Yes, anyway, so Sam, that is good news.
But Sam, where did you get that red hum, jealous?
That is the reddest red I've ever seen on a screen, everybody.
Look at Sam.
It's crazy.
Well, I don't know about that.
But anyway, I've got a whole repertoire of red shirts.
And for a guy who is mildly colorblind,
that's actually a pretty great achievement.
So yeah.
Very good.
Yeah.
Not to upstage you there, Charles.
No, I'm impressed.
I'm, you know, that's the learning journey.
All right, everybody.
It's 8.07, 5.07 a.m. in Australia.
Tao, what part of the world are you in, Tao?
Which coast?
I am currently on the East Coast
in the very lovely, warm New Jersey, Westfield, New Jersey,
today.
And I've been-
Well, everybody, welcome.
Stephen, you are also a co-host now, so we're fixed that.
So no problems there.
Tao in New Jersey, in fact, I had a conversation yesterday
with eight people on a conference call
regarding industrial hemp in New Jersey.
Now, for new people, for first-timers,
for virtual attendees, welcome, welcome
to the Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics.
These sessions go for two and a half hours
in extraordinary circumstances, three,
but we're going for two and a half hours.
Tao, I hope we've got you.
The process, you talk as long as you want, as you know,
and then Q&A, and if you want to talk for five minutes
in Q&A, but we're keen to hear your presentation.
You know the makeup of the group,
all sorts of people here from all around the world.
We'll have announcements after Tao and Q&A,
reactions tab, chat, wonderful, wonderful chat, everybody.
It's amazing, the wonderful information.
Jeremy Forbes does a great job on editing the chat as well.
So please introduce yourself if you're new,
and then if you can put your name on the screen
so that we know that you're not from the,
who are we worried about, Susan?
We're worried about who are we worried about?
Who are we worried about?
Bilderberg Group?
Oh, Bilderberg Group, they're Trinatural Commission,
WHO, the World Economic Forum.
Council on Foreign Relations.
Thank you.
Who was that, Liam?
Gavie. Council on Foreign Relations, yeah.
Good, Liam.
All right, so Stephen, well done for organizing Tao,
well done for organizing the speakers that you do,
and well done all of you for being here.
I think that's the announcements.
And Dr. Tao Braun, over to you to tell us about you
and to share your genius with us.
We're keen, most of us were exposed to you
on Sunday night, Sunday afternoon,
so we're looking forward to hearing from you.
Andy, would you like to share the screen, Tao?
I am going to be sharing my screen.
I won't do it just quite yet.
I will just say hi to everybody and just get a view.
I'm going to do a gallery view.
I can see all of you over there.
Thank you so much.
I mean, some of you I've seen,
whether I have seen you on calls like this before,
or if you're doing any writing out there,
I might have come across your work.
It is really, really great to be included
in this esteemed group.
I appreciate everybody during this pandemic
that is doing their part, no matter big or small,
in terms of ending it.
Part of ending anything is understanding it.
And so I hope to illuminate some aspects today
that either hit your radar, haven't hit your radar,
may have actually come to your attention,
and you might have passed over the information,
which I want to say that it's been probably
something that changed for me around this,
around some of the aspects that you'll be hearing today
is that I'm a little calmer now,
now that the information is out,
I feel a sense of relief.
People have picked up some of the information,
and I am less frustrated and angry with some of our folk
in the, I want to just call working groups like this,
the right side of history.
I think we all know what that means.
And I also want to say that anybody can fall prey
to sort of information bias.
And for whatever reason, our group took some of the work
that I'd been doing and desperately trying
to get out to people.
And really, when finally, some of this work,
including the work that you might have heard on
on the Vandom aspect, to the spike protein,
just said, well, that's a bunch of bullshit.
And, you know, just missed it entirely.
I wouldn't care.
I'm not somebody who cares much about ego-related matters,
but I do care about human life and reducing suffering.
And so our treatments will continue to be off track
and ineffective.
And so it's very important that I want to encourage you
that some of this information that I will illuminate today,
I might not be able to articulate it as well as you.
I'm not a medical doctor.
I will give you a slight background.
I won't bore you with long details.
My mentor taught me never have an introduction
that's longer than your presentation.
I've already gone past.
I will say that my academic background
is a Bachelor of Science and then a Bachelor of Science Honors.
I think you can hear the South African accent.
My Bachelor of Science was done at Wits,
good old University of Wits-Marthesrand,
which I think is now probably some other name.
And then I went off and I did an Honors,
which for those that don't know,
the Bachelor of Science in South Africa
is a three-year program and then the Honors takes it up
to a four-year program.
It's considered a post-graduate year.
I then did an internship in another six months
in statistics and research and analysis,
which was phenomenal work just in terms of the relationship
to research and psychometric testing.
Then did a Master's of Science
with a focus in clinical psychology.
My thesis was on nonlinear systems, chaos theory,
and how it applied to psychopathology.
I'm definitely using a lot of that foundation of work
to understand some of the mechanisms at action
with the spike protein that require things like amplification
and feedback loops and all kinds of things like that.
So that was useful.
I moved to the States just post 9-11
and somewhere along the line,
I completed a doctorate in organizational leadership.
It's a doctorate in education,
focus on organizational leadership.
And then my research was on preventing workplace violence.
I particularly chose that area because I found myself
post 9-11 wanting to do more and more work
that related to the pathology as it relates to mass killers.
I found myself sort of by diluting a lot
of the clinical psychology work
and my love for the clinical psychology side
sort of diluted by getting involved in wellness
and motivational speaking and helping companies
to sell more widgets.
And so the pendulum had a swing and I went back to pathology
and specifically I'm now known as a subject matter expert
in the field of understanding how to prevent
and respond to mass casualty attacks
that relate to man or human-made violence
and specifically stuff that you hear on the news
all the time in the States, these school shootings,
terrorist attacks, bombings.
I am the go-to guy that is,
most of my work is done up on stages as the bridge
that communicates to the public health folks
and to law enforcement and emergency management
how to build an integrated response to mass killing.
So I just bored myself to death with my own bio
and so I'm going to tell you the bits and pieces
that are the most important to me
and then I'll get going with some slides and things
that just helped me to eliminate some of these topics
that I've been working through for two years.
Must understand that prior to the pandemic
I was quite happy to be doing the work as it related
to the typical elements of how you kill people in mass
which includes weaponry like guns and bombs and knives
and then of course as somebody who is teaching people
not to focus on the weapon, I have to know about things
like Siren attacks in Japan and I have to sit
through really boring presentations about what happens
if smallpox ever hit a city and so there was a lead up
into me being aware of the kind of destruction
people could do if they chose to use a bio weapon.
I certainly had a really nice foundational knowledge on it.
I don't know that I ever thought that I'd be using it
in the way that I'm using it now and I also think
that a bizarre topic, a bizarre aspect to this
is that most people would be happily to call it a weapon
but I don't know how many people have reached out
to bioterrorism and bio weapon experts and said,
okay, explain this to me through the eyes of a bio weapon
and we're still tackling this as a medical problem.
I get extremely annoyed and frustrated with describing
what most people understand is a lab made gain
of function weapon and then looking at it through the eyes
of virology or epidemiology just makes absolutely no sense
to me.
It is the reason why a lot of the dots just do not connect
for people because this is not a medical problem.
It leads to a medical problem but the causation
is very different mechanism than natural substances
including natural gain of function that we've all dealt
with in our lifetimes and that the planet has dealt
with for eternity.
I'm gonna tell you a quick story that gives you sort
of a glimpse into my bizarre background in South Africa
and sort of the things that have always interested me
in the crazy experiences I've had.
I was thinking on the way to coming onto this presentation
I was thinking about a story where there was a subject
once a week that was taught in South Africa in high school
and it was called youth preparedness.
And it was like it was straight out of the textbook
from Nazi Germany, this idea of preparing white
South African youth for being able to defend the country
and hold onto apartheid at all costs.
And there was a really great way that they used
a very simple opportunity and the choice to take up
an opportunity I think in part to recruit people
that would land up working for special ops
and CIA like government agencies within South African
government at that time.
And part of it was to give a choice where you would either
be marching on the hot sun.
And for those that have some knowledge of Afrikaans
it would be links, links, links, left, left, left
and links, left, right and you would learn how to march.
And so there was this really bizarre task
of a synchronistic collectivist walking
that we call marching for soldiers.
And then a great way to weed the outliers out of that
and recruit for people that might take on a role
of special ops is to give a choice and say,
there's a way that you can get out of standing out
at the hot sun.
So that picks my curiosity and probably many of you
in this call could relate to this idea.
Tell me about that.
And so what this was is instead of being in the hot sun
for two and a half hours, we would go to a classroom
and there was a teacher and I'll just call him Mr. Smith.
Mr. Smith taught us and made us curious
about methods of killing people,
which to tell my American friends that this was a subject
that I had once a week.
And so I'm gonna tell you two stories that apply
to sort of the bizarre way that I was able to use
really very different thinking around this subject
from an early age to really understand
what they're trying to do to us,
how they're going to adapt and ultimately
what some of the main goals are
of various folks that have mutual agenda.
And so Mr. Smith told us about this situation
where he talked us through a man
that wanted to kill his wife.
And he did this by microdosing on arsenic
and building up a resistance to being able to take in
higher doses of arsenic.
And the idea was that then he would give
an arsenic lace cake to both of them.
He would land up horribly ill,
but he wouldn't die, but she would.
And so the interesting part about it is,
first of all, you've got to understand I was 14 years old
while hearing these stories.
But it intrigued me enough to make a mental note
and to start really taking an interest in toxins and poisons
and how that can both be medicinal, right?
I mean, most people know toxins and poisons.
Anybody who is at Botox, for example,
is at one of the nastiest toxins
shot right up into their face
to decrease the linings of wisdom.
And so most people know toxins, poisons,
venoms, lectins through only the eyes of pharmaceuticals.
Well, this pandemic has brought us back to the understanding
of what toxins and venoms can do
when it's used as a mass poisoning.
The second story I wanted to tell was about
a trigger mechanism for a bombing.
Mr. Smith asked us a range of questions,
and he basically said,
if you wanted to make a timing mechanism for a bomb
and you didn't want it to tick like a clock
and you didn't want it to be digital,
where potentially the battery could run out
and you wanted it to be incredibly slow
and you wanted to use pressure to move two plates together
that would just simply be attached to a battery
that would create a spark and then your bomb would go off.
He explained to us that one of the easiest ways to do that
is with swelling beans in water.
That the beans under pressure in a container
would take up space as they swelled
and then they would push the plates together
and you would have this silent killer of a timing device
that could really sit under somebody's house
or in a building.
And so that is also very relevant
because that kind of thinking highlights
why a lot of the aspects of how they're killing us
are being missed.
In the States, as I'm sure most of you are aware,
the Second Amendment is a big deal.
And so what has happened in the States
is that there's been a fixation around gun control
as a purposeful distraction
because ultimately the weapon of choice
that is going to take out the most human beings
on this planet also is a shot, but it has no percussion.
It is an injection.
And so when I've asked Second Amendment folks
exactly what shots did you think you were gonna hear
and how are you responding to the threat
of not only our constitutional republic disappearing,
but the world's democracy,
the idea is that if you fixate on one weapon,
you're really gonna do an injustice
to your own self-defense and others
because you're going to expect certain ways of killing
that you may miss based on,
you're gonna be waiting for these tells
or for these warning signs that just won't be there
if a mass killer is using a weapon
like a gain of function virus
with a gain of function spike protein on it.
So I'm hoping that that buildup sort of shows you
sort of my thinking and where some of the crazy thinking
comes from that allows me to explore
this very important topic.
Now I'm gonna go to the chat
and I'm opening up on the side over here
and I'm going to try and scan over to some of these points.
By now you might realize that I am very much
what I would consider severe ADD,
which is both a gift and a curse.
The gift is that I absolutely obsess over things
that I don't understand and I will work on things
to infinity if possible and I won't find a need
to separate myself out from understanding
or doing research until I understand that.
But what that does as well is that I have no conscious,
I don't really think about time,
my answers can be long-winded.
I am very unsuitable for people that want bullet points
or multiple choice answers.
And so if you find yourself clicking off
and finding other things to do,
I quite understand how frustrating
my way of explaining things can be.
I also think it's vital that anybody in this call
comes from a place where if this information
around bioweaponry is new to you,
then I think that it should be exciting to know
that I'm gonna put in some time to lay some elements
of foundational knowledge and show you things
to highlight some mechanisms.
And I'm actually gonna do this right away.
I'm gonna just find a quick video.
One second here, I've gotta open up a file
and then I'll share the screen.
And essentially, I'm gonna show you a mechanism of venom
that is one of the most important mechanisms of venom.
And it is one of the things that people just don't know
about that venom can do this.
So my screen is here.
I'm gonna check in with you.
We can see that.
We can see the time. Okay, good.
And I just cleaned up my desktop
because you did not wanna see how it was
before this call.
So I'm gonna pull up this video.
Now, I'm gonna go back to this wonderful gallery view.
I'm seeing some of you over here.
All right, so if you think about what most people assume
with venom as a protein,
most people think of venom as this killing tool,
but venom has multiple functions.
Venom, in essence, before it being used
as a weapon of destruction,
it is a weapon of self-defense.
Strictly speaking from a biological place,
a venom really doesn't get to be called a venom
until it is injected.
And so what's interesting is I wasn't the person
that put out the information about venom.
I tried for a year, wrote to the FBI
that I found that the information that was being put out
was horribly wrong and was killing people.
And SARS-CoV-2 was certainly not a respiratory disease.
It was an envenomation.
And that letter can actually be found on a webpage
that I'm currently running and I'm grabbing emails
because at any moment,
the rest of my social media will be deleted.
I have a lifetime.
I have the honor of having a lifetime ban from LinkedIn.
I got canceled on the same day as Fred van der Bosch
and Robert Malone, so I'm in good company,
but they were invited back.
I wasn't, I pissed Bill Gates off sufficiently
and the rest of these company.
And just like I heard at the beginning,
I too use words like I'm coming for you.
And when you have somebody in counter-terrorism,
it does the type of work that I do.
I think when somebody in counter-terrorism says,
we're coming for you, I think it's taken quite seriously.
And I hope that it gets even more serious
as we close in on these fools.
The interesting aspect for me around Brian Artis,
Dr. Brian Artis, using the sensational approach
that he used with Stu Peters is that I don't believe
that anybody would have ever heard of this aspect of venom
if it wasn't for that way.
So I am deeply grateful in the way it was put out.
There was some damage control that I had to do
because I think that Dr. Artis had spent about two months.
I was into my second year of this stuff
and barely scratching the surface
and being able to highlight some of the mechanisms.
So there was a little bit of damage control
just in saying, okay, well, he's got some of the stuff,
right, this is some of the stuff he's trying to explain.
This is a better way of putting it.
Venom doesn't get to be called the venom
until it's injected.
However, I challenge that definition
because if you think about cobra, the spitting cobra,
it envenomates its prey using the soft tissue,
specifically of the eyes, the conjunctiva.
If it is able to spit this venom,
which goes several feet in the air in an aerosolized bubble,
and then it enters the eyes
or makes contact with the skin of the prey,
the mechanisms of some aspects of envenomation
start immediately and the clock is running for that animal.
So from a self-defense point of view,
venom is to tell the other creature to piss off.
Some animals have decided
that they don't wanna use their venom,
so they've adapted things like a rattle
on the end of their tail because venom is very expensive.
It's a very expensive protein for an animal to make.
It's heavy in energetics.
It uses a ton of resources and why waste it?
Something you should know about the self-defense version
of venom is that when a creature uses venom,
for self-defense, it uses less of it on purpose.
I see some hands opening.
I'm not able to see that right now,
but I will come back to it.
I've got a screen where I'm about to show you this video
and then I'll be able to stop sharing and see your chat box.
Well, Chow, just keep going with your presentation.
Those hands can go up.
Perfect.
People are used to waiting
till you're ready to answer questions.
It's just important because sometimes I like to know
that someone put up his hand and said,
you know, get rid of this asshole.
And I've had that.
Yeah, I'm quite happy at this point to take the...
It's been two years of abuse
and what's wonderful about abuse
is that abuse can make or break a person.
As a clinical psychologist,
I think that my primary role was often to help people
to never go into victim thinking.
And so the more bashed I got over the last years,
it just made me that much more willing to get to the point
where I could not only be right,
but I could explain why I was right
and then obviously use this to help people.
But I've certainly had my bashing from all sides
and all people during this time.
I have got over some of the inherent fear
that a lot of us have got around working this problem,
which is very difficult for people whose credentials
don't match the work that they're doing.
So in this case, you know, finally,
people are much more open to a guy that does bio warfare
and bioterrorism prevention, explaining some of this stuff.
But on the medical side, I'm still trying very hard
and very happy to work with any clinicians
to do the heavy lifting on the clinical side
because one, it would be inappropriate,
and two, it's unethical,
and three, it creates fear for me about, you know,
sort of crossing any of those boundaries into treatment.
I'd rather teach people some of the things
that I know how to do now and let people with the licenses
and the medical jurisdiction to do that work.
An aspect of venom that I'm gonna show you
is that there's major form of venom in terms of eating a prey
is that the reason that predators, apex predators,
are extremely good at killing
is they know their limitations.
And so they don't play to their weaknesses ever.
They play to their strengths.
And so as fast as a snake is, a mouse, a rodent,
some other creature is actually going to be quicker.
And so the most high gain of function venom
as a weapon is very similar
to how they've weaponized SARS-CoV-2,
which is an aerosolized particle
that travels through the air
and then makes contact with somebody.
And in this case, the damage is done
because the way it's built,
and it's a high binding affinity to the ACE receptors,
it really is working like a virus
and having to infect a person
to have its main form of mechanism.
But the spike protein, as numerous studies
have already highlighted, is pathogenic on its own.
And you can actually detach the spike protein completely
from the viral vector and still have a major issue.
In high concentrations,
you will absolutely see it working like a nerve gas.
So let me highlight this video.
And what I'm showing you over here
is that this is an aspect to COVID.
And I wanna make sure that I,
articulating these words in the best way I can.
I'm gonna say that SARS-CoV-1
originated from a virus that was taken from a bat.
It was harvested from a bat, from a copper mine.
And that's extremely relevant
because one of the main ways
that venom is dealt with in the body is through dismutases.
And dismutases is just a fancy way to say
a mechanism of action that creates an anti-corrosive
and specifically about from damage
that oxides can do to the body.
And so when you have something
that's taken from a copper mine, this viral vector,
what that told me right at the beginning
and starting to understand the transportation
using this viral platform is that that virus in itself
is very resistant to copper and zinc.
The mechanisms, the antimicrobial mechanisms
that don't come from big chemical companies,
that come from nature,
most of our balancing of the microbes, parasites,
and parasites in the world
are done through a copper-zinc combination.
The copper and zinc is bound together with a disulfide bond.
And so you have these two positively charged metals
that literally bounce off each other.
There's an old game that came from the 50s
called the Clacker.
And if anybody looks up on YouTube and finds this,
there's now plastic versions of it,
but essentially, a kid would laugh at you
if they looked at this game today
with all of the video games and stuff and say,
well, this is not gonna hold my attention
for more than three seconds.
They would be wrong because things like spinning something
on your finger could be quite stimulating
for a lot of people.
So the Clacker and its mechanism spun round
and what it was are two balls,
and you had them banging on each other
and you could create motion that way.
Well, when you combine copper and zinc
together with disulfide bonds, you create movement
in that the metals are gonna repel each other
and then they're gonna find each other
on the other side of the string
and then they're gonna create movement.
And so we have this wonderful mechanism
of these moving cleaners that are antimicrobial
on both sides of them.
And essentially, they also push things around.
They're creating movement and they're very involved
in the process of breaking up plots, keeping blood flow,
moving things like if there's an accumulation of macrophages.
I mean, they are literally the earliest primitive forms
of a Roomba.
I hope I'm saying that right.
I know the Roomba is also movement-based
but entirely different things.
One of those robotic vacuum cleaners
going around cleaning up the body in a very efficient way.
So that being said, SARS-CoV-1 came from this virus
and then they started working on this virus
and they started doing gain of function.
And gain of function sounds very fancy
but it's really not fancy at all.
Anyone can actually do gain of function in their kitchen
by taking starter plants
and putting them into a glass with not just water
but adding things that you know create life.
So things like copper, zinc, honey, electrolytes, minerals.
And what you'll find is it creates an environment
where things get to stick on the budding root system.
And what you've done is that essentially
you've created ionic charges on these little starter plants
and then things can attach to it.
So gain of function as it comes to coronavirus
is actually very interesting
because you start off with something
that already has little nubs to it.
The coronavirus is known as a coronavirus
because it has this crown and this circle around it.
These little nubs are a perfect way to attach new things.
And if you can mess around with the charges on it
you can attach something
and then you mess around with the charges
and then you attach something there
and you ultimately create a new spike protein
over an existing spike protein.
Really not fancy stuff.
The fanciness of it is purifying it
and the fancy stuff is getting it to replicate.
The earliest paper I could find of successful replication
of a coronavirus with venom on it comes from 1977
and it's a paper that looked at coronavirus
with a new lectin.
For those that don't know,
a lectin is a plant-based toxin, plant-based venom
that the plant uses for its defense mechanisms
and they were able to attach this lectin to a coronavirus
and then get that coronavirus to replicate
with the new structures on it.
Okay, so if we look at SARS-CoV-2 then
and this model that they've now got
and you'll see a video of Dr. Baric talking
about sort of the vaccine development as it relates
and you can see how easily they manipulate these things now
with computer modeling and the computer model also includes
exactly knowing where the charges are gonna be,
what's gonna stick, what's not gonna stick,
how are you gonna purify?
And then they run these viruses through animals
to the point where they can harvest the ones
that are causing the most death.
Now venom doesn't like death,
which is really interesting to say
because most people think of venom from venomous animals
and they think about this creature using it to create death.
The endpoint of venom is death
but the biological function of venom is a suicide switch.
And I'm hoping that I'm now starting to create some pieces
of foundational knowledge that help you to understand
what's happening with people,
both through COVID, wild virus,
as well as what would be happening with people
that you can start seeing some of the behavioral aspects,
behavioral aspects to what's happening psychologically
with people.
What venom wants and the rest of the presentation
will highlight some of these mechanisms,
what venom wants is it wants to get into the prey
and then it wants the prey to do the work of killing itself
and it wants the prey to do that work
by killing itself slowly so that the enzymes that are used
and the bacteria that are used are coming from the prey
rather than from the predator
and that it needs to do this in a way
that it gives an instruction to the prey in various forms.
Hey, don't fight back, take on this victim role,
don't die, become this zombie, I'm gonna swallow you whole,
I'm gonna make it as pleasant as possible for you.
There are some venoms that actually create euphoria
and I'm going to make it as pleasant as possible for you
but I'm gonna swallow you whole
because I need you to be in the suspended animation.
I don't want your organs dying.
I don't want ischemia issues throughout the body,
I want it in certain places that are gonna make sure
that you don't bite, scratch, kick or try and run away
and I'm gonna show you this video.
A lot of you are like,
please God can you just put the video on,
I'm sick of this guy's voice.
Here is this video.
I am going to fit to screen
and I'm gonna move this out the way
and I'm gonna hit play and I think what I have to do
for you to be able to hear the audio
is I'm gonna run it through the speaker.
Actually, I think that I'll just put the chat back on
for this one and that will help me to at least see
some thumbs up if the audio starts playing
with this video then and we'll be good to go.
Now, how do I move this out the way?
It won't let me grab this.
All right, let's see, there we go.
Okay, put it up here.
You're not hearing anybody.
So I'm gonna unplug these.
Let's hit play.
Let's hit.
Okay, so there we go.
I'm gonna unplug this and now we should be,
you should have some sound.
The exact type of insulinism on a goldfish
will be examined.
The bowl marked A contains 400 international units
of commercially prepared insulin
in 100 milliliters of water.
Bowl B contains 100 milliliters
of a 10% glucose solution.
A small goldfish is placed in bowl A containing insulin
for observation of changes in behavior over time.
Insulin is taken up rapidly across the gills
to create a state of hyper insulinism.
Within five minutes, the body of the fish begins to twitch
and movements become increasingly convulsive.
Rapid dotting swimming movements are observed
for a few minutes.
Eventually, a slower regular circular swimming pattern
resumes, but the fish is unable to maintain
an upright position.
For several minutes, the fish frequently turns over
on its side while swimming,
but continues to attempt to upright itself.
Within 20 minutes, the fish remains on its side
Within 20 minutes, the fish remains on its side,
stops swimming, and finally enters a comatose state.
The change in swimming pattern
and the final comatose state are the result
of brain deprivation of glucose produced by hyper insulinism.
The comatose fish is then carefully transferred
to bowl B containing the 10% glucose solution
and again observed for changes.
Within a few minutes, the fish begins to revive.
And within 15 minutes, it resumes its swim pattern
and the final comatose state is the result
of brain deprivation of glucose produced by hyper insulinism.
The body of the fish is unable to maintain an upright position
and within 15 minutes, it resumes
its normal swimming activity.
Placing the fish in a 10% glucose solution
restored circulating glucose to a level necessary
for normal brain activity.
The results of this experiment should clearly illustrate
why human diabetics who rely on insulin therapy
must carefully regulate the amount of insulin taken
and be attentive to early signs of hypoglycemia.
Okay, so let me stop sharing for a second.
Okay, so one of the mechanisms that's at play with COVID
is that you have either the spike protein by itself
and this can happen through shedding.
What was very interesting is that along the way
you kept hearing that shedding is impossible
because they're not using the virus
but that's because the distraction technique
is that it's the virus that's causing the harm to the body.
Coronavirus is if you're ever gonna choose a virus to have,
they're decent viruses to take into your body
and of course we cycle through hundreds of species of them
because they are pretty clean.
I think of them in the same way as I think of the difference
between a tap root system and a,
what's it called, a adventitious root system.
They don't create that much damage
to other cells around them.
They tend to drill down, they want to get out of the way
and they tend to drill down, they want to penetrate the cell,
they want to take the resources and they want to replicate
and so they are not that cytotoxic
and so when I looked at the original
sort of trying to understand why is there so much information,
what's happening in the body over here,
what was very interesting to me is that
there was the easiest way for me to see
the spike protein is the major issue
and I started visualizing the spike protein as a weapon,
I started thinking of it as a medieval mace
but this, basically because of the drawings
that were coming out, the animated drawing,
it was very easy to visualize this thing
either as a mine, an old naval mine
or like a, basically like a medieval mace
where the damage could be coming from just literally
the contact of the virus against cells
and against soft tissue.
It's obviously more complicated than that
but that was a good starting point for me
to start trying to unpack some of the pathology
around the spike protein.
I'm going to just say that if you're looking for proof
that the hyperinsulinemia cycle is a major issue
or one of the driving issues,
you should have a look at the uptake
of diabetes around the world.
You should know that many people post-vaccine
are now diabetic.
You should know that that diabetes
is actually a very interesting form of diabetes
because really it is, is an acute insulin resistance.
And so you're not going to have necessarily
pancreatic involvement in the same way
as a dysfunctional pancreas.
A really peculiar thing that I had no idea took place
in the human body before the pandemic
is we all know about cell differentiation.
What I didn't know is that you can have instructions
given to the body that to take cells
and to ask them to go from specialized cells like insulin
and reverse course and become general again.
Now that is on a micro level.
I want you to think about the macro level of that.
That is ultimately what they are after here
as a global death.
They don't like the outliers.
They don't want people that don't fit the template.
They don't want people that can't be treated by a kiosk
with their mRNA technology of the medicines of the future.
And so they really are trying to create
a lack of genetic diversity
as a short-term part of what they're doing.
And part of that is that they doing that,
I'm going to go all over the place with information here,
but part of the way that they doing that
is that not everybody is going to be sensitive
to this glucose, high insulin, imlimia,
and then glucose issue.
COVID is, I've got a list of lies
that I consider to be the greatest lies
that have driven this pandemic.
And on top of my list is the idea of susceptibility.
About between one and maximum 2% of the world's population
were ever susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 as a virus
with the spike protein on it.
And the reason for that is that it is expression of chromosome 3,
which is Neanderthal gene,
which relates to in part,
it's obviously glucose metabolism that's driving this,
but it gets more complicated than that.
It's very specific to fructose,
the people of the forbidden fruit.
And so there is a driver here where you can have a look at,
besides the elderly that have been purposefully killed
in the seneside, those that actually succumb to this
through injury and then death,
you know that the genetic makeup of those people
is that they were morbidly obese
or they were put there with their comorbidity as diabetes.
But that was also because that circuitry,
that expression, that inability to process glucose
in the same way is the driver of those diseases
in the first place.
So this is very much targeting
those that have glucose metabolism issues.
And then you have this mechanism
that as its first entry into the body,
one of the first things it does
is it messes up insulin and glucose.
An interesting fun fact around assessing your own risk
for COVID, it changes obviously
for those that are vaccinated.
For every vaccine someone has,
they are making themselves vulnerable to coronaviruses,
not just SARS-2, not just to Omicron,
which is a completely different coronavirus,
it is not SARS-2 at all.
And in fact, I don't believe
that it even has venom on it,
but I have not been able to confirm that yet.
But they have made themselves,
the vaccine makes you more vulnerable
to coronaviruses, period.
And then the other thing is that you can do this very easy,
quick test on yourself to know if you would be at high risk.
If you're in a category of people
that doesn't like sugars at all,
if you don't have a sweet tooth,
if you describe yourself as somebody
that could wake up in the morning
and want your coffee black and bitter,
and that you would never put sugar and cream
into coffee or your tea,
you can know that your risk is lower.
And it absolutely targets those with a sweet tooth.
And there's some nice data that shows
that that's one aspect in terms of targeting.
So I'm seeing that there was something,
somebody asked me a question over here,
I'm just gonna address two unique parts to this.
One is that you can absolutely shed venom.
But what I'm not quite sure of yet
is that I'm not sure of the mechanism of actually,
of being shedding the spike protein.
My assumption is that it is in most bodily secretions
with higher loads in saliva.
And I think that it's exploiting salivary glands
no differently than a cobra, spitting cobra.
I think that when they are saying
that it's in an aerosolized particle
and it's just respiratory,
you've got to remember that in 2020,
when people were first hearing about this pandemic
and everyone heard it was a respiratory,
there weren't people walking around coughing and sneezing
and had runny noses,
which should have been a giveaway
that they were really not telling people, the public,
what was really taking place.
And yet there were people getting sick.
And there were also people that would get sick
with very limited contact.
And then there would be people
that sat on top of each other
and then someone didn't get sick.
And so it is very much started looking to me.
And I see another question that relates to this
around nerve gas.
And I'm gonna show you a couple of videos
that help us understand how this is working.
Now, I know that some people are probably gonna log off
early to this call.
And so the most important thing
that I wanna share to anybody,
and it comes with a very narcissistic
plea here, a very request.
The narcissistic request is that I am not interested
in regular academia and publishing.
I consider myself sort of a practical academic.
I don't know if that's laziness
or that it's not stimulating enough for me
or when you do a master's and then you do a doctorate
and no one's ever read those big bodies of work.
There's nothing in it for me to write up papers.
However, what I would like
is anybody using this information
in any gesture that's respectful to the work.
And that also then helps me to create credibility
around this topic so that I can help others.
Give me a favor and say,
well, I heard this first from Dr. Braun
and Dr. Braun made us aware of it.
And so for anybody hanging up today,
the missing piece to this and why I thought
so much damage was done by not understanding
the alpha-bungerotoxin that is on this spike protein
is that in my opinion,
and for those that wanna challenge it
or illuminate the mechanisms here,
I really believe, and you're gonna see some evidence
of this, COVID is driven through the high binding affinity
of the toxins on the spike protein
to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Let me repeat that.
The damage being done and the switches
that create a systemic chaotic disorder
driving the system towards demise
is no different from any other system
that drives people's bodies to death,
but it is purposeful and it is quicker
than a natural process without amplifying catalysts
which are venoms to create that system
that allows that to happen.
And how it's doing that, the exploit,
is that blood flowing through the blood
as a toxin is too slow.
And so if it uses lymph or if it uses blood
or if it uses circuitry in the body,
the quicker way to be disruptive is through electricity.
It is exploiting the nervous system
because that is the fastest way to send the message
across the body.
You can choose one area and you can start there.
And when the nerves are transmitting in unison,
this message, it's a very, very quick way
for the system to change towards this death spiral.
Now, there's a very interesting part
about nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
because I think a lot of people got confused
and they started looking at whether there was something
called muscarinic involvement.
There's very little chance that this is muscarinic.
The type of breathing issues or the type of nerve agent
that you see that involves nicotinic receptors,
but that are the muscarinic, I mean acetylcholine receptors,
but other muscarinic type, those would have more
of the features that you saw, for example, in Wuhan,
where people just suddenly drop.
You would have more aspects of just very,
very quick syncope.
You would have much closer,
it would be easier to spot somebody whose diaphragm
had become paralyzed if the muscarinic receptors
were being exploited.
Nicotinic receptors are really interesting
in terms of its chemical transmission
because ultimately what's happening is the disruption
is the circuitry is either staying on, off,
or it's not switching like a windshield wipers do
between on and off, it's not intermittent.
And there's how the blockage works.
Now, the reason they're called nicotinic receptors
is because back in the day when they identified
this type of receptor, they saw that it has very high binding
to nicotine.
And so there's your answer of why nicotine uses,
if they were in that genetic category
of whether they were gonna be high risk
and that chromosome three expression,
if they were nicotine, if they used nicotine
and nicotine was preloaded in their system,
there was less chance of them having severe COVID
if they were in that high risk category.
Ivermectin for example, has a similar mechanism
except that instead of blocking the neurotransmitter
like nicotine does, Ivermectin changes the circuitry
where it changes the binding affinity on the end of it.
So it's considered a neuromodulator.
And so Ivermectin is interesting
because when SARS-CoV-2 came along, its efficacy was,
if there was gonna be a made a great case for Ivermectin,
it was really, if you took a high risk population,
this expression of chromosome three,
if there was a way of really getting to the point
where you understood exactly who was at risk
based on those chromosomes,
ultimately what you could do is you could help those people
by using something like Ivermectin
that made it very difficult to the spike protein
to exploit those openings.
But it would have to be used prophylactically.
And the other aspect is you have about seven days
of the spike protein in a bell curve
where it's reaching threshold and it takes about seven days
to be able to get enough spike protein in the body
that is accumulated to hit those switches
and to make systemic changes.
And so the body will have natural ways
to defeat the spike protein,
but if it doesn't get defeated within seven days,
you're gonna start having problems on the eighth, ninth day.
That's a little too late for Ivermectin
to actually have decent efficacy.
You really need it as those spike proteins,
I wanna call them blossoming, right?
It's the equivalent of blocking the holes
that they are going to exploit.
And just remember, there's a difference here
between what they're exploiting to reproduce
by helping the virus bind to a cell to basically reproduce
and also helping the body, exploiting the body
in terms of its mechanism to create a zombie
that then allows whether it's a virus or a snake
or a scorpion, whatever it is to do its work.
In this case, there are natural gain of function in viruses
that cause sort of a zombification
that allow the virus to thrive.
Once again, I'm gonna just highlight this
with some slides and some videos.
I am being conscious of time and I will circle back
and take a couple of questions,
but I'm going to share the screen right now
and I want to give you, I'm gonna switch gears
and I'm gonna, before I go back into the
nicotinic receptors and the venom work,
I want to also share some things
that I think are very useful in helping us all understand
how they're doing this to us psychologically.
I just want to make sure I'm sharing correctly.
I am back.
I didn't like this.
All right, you should be seeing the PowerPoint.
Is that correct?
Yes, good, thank you for the thumbs up.
Okay, so there we go.
Okay, so that is a guy called Edward Bernays
and I'm actually gonna do it slightly differently
because I've lost the ability to see you guys
and so I won't know if you're actually seeing,
I'm just gonna do the slides like this.
Okay, so that is a guy called Edward Bernays
and Edward Bernays is Freud's nephew
and he came back from the United States
and he came back from Nazi Germany
and ultimately he said, hey, there's this cool stuff
that Google is using and it's taking control
of people's minds and wouldn't it be cool
if we could use that to sell stuff?
And he was trying to make his name for himself.
I mean, his uncle was Freud,
he's had some pretty big shoes to fill
and so he took Nazi Germany ways of mind control
and he invented the science and industry
called public relations.
And so here's a quote that I'm gonna read you.
The conscious and intelligent manipulation
of the organized habits and opinions of the masses
is an important element in democratic society.
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society
constitute an invisible government.
We are governed, our minds are molded,
our tastes formed, our ideas suggested
largely by men we have never heard of.
And I think those words are more true now
than ever before in terms of the sort of third force
that sits behind us and drives the shaping of minds.
We have a word from Edward Bernays that we all use
and we understand that that's what's happening
and that word is propaganda.
And so the interesting part about him
and I think I have quick access in this folder over here.
I want you to see this Edward Bernays video.
This is Edward Bernays on Letterman of all places.
It's out the way.
Let's talk a little bit about public relations.
You've been doing it for 70 years.
Who were some of your-
72.
72, who were some of your early accounts?
Who were clients of yours back in the very beginning?
In the very beginning,
Clark and Gamble was one of our accounts.
They had a white building, so called the ivory cell.
Right, that was the selling point.
It would actually float in the bathtub
or wherever you were bathing, I guess.
That's right.
And they came to me one day and said
that mothers wash the faces of the children
and they hated soap because their eyes
were stinging from the soap.
And that when people grew up, they wouldn't use any soap
because they get conditioned in childhood
according to Freud, my uncle.
That's so you can get ahead of yourself.
But it's true, your uncle was Sigmund Freud.
And so we made a research known as Denny
and we found a sculptor, Brenda Putnam,
who used soap instead of wax in developing her sculpture.
And it then occurred to me
that if we could develop soap sculpture competitions,
I went to a psychologist and he said,
every child has a creative instinct.
If we got some sculptors to be judges
and had soap sculpture competitions
for children in different age groups.
That would get them accustomed to using the soap.
That would get them to love soap,
only accustomed to it.
The fascinating thing to me was that after the first year,
22 million children were loving soap
and they were saying themselves that.
The point I wanna make around Edward Bernays
and this idea of being able to pay for large amounts of PR
is twofold.
One is that PR is fascinating and that you create spin.
And in our world, partly why this is a perfect storm
is that the exploit here around technology
is the speed of information.
And then that you can create consistency in information
and that those tools used really well
are highly manipulative and very powerful.
However, there's a limit.
There's certainly a limit to the amount
that you can get people on board.
But there is another aspect to this
that is crucial in understanding,
which is that if you take an organization, for example,
if you take an example, for example, coffee, right?
You can have great marketing, you can have a good brand,
you can have a wonderful logo,
but if caffeine wasn't an addictive substance,
you couldn't charge outrageous amounts of money
and you couldn't create strength in that kind of brand.
There's always this link between those things
that we gravitate towards.
And then some of the best products in the world
in pharmaceuticals included,
the ones that are gonna stick have an addictive nature,
which takes me to another aspect
that I really wanted to talk about on this
with all of you today.
I want the understanding that not only
is the driver of the disease
and the diseases that are coming from the vaccine,
not only is that exploiting the nicotinic receptor,
but the psychological behavior aspect
is that this form of bio-weapon
is what's known as an incapacitator.
This is a form of riot control.
This is a form of control mechanism,
a non-lethal, supposed to be non-lethal.
The deaths that we're seeing right now
are a consequence of it being widely dispersed.
And so just like when tasers are used,
tasers will also have high-risk populations
that will get tased and they will die.
They will have a cardiac arrest and they will die.
And that is not what a taser is supposed to do.
And that percentage of that death is very low
for the amount that the taser is used.
In a similar way, the death that we're seeing now
and the death from the vaccine,
that is really only the beginning of the death toll
that we're gonna see,
because these other mechanisms,
they take longer to manifest.
And so the deaths right now are a consequence
of the spike protein hitting the nicotinic receptor.
And for those that are interested in this behavioral side,
I want you to think about that as a drug,
what's happening over here is that the spike protein
is hitting the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
and it is causing a down regulation.
And that down regulation will cause apathy,
it will cause brain fog,
it will cause people to take the edge off,
like the reason that people smoke cigarettes,
and it will cause people to be addicted,
which is why you don't have to do much
except create that first exposure to the shot.
And then people will see, oh, no big deal,
nothing major took place.
And so it's much easier then for them to go
for their second, third, fourth, and 12th booster.
And every time they get the vaccine,
they are creating a dependence on it, a chemical dependence.
And it is also a psychological dependence
because when it starts waning, they will feel anxiety.
And so people that are now post-second or post-booster
and that are not going for another shot
are starting to say, I feel anxious,
and they're starting to go and seek treatment for anxiety.
The other aspect of exploiting the nicotinic receptors
in this way is that you will start seeing in the vaccinated
very much this form of zombie-like features
that we're all experiencing with our friends
and family members who have gone this path
in that it should feel like a creature
that's been hit with venom
that has really given themselves over.
I mean, there is a form of submission now.
And part of that is looking at the nicotinic receptors
in its down regulation.
The symptoms are going to start looking like early dementia
and specifically Alzheimer's.
There is a depersonalization,
there is a Bell's indifference in terms of the trauma
that somebody should be experiencing.
It is really weird how damaging these vaccines
have been to people, and yet their emotions
are disproportionate for the injuries, right?
I mean, you just even saw that with Justin Bieber, right?
I mean, people are reporting,
oh, half my body's paralyzed,
but at least I didn't get COVID.
Or I've gone deaf in one ear, like my recent buddy
who I was able to fix by cycling him through nicotine
and niacin and using mucuna prurians, which is dopamine.
It increases dopamine.
As part of nicotinic down regulation,
you will also have many neurotransmitters
that are out of whack, and one of them is dopamine.
And so dopamine is a play, obviously,
in most neurodegenerative diseases,
including things like depression,
and specifically diseases of,
like, tau protein folding and Alzheimer's.
And so basically you can see that what we're really
having to fix here is very basic chemistry.
On another, oh yeah, and the Parkinsonian part,
definitely, right, you can see that.
And people experience these tremors,
and not only are they experiencing tremors,
but part of it is the absolute feeling of the electricity
that's involved, because it is all circuitry.
I know that I'm gonna be wrapping up soon.
I hope to be back on another call.
This was a sort of quick fill-in that I did,
and so I wanna be, come back and really drill down
in some of the deeper science here,
but there's some things that I wanna leave you
with this thinking about.
When earlier, when we said, you know,
how our scientists don't know what they're doing,
I think that there is many people that the medical community
particularly is vulnerable to something called
imposter syndrome, where even though you're an incredibly
knowledgeable person and that you've done wonderful work,
there's been a, you know, people have had this feeling
that you should be godlike, and so it creates this feeling
like you're supposed to know everything,
and a lot of doctors fall for that.
A lot of doctors will, their arrogance is driven by fear
of being exposed, and it's got worse with the younger doctors
now, where a lot of their own natural ability
to be intuitive, to treat the patient in front of them
has been replaced by handheld devices,
where they don't actually have to look at the patient.
They get one or two bytes of data,
and then they go from there, and then the algorithm
asks the rest of the questions,
and then they get the diagnosis,
and then it spits out the solution.
It really is a way of killing thinking,
and all of you that are physicians know
that there's absolutely no way of being successful
in treating a patient, especially with a complex disease,
by doing that, but that's how a lot of young doctors
are now trained, and that's how they do their work.
Let's, I wanna show you a couple of ways that we know
that the bigger players in this know exactly
what they're doing.
The coin that you're seeing in front of you on the screen
is the 2020 coin from the US Treasury,
and the US Treasury is owned by BlackRock.
I don't know that most people don't know
that the US Treasury is not a government organization,
it's a bank, and it's a private bank,
and currently the financial controllers
through a contract with the US Treasury is BlackRock,
because they fixed the economy,
they stopped it from crashing completely
by getting in exchange this controlling piece
where they control the US Treasury,
and ultimately people ask me when this pandemic
is gonna be over.
It will be over in three main ways.
The first way is that partly we'll know it's over
when we are under a centralized government.
I think anybody in this phone call knows
that that's where part of the goal is heading,
that they really are believing that the world is now ready
for a borderless world with a centralized government.
The second piece to that is that the government
then will need a currency, a global currency,
and part of what's been happening
and why this took place now is that cryptocurrency
was way too individualistic rather than collect,
from a collectivist approach,
and so BlackRock wants to control the global economy
by creating a cryptocurrency,
and then all currencies will be derivatives
of that main cryptocurrency.
So when those two things are in place
from their perspective,
from the main sort of economic drivers,
we'll know that they finally finished
with manipulating killing us
and that they've achieved that primary goal
as one of the main agendas.
The third one is it's over when we say it's over,
and ultimately when we win this war,
which I strongly believe there's some mechanisms
that we can use to end this nonsense,
and to say, no, that's not what we signed up for,
and we don't actually want a world without diversity.
We quite like monetary that has value
and not made up values.
Like these NFTs are really a very interesting concept
that shows us how decayed that we've become
in terms of the fact that you can have
a digital piece of art,
that you can just decide that that's the value of it,
that there's no worth in itself,
there's no intrinsic worth,
that's not tied to a species,
and so this NFT is a really good way of seeing
how far they'll push this sort of digital universe
and that ultimately they're working towards
a token-based society.
Here is the coin from 2021, Tuskegee.
So you should know that they're absolutely trolling,
just like all my mass killers.
I find them because they land up trolling
with little clues that they leave
because it's fun for them.
I mean, killing for you and I is not fun.
For these people, they're more torture,
and the more trolling they do,
like a cat playing with its prey as a form of learning
is basically a big aspect to it.
There's my medieval mace that helped me to visualize it,
but then even easier is that because of the scale of things,
a coronavirus is best understood
as a very, very primitive eons ago jellyfish.
If you understand the mechanisms and what you're looking at
and the features that evolved over millions of years
without them, what you'd be looking at
is this thing that needs to float around,
latch onto something like a reef,
find a way of reproducing.
Jellyfish, for example,
cause something called a medusa,
which is an interesting word.
There's so many death words around some of the words
that are clues for us.
And then what happens is that thing rises off the reef,
swells up and blows up,
and sort of the explosion are more of it's saying,
and where did it get everything that it needed?
It got it from the resources that it tapped into,
and in this case, what a virus does is it steals
from the host, which makes it a parasite.
This was one of the earliest models that I looked at,
and what struck me is here's an envenomation,
and you have a look at all the words that everybody's using
as it relates to the immune response.
And if you didn't know you were dealing with a virus at all,
if nobody had ever said,
oh, this is a pandemic of a virus,
you would be dealing with it, treating it,
and understanding it.
It simply isn't envenomation.
You would be looking at whether it's a harpoon bob
or some other form of injecting a toxin into a system,
and then have a look at the response it does.
And when it comes to venoms,
the only reason that you should actually ever be considering
venom as part of this toxin-like exposure is that venoms,
unlike a lot of toxins,
have very specific actions on proteins,
protein folding, breaking down proteins,
stopping other proteins from developing,
sort of slowing down metabolism.
And so that's why looking at venom becomes important.
I wanna show you this piece of information
that is about the most cruel thing.
And you can think about how the powers that be
on the medical side that are driving this
absolutely know what they're doing.
Here's an email from the chief section
of viral pathogenesis at NIAID, Dr. Paolo Lusa,
writing to Dr. Fauci on April 27th of 2020,
and literally saying,
hey, we've tried this drug,
tyrophibin, agrostat,
and it's derived from anti-clotting protein
found in snake venom,
and they've taken five patients off the ventilators
within two hours, and they've made four recoveries.
Literally dealing with the worst aspect
that is the dreadful part of,
that's gonna cause the death-like symptoms before death
is not the decomposition that the body is gonna go into,
it's the clotting, it's these micro thrombi
that are there very purposefully
to stop the creature from running away.
And the micro clots are in place, and they don't aggregate.
They only aggregate when they're exposed to adrenaline.
So there's your giveaway about why men are more susceptible
to death than COVID,
and why you'll find most men in viral diseases
actually not muscling through it, and we act like babies.
And part of it is the mechanism that muscling through it
with rage or pushing through it
that we do with our system called adrenaline and testosterone
actually increases clotting.
You're simply gonna cause your own demise
by thinking that you can fight through this.
Women have a protective layer against venoms
and against that way of thinking, they switch gears.
Women tend to be less cognitive rigid in the first place,
which is why when we lost in a car,
it will mostly be the gender bias of a woman
that will say, why don't we stop and ask for help?
And the man will say, no, I'm gonna drive around
like an asshole for the next two hours
pretending I know where I'm going.
And part of it is the switch over into oxytocin.
And so the switch over into oxytocin
as it relates to toxin venom is that you get help
from your community, you get help from your village.
Now there's a historical and archeological,
sort of evolutionary is what I'm looking for aspect of that,
which is that if a male has been bitten by a snake
out there hunting, it doesn't really help
to have the emotional side and to cry
and to have less cognitive rigidity and look for help
because they're generally out there hunting by themselves
or in small packs.
But a woman generally as hunt together
would have had much more access to use that oxytocin,
to be emotional, to be open to getting help.
And so there's a biological protection
in the hormones that drive this.
I'm very, very new to the science
that I'm unpacking right now,
which is one of the animals that we can learn from
in terms of how to treat this,
especially with the early days of being exposed
to these types of spike proteins.
And then more specifically for long haulers
is that we think about all kinds of animals that,
especially the animals that we get anti-venom from,
over time they've developed wonderful antibodies
against venom and we use those now
and they're currently using them as treatment.
We just don't call them anti-venom.
They're quite comfortable to call them monoclonal antibodies,
which is anti-venom.
It's just another way of saying anti-venom.
And so they are using them currently to treat this.
They were very useful in SARS-CoV-2
and not useful against Omicron,
which is in part why they dropped it.
The other side to it is that the animal
that I'm currently looking at as a clue to how we do this
is that there is parathyroid involved with.
And the creature that we can learn the most from
and its enzymes that it uses
and how it's using its parathyroid
is no other than the possum.
And so that little word that we say when we say play possum
makes it sound like the possum is here
to teach us to play dead.
But that's only one aspect of the way a possum deals
with venom.
It knows to play dead so that it doesn't get
invenomated again and it knows to slow itself down
so that it's not using adrenaline.
That's where the idea of playing possum,
the idea of don't muscle through this.
But more importantly for us is that parathyroid involvement
makes the possum one of the best creatures
that's able to withstand multiple venom attacks
and sort of munch their way through,
especially invertebrates that are highly toxic and venomous.
And so there's a lot of giveaways for us around the possum.
There are a couple more pieces here before we go.
I wanna show you the part of why I got angry,
especially when I bought this information
to even people within our own circles as early as 2020
and said, why are we not looking at this?
I was certainly not the person that discovered the venom.
I found this wonderful paper as one of the earliest papers
and I can send you all this links so you have it
or you can have a look or take a screenshot of that.
But basically here's this paper.
This is a version of it from 2021,
which is the peer reviewed version.
There was a non-peer reviewed version that came out first
and you can have a look.
And what they're showing is looking at the genomic sequence
that everybody's working for.
And I'm very conscious of our discussion the other day
of who knows that's true.
My answer to that is that there's been numerous ways
to re-engineer this as well as you can take the spike protein
and you can say, well, if it's reacting
with nicotinic receptors,
then take the spike proteins on its own
and you should see nicotinic acetylcholine reaction.
You should see all the enzymes.
And there is a great study where they did exactly that.
They've done it again now with zebrafish or zebrafish.
And the paper that I found to be the most useful
in understanding that the genomic sequence is matching
the toxins that are listed here
is that they expose it to tadpoles
and basically it envenomated the tadpoles.
And you had all of the circuitry issues
and you had all of the enzyme that you should find.
And ultimately what really annoyed me
with people discounting this idea is I don't know the block.
I really didn't care what people want to call it,
whether you call it a toxin, whether you call it a venom.
It is indisputable that the sequences here
are lab-made functional snake venoms.
And an interesting piece of this is that
my work on this evolves all the time
where this particular one shows that there are,
that these sequences that are affecting the alpha-7,
which drives the entire immune system,
and then these other alpha-9 and alpha-10
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors,
you'll basically find COVID if you understand up regulation
and down regulation of these neurotransmitters.
But more importantly, if you can have a look
at what we're dealing with,
you're looking at bungrotoxin, alpha bungrotoxin,
three-finger toxins.
And ultimately I have no idea why people weren't comfortable
saying that the sequences on here were from the Crate snake,
K-R-A-I-T, and from the Cobra,
because if that's the genomic sequence of it
and there's some other things that are spliced into it,
as my next video will show you,
people really should understand the science of genomics.
And then more importantly,
they should understand the science of peptide synthesis
and how easy it's getting for unregulated labs
to be playing with this stuff.
And if you have a look at over here,
here's this paper and the sequences,
and basically they are looking at it,
and it's a neurotoxin.
So I don't know the discomfort
and I don't know why the pushback,
and I don't know why that's not matched very easily.
I think that there was some form of self-protection
from the medical community
where they didn't wanna believe
that this is truly a bio-weapon
that's working as a nerve agent.
And then there was also the part
that I think that this community has been so labeled
and so bashed as misinformation and as hokey
and people that don't know what we're doing,
that to bring in another layer
that makes this all sound so sci-fi
and that makes this all sound so weird,
I think that in itself just made the good scientists
amongst us just shy away from it.
But it is ultimately, it's cost a lot of lives
by not actually recognizing
that this is a major driver.
And there's my hypothesis.
My hypothesis is COVID is an envenomation
caused by replicating venom
on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.
With or without the viral vector,
it has the same features.
And you can have a look,
if you didn't know that you were looking at envenomation,
what you really are just looking at
is a picture of a certainly of long haul COVID.
And you're not gonna get some of the features
where you would have fangs entering
and then you would have local tissue damage,
but the cytotoxic, the neurotoxic
and the cardio toxic features are there.
But missing from that is also an understanding
that venom is a death switch
that basically creates this opportunity
to allow enzymes that create decomposition in the body.
It's an instruction for the body to decompose itself.
I wanna show you the psychopaths
that play around with this stuff
with absolutely no concern for the consequences,
both virus makers, vaccine makers,
they don't really care what they're making.
But all this work is sponsored by NIH
and specifically paid for by Department of Defense.
I'll take these headphones out again.
So in terms of our mouse,
and so the problem with SARS-2 is it doesn't grow in a mouse,
can't use the mouse H2 receptor.
It's pretty easy to model at least four
or five different mutation sets
that you could put into the receptor binding domain
of SARS-2 so that it can use the mouse H2 receptor.
So in this particular paper, we introduced two changes,
one of which we knew was that
one of which we knew interacted with a specific residue
that was variant in between mouse and human H2 molecules.
And the other residue was a proline right next to it.
And we just didn't like the idea of a proline next to it.
So we changed it because, well, we could, and so we did.
So general, there's a proline there and I just don't like it.
I don't know why I don't like it.
I gotta move it.
Prolines are ticky, get rid of them.
I don't want any kink in my protein.
So we made those changes and that virus could now use
the mouse H2 receptor and it grows from zero in a mouse
to 10 to the seventh in a mouse,
but it doesn't produce much in the way of serious disease.
It will cause a little bit of a clinical disease outcome
in an older mouse that's a year old.
So it's beginning to show the age-related disease
phenotype that we'd like to see.
And so that's what that basic paper is about.
And then we have systematically been working on that
ever since to make a full mouse-adapted strain
that is lethal in young and old mice
and captures all of the disease phenotypes
that we would like to see.
One is the age-related disease phenotype.
The second is acute respiratory distress syndrome
and arts like phenotype in the lung.
And the third is we'd like to see a coagulopsy
develop in those animals.
That's the best use of again,
a function thinking process I've never heard.
So I think for one of the things that I bring to the table
around this topic that's maybe different from other people
is this aspect to the work that I do,
which is that I don't have the luxury of being in denial
about the really brutal and disgusting things
that human beings can do on the planet.
I also make myself available to hear those things.
So a little interesting statistic that let me know
sort of how bad the psychological aspects
we're gonna get around, yeah, that is Barak by the way.
That's Dr. Barak.
I'm very, very involved in this work
and I don't understand why I hasn't been called in
for an investigation, a deposition.
And I think that you don't go after the big players.
You just start trying, going after the smaller players
and saying that everyone's gonna get arrested
and you might as well talk up now.
You don't have to fall.
And then they will absolutely give us
everything that we need to know.
For those that are still thinking that this is China
attacking the US or the world,
it's absolutely not.
This is US made.
We own the vaccine, we own the virus.
It was paid for by DOD.
Who used it first, in what way, I don't know,
but the actual problem and the generation of the solution
that is US.
The pandemic is being driven by the US
as the sort of operational side.
But the sort of clandestine side
and some of the other mechanics
that have sort of held the word hostage
being run from Commonwealth countries.
It's very interesting to see
that there are three main organizations
that are driving this pandemic
in terms of the organizational side.
And that's BlackRock, Vanguard and The Street.
And they each play their role in how this happens.
And you absolutely have a component to it
where you're looking after royal families
around the world and royalty.
I mean, royalty was on its way out
and we had things like Arab Spring.
And so the invested parties,
the clandestine units that run our world
that people can come up with all kinds of names for,
they call it Illuminati, Cabal.
I don't care what people call it.
It would be insane to think
that there isn't a group of people
that have a different set of agenda to the SERPs
that they control.
And ultimately when a predator loses control,
it will regain control in some way.
I was gonna make a couple of last closing remarks
and show you one or two more videos.
And one of which is that an interesting aspect for this
is that a set of circumstances have the opportunity
for opportunistic people to take what they want
from a bad set of circumstances.
I mean, if you think about,
let's say there's a natural disaster,
like a tornado or a hurricane,
we often need protectors to go into those areas
because within hours, people will come to loot houses,
they'll steal people's possessions.
They will use a bad set of circumstances
for whatever their gain is.
Sometimes it can be a high level gain,
sometimes it can be really low level playing.
In this case, a whole perfect storm arose
where whoever decided to release this
in whatever form that it was originally released,
Wuhan is only one of the ways
that we know that this is out here.
There is somebody that I know in Australia,
whose young boy of 14 in 2019 in July got COVID in China.
And there's a possibility that was also an attack
where a group of people, students going to China
out of Australia were given a vaccine
that's not on their records.
And then they all got sick while they were there.
And so the equivalent to that is using bio weapons
in that way is a way of introducing
a pathogenic spike protein with its viral vector
by using human transmission and seeing if it sticks.
I don't think it worked and I don't think
it was fast enough.
And I think that Wuhan,
if you go back to the original videos of Wuhan
and didn't know that we're dealing with a pandemic
or a virus, you could swear you were looking at people
that were exposed to a nerve agent
falling over in the street that had been carted away
in the 50 years, for almost 50 years
that I've been on this planet,
never seen anything like that from any virus
where somebody is just absolutely fine in the next thing.
Not only do they have syncope,
but they have syncope that is a non-natural syncope
where they literally don't,
their knees don't buckle and help with a self implosion.
I mean, you have that other incident
and I think it was in Sweden and Denmark
where the minister of health just fell over on video.
And you can see that that form of falling over
is much closer to a nerve agent where it's like timber,
there's no folding that's protective over the brain.
And so nerve agents will do that.
Nerve agents will also cause sort of the weird things
that we saw like happy hypopsics.
On the positive side, my work has brought me to a point
where I feel more alive with science than ever before.
I feel more inspired to share what I know.
The human body is absolutely amazing.
Something that I found fascinating is that
when your body goes into a form of decomposition
and you are trying to fight back,
the thymus gland, which is not mentioned in most,
in two years, it's the brain of the immune system.
The thymus gland actually functions in its highest form
while it's hypopsic.
And so just like the brain, the human brain,
the immune system's brain is one of the last organs to die
to give you a fighting chance.
You can support that thymus gland by taking supplements
that support the thymus gland.
You can also support the thymus gland
by giving it enough vitamins A, D, E and K2,
which are the building blocks.
It doesn't help to be taking vitamin D and not charging it.
It stays in an off switch, which is very important
because vitamin D that's on will cause cholesterol.
Vitamin D that needs to go on and off as it's needed,
but vitamin D needs to be switched on by the sun,
which is another way that they kill the elderly
by just not taking them out for two years.
And that basically will cause all the diseases.
Another really easy aspect that I've been working on
is that I mentioned the resistance,
this was pretty copper resistant.
I built a compound called copperine,
which is essentially a soluble brass, it's a copper alloy
to match SOD1.
And basically SOD1 in the body is a copper zinc dismutase.
And what I realized is that regardless
of whether somebody gets my product,
doesn't get my product,
the biggest thing that you can tell people,
especially those that have had two years of zinc,
you are absolutely driving yourself towards illness
if you're just taking zinc without copper.
It is literally like going to the gas station,
blowing up your left side of your tires
that were doing just fine,
but now they're a little too overinflated.
And every time you go there,
you just keep blowing up one side.
It's going to cause an imbalance,
even though the other side was never flat,
it's now going to be lopsided.
And copper and zinc will sort itself out in the human body.
But if you're going to supplement with zinc,
you always have to take in copper in a supplement as well.
And then sulfur, you can have enough copper and zinc,
but if you're not taking adequate sulfur,
now you've got free-floating copper and zinc in the body,
which the body really does not like.
It causes oxidative stress.
And one of the best ways to take in sulfur
is literally just a hard-boiled egg,
which also has albumin in the egg white
as an anticoagulant.
I will leave those that are slightly more spiritual
in this group, and I'd love to come back for a part two.
I would love to take credit for some of this work,
but yes, absolutely, selenium is very important.
There are so many things that work together.
There's a reason quercetin, for example, is needed.
When you're building this sort of purification system,
you need fibers to be able to bind the toxins to,
and then the metals can pull out
the rest of the toxins with it.
Lastly, a sort of giveaway that I want to leave you with
on a positive note is that a lot of my initial work
was driven by something extremely hokey.
And I don't mind admitting it
because I think it's a wonderful way
where science can come from the past,
and then you can make it work during your time period.
And that is the closest match to oxidative circumstances now,
both on a macroscale and a molecular scale.
Microscale is the plague of Egypt.
And more than likely, they were dealing
with some form of coronavirus,
likely some form that had snake venom as an aspect to it.
And part of what might've happened
is they were actually experimenting
in a very similar way with venoms
in a very, very sophisticated way.
And so what is really crazy is that the Seda ritual,
the Passover, is a template.
It's a wonderful way of seeing what's needed.
It was so important to Jesus that, you know,
on the last night of being alive on the planet,
instead of him going for a couple of beers
with his friends or to go for a stroll
along the ocean front, he said,
let's all meet again and let's draw down the Seda again.
That is the last supper.
Let's go over all of these things.
Why do we lean?
Why do we lean like this tonight?
That's because you have a pancreatitis
that doesn't cause pain because venom is analgesic.
Why do we drink copious amounts of red wine?
That's because they're filled with resveratrol.
Vitamin C is great, but as you know,
if you're treating a septicemia,
you actually need IV doses with vitamin D
because it's completely unstable in an acid environment.
So, resveratrol, I can never say it properly.
I'll just say the R antioxidant is very stable
in acid environments.
And then I sourced a wonderful anti-inflammatory
anti-cancer antioxidant that comes from the cashew shell.
It's also stable in acid environments called anacardic.
And so our methods of treating this
are actually not that complicated.
You have to deal with the fact
that you have to get the toxins out of the body
and chelate them.
You have to deal with an iron issue
because the blood issue is you're literally exploding heme
and it's no longer able to hold on to its iron.
So you have essentially iron filings,
nanoparticle iron filings floating around the body.
And that's also why the electrical system is so messed up.
So a person that's really significantly ill,
part of what you need to consider are medications
that actually chelate iron
like you would use for certain disorders.
Thalassemic would go through chelation like this.
And then you have to also supplement with iron
because the iron is not only problematic
and then it's unbound,
but then they stop becoming anemic.
And so there's this dance you have to play with iron.
Then I wanna get into the sort of juiciest work
that I've been doing.
I hate to call it juicy because it's absolutely awful.
The graphene oxide I hardly ever address
because here's the thing.
I think that there's so many unknowns with this
and like the points were made the other day,
I really don't wanna get into stuff
that I either can't prove or that I can't see the mechanism
while I don't have access
for some level of definitive proof.
What's interesting about graphene oxide
is that more than likely it's an ingredient
and they're allowed to get away with this
because after all, this is still an experiment.
There are at least four versions of the Pfizer vaccine
by the way, there are four known versions in their own notes.
And so that's what we call hot batches.
And I'm looking at some signs that someone shared with me
which is that you have certain areas in the States
where it looks like hot batches
killed significant amount of people that have led to india
more injury than the others.
And I think that that is that if you roughly look
at the types of a spiked protein
about the most that's going to be the least destructive
is the one that's textbook mRNA technology
which they have not achieved in real life.
They might've achieved it in a lab,
they might've achieved it in paper, in a closed system.
You can get a cell to be tricked by glucose motifs
on the end of the spike protein.
It opens itself up and then bang, all of a sudden
the cell has been in a barricade situation
being taken hostage.
Yes, it can happen in a Petri dish.
Very, very difficult to slip by all the mechanisms
that the body has.
If anyone wants to understand the clots
the clots are actually extremely sci-fi.
They are from a science called netosis
which are essentially you can visualize them
where if you ever wanted to see Spider-Man in action
in a nanoparticle way was shooting out a net from a cell
and that is netosis with entire DNA exits the cell
as a trap and they are called traps.
They are net traps where basically what happens
with these nets is when you have toxins and venoms
that can go around the body in numerous ways
messing things up so badly, the body will do things
that they know that short-term damages itself
for the long-term goal of staying alive.
And so those clots are not your regular clots
as Dr. Cole and others have illuminated,
Mike Adams and others, they are not regular clots.
In fact, when you look at them
they should look like as Mike Adams described it
it's almost like looking at jerky.
I mean, you're looking at proteins
and then the weird aspect to them is they should look
a little like a tree bark
because they've got a lot of carbon bonding to him
which is why I also don't necessarily know
that what we're seeing is graphene oxide.
What you're seeing is forms of carbon acting
in really strange way because you're dealing with metals
you're dealing with metalloproteins.
And so you have this sort of magnetism.
There's a lot of questions around 5G.
I will say this about 5G,
the technicians that I've heard from around 5G
absolutely will say that 5G is so strong
then when a new technician doesn't know what they're doing
and if they're playing around with 5G
they can get knocked off their feet.
So regardless of whether it's going to be a form of control
around these or whether there are
quote unquote tracking devices,
I think it's really interesting how conspiracy theories
they always sound laughable
until you understand how easy the technology is.
So for example, once you introduce a metal into the body
in certain ways, the body will naturally
then radiate a frequency.
If you're able to tie that frequency with a person
like an app, like a vaccine passport
and you're able to know that this frequency
that's been picked up on a monitor somewhere
along to Dr. Tao Braun,
then forever that's like me holding a chip, right?
I mean, that's RF technology.
That's exactly what it is.
You take a little piece of metal and then you label it
and you say, this piece is now attached to this laptop.
And if that laptop walks out the door,
we'll know that it's gone missing from our stockroom.
The thing by itself doesn't give you any information.
You have to tag it and then it has to know
what it's attached to.
Now, I'll end with what I was saying
with the craziest part about this.
And this takes me back to being an intern psychologist
working in psychiatric wards
and in maximum security prisons.
In maximum security prisons,
the most important thing I learned
is how dangerous psychopaths are.
And I worked with a psychopath and I feel bad for anybody
whether they ever date one, work for one, or for us
that are now global hostages.
They are so terrible because they are our apex predators.
And we can only ever defeat a psychopath
with somebody that knows how to think like a psychopath.
There is a form of alpha in species.
And you see this in chimpanzees where there is,
we wanna call them, let's say, beta.
It's like the alpha male.
It has the powers over the rest of the community.
It just is not awful.
And that is the only member of that tribe,
whether it's female or male, they can take out the predator.
There's sort of an internal buffer
that allows us to take out predators,
but we actually have to stop thinking like them.
And so part of what I learned is how dangerous they are
because they're incredibly good at manipulating people.
They are magic at just literally getting people
to do all kinds of weird stuff in very strange ways
that they're using very, very primitive mechanisms.
And part of it is just their natural physiology.
For example, psychopaths are naturally bradycardiac.
They have bradycardia.
So you won't see them sweat in an uncomfortable situation.
Like Prince Andrew says around
he's sweating disorder as a pedophile.
He literally said, I couldn't have been sweating.
I don't sweat.
Okay, well, there's only a few diseases that can cause that.
And one of them is being a psychopath.
For those that are enjoying this aspect of the conversation,
I saw somebody said,
they were getting red-pulled over here.
I am somebody that is trained and has to, for my job,
catch very subtle language, very subtle language.
And so part of Prince Andrew for me that's interesting
is the trolling that they do,
like playing with a cat playing with a mouse,
is that when Prince Andrew said that there's no way
that he could have been with the victim,
because he knew exactly where he was over 20 years ago,
because he was with his daughters eating pizza.
Well, pizza is code for pedophilia.
So out of the entire interview on TV,
the giveaway for me and him actually admitting
to his friends of how much fun he's having
of getting away with this crime,
is dropping words by choice that are clues.
And this is how we catch people
and this is how we know their intent.
So they always broadcast in threat assessment.
They absolutely, Jerry said they operate in plain sight.
They absolutely do.
My work is not complicated
because they actually are always in plain sight
and operationally it's very enjoyable for them
to leave clues.
Threat assessment and threat management
uses this weird term called leakage.
I don't like the term leakage at all.
I think of it as broadcasting and they broadcast.
So I wanna end with some new characters
that I want you to please have a look at.
One of them is a person called Dr. Martin Rothblatt.
And Dr. Martin Rothblatt started as Dr. Martin Rothblatt,
inventor of XM radio.
And so what's really crazy about conspiracy theories
is when people say, are we being tracked?
So what's crazy about being tracked is XM radio
now has contracts with most leading car manufacturers
and your car comes with XM radio installed
and whether you subscribe or not,
you have XM radio, which is directly linked to satellites.
And then they not only are tracking every vehicle
and can sell data on congestion
or whether people are moving to Florida
or whether there's less people now
are circulating in this town.
I mean, it is literally just a map.
Like they have a way of tracking ants
using satellite technology in the vehicles that we drive.
What's very dangerous as this person,
Dr. Martin Rothblatt and Dmitry Itzkov,
Russian billionaire.
Here's what I wanna leave you with
that I would feel that here's how I define batshit crazy.
If you are batshit crazy and you have no money,
more than likely you're wandering around on the street
somewhere and are perceived as homeless.
And you have some form of mental illness
that obviously needs help in your suffering,
but you won't have much power as a crazy person.
If you have some money,
sort of in the middle-class range
and you have mental illness,
you will be extremely limited with your craziness
because that is absolutely not allowed
that somebody who'd have free thought
and be a free thinker and come from a place of individualism
in a society that's moving more and more
towards collectivism.
It's absolutely not allowed.
And you would land up on a psychiatric court
as most of us on this call
are deemed psychiatric at the moment.
Absolutely, this is a manmade,
this is a regular pandemic.
And what are these people talking about?
And what's Dr. Braun talking about?
Venom and we are crazy people.
And we are dangerous because of that to the power that be.
But the most dangerous of crazy
are those that have the resources and capability
of making their craziness somebody else's problem.
So I will throw out a couple of people
that are obviously on everyone's radar.
And one of them is Bill Gates.
I will say the sad part about somebody like Bill Gates
is the closest match to my school shooters.
There's a profile of these people.
And generally what they're looking for
is to die with legacy.
And in a very awkward and uncomfortable way,
I'll show you how silly they are,
is that really what it comes down for these people
is that they have a long,
they have a desire for daddy to give them attention.
I mean, Freud would absolutely say,
well, that's just exactly what it is.
Here's this person who is great and has all these skills,
but for whatever reason,
and normally they're on the spectrum
and dad is on the spectrum
and just not capable of that formal bonding.
And so there's a desire for the son
to ultimately win dad's approval.
And dad could be long gone.
And many of us are driven through our work in similar ways,
but we don't go out and do nefarious things
for daddy's attention.
Some of us would actually do good.
And so Bill Gates is a very suffering person
in that he's going to kill a lot of people,
maybe even half the planet,
and he will still die, more than likely a suicide.
And he will die feeling empty and meaningless,
and he'll die a death of nihilism
simply because he's not able to feel
what the rest of us feel as a sense of accomplishment.
And no amount of death will ever bring daddy's attention.
And daddy's long gone anyway,
but he will be driven by that psychotic obsession
and it's now an obsession compulsion.
And he has the resources to make it happen.
And he wouldn't make it happen if the world allowed it.
If we were to shut down his bullshit a long time ago,
including the same tricks that he used of extortion.
It's very interesting for me
how there are a couple of different operating systems
that human beings use naturally.
And the same way as he killed other operating systems
when it comes down to him wanting only one operating system,
he's really doing that across the planet.
He doesn't want human beings using
Neanderthal based operational systems
or Denisovian based operating systems.
He wants it just his way, this sort of modern day human way.
He would not be able to do it
without the enabling he's had,
but more importantly, in terms of where we are
with the pandemic,
the most important thing that I found,
which is the creepiest side to this
is that Bill Gates is actually a very high player
and he's definitely the executor of this,
but it's only stage one of the bigger plan
of Dr. Martin Rothblatt and Dimitri Itzkov and others
who by 2045 want all of us
to become digital versions of ourselves.
Now, if I would have arrived on a psych ward
in Johannesburg, South Africa somewhere,
a chronic facility maybe,
and I would have met somebody that said that
their goal by 2045 was to have every human being
off themselves, suicide or become so deadly sick
that they didn't wanna be in their bodies
and somebody wrote transhumanism.
By definition, it is absolutely transhumanism.
And the reason that you're seeing so much height,
so much discourse currently about the trans communities
is being driven by Dr. Martin Rothblatt.
Dr. Rothblatt is so uncomfortable as a trans person
and got to the point of being so uncomfortable
with his, her form of human body
that they'd rather not be in a body.
And also they try to save their daughter
who had some very horrible cystic fibrosis
like progressive disease,
and they weren't able to help this person.
The combination of that,
that led to this almost Marvel comic like agenda,
like an evil villain,
who's ultimately has been working this philosophy
with others like Demetri Iskop for the last few years,
that human suffering as we know it will end
when we leave our bodies and into the metaverse,
and that we can create these mind clones of ourselves
and feed the data while we're still alive,
and we can allow the mind clones to coexist
amongst ourselves until we're ready to say
that the human form of me doesn't have to exist,
and then we'll let the digital form go on in infinity.
Now, if I was on the psych ward,
I would walk past the nurse and I would say,
you know, Mr. Smith seems to be doing okay today.
Yes, he's still talking about the 2045 project,
and now he wants everybody to enter the metaverse
and kill themselves, but he seems okay,
and he doesn't seem too upset today.
And he also asked, tomorrow,
can you have scrambled eggs?
And I'd go home.
I mean, as a psychologist, I'd go home, right?
And the psychiatrist may go by and go, okay, well,
you know, the antipsychiatrics psychiatric medication
is clearly not working.
They seem to be stuck on the psychosis.
The issue here that our planet is being run
by psychotic individuals,
and we've allowed for the space for our value system,
our morality, our ethics, our way of life,
and our quality of what we deem to be life and death,
and what we decide is worth living as a collective whole
has been hijacked.
We have literally let the patient start running the ward.
And it is in the last point that I wanna make
is something that I took from one of my teachers.
And somebody asked if I've studied school shooters,
I don't even refer to them as shooters
because they use a wide range of weaponry.
The ones that you don't often hear about
are the ones that try and use bombs,
and bombs are a lot harder to use than a weapon,
but there's certainly Columbine, for example,
was a failed bombing.
I study all mass killers,
including those that commit genocides.
And I'll leave you with this that comes from
one of my teachers, Gavin De Becker.
And Gavin De Becker said the universal sign
of impending violence is suffering.
And so whether it's from the perpetrators or us,
you know, we know that it's crucial
because not only are we dealing with disease,
but we're about to enter a time in space
that has more violence on this planet, right?
We've already gone through a genocide.
You've already seen the culling
of the elderly around the world,
including Italy, by the way, including Israel.
What's fascinating is this is not the first suicide
of Israel as a cult.
You have to only know the history of Masada
to know that leaders convince people in a fortress
that it would be better for them to kill themselves
rather than being slaves.
But, you know, if it was me leading,
I'd say, listen, let them round us up.
We're gonna pretend that we're enslaved.
And the first chance you have,
please just cut this guy's jugular,
or we'll rush them, or we'll do this, or we'll do that.
But you don't absolutely, I know leaders should ever give
victims the instruction that it's better to commit suicide
and find a solution.
Israel has done this to themselves.
And the second part is that in terms of an instruction
to kill themselves, we know that many cults
have had this sort of mass action.
And then the suffering part about it is that the violence,
we didn't see this, it wasn't very apparent to me,
but there's a great quote,
someone can maybe find it from Roman times,
where there's an instruction that the elderly
should just throw themselves off the bridge
for the betterment of society.
Many times have societies got to the point
where psychopaths are running the show.
And then ultimately, that's when they have the roughest time
with the Neanderthals and why they go into full mode
of extermination, because the Neanderthals are the ones
that looked after the elderly.
Neanderthals are the ones represented in this group.
Neanderthals invented medicine.
Neanderthals would rather not be listening to me.
You've got plenty of other things to do,
like going to make love and art and listen to music.
And yet we also know the importance
of being philosophical and the importance of intellectualism
and the importance of teaching our children
how to stay alive and be safe.
My message to you that the solutions
are actually right in front of us, it's all of us.
We are the collective that can make this happen.
We need to share our knowledge.
Please do not cancel anybody that has a theory
or a way of explaining something.
Allow them the space to flesh out what they might be seeing.
It could be incredibly useful.
And also please stop over-complicating this.
That's how they're winning.
This is not very complicated.
Their agendas are not complicated and nor are their tools.
They are using the ultimate natural gain of function.
They are using a toxin slash venom to get into our circuitry.
And so we have survived many snake bites for a long time.
And before that we survived jellyfish and sea urchins
and scorpions and buffer toads down in Florida
that if you lick, they'll make you psychotic.
And we have survived spouses and ex-wives
and ex-husbands that are also venomous.
I can absolutely tell you it's in our power.
I know some of you enjoyed that piece of my humor.
Must be those that have had those experiences
with pathological venomous creatures,
humans that we've survived.
I wanna let us know that we can do this.
Please stick this out as a community, it's worthwhile.
For those that know we're really not in this fight,
no insult to the people in this group.
I'm looking at all of us and our ages.
This fight is really not about us.
This fight is about the children.
We owe it to them.
We owe it to them to have a world
where they don't have to live in Mark Zuckerberg's
metaverse ordering virtual products
and going virtual fishing while Mark Zuckerberg
gets to surf the real oceans.
That is always the sort of highlight for me of psychopaths
is that it's blatantly obvious
that they will destroy the world
so that they can have it for themselves.
Literally, if they held themselves to their own standards,
they would have committed suicide
before the metaverse was even ready.
And with that, I'll say thank you so much.
You've given me so much time.
There are so many questions here
and I can take one or two questions
and then I really must go.
And I think I'm just, thank you.
Let's go with some quick questions.
First, Stephen and Peter and Tessa and Liam.
Stephen, wow, Tao, what a tour de force
and congratulations on the work that you have done.
Stephen?
Yeah, really very interesting, Tao.
Could I ask you whether you know anything about messaging?
About messaging?
Yeah, so we're trying to do,
so a few of us are trying to get a narrative out,
an alternative narrative, which as far as we can see,
hasn't really been attempted.
And so obviously we need the help of psychologists
to get into the minds of other people,
you know, the minds of our friends and families.
I just wondered whether you knew anything about that or not.
Yeah, I think that for me, you know, I had a version,
I once was a pod owner in a nightclub
and I saw what you could do with good budget
and that we launched this nightclub
and we put posters everywhere
and we let people know that this nightclub was coming
and then thousands of people turned up
and it shut down the streets.
And I think that messaging,
I think that one of the key aspects of messaging
is don't dilute the message by having more,
numerous messages running at the same time,
that people can't cope with that.
And the other thing is that keep the messages really simple.
And then very, very hard with this
because it's a natural trick that they're using
is that the messaging shouldn't be oppositional
to the messages that they're putting out.
Like for example,
if I was gonna come up with a slogan today,
I would say, I would be saying things that are universal
to all cultures that are experiencing this,
which is some clever phrase
that just basically lets them know
that they mean something.
What we ultimately fighting is nihilism.
These people are nihilistic
and they don't want anybody to feel that they matter.
So the concept of you matter,
and you can see why they particularly chose
Black Lives Matter and then made it vile
if anybody else said that they matter.
That's a purposeful weapon
that was part of the lead up into this.
The idea that the other people can decide who matters.
We all matter, everything matters.
The tiniest bug that you squashed mattered.
And so this idea of embracing some message
around human quality,
some part that taps into the existential crisis.
And then I would say that some of the other things
that come to mind that we can borrow from
are from the Vietnam era,
this idea of what was a tune out,
tune in, tune out type of stuff,
or the idea of, I call it the great Exodus.
Part of it is that we are all locked
into these digital worlds,
but we need to be weaning ourselves off more and more.
And we only need to use it as an absolute necessity
to connect with each other.
But we are far too dependent on these tools
that are also affecting,
whether it's adults or children,
it's affecting our dopamine.
So I'd say part of that messaging is,
what would your day look like if you didn't know?
No, Tao, the kind of message,
I'm talking about the kind of messaging
which will lead people to wake up
and realize what's happening
and rise up against governments.
I think that's what I'm addressing,
but I think that it has to be simple.
And I think that it has to hit people at a core
where it really, when someone says
that they need to be awoken,
one aspect that we're running against
is we need to choose who we're messaging to.
So I hate to say it like this,
and I know a lot of people are very hurt by this.
And a lot of people might not even be there.
And some of you are,
where I look at it as trying to save the people
that are drowning.
And if anybody's ever taken a life-saving course,
you never swim up to somebody that's still struggling
and they'll pull you with them.
And so there are many people,
especially those that are keeping up their boosters,
where in some way, neurologically,
they are now programmed
and are gonna have a hard time convincing them
or waking them up
until those neurotransmitters are freed up.
It is the others.
We need to reinforce those that are already awake.
I would say that it's an absolute struggle right now
to wake anybody up,
but we're all awake,
and what are we gonna do with our waking hours
would be a question that I would ask.
What are you doing with your time?
And how best can we be effective?
That's as best as I can give you.
I would also imagine there's a couple of things
that are driving me nuts in terms of our response
to counter this,
is that we're dealing with organizations
with bottomless amounts of money.
I really am calling for somebody
with the right set of ethics and mechanisms.
We need a global fund to be able to fight this.
We mentioned this the other day
in terms of the equipment that's necessary
to analyze things like the vaccine.
Messaging would be a part of it.
We can pull people out of the lousy work
that they're doing for the enemy by hiring them.
I mean, people will jump ship a whole bunch easier
than you think if you're able to pay.
Most of us are volunteers.
Most of us are struggling through this,
but there's enough money and enough resources
that we can start hiring some of the world's best
at these things and really hone down our messaging
to be very consistent just like they are
and give them a run for their money that way.
Good.
And you mentioned earlier that the venom works
by triggering suicide,
and I didn't quite understand what you meant by that.
Well, so if you have a look at,
and I know that this ties into the last presentation
that I saw with this group,
with Stephanie's work,
Dr., remind me of her last name, somebody?
Sena. Sena, Sena, yeah.
So with Dr. Sena's work,
I 100% agree with everything that she was saying.
I was disagree with some of the mechanisms involved.
I think ultimately those mechanisms would happen,
but they have to be driven by a central circuit board,
and that circuit board is, in my opinion,
the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors,
and especially when it comes to alpha seven
that drives the immune system.
But what you'll see is that she talked about things like
sort of this advanced aging that's taking place
or cancers that arrive.
What the instruction is is that if the predator
needs the prey to decompose itself,
then really the instructions are make enough cells
to keep yourself alive,
but kill off more than you're making, right?
Like the suicide, maybe suicide is a harsh word to use,
but it is a death spiral.
The ultimate goal of the venom is to lead to the demise
of the creature, but slowly.
And so ultimately if somebody, for example,
signs up for these vaccines without them knowing it,
it's a form of suicide.
They're signing themselves up for something
that is going to lead to a sped up version of their demise.
Some things are gonna happen to people
that are sort of weird and obscure,
just based on an AIDS-like profile allows weird cancers
and weird hugs to thrive.
And I worked at HIV AIDS epidemic in South Africa
to know that what was killing people is the sort of,
the obscure diseases.
But for the most part,
what people are gonna find from the vaccine
is that whatever they were destined to have take place
is ultimately what's gonna take place.
And so I use the word suicide very purposefully
because ultimately, even if they were tricked
or forced to take the vaccine, they still took it.
I mean, I'm yet to hear of somebody,
I think there was one child somewhere
that a teacher held down.
There was a kid that was taken to a teacher's house
and the teacher actually held the child out
and vaccinated them, which should have been,
a charge immediately practicing medicine
without allowed to do something.
But for the most part, people have signed up
with a form of this where they have been complicit
in their own crime.
Just a very quick question.
SARS-CoV-1, do you think that was virus, SARS-CoV-1?
I do, give me one second.
Okay.
Yeah, SARS-CoV-1 for, I mean, the most problematic thing,
and I have to address this as a scientist,
I don't like the fact that there's numerous papers
that said this has never been isolated.
I mean, it's hugely problematic.
I mean, it's a major problem.
But I also know that based on what we said the other day,
if I have a look at sort of,
if the thing that's been said,
I think that's a very, very important thing.
The other day, if I have a look at sort of,
if the 3D modeling, if somebody is showing me a piece
of paper with a prototype and drawings and schematics,
and then I know that they've got the machinery to make it,
and I come back and they've made something by spec,
then I can assume that that's what it is.
But as a scientist, it's still very uncomfortable for me
to say things or to work through assumptions.
That are still, you know,
use the non-scientific word iffy.
And one of which is just to know
that this virus works with or without,
I mean, the spike protein works with
or without the viral vector.
I mean, you could literally put this as they have
in a liposome, you know,
just put billions of it into a vial and stick it in,
and it's gonna give someone COVID.
I mean, that's the giveaway.
If COVID-
Yeah, go ahead.
SARS-CoV-2, is that a virus in your opinion?
Yeah, I think that the initial virus,
I think it was a virus that they harvested
from a bat from a copper mine.
I think that that's a regular coronavirus.
It happens to be pretty copper resistant.
And I think that that's just the, you know,
for one other term,
that's the jellyfish that they're using.
You know, that's just the tiny sequence of protein chains
that allows some of the mechanism of action
for this creature to move around
and to find ways to replicate itself
and to live in different environments.
And viruses will thrive or die depending on pH,
very, very subtle changes in pH.
So how did they spread the virus?
I think the human transmission
and everything that the papers have illuminated,
I think that what they were able to do
is make a pretty voracious virus
and with high transmissibility,
the exploit is to be able to use those docking ports
of the ACE receptor.
And then by linking up and having high binding affinity,
it can penetrate the cell.
And that's obviously where it can make more of itself.
The other way that they could spread it
is that you could literally,
you could put, like Brian Otter said,
you could put the spike protein in water
and you could poison the world.
You could put it in the air,
you could put it in saliva and spit on somebody.
It has what's called a cystine knot, which is what-
So what do you think they did?
I think that they,
I think that they created a transmissible virus
that is, gets into the human body.
And if it gets into the human body and is enough of it,
and if that person is genetically at risk
through the mechanisms of actions
that that spike protein and its virus will create,
that person will become a carrier of that virus
and that viral load will go up.
And that titer of virus in somebody can be measured.
And that what's fascinating about it
is they should be able to use that titer
and that if it was susceptible to everybody,
then once somebody has a high titer,
the whole family should be susceptible to it.
And you've seen that that's not the case.
How do you, so I don't know if you were aware,
but as far as I understand,
all-cause mortality didn't increase around the world in 2020.
So is it possible that the whole thing was a fraud?
So the deaths were manufactured from the PCR tests?
Yeah, absolutely.
And then they deliberately instilled fear.
So what the virus didn't kill,
they killed people by midazolam, remdesivir, fear.
I think the fears, well, in my opinion,
the fear has been a big part of this.
And so is it possible that the virus was never needed?
Yeah, absolutely.
So if I have to visualize this as a purely biological attack,
I'll use myself as a victim to that attack.
In 2019, in the fall of 2019,
a bunch of us came back from a law enforcement conference
and we were horribly sick.
I came back covered in hives,
had been exposed to something.
And then progressively over a few weeks,
I was stopping able to breathe.
I went to the doctor, the doctor stuck a needle in,
the nurse stuck a needle in my vein
and tried to get some blood from me.
And it literally looked like jelly.
I mean, jello, it came out, it was coagulated,
it was not flowing.
The neurological consequences that affected my gait,
my knees started buckling,
I was having palsy-like features in my face,
facial grimacing, tremors and tics.
This was my first sign way before anybody
even had a name for this,
that there was something out there
and a bunch of us didn't connect the dots,
that we'd all come back from the same conference
and had been exposed to something.
Now that was in, in the States we call it in fall,
I think that conference was, I believe,
maybe September or October of 2019.
And my vitamin D level crashed to very, very low levels.
I was finally able to start repairing that damage on my own.
No doctors were able to help me.
They couldn't understand what was happening.
There were certain things that I could see that were helping.
For example, I started using Alka-Celtra.
And Alka-Celtra is a really easy way
to just help your body to start, you know,
neutralizing that pH at a gastric level,
but more importantly, it's a low level of aspirin.
You know, it's mechanisms,
it has sodium bicarbonate in it.
Its mechanisms really is a low level,
over the counter way to stop an acidosis.
And so I was able to go through that.
But to answer your question,
that could have been an aerosolized attack.
That could have been in food.
That could have been in water.
There are numerous ways and it didn't have to be a virus.
I can say that there's a part to this
that makes others sick,
whether that is transmission of the venom in some sort,
with or without the viral vector, I don't know,
but you can, it has an aspect that it is transmissible.
The same way as if you are dealing with, let's say,
a bio weapon that is an organophosphate,
you have to be wearing hazmat gear and you have to shower
and you have to make sure that you don't get that
on your skin because you're gonna get sick too.
My dog got sick from me at that time.
You know, I fed the dog a piece of meat
that I'd been chewing on and my dog got horribly ill,
got really bad diarrhea and cycled through this.
A lot of people don't know,
a lot of people's dogs died from the spike protein.
They are cycling through it.
They have other mechanisms that they're impacted by.
And so if I think about how they did this attack,
I think that there are,
there's the distractors that we used,
primary number one tool was fear and an invisible enemy.
I mean, this is the thing of horror stories,
childlike stories where you hide under your,
the monsters are hiding under your bed
and a good flashlight will help you.
It's the fact that-
But now the fear is still there.
And that's probably because we haven't explained
what's going on.
Yeah, so benefits, a change happens when benefits are real.
Like I didn't see a change in my friend
who hasn't listened to a word I've said after two years.
And then he went deaf in one ear from his Pfizer booster.
And then when doctor and an ENT in Hong Kong
couldn't help him and I started helping him
and now he's back at having 95% hearing,
now he wants me to help his wife, right?
And I didn't even know that she was vaccine-injured.
Now that's partly why I want to illuminate
some of these mechanisms that make this really easy
to switch on and off.
It also shows that as a toxin, it's very different.
I think the fear of it being a viral contagion will go away.
The masking in itself is a tactic.
It's a fear-based tactic.
It reminds me of the experiments that were done
on children around the time of Freud
where you'd have somebody dressed up as a bunny
in a big Easter bunny suit and scare them
and see what impact that has on them.
How does that impact their psyche when other things
lead to a global anxiety?
The trauma of the isolation technique
can drive anyone nuts.
There was some data that I was exposed to
right at the beginning that I was working with a group
of therapists from the States that all plug in their data,
anonymous data from their clients,
but it helps them to collectively know as a group
what's trending and what issues are people dealing with.
And sex with animals was up.
Bestiality amongst their clients,
self-reported bestiality was up
because you're literally driving people nuts
by isolating them in their home
and taking away those social structures.
And so fear, but let me go back to the weapons side to it.
I have no doubt that there was a mechanism of action.
And when I wrote to the FBI, I made it clear
that this could work with or without a virus.
I don't think a virus is necessary
or maybe not even implicated.
That's why I haven't concentrated on that aspect.
You don't hear me talking about antivirals as a treatment.
You don't hear me talking about things
that would be found on that possibly SATA plate
that are naturally antiviral.
They are all antitoxin.
They are all anti-venom because the mechanism of action
works with or without that sort of attaching it to anything.
You can also know that giveaway for me is that
this might not be viral at all.
I mean, you have to look at how they're making their vaccines.
They're not making it with a virus.
They're making it with yeast.
Right, so is this a yeast infection?
You know, is this E. coli, right?
I mean, is this working the same as norovirus?
I mean, you can express the most venomous peptides
from E. coli.
So how?
There are...
Mark, come on, we're gonna finish in 10 minutes.
We've got three questions, Stephen.
Yeah, okay, there's one person in the group
who wrote to me and said that she didn't think that the...
She didn't think that the spike protein and the mRNA
were the real problem,
and that was put in to deflect attention from the real problem.
What do you think of that?
Well, I think that what they were able to do,
and I think that we're only on certain stages of this pandemic,
and sadly, we're at like, you know, maybe it's moved on to stage two now.
I think we are almost at like 1.5.
And part of it is that the first layer of any biological warfare like this
is that you take out your elderly and your vulnerable and your sick
and your syndrome, and that was purely a calculation,
an algorithm that's financial.
I mean, at the end of the day, when you have a collectivist approach,
it just cannot support the kind of medical treatment
that we're starting to offer people that were centurions.
You know, from a purely financial point, they used a major distraction,
and then they offed, you know, the bulk of these deaths are not COVID deaths.
These are diseases of neglect.
These are septicemias. These are vitamin D levels crashing.
These are other pneumonias.
And ultimately, then you could run a PCR test with, you know,
whatever you want to put in it as the piece, the protein chain
that you're looking for at a very low cycle rate.
And then, yes, you could get away with murder, right?
This is the equivalent of way at the beginning.
I started with Mr. Smith saying if you wanted to kill your wife
and you took in, you know, high levels of arsenic,
and then you both took in arsenic as a distractor,
ultimately by creating a pandemic that everybody is waiting to die from,
and then there are people dying,
and then you have a look at the cluster of people dying.
They're very sick people, and they're morbidly obese,
and they're diabetic, and then...
They didn't kill enough, you'd think.
Come on, come on, come on, Stave, we're going to run out of time.
Yes, OK.
Thank you, sir. Thank you for your questions and comments.
Peter, we've got four more...
We've got a couple of questions. We've got 10 minutes.
We're stopping at the two and a half hour mark.
Tare, you have to go elsewhere as well.
Peter.
OK, thanks, Charles.
Hi, Dr Brown.
Listened with great interest to everything you said tonight.
My background is as a public order police sergeant,
CBRN trained, including looking into the Tokyo Siren attack
and hypothetical attacks at things like Lloyd's of London.
How do you stop the people when they come out
infecting other people and so on and so forth?
Laterally, I did a law degree in associated legal work,
and I'm also an electrical engineer.
So my two questions, or two parts of the question,
I'll give them both to you, and one of them is very simple.
To your mind, is 5G and an active ingredient in the jabs,
not going into what it is,
involved in any of this obvious genocidal movement,
control movement, track and trace movement?
So that's the first part of the question,
because the NIH have now linked officially
in a peer-reviewed paper that COVID and 5G
are sort of interdependent,
which is something that doctors in Hamburg
linked early in 2020.
They found that Hamburg as a 5G test center,
which Wuhan was,
had an effect on the blood hypoxia, et cetera,
exacerbated by 5G.
The second part of my question after 5G is,
we are all being labeled conspiracy theorists.
It sounds like yourself more so than me,
and the rest of the people on here are anti-vaxxers,
misinformation peddlers,
and quite frankly, they're calling us liars.
Do you see governments moving to tighten
free speech legislation, human rights,
and public order laws, so as to marginalize us,
criminalize us, and ultimately to incarcerate,
and silence us, or worse?
If you do have concerns in this area,
what can we do, and how can we best turn the tables
on them and prove that they are the misinformation peddlers,
conspiracists, and liars?
Is it the courts, public gatherings,
or even disruption to raise awareness,
or is it something else?
Wow, great, great question.
So let me address the part about 5G first,
and say to you that if you have a look at
well-planned attacks of mass killers,
they never include just one weapon.
So Stephen Paddock, out from the 32nd floor of Vegas,
most people know it as this really heinous shooting.
This guy was a millionaire,
so he could even get to the point of being so crazy
that he didn't want to reload any of his weapons,
so he just bought more weapons.
They were all fully loaded, ready to go,
and he just created his own version of a Gatling gun
by just passing himself his own loads of weapons.
But what most people don't know about Vegas
is Vegas was a failed bombing.
He intended to take out the SWAT team
that was sent upstairs to take him out,
and then he was gonna walk out of the other room,
and then go downstairs and get into his car
and blow up that car in the fleeing crowd.
Now, so a mass killer has numerous ways.
They don't really care about the exit point.
As long as they have killed some people,
then their attempt will end in generally a suicide,
but they will not only arrive with just one plan,
and so could 5G be included in this idea
of mass extermination?
Absolutely.
I mean, it doesn't make sense that they would introduce
such a dangerous technology across the world,
knowing that it's gonna kill us an uptick
in all kinds of cancers and all kinds of syndromes.
I mean, there is an absolute overlap,
but I will make it even simpler than that.
There's an overlap between smog and COVID.
I mean, our natural protector,
we've got two major, major protectors
against coronavirus on this planet.
I mentioned one of them earlier, it's copper.
Every time there's a volcanic eruption,
the planet gets a dose of copper released
into its atmosphere.
If that didn't take place, none of us would be here.
The world would have ended a long time ago
because that death and destruction,
nothing would ever grow back.
So we have this natural way where copper
as part of the solution against all viruses
and microbes is the balancer.
But more importantly than that,
coronaviruses are extremely fragile to UVC, to light.
And so you can have a look at one of the biggest giveaways
of how bad this pandemic has been managed
is that the vaccine has now led to these outbreaks
and in all kinds of respiratory diseases
and all kinds of coronaviruses
that shouldn't be thriving in summer.
They should have gone down naturally with seasons
in spring and summer.
And so smog is there as a data point.
China is one of their strategies that they were using.
Not only were they spraying with copper,
but they were also in China,
they've been dealing with their pollution problem
for quite some time now by spraying the air with water.
And that brings down these particles out of Brownian motion.
And then, and you're basically clearing smog,
because if you don't clear it, you know, you've got,
you know, China has a horrible problem, for example,
with the youth with TB.
And it's smog related.
So when, if there is a plan to really exterminate
most of the world,
I don't believe it's gonna be just a pandemic.
It's gonna be something that the word
I can introduce here is the concept of ANOMIE.
A-N-O-M-I-E, ANOMIE is a term for a suicide
that comes from a form where there's either
too much regulation or no regulation.
And so I think what we're seeing is that our regulatory
bodies that are there to protect us has been captured.
And so we're gonna have too much regulation
that will kill people,
like not letting somebody leave the house.
And you're gonna have dysregulation of things like
allowing somebody to come up and put up a giant,
you know, radio tower that causes radiation poisoning
and not holding anyone accountable.
And so I think there's numerous, numerous ways
this is gonna take place.
The second part to it is that,
and do I think that they are, you know,
working side by side?
I don't know and I don't think so.
My knee-jerk reaction would be that they are weapons
of choice, but I don't know that they built in any sort of
conjugated or symbiotic way.
I think that they were both, you know, equally as evil
and doing some massive damage.
The second part is in terms of, you know, sort of how we,
how we do this and how we regain our planet.
One of the things that I think that I have been trying to do
and why I've tried and strive for a balance
between some of the physical sciences
and throwing in some of the psychology,
and especially with younger folks,
is we really need people to understand psychopaths.
Like you can't beat something until you know it
and until you know how they think and what's coming next
and why they do certain things.
And the greatest way that you can poke the bear
with a psychopath is play around with their concept of fear
around the thing that they're fearing the most is failure.
They're absolutely terrified of failure.
And so part of that question I got on messaging,
we need to start telling them that they're failing.
Not only that we're coming from them,
but they've done a horrible job
that they haven't killed enough people.
We're still alive and that we're coming.
And then ultimately by poking them, making fun of them,
you have this ability to get them to start making mistakes
and then they're not in control of the board anymore.
And then there's a part to it that I'm desperate for solutions on
and maybe we can talk offline because law enforcement has been absent.
I am by far, I don't know how many of you have ever had another conversation
in the two years that you've been doing this,
that basically that you've heard from somebody who's in counterterrorism
or bioterrorism or work the cases like you're talking about.
Like there's a whole community that really should have been very present
and they're just not here.
And I don't know how to engage them
and I don't know how we're going to get our natural protectors.
The lead up to them, I'll say it as crudely as I can
because it really is I think what they've been feeling.
You can take the toughest person
and if they're going to fight an opponent that's undersized,
if you want to cheat and you kick them in the groin
before they get into that ring, they're not going to go...
First of all, they're not going to sign up for that fight again.
And also, the embarrassment of not being able to defeat a sort of mediocre opponent
might also keep them out of the fight.
And so they really have been kicked in the groin politically
and so in society across the world as a lead up to this.
And so they've been very, very risk averse to getting involved.
And we have to find ways where we find more people
that are willing to prosecute and investigate.
And once again, I'm going to mention the part that any crime like this,
you never start at your head of the cartel.
You just start taking down your lower level players
and you start using the natural intimidation of,
we're coming for your whole organization,
are you willing to go on public record now?
Are you willing to sign up for some form of tribunal
that allows you to plead amnesty, become a whistleblower?
And we're just giving you that opportunity now.
You received a letter to say, come forward with information.
And then they're going to take that to their bosses.
And that in itself is, you're ultimately, you're now messing with the nest, right?
A bee's hive is only as scary until you know that you're controlling the bees with smoke.
And so we blow smoke at them to make them move.
We make them do things.
We take control of that board.
And so if there's any way that you can think of that will reignite law enforcement and prosecutors,
I'm all ears.
OK, we've got to go.
It's true that we've got Heiko and Arianna.
Thank you, Peter, for the question.
Tao, be quick, because we've got to go.
Heiko from Finland.
You're muted, Heiko.
Yeah.
Dr. Brown, I was really looking forward to your talk and thank you very much.
Learn much more again.
I have any idea how we could find venom in these vaccines?
Because I tried to steal my vaccine and I'm looking forward to get to my court soon.
And after that, I got others to deliver vials to me in order to get them checked.
But if it would be possible to get them checked for venoms, it would help a lot, I think.
So thank you for your comment and question.
I think we covered this a little bit briefly the other day.
And I echoed the frustration that others had felt in terms of, you know, we're scientists over here
and a lot of you are physicians and dealing the hard sciences and we've got so much guesswork going on.
A big issue with this that people are facing is, you know, the sort of giants that are not shy to
use, whether it's NDAs or IP claims, you know, anybody that really should be looking at this
in an easy way. The fear for them is literally just lawsuits and losing contracts and nonsense
like that that are basically allowing this to take place. The issue that we face in that there
are people that are looking at the vaccines and we've got a group of people that are going to do
some new research on the vaccines now. I'm just not sure what people are going to find.
You know, this was very well highlighted in the recent mini documentary that was just released by
Children's Health Defense around the tetanus vaccine leading to infertility in Kenya.
I think that what's highlighted in a very easy way is the fear that labs have.
You know, it can lead to deaths, it can lead to prosecutions, it can lead to businesses
folding and people need to naturally worry about their own families and their own livelihoods.
So that's an aspect, but more importantly, the science aspect of it is that, you know,
it's easier if I show you the recipe of a cake and then you basically know what's in it
basically by trusting the ingredients. But once you've built the cake, to extract out each
ingredients and to know exactly what the concentrations were and to know that things
are now bound to each other and now you've got the issue of conjugation, you can get a signal
from something, but you're now looking at a compound. Like if somebody looked at my
copperene, for example, the parts per million of copper, they wouldn't be getting an accurate read
of the copper PPM because it's a copper alloy, it's bound to the zinc. And so, you know, they
would be having to look for how much brass is in it. And, you know, at that point, spectrometry is
only as useful as how specific the tool can be. And there aren't that many labs with the level of
sophistication of being able to drill down completely into the tiniest, you know, short-chained
peptides. Of course, there's some easy ways of seeing, you know, some basics that will always
be on a safety data sheet. Things like, you know, the pH of something and how much electrochond
conductivity is it, and you can look for certain metals. But when it comes down to a compounded
formula, you really are going to have a hard time drilling down into the true hidden details.
I might be wrong, and I'm willing to be wrong, that body of science is extremely new to me,
and only because I've been doing work within that, within the scope during the pandemic.
And then something that I mentioned that I'll repeat, because it's relevant to this, and I
mentioned it on Sunday, is that the corruption of labs is not only an unethical corruption where they,
you know, sort of might choose to play with things like scheduling and delay your tests,
but it's pretty easy to knock out players that are trying to work something out by some very
low-level sabotaging. I ran some challenge tests against a virus with our product right at the
beginning, and then I got my results back up for waiting months and months, and it was a lot of
money. And then I got back these results, and they didn't match the other three labs. And I said,
but I don't understand. That's the reason we're running them, and we're running them differently
from the other three labs. The other three labs are international. This is going to be a US-based
lab. And for the longest time, I couldn't work out what went wrong. I mean, this is like some
high school-level science. Then I realized what they'd done is that they had dipped the viruses
into bovine serum. And so they gave me a double challenge test, right? Where, you know, there's
nothing that nefarious about it. It can sound like it's an easy mistake, but it's a completely
different experiment, and you'll get different results. And so they've got some very crooked
ways where even if they let you know that they'll run the tests again, well, then, okay, we'll run
them again. You're on the schedule for 2024. I mean, what does that mean, you know, in terms of
helping out humanity? And so what I was mentioning on Sunday, and I really don't have the
capacity or knowledge to even begin to do this, but I know some of you would, really do need a
body. We need to start having the mechanics at play where we've got our own labs and our own
machinery, and we can buy repurposed machinery because some of the companies probably won't even
sell us some of this equipment if they're in contract with bigger players. And then the thing
that I discovered that I'm mentioning again, and you can check this out for yourself, is some of
the equipment is actually just leads to military organizations around the world. The peptide
sciences, when it comes to toxins and venoms, large portions of their grants,
the giveaway on these labs is they will often, they will have the name, the person's name is the
sort of founder, owner of the lab, and then they work with peptides and venoms. And then if you
sort of want to see whether they're going to help out humanity, who are they going to help out,
if that lab is predominantly funded by military money, and it doesn't have to be U.S., I've found
labs all over the world with the predominant checks that are paying for every member of staff
and every piece of equipment, and Australia included. You're talking about Department of
Defense money, and so some of the equipment that they're using isn't even commercially available.
They will not sell it to civilians. Okay, we've got to go.
We've got to go. We want to support your work. What is the...
I go, we've got to go. I go, we're going. Arianna, I'll put you in touch with
Tao. It is way over time. Please share, feel free to share my email address. Feel free to contact me
offline. I'm always happy when somebody either agrees, disagrees, or wants more information.
And thank you so much for your time. I really do have to hang up. Thank you so much. Really
appreciate all of you. Thank you. Great work. Thank you. Thank you, Tao. All right, everybody.
Tom Rodman has put the link in if you want to continue the conversation.
On the Telegram chat, the details are there. It's now two hours and 40 minutes.
We're back again on Sunday. Steven, is there anything you want to announce before we go?
No, that's it, I think. All right, everybody. Thank you. So there's the link. Get the chat.
Save the chat. Wonderful gold. Wonderful information. Thank you for the cheering.
Thank you for the insights. And we will be back again on Sunday night. Well done,
Steven, for organising Tao. And wow, my brain is spinning. I hope your brains are spinning as well.
Thanks to a whole new level of performance. Bye, everybody. Thank you so much.