Jessica, what are you going to talk about to us today?
What are you going to talk about?
I don't know.
I'd rather like you guys tell me what you'd like me to say because there's so many topics
now.
I mean, I asked my partner, like, listen, I'm speaking to a bunch of people tonight
and I don't know what I should talk about.
And I asked him, he's kind of like a person who's interested in stuff.
I reckon if, because Jessica, you're smart, if we put it into the chat, say, what would
you like to, we're going to, we're happy to ask questions, but, you know, give us your
background.
I'll be moderating this.
Sorry about that, Charles.
If you put it into the chat, hey, and by the way, Sam, I love your red t-shirt.
So Jessica, this is where the passion duo here, Sam and I.
You honor me.
So if you put into the chat all the stuff you'd like Jessica to talk about, you know,
the stuff that's high on your priority.
And then Jessica, if you give us a 10 minute rundown of you, there are doctors here, there
are lawyers, there are journalists, there are physicists, there are scientists, there
to run court cases, you know, so.
Yeah, that's why I was, you know, I was kind of wondering what I should talk about because
you guys are a really wide and prestigious bunch.
I mean, I've been on these calls many times and I love the questions after because they're
always really like well poised and coming from a lot of different places.
So yeah, I think that's a great idea.
Somebody wrote something about the reverse transcription and I can talk a little bit
about that.
Yeah, tell me what.
So as you're talking, if you run through those questions rather than me necessarily moderating
it, but I'll just check what's not there.
And then at the end of when you've spoken, then we put our people, put their hands up
and we take them in order.
But if we're putting them all in there now, that'll give you a good guide for what right
now people are interested in.
I can do my best.
Where's the picture of you surfing?
Can I share my screen?
You will when Stephen comes on.
We're waiting for him to arrive.
OK, maybe I can play a picture of you surfing, particularly your carry mullets quite at the
end of your emails.
Where are some pictures?
My album.
Who is a surfer in this group?
I used to be many years surf life saving.
Ray couch surfs.
Len is in Texas.
I don't have surf in Texas.
Maybe the Gulf of Mexico.
No, there's no surf there, is there?
There's Stephen.
Hey, Stephen.
Why does it want my pin here?
Hello Jessica, by the way.
Hi, how are you?
Very well.
I'm just a bit stressed here now.
So why does it want my pin?
Oh, I think I remember what it is.
Oh, no, it's not my pin.
That's made.
How do I get back to?
Sorry, Jessica.
I've got you on solely on the screen now.
So how do I get the gallery?
Change your view.
Top right corner, Stephen.
I'm sorry?
Change view.
Top right corner.
Go to gallery view.
Ah, yes.
Very good.
Yeah.
Couldn't remember.
Oh, yes.
Very good.
So why did it?
So I was trying to get the, sorry about this.
Trying to get the participants and to share the screen and for some reason.
Ah, more.
Yes.
Okay.
I've got a feeling I've got to log in.
Yes, you have to log in, Stephen.
So log in and then make Jessica host because she's going to show us some photos of her
putting questions into the chat, Stephen.
But Charles, can you remind me how do I log in when I'm in?
Just go to another.
Just go to another zoom page.
Why does it want me to log in sometimes and not others?
I don't know.
You're in Wales.
Who knows what the expert are doing under participants.
You can go to the bottom right corner and say claim host bottom right corner.
Oh yes, maybe.
And then I have to log in maybe then.
Yes.
Enter the host key.
Right.
That's what I thought it was asking for.
Sign in to claim host.
Click on that, Stephen.
Well, actually, okay.
That's the easier one.
Oh yes.
Okay.
I understand.
Yeah.
Very good.
Remarkably, I could remember my code in numbers.
But I've gone a different way now.
Well, it's good to be flexible.
I'm putting the link to my interview with Jessica in the chat that I did a while ago.
We had a really good time, Jess, but it's a very long interview and we talk about lots
of fun stuff.
Excellent.
Well done.
We did.
Jess is like a Renaissance woman.
I am.
She's even done some questionable acting in her day.
Yeah.
No, Stephen, get your mind out of the gutter.
None of that.
No, no.
It was for an advertisement for this.
Funnily enough, a facial profiling company.
Yeah, look that up.
My actress name was Shelley.
It was like a mock-up of that show Cheaters, I think it was called.
Yeah, it was pretty...
Shelley could kill somebody.
I've made Jessica the co-host now, remarkably.
Jessica, that's right.
She's going to show us some pictures.
Jessica, can I ask you before you start?
You've got a quote from Carey Mullis.
He's my hero too.
Is he your hero?
Of course.
And if he's your hero, is he a hero because of the surfing or because of what he died for?
Well, he was my hero because of the kind of researcher and human I think he must have been.
And the surfing is just a bonus.
So, yeah, I think I would have been really good at it.
He was a great guy, wasn't he?
Remarkable.
Just like his whole air of being, his ability to question the world without being arrogant about it.
He was a genuine, beautiful human.
He was a great guy.
He was a genuine, beautiful human, I think.
Did you know that I saw a tweet...
I can't quite remember.
I have actually retweeted it so I'll be able to find it.
I saw a tweet and someone...
That's him.
Probably just as well.
I can't remember the name.
But anyway, someone had tweeted that he or she had met his wife or ex, as this person put it, at a cocktail party.
Or at a party.
I think it was a cocktail party.
And that she had said that he was killed.
She was certain that he was killed.
That was a tweet.
Oh, right. Yeah, I did see that.
Yeah.
I wouldn't be surprised.
Let's put it that way.
I mean, there's actually a whole whack of people who've done HIV research who have died under questionable circumstances.
Sure.
I have a target on my back too, I suppose, because I did HIV research for my master's degree.
Yeah.
Bruce Evans, do you remember him?
The anthrax guy, except he wasn't the anthrax guy.
They pinned it on the least likely person and they blamed it all on him and then he was dead next minute.
Incredible.
Anthrax.
Anyway, sorry, Charles.
Sorry, Charles.
Charles is our host in Australia.
Despite that, he's quite charming.
And he's from Hungary originally.
Lovely.
Yeah.
Is that right, Charles?
Thank you, Stephen.
Can you make Jessica co-host or host so that she can share her screen?
I have one.
Oh, good.
Jessica, you should be able to share your screen.
Yeah, I'm trying to find a picture that isn't too skinny.
Like, I take a lot of photos of myself on my longboard.
I'm a longboard surfer, so I do this trick called a hang five, which means that you walk to the end of your board and you put your five toes wrapped around the end.
Here, I'll show you this one.
Never mind my leg.
You know, you have to have bare legs sometimes.
Just a sec.
Share screen.
So, yeah, this is me doing a hang five at my local surf break.
Can you see that?
Yes.
So this is one of the hardest things you can do on a surfboard.
So I'm pretty impressed at myself.
But yeah, I'd be really happy to be doing that in Australia, where I'd planned to go do that for the rest of my life just before the pandemic hit.
I had everything bought and paid for, but it never worked out.
So I'm doing what I can here in Israel.
That's where I am now.
Not much surf in the Mediterranean.
Well, it depends.
Actually, I did do some tallying in my head of how many times I put on my wetsuit in the last, say, five months, and it's only been about 10 times.
It's not for lack of waves per se.
It's for lack of good surfing conditions.
Most of our waves come in from wind, which is, you know, it kind of creates sloppy washing machine conditions instead of like a...
Oh, I can talk about surfing for an hour if you guys want.
That's alright.
Don't get me started because I will.
I don't know how to stop.
Anyway, there's like wind swell and ground swell.
And ground swell is like when you have these gorgeous ripples.
The physicists among you will probably appreciate talking about waves.
But yeah, we don't get those very often.
So it's been a slow winter, let's put it that way.
And it's been cold.
I'm shivering right now.
I'm at home.
But with the heater on, but we're going down to five degrees still, which is so weird for March.
Normally we're in the double digits at least, even in the nighttime.
It's pretty cold here still.
So those early morning surfs have turned into late morning surfs, even when we have them.
All right, Jessica.
So tell us about you for five minutes or so.
And then the questions are in the chat and that will then give you the guide to where people want to go.
Take it from the top of the chat and then everybody just keep putting your questions in the chat.
And Jessica, well, that's where people want to go.
How does that sound, Jessica?
Sounds great. I'll do my best, everyone.
You know, I'm not an expert on everything, but I can try.
The Keri Mullis quote that I have in my email, by the way, is sometimes in the morning when it's a good surf, I go out there and I don't feel like it's a bad world.
And I can't describe how much those words resonate with me because especially in these COVID times, like that's exactly, exactly how I feel.
Because it does feel like a bit of a bad place sometimes when you dig into this data.
So I'm Jessica. I'm Canadian.
I was born in Ottawa.
Me? Yeah.
And I'm actually officially, I think, a Newfoundlander because I spent 17 years in Newfoundland, Canada.
So I also have a bit of an Irish twing sometimes in my accent.
And I started my academic life there at Memorial University of Newfoundland where I did an applied mathematics degree only because I couldn't get into the biology faculty.
They thought my GPA wasn't high enough, so I decided to do math.
And so then I moved into immunology, which is, you know, the place where I learned probably the most in my entire academic career.
It was a fusion or an interdisciplinary degree program where I incorporated the mathematical modeling that I learned in my first degree with the immunology.
And then that's what brought me to Israel.
During my master's degree, I went to an amazing conference in Cleveland, Ohio, where I met all of the HIV math gods.
And one of them took an interest in my poster presentation at this conference.
And he became my PI in Israel for my PhD, as life would have it.
And I'm still here and I've since done a couple more postdocs in molecular biology and protein biology, biochemistry.
So, yeah, I have my interests lie mostly in viruses.
I've been fascinated by these things since I was very little.
I guess I have an affinity for math, so I've combined those two.
But my claim to fame in this freedom fight is mainly through data analysis and strangely enough by talking.
I find myself talking to a lot of people every day.
And so, yeah, along the road, I've picked up the skills that I guess you need to analyze big data sets and the VAERS data, which is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System data that everyone here knows about by now.
And that data set is very, very full and interesting in the context of these COVID-19 products.
And that's only the Moderna and the Pfizer and the Janssen, because that's all that's being doled out in the state so far.
And I chose that data set to start looking at in my quest to teach myself how to use R, because I anticipated that it was going to become really interesting and it has and it continues to be.
I mean, this is a data set that's updated weekly and it never ceases to be alarming to me.
I mean, the numbers go up every week consistently for deaths, for severe adverse events, new types, new adverse event types are added, where over 10,000 different adverse event types in VAERS right now.
It's crazy. I mean, you guys have probably seen this 5.3.6 Pfizer document that was in this large set of documents that was released that has nine pages of the adverse events that they considered important to look at.
Yeah, it's.
Yeah, so that's that's me in this whole fight so far. And luckily enough people are interested to hear what I have to say like you guys so thanks.
So I guess I'll just start scrolling through questions.
So somebody mentions the reverse transcription of the mRNA into the patient's genome. So, yeah, I can speak on that a little bit. I'm not an author on this paper.
Okay, so first of all, let's back up. A paper was published, not pre-print. This is peer reviewed, published recently by a group in Sweden that pretty much definitively shows what we were told couldn't happen, which is that the Pfizer RNA reverse transcribed into DNA.
I read this paper thoroughly, their techniques are sound. They did good controls, you know, you know, you can always make things a little better here and there but it was it was a good piece of work and that's what it showed.
Now, a lot of people are wondering if that means, or if they showed integration.
They didn't.
But they do reference another paper in that original paper which I can read the, I can find it and put it in the, in the chat here that references confirmation that this can happen.
It's frozen, it must be cold in Israel.
Has she been kicked off, Charles?
No, it's just frozen from, she'll be back.
And in the meantime, while we're waiting for Jessica to come back, I just got a note that Pfizer's been suspended on the stock exchange. Anyone got a quick update on that while we're waiting for Jessica to come back?
Are you referring to something new or are you referring to the document they filed which basically delists a dead security and means very little.
Okay, that makes more sense.
It's a bond that was going to expire in late 2022. I suspect they had so much money coming in they just paid it off. And that's why I got to delist it.
Right. Good. Thank you.
They are not delisted, but the story has been characterized as if it had been. Here I'm going to post this, because I was tracking it down for something else and I'll put it right in the notes, so you can, you can, there you go.
Because the way the story was published, it made it out like it had been like dramatically delisted, and that's not true.
Yep. Beautiful. Thank you.
Thank you.
Jim, you've confirmed that, have you?
Jim, who?
There's Jessica. You got frozen. Jessica is called in Israel. You're back again.
Yeah, what did I like? Wow, my internet just shut down.
The last thing you said was again reverse transcribe RNA and MRA, good paper, and you're going to make a reference to another paper.
Yeah.
So this paper where they showed reverse transcription through this retro transpose on called line one references another work where they do show that integration is possible.
So, the bottom line is, this paper definitively showed something that they claimed couldn't happen.
So, everything should stop right now from the point that that paper was published. I mean, it should have stopped a long time ago, but this is very concerning.
There's an implication of the use, well, not an implication, they show that line one, which is the retro transpose on that is employed here, which is also implicated in embryogenesis.
This is very concerning because any change...
Yeah, Stephen, they don't like Jessica talking to us.
No, exactly. I was thinking that.
Yeah. Sam, while we're waiting, is there any quick update on Canada while Jessica logs back in? Just quick 30 seconds a minute or Ray?
Ray has been involved in poking the banks. I'm sorry, Ray, not to put you on the spot, but I think you should talk about that because we're sitting on, as Jen Hibbard was mentioning, we're sitting like on a powder keg here, not knowing what our rights and what the laws are, what has been held over from the emergency act.
I've consulted with a couple of lawyers who didn't know either, but Ray has been very active in sending letters to politicians and bank managers, I believe. Ray, if you want to mention something about that?
Yeah, bankers that I've been dealing with, and they are basically ignoring the idea that their CEOs of the main six banks here in Canada basically are just following the rules, except they're not following the rules because they have responded to something that they don't know.
They're just following something that is illegal for starters.
And secondly, they've not sat down and reviewed what those orders really were. They just went ahead and suspended something in the order of 200 accounts, some of which have no particular direct ties to the convoy at all.
Okay, Ray, hold that thought. We've got Jessica back and we'll continue the thought later because it's very relevant. You'll be the stopgap, okay? And Jessica freezes again.
Yeah, it must be that we're talking about something important that never happens to me. Twice in one call, never happens. Okay, so we're talking about something valuable. Sorry, sorry, I'd love to just listen to everyone.
But Ray, we'll get back to it because I want to hear that too. And yeah, somebody, I can go post it if you want, or I think somebody already did the links to both of these papers.
Anyway, but on that subject matter, I just want to spin off of something else that's really important that ties both the recent Pfizer data dump and something that's very alarming that they said doesn't happen before they injected this stuff into 3 billion people.
And that's the bio distribution of the LNPs, the lipid nanoparticles. So everybody here probably knows that Byron Breidl, freedom of information requested a Japanese study that showed bio distribution of the lipid nanoparticles.
So the Pfizer data itself, like there's a document in the dump data that addresses this, their own animal studies were done in Wistar rats. So it shows the same thing. Absolutely the same thing.
Yes, a percentage of the lipid nanoparticles and their payload, this mRNA does stay at the injection site, but absolutely not all of it. And the largest places in the human body of accumulation are the adrenal glands, the liver, the spleen, and the ovaries.
So they split this up by gender, and there's actually a different bio distribution profile for females, which looks worse for us, by the way, or rats as the model.
And so, not only that, but there's probably accumulation, and the longest time point after the injection that they actually measured was 48 hours. And in the females, the curve was still on an exponential rise, so it stopped at 48 hours like this.
So we don't know if after 72 hours, it was going to plateau and start to descend, or if it was just going to keep going.
So this is really important to know ahead of time, and it's really important for people to know now, because we are starting to see the leaves rustling in the form of adverse event reports out the yin yang.
And this could be precisely because these things are distributing throughout the body and wreaking havoc wherever they end up. And we don't know if this is because of the lipid nanoparticles doing damage themselves, because cationic lipids are highly toxic to cells, or if it's the spike protein, which is the payload.
We don't know. It's probably both. So there's so many things that are going to be revealed now that a lot of us have been wondering about and hypothesizing about for a long time.
The transverse transcription thing, the integration papers coming, I'm sure of it, and the bio distributions. And they also found that the mRNA sticks around in the germinal centers of lymph nodes for a long time in another paper.
So yeah, yay, I got all that out without being cut off.
Jessica's view of Canada at this stage. Sorry, I'm just going to scroll through.
Yeah, that's good. Yep.
I love my country. I adore what happened recently with with the movement of the truckers and all of my freedom fighting colleagues and friends.
I'll tell you from where I am.
And it's probably the same thing if you go the other way and people looking at Israel like nobody knows what's going on here. I'll tell you what's going on, by the way.
From my point of view here, it seemed like as soon as that bank seizure account things started happening. A couple of weeks ago.
I stopped hearing about everything related to the trucker protest.
Like, it's like there's a there's a silence that kind of took over. Even even my inside channels and I'm not sure what to make of that. So now instead of getting all this like, like flood of information about the truckers and the bank accounts being frozen and all of this.
I have to go looking for information.
That's my perception.
I'm not sure that it's different, like for everybody else it might be.
But yeah, the that's my my view of Canada at this stage and I, I hope I feel that it's definitely not over from from the fighting point of view.
I think I think Trudeau's actions are deplorable and he needs to be removed yesterday.
And all of the people who followed him that that Bonnie like devil in in BC I mean God.
Yeah, so there's a lot of people who I really really hope when you know this ball keeps rolling.
I have to answer for what they've done. I hope that people that we're able that the lawyers are able to show like intent and accountability and all of this.
I'm not a lawyer so I don't really know how they're going to approach this but if anyone wants me to help as an expert witness which I'm doing a lot lately I'm going to help from that point of view so I think Canada is critical.
I think I think what Jennifer said before was absolutely true. I think the, you know, the, the, the biggest pivot point was when the Canadian trucker said, hell no and drove to Ottawa I really do.
It started this massive ignition of a flame inside so many people all over the world it really did I spoke with someone in Australia this morning who told me just that, like she was expressing to me how much that movement, the continuing movement as well as meant to everyone
So yeah, I could go on about that for a long time I'm very proud.
So yeah, that's what my view on Canada is.
How can your work on bears be extended, I don't I'm not sure what that means extended.
If someone who type that can elaborate.
Yes, if so if you want to if you want to have a rub put your hand up if that was your question, and then please elaborate that question.
You collecting the questions.
No Jessica's handling them through chat. I'm just reading them. Yeah. Okay.
So there's the zoom. So, who is the who is who is zoom user today.
Please unmute yourself.
Hi Jessica it's Nick cotton study.
I just thinking you know next steps. What are the next steps in terms of your bears analysis where you headed with all your work.
Oh, I'm not sure. I haven't thought about it.
It's kind of a weekly update thing for me right now.
I recently started, like every now and then I have to, you know, stop and think about okay.
How can I summarize what I found in the last, you know, x amount of time so I recently started thinking that it's really important for me to, to keep focusing on the causation point, because I think that this is very important of course, and ways that I can use
to, to tease that out. So, I've been focusing on young people dying lately.
And not only that but young people who are dying, who had no previous conditions not on meds no history. So like I can take out all of the, the confounding, you know, factors, and pretty much definitively say that this kid who was injected two hours before died
because of the injection so that's where that's the the direct line as to where I'm going but as to like a more general sense.
I don't know I mean, I think we all know that that there's. I mean it is a functioning pharmacovigilance tool but it needs to be completely redone. It either needs to be redone from the ground up or it needs to be completely dismantled and a new system needs to take its
place so I think about that too but it's such a huge undertaking, and it's a complex thing what what VAERS is doing already and it is working. So, I don't really have the best ideas as to, like if someone said okay Jess it's on you now.
You you you redesign a VAERS like system that functions.
The first thing I would do is hire other people.
So, um, so that's that's the best answer I can give on that.
Somebody wrote, John draws wrote.
What do you think about suing the FDA regarding their COVID-19 policies.
I think that's a great idea if you can succeed then all the better.
The FDA is not functioning as as the entity that it is anymore. I think that's become very clear. I'm not sure for how long it hasn't been functioning as the regulatory body that it's supposed to be.
But I definitely know that it's been revealed since this COVID-19 scam.
I don't know how else to call it.
Hold on, redacted, I don't know. I would sue all the government. Yeah, the mRNA would modify human DNA of the exes.
Okay, surveillance Stephen.
Yeah Jessica that was my question there about the, does the, you were talking about the reverse transcriptase, would that affect the germline cells?
It would have integration was involved.
That's the best way I can answer that. I'm not really doing that research. I wish I was.
Yeah, I think the best way I can answer is we have so many unknown questions now related to fertility.
Yeah, I think it's beyond a shadow of a doubt we need to, we have enough evidence to stop this rollout now.
Somebody asked, can ivermectin cure the common cold? I'm not sure. There are many medical doctors here who would probably be better qualified to answer that.
But I do know that there is a health practitioner who is treating both COVID, people with COVID and the injection related injuries.
And she does use ivermectin for both. And she says it works for both. So that's the best thing I can say about that.
I'm still like scratching my head about ivermectin though, like as to its mechanism of action. I'm not saying it doesn't absolutely work the way that Pierre Corrie is saying that it does, for example, but I don't know its mechanism of action.
Jessica, what was the name of our health practitioner that you just mentioned?
I'd rather not say because she's trying to stay in complete health.
Right.
Send me a private message if you want, if you can.
Okay, she has a manual that I can send. I think I actually posted it here once before. Yeah, I did.
There was a panel one night and some injured people were on and there was one that stuck with me. I can't remember her name, but I can resend it though. It's very good.
Just to say that I use it to cure myself with the common cold. I'm quite a skeptical person when it comes to these things, but I'm near certain that I started to get a common cold in the morning and it built up fairly strong.
I took the one 12 milligram pill at four o'clock and by six p.m. it was like turning a tap off. It just went like that and I'd been at a party with 15 people and 12 of them got the common cold.
So I'm near certain of it myself.
What drug was that, Ryan?
Ivermectin.
It was Ivermectin, yeah.
Well, you know, it's a world-class drug. It won a Nobel Prize and I mean it's pretty safe. It's got a proven track record for many decades.
And yeah, it seems to me to be, I'm not a really pro drug, but it seems to me to be a wonderful one and I'm fascinated to know like exactly how it works in the context of say virals, viral pathogens, because you know it is an antiparasitic.
Somebody asked about the myocarditis paper that I penned with Peter McCullough and yeah, I can talk about that.
So I've actually written three papers on describing the VAERS data in a descriptive way, like descriptive analysis.
Two of them are published and the third one, this one where the focus was on myocarditis reports in VAERS, was peer reviewed, published, immortalized on PubMed, and then yanked five days before an FDA hearing that I was meant to, that I gave testimony at.
And the main findings of this paper was that there were there was a 19 times above background reporting rate of myocarditis in 12 to 15 year olds, primarily boys.
And of course everybody knows that that's what's happening right now. Anybody who's paying attention can see, even the FDA and the CDC are admitting to this so it's definitely a thing.
And we didn't get any explanation. We both woke up one morning and were informed by, you know, people, you know, who noticed that there was temporary withdrawal written beside the name of paper.
And I was shocked. Peter was shocked. I wrote to the editor and the publisher immediately and because I didn't know what was going on. And I asked what the deal was. I also sent a screenshot of this to all of, you know, the biggies in the field and asked them, is this normal?
And they were like, have you guys seen this before? And none of them had and they all said the same thing. It's like, yes, that's not normal.
So I waited a day, I think, by the end of the day or the next morning to get a reply from the publisher. And it said that they were reconsidering publishing our paper, because it hadn't been an invited paper and Peter immediately responded and said,
That's not a list. That's bollocks. And he gave a number of examples of papers that had not been invited that they had published in the past. And so he said, basically, he was the one who was answering for both of us.
He said, reinstate the paper or we're going to litigate because at this point, imagine this, like it was already published, like it was on PubMed immortalized. We paid our fees.
And we signed a contract. So it's like, you know, this is book burning of 2021. So we waited a week, another week. And finally, they came back with, we're not going to publish the paper because we don't have to.
And that's literally the reason that they gave. It had nothing to do with the content. It had nothing to do with anything. It was just, it's written in our rules that we, at any point during the publication process, can stop the publication.
So, you know, the proofs, the pre-proofs hadn't been approved at that point. So yeah, it's in litigation limbo right now. And, but every week or sometimes more than once a week, I get an email from the publisher, Elsevier, to approve the proofs of that paper.
And this is a trick because if I actually clicked on the link and or press approve or whatever, it would mean that I would be signing over the admission that we had withdrawn the paper, which is not the case. We didn't even know that this was going to happen.
So yeah, it's kind of shocking. It's, we're not the only ones this has happened to.
And yeah, it's heartbreaking because the bottom line is the information is very important. And it might have actually changed the scenery a little bit had it been published properly. Really, it might have made a difference, just like the ivermectin paper from way back in the day.
If they hadn't stomped that out, you know, entirely, the whole situation of the planet might be different right now. It's that, you know, maybe my paper isn't that important, but these papers being stepped on and hidden are really important.
And like I said, this was, this happened five days before I was meant to give my, my three minute talk to the FDA judges on whether or not we should put this into 5 to 11 year olds.
Go figure.
I think it was just a coincidence.
So, that was sarcasm.
You're welcome. Is there a various database equivalent in Israel? No, we have nothing. So I'll tell you guys what's happening here.
I live here, I lived here for 15 years. We have absolutely nothing, even akin to an adverse event data collection system here.
You'd think that since we didn't that we would have established one upon becoming you know the pilot project for Pfizer.
We're on our fourth doses now.
People are still going back.
We, they're trying to put it into six months year olds here, not getting much pushback. There are people pushing back, don't get me wrong, but the numbers are very few.
When you compare it to the population of the country.
We also had a trucker convoy converge on Jerusalem recently which was shut down pretty fast.
We have a lot of riot cops here, military trained.
And I got a voice message from a man who works at a funeral from the woman who wrote the book that I told you about who helps people with were injured and with COVID.
And he says that they absolutely can't keep up with the number of bodies that they have to prepare for burial right now.
There's something very, very wrong going on here right now and nobody is talking about it.
So, unless you're like on the inside inside and you get these voice messages from people who are actually, you know, on site on the job seeing things with their own eyes, like these embalmers right like pulling this crap out of people's arteries like, you know, you're not going to know that this stuff is happening.
So, the situation here is not good. And the weirdest and worst part is that there's so many people.
Most people are just, I'll say that they're walking around with blinders on but I don't know what it is. I mean, we're using terms like mass psychosis and I don't even think that begins to describe what's going on here I mean people are still walking around outside with two masks on alone in the sunshine.
Can you explain that to me? I mean what happened in here that made them think that that was going to provide them with safety or or help them in any way it's very strange to me so that's what's going on here.
It's not the worst place to be. But it's certainly not what, what most people have been led to believe that it is.
What's your take on variability of batch toxicity. Yeah, this is a really hot topic.
I think that there is variability among batches.
I think it's based more, this is only my opinion, I think it's based more on how complete the mRNA templates are, if there is in fact mRNA in these things. We don't know right we're not privy to any ingredient list.
It's probably less based on variability of lipid nanoparticles because these things are like off the assembly line, and they're a composite of four different lipids.
So it's probably not that so I'd say it's more variability on the template that we actually have for this modified mRNA.
And that's going to depend on how it's handled how the product is handled how it's manufactured, delivered, handled at administration so there's so many different things that can result in a variable product.
Absolutely no doubt in my mind that there is variability between the batches, I'll say.
And that's not acceptable. It's just not, I mean that's not how it goes. Your product, if it has a label on it has to be the same as the next product sitting next to it with the same label on it.
It has to be even if they're different lots they have to have the same functionality when they're injected they have to. Otherwise, it's contaminated by for all intents and purposes, which means you should remove that product from distribution immediately.
So, yeah, there's a bunch of us trying to use that as a means to shut this down as well because you can't have product variability. So the difficult part is proving that, of course, that's that's always the difficult part right.
Okay, everybody. How about the little mind yeah, I talked about that in an interview recently about the fact that I watched a series of documentaries recently on the little mind.
That was a tragedy. And there's a lot of parallels here. And one of them is that the tagline that they use to promote the little mind to pregnant women was the same as they're using now, believe it or not, I couldn't believe it I screenshot it safe and effective.
How safe and effective was the little mind.
So yeah, it's it's something for people who are still kind of defending this narrative should think about because you can't, you can't argue about what already happened, you know, historically.
There's accepts reports of adverse. Wow, this is a long one.
Okay.
Pfizer CEO Borla he's a gem isn't he, he says the fourth booster is necessary. If that guy can define what a booster is I'll eat my hat. That's what I have to say to that.
Yeah, he's trying to backpedal now I'm not sure if all of you guys watched his recent video blurb. I wrote a little talk about it.
Yeah, he's trying to escape right now. Just like, I think, maybe Fauci has anyone have any idea where Fauci went I mean.
Yeah, I hope the who is soon neutralized as well but I don't think that's going to happen. And on the subject of the who I'm sure everyone's aware about their, their new lovely pandemic treaty, which they want to introduce internationally, which will basically
I mean, in my opinion, that all they have to do is say, oh, we're in an emergency. And then they can impose whatever dictate they want on anyone in any country at any time, there will be no independent nations that say no, I think we're okay here.
No, no more Swedens.
It's a terrible.
Someone said that the Santa's has said that factory is in protective custody in quotes.
I heard that earlier and I thought it was a joke.
So he actually is.
Well, he said it.
There's a tape of him actually saying he's in protective custody. Is it because somebody threatened him, but usually it's Kennedy's book usually, usually the criminal is not in protective custody.
What's he protecting himself from like the truth.
So from being lynched I should imagine have you seen. Have you seen a Kennedy's book on him.
Of course, yeah I was, I was a little helpful bird in that process.
Yeah, yeah I know I know but like he's also got a lot of adoring admirers who think he's some kind of dummy God.
Wow, there's 71 messages here so I should probably scroll.
Yeah, Rex Murphy rules.
Jessica, what we need to do, people like you and various other people around the world is get together and work out a strategy to hold these people to account.
We've got enough information, got enough evidence to show that these vaccination programs should stop now. And why are they not being stopped now.
So the regulatory bodies involved, all this, the top people should be arrested, we need to do something about it. We're spending all our time talking and saying how difficult everything is you know nothing's working well yes we've got to make the police for example do their job.
Yeah but the police are captured for the most part like we need the litigators.
Like, I think the police are the best bet because they have families and they are right at least in the United Kingdom, they serve the population they don't serve politicians.
Now, there may be pressure from the government on the police, but the average policeman, the good please, they've got families to.
I can see people shaking their heads because they don't believe in the system but then we're never going to win anything. If everybody just goes on, saying how difficult things are. We've got to take the initiative.
They're on the run now you said that the CEO advisor looks as though he's backpedaling. Well if that's the case then now's the time to push.
I can't understand why people like Peter McCullough, I'm not criticizing him but everyone is just doing their own thing.
Stephen and everybody. There are two cases in the courts, right now and all of us need to understand one of those one by American frontline doctors and the other one by the Australian vaccination risks network.
The government lawyers are taking every single strategy to slow down dismembered dismantled obfuscate indeed claim no standing no right to attack FDA, like it's just understand everybody this government will use every criminal slimy trick in the book to slow cases down.
There are cases and you go to court for an urgent injunction, you know, they'll just put it off. There's nothing urgent about this your honor and the judge doesn't want to make a decision. That's what's happening.
So Stephen, we have two separate processes Charles and this is what lots of people they they conflate the legal route with the police route. So when this crime and this clear evidence of criminal activity or the past.
Well police, the police set on sexual abuse of children for 30 years, Stephen, and we're finding with the Metropolitan Police, police will sit on matters they won't investigate.
If, if there, but there are powerful people who are victims of this nonsense now so they should be, they have the ability to put pressure on the police, and that's unprecedented.
The, the.
Yeah, there's an army of people who are damaged by these vaccines, who we need to recruit but that's, I just wondered what you think.
Three, Jessica.
Yeah, I think the litigators are litigating now but I also think that that system is broken.
Everything goes too bloody slow like that's why we're in the shit now it's because, like, the, the fact that the systems are broken, combined with the fact that everything is so slow like everyone's like the, the, the regulatory borders bodies are always typically
behind anyway. So it's like, yeah, I think that it's, I think that people will have to.
They will, they will be held accountable, but I don't think it's going to be soon. And I don't know how much damage is going to be done in the meantime and I think that's just being realistic I mean, yeah, it.
I'm working with a lot of lawyers now and they're really doing their best and they're teaming up with the experts like the medical doctors and the people are treating covert patients and the scientists and the researchers and.
But yeah, the stuff takes time.
I don't know how I feel about any any of the police forces I know that they're good men and women. I know that they're families that they have as well. We saw a lot of this happening in Canada, I mean, I think.
I just, I just know that we're up against a really powerful force here.
Those guys that eventually descended upon Ottawa to remove the truckers those weren't Canadians, those, those are people that were hired from outside so like, you know, there's there's so much capture.
So I don't know.
I'm not sure Jessica we have the truth and they haven't got the truth and also, and the truth will prevail.
And it will prevail sooner rather than later with so many victims we need to recruit all these victims and okay they might be upset. Just at the moment, but there are some who are not upset and who are prepared to give evidence now.
I was on a call with the FDA. Two days ago, two members of from the FDA not not the big ones but you know the ones who they decided to send as their lackeys.
And I came after five in vaccine injured people injection injured people one of them was Maddie de Goure's mom.
And it was.
Okay, first of all, every single one of them was in tears.
Not just for their own loss but mainly because they're, they're not being heard. And this, this was a great opportunity in their eyes to be heard. The only thing that I saw was the same crap that I always see which is like the poised pretentiousness
of like them extending an olive branch to listen, but actually not doing anything about it so it's like the the the roads to.
Wow, it's hard to know how to put it it's like the approach that we need to take right now has to come from like completely outside of the box thinking like approaching the FDA guys and the CDC guys I think it's important.
I think we have to take the traditional routes but I think we also have to take non traditional routes to to get done what needs to get done which is to stop this, this nonsense and rebuild the whole systems from the ground up.
You know it's a it's a it's a really high bar but.
There seems to be a mass formation of a massive noses if you like amongst us, people like us.
There seems to be a mass formation of despair to me everywhere I look nobody's got any suggestions, what to do.
And that's the most important thing we've, we've, we've analyzed this enough now we've done all the talking, we've got all the evidence we need.
Everybody needs to say no, that's what everybody needs to do.
Yeah, and they're making noise.
Yeah, like right.
You see people say what's the point of writing. What's the point of writing the FDA to the EMA to the MHRA. Well you create evidence that's what the point is so you can find out what they said when.
Right, exactly. So that's what's happening now but it's taking time and people like I'm seeing it, I'm seeing more people coming forward as victims.
I'm seeing, of course we're seeing more data, I'm seeing more doctors and lawyers starting to ask questions. So there, I think there's going to be some kind of tipping point and it's going to be really fast and furious when it happens because we only need like a certain
percentage of the population to be on board, let's say, before the, you know, everything changes. I mean, the legacy media are bought off and they are going to keep peddling their nonsense but that can only happen up to a certain degree because if the public stops
listening.
You know, what do they have to do, they're going to have to shift their story because that's, that's what they do. They, they, they pedal crap to whoever's listening so if no one's listening they have to change the crap that they're peddling.
Yeah.
But I think the battle fatigue that's descended on Jessica has to get through a bucket load of questions.
Yeah.
Okay, yeah sorry I have a good one here, some close Schuster Schuster writer wrote.
If you take all the various data, what are the three most dramatic elements you would use when to start a conversation or discussion with a pro vax doctor or in a meeting with people working for authorities I like this question because I can definitively tell you.
I mean, I'm working on plots that compare the last five years of data for specific adverse event against just 2021.
And diabetes stands out really really a lot. So I would say diabetes.
I would say Bell's palsy.
And I mean I can take my pick here, and I would say cancer.
So, what I would say, if you want to start that conversation because they all stand out like sore thumbs in contrast to previous years, I can send you my charts if you want.
But yeah, those are the three.
What would you say to those Bernie Ryan asks, what would you say to those politicians who are simply accepting what their health advisors are telling them.
What do they most need to know or consider in order to oppose both the back. Okay.
So, I think this is true anyone can correct me if they want to.
I think that they're the ones who hire or appoint the health advisors. So, if, if there's a suspicion that they're getting bad advice, which in many cases there is I imagine you can fire that person and hire someone who is up to date with the data with the information
technology, etc. So that's what I would say.
And on that subject, I think everybody kind of knows in here when something's not right. And I think a lot more people feel that way than are admitting to that.
Because yeah, nothing about this is right not one, not one iota of it.
I just want to point about the whole world treaty okay I did it's a stupid idea, and if it goes ahead where we're really in the shit, pardon my language.
I see a T Dundas testified to Senator Ron Johnson on the cover up of military job related health records. Do you understand how the database was modified wasn't modified for the cover up, are you looking at this.
Okay.
Yeah, I can speak about this, but I, but I have to be cryptic.
This is true.
There are two sets of data.
This is public knowledge, but I'm not sure how many people in the public know this, so I'll let you know what I know.
So first of all the military database is a very well capped database the US military, regulated by the Department of Defense, and those, the doctors who work within that system are strictly hired by these, these people.
And so the records are very strict, they're very well maintained.
There's no under reporting factor, as there is in there so it's a very complete data set.
So, somebody got a hold of this data, and it showed some very very luminous differences in.
I mean, an innumerable number of adverse events across the board between 2021, and the past five years, for example, that's why I chose five years from my knee charts.
And so once that got out in this hearing to Senator Johnson.
Five days later, the data was updated, and their claim was that they'd gotten blacks, and they hadn't updated the records for the past year so that's what I know about that.
We don't know the answer yet we're trying to get answers I'm working with Senator Johnson actually on this. We don't know yet.
I've prepared a little slide deck that compares what's there.
I mean I don't, I don't have the original data but I have the charts that are posted on Thomas Renz's site with what's going on in theirs in terms of the military reports.
And, yeah, I, well I don't know if I can't share that yet but.
So yeah, that's what I know about that something fishy is going on and we don't have answers yet we're trying desperately to get them but think about it.
One of those two data sets has to be correct.
And if it's the first one, we have a serious problem on our hands. And if it's the second one, we have a serious problem on our hands, because the way that they modified the data.
To cover up the high high number of total reports and individual adverse event reports was to normalize the data according to 2021. So it means that we have this enormous number of reports being made for all the years going back to 2015.
22 million to be precise, on average, per year. So that would mean that every single member of the military on active duty would have to have had 16 appointments and clocked reports every year.
Every year. So anyway, it's in either case, they have something to explain. And even if we accept just one more point, even if we accept the second data set the corrected data set that's normalized to make it look like the, you know, 2021 wasn't a total disaster.
All the literature that's based on that data for the past five years before that is wrong.
Because it's quoted the data that was used in their non updated set if you if you know what I'm saying.
It's a horrible horrible horrible error if it's an error, it's really bad. And it makes them look very bad. So anyway, that's all I'm going to say about that.
Do you know, please, the Pfizer nano lipid particle are produced by tech company and non pharmaceutical company. Well, I know that there's there's a biotech company in Canada that produces the lipid nanoparticles I think from there or not.
Pfizer is using two types of nano lipid particles. Do you have any idea what they're using? No, I know that there's a composite of four lipids that I think both of them are using and the concentration differences of each form might vary, but I don't know.
Both of them are just for scientific research and one of them is not allowed for you. Okay, I'm not sure. Wow, I'm really backed up here.
Okay.
Yeah, nice. Good. Yeah.
Anyone.
Jessica Stephen warned you that we're good at asking questions so I love it. It's great, because everyone gets to hear the answers that best I can provide. Maybe we can do some hands up in the airs while I'm scrolling here.
There's some hands up.
Jessica so if you're happy to multitask.
Yeah, then we can do that.
Just give priority to the written ones because we've asked them to do right but Dave columns got his hand up so he's a professor from New York of something, Dave, go for it while Jessica's scrolling.
Just a quick question.
This recent paper where it seemed to have reverse transcribed.
And that seems unambiguous word the reverse transcript days come from do they know I have to add it to get it to work. What I didn't get the story there.
So, the, the claim is that it's the reverse transcript is is a is a retro transpose on called line one.
I can't remember what that acronym is for so it's it's an endogenous like thing and human being like we have it it's like I said earlier it's implicated in embryo genesis and.
So yeah it borrowed an endogenous retro transpose on allegedly, and they they measured the expression levels and.
Yeah, they were increased in the presence of this.
Of this biotech product, so yep.
Somebody asked if I'm allowed to publish elsewhere, and we are in reference to the the viral card that is paper but not while we're in litigation.
I started to feel like I just kind of want to do that but.
Do you believe the vaccines, they're not vaccines, the injections are tagging the public for monitoring and associated with fire she.
I think that non ionizing radiation might have something to do with the worst pathology, because of the effect on calcium channels.
I don't think that people are being tagged per se. I think I honestly think that this this injection rollout is more to normalize the mRNA tech, because this is what they're going to be deploying like just listen for the flu shot mRNA this is this coming.
And the end game in all of this, I think, is the digitization of the human and and and monetizing the human being, not just the data but the being so I know that sounds a little bit like spaced out sci fi but.
So I think it's more about that than tagging at this point.
What's the best front end website for various and Vic, I don't know what this, oh okay, or open bears.
Do you detect deleted records in the various database.
For or detect old records that are modified. Okay, so my first paper that you can find on my website which also reports various numbers like open bears, and I do like open bears.
A.
It actually, sorry it's the second paper that I published on pharmacovigilance so if I address the deleted entries from bears, and yes, this is a thing.
It's not a dramatic number.
But it is a number every week. So every week when they update the data, it's a brand new data set. It's not the cumulative data, like you would expect.
So, this is partly because of the vetting process where they have to remove duplicate entries so that's where a lot of the various IDs go.
There are various IDs that go completely missing they're deleted, and they're not, there's no explanation for that.
So, yes, I have and I wrote about it so if you want to learn more about that.
My website is Jessica's universe calm it's pretty easy. And my publications on theirs and all the other stuff is there.
Okay, so we can move on to the next paper to vaccines.
Yeah, we can.
Yep, good.
Are there any vitamins or minerals papers that you've heard promote or offer helpful direction with vaccine injuries.
I mentioned who works with the injured and also coded people, she wrote a book, and it's very comprehensive.
It has this elenco protocol it has a whole bunch of protocols, a lot of natural treatments, and the, the biochemistry behind it like she's really good it's really good.
So I can pass that on.
And she is using Ivermectin as a post injection cure.
Are there strong I think herpetic rashes occurring mostly after boosters. That's a good question.
I think it's occurring after every shot in Israel, for example, we've had enormous outbreaks of shingles.
And, I mean, it's hard to say I dare say that most of the effects are being seen after the second, because I think there's some kind of cumulative effect.
But yeah, it's a good question I can check for you actually.
I think I will. I'm curious now.
Okay, we'll give you a break from reading Cordelia and then Teresa and then go back to reading questions. Cordelia, who is a pathologist.
Sorry.
Hi, just a small comment and a question please.
You talked about Ivermectin earlier, there's a really good chapter in that book, Kennedy's book, the real Anthony Fauci, very detailed and there is a lot of very good evidence, randomized trials about how efficient it is.
And was all presented to Anthony Fauci by God knows how many researchers and doctors but ignored so the evidence is there in the literature, and it's clearly there and, for example, there was one article, a case report of a nursing home in
France where the average age of the residents was 90, and they were all on Ivermectin for scabies, and they all survived a covid outbreak, including the staff so the evidence is there about Fauci ignored it, that's the problem.
And the question is, some people die after vaccination, they just drop dead, they feel really well and then just out of the blue, drop dead, especially after exercise.
So, and then you do a post mortem and there's no myocarditis there's no vasculitis, and very difficult really then to prove it. My personal suspicion is that this is a problem with the ion channels in the membranes of the cardiac cells.
And there is a case report that can induce low, low potassium and low magnesium.
And this is difficult to prove because you cannot see that these iron pumps these iron channels in the cell membrane you can see them on light microscopy.
And, and you can't even really see them properly on electron microscopy.
So, do you have any thoughts on that.
I think that you're dead right. And I think, as far as being proactive is vitamin D can help with that according to a paper that I'm reading now.
You'll probably find this interesting as well it's entitled.
I'm kind of obsessed with the renin angiotensin aldosterone system, and its role in this whole source co VT thing.
So this paper is called the renin angiotensin aldosterone system and calcium regulatory hormones.
And there's a connection between the RAS calcium channels and also vitamin D. And there's a lot of good references to other papers that show the results from trials.
Anyway, I can pass that on as well. So, I think that anybody who's starting to look at calcium channel disruption and epithelial cells is going to hit big money.
That's what I think.
And I think vitamin D might be one of the reasons why vitamin, none of the people who have suffered severe pathologies or died, were vitamin D deficient.
Wait, am I saying that right. All of the people who died were vitamin D deficient so we already know that vitamin D is essential for an optimal immune system but it might also actually be in this particular context, solving that problem.
So, who knows, I don't know yet. I'm really in the research phase right now but I think that you're onto something.
The cardiac cells, they can only contract if they've got enough calcium inside the cell, and without the vitamin D, you're not absorbing the calcium so you can eat, eat a massive block of cheese and you're still not absorbing the calcium if you're vitamin D deficient.
So, if you're not having enough vitamin D in your body, you're not absorbing it no matter what you eat, and the calcium is essential for contraction of the heart muscle.
And what happens if your heart muscle doesn't contract?
I thought one thing is heart failure or maybe just a sudden cardiac arrhythmia, I'm not sure.
Yeah, I thought that's why I'm asking the question. I thought you had a more, an opinion on that.
I'm still wondering like how it's possible that the suddenness of the deaths are occurring and I think they're definitely cardiac related but I don't know yet so yeah, I'm researching this right now.
I'm not a cardiologist yet.
Cordelia, could it be cardiac arrhythmia?
Yeah, but the question is, what triggers it? I mean this is the mystery isn't it? Why are so many footballers dropping dead with cardiac arrhythmias when they're playing, you know, when during exercise?
Well, are they cardiac arrhythmias? We don't know because not enough post mortems have been done, very few. I mean, could they be pulmonary emboli?
Well, yeah, but just the fact that, I mean with pulmonary embolism you would still survive a few minutes but a lot of them just drop dead out of the blue.
And I mean, and then there's nothing there and then if you've excluded the pulmonary embolism and there's nothing there and you can't prove any iron channel pump disturbances, it's really tricky.
Can I add to something? Can I add to something there? Because I've got a huge family, I've been waiting to see things happen in my family because all my siblings are double and triple jabbed.
One of my brothers has just gone into the ICU, massive heart attack, massive arrhythmias, arrhythmias and big clot in his left ventricle.
And then another brother had serious COVID, he was in the ICU with COVID last year. He just had part of his colon removed two days ago with cancer and he's an emergency room MD.
He's a COVID doctor treating COVID patients in Florida so it's not like he was caught up in that, you know, delayed surgery lineup. So it's a combination of everything you're talking about. It's everything.
What was the consistency of the clot? Did he know anything about it?
You know what, my brother, okay, and this just adds to the frustration. He's in total denial that it's got anything to do with this. And the doctors are giving him medication and he's got, he actually survived the massive heart attack.
And he's on medications and they're telling him it's going to dissolve. We all know that heart muscle has died all around it.
And it's just a matter of time before more major complications happen. They're not going in to remove the clot. I assume it's a gelatinous mass. It's a huge clot from what he described. So he's in Calgary, I'm in Toronto. So I'm getting this news. I was going to flat out see him but he's actually going to get dismissed from the hospital. So for the moment, he's all right, but not for long because he's not getting treated properly because it's all in denial. They're all in denial.
And he won't listen to you?
No.
And even my brother in Florida, he's saying the same thing. It's like get yourself to Andy Anderson or somewhere like that where they can, you know, clean out the clot, deal with what's going on, reperfuse that ventricle because there's a chance of getting some reperfusion with some laser treatment.
But he feels he's in good hands in Calgary and he doesn't, he's going to go with meds. I mean, he walked around having had a major heart attack that they call a, what do they call it? This is one that kills you anyway. And he'd had it for five days before he went into the hospital. So he's disconnected anyway from his body somehow.
Did you say he's a doctor?
He's not the one in the ICU. The other brother who had his, he's in MD Anderson right now. He just had his colon, part of his colon removed. He's an ER doctor. And he's trying to convince my other brother to go and get proper treatment.
You know, what we consider proper treatment. But when you're in denial and you're with a group of doctors that are in denial, they're not going to get that treatment.
Because he's saying everything we expect him to say. They're saying, wow, he's symptoms and nothing like they've ever seen before. They don't know how to deal with this. Why has he got all this atrial fibrillation? Why is he, you know, they're not connecting it.
Did you say that there's a clot in his left ventricle?
Yes, yes, large clot.
I've never heard of that.
They're telling him that medicine, medication is going to fix it. That's what they're telling him.
Yeah, but you don't get, I've never heard of a clot in the left ventricle.
Well, now you've heard of it.
So, so thank you, Jennifer. And, you know, how dare you question your brothers. Teresa's got a question for you, Jessica, live.
Thanks, Charles.
I'm going to read a quote to you, Jessica, if that's okay. I just like you to comment on it.
I have to put it in the chat so I can read it.
Right. It was on an interview on the Lou Rockwell show, and I'm just going to read it.
So, just to put some numbers on this, starting in the summer into the fall, with the mandates and the boosters, there were 61,000 excess millennial deaths.
Basically, millennials experienced the Vietnam War in the second half of 2021.
8,000 people died in the Vietnam War, US troops, that is, over the course of 10 years.
So this generation just experienced a Vietnam War in six months.
In which country?
United States.
United States. So yeah, that was Edward Dowd, and he's right.
So we don't think there's enough evidence to go to the police and demand that the police do their job.
Well, I doubt it's like starting this wave of finance here, a wake-up call, and something shifting in the financial arena here, something shifting in the insurance company people.
Basically, we just won't be able to hide this data. You can't hide bodies if they're piling up.
Like I told you about this funeral guy here. The truth will out. It's coming. Not fast enough, but it's coming.
And Jessica, what Theresa brought, that is a sticky idea. That's where Bernie's question about how to get through to a politician.
It's a number like that. More kids have died.
Yeah.
On average than we've lost in the Vietnam War. That's a sticky idea. And we've all got to look at sticky ideas.
All right. Glen's got a question for you before we go on to the next written one.
Hi. On the DNA change transcription, if I recall correctly, the cell line that was used was a liver cancer cell line.
And when that had been done earlier and problems identified with hydroxychloroquine, Dr. Erso debunked that as being due to the use of a cancer cell line instead of a regular one.
Does that present a problem here of potentially diminishing the effect?
It could, but I read something that I thought was actually a really valid point on that subject.
The cancer cell line creates like a milieu that is different from like a normal or non-cancer cell line.
But so is the milieu that we are talking about in the human body in the context of the introduction of these products.
So there's something comparable there.
I thought it was a compelling thing to say about it. Now, having said that, yeah, okay, maybe we should test this in different cell lines for sure.
That's the bottom line for me. I'm like, okay, we have the introductory study that definitively shows this in these liver cancer cells.
So let's test it in different cells and see if we find the same thing. So yeah, that's my best answer.
Okay, thank you.
You're welcome.
All right, Nick's got one more. We'll do that. That's the last one with hands up at the moment.
I know everybody, it's after midnight for Jessica, so she'll read some more questions. But Nick, you go first and then we'll get to written questions.
Oh, hi. So sorry. Just a couple thoughts. Are you looking to maybe to connect the post marketing data to the just do a bare search to compare against?
And I was thinking maybe one would be to calculate an upper bound on the denominator just based on the reports at the time.
At least that would put some pressure on them.
Yep. Yep. Good thoughts. I'm working on it.
Yeah, I'm also working on something
elsewhere. Okay, so the the the Pfizer adverse event data was released on November 17.
Last year. So I'm going to go from there. This is the same but different topic. I'm going to go from that starting point and show how many say deaths like severe adverse events have happened since then, which ties very well into the, the intent because they knew about it.
So this many people died after this day when they actually knew how many people that 3% of the population of their trial had died.
That was the long, the long version of the answer.
There's a couple of good questions here. I'm going to try and roll through them and then maybe I'm going to go to bed soon.
As a rule, is the job lot number entered into each record? Are people asked for the job lot number when they fill out the various form? Yes, they are. And no, they're not all the time.
The one of the columns in the various column data that's actually the worst filled out is the Vax lot number, which is really sad because there's so much that we could have learned from this so far.
They're written improperly and this is just human error. I don't think it's nefarious. I think it's just there are too few people doing too much. So, you know, the Vax lot data is not being entered properly.
But there absolutely is, you know, the section to fill it in when you file your various report. There's not being put to the front end system properly.
Where can we go to get our spike protein level checked and get real data on us? I have no idea. This person asked in Canada and the US. I don't even know if you can do that. Can you do that?
It would be nice.
Where can we refer patients to get spike protein antigen levels checked?
Do you want to feel that? Do you know anything?
Get biopsy of inflamed lymphatic tissue, lymph node, private company specialists.
Any ideas?
No, I heard something about a company vaguely working on a test. And that's all I know. I'm very sorry.
What about Steve Kalash's lab out in DC? I can look into that.
That'd be great.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
Nice.
Because he seems kind of ahead of the game.
Jessica, that's a good point. Is there, are there any tests that we could think of that could be performed, which perhaps aren't being performed now, which would point to, so correlate, so they'd be able to detect vaccine injury.
Is anybody working on that? There must be.
How about Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho? He's a pathologist. He might be quite helpful. He's one of the frontline folks.
Yeah, we know. Yeah, he's been here.
Is Dr. Loris Cahill also working on sequencing?
Yeah, and Ryan Cole is working with Roger Hodgkinson in Canada, too. So I guess we'll talk to their network.
And Ryan, Ryan comes on this call a fair amount now. Lately he's been here actually looking into his microscope while he's on the call.
Posing.
Working.
I'm joking.
Elon Musk is pretty clear as to where this is going. Really?
I don't know what to make of Elon. Does any, do you want to comment on that, Ray?
Yeah, there's actually a live YouTube video cycling right now where he is voicing his concerns about where AI is going.
And I think further in my comment, I made reference to the idea that there was benign inputs and benign outcomes to this whole thing.
And my comment is there, Google is anything but benign.
So there's a presumption that if you have benign inputs to this whole idea of AI, you can have beneficial outcomes.
But we know that the actions of Google, Facebook, all of these groups that are censoring alternative views, I'll put it that way, will absolutely skew the output.
So it's a presumption that's in serious error.
All right.
Somebody asks, what are a few things about VAERS that are broken that we could get fixed easily?
Nothing can get fixed easily. VAERS was brought into effect in 1990, so it's really, really old. It's antiquated.
It's run by people and not enough people.
The online form, like the online forms that you sequentially have to fill out.
Maybe there could be fewer of them. Maybe the timeout can be longer. I don't know.
There are little things that you could fix, but I think it needs to be redesigned and rebuilt personally.
Jim's got a question.
Jim. Hey there. Sorry about that. I was on meeting. Thank you very much for your expertise on this.
A couple of questions. The racial specificity of the spike protein, it seems to affect some people more than others.
And I was wondering if you knew anything about the difference in the Ashkenazi versus the Sephardic death and sickness rate in Israel?
Yeah, I don't. I really don't. I wish I did.
Yeah, it would be really interesting to find out.
The commonality between the Ukraine and the COVID seems to be the spike protein does not seem to affect the Ashkenazi as much as it affects others.
And Ashkenazi are sometimes known as Ashkenazi Kazarians. And the Kazarians predominate Ukraine versus the Russians are not Kazarians.
Could this be, you know, Putin is worried about genetically specific bioterror.
Is this, is he correct? In fact, because the spike protein looks like it doesn't attach to the K26RH2 receptor, which are the Ukrainians or the Kazarians.
Is that, could he be right in saying that COVID and other things that are being investigated by the United States and the Ukrainian labs are actually genetically specific bioterror?
Because he is documentation that our intelligence units, including our military, have been, they've said, OK, who's of Russian descent?
Give us some of your blood. And who is of Chinese descent? Give us some of your blood.
And so the United States military and the intelligence units have actually collected various from various sources, blood from or DNA from various countries and specifically done so.
Are we in a, are we in the age of genetically specific bioterror? Are they are the people who are dropping dead, specifically not K26R?
Interesting. Yeah, we could be.
It's not like we're not innovative as a species, right? Right.
And that would be destroying ourselves, right?
And that would explain that would explain both the COVID and the Ukraine, because we know the Ukraine is extremely corrupt.
They supplied a lot of they supplied a lot of the sex trafficking.
They supply a lot of the uranium and other issues in terms of clandestine operations, bio warfare that would neatly tie everything together.
And especially if the K26R is Klaus Schwab and Soros who are not affected by the spike protein, then you have modus and you have a weapon.
Ew. What a scary thought that is.
Well, one of the first things that I don't make sense.
Sorry. Yeah, no, I one of the first things I thought when this broke like back in January 2020 was genetic polymorphisms of ACE2 like might save us.
So I don't know. I haven't seen much published on that.
So, yeah, you probably know more than I do. And they're good questions.
And then there's another question that needs to be answered.
And that is why is, by the way, if you don't have Thomas Renz, the attorney's communications, probably a good idea for you to contact him.
We're in touch often.
Okay, good. And then and then the reason what is the possible reason that the Department of Defense could legally change the data to kill its own people in the United States to make them sick to lie about the vaccine so that they are allowed to give it to their own military members.
What could be the possible reason that that could legally happen?
I don't know if there is a legal reason. But like I said on that, like, either way, this is not good for them.
No, no matter which story they stick to, whether, you know, they data is like crappy from the beginning and proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that these these products are killing our military members and naming them or, you know, having.
Unless they have a superseding directive.
That allows them to lie to the American people and to their service members and kill them.
Like how does the legal aspect like come in there because I always thought about legal things being like, you know, you know, obey the law because they're kind of good for the greater masses.
I don't know, maybe I'm a bit naive in my, my ideas of laws. I think they should be there to protect people.
As do we. Thank you.
No worries.
Somebody here asked how you prove cancers are being caused by the job.
Well, I don't think we, we can yet. We're going to have to come up with definitive patho mnemonic markers.
So people are developing those tests now.
But I can tell you with certainty that in the context of the code products in the adverse event data, the cancer rates are off the charts for 2021 in the context of the code products and they they're, they're no no like from 1990 up to 2020 and doctors.
Ryan Cole is actually one who's talking about this the most are noticing that their patients who have cancer and remission are not in remission after taking the shot anymore.
So there's on the ground.
I guess we can call them anecdotal study stories, although I don't think they're anecdotal at all. And there's the data that's reflecting what they're saying beyond a shadow of a doubt.
So I guess the proof is coming. We can't do it yet.
More about Thomas Renz okay do you have con yes I do.
Do you know what portion of injected people are testing HIV positive. It's a very good question.
I'd like to know the answer to that myself. I don't have any statistics on this yet.
But I can tell you that it appears from published papers that these shots are causing massive immune system dysregulation in some people, not all people, but in some people and we, we really need to find out why and in who that's happening.
Someone's asking if there's an oncologist in the UK who's helping. I'm not sure.
Somebody else can answer.
Do do do do I'm scrolling I'm scrolling. I have a type A personality so I'm going to want to finish all of these questions but I don't think I'm being realistic because it's already no no no you shouldn't.
I'm gonna I'm gonna put my foot down for you Jess. You know that's nice. You've been working so hard and this is what your second or third interview today.
Second yeah second one yeah so so you have all of our, our permission to to stop anytime that you want so we give the same we give Stephen Coughlin.
Yeah, well absolutely I'm just I'm just trying to speak up for just because I know she's going to push.
So well it's true it's true.
To sell suppression. Hey, am I at the end. I am. Oh my gosh I did it. I win. Okay, somebody wrote.
Yeah. All right.
Can you hear me.
Yes. Okay. I have two questions one concerning rents but the main question I have is all cause death.
You know I know that the federal government here is still pushing and imposing enforcing the the vaccines on federal government employees.
I have a relative who's about to lose her job working in a hospital in Massachusetts and it strikes me that all cause death would be the way you would determine not whether a person for example died of cancer.
But whether as a class people who are vaccine vaccinated die at a much higher rate than the unvaccinated and that by by trying to enforce the the shots to full saturation.
There might be some idea of destroying the ability to be able to conduct an all cause death type of analysis that is along the lines of tobacco and whether that seems like it's far fetched and that argument or not.
No, it's not far fetched.
And the rents question I have and I read his stuff I'm a fan but I've had people throw stuff at me.
And I, you know where I have to say I can't discount that is some of the information he got he got by breaking into a USD DOD medical database.
Right. And which is a serious crime and the question I've been confronted with is if he was really legitimate.
How was he not been arrested. That's how the does that make sense the question I'm being asked and that's that's kind of
Yeah, but from what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong anyone who knows is that it wasn't as much breaking in. There was someone on the inside who's still working there now, who is providing information so that's what I've heard.
Yeah, it would kind of make sense, rather than hacking because that would be a federal crime that you know someone would have to answer for so that's what I know.
Yeah, but we receiving that type of information I do believe is also covered.
Is it.
I do believe.
Yeah, like what if the information is saying something even more criminal. Yeah, that's really interesting.
But if I've been shut down on discussions because of that they've been, you know, if this was legit he would he would have had the FBI on his back for example for having that information.
Yeah, I have thought about that actually so so it's it's a federal crime to receive data from the DOD database. That's what you're saying.
So I recall he was on a video where he was opening up, or he would one of his things was a video of him opening up a database that was marked as, you know, the try remember what the DOD medical databases called dears, not dears.
I can't remember what it's called now. I was in the military at one point. And I do think that they're padding their numbers but if you're if you're in the military database you are constantly trying to get them to reconstitute your medical record every time
you go from one place to the other.
Interesting.
And the full battery of shots every time you move to a new place.
Yeah, I've heard that.
So that the global level they're talking about if that makes sense. But I do believe they kind of play with that information a bit, but the, the, but that's the question I've been confronted with I said you don't know that he's that because if he was really doing this stuff
he would have been arrested. And there's a there's, it's not just on this issue there's a string of issues where we run into this. If that guy was really doing what he said he did, and he's advertising it, then you at least have conspiracy committed crime now I don't mean
that about rents but there's a group of people stacking up in various related issues.
You keep asking you get you keep running up against that wall.
Interesting. I'd love to talk like forever about that because yeah I have, you know, I'm getting like information of the woosah and half of it I don't know what to make of it I don't you know, and you have to do your own vetting right because like a data, a data set comes into
your inbox for example and somebody says hey, look at this it's like okay, who are you.
Should I open this. So yeah, I actually have wondered that.
But but I didn't know that it was. It was it was a no no to accept data, if it was incriminating data. That's an interesting point.
So what's your opinion on that date. Do you think the whole thing is just a, like a red herring.
I don't with friends I don't know. I mean that's my question I actually don't know, but I have had someone point out look at this here's this video of him going in him going in or being with someone who is going in, and if he's with them.
I'm not sure that is something and I've been, I've actually been jacked up about that and I, you know, I don't practice law but I'm a lawyer.
But, so it's one of those things that makes you have to stop. And there's been a series of things in the last 18 months where someone says, Well, you know, if that were really true if he was really making a video of how he did that he is just committed admitted
to conspiracy to dot dot dot. And that becomes the issue. You know if you if you if you enable somebody to do something, then that's totally different than somebody goes into database and tosses it over the transom and it just lands in your lap.
So I mean that, you know, and so I asked that question because I've had to kind of pull back on him a little because that question was left open, you know, like that's a question has to be answered.
Yeah, I agree with you. Yep. Yeah, from my understanding it was.
He's like kind of third party ish and it just, you know, it arrived to him from somebody who's who last I heard I mean I don't talk about this, I haven't talked about it in a few weeks, but last I heard was still employed there so yeah I don't know it's it's a lots of questions
We'll leave that Jessica you're going to be at Stephen Frost over to you to formally thank Jessica and ask her. Jessica Stephen gets the last question by the way before you go to bed.
Okay.
Oh, I did have one yeah.
So, um, I've got six around about 68,000 deaths for the EU, the UK and the US.
Post injection.
And I just wonder what you think the underreporting factor is because I think you've worked with Steve Kersh and you've arrived at the figure of 41 is it or that's what Steve Kersh thinks.
I was sorry.
So, so my question is so do you think that 41 is about rights for deaths in bears.
No.
Okay, I think, I think that it's lower.
Because I think that death is probably one of the most reported adverse events.
But I do still think it's underreported so Steve's estimate is 41, and he used a, a anaphylaxis paper as a proxy for death, and I calculated my own using the Pfizer phase three clinical trial data and the severe adverse event rate, and I came up with 31.
And Ronald cost off also pen to paper.
Where are we injecting kids.
And he came up with a hundred so there's a range of estimates out there and I think it's important to think of this in terms of a range because I think, like, even if you separate it out to standalone adverse events themselves, they're probably all going to have their own underreporting
factor like you're never going to have the same underreporting factor for chills as you are going to have for death, for example. So, if I was going to pull a number out of my hat, I would say it's probably closer to six for death.
But, yeah, it's, nobody knows yet.
Nobody's precisely calculated that number yet. I wouldn't apply the 31 or the 41 to the death adverse event.
There was a paper that said 10 to 100 but that was about nine months ago I think.
Yeah, yeah. Well, there's also the the original Lazarus study which which says that there's data it you know there's only 1% of reports that actually make it in there and, you know that that's possible to.
So, yeah, it's an open question we've asked the, the, the holders of the data, the FDA and the CDC, what they think the underreporting factor is, since they have not only, you know, the data that they show us but all this extra demographic data so you know they could probably do a good estimate there with all their smart people.
But they're not answering us so.
Needless to say, I mean even without the underreporting factor. We've so far surpassed the number of acceptable deaths in the context of a biological it's meant to be helping us, it's just ludicrous I mean it's lunacy.
50 people is the tops and and we're at like 28,000 in the US alone.
But if we take six, your figure.
So if it's 404041 call it 40 times 65 that's that's 2,600,000 deaths, that's 40. If we take six though.
That's six times 65 which is hundred and two hundred and sixty thousand.
And then multiply by four say for the world, because that's just so the figure is for the EU, the UK and the US.
So you multiply what I say 260,000 by four you're going to get 1,000,040,000 I think.
So one million.
But that's a massive figure 1,000,000 that's one sixth of the number of Jews who died under the Nazi regime.
So, and we're not done.
But the point is Jessica nobody has publicized the figures nobody's gone into these things as far as I can see the public needs to hear these figures, because if you start talking in the order of the deaths from the Nazi regime.
Then people will understand the enormity of what's happened.
Yeah, we are talking.
Vera Shirav, she's a Holocaust survivor and she's she's using the numbers and she's she's speaking out.
I mean, anybody who will listen to her she's she's telling the truth and she's not only drawing the parallels she's saying.
Which number is she using?
Which number which underreporting factor?
Yes.
I'm not sure she's using the underreporting factor but she, you know, she's definitively comparing the number of people who have died or will die from these products to, to how many died in the Holocaust.
I mean, it's, it's, that's a very powerful thing that only certain people can kind of talk about in most people's opinion but she's, she's kind of one of the best because she survived it.
But there's another parallel. This is a medical political alliance.
And there have been gross breaches of the Nuremberg Code and what's the Nuremberg Code about? It's about human medical experimentation.
And this all needs to be, but I just can't get people to, to, to work on this with me and working on your own you start to doubt yourself.
Yeah, I think it's, it's.
And I wonder whether some people don't want to, they don't want to get involved in a narrative where they're going to be attacked for mentioning the Nuremberg Code, the N word, you know.
That's the truth, but we need to normalize the freaking truth here. It's like, we've been, it's like the lies are the norm now. I mean everybody here knows that so we need to denormalize that.
Make the truth normal again. I mean, Jesus, it's like if something is true and obvious then no one should be afraid to say it. That's my opinion.
If those million deaths, and that was using your figure,
assuming that we can multiply by four for the whole world with a population which is eight times that of the EU, the UK and the US.
So we're using half that because obviously the number of vaccinated, the number of vaccinations is not going to be as high in Africa, for example, or even in South America.
So use four, you're up to over a million deaths, and I just don't see how that's just the short term. And then we've got all the possible infertility, and then we've got long term deaths.
Steven, have you seen the substack that goes through day by day the Nuremberg proceedings? I just ran into that and I'll put it on there. There's a substack where they go day by day, every Nuremberg.
Yeah, fascinating. So that is actually what you're saying, Jessica, to sensitize people to the truth.
I mean, because that's what we're looking at. But guess what, Carrie, the doctors, and I am a doctor, so I can speak about my disappointments in the medical profession.
Oh, no problem. Your feelings weren't felt by a lot.
And human medical experimentation, because it looks bad for the medical profession. But actually, in my opinion, the reputation of doctors in the medical profession is shot after this.
And the only way that the public are going to trust doctors again is if good doctors come out and speak the truth and get the other doctors, hopefully, to join them.
You're right. All right, Steven, stop because Jessica has to go to bed.
Yep, but it seems very important.
Could I ask?
She's getting ready for bed right in front of your eyes, Steven.
This is very important.
She's starting to pull her top off. Come on, she's already let her hair down. What are you doing?
Hi, so Jessica, I know people are interested in this, but unfortunately, would you be prepared to work with us and expose these kinds of...I would be very interested in getting in contact with Vera Shirav.
Yeah, for sure. Well, actually, I'm not in contact with Vera yet. She's someone I'm still admiring from a distance, but I'm sure we're just one person separated.
I can contact Vera.
Great. Yeah. Okay, John, that's very important. I saw her give evidence to Rhiannon Fulmick and she was very impressive and she was right on the nail with the neurons across.
She's a lovely human being and she just has this amazing precision in her words. She doesn't mince and she's not...she's just...her delivery is very...it's impeccable. I think she's an amazing force.
Yeah.
She knows how to deliver the killer blow.
Come on, Steven, let her go to bed.
Okay.
Jessica.
Well, I want to thank you guys all for sticking with me for two hours. I really hope I did okay with your questions.
Yeah, you did great. You did awesome.
Oh, thank you. And yeah, I'm here regularly when you guys have your famous people on, so I guess I'll see you guys next week.
Steven, can you...
What's the name? Paul...sorry, I've forgotten his name now.
Paul Merrick.
Yeah, Morrick. Yes, Morrick.
Oh, he's next. Oh, good. I'll be here. I love him. He's a lovely human being.
All right, Steven. So, co-host Jessica and make me co-host now, Steven. And Jessica, well done. Great job. It's 1 AM, I presume, in Israel.
Yeah, it's 12.59 on the dot.
Perfect. Good. All right. Well, we got you the baby for one. Thank you very much on behalf of everybody. Thank you.
Thank you, Jessica.
See you soon. Greetings from Ottawa.
Bye, guys.
Bye.