All right, let's get this show on the road.
Welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.
I'm Charles Kovace, Australia's passion provocateur.
That's why I'm wearing red because red is the color of passion.
Stephen Frost started this group, a genius for doing so, so that we fight for truth and
justice and freedom.
Paul's presented to us twice before, I think, Paul, so it's wonderful to have you back.
We know there's lots of professions here, but for those who might be newer to the group,
we have doctors, retired doctors, lawyers, retired lawyers, legal strategists, journalists,
engineers, writers, researchers, nurses, investors, dentists, financiers, and troublemakers like
Jerry Waters and others.
And patent experts, Rima Labo, I'm going to put you in the category of troublemaker as
well, even though you might be a psychiatrist.
It's all about increasing our understanding.
We're here in a true spirit of exploration and discovery.
Most of us understand we're in World War III.
The process is that Paul will present to us for as long as he wishes.
And then Q&A, Paul knows the process.
Put your hand up when you have a question for Paul.
This goes for two and a half hours.
Paul, we'd love you to stay for as long as you can, but if you have to leave early, we
understand.
And then at the two and a half hour, Mark, Tom Rodman has set up a video telegram chat
that those who have more time can join.
But what the two and a half hours enables you to do is to plan your life.
So you go right out of the four melodies are in these two and a half hours and we get tons
of great insights and information.
There is no censorship.
It's proper moderation, free speech.
This is a free speech environment.
Free speech is crucial.
Often we've had over the journey, you know, I urge you to be willing to keep questioning
your beliefs and let's not have debates about people's beliefs.
You know, sorry, that's what we're here for, debates.
But let's not have conflict about different beliefs.
It is about the development of science.
If you have a solution, by all means, put it in the chat.
If you have anything, there's a solution.
And if you don't like someone else's solution, you don't have to go and complain about it.
You don't have to go and attack them.
Not necessary.
But you put your stuff in there.
But someone each one of you has a special insight that in the chat might save somebody's
life.
That's the way life works.
We come from love, not fear.
And Paul, you have demonstrated to us that that's your philosophy, that you do come from
love and the contribution that you've made in this war that we are fighting has been
amazing.
Have an open mind.
And through the journey of questioning your belief, you raise your self awareness and
just to remind you why self awareness is so important, because if you don't understand
you, how can you possibly understand anybody else?
So enjoy the journey.
Paul, thank you so much for again coming with us in your busy schedule.
Before you start, Stephen, is there anything you would like to add?
One thing I did think of the video of Sukrit Bhakthi from I think it was the 12th of October.
I'm not sure about that.
Could be 13th.
That one we need to try to put it about if we can.
I don't know if there are people here with platforms other than the Rumble platform
that it's on.
I don't know whether the video survived on Rumble.
I heard that Rumble had been attacked, Charles, is that right?
I haven't heard.
Anyway, the point is that Sukrit Bhakthi and I would like that to be disseminated as much
as possible.
So we need to send it to Children's Health Defence, for example, and all the other platforms
that we know about.
And so if someone can help with that, I'd be really happy.
Hey, Charles, while we're waiting, my screen share has been disabled.
No, I'll give you the screen share now.
Okay.
So you are now a co-host, Paul.
Okay.
Okay, that's a good thing.
All right.
Over to you.
Welcome.
You tell me when I can start.
You don't have to do a long introduction because if they don't know me, well, who cares?
You're a celebrity.
Everyone knows who you are.
Now, by all means, everyone, just before you start, Paul, please promote the Bhakthi video.
I'll put the link into it, into the chat so that all of you, it's on the Rumble platform.
If any of you know about any dramas with Rumble, let's talk about it in Q&A.
Over to you, Paul.
Okay, thanks, Charles.
So I'm just kind of recovering from influenza, so I may cough a bit.
So our plan, my talk is about 40 minutes or 35 minutes, and then we can do some Q&A.
Obviously, more recently, because of this massive humanitarian disaster with vaccine-injured patients,
we've become interested in helping these patients and formulating a treatment plan for them.
So I'm really going to focus on that.
Fortunately, I have no conflicts of interest.
I'm not selling anything or we're not making money from anything.
So I'm completely conflict of interest free.
And so what I've recently learned is most of what I learned at medical school was bullshit.
So basically, what I've been doing in the last few years is unlearning everything that I've learned.
And the more I unlearn, the more I seem to learn.
And so it's really been an interesting journey because we think the agencies are captured.
We think the federal government's captured.
We think the journals are captured, but the medical schools are captured as well.
And our education is so narrow and biased.
And then obviously, politics has been introduced into science and really has decapitated science.
So what I'm really going to talk about is a definition of spike-related disease,
the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and an approach to treatment.
I'm going to kind of concentrate on the pathogenesis and the clinical features.
So this really is patients with spike-related disease, long COVID, but predominantly the vaccine-injured,
because as I said, it's become a problem of enormous humanitarian disaster.
So the definition, there's really no definition because it's a disease that nobody or the authorities don't believe exists.
So basically, the definition for post-COVID vaccine syndrome is a temporal correlation between receiving a COVID-19 vaccine
and obviously vaccine is used loosely.
And the beginning or worsting of a patient's clinical manifestation is significant to diagnose a patient as a COVID-19 vaccine-induced injury
when the symptoms are unexplained by other causes.
And obviously, there's significant overlap between long COVID, long hauler, and the vaccine injured.
And it gets more complicated because patients with long COVID are often vaccinated.
So it kind of muddies the water.
But as we'll see, the biggest problem is your load of spike protein.
The more spike protein you have, the more pathophysiological derangements you have, the more organ dysfunction, and the greater the risk of death.
So the epidemiology, so I'm using the vaccine adverse reporting events system in the US, which obviously is a complete failure.
It doesn't really work, but it's one of the resources we have.
We know there's an underreporting factor of about 30.
So if you look at the system as of July, there were over 800 adverse events, 5,000 myocarditis and 15,000 deaths.
What's more important, though, is if you actually use data extrapolated from Pfizer's own study, in the US, this works out to about 2.5 million adverse events.
But this, too, is an underestimate.
So there was an independent survey looking at vaccine injury done by the poll fish group.
These are independent pollsters.
And the incidence of adverse events was 5.8 percent, which is very close to the 5.6 percent in an independent survey in the VA.
So you extrapolate this out.
This is over 16 million.
Sixty million people who have severe vaccine related injury.
And it obviously is a problem because it's a disease that's not recognized.
Neither Pfizer, Moderna, the FDA, the NIH CDC recognize that there's such a disease.
So these patients obviously have a problem.
Their doctors don't recognize the disease.
They don't put the symptoms together.
They have little access to health care and it costs them an enormous amount of money.
So this is the VA's data.
So this includes the data in the US as well as data which is reported to the vaccine manufacturers registered in the US.
So they have to report both the US data and the reports that they get.
And you can see how this is approaching 30,000 and you can see this compares to all other vaccines combined.
So the fact that we have a problem is pretty clear.
In terms of the pathogenesis, it's complicated.
It's complicated because, first of all, we don't know what's being injected.
Secondly, the multiple components that are being injected.
One of them is the lipid nanoparticle, which consists of these two LAPA proteins.
So there's ALC0315 and ALC0159, which is the polyethylene glycol.
So as we'll see, the lipid nanoparticle itself causes adverse events.
This is what SARS looks like.
This is the lipid nanoparticle.
So we know that patients can develop a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction due to the polyethylene glycol or other components of the lipid nanoparticle.
PEG activates multiple complement components, the activation of which may be responsible for anaphylaxis and cardiovascular collapse.
So many of the acute anaphylactic reactions to the vaccine are probably due to a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction to polyethylene glycol.
And the lipid nanoparticles themselves are highly pro-inflammatory.
They activate the inflammatory cascade.
But it seems like most of the trouble is due to the spike protein.
It was seems that it was designed to be highly toxic and probably one of the most toxic proteins known to mankind.
And it does a whole lot of bad stuff.
Really, it's really an extremely toxic protein.
And just to summarize, we know it activates inflammation due to molecular mimicry of production of autoantibodies,
causes profound mitochondrial dysfunction.
We have production of amyloid and prion.
We have endothelitis and vasculitis, as well as activation of clotting by multiple mechanisms.
So what spike does is very complicated.
It's an intersection of all of these overlapping pathophysiological processes.
And just to show you some tissue, because people think this is a disease that doesn't exist, but the tissues don't lie.
The cells don't lie.
The pathologist seems to know everything.
So this is what happens to the venule or the endothelium with vaccination.
You can see the endothelium gets completely screwed up.
So this is spike.
So this is a stain specifically for S1 of spike protein.
And you can see that the spike protein accumulates very high concentrations in the endothelium.
And obviously, it does all kinds of bad things in the endothelium, causes this vasculitis, activates clotting, activates the complement cascade,
and results in a profound endothelitis with clotting microvascular perfusion defects.
So this is the heart.
We know that they get a myocarditis.
This is a patient, obviously, who didn't survive.
You see the lymphocytic infiltration in the myocardium.
It seems that there's kind of two phases.
There's the acute cardiac events within 48 hours.
And this seems to be a catecholamine induced, catecholamine surge with coagulative necrosis of the heart and marked arrhythmias.
And then it leads to this lymphocytic myocarditis picture.
And again, this is the myocardium.
This is a vessel completely packed with a spike protein.
And then just to prove that this is not due to SARS-CoV-2, but due to actually the spike protein.
So this is staining for the spike protein and the nuclear capsid protein in the heart.
And you can see how the spike protein, I mean, it's all over the place.
It just lights up in the heart.
And so, you know, what happens is patients get inoculated with this thing that makes RNA and which makes spike.
And the spike gets distributed throughout the whole body and accumulates in the cell.
And we kind of talk about it because the problem is you have the intracellular accumulation of spike protein.
And this is within the coronary artery.
We know that it goes to the coronary artery, can cause an endothelitis, activate clotting, causing thrombosis.
Seymour Holtz's father apparently died of a coronary event related to a spike protein in the coronary artery.
It goes to the aorta. You name it, the spike goes there.
This is spike in the brain. So it penetrates through the blood brain barrier.
It goes for astrocytes. It goes for neurons.
And so this is spike within the cerebral tissue.
So as you can see, what happens is these patients develop disseminated spike, spike protein throughout the body.
So what are the clinical features that these patients have?
This is the problem, because this is a it doesn't conform to what most doctors know.
You have one or two symptoms giving like to a disease.
So these symptoms don't fit into a pattern of a traditional disease.
So most physicians go to these doctors with a whole list of complaints.
The average is 20. And the doctors think that they cook all heads.
It's all in the head because it doesn't fit in with any particular syndrome that they've been taught.
So they think, oh, this is a functional disease. These people are stressed.
So you'll see that there's an enormous spectrum of of symptoms that these people have.
It's not a simple disease. It's really a vaccine injury syndrome.
So, you know, people want to deny that this disease exists.
But if you actually look at the peer review publication, there are now over 2000 peer reviewed articles that have been published describing various forms of covid vaccine injuries.
So, you know, the denial lists have a really big problem, because even though the medical journals are captured, they're now over 2000 peer reviewed published papers.
So this is a I'm just going to go through some survey data, which just gives you some insight into what this post vaccine syndrome really is.
So this was a affiliate group of React.
They did a survey in Germany and we'll talk about the React survey in the U.S., which is really similar.
You can see 777 vaccine injured patients.
Most of the onset is within the first week and certainly within the first two weeks in terms of the age and sex distribution for reasons which may or may not be clear.
So here over 80 percent of the patients are females and females generally within the reproductive ages.
So you can see most of them are women between the age of 30 and 60, bear the brunt.
So this seems to be women in the reproductive period.
So this may be hormonally related to a large degree in terms of the symptoms.
What distinguishes vaccine injured from long COVID is the enormous preponderance of neurological symptoms in the vaccine injured patient.
And this why it's such a devastating disease.
Many of these people are profoundly disabled.
They have weird and odd neurological complaints.
The doctors have no idea what they complaining of because it doesn't fit within any pattern that they know of.
So they get ignored.
And as we'll see, unfortunately, most of the tests are negative, which then further validates their diagnosis that it's all functional.
So most of it, 80 percent of patients have neurological symptoms.
They have problems with mobility, cardiovascular, digestive, visual, nephrological.
So really across the board in terms of organ system involvement and then neurological.
Obviously, it plays an enormous role.
The most important is they get the small fiber neuropathy with tingling numbness, burning the feet are on fire, parasthesia.
So this is one of the most common features.
And then obviously brain fog, dizziness, headaches.
So headaches and migraines are really important.
There's some patients who have severe unrelenting migraines, which go on for weeks.
And we've had patients actually who want to be euthanized because that seems to be the only way that they think they can get relief from these terrible migraines or migraines.
And the other pretty classic disabling symptom is tinnitus.
So these people have severe ringing in their ears, which is nonstop and constant and really not relieved.
And it drives them insane.
So you can see that there are a whole host of neurological symptoms.
So looking at the top 10 symptoms, this is from React 19.
You know, they all complain of tiredness, fatigue, lethargy, exercise intolerance is really important.
So what happens is if they if they exercise, they have the syndrome of profound post exercise fatigue and dysfunction.
So basically they have to exercise the limited access to their threshold, brain fog, palpitations, muscle weakness, tingling, dizziness.
So these are the most common symptoms.
So you may or may not know, this is actually the report released from Pfizer that was released with the first FOIA release.
So this is data reported to Pfizer and the FDA within the first 90 days of the release of the vaccine.
These are the adverse events that were reported to to Pfizer.
So within the first 90 days, so that's from like December to 22 February to 21.
You can see there were 1224 deaths directly related to the vaccine and there were 42,000 adverse events which were reported to Pfizer.
And obviously, you know, it just supports the concept that these vaccines are completely safe and highly effective.
And when you look at the organ systems involved, again, it's a whole slew of symptoms.
And you can see that many Pfizer themselves have classified them as serious, you know, with general disorders, over 20,000 serious adverse events.
So you can see why they wanted to bury this data for 75 years.
And it is astonishing that since this data is released, no one seems to actually care.
So what? I mean, these people should be imprisoned and the vaccine should, you know, if there were, I think, three adverse events from a baby formula and the baby formula was removed from the market.
I mean, these vaccines are the first, you know, three months killed 1200 people and it seems the FDA doesn't really care.
And so further in this document, they actually ate.
So in nine pages, when they list all the adverse special events of interest, you can see this is the nine pages of adverse outcomes with over 500 discrete diagnoses related to the vaccine.
I don't think there's there's any other medical intervention that we know of that as is as toxic and has such a spectrum of pathology as these so-called vaccines.
So obviously, it's a big problem.
And so what I really didn't include in this last slide or this series is that if you look at diagnostic tests, you can see that there's a lot of different types of symptoms.
And so what I really didn't include in this last slide is that if you look at diagnostic tests, over 60 percent of patients, the tests come back normal.
So these patients present with all these symptoms, the tests are largely normal.
And so the doctors just dismiss these patients.
And so we recommend really only screening tests that are important.
You may want to look for reactivation of viruses and and certain bacteria, EBV and CMV.
And obviously, the dictum, as we talk to medical school, that's the only thing that's of value is you only do well.
I was taught at my medical school is only do a test if the results will change your treatment plan.
Just doing a test for the sake of a test serves no purpose in terms of order antibodies.
So these patients have hundreds of border antibodies, which really, if you have a, you know, a small fiber neuropathy, you have order antibodies.
They there, but there's really not much you can directly treat.
There are a few exceptions that, you know, if the patients have, you know, lupus any coagulant, you know,
which would be important because it does increase their risk of clotting and if they have a and a.
But otherwise, to do a whole host of these highly expensive order antibodies really doesn't add much to the treatment.
So in terms of treatment, it's rather difficult because there's no vaccine injury syndrome.
The medical community don't recognize that they obviously know papers published in the New England Journal or Lancet or JAMA on how to treat these diseases.
So, you know, we've had to put together a treatment approach based on, you know, the pathophysiology of outline pharmacology that we're going to see.
And then obviously clinical observation that I've showed you and then feedback from patients.
The bottom line is that this is a chronic immune dysregulation.
So the what one has to do and what I recognize is the body has enormous capacity for health, for healing and self restoration.
And so the main thrust of therapy is to try and help the body heal itself.
And this becomes important because a lot of the clinicians are using potent immunosuppressive therapy, which actually may make things worse.
What is interesting is some is some patients respond to one therapy, whereas another patient will be have completely no response to the same therapy.
So for whatever reason, it needs to be highly individualized.
And the patient really serves as their own control.
That's why having a standard protocol doesn't work.
It has to be it has to be tailored according to the patient's response.
So really, our approach is twofold.
As I showed you from the pathology, the biggest problem is spike and the spike is all over the place and it persists in the cell.
And it is already phenomenon why the spikes persist.
And there are a number of reasons. One is the spike protein or switches off a number of host defense mechanisms.
It inactivates T.
Keller cells. It activates cytotoxic eight cells.
It switches off autophagy. So it actually promotes its own survival within the cell.
So the main our main approach is to get rid of spike.
And the way you do this is to promote autophagy.
And then at the same time, you want to limit the profound pathology, which is produced by spike, the inflammation, the clotting, the mitochondrial dysfunction.
So really, these two go hand in hand simultaneously to reduce the load of spike.
And while you clearing spike to to limit the manifestations of spike.
So this is our post vaccine management protocol.
Obviously, this is on our website.
We've recently updated it. It's always changing as we learn new stuff.
So this is our first line therapy or our first therapies, intermittent daily fasting, which which is really truly an astonishing intervention.
And we'll come to it. So you may or may not know that I because of my interest in this, I knew nothing about this stuff.
I was attacked to diabetic and hypertensive.
I thought I was doomed to be a diabetic forever.
And I basically have cured my diabetes.
I'm no longer on diabetic medication and my blood glucose runs around 100.
And that's all diabetic medication.
And that really was through this dietary manipulation.
So it's really powerful and what it can do, you know, just just for for covert, but for chronic diseases, for diabetes, for Alzheimer's, for Parkinson's disease, for hypertension, for metabolic diseases, for chronic inflammatory diseases.
Because as we'll see, the mid fasting has a profound effect on immune homeostasis by activating the removal of damaged cells and proteins, damaged mitochondria, regenerating mitochondria, has also enormous impact in terms of a whole host of other diseases.
And so we'll talk about this.
Interestingly enough, as we'll see there, a whole host of other molecules which directly activate autophagy.
So if people have difficulty doing strict fasting, you know, they can do less strict, but take these other autophagy induces.
But diet is really important.
So, you know, eating all the time, like most Western people do, is a is a highly damaging lifestyle.
And then I have a Macdon, which has, you know, it's truly an astonishing molecule.
Obviously, it gets poo pooed all the time, but it does really remarkable things.
I mean, apart from being antiviral, it has potent anti-inflammatory properties.
It binds to the spike protein.
As we'll see, it actually also activates autophagy.
Moderate physical activity, low dose naltrexone, which paradoxically the low dose through toll receptors has anti-inflammatory analgesic and neuromodulating properties.
We use melatonin because it's just such an important anti-inflammatory antioxidant and activator of autophagy.
So Mark Twain said a little starvation can really do more for the average sick man than can the best medicine and the best doctors.
And this is an unfortunate statement, but it's actually true.
So, you know, the simple thing of time related feeding or intermittent fasting can actually do what most doctors have no idea about, what medicines can't do and can can can heal the sick person.
So this is just a little outline of the benefits of intermittent fasting, obviously switches on autophagy.
It's probably the most effective way of treating insulin resistance.
It is the most effective way.
So together with decreasing increased insulin resistance, balances your blood sugar.
It is singly the most effective way of treating type two diabetes.
But obviously, you know, big pharma doesn't want you to know, because then you're not going to.
It's cheap. You know, this costs nothing.
They're not going to sell you their medicine.
It has potent anti-inflammatory properties, unlike other forms of dieting.
So this is not a diet. This is a lifestyle change.
It actually increases human growth hormone.
And this becomes important because growth hormone declines with aging, with decreasing lean body mass.
And intermittent fasting actually increases growth hormone levels, increases, reduces, reduces risk of.
Chronic disease and its anti-aging properties.
So I would really recommend anyone who's interested in this to read the guide by Jason Fung.
It's a really outstanding book.
And it was really the second time that I read it that I actually grasped it a little bit.
I understood it a little bit more clearly and went on my new journey.
And basically, he describes how it works, what it does and how to do it,
because there are lots of ways of doing it.
There's not one simple way.
And you really can adapt it to any kind of lifestyle.
But basically, this idea of Western people eating all the time is completely physiologically dangerous.
So we talk about autophagy.
So when the cell has bad proteins and these could be proteins which were misfolded from original transcription.
And these usually get dealt with by the by you.
They get ubiquitated and get dealt with by the ubiquitin proteasome system.
But then you have autophagy.
So this really applies to protein aggregates, organelles that are damaged, bacteria, viruses and foreign proteins.
I get destroyed by this process of autophagy.
And so there is a bit of an overlap between ubiquitination and autophagy.
You can see that this is direct ubiquitination with adding the ubiquitin and proteasome.
But through the autophagy, one also gets some degree of ubiquitination.
So there is some overlap.
So really, autophagy is basically self-eating.
The cell eats itself to protect itself.
And we'll see how activation of autophagy actually prevents cell apoptosis.
And they are reciprocally activated.
So basically, what happens is you activate autophagy.
It puts all these damaged organelles, damaged proteins in the garbage truck and loads it into the garbage truck to be removed.
So it's really the way the cell deals with misfolded protein, damaged organelles.
And all unicarious cells do this. Yeasts do this. Mammals do this.
It's a truly remarkable process.
So there's the process of macroautophagy.
So you have the cell stress, whatever that may be, activates the isolation membrane, which then starts the phagophore, which then encapsulates the cargo, forms this autophagosome.
The autophagosome then combines.
So this autophagosome is a double membrane vesicle, combines with the lysosome.
The contents of the autophagosome gets digested to its constituent basic parts, whether it be amino acids or glucose, and then is released.
So what triggers autophagy?
So there are a few mechanisms. Firstly, a decline in cellular ATP.
So basically it's a sign of inadequate cellular energy.
It triggers AMP kinase. One of the most important is a reduction in cytosolic pool of acetyl-CoA.
So obviously acetyl-CoA is produced from breakdown of glucose and fatty acids making acetyl-CoA, which then gets into the Krebs cycle.
So a decrease in acetyl-CoA actually reduces protein acetylation, particularly of certain proteins.
So low amino acids, particularly leucine and low insulin, activate this metabolic switch, MTOR, complex 1 kinase, which gets deacetylated.
And so MTOR acts as a metabolic switch, which switches on and switches off autophagy.
However, it's really complicated. There are multiple genes and multiple processes involved, and there are scientists that spend their days just studying autophagy.
So you can see there are multiple autophagy-related proteins and genes.
But as we said, amino acid decrease or reduce insulin act via the MTOR complex to act as one of the important metabolic switches.
There's the ULK1 complex as well as the phosphoartosinal complex.
And these act through a whole bunch of genes and proteins to activate the autophagy process.
So you can see, again, that it's a very complex intracellular regulating process.
Again, MTOR, ULK and Beckland regulating this process.
And then you have chaperone-mediated autophagy in which heat-shot protein binds to these bad proteins and dumps it in the lysosome.
So as I said, there is an interplay between autophagy and apoptosis.
So the idea really is to protect the cell so the cell doesn't kill itself.
So autophagy, when activated, actually switches of apoptotic pathways, switches on autophagy in a way of protecting the cell from cell death.
So autophagy and spike protein removal.
As I said, the cells are loaded with spike.
I showed you histology pictures of the cells loaded with spike.
And we know that from Bruce Patterson's work and other work that the spike stays in the cell for at least 18 months.
We don't know how long it stays there.
And so the goal is to get rid of spike.
And the only way we know getting rid of spike when it's in the cell is through activating this process of autophagy.
So if you have less protein, it therefore causes less of the downstream effects.
Autophagy removes other misfolded proteins.
We know that the spike induces amyloid and induce some prion proteins.
So this is a way of removing those as well.
And by the way, you know, activating autophagy has been shown to be very effective in both humans and animal models in decreasing the risk of Alzheimer's and degenerative brain disease.
So, you know, that's what I'm trying to do is, you know, so hopefully I cured my diabetes, but hopefully I can cure my dementia at the same time.
So the activators of autophagy is quite interesting how this list has grown.
So obviously the most potent is intermittent fasting or periodic daily fasting.
I mean, so this is the way the body was designed.
But then there's some other molecules which directly activate resveratrol through many of those controller molecules resveratrol, which is a phytochemical, spermidine, polyamide.
And you can buy these over the counter.
I have a Mactan, melatonin, methylene blue, coffee and exercise.
It just so happens that infrared therapy, which is a cool way of energizing the mitochondrion and reducing inflammation also activates autophagy.
But then you have inhibitors. So SARS-CoV-2, probably the spike protein, it actually inhibits autophagy by interfering with beclin-1.
Proton pump inhibitors for multiple reasons.
You want to avoid them because they inhibit autophagy. Hydroxychloroquine, as it so happens, inhibits autophagy.
So what's nice about this is it's simple and it's effective.
There's nobody who really can't do this.
And no matter what your age or your culture or your religion or what you do, there's a way that you can adapt this to your lifestyle.
So it's simple. Basically, you don't eat.
It's as simple as that. You don't eat. And people think, well, you're going to get hungry.
Well, actually, that doesn't happen because insulin resistance is what blocks leptin acting in the brain.
So it's the high insulin levels that actually cause your appetite and make this a vicious cycle of insulin resistance causing you to eat carbohydrate,
which makes it worse. So you continuously snacking and eating.
Once you break that habit, it's a truly astonishing thing. You can eat one meal a day and not be hungry.
It's truly astonishing. So it's basically no eating.
So the benefits of intermittent fasting, you know, acutely improve mental clarity, causes weight loss, loss of fat loss, lowers blood glucose level.
It's probably the most important way of improving insulin sensitivity, as we said, maintains growth hormone.
It keeps your metabolic rate stable, which is unlike other forms of diets, which actually become self-defeating because as you stop eating,
you decrease your basal metabolic rate, improves fat burning, lowers cholesterol, prevents Alzheimer's.
You live longer, you live happier and reverses aging.
So it really is a remarkable intervention. And as obviously it costs nothing.
In fact, you can save money. So that's why, you know, big pharma and the food industry are not really interested in promoting intermittent fasting.
So as I said, the advantages, it's simple. It's just don't eat. It's free. It doesn't.
It's not an expensive thing. Anybody can do it. In fact, you probably eat less.
And so you spend less on food. It's convenient. It's adaptable. You can do it according to your lifestyle.
You can still go out and enjoy a meal now and then and, you know, kind of splurge now and then.
It's very powerful. It's very flexible and ready. It can work with any kind of diet.
You know, we like the low carbohydrate, high fat diet, but you can use it with a Mediterranean diet or whatever diet you are on.
If you if you are a plant person and only eat plants, you know, that would work too.
So who shouldn't fast? So there are a few contraindications, obviously, if you malnourished, anorexia, pregnant woman, breastfeeding woman.
We don't we don't like any children because they're still growing.
And those who have medical conditions should be done under supervision of a health care provider, particularly type one and type two diabetics,
just because you're going to have to adjust their medication.
And as I said, I don't take my diabetic medication because my fasting glucose runs around 100.
My post-perennial glucose goes up to about 120, 130.
So, you know, I would be definitely hypoglycemic if I continued my stupid medications.
So you need to combine intermittent fasting with real food.
And this is also a really important concept, real food.
So if something looks like food, then it's really likely to be food.
If it comes in a box or a package and has a label, then it's really processed food and it's not food.
I'm sure most would agree that these fruit loops is nothing food like about it.
So what you really want to do is couple intermittent fasting with eating real food and avoiding sugar,
fructose is a poison and omega six vegetable oils, which we know actually increase your risk of cardiac events.
So, you know, in the olden days, people used to eat most of their meals at home.
You know, as we become more civilized, it seems that we eat out more and more.
We go to drive throughs or takeouts.
And obviously, that's not a good thing.
So in addition, one has to have healthy eating habits.
You want to only eat at the table.
Don't eat at a computer.
So none of you should be eating now.
You don't eat in the car.
You don't eat sitting on the couch.
You don't eat in bed.
You don't want to eat in the lecture theater.
You want to avoid mindless eating.
So there's so many people who just eat for no good reason.
They just eat.
There's no good.
There's no reason for that.
So you need to have healthy eating habits.
And then there's this concept of poison and food.
Food is defined as a substance that provides nutrition and growth.
And poison is a substance that promotes illness when much of what is produced by industrial agriculture
is quite literally not food but poison.
So most of what Western people eat is really not food but poison.
And Robert Lustig, in his really excellent book, Metabolical,
basically highlights that the high concentration of processed foods with high carbohydrates
and high fructose corn syrup are the major toxins to which the human is exposed.
And the likelihood is that there are more deaths and morbidity from sugar than there ever were from cigarettes.
And high fructose corn syrup and fructose is actually quite harmful.
The fructose is metabolized differently to glucose.
It's metabolized to fatty acids and causes fatty liver,
which then causes the whole spectrum of insulin resistance.
So high fructose corn syrup is particularly toxic.
So the toxicity of processed foods is sugar, particularly fructose.
It causes the fatty liver insulin resistance.
It damages mitochondria and is pro-inflammatory.
And then we take these omega-6 fatty acids from seed oils, which are pro-inflammatory and potentially pro-oxidant.
And we don't take enough of the anti-inflammatory omega-3s.
We don't have enough fiber.
So really, most of the Western diet is really a toxic concoction of toxins.
And so we think about the corruption of Big Pharma,
but the corruption by Big Food is absolutely no different.
And they're in cahoots.
They're in cahoots with Big Pharma because basically they support each other.
So all of these big players, they perpetuate the misinformation regarding food.
The food pyramid in the US is completely upside down and completely inaccurate.
Saturated fats, which they de-emphasize, are actually really healthy and do not increase your cholesterol.
So we know, I mean, the past two years have shown us that industry bioscience,
industry bioscience to create a narrative that supports their financial industry.
And it really doesn't matter what the industry is.
It could be the tobacco industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the processed food industry, the soft drink industry, or the sugar industry.
They buy science.
They manipulate science.
They create fraudulent studies to really support their financial interests.
And so that's an overview of what's become an interesting journey for me.
I never knew I'd go down this route.
It's basically forced me to challenge what I was taught at medical school and basically to, you know,
follow a much more healthier lifestyle, which for me actually, you know,
the power was that I'm no longer a diabetic and heart intensive.
So with that, I thank you.
And if you have any questions, I'll try and answer.
We have questions. Paul, well done.
Many, many thanks. Quick round of applause for start, everybody.
Great job. Most enjoyable.
Now, as everyone knows, traditionally, Stephen goes first, but I've got a couple of questions while Stephen's collecting his wits here, Paul.
And and two comments.
So for 29 years, I've been an educator since I left my legal career.
And you said simple. Fasting is indeed simple.
And I bring to everyone's attention that the dichotomy of simple is not easy.
OK, so it's simple to not eat.
You say beautifully, Paul, and eventually it becomes easier.
But getting fit is simple.
All you have to do is walk one hour a day.
That's as simple as it gets. Not easy.
So just understand that.
Yeah, let me answer that.
Because what you say is true, because that's the main argument people give is that it's not easy.
But so my answer is twofold is firstly, like most things in life, the more you try, the better you get at it.
So, you know, it's something you have to have your heart and soul in.
And then once you actually master it, once you figure it out, it changes your life in a way that is so profound.
I used to be a food addict.
I was addicted to food.
I was addicted to carbohydrates.
I would eat all the time.
And for me, it's truly astonishing.
I eat once a day and I'm not hungry.
So you basically can physiologically change the way your body works metabolically.
So at the beginning, it's it's a matter of perseverance.
And I think the goals are worth it and the ways to do it.
So, you know, I was really intent on doing this.
But this, you know, the less extreme ways of doing it and particularly women shouldn't do it as aggressively as I did it.
So what you can do is you can narrow your eating window to four or five hours so that you eat between 12 o'clock and four or five.
And that's it. Don't eat in the morning.
Don't eat when you go to bed.
And that's that most people can do that.
Eating before you go to bed is a really bad thing because you want to switch off, switch on autophagy when you're sleeping.
It's very important for neuronal regeneration.
And if you eat a big meal before you go to sleep, you actually prevent that happening.
So the optimal time for your main meal actually is about two or three in the afternoon.
So it's just a matter of, you know, doing what you need to do.
And I suppose, you know, if you're interested in, you know, not getting diabetes, not getting Alzheimer's, not getting Parkinson's,
living to 120 and being happy and healthy, then that's what you want to do.
If you want to kill yourself with poisonous food, that's fine.
That's your choice. And, you know, people give the argument it's not easy.
Well, you know, life's not easy.
But if you put some effort into it, you could make all.
Paul, there's another dichotomy.
The easy hard. If you take it easy, life becomes hard.
If you do hard things, life becomes easy.
And I agree with you. Just going for a walk.
You know, you don't need to go to the gym and pump iron, but, you know, just going for a walk in the sunshine.
I don't know. You're in Australia. So, you know, you have some all the time.
I don't think we recognize how important the sun is.
So just going for a walk in the sun has, you know, important physiological and psychological benefits.
So it's just, you know, we need to be more like how we evolve hunters and gatherers.
You know, we didn't spend that time indoors. We didn't go to the supermarket.
We were hunters and gatherers. And I think that's what we need to do.
So to tie it to reinforce that when you walk, Paul.
So when you walk, and I've been just for others, I've been competing in triathlons for 37 years.
I went to my first naturopath in 1965. I'm 70 years of age.
So, Paul, I'm testimony to what you are sharing with the group. When you walk, look up, not down.
That's another element, you know, as you're walking, look into the distance.
Now, two other things before Stephen. I have been an organic farmer since 1976.
So 46 years I've had an organic farm to produce real food.
Secondly, a doctor, doctor, doctor, doctor, local doctor here in Australia.
His famous book was Everything in Moderation, except Sex, Laughter, Fish and Vegetables.
OK, I'd go along with that.
And and so he came up with this wonderful idea that becomes a usable that ties in poor with your real food model.
He said, don't go for don't try to get high GI, high glycemic index or low GI foods.
He said, go for avoid high AI foods. That's artificial artificial interference.
He said, avoid artificial interference with food, go for low AI foods.
So that was an easy model. And lastly, before we get to Stephen, Omega six and Omega three.
I bring to your attention, everybody, that the perfect balance of Omega three, six and nine fatty acids is in hemp seeds.
Hemp. I've talked about hemp.
Look it up. It is the perfect source of protein and those Omega three, sixes and nines because Paul talked about that.
You know, you're too much Omega six, not enough three.
Hemp seed is just solution to that dilemma.
Yeah. The other seed that I discovered is chia seeds.
Yes.
Which are high in protein and high in Omega threes.
And you can do all kinds of things with chia.
So put in there some wonderful, Paul, there's some wonderful comments in the chat.
Randy Stewart, you know, people have gone from two hundred and forty five pounds to one hundred and forty five pounds.
So, Paul, make sure you save the chat because it's and the ideas and each one of us, the experiences that we've had, we put in the chat and this chat is going to become a wonderful resource for all of us.
Yeah. And, you know, I read Tim Nokes book and obviously he's an expert and an inspiration.
And I think he knows more about this than anybody else in the whole world, just because, you know, he faced a jury trial over this.
So, I mean, his book is an inspiration.
And which book is that again?
Tim Nokes. So Tim Nokes.
Yeah, he is the exercise physiologist who was he was crucified by the South African Medical Council for for proposing, you know, the health benefits of a, you know, low carbohydrate, high fat diet.
Right. Excellent. Tim Nokes, everybody. N-O-A-K-E-S, I presume.
Yes, he's written two books which are really fascinating.
What's interesting about him is, you know, we have been persecuted, you know, as a community.
When it came to him, he was persecuted as an individual.
They picked him out and they went for him in such a vicious and aggressive way.
And, you know, he took four years, but he defended himself and he came out, you know, victorious in the end because, you know what?
Triumph, science and truth will always triumph.
Beautiful. Beautiful. All right. And people have put the link into the chat. Well, well done, everybody.
Stephen, over to you.
Yeah. So thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Well, I just wanted to ask you, in your opinion, I mean, I wouldn't have asked this question had I not listened to what you just said about the sun.
And so I was thinking about my wife is Swedish and so she lives.
She has lived in pretty near the Arctic Circle.
And so what is the healthiest latitude to live in? Has anybody done research into that?
Because obviously you can't go for a walk in the winter in when you're close to the Arctic Circle.
Well, the sun is very low. I mean, that.
Yeah. So, you know, what the Finns do is the Finns go in saunas and, you know, sauna bathing actually is proffesed, activates autophagy, activates heat shock protein and reduces your all cause mortality, treats depression, treats cardiovascular disease.
So that's one thing. The second is that infrared therapy.
So I actually have now it's called photobiomodulation. So if you can't get sun.
So your point is a good one.
And it's like winter now, if you can't get sun, you can actually buy a light light source that actually mimics almost exactly the sun.
So it's it's infrared. It's red and it has a spectrum almost identical to that of solar radiation without ultraviolet light.
So I have this light thing which I shine on myself when I'm sitting and doing stuff, which is like being outdoors, getting sun.
And the benefits of intro. So why infrared is so cool is it unlike. So this is near infrared. So you have to be careful. Unlike far infrared, near infrared actually penetrates about 10 inches into the body.
And what it does is it activates mitochondria apart from actually being any inflammatory, any oxidant.
It actually activates mitochondria and probably through cytochrome oxidase and increases intracellular ATP.
And so it's such a simple way of getting sunshine without being in the sun, without getting ultraviolet light and getting all the advantages of sunshine.
So what's you know, once you start going down these rabbit holes, you see things that are really interesting.
So what they're probably the most effective therapy in the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic in the U.S.
You won't believe what it is. Was open air therapy.
So what they did in Boston, they took these patients with severe influenza pneumonia.
They took them from being in the hospital and put them outdoors in the sunshine.
It calls open air therapy. And there's there's a paper by the medical director of of Massachusetts who actually wrote a paper in 1918 showing the mortality went from 40 percent to 10 percent.
So sunshine, just sunshine.
And it's because of the infrared has all of these enormous any inflammatory immune stimulating properties.
So it's truly astonishing.
And then there is a more recent study looking at people who are sun averse.
So there are people who completely scared of going in the sun.
And if you look at their mortality, their risk of dying is twice as high as those people who not sun averse.
So, you know, the sun has enormous. I mean, who would have thought about it?
You know, it's cheap. It's there. You don't have to pay for it.
The sun has enormous heating properties. And if you live near the North Pole or whatever, then you can buy these indices and globes or bulbs that look at producer spectrum of is the same as the sun.
So people on the call need to get a near well, people watching the video as well need to get a near infrared lamp.
Is that what you said? Yes. Yes. And people know what that is, do they?
Yes. OK. And the other thing I want to ask you about.
Well, there's several things. But but so you mentioned well, Charles mentioned fish and vegetables.
So I was thinking that, you know, one meal a day sounds a bit frugal to me and completely the opposite from what my grandmother would say.
And she lived to one hundred and five. So so I just wonder, could we eat as much fish and vegetables as we like?
So, you know what? I think your grandmother probably lived a much healthier lifestyle.
She she walked. She ate healthy foods. She didn't smoke.
She made her own food. So she had a healthy lifestyle.
And obviously, fish and vegetables are really important.
So but if you actually. So, you know, I'm not saying don't eat a healthy diet.
What I'm saying is avoid breakfast is that this idea of eating all the time, which we do.
I mean, I was a food addict. I couldn't stop eating. And that's what's really bad.
And if you think about our hunter and gatherer ancestors, you know, there wasn't a supermarket around the corner.
They were not eating all the time. They would hunt and then they would gather and that periods where they would fast.
And that's the way we evolved. So, you know, I think you can adapt this to whatever is suitable to your lifestyle.
But I think this incessant snacking that we do, you know, you look at when people got to, you know, physicians at the hospital, they eating all the time.
The snacks and things that they're eating. People do this in office buildings, you know, in the office.
They're eating donuts. I mean, donuts are probably the most poisonous food there is.
So, you know, I think there were lots of ways of doing it. It depends upon what your goals are.
And so, you know, I my goal was to cure my diabetes, which I did.
And I think, you know, whether I would have achieved this by being less strict, I don't know, but it's very flexible.
So that's why I like Jason Fung's book, because you can adapt it to your lifestyle.
I think eating in the morning is not a good thing for multiple reasons.
I mean, you're most insulin resistant and you don't need to have a big meal at breakfast.
This idea that you need to have breakfast like a king, I think is misplaced.
So there are lots of ways of doing it.
There's no question that periodic fasting or intermittent fasting has all of these biological properties.
But, you know, it has to be in the context of your general lifestyle.
And one has to be careful of, you know, anecdotes because people say, oh, my grandmother, she smoked.
She was 140. So smoking can't be bad, but she probably had good genes.
She did other good stuff. So that's my short answer.
Yes. And then also, so if you're living in a northern latitude, so I live at 53 degrees north.
So does that mean that for several weeks in the winter, the depths of winter, it's no use to go out for a walk in the sun or without the sun?
Because I've also read recently actually that in the middle of the day, even though it's cloudy outside, it's a lot lighter than in the house.
Yes. So I would say going for a walk is good, even in winter, but just because being out, as Charles said, going for a walk with your head up is good, you know, both for your psyche as well for your body.
And you do get radiation. Obviously, the earth is tilted.
And you don't get as much, but it's still you do get a fair amount of radiation and you get exercise.
So I think, you know, if it's not, you know, you know, 100 degrees below freezing and you can survive it, that, you know, walk outdoors is always a good thing.
Yes. And just to nail it down about the fish and vegetables, could you actually have a meal, as you suggest, between two and three p.m. in the afternoon?
And then if you want to eat something, eat vegetables and fish in the morning and evening or not?
Yes. So you have to. So, you know, if you once you start eating, you switch on and you switch on this metabolic pathway.
So you have to you have to starve for at least we don't know, probably eight to ten hours for the switch on autophagy.
So. So you have to have a period where you're not eating.
And so you can adapt your lifestyle, but you need at least eight hours of not eight to ten hours of not eating.
So, I mean, you think about it, you know, you don't eat when you sleep most mostly.
And then if you don't have a breakfast, then, you know, that extends the period.
Coffee is fine. Coffee actually activates autophagy.
So what I do is I when I wake up, I have two or three cups of coffee.
That's fine. That doesn't count.
But having a big meal in the for breakfast doesn't really make sense.
And, you know, once you get used to this lifestyle, simple, it's it's, you know, Charles says it's difficult.
It's not, you know, running a marathon is always hard.
Always this this is once your body gets used to it, you're doing what we were made to do.
You know, this is the way we were made.
We evolved as hunters and gatherers.
So it does become easier with time.
And so what I say is, you know, everyone's life situation is different.
You can adapt it to your lifestyle.
Obviously, fish is good and vegetables are good.
And sex is good.
Yes, I'm not going to go there. Yes.
As often as you can.
Yes. And you said something else as well, Charles.
You said four things. Laughter, laughter.
Oh, laughter. Yeah. I laughed quite a bit.
So, Charles, sorry, Paul, I wanted to ask about Pfizer's data.
That is proof of crime.
So why hasn't that been picked up by the police and other agencies?
So, I mean, I mean, this is the million dollar question, and I don't know.
So, you know, I've just read the book, The Turtles All the Way Down.
If you haven't read this book, I think you need to read this book.
So often, you know, the true Anthony Fauci book, you read, you need to read this book.
The Turtles All the Way Down.
It basically highlights the corruption of big pharma and the vaccine industry.
And what I figured out is that the agencies have been complicit with this fraud, complicit with this fraud for the last 20, 30, 40 years.
So this is what they do.
The agencies work for big pharma, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, the European Council, probably the same in Australia.
These people work for pharma.
So, I mean, any logical person would say this is a crime that, you know, the FDA have this data.
They have this data.
They wanted to bury just on this data.
They should have withdrawn these so-called vaccines.
I think there was enough data.
The people we work with seem, in my opinion, to have missed an opportunity to highlight Pfizer's data, which they themselves, as you said, wanted to hide for 75 years.
But a judge, unfortunately, I can't remember where the judge was. Was it Florida or Texas?
Yes.
He ordered that they be released.
And then they started to release some documents monthly.
I don't know what's happened to that.
Is anybody watching the stuff?
Yes. I mean, it is coming up.
Peace be with you.
You get little pieces.
So the problem also, as you know, is that main media will not touch any of this because the main media is controlled by the same power people.
So they don't want to talk about this because, you know, this should be all over the media.
You know, I mean, so it's part of this madness that we're living through is the censorship.
But then there's also the media that are controlled by big pharma, controlled by industry, controlled by Gates, controlled by World Economic Forum.
They controlled the only the only news aid outlet in the U.S.
that's of any value is Epoch Times.
I don't know if you have access to them.
So they're really good.
They may be a little bit too right wing, but at least they try and be objective and tell you the stories as they are.
Sure. So we've got someone on the call today for who is talking to MPs in the UK and House of Lords.
They're not MPs, of course.
And so I don't understand why FISA's data has not been used by people working with us as proof of crime.
They have released the FISA have actually released these documents.
So they've effectively admitted what was in those documents.
And it's proof of crime.
So why on earth is that not enough for the British MPs, for example?
So, I mean, you know, the way I look at it is, you know, Pierre Pierre picked this up much sooner than I did.
I was a little bit cautious.
But I think now if you look at the totality of evidence, the totality that it's undeniable that these vaccines are the most toxic medical intervention that have ever been utilized.
It's resulted in, you know, hundreds of thousands of deaths and disability, and they should be removed.
But yet, you know, what are they doing?
They're promoting these vaccines.
And now what they want to do is combine the COVID vaccine with the flu vaccine to mRNA vaccines.
And their safety is predicated by the fact that they now think because the COVID vaccine is FDA approved,
they don't need to go through the same regulated process.
And this is exactly what they did with all the childhood vaccines.
That's why it's called the turtles all the way down, is that there was never a definitive study proving the safety.
And so they're going to keep on adding new vaccines that are so-called safe and effective based on the premise that the COVID vaccine is safe and effective.
And so we screwed.
And why? Why? I mean, the federal government's doing this, the agencies do.
Why the people out there aren't outraged? I don't understand it.
Correct. So you could argue that we've got all the proof that we need.
And that was provided by Pfizer, who effectively admitted that they were committing crime.
Well, it didn't say that they were, but they gave the evidence which was necessary to convict them.
Yes. It is extraordinary. You pointed out, you made me think about it when you were talking.
So I knew about this after the being released, but I hadn't realized that we missed the trick by not highlighting it.
Yes. Because it's something we're not proving anything that he would miss it is.
Yes. And we never used it.
Yes. I mean, that document is now available. I mean, I showed it to you.
That should be spread throughout the whole world because it tells the story.
I mean, it's their story. It's not our story. It's their story.
The same way they admitted that they never tested that the vaccine prevents transmission of the disease,
which was the very reason people were vaccinated, that they've admitted it.
But the importance for us, Paul, is that we don't need to go down all these rabbit holes.
And I learned from lawyers in my case that actually make a single point in every email.
Don't make 10 points or 100 points because then the good points get lost in all the rubbish.
But of course, if you're very upset, then you want to include everything when you're writing to your lawyers.
So I did learn eventually to just keep one point in one email and highlight it.
Similarly, in this massive crime with many, many rabbit holes go down to get lost in have them arguing back.
We could just concentrate on the stuff they released. And that's proof of crime.
So yes, my opinion, I just thought of it tonight.
I agree with you. I mean, it's their data. It tells the entire story.
It tells you the spectrum of diseases caused by this vaccine, which is unprecedented.
It's their data. They can't deny it. I mean, that in itself should they should have been found guilty and sent to jail.
I agree with you. And you triggered this in my mind tonight when you were talking.
You gave a suggestion that you thought it was strange. And I thought, yeah, that's very strange.
But I had noticed this stuff before and thought, wow, how are they getting away with that?
But we haven't actually pushed it. I just wanted to ask one more thing, and that's shedding.
I know a lot of people on this call are very interested in shedding because a lot of people are not injected.
So is it an issue or not, in your opinion?
Yes, it's a good question. And obviously, there's not no the New England hasn't published much data on shedding because they don't want to investigate it.
So when I first heard about it, I thought this sounds like loony tunes to me.
But I can tell you that it's a real thing. You know, we know personally from stories of patients who have been in close proximity.
And this doesn't mean to be close contact or sexual contact or direct touching, but have been in close contact with people who recently been vaccinated.
And they develop symptoms, tiredness, fatigue and menstrual changes.
So it is a real thing. But and probably what happens is that they, you know, the spark goes all over the place into the cell and you get you extreme exosomes.
So it's possible these people are exhaling exosomes, which they get inhaled by people in close proximity and causes spike disease by close contact.
And Pia has in fact treated two or three patients who were spiked by shedding and did improve with any spike treatment.
And so it happens. Nobody wants to.
I mean, it would be simple to test, but obviously, you know, Pfizer is not going to test it.
The federal government is not going to test it. But I think it's a real thing and we need to know about it.
So don't you think it's very odd that the people on our side, the doctors and all the people working with those doctors, the last thing they want to discuss is shedding.
It's almost ignored. And that could be because the people who are not injected, the only risk they have is from shedding.
So they don't want to know whether the shedding is an issue or not.
Yeah. Yeah, I think there are lots of people reason that I want to, but there are people who who are unvaccinated, who are scared.
They don't want to be around people who vaccinated.
And obviously, it just adds to the conspiracy theories that go around.
But as you know, what's a conspiracy theory turns out to be a fact.
So I think it's a real issue. The problem is, as you know, I don't think there's a single paper published on shedding.
No one wants to publish it. And you'll never get a paper published just because that's the medical media is controlled.
That's a good point. So just so if any of you have.
OK, Steven. Yep.
So, Paul, if they if they haven't submitted any papers to journals, then obviously there aren't going to be any public any studies published.
But so, you know, studies which have been submitted but not published.
No, no, it's a good question.
My impression is that nobody is looking into it.
And that would be consistent with people not wanting to know whether they're at risk if they're unvaccinated.
Yes. Crazy. We need to know. Yes.
Yeah, it's something which needs to be done.
Enough people are concerned about shedding and it would be easy enough to do it.
But nobody wants that. No one. You're right.
I don't know of any studies that have actually been done looking at shedding.
Otherwise, we'll have the disaster of unvaccinated people dying for unknown reason.
And the real reason is possibly that they've been shed upon.
I don't know. It's like secondhand smoking, which was, you know, poo pooed and is now a reality.
Yes. Anyway, so Charles, go ahead.
All right. Wonderful. Wonderful. Wonderful.
And everybody, you know, Stephen's asking great questions.
We've got nine. We've got ten hands up, Paul.
So, you know, the speed at which we get through the questions will depend on the length of your your answers.
Everyone keep your questions tight. But Paul, you're sharing wonderful information.
If any of you have links to papers that have been done or articles on shedding, please put them into the into the chat.
And Paul, I just want you to understand that, you know, this is a no, this is a no jabbed environment, broadly speaking.
And you haven't been coughing here for the last hour and a half, you see.
So clearly we're not shedding on you. No, more importantly, we're sending you positive vibes, you see.
So that's why you're not coughing. Sounds good.
All right. Gary Finkelstein first and then Daria.
Yeah, thank you, Paul, again for coming. Sorry, I'm in the dark. I have no lights where I am.
But thank you again for joining us. I have a very quick question.
I just when you're talking about the anaphylactic shocks following being connected to the polyethylene glycol,
how would one explain the anaphylactic shocks with the vector vaccines like AstraZeneca?
We're correct and we're wrong, but polyethylene glycol is not.
Yeah, yeah. So, I mean, so I mean, it's I mean, anaphylaxis is due to a type one IgE mediated reaction.
So probably there were other components in the AstraZeneca vaccine that resulted in a type one reaction.
I mean, the problem is we have no idea what's in these files, you know, which is part of the problem.
So what would it be useful is if they had done what they should have done is a three arm study.
You know, the the vaccine or whatever it is, but mRNA and lipid nanoparticles,
then they should have given lipid nanoparticles without the RNA to actually see what happens.
So, you know, they did it in mice, we think, but it wasn't the lipid nanoparticles.
So we're ready, you know, much like many of the other vaccine studies,
we need to understand what the adjuvant does or the carrier does.
So it would have been useful if there were studies just on the lipid nanoparticle.
So that's probably the DNA vector thing.
We don't know. We don't know what's the rest of the stuff in these vaccines.
Thank you. Appreciate this. Thanks, love.
Thank you, Gary. You must know Paul, of course, face to face.
Oh, yeah. Hi, Dr. Merrick. You probably don't remember me.
We had dinner together in Nashville when you were at the Nurses Summit.
Yep. So I hopefully you got the email that I asked the company to send you that you asked for space research.
Just, you know, take a look at that. If you didn't get it, you could get a hold of me.
I'd say you have a copy of my card and email and everything.
But I wrote down my questions. So, oh, by the way, you guys see this.
I bought this jacket when I was in Cape Town. Cool.
Anyway, yeah, that was in 2017. I went to South Africa.
OK, so here's a question. There are basically you have testified to the fact that autophagy is going to help people recover, detox and get healthier.
There are people that argue that you cannot detox from the vaccine and it's permanent and irreversible.
The only way I could besides the actual direct toxins from the chemicals and things we don't know is in there.
Unless somebody has reverse transcriptase and is making spike protein for the rest of their lives.
The question is, everybody else should be able to turn over their cells and recover from.
The spike.
And cleared out of their bodies if they stop getting boosters.
So there's others who claim that there are numerous toxins like has mentioned that people have mentioned graphene, parasites, toxic metals,
venoms, various things people are finding or believing that there's some kind of microchip formation.
But certainly people are getting sensitive to energies from 5G and everything else, whether that's from the shot or not.
But my question is independent of meds and supplements is autophagy.
Would you consider with the fasting an ideal form of overall detox independent of the noxious source in the cases where it's not contraindicated?
And then do you have any thoughts about the enzyme supplements that are clearly effective in acute illness like nato kinase and lumbar kinase that can help break down the spike protein itself?
So those are my two questions. Is there hope for people to be able to detox and restore their health when they're vaccine injured?
And is there a certain percentage of people who simply won't be able to do that?
Yes. I mean, you ask a good question and we don't know.
So, I mean, what one would have to do is actually prospectively study these people.
Nobody wants to do these studies. Pathologists don't are discouraged for staining tissues for spike protein.
So people don't want to know the answer. So, you know, obviously it's a good question.
I don't know how else to get the protein out of the cell.
The problem with there's a study looking at nato kinase or one of these things is that they used it extracellularly.
It has to get into the cell. So, you know, you have a protein in the cell.
How are you going to get an enzyme into the cell which breaks down the protein?
So that was an in vitro study which has no resemblance to reality.
So I think nato kinase and lumbar kinase are really important in terms of the effects of fibrolysis and breaking down clots.
But I'm not sure that they are effective for breaking down intracellular spike protein.
And so we know the protein is in the cell.
I showed you the studies where staining showing it's in the cell.
Bruce Patterson and others have shown us in the cell.
And so the question is how to get it out.
And you may be right. We don't know. Some people may not be able to get rid of the spike.
We don't know that. But at least what you can do is try whatever you can to activate your your host defense mechanisms to get it out.
You know, this was something which we came up with as a way of getting rid of spike.
How effective it is, we don't know because there are no really prospective studies.
We do know that there are some vaccine injured people who once they started following this protocol turned around remarkably.
But obviously that's an anecdote.
I think one has to be careful of the so-called detox programs because I'm not sure what toxins they're removing and how they're removing them.
Because this is protein within the cell.
So for another kind of days to somehow magically break down in procedure, the protein, it's just not going to happen.
It's going to work extra certainly maybe on cell surfaces.
So if that's a long around answer, I mean, clearly what we need is, you know, people to admit there's a disease and then study this disease and see what we can do to mitigate the adverse effects of a spike.
Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate it.
It just came to me that this autophagy and the fasting really is probably the most powerful tool that we can have in general for just feeling better, even if we're not sick with spike disease.
And I know it's helped me. It's helped a number of people in the chat.
And you've testified as well. So I can highly recommend it.
And those who can tolerate it. Yeah.
And, you know, for people with neuro degenerative diseases, people with chronic inflammatory diseases, people with metabolic diseases, you know, independent of spike protein, it has enormous benefits.
It appears to reduce the risk of cancer because it gets rid of these bad proteins.
So it has a positive effect on health. There's no downside.
Yeah. And then have you seen where people have a lot of sensitivities in general to foods or just environmental noxious stimuli if fasting does any good for them?
Yes, a good question. I'm not sure.
It seems to be a simple way of helping the immune system increases T cell function, B cell function.
It does all kinds of really good things. So there seems to be no downside.
Thank you. Thank you so much. I appreciate it very much. God bless you.
Thank you. Thank you, Daria. Tessa.
Hello. First of all, Paul, thank you. Thank you so much for this presentation for your work.
Well, I have a quick comment. I posted the Pfizer or Pfizer's document where they talk about shedding. They don't call it shedding. They call it something like environmental exposure, study intervention.
But it's all there. So and it's from at least a year ago, maybe like two years ago. It's an old document. So it's been out there in broad daylight and not a conspiracy theory at all.
And then another one is a longer one. Well, I have accidentally come upon a theory or formed a theory and it became especially significant in my mind, at least after I talked to Sasha Latipova.
And well, as you probably know, she looked into manufacturing defects and God knows what else. And so and also some people here did the testing of the vials and they didn't even find any mRNA in the vials.
So it could be spike in some circumstance or it could be something else. And then the theory that I stumbled upon, it could answer that.
Why do you bring it up? So obviously, as you know, people have looked at the lot numbers and the adverse events and there's certain lots that have a thousand fold higher risk of adverse events.
And so Pfizer may be playing games with us. So some of the vials may just be placebo. We don't know. So it would be interesting if we could actually see what's in the vials that are associated with the highest risk of adverse events, because your question is a good one.
I mean, you would imagine Pfizer would so-called want to know why certain lots have a higher incidence of adverse events than others. That's such a fundamentally important question. And we need to know that.
Oh, absolutely. And I think Sasha was citing somebody else where they did a randomly test a couple of vials from a particular batch with no like zero or one adverse events for the entire batch. And it had no mRNA in there at all.
So probably correlation. And then my theory that I just want to bring out and just throw it out there as food for thought has to do with potentially another mechanism.
I took a very deep dive and I'm not a doctor. I'm a writer who grew up in a medical family with a very curious mind. So there's such thing as a chronic toxoplasma that is not toxoplasmosis that is not like they teach in medical school.
So seemingly, or at least there's a German doctor who was researching it in depth and he discovered that what they teach in medical schools is kind of outdated.
And there's research saying that the cyst tissue, the tissue cyst form that is normally considered innocuous, it just sits there.
It just sits there. Many people have it does nothing that it actually can cause inflammation and neurological symptoms that are very, very similar to what is described as vaccine injury.
And to make things worse, it cannot really be diagnosed by conventional means because I think in the 90s they discovered but for some reason didn't publicize that when this particular parasite transitions from the tachyzoid form that everybody knows that it's active.
It can be diagnosed to the bradyzoid form. It restructures its cellular structure completely. So the antibodies no longer recognize it. They cannot do anything about it.
And if many years pass, then all the antibodies that the tests know how to, you know, the test know to look for, they wait. So a person can have this chronic form, active problems, and then potentially and that's I'm just thinking.
So if the vaccine or well, bad word for it, whatever the injection, it is known to really hit the immune system. And it could trigger this parasite and it impacts vision and cause brain inflammation.
But if the condition is such that it cannot be diagnosed given conventional means, and then everybody's mystified and there could be of course a million other things happen at the same time, then.
And this parasite is also shaded with Alzheimer's with all sorts of neurological symptoms and of course vision problems. So I'm just throwing out there for as many doctors as possible to look into that if it strikes your curiosity.
I went as far as I published a big article in Dr. McCallers website, but I'm not a doctor so I really want more doctors to think about it and maybe it can help people. So that that's my long comment.
Okay, maybe if you could. Sorry, coughing now, if you could send me a copy of what you've written.
I think you have to keep an open mind, your mind is be open you can't let your brain fall out, but you have to have an open mind and consider all possibilities because I think everything's on the table.
Yeah, I'll do that I'll ask.
Yeah, okay.
Very good.
Very good Tessa will get this for Paul.
Tessa, do you have a
Tessa, do you have Paul's email address. I don't.
Just email me then. Okay, I'll do that.
Thank you. Thanks Tessa.
Will Arthur.
Will Arthur talk. Yes he will.
Hello there. Can you hear me okay. Yep. Perfect.
Okay, Dr. Merrick, thanks for taking my question. It's a two part question I'd like to just ask it the whole thing and then you can respond.
So it more has to do with rather than your presentation today has to do with just your mission over there at the frontline COVID-19 critical care alliance with that you co formed with Dr. Pierre Corey.
And it seems to be all about early treatment for COVID. And I've been. So the first part of my question has to do with ivermectin and the toxicity of it.
I was looking up the MSDS and the package inserts and there are very strong warnings about the acute toxicity of ivermectin which it describes these MSDS is described as insecticide.
And the LD 50 I've seen as high as or as low as 10 milligrams per kilogram in some animal models. So that's like about like cyanide or strychnine.
And my friend is a nurse and she says that ivermectin is the insecticide alternative to clot shots.
And so the Michael so one question has to do with who who is this therapy or prophylactic indicated for who should take this insecticide.
And then my second part the second part of the question this this really this really gets to the to the substance of it this one question I think is really going to if you can answer just this this one that I have that I think it's really going to cut to it.
So basically it's the question of is I've heard you say many many many many many many times that ivermectin is an effective therapy or prophylactic for covid.
And I just have a question with that that doesn't that doesn't make much sense to me because in order to design a study and I'm sure there are lots of studies showing that ivermectin is an effective therapy or prophylactic for covid.
But I would say that these studies rely upon fraudulent methods and let me just explain why.
So let's first note that if you look at the at the CDC website for the covid symptoms it's not covid is not defined by a unique new and distinguishing clinical expression or syndrome.
It's the same it's very common symptoms headache you know stuffy nose you know body aches that kind of thing it's flu like symptoms.
So if we don't have a clinical standard for determining a covid case then what are we left with well we're left with these various serum tests like the real time PCR the lateral flow test which is I think it's an antibody test.
None of these tests have been calibrated to any real world materials and CRM certified reference material this is the gold standard this would be you know if you're if you're doing a scale you do use standard weights if you're doing a caliper you do.
You do gauge blocks if you're calibrating a PCR your gold standard is going to be viral isolates obtained directly from a sick patient that have not been contaminated by foreign.
DNA and RNA like monkey kidney cells and various things and fetal bovine serum so my question is Dr Merrick this is this is the essence of it right here okay if you could speak about the toxicity of.
ivermectin and who it's indicated for but this is my main question here how is it possible to design a study of the efficacy of some therapy to treat a disease which lacks any objective diagnostic criteria.
Okay so that's a big question so firstly I'll say.
We know that over 3.2 billion doses of ivermectin have been dispensed for the treatment of parasitic diseases, we know categorically definitively it's one of the most safest medications on this planet.
If you can even look at the VG access database prior to covert which which logs all adverse events from all drugs.
They have about six or seven deaths from ivermectin and in fact all the deaths have been investigated, there was a pharmacologist in Paris who did a whole 400 page article thesis on ivermectin.
You could not find a single death a single death due to ivermectin the the you know people have taken 10 times the so called toxic dose.
And had no adverse events it truly more people die from Tylenol and paracetamol than they do from ivermectin.
It is one of the safest medications there is and then multiple databases that support this so in terms of the effectiveness, I can quote one study to you.
Now of course, this is an outstanding study it's it's a double blind placebo controlled expertly expertly executed study by Eli Schwartz from Israel who Israel is not a shitty country.
And so what they did is they took people who had features of SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomized to placebo or standard of care plus ivermectin but what he did.
And makes his study absolutely unique he cultured for the virus. He did viral culture looking for SARS-CoV-2.
Okay, so firstly, he knew they had the infection you saw as CoV-2 because they felt the virus and then they looked at viral culture clearance with ivermectin and guess what happened.
The patients got better much quicker and they cleared virus much quicker they cleared PCO much quicker. So that's the beginning and end to the answer I mean the data supporting the use of ivermectin is overwhelming.
The problem is is that big pharma and every agency controlling all the journals produce fraudulent papers, the active six pet paper published now in JAMA is the most outrageous example of fraud, because actually what they did is the patients who got ivermectin actually had a statistically more rapid improvement.
But in order to cover up the data, they changed the endpoint. So the endpoint was 14 days that was the predetermined endpoint. If you use that predetermined endpoint is hidden and was covered up.
ivermectin was more effective than placebo but in order to make it an ineffective drug they changed the endpoint to 28 days by which time everyone had improved.
So that's just one example of the complete and utter fraud perpetuated by these so-called I mean the NIH spent 150 million dollars on this fraudulent study.
Each one of these studies are completely and utterly fraudulent. So Dr. Schwartz's paper which is an outstanding paper he cannot get it published. Not one single journal will publish his paper. It's an outstanding paper.
And yet you have fraudulent studies being published in JAMA, New England Journal and Lancet. So that's unfortunately the landscape that we live in. You just cannot trust the published data. So that's why you have to dig much deeper and look into the more grayish data.
So that's what we do with respect you didn't answer my question. So in other words, I think what you're telling me is rather than we have to have an objective diagnostic criteria for measuring a COVID case if we're going to be designing a study to treat the efficacy of some therapy to treat it.
So there's no all we have is an ambiguous clinical diagnosis of a non distinguishing syndrome. We can't use a clinical diagnosis for COVID because it's generic. So all we're left with is a 100% bogus serum test that's uncalibrated to anything in the real world.
We can't use PCR within the context of a clinical trial to measure the efficacy of ivermectin to treat COVID because PCR is completely uncalibrated. The results are meaningless. That's my last statement. I'll let you respond and I'll mute myself. Thank you.
You know, obviously you're raising a different question, which is extremely complicated. And you know, beyond the realm of, you know, this could get into a two hour discussion on how to diagnose COVID if COVID exists what COVID is. But the study by Eli Schwartz, I think he cultured the virus.
I mean, he actually cultured SARS-CoV-2 and he looked for viral clearance. I think that's probably the most definitive data that ivermectin works clinically. And then there's prophylactic studies they've done in multiple South American studies. The diagnostic criteria is another can of worms.
And I think it depends upon the circumstances that are applicable at that time. So right now, it becomes really difficult because of influenza, because influenza is now commingling with RSV, which is commingling with Omicron. So one has no idea what patients actually have.
So I think there's the epidemiological data can help you decide what's the most likely pathogen. Now it's who knows what the heck is going on. So I thought I had COVID, but in fact, I had influenza. So that's another can of worms. Charles, you've muted.
Thank you. Appreciate it.
Thanks, yes. Thanks. Thanks, Will. Thanks. Thanks, Paul. Yes, it is an influencer or a common cold and all of those wonderful complex issues. Thank you. Ray Fernandez also from Australia, Paul.
Hi, thanks, Charles. Hi, Paul. I missed part of your protocol, but I've read it before on the IRRecover protocol on your website. And one of the things that it said in there was that you need to commence that protocol as soon as you think that there's been some sort of vaccine injury.
And I'm just wondering, I don't see any harm in commencing it a year after you've been vaccinated, if you're still getting symptoms of that. And I just wanted to run that past you and ask you that question.
I guess to explain why I'm asking is I know someone that had a vaccine reaction within 12 hours of taking the vaccine with SVTs and various arrhythmias and dyspnea problems. And a year and a couple of months later, they're still getting arrhythmias, SVTs three and four times a week.
And I'm just I think that I'd like to know if you think there's any downside to commencing that protocol even a year and two months later.
I mean, so our approach in medicine is never too late. I mean, it's never too late to treat a patient. You always got to try your best. Obviously, the earlier the better. A patient has a cancer, the earlier you get it, the better.
But it doesn't mean you can't treat the patient. So the fact the patient's still symptomatic a year later would suggest the patient's got ongoing inflammation. Patient may have ongoing auto antibodies, got ongoing endothelial injury.
So I don't think this you've got anything to lose by treating the patient at this time. And you know what you treat and see what happens.
OK, thank you very much. I'm sorry if it was a long-winded question.
No, sure. Thanks, many thanks, Ray. Thanks, Charles. Thank you. Kestrin.
Hi, thank you for coming on today again, Dr. Merrick. I have a comment and request.
When it comes to women in intermittent fasting, especially women of childbearing age, I've been fasting for many years and some success and some failure.
What I had found is actually the opposite of what you suggested, where you had suggested, you know, women, we have to do it a little bit differently. I totally agree with that.
But actually, I found that doing it more intensely rather than less, but very specifically timed works the best because we need to we need to make our hormones.
And if we don't make our hormones, it's we're a mess.
And so what I found is if I would water fast for three days during my period when I'm not making hormones, it worked wonders.
It was magical. It was absolutely fantastic.
The second thing is a request. Please think about us pregnant and breastfeeding women because, you know, we have problems here where it's like, you know, we just kind of get dumped out.
But it is an issue in terms of shedding and whatever is going on, whether it's the lipid nanoparticles being shed or the spike proteins.
I mean, it is a concern where I am around people and I'm like, OK, so what do I do?
What do I do to to clear it if I'm pregnant and soon we'll be breastfeeding here?
So, you know, if you can think about what possible solutions are for us.
Yeah. So, I mean, in terms, you know, if you have any specific thoughts about intermittent fasting in women, you know, we would appreciate that because it is apparently women tend to have a lot of
thyroidic with more intermittent fasting. So there's of course these hormonal issues.
So that's why we express some caution. But what you say makes sense.
If you want to send me a few ideas, it sounds good in terms of shedding.
So one of the other things, obviously, is, as you know, anyone who's pregnant, you have to be so careful about any recommendation, because if anything goes wrong, they blame the doctor.
So that's why one always has to be careful in terms of shedding.
I mean, what I would say, I mean, you know, what do you do?
I suppose if it's a it's a close friend or someone you want to you want to know, were you recently vaccinated?
Maybe, you know, you've got to ask them, you know, if you're going to be close contact with somebody, are you recently vaccinated?
I mean, maybe that's what we have to do.
So it has now reverse discrimination.
It's the vaccinated that need a vaccine card, which they show to the unvaccinated.
I don't know what the answer is to this shedding issue.
You know, it's obviously an important issue.
Yeah, I just actually had that conversation with my parents because they've been all in.
They've had four doses already.
We're talking about taking the fifth and I'm sitting here going like I cannot be around you for for at least a few weeks to a month at least.
And I did have to do that, NAS, but especially going into the holiday season here, it's one of those concerns.
And if it's possible to figure out some method for I mean, obviously, fasting doesn't work very well during this time.
But, you know, any supplements that are safe for for pregnant or breastfeeding women or any kind of solution for us, because this is this is years of our lives and it's a little tricky time right now.
Yeah, I mean, yeah, your point is well taken.
And obviously, you know, we always have to be cautious, especially in the U.S.
Because this pregnancy is a big issue.
I mean, the thing about pregnancy is the opposite is why would you want to be pregnant?
I mean, the opposite is why would you ever want to vaccinate a pregnant woman with a vaccine whose safety is undetermined?
I mean, that's the most outrageous thing of all.
You know, so, you know, all we can say to health, you know, pregnant woman is just exercise as you can and just eat a healthy diet and avoid vaccinated people.
So, so, so, Catherine, great, great questions, you know, avoid, avoid nine out of ten people or whatever it is where you are.
Yeah, I mean, the other question really, which we don't know is someone who's vaccinated, how long do they shed for?
That's an important question, because, you know, maybe time limited that they have the spectreemic phase, you know, who knows?
So that's why it's important for us to study so we can make some, you know, some common sense advice.
You know, if it's last for a week or two weeks, but if it lasts for months, you know, it changes the the formula.
All right. Now that we've got we've got 29 minutes to go.
There's the telegraph group after we finish.
Now, Paul, I you so wonderful that we've got you for so long and thank you.
Now, I'm very concerned about the fact that you haven't had to go for a toilet stop.
Yes, I'm going to have to go soon.
So I'll try to answer some questions because I actually have to go and fetch somebody.
So, yeah, good.
All right. We'll be we've got four more to four hands up here, Paul.
So you can take a toilet break now if you need one.
You OK?
Right. Beautiful. Those nappies are fantastic.
All right. Beverly.
Thank you so much, Paul, for a really great presentation.
And I think that your protocol, the FLCC is probably the best out there.
And congratulations on that.
Thank you.
I'm an independent scientist who early on saw a link between the two.
Thank you. I'm an independent scientist who early on saw a link between the symptomatology of COVID
and the adverse health effects of wireless communication radiation.
And I published with great difficulty, I published a peer reviewed paper on that overlap in the symptomatology.
But what we have also now with the adverse health effects from the so-called vaccines are very similar symptoms
in terms of clotting, neurological symptoms, brain fog, sleep problems and heart issues.
And so I just like to bring it to your attention if you're not aware that you might want to add to your protocol
reduction of one's exposure to wireless communication radiation, to the plethora of devices.
Most people are very unconscious that their immediate environment actually gives them the greatest exposure.
And it's not just the antennas and the new infrastructure going up with 5G outside their windows,
but rather their home, their school and their business environments.
And the same symptoms. I can't help but think that this may be exacerbating.
You know, toxins can do that to one another.
Spike protein is clearly a bad toxin.
But wireless communication radiation has so many so much overlap in its adverse effects,
which are well documented for 50, 60 years.
I've been studying this for some 10 years and I can tell you what struck me was the clotting.
I see it in the blood right away.
People exposed to just a few minutes from a Wi-Fi router, say four minutes of exposure, just passing by a Wi-Fi router.
Their blood shows micro clocks almost immediately in live blood analysis under the microscope.
And so people are sitting near these things or sweeping near them.
And I just recommend you take a look at that literature and you may consider adding it to your protocol.
Sure. Yeah, I mean, I understand what you say.
Maybe you can send me a...Charles can give you my email.
You can send me a copy of what you've written, because, you know, obviously this is complicated.
It's complicated. Is that funny?
You know, its complexity makes it so confusing with so many moving parts.
It's really very difficult.
So we do what we can do.
You know, the 5G and the EMG is an issue.
Yes. And of course, a lot of it was rolled out, the infrastructure, during the pandemic when people were on lockdown.
There was across the world a lot more rollout of infrastructure, implanting antennas.
And now they have drones and satellites emitting.
I mean, it's gotten to be so exorbitant, the radiation to which we're exposed.
And yet we're kind of like the frogs undergoing heat in a pot of hot water.
They're turning up the heat. And so we're going to die rather than jump out.
And that's what's happening.
And yet few people recognize the environmental factors in this pandemic, which have been ignored, namely the 5G and 4G enhancement, as a potential co-factor.
I tried to write about that and was censored really horribly, but finally got it out.
So I'm happy to send you my paper. I'll get your email address.
Thanks.
Beverly, if you could put your email into the chat so anyone who wants your paper can also ask you for it.
OK, I have a couple of papers and I'll do that.
Wonderful. Thank you, Beverly.
And remember, everybody, Niki Florio also talked about this.
Geoengineering Watch is another great resource, as is beheroic.com.
BEEheroic.com. OK, it's ready to go.
Paul, you're doing well?
Yep.
Shimon.
Hello.
I'm Shimon Janowicz from Israel.
Thank you very much, Paul, for your presentation.
I thought it was fascinating.
I like the method of autophagy, intermittent fasting, and I'm interested in the infrared saunas,
because I'm a victim of severe poisoning exactly one year ago, October 2021.
So well done.
And I want to touch a little bit on some of the other things that you mentioned.
So first of all, I can assure you that no one, not only in Israel, but nowhere else, has ever isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
And another thing that I want to say is in regards to the injectables that some people call vaccines, it is liberating to take a look at those under a microscope.
And what we found was that you don't need an electron microscope.
Just a very good optical microscope with some dark field or phase contrast would do.
And I've given a presentation to this group about my microscopy results.
And what we see there is the most amazing thing.
Nothing in their official narrative is true.
They have been lying to us, not only since COVID started, they have been lying to us for at least a hundred and some years, because I went back in history to check the Spanish flu.
And there is a video, I think I published it in the chat of one of the meetings.
I did the research on the Spanish flu of 1918.
What did I find?
That it was a result of toxic injections created by what was then called the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, given initially to US soldiers about to be sent to the dying Great War in Europe, later renamed World War I.
And then given to the entire population in the US and shipped overseas to many countries.
And there was no need to test whether this disease was infectious or not, because it wasn't.
There was never any virus implicated in this disease.
It was just the toxicity of the injections were initially called anti meningitis injections that killed all those millions of people.
So if you look at my video, you can see that in 2007 and 2008, one Anthony Fauci wrote a couple of fraudulent papers claiming that the entire genome of this H1N1 flu virus has been sequenced.
No, there was never any H1N1 flu virus implicated in the Spanish flu, which wasn't Spanish and it wasn't a flu.
So these people are the masters of toxins and the masters of the poison needles.
So if you take a look, as I did on these injections that some people call vaccines, you can see that they are swarming with lethal technologies, including but not limited to manufacturing electronic circuitry in the bodies of people.
And they include structures that are self assembled from the liquids and materials and hydrogel inside of those vials.
And they contain toxins straight from the bottle.
So I'm afraid that the entire spike protein is a big hoax.
Now, there are definitely toxins involved in this, but none of them come from any so-called virus.
So people really are being poisoned.
And there is shedding. Now, I'm not a medical doctor.
I'm just a scientist from electrical engineering.
But I did some research and I found that even chemotherapy is shedding.
And in fact, men who are undergoing chemo are advised to use condoms during sex.
Well, I can tell you that not me, some of my colleagues that I'm working with, we found the technology for shedding in these injectables.
So people are talking about graphene oxide. Graphene oxide is not what's important.
What's important is the structures that are assembled from all these materials that may include graphene oxide.
And they have the capability of injecting some very advanced materials that could include toxins and the building blocks to sequester them.
So I want to reiterate a very good point made earlier by Will Arthur.
When I was fatally ill in October 21, I was dying, no doubt about that.
So someone in Israel rushed ivermectin to me and I can testify, I took a huge dose.
It's very safe, as you're saying. I had no problem with the safety of ivermectin.
The problem was that it was worthless for me. I'm not sure about others.
On the other hand, it wasted me some five crucial days that I was waiting for this ivermectin to work and it didn't.
However, on my last breath when I reached for a drawer in which I had some three-year-old steroids, corticosteroids and an acetylcysteine,
and took those, I was immediately improving. I was no longer dying. Unfortunately, there is some damage left.
And then there is not only tissue damage, I'm sure there is a very elaborate chronic inflammation going on that we need to get rid of.
And that is, autophagy is exciting. Even the low dose, a track sound sounds very intriguing.
And of course, I'm just curious to know which infrared therapy is the cheapest and most effective.
So I would like to thank you very much for your presentation, which I thought was amazing.
And just mention that I already gave a presentation. I could give it again if you're interested to show you what's in these injections.
And again, I want to assure you that no one in Israel has ever isolated any SARS-CoV-2. Thank you very much.
Have you recorded your lecture?
We can send that to you, Paul.
Yeah, you can send me, yeah. That would be good. Thanks, Sam.
So I've got another five minutes. Hey, Charles, then I have to go.
Yep. Yep, yep. So I'll send that to you. So Randy and Jim, be quick because Paul's got five minutes left.
Okay, I'll keep it. Keep it quick. It's hard for an engineer.
Dr. Merrick, you are one of my biggest heroes in this. I've been following you since the beginning and Pierre and Corey and watching you figure this all out.
It's great. You just summarized my personal research since 2018 in a single presentation. I am so elated. It's so affirming.
You're someone who's definitely living with your brain turned on.
And you know, you've gone through the hardest kind of learning, which is unlearning what you previously thought was true.
I had similar, but my learning wasn't as deep as you being in the medical field. So my hat is off to you.
In fact, I've had, you know, you talked about vitamin C and some things, not today so much.
But I have scars that I've had for 60 years that are healing.
And I link that healing to the autophagy plus high vitamin C intake,
which leads me to believe that the body is capable of regeneration that we never thought was possible before.
You know, I know other doctors like Paul Bredesen and Dave Asprey, and he's not a doctor, but he's done a lot of research.
David Sinclair, you know, believed that we can go backwards in age to a certain extent.
So I was just prefacing this to ask this question.
What are your thoughts about someone I know who since they got shots has had things like blood pooling in their extremities and heart muscle damage from the shots?
What might trigger something that would cause the recognition of the spike producing protein in those cells that are producing it and continuing to cause this damage?
So that they get targeted for apoptosis.
I mean, obviously we know about the intermittent fasting, doing the autophagy and stuff like that.
And I kind of have some ideas on some of that.
You know, you talked about the red light therapy and stuff like that.
I know many like Wim Hof have talked about that for triggering your body to recognize the weak cells or the ones that are acting like viral cells in our body and targeting them for apoptosis so that they get replaced.
Yeah, it's a good question.
I mean, that's I mean, what we have to figure out is how to target, you know, spike cells that retain spike protein, which is not an easy thing to do to selectively go for those cells.
But you're right.
Charles, does Jim have a question?
Yep.
Thank you, Randy.
Thanks, Paul.
Thanks very much for your presentation.
That was great.
The two different theoretically two different types of spike proteins, one spike protein that theoretically came from the Wuhan lab as as documented in the blast sequence, the BLAST sequence and the other designed by a guy named Jason McClellan out of the University of Texas, Austin.
That is theoretically in all our vaccines, the one that is tethered by the proline and has some other changes in it.
Can you identify have you identified the two different types of spikes in the brain or in the or anywhere else?
And then and and have you talked with Jason McClellan and asked him why that ACE2 receptor is still active?
Because if that because indeed he says it's still active and that could explain why his vaccine spike protein targets cardiac tissue, vascular tissue, et cetera.
And and then why it becomes a why it becomes a prion and if he ran it through any computer programs like the like the DOMA and a program of DITRA DTRA to find out what would happen if it if it was regenerated in cells like the liver.
Thank you.
If you could send me his information, that would be useful.
So many of those slides I got from Ryan call and the way I understand it is they raise monoclonal antibodies against the S1 fragment of spike.
So then they labeling the tissues with a monoclonal antibody against spike one, whatever is so whatever commercial product it is.
So I'm not sure that that's selectively going for different.
You know, I'm not sure what the epitopes are these antibodies.
I think these are, you know, pathology grade slide.
So it's a good question.
I think they're just going for the S1 segment.
And then my follow on question is about the they who is organizing this they who has control of our media.
It's become very clear that it's our intelligence community that's behind this and our intelligence community that's infiltrated into the DOD and and other MI6 Mossad.
How do we respectfully ask them to ban the spike protein in the United States or in the world?
Because it's the it's it's a worldwide biotech terror weapon.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, you can give us a message.
I don't know.
We will have a presentation presentation on that.
All right, Jim.
Excellent questions.
Paul, you're one, you know, the open mindedness that you exhibit is excellent.
Jim, you ask great questions.
Many great questions.
Well done, everybody.
Steven, you got one more question because Paul has to go.
But you go, Steven.
So very quickly, Paul.
Can you so since we're talking about vaccine, we're very concerned about vaccine.
There's a possibility, indeed, a probability that people are being shed upon.
So we should be concerned about the unvaccinated too.
And I'm asking you because I wanted to say that you're a brilliant doctor.
You you keep an open mind exactly as we were taught at our medical school.
And you just have to look at your thinking about septicemia.
You're extremely creative.
You're exactly as a doctor should be.
And I beg you to keep an open mind in the future.
I'm going to say that my personal opinion, I've come to this conclusion that I thought that this was a massive fraud from the beginning.
But I eventually realized that COVID-19 doesn't exist, in my opinion.
It hasn't been diagnosed properly of the complete failure of diagnosis.
I'm concerned about women.
They generally they're two thirds of the weight of men.
And yet they've been given the same dose of this toxic injection as men.
And women are more important to the species than men, but not as far as reproductive capacity goes.
Because obviously if you've got an island with 100 men and one woman and 100 men, sorry, 100 men and one woman and 100 women and one man who's fertile, then the second island is going to do better in the long run.
So I wonder whether women have been targeted with intent.
And that's evidence of crime again.
I want to ask you, this is really important.
Is what we think is in the injections actually in the injections?
And how on earth could we, if the answer to that is yes, then how do we know?
And also, how do we know what is in all the lots or batches?
So if the answer is yes.
So I know that's a lot if you've got anything to say.
But the main thing is thank you so much for coming.
You're a brilliant doctor.
You're exactly like a doctor should be.
Thank you. And you know, the answer is we have no idea what's in the vials.
I think, you know, there should be more transparency.
You know, when you prescribe a physician prescribes ampicillin, he knows exactly what he's prescribing.
He knows how it works. He knows the side effects.
Unfortunately, our patients are being injected with the stuff we have absolutely no idea.
No idea. And so that's part of this fraud.
You know, I mean, it's so many multiple levels, but it's a complete absurdity.
The lack of transparency.
And we have no idea what's in these files. Nothing.
So, Paul, everybody's talking about the spike protein.
And I was thinking, you know, she won.
Yanavitz got me thinking about this, but I was already thinking about it before.
So is it possible that, you know, we're told so.
I remember asking Stephanie Sena, she's absolutely brilliant.
I said, I asked her the same question.
Are we sure that what we think is in these injections is really there?
And then I asked her, how do we know?
And she said, oh, the CDC and the FDA.
Well, I said they're the enemy. Why should we believe the enemy when we've got so much evidence of fraud?
And so you see what I mean?
We were talking so much about the spike protein, but is it there?
Was that, will we fed that to get us thinking down the wrong path?
I mean, the only answer is, I mean, there are studies that have looked, you know, at patients post vaccination,
looking for mRNA and spike protein.
So there are studies that up to two months have found both mRNA and spike protein in lymph nodes and in the blood.
So I think they are getting mRNA and they're getting spike protein.
But who knows? You know, it's such an open question.
It would be really important to know exactly what they're getting, the quantity of mRNA.
Is it coding for the same sequence? What proteins they're coding for?
I think there's so many unanswered questions.
So that's why it's very difficult to be dogmatic because we have really no idea what's going on.
But Paul, as you know, so many people talk so confidently about the spike protein, mRNA.
The reality is we don't actually know.
And I realized that when I asked Stephanie Senoff, so I was very surprised that she couldn't answer my question.
Eventually said CDC, FDA.
Well, they're the enemy. Why should we believe anything they told us?
So, yeah, so we can't believe anything is they say you're absolutely right.
They fraud and they lie. So.
So the two priorities in my mind, we need to know about shedding and we need to know what's in these injections.
And if we don't know what's in that in the injections, that's part of the evidence that we need to give the MPs in the UK who say they're interested, but maybe just collecting, you know, finding out who is going to speak.
So we need to know.
I think it is a priority to find out what's in these vials and why are some lots more toxic than others?
I mean, it's such a fundamental question that we need to figure out what's in these vials.
So Paul, I can put you in touch with Craig Pardecoupa and he's the one who has got the wonderful science.
How bad is my batch? He's incredibly creative.
You'd get on fine with him.
Okay.
The other thing is, I think we should say to the drug companies.
What about the dose for women? Why didn't you adjust the dose for women?
And why? Where did this notion come from that governments around the world could mix and match different manufacturers of vaccine?
That's never happened before in my mind, as far as I know.
And nobody questioned this.
Yeah. Whoa. Why is nobody questioning that?
And I just remembered it now. Yeah.
I mean, you know, the whole story is a fraud and a lie.
I mean, you can't find any truth.
That's the problem.
You know, they it's been a mess of fraud.
Sure. Yeah.
And yet it must have been lit.
Let Paul go.
People still keep going on, you know, talking about the spike protein as if we know for certain that it's there.
Yeah, I think, you know, we're making the best assumptions we can.
I think we don't know. We don't have.
I mean, we don't have a lot of information, of true information.
Yeah. So the killer point for me is that the fact that nobody in the world knows what's in the injections is evidence of wrongdoing.
And they say it's trade secrets.
But we know that people have died according to theirs and you do it and the M.H.R.A. in the UK.
And I've got the figures. Yeah. 20 million dead worldwide.
All right. That's it. That's it. Come on.
Paul, you are you are relieved of your duties, everybody.
Thank you. Thanks. Thanks. Thanks. I'm going to go. Thanks.
All right, everybody. Thank you.
The link to Todd Todd, Tom Rodman, Todd, Todd Rodman in the telegram chat is there.
Our two and a half hours is up.
Thank you for the wonderful links in the in the chat and the sharing of experiences.
I think one of the wonderful, wonderful things that's happened from from this fraud is that many more people are questioning the research and the safety of vaccines and the whole game.
So I think Paul's testimony to us here about his start opening point that that he discovered that most of what he learned at medical school was bullshit.
I quote him. So everybody, thank you for being here.
And we're going to get to that.
Steven, are we clear? Do we know who's coming Tuesday night?
General McInerney is a three star general for. Yeah.
General Tom McInerney. Excellent.
All right, everybody. Thank you. Well done.
We will terminate this. Go over to the Rodman.
And Diane, Sam enjoyed his time with your group, so we'll hear about that as well.
Steven, you and I will talk and on we go in the learning journey, everybody.
Very good. Thank you.
And I'll get the chat to you, Steven.
Thank you, Charles and Steve. I appreciate it.
Thanks, Daria.
Well done, Randy, on on the fasting on all of you who have managed to get onto the fasting and eating and understanding nutrition.
So what a great teacher for Mark is.
Yeah. Wonderful. Wonderful. Wonderful presentation.
It's this it's the essence. It's the essence of the presentation.
And that's great.
Yeah.
All right. Bye.
Thank you, Brian.
Send the chat to Charles. Yes, I will. Yeah. Thanks. Yeah.