1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:07
Everybody, we've got 40 people here. Welcome. Let's get this show on the road. Anna is ready to go.

2
0:00:07 --> 0:00:13
I'll introduce her in a moment. So welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics founded by Stephen

3
0:00:13 --> 0:00:21
Frost and his genius. I'm Charles Covess, your moderator in Australia. I wear my red jacket

4
0:00:22 --> 0:00:27
because I'm Australasia's passion provocateur. Really is the colour of passion and all of us here

5
0:00:27 --> 0:00:33
are passionate about freedom and truth and justice and the Nuremberg Code.

6
0:00:35 --> 0:00:39
There are lots of professions here. If this is the first time that you are here, please

7
0:00:41 --> 0:00:46
introduce yourself in the chat. You are most welcome. The chat is a wonderful resource.

8
0:00:46 --> 0:00:54
Please put your name, properly describe your name so that we know who you are and we welcome you.

9
0:00:54 --> 0:01:01
We are here in the spirit of exploration and discovery and the exploration of true science.

10
0:01:02 --> 0:01:08
And I'm very much influenced by Michael Crichton, the writer's quote,

11
0:01:08 --> 0:01:14
that when someone tells you the science is settled, reach for your wallet.

12
0:01:18 --> 0:01:21
So most of us understand we're in World War Three.

13
0:01:24 --> 0:01:30
We go for two and a half hours. So we have a presenter and then Q&A for the questions after

14
0:01:31 --> 0:01:37
Anna de Busseret, a lawyer, is our presenter today. Use the reactions tab to put your hand

15
0:01:37 --> 0:01:43
up for questions which we handle in order. After the two and a half hours, Tom Rodman

16
0:01:44 --> 0:01:52
organises a video telegram conversation where it's less structured. If you have the time to

17
0:01:52 --> 0:01:57
keep going, that's an opportunity to keep discussing. There is no censorship here. This

18
0:01:57 --> 0:02:04
is a free speech environment, but there is proper moderation. So please understand the distinction

19
0:02:04 --> 0:02:10
between being properly moderated and you thinking there's not free speech. Free speech doesn't mean

20
0:02:10 --> 0:02:18
that you can talk wherever you'd like. So that's what moderation is about. But free speech is

21
0:02:18 --> 0:02:26
crucial. And this discussion group encourages free speech, different ideas. And if you're upset

22
0:02:26 --> 0:02:31
by anything that the speaker says, great, be upset. The speaker didn't upset you, you upset you.

23
0:02:34 --> 0:02:38
So the other issue that happens in this discussion group is that somebody says,

24
0:02:38 --> 0:02:43
I've got a solution to something and they put it in the chat. And somebody else says that solution

25
0:02:43 --> 0:02:49
doesn't work. Well, go and have a private discussion elsewhere. But if anyone's got a solution,

26
0:02:49 --> 0:02:53
put it in the chat. And if someone else thinks it doesn't work, put it in the chat. But you don't

27
0:02:53 --> 0:02:57
have to have a ding dong argument because all you do is make a fool of yourself in front of all the

28
0:02:57 --> 0:03:06
other people watching this war of words. So, you know, we're not going to censor anyone who puts

29
0:03:06 --> 0:03:13
something in the chat. And I ignore quite frankly, the stuff. I love the chat and I ignore the

30
0:03:13 --> 0:03:18
arguments that happen between people. But it's the exploration of ideas. I get such

31
0:03:18 --> 0:03:27
wonderful insights from the chat. I hope you do as well. The our fundamental principle is

32
0:03:27 --> 0:03:35
we aim to come from love, not fear. As you see, most of the world comes from fear. So this is a

33
0:03:35 --> 0:03:42
place where we encourage coming from your soul, passion, love, not fear. Have an open mind.

34
0:03:43 --> 0:03:49
I hope your self awareness increases through this journey. Because at the end of the day,

35
0:03:49 --> 0:03:56
when you get a new idea, like Mark Bailey, who spoke to us last week, so the last Sunday night,

36
0:03:56 --> 0:04:02
so many people get upset if somebody dares say something with which they disagree. And indeed,

37
0:04:02 --> 0:04:07
on the C19 group today, you know, Jay Sanchez is coming out and saying that Robert Malone is

38
0:04:07 --> 0:04:12
controlled opposition, blah, blah, blah. Well, he might have that opinion doesn't make it true.

39
0:04:13 --> 0:04:20
So everybody, we're on a learning journey. Love, wonderful to have you here. Stephen,

40
0:04:20 --> 0:04:27
well done for organizing this group and Anna de Boussoure from the UK. Welcome. We are in

41
0:04:27 --> 0:04:36
your metaphorical hands. Thank you, Charles. Hello, everybody. And thank you for participating

42
0:04:36 --> 0:04:43
tonight. So as you've read from my from the invitation, I'm a lawyer, but I'm also an

43
0:04:43 --> 0:04:49
army officer with the British Army, although I'm not currently serving, still under a call up

44
0:04:49 --> 0:04:57
liability for the next three years, but not currently posted. But when I look at the Nuremberg

45
0:04:57 --> 0:05:03
trials, I come at it not just with a legal head on but with a military head on, you know, and with

46
0:05:03 --> 0:05:09
an understanding of the law and customs of war. And so what I find interesting about the Nuremberg

47
0:05:09 --> 0:05:17
trials is that it's interesting to find out how you could read those unless you actually did

48
0:05:17 --> 0:05:22
understand the law and customs of war. If you were just reading them in isolation, because they have

49
0:05:22 --> 0:05:29
to be put in the context of the legal framework at the time. But before I launch into that,

50
0:05:29 --> 0:05:34
I wanted to say that, you know, what's really interesting about reading these trials is that

51
0:05:34 --> 0:05:40
it's very clear that we've got the same problem then as we do now, which is that you had a whole

52
0:05:40 --> 0:05:47
bunch of doctors who were either conscripted into the military or who were voluntarily in the

53
0:05:47 --> 0:05:54
military, who were caught up in the war machinery, and were being asked to do all kinds of things

54
0:05:54 --> 0:06:00
such as breach their medical ethics and resulting in the heinous crimes that we now are aware of.

55
0:06:01 --> 0:06:06
And when you think about what's happening today, there are the same kind of parallels.

56
0:06:07 --> 0:06:13
And if you look at acts of warfare, again, before we launch into what was actually being done by

57
0:06:13 --> 0:06:20
these doctors, and take a step back, in warfare, there are means and methods of warfare that are

58
0:06:20 --> 0:06:26
lawful and means of methods of warfare that are unlawful. And there are also restricted methods.

59
0:06:27 --> 0:06:35
And the latest analysis from the two generals in America, General McInnery and Paul Valerly,

60
0:06:35 --> 0:06:43
is that we are experiencing unrestricted warfare. And in fact, there were two Chinese generals,

61
0:06:43 --> 0:06:52
I think they wrote a paper in 1991, about how a country with less military might could indeed

62
0:06:52 --> 0:07:01
inflict war upon their enemy in unrestricted ways. And so what we're dealing with currently is all

63
0:07:01 --> 0:07:07
kinds of means and methods of warfare being deployed against us, many of which are prohibited under

64
0:07:07 --> 0:07:14
the various warfare conventions. But likewise, back in Nazi Germany, a very similar thing was

65
0:07:14 --> 0:07:19
happening. So we have to ask ourselves how we've ended up in the same place today as we did then.

66
0:07:20 --> 0:07:27
But in that context, with that context in mind, you know, what the German doctors were doing,

67
0:07:27 --> 0:07:36
were either lawful or unlawful actually. They were either medically ethically appropriate,

68
0:07:41 --> 0:07:47
or they weren't. Okay, so what we need to do is we need to understand that greater context,

69
0:07:47 --> 0:07:52
because a lot of the German doctors were claiming, of course, that many of the things that they were

70
0:07:52 --> 0:08:00
doing were either necessity, or they were, you know, lawfully following orders, following the

71
0:08:00 --> 0:08:06
government's guidance, similar kind of thing today. So before I launch into it, though,

72
0:08:06 --> 0:08:17
because what I propose to do is go through the, if I show it to you, this is part two, volume two,

73
0:08:17 --> 0:08:22
and that's not all of it, of the medical cases, trials of war criminals before the

74
0:08:22 --> 0:08:28
near military tribunals. And what it does is it starts off looking at the necessity

75
0:08:28 --> 0:08:36
of the experiments that were being conducted by the Germans, the doctors rather, and then looking

76
0:08:36 --> 0:08:44
at the usefulness of the experimentation, and then going into medical ethics as they were at the time,

77
0:08:44 --> 0:08:51
asking both the defence and the prosecution their evidence on the general state of medical ethics

78
0:08:51 --> 0:08:58
at that point in time. And then both sides give their evidence under cross-examination,

79
0:08:59 --> 0:09:05
their documents that they're relying on, and then it leads into the judgement. So before,

80
0:09:05 --> 0:09:12
and the sentencing. So that's the structure of it, and this runs to around

81
0:09:12 --> 0:09:20
around 300 pages I've got here. So what I propose to do is to read the key sort of passages out of

82
0:09:20 --> 0:09:25
each of those sections, so you get a good understanding of what the main arguments for

83
0:09:25 --> 0:09:33
the prosecution and the defence are, and then the main points of the judgement. But given there were

84
0:09:33 --> 0:09:39
something like 20 defendants, I don't propose to go through the evidence for each one, because

85
0:09:39 --> 0:09:46
a lot of it is repeated. But also I think we ought to concentrate on the main defendant, Carl Brandt,

86
0:09:48 --> 0:09:55
because he was charged with many of the offences and indeed found guilty and hanged. So I thought

87
0:09:55 --> 0:10:01
we could go through his evidence, one of the others who got life imprisonment, and then one who was

88
0:10:01 --> 0:10:07
not guilty, so that you could try and see the comparison about why one was found guilty and

89
0:10:07 --> 0:10:14
hanged, one was put in jail, and then one was found not guilty. So that's what I propose to do.

90
0:10:14 --> 0:10:22
But before I launch into that, first of all, does that sound helpful? But mostly, are there anything,

91
0:10:22 --> 0:10:28
is there anything in particular you'd like me to focus on? Because what I'm proposing to focus on

92
0:10:28 --> 0:10:34
are the arguments about the state of medical ethics at that time, and then how they were judged

93
0:10:35 --> 0:10:45
in accordance with that. So Anna, let's ask Stephen, that sounds excellent with your planning,

94
0:10:45 --> 0:10:50
and then if anyone has other elements, then they can put it in the chat and I'll bring it to your

95
0:10:50 --> 0:10:55
attention as we go through, Anna, so that you're not distracted by having to read the chat. Stephen,

96
0:10:55 --> 0:11:01
are you happy with Anna's planned course of action? Yes, that's fine, Anna. Maybe if you could

97
0:11:01 --> 0:11:10
weave it in how the Neuronberg trials arose. Presumably, there were people saying in the

98
0:11:10 --> 0:11:15
Second World War and before, oh, they can't do anything about this, but they did do something

99
0:11:15 --> 0:11:24
about it. They conducted military tribunals and presumably they changed laws or made laws,

100
0:11:24 --> 0:11:30
I don't know how it worked, but that would be very interesting. Yeah, well, so, okay, so essentially,

101
0:11:30 --> 0:11:36
obviously, as we know, what happened was that during the war, there were increasing reports

102
0:11:36 --> 0:11:41
of horrors being committed at various concentration and labour camps, and indeed, the House of

103
0:11:41 --> 0:11:47
Commons issued a statement, I think it was in 1942 or 1943, acknowledging these reports

104
0:11:48 --> 0:11:54
and condemning them, but acknowledging that until we'd won the war, we couldn't bring these people

105
0:11:54 --> 0:12:02
to trial. And so, to a certain extent, it was a case of having to release the prisoners each

106
0:12:02 --> 0:12:09
time ground was made and these camps were discovered. But ultimately, evidence was being

107
0:12:09 --> 0:12:16
gathered all the time and then as soon as they were able to, the military tribunals were established

108
0:12:16 --> 0:12:23
and various defendants were brought to trial under different categories, as we know. The main

109
0:12:23 --> 0:12:28
military soldiers were brought to trial in the first set of tribunal hearings, but then the doctors

110
0:12:28 --> 0:12:36
were the judges, media personnel, bankers, all different categories of people who were, you know,

111
0:12:36 --> 0:12:42
considered to be main perpetrators of the main atrocities were brought to trial. So, what happened

112
0:12:42 --> 0:12:50
was that whilst the legal framework to judge these people was already in existence for most of the

113
0:12:51 --> 0:12:58
war crimes under the existing war conventions, there were new crimes that were defined because

114
0:12:59 --> 0:13:04
under the existing legislation, there wasn't a definition that covered the kind of atrocities

115
0:13:04 --> 0:13:11
that were occurring. So, what they created was a council law 10, I think it was called,

116
0:13:11 --> 0:13:17
hold on, I'll just find it in the judgment, it sets it out quite clearly here. The jurisdiction

117
0:13:17 --> 0:13:23
of the tribunal, this is on page 172 of the tribunal, so it says the jurisdiction and powers

118
0:13:23 --> 0:13:29
of this tribunal are fixed and determined by law number 10 of the control council for Germany. So,

119
0:13:29 --> 0:13:34
in other words, when the allies took over and put their government in place of the

120
0:13:35 --> 0:13:42
the newly occupied territories of the winning country, they put in place this law number 10,

121
0:13:42 --> 0:13:47
which allowed for certain crimes to be brought within the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

122
0:13:47 --> 0:13:52
So, article two of that said that each of the following acts is recognised as a crime,

123
0:13:53 --> 0:14:00
in brackets B, war crimes, atrocities or offences against persons or property constituting violations

124
0:14:00 --> 0:14:07
of the laws or customs of war, including but not limited to murder, ill treatment or deportation

125
0:14:08 --> 0:14:14
or for any other purpose of civilian population from occupied territory, murder or ill treatment

126
0:14:14 --> 0:14:20
of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private

127
0:14:20 --> 0:14:26
property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages or devastation not justified by military

128
0:14:26 --> 0:14:33
necessity. Okay, so very clearly in war crimes is murder and ill treatment etc of people,

129
0:14:34 --> 0:14:39
now giving medical treatment or experimentation without consent lawfully given and they die

130
0:14:40 --> 0:14:44
can amount to a war crime as you can see because it's either ill treatment or it's murder, prima

131
0:14:44 --> 0:14:58
facie. So that's that one and then it goes on to say, oh actually here, sorry it hasn't got crimes

132
0:14:58 --> 0:15:06
against humanity defined because the page is missing. This is the original one that I printed

133
0:15:06 --> 0:15:11
off and it actually as I've gone through it there are several pages missing and one of those is that

134
0:15:11 --> 0:15:16
critical one about crimes against humanity but it's essentially the same definition as it is now,

135
0:15:16 --> 0:15:24
which is all the different ways that you can commit a crime such as torture, imprisonment, rape,

136
0:15:24 --> 0:15:34
slavery, medical segregation. So they put those in the law council number 10 and that gave

137
0:15:34 --> 0:15:44
jurisdiction to the tribunal to judge them on that basis. In fact, sorry here I have just found the

138
0:15:44 --> 0:15:49
crimes against humanity, so sorry folks it's a bit of a... crimes against humanity atrocities and

139
0:15:49 --> 0:15:56
offences including but not limited to murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation,

140
0:15:56 --> 0:16:03
imprisonment, torture, rape or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population

141
0:16:03 --> 0:16:08
or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds whether or not in violation of the domestic

142
0:16:08 --> 0:16:16
laws of the country were perpetrated. Okay so and then what they did was that it wasn't just people

143
0:16:16 --> 0:16:23
who perpetrated they dealt with aiding and abetting so paragraph two of that part of the order says

144
0:16:23 --> 0:16:30
that any person without regard to nationality or the capacity in which he acted is deemed to have

145
0:16:30 --> 0:16:36
committed a crime as defined in this article if he was a a principal or b was an accessory to the

146
0:16:36 --> 0:16:44
commission of any such crime or ordered or abetted the same or c took a consenting part therein or

147
0:16:44 --> 0:16:50
d was connected with plans or enterprises involving its commission or e was a member of any

148
0:16:50 --> 0:16:56
organization or group connected with the commission of any such crime so you can see that's very

149
0:16:56 --> 0:17:04
broadly defined so that you can catch all the people in the chain of causation from the person

150
0:17:04 --> 0:17:12
who you know promulgated the initial order all the way through to the people who executed it

151
0:17:12 --> 0:17:19
and all the people involved in between. Anna this is a really crucial point and I think so we've

152
0:17:19 --> 0:17:25
heard from many people as you know that the Nuremberg code doesn't apply but the fact is

153
0:17:26 --> 0:17:32
and they didn't have a Nuremberg code before the second world war they had a kind of rough series

154
0:17:32 --> 0:17:40
of rules which they abided by when it came to medical ethics but the point is that they did

155
0:17:40 --> 0:17:45
have these trials and so when people say that the Nuremberg code doesn't apply at the moment

156
0:17:46 --> 0:17:51
well it will apply in the future if it doesn't apply now you see what I mean? Yeah I mean that

157
0:17:51 --> 0:17:56
that's um I'm going to go on to the bit about the what existed at the time of these trials because

158
0:17:57 --> 0:18:05
there was in place a set of medical principles already but what the tribunal goes into is the

159
0:18:05 --> 0:18:12
evidence both for the prosecution and the defense about the precise nature of those medical ethics

160
0:18:12 --> 0:18:19
as they applied to live human experiments so what they did in the in the course of the trial was

161
0:18:19 --> 0:18:27
that they engaged the expertise of a Dr Ivy from America who was asked to give his view on what

162
0:18:28 --> 0:18:35
the governing principles were and he cites three initially including of course the first one is

163
0:18:35 --> 0:18:41
the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential and the Germans give their

164
0:18:41 --> 0:18:48
understanding of medical ethics and then between them all what they do is they identify what are

165
0:18:48 --> 0:18:56
the generally accepted medical ethics at the time and out of that comes the 10 principles which then

166
0:18:56 --> 0:19:03
become the Nuremberg code but if I take you through the um the tribunal's way of dealing with that I

167
0:19:03 --> 0:19:07
think you'll find it really interesting because I will come on to that in more detail Stephen

168
0:19:07 --> 0:19:14
because yes your essential point is that you know first of all the Nuremberg code wasn't a new idea

169
0:19:14 --> 0:19:21
we there was already an existence in firm medical ethics but secondly the need for it was because

170
0:19:21 --> 0:19:28
it was recognized that it wasn't in a easily read format and so one of the defendants makes the point

171
0:19:28 --> 0:19:33
that that would be the job for the tribunal to actually put it in written form so that there can

172
0:19:33 --> 0:19:41
be no doubt going forward and the fact is that the Nuremberg code then became enshrined in the

173
0:19:42 --> 0:19:49
Geneva declaration issued by the world medical association in 1950 which bound all physicians

174
0:19:49 --> 0:19:56
so it was the Nuremberg code you know on steroids and then in 1964 both the Nuremberg code and the

175
0:19:56 --> 0:20:04
Geneva declaration were essentially enshrined in the Helsinki declaration and then the Helsinki

176
0:20:04 --> 0:20:11
declaration has been enshrined in UK statute law in the medicines for human use clinical trials

177
0:20:11 --> 0:20:18
regulations so certainly in the UK the Nuremberg code has effectively become enshrined in statute

178
0:20:18 --> 0:20:26
law but it's also binding criminal case law I mean you know the the beauty of case law judgments

179
0:20:26 --> 0:20:34
which is why they're such important reading is because the judges take the existing laws and

180
0:20:34 --> 0:20:41
ethics and apply them to the particular circumstances of the case explaining as they do so how the law is

181
0:20:41 --> 0:20:48
applied in that particular circumstance which you don't get from simply reading the penal code

182
0:20:48 --> 0:20:55
or you know the the code of medical ethics and that's why case law is so important but it's also

183
0:20:55 --> 0:21:02
why it's binding because you know if you have a similar set of facts such as today where you've

184
0:21:02 --> 0:21:08
got medics in the NHS conducting live human experiments on people then you know the same

185
0:21:08 --> 0:21:15
principles in this case would apply which is why case law is binding because the idea is that if

186
0:21:15 --> 0:21:23
you spend all this time and trouble on deciding facts on the law then you don't necessarily want

187
0:21:23 --> 0:21:29
to go through the whole exercise again because that's why it's binding on on other courts so

188
0:21:29 --> 0:21:34
yeah I strongly refute the suggestion that the Nuremberg code isn't binding certainly in the UK

189
0:21:34 --> 0:21:43
it is but yes if I can go through the actual judgment then and read you some bits out of it

190
0:21:43 --> 0:21:47
I think that'd be very helpful so the bit about medical ethics

191
0:21:51 --> 0:21:58
it starts with both sides giving arguments about whether or not experiments are necessary

192
0:21:58 --> 0:22:05
particularly in the state of war so for example you had typhus outbreaks and you had soldiers

193
0:22:05 --> 0:22:11
dying from infected wounds on the front or you know shipwrecked people not being able to survive

194
0:22:11 --> 0:22:18
you know out on sea so they were doing all these experiments to sensibly help their own

195
0:22:18 --> 0:22:25
soldiers and their own population to deal with the challenges including vaccination programs so

196
0:22:25 --> 0:22:32
what you'll see is a number of the experiments that were being conducted that they're being

197
0:22:33 --> 0:22:40
charged as crimes against humanity included funnily enough vaccination experiments and

198
0:22:40 --> 0:22:47
in terms of arguing the necessity the evidence that's first that's put forward into in the

199
0:22:47 --> 0:22:55
defense of carl brandt was the extract from the testimony of the defendant on examination so the

200
0:22:55 --> 0:23:01
judge says witness this question of the necessity for an experiment is it your view that it is for

201
0:23:01 --> 0:23:07
the state to determine the extreme necessity for such an experiment and thereafter those who serve

202
0:23:07 --> 0:23:13
the state are to be bound by that procedure i think you can answer that yes or no defendant

203
0:23:13 --> 0:23:19
carl brandt this trial shows that it will be the task of the state under all circumstances basically

204
0:23:19 --> 0:23:26
to clarify this position question for the future what kind of answer is that question witness as i

205
0:23:26 --> 0:23:32
understand your statements a moment ago they were that the physician having once become the soldier

206
0:23:33 --> 0:23:38
thereafter must subordinate such medical ethical views as he may have when they are in conflict

207
0:23:38 --> 0:23:44
with a military order from higher authority is that true and carl brandt says i didn't want to

208
0:23:44 --> 0:23:49
express it in that form i didn't did not mean to say that the physician the moment he becomes a

209
0:23:49 --> 0:23:55
medical officer should change his basic attitude as a physician such an order can in the very same

210
0:23:55 --> 0:24:01
way be addressed to a physician who is not a soldier i was referring to the entire situation

211
0:24:01 --> 0:24:05
as it prevailed with us in germany during the time of an authoritarian leadership

212
0:24:05 --> 0:24:10
this authoritarian leadership interfered with the personality and the personal feelings of the human

213
0:24:10 --> 0:24:17
being the moment an individuality is absorbed into the concept of a collective body every demand

214
0:24:17 --> 0:24:22
which is put to that individuality has to be absorbed into the concept of a collective system

215
0:24:24 --> 0:24:30
therefore the demands of society are placed above every individual human being as an entity

216
0:24:30 --> 0:24:36
and this entity the human being is completely used in the interest of that society the difficult

217
0:24:36 --> 0:24:41
thing and something which is hard to understand basically is that during our entire period

218
0:24:42 --> 0:24:47
everything was done in the interest of humanity so that the individual person had no meaning

219
0:24:47 --> 0:24:52
whatsoever and the further the war progressed the stronger did this principle thought appear

220
0:24:52 --> 0:24:59
this was designated in the end as total war unrestricted warfare right and in accordance

221
0:25:00 --> 0:25:04
the leaders of the state gave orders quite generally and demanded that orders be carried out

222
0:25:04 --> 0:25:09
it was very tragic for a number of persons not only within the framework of these experiments

223
0:25:09 --> 0:25:14
but also in other situations that they had to work under such orders without considering the

224
0:25:14 --> 0:25:19
entire situation as it prevailed in germany one cannot understand the question of these particular

225
0:25:19 --> 0:25:26
experiments at all now that's the main defendant carl brant's evidence on the necessity so in other

226
0:25:26 --> 0:25:34
words he's saying that the the authoritarian leadership was such that you know you just took

227
0:25:34 --> 0:25:40
the order and the you just accepted that it was necessary for the benefit of the collective

228
0:25:40 --> 0:25:47
over the need of the individual now his evidence on that point is echoed by most of the defendants

229
0:25:47 --> 0:25:54
all of whom incidentally pleaded not guilty to the atrocities and they all plead guilty on the same

230
0:25:54 --> 0:26:00
kind of basis as carl brant which was oh it was necessary it was necessary to do all of these

231
0:26:00 --> 0:26:09
experiments it was a state of war we you know the benefit of the collective was more important than

232
0:26:09 --> 0:26:14
the individual and we were just following orders and that was essentially what each one of them

233
0:26:14 --> 0:26:21
was saying so what the tribunal then does is that they ask the prosecution

234
0:26:25 --> 0:26:32
dr andrew the witness the expert witness dr andrew ivy from america his view on the necessity

235
0:26:33 --> 0:26:38
so this is the extract from the testimony of prosecution expert witness dr andrew ivy under

236
0:26:38 --> 0:26:44
cross-examination dr servetus witness take the following case you are in a city in which the

237
0:26:44 --> 0:26:49
plague is raging you as a doctor have a drug that you could use to combat the plague however you

238
0:26:49 --> 0:26:54
must test it on somebody the commander or let us say the mayor of the city comes to you and says

239
0:26:57 --> 0:27:04
sorry here is a criminal condemned to death save us by carrying out the experiment on this man

240
0:27:04 --> 0:27:10
would you refuse to do so or would you do it now i need to interject here because one of the

241
0:27:10 --> 0:27:16
defenses that was put forward was that they weren't really killing people they were taking

242
0:27:17 --> 0:27:24
condemned prisoners and using them as an experimentation if they died they would have

243
0:27:24 --> 0:27:30
been executed anyway because they were condemned to death that was one of their arguments which is

244
0:27:30 --> 0:27:36
dealt with in great detail and basically that's an argument is rejected saying you can't take a

245
0:27:36 --> 0:27:41
prisoner who you think has been condemned to death who might not actually be condemned to death

246
0:27:41 --> 0:27:48
under the penal system and essentially execute them in the course of a medical experimentation

247
0:27:48 --> 0:27:54
and say that was justified but anyway this is the question that he's being asked of dr ivy you know

248
0:27:54 --> 0:28:00
here's a criminal experiment on them for the greater good dr ivy says i would refuse to do so

249
0:28:00 --> 0:28:06
because i do not believe that duress of that sort warrants breaking of ethical and moral principles

250
0:28:06 --> 0:28:11
that is why the hag convention and geneva conventions were formulated to make war a

251
0:28:11 --> 0:28:17
barbaric enterprise a little more humane questions you believe that the population of a city would

252
0:28:17 --> 0:28:22
have any understanding of your action answer they have understanding for the importance of

253
0:28:22 --> 0:28:26
the maintenance of the principles of medical ethics which apply over a long period of years

254
0:28:27 --> 0:28:32
in a short period of years physicians and medical scientists should do nothing with the idea of

255
0:28:32 --> 0:28:38
temporarily doing good which when compared up carried out repeatedly over a period of time

256
0:28:38 --> 0:28:43
would debase and jeopardize a method for doing good if a medical scientist breaks the code of

257
0:28:43 --> 0:28:49
medical ethics and says kill the person in order to do what he thinks may be good in the course

258
0:28:49 --> 0:28:54
of time that will grow and will cause a loss of faith of the public in the medical profession

259
0:28:54 --> 0:28:59
and hence destroy the capacity of the medical profession to do its good for society the reason

260
0:28:59 --> 0:29:04
we must be very careful in the use of human beings as subjects in medical experiments

261
0:29:04 --> 0:29:09
is in order not to debase and jeopardize this method for doing great good by causing the public

262
0:29:09 --> 0:29:16
to react against it so in other words the only reason you shouldn't do it is because otherwise

263
0:29:16 --> 0:29:24
the public would lose faith in you a bit of a dodgy argument it says but witness do you not

264
0:29:24 --> 0:29:30
believe that your ideal attitude here is more or less that of a single person standing against

265
0:29:30 --> 0:29:35
the body of public opinion answer no i do not that's why i read out the principles of medical

266
0:29:35 --> 0:29:40
ethics yesterday and that is why the american medical association has agreed essentially to

267
0:29:40 --> 0:29:45
those principles that is why the principles the ethical principles for the use of human beings

268
0:29:45 --> 0:29:52
in medical experiments have been quite uniform throughout the world in the past and they go on

269
0:29:52 --> 0:29:59
to talk about the hippocratic oath and the importance of that and he goes into that in

270
0:29:59 --> 0:30:06
more detail later on sorry i just want to get to there's so much to go through here

271
0:30:07 --> 0:30:13
pages and pages of it so i've only you know called out the main bits and sometimes it won't sound

272
0:30:13 --> 0:30:19
quite right to you because obviously it's not in the greater context but yeah so basically he's

273
0:30:19 --> 0:30:25
essentially saying there that you know the principles of the medical ethics as put forward

274
0:30:25 --> 0:30:32
by the medical american the american medical association were already in existence and had

275
0:30:32 --> 0:30:39
been for some some time and we already know that of course and that's the point that you know the

276
0:30:39 --> 0:30:44
urinberg code didn't come out of nothing it was already essentially in existence

277
0:30:44 --> 0:30:45
um

278
0:30:47 --> 0:30:55
but then we have um the extract from the closing statement of the prosecution under the section on

279
0:30:55 --> 0:31:02
subjugation to medical experimentation as a substitute for penalties and this talks about

280
0:31:02 --> 0:31:07
several of the defendants argued that medical experiments alleged that medical experiments

281
0:31:07 --> 0:31:12
alleged as criminal upon concentration camp inmates were justified because they were a

282
0:31:12 --> 0:31:18
substitute for penalty or punishment previously imposed on the experimental subjects and that's

283
0:31:18 --> 0:31:25
the section where they talk about um the fact that you know that therefore it was justified

284
0:31:25 --> 0:31:30
but it goes on to say here from the closing statement of the prosecution the proof in this

285
0:31:30 --> 0:31:35
case has demonstrated beyond all doubt that the so-called criminal sentenced to death were very

286
0:31:36 --> 0:31:43
rarely used in any of the experiments um there's been no proof whatever that criminal sentenced

287
0:31:43 --> 0:31:49
to death by an ordinary court could possibly be executed in a concentration camp experimentation

288
0:31:49 --> 0:31:55
on such person is to compound the crime of his initial unlawful detention as well as to commit

289
0:31:55 --> 0:32:02
the additional crime of murder or torture as has been said by another tribunal exculpation from the

290
0:32:02 --> 0:32:08
charge of criminal homicide can possibly be based only upon bona fide proof that the subject had

291
0:32:08 --> 0:32:14
committed murder or any other legally recognized capital offense and not even then unless the

292
0:32:14 --> 0:32:19
sentencing tribunal with authority granted by the state in the constitution of the court declared

293
0:32:19 --> 0:32:24
that the execution would be accomplished by means of a low pressure chamber so in other words the

294
0:32:24 --> 0:32:29
only way that you could justify doing that was if a sentence of the court had already said that they

295
0:32:29 --> 0:32:37
could be killed in that way so again the the idea that the doctors in the third rike actually

296
0:32:37 --> 0:32:44
thought that it was a reasonable thing to do raises very serious questions about um why they

297
0:32:44 --> 0:32:49
considered that that would be ethical but when you go into the later evidence it becomes

298
0:32:51 --> 0:32:59
quite clear why they um thought it was ethical and that what the defense defense does is produce

299
0:32:59 --> 0:33:05
copious amounts of evidence to prove that in fact conducting live human experimentation in the way

300
0:33:05 --> 0:33:14
that the german doctors were doing was uh had been conducted um for well since 1791 they've produced

301
0:33:14 --> 0:33:23
on record um and by americans the brits the italians um all across the world in fact and what the german

302
0:33:23 --> 0:33:30
doctors therefore say is that you should you know if you're judging us for doing things during a

303
0:33:30 --> 0:33:35
war that you know you yourself have done in the first world war before then and therefore you're

304
0:33:35 --> 0:33:45
condemning us unfairly essentially and so they put forward that argument um and carl brand again the

305
0:33:45 --> 0:33:47
closing brief of the defendant

306
0:33:51 --> 0:33:56
says this the indictment embraces certain medical experiments which are called war crimes and crimes

307
0:33:56 --> 0:34:02
against humanity according to paragraphs 10 and 15 of the indictment these experiments are designated

308
0:34:02 --> 0:34:08
as crimes as a violation of the general principles of criminal law as evolved from the penal law of

309
0:34:08 --> 0:34:13
all civilized nations as well as violations of the national penal laws of the countries in which such

310
0:34:13 --> 0:34:18
crimes were committed an indication of their punishable character was seen in the fact that

311
0:34:18 --> 0:34:24
the experiments were carried out without the consent of the persons experimented on however

312
0:34:24 --> 0:34:29
we must examine whether this consent of the person subjected to experiments is always necessary

313
0:34:29 --> 0:34:34
or whether it can be replaced by an order of the state through the penal administration and further

314
0:34:34 --> 0:34:40
if the same law applies to the execution of sentences on foreigners if consent to the to

315
0:34:40 --> 0:34:44
the human experiment by the person experimented on can be replaced by an order of the state

316
0:34:45 --> 0:34:49
then the person responsible for the experiment cannot be punished in cases where the experiments

317
0:34:49 --> 0:34:54
were carried out through the official penal administration in accordance with the order

318
0:34:56 --> 0:35:01
so i don't know if that basically makes sense to you but again they're arguing that consent doesn't

319
0:35:01 --> 0:35:07
always have to be obtained it could be given by the state which again i think is a very dodgy

320
0:35:07 --> 0:35:15
placement to come tom but that was their defense um sorry as i say folks it might seem a bit

321
0:35:15 --> 0:35:22
disjointed because i'm having to go through so many pages of it here please bear with me um

322
0:35:24 --> 0:35:37
so essentially what they then do the defense is that they then bring in loads of evidence to prove

323
0:35:38 --> 0:35:46
the fact that there were all these sorry all these experiments being run by people

324
0:35:46 --> 0:35:51
all over the world and i wanted to read you some of them because it's actually quite horrifying

325
0:35:52 --> 0:35:55
so here we go so

326
0:36:01 --> 0:36:05
yes here we go so this is the extract from the final plea for the defendant gherpard

327
0:36:06 --> 0:36:11
evidence has now proved that in recent decades and even earlier numerous experiments were carried

328
0:36:11 --> 0:36:17
out on human beings and moreover on persons who did not volunteer for such purposes in this respect

329
0:36:17 --> 0:36:23
i refer to the statements of the expert you know witness in nearly all countries experiments have

330
0:36:23 --> 0:36:28
been performed on human beings under conditions which entirely exclude volunteering in a legal

331
0:36:28 --> 0:36:29
sense um

332
0:36:33 --> 0:36:37
so hang on in view of the fact that a criminal event no the court for this reason will not

333
0:36:37 --> 0:36:42
will also not overlook the fact that particularly during the last years even outside germany

334
0:36:42 --> 0:36:47
medical experiments were performed on human beings who undoubtedly did not volunteer

335
0:36:48 --> 0:36:56
and they go on to say in another one of the defendants one uh the extract from the final

336
0:36:56 --> 0:37:01
plea for the defendant beagle book he says my learned colleagues have compiled a long list

337
0:37:01 --> 0:37:06
of documents on human experiments especially from the western democracies um

338
0:37:10 --> 0:37:14
here we go

339
0:37:22 --> 0:37:22
sorry

340
0:37:26 --> 0:37:30
yeah

341
0:37:35 --> 0:37:40
well it's just it was really really horrifying actually i might have to put it together in a

342
0:37:40 --> 0:37:44
separate one here we go medical experiments in other countries here we go the practice of

343
0:37:44 --> 0:37:49
medical experiment and human beings in other countries was brought out by the defense in an

344
0:37:49 --> 0:37:53
effort to show that the medical experimentation in which these defendants engaged was not criminal

345
0:37:54 --> 0:38:02
okay so that what they say is that um one should compare among others the plague experiments by

346
0:38:02 --> 0:38:09
strong in 1912 or 900 convicts including an experiment on 42 persons some of whom were

347
0:38:09 --> 0:38:15
persons sentenced to death and the typhus experiments by hamdi on 153

348
0:38:16 --> 0:38:23
there was here we go there's ones on children where they talk about the fact that

349
0:38:24 --> 0:38:29
it was a particularly horrifying one where this stuff this chap has taken the

350
0:38:32 --> 0:38:40
uh i'm sorry guys i wish it was much easier to read yes here we go a report on infectious

351
0:38:40 --> 0:38:46
a report on infectious colitis observed in children so they quote this from 1885

352
0:38:46 --> 0:38:50
confirmation of the suspicion of infection of the conjunctiva caused by

353
0:38:51 --> 0:38:56
vaginal secretion by chance i had the possibility to inoculate the vaginal secretion of sick women

354
0:38:56 --> 0:39:01
into the conjunctiva of three children patients who were in the final stage of the disease

355
0:39:02 --> 0:39:06
two children died one and a half and two days after the inoculation without

356
0:39:06 --> 0:39:10
showing any reactions the third child contracted conjunctivitis

357
0:39:10 --> 0:39:16
which healed after treatment and died on the 10th day three moribund children and they use

358
0:39:16 --> 0:39:21
examples like that all the way through from the end of the 18th century through to the first world

359
0:39:21 --> 0:39:29
war of experiments all around the world essentially saying what we were doing was normal and indeed one

360
0:39:29 --> 0:39:37
of the criticisms that comes out of the trial when you read about it later is that in many ways that

361
0:39:37 --> 0:39:43
was correct that the german doctors were in fact doing what the british medical profession and the

362
0:39:43 --> 0:39:50
americans had done in the first the first world wars and prior to that so that's the context of

363
0:39:50 --> 0:39:57
their defense essentially that it was necessary that they were conducting it on prisoners who

364
0:39:57 --> 0:40:03
were condemned to death anyway that loads of other countries were also doing the same thing

365
0:40:03 --> 0:40:10
and essentially therefore that they were not guilty and they didn't feel guilty for any of the crimes

366
0:40:12 --> 0:40:20
so what happens then is that there's then final pleas from everyone and it comes onto the judgment

367
0:40:20 --> 0:40:25
and i think this is the bit that is most important

368
0:40:32 --> 0:40:39
right so and this gives a bit of the context that you were asking for earlier as well

369
0:40:40 --> 0:40:47
stephen so military tribunal one was established on the 25th of october 1946 under general order

370
0:40:47 --> 0:40:53
68 issued by command of the united states military government for germany it was the first of several

371
0:40:53 --> 0:41:00
military tribunals constituted in the u.s zone of occupation pursuant to military government

372
0:41:00 --> 0:41:05
ordinance number seven for the trial of offenses recognized as crimes by law number 10 of the

373
0:41:05 --> 0:41:10
control council for germany law number 10 was the one i read out earlier that defined war crimes

374
0:41:10 --> 0:41:15
and crimes against humanity so by the terms of the order which established the tribunal

375
0:41:16 --> 0:41:21
um the tribunal was ordered to convene at nuremberg to hear the cases as might be filed

376
0:41:21 --> 0:41:26
on 25th of october the chief counsel lodged an indictment against the defendants copy of

377
0:41:26 --> 0:41:30
the indictment was served on each defendant on the 5th of november

378
0:41:32 --> 0:41:38
the trial was conducted in two languages it consumed 139 trial days

379
0:41:38 --> 0:41:46
including six days allocated for final arguments during the 133 trial days used for the presentation

380
0:41:46 --> 0:41:53
of evidence 32 witnesses gave oral evidence for the prosecution 53 witnesses including the 23

381
0:41:53 --> 0:41:58
defendants gave oral evidence for the defense in addition the prosecution put in evidence as

382
0:41:58 --> 0:42:04
exhibits a total of 570 affidavits reports and documents the defense put in a total number of

383
0:42:04 --> 0:42:13
901 making a grand total of 1471 documents received in evidence so this was a substantial

384
0:42:13 --> 0:42:17
trial as you can hear which is one of the reasons i'm having difficulty going through all the papers

385
0:42:17 --> 0:42:25
get pages to get to the right points um but yeah then it goes into the jurisdiction and

386
0:42:25 --> 0:42:32
there goes into the charge okay so these is this is how each of them were charged the indictment

387
0:42:32 --> 0:42:39
were charged the indictment is framed in four counts count one the common design or conspiracy

388
0:42:39 --> 0:42:44
the first count of the indictment charges that the defendants acting pursuant to a common design

389
0:42:45 --> 0:42:50
unlawfully willfully and knowingly did conspire and agree together to commit war crimes and crimes

390
0:42:50 --> 0:42:56
against humanity um now there was a technical point there in that um they weren't able to

391
0:42:56 --> 0:43:04
fully pursue the conspiracy charge because of the way that the council number 10 law was drafted and

392
0:43:04 --> 0:43:10
so they had to amend that charge slightly but essentially um it was basically the common design

393
0:43:10 --> 0:43:16
that they were all in it together counts two and three war crimes and crimes against humanity

394
0:43:16 --> 0:43:21
the second and third counts of the indictment charged the commission of war crimes and crimes

395
0:43:21 --> 0:43:26
against humanity the counts are identical in content except for the fact that in count two

396
0:43:26 --> 0:43:31
the acts which were made the basis for the charges are alleged to have been committed on civilians

397
0:43:31 --> 0:43:36
and members of the armed forces then at war with the german reich whereas in count three

398
0:43:36 --> 0:43:40
the criminal acts are alleged to have been committed against german civilians and nationals

399
0:43:40 --> 0:43:45
of other countries um so essentially same crimes but different categories of people

400
0:43:46 --> 0:43:52
um that were attacked essentially um now in terms of

401
0:43:56 --> 0:44:02
sorry counts two and three alleged in substance that between september 1939 and april 1945 all

402
0:44:02 --> 0:44:09
of the defendants were principals in accessories too ordered abetted took a consenting part in

403
0:44:09 --> 0:44:15
and were connected with plans and enterprises involving medical experiments without the

404
0:44:15 --> 0:44:21
subject's consent in the course of which experiments the defendants committed murders

405
0:44:21 --> 0:44:28
brutalities cruelties tortures atrocities and other inhuman acts um it is a verb that such

406
0:44:28 --> 0:44:32
experiments included but were not limited to the following and i won't read them all out they

407
0:44:32 --> 0:44:36
include high altitude experiments freezing experiments but the main ones i've underlined

408
0:44:36 --> 0:44:42
the vaccine experiments because of course that's what's happening today so c malaria

409
0:44:42 --> 0:44:47
experiments from about february 1942 to april 45 experiments were conducted at the dacal

410
0:44:47 --> 0:44:53
concentration camp in order to investigate immunization for and treatment of malaria

411
0:44:53 --> 0:45:00
healthy concentration camp inmates were infected by mosquitoes or injections etc etc um over a

412
0:45:00 --> 0:45:05
thousand involuntary subjects were used in these experiments many of the victims died and others

413
0:45:05 --> 0:45:11
suffered severe pain and permanent disability the defendants carl brandt and lazer rostock

414
0:45:11 --> 0:45:16
etc are charged with special responsibility for and participation in these crimes

415
0:45:17 --> 0:45:23
and then we've got other experiments lost gas sulfonide bone muscle ones um and then there's

416
0:45:24 --> 0:45:33
uh 176 hold on sorry um yes and then there's epidemic jaundice experiments

417
0:45:33 --> 0:45:39
to investigate the causes of and inoculations against epidemic jaundice subjects were deliberately

418
0:45:39 --> 0:45:45
infected some of them died um then they had sterilization experiments which again you know

419
0:45:45 --> 0:45:51
the evidence is showing that these injections are sterilizing people purpose of these experiments

420
0:45:51 --> 0:45:56
was to develop a method of sterilization which would be suitable for sterilizing millions of

421
0:45:56 --> 0:46:01
people with a minimum of time and effort sound familiar these experiments were conducted by

422
0:46:01 --> 0:46:06
means of x-rays surgery and various drugs thousands of victims were sterilized and

423
0:46:06 --> 0:46:11
thereby suffered great mental and physical anguish there were spotted fever experiments

424
0:46:11 --> 0:46:17
to investigate the effectiveness of spotted fever and other vaccines um numerous healthy

425
0:46:17 --> 0:46:24
inmates were deliberately infected um as a result hundreds of persons experimented upon died

426
0:46:24 --> 0:46:30
experiments with yellow fever smallpox typhus paratyphus a and b cholera and diphtheria will

427
0:46:30 --> 0:46:38
also conducted experiments with poison in or about december 1943 onwards to investigate

428
0:46:38 --> 0:46:43
various poisons upon human beings the victims died a result of the poison or were killed

429
0:46:43 --> 0:46:50
immediately in order to permit autopsies um in september 44 experimental subjects were

430
0:46:50 --> 0:46:58
shocked with poison bullets and suffered torture and death so those were some of the main categories

431
0:46:58 --> 0:47:02
of the experiments um in addition to the medical experiments the nature and purpose of which have

432
0:47:02 --> 0:47:08
been outlined as alleged certain of the defendants are charged with criminal activities involving

433
0:47:08 --> 0:47:14
murder torture and ill treatment of non-german nationals as follows and i have to warn you one

434
0:47:14 --> 0:47:24
of these is um uh pretty horrible hold on um this one in particular i think is horrendous um

435
0:47:24 --> 0:47:32
um but 112 jews were selected for the purpose of completing a skeleton collection

436
0:47:33 --> 0:47:40
um they their photographs and measurements were taken they were then killed um and the skeletons

437
0:47:40 --> 0:47:47
kept between 42 and 94 and 44 the defendants bloom and rudolph brant were principals in

438
0:47:47 --> 0:47:53
accessories to order abetted took a consenting part and connected with plans and enterprise

439
0:47:53 --> 0:47:58
involving the murder and mistreatment of tens of thousands of polish nationals they were alleged

440
0:47:58 --> 0:48:04
to be infected with incurable tuberculosis on the ground of ensuring the health and welfare of

441
0:48:04 --> 0:48:10
germans in poland many tubercular poles were ruthlessly exterminated while others were isolated

442
0:48:10 --> 0:48:17
in death camps within adequate medical facilities and then the the final one of the other commission

443
0:48:17 --> 0:48:23
you know outside of experimentations was this one which we all know about the t4 program between

444
0:48:23 --> 0:48:29
september 1939 and april 45 the defendants carl brandt bloom brackenhoven were principals in

445
0:48:29 --> 0:48:34
accessories to ordered abetted took a consenting part in and were connected with plans and

446
0:48:34 --> 0:48:39
enterprises involving the execution of the so-called euthanasia program of the german reich

447
0:48:40 --> 0:48:45
in the course of which the defendants herein murdered hundreds of thousands of human beings

448
0:48:46 --> 0:48:53
the program involved now personally i think what's happening at the moment is an updated version of

449
0:48:53 --> 0:49:00
the t4 program this program involved the systematic and secret execution of the aged insane incurably

450
0:49:00 --> 0:49:06
ill of deformed children and other persons by gas lethal injections and diverse other means in

451
0:49:06 --> 0:49:12
nursing homes hospitals and asylums such persons regarded as useless eaters and a burden to the

452
0:49:12 --> 0:49:17
german war machine the relatives of these victims were informed that they died from natural causes

453
0:49:17 --> 0:49:26
such as heart failure german doctors involved in the euthanasia program are also sent to the eastern

454
0:49:26 --> 0:49:29
occupied countries to assist in the mass extermination of the jews

455
0:49:32 --> 0:49:35
counts two and three of the indictment conclude with the affirmation that the crimes and

456
0:49:35 --> 0:49:41
atrocities which have been delineated constitute violations of international conventions which

457
0:49:41 --> 0:49:46
indeed they do the laws and customers of war which indeed they do the general principles

458
0:49:46 --> 0:49:51
of criminal law is derived from the criminal laws of all civilized nations which indeed they do

459
0:49:51 --> 0:49:56
and the internal penal laws of the country and then count four is membership of criminal

460
0:49:56 --> 0:50:01
organization which i won't go into because essentially what they were saying was that

461
0:50:01 --> 0:50:09
if um you know they decreed certain organizations as criminal such as the ss and therefore if a

462
0:50:09 --> 0:50:16
doctor was a member of the ss then account four was membership in a criminal organization but

463
0:50:16 --> 0:50:23
i won't go into that at the moment because that's more detail so this is the key part of the judgment

464
0:50:23 --> 0:50:30
now this is the bit that says the proof as to war crimes and crimes against humanity and then

465
0:50:30 --> 0:50:36
permissible medical experiments so judged by any standard of proof the record clearly shows the

466
0:50:36 --> 0:50:41
commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity substantially as alleged in counts two

467
0:50:41 --> 0:50:45
and three of the indictment beginning with the outbreak of world war two criminal medical

468
0:50:45 --> 0:50:50
experiments on non-german nationals both prisoners of war and civilians including jews and asocial

469
0:50:50 --> 0:50:56
persons were carried out on a large scale in germany in the occupied territories these experiments

470
0:50:56 --> 0:51:02
were not the isolated and casual acts of individual doctors and scientists working solely on their

471
0:51:02 --> 0:51:07
own responsibility but were the product of coordinated policy making and planning at high

472
0:51:07 --> 0:51:14
governmental military and nazi party levels conducted as an integral part of the total war

473
0:51:14 --> 0:51:19
effort now that's the key point right when we're talking about unrestricted means of methods of

474
0:51:19 --> 0:51:27
warfare how easy would it be to say oh we were conducting all these experiments you know necessary

475
0:51:27 --> 0:51:32
experiments for the good of our country whereas in fact what you were doing was selecting multiple

476
0:51:32 --> 0:51:38
people and just murdering them in inhumane ways you know essentially and saying oh we were doing

477
0:51:38 --> 0:51:45
it for the greater good they were ordered sanctioned permitted or approved by persons

478
0:51:45 --> 0:51:50
in positions of authority who under all principles of law were under the duty to know about these

479
0:51:50 --> 0:51:56
things and take steps to terminate or prevent them so that's the you know the proof that they

480
0:51:56 --> 0:52:01
happened they then talk about permissible medical experiments the great weight of the evidence

481
0:52:01 --> 0:52:06
before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings when kept within

482
0:52:06 --> 0:52:11
reasonably well defined bounds conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally that's

483
0:52:11 --> 0:52:18
what they had decided in the preamble what were the existing medical ethics about experimentation

484
0:52:18 --> 0:52:25
you know was it normal to experiment on people and if so was it ethical and the answer was yes

485
0:52:25 --> 0:52:30
provided it was within certain bounds so the protagonists of the practice of human

486
0:52:31 --> 0:52:36
experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good

487
0:52:36 --> 0:52:44
of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study all agree however that certain

488
0:52:44 --> 0:52:49
basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral ethical and legal concepts

489
0:52:50 --> 0:52:57
and this is where they set out the 10 principles of the nierenberg code number one the voluntary

490
0:52:57 --> 0:53:02
consent of the human subject is absolutely essential this means that the person involved

491
0:53:02 --> 0:53:08
should have legal capacity to give consent should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power

492
0:53:08 --> 0:53:16
of choice without the intervention of any element of force fraud deceit duress overreaching or other

493
0:53:16 --> 0:53:21
ulterior form of constraint or coercion and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the

494
0:53:21 --> 0:53:25
elements of subject matter involved so as to enable him to make an understanding and enlighten

495
0:53:25 --> 0:53:32
decision this latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the

496
0:53:32 --> 0:53:38
experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature duration and purpose of the

497
0:53:38 --> 0:53:44
experiment the method and means by which it is to be conducted all inconveniences and hazards

498
0:53:44 --> 0:53:50
reasonably to be expected and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his

499
0:53:50 --> 0:53:55
participation in the experiment the duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of

500
0:53:55 --> 0:54:02
consent rests upon each individual who initiates directs or engages in the experiment it is a

501
0:54:02 --> 0:54:10
personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity now that's

502
0:54:10 --> 0:54:18
just the first principle of these 10 principles that were enunciated second the experiment should

503
0:54:18 --> 0:54:24
be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society unprocurable by other methods or

504
0:54:24 --> 0:54:29
means of study and not random and unnecessary in nature now i don't know whether we need to

505
0:54:29 --> 0:54:34
go through the rest of the points do you want me to go through them all or do you all know them already

506
0:54:34 --> 0:54:42
quick answer no the essence of it you've got but just quickly give us the other eight just rather

507
0:54:43 --> 0:54:48
all right just quickly then um the experiment should be so designed and based on the results of

508
0:54:48 --> 0:54:53
animal experimentation which again we know isn't happening at the moment this time around either

509
0:54:53 --> 0:55:07
and a knowledge of the experiment should be so conducted to so as to avoid all unnecessary

510
0:55:07 --> 0:55:14
physical and mental suffering and injury well that's been breached with the current set of

511
0:55:14 --> 0:55:20
live human experiments number five no experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori

512
0:55:20 --> 0:55:26
reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur well again we already have that

513
0:55:26 --> 0:55:32
evidence except perhaps in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects

514
0:55:33 --> 0:55:37
and that's the point that one of the you know that dr ivy was making he said well i've actually

515
0:55:37 --> 0:55:43
participated in my own experiments and therefore it's ethical and that's one of the parts of the

516
0:55:43 --> 0:55:49
newenberg code is that and the declaration of helsinki is you know just because a physician is

517
0:55:50 --> 0:55:55
participating participating doesn't mean that the overall experiment is therefore ethical

518
0:55:57 --> 0:56:02
the degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian

519
0:56:02 --> 0:56:08
importance of the problem to be resolved by the experiment seven proper preparation should be made

520
0:56:08 --> 0:56:13
and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote

521
0:56:13 --> 0:56:21
possibilities of injury disability or death now i take issue with that because you know the

522
0:56:21 --> 0:56:26
vaccine clinics are not providing individual clinical risk assessments for example and most

523
0:56:26 --> 0:56:33
of the time they're only people are only monitored for a few minutes this specifically says preparation

524
0:56:33 --> 0:56:39
should be made adequate facilities to protect the experimental subject in other words they should

525
0:56:39 --> 0:56:44
be taken through the full clinical risk assessment beforehand but they're not number eight the

526
0:56:44 --> 0:56:51
experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons and yet we have volunteers doing

527
0:56:51 --> 0:56:56
these experiments on people the highest degree of skill and care should be required through all

528
0:56:56 --> 0:57:03
stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment number nine during the

529
0:57:03 --> 0:57:08
course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end

530
0:57:08 --> 0:57:13
if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to

531
0:57:13 --> 0:57:20
him to be impossible so for example the lockdowns the stay at home orders you know that's a live

532
0:57:20 --> 0:57:25
human experiment people should have been able to say okay i've had enough i need to leave my home

533
0:57:25 --> 0:57:32
now you know i've reached my limits instead of killing themselves for example number 10 during

534
0:57:32 --> 0:57:37
the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment

535
0:57:37 --> 0:57:44
at any stage if he has probable cause to believe in the exercise of good faith superior skill and

536
0:57:44 --> 0:57:50
careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury

537
0:57:50 --> 0:57:58
disability or death to the experimental subject okay so when you hear all of those i think you'll

538
0:57:58 --> 0:58:01
all agree that they're all being broken at the moment with the live human experiments that are

539
0:58:01 --> 0:58:07
being conducted on us and when i say the live human experiments i mean the lockdowns i mean the

540
0:58:07 --> 0:58:15
masks i mean the testing i mean the the injections those are all live human experiments so it goes on

541
0:58:15 --> 0:58:21
to say of the 10 principles which have been immunated our judicial concern of course is

542
0:58:21 --> 0:58:26
with those requirements which are purely legal so they don't want to go into you know the

543
0:58:28 --> 0:58:34
scientific methodology for example because that's not for them to comment on but about whether or

544
0:58:34 --> 0:58:40
not consent is obtained that goes to the lawfulness of it so we find from the evidence and in the

545
0:58:40 --> 0:58:45
medical experiments which have been proved these 10 principles were much more frequently honoured in

546
0:58:45 --> 0:58:50
their breach than in their observance in every single instance appearing in the records subjects

547
0:58:50 --> 0:58:57
were used who did not consent to the experiments in no case was the experimental subject at liberty

548
0:58:57 --> 0:59:02
of his own free choice to withdraw from the experiment in many cases experiments were

549
0:59:02 --> 0:59:09
performed by unqualified persons same as today were conducted at random for no adequate scientific

550
0:59:09 --> 0:59:15
reason and under revolting physical conditions all of the experiments were conducted with

551
0:59:15 --> 0:59:20
unnecessary suffering and injury but very little if any precautions were taken to protect or

552
0:59:20 --> 0:59:26
safeguard the human subjects from the possibilities of injury disability or death in every one of the

553
0:59:26 --> 0:59:31
experiments the subjects experienced extreme pain or torture and in most of them they suffered

554
0:59:31 --> 0:59:36
permanent injury mutilation or death either as a direct result of the experiments or because of

555
0:59:36 --> 0:59:42
lack of adequate follow-up care again that's happening now the lack of adequate follow-up care

556
0:59:43 --> 0:59:48
obviously all of these experiments involving brutalities tortures disabling injury and death

557
0:59:48 --> 0:59:53
were performed in complete disregard of international conventions the laws and customs

558
0:59:53 --> 0:59:59
of war the general principles of criminal law as described as derived from the criminal laws of all

559
0:59:59 --> 1:00:06
civilized nations and control council law number 10 manifestly human experiments under such conditions

560
1:00:06 --> 1:00:11
are contrary to the principles of the law of nations as they result from the usages established

561
1:00:11 --> 1:00:18
amongst civilized people from the laws of humanity and from the dictates of public conscience okay so

562
1:00:18 --> 1:00:25
basically they are saying that well you heard what they said that they're condemning basically all

563
1:00:25 --> 1:00:30
of the experiments because the evidence proved and you heard how much evidence was actually presented

564
1:00:30 --> 1:00:39
to the trial over 139 days that that was the general case and therefore they then look at each

565
1:00:39 --> 1:00:49
what each defendant did and judge them in relation to that now can i just before i just go through

566
1:00:49 --> 1:00:59
the main you know finding against carl brandt what i find fascinating is that when they look at the

567
1:01:00 --> 1:01:07
when they look at sorry page 88 page 89 oh yeah here we go so carl brandt was found guilty and

568
1:01:07 --> 1:01:14
was hanged now when you look at the experiments he conducted and how many people died and you

569
1:01:14 --> 1:01:19
compare it to the what we now think millions of people who have died from the current set of

570
1:01:19 --> 1:01:27
experiments these ones pale into comparison they make it look like child's play the defendant carl

571
1:01:27 --> 1:01:32
brandt is charged with special responsibility for and participation in freezing malaria loss

572
1:01:32 --> 1:01:37
gas sulfanolamide bone muscle and nerve regeneration and bone

573
1:01:41 --> 1:01:46
transplantation seawater epidemic jaundice sterilization and typhus experiments as alleged

574
1:01:46 --> 1:01:50
under counts two and three of the indictment he's also charged in counts two and three with

575
1:01:50 --> 1:01:54
criminality in connection with the planning and carrying out of the euthanasia program

576
1:01:54 --> 1:01:59
of the german reich so on a killing spree some might say

577
1:02:02 --> 1:02:07
so when it goes through the experiments it says for example under the sulfamide experiments

578
1:02:08 --> 1:02:14
it was stated that 75 persons have been experimented on and the subjects have been

579
1:02:14 --> 1:02:21
deliberately infected three died three died had he made the slightest investigation he could

580
1:02:21 --> 1:02:25
have ascertained that such experiments were being conducted on non-german nationals without their

581
1:02:25 --> 1:02:31
consent an inflagrant disregard for their personal rights and that such experiments were planned for

582
1:02:31 --> 1:02:37
the future so again one of the reasons he was found guilty was because apparently he made no

583
1:02:37 --> 1:02:42
investigation at all about whether or not these experiments were being conducted in accordance

584
1:02:42 --> 1:02:48
with the principles that we've just read out the 10 principles it does not appear that at any

585
1:02:48 --> 1:02:52
time he took any steps to check medical experiments on human subjects

586
1:02:54 --> 1:03:00
occupying the position he did and being a physician of ability and experience the duty rested upon him

587
1:03:00 --> 1:03:05
to make some adequate investigation concerning the medical experiments which he knew had been

588
1:03:05 --> 1:03:08
were being and doubtless would continue to be conducted in the camps

589
1:03:11 --> 1:03:16
the jaundice experiments eight prisoners have been condemned for the death of a man

590
1:03:16 --> 1:03:21
eight prisoners have been condemned to death and they were experimented on lost gas

591
1:03:21 --> 1:03:33
lost gas sorry lost mustard gas experiments 200 campmates were experimented on 50 of them died

592
1:03:35 --> 1:03:43
euthanasia of course that's a much bigger one but here they talk about how the euthanasia was planned

593
1:03:43 --> 1:03:49
so it said a budget was adopted the method of determining candidates for euthanasia was established

594
1:03:49 --> 1:03:54
a patient's transport corporation was organized to convey the selected patients to the gassing

595
1:03:54 --> 1:04:00
chambers questionnaires were prepared which were forwarded to the heads of mental institutions

596
1:04:00 --> 1:04:04
one questionnaire to be accomplished concerning each inmate and then returned to the ministry of

597
1:04:04 --> 1:04:09
the interior at the ministry who completed questionnaires were examined by so-called

598
1:04:09 --> 1:04:13
experts who registered their professional opinions there on return them to the appropriate

599
1:04:13 --> 1:04:18
office for final examination and orders were issued for those patients who by this process

600
1:04:18 --> 1:04:25
were finally selected for extermination thereafter the condemned patients were gathered at collection

601
1:04:25 --> 1:04:29
points from whence they were transported to the euthanasia stations and killed by gassing

602
1:04:30 --> 1:04:40
now what i find disturbing about that is that there's evidence from the nhs that the do not

603
1:04:40 --> 1:04:48
attempt to resuscitate pathways were put in place in covid that meant that any patient who turned

604
1:04:48 --> 1:04:54
up at hospital had an automatic do not attempt to resuscitate order placed on them whether they were

605
1:04:55 --> 1:05:04
aware of it or not and again the when it came to um you know who should be given a covid injection

606
1:05:04 --> 1:05:13
it was obviously the people who were elderly severely disabled learning difficulties and in

607
1:05:13 --> 1:05:19
fact the evidence shows that i think it was two-thirds more now i won't even quote the

608
1:05:20 --> 1:05:25
precise figure but essentially that people in those categories have died at a far greater

609
1:05:25 --> 1:05:30
rate than the other members of the population it's looking suspiciously like we have another

610
1:05:30 --> 1:05:34
euthanasia program running in my view but i'd like to hear your viewpoints on that

611
1:05:37 --> 1:05:43
so the evidence is conclusive that almost at the outset of the program non-german nationals

612
1:05:43 --> 1:05:45
were selected for euthanasia and exterminated

613
1:05:48 --> 1:05:54
carl brandt actually at the end says that he willingly took part in the euthanasia program

614
1:05:55 --> 1:06:02
because he considered that they were mercy killings and that he stands by that and again

615
1:06:02 --> 1:06:07
you have to understand the thinking of the german medical profession at the time which they the

616
1:06:07 --> 1:06:14
defendants try and justify which was that they were incredibly good kind doctors and that most

617
1:06:14 --> 1:06:20
of the people selected for euthanasia were going to die a horrible death anyway especially the

618
1:06:20 --> 1:06:25
incurables and therefore it was essentially mercy killings now presumably one of the reasons why

619
1:06:25 --> 1:06:31
carl brandt ended up being hanged because he shows no remorse for the euthanasia program

620
1:06:32 --> 1:06:39
and so essentially it says here the we find that carl brandt was responsible for aiden and abetted

621
1:06:39 --> 1:06:45
took a consenting part in and was connected with plans and enterprises involving medical experiments

622
1:06:45 --> 1:06:50
conducted on non-german nationals against their consent and in other atrocities in the course of

623
1:06:50 --> 1:06:56
which murders brutalities cruelties tortures and other inhumane acts were committed to the extent

624
1:06:56 --> 1:07:01
that these criminal acts did not constitute war crimes they constituted crimes against humanity

625
1:07:01 --> 1:07:07
the conclusion military tribunal one finds in a judge is the defendant carl brandt guilty under

626
1:07:07 --> 1:07:15
counts two three and four of the indictment and as i say his the sentence was hanging so each what

627
1:07:15 --> 1:07:21
happens with is that with each of the defendants they go through essentially the same process you

628
1:07:21 --> 1:07:28
know they say who was this doctor how much authority did they have where were they taking

629
1:07:28 --> 1:07:35
their orders from and what experiments were they involved in so the next defendant is dr hand loza

630
1:07:35 --> 1:07:42
who gets life imprisonment he's charged with special responsibility for high altitude freezing

631
1:07:42 --> 1:07:56
malaria loss gas etc um is the typhus experiments under counts two and three of the indictment

632
1:07:56 --> 1:08:01
hand loza is charged with special responsibility for and participation in typhus experiments

633
1:08:01 --> 1:08:06
conducted in the bukenwald concentration camp which was supervised by a certain dr ding

634
1:08:07 --> 1:08:13
um there can be no question that in 1941 typhus was a potential menace to the german army and to

635
1:08:13 --> 1:08:18
many german civilians the use of inadequate typhus vaccine was therefore a matter of prime

636
1:08:18 --> 1:08:23
importance the distribution of vaccines to the weimark was in the within the control of hand

637
1:08:23 --> 1:08:29
loza in the exercise of his functions he was also interested in typhus vaccine production

638
1:08:30 --> 1:08:43
um so yeah it talks about how he gets the order to conduct these experiments um and two people died

639
1:08:45 --> 1:08:50
and again i'm raising that because i'm not minimizing the fact that two people died i'm

640
1:08:50 --> 1:08:57
just struck by the fact that each of these defendants were being held responsible for

641
1:08:57 --> 1:09:03
these you know one two three eight deaths as well as the thousands of deaths but again in the context

642
1:09:03 --> 1:09:09
of how many people are dying from these current experiments it just i just find it really quite

643
1:09:09 --> 1:09:15
extraordinary that you know as people have said previous vaccines have been pulled after 50 deaths

644
1:09:15 --> 1:09:20
and yet we're watching hundreds of thousands unfold it's doing my head in um

645
1:09:22 --> 1:09:28
so hand loza in his superior medical position made no effort to investigate the situation of

646
1:09:28 --> 1:09:33
the human subjects or to exercise any proper degree of control over those conducting experiments

647
1:09:33 --> 1:09:39
within his field of authority and competence at the slightest inquiry being made the facts would

648
1:09:39 --> 1:09:43
have revealed that in vaccine experiments already conducted it be involved deaths had occurred

649
1:09:43 --> 1:09:50
both as a result of artificial infections by the lice um or but from infections by a variant virus

650
1:09:50 --> 1:09:56
given to subjects after they had first been vaccinated with either the i can't pronounce

651
1:09:56 --> 1:10:03
names of the vaccines whose efficacy was being tested had this step been taken and had hand loza

652
1:10:03 --> 1:10:08
exercised his authority later deaths would have been prevented in these particular experiments

653
1:10:08 --> 1:10:13
and these deaths not only occur with german nationals but also among non-german nationals

654
1:10:13 --> 1:10:19
now again going back to the current situation you know in the uk it's the ccg the care commissioning

655
1:10:19 --> 1:10:26
groups which are which comprise the local gps in an area who have commissioned

656
1:10:27 --> 1:10:33
this vaccine to be rolled out and they're being rolled out in clinics typically not at the gp

657
1:10:34 --> 1:10:39
surgeries they're being rolled out in clinics in places like schools and you know churches and

658
1:10:40 --> 1:10:47
other places shopping centers and they're being run by volunteers we don't even know how many

659
1:10:47 --> 1:10:55
qualified medical staff are actually there on site let alone going through individual risk assessments

660
1:10:55 --> 1:11:02
and it's exactly the same criticism that the tribunal makes of hand loza and frant they knew

661
1:11:02 --> 1:11:07
people were in these vaccination programs usually without their consent they knew that

662
1:11:07 --> 1:11:13
people were being maimed and injured and yet they just let the vaccination programs continue

663
1:11:13 --> 1:11:20
exactly the same as happening today so

664
1:11:26 --> 1:11:31
yeah in connection with hand lozers responsibility for unlawful experiments

665
1:11:31 --> 1:11:35
on human beings the evidence is conclusive that with knowledge of the frequent use of non-german

666
1:11:35 --> 1:11:40
nationals as human experimental subjects he failed to exercise any proper degree of control over

667
1:11:40 --> 1:11:46
those subordinated to him who were implicated in medical experiments coming within his officials

668
1:11:46 --> 1:11:52
official sphere of competence this was a duty which clearly devolved upon him by virtue of

669
1:11:52 --> 1:11:57
his official position had he exercised his responsibility great numbers of non-german

670
1:11:57 --> 1:12:01
nationals would have been saved from murder to the extent that the crimes committed by or under

671
1:12:01 --> 1:12:07
his authority were not war crimes they were crimes against his humanity conclusion military tribunal

672
1:12:07 --> 1:12:12
one finds in a judge's the defendant's secret hands over guilty under counts two and three of

673
1:12:12 --> 1:12:23
the indictment so that's you know life imprisonment and hanging for non-consensual experiments where

674
1:12:23 --> 1:12:31
basically they didn't bother to exercise any supervisory power over it authority over it and

675
1:12:31 --> 1:12:36
had they done so they could have seen that the experiments were unethical were causing harm and

676
1:12:36 --> 1:12:41
they could have saved lives and they failed to do so and so they were found guilty of the result

677
1:12:43 --> 1:12:49
rostock is the next one who's brought to trial now he's not he's found not guilty and the reason

678
1:12:49 --> 1:12:54
for that is that the prosecution does not contend that rostock personally participated

679
1:12:54 --> 1:12:59
in criminal experiments it vigorously argues however that with full knowledge that concentration

680
1:12:59 --> 1:13:04
camp inmates were being experimented upon he continued to function upon research assignments

681
1:13:04 --> 1:13:10
concerning scientific investigations the results of which were probably further experiments upon

682
1:13:10 --> 1:13:16
human beings the prosecution then argues that his knowledge concerning these matters considered

683
1:13:16 --> 1:13:21
together with the position of authority which he occupied in connection with scientific research

684
1:13:22 --> 1:13:27
and the fact that he failed to exercise his authority in attempt to stop or check criminal

685
1:13:27 --> 1:13:33
experiments renders him guilty as charged so he wasn't personally taking part in the experimentation

686
1:13:33 --> 1:13:38
but because of his scientific research he must have known that harm would have happened and he

687
1:13:38 --> 1:13:44
didn't do anything about it so that was the allegations made against him doubtless rostock

688
1:13:44 --> 1:13:49
knew that experiments on concentration camp inmates were being conducted he presided over

689
1:13:49 --> 1:13:55
the meeting of surgeons held in may 1943 and they heard statements that experimental subjects had

690
1:13:55 --> 1:14:00
been artificially infected doubtless he knew that the experiments were dangerous and that further

691
1:14:00 --> 1:14:05
experiments would be conducted however it does not appear that either rostock rostock or any

692
1:14:05 --> 1:14:11
subordinate of his directed the work done on any assignment concerning criminal experiments

693
1:14:11 --> 1:14:17
the record does not show that the position held by rostock vested in him any authority whatsoever

694
1:14:17 --> 1:14:23
other than as above stated no experiments were conducted by any person or organization

695
1:14:23 --> 1:14:29
which was to the least extent under rostock's control or direction so that's the difference

696
1:14:29 --> 1:14:36
that yes he may have known about it and yes his work could have made him realize that um

697
1:14:36 --> 1:14:42
you know criminal harm was going to occur but because he wasn't involved directly

698
1:14:43 --> 1:14:48
they found him not guilty now i can't comment on that as to whether or not that was a fair

699
1:14:48 --> 1:14:55
decision but that's where they drew the line and as i say there are all of the other defendants

700
1:14:55 --> 1:15:00
as well going through exactly the same kind of process what experiments were they involved in

701
1:15:00 --> 1:15:06
what authority did they have to put an end to them and therefore you know what duty was imposed

702
1:15:06 --> 1:15:17
on them to do precisely that and did they fail in that duty overall seven doctors were sentenced to

703
1:15:17 --> 1:15:25
hanging five doctors to life imprisonment one doctor for 10 to 10 years one to 15 years and

704
1:15:25 --> 1:15:32
two doctors for 20 years so 16 were given sentences and the rest were found not guilty

705
1:15:33 --> 1:15:43
so that is essentially in a nutshell as much as i could um you know the medical cases

706
1:15:44 --> 1:15:51
as i say what strikes me about it all is firstly the fact that you know all of the doctors

707
1:15:52 --> 1:15:57
pleaded not guilty because their view was either these experiments were necessary

708
1:15:59 --> 1:16:06
you know as part of war or it was the um you know they were just following orders and they were

709
1:16:06 --> 1:16:13
reasonable orders because of the first point necessity um the other point they make is that

710
1:16:14 --> 1:16:22
you know they were they had a blind faith essentially um so one of them is saying that

711
1:16:22 --> 1:16:29
you know everyone loved and adored hitler so much and believed that everything that he was doing was

712
1:16:29 --> 1:16:36
for the benefit of people so when they when hitler ordered you know mass vaccination experiments he

713
1:16:36 --> 1:16:43
thought it was for the greater good and never even questioned it um which again has bells ringing

714
1:16:43 --> 1:16:47
for me because the number of people are saying similar things today we trusted vaccines we

715
1:16:47 --> 1:16:54
trusted big pharma we trusted you know being told that these were safe and effective um a similar

716
1:16:54 --> 1:17:02
kind of blind trust being uh expressed today as being expressed in those days as well um but

717
1:17:02 --> 1:17:08
ultimately as you can see there was a code of medical ethics that these perpetrators weren't

718
1:17:08 --> 1:17:17
upholding and again the same today the difference between then and now is that we've had 70 years

719
1:17:18 --> 1:17:28
worth of more laws and ethics to clarify some of the um issues that people were contesting in those

720
1:17:28 --> 1:17:34
days you know such as can you take a prisoner um and experiment on them on the basis that they're

721
1:17:34 --> 1:17:41
condemned to death anyway um and consent issues about implied consent you know as someone's rolled

722
1:17:41 --> 1:17:45
up their sleeve does it mean they're actually consenting even if they can't speak english and

723
1:17:45 --> 1:17:51
say yes so all of those issues which some of the defendants were relying on as an excuse have now

724
1:17:51 --> 1:17:59
been ironed out in um subsequent laws and medical ethics so whilst i find reading through this shocking

725
1:17:59 --> 1:18:04
that there were doctors at the time who were claiming what they were doing was ethical it's

726
1:18:04 --> 1:18:11
even more shocking to me now that not only if we have those judgments which no doctor i've

727
1:18:11 --> 1:18:17
spoken to has read no lawyer that i've spoken to has read so what was the point of it all if

728
1:18:17 --> 1:18:22
nobody actually reads it but as i keep saying in addition to that we've got copious more laws and

729
1:18:22 --> 1:18:31
ethics so as stephen said and i'll wrap up now why and how are we still here how are we still

730
1:18:31 --> 1:18:36
going through the same thing where medics from around the world are conducting live human

731
1:18:36 --> 1:18:43
experiments as i say the um and it's all the same stuff so as a lawyer i find it very very

732
1:18:43 --> 1:18:49
frustrating because when i read all of this it seems to me to be very clear that what's happening

733
1:18:49 --> 1:18:56
today is a massive breach of law and medical ethics and yet here we are so i hope you found

734
1:18:56 --> 1:19:02
that helpful um there's so much more that's in here that you would find fascinating to read i'm sure

735
1:19:03 --> 1:19:09
um if you're that way inclined um but please do ask me questions very good very good anna

736
1:19:10 --> 1:19:15
great job round of applause everybody thank you anna we'll come to the questions in a moment

737
1:19:15 --> 1:19:21
good job now a couple of announcements before we get to stephen and q and a firstly

738
1:19:22 --> 1:19:29
the meryl nass who has addressed us is before a kangaroo court of medical board in the u.s

739
1:19:30 --> 1:19:39
and daniel craft and others are watching that so be aware of that um and it is quite interesting

740
1:19:39 --> 1:19:42
so we haven't got time to go to that but it's on at the moment secondly

741
1:19:44 --> 1:19:51
dan dan craft has come up with an idea that stephen and i support of helping shimon yanovitz get a

742
1:19:51 --> 1:19:59
dark field microscope and so and so to enable shimon to keep doing his work the question is

743
1:20:00 --> 1:20:09
in what way could we get a dark field microscope even a used microscope to shimon in israel so

744
1:20:10 --> 1:20:16
so it's not just a question of you know throwing money at it there might be used microscopes

745
1:20:16 --> 1:20:24
there might be a way that someone knows so dan will put his i'll put his contact details into

746
1:20:25 --> 1:20:31
the chat but shimon's work is so important he is restricted with resources so dan came up with

747
1:20:31 --> 1:20:39
this idea and stephen and i consider an excellent idea so let's see how we can help shimon get that

748
1:20:41 --> 1:20:49
tool get that important resource so meryl nass helping shimon i'll put his daniel in there

749
1:20:49 --> 1:20:58
and the third thing that's interesting before stephen asks his question is that in queensland

750
1:20:58 --> 1:21:05
ana in australia a law is being brought in and the way that the law is structured in australia

751
1:21:05 --> 1:21:11
is that queensland is the lead state for a change in the national health law and then other states

752
1:21:12 --> 1:21:21
copy that so there's a somewhat uniform law amongst the states now this law is now saying

753
1:21:21 --> 1:21:28
precisely what you've been dealing with it says that a doctor who gives advice contrary to the

754
1:21:28 --> 1:21:35
government position is breaching the law and so here's the question we won't i just bring it to

755
1:21:35 --> 1:21:41
everyone's attention that right now a law is being brought in that would make doctors ignore

756
1:21:41 --> 1:21:48
the patient before them and follow orders now that's also what's happening in california

757
1:21:49 --> 1:21:54
and so we'll have a we'll have a conversation let's do the questions first but be aware that

758
1:21:54 --> 1:22:01
ana precisely what you're saying hey we're back here again where the state says you doctors

759
1:22:01 --> 1:22:07
mustn't do this and you start to go what did nuremberg say the doctors just slavishly take

760
1:22:07 --> 1:22:15
orders from government that's the point about medical ethics and morals and ana you talked

761
1:22:15 --> 1:22:21
about morals and ethics it's happening now i'll bring it to your attention we'll have a discussion

762
1:22:21 --> 1:22:27
a little bit later and there was one other thing that question was asked ana you mentioned a report

763
1:22:28 --> 1:22:36
there's there's comments in the chat about a euthanasia report or a euthanasia exercise that

764
1:22:36 --> 1:22:40
was happening now and people said what's the name what's the name that ana mentioned you mentioned

765
1:22:40 --> 1:22:46
some name of some report if you can't think of it doesn't matter but if you can someone or if you

766
1:22:46 --> 1:22:52
can't specifically remember don't worry someone will bring it to your attention can you remember

767
1:22:52 --> 1:23:01
me the yes the euthanasia report no i don't know about ana what did ana mention can you remember

768
1:23:01 --> 1:23:11
um i i know um ana mentioned there the um the government's dnr um yeah the cqc i put in the

769
1:23:11 --> 1:23:18
in the chat there that the care quality commission in the uk actually provided a report in 2021

770
1:23:19 --> 1:23:25
wear it and i quote verbatim um there were potentially avoidable deaths as a result of

771
1:23:25 --> 1:23:31
the uk government actions but nothing has happened as a result of their own watchdog

772
1:23:31 --> 1:23:38
finding them culpable and one of the questions or part of a two-part question i got for ana

773
1:23:38 --> 1:23:45
will involve that later regarding the rule of law ana as we've discussed previously okay great

774
1:23:45 --> 1:23:49
all right thank you peter for that insight everybody that was the report that ana

775
1:23:49 --> 1:23:54
mentioned so in tradition here everybody particularly for new for new participants

776
1:23:54 --> 1:24:01
steven is the founder of the group he and ana ana well knows this steven gets the first

777
1:24:02 --> 1:24:07
first opportunity to ask questions and to explore ideas that have occurred

778
1:24:07 --> 1:24:13
through the presentation steven over to you yeah thank you i know that was great um

779
1:24:13 --> 1:24:22
um i uh would encourage people on the in the group to uh to have a look at what ana has been

780
1:24:22 --> 1:24:29
talking about themselves um but i understand and that a lot of people won't be comfortable

781
1:24:29 --> 1:24:35
doing that uh it was pretty hard to listen to ana but anyway um i agree with you that

782
1:24:35 --> 1:24:41
what's happening now is actually worse than what happened in the second world war in terms of

783
1:24:41 --> 1:24:52
numbers but also as you pointed out you know we had uh people who thought they had they were

784
1:24:52 --> 1:24:59
widely read you know and uh so they should have known better than in the 40s or the 30s late 30s

785
1:24:59 --> 1:25:07
i think it was um and um yes it's going on now and one of the things i thought of when you were

786
1:25:07 --> 1:25:11
talking um i agree with you about the do not resuscitate programs that that could be an

787
1:25:11 --> 1:25:19
updated t4 program and maybe they've used it as a blueprint i don't know but uh everyone's

788
1:25:20 --> 1:25:26
all the time it's been the over 70s over 80s i think it was initially who are most at risk and

789
1:25:26 --> 1:25:34
now denmark for example think they're very virtuous because they've said oh don't over

790
1:25:34 --> 1:25:40
don't uh inject anyone under 50 i think you have to be over 50 to qualify for a

791
1:25:40 --> 1:25:47
vaccination in denmark i think that's right but i've thought all the time that their claim that

792
1:25:47 --> 1:25:54
the elderly were most at risk they're most at risk of every damn disease the elderly so why would you

793
1:25:55 --> 1:26:01
create special rules in in this you know covid 19 alleged disease so um

794
1:26:01 --> 1:26:09
um and also if you've given the vaccination a dangerous injection then they're the very

795
1:26:09 --> 1:26:18
people who'll be tipped over the edge into death so you know it's like i've i haven't accepted the

796
1:26:18 --> 1:26:25
the philosophy that you inject those people first you know it was made out to be a kind thing to do

797
1:26:25 --> 1:26:33
precisely as i think carl brandt was arguing about euthanasia you know they were doing they

798
1:26:33 --> 1:26:39
pretended to be kind to old people when actually they were doing exactly the opposite and therein

799
1:26:39 --> 1:26:45
lies the true evil of what's happened i just wondered what you think about that yeah well i

800
1:26:45 --> 1:26:50
think that's the whole point isn't it that you know you can you can describe as a mercy killing

801
1:26:50 --> 1:26:54
something which actually is an intentional brutal killing depending on

802
1:26:55 --> 1:27:01
in it and they've done it now in 20 since 2020 and they're doing it still

803
1:27:03 --> 1:27:10
including denmark there's you know the supposed virtuous country who've done the right thing no

804
1:27:10 --> 1:27:14
they haven't done the right thing they're still killing the old people yeah yeah and in fact

805
1:27:14 --> 1:27:22
there's going on from the nuremberg trials in the 40s they brought some nurses to trial in the 60s

806
1:27:24 --> 1:27:32
and one of them anna actually confesses to have killed over 5 000 children and these are typically

807
1:27:32 --> 1:27:38
children in you know mentally disabled children i think they were in polish asylums but it's

808
1:27:38 --> 1:27:43
fascinating because you listen to each of these nurses give their evidence and they're all saying

809
1:27:43 --> 1:27:48
essentially the same thing or we thought we were doing a kind thing you know some of these children

810
1:27:48 --> 1:27:51
had nobody to look after them if they went out into the community they'd have ended up on the

811
1:27:51 --> 1:27:58
streets and you see how they're convincing themselves that you know these cold-blooded

812
1:27:58 --> 1:28:09
murders were acts of kindness it's yeah disturbing and and the other thing that strikes me prior to

813
1:28:09 --> 1:28:15
this so-called pandemic which was the pandemic nobody trusted or very few people trusted the

814
1:28:15 --> 1:28:20
government and all of a sudden they're trusting the government quoting the government on everything

815
1:28:20 --> 1:28:29
blindly crazy they didn't even like the government in this country and they didn't like um well they've

816
1:28:29 --> 1:28:37
preferred the former prime minister to the present um but anyway um so when you're reading through

817
1:28:37 --> 1:28:45
these papers anna what was the most shocking thing to you i think the normalization of how

818
1:28:46 --> 1:28:52
brutal these experiments were the narrative that these doctors were running in their head

819
1:28:53 --> 1:28:58
consistently throughout which was you know we're good physicians we're there for the love of

820
1:28:58 --> 1:29:04
humanity and we just found ourselves in a difficult position and um uh don't we don't feel guilty

821
1:29:05 --> 1:29:10
you know we can justify it to ourselves and in fact there's a certain amount of um

822
1:29:11 --> 1:29:15
i think i'd call it whining really of you know being misunderstood

823
1:29:17 --> 1:29:24
and i and i just but then on the other hand i do try and i try and give credence to what they say

824
1:29:24 --> 1:29:32
which is you you can't sit there and judge us unless you are actually in that regime

825
1:29:32 --> 1:29:38
experiencing it for yourself um and i think you know there must be a certain truth in that

826
1:29:38 --> 1:29:43
there were a number of doctors who said that you know they tried to raise objections and

827
1:29:43 --> 1:29:49
they weren't comfortable with it but you know they there was incredibly little that they

828
1:29:49 --> 1:29:54
could actually do about it realistically and again i don't know how true that is because

829
1:29:54 --> 1:29:59
people are using the same excuse today oh you know in the nhs oh it's impossible to say no

830
1:29:59 --> 1:30:05
well is it really what's gonna happen someone got a gun to your head i mean in those days

831
1:30:05 --> 1:30:12
literally people could get shot on the spot by you know the ss and etc but that's not happening now

832
1:30:13 --> 1:30:18
so i don't understand how people can be saying things like you know well we were forced to do

833
1:30:18 --> 1:30:24
the vaccination program we didn't have the choice well didn't you dr white walked away

834
1:30:24 --> 1:30:32
dr jerry waters walked away but you know they haven't been murdered so yeah i don't know how

835
1:30:32 --> 1:30:37
much of of that was the same then where they were saying that they felt they had to comply but how

836
1:30:37 --> 1:30:43
much choice did they have i don't know and as one british doctor said to me um the last words he

837
1:30:43 --> 1:30:48
ever said to me because i asked him about what he was going to do i won't mention the name um but i

838
1:30:49 --> 1:31:00
respected him before he was involved in a huge fight and he said that he had he felt he had to

839
1:31:00 --> 1:31:05
do it as a gp because they were queuing they were queuing in the streets for the injections for

840
1:31:05 --> 1:31:06
vaccinations

841
1:31:09 --> 1:31:12
so i have on that doctor since

842
1:31:14 --> 1:31:21
crazy uh i've done a number of doctors have drifted away as well i was involved with

843
1:31:21 --> 1:31:27
um you know in the junior song thing the junior you know we were supporting during the song

844
1:31:28 --> 1:31:34
um doctors for song it was called um i just wanted to ask you about the uh the um people

845
1:31:36 --> 1:31:42
who were hanged i think they were selected for death sentences rather than life imprisonment

846
1:31:42 --> 1:31:49
because they were i think all the people who were murdered sorry um hanged were ss is that right

847
1:31:51 --> 1:31:58
uh i'd have to check that point to be honest i haven't specifically done that

848
1:31:58 --> 1:32:02
exercise to work out whether it was because they were ss

849
1:32:02 --> 1:32:07
yes in the sentences it doesn't actually um

850
1:32:10 --> 1:32:17
yeah i don't know i i read that somewhere yeah hang on hanging um membership of an organization

851
1:32:17 --> 1:32:24
yeah he was yep membership of an organization membership of an organization yeah actually

852
1:32:24 --> 1:32:29
that is true all of those were who were hanged were membership yeah membership of the criminal

853
1:32:29 --> 1:32:35
organization and i think that once selected for life imprisonment were not members of the ss

854
1:32:36 --> 1:32:43
in other words there were no ss members who would try to who got away with that but i'm

855
1:32:43 --> 1:32:47
not absolutely sure about that no that seems to be right actually looking at it from that perspective

856
1:32:51 --> 1:32:55
um oh no no no carl gentson what had membership of an organization declared criminal

857
1:32:56 --> 1:33:01
and he got life imprisonment um

858
1:33:03 --> 1:33:09
so and i wondered how did carl brandt come to prominence as the main defense with defense

859
1:33:10 --> 1:33:16
defendant sorry how well how did carl brandt come to prominence as the main defendant

860
1:33:17 --> 1:33:24
what what position did he occupy in hitler's germany um well i should give it give it to how

861
1:33:24 --> 1:33:31
they describe it because as i understand it essentially he um ends up being given more and

862
1:33:31 --> 1:33:37
more and more authority by um hitler as time goes on so that they essentially say that he

863
1:33:37 --> 1:33:44
was only answering um to basically hitler in charge of everything but let me just quickly

864
1:33:44 --> 1:33:48
have a look at that hold on give me a moment talk amongst yourselves

865
1:33:54 --> 1:34:02
it's okay and i'll ask another time so because it's a very good question it's very important

866
1:34:02 --> 1:34:08
because it is um it's just that sorry it's here we go um

867
1:34:11 --> 1:34:18
yeah so basically they say that um carl brandt joined the national he became a member

868
1:34:18 --> 1:34:20
he's promoted to the grade

869
1:34:23 --> 1:34:24
major general

870
1:34:27 --> 1:34:32
right hang on sorry during the month of april carl brandt was promoted to the rank of uber straff

871
1:34:32 --> 1:34:38
and barnifura sorry for any germans out there that was probably horribly pronounced in the alimine

872
1:34:38 --> 1:34:45
ss in 1940 he was transferred to the waffen um he received a grade equivalent to that of major

873
1:34:45 --> 1:34:52
general in the waffen in 1943 and in 1944 was promoted to the grade of lieutenant general

874
1:34:53 --> 1:34:57
having at some previous state been relieved as hitler's escort physician he was again

875
1:34:57 --> 1:35:04
appointed as such in the fall of 1944 in 19 general is a three-star general isn't it major

876
1:35:04 --> 1:35:09
generals too so he was invested with high authority over the medical services military and

877
1:35:09 --> 1:35:15
civilian in german paragraphs three and four of this decree referring to carl brandt read as

878
1:35:15 --> 1:35:21
follows i empower professor dr carl brandt subordinate only to me personally and receiving

879
1:35:21 --> 1:35:27
his instructions directly from me to carry out special tasks and negotiations to readjust the

880
1:35:27 --> 1:35:32
requirements for doctors hospitals medical supplies etc between the military and the

881
1:35:32 --> 1:35:39
civilian sectors of their health and medical services so basically he's um you know broad

882
1:35:40 --> 1:35:46
broad order from hitler is essentially the way that it's um so essentially what he was with

883
1:35:46 --> 1:35:56
the surgeon general yeah uh i don't know whether they use that exact term the plane um hang on

884
1:35:57 --> 1:36:02
because he then gets another order on 1943 signed by hitler's his authority was strengthened the

885
1:36:02 --> 1:36:08
pleniple pleniple plenary for the medical and health services general commissioner professor

886
1:36:08 --> 1:36:14
dr brandt is charged with centrally coordinating and directing the problems and activities of the

887
1:36:14 --> 1:36:26
entire medical and health services yeah it doesn't one last question and law number 10 yeah seems

888
1:36:26 --> 1:36:33
to be absolutely crucial um to us in the future because it's going to be something like that that

889
1:36:33 --> 1:36:40
brings all the crimes which we've seen in the last two and a half years into the jurisdiction of

890
1:36:41 --> 1:36:50
military court so what's your view well of course we now have in theory i i suppose it's in practice

891
1:36:50 --> 1:36:54
the international criminal court because of course what happened after nuremberg

892
1:36:54 --> 1:36:58
was that there were other military tribunals that were established for various other

893
1:36:58 --> 1:37:04
heinous crimes that happened since the war but eventually there was a demand for an international

894
1:37:04 --> 1:37:10
criminal um court to be permanently established to hear such crimes and i think it was established

895
1:37:10 --> 1:37:19
was it 1990 or something um but um so the rome statute which governs the international criminal

896
1:37:19 --> 1:37:27
court is now the um the law that sets out the crimes that uh fall within the jurisdiction of

897
1:37:27 --> 1:37:34
the icc so crimes you know article six is um genocide i think article seven is crimes against

898
1:37:34 --> 1:37:43
humanity and article eight is uh war crimes by warfare etc so that's kind of taken the um you

899
1:37:43 --> 1:37:49
know the law council is peculiar to that time we've got updated laws now but the problem is

900
1:37:50 --> 1:37:57
whilst the rome statute for example is enshrined in uk law into the in the international criminal

901
1:37:57 --> 1:38:04
court act i think it's 2001 the harsh reality is that those crimes may fall within the jurisdiction

902
1:38:04 --> 1:38:10
of the icc but how do you get the icc to actually engage and hear any of them you know we've made

903
1:38:10 --> 1:38:18
two applications to the icc but one in april 2021 and the other one in december 2021 and

904
1:38:18 --> 1:38:23
nothing's happened and those of other countries have also written and asked them to intervene

905
1:38:24 --> 1:38:29
so then where do you bring those crimes into what forum but anna that's precisely why there'll be

906
1:38:29 --> 1:38:34
military tribunals what you're thinking in the long run well yeah but then you see under the

907
1:38:34 --> 1:38:40
armed forces act um the what it says is that certain crimes can be brought within the

908
1:38:40 --> 1:38:44
jurisdiction of the courts marshals certain crimes have to be brought within the jurisdiction

909
1:38:44 --> 1:38:49
of the civil courts and some you get a choice as to whether it's courts marshal or not

910
1:38:49 --> 1:38:55
but with the more serious crimes um you know that has to be instigated by the director of

911
1:38:55 --> 1:39:01
public prosecutions unless it's a court of military tribunal and to be honest i've looked into it and

912
1:39:01 --> 1:39:06
it doesn't seem to me to be that clear as to who has the authority to determine this

913
1:39:07 --> 1:39:14
and the reality of the icc is that they've brought very few prosecutions yeah exactly because uh

914
1:39:14 --> 1:39:21
was the un behind the icc they were connected i think well and you know evidence is that the

915
1:39:21 --> 1:39:26
judges certain judges have been brought off i don't want to make that allegation firmly but

916
1:39:26 --> 1:39:33
there's plenty of evidence to show that you know like all of these um organizations they've been

917
1:39:33 --> 1:39:39
captured sure and look at milosevic you know that's the look what happened there

918
1:39:41 --> 1:39:47
and committed suicide but actually he was in their care or should have been and it should have been

919
1:39:47 --> 1:39:56
protected but anyway um thank you on it all right all right now one other i've got a shocking

920
1:39:56 --> 1:40:05
announcement for you everybody a truly shocking announcement we're having a another meeting

921
1:40:05 --> 1:40:14
tomorrow night this is a shock this is the first time in human history that steven frost medical

922
1:40:14 --> 1:40:23
doctors for covert ethics is having three meetings in a week so tomorrow same time as tonight or this

923
1:40:23 --> 1:40:30
afternoon in the us or for australia in the morning uh is addressing us and steven considered

924
1:40:30 --> 1:40:38
this to be so important that we're putting on another event so steven you watched this

925
1:40:38 --> 1:40:45
presentation and you urge everybody to come and watch and look at uh sukker its presentation

926
1:40:45 --> 1:40:51
correct yeah he made a speech in athens to the greek people it was absolutely brilliant so i

927
1:40:51 --> 1:40:58
watched the whole of it yeah um so it's going to make the same speech to us tomorrow all right

928
1:40:58 --> 1:41:04
everybody put it in your diaries the invitations will be coming in the next in the same time uh

929
1:41:04 --> 1:41:18
it'll be 8 p.m uk time 9 p.m central european time 6 a.m melbourne time midday la time 3 p.m

930
1:41:18 --> 1:41:25
new york time you can work the rest out yourselves everybody so and bornio will also be 3 a.m again

931
1:41:25 --> 1:41:30
for poor leo all right so that's on your agenda everybody's coming maryl ness the recording will

932
1:41:30 --> 1:41:35
be available on children's health defense dan craft has put his connections in there for shimla

933
1:41:35 --> 1:41:40
let's get to questions we've got 45 minutes for questions and are you okay for 45 minutes

934
1:41:40 --> 1:41:47
yep wonderful okay hyko you're up first oh sorry before hyko does dan is there anything you want

935
1:41:48 --> 1:41:52
about how we want to help shimon by any chance are you okay

936
1:41:57 --> 1:42:06
he looks okay good all right hyko thank you and i learned a lot again but uh is it possible to get

937
1:42:06 --> 1:42:14
somehow the piece about the sterilization testing uh with vaccines uh for my new status somehow

938
1:42:14 --> 1:42:24
okay next it's breaking up a bit i couldn't hear the start of i have three questions the first is

939
1:42:24 --> 1:42:34
it possible to find out or get it in writing uh the part about the civilization experiments

940
1:42:36 --> 1:42:43
in germany the sterilization experiment ana the civilization experiment sterilization

941
1:42:45 --> 1:42:47
sorry that's what i was struggling to understand

942
1:42:50 --> 1:42:56
what the the the bit of the judgment where it deals with the sterilization experiments

943
1:42:56 --> 1:43:01
yeah is it possible to to learn more find out more about that somewhere

944
1:43:02 --> 1:43:10
what the details of the experiments yeah i mean um i could send you the extracts that deal with it

945
1:43:10 --> 1:43:18
yeah okay beautiful the others well i have been studying very much in german

946
1:43:18 --> 1:43:26
it's german schools for 13 years and also read this reprint in the norwegian doctors association

947
1:43:26 --> 1:43:34
paper about the njolnberg codexes but i couldn't find how they found out which of them of these

948
1:43:34 --> 1:43:39
excuse ones were picked out to be rewarded with

949
1:43:42 --> 1:43:46
the project paperclip did you find anything about that

950
1:43:47 --> 1:43:53
oh well the fact that so many of these german doctors were ending up um brought over to america

951
1:43:54 --> 1:44:01
only seven no a number of them i don't know how many but i yes no i do know about operation paperclip

952
1:44:01 --> 1:44:07
and that they were well they do it mentions it to a certain extent in here about the fact that um

953
1:44:08 --> 1:44:14
you know a lot of the work that was done by the germans was appropriated by the americans

954
1:44:15 --> 1:44:20
um you know a lot of the research that was actually done during the war was then appropriated by the

955
1:44:20 --> 1:44:27
americans as handy get the germans to do it blame the germans for it and then use use it for your

956
1:44:27 --> 1:44:35
own purposes all right and the third one i i hope mark sex and others other were more lucky

957
1:44:36 --> 1:44:42
as lucky as i was because i tried something like the same thing like in bristol in january

958
1:44:43 --> 1:44:50
and uh what i wanted to uh find out on the batch numbers which of the vaccines in the vaccine

959
1:44:50 --> 1:44:56
center were dangerous and delivered them to the police but uh the two got arrested

960
1:44:58 --> 1:45:04
but after five hours we were free again and they said well you get a very hard

961
1:45:05 --> 1:45:12
court case and a big fine and in june i got the letter uh case dismissed

962
1:45:12 --> 1:45:12
oh

963
1:45:14 --> 1:45:20
did you hear some how's mark and the others are doing now they were arrested right well yes i got

964
1:45:20 --> 1:45:25
an update from one of the other military people who phoned me at about six this evening to say

965
1:45:25 --> 1:45:33
that mark um one of the other vets called mickey p and um see steve have all been arrested for

966
1:45:33 --> 1:45:41
aggravated trespass but the view is that they may have done that on purpose because having having

967
1:45:42 --> 1:45:47
been sick of trying to deal with the police just you know walking away they think well get ourselves

968
1:45:47 --> 1:45:54
arrested we're actually in the police station then it's not a lot like we can chew their ears off so

969
1:45:54 --> 1:45:59
i'm going to be interested to see where it goes but you know the view the view our end is that we

970
1:45:59 --> 1:46:06
just need to keep going to these clinics day in day out day in day out um until the police give in

971
1:46:07 --> 1:46:12
because they're just stonewalling but the stonewalling is just getting more and more

972
1:46:12 --> 1:46:19
ridiculous given the increasing evidence of the deaths and the harms exactly but it's very good

973
1:46:19 --> 1:46:29
because this stand which we have in the center that led to uh uh of course papers writing about

974
1:46:30 --> 1:46:37
and uh then the government was giving more money to extra security

975
1:46:39 --> 1:46:46
bodies which had tents and watching this thing but now after one week later the center was closed

976
1:46:47 --> 1:46:55
and then and the security police was uh saying we have to be careful for these right right wing

977
1:46:56 --> 1:47:03
uh anti-busters they're getting more and more dangerous but it's going the right way

978
1:47:04 --> 1:47:13
and now uh a lot of things are happening in connection with the uh the law of land

979
1:47:15 --> 1:47:23
and uh yeah so uh so it's really going the right way thank you very much well thank you haiko as

980
1:47:23 --> 1:47:29
well for keep on trying to close it down in norway it's music to my ears but you know again

981
1:47:29 --> 1:47:35
these this trial makes it very clear doesn't it that the people who should be shutting it down

982
1:47:35 --> 1:47:39
are the people who are actually involved in the trial that is themselves you know in this in the

983
1:47:39 --> 1:47:48
case in the uk it should be the ccgs who should be shutting it down well i think the medical defense

984
1:47:49 --> 1:47:54
union and the medical protection society and the general medical council should be speaking out

985
1:47:54 --> 1:48:05
about the what we've been talking about tonight all right thank you haiko well done um peter for those

986
1:48:05 --> 1:48:12
who don't know is is amongst other things a lawyer and what else are you peter just tell us

987
1:48:12 --> 1:48:14
uh

988
1:48:15 --> 1:48:22
originally uh an electrical engineer then police officer police sergeant including cbrn chemical

989
1:48:22 --> 1:48:29
biological radiological nuclear and a few other things and then i did my law degree in my latter

990
1:48:29 --> 1:48:36
life and deal with boring wills and trusts and powers of attorney at the moment but uh yeah like

991
1:48:36 --> 1:48:42
like ana just trying to do bits like we all are and ana just thank you so much for all you do and

992
1:48:42 --> 1:48:48
for just you know lifting that torch and shining brightly that's all we i think we can do at the

993
1:48:48 --> 1:48:54
moment and my two questions or two points um actually revolve around that so we've discussed

994
1:48:54 --> 1:49:00
the new remberg trial tonight and i think we all agree that something like a new remberg trial or

995
1:49:00 --> 1:49:08
2.0 as everybody's saying um should be heard so how do we get um a hearing and preferably in a

996
1:49:08 --> 1:49:15
proactive manner rather than new remberg which was proactive after it all happened we're still

997
1:49:15 --> 1:49:19
in the eye of the storm with this and we need to stop the deaths so there's the multi-million

998
1:49:19 --> 1:49:24
dollar question and i know it's difficult to answer but where do you see it because a lot

999
1:49:24 --> 1:49:29
of people who aren't lawyers aren't police officers or been involved in prosecutions like you and me

1000
1:49:30 --> 1:49:34
will not understand how the hell we haven't managed it yet especially when we've got somebody like

1001
1:49:34 --> 1:49:41
reiner fulmich um with his german and uh sort of english contacts if he can't manage it there's a

1002
1:49:41 --> 1:49:47
massive problem and the second point was to do again with the care quality commission report in

1003
1:49:47 --> 1:49:53
2021 which to me typifies the fact that the rule of law and we've had this discussion you and me

1004
1:49:53 --> 1:49:59
previously um when i said that i felt the rule of law had collapsed you were adamant it hadn't and i

1005
1:49:59 --> 1:50:05
fully respect that but it's certainly sidelined at the moment for anybody who doesn't know

1006
1:50:05 --> 1:50:11
what the rule of law is um it enshrines the history of law going back to the year dot

1007
1:50:11 --> 1:50:16
where we're all equal in the eyes of the law nobody's above the law etc etc but it certainly

1008
1:50:16 --> 1:50:24
seems at the moment that the governments are above the law because they have somehow frozen

1009
1:50:24 --> 1:50:31
the rule of law even in british or in the uk law um they stopped the coroner's court they took the

1010
1:50:31 --> 1:50:37
powers of the coroner's court they stopped uh post mortems which would as happened in germany with

1011
1:50:37 --> 1:50:44
the pathology reports would have pointed out that 5g had a big effect on hypoxia which was wrongly

1012
1:50:44 --> 1:50:49
diagnosed as covid as well as everything else they burnt the bodies and burnt the evidence

1013
1:50:49 --> 1:50:53
so has the rule of law collapsed and how do we get the court case we need

1014
1:50:53 --> 1:51:00
preferably proactively ana well okay first of all the rule of law well first of all can i just say

1015
1:51:02 --> 1:51:07
it can't be uh proactive as opposed to retroactive because they've already been

1016
1:51:08 --> 1:51:13
in my opinion there've been about 20 million deaths around the world from these injections those are

1017
1:51:13 --> 1:51:21
just the short-term deaths not counting uh effects of sterilization possible sterilization and uh

1018
1:51:22 --> 1:51:28
long-term deaths medium-term deaths they're not included 20 million so far that's far in excess

1019
1:51:28 --> 1:51:34
of the numbers you're looking at for the uremburg trials isn't wouldn't you say ana absolutely

1020
1:51:35 --> 1:51:43
absolutely um yeah i mean going going back to the rule of law um the the point i make to people is

1021
1:51:43 --> 1:51:50
that the rule of law hasn't changed essentially you know it's it it says what it says and it's

1022
1:51:50 --> 1:51:57
i think especially in terms of medical experimentation and informed consent i think

1023
1:51:57 --> 1:52:04
our laws pretty much cover the situation fairly well it's not great because you can't find

1024
1:52:04 --> 1:52:10
the governing law in one easy document you have to look around and draw it from various sources

1025
1:52:12 --> 1:52:19
but the law as currently written does govern these um these live human experimentation pretty well

1026
1:52:19 --> 1:52:26
as in it defines them condemns them and provides for redress for them the problem we have with our

1027
1:52:26 --> 1:52:31
rule of law is that as i've established for the public record nobody's taught law at school

1028
1:52:32 --> 1:52:38
they haven't been for generations that includes doctors includes politicians and you know um the

1029
1:52:38 --> 1:52:44
police and therefore all the people who we turn to to uphold the rule of law can't uphold it

1030
1:52:44 --> 1:52:51
because they themselves are clueless about it so i don't think it's the rule of law that's at fault

1031
1:52:51 --> 1:52:59
or um lacking it's the people operating the rule of law right that's at fault now in terms of

1032
1:52:59 --> 1:53:05
process what that means in reality is this for example how do we you know you're saying how do

1033
1:53:05 --> 1:53:13
we bring things to court well take it on a a case by case basis you know you've got the case in

1034
1:53:13 --> 1:53:19
america in india rather where i think there are now two or three murder cases being brought

1035
1:53:19 --> 1:53:26
by parents on behalf of their child for dying from the vaccine so the first one i heard of was a

1036
1:53:26 --> 1:53:34
23 year old guy who died because he had to take the vaccine to take his train journey

1037
1:53:34 --> 1:53:40
and the mother is now suing the police over there for failing to investigate the crime

1038
1:53:41 --> 1:53:45
bill gates you know the train company etc and i think there's now another murder case launched

1039
1:53:45 --> 1:53:51
for that so that starts the ball rolling right because you've got somebody bringing an actual

1040
1:53:51 --> 1:53:57
murder case now what we've got in this country are people who have approached me for example

1041
1:53:57 --> 1:54:04
several of them saying i want to bring murder charges i'm convinced my um you know um brother

1042
1:54:04 --> 1:54:10
or whatever has died um as a result of the vaccine now practically speaking how do you prove

1043
1:54:11 --> 1:54:19
a the causation because we can't get post-mortems um autopsies being done the bodies are being

1044
1:54:19 --> 1:54:25
cremated quite often so how first of all how do you actually prove the causation in those

1045
1:54:25 --> 1:54:31
circumstances secondly going to the police clearly the police aren't um taking these

1046
1:54:32 --> 1:54:40
as criminal complaints so what does an individual do to actually start the process of bringing a

1047
1:54:40 --> 1:54:46
murder claim in those circumstances the advice i've been giving to people is please go and get

1048
1:54:46 --> 1:54:55
yourself a post-mortem for contact the coroner and go to the police right but even then even if

1049
1:54:55 --> 1:55:00
they get the ball rolling how do they have the money to bring legal proceedings and that's the

1050
1:55:00 --> 1:55:06
other major factor in that a number of people have said to me i'd love to bring a case and i've said

1051
1:55:06 --> 1:55:11
well even if i could act for you for nothing over the period of two or three or four years however

1052
1:55:11 --> 1:55:18
long it's going to take um i can't work for you on my own we would need expert witnesses court fees

1053
1:55:18 --> 1:55:25
etc so you better raise some money and that's usually the last you hear of people they say

1054
1:55:25 --> 1:55:32
can't afford it there's no crowdfunding for it so how do you actually get these cases off the ground

1055
1:55:32 --> 1:55:39
is a massive question i've been saying to people we need a you know a fund of money so that anybody

1056
1:55:39 --> 1:55:45
who presents as being willing to take standing in a case actually gets support from the community

1057
1:55:45 --> 1:55:49
to take that case because most people don't want to take standing most people don't actually want

1058
1:55:49 --> 1:55:55
to go through the pain of a court hearing so if we've got civilians who are prepared to do it we

1059
1:55:55 --> 1:56:02
ought to support them but you know that's why i think rhino ended up doing court of public opinion

1060
1:56:02 --> 1:56:08
because the same kind of barriers how do you actually get these cases into a properly convened

1061
1:56:08 --> 1:56:13
court and get a fair hearing and most of the lawyers are despairing because we're all struggling

1062
1:56:13 --> 1:56:23
with the same thing not that that's very helpful answer i'm afraid there's no i hope no i i think

1063
1:56:23 --> 1:56:29
yeah you you've answered i think from a an expert perspective what a lot of people are frustrated

1064
1:56:29 --> 1:56:34
with um we're all in the same boat with it and i had a case um i put a case together that

1065
1:56:35 --> 1:56:42
i presented to a chief constable friend of mine and i was hopeful and i went through my service

1066
1:56:42 --> 1:56:48
with this colleague we're really good friends and i got nowhere with it it was dropped basically um

1067
1:56:48 --> 1:56:55
she just told the party line which is the government line um and i put her around my mp i've put them on

1068
1:56:55 --> 1:57:03
notice of nolan principles um as was put in the chat by an ex-murder squad detective colleague

1069
1:57:03 --> 1:57:09
of mine earlier on ian humphreys uh you're looking at defenses against the persons act

1070
1:57:09 --> 1:57:16
all sorts of misconduct in public office etc uh everything has been thrown at them and they are

1071
1:57:16 --> 1:57:22
hiding per new remberg behind government government says it's okay we were just following orders

1072
1:57:23 --> 1:57:29
that's what they're doing all right well before we get too depressed about this i helped set up two

1073
1:57:29 --> 1:57:35
funds in australia i gave some advice on how to set it up in the uk and what it needs in the simple

1074
1:57:35 --> 1:57:41
terms just imagine one million people in the uk giving ten dollars a week each into a legal fund

1075
1:57:41 --> 1:57:48
entirely doable 100 000 a week ten dollars or ten pounds a week a million dollars a week coming in

1076
1:57:48 --> 1:57:54
to fund these cases just need somebody to organize health alliance australia has been set up to do

1077
1:57:54 --> 1:58:01
that and it is funding cases and in america some of you would have heard some five weeks ago warn

1078
1:58:01 --> 1:58:06
amendenhorst said over 16 000 cases are going through the court system and the other thing to

1079
1:58:06 --> 1:58:14
realize is there are many cases pushing back and there are notices of liability there are there is

1080
1:58:14 --> 1:58:21
no deniability available to these officials they will be they will be held to account so there are

1081
1:58:21 --> 1:58:26
many many cases happening we don't know all of them and then when there's a successful case

1082
1:58:26 --> 1:58:33
they get settled on confidential terms so we don't find out about it so all we do is don't despair

1083
1:58:33 --> 1:58:38
we keep going with the work that you're doing and that i'm doing that all of us here are doing

1084
1:58:38 --> 1:58:44
there's no stopping full stop because every person we talk to makes the differences bobby kennedy told

1085
1:58:45 --> 1:58:51
in december last year it takes five messages from five different people to wake somebody up

1086
1:58:52 --> 1:58:57
your message might be the first your message might be the fifth you don't know and as more and more

1087
1:58:57 --> 1:59:04
babies die as more and more athletes die as more and more people die of sudden death more people

1088
1:59:04 --> 1:59:13
will wake up so we know and the simple model is that the sheep will die the wolves will live

1089
1:59:13 --> 1:59:19
our job is to see how many sheep we can wake up so on we go that's why we're here two three times

1090
1:59:19 --> 1:59:25
a week thank you peter for your questions ana here's we've got a wolf here you're a wolf ana

1091
1:59:25 --> 1:59:31
and so is ana in fact all of you are wolves here on this call go ana peter peter's a wolf too

1092
1:59:31 --> 1:59:37
peter wolf hey there you are peter wolf steven wolf hi ana thank you so much for this information

1093
1:59:37 --> 1:59:43
i'm trying to understand so sasha latipova was talking about the fact that there have been

1094
1:59:43 --> 1:59:48
contracts uncovered that really showed that all the big pharma companies in the united states

1095
1:59:48 --> 1:59:52
are regulated and governed by the department of defense or fall under the department of defense

1096
1:59:52 --> 1:59:59
and that the department of defense has been contracting with other pharmaceutical sub

1097
1:59:59 --> 2:00:06
contractors who are regulated by the chinese communist party and so the fact that we are not

1098
2:00:06 --> 2:00:12
allowed to for example analyze the vials because it's federal property and it's classified for

1099
2:00:12 --> 2:00:20
civilian and military use meaning it meets classification as a weapon is is pretty concerning

1100
2:00:20 --> 2:00:26
and so my question is legally if we want military tribunal but the department of defense or the

1101
2:00:26 --> 2:00:33
military is actually involved in instituting this on the civil population how the heck do you get

1102
2:00:33 --> 2:00:44
anywhere oh spot on ana absolutely spot on i couldn't work out why for the whole of 2020 i

1103
2:00:44 --> 2:00:50
was being completely ghosted and stonewalled from all my military contracts by raising the

1104
2:00:50 --> 2:00:55
contacts by raising the alarm and then when toad calendar came out with the evidence that actually

1105
2:00:55 --> 2:01:01
this is a collaboration between the dod and the uk ministry of defense and the increasing evidence

1106
2:01:01 --> 2:01:07
that that's indeed the case no wonder the military have been ignoring me and you know others who've

1107
2:01:07 --> 2:01:13
been trying to blow the whistle and precisely that why would they bring military tribunals

1108
2:01:14 --> 2:01:22
and expose you know what's going on um now what from where i've been sitting the armed forces

1109
2:01:22 --> 2:01:31
2006 act applies here in the uk which to me as a soldier means this i have a duty to uphold the

1110
2:01:31 --> 2:01:38
law of armed conflict and if i become aware of any breaches i must report them into my commanding

1111
2:01:38 --> 2:01:45
officer the commanding officer then must report it to the military police and the military police

1112
2:01:45 --> 2:01:53
must investigate and i've kept keep going in to the military saying so all these reports i'm making

1113
2:01:53 --> 2:02:00
what's happening and i'm getting nothing and it's the same for the other military people i know who

1114
2:02:00 --> 2:02:07
are reporting it in and getting nothing so again the reality how do you how do you actually you

1115
2:02:07 --> 2:02:12
know progress this when you know that you're up against the people who are actually perpetrating it

1116
2:02:15 --> 2:02:18
a conundrum i'm sorry i don't have all the answers this is

1117
2:02:19 --> 2:02:28
they knew and and and everybody these people who are doing this evil the psychopaths we know just

1118
2:02:28 --> 2:02:33
go back if you don't stop asking the question who is doing this we know who's doing this just go back

1119
2:02:33 --> 2:02:40
and look at daniel esterland the game is clear the point is the people in queensland the people

1120
2:02:40 --> 2:02:47
around the world the vouchers of this world are doubling down because they know they will suffer

1121
2:02:47 --> 2:02:54
the nuremberg consequences when the people rise up so they they're getting ever more desperate

1122
2:02:56 --> 2:03:02
this has to and you're in you know you're in the you're in the war game if you look why would they

1123
2:03:02 --> 2:03:07
suddenly give up and say yes you guys all right because then we'd come hunting them so and and

1124
2:03:07 --> 2:03:12
that's why i say to people don't threaten them with hanging we might hang them but don't threaten

1125
2:03:12 --> 2:03:18
them with hanging because then they've got nothing to lose well also death penalty has been abolished

1126
2:03:18 --> 2:03:27
right yes in many cases that's correct that's correct all right avarie you muted avery

1127
2:03:29 --> 2:03:34
okay anna uh thanks for being here today and educating all of us on the details of the

1128
2:03:34 --> 2:03:42
nuremberg code especially the 10 points that you went through my question you is at our thursday

1129
2:03:43 --> 2:03:49
symposium medical martial law which todd calendar and many others helped put together

1130
2:03:51 --> 2:03:57
you know reiner fulmerich was one of the last guests who last speakers he mentioned he had

1131
2:03:57 --> 2:04:07
already filed in europe i'm just a little bit unclear as to who he filed against he said that

1132
2:04:07 --> 2:04:13
once that um went a little bit further down the road then he would bring that and bring that case

1133
2:04:13 --> 2:04:21
to america to file in in the united states so are you aware that he has filed for sure and who did

1134
2:04:21 --> 2:04:28
he file with i'm sorry every i i actually didn't hear rhina speak so i'm not sure what case he was

1135
2:04:28 --> 2:04:35
referring to as far as i was aware rhina's bringing several cases i knew that he was acting um for

1136
2:04:35 --> 2:04:42
uh professor bodak at some uh one point but i don't i'm not actually aware of which cases he's

1137
2:04:42 --> 2:04:49
issued i didn't hear his update maybe someone else in the group heard well the impression that i think

1138
2:04:49 --> 2:04:54
some of us had was that this was the big one you know the one that where he was going to go after

1139
2:04:56 --> 2:05:04
really the cabal if you would to just term it that way but i'd have to go back myself and listen to

1140
2:05:04 --> 2:05:11
exactly what his words were to to clarify but i thought this was his reference to having just

1141
2:05:11 --> 2:05:19
recently filed in europe a large case i mean a really really major case did he say what it was

1142
2:05:19 --> 2:05:25
abri so that's the thing i would have to go back i mean the impression i had was this was something

1143
2:05:25 --> 2:05:32
that he had been working on for as you know the past more than a year for sure and had been

1144
2:05:32 --> 2:05:38
discussing how it was going to be done eventually and this was it that this was filed in europe

1145
2:05:38 --> 2:05:45
and that once that went through um you know uh further down than if it was successful then he

1146
2:05:45 --> 2:05:50
was going to go ahead and file in the united states but i'd have to go back i mean it's all

1147
2:05:50 --> 2:05:58
in the symposium and we have a recording of the symposium also and in fact abri recording the

1148
2:05:58 --> 2:06:04
recording was released this morning i think yes i'll dig out the link or someone will have the

1149
2:06:04 --> 2:06:10
link on this call who attended the symposium but anyway in fact it went to the moderator so abri

1150
2:06:10 --> 2:06:16
you've got a link see if you can find it and put in the chat yeah what what i'll do charles is i

1151
2:06:16 --> 2:06:20
will forward the uh link because i've already downloaded it and forwarded it to a number of

1152
2:06:20 --> 2:06:27
people but i will go ahead and send a link to you momentarily off of my desktop and then you can

1153
2:06:27 --> 2:06:32
put it in chat if you don't mind and it's well worth watching it went for one and a half hours

1154
2:06:32 --> 2:06:37
one three quarter hours and then that was before it went in the breakout rooms there's excellent

1155
2:06:37 --> 2:06:42
information and i think you that's right in fact did you manage to get on because there were

1156
2:06:42 --> 2:06:47
technical problems yeah thank you i got on to the main symposium but i couldn't get then get out

1157
2:06:47 --> 2:06:54
into the breakout rooms so there's a problem all right every will give it every will give all of

1158
2:06:54 --> 2:07:00
you the links i hang about we'll put in the chat all right thank you avarie claire thank you

1159
2:07:00 --> 2:07:02
you

1160
2:07:05 --> 2:07:10
hi hi ana thank you for that very interesting presentation it's great to have a really good

1161
2:07:10 --> 2:07:16
legal mind on this i'm a medical journalist based in australia though i sound british

1162
2:07:17 --> 2:07:23
one thing i've done is read the public assessment reports for the three vaccines the uk public

1163
2:07:23 --> 2:07:29
assessment reports which were available very early on in the rollout this is what the mhra looks at

1164
2:07:30 --> 2:07:36
they have to write the logic of their decision does it help our case that there is evidence

1165
2:07:36 --> 2:07:41
in those that when they started the rollout so rather than trying to look for bodies and

1166
2:07:41 --> 2:07:45
prove they've killed does it help our case that those show quite clearly that

1167
2:07:46 --> 2:07:56
that the vaccines were distributed to many organs in in in mice and rats and that um you know they

1168
2:07:56 --> 2:08:02
were they were first in class genetic vaccines that we hadn't used before and there was no

1169
2:08:02 --> 2:08:07
evidence at all that they stopped transmission so does that help our evidence this was known

1170
2:08:07 --> 2:08:13
right at the beginning it's there in black and white in uk government documents well yeah

1171
2:08:13 --> 2:08:18
absolutely particularly given the risk benefit analysis right because as you say one of the

1172
2:08:18 --> 2:08:25
principles is that it must be for the overall benefit and not arbitrary etc um and did that

1173
2:08:25 --> 2:08:32
did that report also um mention the bio distributions study from japan no it doesn't

1174
2:08:32 --> 2:08:39
but it that's phisor isn't it mentions that um that more information has been given to the mhra

1175
2:08:39 --> 2:08:45
but it's not reported there they just say it goes went to the liver and they don't get but clearly

1176
2:08:45 --> 2:08:52
the mhra i think have been given that information but it's not reported on and and the other thing i

1177
2:08:52 --> 2:08:59
just want i i think um there's kind of you know the definition of vaccine was changed in 2021 to

1178
2:08:59 --> 2:09:04
make these these things be vaccines in fact vitamin c is now a vaccine it's anything that

1179
2:09:04 --> 2:09:11
helps the immune system um i think i'm sure this is um i probably someone more expert on this than

1180
2:09:11 --> 2:09:17
me but i think that this this meant didn't it that these could be evaluated as vaccines and if things

1181
2:09:17 --> 2:09:22
are evaluated as vaccines it's my understanding that there are far less rigorous tests required

1182
2:09:22 --> 2:09:26
for instance you don't need to do carcinogen um whether they cause cancer whether they can affect

1183
2:09:26 --> 2:09:32
the genome um and so because they were defined as vaccines even though they were gene therapy

1184
2:09:33 --> 2:09:38
they were they were pain they were able to play lip service to oh we're testing these but in fact

1185
2:09:38 --> 2:09:45
it was a slight of hand yeah so i i am i have written an article on this uh which i would like

1186
2:09:45 --> 2:09:49
to send to you anna um i've been trying to get it published in the uk mainstream media i'm working

1187
2:09:49 --> 2:09:54
through newspaper after newspaper being ignored um i'd like to send it to you and you might read it

1188
2:09:54 --> 2:10:04
that would be lovely yes please okay okay can i just pick up on that definition though one of

1189
2:10:04 --> 2:10:10
the first things i challenged one of the first multi-disciplinary group groups that i worked with

1190
2:10:10 --> 2:10:18
here in the uk heart the health advisory research team um and yeah one of the first um issues i

1191
2:10:18 --> 2:10:27
raised with them is that i the these products did not meet the definition as set out in um either

1192
2:10:27 --> 2:10:34
vaccines the legal definition of vaccine or indeed human medicine because what's happened is that

1193
2:10:34 --> 2:10:41
in the uk at least these were given temporary emergency um approval under regulation 174 of

1194
2:10:41 --> 2:10:46
the human medicines regulations um on the basis as you know that there were no other treatments

1195
2:10:46 --> 2:10:55
available etc now it doesn't the definition of a human medicine what these mrm rna technologies

1196
2:10:55 --> 2:11:03
they actually meet the definition of a medical device and a medical device um is should be

1197
2:11:03 --> 2:11:11
regulated under the medical devices regulations um and that falls within the consumer protection

1198
2:11:11 --> 2:11:19
regulations so my firm belief is one of the reasons that they you know wanted to avoid

1199
2:11:19 --> 2:11:24
it being called a medical device was because of proceed consumer protection was much much higher

1200
2:11:24 --> 2:11:30
and they couldn't get it through any kind of emergency approval when i raised that with um

1201
2:11:30 --> 2:11:35
the team at heart a number of them immediately said oh yes you know that's we thought about that

1202
2:11:35 --> 2:11:43
as well and indeed um antonietta gatti i think her name is um nanotechnology specialist from italy

1203
2:11:43 --> 2:11:48
she gave her professional opinion that this technology was in fact you know meeting the

1204
2:11:48 --> 2:11:55
definition of a medical device but they patent lawyer there keith johnson i think his name was

1205
2:11:56 --> 2:12:01
was absolutely furious and was adamant that you know these were properly defined and that you know

1206
2:12:01 --> 2:12:06
only a patent lawyer could say whether or not these were properly defined so it seems that

1207
2:12:06 --> 2:12:12
it's still an argument out for debate but i would take it i would take it to that argument i would

1208
2:12:12 --> 2:12:18
like to hear other people's opinion on is that because it was lipid nanoparticles is that their

1209
2:12:18 --> 2:12:23
argument that it's a device it's a very small device yeah because it's two parts basically

1210
2:12:23 --> 2:12:30
you know it has the lipid encapsulating it so that it can deliver its payload to the nucleus

1211
2:12:30 --> 2:12:40
intact yes or it's a device with two components in it right a bit like um you know um how the

1212
2:12:41 --> 2:12:47
you know like an insulin pump that kind of you could argue couldn't you that the the um

1213
2:12:47 --> 2:12:53
astrazeneca is a that's a virus delivering the dna but you're saying because the virus is a

1214
2:12:53 --> 2:12:57
natural thing and you're saying the lipid nanoparticles are sort of man-made a device

1215
2:12:57 --> 2:13:03
is that the argument certainly with the mrna ones i'm not so sure about the other types

1216
2:13:03 --> 2:13:10
that's delivered by a virus yeah the yeah yeah i should put a little um brief note together for

1217
2:13:10 --> 2:13:15
you all so that you can see the definitions and maybe as a group you can determine whether you

1218
2:13:15 --> 2:13:22
think you know which which that definition it best suits and therefore which regulatory framework

1219
2:13:22 --> 2:13:32
should be invoked thanks that's me done thank you thank you claire all right everybody now

1220
2:13:32 --> 2:13:36
stephen before we go to final questions and comments and we're tracking very well on time

1221
2:13:36 --> 2:13:42
well done all of you we've got 11 minutes to go then we can then the telegram group is available

1222
2:13:42 --> 2:13:48
tom rodman has put the link into there um anna can we touch on this question

1223
2:13:48 --> 2:13:54
and stephen my question to the two of you from what we have learned today

1224
2:13:55 --> 2:14:04
new legislation is coming in that is the same as military orders from hitler what do you say

1225
2:14:04 --> 2:14:10
anna and what do you say stephen the doctors should do come on here we are this is medical

1226
2:14:10 --> 2:14:18
doctors for covert ethics anna first you well i think it's very very clear on the um the analysis

1227
2:14:19 --> 2:14:24
conducted in the new york trials here of the medical cases that the overriding duty and

1228
2:14:24 --> 2:14:29
responsibility for the patient safety the individual patient safety rests with the

1229
2:14:29 --> 2:14:35
physician and the physician alone not with the government um not with you know anybody within

1230
2:14:35 --> 2:14:45
the military such as hitler um you know and um ivy the expert witness you know um repeatedly

1231
2:14:45 --> 2:14:50
brings everyone's attention back to the Hippocratic oath as evidenced for how long that

1232
2:14:50 --> 2:14:55
ethical principle has been in place at the physician's duty overriding duty is to the

1233
2:14:55 --> 2:15:01
individual patient um so i personally think there's no debate and the whole argument that

1234
2:15:01 --> 2:15:07
you know the government can order a medic to set aside the medic's own professional

1235
2:15:07 --> 2:15:16
um ethics oath and code of conduct is um you know entirely uh against the rule of law and against

1236
2:15:16 --> 2:15:22
our code of ethics and morals um and that must be the case because otherwise any individual

1237
2:15:22 --> 2:15:27
professional could be ordered to do something against their professional code and they wouldn't

1238
2:15:27 --> 2:15:33
have a choice about it i mean it's the same with solicitors right if the law society ordered me

1239
2:15:34 --> 2:15:39
to break my code of conduct i would be standing up and saying no it's you know i'd rather leave

1240
2:15:40 --> 2:15:46
and i'd rather not work as a solicitor than you force me as a professional to be in breach of my

1241
2:15:46 --> 2:15:56
own laws codes and conducts so that would be my firm view excellent stephen yeah i agree with

1242
2:15:56 --> 2:16:03
there are no circumstances where so the doctor is trusted by the patients

1243
2:16:04 --> 2:16:10
and his duty is to the patient and nobody can interfere in that relationship in my view

1244
2:16:11 --> 2:16:13
and certainly not in the present circumstances

1245
2:16:14 --> 2:16:22
but it's clear to me that any doctor who's worth the name should have realized that this was all

1246
2:16:22 --> 2:16:30
wrong all of it was wrong and they didn't so what happened clearly they were very well educated

1247
2:16:32 --> 2:16:38
so that so that does anybody want to argue the proposition that doctors should be simply doing

1248
2:16:38 --> 2:16:43
what the government wants them to do with their patients does anyone i can't imagine here but

1249
2:16:43 --> 2:16:51
but ana is strong on this stephen is i'm a i'm a lawyer i'm a legal strategist i'm strong on this

1250
2:16:52 --> 2:17:00
i cannot believe that doctors would there follow these new rules in california they should leave

1251
2:17:00 --> 2:17:06
the profession in droves that's what will stop this nonsense and as pamela norris says in the

1252
2:17:06 --> 2:17:13
chat just say no everyone in this group if they felt like it if they felt like making a difference

1253
2:17:13 --> 2:17:18
should write to the general medical council in the uk because they're trying to bring in

1254
2:17:18 --> 2:17:25
a new code of conduct conduct called uh what is it good medical practice i think and one of the

1255
2:17:25 --> 2:17:33
things is that doctors are expected not to oppose government policy or words to that effect not as

1256
2:17:33 --> 2:17:41
blatant as that but it's essentially doctors should not um well well the quainsland rule

1257
2:17:42 --> 2:17:49
out doctors must not not should not correct no it's outrageous it must be okay everybody so

1258
2:17:49 --> 2:17:53
there's the clear position steven last questions to you in the last seven minutes and then i

1259
2:17:53 --> 2:17:58
you have a closing comment but first steven do you have any closing questions before we finish

1260
2:17:58 --> 2:18:03
and then we can go to so and then maybe you and i can work together and uh write to the um general

1261
2:18:03 --> 2:18:10
medical council absolutely that'd be good wouldn't it for sure i'd love to do that i've been trying

1262
2:18:10 --> 2:18:16
to get to get to the gmc for years it's such and then publish it everywhere well everywhere we can

1263
2:18:16 --> 2:18:25
get it in tv news would do it fantastic so we'd need to um make it a good now there's one is

1264
2:18:25 --> 2:18:34
there's one issue that's relevant everybody to the merrill nass hearing um and the and the

1265
2:18:34 --> 2:18:40
anna you've mentioned to this group some dramas that you're facing but let's talk with merrill

1266
2:18:40 --> 2:18:48
nass and sam y and general medical council and these medical boards as a matter of law

1267
2:18:49 --> 2:18:54
natural justice says you should not have a judge who is biased

1268
2:18:56 --> 2:19:02
okay so so natural justice so just turn our minds to the moment say this whole idea of natural

1269
2:19:02 --> 2:19:10
justice what happens if natural justice is not followed anna because it's not being followed by

1270
2:19:10 --> 2:19:16
these medical boards they're biased they're they're fraudulent judges will do it rhinophomics

1271
2:19:16 --> 2:19:23
is almost all judges have been bought off but what's the consequence if there's no natural justice

1272
2:19:25 --> 2:19:30
what do you mean as in what's our what's our lawful redress or what do you think is an

1273
2:19:31 --> 2:19:36
what's our lawful redress that's that's yes that's the lawful redress is that ultimately we would

1274
2:19:36 --> 2:19:43
have the right to convene our own um court you know ultimately under common law if the current

1275
2:19:43 --> 2:19:50
court system is not giving us redress but the issue of course is is how um how that any kind

1276
2:19:50 --> 2:19:55
of decision from that is taken seriously and implemented especially by for the likes of for

1277
2:19:55 --> 2:20:01
example the police and this is where you know i think the lawyers in all the countries are falling

1278
2:20:01 --> 2:20:07
down with the same problem how do we actually either access the current court system with the

1279
2:20:07 --> 2:20:13
current police system um because we're being stonewalled and failing typically or establishing

1280
2:20:13 --> 2:20:21
our own with any credibility that will have any follow-through um the reality is of course in the

1281
2:20:21 --> 2:20:27
what's happened in previous cases is that when people haven't had redress through the courts

1282
2:20:27 --> 2:20:31
they have set up their own people's court and they've been judged jury and executor

1283
2:20:31 --> 2:20:38
executioner pretty much on the same day quite often and rough justice is handed out and the

1284
2:20:38 --> 2:20:44
job gets done and you know tribunals were set up after the war all over the world and that's what

1285
2:20:44 --> 2:20:51
happened that kind of justice so i can see that happening ultimately frankly you know

1286
2:20:52 --> 2:20:58
there has to be a proper redress otherwise people will take matters into their own hands

1287
2:20:58 --> 2:21:05
at some point and all over the internet people are talking about rising up and taking out arms and

1288
2:21:05 --> 2:21:11
taking into their own hands and having to be pulled back by others saying you know violence isn't the

1289
2:21:11 --> 2:21:18
answer but people are sharing images of guillotines and um you know they're baying for blood and for

1290
2:21:18 --> 2:21:28
justice so i can't see that suddenly dissipating so that's what's happened in the past isn't it

1291
2:21:28 --> 2:21:34
Anna that people have been forced to take the law into their own hands and Chalchewski was a victim

1292
2:21:34 --> 2:21:40
of that i think that's the one i always quote that's the one i quote you know they were protected

1293
2:21:40 --> 2:21:46
up until a few days before their trial from uh you know that when suddenly their inner circle

1294
2:21:46 --> 2:21:51
realized that they were protecting them no longer they were vulnerable they were lynched out of their

1295
2:21:51 --> 2:21:55
house and they were brought to trial i think christmas day morning weren't they and executed

1296
2:21:55 --> 2:22:02
in the afternoon the helicopter came down yeah i can't remember his wife's name was Alina was it

1297
2:22:02 --> 2:22:11
it was she had lots of shoes like Imelda Marcus yeah yeah all right and the comment is made

1298
2:22:11 --> 2:22:16
let's not generalize well we're not generalizing about all doctors we're talking about doctors

1299
2:22:16 --> 2:22:22
that are following orders and we're talking about doctors who refuse to see the evidence

1300
2:22:22 --> 2:22:27
and we're talking about doctors who refuse to stay informed well chance is it and uh we made

1301
2:22:28 --> 2:22:34
the point when you sign on a when you sign on a new phone contract or you sign up to use an

1302
2:22:34 --> 2:22:44
apple service there's 42 pages of regulatory terms that you consent to the fact that you don't read

1303
2:22:44 --> 2:22:51
them doesn't mean you're not bound by them so the fact that this information is available no doctor

1304
2:22:51 --> 2:22:58
can say i didn't know no doctor can say that and i i'm absolutely generalizing now so

1305
2:23:00 --> 2:23:05
anyway it's now time to go it's eight it's two and a half hours people on this caller in no doubt in

1306
2:23:05 --> 2:23:11
my opinion the huge majority of doctors have not done the right thing in the last two and a half

1307
2:23:11 --> 2:23:21
years correct correct so i think so the people who've done vaguely the right thing

1308
2:23:21 --> 2:23:26
are kind of one in 10 000 doctors i would say that's a rough guess

1309
2:23:28 --> 2:23:35
well there's 100 000 doctors in australia and they're finishing

1310
2:23:35 --> 2:23:42
it's an interesting question whether what percentage of stress

1311
2:23:43 --> 2:23:49
thank you yeah thank you very much all right i think it's fine i'm sending her we are going

1312
2:23:49 --> 2:23:58
everybody and uh thank you for being here it's