1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:01
This is your time.

2
0:00:01 --> 0:00:04
And yeah, all right.

3
0:00:04 --> 0:00:05
We're done.

4
0:00:05 --> 0:00:06
We're ready to go.

5
0:00:06 --> 0:00:09
Thank you for the volunteers who, if they if they get in later, I won't do the

6
0:00:09 --> 0:00:11
intro because just in the interest of time.

7
0:00:11 --> 0:00:15
But for those of you who want to see a standard intro, look at another recording.

8
0:00:15 --> 0:00:16
And we're delighted.

9
0:00:16 --> 0:00:21
Thank you, Stephen, for organizing Mike Yeaton to be with us and for going through

10
0:00:21 --> 0:00:27
those logistical hurdles and Mike, we're in your hands and look forward to your

11
0:00:27 --> 0:00:29
conversation and you and a.

12
0:00:29 --> 0:00:34
Charles, can you do your normal speech so that it's the same as usual, even though

13
0:00:34 --> 0:00:35
it's a bit later than usual?

14
0:00:35 --> 0:00:36
Yes, I can.

15
0:00:36 --> 0:00:37
I'll be I'll be quick.

16
0:00:37 --> 0:00:41
So welcome to today's discussion of medical doctors for COVID ethics

17
0:00:41 --> 0:00:42
international.

18
0:00:42 --> 0:00:43
This group was founded by Dr.

19
0:00:43 --> 0:00:48
Stephen Trust over three years ago with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice,

20
0:00:48 --> 0:00:49
freedom and health.

21
0:00:50 --> 0:00:53
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a

22
0:00:53 --> 0:00:54
whistleblower and activist.

23
0:00:54 --> 0:00:56
His medical specialty is radiology.

24
0:00:57 --> 0:01:02
I'm Charles Covessa, moderator of this group on Australasia's passion provocateur.

25
0:01:02 --> 0:01:06
And we love passionate people in these meetings and everyone who comes here is

26
0:01:06 --> 0:01:07
passionate.

27
0:01:08 --> 0:01:12
I practice law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago.

28
0:01:12 --> 0:01:16
And over the last 13 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies

29
0:01:16 --> 0:01:19
for vaccine damage and damage from bad medical advice.

30
0:01:20 --> 0:01:22
I'm also the CEO of the industrial hemp company.

31
0:01:23 --> 0:01:27
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world.

32
0:01:27 --> 0:01:30
Many of us thought that vaccines were OK.

33
0:01:30 --> 0:01:33
Now, many of us proudly say, yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers.

34
0:01:34 --> 0:01:38
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in

35
0:01:38 --> 0:01:38
the chat.

36
0:01:38 --> 0:01:42
If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or have a radio or TV show or you've

37
0:01:42 --> 0:01:47
written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you

38
0:01:47 --> 0:01:48
and find you.

39
0:01:48 --> 0:01:52
Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War Three and that the

40
0:01:52 --> 0:01:55
medical science battle is only one of 12 battle fronts.

41
0:01:56 --> 0:01:58
This is no time for us to be tired.

42
0:01:58 --> 0:02:03
We are some four years into what I predict is a seven year war.

43
0:02:03 --> 0:02:05
So we're only halfway through.

44
0:02:05 --> 0:02:07
So re-gird your loins.

45
0:02:08 --> 0:02:12
Most of us understand the development of science and that the science is never

46
0:02:12 --> 0:02:15
settled and Mike Gidd and our guest today is a scientist.

47
0:02:15 --> 0:02:16
I'm sure he knows that.

48
0:02:18 --> 0:02:20
Some of us believe that viruses exist.

49
0:02:20 --> 0:02:25
Some of us believe that they are a hoax and some of us are sitting on the fence.

50
0:02:25 --> 0:02:29
This meeting runs for two and a half hours, after which, for those with the

51
0:02:29 --> 0:02:34
time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting for those with the time to join.

52
0:02:34 --> 0:02:35
We'll listen to Dr.

53
0:02:35 --> 0:02:38
Mike Gidd and our guest for as long as Mike wishes to speak.

54
0:02:38 --> 0:02:39
And then we have Q&A.

55
0:02:40 --> 0:02:43
Stephen Frost, via long established tradition, asks the first questions for

56
0:02:43 --> 0:02:44
15 minutes.

57
0:02:44 --> 0:02:50
This is a free speech environment with appropriate moderating and no ad hominem

58
0:02:50 --> 0:02:50
attacks.

59
0:02:50 --> 0:02:52
You don't attack people.

60
0:02:52 --> 0:02:53
We discuss ideas.

61
0:02:55 --> 0:02:57
If you're offended by anything, be offended.

62
0:02:57 --> 0:03:00
We are lovingly not interested.

63
0:03:00 --> 0:03:04
We reject the offense industry that requires nobody to say anything that may

64
0:03:04 --> 0:03:05
offend another.

65
0:03:06 --> 0:03:09
We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.

66
0:03:09 --> 0:03:10
Fear is the opposite of love.

67
0:03:10 --> 0:03:11
Fear squashes you.

68
0:03:12 --> 0:03:14
Love on the other hand, expands you.

69
0:03:15 --> 0:03:18
As human beings, our unity is our strength.

70
0:03:18 --> 0:03:20
Being divided makes us weak.

71
0:03:22 --> 0:03:26
These twice weekly meetings are not just talk fests and extraordinary range of

72
0:03:26 --> 0:03:30
actions and initiatives have been generated from linkages made by attendees

73
0:03:30 --> 0:03:32
in these meetings.

74
0:03:32 --> 0:03:36
If you have a solution or a product or links or resources that will help people

75
0:03:36 --> 0:03:40
put the details into the chat, the meeting is recorded and is uploaded onto

76
0:03:40 --> 0:03:41
the Rumble channel.

77
0:03:42 --> 0:03:44
And they're welcome to our guest presenter, Dr.

78
0:03:44 --> 0:03:49
Mike Yead and famously renowned, we're at 100 limit on our meeting size.

79
0:03:49 --> 0:03:52
Mike, that shows the how popular you are.

80
0:03:52 --> 0:03:56
And thank you so much for giving us your time, wisdom and insights.

81
0:03:56 --> 0:04:02
And Mike's CV for those watching the recording is on the show notes on this

82
0:04:02 --> 0:04:03
recording that is on the Rumble channel.

83
0:04:03 --> 0:04:07
And thank you, Stephen Frost, again, for creating this group over three years ago

84
0:04:07 --> 0:04:10
and for organizing Mike to be with us today.

85
0:04:11 --> 0:04:12
Over to you, Mike.

86
0:04:13 --> 0:04:15
Charles, thank you very much.

87
0:04:15 --> 0:04:20
A fantastic introduction and also really good to just hear about the group and

88
0:04:20 --> 0:04:22
welcome. Welcome.

89
0:04:22 --> 0:04:26
Thank you very much, everyone, for for connecting and listening to me.

90
0:04:27 --> 0:04:30
Stephen, thank you. Thank you for the invitation to and of course, your

91
0:04:31 --> 0:04:32
companionship over the years.

92
0:04:34 --> 0:04:35
We've been speaking for a long time.

93
0:04:35 --> 0:04:37
So so I'm Dr. Mike Eden.

94
0:04:37 --> 0:04:41
I would describe myself as a career life scientist.

95
0:04:42 --> 0:04:46
I trained in biochemistry and toxicology, my first degree.

96
0:04:48 --> 0:04:52
That was an unusual training in that there were a couple of professors at

97
0:04:52 --> 0:04:57
university who had specialized in understanding how it is mechanistically at

98
0:04:57 --> 0:04:58
the molecular level.

99
0:04:58 --> 0:05:02
People can be damaged by certain environmental chemicals, insecticides and

100
0:05:02 --> 0:05:07
so on. So their interests have given birth to a course and I was a beneficiary.

101
0:05:07 --> 0:05:10
So I call that mechanistic toxicology.

102
0:05:12 --> 0:05:16
I'm English, so I don't like bragging, but it's worth saying that the university

103
0:05:16 --> 0:05:22
awarded me the first class honors degree that was head and shoulders higher than

104
0:05:22 --> 0:05:25
any other person had been awarded from the faculty at the time.

105
0:05:25 --> 0:05:27
So I must have been doing something right.

106
0:05:29 --> 0:05:33
It was a four year undergraduate training and I spent a year in the scientific

107
0:05:33 --> 0:05:38
civil service, half of which was at the UK's top secret

108
0:05:38 --> 0:05:44
chemical defense establishment at Porton Down, which used to be and is still now,

109
0:05:44 --> 0:05:49
in my view, a biological weapons facility of some kind.

110
0:05:50 --> 0:05:54
And I did a little bit of research there whose objective was to help protect

111
0:05:55 --> 0:06:02
British and allied troops from organophosphorus nerve agents in a small way.

112
0:06:03 --> 0:06:08
Then I worked at the forensic science headquarters in Aldermaston next to the

113
0:06:08 --> 0:06:13
atomic weapons facility and I learned lots of analytical techniques from very clever

114
0:06:13 --> 0:06:14
scientific civil servants.

115
0:06:16 --> 0:06:20
And at the end of that year, I resolved not to join scientific civil service

116
0:06:20 --> 0:06:24
because they all sounded very bored and frustrated.

117
0:06:24 --> 0:06:27
So but I always wanted to do applied work.

118
0:06:27 --> 0:06:31
And so I decided to take a PhD in the scientific civil service.

119
0:06:31 --> 0:06:34
I did a very quick PhD.

120
0:06:34 --> 0:06:38
I was offered to be sponsored by the M.O.D., the same people who had employed me for a

121
0:06:38 --> 0:06:40
little while as an undergraduate.

122
0:06:40 --> 0:06:42
And I did a very quick PhD.

123
0:06:42 --> 0:06:47
I started, finished, rooted up and passed the VIVA in exactly 36 months.

124
0:06:48 --> 0:06:54
And it was on the effect of opiates on respiratory function.

125
0:06:54 --> 0:07:00
So I was looking at central and peripheral actions of opiates like morphine on various

126
0:07:01 --> 0:07:07
reflex. And the goal was to see whether we could separate the receptors involved in

127
0:07:07 --> 0:07:13
pain relief from those involved in cardiorespiratory depression.

128
0:07:13 --> 0:07:15
Bad news is we couldn't.

129
0:07:16 --> 0:07:21
But I used an interesting technique or two, which I was able to take into into an

130
0:07:21 --> 0:07:27
industry. And most importantly, it taught me the scientific method of reading into a

131
0:07:27 --> 0:07:32
subject, trying to join the dots, thinking of unanswered questions that were worth

132
0:07:32 --> 0:07:37
answering to formulate them, convert them into experimental plans and then gain

133
0:07:37 --> 0:07:42
agreement for those and then go and do them, trying not to drop tubes on the floor and

134
0:07:42 --> 0:07:44
missing the time points and so on.

135
0:07:44 --> 0:07:50
So I did a three year course, a three year PhD and learned how to do the scientific

136
0:07:50 --> 0:07:53
the scientific method as we as we know it.

137
0:07:54 --> 0:08:00
And then straight away after that, I joined I took I've taken two big jobs in so-called

138
0:08:00 --> 0:08:05
big pharma. So the first seven years I was at the Wellcome Research Labs, which were

139
0:08:05 --> 0:08:11
then acquired by Glaxo to form eventually Glaxo SmithKline.

140
0:08:11 --> 0:08:15
And I only now realized how important that was.

141
0:08:15 --> 0:08:21
And that was probably an event on the timeline of the plans, believe it or not, to the

142
0:08:21 --> 0:08:24
event we're living in now. Why do I say that?

143
0:08:24 --> 0:08:30
Well, it's because it liberated an enormous amount of capital which was used to to start

144
0:08:30 --> 0:08:33
the really to fund the Wellcome Foundation.

145
0:08:34 --> 0:08:39
And I believe the Wellcome Foundation is one of a triumvirate of bodies which have

146
0:08:39 --> 0:08:44
corruptly altered the direction of biology research in the world for the last 30 years.

147
0:08:44 --> 0:08:50
Anyway, so I left Wellcome and I was recruited, actively recruited by head of

148
0:08:50 --> 0:08:55
pharmacology there had seen me give a speech said, you know, we're going to we would

149
0:08:55 --> 0:09:00
like to expand a respiratory drugs research group here at Sandwich and Kent.

150
0:09:00 --> 0:09:03
We'd like you to come. And I interviewed, loved it.

151
0:09:04 --> 0:09:05
And I stayed 17 years.

152
0:09:05 --> 0:09:12
And in addition to growing the group and working with over 200 people, we produced a lot

153
0:09:12 --> 0:09:17
of experimental medicines that were still in progress at 2011 when the company closed

154
0:09:17 --> 0:09:18
the entire facility.

155
0:09:19 --> 0:09:25
At the time I left, I was worldwide head of research for allergy and respiratory diseases

156
0:09:25 --> 0:09:29
for Pfizer, which at the time was the biggest research based drug company.

157
0:09:31 --> 0:09:36
So it means I didn't get to decide make all the decisions, but I was expected to have an

158
0:09:36 --> 0:09:39
opinion about everything in my area.

159
0:09:39 --> 0:09:40
And I loved it.

160
0:09:40 --> 0:09:42
It's really, really good fun.

161
0:09:42 --> 0:09:49
Having left in 2011, I worked very hard to see if I could find other people interested

162
0:09:49 --> 0:09:54
in the drugs that were in progress that Pfizer was willing just to put in the in the skip

163
0:09:54 --> 0:10:00
the dumpster because they were liberating cash and reducing their internal research

164
0:10:00 --> 0:10:05
footprint. Just just in parenthesis, all drug companies have realized they have no idea

165
0:10:05 --> 0:10:09
how to industrialize the process of drug discovery.

166
0:10:10 --> 0:10:15
It's more an art than a science that the methods you have to use to evaluate things are

167
0:10:15 --> 0:10:21
scientific. But the idea is as much art as anything else.

168
0:10:22 --> 0:10:28
And I did have the privilege of meeting Professor James Black, who invented both beta

169
0:10:28 --> 0:10:33
blockers and H2 antihistamines back in the day when those things were considered valuable.

170
0:10:33 --> 0:10:38
And although those drugs might not be wonderful now, he was a pretty smart guy and I think

171
0:10:38 --> 0:10:41
honest. And I learned a lot from people like that.

172
0:10:41 --> 0:10:46
So I tried to find new owners for the work I had been doing.

173
0:10:46 --> 0:10:51
And I was really pleased that it was mostly acquired by the world's second largest

174
0:10:51 --> 0:10:56
generic company called Mylan, who on the basis of the work I had been doing, formed

175
0:10:57 --> 0:11:00
a UK subsidiary and acquired almost everything.

176
0:11:00 --> 0:11:03
So the people went across and got jobs.

177
0:11:03 --> 0:11:04
The work continued.

178
0:11:04 --> 0:11:07
I'm proud to say they launched the products.

179
0:11:07 --> 0:11:09
So I wasn't completely wrong, Mr.

180
0:11:09 --> 0:11:12
Pfizer. The bits they didn't want.

181
0:11:13 --> 0:11:16
I'll just I didn't think about doing anything with them.

182
0:11:16 --> 0:11:23
But for the first year, having left Pfizer for 2011 to 12, I just I was just very lucky

183
0:11:23 --> 0:11:27
people contacted me and said, we'd like you to consult if you'd like to do a day a week or

184
0:11:27 --> 0:11:29
day a month, whatever it was.

185
0:11:29 --> 0:11:36
So I started building a little portfolio of consulting clients, all startups, all biotechs,

186
0:11:36 --> 0:11:38
mostly in the in the US.

187
0:11:39 --> 0:11:43
And that happened probably because for 10 years at Pfizer, I did a job that nobody

188
0:11:43 --> 0:11:48
wants to do, which was to review the external environment for any in licensing or

189
0:11:48 --> 0:11:50
acquisition opportunities.

190
0:11:50 --> 0:11:55
Pfizer was like lots of companies, as I mentioned earlier, was realizing they could

191
0:11:55 --> 0:12:00
not invent drugs internally at the rate required to feed the machine and all the implied

192
0:12:01 --> 0:12:02
growth rates that Wall Street wants to hear.

193
0:12:03 --> 0:12:04
So it's like, what are we going to do?

194
0:12:04 --> 0:12:09
It's like, OK, get these scientists if they can't invent stuff to run the radar on

195
0:12:09 --> 0:12:13
everybody else's smaller companies and and so on.

196
0:12:13 --> 0:12:18
And so there were two or three deals I did that and I think 10 billion in revenue.

197
0:12:19 --> 0:12:21
So I had to be very persistent.

198
0:12:21 --> 0:12:24
That taught me persistence right up to the board level.

199
0:12:24 --> 0:12:30
And the particular example was Pfizer formed a relationship with Berlinger-Ingelheim for a

200
0:12:30 --> 0:12:35
drug called Sporiva, which at the time of identification was in early phase two

201
0:12:35 --> 0:12:38
trials. So I thought that that's a good drug.

202
0:12:38 --> 0:12:42
I think it is. And so anyway, I proved influential.

203
0:12:42 --> 0:12:44
I could and persistent really.

204
0:12:45 --> 0:12:49
So and it's because I kept reviewing things.

205
0:12:49 --> 0:12:53
I reviewed 100 opportunities, 97 of which we declined.

206
0:12:53 --> 0:12:55
So not it's not fun.

207
0:12:55 --> 0:13:01
But what I did and I didn't realize it at the time is I was getting a live teaching on how not to

208
0:13:01 --> 0:13:05
do biotech and when it worked, how to do it.

209
0:13:05 --> 0:13:12
So when I left Pfizer, I got invited back to consult to some of these folks who'd started

210
0:13:12 --> 0:13:14
another company saying, you know, you were helpful.

211
0:13:15 --> 0:13:18
A couple of them over coffee said, what are you going to do with all the stuff that's going to get

212
0:13:18 --> 0:13:20
thrown away? And I said, no idea.

213
0:13:20 --> 0:13:22
And they said, well, you should spin those assets out.

214
0:13:23 --> 0:13:29
And I had no idea. But anyway, within a couple of weeks, I'd formulated an idea that, yeah, I could

215
0:13:29 --> 0:13:31
probably do something with those compounds.

216
0:13:32 --> 0:13:38
So I got together a small team, went to see someone, senior advisor, say, so I said, if I run if I

217
0:13:38 --> 0:13:44
raise some private capital, will you at least in principle agree to negotiate to assign those

218
0:13:44 --> 0:13:45
patents to me? And they said, yeah.

219
0:13:46 --> 0:13:51
18 months later, I came back with a six million seed of investment from San Francisco.

220
0:13:51 --> 0:13:55
It's an answer there. And ZRCO was born.

221
0:13:55 --> 0:14:02
And I led as a CEO and we grew up to 25 staff, raised about 40 million US dollars, ran a

222
0:14:02 --> 0:14:05
clinical trial, which was unbelievably positive.

223
0:14:05 --> 0:14:11
We conversed a drug that was intended for asthma to a drug that could be used in atopic

224
0:14:11 --> 0:14:16
dermatitis, a disease of inflammation and itch in the skin for which there were no oral

225
0:14:16 --> 0:14:18
treatment. So this isn't once a day oral treatment.

226
0:14:18 --> 0:14:20
And it looked fantastic.

227
0:14:21 --> 0:14:27
And within a few months, Novartis, the big Swiss drug company, acquired my little company

228
0:14:27 --> 0:14:29
for an obscene amount of money.

229
0:14:30 --> 0:14:32
I only had a little shareholding at that time, but it was enough to retire.

230
0:14:32 --> 0:14:35
And I did. That was 2017.

231
0:14:36 --> 0:14:42
So I was enjoying early retirement when what I call the Covid era began.

232
0:14:43 --> 0:14:47
And I think quite early on, I thought I was very frightened, like most people.

233
0:14:47 --> 0:14:48
You were intended to be.

234
0:14:49 --> 0:14:51
But I noticed this is very important.

235
0:14:51 --> 0:14:57
I noticed significant public figures on the television that I knew because I've been

236
0:14:57 --> 0:15:02
around so long that, for example, Sir Patrick Vallance was a former colleague at

237
0:15:02 --> 0:15:04
Wellcome over 30 years earlier.

238
0:15:05 --> 0:15:09
So I slightly knew these people and I noticed that he wasn't telling the truth.

239
0:15:10 --> 0:15:15
So sometimes I spotted him saying things I knew were not true and I knew he knew them

240
0:15:15 --> 0:15:19
because we had trained in the same university ecosystem at the same time.

241
0:15:19 --> 0:15:21
So I thought, why are you lying?

242
0:15:22 --> 0:15:25
Once you spot someone's telling a lie, you pay a lot of attention.

243
0:15:26 --> 0:15:28
And then there was talk of lockdowns.

244
0:15:28 --> 0:15:30
And I kind of knew this was nonsense.

245
0:15:30 --> 0:15:37
I'll put it to people that for it not to be nonsense, you have to believe that people

246
0:15:37 --> 0:15:42
without symptoms, that is well people, can give a disease they haven't got to other

247
0:15:42 --> 0:15:46
people. Now, that isn't very likely, and it didn't happen.

248
0:15:47 --> 0:15:53
But when you and of course, and then the other thing to say is it's quite complicated

249
0:15:53 --> 0:15:58
that I did used to believe in the germ theory model of acute respiratory diseases.

250
0:15:59 --> 0:16:01
So I don't anymore. But at the time I did.

251
0:16:02 --> 0:16:03
And so I thought, well, this is crazy.

252
0:16:03 --> 0:16:08
The people who are the best sources of infection are the people who were ill and the

253
0:16:08 --> 0:16:10
people who were ill are already at home or in hospital.

254
0:16:11 --> 0:16:13
And the well people can't infect other people.

255
0:16:13 --> 0:16:15
So lockdown is stupid.

256
0:16:15 --> 0:16:21
And I started reading the pandemic preparation plans of all the countries I could find,

257
0:16:21 --> 0:16:24
starting with UK and then Germany and then France and America.

258
0:16:25 --> 0:16:26
None of them mentioned lockdown.

259
0:16:28 --> 0:16:29
And it was illogical.

260
0:16:29 --> 0:16:32
And so I said to my wife, something horrible is happening.

261
0:16:32 --> 0:16:36
So what do you mean? I said, there are all the countries are talking about making a

262
0:16:36 --> 0:16:39
stay at home and explain to why it was mad.

263
0:16:40 --> 0:16:41
And she looked very concerned.

264
0:16:41 --> 0:16:43
I said, I'm really, really concerned.

265
0:16:43 --> 0:16:48
And on the day then Prime Minister Boris Johnson said, I sorry to have to tell you,

266
0:16:48 --> 0:16:50
you must stay at home.

267
0:16:50 --> 0:16:55
Apparently, I was racing up and down the stairs all evening, muttering, we are in so

268
0:16:55 --> 0:16:57
much trouble. And I knew we were.

269
0:16:57 --> 0:16:59
I didn't know what the hell was happening.

270
0:16:59 --> 0:17:02
But I knew that something serious was happening.

271
0:17:02 --> 0:17:08
And let me put it to you, ladies and gentlemen, the only way all the countries of the

272
0:17:08 --> 0:17:15
world are pretty much would do the same stupid thing that I knew was hopeless and

273
0:17:15 --> 0:17:22
was not in their plans would be if there was a supranational plan, supranational

274
0:17:22 --> 0:17:23
force above those countries.

275
0:17:24 --> 0:17:27
You know, that I knew that that evening, I had no idea who they were.

276
0:17:28 --> 0:17:31
And that's true. They didn't decide to do it on their own.

277
0:17:31 --> 0:17:32
Someone told me to do it.

278
0:17:33 --> 0:17:37
There's no way that could have independently all decided to do a stupid thing that was

279
0:17:37 --> 0:17:42
out with their original plans that had been put together by, I think, sincere, careful

280
0:17:42 --> 0:17:46
people. So I knew already in March something was happening.

281
0:17:46 --> 0:17:51
I didn't know what at the time, as I've said, I thought that acute respiratory

282
0:17:51 --> 0:17:56
diseases were caused by sub microscopic infectious particles called viruses.

283
0:17:56 --> 0:17:57
I no longer believe that.

284
0:17:58 --> 0:17:59
And what will come to the chase?

285
0:17:59 --> 0:18:08
All I believe that a I believe that a fake emergency has been strung up sprung upon

286
0:18:08 --> 0:18:16
us. I didn't think that early on, but probably in 2021, I encountered Professor

287
0:18:16 --> 0:18:23
Dennis Rancourt or Denis Rancourt, and he had done a week by week analysis of all

288
0:18:24 --> 0:18:29
cause mortality separately in each of the 50 US states.

289
0:18:29 --> 0:18:34
And he'd been doing it for some time before the pandemic.

290
0:18:34 --> 0:18:41
And so he started publishing in the summer of 2020 saying in no in no state, looking

291
0:18:41 --> 0:18:46
at people dying in terms of sex, age and date of death.

292
0:18:46 --> 0:18:51
When I when I do the plot, he said, I see no there's no sign of anything happening.

293
0:18:51 --> 0:18:57
Up until the moment when a pandemic was declared, whereupon the world went mad.

294
0:18:57 --> 0:19:04
And around so I didn't know, but I now know there was there was nothing happening prior

295
0:19:04 --> 0:19:06
to the declaration of a pandemic.

296
0:19:06 --> 0:19:08
And I think that means there wasn't one.

297
0:19:08 --> 0:19:13
So it doesn't matter to me if there was a virus or not a virus.

298
0:19:13 --> 0:19:16
There wasn't any public health emergency.

299
0:19:16 --> 0:19:17
I think that's the thing to focus on.

300
0:19:18 --> 0:19:21
And yet the world went crazy.

301
0:19:21 --> 0:19:22
We were locked down.

302
0:19:22 --> 0:19:29
We made the way wear masks, wash our hands, keep social distance, close most businesses

303
0:19:29 --> 0:19:32
unless they were essential, not do international travel.

304
0:19:32 --> 0:19:36
In some countries, closed schools and universities.

305
0:19:36 --> 0:19:38
Everything went remote.

306
0:19:38 --> 0:19:42
It's like that is so destructive on two fronts.

307
0:19:42 --> 0:19:45
It's actually so destructive.

308
0:19:45 --> 0:19:52
On two fronts, it's I'm enough of an economist to know that if you do that, every country

309
0:19:52 --> 0:19:53
that does it will go bankrupt.

310
0:19:54 --> 0:20:01
You can't you can't fund an economy by borrowings for months to years and not have

311
0:20:01 --> 0:20:03
unbelievably serious consequences.

312
0:20:03 --> 0:20:09
Seriously, I personally think all the countries of the world are technically bankrupt and

313
0:20:09 --> 0:20:17
have been kept going by agreement with the central banks over led by the Bank of International

314
0:20:17 --> 0:20:19
Settlement in Switzerland.

315
0:20:19 --> 0:20:23
So I think they've agreed you're all broke, but we'll keep it going.

316
0:20:24 --> 0:20:26
So financial damage was one.

317
0:20:26 --> 0:20:30
There were individuals at the national level in damage in currency.

318
0:20:30 --> 0:20:32
Also, individuals were bankrupted.

319
0:20:34 --> 0:20:37
And then, of course, the third main factor was social dislocation.

320
0:20:38 --> 0:20:42
You know, people whose whose lives were only kept meaningful because they were interacting

321
0:20:42 --> 0:20:45
daily with with people who mattered to them became depressed.

322
0:20:45 --> 0:20:48
And I'm sure many of them died.

323
0:20:48 --> 0:20:52
Humans don't like isolation anymore than if you put a dog on it, turn the candle and leave

324
0:20:52 --> 0:20:55
it for a few months, it'll probably be dead, even if you feed it every day.

325
0:20:56 --> 0:20:58
And humans aren't very different.

326
0:20:58 --> 0:21:01
So I believe there was not a public health emergency.

327
0:21:01 --> 0:21:07
One was faked using lies, propaganda and this wretched PCR test, whether or not the

328
0:21:07 --> 0:21:11
virus was a virus is irrelevant because there wasn't a public health emergency.

329
0:21:12 --> 0:21:17
And then there were economic damage, which at a country level, individual level and a

330
0:21:17 --> 0:21:18
social destruction level.

331
0:21:19 --> 0:21:26
But where I really come in and where I I think I stand alone, which is very shocking,

332
0:21:26 --> 0:21:30
what I'm going to tell you, but we know what I'm going to tell you that it is in my

333
0:21:30 --> 0:21:37
opinion, the other another of the objectives of this fake pandemic was to incentivise over

334
0:21:37 --> 0:21:41
5 billion humans on the planet to roll their sleeves up to receive an injection of a

335
0:21:41 --> 0:21:47
material that was designed intentionally to to injure, kill and reduce fertility.

336
0:21:48 --> 0:21:51
Now, a lot of people have got upset to me with me when I've said this.

337
0:21:52 --> 0:21:58
I point out my entire career has been in the business of rational drug design, working

338
0:21:58 --> 0:22:03
with colleagues. I put it to you that with the exception of natural products that can

339
0:22:03 --> 0:22:09
be purified from a source, every synthetic drug, everything that's in a tablet or a

340
0:22:09 --> 0:22:14
bottle or a spray or cream, every atom in there is in there because someone decided to

341
0:22:14 --> 0:22:19
put it in there. And you only put things in there because they serve a function.

342
0:22:20 --> 0:22:25
And coming right down to the level of the design of a of a molecule, it could be a

343
0:22:25 --> 0:22:31
beta blocker or a steroid or this macromolecule we're told called modified mRNA,

344
0:22:31 --> 0:22:34
that every single part of it is there for a reason.

345
0:22:34 --> 0:22:39
And so in a sense, I can virtually lean over the shoulder of the designer, look at the

346
0:22:39 --> 0:22:42
structure and think, what were you what were you up to?

347
0:22:43 --> 0:22:52
And and I can I can name and I will at least three features of these molecules, which as a

348
0:22:52 --> 0:22:59
35 year veteran of this industry, I am certain would not have gone forward if this was like

349
0:22:59 --> 0:23:06
a drug I was involved in. And I know of other people who have identified two further

350
0:23:06 --> 0:23:12
mechanisms. So what I'm saying, I'm going to justify that there are multiple independent

351
0:23:13 --> 0:23:16
designed in toxicities in these injections.

352
0:23:17 --> 0:23:25
And before I describe them, I will say that with Dr. Wolfgang Vodarg, I wrote an open

353
0:23:25 --> 0:23:31
letter to the European Medicines Agency before any of these products have, quote,

354
0:23:31 --> 0:23:34
authorization. So we couldn't know what the profile was.

355
0:23:35 --> 0:23:40
But I detailed not all of them, but I detailed the ones I thought of the tie at the time,

356
0:23:41 --> 0:23:46
saying, for goodness sake, you know, desist if you inject millions of people with this.

357
0:23:47 --> 0:23:49
This is these are the kind of things I anticipate will happen.

358
0:23:50 --> 0:23:52
Well, they have all happened.

359
0:23:52 --> 0:23:55
They have all happened and more.

360
0:23:55 --> 0:23:57
I we didn't I hadn't thought about cancer.

361
0:23:58 --> 0:24:03
So I'm going to describe three things that are blindingly obvious.

362
0:24:04 --> 0:24:09
And then I think what I'll do is I'll stop and take questions on the whole thing.

363
0:24:11 --> 0:24:17
I recently wrote an open letter to the Metropolitan Police and it's on my sub stack.

364
0:24:17 --> 0:24:18
If you look up Dr.

365
0:24:18 --> 0:24:21
Mike Eden, sub stack is the only article there.

366
0:24:21 --> 0:24:22
A friend of mine said I should put it out there.

367
0:24:24 --> 0:24:30
And in that letter, I more or less laid out what I just what I've just said so far, who I am,

368
0:24:31 --> 0:24:35
the backdrop and the awful allegations.

369
0:24:37 --> 0:24:43
So the three things I'm going to pick out and there are many more, but these I think are so I think I

370
0:24:43 --> 0:24:44
think you can't deny these.

371
0:24:44 --> 0:24:53
So number one, if you express, if you force a human body to to manufacture something that doesn't

372
0:24:53 --> 0:24:57
belong in the human body, it will be non self or foreign.

373
0:24:58 --> 0:25:00
And that's what these products do.

374
0:25:01 --> 0:25:05
They they provide a genetic instruction, messenger RNA.

375
0:25:05 --> 0:25:12
It says, please glide into these cells and tell the cells to do what instruction is, which is to make

376
0:25:12 --> 0:25:13
whatever is encoded.

377
0:25:14 --> 0:25:20
If you do that, I believe based on simple immunological principles that have been known for at

378
0:25:20 --> 0:25:27
least 60 or 70 years, that every cell that does that will mark itself now as foreign.

379
0:25:28 --> 0:25:35
Your immune system plays nice with itself most of the time unless you're ill because your immune

380
0:25:35 --> 0:25:40
system is constantly traveling around your body, T cells and so on, sniffing and sniffing and

381
0:25:40 --> 0:25:42
sniffing. And it keeps spotting.

382
0:25:42 --> 0:25:44
Yep, that's my. Yep, that's my. Yep, that's my.

383
0:25:44 --> 0:25:52
What's that? And if it finds a cell that no longer is displaying the sort of I'm one of you symbols,

384
0:25:52 --> 0:25:55
your immune system goes to war, attacks it and kills it.

385
0:25:57 --> 0:25:59
This happens in at least two ways.

386
0:25:59 --> 0:26:06
One is if you get an infection and no matter what kind your immune system will notice something is

387
0:26:06 --> 0:26:12
wrong and attempt to save you from it by launching a lethal attack on the cells and tissues,

388
0:26:12 --> 0:26:14
doing that non-self thing.

389
0:26:15 --> 0:26:18
So what I'm saying is it's axiomatic.

390
0:26:18 --> 0:26:20
That is must follow.

391
0:26:20 --> 0:26:28
If you inject someone with mRNA encoding anything other than a protein that belongs in you, you

392
0:26:28 --> 0:26:31
will trigger autoimmune attack.

393
0:26:31 --> 0:26:36
And depending on the dose and the distribution and how long the stuff persists, you could get

394
0:26:36 --> 0:26:38
mild symptoms or it could kill you.

395
0:26:38 --> 0:26:42
But it will not be good and it will happen every time with everybody.

396
0:26:42 --> 0:26:46
It's just a question of whether it would be seriously bad or not.

397
0:26:46 --> 0:26:50
And that will depend on, as I say, dose distribution and your luck.

398
0:26:50 --> 0:26:53
So that's the first thing. It's the wrong.

399
0:26:53 --> 0:26:54
It's the wrong approach.

400
0:26:56 --> 0:27:03
What do I mean by that? If you wanted to make a vaccine, I'm really now not happy with with

401
0:27:03 --> 0:27:04
vaccineology at all.

402
0:27:04 --> 0:27:10
But if we just go along with the original narrative, if you wanted to do that, you wouldn't

403
0:27:10 --> 0:27:13
do it this way. You would do anything else.

404
0:27:13 --> 0:27:17
Extract the pathogen and whatever.

405
0:27:17 --> 0:27:18
Show that to immune system.

406
0:27:19 --> 0:27:23
I know that doesn't work, but that would have been at least what people expected.

407
0:27:24 --> 0:27:26
So why does this technology exist at all?

408
0:27:27 --> 0:27:29
Dr. Robert Malone, I think, had patents for its invention.

409
0:27:29 --> 0:27:31
Why does it even exist?

410
0:27:31 --> 0:27:34
Well, originally, I think people just wanted to know if you could do it.

411
0:27:35 --> 0:27:39
And perhaps that's where Dr. Malone's PhD research or postdoc research came in.

412
0:27:39 --> 0:27:43
But I remember hearing about it 15 or 20 years ago in Pfizer.

413
0:27:44 --> 0:27:48
And it was presented to me with a perfectly sound rationale, which I'm just going to

414
0:27:48 --> 0:27:49
briefly explain.

415
0:27:49 --> 0:27:57
It was the idea was that you could use the destructive power of your immune system to

416
0:27:57 --> 0:28:04
kill tumours that you couldn't get to with surgery, so-called non-receptible tumours.

417
0:28:04 --> 0:28:05
So like a certain brain tumours.

418
0:28:06 --> 0:28:10
Most tumours have unique markers on their surface.

419
0:28:10 --> 0:28:14
They are deranged, but they identify themselves with a different postcode on their

420
0:28:14 --> 0:28:23
surface. And so if you could direct an mRNA sequence to that postcode and inject it, it

421
0:28:23 --> 0:28:27
will mostly go to that tumour and your immune system will then kill it.

422
0:28:28 --> 0:28:30
I don't know whether it works, but the idea is rather beautiful.

423
0:28:31 --> 0:28:33
As a drug discoverer, I thought, that's pretty clever.

424
0:28:33 --> 0:28:36
And it's called immuno-oncology.

425
0:28:36 --> 0:28:39
It is a division of many drug companies.

426
0:28:39 --> 0:28:42
There are biotechs funded to do this stuff.

427
0:28:42 --> 0:28:45
So it does have a potential use.

428
0:28:46 --> 0:28:51
But if you give it to healthy people and you force them to express something that

429
0:28:51 --> 0:28:55
doesn't belong in their body, it cannot help them.

430
0:28:55 --> 0:28:57
It's hopelessly inappropriate.

431
0:28:57 --> 0:28:59
It's definitely designed to injure you.

432
0:28:59 --> 0:29:01
That's number one. Number two.

433
0:29:01 --> 0:29:03
I've only got three. Number two.

434
0:29:04 --> 0:29:08
It's not just making your body make something that doesn't belong in you.

435
0:29:08 --> 0:29:14
The question is, what did they choose to ask to make your body manufacture?

436
0:29:14 --> 0:29:20
They could have picked anything from this so-called virus, the so-called SARS-CoV-2,

437
0:29:21 --> 0:29:23
for which apparently we have the sequence.

438
0:29:23 --> 0:29:31
So they could have had the messenger RNA encode and make your body make any of the

439
0:29:31 --> 0:29:34
bits of that. So I put it to you.

440
0:29:34 --> 0:29:40
The rule of thumb would be, don't make your body make something you know is dangerous.

441
0:29:41 --> 0:29:47
The only known dangerous protein in this material, I don't know whether the virus is

442
0:29:47 --> 0:29:49
real or not, but I know the sequence exists.

443
0:29:50 --> 0:29:55
And if you convert that sequence into protein, the only bit that we know is poisonous is

444
0:29:55 --> 0:29:57
the so-called spike protein.

445
0:29:57 --> 0:30:02
It is of a nature for which there was much literature, published literature in the peer

446
0:30:02 --> 0:30:08
review journals to show that these were kind of venom-like proteins that would activate

447
0:30:08 --> 0:30:12
blood platelets, almost certainly would stimulate blood coagulation.

448
0:30:12 --> 0:30:18
They were toxic to cardiac muscle and they altered damaged neuronal transmission.

449
0:30:18 --> 0:30:24
And so not only do we have a technology that forces your body to make something foreign,

450
0:30:24 --> 0:30:29
and I told you and no one has told me I'm wrong, that that will make your immune system

451
0:30:30 --> 0:30:33
think it's invaded and attack your own tissue and destroy it.

452
0:30:33 --> 0:30:38
It's the only way your body can save you from that perceived infection or tumor.

453
0:30:38 --> 0:30:42
As I say, tumors are the other things that causes this derangement and your body probably

454
0:30:42 --> 0:30:47
saves you from a tumor every other day that you never knew you had from like a solar, a

455
0:30:47 --> 0:30:50
gamma ray went through you, damaged your DNA.

456
0:30:50 --> 0:30:53
Your immune system noticed a deranged cell and killed it.

457
0:30:53 --> 0:31:00
Good job. But not only did these materials force your body to make non-celled proteins,

458
0:31:00 --> 0:31:05
which will lead to this autoimmune attack, but your body is now making something which I

459
0:31:05 --> 0:31:07
knew and I can point to the literature.

460
0:31:07 --> 0:31:12
It makes it makes something analogous to things already proven as toxins.

461
0:31:13 --> 0:31:17
Well, guess what? My guess is, you know, depending on where it went in your body after

462
0:31:17 --> 0:31:23
injection, how well it was taken up, how efficiently it was converted to protein and

463
0:31:23 --> 0:31:29
how long that went on, which frankly is a crap shoot, a lottery for every single individual.

464
0:31:30 --> 0:31:34
You could get blood clots, you could get heart injury, you could get neurological

465
0:31:34 --> 0:31:37
conditions and you got all of those, didn't we, folks?

466
0:31:37 --> 0:31:41
And they were predictable because they follow from the design choice.

467
0:31:41 --> 0:31:45
And the last one I'm going to mention, there are many more, but I think three is powerful

468
0:31:45 --> 0:31:48
because they're different and so obvious.

469
0:31:48 --> 0:31:57
The third one, the mRNA products, Moderna and the Pfizer BioNTech, were formulated.

470
0:31:57 --> 0:32:03
What does that mean? Usually the drug substance, the actual active is tiny, often so

471
0:32:03 --> 0:32:04
small you can't see it.

472
0:32:04 --> 0:32:07
It might be milligrams or even micrograms.

473
0:32:07 --> 0:32:13
You have to bind it up with with fillers and, you know, things to bulk it up so you can

474
0:32:13 --> 0:32:16
make a tablet or a spray or an ointment or an injection.

475
0:32:17 --> 0:32:19
And that whole process is called formulation.

476
0:32:20 --> 0:32:25
So you take the drug substance, the thing you've invented, and then clever people in

477
0:32:25 --> 0:32:31
pharmaceutical sciences work out how to stabilise this molecule, how to make sure it's

478
0:32:31 --> 0:32:35
pure, that it's stable, that it'll be released when it needs to be and so on and so

479
0:32:35 --> 0:32:39
forth. It's very, very complicated, not my skill area.

480
0:32:39 --> 0:32:43
But I learned quite a lot about formulations in the respiratory side.

481
0:32:43 --> 0:32:49
So when I looked at this formulation, the formulation is lipid nanoparticles.

482
0:32:49 --> 0:32:53
So it's a kind of grease, but it's a particular kind of grease formulated in a

483
0:32:53 --> 0:32:58
particular way. And so I thought, well, yeah, I can see why you would protect this

484
0:32:58 --> 0:33:02
vulnerable genetic material in this blob of lipid when you inject it.

485
0:33:03 --> 0:33:06
The lipid will help it just slide through the wall of a cell, straight through the

486
0:33:06 --> 0:33:08
wall of a...it'll go all around the body.

487
0:33:08 --> 0:33:10
It's what it's designed to do.

488
0:33:10 --> 0:33:17
So I was looking it up and I stumbled upon a 2012 paper and I read it with mounting

489
0:33:17 --> 0:33:25
horror because lipid nanoparticles is one of a category of sort of macromolecule.

490
0:33:25 --> 0:33:29
That means large molecule carriers, transporters, vehicles.

491
0:33:30 --> 0:33:32
So they've been in use for quite a while.

492
0:33:32 --> 0:33:36
And it was well known to people in the pharmaceutical science, the formulation end

493
0:33:37 --> 0:33:42
that these particular macromolecules, lipid nanoparticles, have a propensity that

494
0:33:42 --> 0:33:49
is are inclined to accumulate in the ovaries of every species tested to date.

495
0:33:50 --> 0:33:52
And so I thought, well, I'm a toxicologist.

496
0:33:52 --> 0:33:57
I can tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that if you have an observation in your

497
0:33:57 --> 0:34:01
toxicology studies, you're not allowed to ignore it.

498
0:34:01 --> 0:34:04
You have to assume that that's what's going to happen in humans unless you've got

499
0:34:04 --> 0:34:06
data to show it doesn't.

500
0:34:07 --> 0:34:12
So I am now faced with a formulation of horrible material, which I think is going

501
0:34:12 --> 0:34:17
to damage people by an autoimmunity and a direct toxicity that's going to accumulate

502
0:34:17 --> 0:34:18
in their ovaries.

503
0:34:19 --> 0:34:24
Then some enterprising person wrote to the Japanese regulator and under their

504
0:34:24 --> 0:34:31
Freedom of Information Act was able to obtain studies, distribution studies of

505
0:34:31 --> 0:34:32
the Pfizer product.

506
0:34:33 --> 0:34:36
And we translated it from the Japanese.

507
0:34:36 --> 0:34:40
And they had studied its injection and distribution, I think, is either in rats

508
0:34:40 --> 0:34:40
or mice.

509
0:34:41 --> 0:34:42
And guess what?

510
0:34:42 --> 0:34:47
It accumulated in their ovaries as predicted from the literature.

511
0:34:47 --> 0:34:50
So these are not accidental.

512
0:34:50 --> 0:34:54
The choice of mRNA is dangerous to healthy people.

513
0:34:54 --> 0:35:01
Its original use was immunoncology for people who are beyond saving by chemo or

514
0:35:01 --> 0:35:02
surgery.

515
0:35:02 --> 0:35:05
I've got second thoughts about a lot of this stuff.

516
0:35:05 --> 0:35:10
But then the spike protein, it's analogous to materials known to be toxic to human

517
0:35:10 --> 0:35:11
cells and the maline cells.

518
0:35:11 --> 0:35:12
And they made your body make it.

519
0:35:13 --> 0:35:18
Finally, for now, they formulated a material already known by people in the

520
0:35:18 --> 0:35:24
industry to lead to accumulation of the payload in the ovaries where it will do

521
0:35:25 --> 0:35:26
the two things I just mentioned.

522
0:35:27 --> 0:35:31
So I'll tell you a couple of other things.

523
0:35:31 --> 0:35:35
The most common reason drugs fail in development, two most common reasons.

524
0:35:36 --> 0:35:37
One is they don't work.

525
0:35:37 --> 0:35:39
Medical hypothesis was wrong.

526
0:35:39 --> 0:35:45
You put it in people with itchy red skin and you put it in the vehicle group and

527
0:35:45 --> 0:35:47
a test group and it's blinded and so on.

528
0:35:47 --> 0:35:48
It's all done properly.

529
0:35:48 --> 0:35:51
That was the single experiment we did in my biotech.

530
0:35:51 --> 0:35:54
You break the blind and damn it, both the groups are the same.

531
0:35:55 --> 0:35:56
Your drug hasn't done anything.

532
0:35:56 --> 0:35:59
So that's why it was so miraculous when ours did work.

533
0:35:59 --> 0:36:00
But that's the most common outcome.

534
0:36:00 --> 0:36:01
You're wrong.

535
0:36:01 --> 0:36:04
We're not clever enough to work out what's going to happen.

536
0:36:05 --> 0:36:08
And that's one of the reasons why the industry is not just failing.

537
0:36:08 --> 0:36:09
It's failed.

538
0:36:09 --> 0:36:10
It can no longer.

539
0:36:11 --> 0:36:12
It can't make profit anymore.

540
0:36:12 --> 0:36:14
It's a dead industry.

541
0:36:15 --> 0:36:18
I don't think there's been any significant new products that I personally would have

542
0:36:18 --> 0:36:20
been happy to have got behind.

543
0:36:21 --> 0:36:26
They're like one million pound a patient, cancer, biologicals, which I've looked at

544
0:36:27 --> 0:36:30
the data and they might give you a month.

545
0:36:31 --> 0:36:33
I don't even trust the clinical data now.

546
0:36:33 --> 0:36:34
I think they cheat.

547
0:36:35 --> 0:36:39
So I think they're now at a point where they've got enormous financial resources and they

548
0:36:39 --> 0:36:42
can't make money in the normal way and whatever.

549
0:36:42 --> 0:36:45
And I think this is one of the motivations.

550
0:36:45 --> 0:36:49
What's happened is it's provided enormous income for the pharma companies.

551
0:36:49 --> 0:36:53
But as I say, those I was going to say that that's one of the two main reasons why we

552
0:36:53 --> 0:36:54
fail.

553
0:36:54 --> 0:36:57
One is we're wrong in the medical hypothesis and the drug simply doesn't work.

554
0:36:58 --> 0:37:03
Now, sometimes you get a chance, another chance, because a different hypothesis comes up

555
0:37:03 --> 0:37:04
and you find a use.

556
0:37:04 --> 0:37:07
So the classic example is Viagra.

557
0:37:07 --> 0:37:12
Its original use had been to relieve angina by relaxing blood vessels in the heart.

558
0:37:12 --> 0:37:13
And it didn't do that.

559
0:37:13 --> 0:37:14
People did not report improvements.

560
0:37:15 --> 0:37:20
But the famous use that eventually was discovered was it dilates blood vessels in the

561
0:37:20 --> 0:37:26
penis and helps men have bigger erections and billions of dollars were made out of it.

562
0:37:27 --> 0:37:28
So you were wrong.

563
0:37:28 --> 0:37:29
They were wrong in the medical hypothesis.

564
0:37:29 --> 0:37:33
But another medical hypothesis was able to make use of the drug because it wasn't

565
0:37:34 --> 0:37:35
obviously unsafe.

566
0:37:36 --> 0:37:42
But the other reason drugs fail is because they're toxic either in people or in multi-dose

567
0:37:42 --> 0:37:45
studies in rats, dogs, monkeys, whatever is required.

568
0:37:45 --> 0:37:50
So I'm very sorry if there are people who are philosophically set against vivisection.

569
0:37:50 --> 0:37:52
And I do understand that.

570
0:37:52 --> 0:37:55
I grew less and less comfortable with that as I got older.

571
0:37:55 --> 0:38:00
Nevertheless, someone has to be, as it were, the guinea pig and I don't want it to be

572
0:38:00 --> 0:38:01
people.

573
0:38:01 --> 0:38:05
So the main reason, the second main reason, and it's extremely common, unfortunately,

574
0:38:05 --> 0:38:12
is that for reasons we were not able to anticipate the drug when taking the required dose for

575
0:38:12 --> 0:38:18
long periods of time, if it was a chronic drug, produced unacceptable side effects.

576
0:38:19 --> 0:38:25
So with the first one, medical hypothesis being wrong, my God, you would be grilled.

577
0:38:25 --> 0:38:27
It's like you need to explain your medical hypothesis.

578
0:38:27 --> 0:38:29
What's the evidence supporting that?

579
0:38:29 --> 0:38:31
Is the counter evidence?

580
0:38:31 --> 0:38:32
What were your peers doing?

581
0:38:33 --> 0:38:34
How quickly could we test the hypothesis?

582
0:38:34 --> 0:38:37
There was people all over it and rightly so.

583
0:38:38 --> 0:38:41
The second one, everyone got a shot at it.

584
0:38:41 --> 0:38:41
What do I mean?

585
0:38:43 --> 0:38:48
Before you nominated a compound, we literally would have all hands meetings.

586
0:38:48 --> 0:38:53
And your job was, if you've been in the industry, you may have an opinion.

587
0:38:53 --> 0:38:57
You may spot something about the design of that molecule that triggers a thought where

588
0:38:57 --> 0:39:03
you think, I've seen that before and it led to kidney toxicity in 1978 or something.

589
0:39:03 --> 0:39:05
So we would go over these damn things.

590
0:39:06 --> 0:39:09
And it was called like a structural alerts meeting or something like that.

591
0:39:09 --> 0:39:12
Each drug company will have its own process.

592
0:39:12 --> 0:39:17
Because what you don't want to do is five years down the road after $50 million has

593
0:39:17 --> 0:39:20
been spent to find it fails for toxicity.

594
0:39:20 --> 0:39:22
And someone goes, oh, yeah, I thought it would do that.

595
0:39:22 --> 0:39:24
So seriously, that's what used to happen.

596
0:39:25 --> 0:39:30
So I'm saying these products, if they were proper, would have gone through like a structural

597
0:39:30 --> 0:39:33
alert review or a TOCS cross-specs review.

598
0:39:34 --> 0:39:41
And anyone like me or anyone who'd been hired by me would have looked at this and thought,

599
0:39:42 --> 0:39:43
no, you can't meet non-self.

600
0:39:43 --> 0:39:45
It'll cause autoimmune reactions.

601
0:39:45 --> 0:39:50
No, you damn well better not meet their bodies make that funny spike protein because that's

602
0:39:50 --> 0:39:52
analogous to lots of venoms.

603
0:39:52 --> 0:39:57
What the hell are you doing using this macromolecule lipid nanoparticles?

604
0:39:57 --> 0:39:59
Do you not know it's going to accumulate in the ovaries?

605
0:39:59 --> 0:40:03
So I'm promising you this would not have got out of the door.

606
0:40:04 --> 0:40:05
So I'm going to take a long pause.

607
0:40:05 --> 0:40:13
But just to say there are at least two other independent mechanisms of toxicity built into

608
0:40:13 --> 0:40:14
these molecules.

609
0:40:14 --> 0:40:18
I can't name them because I'm not a molecular biologist, but they are apparently.

610
0:40:18 --> 0:40:24
There's a nuclear localization signal in the sequence, which means it's going to traffic

611
0:40:24 --> 0:40:26
to your nucleus, which it doesn't need to be in.

612
0:40:27 --> 0:40:28
And what was the other one?

613
0:40:28 --> 0:40:32
Is that there is something called I think it's a partial SV40 promoter.

614
0:40:32 --> 0:40:37
I think that has something that might be bad for oncological reasons.

615
0:40:37 --> 0:40:41
And apparently you would not tolerate either of these two things in the product.

616
0:40:41 --> 0:40:41
So that's fine.

617
0:40:42 --> 0:40:49
So I'm going to ask you on the call, having heard me describe my history in training,

618
0:40:50 --> 0:40:55
the processes we use, the most common reason for failure and what we tried to do to avoid it,

619
0:40:55 --> 0:41:02
and my description of what I thought would cause harms and the fact that we wrote them down

620
0:41:03 --> 0:41:06
before they were launched and then those things happen.

621
0:41:07 --> 0:41:12
I'm going to ask you, is there anyone on the call, horrified though you may be,

622
0:41:13 --> 0:41:19
that doesn't think as I do that these were designed intentionally to injure, kill,

623
0:41:19 --> 0:41:20
and reduce fertility?

624
0:41:20 --> 0:41:21
So I shall stop.

625
0:41:21 --> 0:41:25
Mike, thank you so much.

626
0:41:25 --> 0:41:30
And for those watching the recording who didn't get the note, Mike chooses not to have his video

627
0:41:31 --> 0:41:35
showing at the moment because he's in holiday mode.

628
0:41:35 --> 0:41:38
So thank you so much for articulating so beautifully.

629
0:41:38 --> 0:41:42
You addressed us a couple of years ago and I've kept your notes.

630
0:41:42 --> 0:41:45
And again, you articulate so well.

631
0:41:45 --> 0:41:50
And many of us know that someone who truly understands their craft can articulate complex

632
0:41:50 --> 0:41:53
ideas in ways that non-experts can understand.

633
0:41:53 --> 0:41:58
So I'm very grateful to the way that you have done that.

634
0:41:58 --> 0:42:03
So Mike, Stephen Frost gets the first 15 minutes and then we've got lots of hands up,

635
0:42:03 --> 0:42:04
which is wonderful.

636
0:42:05 --> 0:42:10
So, and Stephen, Stephen will have far more than 15 minutes, but anyway,

637
0:42:10 --> 0:42:12
Stephen, are you ready to go?

638
0:42:15 --> 0:42:19
Yeah, so, yeah, Charles, I'm sorry.

639
0:42:20 --> 0:42:25
I want to say sorry for losing my cool a little before the meeting.

640
0:42:26 --> 0:42:29
I didn't mean to be sharp with people who were trying to help me,

641
0:42:30 --> 0:42:36
but I was just trying to concentrate on what I thought I knew was the correct thing to do

642
0:42:36 --> 0:42:40
and what you also agreed most of the time, at least.

643
0:42:40 --> 0:42:46
So I didn't mean ill towards whoever I snapped at, but I was really under pressure in my mind.

644
0:42:47 --> 0:42:48
Sorry.

645
0:42:50 --> 0:42:57
And as far as your presentation, Mike, it was just brilliant.

646
0:42:57 --> 0:43:03
And if there were two people born for this crisis, I think you are one of them.

647
0:43:04 --> 0:43:05
Oh, three, maybe.

648
0:43:06 --> 0:43:11
Sukhru Bhakti is another and Archbishop Vigano is another.

649
0:43:12 --> 0:43:17
So I agree with you on everything you've said.

650
0:43:20 --> 0:43:25
You have you're so, how shall I say, precise in your use of English.

651
0:43:26 --> 0:43:28
You may be shy, but you're incredibly articulate.

652
0:43:29 --> 0:43:33
But most of all, what impresses me is you get your thoughts in order

653
0:43:33 --> 0:43:35
and you're always logical in your thoughts.

654
0:43:35 --> 0:43:42
But a lot of people, of course, including me now, think that what we need to solve this nonsense,

655
0:43:42 --> 0:43:47
these Trojan horses, totalitarianism is a spiritual element,

656
0:43:47 --> 0:43:51
and that doesn't always involve logic, as I'm told.

657
0:43:52 --> 0:43:53
I agree.

658
0:43:53 --> 0:43:54
I absolutely agree.

659
0:43:54 --> 0:43:59
And I used to be embarrassed in saying what I'm going to say

660
0:43:59 --> 0:44:01
because I'm a scientist and this isn't science.

661
0:44:03 --> 0:44:10
But in the summer of 2021, I had an encounter.

662
0:44:10 --> 0:44:16
And I think I took from this encounter an instruction to do what I'm doing.

663
0:44:17 --> 0:44:18
That was it.

664
0:44:18 --> 0:44:19
No promises.

665
0:44:19 --> 0:44:21
It was like, you have to do this.

666
0:44:21 --> 0:44:21
Good for you.

667
0:44:21 --> 0:44:27
I mean, I was already committed, but it was a and also it had been a terrible time.

668
0:44:27 --> 0:44:31
And as I started to discover what I've described to you,

669
0:44:31 --> 0:44:36
which I hope I haven't been too cool about, I fell apart because I'd been a normie.

670
0:44:37 --> 0:44:42
I fell apart because I'd been a normie until 2020.

671
0:44:42 --> 0:44:45
I listened to the BBC for 41 years.

672
0:44:45 --> 0:44:48
I got the Sunday Times every Sunday for about 25 years.

673
0:44:48 --> 0:44:52
I kind of believe roughly what I was being told, bit sceptical every now and again.

674
0:44:53 --> 0:45:01
So to follow the data as I did, so my head was following and my soul was screaming.

675
0:45:02 --> 0:45:04
I describe it as psychological whiplash.

676
0:45:05 --> 0:45:07
I think I had a mini I probably had a mini breakdown by the end of the year.

677
0:45:08 --> 0:45:13
And I was climbing out of it again, past very, very dark thoughts.

678
0:45:13 --> 0:45:18
And then one night, something appeared and it was like more or less,

679
0:45:19 --> 0:45:21
here's a handful of courage and just get on with it.

680
0:45:21 --> 0:45:23
And I've never felt frightened since that moment.

681
0:45:24 --> 0:45:25
And that was that was God.

682
0:45:26 --> 0:45:26
That was God.

683
0:45:27 --> 0:45:28
Good for you, Mike.

684
0:45:29 --> 0:45:33
I don't know whether you can remember because at the time I now realise you were

685
0:45:34 --> 0:45:37
really psychologically tortured into a corner.

686
0:45:37 --> 0:45:38
And so was I.

687
0:45:38 --> 0:45:39
And I didn't.

688
0:45:39 --> 0:45:42
I thought we were immune from this psychological torture.

689
0:45:42 --> 0:45:46
And I happen to think, Mike, and I think you should know this because you're British as well.

690
0:45:46 --> 0:45:49
I want to hold these bastards to account.

691
0:45:49 --> 0:45:53
And I am also giving information to the police.

692
0:45:53 --> 0:45:53
I wrote to the police.

693
0:45:53 --> 0:45:55
I haven't published it.

694
0:45:55 --> 0:45:55
Maybe I should.

695
0:45:55 --> 0:46:00
But I kept it very, very tight so they couldn't gainsay what I'd said to them.

696
0:46:01 --> 0:46:04
But I think, you know, your letter is absolutely brilliant.

697
0:46:04 --> 0:46:10
Someone was saying to me the other day, trying to draw my attention even more to your letter.

698
0:46:11 --> 0:46:13
And I will have a look at it again.

699
0:46:13 --> 0:46:21
But so, Mike, the terrible thing in the United Kingdom is that actually it appeared to be better

700
0:46:22 --> 0:46:29
than in France and other countries, you know, which had hard measures, should we say,

701
0:46:29 --> 0:46:33
in inverted commas, which were never just because there was never any pandemic.

702
0:46:33 --> 0:46:36
There wasn't even a disease called Covid-19, in my opinion.

703
0:46:36 --> 0:46:38
It wasn't properly diagnosed.

704
0:46:39 --> 0:46:45
And that's one of my strong points to the police because I am a medical doctor.

705
0:46:45 --> 0:46:50
And even if no one in the world agrees with me, I have a right to a medical opinion.

706
0:46:50 --> 0:46:51
No doctor.

707
0:46:51 --> 0:46:51
You do.

708
0:46:51 --> 0:46:52
Yeah.

709
0:46:53 --> 0:46:56
And I don't want to prove it beyond reasonable doubt or beyond the

710
0:46:56 --> 0:46:59
probabilities as in court of law.

711
0:46:59 --> 0:47:05
And I don't have to, as a scientist, do enormous numbers of randomized control trials,

712
0:47:05 --> 0:47:07
double-blinded or whatever.

713
0:47:08 --> 0:47:14
But I'm trained as a doctor and my duty is to diagnose for the patient in the best way

714
0:47:14 --> 0:47:21
possible using all my experience and all my, hopefully, good training.

715
0:47:22 --> 0:47:25
And somehow or other, I think I did get a good training because when I was training,

716
0:47:26 --> 0:47:31
we were told that even if you believe in viruses, which I'm not sure I do now,

717
0:47:32 --> 0:47:40
I'm pretty sure I don't, a deadly virus cannot cause a pandemic.

718
0:47:40 --> 0:47:44
And I was fascinated by that.

719
0:47:44 --> 0:47:48
So I can't remember the name of the professor who taught us this,

720
0:47:50 --> 0:47:51
but I remembered it.

721
0:47:51 --> 0:47:57
And I found out Christmas is a time for me writing an email to all the people I

722
0:47:57 --> 0:47:59
qualified with and challenging them.

723
0:47:59 --> 0:48:00
And guess what, Mike?

724
0:48:00 --> 0:48:07
I can't get a single person I qualified at Liverpool University with to engage with me,

725
0:48:08 --> 0:48:13
even privately, even people I shared flats with.

726
0:48:14 --> 0:48:15
They're that terrified of me.

727
0:48:16 --> 0:48:19
That's the thing that I have to say that's made me,

728
0:48:21 --> 0:48:27
so I think I've recorded something like 250 interviews, something like that.

729
0:48:27 --> 0:48:30
And I would just comment, actually, it's important for me to mention in case anyone's

730
0:48:30 --> 0:48:37
listening for the first time, it's no use Googling Dr. Mike Yead.

731
0:48:37 --> 0:48:41
Please don't use Safari, Google, whatever they are.

732
0:48:41 --> 0:48:45
Don't use the mainstream search engines, or at least don't only use them.

733
0:48:46 --> 0:48:50
In fact, I invite people, there's a very interesting experiment,

734
0:48:50 --> 0:48:52
I did it yesterday, so it's still valid.

735
0:48:53 --> 0:48:58
Most people, including me, I thought that browsers or search engines were pretty much

736
0:48:58 --> 0:49:01
a generic function.

737
0:49:01 --> 0:49:04
You type in what you want to find, and they find it for you.

738
0:49:05 --> 0:49:08
I didn't understand how it did it, but they're all about the same, right?

739
0:49:08 --> 0:49:09
Well, they're not.

740
0:49:09 --> 0:49:15
If you type Dr. Mike Yead into Google, and then just have a look at the first two or

741
0:49:15 --> 0:49:20
three pages, you'll find that I'm a very famous anti-vax conspiracy theorist.

742
0:49:21 --> 0:49:26
And you'll find articles from Reuters saying how wrong I am about all sorts of things.

743
0:49:27 --> 0:49:32
If you type Dr. Mike Yead into minority search engines, of which there are dozens,

744
0:49:32 --> 0:49:40
like something called Mojeek, M-O-J-E-E-K, or Yandex, Y-A-N-D-E-X.

745
0:49:40 --> 0:49:45
If you put Dr. Mike Yead in any of the small ones, you get hit with about 50 of my presentations.

746
0:49:46 --> 0:49:47
How interesting.

747
0:49:47 --> 0:49:55
Now, that can't happen unless someone has decided to filter the search results,

748
0:49:55 --> 0:50:01
which most people will get, because most people, most of the time, will use mainstream browsers.

749
0:50:01 --> 0:50:04
And what you find is lies about me.

750
0:50:06 --> 0:50:12
Why would someone go to the effort of lying about me and hiding things I have actually done?

751
0:50:12 --> 0:50:14
And I think the answer is obvious.

752
0:50:14 --> 0:50:15
They don't want you to hear from me.

753
0:50:15 --> 0:50:17
Why would they not want you to hear from me?

754
0:50:18 --> 0:50:19
Is it because I'm telling the truth?

755
0:50:21 --> 0:50:26
It seems to me an elaborate piece of work that they would do that.

756
0:50:27 --> 0:50:30
And of course, they may get rid of it now, I pointed it out, but

757
0:50:31 --> 0:50:34
I would say that's the sort of thing that's quite useful.

758
0:50:34 --> 0:50:39
You can show someone on their own phone and you ask them beforehand what would they expect to happen.

759
0:50:39 --> 0:50:41
It's like it should be roughly the same, right?

760
0:50:42 --> 0:50:44
Because if it's not, what use is a browser?

761
0:50:44 --> 0:50:46
Is you just going to get random garbage?

762
0:50:46 --> 0:50:47
So it should be roughly the same.

763
0:50:48 --> 0:50:49
It's not even roughly the same.

764
0:50:51 --> 0:50:54
Anyway, so one of the reasons people have said to me,

765
0:50:55 --> 0:50:58
my sister in Australia who thinks I'm a conspiracy theorist,

766
0:50:59 --> 0:51:04
the other day said, well, if any of the stuff you've said is true, Mike, why haven't they killed you?

767
0:51:04 --> 0:51:06
I've got a perfectly good answer.

768
0:51:06 --> 0:51:08
They don't need to do this medieval stuff.

769
0:51:08 --> 0:51:12
If the person lives in the modern technological world,

770
0:51:12 --> 0:51:16
they have IT tools that serve the same purpose.

771
0:51:16 --> 0:51:19
They can censor and smear you easily.

772
0:51:20 --> 0:51:22
And there's very little you can do about it.

773
0:51:22 --> 0:51:26
So to those listening, I can't, I don't,

774
0:51:26 --> 0:51:29
I think I cannot reach further than I have done.

775
0:51:31 --> 0:51:32
It's not de Vietist.

776
0:51:33 --> 0:51:34
Every now and again, we travel.

777
0:51:34 --> 0:51:40
So we'll be in say Heathrow or St Pancras station or somewhere in a busy area of London.

778
0:51:40 --> 0:51:42
And I'm routinely recognized once.

779
0:51:43 --> 0:51:47
And I've kind of done like counting the size of crowds.

780
0:51:48 --> 0:51:52
And my estimate is that I'm recognized by less than one in a thousand people.

781
0:51:53 --> 0:51:56
Interestingly, that number is the same whether I'm in

782
0:51:56 --> 0:52:01
Mexico, Florida, Arizona, France, Spain, London.

783
0:52:01 --> 0:52:04
So the message has kind of got out there, but to less than 0.1%.

784
0:52:05 --> 0:52:07
It's not a different number.

785
0:52:07 --> 0:52:09
I'm not recognized more often now than two years ago.

786
0:52:11 --> 0:52:13
And that's hard data, folks.

787
0:52:13 --> 0:52:15
That tells me that I've worked and worked and worked

788
0:52:15 --> 0:52:18
and not reaching more people than I was two years ago.

789
0:52:18 --> 0:52:20
And I think the reason's obvious.

790
0:52:21 --> 0:52:23
The alternative to interning me or killing me

791
0:52:24 --> 0:52:27
is to turn the tourniquet on censorship.

792
0:52:27 --> 0:52:29
So I will not be able to reach people.

793
0:52:29 --> 0:52:33
So the people on this call, for example, the people in your circle, your family,

794
0:52:33 --> 0:52:37
your workmates, your friends who perhaps think you're a bit nuts,

795
0:52:37 --> 0:52:39
I'm never going to reach them.

796
0:52:39 --> 0:52:41
You could wait 10 years and they'll never hear from me

797
0:52:41 --> 0:52:42
because they're not looking for me.

798
0:52:43 --> 0:52:46
And the mainstream media will never tell them the truth.

799
0:52:47 --> 0:52:49
And so the hard thing I have to say to you is,

800
0:52:50 --> 0:52:50
it's you.

801
0:52:50 --> 0:52:54
If you do not manage to persuade them, we will lose

802
0:52:55 --> 0:52:59
because there are very few people willing and able to do what I'm doing

803
0:52:59 --> 0:53:02
and they have constrained me very effectively.

804
0:53:02 --> 0:53:03
And I can see why they've done it.

805
0:53:04 --> 0:53:06
And frankly, I'd prefer they did this than the alternative

806
0:53:06 --> 0:53:08
because they would have otherwise killed me.

807
0:53:09 --> 0:53:16
And so I'm optimistic, but I have to keep asking people that you have to do it, please.

808
0:53:16 --> 0:53:17
You have to do it, please.

809
0:53:18 --> 0:53:21
I cannot reach further than I have already.

810
0:53:22 --> 0:53:25
My own empirical evidence says I am not.

811
0:53:25 --> 0:53:28
And as a consequence, I don't really want to do a lot more interviews.

812
0:53:28 --> 0:53:31
It's a waste of my life and I can't justify it to my family.

813
0:53:32 --> 0:53:34
And it has a terrible impact on me.

814
0:53:34 --> 0:53:35
And it's not useful.

815
0:53:36 --> 0:53:37
I'm not reaching more people.

816
0:53:38 --> 0:53:43
But if other people bottle any part of what you've heard and think,

817
0:53:43 --> 0:53:45
right, I understand that bit.

818
0:53:45 --> 0:53:47
And then you go forward with it.

819
0:53:49 --> 0:53:50
That's the way we'll beat them.

820
0:53:50 --> 0:53:51
That's the way we'll beat them.

821
0:53:53 --> 0:53:55
We can save ourselves if we work together.

822
0:53:56 --> 0:53:57
Yeah, sure.

823
0:53:57 --> 0:54:01
So there are many others, Mike, who are less brilliant than you,

824
0:54:01 --> 0:54:05
who can gain comfort from hearing your words

825
0:54:06 --> 0:54:10
and be emboldened and do your work for you.

826
0:54:10 --> 0:54:12
So you do fulfill a function.

827
0:54:12 --> 0:54:15
So talking to this group, it may not appear many,

828
0:54:15 --> 0:54:18
but there are many people who view the videos afterwards.

829
0:54:18 --> 0:54:21
And I'm going to send a copy of this video to my MP

830
0:54:21 --> 0:54:24
and also to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner,

831
0:54:25 --> 0:54:30
accompanied by another letter to ask why I haven't had even an acknowledgement from the...

832
0:54:30 --> 0:54:34
I copied in the Commissioner, but I sent it to the PC.

833
0:54:34 --> 0:54:36
I think you did as well, Mike.

834
0:54:36 --> 0:54:38
And I also copied in my MP.

835
0:54:38 --> 0:54:43
So I've learned these tactics because the bastard state in the UK

836
0:54:43 --> 0:54:50
targeted me in 2013 and took my job away from me by text with no explanation,

837
0:54:50 --> 0:54:52
because I highlighted...

838
0:54:52 --> 0:54:55
So I was a classic whistleblower, except I didn't know what whistleblowing was.

839
0:54:56 --> 0:54:59
I highlighted criminality in the military,

840
0:54:59 --> 0:55:04
of the British military with Class A controlled drugs.

841
0:55:04 --> 0:55:05
And they were trying to cover it up.

842
0:55:05 --> 0:55:08
And I told them there was no way they could cover it up,

843
0:55:08 --> 0:55:12
that they needed to tell the police and that the police needed to investigate.

844
0:55:12 --> 0:55:15
I was rather naive, but it was the truth.

845
0:55:15 --> 0:55:18
And they're terrified of people who tell the truth, Mike.

846
0:55:18 --> 0:55:23
But you do fulfill a purpose because you encourage other whistleblowers to speak out

847
0:55:23 --> 0:55:27
and whistleblowers are absolutely key.

848
0:55:27 --> 0:55:32
And especially the ones like you and me who survive the onslaught.

849
0:55:33 --> 0:55:37
Sure, no, I do think what I'm doing is important,

850
0:55:37 --> 0:55:40
but it won't be enough is what I'm saying.

851
0:55:41 --> 0:55:44
And I've made this little speech 50 times.

852
0:55:46 --> 0:55:47
I hope people do do something.

853
0:55:48 --> 0:55:53
All I ask people is to do the best you can with what you've got where you are.

854
0:55:54 --> 0:55:56
And keep doing it every day.

855
0:55:58 --> 0:56:01
I wish I didn't, but I probably do 16 hours a day, seven days a week.

856
0:56:01 --> 0:56:05
I can't stop, but I can't do anymore.

857
0:56:05 --> 0:56:09
If you know what I mean, I can't make this be more effective,

858
0:56:09 --> 0:56:10
but I can't stop either.

859
0:56:10 --> 0:56:14
And so I'm begging you, everyone, if you're not doing 20 hours a week,

860
0:56:14 --> 0:56:15
you're not helping.

861
0:56:16 --> 0:56:18
Everyone can spare 20 hours a week.

862
0:56:19 --> 0:56:23
Seriously, even if you're working, use your evenings to be active.

863
0:56:23 --> 0:56:25
We will roll these bastards over.

864
0:56:25 --> 0:56:28
If you do that, if you don't, we will lose.

865
0:56:29 --> 0:56:33
Let me just say, let me just say that the people who have planned this,

866
0:56:33 --> 0:56:36
and I never would believe I would be saying this,

867
0:56:36 --> 0:56:41
but if you don't know of a lady called Katherine Watt,

868
0:56:41 --> 0:56:46
she's an American paralegal, and she has researched going backwards

869
0:56:47 --> 0:56:54
and found 60 years, evidence receipts of 60 years of patient,

870
0:56:55 --> 0:56:59
obviously directed amendments to public health legislation in the US.

871
0:56:59 --> 0:57:02
And she and I believe that that has happened everywhere in the world.

872
0:57:02 --> 0:57:06
60 years, that's like three generations of politicians

873
0:57:08 --> 0:57:15
have constantly edited public health laws to allow what happened to happen in 2020.

874
0:57:15 --> 0:57:18
Because I won't describe it because I'm not clever enough,

875
0:57:18 --> 0:57:21
but it's nothing like you think, and it's all legal.

876
0:57:21 --> 0:57:24
What they've done is what she calls legal on paper.

877
0:57:24 --> 0:57:27
It's obviously legal, but it's legal on paper.

878
0:57:28 --> 0:57:34
And so she has found 10 major amendments to public health law,

879
0:57:34 --> 0:57:39
which eventually allow this, that if the Health and Human Services Secretary

880
0:57:39 --> 0:57:42
or the President says there is a public health emergency,

881
0:57:42 --> 0:57:48
they just need to say those words, then a whole bunch of things are then allowed.

882
0:57:48 --> 0:57:51
The military can impose what are called countermeasures

883
0:57:51 --> 0:57:55
these injections are not vaccines, they're not even medical products.

884
0:57:55 --> 0:57:57
They're not medical products.

885
0:57:58 --> 0:58:01
The apparent interaction with the FDA is a pantomime.

886
0:58:02 --> 0:58:05
They are medical products ordered by the military

887
0:58:05 --> 0:58:08
under public health emergency as countermeasures.

888
0:58:08 --> 0:58:12
They do not require informed consent any more than they need to give you

889
0:58:12 --> 0:58:15
informed consent before they put down a barrier and push you off an area,

890
0:58:17 --> 0:58:19
like a police investigation, seriously.

891
0:58:19 --> 0:58:24
So they are legally countermeasures and they are treated no different than

892
0:58:24 --> 0:58:25
grime tape.

893
0:58:25 --> 0:58:27
They can push you away.

894
0:58:27 --> 0:58:28
They can inject you.

895
0:58:28 --> 0:58:29
They have to do anything.

896
0:58:29 --> 0:58:35
And as long as every person is following the then prevailing law

897
0:58:35 --> 0:58:38
of this medical emergency, of a public health emergency,

898
0:58:38 --> 0:58:41
they can't even be prosecuted, even if they kill you.

899
0:58:41 --> 0:58:44
Because the law says you may do all these things

900
0:58:44 --> 0:58:48
at discretion of the Health and Human Services Secretary or and or President

901
0:58:48 --> 0:58:50
in the event of a public health emergency.

902
0:58:51 --> 0:58:53
So that's unbelievable.

903
0:58:53 --> 0:58:54
But that's not the only one.

904
0:58:54 --> 0:58:58
So that's Catherine Watt with a K, W-A-W-T.

905
0:58:58 --> 0:58:59
Please let me finish.

906
0:59:00 --> 0:59:03
Catherine Watt, K with a Catherine and then W-A-W-T, set substack.

907
0:59:05 --> 0:59:11
Sasha Latipova, she's an American of Ukrainian extraction, very clever lady.

908
0:59:11 --> 0:59:14
And she has pieced together how the public health law was used.

909
0:59:14 --> 0:59:17
So she would combine my skills with Catherine's.

910
0:59:17 --> 0:59:21
And if you read no one else, Sasha Latipova will combine the thing.

911
0:59:21 --> 0:59:23
So and then the third person I would mention

912
0:59:25 --> 0:59:31
is a retired financier called David Rogers Webb, now living in Sweden.

913
0:59:31 --> 0:59:37
And he has discovered 60 years of subversion of private property rights law

914
0:59:37 --> 0:59:40
in every country around the world, every country.

915
0:59:40 --> 0:59:42
There are no exceptions.

916
0:59:43 --> 0:59:46
What has happened is that things that you and I think we own

917
0:59:46 --> 0:59:49
as owners, we're no longer the owners.

918
0:59:49 --> 0:59:53
We have a contractual right called beneficial ownership.

919
0:59:53 --> 0:59:54
They've invented the term.

920
0:59:54 --> 0:59:58
It's all completely, you know, anyway, you don't own things anymore.

921
0:59:58 --> 0:59:59
You are the beneficial owners.

922
0:59:59 --> 1:00:00
What does that mean?

923
1:00:00 --> 1:00:04
It means if there is a default, which there will be,

924
1:00:04 --> 1:00:06
that's why they've broken the economy on purpose

925
1:00:06 --> 1:00:08
and printed enormous amounts of currency.

926
1:00:08 --> 1:00:10
They can announce that things are bankrupt.

927
1:00:10 --> 1:00:14
They can announce that currency is no good for international trade.

928
1:00:15 --> 1:00:16
And that will stop trade.

929
1:00:17 --> 1:00:20
And then they will substitute a made up currency

930
1:00:20 --> 1:00:22
called central bank digital currency.

931
1:00:22 --> 1:00:24
I'm sure they have already prepared.

932
1:00:24 --> 1:00:27
And you will hear in every country, every central bank

933
1:00:27 --> 1:00:29
has been experimenting with this.

934
1:00:29 --> 1:00:31
So it's not a conspiracy theory.

935
1:00:31 --> 1:00:34
It's a conspiracy and there's nothing theoretical about it.

936
1:00:34 --> 1:00:38
David Rogers Webb has identified the changes in the law

937
1:00:38 --> 1:00:42
that means that you and I, everyone on the call,

938
1:00:43 --> 1:00:46
will be deprived of what we think is our lawful property

939
1:00:46 --> 1:00:48
if there's a big enough default.

940
1:00:49 --> 1:00:53
And the beneficiaries are the senior creditors

941
1:00:53 --> 1:00:56
who are the same people who run everything in the world.

942
1:00:56 --> 1:00:57
You don't need to name them.

943
1:00:59 --> 1:01:00
So that's what will happen.

944
1:01:00 --> 1:01:03
Your houses, your cars, your bank account, your pension,

945
1:01:03 --> 1:01:07
your stock investment portfolio will all vanish.

946
1:01:07 --> 1:01:08
The computer will go off.

947
1:01:09 --> 1:01:12
And even if it comes back on, they will have disappeared.

948
1:01:12 --> 1:01:15
And you may think that sounds fantastical.

949
1:01:15 --> 1:01:17
Go and bloody listen to David Rogers Webb.

950
1:01:18 --> 1:01:19
That's what's going to happen.

951
1:01:19 --> 1:01:24
So public health law, private property rights law,

952
1:01:25 --> 1:01:27
and then there are numerous others.

953
1:01:27 --> 1:01:31
I think we're all as wise to the global warming scam.

954
1:01:31 --> 1:01:33
About 60 years, funnily enough.

955
1:01:33 --> 1:01:36
It's about 60 years of propaganda and lies

956
1:01:36 --> 1:01:39
and payments that have bent the public science

957
1:01:40 --> 1:01:42
to a particular narrative.

958
1:01:42 --> 1:01:44
Anyone who goes against it loses their position,

959
1:01:44 --> 1:01:47
doesn't get grants, can't get published, is crushed.

960
1:01:47 --> 1:01:49
So that's a lie too.

961
1:01:49 --> 1:01:52
I personally, this is slightly more controversial.

962
1:01:52 --> 1:01:57
I think there's 60 years of propaganda about overpopulation.

963
1:01:57 --> 1:01:59
I personally don't think that's happened.

964
1:01:59 --> 1:02:01
I think people talking in those terms,

965
1:02:02 --> 1:02:05
it's the most anti-human argument I've ever heard.

966
1:02:05 --> 1:02:08
It's like, who do you think should go then

967
1:02:08 --> 1:02:09
if you think there are too many people?

968
1:02:09 --> 1:02:10
Who is it you're going to kill?

969
1:02:11 --> 1:02:16
Because I think they are absolutely determined,

970
1:02:16 --> 1:02:19
organized, and it's irrational.

971
1:02:19 --> 1:02:21
I think we're not overpopulated.

972
1:02:21 --> 1:02:22
We're not damaging.

973
1:02:22 --> 1:02:24
We're not committing global warming.

974
1:02:24 --> 1:02:29
So why are they trapping us and beginning to kill us?

975
1:02:29 --> 1:02:31
And I have no explanation.

976
1:02:31 --> 1:02:35
There's no rational reason for them to do what they're doing.

977
1:02:35 --> 1:02:37
And so I'm looking for an irrational one.

978
1:02:37 --> 1:02:41
And I think in the end, it comes down to dark forces.

979
1:02:41 --> 1:02:43
I've run out of explanations.

980
1:02:45 --> 1:02:48
But it looks to me they are diabolical, literally.

981
1:02:49 --> 1:02:49
Yeah.

982
1:02:50 --> 1:02:51
They're in a deadly couple.

983
1:02:51 --> 1:02:52
I think this is good and evil.

984
1:02:52 --> 1:02:53
It's good and evil.

985
1:02:53 --> 1:02:57
So those three people, Mike, we've had all three of those.

986
1:02:57 --> 1:02:59
Catherine Watts, Sasha Latapova, David Rogers Webb,

987
1:03:00 --> 1:03:02
Honours Guests, and I'm a friend of that.

988
1:03:02 --> 1:03:03
It's fantastic.

989
1:03:03 --> 1:03:04
Fantastic.

990
1:03:04 --> 1:03:05
Yeah, that's great.

991
1:03:05 --> 1:03:08
Well, then it means you can glue them together.

992
1:03:09 --> 1:03:12
And although it will be shocking, find a way to explain to people.

993
1:03:12 --> 1:03:15
So you can't just go in and tell them all this stuff.

994
1:03:15 --> 1:03:20
But my wife tells me, and she is right, she says, you can't lecture people.

995
1:03:20 --> 1:03:21
They are repelled.

996
1:03:22 --> 1:03:23
Not because you're not believable.

997
1:03:23 --> 1:03:25
You were very believable.

998
1:03:25 --> 1:03:27
But because you were believable, it's horrifying.

999
1:03:27 --> 1:03:34
She said, I've watched you talk to people and they go pale and they shrink and they move away.

1000
1:03:34 --> 1:03:37
And it's like they're frightened of what you're telling them.

1001
1:03:37 --> 1:03:38
She said, you can't do it.

1002
1:03:38 --> 1:03:40
She said, you can't do it that you can do it with a professional

1003
1:03:40 --> 1:03:44
who's trying to help because they kind of they will steal themselves.

1004
1:03:44 --> 1:03:48
You know, they're used to dealing with difficult things like police and army and

1005
1:03:48 --> 1:03:49
doctors and so on.

1006
1:03:49 --> 1:03:51
They're used to dealing with bad news.

1007
1:03:51 --> 1:03:53
But the average member of the public is not.

1008
1:03:54 --> 1:03:57
And she said, if you come up to them like that, they would just run away.

1009
1:03:57 --> 1:03:59
She said, you've got to ask them rhetorical questions.

1010
1:03:59 --> 1:04:01
Well, I'm no good at that, ladies and gentlemen.

1011
1:04:01 --> 1:04:05
So please go and do that because I'm not good at that.

1012
1:04:05 --> 1:04:09
I'm I get on my soapbox and I lecture and it repels people.

1013
1:04:09 --> 1:04:11
But you can do a better job with other people.

1014
1:04:11 --> 1:04:12
Thank you.

1015
1:04:12 --> 1:04:19
And the problem, Mike, is this and maybe you've noticed it and that when you talk to people

1016
1:04:19 --> 1:04:23
and you frighten them, unfortunately, they even know you're a good person and you're telling

1017
1:04:23 --> 1:04:29
the truth and a bit of them doesn't like the person they're hearing the truth from.

1018
1:04:29 --> 1:04:30
Absolutely.

1019
1:04:30 --> 1:04:34
Yet my own sister, who used to say she loves me and how are you, little brother?

1020
1:04:34 --> 1:04:36
She says you've lost your mind.

1021
1:04:36 --> 1:04:37
You are a conspiracy theorist.

1022
1:04:37 --> 1:04:39
You've been captured.

1023
1:04:39 --> 1:04:40
Don't ever speak to me again.

1024
1:04:42 --> 1:04:47
And that was that was very upsetting because she was she was my bloody hero when I was a kid.

1025
1:04:47 --> 1:04:48
She's five years older than me.

1026
1:04:48 --> 1:04:51
She has a PhD in fungal genetics.

1027
1:04:51 --> 1:04:54
She's a clever lady, but she thinks I'm crazy.

1028
1:04:55 --> 1:04:56
And I'm stopped.

1029
1:04:56 --> 1:04:59
I've stopped trying because she lives in Australia.

1030
1:04:59 --> 1:05:01
If I could go and speak to her, it might be different.

1031
1:05:02 --> 1:05:05
All my family in the UK are absolutely onside and they always were.

1032
1:05:06 --> 1:05:09
So my sister, my kids, their kids work.

1033
1:05:09 --> 1:05:10
Sorry.

1034
1:05:10 --> 1:05:11
Which city is she in?

1035
1:05:11 --> 1:05:12
She's in Adelaide.

1036
1:05:12 --> 1:05:13
All right.

1037
1:05:14 --> 1:05:16
I was thinking if she was in Melbourne, maybe Charleston.

1038
1:05:17 --> 1:05:18
Yeah, yeah.

1039
1:05:18 --> 1:05:19
I think so.

1040
1:05:19 --> 1:05:23
People have people have tried on my behalf and she really didn't like it.

1041
1:05:23 --> 1:05:26
She told me I understand that she thought I was stalking her.

1042
1:05:27 --> 1:05:28
It is understandable.

1043
1:05:28 --> 1:05:29
It didn't go well.

1044
1:05:30 --> 1:05:32
So I'm not I won't try.

1045
1:05:32 --> 1:05:33
I was just trying to save her, you know, but.

1046
1:05:33 --> 1:05:34
Yeah, I understand.

1047
1:05:34 --> 1:05:37
Anyway, Charles, can I just say this?

1048
1:05:37 --> 1:05:38
There's one thing I want to say.

1049
1:05:38 --> 1:05:39
Yeah.

1050
1:05:39 --> 1:05:46
So, Mike, as a medical doctor, I've observed that in particular in the United Kingdom,

1051
1:05:46 --> 1:05:52
our country where everything was rather soft, but these people like Boris Johnson were saying,

1052
1:05:52 --> 1:05:58
you must say at home, they must have known they must have known

1053
1:05:58 --> 1:06:04
as any doctor should have known that we're highly social animals, human beings.

1054
1:06:04 --> 1:06:11
And to lock people down, lock human beings down, they must have known was pure evil.

1055
1:06:12 --> 1:06:17
And I think the United Kingdom, we had to endure this bloody a nudge unit,

1056
1:06:17 --> 1:06:18
you know, whatever it's called.

1057
1:06:18 --> 1:06:19
I can't remember.

1058
1:06:19 --> 1:06:20
Behavioral insights team.

1059
1:06:20 --> 1:06:21
Yeah, yeah.

1060
1:06:21 --> 1:06:26
And that was the final, final nail for me.

1061
1:06:26 --> 1:06:27
I just observed it.

1062
1:06:27 --> 1:06:31
I thought I was immune to the psychological torture that was going on in every country

1063
1:06:31 --> 1:06:34
in the world, but particularly in the United Kingdom.

1064
1:06:34 --> 1:06:40
And we must we British men must hold our bastard government to account for this.

1065
1:06:40 --> 1:06:43
They did, which they must have known.

1066
1:06:43 --> 1:06:47
And if they didn't, they should have known was evil.

1067
1:06:47 --> 1:06:48
And why was it evil?

1068
1:06:48 --> 1:06:49
Because it was anti-human.

1069
1:06:50 --> 1:06:53
It was not right to lock people down.

1070
1:06:53 --> 1:06:55
We're highly social animals.

1071
1:06:56 --> 1:06:59
In the country should have been shouting like from the rooftops like I know.

1072
1:06:59 --> 1:07:01
And that's that's very depressing.

1073
1:07:01 --> 1:07:05
And the so I know a lot of people get very angry with our politicians.

1074
1:07:05 --> 1:07:07
And I do too.

1075
1:07:07 --> 1:07:12
But I never really thought that the elected politicians were in charge.

1076
1:07:13 --> 1:07:18
Even when I was a normie and I believe things, I thought you remember Blair used to think

1077
1:07:18 --> 1:07:19
about Blair's style.

1078
1:07:19 --> 1:07:22
I think it was called so for government.

1079
1:07:22 --> 1:07:26
And I think it really meant government by informal conversation.

1080
1:07:27 --> 1:07:33
And I'd watched enough of the British political comedy called Yes, Minister and its successor,

1081
1:07:33 --> 1:07:39
Yes, Prime Minister to to understand that white whitehall has run a significant part

1082
1:07:39 --> 1:07:42
of the world for, I think, four or five hundred years.

1083
1:07:43 --> 1:07:45
And I doubt they lost any lessons.

1084
1:07:45 --> 1:07:52
I imagine every lesson learned on the effectiveness of controlling people's behavior.

1085
1:07:52 --> 1:07:57
Incentivizing them to do things, incentivizing them not to do things.

1086
1:07:57 --> 1:08:05
I imagine those lessons have been have been learned and bottled and reused and amplified

1087
1:08:05 --> 1:08:07
nowhere better than Westminster.

1088
1:08:07 --> 1:08:15
You know, and so I don't think the 650 MPs have any significant power where it comes

1089
1:08:15 --> 1:08:16
to things like this.

1090
1:08:16 --> 1:08:22
They may be able to get a campaign going in their constituency for some particular thing.

1091
1:08:22 --> 1:08:27
But I don't I don't think the government's even faintly interested in what any or all

1092
1:08:27 --> 1:08:28
of the MPs say.

1093
1:08:28 --> 1:08:32
And I don't think that they are particularly well briefed.

1094
1:08:32 --> 1:08:34
They're not selected because they're clever and knowledgeable.

1095
1:08:35 --> 1:08:41
So but of course, what they act as, there was a bloody barrier between me through my

1096
1:08:42 --> 1:08:46
constituent, CMP Rosie Duffield, who's stupid.

1097
1:08:47 --> 1:08:49
I mean, I've written to and had many conversations with her office.

1098
1:08:49 --> 1:08:52
But they don't they're not interested.

1099
1:08:52 --> 1:08:54
That's not their job.

1100
1:08:54 --> 1:08:59
And you won't get people in Whitehall, you know, closest I've got is a couple of visits

1101
1:08:59 --> 1:09:05
up there with with Andrew Bridgen, you know, and he's not he's not in charge either.

1102
1:09:05 --> 1:09:08
I don't I doubt I doubt the prime minister.

1103
1:09:08 --> 1:09:11
I don't think Boris Johnson had anything to do with this.

1104
1:09:11 --> 1:09:13
I doubt he had any role in the planning.

1105
1:09:13 --> 1:09:17
I suspect he was told about it at some point.

1106
1:09:17 --> 1:09:20
And his job was to be the puppet that went out and told people what to do.

1107
1:09:21 --> 1:09:22
That's my guess.

1108
1:09:22 --> 1:09:28
I think there are a few people who my my instincts tell me were centrally involved.

1109
1:09:28 --> 1:09:31
I think I think Blair is centrally involved.

1110
1:09:31 --> 1:09:38
I think he's been a major criminal and people who run the Wellcome Trust, you know,

1111
1:09:38 --> 1:09:39
Sir Jeremy Farrar and his successors.

1112
1:09:39 --> 1:09:43
I'm pretty sure I've written this down, by the way, in the past.

1113
1:09:43 --> 1:09:48
By the way, in the past and usually what happens when you sound to people is you get

1114
1:09:48 --> 1:09:51
injuncted or prosecuted and it's not happened.

1115
1:09:52 --> 1:09:58
So it is a matter of fact that the Wellcome Trust, the National Institute of Health under

1116
1:09:58 --> 1:10:05
Fauci and the Bill and Linda Gates Foundation under Christopher Elias, who's the science

1117
1:10:05 --> 1:10:13
guy for Gates, those three people for Fauci and Elias were known to have met on an offer,

1118
1:10:13 --> 1:10:19
I think 30 years and between them, they controlled roughly two thirds of the private biomedical

1119
1:10:20 --> 1:10:23
research budget outside of drug companies.

1120
1:10:23 --> 1:10:28
And I think that means they have been able to shape the entire environment in human biology

1121
1:10:28 --> 1:10:29
for up to 30 years.

1122
1:10:29 --> 1:10:34
And so the literature says what they decided it to say, because if you're a professor or

1123
1:10:34 --> 1:10:39
a graduate student and you apply for a grant, you'll get one if you're a tier to whatever

1124
1:10:39 --> 1:10:45
the lines to take are and you'll know that from your provost and then from the minister

1125
1:10:45 --> 1:10:51
in Whitehall and your research needs to conclude with manuscripts that say this kind of thing or

1126
1:10:51 --> 1:10:54
it won't get published or only in a low impact journal.

1127
1:10:54 --> 1:11:00
And you just keep repeating the process over decades and the literature says what the

1128
1:11:00 --> 1:11:01
controllers wanted to say.

1129
1:11:01 --> 1:11:02
It's as simple as that.

1130
1:11:02 --> 1:11:05
I always knew I hated academia.

1131
1:11:05 --> 1:11:08
Now I know why I hated academia because it's got worse and worse.

1132
1:11:08 --> 1:11:11
And everyone I know professors of immunology and they say, oh, it's terrible.

1133
1:11:12 --> 1:11:16
I say, well, how can you tolerate being in this environment where you're not even really

1134
1:11:16 --> 1:11:16
doing research?

1135
1:11:16 --> 1:11:21
You're you're helping to shape an agenda and an environment that other people have created

1136
1:11:21 --> 1:11:22
for you.

1137
1:11:22 --> 1:11:23
And it's like they shrug.

1138
1:11:23 --> 1:11:26
It's like you have to get a company car, get full pension two years.

1139
1:11:26 --> 1:11:28
It's like, oh, yeah.

1140
1:11:28 --> 1:11:33
So I say to say this to people, if you're frightened of what will happen, if you speak out,

1141
1:11:35 --> 1:11:37
imagine what's going to happen if you don't speak out.

1142
1:11:38 --> 1:11:42
Do you think these people are going to go away having done what they've done?

1143
1:11:43 --> 1:11:44
Do you think this is over?

1144
1:11:45 --> 1:11:51
No, they will do either other things or this kind of thing again.

1145
1:11:51 --> 1:11:55
And just just very briefly, given you've heard from Katherine Walsh,

1146
1:11:55 --> 1:12:00
Sassilisipova and David Rogers Webb and me, I think the four things that are going to occur,

1147
1:12:00 --> 1:12:01
we don't stop them.

1148
1:12:01 --> 1:12:03
Let me tell you what I think will happen.

1149
1:12:03 --> 1:12:08
I think number one, a new event will trigger obligatory digital ID.

1150
1:12:08 --> 1:12:12
And at some point, you'll have to have it, for example, to get rations.

1151
1:12:12 --> 1:12:13
They'll make you have it.

1152
1:12:14 --> 1:12:20
Second, if the triggering event for this digital ID isn't a financial crisis,

1153
1:12:21 --> 1:12:25
then there'll be a financial crisis, as I described earlier.

1154
1:12:25 --> 1:12:29
It will destroy all sovereign currencies and steal all private wealth.

1155
1:12:29 --> 1:12:31
Then you'll have total dependence on the state.

1156
1:12:31 --> 1:12:36
If you haven't got your own resources and they will introduce central bank digital currencies,

1157
1:12:37 --> 1:12:42
then the media will continue to lie about things like waves of pandemics.

1158
1:12:43 --> 1:12:44
There'll be a…

1159
1:12:44 --> 1:12:46
The WHO will tell you there's a pandemic.

1160
1:12:46 --> 1:12:50
Far more will pretend to make mRNA, quote, vaccines.

1161
1:12:50 --> 1:12:53
Governments will mandate them if the WHO hasn't already done so.

1162
1:12:54 --> 1:12:59
Your digital ID that in step one you're made to take will depend…

1163
1:12:59 --> 1:13:01
Its validity will depend on you being jabbed.

1164
1:13:02 --> 1:13:03
No jab, no food.

1165
1:13:03 --> 1:13:04
No jab, no money.

1166
1:13:04 --> 1:13:05
No jab, no job.

1167
1:13:05 --> 1:13:06
No jab, no travel.

1168
1:13:07 --> 1:13:10
Your CDBDC will simply not work.

1169
1:13:10 --> 1:13:13
And then four, rinse and repeat until the population reaches the desired levels.

1170
1:13:14 --> 1:13:17
I think they're going to empty whole countries.

1171
1:13:17 --> 1:13:17
That's what I would do.

1172
1:13:18 --> 1:13:25
So what I'm saying is we have to stop at the step of obligatory digital ID.

1173
1:13:25 --> 1:13:29
I think that's the last thing they need us to choose to do.

1174
1:13:30 --> 1:13:34
If they make us successfully adopt digital ID,

1175
1:13:34 --> 1:13:37
they don't need our consent for any of the other steps I mentioned.

1176
1:13:38 --> 1:13:39
Right?

1177
1:13:39 --> 1:13:44
If you concede that you have to have a digital ID in order to enter or leave a facility,

1178
1:13:46 --> 1:13:50
make a transaction, buy food, get on a plane, fill your car.

1179
1:13:50 --> 1:13:54
If you accept that principle, they can do the things I've just said.

1180
1:13:54 --> 1:13:55
And they will do those things.

1181
1:13:55 --> 1:13:56
Of course they will.

1182
1:13:57 --> 1:13:58
I would.

1183
1:13:58 --> 1:14:02
If I was as diabolical as them, that's what I would do.

1184
1:14:02 --> 1:14:05
And so I say now to the people on this call,

1185
1:14:06 --> 1:14:08
my wife and I are not going to take a digital ID.

1186
1:14:09 --> 1:14:13
If it means we lose all our money, we will lose all our money.

1187
1:14:13 --> 1:14:15
We're not fucking taking a digital ID.

1188
1:14:16 --> 1:14:21
I would rather go to my grave as an analog man than take digital ID.

1189
1:14:21 --> 1:14:25
Because if you gain a digital ID, you don't gain a digital ID.

1190
1:14:25 --> 1:14:28
You lose your humanity and you become a QR code.

1191
1:14:29 --> 1:14:31
And you're controlled like a…

1192
1:14:31 --> 1:14:36
You become an avatar and you will be controlled and you will be taken to your death.

1193
1:14:37 --> 1:14:38
So don't take it.

1194
1:14:38 --> 1:14:40
You don't need digital ID.

1195
1:14:40 --> 1:14:43
They need you to take it in order to control you.

1196
1:14:43 --> 1:14:44
So don't concede it.

1197
1:14:44 --> 1:14:48
And the worse the punishment that they threaten you with for not taking it,

1198
1:14:48 --> 1:14:49
the more you'll know I'm right.

1199
1:14:50 --> 1:14:55
So please say to each other, say to other people, tell your boss.

1200
1:14:56 --> 1:14:57
I think it's like giving up smoking.

1201
1:14:57 --> 1:14:59
Tell everybody what you're going to do.

1202
1:15:00 --> 1:15:07
And I think if we can stop them and tell people digital ID will provide total control.

1203
1:15:08 --> 1:15:10
If not now, if you think, no, they wouldn't do that.

1204
1:15:10 --> 1:15:12
Well, what about in the future?

1205
1:15:12 --> 1:15:14
You're so sure that at no point in the future,

1206
1:15:15 --> 1:15:18
anyone ever wants to control you because they will be able to.

1207
1:15:18 --> 1:15:24
If you have to present it to any transactions like the mark in Revelation,

1208
1:15:24 --> 1:15:25
just don't take it.

1209
1:15:25 --> 1:15:26
That's about the most…

1210
1:15:28 --> 1:15:31
As I'm saying this to you, I'm feeling my power grow.

1211
1:15:31 --> 1:15:34
I'm not taking it no matter the consequences.

1212
1:15:35 --> 1:15:36
Good for you, Mike.

1213
1:15:36 --> 1:15:39
So, Mike, if you want to rest from all your work,

1214
1:15:40 --> 1:15:43
we live by the sea and you're welcome here anytime with your family.

1215
1:15:44 --> 1:15:45
Lovely.

1216
1:15:45 --> 1:15:46
We definitely should meet.

1217
1:15:46 --> 1:15:47
Are you in England?

1218
1:15:47 --> 1:15:48
Yes.

1219
1:15:48 --> 1:15:49
Wales, actually.

1220
1:15:49 --> 1:15:50
Depends whether you…

1221
1:15:50 --> 1:15:51
Oh, yeah, yeah.

1222
1:15:51 --> 1:15:52
Of course, yes.

1223
1:15:52 --> 1:15:53
The United Kingdom, yeah.

1224
1:15:53 --> 1:15:54
In the UK.

1225
1:15:55 --> 1:15:56
Thank you, Stephen.

1226
1:15:57 --> 1:15:57
Thank you.

1227
1:15:57 --> 1:15:58
It's lovely to speak to you.

1228
1:15:58 --> 1:15:59
Brilliant, Michael.

1229
1:15:59 --> 1:16:00
Thank you so much.

1230
1:16:00 --> 1:16:01
Thank you very much.

1231
1:16:01 --> 1:16:02
Is there any other…

1232
1:16:03 --> 1:16:05
Is there like a really important…

1233
1:16:05 --> 1:16:08
There are 11 people with their hands up.

1234
1:16:08 --> 1:16:09
Yeah, 11 people with their hands up.

1235
1:16:09 --> 1:16:11
Mike, are you on your phone, Mike?

1236
1:16:12 --> 1:16:14
No, I'm on a laptop.

1237
1:16:14 --> 1:16:17
Yeah, so maybe if you strike the screen,

1238
1:16:17 --> 1:16:18
you'll see there's 11 hands up,

1239
1:16:18 --> 1:16:19
so we've got lots of questions for you.

1240
1:16:19 --> 1:16:22
So the speed with which you get through them

1241
1:16:22 --> 1:16:23
will depend on the speed of your answers.

1242
1:16:23 --> 1:16:24
So there you are.

1243
1:16:24 --> 1:16:26
But wonderful, wonderful material.

1244
1:16:26 --> 1:16:29
And Stephen, you didn't take more time

1245
1:16:29 --> 1:16:32
because Mike was speaking, so I absolutely get that.

1246
1:16:33 --> 1:16:34
Yeah.

1247
1:16:34 --> 1:16:38
So, Charles, I think that Mike doesn't maybe know

1248
1:16:38 --> 1:16:40
how to get the view up so he can see the gallery, you know?

1249
1:16:40 --> 1:16:43
So he can see people who are posing.

1250
1:16:43 --> 1:16:44
So if you explain…

1251
1:16:44 --> 1:16:44
I can now.

1252
1:16:44 --> 1:16:45
Yeah, I can.

1253
1:16:46 --> 1:16:47
So you know how to do it, do you, Mike?

1254
1:16:48 --> 1:16:49
I can see that.

1255
1:16:49 --> 1:16:51
Yes, I can see a whole fluster of…

1256
1:16:51 --> 1:16:53
I thought they were like little gold stars,

1257
1:16:53 --> 1:16:55
but yeah, that's because my glasses aren't very good.

1258
1:16:56 --> 1:16:56
They're hands.

1259
1:16:56 --> 1:16:57
I see they are hands.

1260
1:16:57 --> 1:17:00
Okay, well, let's get through them.

1261
1:17:00 --> 1:17:01
Let's get through them, Mike,

1262
1:17:01 --> 1:17:03
because we've only got 50 minutes before we have to go.

1263
1:17:04 --> 1:17:06
So, Theresa, you were first.

1264
1:17:06 --> 1:17:09
Did you drop out accidentally or deliberately?

1265
1:17:10 --> 1:17:12
No, mate, I lost my signal.

1266
1:17:13 --> 1:17:13
Okay, go for it.

1267
1:17:13 --> 1:17:14
Well, I don't know.

1268
1:17:14 --> 1:17:15
You go first, and…

1269
1:17:15 --> 1:17:15
All right.

1270
1:17:17 --> 1:17:18
Okay, thank you.

1271
1:17:18 --> 1:17:18
Thank you.

1272
1:17:19 --> 1:17:21
It's just a quick one, Mike.

1273
1:17:24 --> 1:17:28
In 2021 and 2022 and 2023,

1274
1:17:28 --> 1:17:30
I've been saying to the various medical groups

1275
1:17:30 --> 1:17:32
that I'm a hanger on to,

1276
1:17:33 --> 1:17:37
that we have to write a kind of sucker punch letter

1277
1:17:37 --> 1:17:42
where you write not just to one police chief constable in the UK,

1278
1:17:42 --> 1:17:44
but to all of them.

1279
1:17:45 --> 1:17:46
The same letter.

1280
1:17:46 --> 1:17:48
On balance of probabilities,

1281
1:17:48 --> 1:17:50
there are 49 chief constables in the UK.

1282
1:17:51 --> 1:17:53
On balance of probabilities,

1283
1:17:53 --> 1:17:55
you'll probably have five chief constables

1284
1:17:55 --> 1:17:56
that are not vaccinated

1285
1:17:57 --> 1:18:01
or that have serious doubts about what's going on.

1286
1:18:01 --> 1:18:04
There are 32, or they were the last time I looked,

1287
1:18:04 --> 1:18:05
full-time coroners

1288
1:18:06 --> 1:18:09
and part-time coroners that supplement their work.

1289
1:18:09 --> 1:18:13
On balance of probability, you might have three coroners.

1290
1:18:13 --> 1:18:19
Now, it's no good writing to one, like the Metropolitan Police,

1291
1:18:20 --> 1:18:22
and expecting him to sort of stand up

1292
1:18:23 --> 1:18:27
when there's 48 other chief constables who aren't.

1293
1:18:27 --> 1:18:29
But if we approach all of them at the same time,

1294
1:18:29 --> 1:18:30
I agree.

1295
1:18:30 --> 1:18:33
And unite the ones that…

1296
1:18:34 --> 1:18:36
Five chief constables is a coalition.

1297
1:18:36 --> 1:18:39
Five chief constables can do anything, Mike.

1298
1:18:39 --> 1:18:40
Yeah, no, I agree with you.

1299
1:18:40 --> 1:18:41
I think that's great.

1300
1:18:42 --> 1:18:43
So I say to people,

1301
1:18:46 --> 1:18:47
somebody please use that stuff.

1302
1:18:48 --> 1:18:51
I'll tell you what has happened over the last four years

1303
1:18:51 --> 1:18:54
is I get lots of good suggestions of more work for me to do,

1304
1:18:54 --> 1:18:55
and I'm knackered.

1305
1:18:56 --> 1:18:56
Right?

1306
1:18:56 --> 1:18:59
So I want someone to say,

1307
1:18:59 --> 1:19:02
I'm going to take your letter and put 49 addresses on it,

1308
1:19:02 --> 1:19:03
and then you can just check it.

1309
1:19:03 --> 1:19:05
So, okay, and then I will send it.

1310
1:19:05 --> 1:19:06
That would be a great idea.

1311
1:19:06 --> 1:19:10
Because the idea that I will do it is that I just won't get to do it.

1312
1:19:10 --> 1:19:11
I'm just so…

1313
1:19:12 --> 1:19:14
I'm at a point where I recognise clinical depression.

1314
1:19:15 --> 1:19:15
Right?

1315
1:19:15 --> 1:19:19
I sometimes can't do anything, and I analyse why I can't do it,

1316
1:19:19 --> 1:19:21
and I've got to the conclusion it's like,

1317
1:19:21 --> 1:19:24
you're probably suffering from either trauma or depression.

1318
1:19:25 --> 1:19:28
So I'm sure there are lots of great ideas.

1319
1:19:28 --> 1:19:30
I'm telling you, I'm a wounded soldier.

1320
1:19:30 --> 1:19:31
So use me.

1321
1:19:32 --> 1:19:34
Please don't expect me to do more now.

1322
1:19:36 --> 1:19:40
Well, with the help of a couple of the doctors in the group,

1323
1:19:40 --> 1:19:42
and by cribbing from Ryan Cole's notes,

1324
1:19:42 --> 1:19:43
I hope you're still on the call line.

1325
1:19:43 --> 1:19:45
Yeah, it's a great suggestion.

1326
1:19:45 --> 1:19:47
I think it's a really, really good, really important idea.

1327
1:19:47 --> 1:19:51
I'm happy for somebody to take the idea of a letter

1328
1:19:51 --> 1:19:54
and just, you know, whittle it down to two pages,

1329
1:19:54 --> 1:19:55
send it to all of them.

1330
1:19:55 --> 1:19:55
Please.

1331
1:19:55 --> 1:19:58
I think really it's like the arrangement

1332
1:19:59 --> 1:20:01
at the top of the letter, as it were.

1333
1:20:01 --> 1:20:03
It's like, who the hell are we writing to?

1334
1:20:03 --> 1:20:05
If that was made clear, that would be,

1335
1:20:05 --> 1:20:08
that's the thing that would probably take a little bit of research,

1336
1:20:08 --> 1:20:10
but it's a really good project.

1337
1:20:10 --> 1:20:11
Basically, it's like saying,

1338
1:20:11 --> 1:20:14
I am writing to all of these named individuals.

1339
1:20:14 --> 1:20:17
So it's like a page, and then we can bung.

1340
1:20:17 --> 1:20:21
My letter's the easy bit, but I think it's a great,

1341
1:20:21 --> 1:20:22
I think it's a really important idea,

1342
1:20:22 --> 1:20:25
and we should bloody well do it within the next few weeks.

1343
1:20:25 --> 1:20:30
And to take it further, Theresa, to the DPPs, okay?

1344
1:20:30 --> 1:20:31
So the police, yes?

1345
1:20:31 --> 1:20:31
Yeah, yeah.

1346
1:20:33 --> 1:20:36
I just think that if you can, in confidence,

1347
1:20:36 --> 1:20:41
go to each of them and say, look, you're not alone.

1348
1:20:41 --> 1:20:44
We will unite you in confidence.

1349
1:20:44 --> 1:20:46
We will help you form a coalition.

1350
1:20:47 --> 1:20:49
They can take down one chief constable,

1351
1:20:49 --> 1:20:51
but they can't take down five or six.

1352
1:20:51 --> 1:20:52
Yeah, I agree.

1353
1:20:52 --> 1:20:53
Yeah, not all at once.

1354
1:20:54 --> 1:20:57
Basically, I think what you're saying,

1355
1:20:57 --> 1:20:58
and I have thought of this, I've thought,

1356
1:20:58 --> 1:21:01
if we are effective, we'll force them to change tack.

1357
1:21:02 --> 1:21:05
It won't be easy for them.

1358
1:21:05 --> 1:21:06
I don't know that they'd be able to stop,

1359
1:21:06 --> 1:21:09
but they will be forced to change tack.

1360
1:21:09 --> 1:21:11
And I think if they're forced to change tack,

1361
1:21:11 --> 1:21:13
it'll wake a lot more people up.

1362
1:21:13 --> 1:21:15
So I think that's the catalyst.

1363
1:21:16 --> 1:21:19
We must do something to put them off their stroke, really.

1364
1:21:19 --> 1:21:23
Otherwise, they'll just keep going,

1365
1:21:23 --> 1:21:24
and they may well be on track.

1366
1:21:24 --> 1:21:25
I have no idea.

1367
1:21:25 --> 1:21:27
I haven't got a copy of the script.

1368
1:21:27 --> 1:21:29
I think it's a great idea, Theresa, really.

1369
1:21:29 --> 1:21:30
Thanks, Mike.

1370
1:21:30 --> 1:21:31
Okay, well done.

1371
1:21:31 --> 1:21:32
Excellent.

1372
1:21:32 --> 1:21:32
Yeah.

1373
1:21:33 --> 1:21:34
Thank you, Theresa.

1374
1:21:34 --> 1:21:34
Daria.

1375
1:21:36 --> 1:21:37
Mike, hi.

1376
1:21:37 --> 1:21:38
My name is Daria Schuller.

1377
1:21:38 --> 1:21:40
I'm a retired neurosurgeon and pharmacist,

1378
1:21:40 --> 1:21:42
and I've worked in the pharmaceutical industry

1379
1:21:42 --> 1:21:44
when I was moonlighting during college.

1380
1:21:45 --> 1:21:47
And I'm still involved with the United States Pharmacopeia

1381
1:21:47 --> 1:21:50
at my state of Indiana level as a delegate.

1382
1:21:50 --> 1:21:55
So I did share one handout in the chat.

1383
1:21:55 --> 1:21:57
So hopefully, if you need it, I can get it to you

1384
1:21:57 --> 1:21:58
if you're interested.

1385
1:21:58 --> 1:22:00
But they're not stopping.

1386
1:22:00 --> 1:22:04
This whole mRNA is going on full steam ahead.

1387
1:22:04 --> 1:22:06
And that's probably the most important message

1388
1:22:06 --> 1:22:08
I have to get to everybody here today,

1389
1:22:08 --> 1:22:14
that in the hopper is something close to over 300 drug products,

1390
1:22:14 --> 1:22:17
the vast majority of which are vaccines, okay?

1391
1:22:17 --> 1:22:20
And then fewer for the orphan drugs

1392
1:22:20 --> 1:22:22
and genetic disorders and cancer.

1393
1:22:22 --> 1:22:23
So this isn't stopping.

1394
1:22:24 --> 1:22:26
The only way it stops is when people say no.

1395
1:22:26 --> 1:22:30
And say if they hear mRNA, they should run screaming.

1396
1:22:31 --> 1:22:33
This is not a good technology for cancer.

1397
1:22:33 --> 1:22:35
I was dealing with this when I was at the Cleveland Clinic

1398
1:22:35 --> 1:22:38
and after with my patients that had malignant brain tumors

1399
1:22:38 --> 1:22:41
and the early neuroimmuno therapies that were tried.

1400
1:22:41 --> 1:22:44
I remember referring a patient back to the Cleveland Clinic

1401
1:22:44 --> 1:22:46
and didn't do well at all.

1402
1:22:46 --> 1:22:47
Didn't do well at all.

1403
1:22:47 --> 1:22:51
It's just like didn't even come close to stopping this disease.

1404
1:22:51 --> 1:22:53
But the thing that struck me,

1405
1:22:53 --> 1:22:55
and I want to use the word resonance

1406
1:22:55 --> 1:22:58
because it resonates back to us now that you're still here

1407
1:22:58 --> 1:23:01
and the things you said four years ago,

1408
1:23:01 --> 1:23:03
three years ago, you're still saying now.

1409
1:23:03 --> 1:23:05
And that rings a really loud bell

1410
1:23:05 --> 1:23:08
because you've been consistent the entire time.

1411
1:23:08 --> 1:23:11
And I understand that pharmaceutical side of it

1412
1:23:11 --> 1:23:14
and that's why I was very concerned about mRNA as well.

1413
1:23:15 --> 1:23:18
I saw the Reuters did one of the first hit pieces on me,

1414
1:23:18 --> 1:23:20
I think in March of 2021.

1415
1:23:20 --> 1:23:22
But I remember hearing an interview with you

1416
1:23:23 --> 1:23:25
and I can't remember who the host was,

1417
1:23:25 --> 1:23:28
but you were talking about, and I think Dr. Bender's,

1418
1:23:29 --> 1:23:31
I've seen this on his Twitter as well,

1419
1:23:31 --> 1:23:35
how you don't go vaccinating people during a pandemic

1420
1:23:35 --> 1:23:37
because if there's active infection

1421
1:23:37 --> 1:23:41
and then you introduce an injected antigen

1422
1:23:43 --> 1:23:46
that it could be catastrophic, which it was.

1423
1:23:46 --> 1:23:50
And I just wondered if you recall making that comment.

1424
1:23:51 --> 1:23:55
I think it was, I can't remember his name,

1425
1:23:55 --> 1:23:58
but there's a guy, others will remember,

1426
1:23:58 --> 1:24:01
but yeah, that may or may not be true.

1427
1:24:01 --> 1:24:03
Personally, I don't think there was a pandemic.

1428
1:24:03 --> 1:24:05
I'm not even sure pandemics are possible.

1429
1:24:07 --> 1:24:10
The Spanish flu, for example, this is not my research.

1430
1:24:10 --> 1:24:13
Unbelievable, there are a couple of descendants

1431
1:24:13 --> 1:24:16
of Yorkshire farmers who run a podcast

1432
1:24:16 --> 1:24:18
called the Sheep Farm Podcast.

1433
1:24:18 --> 1:24:20
And they are unbelievable.

1434
1:24:20 --> 1:24:26
These guys do family tree research going back to 1700s.

1435
1:24:26 --> 1:24:29
I'm sorry, the people who are doing this,

1436
1:24:30 --> 1:24:33
their descendants go back to that sort of period.

1437
1:24:33 --> 1:24:35
I mean, in fact, they may go back much further,

1438
1:24:35 --> 1:24:39
but we can find the receipts of all the influences

1439
1:24:39 --> 1:24:41
definitely back to there.

1440
1:24:42 --> 1:24:45
I've forgotten the train of thinking there,

1441
1:24:45 --> 1:24:48
but yeah, the pandemic stuff.

1442
1:24:48 --> 1:24:51
So the Spanish flu stuff is there wasn't a pandemic then.

1443
1:24:53 --> 1:24:55
It was nothing like what we've been told.

1444
1:24:55 --> 1:24:58
Something happened, I don't know what the something was,

1445
1:24:58 --> 1:25:00
and then they inserted information

1446
1:25:00 --> 1:25:02
into the literature afterwards,

1447
1:25:02 --> 1:25:04
which makes it look like there was a pandemic.

1448
1:25:04 --> 1:25:07
In other words, I am saying there's at least

1449
1:25:07 --> 1:25:09
a hundred years of rehearsal.

1450
1:25:09 --> 1:25:11
Now, people who understand formation

1451
1:25:11 --> 1:25:14
around the Federal Reserve are not surprised.

1452
1:25:14 --> 1:25:15
They go, well, we knew that.

1453
1:25:15 --> 1:25:16
I think it goes back.

1454
1:25:17 --> 1:25:20
Honestly, it goes back further than we can imagine.

1455
1:25:20 --> 1:25:22
I know some people who think it goes back to ancient Egypt,

1456
1:25:23 --> 1:25:27
but it definitely goes back to more than a hundred years.

1457
1:25:28 --> 1:25:29
So you're absolutely right.

1458
1:25:29 --> 1:25:31
Now, I personally don't,

1459
1:25:31 --> 1:25:33
the reason I wanted to intervene is

1460
1:25:33 --> 1:25:35
I don't think there are pandemics.

1461
1:25:35 --> 1:25:37
I think they're immunologically implausible.

1462
1:25:37 --> 1:25:40
I also think if they were possible,

1463
1:25:40 --> 1:25:44
we'd probably have gone from the planet repeatedly,

1464
1:25:44 --> 1:25:46
as would other species,

1465
1:25:46 --> 1:25:48
because wouldn't it also follow

1466
1:25:48 --> 1:25:50
that they could suffer from pandemics?

1467
1:25:50 --> 1:25:51
And yet they don't.

1468
1:25:53 --> 1:25:55
That's something that's not really provable, I don't think.

1469
1:25:55 --> 1:26:00
But the fact is there's so much fakery around it,

1470
1:26:00 --> 1:26:03
it makes me think, well, if it was real,

1471
1:26:03 --> 1:26:04
why wouldn't you just bloody do it?

1472
1:26:05 --> 1:26:09
The fact they have to fake it suggests to me that it isn't real.

1473
1:26:09 --> 1:26:10
But what is real is the fear

1474
1:26:11 --> 1:26:13
that if people believe it, then they're frightened.

1475
1:26:13 --> 1:26:16
Yeah, you need the fake science to prop up the fake news.

1476
1:26:16 --> 1:26:18
Absolutely, you do.

1477
1:26:18 --> 1:26:19
You need the fake science to go with the fake news.

1478
1:26:19 --> 1:26:23
So believing in pandemics, believing in contagion,

1479
1:26:24 --> 1:26:27
believing in bloody vaccines, you need all of this stuff.

1480
1:26:27 --> 1:26:29
And here's the thing, I think partly,

1481
1:26:31 --> 1:26:34
why all the long drawn out lies about climate change,

1482
1:26:34 --> 1:26:38
the long drawn out emphasis about the world's overpopulated

1483
1:26:38 --> 1:26:41
beyond its carrying capacity, I don't think that's true.

1484
1:26:41 --> 1:26:42
I think I've got an answer to that,

1485
1:26:42 --> 1:26:45
because three people have written to me, you know,

1486
1:26:46 --> 1:26:50
all by hand, you know, they've said something,

1487
1:26:50 --> 1:26:54
they all said something like, I think you're right,

1488
1:26:54 --> 1:26:57
but I think I understand why they are doing it.

1489
1:26:57 --> 1:27:01
It's like, we're destroying the world and we've deserved it.

1490
1:27:01 --> 1:27:04
So I've been written to by three people, they're not happy.

1491
1:27:04 --> 1:27:07
They're saying, this is what I've come to the conclusion,

1492
1:27:07 --> 1:27:09
that we've destroyed this world

1493
1:27:09 --> 1:27:12
and they are culling us in order to save it.

1494
1:27:12 --> 1:27:16
Well, it's not true, folks, we are not warming our climate.

1495
1:27:16 --> 1:27:20
We're not overpopulated and so on.

1496
1:27:20 --> 1:27:22
And so why are they doing it?

1497
1:27:27 --> 1:27:32
I think a lot of people give in because they think we deserve it.

1498
1:27:33 --> 1:27:34
Isn't that a terrible thing?

1499
1:27:35 --> 1:27:39
I've heard people say, well, dirty job, someone's got to do it.

1500
1:27:39 --> 1:27:42
When they finally got to realising, I'm probably right,

1501
1:27:42 --> 1:27:43
they've literally shrugged and said,

1502
1:27:43 --> 1:27:46
well, we brought it upon ourselves, folks.

1503
1:27:46 --> 1:27:49
I think it's diabolical, it's not true.

1504
1:27:49 --> 1:27:54
But I think it was designed years ago to bring about capitulation.

1505
1:27:55 --> 1:27:57
So don't give way on these other lies either.

1506
1:27:57 --> 1:28:00
I mean, I'm not an expert in those, I don't claim to be.

1507
1:28:00 --> 1:28:07
So Mike, absolutely, you and I have come to the same conclusion

1508
1:28:07 --> 1:28:11
that no pandemic has ever occurred, no pandemic can occur

1509
1:28:11 --> 1:28:14
and no pandemic will occur in the future.

1510
1:28:14 --> 1:28:17
We therefore don't need the WHO, even though we're bastards,

1511
1:28:18 --> 1:28:19
we don't need them.

1512
1:28:21 --> 1:28:24
So we need to get rid of the WHO because, not because it's evil,

1513
1:28:24 --> 1:28:27
because it is evil, but because we don't need them.

1514
1:28:27 --> 1:28:29
And that would be the ultimate humiliation.

1515
1:28:29 --> 1:28:32
I think the whole of virology and evidence-based medicine

1516
1:28:32 --> 1:28:36
was a construct to allow what's happened in 2020.

1517
1:28:36 --> 1:28:37
Yeah, I agree.

1518
1:28:37 --> 1:28:38
All right.

1519
1:28:38 --> 1:28:42
So we've come to it by different means without influencing each other.

1520
1:28:42 --> 1:28:45
So very good, both united in that conclusion.

1521
1:28:45 --> 1:28:49
And Mike, I just point out that Vera Sharov is here,

1522
1:28:49 --> 1:28:50
she's presented to us on the Spanish Flu.

1523
1:28:50 --> 1:28:54
So if you speed up the answers to your questions, Vera,

1524
1:28:54 --> 1:28:58
I'm sure we'll touch on her wonderful research on the alleged Spanish Flu.

1525
1:28:59 --> 1:29:02
So let's be quick, everybody, with the questions rather than too many,

1526
1:29:02 --> 1:29:05
because we've only got 45, 40 minutes left

1527
1:29:05 --> 1:29:06
and there's 12 hands up.

1528
1:29:06 --> 1:29:06
Go, Glenn.

1529
1:29:07 --> 1:29:09
Charles, no statements, questions, please.

1530
1:29:12 --> 1:29:13
Hey, Mike.

1531
1:29:13 --> 1:29:15
So glad to be speaking with you again.

1532
1:29:16 --> 1:29:19
In the call from God, I think that's tremendous,

1533
1:29:19 --> 1:29:21
and I'm in the same place with you there.

1534
1:29:21 --> 1:29:23
I also believe that we can save ourselves,

1535
1:29:24 --> 1:29:27
but I think it's a lot bigger count of people

1536
1:29:27 --> 1:29:28
that we need to be participating in,

1537
1:29:28 --> 1:29:31
that needs to get at least into the tens of millions

1538
1:29:31 --> 1:29:33
to hundreds of millions to be participating.

1539
1:29:35 --> 1:29:39
Now, you've done an excellent crime scene investigation

1540
1:29:39 --> 1:29:43
of going through the what's and the hows,

1541
1:29:43 --> 1:29:46
namely the what being a eugenics foundation theme

1542
1:29:46 --> 1:29:48
of we need to cull the earth.

1543
1:29:48 --> 1:29:52
And that goes back to the early 1900s, even the late 1800s,

1544
1:29:52 --> 1:29:55
when there was a formal international body that was pushing that.

1545
1:29:56 --> 1:30:00
And with that, we're now seeing the outcome of murder and infertility.

1546
1:30:01 --> 1:30:07
You're seeing the how by using poison and mental disease despair

1547
1:30:07 --> 1:30:10
as a way of eliminating the population.

1548
1:30:11 --> 1:30:15
What I'd like to call out is that too often we have a tendency

1549
1:30:15 --> 1:30:19
to say this is a big mob out there, and it's a giant syndicate,

1550
1:30:19 --> 1:30:24
but it's being driven at the very top by a very small number of elites.

1551
1:30:24 --> 1:30:29
Those elites do not include the WF, the WHO, the farmer CEOs,

1552
1:30:29 --> 1:30:32
the head of Hamas or the Rothschild family.

1553
1:30:32 --> 1:30:35
Those are all side players in much lower tiers

1554
1:30:35 --> 1:30:38
or not even actually involved to any degree.

1555
1:30:38 --> 1:30:40
This is all being done at the top.

1556
1:30:41 --> 1:30:46
The team I'm working with has been spending an enormous amount of time

1557
1:30:46 --> 1:30:47
of documenting that.

1558
1:30:47 --> 1:30:50
And if you look under my, you'll see the rumble.

1559
1:30:51 --> 1:30:53
We have a channel, L4ATV1.

1560
1:30:53 --> 1:30:59
We have produced two to four hour videos for the last 15 weeks

1561
1:30:59 --> 1:31:01
to document all of this.

1562
1:31:02 --> 1:31:05
I haven't been doing much marketing because we've been spending

1563
1:31:05 --> 1:31:07
all the time of getting information.

1564
1:31:10 --> 1:31:14
As part of partnering, I want to make sure that you're aware

1565
1:31:15 --> 1:31:17
or if you haven't been aware that you are,

1566
1:31:17 --> 1:31:23
that the significant contract out right now beyond David Rockefeller,

1567
1:31:23 --> 1:31:27
Alex Rockefeller, George Soros, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg,

1568
1:31:27 --> 1:31:35
Joe Biden is a key element of their attempt to attack and eliminate people.

1569
1:31:35 --> 1:31:40
And there is a contract that he has entered into with George Soros

1570
1:31:40 --> 1:31:43
and the Rockefellers to be paid.

1571
1:31:43 --> 1:31:48
This is President Biden to be paid $100 million per year

1572
1:31:48 --> 1:31:53
as part of opening up the borders and allowing all of the international effects

1573
1:31:53 --> 1:31:56
to happen in the US at their will.

1574
1:31:57 --> 1:32:03
So I'm simply saying that your theme around joining together

1575
1:32:03 --> 1:32:06
and working as a unit and doing that locally,

1576
1:32:06 --> 1:32:10
do you have other ideas of how we could form that group,

1577
1:32:10 --> 1:32:15
how we could manage that team and do it on a regular basis at least once a week?

1578
1:32:16 --> 1:32:17
Okay. So thank you, Glenn.

1579
1:32:18 --> 1:32:19
That was a comment.

1580
1:32:19 --> 1:32:20
Not interested in comments, questions.

1581
1:32:20 --> 1:32:21
We're tight for time.

1582
1:32:21 --> 1:32:25
It was a question around organizing a response effort.

1583
1:32:25 --> 1:32:26
Please let him answer.

1584
1:32:26 --> 1:32:26
Come on.

1585
1:32:26 --> 1:32:27
You took time.

1586
1:32:28 --> 1:32:30
I'm going to shout it up.

1587
1:32:30 --> 1:32:31
Questions, Albert.

1588
1:32:31 --> 1:32:32
All right.

1589
1:32:32 --> 1:32:35
No, Charles, he did ask a question at the end.

1590
1:32:35 --> 1:32:35
Okay.

1591
1:32:36 --> 1:32:38
I honestly, I'm sure you're right.

1592
1:32:38 --> 1:32:42
I'm well aware that very few people are involved.

1593
1:32:42 --> 1:32:45
Some people have asked me, well, if what you're saying is true,

1594
1:32:45 --> 1:32:47
half the prize or we don't know about it.

1595
1:32:47 --> 1:32:51
I've said, I think at minimum, you'd only have to have two people involved,

1596
1:32:51 --> 1:32:54
the actual person who did the designing of the mRNA

1597
1:32:54 --> 1:32:56
and probably the CEO or head of R&D.

1598
1:32:56 --> 1:32:57
You don't need anybody else.

1599
1:32:58 --> 1:33:01
So I'm sure most people in Pfizer think they've done great work and have saved the world,

1600
1:33:02 --> 1:33:04
except for the few people who are following me.

1601
1:33:05 --> 1:33:10
Unfortunately, I haven't been contacted by large numbers of former colleagues,

1602
1:33:11 --> 1:33:12
which is disappointing.

1603
1:33:13 --> 1:33:16
In the first year, I was written to by 30 colleagues

1604
1:33:16 --> 1:33:17
who said, can you more or less shut up?

1605
1:33:18 --> 1:33:21
And I just very briefly, because it's quite funny.

1606
1:33:22 --> 1:33:24
And I thought for a day or two, and I turned their letter over

1607
1:33:24 --> 1:33:26
because they'd sent me a physical letter and it all signed it.

1608
1:33:27 --> 1:33:33
And I wrote back and I said, I thought I had hired cleverer people with stiffer spines.

1609
1:33:33 --> 1:33:36
You're sincerely, Dr. Mike Heaton sent it back.

1610
1:33:37 --> 1:33:39
So, and no one has contacted me since.

1611
1:33:39 --> 1:33:45
So actually one guy, one guy I worked with in the biotech after leaving Pfizer contacted me to say,

1612
1:33:45 --> 1:33:46
oh shit, you're absolutely right.

1613
1:33:47 --> 1:33:49
So I have no idea, Glenn.

1614
1:33:49 --> 1:33:56
I have no skills or resources to train me to do any of such things.

1615
1:33:56 --> 1:33:58
We'd be better off getting people who are ex-forces.

1616
1:33:59 --> 1:34:00
I can brief those people.

1617
1:34:00 --> 1:34:01
I can't do this stuff.

1618
1:34:03 --> 1:34:05
I can brief those people, but I can't do this stuff.

1619
1:34:06 --> 1:34:07
All right.

1620
1:34:07 --> 1:34:09
So it's easy to do the things I can do.

1621
1:34:10 --> 1:34:15
But because I've had the opinion that it doesn't much matter who the who is.

1622
1:34:15 --> 1:34:17
Sorry, it doesn't matter who the perpetrators are.

1623
1:34:17 --> 1:34:21
Because am I going to do something different if I learn it is or isn't person X?

1624
1:34:21 --> 1:34:27
And the answer is no, I can't do anything to the QANT family if they're involved.

1625
1:34:27 --> 1:34:28
And I hope they aren't.

1626
1:34:28 --> 1:34:31
But if they are, I can't do anything different.

1627
1:34:31 --> 1:34:33
I don't know anyone who could do anything different.

1628
1:34:33 --> 1:34:37
If I tried to do anything that would even smack of doing something different,

1629
1:34:37 --> 1:34:39
I would be legally arrested.

1630
1:34:39 --> 1:34:43
So I don't really know what to do with the information you provided me with.

1631
1:34:44 --> 1:34:47
I'm not the person who can do anything with that.

1632
1:34:47 --> 1:34:52
I'm a retired, broken, bladded scientist, you know, partly living in England and Spain.

1633
1:34:52 --> 1:34:54
What can I do on that front?

1634
1:34:54 --> 1:34:55
Someone else can.

1635
1:34:55 --> 1:35:01
I think there'd be a different group of fairly gritty elderly guys who probably could do

1636
1:35:01 --> 1:35:02
something, but I'm not it.

1637
1:35:03 --> 1:35:05
I am happy to speak to those people at the right time.

1638
1:35:06 --> 1:35:07
Okay, that's the answer.

1639
1:35:07 --> 1:35:09
To be next witness, you mean, Mike.

1640
1:35:09 --> 1:35:10
Albert?

1641
1:35:12 --> 1:35:12
Yeah.

1642
1:35:12 --> 1:35:13
Hi, Mike.

1643
1:35:14 --> 1:35:16
Big fan, tremendous honor.

1644
1:35:16 --> 1:35:16
Nice to meet you.

1645
1:35:18 --> 1:35:24
I was wondering what your thoughts were on this monoclonal quasi vaccine that they're

1646
1:35:24 --> 1:35:29
pushing on the newborns, the Bay Fortis.

1647
1:35:29 --> 1:35:32
It's a monoclonal called Nersivimab.

1648
1:35:33 --> 1:35:35
And since you're a respiratory guy, have you ever?

1649
1:35:35 --> 1:35:36
I've never heard.

1650
1:35:36 --> 1:35:38
Yeah, I've never heard of it.

1651
1:35:38 --> 1:35:41
And before, without even looking at it, the answer is no.

1652
1:35:43 --> 1:35:43
That's my answer.

1653
1:35:45 --> 1:35:45
Awesome.

1654
1:35:45 --> 1:35:47
Hey, God bless you, Mike.

1655
1:35:48 --> 1:35:49
And you, Albert.

1656
1:35:49 --> 1:35:49
Thank you.

1657
1:35:51 --> 1:35:53
Hedge of protection can continue on you.

1658
1:35:53 --> 1:35:54
Thank you so much.

1659
1:35:54 --> 1:35:55
God bless you.

1660
1:35:55 --> 1:35:55
Great.

1661
1:35:55 --> 1:35:56
Thank you, too.

1662
1:35:57 --> 1:35:59
Albert is an expert on theirs.

1663
1:35:59 --> 1:36:00
I know.

1664
1:36:00 --> 1:36:01
I've seen you.

1665
1:36:02 --> 1:36:02
Thank you.

1666
1:36:02 --> 1:36:03
Thank you, Albert.

1667
1:36:03 --> 1:36:04
Anders?

1668
1:36:04 --> 1:36:05
Keep it short.

1669
1:36:05 --> 1:36:06
No statements.

1670
1:36:06 --> 1:36:06
Question.

1671
1:36:08 --> 1:36:09
Hello, Mike.

1672
1:36:09 --> 1:36:10
Nice to talk to you.

1673
1:36:13 --> 1:36:14
Can you hear me?

1674
1:36:14 --> 1:36:15
Yes, I can.

1675
1:36:15 --> 1:36:16
Yes, thank you, Anders.

1676
1:36:16 --> 1:36:17
Very well.

1677
1:36:17 --> 1:36:18
Nice to talk to you.

1678
1:36:18 --> 1:36:21
So I don't want to say a lot.

1679
1:36:21 --> 1:36:26
I just say that in my research, as you know, we have been in contact.

1680
1:36:26 --> 1:36:33
There is quite likely that we have been all deceived to believe that this mRNA

1681
1:36:35 --> 1:36:41
and this lipid nanoparticle is what they say it is.

1682
1:36:41 --> 1:36:42
And I'm not saying it is not.

1683
1:36:42 --> 1:36:46
But there is something magnetic in these jabs.

1684
1:36:46 --> 1:36:51
And we have found that there is graphene metals.

1685
1:36:51 --> 1:36:55
And these LNP transforms to become hydrogel.

1686
1:36:56 --> 1:36:59
And these kind of go together and they crystallize.

1687
1:36:59 --> 1:37:01
And you have antennas.

1688
1:37:01 --> 1:37:04
And you have an EMF event in the body.

1689
1:37:05 --> 1:37:06
And I don't need to preach on that.

1690
1:37:06 --> 1:37:10
But let's say I will just say you are most likely aware of Dr. Ana

1691
1:37:11 --> 1:37:19
Mihalcea, who has been doing good blood analysis to confirm that this is the case.

1692
1:37:20 --> 1:37:23
So I think it would be great.

1693
1:37:25 --> 1:37:30
I will just say I don't know anything about the sort of EMF side.

1694
1:37:30 --> 1:37:33
And I'm not going to dismiss it.

1695
1:37:33 --> 1:37:38
But I'm going to tell you right now, I don't even have school level knowledge

1696
1:37:38 --> 1:37:41
of the kind of physics involved.

1697
1:37:41 --> 1:37:44
So I'm not going to be the right person to work through.

1698
1:37:44 --> 1:37:45
I do not have.

1699
1:37:46 --> 1:37:49
What is it that Clint Easterwood said?

1700
1:37:49 --> 1:37:51
Man's got to know his limitations.

1701
1:37:51 --> 1:37:51
Right?

1702
1:37:51 --> 1:37:53
I'm not against you.

1703
1:37:53 --> 1:37:54
I don't know anything about it.

1704
1:37:54 --> 1:37:59
And there's no chance that I'm going to become sufficiently knowledgeable to be an advocate.

1705
1:38:00 --> 1:38:01
So I'm not your enemy.

1706
1:38:01 --> 1:38:03
I cannot be an advocate.

1707
1:38:03 --> 1:38:04
I'm just way off the pace.

1708
1:38:05 --> 1:38:07
That's my honest opinion of myself.

1709
1:38:08 --> 1:38:09
Okay.

1710
1:38:09 --> 1:38:11
So I fully understand your position.

1711
1:38:11 --> 1:38:13
So I'm not saying anything against it.

1712
1:38:13 --> 1:38:15
No, I'm not saying anything against it.

1713
1:38:15 --> 1:38:17
I just know so little.

1714
1:38:19 --> 1:38:20
I'm just massively off the pace.

1715
1:38:22 --> 1:38:24
I'm very narrow.

1716
1:38:24 --> 1:38:27
I know all about a spider's behind, but nothing about butterflies.

1717
1:38:29 --> 1:38:29
That's my problem.

1718
1:38:31 --> 1:38:32
Okay.

1719
1:38:32 --> 1:38:40
I will just say that it would be very good for all of you to see the research of Dr.

1720
1:38:40 --> 1:38:45
Ana Maria Mijacea because she has really found something outside the box.

1721
1:38:45 --> 1:38:47
And that will reveal something.

1722
1:38:48 --> 1:38:52
So I don't need to ask questions because my questions are about 5V.

1723
1:38:52 --> 1:38:54
So I will stop it there.

1724
1:38:54 --> 1:38:55
Thank you, Anders.

1725
1:38:55 --> 1:38:58
And Anna Mijacea has presented to this group as well, Anders.

1726
1:38:58 --> 1:38:58
Jim.

1727
1:38:58 --> 1:38:59
Thank you very much.

1728
1:38:59 --> 1:39:00
Great presentation.

1729
1:39:03 --> 1:39:08
Plausible deniability, making sure that these bad actors don't have plausible deniability.

1730
1:39:09 --> 1:39:15
We brought this information about the SARS-CoV-2 or our medications being made in China to our

1731
1:39:15 --> 1:39:17
Department of Defense.

1732
1:39:17 --> 1:39:20
They were all very interested in June of 2019.

1733
1:39:21 --> 1:39:28
In January of 2020 and March of 2020, when we told them the antidote might be hydroxychloroquine

1734
1:39:28 --> 1:39:31
or chloroquine, they may not have been as interested.

1735
1:39:31 --> 1:39:37
And we have documentation that shows that we brought this to as high a level as the joint

1736
1:39:37 --> 1:39:42
chiefs, notifying them that it was likely that hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine would

1737
1:39:42 --> 1:39:48
provide T cell immunity because it would prevent the initial binding of the virus.

1738
1:39:49 --> 1:39:51
Because it would prevent the initial binding of the ACE2 receptor.

1739
1:39:54 --> 1:40:01
There has now been a movie called Broken Truth or Epidemic of Fraud has put out showing that

1740
1:40:01 --> 1:40:07
hydroxychloroquine was meaningfully withheld not only this year, but not only in this

1741
1:40:08 --> 1:40:11
pandemic, but since 1600 as a weapon of war.

1742
1:40:13 --> 1:40:18
Can you provide, and I'll give you that evidence if you haven't already

1743
1:40:18 --> 1:40:23
seen Epidemic of Fraud, Didier Raoult is promoting the movie now.

1744
1:40:24 --> 1:40:30
Do you have evidence that shows that if we had all been able to get hydroxychloroquine as a

1745
1:40:30 --> 1:40:38
preventative before, or low dose, before this pandemic was started like in 2020 or 2019,

1746
1:40:38 --> 1:40:45
that we could have all developed T cell immunity and not had this immunocompromise and immunogenicity

1747
1:40:45 --> 1:40:50
of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, whether it be an original virus form or vaccine form?

1748
1:40:50 --> 1:40:50
Thank you.

1749
1:40:51 --> 1:40:57
So Jim, yes, there definitely was manipulation of availability of certain drugs.

1750
1:40:58 --> 1:41:05
Early in 2020, I thought, as most people did, that the authorities were doing their best to

1751
1:41:05 --> 1:41:10
make sure that there were not alternatives to the vaccines.

1752
1:41:11 --> 1:41:16
Now, personally, you've heard Stephen Frost and I had an exchange.

1753
1:41:16 --> 1:41:21
The mail may not have been, I don't think it was a virus, but I don't want to die in a ditch over

1754
1:41:21 --> 1:41:28
it. There wasn't a public health emergency. There was not a pandemic. So in a sense, I don't think

1755
1:41:28 --> 1:41:30
I can answer your question because I don't think there was a pandemic.

1756
1:41:30 --> 1:41:32
Was there a spike protein?

1757
1:41:32 --> 1:41:39
I don't know. I don't think it's necessary that there was something, but

1758
1:41:39 --> 1:41:46
I know some of my colleagues think there was a locally released poison of some kind.

1759
1:41:46 --> 1:41:49
The problem with these things is that they're not provable or forcibable.

1760
1:41:50 --> 1:41:56
That is, you reach a position where you realize that you dig and dig and dig and you can't reach

1761
1:41:56 --> 1:42:03
your conclusion. And I have to say, folks, if you get to that position where logically you can't get

1762
1:42:03 --> 1:42:07
to a defensive position, please stop. You're just going to wear yourself out.

1763
1:42:07 --> 1:42:12
Or, for example, if people on either side of a debate don't agree the terms of the debate,

1764
1:42:12 --> 1:42:17
you must stop because you're just going to bash each other to death whilst allowing the

1765
1:42:17 --> 1:42:24
perpetrators to win. So, Jim, I don't think there was a pandemic. They definitely did

1766
1:42:24 --> 1:42:29
meaningfully withhold drugs that have been in use for a long period of time, and I think that was

1767
1:42:29 --> 1:42:35
bad. I don't know how meaningful that was in terms of people's illness, but it definitely was

1768
1:42:35 --> 1:42:41
a strong permissive force in terms of bringing out these, I think, intentional poisons, the

1769
1:42:41 --> 1:42:49
so-called vaccine. So, for whatever reason they did it, whether it was because it would have allowed

1770
1:42:49 --> 1:42:55
people to treat themselves or it was just to create their fear, I don't know. And they did do it.

1771
1:42:57 --> 1:43:02
So what I'm saying, I don't think there's a solution to say, if we could have had this,

1772
1:43:02 --> 1:43:05
it would have all been no problem because I think if we hadn't done any bloody testing,

1773
1:43:05 --> 1:43:11
there wouldn't have been a pandemic. So I don't think there was one. I think it was lies, propaganda,

1774
1:43:11 --> 1:43:17
and a rotten piece, a useless, a bad use of carromelosis technique to make people think

1775
1:43:17 --> 1:43:22
that there were infections where there weren't. That's my opinion. I can't prove it. And that's

1776
1:43:22 --> 1:43:26
why I didn't talk about it. I said there wasn't a public health emergency and people have been

1777
1:43:26 --> 1:43:32
jabbed with things that are definitely designed to injure and kill. Then I don't need to be in

1778
1:43:32 --> 1:43:36
dispute with anybody, I don't think. Anyway, so I probably didn't give you a great answer,

1779
1:43:36 --> 1:43:39
but it's because I've got a slightly different perspective on what happened.

1780
1:43:39 --> 1:43:44
S2 Okay. Thank you very much. And can you tell what people were dying of in the hospitals? Or

1781
1:43:44 --> 1:43:48
was it just a regular smooth like that? S1 Oh, yeah. No, they've been, I think they're

1782
1:43:48 --> 1:43:57
being killed. Honestly. Oh, just in just in one minute. In hospitals, there were internationally

1783
1:43:57 --> 1:44:03
a change in medical procedure, you do not ventilate people. You do not say sedate, intubate and

1784
1:44:03 --> 1:44:09
ventilate people with an open airway that's not obstructed. And they do not have an injured chest

1785
1:44:09 --> 1:44:13
wall. Correct, Stephen? Why would you do that? These people can ventilate on their own. If they

1786
1:44:13 --> 1:44:19
needed oxygen, you give them an oxygen mask, you do not stay intubate and ventilate. That's a that's

1787
1:44:19 --> 1:44:24
a great procedure. If you can't breathe. It's a terrible procedure. If you were a vulnerable person,

1788
1:44:25 --> 1:44:30
that will lead rapidly to death. I do know a lot about that is something we did in my form of

1789
1:44:30 --> 1:44:36
research. They were murdered in hospital, Jim. And then people were given remdesivir. They were now

1790
1:44:36 --> 1:44:41
sedated, they were not given treatments, and they just died. They were murdered by bloody doctors

1791
1:44:41 --> 1:44:47
and hospitals. In the care homes, they were given my dazzle am and morphine designed to help them

1792
1:44:47 --> 1:44:53
pass without suffering. Those are two components of the lethal injection used in some US states.

1793
1:44:53 --> 1:45:01
My PhD was in the effect of opiates on respiratory reflexes. Opiates depressed the respiratory drive,

1794
1:45:02 --> 1:45:08
as does my dazzle. I mean, in fact, they are synergistic. So in care homes, in my country,

1795
1:45:08 --> 1:45:15
people not even qualified to put a plaster on people were invited and some did pick up syringes

1796
1:45:15 --> 1:45:22
and jab to their elderly charges with high doses of my dazzle am and morphine and came back later

1797
1:45:22 --> 1:45:31
and put them in a body bag. They were murdered on mass, Jim. And in the community, doctors like my

1798
1:45:31 --> 1:45:37
ruddy family doctor, I want to say rude words at this point. She was she was told, oh, we were

1799
1:45:37 --> 1:45:42
told this is a virus and not to prescribe antibiotics. Huge numbers of people died in

1800
1:45:42 --> 1:45:49
the community, even young people of bacterial pneumonia or whatever that was. So they were

1801
1:45:49 --> 1:45:55
murdered, Jim. You don't need to, there wasn't a new disease. They were just murdered in hospitals,

1802
1:45:55 --> 1:46:01
care homes and the community in the ways I've just described. That's not in dispute. That was solved

1803
1:46:01 --> 1:46:07
in 2020. That's horrifying. If you didn't know that, you're probably absolutely horrified. I

1804
1:46:07 --> 1:46:14
met my wife's family doctor in the supermarket just before Christmas. And I veered away from

1805
1:46:14 --> 1:46:19
her. My wife says, Come on, have a word. I said, I don't dare speak to her. Anyway, I spoke to

1806
1:46:19 --> 1:46:25
him. She said, she said to me, Oh, my I've been following your work. I nearly bloody strangled her.

1807
1:46:25 --> 1:46:30
And I've said, Are you still injecting people with that stuff? She said, I'm only one of five

1808
1:46:30 --> 1:46:35
people in the practice. My voice doesn't count for anything. I said, You are murdering people.

1809
1:46:35 --> 1:46:40
And she kind of looked winsome and walked off and got in her brand new German car. It's like,

1810
1:46:41 --> 1:46:46
there are people in our community who are as bad as the good Germans in Germany. I just met one.

1811
1:46:47 --> 1:46:52
Well, that's what happened, Jim. There wasn't an illness. There was not a new illness. In my,

1812
1:46:52 --> 1:46:57
they might have poisoned some people in New York and Bergamo. I'm not even persuaded of that.

1813
1:46:57 --> 1:47:01
But if that's true, then it's true. But anywhere, everywhere else, nothing happened except

1814
1:47:01 --> 1:47:09
propaganda, lies, rotten tests, and then murderous procedures. That's what happened. That's a pandemic.

1815
1:47:10 --> 1:47:16
Our doctors murdered our colleagues and our parents, and they're still doing it.

1816
1:47:18 --> 1:47:23
Beautifully said. Thank you. Thank you, Jim. They're still doing it. They are. Okay, you're

1817
1:47:23 --> 1:47:27
doing very well, Mike. We've got four hands up and then Stephen, last couple of questions.

1818
1:47:27 --> 1:47:29
We've got 20 minutes to go. You okay for 20 minutes, Mike?

1819
1:47:30 --> 1:47:35
I can just do it. I'm starting to get in pain. Yeah, good. Okay, we'll be quick.

1820
1:47:35 --> 1:47:37
Okay, everyone, questions and Mike's answers. Janet.

1821
1:47:43 --> 1:47:45
Janet is trying to unmute, I hope.

1822
1:47:47 --> 1:47:52
We'll come back to Janet. Don't keep you waiting. Emmanuel, who presented to us last week,

1823
1:47:52 --> 1:48:03
Mike. I found myself. Okay, come on. Okay, yeah, just a couple of fairly short questions.

1824
1:48:04 --> 1:48:11
Going back to toxicology, I understand that the toxicity of remdesivir was already known before

1825
1:48:11 --> 1:48:18
COVID, yet it was still recommended. Yes. So my question is, what is the mechanism of its toxicity?

1826
1:48:18 --> 1:48:24
And was it also deliberately used to damage people? My second question is about the

1827
1:48:24 --> 1:48:31
AstraZeneca. I understand that the AstraZeneca vaccine was stopped from being used. Is that

1828
1:48:31 --> 1:48:37
correct? And why did that happen? Yeah. So remdesivir, my understanding is that it lowers

1829
1:48:38 --> 1:48:43
renal function. I don't actually know how it does that. I haven't looked, to be honest,

1830
1:48:43 --> 1:48:50
it might be known. And so here's my ghastly thought. And this came to mind after John O'Looney,

1831
1:48:54 --> 1:49:00
the funeral director in England. And he told me that he was receiving the deceased from hospital.

1832
1:49:01 --> 1:49:07
And they were in body bags. And he said, when I opened the body bags, it's full of fluid. And

1833
1:49:07 --> 1:49:12
I've never seen this before. And I said, what about people from care homes? He said, no.

1834
1:49:12 --> 1:49:18
And so here's my thought. They were given remdesivir intravenously in hospital or equivalent

1835
1:49:18 --> 1:49:25
drugs, which lowered their ability to clear fluid from their body because it reduced glomerular

1836
1:49:25 --> 1:49:31
filtration rate. And they maintained them on drips. And they just died from hypervolemic shock.

1837
1:49:32 --> 1:49:39
And then remember, they were already sedated and ventilated. So if I was murderous Fauci,

1838
1:49:39 --> 1:49:46
that's all I would need. I'd give them a drug. I'd get them in hospital. They're sedated and

1839
1:49:46 --> 1:49:51
ventilated. They'd be on a drip. OK, what do I need to do is knock them out of kilter. It's like

1840
1:49:51 --> 1:49:56
reduce GFR. That'll do. Stick them on remdesivir. They'll be dead in a week.

1841
1:49:57 --> 1:50:02
So I think that's what they did. Yes, it was known. There might be other toxicities. It looks a

1842
1:50:02 --> 1:50:09
horribly toxic drug, to be honest. The AstraZeneca drug, I always thought, even before it was approved,

1843
1:50:09 --> 1:50:16
I had this instinct that it was a sacrificial offering along with the J&J. I have a reason for

1844
1:50:16 --> 1:50:22
that. But I think they were particularly nasty. These are allegedly DNA vaccines that were not

1845
1:50:22 --> 1:50:28
delivered in lipid nanoparticles. And I don't know. I probably could think of it, but I can't think

1846
1:50:28 --> 1:50:33
of it right now. But I remember saying to my wife then, those things are so horrible that they're

1847
1:50:33 --> 1:50:40
going to get withdrawn. And it's going to create an open field for the mRNA products, which in my

1848
1:50:40 --> 1:50:49
opinion are all Pfizer. I think Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, I think they're all funded by military,

1849
1:50:49 --> 1:50:58
basically DARPA, which I think is like CIA, Black Ops money, DARPA, the Defense Project Research,

1850
1:50:58 --> 1:51:04
whatever it is. I vaguely began to wear during my 10 years of consulting, most of which was in

1851
1:51:04 --> 1:51:10
the Boston area. Boston is the biggest concentration of private biomedical funding. So venture

1852
1:51:10 --> 1:51:18
capitalists spend money on people who turn up and pitch a good story. I got most of my next round of

1853
1:51:18 --> 1:51:23
funding from there. But there's loads of funny looking biotechs just set back from the road.

1854
1:51:23 --> 1:51:27
You write the names down and do some Googling, you nearly always find out that their principal

1855
1:51:27 --> 1:51:33
funder is DARPA. And I think they're, I think they are CIA labs. I think that's what they are.

1856
1:51:35 --> 1:51:44
And so I think this, I think the drug companies are clearly, they're clearly guilty as hell.

1857
1:51:44 --> 1:51:49
I think their main role in this crime has been to white label products made by other people.

1858
1:51:50 --> 1:51:57
I think they've probably been made in deep state labs, and then they've been rubber stamped by a

1859
1:51:57 --> 1:52:04
couple of companies. And I think AstraZeneca and J&J were used as, I think they were used to provide

1860
1:52:04 --> 1:52:09
evidence that others have used against me. They've said, the regulators are very good, you know,

1861
1:52:09 --> 1:52:15
they remove the dangerous products, right? The AstraZeneca was withdrawn. That shows they're able

1862
1:52:15 --> 1:52:19
to withdraw dangerous products. It's like, yeah, but I knew they were going to do that, because it

1863
1:52:19 --> 1:52:26
was obviously more toxic. The other reason I thought that is the stupid woman that was allegedly its

1864
1:52:26 --> 1:52:33
inventor who got a damehood and was given a round of applause at Wimbledon in 2021. I did a bit of

1865
1:52:33 --> 1:52:39
research on her and she's a really stupid person. And everyone hates her. She never hires clever

1866
1:52:39 --> 1:52:45
people because she's so insecure. Anyway, so I reckon I thought it was a sacrificial product,

1867
1:52:45 --> 1:52:52
and then it went. With J&J, I don't know how it came about. But by amazing coincidence, the person

1868
1:52:52 --> 1:52:58
who was notionally in charge of it was a man I had worked with 10 years previously. And when his

1869
1:52:58 --> 1:53:05
company Johnson Johnson launched the product, I wrote to him to say, Matai, Matai Naman, you are

1870
1:53:05 --> 1:53:12
standing astride a product that's going to kill people. And we had a conversation by email. And

1871
1:53:12 --> 1:53:18
then he then he went dark and about three months later resigned with no reason given. No one ever

1872
1:53:18 --> 1:53:25
leaves an executive vice president position from a big drug company without reason, because most of

1873
1:53:25 --> 1:53:30
their payment, most of their compensation is deferred, stock options, restricted stock units

1874
1:53:30 --> 1:53:38
and cash. And I think he left $10 million behind. And I think he left because I drew his attention

1875
1:53:38 --> 1:53:44
to something he did not realize. And that drug was withdrawn from the market. Both of the DNA

1876
1:53:44 --> 1:53:50
products came and went. Anyway, I don't know, I can't prove any of this stuff. And it doesn't

1877
1:53:50 --> 1:53:58
matter if I'm right or not. The design of them is to injure and kill. But I come to believe that

1878
1:53:58 --> 1:54:05
they've just been shopfronts for stuff that was going on in the background. So I because they're

1879
1:54:05 --> 1:54:11
bad people, you know, they've those those enterprises, you know, that the money, if you've got guns,

1880
1:54:11 --> 1:54:17
money, intelligence, it's just the most powerful force which you've used for bad, which it is,

1881
1:54:18 --> 1:54:26
it creates this, this nexus which is which is foul. There's no need to, you don't need to widen the

1882
1:54:26 --> 1:54:31
net further and say get some bad actors in for drug companies, you know, you just need them to

1883
1:54:32 --> 1:54:35
put their labels on it and shut up. I think that's probably what they've done.

1884
1:54:36 --> 1:54:38
Mike, what was the name of the man and what was the name of the woman?

1885
1:54:40 --> 1:54:45
I can't, I will be able to find it because she got a damehood. And she said she's the AstraZeneca

1886
1:54:45 --> 1:54:50
woman. I know someone who knows her and she's not very clever. But that doesn't really matter. I

1887
1:54:50 --> 1:54:55
don't think I don't think I don't think her product was ever intended to be important. And I don't

1888
1:54:55 --> 1:55:00
think it has been. I think if you look at the if you look at the five, I think it's 5.4 billion

1889
1:55:00 --> 1:55:08
humans have been injected. I think all the gene based vaccines because I've no idea really what's

1890
1:55:08 --> 1:55:12
happening in the other parts of the world. I don't really know anything. Remember, they're lying to

1891
1:55:12 --> 1:55:18
us. Everything is unknown. Everything's untrustworthy unless you can verify it. But I think the vast

1892
1:55:18 --> 1:55:22
majority of people have been injected with the mRNA product. And I think that was always the intention.

1893
1:55:23 --> 1:55:26
That's what and furthermore, when you look around the world now,

1894
1:55:27 --> 1:55:33
you find announcement after announcement in country after country of Pfizer and Moderna

1895
1:55:33 --> 1:55:43
opening new factories to make mRNA vaccines, they say. Well, I've just told you that all of them will

1896
1:55:43 --> 1:55:50
be automatically toxic because they will induce autoimmune response to your body making non self

1897
1:55:50 --> 1:55:56
non human protein. Why are all these countries doing it? Because they're all part of that they

1898
1:55:56 --> 1:56:00
they probably don't know what they're doing most of them. But I'm saying that the

1899
1:56:00 --> 1:56:06
whoever is forcing this is now what what do you think is going to happen to all the vaccines that

1900
1:56:06 --> 1:56:11
they're making is my question. And so they're going to be put into people's arms if we don't stop them.

1901
1:56:12 --> 1:56:17
They're going to be put into people's arms if we don't stop them. And if you have multiple doses,

1902
1:56:17 --> 1:56:25
you will die. Okay, and so that's what I think. So we need to stop them. We do. Thank you, Janet.

1903
1:56:25 --> 1:56:30
We've got three questions to go then Stephen to finish Emmanuel who spoke to us last week, Mike.

1904
1:56:31 --> 1:56:37
Okay. Yeah, thank you. Thank you, Dr. Yaden for a superb presentation. It's really a privilege to

1905
1:56:37 --> 1:56:46
hear you. I have two questions. One, how dependent was the Pfizer jab on being kept at sub freezing

1906
1:56:46 --> 1:56:53
temperatures to be dangerous? And then second, you know, there was an agreement between Pfizer

1907
1:56:53 --> 1:56:57
and New Zealand, which was one of the most difficult countries to be in during the

1908
1:56:58 --> 1:57:07
COVID operation, the lockdowns, etc. And yet, and the government will not release that agreement made

1909
1:57:07 --> 1:57:16
with Pfizer. Do you think there's anything in that agreement that would help to galvanize the normies

1910
1:57:16 --> 1:57:24
as it were, who can't really contend with this tremendous? So yeah, so the second part first,

1911
1:57:26 --> 1:57:31
I can't remember who it is. There were so many people, right? But I know some people have got

1912
1:57:31 --> 1:57:38
hold of oh, yes, it's my friend, retired policeman from England, Mark Sexton. I think he now has,

1913
1:57:38 --> 1:57:48
I think he's got three country contracts between country X, Y and Z and Pfizer, I think. And he

1914
1:57:48 --> 1:57:52
said, he's not an illegal scholar, but he said reading them, they look fundamentally the same.

1915
1:57:54 --> 1:57:58
So, you know, I don't know is the answer. By definition, I don't know what's in what we

1916
1:57:58 --> 1:58:06
haven't seen. But they're definitely abusive contracts. I mean, I did have nothing to do with

1917
1:58:06 --> 1:58:12
selling vaccines. But I know what a Pfizer, what boilerplate language, boilerplate means standard,

1918
1:58:12 --> 1:58:19
I know the kind of way they construct contracts. You know, they're pretty aggressive. And for

1919
1:58:19 --> 1:58:25
example, you would always have what's called an entire agreement clause, which means any agreement

1920
1:58:25 --> 1:58:31
pre existing between the parties written or verbal is hereby, you know, voided and replaced by this

1921
1:58:31 --> 1:58:36
one, you'll always find an entire agreement phrase, Pfizer always puts it in there. In case anyone

1922
1:58:36 --> 1:58:42
ever claims our well, we had to scream. So I know certain are, you know, the sort of anatomy of

1923
1:58:42 --> 1:58:51
these things. But I think it's so difficult, it'd be like 150 pages, probably. Imagine trying to

1924
1:58:51 --> 1:58:58
explain something in that contract to a normie, they won't get it. They're not, most of us are not

1925
1:58:58 --> 1:59:03
lawyers. And I'm not. And I but I learned a little bit because I was very interested when we were

1926
1:59:03 --> 1:59:09
negotiating one particular contract. And I'm like that. I just I love working with people who are

1927
1:59:09 --> 1:59:13
good at things. I keep asking them questions, and they keep speaking. So I picked up a little,

1928
1:59:13 --> 1:59:19
just a little knowledge to be dangerous. I think if we saw the contract, we would, we would know

1929
1:59:19 --> 1:59:24
these bloody things were abusive. I'm not sure that we would find it particularly helpful.

1930
1:59:24 --> 1:59:30
You know, if we explain that in subsection five two, it says, you know, the party, you know,

1931
1:59:30 --> 1:59:37
purchaser agrees to hold Pfizer harmless, it'll probably say that. It'll probably say Pfizer,

1932
1:59:37 --> 1:59:42
you know, part purchaser agrees to hold Pfizer harmless. That's normal. If you're selling

1933
1:59:42 --> 1:59:48
something, you always write the contract to say if you agree to buy from me, then provided we've done

1934
1:59:48 --> 1:59:53
all the things we said we should do, you will hold me legally harmless, you won't, you can't sue me

1935
1:59:53 --> 1:59:58
for having met the terms of the contract. So you'd have to find I've done something not in the

1936
1:59:58 --> 2:00:04
contract. That's just the way legal agreements are. So they'll it'll look horrifying. But I

1937
2:00:04 --> 2:00:08
don't know. I don't know that I would almost be able to persuade the man in the pub to get excited

1938
2:00:08 --> 2:00:14
about it. Even if I found a clause like that, it says purchaser agrees to hold Pfizer harmless.

1939
2:00:14 --> 2:00:18
Because I would say yeah, but I probably would have expected him to say that. They did in the

1940
2:00:18 --> 2:00:24
contract I looked at. Seriously, they all look all these contracts look abusive and both parties

1941
2:00:24 --> 2:00:28
fight back and forwards and they get something they can both agree. In fact, the only reason you

1942
2:00:28 --> 2:00:34
have a contract is not when you're friendly, when you're friendly, you don't need to contract,

1943
2:00:34 --> 2:00:39
you know, you supply they give you the money or whatever it is you supply they inject people,

1944
2:00:39 --> 2:00:44
you only need to contract when you fall out. That's the only time you need it. And so

1945
2:00:45 --> 2:00:49
this lawyer told me only time you're ever going to be looking at this again is when we're facing

1946
2:00:49 --> 2:00:54
court. So don't don't give them an inch. Because the time you'll be opening this page again,

1947
2:00:54 --> 2:00:59
is when they're suing us breach. So we have to write it in such a way that we'll win.

1948
2:00:59 --> 2:01:06
And I realized I thought I'd hate to be a lawyer. I'm glad he's my lawyer. So I've got a long way

1949
2:01:06 --> 2:01:14
around the house. I don't know. It's possible. But legal contracts, I think will be a difficult

1950
2:01:14 --> 2:01:20
thing to use, because they're nasty, even when they're normal. And then what else I need to

1951
2:01:20 --> 2:01:28
say something else? Yes. Just just an honesty thing here. This this bit about freezing and

1952
2:01:28 --> 2:01:33
then not freezing. You know, initially, we were told they had to be at minus 80. Minus 80 is as

1953
2:01:33 --> 2:01:39
cold as you can commercially reasonably get. So they're research grades with research grade

1954
2:01:40 --> 2:01:46
freezers that you don't get them in the supermarket or even in a wholesaler. You'll get

1955
2:01:46 --> 2:01:51
them in research labs in hospitals and universities. They're difficult things. And I know I remember

1956
2:01:51 --> 2:01:56
thinking when they said, Oh, you don't need to put them in the minus 80. You can just keep them in

1957
2:01:56 --> 2:02:03
a domestic freezer. So I don't know is the answer. But the one possible explanation would be this is

1958
2:02:03 --> 2:02:07
pretending that they've made a real product because they haven't. They say they really haven't. It's

1959
2:02:07 --> 2:02:13
all pantomime. But if I pretend for a moment they made a real product, it would be something like

1960
2:02:13 --> 2:02:18
this, that they were so rushed on doing what's called the forced instability testing. That is,

1961
2:02:19 --> 2:02:25
you try and degrade something in order to work out what its shelf life is. You could do two things.

1962
2:02:25 --> 2:02:31
One is you can stick it in the in the storage condition and come back in a year and see if it's

1963
2:02:31 --> 2:02:35
still all right. And if it is, you come back in three years and see if it's still all right.

1964
2:02:35 --> 2:02:41
Now, I think I'm only half joking. You can see that's not a good way of getting a shelf life in

1965
2:02:41 --> 2:02:46
a new product. It's a very good way for one that you've been producing for 10 years, because you've

1966
2:02:46 --> 2:02:52
got the in life data. But with a new product, you still need to provide the pharmacy wholesalers with

1967
2:02:52 --> 2:02:57
some kind of storage half life, you know. And so what you do is you do something called forced

1968
2:02:57 --> 2:03:04
degradation. You deliberately stress the products and see. I could talk for ages on this. And it

1969
2:03:04 --> 2:03:09
could be that they started using a rigorous condition. And then as they got the results of

1970
2:03:09 --> 2:03:14
their forced degradation data, they said you don't need to keep it at minus 80. So it could be

1971
2:03:15 --> 2:03:20
innocent. Now, I don't think it's innocent, but they could they would be able to come back.

1972
2:03:20 --> 2:03:24
They would be able to come back with an answer. I'm not I'm not batting for these people,

1973
2:03:25 --> 2:03:30
but I think I could come up with a half decent answer, which would mean people that we were

1974
2:03:30 --> 2:03:35
talking to would get an air. That's that's not relevant. But I have to admit something at this

1975
2:03:35 --> 2:03:43
point. My friend Sasha Latipova is not convinced that people are even being injected with much mRNA.

1976
2:03:47 --> 2:03:53
She says, I'm not convinced that they've actually made what they have told us they've made. And this

1977
2:03:53 --> 2:03:58
is back to Anders point. That's why I'm not his enemy. I don't know enough to know if he's right.

1978
2:03:58 --> 2:04:04
But so Sasha says there's been analyses done, and they do find some mRNA in the vial,

1979
2:04:05 --> 2:04:13
but they find mostly broken fragments. And I think, see, I cannot distinguish now at this point

1980
2:04:13 --> 2:04:20
between whole thing is a faint, which is what Anders I think is saying, or if these are just

1981
2:04:20 --> 2:04:26
degradation products of because all we've ever got is used vials. They could have been like left out

1982
2:04:26 --> 2:04:31
in a desk for an hour, because by the time the vials empty, no one needs to take care of it

1983
2:04:31 --> 2:04:37
anymore. It's going in the bin. So you can see the problem here, we've got so little information,

1984
2:04:38 --> 2:04:43
and we're probably not going to get better information. So that's where I am. As I said

1985
2:04:43 --> 2:04:49
earlier, when I reach when I realize my shovel is not going to go into productive earth, I stop

1986
2:04:50 --> 2:04:55
because it's just going to wear me out. Follow the follow the trail where the where the evidence

1987
2:04:56 --> 2:05:01
said even if it's not true, you see the mRNA stuff, they've told us that's what they're doing.

1988
2:05:01 --> 2:05:08
As a subject matter expert, I've described how that's definitely intentionally dangerous. So

1989
2:05:08 --> 2:05:13
even if that's not what they're doing, they can't get out of it. I'll modify my story if I get enough

1990
2:05:13 --> 2:05:19
data. Meanwhile, they said this, I'm telling you that's dangerous. No question. All right,

1991
2:05:19 --> 2:05:24
I will take it. The nose on the Bible, I filed multiple affidavits saying exactly what I've said

1992
2:05:24 --> 2:05:29
today. Okay, thanks. Yeah, thanks, Emmanuel. Celia, we're not gonna have time for you because

1993
2:05:29 --> 2:05:34
we're tight for time. Sadly, put it in the chat. We'll pass it on to Mike. We've got Peter Vera

1994
2:05:34 --> 2:05:40
and then Stephen. We need to hear Celia. We need to hear what her question is. But anyway, she's last.

1995
2:05:41 --> 2:05:42
All right, go, Peter.

1996
2:05:44 --> 2:05:51
Hi, thank you very much for having me. And thanks a lot, Michael, for your presentation. It's always

1997
2:05:51 --> 2:05:57
extremely interesting. I've been following you for the last four years and I fully agree with you.

1998
2:05:57 --> 2:06:03
I'm not a doctor. I'm an economist and I've had the privilege, if you want, to work for at least

1999
2:06:03 --> 2:06:10
10 years with WHO inside and have seen a little bit how this organization, which is not really,

2000
2:06:10 --> 2:06:19
as you know, probably a UN agency, how it works. And what is now going on, you know, with the

2001
2:06:19 --> 2:06:24
pandemic treating and the international health regulation modification is just horrifying.

2002
2:06:25 --> 2:06:30
And what I was wondering is whether you know anything about it and you know whether this may

2003
2:06:30 --> 2:06:39
have a chance to go through or not. No, I only know what, there's a guy who's made it his life's work.

2004
2:06:39 --> 2:06:45
Everybody will tell me what his name is. Every day somebody puts out international health

2005
2:06:45 --> 2:06:51
regulations and WHO pandemic treaty related. James Roguski. James Roguski, you know,

2006
2:06:52 --> 2:06:59
gives the man a medal. So honestly, you can only follow a small number of things at a time.

2007
2:06:59 --> 2:07:06
And I think James has got this. So I always share it on my channel, but I have not had time to look

2008
2:07:06 --> 2:07:12
at it. But what I would say is, and I think Stephen said, these bloody things, pandemics are

2009
2:07:12 --> 2:07:17
not possible. They're immunologically implausible. Everyone knows, even if it's not true,

2010
2:07:17 --> 2:07:22
everyone has understood the model to be that very infectious things aren't very dangerous and very

2011
2:07:22 --> 2:07:28
dangerous things, you know, don't travel very well. Because if that wasn't true, as soon as something

2012
2:07:28 --> 2:07:35
really nasty that was both highly transmissible and lethal arrived in the world, everyone, you know,

2013
2:07:35 --> 2:07:40
it would wipe people out or it would knock the population back, you know, 90%. And that isn't

2014
2:07:40 --> 2:07:46
what seems to happen, at least not in the last millennium. So I don't I think it's just,

2015
2:07:47 --> 2:07:54
I think it's illogical. And here's the other thing, just very quickly, I can explain why even in their

2016
2:07:54 --> 2:08:01
own terms, it's mad. And that's why you can tell the person in the pub. WHO wants to take to itself

2017
2:08:02 --> 2:08:08
the power to call public health emergencies of international concern, and then, as it were,

2018
2:08:08 --> 2:08:12
orchestrate the response, including giving instructions to countries in lockdown here,

2019
2:08:13 --> 2:08:21
take these jabs. My objection, get the principle of just the practice. Something new has arrived,

2020
2:08:21 --> 2:08:29
some new emergency we're allegedly has arisen in the world. WHO doesn't know what the best thing

2021
2:08:29 --> 2:08:36
to do is. I don't know what the best thing to do is, neither do you or anyone else on this call.

2022
2:08:36 --> 2:08:42
But I tell you what, we probably all have very good ideas. Humans are brilliant at solving this

2023
2:08:42 --> 2:08:49
kind of problem. We solve it the best we do the best we can in our local area and communicate with

2024
2:08:49 --> 2:08:55
each other. That gives you autonomy. No one's doing it to you. It allows you experimentally

2025
2:08:55 --> 2:09:01
determine what is the best thing to do rapidly, then you can share that information. It also,

2026
2:09:01 --> 2:09:07
by the way, fits with the idea of autonomy of countries. If you take that power to the centre,

2027
2:09:08 --> 2:09:16
they won't know what to do. That's the problem. If a new situation arrived, arose, by definition,

2028
2:09:17 --> 2:09:23
they don't know what to do. How can they possibly give the best instructions? How will we know that

2029
2:09:23 --> 2:09:30
that was the right thing to do? How will we learn from the normal diversity of responses that will

2030
2:09:30 --> 2:09:37
teach us away from or towards particular courses of action? So straight away, it will fail. Even

2031
2:09:37 --> 2:09:43
if they were nice people, it will go wrong the first time you use it for the reasons I've explained,

2032
2:09:43 --> 2:09:50
and I'm not wrong. So and of course, they are nasty people and they plan to kill us, like I keep

2033
2:09:50 --> 2:09:56
saying. But you can see that you don't need to be a lawyer. You don't need to be a scientist. You just

2034
2:09:56 --> 2:10:02
need to think logically for two minutes and you realise that it's a novel situation. Why would

2035
2:10:02 --> 2:10:08
you have one guy in Switzerland who doesn't know the best thing to do to tell 192 countries what to

2036
2:10:08 --> 2:10:14
do? And how will you ever know it was the right thing to do if you don't have quite a lot of

2037
2:10:14 --> 2:10:18
autonomy and variation and good communication, which is what humans have done since the dawn of

2038
2:10:18 --> 2:10:24
time? So, you know, by the way, then wanting to draw the powers to the centre are highly consistent

2039
2:10:24 --> 2:10:30
with mine and others concerns that they want to take away your freedom and compel you to receive

2040
2:10:30 --> 2:10:35
injections that are dangerous. That's what they're going to do with it. So there you go. All right.

2041
2:10:35 --> 2:10:41
Anyway, that's that move. I think we should move on. Moving. Thank you, Vera, Celia,

2042
2:10:41 --> 2:10:49
Hoodie, quick announcement. Let's go. First of all, thank you, Michael. I have a question to you,

2043
2:10:49 --> 2:10:54
but that's you know what the question is and you know what the answer is actually.

2044
2:10:54 --> 2:11:00
But in terms of this, one of the things that I've observed right from the beginning is that local

2045
2:11:00 --> 2:11:09
people, ordinary people, not lawyers, not doctors, not scientists, many more of them have gotten it

2046
2:11:10 --> 2:11:16
and they are marching toward us. It's not a stampede. God damn, I wish it was. And

2047
2:11:17 --> 2:11:24
don't say that, you know, you're tired. I know you are, but you are being heard. And sometimes

2048
2:11:24 --> 2:11:33
even a portion of what you say gets into people, you know, to get you more out there, not just

2049
2:11:33 --> 2:11:40
talking to the ones that you are, which of course is one of the projects of my book. Books get to

2050
2:11:40 --> 2:11:46
some people and the book that I'm working on, which Mike is part of, and so are Sasha and David

2051
2:11:46 --> 2:11:53
Webb and a whole lot. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Everybody's in. I don't disagree. I just,

2052
2:11:53 --> 2:12:00
we, it's not, that's not enough is what I'm saying. Absolutely should do it. But if people think,

2053
2:12:00 --> 2:12:05
oh, that's great. They've got it. That will be a minute. That will be a fatal error. We, you know,

2054
2:12:05 --> 2:12:11
got to demand people pick up the bloody baton and run as well. Absolutely. That's why I say,

2055
2:12:11 --> 2:12:17
yeah. Look, and my floor, I've got a neurologist at Columbia University. Do you know that he's still

2056
2:12:17 --> 2:12:27
in masks? Now that is a real crime. We're talking neurology. He never picked up a real, anything.

2057
2:12:27 --> 2:12:34
Yeah, it's very depressing. I know, I know a doctor who, who's met specialists when he was still

2058
2:12:34 --> 2:12:39
allowed to practice. He's a foot surgeon and the person would say, oh, I'm really busy. And he

2059
2:12:39 --> 2:12:43
would say, my friend would say, well, you're busy. And he said, yeah, I've got really unusual,

2060
2:12:43 --> 2:12:47
whole bunch of neurological conditions. And he would say, do you know why that's happening?

2061
2:12:47 --> 2:12:52
The guy will like look at him slightly and say, well, obviously the vaccines. And then my friend

2062
2:12:52 --> 2:12:59
said, you couldn't say anything about it. He went, no. Right. They're good Germans. And you know what

2063
2:12:59 --> 2:13:05
I mean? They're really good Germans. Oh, yeah. They're all over the place. But I take your point

2064
2:13:06 --> 2:13:14
in England. The self-employed, we call them white fan man. They often drive around and

2065
2:13:14 --> 2:13:20
like a battered fan and they fix stuff. They fix electrics. They put fix your plumbing. They mend

2066
2:13:20 --> 2:13:27
your car, do your drive. Those people, when most of them were never fooled. I don't know why it is.

2067
2:13:27 --> 2:13:32
Some psychologist gave me an explanation, but I went for it. So I agree with you. I think what

2068
2:13:32 --> 2:13:38
they don't know is they don't know how bad this is. They know that they're being lied to, but they're

2069
2:13:38 --> 2:13:44
used to that. Some of them have told me we're always lied to, Mike. I'm used to it. So they never tell.

2070
2:13:46 --> 2:13:50
Yeah, they don't trust. They don't trust authority. They don't trust authority.

2071
2:13:51 --> 2:13:59
But so how to get them beyond the point of not trusting the man. And I'll just give you one tiny

2072
2:13:59 --> 2:14:10
example. In London, the mayor, Sadiq Khan, has greatly restricted the flow of ordinary people

2073
2:14:10 --> 2:14:15
driving their cars in London by imposing what's called the ultra low emission zone and then

2074
2:14:15 --> 2:14:20
expanding it, which is what they'll do. Eventually stop you moving around in your own private

2075
2:14:20 --> 2:14:29
powered car. That's what they will do. And the system operates on a series of automatic number

2076
2:14:29 --> 2:14:35
plate recognition, ANPR cameras, and they've been put up on hundreds of poles around

2077
2:14:37 --> 2:14:43
expanded London. At night, what I think are probably working class men in vans,

2078
2:14:44 --> 2:14:51
go out, put on a balaclava, get out their battery powered angle grinder, take the bloody things down.

2079
2:14:52 --> 2:14:56
And therefore, blade runners, these people, and they have taken down hundreds and hundreds and

2080
2:14:56 --> 2:15:02
hundreds. So that's good news, right? That's good news. These people know they've got to do something.

2081
2:15:03 --> 2:15:08
This wasn't me, but I was on March in London a few months ago with someone who understood what we

2082
2:15:08 --> 2:15:15
were talking about, these concerns. That person reached out to the head of the blade runners

2083
2:15:16 --> 2:15:19
because we thought, wouldn't it be good if we could combine them together? And unfortunately,

2084
2:15:19 --> 2:15:24
their disappointing answer was, we're not marching with a bunch of lunatic anti-vaxxers.

2085
2:15:25 --> 2:15:30
So I'll just give you this information. So the working class guys who are taking down the

2086
2:15:30 --> 2:15:36
Ulysses cameras think I'm mad. They're not about to be my, I want them to be my allies, but at the

2087
2:15:36 --> 2:15:41
moment, they're just concerned about car regulation. They're not interested in Jabs and

2088
2:15:41 --> 2:15:47
WHO and Bill Gates. Sorry to say that at the end, but that's the reality. We have to...

2089
2:15:48 --> 2:15:54
All right, Mike, we're going to keep moving. Vera addressed us two years ago this month,

2090
2:15:54 --> 2:16:00
and Vera posted the recording and the Q&A into the chat. It was a masterful presentation on the

2091
2:16:00 --> 2:16:04
Spanish Flu, Mike. So if you ever want some entertainment, what's a beautiful presentation.

2092
2:16:04 --> 2:16:09
I'd love to. Yeah, I'd love to. That'd be great. Thank you, Vera. Okay, Celia, then Hootie's going

2093
2:16:09 --> 2:16:14
to give us a quick report and then Stephen will say a quick farewell. Come on Celia. We're a big

2094
2:16:14 --> 2:16:25
fan of Celia, everybody here. Unmute yourself. Mike, tremendous presentation. Thank you. I'm a

2095
2:16:25 --> 2:16:31
big admirer of yours, and I especially appreciate your clarity of language. So important for

2096
2:16:32 --> 2:16:38
breaking the spells. I wanted to go to something you said in the beginning. I wrote down your

2097
2:16:38 --> 2:16:46
choice of words, the supra-natural... Did you say force? Supra-national force.

2098
2:16:46 --> 2:16:53
Yeah. Sorry, supra-national force that had all the countries marching in lockstep, which was so

2099
2:16:53 --> 2:16:59
shocking and terrifying. Now, I'm half Swedish, grew up in Sweden, but one doesn't have to be half

2100
2:16:59 --> 2:17:05
Swedish to have watched with great interest what Anders Tegnell did in Sweden. He did his own thing,

2101
2:17:05 --> 2:17:12
and then there was Maka Fuli in Tanzania. It did not end well for him. So one did see at least two

2102
2:17:12 --> 2:17:17
countries, maybe there were a few more step aside. I don't want to really take time to try to figure

2103
2:17:17 --> 2:17:24
out why they might have done that, but what I do want to ask you is this. Given that there was this

2104
2:17:25 --> 2:17:32
supra-national near perfect coordination of nations in the beginning, doesn't that

2105
2:17:32 --> 2:17:39
indicate that the WHO pandemic treaty that we are all dreading, May 24th, was already in force?

2106
2:17:39 --> 2:17:48
And if so, what do you think about that? And lastly, in other words, are they about to kick

2107
2:17:48 --> 2:17:55
in with yet another degree of supra-national force, or has it already been in place?

2108
2:17:55 --> 2:18:00
No, you make a very good point. That's a very, very good point. I think you're saying, just to

2109
2:18:00 --> 2:18:08
summarize back, there already seemed to be the levers of power, the networks of influence,

2110
2:18:08 --> 2:18:12
being able to dole out the orders and have them followed, that was already in place.

2111
2:18:12 --> 2:18:17
So in a way, I think you're saying, to what extent would it really make any difference if

2112
2:18:17 --> 2:18:20
there was or wasn't this treaty in place? I think that's one thing. That's right.

2113
2:18:21 --> 2:18:28
That's right. That's a good point. Do we have a fighting chance?

2114
2:18:30 --> 2:18:37
Well, we definitely always have a chance. Yeah, you know that. It's not over until it's over,

2115
2:18:37 --> 2:18:44
that's for sure. My first line in the sand will be when they try and make us have digital ID,

2116
2:18:44 --> 2:18:49
and I'm not having it. I know there will be very bad consequences. But I'm just saying,

2117
2:18:52 --> 2:18:57
it will come. And I want the people on this call to rehearse in front of the mirror,

2118
2:18:58 --> 2:19:03
that they're not going to take it. Because if 89 of you take it, think, well, I won't do the next

2119
2:19:03 --> 2:19:08
step. It's like, you've stepped into the killing machine. Sorry, Vera, to use that particular

2120
2:19:08 --> 2:19:14
phrase is very deliberate. Because what people need to hear right now is,

2121
2:19:15 --> 2:19:20
where have they failed? Where have the wheels come off? Where is their Achilles heel?

2122
2:19:21 --> 2:19:25
You mean as an individual? No, I mean, the big apparatus.

2123
2:19:25 --> 2:19:30
Oh, right. No, the perpetrators. Yeah, no, it's a great point. That's a very good point. I mean,

2124
2:19:30 --> 2:19:37
I think that if you're able, lots of people have been able to suss that things were wrong

2125
2:19:37 --> 2:19:44
from different perspectives. For example, I'm a massive fan of a singer called Ian Brown. He was

2126
2:19:44 --> 2:19:50
the lead singer of the Stone Roses and then had a long solo career. And in the summer of 2020,

2127
2:19:50 --> 2:19:55
he wrote a song called Little Seed, Big Tree. And when you read the lyrics, it's like,

2128
2:19:56 --> 2:20:03
he worked out all the stuff I've told you. And because of the time it takes you to

2129
2:20:04 --> 2:20:09
arrange, rehearse, get recordings and so on, he probably had written those lyrics in the spring

2130
2:20:09 --> 2:20:17
of 2020. Now, how did an uneducated man from Manchester work it out? I don't know, but he did.

2131
2:20:17 --> 2:20:23
If you look at the lyrics of Little Seed, Big Tree, tell yourself that the author didn't know

2132
2:20:23 --> 2:20:27
what was happening. And I promise you the explanation isn't because he's one of the

2133
2:20:27 --> 2:20:33
perpetrators. He's someone whose career was badly restricted because I think he turned down

2134
2:20:33 --> 2:20:41
the deal that lots of other people took. So yeah, so they've made look what I'm in brief,

2135
2:20:41 --> 2:20:47
lots of people spotted that it was mad and fraudulent. And I think it's a great question.

2136
2:20:47 --> 2:20:53
It's a really good prompt to us to think about what's the sharpest thing for each of us that

2137
2:20:53 --> 2:21:00
made it obvious. The fact you're on this call, you didn't drift here, you came here. So I think

2138
2:21:00 --> 2:21:05
that's worth building on Celia. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. And enough. And many people

2139
2:21:05 --> 2:21:10
from different angles, Mike, well said and important question. All right, Hootie, quick

2140
2:21:10 --> 2:21:14
announcement by you, Mike will be interested in this as well. Hootie presented to us in January,

2141
2:21:14 --> 2:21:21
put the recording into the chat. Graham, you go. What is it? Say what he is, Charles. So he's a

2142
2:21:21 --> 2:21:27
landline pilot. He's a sect, Pontus pilot who refused to be jabbed. And Hootie, he's recording

2143
2:21:27 --> 2:21:31
or putting the check go, go Hootie, give us a quick Senate. He resigned, actually, Charles, he resigned.

2144
2:21:33 --> 2:21:39
Good man. I've heard of him from a friend in Australia already as a great man. So thank you.

2145
2:21:39 --> 2:21:45
Let's know on his head from me. If he's here. He's here. Speak up, unmute yourself.

2146
2:21:49 --> 2:21:57
He's not on my on my panel. He's here. He should be, Mike. He's there. Okay. Well, first of all,

2147
2:21:57 --> 2:22:03
thank you for allowing me to speak up at the last minute. And Dr. Michael, you, I have great

2148
2:22:03 --> 2:22:07
admiration for you. And our mutual friend is trying to tee something up. And when you're ready,

2149
2:22:08 --> 2:22:11
if you're prepared, I understand you're tired because I'm exhausted as well.

2150
2:22:12 --> 2:22:17
Look, I just want to touch quickly on what happened in the Senate Royal Commission hearings in

2151
2:22:17 --> 2:22:23
Australia in Canberra last Wednesday, John Larder, the SAC paramedic and I attended to give evidence

2152
2:22:24 --> 2:22:30
in the Royal Commission to the towards the structure of the Royal Commission.

2153
2:22:30 --> 2:22:36
And what before I went in there, I had nothing really prepared, but I sat in the car and I prayed,

2154
2:22:37 --> 2:22:42
and I asked for guidance on which way to take this. Now, what I've realized in the last three

2155
2:22:42 --> 2:22:47
or four years, as you would have Michael as well, is that a lot of a lot of people involved in

2156
2:22:47 --> 2:22:53
handing down these mandates and rules and regulations, they're corrupted, but they're

2157
2:22:53 --> 2:22:57
not just corrupted from a financial perspective, they're intellectually corrupted. A lot of them,

2158
2:22:59 --> 2:23:03
a lot of them really can't string a solid argument together. And sadly, some of those

2159
2:23:03 --> 2:23:07
are our elected representatives. So we have to look at them from a different angle.

2160
2:23:08 --> 2:23:14
In my life as an airline pilot, I was also a human factors facilitator or instructor. I used to teach

2161
2:23:14 --> 2:23:21
cabin crew, crew, how to solve a problem that a critical problem by critical thinking and teamwork.

2162
2:23:21 --> 2:23:26
Now this came about after an accident in the Everglades in Florida back in the 70s,

2163
2:23:26 --> 2:23:31
when the United Airlines DC team crashed into the Everglades because all the pilots and the

2164
2:23:31 --> 2:23:36
flight engineer were concentrating on changing a light bulb in the landing gear. I remember,

2165
2:23:36 --> 2:23:43
I remember reading it. Yeah, I remember reading. As a result of accidents like that, human factors

2166
2:23:43 --> 2:23:50
was a genre that was formed to make airline flying safer. And in that capacity, I also taught

2167
2:23:50 --> 2:23:55
medical surgical teams and Air Force crews that were sent to us on a subcontract basis to

2168
2:23:55 --> 2:24:01
participate in our course. What I realized in the in all of this was before I went into the

2169
2:24:01 --> 2:24:07
Senate hearing, I have to appeal to those people who don't have the common sense to listen to

2170
2:24:07 --> 2:24:11
arguments from us because they just want to follow a narrative that's been pre prepared for them.

2171
2:24:12 --> 2:24:17
I talked about Apollo 13 and whether people believe in the Apollo missions are not irrelevant.

2172
2:24:18 --> 2:24:25
But the scenario is this. There was an accident on the spacecraft on the way to the moon. And

2173
2:24:25 --> 2:24:30
as a result, Houston, we have a problem. And as a result of that call, a whole lot of people got

2174
2:24:30 --> 2:24:35
together to work out some solutions to get those astronauts home. Now, according to the story,

2175
2:24:35 --> 2:24:40
they use duct tape and cardboard basically to get a square peg to fit into a round hole and they got

2176
2:24:40 --> 2:24:47
them home. When I spoke to the Senate, I said that we're in a similar situation. When this so-called

2177
2:24:47 --> 2:24:53
pandemic was released upon the world, a whole bunch of people in the scientific arena race defined a

2178
2:24:53 --> 2:25:01
solution which was a vaccine. And while they were all in mass, racing defined some kind of a solution.

2179
2:25:01 --> 2:25:06
A whole bunch of other people like you, Mike Yeaton and Dr. Peter McCullough and Pierre Corey and

2180
2:25:06 --> 2:25:11
others were saying, all right, they're looking after this that far ahead of a solution. What have

2181
2:25:11 --> 2:25:17
we got in the cupboard that we can use now to save lives while we're developing that? And so a whole

2182
2:25:17 --> 2:25:22
bunch of you got together and you said, hey, Dr. Tess Laurie looked at Ivermectin and all these other

2183
2:25:22 --> 2:25:28
people came together with a whole bunch of solutions. And they went back to the authorities

2184
2:25:28 --> 2:25:33
and said, hey, while you're working on a vaccine, we've got solutions for you. Let's implement these.

2185
2:25:33 --> 2:25:40
Now in the Apollo 13 scenario, the mission controller said, yep, that's great. Let's do that.

2186
2:25:40 --> 2:25:45
But when it came to this COVID madness, not only were the doctors who were working on what we had

2187
2:25:45 --> 2:25:51
in the cupboard that was already available censored, so were their solutions. And that

2188
2:25:51 --> 2:25:58
led me to say in the Senate that we are at the pointy end of the worst human factors disaster

2189
2:25:58 --> 2:26:03
in global history because the solutions that are readily available now have been cancelled.

2190
2:26:04 --> 2:26:08
And my urgency message to the Senate was government, you must listen.

2191
2:26:09 --> 2:26:14
When I used to fly airplanes, if ever there was an emergency situation I was involved in

2192
2:26:14 --> 2:26:18
and I wasn't ticking all the boxes to get the airplane on the ground like the crew did in the

2193
2:26:18 --> 2:26:24
Everglades, I was trained to respond to a message from my copilot, captain, you must listen.

2194
2:26:25 --> 2:26:30
And that's what I went to the Senate. And there were two senators in the chamber, but several on

2195
2:26:30 --> 2:26:36
the call that weren't available to be there and to present those people, none of them asked a

2196
2:26:36 --> 2:26:42
question after that. They couldn't argue with it. Now, if we go in with the science and all the

2197
2:26:42 --> 2:26:47
other stuff, they would argue, they would come out and ridicule them, whatever. They could not

2198
2:26:47 --> 2:26:51
get over that because that's the real truth of what's going on. There are solutions readily

2199
2:26:51 --> 2:26:57
available. They have been ignored and those who were proposing them through pragmatism and reason

2200
2:26:57 --> 2:27:03
have been cancelled like yourself. And we have to appeal to these intellectually handicapped

2201
2:27:03 --> 2:27:09
politicians and bureaucrats that there are solutions and the people who have those solutions

2202
2:27:09 --> 2:27:14
should be brought out of the cupboard and into the light where they can participate in the debate

2203
2:27:14 --> 2:27:19
and get people well and get our countries back on their feet again. And I can honestly say that the

2204
2:27:19 --> 2:27:25
video of that presentation to the Senate is going viral. And I believe we need to look at different

2205
2:27:25 --> 2:27:32
ways of waking people up. And I believe that's one way of doing it. We have to stop saying people

2206
2:27:32 --> 2:27:37
have got to go to jail, people have got a hand. We've got to look to the intellectually handicapped,

2207
2:27:37 --> 2:27:41
stop running down rabbit holes in different directions and focus on the target. And I think

2208
2:27:41 --> 2:27:47
we can do it. And Michael Yeaton, you have done so much work and I congratulate you for that.

2209
2:27:47 --> 2:27:52
And I'm really concerned about you personally because you've done much more than most other

2210
2:27:52 --> 2:27:59
people and I thank you for it. So thank you. Thank you for saying that. And I think we're all doing

2211
2:27:59 --> 2:28:05
what we are, as it were, dropped into this moment in space to do, including, you know, your thing

2212
2:28:05 --> 2:28:09
you just said there, that there's such powerful work. It's like, Captain, you must listen.

2213
2:28:11 --> 2:28:19
That's great. I mean, because, yeah, I'm sure that that has saved lives repeatedly in a crisis.

2214
2:28:19 --> 2:28:22
So, yeah, maybe it's, you know, Mike, you must listen or whoever it is.

2215
2:28:24 --> 2:28:31
I think you're talking about, can we find ways to get additional or can we find ways to get allies?

2216
2:28:31 --> 2:28:38
At the moment, in the past, I've tried to inform them. And I think they don't really know what's

2217
2:28:38 --> 2:28:43
going on. The 650 elected members of parliament in Westminster, I think most of them do not know

2218
2:28:43 --> 2:28:51
what's going on. I don't think they've all been, you know, shown the script and told, you know,

2219
2:28:51 --> 2:28:55
this is your reward if you go. I don't think they know what's going on. I think they're not

2220
2:28:56 --> 2:29:02
expected to really participate, but to turn up, I think they call them lobby for that. You're

2221
2:29:02 --> 2:29:05
expected to turn up and go through the bloody lobby. If you're told to go through the iLobby

2222
2:29:05 --> 2:29:11
or the noLobby, that's what you do. And certain people get selected to get, you know, government

2223
2:29:11 --> 2:29:15
positions, and then they get more senior government positions. And so they're willing to be very

2224
2:29:15 --> 2:29:23
accommodating of their party. And so if someone like me points out your government, your party

2225
2:29:23 --> 2:29:29
is doing the wrong thing. It's just, you know, I know they know before they even hear me that if

2226
2:29:29 --> 2:29:34
it sets them against their party, it doesn't matter what I tell them, they're not going to do it.

2227
2:29:35 --> 2:29:41
Right. That's, but they are, and I think they also deselect people like you and me.

2228
2:29:42 --> 2:29:46
So we, people like you and me never get elected. Even if we wanted to stand,

2229
2:29:46 --> 2:29:50
they'd have removed us because it's like that hoodie guy sounds like he's going to be clever

2230
2:29:50 --> 2:29:57
and trouble. And so we've ended up with a whole bunch of bloody drones. I've noticed in your

2231
2:29:57 --> 2:30:03
Senate, you seem to have at least two people who have got their head screwed on and are brave enough

2232
2:30:03 --> 2:30:09
to speak about it. Antic is one of them and there's another guy. So I'm not looking at,

2233
2:30:09 --> 2:30:17
I'm not looking at politics. So. Renick and Malcolm, Michael Roberts, sorry, what's the name?

2234
2:30:17 --> 2:30:26
Malcolm Roberts, you've got some very well informed people who won't shut up and they are being heard.

2235
2:30:26 --> 2:30:32
I'm not looking at politics. I don't watch any mainstream media. I've seen them. So that whatever

2236
2:30:32 --> 2:30:37
they've managed to get around the world. And that's, so that's good. All right. We're 20 minutes over.

2237
2:30:37 --> 2:30:44
Woody, I know we're way over. But there's something that all. Steven, you must listen.

2238
2:30:45 --> 2:30:50
Just momentarily. Very good. I think seriously, I think what, something about what Celia said,

2239
2:30:51 --> 2:30:56
you know, there's already some vulnerabilities that, you know, rather than what me worrying about,

2240
2:30:56 --> 2:31:01
they have got awesome power. And if we're not bloody lucky and determined, they will roll us over.

2241
2:31:01 --> 2:31:07
But not over. And that's why I'm thinking there's probably they've made some mistakes,

2242
2:31:07 --> 2:31:13
which we need to capitalize on. And I think Graham has hit on some points, which is in every

2243
2:31:13 --> 2:31:18
legislature, there's a handful of people who are brave and clever. Imagine if we could get

2244
2:31:18 --> 2:31:24
them all together and let's say we had three from every one of 192 countries who are articulate

2245
2:31:24 --> 2:31:29
and brave and plugged in. You'd have whatever that would be. You probably have a thousand people.

2246
2:31:31 --> 2:31:37
I don't know. Can we do something? I don't want to form a one world team. One that's ever so

2247
2:31:37 --> 2:31:41
macabre and frightening. And also we provide an opportunity for us all to be wiped out at one time.

2248
2:31:41 --> 2:31:48
But there seem to be too small a number in any one country to get a breakthrough in any one country.

2249
2:31:48 --> 2:31:53
There's no point in us getting the bronze medal in every country. We've got to get gold somewhere.

2250
2:31:54 --> 2:31:57
I don't know how to do it, but I feel we've got to get gold somewhere.

2251
2:31:59 --> 2:32:06
Charles, you must listen. We can't let Michael go without a 22nd prayer. Please don't let us do that.

2252
2:32:06 --> 2:32:07
Okay.

2253
2:32:07 --> 2:32:08
Rana, who do you want to do it?

2254
2:32:09 --> 2:32:16
Braym is a wonderful communicator. He's an airline captain or was and I think he was

2255
2:32:16 --> 2:32:20
the most senior in Australia at the time he resigned. I don't know whether that's true,

2256
2:32:20 --> 2:32:26
but anyway, the point is that he's a wonderful communicator. He's incredibly trustworthy. He's

2257
2:32:26 --> 2:32:32
very sensible. And I think he's exactly the kind of guy who is able to put these messages out to

2258
2:32:32 --> 2:32:36
the public in language that they understand because he needed to do it when he was an airline

2259
2:32:36 --> 2:32:43
pilot. Thank you, Stephen. Okay, Hoody, go for your 20 seconds. Charles, can we have a question?

2260
2:32:43 --> 2:32:46
Stephen, we'll do it. We'll do the prayer and then your last question, Stephen. Okay, so

2261
2:32:47 --> 2:32:51
Hoody. Thomas Binder as well. He had his hand up before and he lost it because of people.

2262
2:32:51 --> 2:32:58
Yeah, we're way out of time. Thomas, quick question. Go. I haven't got people leaving,

2263
2:32:58 --> 2:33:04
Stephen. Come on, Thomas, go. Stephen asked me whether I wanted to say something so I rose my

2264
2:33:04 --> 2:33:10
hand. Hi, Mike. Great to hear you. Hi, Thomas. It's our time to meet you in person once. I hope we

2265
2:33:10 --> 2:33:19
can do this. I fully agree with everything you said. I think the most important things we have to

2266
2:33:19 --> 2:33:26
inform the public are three. First, there was no pandemic of a killer virus. There was mainly,

2267
2:33:26 --> 2:33:34
if not completely, an RT-PCR testing pandemic. Second, the whole mRNA vaccine platform is

2268
2:33:35 --> 2:33:43
basically flawed, so it must be banned. And the third is refused to accept anything that contains

2269
2:33:44 --> 2:33:51
digital in its name. Yeah, these are my two cents. Yeah, I absolutely, wholeheartedly endorse all

2270
2:33:51 --> 2:33:56
three of those things. Thank you. Thank you, Thomas. Thank you, Stephen. Okay, Stephen,

2271
2:33:56 --> 2:33:59
one question because then we'll have a closing prayer from Hoody and then we're going to go.

2272
2:34:02 --> 2:34:08
So, Mike, I noticed that you say that there was no pandemic, but you also say the formulation was

2273
2:34:08 --> 2:34:14
such that actually you know that it was a complete fraud. They used three different methods to kill

2274
2:34:14 --> 2:34:19
people. And in fact, I think you went on to say there were two more, which you had limited

2275
2:34:19 --> 2:34:26
knowledge of. I think it's extremely important from you to the people around the world hear

2276
2:34:26 --> 2:34:33
that message, that distillation, if you like. And then if they want to know more, you can provide

2277
2:34:33 --> 2:34:40
all the evidence. I am right now in a process where someone reached out to me to say,

2278
2:34:41 --> 2:34:46
we need to get what you've said down in writing. You need to speak to me and I will write the

2279
2:34:46 --> 2:34:51
bloody article. So I've actually had someone do exactly what I needed. They threw me the life

2280
2:34:51 --> 2:34:56
raft to say, grab hold of that. I'll pull you to the shore and then I'll record you speaking. I

2281
2:34:56 --> 2:35:02
will write the article. So it'll be me and the author. So we are going to do this in the next

2282
2:35:02 --> 2:35:07
couple of weeks. So we need wordsmiths and we need people like Celia Farber, who's a brilliant,

2283
2:35:08 --> 2:35:14
insightful author, expert on the AIDS virus. And she was thrown into that at a very tender age.

2284
2:35:16 --> 2:35:20
But I think that we need to play to our strengths. And so I'm talking from a medical

2285
2:35:20 --> 2:35:27
doctor's point of view. In my view, there was not only no pandemic, but there was no disease

2286
2:35:27 --> 2:35:34
called COVID-19. It was a fake disease. The PCR test we know was fraudulent. You wrote with William

2287
2:35:34 --> 2:35:39
Wolfgang Wood, I'll go think about that to the European Meds Foundation. So you understand that.

2288
2:35:39 --> 2:35:43
But I understand as a medical doctor and all doctors in the world should have understood that

2289
2:35:43 --> 2:35:50
it wasn't properly diagnosed this so-called disease. So the whole thing was a fraud. It was

2290
2:35:50 --> 2:35:57
a fake. And so there was no, and why was it so when, so they tried to say, oh, but you know,

2291
2:35:57 --> 2:36:03
so it wasn't even clinically possible. It wasn't possible to diagnose it clinically. That's the

2292
2:36:03 --> 2:36:09
point. So there was nothing that a medical doctor could hang his hat on and say that's COVID-19.

2293
2:36:09 --> 2:36:14
They tried to say, oh, loss of taste, loss of smell and all this nonsense. And seems everybody

2294
2:36:14 --> 2:36:18
in the world seemed to forget that when they had a cold previously, they lost their sense of taste

2295
2:36:18 --> 2:36:24
and smell and the same with, and then they say, oh, it was, it lasted longer with COVID. No, sorry.

2296
2:36:24 --> 2:36:33
There was no symptom that was pathognomonic for COVID-19. So the whole thing was a fraud.

2297
2:36:33 --> 2:36:38
And it's been done before. They did it with the swine flu. And Wolfgang Wood, they hear the

2298
2:36:38 --> 2:36:47
German hero. He forced an investigation at the European, at the Council of Europe, which is a

2299
2:36:47 --> 2:36:53
constituent part of the European Union. And the investigation is on the, the report of that

2300
2:36:53 --> 2:36:59
investigation is on the internet. It was a fraud. They did the same thing in 2020 and we're still

2301
2:36:59 --> 2:37:05
living through that nonsense. We need to expose these. Come on. But how many trials? No, we're

2302
2:37:05 --> 2:37:11
half an hour over. People are leaving in droves, Stephen. You don't care. I do. I don't care about

2303
2:37:11 --> 2:37:14
the people who leave because if they leave, they shouldn't have left. Come on. Come on.

2304
2:37:16 --> 2:37:23
I just nearly finished, Charles. So there was no COVID-19. There was no pandemic. There never was

2305
2:37:23 --> 2:37:28
a pandemic. Pandemics are not possible in the future. And no fear is necessary because they

2306
2:37:28 --> 2:37:34
use fear propaganda against all the populations around the world to promote this nonsense. This

2307
2:37:34 --> 2:37:40
Trojan horse for totalitarianism. We need to expose them. Okay. Thank you, Stephen.

2308
2:37:40 --> 2:37:46
Hoodie, closing prayer, please, for Mike and the group. Dear Lord, Father in heaven, we just call

2309
2:37:46 --> 2:37:52
on your Holy Spirit, Father God, to nurture the heart of Michael Yeaton, a man who has given so

2310
2:37:52 --> 2:37:58
much to bring so much truth at such great cost. Father, we know this is taking a toll on him and

2311
2:37:58 --> 2:38:03
we're all paying a price, but he is paying a very, very high price. Lord, we need to be

2312
2:38:03 --> 2:38:08
called to action. We need to find ways to penetrate the truth into the houses that make the differences.

2313
2:38:09 --> 2:38:14
So Lord, as we proceed further, we ask you to guide our every step. But most of all,

2314
2:38:14 --> 2:38:18
our prayer at this moment is that you would surround Michael Yeaton with angel swords drawn

2315
2:38:18 --> 2:38:25
to protect him, to watch over him and to cover him. And this is our prayer in Jesus name. Amen.

2316
2:38:25 --> 2:38:32
Amen. Well said. Thank you, Graham. Beautiful. So for those with the time, Tom Rodman has put

2317
2:38:32 --> 2:38:36
the link into the video group for those who have endless amounts of time to do that. Well done.

2318
2:38:36 --> 2:38:42
If you do, there's the link. Mike, thank you so much for being with us, Stephen. Thank you

2319
2:38:42 --> 2:38:49
for organizing, Mike, to be with us. And some very important information. Please watch the recording

2320
2:38:49 --> 2:38:56
for those of you who are live and we will see you again on Sunday night, Monday. Big round of

2321
2:38:56 --> 2:39:01
applause to Mike. Hopefully you can see us, Mike, that we're all clapping. Yeah, okay. Thank you very

2322
2:39:01 --> 2:39:06
much for inviting me and then putting up with me because as you can tell, I can not only talk for

2323
2:39:06 --> 2:39:12
England, but I can talk for anybody and not stop. But thank you very much. I've enjoyed the interaction.

2324
2:39:14 --> 2:39:17
Thank you, Mike. Thank you. Wonderful. Thank you, Mike. Enjoy the rest of your vacation.

2325
2:39:17 --> 2:39:23
Thank you. Thank you. Bye bye then. Thank you. Bye bye. Thank you so much.

2326
2:39:29 --> 2:39:35
Thanks, Charles. Thank you, Stephen. Great job. We got there. Woody, say your name.

2327
2:39:35 --> 2:39:40
I'm sorry. I just felt that it was such an important presentation. Yeah, yeah, no, it's okay.

2328
2:39:40 --> 2:39:44
And we wouldn't get another, well, we would get another chance, but you know, you can't

2329
2:39:44 --> 2:39:50
recreate the atmosphere of this evening and I think that we should all feel that that was

2330
2:39:50 --> 2:39:55
well spent. That was time well spent. Yeah, it was. Thanks for having me in there, guys. Thank you.

2331
2:39:55 --> 2:39:59
Bye bye. Bye bye, buddy. Thanks. Thank you so much to you as well for that prayer. Thank you.

2332
2:40:00 --> 2:40:04
All right. Bye, everybody. And to everybody who asked questions. Thank you.