude.
Good.
Just let Amanda.
I've spoken.
I've sent an email.
Amanda's presenting.
So Q&A at the end, if there's time.
So keep going, Amanda.
Yeah.
So I'm there now.
I know you're you're correct, Stephen.
It's but why I did that is because I'm trying to I'm trying to lay a groundwork.
That's why.
OK, I'm trying to help people understand my position and also help people understand that this information is vital because it gets us to.
So we do know a couple of hundred years ago, well, not, you know, not even that long ago, really.
I mean, the last 100 years plus, we had an infiltration of our medicine systems by the Rockefeller institution.
I'm sure most people know how this happened, that big oil barons and Ford Motor Company was involved in all the.
The big wigs who who basically got became billionaires in it.
That was even unheard of.
They created with the Flexner brothers, the Flexner report, which then got all the rules on what were what schools were being taught or what they were going to teach the doctors and what was allowed permitted as far as remedies.
Now, this launch of the
The launch is off the back of the germ theory belief because you can't have one germ for every medicine with one germ to one medicine and one germ to one disease.
If you don't have that philosophy or that belief system, and we also
saw the AMA and at that time, be born.
Now their goal was to destroy the homeopathic hospital. So we had in America, there were lots more in the UK than America, but they were all over the place.
And they were the biggest competition to the medical world that wants to get established into the using oil, basically using oil extracts as drugs.
And it's the study of disease, but it's not the study of health.
That's very, very important distinction that the schools that the doctors and even even in my case all the first two years. It's all about studying disease pathology and all this.
And we don't even learn about remedies until later, because we're the ideology is that if you understand the disease, then you understand how to apply the remedy that is there to suppress it.
But that's not health. Health is expression health is helping the body actually complete what it's doing because it's an alien intelligence.
So what I'm going to go through today in some fine detail and if someone would please let me know when I have like about 10 minutes left that would be great, because I'm going to move this along for a little faster now.
And it's going to go through.
Dr. Stefan like his reputation of biology paper. And what it's going to do is I'm going to help people understand the seven, the main seven, there's more than seven, but there's, I'm going to go through seven problems with the scientific method as it's being done when we're trying to characterize what is a virus.
And I think it will help people get their head around what's going on with the studies and what the complaints are what the problems are.
So, the first assumption, and is that we have a death of the cells.
We have material that is taken, and that is removed either from the body, or from a scraping, or from another another tissue type, and it is taken and stained and drugs are added to it and it's put on agar and put in a certain circumstance of medium in order to try to grow something.
But what happens is there's a site of pathic effect. And when you remove a cell from the body you put it in these mediums and give it neomycin and other chemicals, the cell will begin to die.
So what they're trying to do is keep the cell alive as it's dying and try to keep other contaminants away from as much as possible.
So they starve and poison the cells first, without assuring that their methods themselves are not the cause of the effect that they're attempting to uncover.
So what the first reputation is that in order to ensure that you are not creating the very thing that you say you are finding is to make sure there are proper controls put in place, so that when you are removing tissue, you are doing it to different tissue types at the same time to make sure that you're not creating the same
pathic effect in all of these things. And Dr. Lanka actually did this. He did this experiment. He's done, I believe, three different experiments from this list so far to show that they have not done rigorous science, and that he has been able to find what they call
viruses in healthy cells that are starved and poisoned, that the breakdown products of the cells themselves are these particulates, and that the DNA or RNA that is found is from the host cell themselves. It's from the body of the participant.
And, and so if we want to prove this, we need to do proper controls.
Another kind of something that someone may you may have heard of about SV 40. Right. This is considered a contamination for vaccines and vaccines because they use all kinds of cell lines and they're very contaminated.
So is this, but is it a virus, or is it a cell artifact that they had not cleaned, and I was reading a paper about, about SV 40, and they were saying that some of the polio vaccine, you know, this is from 1955 to 1963 was contaminated with a virus called
SV 40 and I came from a monkey kidney cell cultures, which is what they use to produce the vaccine.
And the contamination was in the inactivated polio vaccine. And then they were working to eliminate this problem.
And what I realized is this, this is just the side of pathic effect. Once again, where they're claiming that it's a virus but it's really damaged breaking down tissue.
And they're trying to build in there, whatever they've done in their medium to keep the cell structure, you know, appropriate and not going through its own clear more thick alteration, like when we die, for example, like there's been an experiments done where a body a dead body is has been put into a chamber that is sealed.
So no bugs, no, nothing can get in. And the body will break down by its own from within its own mechanisms will break itself down.
That is because we have microorganisms and lineages in our body that will change their shape and their characteristics and what they do in the body, depending on the terrain to the terrain acidity and other factors dictate the way the cell is formed, and then that cell will be a job.
And so that means a bacteria can become a fungus. That means a fungus can become a bacteria. That means a bacteria can become in a different formations. We have a cockey you have a broad you have all of these shapes, and they can morph into all of these things which we have evidence of
evidence of we've seen under live blood cell microscopy, for example. So what about the amortism. This is not addressed when talking about these germ cell lineages, what's alive and what's not, and where he's coming from. So that was interesting with the SV 40.
I just also want to mention that Dr Lanka did create a legal precedent, which is very important because what he did is the mystery in the misinterpretation was based on measles virus, and he had a publication by john Franklin Enders and a colleague from June 1 1954 this is the measles the base measles paper.
And so it was ruled this publication by the highest court in Germany, that it contained no evidence of a virus so this is like the foundational papers saying, you know, found measles. But if you read it, it actually doesn't say anything to that effect it actually
Read it yesterday, just to refresh my mind and it's, it's all suggested, the whole thing is just if may might could, it might be there and, but it became in science, this exclusive basis for the for the for measles virology and and since and for all virology since 1954, including this Corona hysteria, right, that's a big deal.
And he did lose the case, originally because judge was totally just inappropriate, but he won an appeals, and they said that this does not prove there's measles virus. And so this can be used in a court of law, going further as well.
And I have that paper I can give you links later.
Not a problem. So the second.
So what happens is virologists will either mentally assemble meaning in a computer program, they, you will see short pieces of so called genetic information from dying cells.
And they will form a long, long genetic strand which they output as the genetic strand of a virus. So this is a conceptual computational process, and that is called alignment.
So they did not make the control attempts again, the attempt to conceptually computationally construct the dire desire genetic strand, even from short pieces of so called genetic information from non infected sources.
So, they do not run the same process for healthy cells to see if there is a difference. So alignment is problem.
And for said alignment for the third lack of proof, proof, the sequence source is questionable. So what happens is they never attempt to check whether or not the so called genetic information, which is computationally generated so what they do is they have a certain
amount of the DNA that they've, they've said they've got from their sample that they've characterized, but they're matching it to other samples that they have in their database and what they're trying to do is see what's same and what's different, so that they can put it in their phylogeny that they can make sense of it and see what it's related to, which is, it's basically irrelevant.
But that but but not to them and they then construct the virus genome from the existing data set.
But genetic sequence sequences are coming from animals and bacteria and plants and humans or they're fabricated there's all kinds of sources of this material. So they need to prove them that this material came from inside of virus.
But they don't. So, for example, take parts of the genetic material from so called HIV, then break it up and realign it through the computer conversion to see if you can get COVID-19 with the same DNA input.
And guess what? Blanca did that too.
And that's exactly what happened. He could find measles, even so not even the cell cultures could he find it. He could find it computationally.
So this is not scientific. This is
embarrassing.
Actually, when you really when you really think about it like this, you're like, what are we doing? What are we doing?
Now, the fourth proof is about manufacturing.
So what and what I said in the in the beginning is that they've never really isolated it. Now, what I mean is, they have only done isolation by indirect means for using a specific artificial cell system.
Right. So they never have just found it wild type and they just, oh, I found one just don't nobody move. Let me get it. I'm going to get this cool one. I'm going to take it.
I look at this. Oh, that's so cool. Never no virologist has ever seen virus. And they then mix the monkey cells and the human cells and the fluids and the antibiotics and then they observe what's happening.
This is not the removal from the body direct to the microscope. This is observation of this is not observation of form of the body. Sorry of the living body or the living blood even this is dead material.
There's nothing living here. How can even claim it's alive virus or that they're alive?
Because there's there's there's no they can't take the little virus they say that's inside the capsid. They can't take that out and go measure it and weigh it and and check it out. It's all done indirect, which means your own belief system can taint the science.
That's by science.
The fifth lack of proof proof is full isolation. So it's never been like I was saying they've never taken it out isolated biochemically characterized it obtain the supposed genetic material from the from these viruses that they photograph using electron microscopic images, which are all colored and then they show you a picture could be anything literally.
Because they even say that these viruses can have a protein capsid, but they also could have one made of fats or carbohydrates as well. But really, because then there's a bunch of other cells that look like that that we call endosomes exosomes.
There's, there's all sorts of breakaway pieces inside the cell. So how are we sure.
They have not done control experiments to whether after they've isolated the structures, it's actually possible to detect these viral proteins that envelope with the virus and above all the viral genome, which is supposed to be central component characters to go to the virus.
That's never been done. And it's not.
I don't think it's a big ass to do some of these controls, but the problem is that they do them, they're going to have a problem. This is why they don't do. And this is not science.
This is agenda. This is politics. This is money. And there was a study done that showed that there was that 60% of studies are incorrect.
So there's that too.
Number six is this. The lack of proof is that.
He did these Dr. Lanka did these side of pathic effect.
You know, he looked at the dying structures and he compared them.
And again, no control experiments with cell tissues that were not infected, but were treated.
So they're treated.
And you have all these cells components that have come to the surface. Now they are all swirled together. So imagine you have like dying tissue.
Protein fat, solvents, and all swirled together.
And now you're claiming that that's the material that was the disease material that's causing all these diseases.
But then they try to make that.
Someone sick with it and they can't they can't do it, meaning they can't.
So say I had an expression, a cold, which is just a detox expression.
Say I'm around someone else and I try to cough and sneeze on them and get mucous into them and whatever.
They tried all these studies. They tried to prove this viral contagion and they don't get viral contagion.
So is it contagious or not? Because if it is, you would probably be able to get some people sick if you keep doing this.
And they found no, you couldn't. And this is back from Spanish blue times.
There's all kinds of different papers you can look at that help you understand it doesn't work like that.
There's something else going on, if anything.
And I've explained a lot of this in my videos, you know, at yummy.doctor, if you want to like cruise through.
Like I said, massive topic.
Lots of questions come up. What about all these diseases? What about where where these viruses originated from?
You know, how did they come to be? There's so much to go down this rabbit hole.
But it's very important because it really empowers you to understand that, you know, it's really your responsibility, your health.
So so so that's those are so the seventh one. Sorry, just to wrap up the seven steps.
So there's too many failed transmission attempts. This is the seventh lack of proof.
So the so-called transmission attempts that virologists make to prove transmission and pathogenicity of the suspected viruses actually refute all of virology because.
The simply experiments themselves are triggering the symptoms.
So animal experiments provided as evidence of existence and effectiveness of these suspected viruses are giving just material, just cellular material.
It's not like we pulled you pulled it out of the cell.
You've manufactured in cell. That's very, very different.
So it's the same idea like you have non infected or sterilized materials and you bring them into the situation.
You see the comparison. But these so there's control steps along the way of this isolation and characterization of a virus that is not done.
It's simply not done. And when they are done.
When those controls are done, it shows that these things are not viruses, that these things are our own cells breaking down and in the body when we studied the pleomorphic cycle.
We see that we have a 16 stage somatic cycle that blebs off of our red blood cell membrane and those things change in order to serve us in order to take care of wastes and to remove attach dissolve breakdown.
And to ingest and help the body to eliminate these things. And you, you can't have the germ theory doesn't work when you understand that we have this cell lineage in our bodies, because they're not there to do harm.
They're there to clean up. Even in nature, you'll see a tree falls down fungus forms on it.
And it's just sort of what's breaking down the trees, putting it back into nature, breaking it down into smaller bits to be rebuilt. Right. And it's the same process that's happening in our body.
We have an anabolic system and a cat catalytic system or a system system that is breaking things down all the time.
And we, we, if we understand that those lineages keep us healthy.
And that when we say have a wound, right and it automatically starts to heal.
What an infection is, is really something that has gotten in that might not be part of you, like it's it's you versus not you that shouldn't be there. So then there are things that shouldn't be in your body and the body will get rid of those things because they don't belong, they're not part of you.
Right, like dirt in the wound. That's not part of you. A sliver in your fingers, not part of you. It's going to push out. It's going to there's going to be bacteria that come to try to dissolve the material and push it out great pus and do that process.
Well, that's what's happening in your entire body.
So science here has failed.
So, in all these seven steps that virologists have, you know, take to claim a virus they refuse to comply with the most important scientific duty.
And that's to verify their methods.
They don't document control experiments, and really what this whole idea should be scrapped back to the drawing board. Let's go back to the time before past year, the fraud past year, and, and those who were manipulating.
Cotches postulates, which also viruses don't follow rivers criteria or conscious postulates and go back to the drawing board and do the science that's required and fund the science that's required.
So this SARS-CoV-2 virus, it simply is fabricated, does not exist.
It does not exist.
You have.
I have studies that I can show you how they were, you know, manipulating.
You know, they were trying to do viral genome sequencing and they were trying to extract materials from broncho alveoli fluid samples and they're trying to do this.
And, and also had genetic contamination going on from fetal bovine serum and adding in all of these things so when they do this, how are you, so you're taking a swab from someone, say, and then you're supposedly wiping it on a Petri dish, and you're adding in all these
materials.
There's one thing to walk away with.
It's that that's ridiculous. I'm sorry that is not. That's not how you do science.
They're, they're basically like they've made Tinker toys, and they're playing with Tinker toys, and they circle jerk. Now, now they've created whatever monster they've created, which is just garbage.
They put poison or poison with it, they injected into your body has a total reaction. What they're trying to mimic is the symptoms that you get when that particular mechanism of detox is triggered in you, it will have a certain subset of symptoms might involve
the nose might be mucus might be coughing might be respiratory based or not might be gut based, otherwise, and they try to match this so that when they try to force feed the animals into producing sickness, which is disgusting what they do, because there are
There are animals, nothing happens or animals that just die right away. So the perfect animal is the one that they can manufacture this sickness in and I did this in the lab because I was a an animal lab technician.
And I saw this process, I knew knew what they did to try to make the animal sick so they could cure it with their drug and prove that the drug cured the problem.
And so much animal needless animal test.
This really gross. It's not true science there also because that's not that's not proper contagion forcing something into an animal until they become sick is not scientific.
Okay, and don't tell anyone about the dead animals are the ones who were fine. Right. That, and then they try to match their serum with a suppression and that's the cure. And that's the circle jerk.
This is why the whole ideology is false. This is why vaccines themselves are ridiculous. They're ridiculous, even, even the concept was at least born of a little bit of thought like maybe five take a little bit of us and inoculate through the skin and trigger you.
Maybe your body might like know it and understand it. I mean this concept came from alcohol use, because they noticed that people who took to drink a lot could handle their liquor and people who couldn't couldn't so they thought somehow there's something in the body that makes you be able to handle it and they
And they put this ideology on all kinds of things. Well, that's not it's just enzyme systems and a slow death that's that the alcoholism there. Right. But it doesn't work for what they're calling antibodies because this whole antibody system, which is also a big circle jerk.
They're non specific. So these antibodies are also, first of all, we haven't isolated them characterize them and really gotten down to what they're talking about. But these change.
Also, and what I would say what they're calling antibodies are our pliomorphic cells at a specific stage of growth and what they're doing is making a wide shape to grab on to the antigen and remove it.
And that's it. And they don't, whether it's in your body at that given time or not is irrelevant. And that using that as a litmus test to say you have something or not or you've been exposed to something or not is like you might as well flip a coin at that point.
Again, ridiculous. So we've never had any purified viral isolate. They've never taken the genome out of the virus characterized the full length of it as should be done. You know, if you're claiming that this is something without using computer modeling and and some sort of fancy gadgetry and should be able then to take that.
Take that. Actually, you shouldn't even have to grow it. Anything. You should just go back to your original sources sick and take it out of there because apparently it flies through the air. Right. I mean, it's so easy to get. Why? Why is it so? Why do you have to grow it for you should have ample inside the person don't you think but no, they say there's not enough virus particles found in the samples to analyze.
That's weird. They also say that viruses are intracellular parasites meaning they cannot be found outside of the cell in this manner. But then they okay wait. So if this is correct. Okay, we cannot find the virus on the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or lethal.
Those two don't seem to be congruent. And then if the second one is correct, then how does the virus even spread like what's its mechanism of spread because we're told it emerges from the cell to infect others. So then, but we can't find it. So we can't find it.
We can't find it. So we can't find it. It's said to be in the body encapsulated, but yet emerges. So where's the mechanism where you can where you've shown us this is the steps. These are the steps we have been able to characterize in the body of the viral process.
No such science exists. These are all conceptualizations. They're all cartoons. When I studied immunology, they was all there was no was carts literally cartoons immunology virology histology was, you know, even histology was confusing because you're like what am I really looking at here you say I'm looking at that.
But this is a stain something under a microscope.
What are we sure that our methods aren't even changing the way we see the inside of the cell.
Are we sure that all the structures we see inside the cell or inside the cell inside our bodies because it doesn't really look like that inside of our bodies.
It only looks like that once they've been taken out the body and manipulate.
Again, that that is vital.
Okay.
So, by Raleigh to leads to vaccines, of course, and this is also why it's collapses, the vaccinology is understanding.
So, you know, shining light on this truth is essential to stop a fraud from happening again because they're going to keep trying this game, they're going to keep trying with the fear.
So, if pathogenic viruses do not exist then what is going into these injectable devices exactly, by the way, and what is their purpose them right. This is a pertinent scientific question, and very relevant.
If we know that they, whatever they've done, whatever they think they've characterized is not there. If we know that we get sick, otherwise, because I know that I've experienced how belief can shape the way that you respond to exposures of things, then what are the vaccines for again.
Oh, wait. Oh, yeah, we know.
They're for sterilization, and therefore population control.
Right, like death, that kind of control, as well as making customers for life.
I practice after about, I don't know, I was.
I've been, I've been doing this for like almost 20 years, but.
Back when I realized that if we just never vaccinated ever.
Most of the people that I was seeing wouldn't have been sick at all. I don't think it would be sick at all. I think they'd be their guts wouldn't be destroyed.
Their nervous systems wouldn't be on haywire, their endocrine system wouldn't be a mess, and the little things that would come up in their life, they would be able to take care of.
I honestly believe that I think it's one of the greatest surges of our time, and should be wholly eliminated not just based on the, you know, what's in them like aluminum and mercury and all these other things but just on the fraud of it all.
It's, it's, it's time has come now. Plus we have so many beautiful methods to heal.
And we have a whole world opening up of knowledge, and we don't need to go there anymore we don't need to think like that anymore that's that they're dying. I really feel like that whatever they're trying to do this stranglehold they're trying so hard now to do to us.
I really feel like they're desperate and they're, they're going to be heavy handed, because they're desperate, but it's like the mark of a dying enterprise, and that's a good that's good for us actually because that means they're loose loose cannon a little bit they're losing control.
And the only thing that can fail now is if we just don't do anything.
So, anyway, I, I just, I know it's it's, it can be open up a can of worms this topic. It has opened up.
But look, I figured this out back in 2016 or so end of 2016.
And how I did is that I couldn't understand how my friend had had been told had gone to like this biofeedback practitioner and was told they had like all these viruses in his body and one.
How does that work actually I never really thought about it. Like, now it's all coronavirus, but where did all these there how many thousands of viruses are there aren't they like everywhere.
All the time. So, then why isn't everybody just dead, because I just can't see how if the germ theory was real I think everyone would be dead because it wouldn't just go away, there'd always be a host, you know, and when we look out into our reality.
What do we see. Well, we see being us being poisoned on multiple levels. Doesn't that make more logical sense of why we are becoming ill at all, because we're overloaded with poisons, and the body cannot does not want the non self in must get rid of the non self must remove it.
And we have mechanisms inside of us that help us do that. For one example, we have the inflammatory process, we have another example the mucus formation process. And these are ways in which the body uses material to get out other material.
And that's why we see symptoms, if the body cannot handle the load through internal organs, then it must push it out through other organs like the skin or using other mechanisms.
Right. This is why we get symptoms. Right. What are symptoms. Well, those are healing mechanisms being activated in your body, and they are run on nutrients and electricity and water, and they help keep you alive.
And if you keep putting poisons in, it can't do its job, and it must remove it has all these methods to do it. Their health and wellness is very simple. Right. As you can understand it, anyone can understand it, it should have been taught in schools properly, my daughter gets it.
She never grew up with any of these exposures, and she automatically realizes that if she's eaten too much sugar, or she's done something she shouldn't be, you know, she's eating something she shouldn't have, she will immediately have symptoms of removal in her body and she's been able to associate those things together.
I mean, we have people who had a shot, they have a stroke, and they still can't make the association. I mean, that's a problem too. But yet, you know, my daughter can extrapolate and understand that she can make a correlation between a food she eats and how she feels afterwards.
So this is, you know, this knowledge that we have mechanisms inside of us, we have triggers for purging. So for example, change of seasons, that's a trigger. That means you might have had a lot of junk at Christmas, maybe you've been really stressed, whatever has been going on through whatever that season is.
And now there's a new challenge coming. And it doesn't matter if they're all stressors, like the change of season is a stressor, because your body has to adapt to it. Just fine, your body is meant to adapt to all of these things.
But if you can't adapt because you have something in the way of your adaptation, well then it must go into a removal process in order to make that correction, so that it can go into the next changes.
It might be a circadian rhythm shift, or hormonal fluctuation shift, whatever it might be. But if you have a head metal in the way, or you have toxins blocking this mechanism, gotta go. And so spring and fall, where they say there's two different viruses involved in those seasons, yeah, no, not at all.
And then just like, oh, you know, the virus is like, oh yeah, it's time to wake up guys, let's just go like get some random people on the street. Like just, you know, just walking down the street randomly and it's coming at you. You made it. You created your disease by your behaviors. You're totally in control of the show here.
Right? Well, God is, but you know what I'm saying, like you're in control of what you put in this pie hole here in your mouth. Right? So you, you're in charge. This is why we must stop giving our authority away like this. Like, I don't know what to do, doc. Help me. You know, tell me what to do. I don't know. Ah, this thing that has to go away.
What has to happen is you go, Oh yeah, looks like we were imbibing too much this year. My whole household got triggered because we're all very genetically similar. We all eat similar, we're all exposed similarly, and we all got triggered similarly. And that's why we all down at the same time.
It's not because the virus just happened to pop out of one person and float around and go to another and another another like this. That's not how it works. Now, what's exciting, what I'm excited about is to study all these that with the correct mind to study all of these things, these phenomena.
I'm very excited. I probably won't be able to do it myself or my lifetime, but our children, you know, encouraging them to look at these phenomenon with this corrected base information, because if you have your foundation, correct, all the fruits that grow are correct.
But if your foundation is rotten, all the fruits will be rotten. And this is the core of virology, this rotten ground and all of its fruits are rotten too. All of its biologics are killers. All of its methods are deadly and suppressive.
But when you know the truth as your foundation, then you know if you're when you're in alignment, you will get life supporting information from that alignment. And that's why we have to strip this right down to the base and start the ground level again.
And we are and and there's information that because this was, you know, the German terrain discussion. It's like a 40 year old concept like they they they had debates for 40 years is what I'm trying to say.
Okay. Wasn't like, Oh, yeah, sure. Cool idea, bro. No, they're like, you're an idiot. What are you talking about? You know, pasture. Why did you just hurt that dog in the public forum, you just mutilated a dog by injecting rabbit tissue culture into the brain of a dog and it starts to froth like a maniac and die and now proclaim its rabies.
What's what is this? This is not science. This is magic. This is magic. It's exactly what it is. We go to the doctor. Okay. And I'm not talking about awake doctors. I'm talking about sleep doctors. So there have a symptom. Have a you say, Hey, doc, I have these set of symptoms.
Help me. Oh, well, we have this experimental dog for that or this one that's off label or this one. Let's try this. Let's try it. I don't know what I'm doing. Let's try. This is what they they'll say this. I have all of the feedback from patients of what doctors have said to them about this, you know, like, try it.
You mean you don't know if it works. You don't know if it's even for this condition. Okay. And then what the goal is of the practitioner is to make the symptom go away, go away. So suppression of symptoms is the conventional medicine. Think that's the germ theory thought.
That's what's killing us. When we shift and we understand that you're not there to be. You're not the war is not against your own body. You know, it's not what's happening. You don't need to fight it. You don't need to say no bad you that how dare you have sudden such a symptom.
Go away. No, what you're doing is you're saying I listened to the wisdom of my body. What the heck is going on? What is it? What am I missing? What nutrient did I not give it? What poison did I put in it? What have I been doing? That's not right to my body. Where's my hygiene?
Hygiene. There was a school of high, high genus hygiene back in, you know, early, late, late 1800s and Dr. Shelton Shelton if you want to look him up. Amazing, amazing information. Still quite conventional actually in some in some senses, but they understood the terrain.
They understood that you get this right. You don't get sick. You see, so it doesn't matter what your exposure. It has nothing to do with an immune system. Nothing whatsoever. Those cells are part of your body's defense system. Cleanup crew, solvent creation crew, lymphatic system.
There's no real immune system that was brought in to prop up the germ theory ideology and the idea of viruses or germs causing disease that just know how that's not how it actually works.
So if you want to help yourself, you have to understand there's nutrients you're going to make sure you're going to have. You're gonna make sure your gut is working and absorbing the food properly so you can get your fuel and your nutrients.
And then you're going to assess your health from what's come in that shouldn't have come in like vaccines, different drugs and aspartame and food dyes and chemtrail fallout or whatever the hell else they've been doing.
And you're going to put a plan together on how to help chelate and remove those from the body. And that is proactive health care. That means when springtime comes, you don't even need to have the expressive symptoms.
I don't. I don't get sick like that. I don't ever have those expressions because I know already ahead of time. If I've not been a good girl, you know, if I've been like eating or drinking something I might, you know, shouldn't have.
I'll know, okay, back away now, hygienically clean up the body, put the cleansing methods into play. I use a lot of enemas, for example, for one method coffee specifically will cleanse the liver and cleanse the blood.
Now clean it up. That's there's your cancer, heart disease, your, your, your nervous system problems, your, your menopausal problems, your hormone problems.
All of these issues are these imbalances. So this is what I'm saying becomes the everything becomes simpler. They've made it all very complicated. Don't language, you know, all of these different codes and technologies and things.
And it's useless really, most of it. It's make work projects, all of this stuff. It's not reality. It's not true. We've been warped our minds have been warped from a baby.
So we must be gentle on ourselves because, man, questions are going to come up when you when you're like, okay, well, you know, what about polio? What about tetanus? Or what about all these other things? How do all these things work? What's happening?
And all this is happening in all this, which again, I see is exciting because it's like, oh, yeah, well, now that my foundation is craft. Yeah, what is the mechanism here? What's what is going on here?
And one of the things that's really important is in childhood exam thumbs or childhood expressions, they're different than those of the doubles.
Yet they get lumped together all the time just because certain adults have had those expressions when they really shouldn't have. Right. But those are childhood expressions that may or may not occur depending on their terrain strength.
And how in there. So that's their nutritional strength there. How much poisons that stored and these sorts of aspects emotional health and all these other things. Right. Determinants of health. That's what makes you strong.
And they so having this thought and like, what's HIV? What are what are you know, go? I've done them all. I had to years ago. I had to go through all of them, read all the original papers, look at the methodology section there.
Every single one of all of so-called viruses. If you read the methods and you get keen on how to read them, you're like, what is this? And a lot of them are again, maybe suggestive could be more studies needed this sort of thing.
But then they're just taking his truth. Because I don't think people are really reading them. And I don't think I think we got so indoctrinated by the bloody television set.
Honestly, throw the damn thing out. And we just got taken. We got taken into the whole illusion of it, you know, and it's okay. And it's not it's not your fault. It's not our it's not our fault. We were manipulated.
We were you and the righteous anger is certainly there. But the only way that we can take charge of it now is that the real revenge, if you will, is that we don't we don't entertain them anymore.
We're we're done with with the lies and the fake science. We're moving on. And here we are. Now we're going to do our science. And we're going to show you without a shadow of a doubt that what you've done is fraudulent.
And we're going to collapse this house of cards because we are in a paradigm shift, which you can never you can never lie forever.
Because eventually, the bits of truth that you toss out the lie, throw behind you, they pile up pile up and pile up and pile up. And eventually you can't ignore that anymore. It's going to topple over you.
And that's where we are with this. And so the this was the last kick of the can probably understood we were starting to figure it out. And this last big pandemic was their kick of the can to use that as a massive fear.
So they could herd us into the 15 minute city, you know, one world government, one world money ideology. And here we are. Here we are.
So that's why I don't I got very frustrated with how to affect change because I'm very focused on that. I'm like, who do I speak to? How do I do this? Right.
And I didn't I got frustrated because I was like, I don't know, not too sure. Like, I don't. It's not like you can just go up to someone in government and like, make them sit down and explain all this to them one by one.
Like, how is that going to make anything change? Are they going to even understand it? You know, how would that even I didn't have those answers. And that's when I realized that that's not what we're here to do. We're here to transform the self.
Like I was saying at the beginning, why I prefaced it, because all of this knowledge ultimately comes home to our hearts, to our centers, and that we are the ones we've been waiting for. And we are going to do it. We are doing it.
Look at us come together. There's meetings and groups like this all over the world. Some are very hidden and quiet and some are just, you know, public. There's a lot of it happening. People are not going to take it sitting down.
And I think we need to be helpful. I think we need to try to use our God given power to affect change where we have some control and where would that be with the self and your families and your communities and making sure you don't absorb their lives anymore.
Just stop ingesting. I just if it's fear based now, I don't I don't really entertain it much other than if it's a piece of information I need to know about what's happening, banking or something like that.
You know, so I think I think I'll stop here because there'll probably be questions and I can go on off off off of those.
You said you said the framework.
Very well, Amanda, and I've said this to the group before but you what you say resonates with me in terms of holistic health I went to my first naturopath in 1965 there are naturopaths on this call.
And, and I don't have a doctor, I haven't been to hospital for illness. And nor do I intend to. And this whole understanding of what health is now, I was with the managing director for Hay House yesterday.
And I shared with him that the, what I learned in 1970 is the single number one major cause of disease in us humans.
The answer is constipation.
And when you think about it and I found this to be true. If you are constipated, you have a problem and we came up with a different saying the common saying is you are what you eat.
Now, perhaps more accurate to say you are what you don't eliminate.
So there's a thought for everybody because we are a bundle of pipes and tubes to the universe comes into us goes through us if you hold on to stuff.
That's what your body's made of so there you are this and thought for everybody. And Amanda, I've loved listening to your perspective, and it's, it certainly aligns with mine, and what I've learned about big pharma since night, its activity since
1910. It is the most powerful and well funded lobby group on the planet for politicians and politicians in Australia and America are bought.
And one of the huge benefits of the covert scam is that more people will realize that politicians are bought by big pharma. So that's where we're at delighted to listen and Stephen well done for organizing and so put hands up everybody and of course
traditionally Stephen Frost goes first. So here you are, Stephen over to you.
Yeah, so, Amanda, thank you for speaking to us. You're very brave. I'm a bit shy about, I've had to learn to speak in public I still can't do it and I.
So the reason I asked you whether you know you wanted us fall back on quick or give you that option was because I can't envisage speaking for one and a quarter hours I think that's how long you spoke for.
With no input from anybody else you're not getting any feedback are you can't, and on this plant, you know on zoom. You can't see your audience so it's not really anyway, so it's, I think it's really difficult but anyway I wanted to ask you, what do you think of
The project various sting operation.
If you've got you know if you don't know or you haven't done any thoughts about it, then it's okay but I just wondered whether you might have thought about it and bearing in mind what you've been talking about.
Well I stopped following up.
So, a little bit ago.
When they, they fired what's his name.
They just, I don't know why I it was very. I'm sure they're doing great work, but it's just not in my, I stopped following them for a while.
Yeah, I thought it was very suspicious that they seem to emphasize every single point, and they, including James O'Keefe was apparently kicked out by his own directors immediately after the biggest scoop ever for project.
Yeah, him. I stopped following a little bit before he was kicked out but then after that I was like, this is something's up.
Yeah. But also did you notice the way that the guy who was the alleged leaker from Pfizer I never saw any evidence that he was ever working for Pfizer, and also the, the answer where he said.
And straight away, too quickly in my view, he said, I was literally lying.
Remember when he was first uncovered. And I thought that was a very unlikely sentence to come out of somebody's mouth who's just been, you know, realizing that he's been duped.
I, well either project various as you know James O'Keefe was duped to itself so it was a double sting operation, or some kind of double bluff and James O'Keefe was part of the opposition I don't know.
It's very difficult to know but I just felt it didn't feel authentic the whole story didn't fit together.
But I watched the videos.
Yeah, exactly. So it's hard to, it's all about feeling I think and so, um, so what do you, so looking back over the last three years terrible crimes have been committed, what would you say in your mind, the worst crimes you know so the
psychological torture, the kind of Psyop, if you like, psychological operation which was clearly planned in detail. So governments were psychologically torturing their own populations as far as I can make out.
And, or do you think the killing of many people around the world with these injections, when we didn't even know what was in the injections.
I think consent was impossible. So what, what do you think or maybe haven't thought of it, but what do you think are the biggest crimes in your mind about what's happened and you're in, you're in Canada, aren't you.
Yeah, so Canada has been really badly affected. Yeah.
Well, I would say, you know, murderers pretty high up there, you know,
there's like bad things that they've done, like murder by injection, you know, it's pretty bad. Yes, I'll go there. It might be worse, there might be worse than death. Who knows who knows. I mean, when you wake up to this world, you know, which is not an easy thing to do.
You start to question, what are these people, because they're, they're not right in the head on a lot of levels.
Exactly.
Yeah, I think it's, they're using magic, black magic, death rituals, blood rituals, creepy shit that they're doing to maintain power, because it's synthetic, everything they do is synthetic.
And this is why this true safety is in, you know, natural principles in nature and in listening inward and, you know,
So do you think they're, well, yeah, they're hubris, if you like, do you think it extends to thinking that they can achieve immortality and, you know, as in the case of Elon Musk, he thinks he can go to another planet, when Mars is too cold, and Venus is too hot in our solar system.
And the next solar system is 2.8 billion miles away.
Yeah, so how do they measure that, because that science sounds pretty shaky to me too.
Sorry.
How did they measure that because that science sounds pretty shaky to me too.
So four light years away is the Sirius, the nearest star, and therefore the nearest solar system.
So these freaks think that they can mess about with nature when we've got a universe which consists of hundreds of billions of suns in our galaxy, the Milky Way, and hundreds of billions of galaxies.
These are, these are figures which most humans can't comprehend, and everything so amazingly worked out, you know.
So, the people, so 600,000 people die in the UK every year, normally.
And, and in America is a 3 million I think and they're all replaced in normal times when they're not busy sterilizing everybody by all the people born and just a few more you know, and it's everything so amazing and immunology is so incredibly complicated, what we know what we think, you know what we know.
In inverted commas, maybe far from the real truth, you know, especially now we realize that after this nonsense over the last three years so I just am stunned by these mere human beings who think that they can mess about with nature when the universe is incomprehensibly big and complicated,
and all these orbits, you know, and they think that they can mess around with nature, you know, our nature on this planet.
It's ridiculous. What do you think?
Well, I have a different cosmological outlook.
I don't believe any of that. And I think they've lied about all that too. I don't think we live in a universe, you know, any of that.
So, but if you want to learn more about it I did my corrected cosmology lecture with Dr. Kelly Brogan. That's available at yummy doc doctor if you want to go down that rabbit hole it's another rabbit hole like biology, again, about how they lie about where we live.
I think we're in a simple closed system. And, and it's probably just us, probably whatever reality is here is just here. And we're trapped with a bunch of maniacs.
For some reason.
So, you know, we're working through that one, but we have a ways to go, because there's just like like I said we're trying to come up with answers, we're getting ahead of ourselves, because we're trying to use their what they indoctrinated us with to formulate our answers or
things right like I said that foundation. So we got to tear it right down to the foundation. So that's why the Socratic method I really like it's like, oh well how do you, you know, then you ask a question like well I have a question like how do you know Mars is like that,
are you sure you know how do you know let's then let's peer into what are they really doing when they are doing these mechanism, these methods are they truly sound or not because we're assuming all of it, every last bit of it.
We can't go there we can't do that we don't have those microscopes we don't have those capabilities, we're trusting them. The frame big fat liars they keep lying to us we keep trusting them. I don't. I believe none of it.
Exactly.
Exactly. One ounce of it. So I threw it all away. I threw it literally through every bit of it away. Sure. And you know I've got that I've got that big brave Leo part of me so I don't give a shit. I was like, oh, I know who I am.
I don't care. I don't need those structures, I'm throwing the structures away. And then I started bringing them in little by little. Yes, rings true. Yes, this is got evidence. Yes, this is fact based. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, like that.
Yeah, and I know. So, yes.
So, the people who think that they should do something but end up doing nothing.
I don't know they seem to be waiting for some kind of group to emerge they don't seem to understand that groups are very easy to control, usually, you know for the criminals to control.
And the one thing that they have real difficulty with is individuals who stand up and say, I'm not having any of this.
And because, yeah, you know, is it worth them putting a lot of effort to silence one person well maybe yes but in practice I don't think they can do it. There are just too many voices coming up at all times.
And I think the truth will come out.
I wanted to ask you, in your mind.
So which are the most top five most important books that have influenced you.
That's, that's tough.
Doesn't have to be the absolute top five but the font, the five that come to mind. So, well,
Buckminster Fuller's works were very pinnacle for me, for me, in, like as a baby in first year university.
And Amanda, here's Bucky's dimension map behind me.
Oh, wait, let me find it.
I know there's something wrong with my computer but I'm having real difficulty hearing you I don't know whether anybody else is but.
Anyone else. No, I can hear you okay.
Yeah, your volume is a bit low.
That's all a little bit like, really.
Okay, not much.
Very strange.
Okay. Well, listen hard, Stephen.
I am doing.
I can hear but just about. I've got good hearing as well.
Apparently, must have a virus in there or something.
Anyway, five books Bucky Fuller.
Yes, Bucky Fuller.
I read the operation manual for planet or operating the operating manual for spaceship Earth.
Spaceship Earth and then there was another one.
So, it's a change to the moon.
No, I can't remember the name of it now.
But she.
He would he helped me understand law, natural laws not weird. He helped me understand the one piece, this one important piece the rest of those all cool of course but this piece stayed with me foundation.
There's the people of the sea and the people of the land and they are different.
And that the people of the sea or pirates, and they are trying to trick the people of the land to give away their land and to give away their rights and to give away their freedoms, and that they've, they've pushed themselves into our reality.
That's, that's sort of the storyline that came through for me or that, you know, did something for me.
And it makes sense, because now I study Admiralty law and that's a lot of the sea and merchant law and maritime law right and that that's how we operate on the land today but that's illegal we're not supposed to do that.
This is why we get fined and taxed and problems and jailed and all these things is because we're using wrong law we're using their systems on land, you know, exactly.
So anyway, that was a big piece.
I did read.
Oh gosh, what's the name of that one.
I was thinking of the, you know, the books that you've used for.
You're a naturopathic doctor are you and not sure, or a herbalist.
Not.
Yeah, so, so the books that you.
Yeah, which ones, which ones did you like most or maybe you can remember them because I can't remember any of my textbooks but we have one actually grants anatomy.
I would go to when we still had real cool old bookstores, and I would pull health books from the 70s, and I would buy them all. So there, there were a couple in that collection once called like wellness something when I do my courses.
I'm going to have a course that I'm going to walk through literally all my book resources, I'm going to go through my whole library, and I'm going to show you all the books and what they taught and what they were good for and why you know and all that I'm going to do as like a course, because
because there's so many influential ones but I read, I read one called mutant message down under believe it or not. And it helped me understand. This is about the Australian outback, and that they were that the aboriginals were completely telepathic.
And this was a woman who went and lived with them and traveled, they were nomadic and traveled with them in the outback and her, her tails, and they were telepathic.
And that so that got me that was early on I was like, oh, this is even before university, like, oh, we have that capability I already know we have that capability so going in already knew there's more to the story.
Right.
It was more to us than we've been told.
That was really important.
Geez. Yeah, there's the camera, that name that wellness book but that was really important. There's a book.
I think it's called I've seen cats hit like K at Z, I believe, I have to look that book up it's about the gut. There's a really good book that helped me understand how pinnacle important vital gut health is to the entire your entire body and that if you can.
You know what to do just start fixing gut, like if you have a problem and you don't know what it is. Just work just start at the gut, you'll get somewhere.
And the gut meaning like stomach intestines liver pancreas like the entire elementary system.
And then I have quite a few. Oh, I'm Juliana the herbs, all her books Juliet.
She was an herbalist. She was definitely an inspiration for me to get familiar with the plants and go out into the wild and and learn the plants listen to the plants.
What was his last name.
I think his last name was cow and actually different count up, not Tom.
Anyway, he wrote a book called plant spirit messages or plant spirit medicine, Elliot, Elliot Cohen, Cohen, plant spirit medicine and I met him I went to one of his talks, and he was talking about that clairvoyance in communicating with medicine and because I was
I was like, how did they know this. They didn't have chemical labs and all this stuff. How did they know how to call pepper know that this plant that red raspberry leaf was an astringent and it helped with tissues and it did all these things, and it was a
And it was a nutrifier. We didn't how you know I think our ancestors knew all the plants automatically through tele to through telepathy communicating with the plant itself consciousness of the either the water which we know now that water has its own language and consciousness through
And what about these plants, what are what what is what is life, you know, how are we communicating or how are we gaining knowledge telepathy from the plants. And so he had a sort of structure where you go out and you sort of sit with the plant community connect and then you allow
Allow sorry I had the last word heard there was allow Chris Mel Amanda. Sorry, I'm going to hold this up a little bit. Just just when you do that.
That's better. When you do that.
Okay, so to allow the process of, of your mind connecting with the subliminal or subconscious aspects of really it's probably you just ask asking your higher self, you know what that is. But this is how they knew what they were for back then I was like, oh, it's because they were.
They could can we had gifts that we've lost weeks we've fallen right and so we have to remember that we have these abilities and we have to get those muscles strengthened.
Well, we used to have common sense, but I've been thinking, wait, wait.
So common sense seems to be remarkably uncommon. These days, and wisdom seems to have disappeared completely you know if you're trying to think of an equivalent for Bertrand Russell or
I don't know whoever you'd like to mention Solzhenitsyn.
Because he said, I don't know whether you know this but Solzhenitsyn wrote some amazing books in the Soviet Union but then when he got to America. He was asked why he wasn't writing books anymore.
I think he, you know, he's writing activities fell away and he said I'm too comfortable.
So he meant that you needed to be uncomfortable to
know to have the insights maybe that are worth actually recording and and also to have the, the will to actually write books you know because they're complicated books Solzhenitsyn's the ideas under well, I think they're pretty deep.
Very cool. I'll read those.
Wisdom seems to have disappeared. Yeah. Well actually one book that I think is highly relevant at the moment is William Golding's Lord of the Flies. I don't know if you've read, reread that.
I read it a long time ago I can remember it and I, and I, and it's come to mind a few times.
The bit at the end where the British Naval Officer, Ralph I think it was who fell over, and he saw a boot in front of him and it turned out, he looked up and it was a British Naval Officer.
And there's a line there that the boys started to cry. Some of the boys started to cry as they told their stories.
So, so the, so the, so the Naval Officer was a leader if you like.
And he, as they told their stories, he was just reacting normally. He wasn't in the cult, but they were all in the cult.
And so they realized, well, subconsciously, that they could be honest. I don't know but anyway, I think that was the moment that they, some of them were coming out of the cult, meeting this guy, they, but the fear when everything went wrong on that island, kept them in the cult.
When he arrived, that fear, to some extent at least disappeared, and that's what got them out. I've never heard it talked about in this, it's my perception of what I remember.
So, but maybe give someone else a chance, Charles, we usually have lots of questions.
Okay, so we've got, we've got questions. Okay.
Thank you, Stephen.
Thank you. It's a great, it's a great question for all of us to contemplate what are the, what's the one book or the five books that have impacted on your life. It's a tough question particularly read a lot of books but Bucky, I've been a fan of Buckminster Fuller, for those who don't know him, Amanda, you know, 47 honorary doctorates, I'm the, I'm a trustee of the Global Energy Network here in Australia, which is based on his
genius in the US, Peter Meissen founded that in 1986, so I'm still pushing Buckminster Fuller's work and I point out to everybody from Bucky that the foundational difference between richer and poorer countries is electricity.
The foundational difference between rich and poor countries is electricity. The second foundational difference is a legal structure.
Good legal structure because that's what will allow money to come in. And so the whole game of of reducing electricity in the running the fraud of climate emergency is designed to drop our GDP to drop our ability to resist the globalists, everyone please understand that.
And the solution to alleged overpopulation which won't happen if whatever happened.
Every single country with sufficient electricity has a naturally reducing population, everyone just understand that every country with enough electricity as a reducing population.
And lastly, India has 300,000 villages.
In fact 320,000 villages that do not have access to electricity. And so the scam that is on and Mandy mentioned smart cities. It's a scam everybody worse than the COVID scam, the COVID was just a warm up for this scam.
Now, Amanda, what's your give us a, I'm really interested in your perspective on the complexity you touched on this the complexity of the human body.
And, and Stephen sort of touched on it as well. I'm really interested with we took a survey here of some months ago we might take it again, of the extent to which we understand what's happening inside the cells of the human body.
The majority said we understand less than 10%. What's your perspective on the complexity of, you know what we're dealing with in trying to understand the functioning of our body.
Well, I think when we look at two major aspects water and electricity.
We begin to actually simplify the system, a lot more I think we've complicated it by doing this microscopic analysis where we have made specialists we've sort of separated everything apart into its categories, which is fine it's fine it's fine to look at something whole and try to piece it apart.
But you can assume you know how to how it works just because you pulled it apart, right, like the radio might not work now, once you pulled it all apart you put out things to hopefully put it back in the right place.
You don't know if it's going to work or not but you still don't know what makes it work. Right. You have to have the radio signal for it to work.
So there's, there's a few aspects there. Once the physical aspect is, is put together that's great but what's the what's the electricity where what's the energy what's the fuel.
Right. And when we study water, and the fourth phase water specifically as per you know Gerald Pollock's work and and Albert Lang, or Gilbert Lang before him, or around the same time, and they understood that we don't even understand the basics of water nevermind all the other things
we're going on about.
So now we, there's a fourth phase of water, solid liquid gas, there's probably more than actually these stages there's all the stages in between. But then there's this liquid crystal structure, whereby the hydrogen ions are holding hands so you have H3O not H2O, and this
creates a mesh network and inside the pockets in between the hand holding, you can have substances you can have like copper iron or whatever whatever the nutrient could be even a waste material could be something trapped in the match.
And then that can be identified. So, so say it's like a, like a fence, grab this, this whatever materials can be amplified or it can be called in to get rid of and I think other than the mitochondria which is part of this network.
Okay, we talked about different cell structures but I don't think we've gone through rigorous science to prove exactly how proteins are forming in the body. We're not really understanding how we have immediate communication, we can move your finger, I'm thinking, I'm not thinking about moving my finger
I'm thinking about moving my finger. How is that happening so rapidly. If it's just a nerve impulse with, you know, with some chemical coming out going to another nerve sending another nerve signal send them.
They have to produce molecules these things that they've estimated this takes some sort of time, it would take like two or three seconds before my thought of moving my finger to my finger back.
And that's just when you when you add up the time to take.
So, we are, we are beyond space and time we this, we're not even opened up to what we are, and how we work so I think we're actually more elegant than what is displayed.
I think we think it's more, it's kind of simpler in a way, you know when you wake up to information like it seems very complicated you don't understand it because you haven't read it and looked at it, whatever sound, it seems ominous, then you sort of dive in gets easier
thinking is, you know, okay. And then, then you get another answer and another answer, and it might make a mess on the carpet for a while but then all of a sudden you're going to clean it up and put it back together again and that's kind of what we, what I was saying where we've divorced the
body into pieces. Now we're doing the work we got to put it all back together and see if it works.
And, and also listen to the living body and study the living body and study the living blood and study it in situ in reality in nature, rather than this separation, break it up into bits, and somehow the bits translate back to to us once they've been manipulated doesn't
make sense.
Beautiful, I think cells. So, cell structure is actually much simpler than we've been led to believe.
Beautiful. I love that metaphors are really wonderful ways to help us to understand what is going on radio is a good example. You know, and it's a little bit. There's another good metaphor that leadership, you know what is good leadership you know it's like a frog you know you can pull
a frog apart to see what's made of but you can't put it back together again to function is not like a bicycle that you can pull it apart and then put it back together again so thank you for that.
Yeah.
Yeah, I was wanting to respond to your question about favorite books, which is also very directly related to what I think Amanda's talking about.
I had always been an atheist from early childhood.
And my all time favorite book. I should say my all time favorite class in either graduate or undergraduate school was a class in the 19th century, late 19th century Russian novel, or encounter Dostoevsky, and the brothers Karamazov, which I think is the greatest book ever written.
And the three brothers, the three work Karamazov brothers all represented three different approaches to life.
One of the rational questioning approach the other is the is faith. And the third was the what appeared on the surface the least likely the impulsive brother, the reckless brother and
Dostoevsky's conclusion he worked on this in every single novel he wrote in life's work.
And this was Dimitri.
The.
What would I say he was he was impulsive he was sensual.
He was driven by impulse and feeling.
And he suddenly started asking.
From a dream called the babe.
Why there was suffering.
And he realized he could not ever know that he could never not know not answer that. But he said his life about after that point to correct it in every way he could.
And the other very important class I had and college introduced me to already Berg saw the French philosopher, who had was challenging Darwin.
And he was saying that survival is not the purpose of evolution.
That's not the end result.
And he belongs there was something he called the Allah V tall, the vital spirit.
You know, what has been known as the force in Star Wars.
And I had an actual mystical experience when I was about 20 years old after my dad had died. And that's exactly what I saw and felt.
And, Amanda, that is, I see that as the spirit, the force that is driving what you're talking about.
The incredible complexity of the body and our bodies that is adapted to this particular environment.
And something beyond that something beyond the physical something beyond the circumstantial something belong the historical that is driving this and I believe if we're lucky that's the force that's going to defeat the globalists.
So what that force you're talking about, Jack?
Well, first of all, Amanda, you're talking about some something.
Sorry.
Well, Amanda was talking about something beyond there's something beyond anatomy, there's something beyond physiology, there's something beyond physical adaptation to our particular environment.
And that is what our own Robert song called.
And I believe the vital spirit, the Allah V tall. And when I look at the globalist those that we can identify like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates and so forth. I don't see that in them.
Exactly.
So that's why we're going to win.
Sure.
Yeah.
They have no human authenticity, do they either of those two, and then there are others as well.
Yeah, and what they're doing is they're manipulating our emotional vulnerability their emotion, they're manipulating us through evoking fear.
And when you have a psychologist, so when you evoke fear in a person we regress psychologically to a very young level.
And, and our cognition, you can see how cognition has been simply wiped out and the people who are so called woke there they're exactly the opposite they're exactly the opposite of woke, which is a projection.
And, you know, so they have, they can't think beyond about three words, like safe and effective, or you don't care about your grandma, things like that that's the extent of their thinking.
And so they're talking slogans almost. Yeah, and I started thinking about this almost immediately.
Because as a psychologist who has observed the American Empire.
Ever since the Vietnam War.
And even looking back on our excuses for bombing Japan, and the atomic bomb in Japan. I see nothing but lies. I see we have been lied to about everything, everything.
And they have it you know whether it's the Vietnam War, there was no Gulf of Tonkin ever, whether it was 911, all of this every single thing that's happened has been designed to evoke fear, widespread general public fear, and then to exploit that fear for some
you know very self centered and nefarious purposes.
And so I immediately smelled a rat when this thing happened it just looks like the same old story over and over and over again always in a new costume.
And so I started snooping through the internet all the time and I, and I put together is now a six chapter slideshow, almost entirely of actual screen captures of documents.
So, why wasn't everybody doing that.
I have dozens and dozens of very important screenshots that are sequential, because I started this at the beginning.
Why isn't everybody doing that?
Screenshots of things that are happening in 2020 for example, you mean?
Yeah, yeah, right from the beginning, like from January 2020.
So Jack you have the possibility to create a timeline which.
Yeah, in fact I'm writing a book right now that starts with that.
And what and what it is though it's an example is if you are free.
If you are free to think, and you are free to question, it's going to lead you somewhere.
But if you're stuck in a in a in a place of fear that has frozen everything else, or you're in a stampede mode.
See where you're where you can't think of anything except running away.
And we're no different than any other herd animal in that respect.
And so what I the slideshow I created is what what is possible if you're not locked in like that to mindless escape mode.
And now more and more people worldwide are waking up and looking all over the place.
You have Sasha Latipova and all these coming out with lots of very complicated things and really thinking seriously about all this.
And and not assuming we have all the answers but there's a helper getting a hell of a lot closer every day.
Sure.
Yeah.
Go ahead.
I was just saying you mentioned Sasha Latipova, Katherine Watt, JJ Cooey, Meredith Mellier.
Right.
These people are the people you guys have on.
Yeah.
And Christine as well.
She's brilliant.
But Jack, can I ask you so you mentioned the Brothers Karamazov.
Excuse me a second, Amanda.
But let's just ask Jack now.
What other books did you like?
Say four more.
Well, there's a lot of books I like those two and also R.R. Bergson's book.
I think it's called this two.
It's very academic sounding.
It's basically listed under theology.
But the those are the books that actually affected me, actually created, assisted me to create a cosmology that feels right.
And also kind of illuminates everything else that goes on.
What that thesis about evolution I thought was very important that we are not simply evolving physically toward a physical conclusion, toward increasing robustness as a species.
And he very cleverly pointed out that if simple species survival were the object of evolution, it would have ended with the insects because they're really good at that.
They're much better at it than we are.
But somehow evolution took a different course.
It took a different path into mammals and vertebrates and and on into primates and so forth.
There has been a very clear direction of evolution that is not in the service of survival.
Correct.
Actually, interesting.
Yeah.
Amanda, what do you say?
You can even quite enough.
Darwin, Darwin was a Masonic fraud and a liar.
The whole concept of evolution is a lie.
The whole thing.
That is not how it works.
Like I said, literally everything you think is true is not including that.
They proved that adaptations of groups of what they call whatever you call species.
I don't even use that word.
Amanda, your sound is going even lower now for me.
I don't know about anybody else.
What do you say, Charles?
So we want to listen to you, but it's very different.
Are you holding it up?
You can't hear.
OK, maybe I just.
That's better.
I might have just my Internet might have just gone out to.
Or is it that microphone that when you lean forward for some reason, it works then?
I don't know.
Now you see it's very quiet.
It's quiet.
Strange, isn't it?
Check your microphone input.
Go to just go to go to your microphone in the bottom left corner.
Click on audio settings and just go microphone input.
Put that on Max.
Yes, the top one is not.
I think I did it.
Oh, no, the second one, I think.
You're right.
I don't know.
That's a bit better.
Oh, my knob.
I didn't know that.
That's a shame.
Anyway, we'll make the best of it.
Now you've gone quiet again, Amanda.
Really?
Yeah, I'm not trying to be awkward.
I'm just telling you because nobody can hear you.
I know I can see I can see in my audio that it won't go past a certain point.
So something is wrong.
Something is wrong.
Yeah.
Zoom optimized audio.
And now it's okay.
What did you do?
I know it keeps.
I know I'm seeing it.
I'm seeing it go up and down.
It's weird.
It is weird.
I have no explanation for it.
It's just.
Well, now it's fine.
Okay, so I'm going to keep looking at my levels.
That's what I'm going to do.
Okay.
Well, I can't get any video.
So let's just blame Bill Gates for it all.
I'm so I actually just realized that today is the third year anniversary of
the day.
I was so heavily or like the weeks of attacks that I had when I came out
publicly.
And I finally decided on this day and this exact day, three years ago,
I closed my public store.
To my town because of the hate and the censorship than the attack.
Like it was there.
I had death threats.
I had people calling me and I won't repeat what they said.
Terrible things to me.
And threaten my life.
You know, for saying these things.
And I doubt I'll ever get any apologies.
No.
But what I was saying, what I was saying was that everything's a lie,
including evolution.
They've done studies where they see adaptations.
But once the environment.
No longer requires that adaptation.
The animal.
Removes the adaptation. So it goes the other way.
It goes back. So you only have the adaptation to use it.
Temporarily or for that situation, but it doesn't.
Other than a little bit of information that goes to the next generation
about it.
It doesn't change their face or their,
how many fingers they have or any of that shit.
We did not come from Amoeba.
We did not come from.
From.
From the animal.
The animal.
So we did not come from Amoeba.
We did not come from.
From oceans and.
Crawled up.
And then all of a sudden our arms, you know, came to be,
and our feet came to be in this sort of nonsense.
Abs.
That's what I was saying.
Like every literal thing.
That they have told us is life and is reality is wrong.
And we have to go right back to the drawing board and literally
questioned every single thing.
You know,
you're not going to be able to tell a lie to someone that you
know,
they're not going to be able to tell a lie to someone else.
If you can direct this inside yourself, you can't be fooled.
They can't immediately.
You smell rat.
You, you,
you now tuned yourself to truth or at least tune yourself to what a
lie looks like.
And now you know that.
You're not going to fall for any of that again.
And I don't know how many are walking this particular narrow path.
I don't know if it's everyone's going to understand.
I think it's time for us to focus on ourselves.
And I think that's what we are.
And there's a huge percentage of us.
And this is why I'm focusing more on us rather than waking up the
masses anymore. I was doing that.
I was like really pushing the masses. Wake, wake, wake up, wake up.
I think it's dumb done now.
I think it's time that we focus on us and, and get into the private.
Meaning we're not operating from our public functions anymore.
We're not paying taxes anymore.
We're not contributing to the system anymore.
I think that's the biggest problem.
We're not teaching our children the correct information.
So we have to get right with it.
You know, I don't teach my child evolution.
I don't even think we're that old.
I don't think we're as old as, as,
as any of those characterizations are.
And even the way that they're doing fossil records and shit.
If you understand that we used to be bigger.
Now the big question is why did everything used to be giants?
And I think that's the biggest problem.
If you understand the evolution bullshit, you don't understand that.
But if you really look back and you find,
we find the bones of giant humans and giant,
every animal and giant, every plant and giant, giant, everything.
Why were we so big? And more importantly,
why are we getting smaller?
And is it because we don't have as much CO2 actually in our
environment as we used to?
Cause there's another bunch of bullshit right there.
And you're not going to accept that anymore.
You're going to get to another,
the whole house of cards starts toppling.
And so that would be the thing to come into your world.
It's like, I'm not going to accept into that anymore.
I'm going to review my beliefs.
Now.
What do you think?
True.
You know,
Yeah.
Was that.
Hang on.
Steve.
We'll leave that to last.
We're running out of time.
You say it's Christine. Yes.
And.
Yeah.
I think I'm.
Rodman suggests Amanda, just before we get to Christine.
That you go to your audio settings and uncheck the automatically
adjust microphone volume.
So what do I check instead?
Hi.
I'm checking.
No, it's got, if you, if you got a tick,
if it's ticked automatically adjust microphone volume, untick it.
So you got an audio.
So now,
You got a tick and then you can check it.
I'm sorry.
I just asked you again.
Hang on, Steven.
Now you're quiet.
So now see, it's the opposite. It's exactly the opposite.
I had automatically adjust microphone volume.
Unchecked through the whole thing. That was low.
When I go in and check it, it allows it to be loud again.
So it's, it has to be on, has to be checked on.
Right.
Okay.
Hi, Amanda.
Thank you so much for your presentation.
I just wondered, I thought it might be useful if you could talk.
Just like introduce people to the concept of a private membership
association, because.
I know that's something that you have experienced with,
and I think it could be of interest to a lot of people,
I think we'll have a little bit more time to talk about that.
And I'm sure there's a lot of people probably on this call.
If that's not too off topic,
but you were talking about lawful stuff,
just a couple of times they're touching on it.
So I thought perhaps you could just introduce that.
Cause maybe a lot of people have never heard of it.
Yeah.
Yeah, sure. I will.
And this is Christine Massey, by the way, everybody.
I'm just wondering if you have a list of the people who are
eligible for freedom of information requests for all viruses and so
called diseases.
And as a mass, how many you have now?
Christine.
Of the Apple.
First SARS-CoV-2 we have 214 institutions on record from 40
countries.
And then for other alleged viruses.
I haven't asked about every single virus yet,
but dozens of them.
I have a list of people who have been in a couple of cases.
I have a list of a lady in England who's asked a lot of the local
authorities that do the actual testing and stuff. And nobody,
nobody knows of anybody on earth,
finding any alleged virus in any patient and purifying it so that
they could actually do science.
Yeah. So that's really important too,
which I didn't get a chance to really mention in my presentation.
Cause I've mentioned it in others. I want,
I don't lean on my old information.
I want people to know that,
how much work I put into these,
because I wanna continue to learn
and I don't wanna be wrong.
And so I go back as if I'm,
we're 10 new,
I go into it as if I'm a newbie again,
and I read it all from that.
And, you know, obviously I'm not,
obviously I have the foundation,
but I suspend what I think I know when I go into read,
because, and then I wanna present fresh every time,
I wanna turn it over constantly and enhance it.
And I think that's really important,
because once we think we know, we're done.
And so as far as law goes,
thank you Christine so much
for all your work and your question.
It is vital that this is the step.
People are like, well,
what's gonna happen when the money is worthless?
What's going to happen when I can't pay XYZ
or, you know, the government's starting to breathe down
my neck or whatever, and, or I can't pay a bill,
I'm default on a bill, they're trying to come after me.
These sorts of things, all of these aspects.
If you realize who you are as a living man or woman,
rather than the birth certificate, straw man,
corporation name, all capital name
that you've been given at birth,
then you will start to understand how to communicate
with these corporate entities
who are not operating as living men and women.
They are corporations as a different set
of communication and rules.
And I tend to use corporate, sorry,
I tend to use the fee schedule approach,
meaning I'm using contract law here.
And if they want to engage,
if one corporation wants to engage with another corporation,
then there's a request, oh, hi, hello, we request,
we're asking you to talk to us or engage with us.
Would you like to?
And then as a business or a corporation,
you're a corporation, you don't have to be in business
to be a corporation, but you can have an instrument
if someone wants to have a consultation with you,
that you charge them upfront.
So like the government asked me to file my taxes.
So I said, oh, I conditionally accept your contract offer.
Thank you so much for your letter.
And here's my fee schedule.
Here's my first bill.
It's going to take me, I estimated approximately six hours
to do my taxes and all the other paperwork
and filing and whatever.
And so my fee for that is $3,500.
And when you pay that, because I don't do credit,
then I will do it, absolutely.
So you're not saying no,
you're actually being cooperative and they've got nothing.
They can do nothing for that.
So that's just one aspect of it.
But the point is, is knowing that you aren't the corporation
and if you operate from the living man and woman status,
then you aren't privy to all of the charges and the taxes
and the things that they're trying to place
upon your person, the person, the all capital name person,
because you aren't the person.
And they've got us operating in error in law
and in commerce.
So it's just a big topic, a lot to learn.
If you want to look up my videos with Dean Clifford,
that's a good launching off point.
He's very candid, like I am more candid, we're Canadians,
we're a little bit rough.
And he talks about why that's important to know
who you are in this commerce position and then act.
For every request, it doesn't matter
if you're licensing fees are come due.
You have to negotiate with this as a private entity,
not as a public entity.
So that means you still should be able to negotiate terms
with that group or corporation.
But what I did is walked away from my license
because the whole idea of the license is an anagram
for silence where it's about control.
It's not really, it's always paraded as something good.
Like don't you want a 15 minute city
so you can walk to all your destinations
and have like local shopping
and not have cars congesting your streets.
Isn't that sound wonderful?
Sure, that's how evil works.
They paint a picture of it all covered in roses
and beautiful smelling.
And it's all just a Trojan horse to get you to want it
to do it.
So this is the same thing with the license
because it gives you this prestige
and it gives you new things you're allowed to do now
under the under law or under whatever they deemed
you're allowed to do.
So this is, but who are these people?
Like I had to keep questioning.
I'm like, well, who are they to give me this?
Who are they to tell me I can't,
and you go all the way up the line.
It's like, well, these are just a bunch of people
who sat down and made a bunch of laws
and decided those are the laws
and decided this is how it's gonna work.
But I didn't have public consultation.
My input wasn't asked for.
So I think dropping the license system
and coming up with our own way of doing it
that cannot be corrupted is kind of the key because,
and that's what I've been thinking about.
How can we make institutions, boards, corporations,
all these sorts of things?
How do we do this without corruption
infiltrating the system?
What are the checks and balances that have to happen
so that this doesn't happen again?
You know, that's where a lot of my thinking is.
But looking at those videos,
understanding these different forms of law
and how we got pulled into the naming convention,
and that's all under driver's license
and all of these things with the old capital name,
it's a good primer for people to get that in their heads
that they are actually the ones
who supposedly created government
to help them with the things like roads and garbage
and electricity and these sorts of help.
You know, it was supposed to go that way
where we created the government to help us
and now it's become corrupted
where it's trying to take over us.
So how do we prevent that from happening again?
Because we're gonna make new structures again.
We're gonna have collaborations and discussions
with corporations and boards and things
from our awake perspective,
but we still have to have sentinels
to understand when corruption is trying to sneak in,
what that even looks like.
So there's a lot to unpack there,
but I do encourage people to look into the topic.
Christine.
And did you touch on private member associations?
And Stephen, I'll ask Warner Mendenhall
to give us an update on the COVID Litigators Conference
that happened last weekend,
just a couple of minutes before we finish.
In private member associations,
I've been hearing about PMAs,
so can you just mention that Amanda, please?
Yeah, I operate as a PMA,
but, and you can still incorporate,
you can still use both.
That's really complicated, but anyway,
the whole, it's different for different businesses
depending on what you're doing.
So it's not just across the board,
so it's basically like,
I wanna start a PMA for a food co-op.
I wanna do a PMA for my business,
but my business has liability.
So now that's a different story
because now you have different liabilities.
So you might need malpractice insurance,
you might need other things.
So it's very tailored to what you are doing
or trying to do.
In my case, it means, or the simple answer is,
it means that you're engaging, like,
so say I want to make a widget
and my friend wants that widget.
So my friend comes to me and says,
hey, can I have that widget?
Sure, well, how much did it cost you?
Oh, it cost me this and that and this and that.
Okay, well, I don't wanna just take it from you.
I'll give you a fair amount back for it.
Oh, sure, no problem.
But that's a private exchange.
That's an agreement between two parties.
But once you get into the public domain,
so there's a public domain and jurisdiction
and a private domain and jurisdiction.
The corporate entities, the government, so forth,
they have jurisdiction over the public, not the private.
The private, you can have a private club
where the membership sign an agreement form with you
and this is the agreement
and this is how it goes forward, right?
You can't do anything that harms people, obviously.
You can't have like a murder club.
I ain't gonna, that's not gonna work.
There's limitations, what I'm saying.
Like you can't just do harm.
That's not the point.
The whole point is that you are responsible.
You are being more responsible.
You're taking responsibility.
You don't need mommy and daddy government
to tell you what to do or tell you to sweep your floors
or tell you to get the mice out of your apartment
or whatever, because you're an adult
and adults have responsibilities
and take those responsibilities seriously.
And that's the same thing with a PMA.
So you have to, so you're not leaning on anybody else.
It's on you.
So it is a more serious contemplation you have to have.
Are you ready for that?
Are you ready for the responsibility
and the work that it takes when you do have a conflict?
Because if conflicts arise between your customers
or your clients or whatever in the private,
the PMA structure, the agreement is that you too
will work it out together.
You will sort it out together.
You don't need a mediator at that point.
Or if you do, it's a mediator you both agree on
that's in the private, like a mutual colleague
or something, right?
Otherwise, because the agreement is you're not gonna
drag us into the public with this problem.
We're gonna keep it in the private
and we're gonna deal with it ourselves, right?
So there's some risks, so obviously involved.
We're still learning.
It's a bit new.
What happens when we bump up against the public domain?
How do we interface?
There's a lot you have to really look at.
But the simple fact is that you're just having like,
you meet someone on the street, you're doing an exchange.
In the private, it's agreement between two parties
that are living men or women and not interactions
between corporations.
And it has no need for taxation or any of that
because you're trading privately
and not in the public domain.
So it has different rules.
Very good, very good, very good overview.
And in Australia, but around the world as well,
licensing and board certification
all touches on that contractual elements
that you're touching on, Amanda,
there where you apply for registration and you agree,
I will be bound by the decisions of the board.
It's not legislative, it's contractual.
We need to understand that important distinction.
All right, Stephen, your last questions,
because we're up two and a half hours up in six minutes.
Well, let me add one quick comment.
To have a merger club, you need your own public agency.
I have a what?
You need your own government agency,
like the CDC or something, you know, at the murder club.
Oh, the murder club, yeah.
We are talking about that.
I have a merger club, yeah.
Very good, very good.
Charles, you said that you wanted an update from Warner.
Warner, yes, Warner sent me that.
He's on a phone call.
If he runs out of time, he'll give it to us
on Sunday night.
But that big litigators weekend was last weekend.
So it'd be good, but we are finishing in five minutes.
So you go now, Stephen.
Amanda, what, you know, the tax people
who wanted you to fill in some boring forms
and you presented them with a bill for $3,600,
was it Canadian dollars?
Did they pay it?
No, no, I haven't heard from them.
Have you submitted your tax return?
No, no, no, they didn't pay me.
Funny, right.
I've done this with taxes.
I've tried all the methods.
I was pulled into court scenarios
once I graduated at Atropa Thur College
and I used those scenarios to my advantage
and I practiced a lot of these different ideas of law
in actual courts to see what's real, what's not,
what works, what doesn't, what they're,
what they bully back with when you start to come at it
from a private person in their public domain,
how to argue jurisdiction,
how to put the judge on their oath, which I did,
which if you do that, by the way,
they will bring in two armed guards
and they will draw their guns
and they will stand behind you if you do that.
Just so you know.
And I practiced all the different type of paperwork as well
with different banks and institutions and things
to see how this played out.
And I got a lot of success from it
and I think my bravery kind of came up from facing that
because I think a lot of people are really afraid
of that system and what it can mean,
but I had a bench warrant call out for me
because I told them that they've dragged me in
against my will and I'm not gonna comply, right?
So then they made me comply because they tricked me
into getting jurisdiction by taking my driver's license
out of my bag.
Anyway, I was in jail for one night
because of the bench warrant and I was sitting,
I was meditated the whole time and I was like, I see,
this is it, this is the greatest fear.
This is pretty much the greatest fear.
I'm like next to death or suffering or,
the incarceration is like a pretty decent fear
for why you wouldn't rock the boat, right?
I'm like, I was fine.
I'm like, oh yeah, it's okay.
Been there, got it.
I got, I understand the programming,
I understand the thing.
I saw what it's about and I was out the next day and then-
Did they feed you, Amanda?
They tried to feed me McDonald's food
and I said to them, if I eat that food,
I will be very, very ill and you will have to take me
to the hospital.
So I said, I'm very clean eating
and at the time I was actually raw vegan.
And I said, the only thing that you can feed me
is already in my bag.
It was my leftover lunch and it was a grapefruit.
If you could give that to me, that'd be great.
They're like, sorry, we can't do that.
La la la.
So I'm like, that's fine, I'll fast.
And I'm meditating there, meditating there for a few hours
and then a woman cop opens the door
and gives me my grapefruit without saying a word.
And it was the best-
Did you want it?
What?
She gave me my food.
She gave me my grapefruit that I had asked for earlier,
hours earlier.
And she just handed it to me with a smile and I ate it
and then it stunk in there.
It was just disgusting.
And so I used the grape, the peel
and I squeezed all the essential oils out
and I had like an aromatherapy experience in there too.
And they have CCTV camera watching me the whole time.
So anyway, it was quite an experience for me,
but what it did, I reached that fear level
and now it's not a fear, it's gone.
Beautiful.
That's a lovely love.
Do the thing you fear and the death of fear is certain.
I think that's, Rome is in the Bible.
Do the thing you fear.
So Amanda, did you have the means to take the zest?
Is it, when you take the zest of an orange, for example,
or a grapefruit, did you have that?
Yeah, yeah.
That's what I squeezed it into the air
and it was smelling wonderful.
Yeah.
All right.
We've got Warner here, Steven.
We have a quick update on the COVID litigators
and perhaps a bit more at the next meeting.
Warner, tell us how it went.
Oh, hello everybody.
Oh my goodness.
And I see a few people who are at the conference.
I see John Bodwin down there
and I think I saw Meryl on here as well.
Boy, all I can say is I was just thrilled
with everybody who came.
We had so many wonderful discussions.
We had, I think, 43 panelists speak over two days,
very rapid fire.
John can tell you how that was.
It was a little bit, it was very fast,
but nobody was getting bored.
Nobody was looking at their cell phones
or their computers for the most part.
And I think, you know, we ended up
with about 200 attorneys there.
I was not expecting that many.
I think we had, these are rough numbers guys,
but I think we had about 30 doctors,
maybe 20 or 30 nurses.
We had media.
I'm not even sure all the media that was there.
I gave about six interviews over the weekend
and I know one was to Politico.
So I'm very curious as to how they're gonna spin this
in Politico.
I haven't seen it yet.
The New York Times is there, Washington Post,
and then a lot of the alternative media were there as well.
And I guess NPR was there though.
I didn't interview with any of those major media
except for Politico.
I just didn't have, it was, they were trying to catch me
as I was running between, you know, various meetings.
Warner, I just want you to be quick
because Amanda, I wanted to know
if you have a question of Warner from this litigators group
because Warner, that work you did in organizing,
that was a huge amount of work.
And I also want to be conscious of Amanda's time
for the two and a half hours.
Amanda, do you have any questions of Warner
on the great work that Warner and his group
are doing in America?
You're on mute.
Sorry, I just realized.
Well, I'm new to what this group is particularly doing.
Is it specifically targeted for stopping the vaccine
or what is the goal?
Yeah, Warner is-
So the goal of the group, Amanda,
is to talk endlessly until we understand
what has happened to us in the last three years.
That's essentially what it is.
And the reason that's important
is because unless we do that, and until we do that,
we can't hold these people, these criminals,
properly to account if we don't know what they've done to us,
including reducing many of the population
into Stockholm syndrome.
A very dangerous state.
And the AI agenda part of it too, the trans-humanism part.
Yeah. Yeah, sure.
And, but so when you do, have you looked at,
I can send you some research.
There's one-
Warner is a brilliant lawyer in Ohio, I think,
and he's also in New York state.
So he's running a lot of cases,
including the biggest legal case in the world.
Oh, is that still going, Warner?
It is still going, yeah.
Yeah, and that's which now, the whistleblower?
Yeah, it's Brooke Jackson against Pfizer.
It's in the court in Beaumont, Texas right now.
We're still, we had a very good hearing
a month ago down there.
You know, I have, you know, obviously it's, you know,
a David or maybe a Sarah versus Goliath situation.
And, you know, I was very pleased
that the judge had read the materials
because, you know, he had some penetrating questions
for Pfizer, you know, questioning all of the requirements,
you know, in the statement of work
and that it be a safe, effective, you know,
he kept coming at that and, you know,
they would come back and say,
no, it doesn't have to be safe and effective.
And he's like, are you telling me
you can get something through the FDA
that's not safe, not effective,
and we can't hold you responsible?
And they said, yes.
And it didn't seem like he liked that answer.
So I have more hope.
I mean, you know, I'm always an optimist anyway,
but I, you know, I've had to say to my client
that our chances are very slim.
And I actually have told her they're less slim
after what we've been through so far in the litigation.
And certainly after that hearing,
I felt a glimmer of hope, you know, in this.
So I'm, you know, I didn't expect it,
but I wonder what's happening in the background.
You know, a friend of mine texted me today
and I'm gonna go, you know,
we have so many sad things happening.
You know, her nephew died,
and he was in his early 40s, Air Force, you know, pilot.
And I, you know, and she sends me a picture, you know,
and she's blaming Pfizer.
And, you know, and I do think that this is the damage
at this point, unfortunately,
and you know, many of us here tried to stop it,
but the damage at this point is so extensive
that it's affecting literally everybody
that I know in some way.
And I'm sure it's affected the judge and his staff
and friends of his, and they're starting, you know,
to put this together.
And I, you know, I wish we could have stopped it.
I, you know, and I, you know, my client, Brooke,
we were at the conference,
and a woman came up to her,
and she didn't have a conference tag on.
She wasn't actually attending the conference,
but she had driven to the conference to find Brooke.
And it turns out that her son had committed suicide
six months to the day earlier
because of vaccine injuries that were really, really severe.
I mean, she described things like his skin
was shedding off of his body.
You know, she described, you know,
basically an Alzheimer's condition
that seemed to be affecting her son, you know,
and he ended up ending his life.
And she came to see Brooke and hand her the estate,
which wasn't much, it was $10,000,
but she handed her Brooke, her son's, a check
from her son's estate for $10,000,
and said, I don't want Pfizer
to ever forget that they killed Michael.
Wow.
So, you know, these-
So that's the kind of story, Warner,
that needs to be told worldwide.
I don't know whether you know this,
but Todd Kalander has got a new platform.
So it's called Cloud Hub, and it's only just started.
He only acquired it about a couple of weeks ago, I think.
He's had one meeting so far.
And anyway-
Well, you know, I'm very, you know,
we're buried in communications,
but I'm happy to appear in anything I possibly can
to spread the word.
No, listen to this though, Warner.
The platform that has the capability.
So unfortunately, it's artificial intelligence,
like Zoom, you know, except this one is amazing
because it can broadcast live to 100,000 people
all over the world at the same time,
and translate into about 90 languages
with less than a second delay.
So we'll get you on there.
Anyway, we-
You can tell that story.
That's a great story.
We'll find out about that.
We're fast running out of time.
Amanda, I'm conscious you have to go.
Len's got his hand up.
But Warner, that is a powerful story, everybody.
And we've all got stories, and we know we need those stories,
and Warner's collecting them.
And Amanda, I'm glad you've met Warner here
because that's-
That's-
Very amazing.
For you to know.
Just so-
Warner, there's just one thing that you need to know
if you haven't, sorry.
I need to just tell Warner one thing.
So the reason you said that you're surprised, Warner,
that all these people are affected,
you've come to that conclusion.
Yes, you're absolutely right.
They've got Stockholm syndrome
as a result of the worldwide psychological torture
by their own governments.
And it was planned.
So that's my perception as a medical doctor.
They've all got-
We have all got Stockholm syndrome.
To an extent, we've been damaged, anyway.
I haven't.
Well, we've been damaged.
I do think, I mean, it was really an amazing group
of people who got together in Atlanta.
We're gonna do it again next year,
and CHD's doing one this fall.
I was particularly impressed by the range of political views
and the diversity, equity, and inclusion of our conference.
It was very diverse.
And Charles, you may know,
we had some Aussies out there as well.
Dr. Mal came out.
Wonderful.
So we had three people from Australia there.
It was fantastic.
But the other thing that I just wanna let people know,
the energy coming out of that conference was,
I know that so many of these attorneys
were isolated and alone,
and they had a show of hands as to how many were in firms
of under 10 or even solo practitioners,
and most of the room were firms
that were less than 10 lawyers.
And the other thing is just the young lawyers
that were there.
I was shocked at the number of young lawyers
that are really gearing up.
And three of them were ex-Marines,
and they're ready to charge the hill, man.
You know, so I'm, you know, just, you know, we need,
the field of law is aging in the United States.
I think the average age of a lawyer is probably 45 right now.
I'm 61.
And, you know, to see this passel of young lawyers there,
you know, trying to link up and linking up with each other,
just fantastic.
It's just fantastic.
I feel the energy of them in particular.
And, you know, we're gonna help support everybody.
That was the goal of this, was to really get networked
and make sure everybody has litigation materials,
understanding what they're doing in litigation.
If they wanna get into a new area,
that they've got support and expertise,
somebody to mentor them in that new area.
We're trying to find funding mechanisms
for many of these lawsuits who are working on that as well.
And we are also trying to work on things like, you know,
one thing I kept emphasizing was don't destroy your experts.
You know, what do you have to do when you get an expert in?
Cause we do need experts in a lot of these cases.
You've got to know how to, you know,
you've got to know how to defend your expert
under the federal rules of evidence.
You've got to know how to attack an expert as well.
So, you know, both sides of that coin,
we've really got to teach the lawyers that.
I think that's one of the most crucial things coming up
because a lot of this is gonna rely on experts.
So anyway, I'd be happy to come back
if you guys wanted me to and kind of-
So Warner, on that note, you can come back next Sunday
or you can come back next Tuesday.
It's up to you.
I'll tell you what, let's plan like-
Oh, not Sunday, Tuesday or the following Sunday, sorry.
Okay, let's plan on Tuesday.
I'll give a half an hour overview of the conference
and what we covered if you guys would like,
if you don't already know it.
Very good, yes.
Can we ask you questions afterwards or not?
Let's see, let me look at my calendar.
I, you know, my calendar has filled you guys
and I do want to thank you because your, you know,
there's a number of groups that have been critical
to me making some of the connections that I've made
and your group is certainly one of those.
So thank you very much.
It's, you know, so many people that I've met
through the group and have learned of me through the group
and it's just been a, you just, you may not realize,
I mean, maybe you do.
I mean, it's just, you guys have really been a vortex
of information and connection for, you know,
I think for COVID information
and it's absolutely been critical.
And I know it's, you know, I know things,
there's been difficulties here and there along the way.
It doesn't matter, it's been fantastic.
So yes, you're at 3.30 EST next Tuesday, is that correct?
Every two-
It's 3.00 PM, 4.00 PM I think.
3.30, so wait a minute, are you EST, yes?
Yeah, I am.
Okay, come on, that's Tuesday.
So it's 3.00 PM, 3.00 PM, oh, sorry,
Australia goes back, doesn't it?
So, but that doesn't affect the relationship
between the UK, so it's 3.00 PM next Tuesday, Warner.
Can you manage that?
I can come on about 3.30 PM, you know-
Let's not do this now, just, you've locked it in,
we'll fix it, Amanda, we've got to let Amanda go.
Glenn's got a quick question-
Sorry for taking up a lot of time, Amanda, thank you.
I'll email you, Warner, sorry, Amanda.
Glenn, quick, you know what I'm gonna do.
Go ahead, Amanda.
I just sent you, I just sent Warren the paper highlighting
that it's a testing pandemic, it might be helpful for you
because it describes the differences between
what would be categorized as a true pandemic,
like a mass poisoning, right?
And a testing pandemic, so the pandemic is showing
on the papers because of the testing,
so it's the testing that makes it look like it is.
So that's the evidence.
And that's exactly what happened, yeah, exactly.
So, do you send out to Warner, did you say, Amanda?
Yeah, Warner.
Okay, it's in the chat, yeah.
So- Yeah, I send it public and private.
So, Amanda, so if you want to-
Hang on, hang on, we're gonna Glenn,
and then we're gonna finish, Glenn, quickly.
So, it's a yes or no to Warner in that during the conference,
did they do anything around tuning up
whistleblower mechanisms?
If the answer is yes, I'll get ahold of you,
if the answer is no, then I won't.
We had all kinds of whistleblower
and also discussion of criminal charges, yes.
Okay, thanks.
Good, that's beautiful.
All right, Stephen, last question, Amanda,
because we're gonna let it go and we're gonna finish.
So, Amanda, what I was gonna say was,
so I'm sorry I'm talking too much,
but I just wanted to say that if you want a group
to join when you haven't got anything to do,
then you're welcome to join us and join in the chat,
so that you're not having to present,
but you can actually get points over,
and Warner knows that, and lots of other people know that too,
so then they come on, despite me and Charles.
Correct. Thank you.
Okay, thank you, Stephen, thank you, Amanda.
Big round of applause, everybody, for Amanda.
Well done for your courage, for speaking your truth.
Oh, Shasta, come on, we're out of time, Shasta.
One, 30 seconds.
Just one quick thing.
I just wanna follow up with what Dr. Amanda said
about the testing pandemic,
that even if you don't wanna talk about viruses
existing or not, the fact that they were cycling,
the cycle threshold was above 35,
and Fauci himself said that that wouldn't pick anything up.
If Warner can remember that when he's talking
to Pfizer and all these lawyers
to look at the cycle threshold that was being used
to make those alleged cases, if they were 38 to 40,
even according to Fauci, they were dead nucleotide, period.
I think Warner does know that,
but we can't be sure of anything.
Just a way in, we are suing under seal
one of the testing companies for what,
you know, the basically inaccurate tests,
and we're very aware of it,
and in fact, Pfizer had control
of all the PCR testing in the trials,
so we're very, very aware of this issue.
And I believe, Warner, that they switched in 2021,
in January, vaccinated people,
they started cycling it at 28 and unvaccinated at 40,
and to me, it's just total criminality.
So I'm really, I'm glad that you know Dr. Amanda now.
Thank you guys, appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thanks, everyone.
Thank you so much for coming on
and being so brave with us a lot.
Thank you, Amanda.
All right, everybody.
Thus end, thank you for being here.
See you on Sunday, Monday,
depending where you are on the planet,
I'll be starting at 5 a.m. on Monday,
after daylight saving ends in Australia,
so we poor Aussies get screwed again.
But anyway, we're used to that.
Bye, everybody.
Thank you, Warner, good to see you.
Matilda will talk, bye.
Stephen, thanks.
Bye, see you, Sam.
Thank you, Charles.
Bye.
Thank you.
Bye.
Bye, everybody.