All right, so the question now, Stephen, let's unpack what we need to do and then go on to
other questions.
From what Richard is doing, is anybody confused about sources of information and what he would
like us to do with the 10 letters?
Charles, you've got your hand up, is that because you want to say something or because
it's legacy?
That's legacy, sorry, I'll get it down.
No worries, thanks.
So the question, it's clear in my mind that for anybody from any other country, you put
a cover letter on his existing letter to the US Attorneys and say this is what's happening
in the US.
I'm bringing this to your attention because after the US, this process is going to be
also repeated in this country.
Let me assure you, like Michelle Brennan has done in Scotland, like many of you have
done, like Charles Crofton, Atkins that you've done in the UK, many of us are writing to
politicians in Australia, putting them all on notice, writing to directors of public
prosecutions.
But Richard's focus is to overwhelm the attorneys general in states and the federal so that
there is no plausible deniability possible.
And that increasing pressure will lead to one, two, three attorneys taking those actions.
That's the game plan from 10letters.org and the Flemingmethod.com is also a source of
the depositions of articulating the evidence.
His affidavit, well thought out clearly.
So that helps us in our thinking about what are the issues.
That's what I understand the game plan to be and is one almost 100 of us on here.
If we sent it out to 10 people, that would be if we if we send it out to 10 people, we
spread the word as a thousand people that then goes out to 10,000 people.
So it's the viral system that Glenn Macco also did.
That's what I understand.
Simon, you have your hand up.
Suggestion, comment, question.
I also talked with Mark yesterday about Stephen's letter before, Jacques's letter.
I think it's also one that is very nice to send around.
I don't know if Stephen, you have an update?
Yeah. Oh, you mean the global research one, the one I published there?
The one that you started French with.
So Michel Shostoska is talking to him yesterday or the day before.
And he actually asked me about that because I'd forgotten about it.
I know it's bad, but I had forgotten about it.
And but he said, can you do an update?
So I am going to do that.
That's on my list.
I'm happy to edit a bit if you want or make it a bit colorful or something.
But my question is actually in the...
I'm happy to work, Simon.
I couldn't hear that.
Like last time to put it a bit in with some pictures and links and a bit, you know, edit a bit.
Yes. OK.
But we're also discussing actually to open up this letter thing.
Like I would love to have a letter for my mayor.
I would love to have a letter for the hospital.
I'd love to have a letter for...
We have a letter for the Pfizer employees and we have so many like targets you can go for your own doctor.
And if there's a place where you can download standard letters around us that is more customized to either
a doctor, the hospital or the mayor of a city or police department or whatever, I think it would be...
Simon, you mean we should have a website?
No, I mean, it doesn't matter where it is.
But if it's somewhere where people can get letters that they can customize to their own mayor, to their own doctor,
to their own... with the data, which is already there.
And we just... I think you could spread...
The trouble is, yeah, well, the trouble is each letter needs to be as good as possible.
That takes time.
So, but I was thinking of saying to Charles, where's Charles now?
Doesn't really matter if you can't see him.
Oh, there he is.
I'm here. I'm here.
I was thinking of saying, Charles, that maybe we should do a kind of template for, you know, so that...
So it sounded like Richard Fleming
favoured sending those three links with the video, the indict...
Sorry, the affidavit and the book.
And so just to complete it and get it as good as possible, try to do a letter for people, you know, who don't particularly like thinking.
And so that way we avoid kind of maximise our chances of getting traction if we do a good letter, a short, good letter,
which can... a template for which people can use in this group.
But the trouble is we haven't got a website, so maybe you can do that, Simon.
No, we can...
Or just some place where we can deposit letters.
Yes, exactly. Templates.
I think also...
Sorry.
Go, Simon.
I think it's powerful, of course, to have his name on there, but it's also very powerful if just citizens, anybody just put their own name on it and they say, OK, we can send that letter to our local mayor.
Sure. Yes, exactly. You mean...
All the employees of Pfizer just put it under their car, you know, where they want it.
Exactly.
So...
But Simon, did you mean that using Richard Fleming's affidavit, for example, and just putting our names on it, or did you mean that at all?
I just meant... Sorry for being so clear.
I just meant that it would be nice to have a source of letters to different people in every country, that people don't have to write it all, but they just can take the content already, put their name on top,
put some other material on there and then send it to whatever they can.
To their doctor would be a different letter than to the mayor, would be a different letter than to politicians and so on.
So just a big resource.
Exactly.
Letters would be fantastic.
Yeah.
Simon, I think what we can do is do a template and also after we've had a look carefully at the flemingmethod.com and the 10 letters, see what data is there, because I'm sure all the information is there.
I haven't had time to go to those two websites, if anyone does.
But that's what Richard was telling us, that his affidavit with all of the laid out evidence is there.
It doesn't need much more.
And Charles, I happen to, so thanks to Avery, who's on the call now, he's an American doctor.
He drew my attention to something I had seen before, meant to remember and then forgot.
And Avery, can you guess what it is?
Rhinoformix opening submissions to the Mock Fords.
The templates, the Todd calendar, the projects that we're doing.
Right.
No, I meant you actually sent, I think you said to the C19 lot, you said, have a look at this, what do we think of this kind of thing?
And I looked at that today and I thought it's absolutely brilliant.
And I did think that at the time, it's probably the best account of what has happened in simple language.
And he does it on a video and I've decided I'm going to do a transcript of it because it's that good.
It's about 20 minutes long and it would take a long time to do a transcript, but I think it's worth doing.
Is this the video clip from Del Big Free?
No, it's the video clip of the Mock trial, if you like.
Yeah, Rhinoformix.
Crimes Against Humanity trial, yeah.
William.
Yeah, I'll just make a comment.
You know, I did share that with C21X and one of the individuals who actually represents a larger group that uses, that has an attorney that we're all familiar with.
It's not Todd calendar, but at any rate, she sort of was relatively negative about former.
And she said that this was something that he had no standing and that this is something that she just, it was sort of like she just didn't take it.
That's not the point though, Avery.
The point is, in my opinion, it's the best account I've seen.
Yes, yes, that's true.
Simple language of what has happened in the last two and a half years.
Absolutely. It's a model.
It's labeled as a model.
As his first presentation to a grand jury.
Yeah, I thought it was brilliantly done.
And people, you know, I know that Dr. Fleming is not particularly good friends with Reiner, but there are other people attacking Rhinoformix and I think we can't afford to attack our own people, especially.
Yeah, I mean, personally, I enjoy listening to Reiner.
It's frustrating that it takes so long to do what needs to be done, but it probably does.
It takes a long time to do it.
I'm not an attorney, so I can't speculate on that, but I think he's a reputable man.
He also one of your compatriots in UK, who's a member of our group, actually sent me a note that I'll just share one line with you.
Basically, he commented that there were two huge cases that Reinerformix was very successful with.
One was against, I think, Deutsche Bank and another.
And Volkswagen.
I'm sorry?
And Volkswagen.
Yeah, maybe that was it.
But, you know, he thought pretty highly of Reiner.
And I have no reason to distrust the man.
I think he's very loyal to the cause.
I think he's intent, whether he succeeds or not eventually, I don't know.
I will say that Dr. Ferguson is very interesting because I see this group is kind of, Simon mentioned templates.
And this is exactly what the project through Todd is putting together.
We're putting together templates so that we can wage a campaign in a matter of just weeks or just a couple of months and attract anyone who's vaccine injured, anyone who was given the vaccine, the quote, vaccine without informed consent, which means everyone, or anyone who was treated inappropriately in the hospital.
They can pick a category out of these categories, pick a template, fill it out.
And we have literally at this point, I think about 50 attorneys that have volunteered to each one will take on some of these, review them before they're submitted to state courts.
It has to be submitted to state courts because they're negligence or not providing appropriate countermeasures, countermeasures, proper treatment.
You can't go after.
And this is exempt from the Prep Act.
Prep Act is on a federal basis and has to do with willful harm or whatever.
And we can't go that route because of the Prep Act.
But you can go through state courts and we're working on and we've got a massive number of people who've signed up for this through C21 and another subgroup.
And also some people who are on this call are aware of all this.
But I've got 70 other lawyers worldwide.
You have a list of attorneys forwarded to me and I'll forward them to Catherine Watt, who is working for Todd's project, putting, trying to help put all this together.
We're going to establish a separate website because this is too much to put on his one site under VaxChoice.
That's the feeling. He has an IT guy who's going to be working to establish a second website.
So, you know, it sounds like we're in a parallel here, to my point.
It's just that Fleming's is at an international basis, national, international.
We're more at the state level of individual filings to overwhelm the state courts.
Can I interject here because I think there's some fantastic ideas that are coming out.
I think we're at a point here where we can actually start to make some progress.
I completely agree, Avery.
What we need is to start off with a website that we can then expand and build upon.
So it starts off with whichever country is going to lead it.
But there should be, it should be database driven with the opportunity to switch countries.
So you go on to the website as a user, as a member of the public.
Right. And what you're able to do is you're it's to generate it's a form filling exercise to generate a letter, a legal letter to go to your representatives, go to your MP, to go to the attorney general or whatever.
And in the form, you get to you get to to to write your complaint so you can select the form that you're complaining about informed consent.
You're complaining about the death of a relative, you're complaining about the negative side effects that you or your family or people that have suffered from you, you know, whatever negligence that you you feel that you want to complain about.
You fill in that form and then you are able to to to to fill in the area of the form that you want to make your complaint.
And then you you press generate and it creates the email, it creates the letter. Right.
And it fires that to the you can what you do is you put in your address, your postcode or whatever it actually generates the your your MP and his email address.
Right. And then it fires it all off. And so this is and the so it's not very difficult to create this.
I mean, you could you could create this for a thousand someone would build this for a thousand dollars.
I mean, it would really wouldn't be too difficult to do. But then it gives us all, you know, if you've got these lawyers behind or whatever, you know, you can work on the back end to to make all of this to put this stuff together.
And the front end, you know, just provides an opportunity for members of the public just to go crazy on it.
The attorney would review that letter once the individual completes the fill in the blanks and so forth to review that to be sure it's valid.
And then it would be filed, at least in our project, through the state court systems.
But but you're right. I mean, if you could have some sort of and, you know, I have to talk to Todd about it.
I don't know if he's even on the call. I did forward him the link about 20 minutes ago.
But and he has a lot of respect for Fleming, by the way. I mean, both of them have been involved in DOD issues, as you know.
But yeah, you're exactly right. We just need to be sure that an attorney can review it.
The filing fees, we're talking about waiving those the attorneys are.
But, Stephen, if you could just send me a list of the attorneys that would want to be involved and we can add them to the list.
And I'll talk to Todd about perhaps if there's a way once we build a website, can we have links that would be for somebody, say, in the UK or somebody in a different country that wishes to file with with their attorney, whatever officials in your countries?
So what would be good to avoid, Avery, if possible, and Charles would be duplication.
So I've got this and Todd knows about it because we were working.
Well, we still are working together. But but so he knows about this list.
He's probably forgotten it, though, because he's so busy.
But I can I can communicate with you, Avery and Todd.
I mean, yeah, it's CC Todd.
Avery, are you are you helping Todd at the moment officially or kind of unofficially?
Well, on the initial call about 10 days ago, there were three physicians and 30 attorneys.
It was a Zoom call and I was notified by the Florida Medical Freedom Coalition to participate.
And basically, I raised my hand and, you know, after hearing all the lawyers discuss all of this and the need to have medical expert input, I volunteered to assist him in any way I could.
And I know we have other doctors are very interested in that as well.
They're on our list. But I mean, you know, a lot of these are actively practicing doctors like Dr. Cole and Dr. Tyson, the various ones that you're familiar with.
They're in active practice. Now, I have the knowledge background, but I'm not actively practicing medicine, which is a dent if I have to serve as an expert.
But I'm an organizing person, a messaging person, a connect people type person.
I'm working with Todd and a group of people to to try to help his project along.
I'm just one of a few of a very few at this point, I think.
And Avery, you're a radiologist like me, aren't you? Therefore, very sharp. No, I'm joking.
Well, I'm a critical thinker and an imager. Yes, everything's visual.
That's right. Avery is very critical.
He's very sharp, Avery.
Thank you, John.
Yeah, just on that, actually, Cathy, we've looked at this a few weeks ago and the technology is there.
I mean, it's done for making contracts, legal contracts.
Everything is there. You just have to.
So if we want to do it, bring together the knowledge on one side from the doctors.
Simon, sorry, the knowledge is for what? For this website?
For making an automated claim generator.
Yes, exactly. As Charles suggested. Could you do that?
We've lined it out at the time.
Simon, could we just do it so that we don't have all the frills of having days for various minority groups and all that kind of thing?
So just keep it to these templates and I'll get back in touch with you.
Keep it very tight, I think, so it doesn't become unwieldy and therefore lose its reputation.
I will.
OK, Simon, thank you for that. Cathy, Cathy Doll.
Yeah, so listening to Avery and other people's ideas and being familiar with how government is completely different in every US state.
So some states, the state controls, you know, virtually everything throughout the state.
Some states, they cede certain functions to the counties and some states, they ceded to the cities.
All these states have different policies. Some are made, all the mandates illegal.
Some didn't. In my state of Massachusetts, every city is different as far as the mandates.
So I really think Dr. Fleming's idea is the best one for the United States.
And Avery's idea might work better for a country that has uniform laws so you can make one letter.
But you can't make one letter that's going to work in every US state.
You can't even make one letter that would work for every town in certain states or every county in certain states.
Cathy, we're not going to do that. We're not doing that. We're actually going to make it very specific.
We have attorneys that are essentially licensed in all the individual states.
Yes, right. So you'd have to make a different letter for every state.
And in some states, you'd have to make a different letter for every city or town or in some states, a different letter for every county.
But would you, Cathy, when it's about serious crime?
These are state courts, not serious.
Serious crime is serious crime in every state, surely.
Well, why not start with adopting Dr. Fleming's idea?
Well, that's what I'm defending his idea, which, as I understand it, yeah.
But he's already got a website that generates the letters for, you know.
I see what you mean. Yes, for that. Yes. No, we were talking about other things. Yes.
So we're talking about two lots of different things.
Yeah. So I was just thinking what you're talking about might work, you know, doing something different than what he's doing might be better in different countries where, you know, the country is small enough that it has, you know, one government for the country.
So what we need to do is, yeah, maybe you can help us, Cathy, because you've got a mathematical brain.
You are a professor of mathematics, aren't you?
No, I'm not a professor. I have a master's degree.
I've taught college. Yeah, I've taught, you know, I've taught engineers and, you know, a lot of math.
But mostly, and I've taken a lot of political science, which is why I know that the state to state laws are just so variable in the United States.
We'll have the citations for each state specific to each state.
You would need an attorney to do the research for every state.
But in some states, you need to research every county in every town is what I'm saying.
So it's not as easy a process as you're.
So Cathy, you can be our devil's advocate, but we won't be defeated.
So we will do it.
Oh, yeah. Or do it. Do that for England or, you know, where there is a more uniform government for each, you know, place, you know, or there's fewer.
I think we really need to discuss it.
So I don't know, whoever is interested, but Avery, Simon, you, Cathy, me and Charles, of course.
Well, I'm going to just adopt Fleming's method because I'm in the United States and I happen to own three houses in three different states.
So I might just fudge it and, you know, write to three different states because I have an address.
I think that his is at a different level.
It's more of a going after the crime, the crimes against humanity at a much larger level than what we're talking about with Todd.
Todd Callender is referring to individual victims flooding the state courts after these attorneys have reviewed to make sure that they fit the puzzle, you know, fit the pattern for those courts.
Yeah, that's a great idea. I like that idea.
But what I'm saying is, you know, the real question in my mind is, you know, I love what Fleming's doing.
I think it's a little bit different in the sense it's focusing on AGs, you know, states, attorneys, general.
And then what sets off the ground, he's implying that we can expand that internationally, if I'm not mistaken, but not yet.
And he wants to succeed here before we promise other nations.
So the question is, is combining the two too much or for one website or does he, you know, does his website take care of his objective?
And Todd and his developing site needs to, we just need to have a parallel that addresses what we're going for at the state level, the individual level.
One other thing I wanted to mention is his affidavit is 115 pages long, approximately.
So, you know, he's got like a long letter that's really good that names the defendants.
And then he's got the cover letter generated for us, which is great.
But all he needed to do was put in the name and address of all the states attorney general.
So that was nearly as difficult as what you're trying to do.
Exactly. I agree with you. I agree.
I think that, you know, he's going to be...
And I was just thinking you could really expand Dr. Fleming's method to other countries.
Yes, exactly. And I think it would be a mistake to just wait for the United States.
I agree.
We need to be firing in all the countries in the world because we don't know where the successes will be.
Right.
Yeah, Cathy, I agree.
I think for right now, based on all of the discussion here, that Fleming has got the ball rolling in his direction.
And we just need to let him do that.
And whether he wants to consent that we share that with other nations at this point, that's up to him and whoever.
And then we'll just have calendar.
You know, his is a project in progress and it'll take a few weeks, I think, to get it off the ground because we're going to wage a campaign.
But it won't be the same thing as what Fleming is doing at just the AG level for each state.
He's already got his all mapped out.
It's obvious he's got it all planned out.
We don't really have all of our templates out for the state, you know, individual grievances and so forth.
We're in an earlier organizational phase.
I think Todd has two templates.
Avery, in summary, Todd is concerned with civil matters, correct?
Also criminal, maybe, but primarily with civil, correct?
Richard is concerned with crime.
Big difference.
That's correct.
There is a big difference.
And I think this is, I can't tell you the right answer.
I could get that if Todd were on the call.
No, no, it's clear, Avery.
It's clear. Todd is not going for criminal.
It's for civil complaints about hospitals, about whatever, and the templates for each state or county or district.
But they're still both very valuable.
And remember, Richard's method is not because, you know, Michelle's written, many of us have written letters to politicians and attorneys general.
That's not the point of Richard's method.
Richard's method is to overwhelm each state attorney general with thousands of letters so that they realize how this is not just one loner idiot like Charles Codes and Avery Brinkley and Stephen Frost.
This is thousands of people.
That's the point.
Right.
I will say it's on the basis of negligence is what we're looking at now.
If that's not civil.
That's civil, Avery.
That's civil.
Okay.
Avery, the negligence, so-called negligence is criminal.
Criminal, yeah.
No, no, no.
It's only if it goes to the next level, Stephen, the negligent homicide.
But negligence per se is civil.
And I'm saying what has happened in the last two and a half years, Charles, is not negligence.
But if you're taking crime, that's good.
Everyone's got to understand this.
If you want to issue criminal proceedings, you need the state to cooperate with you, just like reporting a crime to the Metropolitan Police.
They shut it down.
Please understand that.
You can't just put a complaint in and something's going to happen.
No, it won't.
I understand what you mean.
Sorry.
Yes.
Okay.
That's civil.
That's Todd's strategy.
There are a whole bunch of civil cases going as well.
And remember, Warner told us two weeks ago, and he'll be speaking to us on the 28th of August, Warner told us there's over 16,100 live cases in the U.S.
right now going through the courts.
Well, let's make that 100,000 cases because there's a million attorneys in the U.S.
And some are criminal because, like, for instance, there's one guy where they killed his daughter and they put an illegal do not resuscitate order on her.
And he demanded to have it removed and they refused to remove it.
We've got a lot of those.
A lot of those.
Yeah.
And there's also everybody the law of tort, Kathy.
So, so, you know, you can you can get you can get a similar outcome with not having to go through the criminal process.
The law of tort everybody is the law of wrong.
So, Kathy, that example, if someone does something wrong to you, you can take action against them in the civil civil.
This particular father wants them to change the birth certificate to say murder.
Yes, or the death certificate, not the birth certificate.
Oh, yes.
Yes, of course.
Charles, I want to inject so there's not confusion to our audience here, even though it is state AG's, it is not state court for Richard Fleming's.
It's federal court.
And therefore, there doesn't need to be uniqueness in the letter that goes out from from Richard because all of the AG's, we want them to be going into state district court to apply it
and state law.
I mean, federal district court, federal law is the same across the country.
Very good.
Thanks, Glenn. Excellent.
Charles, Eric, Eric Morris, I think it is has been waiting a lot.
Sir, right on.
Thank you. Thank you, Stephen.
I can make a website so there it's pretty straightforward and then I can allow somebody to easily just take over it if I'm not around.
So my background, I'm one of the guys that actually took Dr. Fleming's research because he has a congormon of research.
If you read up there and Dr. Francis A. Boyle, and we went I went to the DOD and the IG and they basically filed complaints and it fell on deaf ears back in early 2020 on the experimental injected bio weapon.
So we and we propose it as a bio weapon that they're sticking in someone's arm.
And of course, here I am.
I'm still fighting it.
And but I can do the site for you.
And I'm still pure blood.
I haven't taken it and I can retire now.
So I'm in the active duty Air Force mid level guy.
So flying 130s.
And your sperm is the new crypto new digital asset, the unjabbed sperm.
Right.
By the way, Eric, thank you.
So you're still in the system, Eric.
Can you send your email to Stephen Frost, please?
Just make sure that he's got it.
My thing right here on the chat here.
Thank you.
There it is.
KB could you possibly send me an email?
Yeah, yes, sir.
Yeah, that's great.
Very good.
And then I'll send it.
Well, can you send a message directly to me?
And then I'll shoot an email to you.
I'll be in touch.
I'll get in touch.
Right.
Yeah.
Thanks, Eric.
Shimon.
Yes.
Hello.
Thank you.
So I want to play a little bit of the devil's advocate.
First of all, I think that during a genocide, it is not very helpful to write letters.
But that's an opinion.
Another point I wanted to make is that I completely disagree with Dr. Fleming on his analysis on what these injectables are.
And I had a dispute with him on that.
He does not understand the role of nanotechnology that I know is in there.
And I think it's a bit risky to pretend that you know everything about something like where the virus originated from,
where a specific strain originated from and what's in the injections.
And it's not just a bio weapon.
It's a whole technology.
Thank you.
Well, yes, Shimon.
Nobody in the world knows what's in these injections.
So, well, I'm sorry.
So I participate in testing that.
And this is ongoing.
And I agree.
We don't know exactly.
But we've unraveled enough to know that the official narrative is completely fake.
Correct.
But what is in the injections, nobody in the world knows.
So I too despair when I hear people.
But I forgive Richard because he's actually done something.
I too despair when people make out that they know more than they obviously do,
including the use of Omicron, Delta.
I would like to know how that has been diagnosed.
I really would.
But I don't want to be fighting Richard Fleming or Rainer Fullmich.
And I wish they weren't fighting each other.
I think Richard Fleming understands a lot about the technology from everything I've seen.
Have you looked at his?
That's not the point, Cassie.
That's not the point that Shimon is making.
Have you looked at Richard Fleming's treatment protocol, which he's had up for over a year now?
Yeah, but that's not the point.
Just for the record, I am familiar with the work of Richard Fleming.
And I sit regularly with Rainer Fullmich and Bobby Kennedy Jr.
and Mary Holland in their CHD meetings.
And so I know a thing or two.
Although I'm not a lawyer and I'm not even a radiologist.
But Shimon, some of us know here that there's a dispute between Richard Fleming and Rainer Fullmich.
But to be honest, I like both of them and I think we need them both.
And we don't want them fighting.
And we don't want others who are shooting from the sidelines fighting either.
And about the no virus, you know, whether there is or there isn't a virus.
But I agree with you, Shimon, that people talk as if they know more than they actually do.
And we're talking about people who claim to back up everything they say with science.
And I just can't understand it.
That was my point exactly, Stephen.
I really cannot understand where the diagnosis Omicron comes from or Delta.
Because in my view, the whole of the medical side of this nonsense had was all about misdiagnosis and encouragement to misdiagnose.
And there were no symptoms that were pathognomonic for Covid-19.
And there was no test for Covid-19.
And you wouldn't expect a test for a coronavirus.
Yes.
I filed the IG complaint using Keri Mollis's patents and literally our medical department came back and confirmed that it's a replication process and not a measure of contagion of any sort.
And they stated that in their rebuttal to my thing.
And they said we're still going to use it despite what we just said.
So yes.
Eric, could you send that to me?
Yes, sir.
I didn't see your email.
Yes, sir. I'll get I can.
I can.
If I got on my computer right here.
My email address is steven.frost.
Steven with a PH.
.frost as in Jack Frost.
At BTinternet.com.
So nobody has satisfactorily explained to me how, including Peter McCullough, but I respect Peter McCullough, obviously for all the work he's done.
But nobody has satisfactorily explained to me where the diagnosis for Omicron and Delta and all these BA5 and BA1 and all the rest of them.
It's just nonsense, in my opinion.
And the fact that people are repeating it just makes it more difficult to understand what's happened for the general public and for the doctors, never mind the general public.
Steven, Steven and Charles. Sorry, my hand up isn't working. It's Mark Sexton here. Good evening.
Hello, Mark.
Hello, Mr. Sexton. We'll call you Professor Sexton.
Yes.
Long time no speak. I hope you're all very well.
Indeed.
Call your superintendent.
Hang on, Steven. So Mark's had his hand up for a while. Eric, you're done, correct? And Shasta will come back to you after Mark and Mark, go. Good to see you.
Apologies, I can't get my hand wave thing to work and I'm not very good at tech. Anyway, good evening everyone. Steven and Charles, in particular. I haven't seen you for a while.
In relation to what Richard Fleming is proposing, I had a meeting, I'm sure you're all aware, about the crime number and the criminal investigation with the Metropolitan Police in London that failed in February.
I actually had a meeting with somebody who had a significant amount of knowledge about that criminal investigation.
Now you all know that we literally flooded the Metropolitan Police. They were getting an insurmountable amount of phone calls, emails, personal visits to the police stations.
And what this police inspector actually told me to my face was the directive from the top.
Everything that comes in, and he said they were getting battered daily with thousands of calls, emails and the likes, letters.
Ignore, delete, put them in the bin and do not reply. That's exactly what they were told. Whether it was 100 a day, a thousand a day, 10,000 a day, everything was delete, bin, ignore, do not reply.
That was the response that came from the powers that be.
And unfortunately, that seems to be across the board in the UK. I have tried absolutely everything. I've been, as you know, with MPs, with police, the Association of Crime Commissioners, the London Mayor, the Independent Inquiry into the COVID pandemic, which is being carried out by the chair, Baroness Hallett.
I've been in touch with their office and what they're all doing is, if you're reporting or alleging crime, go back to the police. You go to speak to the police. They say this is a political matter.
Go and speak to your MPs. They're batting you from pillar to post and you go around in a big vicious circle. We've done that to death here.
We've done all the liability orders. We've done all the cease and desist orders. We've done all the personal liabilities to headmasters, to pharmacists, to doctors, hospitals, MPs, senior police. We've done all the letters. We've done all the talks. We've done all the liens. We've done everything for the last 18 months until they're coming out of our ears.
The only stage left is for the people to do the right thing and take the law into their own hands the right way.
Mark, you know that I'm a big supporter of yours, but I think that Americans understand the grand jury system much better than you and I do.
So I don't think it's equivalent to reporting things to the police, a grand jury investigation.
That's totally different process. I do agree with you.
And the thing in the United States is there's not worth doing it.
Yeah. So in the United States, there are, you know, many Republican led states. So those attorney generals are going to be more apt to start an investigation than democratically led states, most likely.
Exactly. And hopefully the point has been made that in the documents provided by Richard Fleming, that if they don't act, if they don't call a grand jury, then they too could be considered in the future as complicit in all these crimes.
We're getting that here too, Stephen, and what's happening is they don't care.
We've had private criminal prosecutions where the judges turn around and said, I'm not even going to read this.
We've got lawyers who are sending in letters, as you know, Philip and Lois have done an incredible amount of work.
Those letters, which are incredible and very heavily evidenced with crime and who's responsible. They're ignoring them. They're putting them in the bin. They don't care.
But again, Stephen, Mark's going. Keep going, Mark.
I would also add that are we forgetting the evidence from Dr. Pornima Wagg and Christine Massie's freedom of information requests where on the 20th of July, we literally had to fight with the police at Charing Cross police station just to get that evidence submitted and four people were arrested.
They don't even want the information now. They're ignoring it. They don't care. And that's coming from some very powerful people.
That's more evidence then of complicity by the police, UK police.
And I agree with you, Stephen, but they don't care. Every route we take.
Well, we don't care what they think, what they care about. They are getting to the film now.
And that's why it's down to the people now here. It's down to us, the people, to do the right thing and use our law, which is their law, their law, which is our law, to start taking the law into our own hands and doing it the right way. And that's where we are here.
And that's what Reiner Fulmich is about, crimes against humanity.
There comes a point when even the police in the UK think, hang on a minute, maybe this is changing a bit.
So I don't think there's anything wrong. And I think it would help a lot if Richard Fleming's letter and Reiner Fulmich, whatever he's got in here.
So when I've done that transcript, we present these things to the police because once we've got it recorded that they know they've had this stuff submitted to them, then from that date, we can use that evidence in the future.
We have been doing that, Stephen, since October 2020. And the directive that's coming through now is anything to do with the government, anything to do with Covid or the vaccines, ignore it.
We're not investigating it and we're not going to give you a police officer to talk to you about it and report any crime. They're now sticking to that directive, I'm afraid.
So what are you saying, Mark, that we just give up and...
No, no, no, no, no, it's the people now, Stephen, it's down to the people.
That's where we are.
We've known that for a long time, Mark.
Good, that's what we have to keep doing.
I have exhausted every lawful avenue. I've exhausted everything with MPs, crime commissioners, mayors, the independent officers, police conduct, the police.
I've gone to every single avenue, including the police federations of England and Wales and the Metropolitan Police.
They are not going to do anything at all.
Well, they're all complicit then. So they'll all be...
No, no, no, hang on, Stephen, the point that Mark's...
We know what the police are going to do, which is nothing. Good. At least, Mark, you've done great work in identifying that.
So going to the police is a waste of time. We've notified them. They're already on notice, Stephen.
But we do other actions. Charles Crofton Atkins has told us he's been pushing politicians. We all have to push politicians.
We all have to get the people on site, everybody. We've said that for a long time, for 12 months.
That's what Glenn Makkow's work is about. That's what Jerry Brady is doing in terms of getting the vaccines.
Large numbers of people. They are a small number. We are a large number. That's the fact.
So, Mark, despite the fact that you haven't got many results yet, you've done very valuable work in exposing the vagaries of the British police.
Yeah, yeah. That's it.
That is correct. It's been a two and a half year journey of banging my head against the wall.
But Stephen, there's no way they can turn around and say and plead ignorance to this because they've all got that information.
Exactly.
They've acknowledged it, but they're not going to do anything with it. So it's the end game for them now.
So in relation to Charles, is it Crofton Atkins? Is it possible that Charles can reach out to me?
I'd really love to talk to him about what he's been doing. So I think we could do some work together on that.
Yeah, that would be very good. Yeah. I don't know if he's on the call now.
That's right. We'll check. Mark, I'll happily. We've got his email. So we'll do that. All right. Thank you.
And I'll speak to you all soon. I need to go and get my bill a bit from work. So good to see you all and keep fighting the fight.
I'm proud of every one of you.
Well done, Mark. To you. Thank you.
Come more often, Mark. Fight with us.
Pardon?
Come more often. Fight with us.
I can't cope with all your egos. I can't. I just can't cope with them all.
We haven't got any.
All right. Good Mark.
Hi. Thank you.
Well, Dr. Stephen, did you read Eric Copolino's chronology of the whole SARS-CoV narrative, as well as the sequence shill that he sent out to the whole group two weeks ago?
It's Shasta, isn't it?
Yes, it is. Hi. Hi, Dr. Stephen.
So I did see it, Shasta, but I haven't had time to read it. I didn't have time when I was going through.
I haven't had time yet. No, sorry.
I know Sue Frost has been reading the entire thing and I have to acknowledge her for that.
I guess for me as a holistic doctor of 30 years, I feel like the doctors and the investigative reporters also need to be pushed.
As you were just saying, how are they coming up with a test for Omicron and all these other variants?
They need to explain that to us. And how are they even, and I'm not trying to be, I'm not trying to be divisive, but if the PCR test never works,
if the PCR test never was to detect infection, then Dr. Stephen, how did they even come up with SARS-CoV-2?
You mean the COVID? There is a SARS-CoV-2 if the PCR test does not work.
And allegedly, according to the COVID-19, you mean? SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.
OK, well, in my opinion, so let's forget the virus.
Let's say that there is a disease called COVID-19, which they've claimed all along.
Right. Yeah. So in my opinion, there is not a single symptom which is pathognomonic peculiar, if you like, to COVID-19.
And neither is there a test, because as far as I can understand, there never has been a test which has worked for coronaviruses or any viral illness.
Well, OK, there may be one or two tests, but there weren't any. And Drosten rushed it through.
I think it was Eurosurveillance. But the cycle threshold of 45.
Cycle threshold of 45. Yes, that's what they were doing.
But it doesn't matter what cycle threshold. It's not intent.
Kerry Mullis, in my opinion, was murdered in preparation for this pandemic in inverted commas, which isn't a pandemic.
Hear, hear.
My thing is, Dr. Stephen, I don't think that that has been satisfied that there was even a new virus.
And this isn't to be argumentative, but the all-cause mortality in the world did not increase in 2020, 5.8 million.
And they just, in my opinion, relabeled scared and probably even had crisis actors.
So my thing is I want the doctors to be pushed.
I want the doctors to look in their blind spot and see if the scientific theories have been satisfied.
If these tests are congruently giving the same positives to the same samples in multiple labs.
And if they're not, stop using them. Stop. The doctors need to stop.
Well, the tests don't work. We know that.
Yeah, but the doctors keep validating these diagnoses from these tests that don't work.
And the doctors do not seem to want to speak up about this potential huge hoax.
One thing I personally don't think is a very good possibility, Shasta, that no COVID-19 exists.
There is no. I'm with you, Dr. Stephen. I agree.
There's a very, very good possibility.
I have a research...
But guess what, Shasta? A lot of the doctors, it's more important for them to stay in the in crowd of this movement than it is to actually say the truth.
I'm with you.
Or say what they really think.
We have all failed because six months old are being jabbed and they're being murdered.
We have all failed. And my request is that doctors get pushed to look in their blind spot
and see if the scientific theory has been satisfied as you have looked, Dr. Stephen, and stop using this scam test because now they want to do it to monkeypox.
And what are they going to do next?
It's to me, it's not just the people and it's not just the lawyers.
It's the doctors and the investigative reporters that want to stay chummy with their buddies and also don't want to look at the details.
But Shasta, it's not all about...
So the medical thing is, you know, the pandemic bit in inverted commas is part of it, yes, but then you've got the energy thing, you've got the Ukraine War thing, which is connected to the energy, and then you've got food shortages, which of course, it's just incredible what's going on.
I'm with you, Dr. Stephen. It's just that I'm in a medical doctors for COVID ethics and I don't think it's ethical to validate a diagnosis based on the testing.
I absolutely agree with you. And I just don't understand why people talk glibly about Omicron and Delta, you know.
I'm with you.
And I think, well, how's that been diagnosed? It hasn't been diagnosed, in my opinion.
I'm with you.
Hang on.
Thank you.
We've made the point. Thank you, Shasta. And the other point that's been made by numerous experts is that the PCR test doesn't diagnose anything. Now, that has been said, and stop trying to work it out.
Stephen, it's very clear the PCR test is a tool for this agenda. It's nothing to do with science. Stop trying to articulate this. So let's move on.
We know why the PCR test is being used.
Yes, but it's very important to explain to the people why they had to come up with something so outrageous as the PCR test for a viral illness.
And the reason, of course, was that it was a very convenient way of increasing the cases and thereby imposing the fear propaganda, because the cases led to deaths and hospitalisation.
And it was all about fear propaganda. They needed the cases. And that's why the PCR test was absolutely crucial. And I think even Reiner's missed that. But I don't know. Maybe I'm wrong.
No, he hasn't.
Okay, Jim, I'll presume JWT.
Yes, thanks. Hey, a couple of things. The PCR test, the reagents were all wrong until March 13th of 2020.
When they switched the reagents, everybody became positive and then they shut down the United States.
Just think about that. So they changed the reagents. So everybody was testing negative up until March 13th of 2020.
And then they switched the reagents. This has been a planned takedown of the United States to shut down by the third week of March 2020.
Goldman Sachs made a $1.5 billion put in November of 2019 saying the entire world economy would collapse by 2020, by the third week of March 2020, and made $100 billion on a $1.5 billion bet.
That is 95 times their bet.
Goldman Sachs knows about it. They just hired the former director of MI6.
This is an intelligence takedown of the world.
I happen to be a radiologist as well. And I see that on my screen here.
That's funny. Yeah. Good. Two radiologists in the top left hand corner.
So but I'm interventional. So okay, slightly different. But I'm also but but this is the this is the NBA side. And the finance. This is a financial takedown of the world.
Exactly. And it was being done by what I what is the by ACE2 is it is murder by numbers. The ACE2 receptors are very critical.
The ACE2 receptor is the same thing that binds and you know, I don't care to talk about a vaccine or a virus. I only talk about the spike protein. Yep. The spike protein is what you measure the spike protein is what they say is all Macron or Delta or whatever.
It's the spike protein and the spike protein now since Pfizer has the authority to generate any kind of new spike protein they want.
They don't have to they can think about a variant make it injected into people by gum. There's the next variant and it's not a COVID variant. It's a spike protein variant.
And we know that the spike proteins form exosomes and you breed them out and you shed them. This is a spike protein pandemic. I don't care to talk about a virus because I'm not going to argue with anybody if it's there or not.
And I'm not going to talk about a lag lab leak theory or whether it was lab leak. This is this this is intelligence takedown.
So I do agree that this is genocide and I believe we need to go to the UN Genocide Council.
And I believe this is a takedown of the world from the neutral countries because the neutral countries cannot be harmed while everybody else fights each other.
The neutral countries often sponsored World War and then they benefit from the end from everybody fighting each other.
That's Switzerland. That's Costa Rica. That's Israel. The neutral countries.
And we must be cognizant of this.
So we must also figure out that this is the intelligence community.
And there's a reason why, you know, Tom Rents uncovered all this these issues of of the Department of Defense cleaning off their records of lying.
What would allow them to lie to the American people and to lie to the defense community and to lie to their military members?
Well, if this was a if this was authorized, if somehow this damage and this death was authorized by levels higher than the Department of Defense, then they could allow they would be allowed and mandated to lie about this to keep this secret.
And that prospect is very scary.
Because that means everybody is being lied to in the United States and the six size countries who are working together in this MI6, the Mossad, CIA, NSA.
That means this is an entire intelligence takedown.
And that means that you're not going to get the truth until you declassify the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
And the people who declassify it are the Declassification Board of the United States, which includes Ezra Cohen Watnick.
Ezra Cohen Watnick is the head of Declassification Board, and then it must be declassified by Joe Biden.
Unfortunately, the CIA and the NSA and the and these intelligence communities run our elections because they use Dominion servers,
Hark InterCivics, which is owned by Bain Capital, which is also a CIA operation, and Twitter, Facebook, Google are owned by InQtel.
InQtel, Q-T-E-L. Q is homage to the Q of MI6 or James Bond, which is KU, which is the CIA.
This is all intelligence. So how do we stop this?
We have to we have to ask this intelligence community or tell the intelligence community that this is racially specific bioterror.
That does not harm George Soros.
That does not harm Rochelle Walensky.
Does not harm Nancy Rosenstein, who authorized this vaccine in the CDC, who's Rod Rosenstein's sister, who does not harm Klaus Schwab.
This spike protein is the bioterror. I don't care if there's a virus because the spike protein is what's circulating.
So Dr. Fleming may have a may have a point.
Go ahead, write letters, but we may need to take some additional action and and not focus on the virus, focus on stopping the deployment of this spike protein throughout the world.
We should we should label this spike protein bioterror and we must stop even allowing it to be produced.
Stop the mRNAs from being allowed to be made.
Stop anything that allows the spike protein to be disseminated throughout the world because it is genetically specific bioterror.
Thank you. Thank you, Jim. Thank you. I agree.
Yeah, I agree with a lot of what he just said. I mean, the whole point here is spike protein.
If you read Kapilino's, I mean, Eric Shasta was referring to, I read most of that.
The only thing that I thought really was absolutely off center was that all of this is psychological, that if you had COVID, it was all because you had fear and you had some sort of psychological condition that made you think you had COVID.
I had COVID, but I'm not psychologically prone to imagination when I get sick.
I never get sick almost, knock on wood, but I had it.
And I know people who were in the same room that I had it because we were all exposed to a common source.
And it wasn't water. It may have been ventilation.
But, you know, it was back when everybody was masking.
But, I mean, it's contagious. Clearly, it's contagious.
Whether it's contagious spike, we know it sheds, or it's a virus.
He's right. I mean, you can argue about that till the cows come home.
The whole point is, I guess he's making a point here that if you go with what Richard's postulating, he's basing a lot of it on the fact that it's viral and maybe that's not correct.
I still think we need to send these letters to the attorneys general. We need to do this on all fronts.
So, yes, I agree, Avery.
It doesn't matter what your opinion is about whether there was a virus or whether there was a COVID-19 or it.
We still need to do it.
But my question to anyone who wants, I mean, how is a bioweapon, educate me, how is something contagious if it's not either bacterial, viral, or whatever?
I mean, unless it's in the air you breathe or in the water you drink or the food that you eat.
There just no one has proved commonalities here other than maybe the air you breathe because this is aerosolized.
Avery, you've said now and I don't want to argue with you, obviously, because you're a radiologist.
But no, I'm sorry.
Stephen, Stephen, Stephen, before you go on, we've got two newcomers with Eric.
I think everybody can see it. Hello, kids. Wave. Look at this, Stephen.
Hi. That's why we're all working for everybody.
Hey, go boys and girls.
Sorry, Stephen, keep going.
Yes. Avery, I just wanted to ask you.
So I'm not taking pot shots at you, but I'm just I'm interested.
What symptoms or maybe you think it's, you know, secrets or confidential.
And I will have to accept that.
But but what symptoms did you you know, you say you have had covid-19 that that was transmitted to others.
What symptoms did you all have, which you which were peculiar to covid-19?
Why couldn't it have been misdiagnosed flu?
You know, could have been or any other respiratory virus for that matter.
Exactly. You're exactly right, Stephen. That's true.
The only thing I would say is a lot of clinicians use a loss of taste or smell.
You know, I don't know how accurate that is. Maybe you could lose that with loss of taste.
Smell is not pathognomonic for covid-19.
Right. It was it was claimed by governments that it was.
And the next thing everybody's saying, the people around me are saying, who have had covid-19?
I've said, how do you know you've had covid-19 and it wasn't flu?
Oh, because you know, a sense of smell.
And you remember that they also they also really convinced me then not.
They also said that the number of flu cases was at an all time low that year.
And I don't believe that this could have very well been a variation of the influenza virus.
Of course. But pneumonia pneumonia and flu deaths disappeared in the UK.
But for someone to state that it's a bio weapon, but it's not contagious.
I have a huge problem with that because I know it was contagious.
I mean, otherwise, how would I have had it? I mean, I wasn't drinking.
We have well water. You know, my wife didn't get it, but she was isolated in a different part of our house.
But I know two people I was around who had the same symptoms I had.
And I mean, you've got millions of people that had it.
You know, whether it was obviously not it may not have even been a pandemic.
We know that the PCR test and Shasta is correct and everyone else is said this.
Those tests are just worthless. We don't even get them anymore.
I mean, not if we have any education.
But Avery, crucially, that was the basis of the pandemic.
Alleged pandemic. Right. That's the point I'm making.
OK, Avery, thank you for that.
And the fact Anna has gone through and I know we've got a moving population here,
but a bio weapon can be a virus or a bacteria bacterium.
No, you know what? I'm prepared to.
I'm prepared to accept that, you know, if someone said it was not a bio weapon, I'd consider that too, because I don't believe anything at the moment.
Hang on, Anna, Steve, I don't care whether you believe it or not.
The definition of bio weapon is clear. Full stop. It's in legislation. It's very clear.
Yes. So that's just I just make it so Charles, tell me how do you know that this was a bio weapon released?
I don't know. I was some quoting Anna who studied under the laws of war that you've already referred to.
Sure. What the definition of bio weapon is a spike protein fits into that definition.
That's all. That's all.
Definition of bio weapon is in legislation.
But what I think we need to do is exactly what Shasta suggests.
That's a different question of what we need to do.
So the medical doctors need to get together and discuss this from the beginning and question everything.
Anyway, let's get to the question.
We've got 23 minutes, but there's a very important article in Michelle's latest newsletter, everybody, to take Stephen's point there.
And John O'Looney. Sorry, Michelle published a letter from John O'Looney.
I don't know if many of you have read it. I'll refer to it if we have time.
Glenn, first you then Shimon.
I'd like to issue a challenge.
It's not often that we get some precise material and a precise mechanism that allows us to actually take action instead of a lot more talk.
So we've been presented a case, I think a powerful one.
We've been presented a website to activate that.
And my challenge is, we still have over 60 people here.
As many as you as possible after you leave this room or tomorrow, go and activate that link, exercise it and see what it's like.
Come back on Tuesday at three o'clock and tell us your experience.
Did it seem to make sense? Were there any problems with it?
Even if you don't believe in it, I'd like to have the feedback of how does the process work?
Are there any flaws? Are there some things we could correct and help Dr. Fleming to improve it before?
And then that allows us to go out all the more powerfully and broadcast it to a really large segment.
I also want to point out, even though there's a stronger likelihood of Republican AGs that would engage in here, every state should send it.
We don't want Democratic states somehow putting in complaints against other AGs.
We want to show every state that we're in favor of this, if nothing else, to muzzle the Democratic ones that would otherwise oppose us.
But in any case, we want those counts to be up and substantial and every AG and their associated governors to know there's anger out there and there's a place that we can act.
And I think this is a great opportunity.
Well said. Well said, Glenn. This is an opportunity for action, everybody.
And I point out that whilst you might think it's not going to do anything, that doesn't make it so.
And so Richard is not stupid. He has thought through this process, put the AGs on notice and shared amongst all our respective countries.
Thank you, Glenn. Good challenge. There's the challenge. We will have reports, Stephen, Tuesday evening.
We'll have reports back from people who've taken action on Glenn's challenge.
Very good. Yeah. Excellent.
Shimon.
Thank you. I want to say something regarding the spike protein.
I think that we've become too favorable towards that term.
My opinion is that there are clearly toxins at play here, but there is more than one.
And this alleged viral infection started out as a respiratory syndrome.
And then people started having neurological problems.
When I had COVID, in quotes, I had brain inflammation.
There was nothing wrong with my lungs.
And I didn't bother shoving those 10 inch sticks into my nose.
And so it started as a virus with spikes.
And then it turned out that there is something toxic, even when the spike detaches from the alleged virus.
And as far as I'm concerned, they could be rotating a few toxins and calling them with Greek alphabet names.
This is my opinion.
And also, I noticed that when people started to get injected and there was shedding, apparently,
the injected people don't die of respiratory problems.
They die of heart failure and myocarditis and such things.
So there is a lot of confusion.
I would add to that the chemicals that have started to be deployed during this pandemic,
only they call them disinfectants.
And they spread them in hospitals and nursing homes and in schools and everywhere, even in the streets.
Has anyone tested these disinfectants? And so on.
So, yeah, I rest my case.
Yes, there's a lot of stuff which is being repeated, Shimon, in my opinion,
which maybe it was planted there to get people to go along a certain road, which is going to get them nowhere.
Absolutely agree. There's a lot of deception here.
And obviously, some people are trying to send us up wrong routes and we should be careful about that.
Yeah. And you know what, Shimon, I'm not even convinced about the spike protein.
I really would like to start from the beginning with somebody who knows what they're talking about with an open mind.
But nobody's got an open mind at the moment.
I think you'll, Charles and Stephen, you need to hear this brief story.
I'll be real brief. Yesterday, an acquaintance of a friend of mine went, Bell, and he's the father of the friend's friend.
And he went to the emergency room at a local hospital in Florida.
And they told him that, well, they did a PCR test and they said, well, you have COVID.
But he was asymptomatic. He had just had a fall is all he had. He had no other symptoms whatsoever.
Fortunately, his son was with him. And he says, well, no, my dad has no other symptoms.
He doesn't have COVID. And they wanted to start him on remdesivir.
And yes, they said, well, we need to put you on remdesivir and go ahead and admit you for now.
And then we'll have to decide later if we need to go to the ventilator or whatever we need to do.
That is just absolutely criminal. The son took the father out, even though the hospital said you can't do it.
He says, yeah, I'm taking my dad out. He took the father to a doctor I know, an internist in central Florida, who's very, very good.
And he cleared him completely. He says, you don't have any virus. You fell. You're fine.
He went home and he's fine. So you have these hospitals that are criminal in what they're doing to people.
And this is making me livid.
They're bastardizing the practice of medicine.
What's that?
They're bastardizing the practice of medicine.
Absolutely. Makes me livid to hear these stories.
It's complete nonsense.
I sent this to the state surgeon general.
He won't reply and he's already told me he can't reply under sunshine laws, but he said he would read every message.
I sent him the message because the friend of this guy whose father I refer to asked me if I could contact the surgeon general.
And I know him as Dr. Lattapoe, who was appointed by Governor DeSantis.
He's on the frequency we are.
But he's also political in some ways.
He has to be because he's a state surgeon general.
He's of the GOP.
But Avery, couldn't you write to Lattapoe and tell him this story?
Yes. I told the friend that called me to tell her friend to write the Department of Health, the ACHA,
which is the health care association where you file complaints against hospitals,
and also write a letter to the administration of the hospital and let them know that this is...
And I think that the internist who cleared this gentleman's father, he needs to do that along with the son.
They need to do this.
If people don't do this en masse, they're going to keep doing these...
But Avery, so fortunately he had a son who stuck up for him.
Exactly.
Just imagine all the more vulnerable people who go in like that for a fall.
And this is in Florida, yes?
Yes.
Yeah. So just imagine all the vulnerable people go in and then the next thing they are on remdesivir and they are on a ventilator.
And then on a ventilator.
And then the next thing they're dead.
Yes.
And then the poor relatives are so upset by the death, they can't think, never mind do anything about it.
That's true.
So it's really important, Avery, that you raise the alarm with Lapidot as to what is going on in that hospital,
because presumably he has the power to close that hospital.
But because it's political, he probably wouldn't.
But he needs to know from you, a medical doctor, and I will write to him if you like, that this could be going on...
Well, I asked Dr. Lattell to do this.
This could be going on on an industrial scale.
Yes.
Undetected.
Well, I'm going to make sure that the physician who cleared him, who I know well and who's licensed, by the way, was...
Certification was threatened by the American Board of Family Practice.
I've also communicated with him and asked him to file a complaint.
If he doesn't do it, I'm going to do it.
Excellent.
Maybe you should write to the Attorney General of Florida about that.
Actually...
Oh, that is Lapidot.
Sorry.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
Sorry.
Oh, no.
The Lapidot is State Surgeon General, but the Attorney General...
Sorry, General.
Yes, I'm sorry.
...will get my letters from Dr. Ferguson.
I mean, Fleming.
Exactly.
Okay.
Very good.
Okay.
Eric.
Yes, sir.
I'd like to add to Dr. Yannowitz's stuff about neurological issues.
So, myself, I had decompressed sickness in 2007 going up in elevation.
I was put in a hyperbaric chamber for three days or a decompression chamber where you
drop down purge oxygen for three days straight.
Fast forward in early 2020, I started having the same neurological symptoms.
So, when we'd go up and do airdrop operations, literally headaches, sharp pains, all the same
things happening, neurological symptoms happening, and it's all happened...
And as goes off of the shedding and the stuff that was written in Johns Hopkins University,
they...
Literally, everybody's panicking in my unit to get the shot because they're going to face
administrative action.
And I later, I went...
What they call it, duty is not including flying.
And they put me on the...
I went, got some MRIs done.
I don't know if this is from the shot or what, but they found an arachnid system.
I'm not sure if it's an arachnid system, my brain.
Fast forward, as soon as they quit doing all of the shots on a regular basis, and they're
not really pushing boosters right now where I'm at, the symptoms went away.
So, being in a high concentrate area where you're in a close crew contact, and then everybody's...
It's a high concentration of the shot going into it.
And I noticed once they went away, once that quit, my symptoms went away in going up in
elevation.
Fast forward also in October.
So, since most of you all know that your heart problems and your neurological problems, they
can be kind of confused together.
So, I got a flu shot, numb in my arm for three days.
So, I didn't know.
I was like, I know the doctors weren't going to say anything.
So, I filed a fair saying there's a GlaxoSmithKline shot.
I didn't go to the doctors or anything then.
I talked to some of my buddies that are ex-CIA and then ex-military colonels.
I had another shot called the...
For the tetanus shot, and that's when I had heart chest pains again.
I went in and I've had like developed...
I got a...
I don't got myocarditis, but I got a heart valve disorder and some aortic aneurysm stuff going on.
So, upper aortic, thank God.
So, I can live with it, right?
But definitely the neurological stuff, that is something that I personally felt happened in it.
And from what I've seen with the spike protein, it attacks the weakest part of your immune system.
So, you know, kidneys or whatever it is.
And in my case, it was neurological because I'd already been neurologically damaged and it was
re-aggravating everything that was going on in there.
And I'd just like to add that.
So, if I talk to Yana, what's up?
That does speak volumes of that.
And also, when I was bringing stuff to the intelligence community,
I'd go out kind of like what JWT was saying.
The intelligence community wanted to hear it, wanted to hear it.
And then they didn't want to hear it anymore because basically the leadership does not want to hear it.
And we literally in the...
I don't call it the oath to the Constitution.
I call it oath to the retirement.
And many people are willing to just basically sell themselves short, unfortunately,
and sell themselves, their own selves down the river, you know, with this death shot.
So, yeah, there is definitely a neurological side to it.
And there's definitely some shedding going on from my empirical evidence.
Thank you. Thank you, Eric.
Now, we've got eight more minutes.
Tom Rodman has put the link into the Telegram chat after the 30...
after we get to the two and a half hour mark.
Eric, thank you for that testimony.
Avery, thank you for that evidence.
I was going to share with you something.
Jim, you've got your hand up.
Be quick and then I'll share an important report that I'm going to put in the chat for everybody.
I'll put this in there. Jim.
OK, thanks. Very good.
Hey, Eric, I'm a former flight surgeon with the Navy.
So we talk on the side.
The aortic aneurysms are caused by the ACE2 receptors clogging what's the middle layer of the aorta called the vasovasorum.
OK, so that middle layer dies and then you get the aortic aneurysm.
So people who are getting the vaccines are getting the aortic aneurysm.
But that can also be the people who are having the virus.
It's the same ACE2 receptor causing this damage.
So you're getting so the vaccinated are getting hit harder, but the unvaccinated will be hit as well.
It's all about the ACE2 receptor.
We can talk offline if you want.
Stephen and Charles can connect with you.
Thanks.
Thanks, Jim.
All right. Now I'm going to share this two things.
Number one, I'm going to put into the chat a 107 page document that is now prepared by Philip Altman, a friend of Jerry Brady, doing wonderful work in Australia.
You can see on the screen.
This is the state of the art.
It builds on what it's supportive of what Richard is.
This is a total analysis for 107 pages.
It addresses important aspects of Covid-19, especially in Australia.
The focus on the nature, deployment and effect is abundantly clear.
There's been repression and suppression in scientific circles and the media of any views or suggestions that one counter to the government mainstream narrative.
Many studies now indicate the Covid vaccines, especially the mRNA, are less than safe and effective and the ramifications are truly confronting.
And with these facts, the scientific and medical communities can now begin proper discussions of potential solutions.
This report is being sent to every medical college in Australia.
And I urge all of you to send it to every single medical college that you know.
That's the point of this report.
It's called.
This, Philip Altman spent 30 plus years with the TGA in Australia, knows what he's talking about.
Have a read of this, but send it to medical colleges, not universities.
The second thing I wish to share with you, I mentioned it is the global research newsletter.
And it's from John O'Looney.
And essentially, he makes this statement and I urge you to have a look at the website is this is Michelle Shostakovsky's newsletter.
He says justice won't come from our legal system.
It will come from the collective masses rising up against doctors.
And I urge you to read this article because it's salutary, because when people see what's been done to them, they will take action against their doctors, says John.
And the people who did this will then get away with it.
So it's a it's it shifts your thinking.
I'll put the link into the chat.
Now put into the chat, Maverick, you're next.
We're going to finish in a moment. Jim, you've got your hand up.
Is that another comment? But Maverick, let Maverick go first, because you had a number of comments.
Can you hear me? Yep.
Sorry, I just arrived. It was quite funny to listen to you guys while I was riding the bike.
Never experienced it. Thank you, Stephen, for all this entertainment.
I just wanted to pop in and say sorry, because I'm not here since the past month.
I'm still alive. I just had to crash at a friend.
The situation is not the best right now.
But hey, in case some of you were worried, I'm still here.
Excellent. Excellent.
We're wondering where you were Maverick, so lovely to have you here.
Still, still Southern Ontario for a couple of more weeks, maybe two, three, big maximum, then the States.
And then we'll see.
Hope you're wearing your mask, Maverick.
No. You remember I had a $8,250 Canadian fine three months ago?
Yes, I know.
Well, in the past two weeks, I crossed, I went to the States three times.
On the way in, no questions, no PCR, no nothing. Enjoy your time in the States.
Wow.
So if I go to Canada, I can't get into Canada though, yeah.
Coming back to Canada, no questions, no PCR, no nothing.
Zero questions.
So did you pay that fine, Maverick?
Are you nuts?
Okay.
Well said, Maverick.
No, I will never pay this.
So Maverick, how many times have you had, have you had any letters from them saying you must pay your fine?
No, not a single letter, not a call, not a letter.
Wow.
They have all my info. I mean, if they want to find me, they'll find me. It's not a problem.
Yeah, yeah.
I don't care actually. But why would I pay something that goes against my rights?
So it was a hoax then, the whole thing that, you know, all this $8,000 fine.
It's fear porn. That's all it is. It's a scare tactic.
No.
Nothing happened.
In 2020, people were saying to me, just go to the airport because when you get to the airport, they don't challenge you.
No, they were right.
And I'm now wondering whether I could get into the United States if I flew from the UK.
Even though you're supposed to be vaccinated.
You're supposed to be nothing. The only thing you're supposed to do on this planet is die one day.
You do what you want.
Sure.
Nice, very beautiful. Okay, everybody.
Thank you.
Thank you, guys.
Glad to hear your voice.
No problem.
Tom, thank you for the chat. The link is in the chat.
And thank you for being here. As Daria says, death and taxes are certain.
Well, there's some interesting legal strategies being put in place where Australians are not paying their taxes, Daria,
because the law on constitutional grounds is argued to be invalid and unenforceable.
And that's what's happening with these fines, Stephen. So in Australia, people aren't paying the fines.
So push back. Never, never complies. Better to go to jail than pay these fines, which they won't put you in jail anyway.
Tom's put the link in there. Thank you for being with us. See you on Tuesday.
Tuesday, Stephen, John Stone, you're going to confirm you have organized a super guest.
Yeah.
Andrew Wakefield, Andrew Wakefield, Andy Wakefield on Tuesday.
So we just got to confirm that that should be interesting.
Yeah, that'll be wonderful. So Jerry says, do not comply. Compliance is why this continues.
Thank you. CMN news.org. Jerry's newsletter.
Charles, should we say who Andrew Wakefield is for those who don't know who he is?
I can't imagine anyone here wouldn't know who Andy Wakefield is.
Doctor, deregistered doctor who understands the dangers of vaccinations
and has been working closely with Del Bigtree, produced the first and second Vaxxed movies, VAXXED.
And because he questioned vaccines at the time he did, he was mercilessly pursued in the UK
and chased out of the country, essentially. And I think now lives in Texas.
That's right. I think he's with Elle Macpherson, isn't he? The Australian model.
Oh, right.
So he's, you know, punching above his weight for a UK doctor, Stephen. International supermodel.
Yeah. Well, he's welcome to Elle Macpherson. She's not my type.
Lucky, lucky, lucky Andy. Otherwise you'd steal it from her. OK, everybody.
Oh, I shouldn't have said that, maybe publicly.
Daria, Daria knows Andy. Well done, Daria. Thank you for being here.
Go to the Rodman, follow the Rodman link to the telegram if you've got time to be there.
Look forward to being with you and with Andy Wakefield on Tuesday night, Wednesday morning, 5am.
For me, we poor people here in Melbourne, Australia. Bye, everybody.
Bye, everybody.
Can you send me this chat, Charles?
Yep. Hey, Stephen, Charles, how does this microphone sound? I got a new set of headphones.
OK, good. That's all I needed to know. Thanks. Yeah, I love you guys.
Perfect. Kathy. Talk to you Tuesday. Oh, it's Daria. OK. Yeah, I was going to say.
Yeah. Bye. Excellent. Bye.