1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:08
Ray, we're going to stop. Good evening. Christine is here. Christine, hello. We're all waving

2
0:00:08 --> 0:00:17
to you. You're the star of the show and we know how much in demand you are. So we want

3
0:00:17 --> 0:00:23
to respect your time, even though we love talking amongst ourselves, as you know. And

4
0:00:23 --> 0:00:27
it's great to have you back here again. I think this is your third time with us. So

5
0:00:28 --> 0:00:36
that's wonderful. Wait, still connecting. Connecting to audio, you are.

6
0:00:41 --> 0:00:48
Mouse problem, she says. I can't connect. Okay, we'll wait. That's okay.

7
0:00:48 --> 0:00:54
Don't worry, Christine. So we can see you, Christine, but we can't hear you.

8
0:00:54 --> 0:00:58
Tom, she's got some mouse problem. There's a rep running around in her mouse.

9
0:00:59 --> 0:01:02
We'll lip read. We'll lip read. That's it. We'll lip read.

10
0:01:05 --> 0:01:13
You can write on the screen. A little person doing sign language down beside her, you know.

11
0:01:13 --> 0:01:16
Christine, if you try again, maybe go out and come back in.

12
0:01:16 --> 0:01:26
Yes. So welcome, everybody. We'll do the formal start as soon as we get Christine back in with

13
0:01:26 --> 0:01:41
us. I want to bring to your attention the Steve Kirsch newsletter called Sanity Check. And one of

14
0:01:41 --> 0:01:49
the challenges that we all have is the fire hose of information that we're all getting.

15
0:01:49 --> 0:01:54
It's a little bit like being a politician. Even the lowest level politician in Australia gets

16
0:01:54 --> 0:02:00
bombarded by thousands of constituents. And most politicians, as Stephen has found, don't respond

17
0:02:00 --> 0:02:09
to their constituents anyway. Here's Christine back. Can she get a little bit of information

18
0:02:09 --> 0:02:18
she gets? Permute working. You want to try it on your phone, Christine?

19
0:02:27 --> 0:02:33
The other, so the Steve Kirsch newsletter, I want to show that to you just to bring it to your

20
0:02:33 --> 0:02:43
attention. It is masterful. And it's an excellent summary for all of you to share, all of you to

21
0:02:43 --> 0:02:51
have almost printed out. So he said he did this as a sanity check to see where we're at. Are we

22
0:02:52 --> 0:03:00
opposing the narrative sane? And Steve says, here's a list of data points that suggest that I'm sane

23
0:03:00 --> 0:03:10
in no particular order. And he goes through one, three, four, CDC hides from the facts. Five,

24
0:03:10 --> 0:03:15
the FDA's Peter Marks public is he'd do anything to reduce vaccine hesitancy.

25
0:03:15 --> 0:03:24
There are no debates. Number seven, that's a big issue. The VAERS analysis is ignored. The large

26
0:03:24 --> 0:03:29
number of black swan events, you know, hacking, so it's safe and effective. The messages from the

27
0:03:29 --> 0:03:38
grave from high profile people, the Doug Brignol test. Remember that? The super fit guy, Brignol

28
0:03:38 --> 0:03:42
challenged the vaccine and said, if he didn't die, people like me should apologize. He died

29
0:03:42 --> 0:03:48
shortly after getting his latest vaccine. The died suddenly Facebook group had over 300,000 members

30
0:03:48 --> 0:03:55
and was growing at 20,000 new people a day. Polling done through independent polling companies.

31
0:03:55 --> 0:04:02
The only the book turtles all the way down. Embarmer statistics, insurance company data,

32
0:04:02 --> 0:04:07
the McCullough assumption. This is important, everybody. If a healthy person suddenly dies

33
0:04:07 --> 0:04:13
and there's no antecedent disease, it's the vaccine until proven otherwise. That's the rule.

34
0:04:14 --> 0:04:20
Ignoring doctors who point out troubling safety statistics, extreme anecdotes, stories like six

35
0:04:20 --> 0:04:27
stents, Wayne Roo's wedding. The fires of Ace Tree trial had more deaths in the vaccine group,

36
0:04:27 --> 0:04:33
independent validation, Naomi Wolf's team. The people in charge keeping it wrong.

37
0:04:36 --> 0:04:40
Prominent people who once promoted the vaccine are safe and effective are now realizing their

38
0:04:40 --> 0:04:45
original based on trust. So I've seen Mel Hotchell, we've talked about him. Other countries are

39
0:04:45 --> 0:04:51
admitting their mistakes. Top doctors are calling for an end to booster mandates in published papers.

40
0:04:52 --> 0:04:58
A recent poll in Australia, my country showed huge dissatisfaction. I hear all the stories all the

41
0:04:58 --> 0:05:02
time about doctors who privately tell people that they're very worried by what they're seeing but

42
0:05:02 --> 0:05:10
keeping quiet to save their jobs. Okay. So what I'm saying is there are 30, 30 elements of sanity

43
0:05:11 --> 0:05:15
checks. It's on the Steve Kirsch newsletter. It's a wonderful resource. All you have to do is print

44
0:05:15 --> 0:05:21
that out, carry it in your pocket and when somebody says A or B, you just show them that.

45
0:05:22 --> 0:05:28
So I would recommend using it. If you're not ready for the conversation, then you lose the

46
0:05:28 --> 0:05:35
conversation when somebody says to you, oh, you're a nutcase. And so that's, that's what we have to do.

47
0:05:35 --> 0:05:40
That's what we have to be ready for the conversation. If we want to fight for

48
0:05:41 --> 0:05:47
truth, for justice, for freedom, which is why we're here. So useful resource.

49
0:05:49 --> 0:05:52
All right. Now, have we got Christine back yet?

50
0:05:54 --> 0:05:58
Visually, we have this. I'm not sure about the microphone.

51
0:05:58 --> 0:06:09
So Christine, there you are. Okay. So welcome. You got two minutes. Okay. She'll be here with us

52
0:06:09 --> 0:06:19
in two minutes. So has any, so the other thing to the other thing that this twice weekly meeting

53
0:06:19 --> 0:06:29
gives us is tools each time again, tools and people come up with ideas. So, so each one of us

54
0:06:30 --> 0:06:37
has to do what we see needs to be done in the way that we do locally. And then globally, we are

55
0:06:37 --> 0:06:43
mixing meeting globally and the leaflets strategy, Mark Dyer has taken some steps. I've been delayed

56
0:06:43 --> 0:06:50
by two weeks, but the leaflets strategy is being implemented so that we get the message out to

57
0:06:50 --> 0:07:00
people who may be woken up and physical leaflets work. So Charles, it's Charles, it's my wife,

58
0:07:00 --> 0:07:08
Hemmings, big push to get me to, to do it. She's, she's, she's the big push. Yeah. And look, if

59
0:07:08 --> 0:07:16
there's 10% opposing this evil narrative, 10% of humanity, let's say there's 4 billion adults on

60
0:07:16 --> 0:07:24
the planet. If 10% of people are on our side, that's 400 million people, which are very comfortable.

61
0:07:24 --> 0:07:29
We have got 400 million people on our side. And particularly when you look at the low vaccine,

62
0:07:30 --> 0:07:36
the low bio weapon take up in Africa, 400 million people just imagine.

63
0:07:36 --> 0:07:44
So just imagine if, if 10% of that 10%, if 1% of humanity, that's 40 million people handed out

64
0:07:45 --> 0:07:53
100 leaflets each physical leaflets work. And we just have to give those people on our side,

65
0:07:53 --> 0:08:01
something to do. That's what this meeting helps us to do. Christine has you, I see where, so,

66
0:08:02 --> 0:08:09
so my point is locally, you do what you see needs to be done. Everyone does, every one of us does it

67
0:08:09 --> 0:08:17
locally. And then globally, we have consistent messages going out. And as, as brother Alexis

68
0:08:17 --> 0:08:23
said on Sunday night, we're winning. They never expected this much pushback. Now, the fact that

69
0:08:23 --> 0:08:29
we're in the middle of a war, don't despair our job. And that's why we come to these twice weekly

70
0:08:29 --> 0:08:35
meetings. Our job is to maintain our own passion. Hence the red jacket read is the color of passion.

71
0:08:35 --> 0:08:40
You are passionate for truth and freedom and justice and ethics. That's why Stephen started

72
0:08:40 --> 0:08:47
this group. So, so there's no, it's all too hard. No bullshit. What about just think back to World

73
0:08:47 --> 0:08:53
War Two, just think back to World War One, they were every one of those wars, you know, the soldier

74
0:08:53 --> 0:08:59
on the fields was fighting for freedom. England didn't want to be taken over by Germany. Simple

75
0:08:59 --> 0:09:09
as that. So Christine, are you ready? No. Don't worry, Christine. What about you?

76
0:09:12 --> 0:09:17
That's all right, Christine will work it out. She's got, she's got, Lisa's wearing her red clogs.

77
0:09:18 --> 0:09:25
So the other element that we have, we've got, we need some fundraising while we're waiting.

78
0:09:25 --> 0:09:34
Shimon Yanovitz, we need just $3,000 more. Dan Craft has got some, has got a used piece of,

79
0:09:34 --> 0:09:41
a used microscope that he can get for about $3,000 to pay the customs and the like for Shimon

80
0:09:41 --> 0:09:48
Yanovitz. I bring it to your attention. I, the easiest way to do this is to send an email to

81
0:09:48 --> 0:09:53
Daniel Craft. I'll put his email address. If, if 20 of us put in a hundred dollars each,

82
0:09:54 --> 0:10:03
there's $2,000 or $150. Shimon, so if you are interested, send an email, I'll post

83
0:10:04 --> 0:10:09
Daniel's email address, please. We need, we need that last piece. That's something practical that

84
0:10:09 --> 0:10:16
we can do to help his work. Now, the other thing that, the other thing that I'm, that

85
0:10:18 --> 0:10:24
this group gives us an opportunity to explore is what other ideas have you had

86
0:10:25 --> 0:10:32
that people can be doing? And as a, you know, each one of us taking the steps has an impact.

87
0:10:32 --> 0:10:38
What would you like to see happening? And I suppose I wonder if there's anyone here from Alberta.

88
0:10:38 --> 0:10:45
I would love to see happening in Australia. What's happening in Alberta is, can anybody report on

89
0:10:45 --> 0:10:52
the premier of Alberta, Ray, you know, the, and the, and the rebel news request to the new

90
0:10:52 --> 0:10:58
premier of Alberta, who said that she promised if she gets into power, she will do certain things.

91
0:10:58 --> 0:11:03
Ray? Yes, that's actually very exciting. What's happened even over the weekend.

92
0:11:04 --> 0:11:11
Our premier, our new premier, Daniel Smith, and I just did a quick post in the chat there,

93
0:11:12 --> 0:11:22
has now told Alberta Health Services, who have been linked with World Economic Forum,

94
0:11:23 --> 0:11:29
that they will be disconnected. And she's essentially told the WEF to get lost.

95
0:11:30 --> 0:11:38
Pretty amazing. She is undertaking some other major endeavours to reform

96
0:11:39 --> 0:11:48
Alberta Health Services, collapse down the extremely bloated middle management system

97
0:11:48 --> 0:11:57
that has existed there, which has just really hindered our end product in terms of health

98
0:11:57 --> 0:12:09
services here. She is an absolute warrior. And she will become, I think, a really bright light

99
0:12:09 --> 0:12:19
in the Western world. We're currently in the stage of promoting her wildly. I will put it that way.

100
0:12:19 --> 0:12:27
Over the weekend, the United Conservative Party, which is currently the ruling party,

101
0:12:28 --> 0:12:43
elected nine board members to its board. There are 17 board positions. Nine of those were open

102
0:12:43 --> 0:12:55
for reelection for two-year terms. We took all nine of them. It was actually extremely amazing.

103
0:12:56 --> 0:13:05
I'm currently positioned as the vice president of policy and governance, which will deal with a lot

104
0:13:05 --> 0:13:14
of issues in terms of recommendations that go to government. We have a direct line with our premier,

105
0:13:15 --> 0:13:23
which is just exceptional. And basically, that's the amazing good news from Alberta.

106
0:13:23 --> 0:13:28
Great. Can I insert something here? Christine is showing up twice on my screen. One of them

107
0:13:29 --> 0:13:34
looks like it's working. I just want to make sure she doesn't get lost. Okay, we got it.

108
0:13:34 --> 0:13:40
Okay, keep an eye on her. Keep an eye on her. Yeah. So Christine had audio for a moment. She's

109
0:13:40 --> 0:13:47
working on it. She'll speak up when she's able. Christine, can you speak? I can hear you, at least.

110
0:13:47 --> 0:13:54
Can you hear me? Yeah, we can. Okay. We've got you twice, but that works okay. Christine.

111
0:13:54 --> 0:14:03
Yeah, I'm using the phone for audio and basically the laptop for video. Yeah. Good. Christine,

112
0:14:03 --> 0:14:10
thank you. Can I just ask Ray Charles? Ray, is Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta,

113
0:14:10 --> 0:14:14
the new premier of Alberta? She apologised for what had happened to the,

114
0:14:15 --> 0:14:19
she apologised to the unvaccinated, I believe, and to the people who've been injured,

115
0:14:20 --> 0:14:27
as I understood it. But is she the Danielle Smith who was in our group? That is correct. A year ago?

116
0:14:27 --> 0:14:37
Wow. Yeah, I invited her to be part of this group. She readily accepted and, you know,

117
0:14:38 --> 0:14:48
we correspond back and forth quite frequently. And so, you know, here's an example of our group

118
0:14:48 --> 0:14:58
having a major impact on political positioning. Christine has been an amazing example as well.

119
0:14:59 --> 0:15:04
I can't tell you how exciting it is to have someone like Christine

120
0:15:04 --> 0:15:11
standing up in the European Parliament and presenting an exceptionally good logical case.

121
0:15:12 --> 0:15:22
Premier Smith is doing the very same thing here in Alberta. We're just absolutely overjoyed with

122
0:15:22 --> 0:15:28
what's happening. Ray, what's her background? Was she a journalist or a lawyer? I don't remember.

123
0:15:28 --> 0:15:35
She was a journalist. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. Wow. Very good. Well, I'm glad to hear Ray.

124
0:15:35 --> 0:15:43
So watch for her over the next week. We're trying to get her position to appear on a major, major

125
0:15:44 --> 0:15:52
media outlet here shortly. And so Rebel News said, you promised to apologise when you got into power.

126
0:15:52 --> 0:15:57
You're in power. Will you apologise? And Danielle said, yes, we apologise. And Ray, as you see,

127
0:15:57 --> 0:16:02
I just bring that to everyone's attention. Everybody who lost their jobs in the health

128
0:16:02 --> 0:16:08
in any government position in Alberta is invited to come back and have their jobs back unjabbed.

129
0:16:09 --> 0:16:17
Okay. That's correct. And we're also looking for compensation for lost revenues for those

130
0:16:17 --> 0:16:25
individuals as well. Many of them were devastated by what happened. Yeah, that's true. And I just

131
0:16:25 --> 0:16:33
heard that the Supreme Court of New York, they just issued an order today that all employees that got

132
0:16:33 --> 0:16:38
laid off because they were unvaccinated have to be reinstated. And there will also be granted back

133
0:16:38 --> 0:16:45
pay. Wow. What was that, Christine? New York. Oh, yes. That's right. I read that too. Yeah. Yeah.

134
0:16:46 --> 0:16:52
Yeah. So it's starting. It's beginning. We're just good. Yep. It's just sad to say. All right, Christine.

135
0:16:53 --> 0:17:00
So let's get this show on the road. This wonderful show, the Stevens. See that as Ray says,

136
0:17:01 --> 0:17:08
we are dropping seeds. And as the Bible says, some seeds will sprout and some seeds won't,

137
0:17:08 --> 0:17:13
but there are many that are sprouting. There are so many pushbacks happening. So welcome everybody,

138
0:17:13 --> 0:17:19
particularly first timers. If this is your first time, if this is your virginal visit, please

139
0:17:20 --> 0:17:25
insert, please tell us about yourself. You're most welcome to share information about you.

140
0:17:25 --> 0:17:31
Put your name, put your name up on the screen. So we know we'll have Chris, listen to Christine

141
0:17:31 --> 0:17:36
as to what she's up to. This is a place of free speech, no censorship. And indeed,

142
0:17:37 --> 0:17:42
Piers Morgan last night, Christine was interviewing Yay, formerly Kanye West,

143
0:17:43 --> 0:17:48
and, you know, asking the question, well, what's the limits on free speech? And Yay says, what do

144
0:17:48 --> 0:17:53
you mean? Free speech is free speech. And we're going to have someone else deciding what you can

145
0:17:53 --> 0:17:59
say, what you can't say. This environment is a free speech environment with proper moderation.

146
0:17:59 --> 0:18:05
That's how, that's how Stephen and I run it. And we, and we make sure we lovingly brutal here.

147
0:18:05 --> 0:18:12
We come from love and not fear. And that's what this twice weekly meeting is about. Reinspiring

148
0:18:12 --> 0:18:17
you to not be fearful and to fight for what you believe as Bobby Kennedy says,

149
0:18:17 --> 0:18:22
what hill are you willing to die on? And there's another beautiful quote that said,

150
0:18:22 --> 0:18:29
you know, I'd rather die standing than live kneeling. You know, I like that idea. So

151
0:18:29 --> 0:18:34
Christine, you are a true warrior. Thank you for joining us. These meetings, everybody goes for

152
0:18:34 --> 0:18:39
two and a half hours. Tom Rodman has set up another telegram video group for those who have more time.

153
0:18:40 --> 0:18:45
And then Christine, we, as you know, we have Q&A after Christine's presentation. You can make your

154
0:18:45 --> 0:18:50
presentation as long as you like, and I'm sure we'll have a healthy discussion. Thank you again,

155
0:18:50 --> 0:18:56
Christine, for joining us and over to you. Yeah. Well, so first of all, I do appreciate,

156
0:18:56 --> 0:19:02
of course, this space of free speech, because as I always say, or as it has been said before,

157
0:19:02 --> 0:19:09
you can either talk about free speech or you have free speech. And as soon as you start talking about

158
0:19:09 --> 0:19:16
free speech, then you no longer have it. It's as simple as that. Yeah. Well, so I really cannot tell

159
0:19:16 --> 0:19:24
you any things, particular or spectacular news. The news I have, I've already put out in my videos.

160
0:19:24 --> 0:19:31
I'm pretty sure you're aware of it. So it was, of course, that Pfizer did admit they never even

161
0:19:31 --> 0:19:39
tested on transmission, which this entire lie was based on. So, and I did look into the

162
0:19:41 --> 0:19:48
plan, the action plan of the EU commission. And there are some things that are rather concerning,

163
0:19:49 --> 0:19:54
especially when they're talking about, it's all coming back. It's all in the plan for

164
0:19:55 --> 0:20:02
fall, winter 2023. So it's all coming back like the non-pharmaceutical measures, like lockdowns,

165
0:20:03 --> 0:20:11
wearing masks, mandates of masks, social distancing. They do want to avoid school closures,

166
0:20:11 --> 0:20:18
because they did kind of realize by now that that was a really bad idea, since students are really,

167
0:20:19 --> 0:20:26
yeah, they lost so much. There is discrepancy in their learning effort. So they do want to avoid

168
0:20:26 --> 0:20:36
that, but everything else will still be on. They will continue to make a real hard effort to get

169
0:20:36 --> 0:20:43
everyone vaccinated, starting by the ones who haven't even begun yet. They call them the

170
0:20:43 --> 0:20:51
hard to reach groups. And they want to come up with special kind of communication strategies

171
0:20:51 --> 0:21:00
and tactics to get these people in line as well. And of course, they're already coming out with the

172
0:21:00 --> 0:21:07
new narrative as to what to label these people. So the ones that are not vaccinated or hesitant

173
0:21:07 --> 0:21:13
about getting vaccinated, now even hesitant about getting the shot, the boosters or the updates,

174
0:21:13 --> 0:21:21
how they call it now, that of course is linked to narratives about being anti-Western, anti-EU.

175
0:21:22 --> 0:21:29
And of course, they dropped in the pro-Russian thing in there too. So if you don't get in line,

176
0:21:29 --> 0:21:34
and if you don't do what your government tells you in terms of getting your boosters for as

177
0:21:34 --> 0:21:40
many as they would tell you, then you are sure pro-Russian or anti-Western, whatever.

178
0:21:40 --> 0:21:48
So that's still all going on. And then of course, what they do have in there. Oh yeah, the three

179
0:21:48 --> 0:21:55
months, the German, Seck of Health, that was like a few months back, he was talking about,

180
0:21:56 --> 0:22:03
it was no longer fully vaxxed, it was then freshly vaxxed. And the definition of being

181
0:22:03 --> 0:22:13
freshly vaxxed is the last shot is no longer than three months back. So that idiot didn't come up

182
0:22:13 --> 0:22:19
with that himself. It says it in the commission proposal of the EU as well. So we are talking

183
0:22:19 --> 0:22:29
about now getting shots every three months, if that's their idea. And then of course, they do

184
0:22:29 --> 0:22:37
want to systematically vaccinate pregnant women. And they include them in the so-called

185
0:22:37 --> 0:22:45
risk groups among people over 60 years of age, or people with underlying conditions. So pregnant

186
0:22:45 --> 0:22:54
women are now a risk group for COVID. So that's why they should get or have priority with this

187
0:22:55 --> 0:23:01
new vaccine that's apparently coming out. I shouldn't call it a vaccine, it's really an injection.

188
0:23:02 --> 0:23:07
So yeah, that's what they're doing. That's what they're planning.

189
0:23:08 --> 0:23:12
As far as I know, there has been a WHO summit last week in Berlin.

190
0:23:14 --> 0:23:22
I have received some information, but the information is, I haven't been able to review

191
0:23:22 --> 0:23:29
the information yet. So I would not be able to speak on that in depth. But I could say

192
0:23:31 --> 0:23:36
they will continue to push with everything. And what they're doing now is they're talking about

193
0:23:36 --> 0:23:44
all these other kinds of pandemics that are going to hit us. So polio apparently is coming along

194
0:23:44 --> 0:23:52
again. And they kind of blame that on the fact that the vaccine hesitancy has now spread

195
0:23:52 --> 0:23:57
throughout the world. People don't trust the pharma anymore, don't trust the governments anymore.

196
0:23:57 --> 0:24:07
Yeah, well, guess why. But they will continue to push that. And that of course means that

197
0:24:08 --> 0:24:16
the authority that the WHO is supposed to get, which did not happen in July, it was luckily,

198
0:24:16 --> 0:24:22
didn't go through then, but they will continue to push for it. And their narrative or argument now is

199
0:24:24 --> 0:24:30
the reason that they weren't able to deal with COVID in a timely manner,

200
0:24:31 --> 0:24:35
and kind of contemplating the fact that it's been going on for two and a half years now.

201
0:24:35 --> 0:24:43
And the reason for that is, was the WHO simply did not have enough authority to address it in a

202
0:24:43 --> 0:24:50
proper way. And then of course, the nasty national states, all demanding their sovereignty and

203
0:24:50 --> 0:24:59
whatever. So that's what they will do next. And to get the governments all in line, to just endorse

204
0:24:59 --> 0:25:08
the WHO to be equipped with more authority. So in future pandemics, the WHO can just take over,

205
0:25:09 --> 0:25:15
and pretty much what they had planned on doing in the first place, they will continue to push that

206
0:25:15 --> 0:25:24
now. This is cooking on a rather large flame, a small flame for now, because they did realize,

207
0:25:24 --> 0:25:31
of course, they may have gone too far, may have been too pushy, may have taken it too far,

208
0:25:31 --> 0:25:38
too hasty about it. So they will scale it down just a bit. But in the background, everything is

209
0:25:38 --> 0:25:45
still continuing. And they will continue to do whatever they need to do to get everyone in line,

210
0:25:45 --> 0:25:51
and to push their sick agenda. That's pretty much what I can say for now.

211
0:25:51 --> 0:25:59
And Christine, can I ask you about the committee that started this latest

212
0:25:59 --> 0:26:12
series of events for you and Christian Therese? I watched that, and I could barely do it, but it

213
0:26:12 --> 0:26:18
was absolutely astonishing to me, the nonsense that they were talking about. And then you came

214
0:26:18 --> 0:26:23
up and said, I demand that you declare yourselves incompetent. And I thought, great!

215
0:26:25 --> 0:26:30
But she deliberately disobeyed the rules of the EU, as far as I could see.

216
0:26:31 --> 0:26:38
Yes, she did. Even though, of course, this doesn't go any further than this group.

217
0:26:39 --> 0:26:44
The point of order I raised, the article I based it on, I did kind of stretch it there too,

218
0:26:45 --> 0:26:51
I have to admit that. I just needed to find, I mean, this specific article pretty much only

219
0:26:51 --> 0:26:58
deals with competency issues among different committees. But, I mean, you know, they're doing

220
0:26:58 --> 0:27:03
whatever they want. So I figured, well, that's what it says in the article. So I can base my point of

221
0:27:03 --> 0:27:11
order on that. And my point really was to point out how ridiculous it all was, which it actually is.

222
0:27:12 --> 0:27:20
And to get a way of getting my colleagues to understand that we cannot do anything in this

223
0:27:20 --> 0:27:27
special committee, since we lack the authority to do anything, we cannot compel anyone to come in

224
0:27:27 --> 0:27:35
there. We ask questions, if they choose to answer, they do, if not, they don't. So it's really a

225
0:27:35 --> 0:27:43
ridiculous committee. And it was my way of pushing for a formal inquiry committee. And that's what

226
0:27:43 --> 0:27:53
we will continue to do. And we, if we get it all done, meet all the requirements, we should be able

227
0:27:53 --> 0:27:59
to get a vote on that in the December plenary, because the plenary will have to vote on it,

228
0:27:59 --> 0:28:07
to actually form such a committee. So, like I said, we might be able to get that vote in

229
0:28:08 --> 0:28:13
by December, the December plenary, and then we'll just take it from there. What we will also do in

230
0:28:13 --> 0:28:26
that committee is to push to CEO, Pfizer, Pfizer CEO will be invited again. So this time, I reckon

231
0:28:26 --> 0:28:32
the invitation to appear in this committee will be a little more sternly than the last time.

232
0:28:34 --> 0:28:39
What we try to do also is to get Ursula von der Leyen in front of that committee.

233
0:28:40 --> 0:28:49
That was debated today in an office meeting, you would call it behind the scenes.

234
0:28:50 --> 0:28:57
And that that did not find a majority yet. But we will keep pushing so that she will have to

235
0:28:57 --> 0:29:02
appear there too. So we can ask her some questions too. Christine, could you maybe explain for the

236
0:29:02 --> 0:29:11
people who don't know about the text messages? She refused to release and also Albert Bollow,

237
0:29:11 --> 0:29:18
Pfizer refused to release. But there were questions that Christine, I can't remember where I saw these.

238
0:29:18 --> 0:29:26
Why can't you push to have... So instead of pushing Pfizer to release the contracts,

239
0:29:27 --> 0:29:35
why on earth are the contracts not published by the EU? Yeah, that's just the thing.

240
0:29:36 --> 0:29:44
They kind of like say it's trade secrets and they don't want to release their pricing

241
0:29:45 --> 0:29:52
and all of that, which is a bunch of bogusness. I'm sorry, this is crap. I mean, we are elected

242
0:29:52 --> 0:30:00
representatives and we cannot do our job because our job is to basically justify whatever was

243
0:30:00 --> 0:30:06
decided here to our constituents and we can't do this if we don't have any information as to

244
0:30:06 --> 0:30:15
what they actually agreed upon. So they kind of still hide behind that. We will continue to push

245
0:30:15 --> 0:30:26
for that too. But about the text messages, that is really an interesting story. So the EU Commission

246
0:30:26 --> 0:30:33
is obligated to release all relevant documentation or whatever deals they're striking with whoever.

247
0:30:34 --> 0:30:42
And once they were asked to release those text messages, they simply said, well, no, they do not

248
0:30:42 --> 0:30:49
fall under the regulation of having to be provided because they are not... How do they call it? Oh,

249
0:30:49 --> 0:30:56
it's only short-lived documentation. So it's not really a document that they need to keep

250
0:30:56 --> 0:31:07
and need to provide to the public, which of course is bogus. So the point is these text messages were

251
0:31:07 --> 0:31:16
exchanged, that much is clear, prior to the actual negotiations of the contracts. God only knows

252
0:31:16 --> 0:31:24
what CEO Borla and Funderlion hatched up together there. And plus considering that her husband

253
0:31:25 --> 0:31:35
is part of a pharmaceutical company, I think they made like what, $3.5 billion on that deal,

254
0:31:35 --> 0:31:42
if not more than $35 billion. I don't remember. So this is something really fishy going on here,

255
0:31:42 --> 0:31:48
but she refuses to release those text messages since they, by her definition, do not

256
0:31:49 --> 0:31:57
fall under the regulation of having to be provided. And so our idea was to get Borla in

257
0:31:58 --> 0:32:06
because he was the other part of that text message conversation. So we wanted to ask him,

258
0:32:06 --> 0:32:15
but he had agreed to appear and last minute he kind of pulled out because I guess they thought

259
0:32:16 --> 0:32:19
where we were going with this. So he just dropped out and sent someone else.

260
0:32:21 --> 0:32:27
But Borla Funderlion, she's been known in Germany too. She was a member of government there too,

261
0:32:27 --> 0:32:33
in various positions. And this is not the first time that something like this is happening. The

262
0:32:33 --> 0:32:42
last time it was involving emails, which when she was supposed to supply them or provide them,

263
0:32:42 --> 0:32:46
they suddenly got deleted by accident, of course.

264
0:32:48 --> 0:32:52
Just so you know, you can never delete emails. They're always available for a,

265
0:32:54 --> 0:32:57
maybe difficult to get, but they can always be recovered.

266
0:32:57 --> 0:33:05
Yeah, I know. I know. Well, like I said, that's just Ursula Funderlion, but on that text messaging,

267
0:33:05 --> 0:33:14
we will get her because what has happened, the EU state attorney, they opened an investigation

268
0:33:14 --> 0:33:20
into these matters now. They're investigating the EU commission and investigating Ursula Funderlion.

269
0:33:21 --> 0:33:31
The Ombudspom, she is responsible for complaints from citizens about how the EU conducts their

270
0:33:31 --> 0:33:41
affairs. And she complained and raised an issue with that. And also the agency that is

271
0:33:41 --> 0:33:48
making sure that all the finances are correct. They also made an issue of this.

272
0:33:48 --> 0:33:53
So it's getting kind of tight for Ursula Funderlion by now.

273
0:33:54 --> 0:34:00
Yeah. So can I just ask you, Christine, so it's just been in the chat, well, I don't know,

274
0:34:01 --> 0:34:07
so I think it's Michelle, is it? So she says that nothing can be deleted on the internet,

275
0:34:07 --> 0:34:14
is actually deleted. Yeah. So you could push to get those emails published.

276
0:34:15 --> 0:34:19
Well, that's kind of milked out. Yeah, that's still milked. That's done with.

277
0:34:19 --> 0:34:23
Are there any emails between Funderlion and Brülo?

278
0:34:24 --> 0:34:30
And I would think so. And they were probably provided as requested.

279
0:34:31 --> 0:34:38
Okay. And there's nothing in those, of course. I haven't seen them, but the agencies that have

280
0:34:38 --> 0:34:45
seen them, had there been anything in there, they would have raised the alarm on that.

281
0:34:45 --> 0:34:53
Would they? So I think that the really important stuff is in those text messages,

282
0:34:53 --> 0:35:00
knowing fully well that she would not release those. Correct. Yeah. So how do you know the

283
0:35:00 --> 0:35:10
agencies would actually flag it up if they found something? Good question. But that's the agency

284
0:35:10 --> 0:35:16
that it's their job, basically, to check that everything has been done correctly.

285
0:35:16 --> 0:35:27
Yeah. Are they paid by the EU, Christine? Well, it's kind of like they are in charge of controlling

286
0:35:27 --> 0:35:36
EU commission. So they would say something. They would. Is this the audit part of the EU?

287
0:35:36 --> 0:35:45
Yeah, exactly. The seventh institution. Yeah. Yeah. So who is Dr Haas, by the way?

288
0:35:47 --> 0:35:53
He was on the committee. Dr Haas? I don't know. No clue. He was the guy in front of you,

289
0:35:54 --> 0:36:00
and you were concentrated on the chair, I think. But Dr Haas was to the right as you looked at them.

290
0:36:00 --> 0:36:12
Oh, yeah. He was. He was in EU case, but he was pathetic. Yeah. Yeah. To be honest,

291
0:36:12 --> 0:36:17
I don't remember. I really don't remember. You know, you just sit there, and there's so

292
0:36:17 --> 0:36:23
many information dropping on you, you know, and it's like, at the end, I really will have to

293
0:36:23 --> 0:36:29
recap what happened, you know, with the documentation I have from the committee.

294
0:36:29 --> 0:36:37
But things are happening so fast, so quickly. It's really sometimes hard to remember. But yeah,

295
0:36:37 --> 0:36:43
there was a guy that was just, you know, sitting there, and I was actually, I was getting ready

296
0:36:43 --> 0:36:50
to ask him a question, but then it wasn't my turn even anymore. There was no time left for whatever

297
0:36:50 --> 0:36:55
reason. So that sometimes happens whenever it's my time to ask a question. We suddenly had run out

298
0:36:55 --> 0:37:03
of time. That happens too. So, yeah, but... What struck me listening to all that nonsense

299
0:37:03 --> 0:37:11
was that there was so many damned regulations which he kept quoting. I know. And in addition

300
0:37:11 --> 0:37:16
to that, all the different languages and people complaining they hadn't got it in, what was it,

301
0:37:16 --> 0:37:22
Latvian? I can't remember which language, Slovakian? But it would be, oh no, Croatian it was actually.

302
0:37:24 --> 0:37:33
And so the possibility for mix-ups was huge. Was it designed like that? Why didn't they have one

303
0:37:33 --> 0:37:38
language like French or English, you know, instead of all the different languages of the...

304
0:37:39 --> 0:37:45
Well, that's, I mean, that's the huge problem with the EU. We do not have a common language,

305
0:37:45 --> 0:37:54
but yet they just, you know, think, yeah, well, but we rule them anyway. So when working here,

306
0:37:55 --> 0:38:01
every member of every state has the right to have these committee meetings and

307
0:38:01 --> 0:38:06
plenary meetings conducted in his language. And if that's not the case, then they will provide

308
0:38:06 --> 0:38:13
translation for it. But it is a huge problem. But it doesn't work, does it? I'm sorry? It doesn't work.

309
0:38:15 --> 0:38:21
So it's a multiple deniability then? Exactly. And, you know, even if you could translate a word

310
0:38:21 --> 0:38:27
literally, it will mean different things in different languages, depending on how it evolves,

311
0:38:27 --> 0:38:35
you know, the cultural context of it, whatever. So yes, it is a huge issue. I always call it,

312
0:38:35 --> 0:38:43
you know, the Babylonian confusion. That's what it is. Yeah. But they're banking on that. That's

313
0:38:43 --> 0:38:49
what they're banking on. They don't want people to understand them anymore. And people are not

314
0:38:49 --> 0:38:57
supposed to voice their political will, you know, which we are supposed to implement here.

315
0:38:57 --> 0:39:02
They aren't supposed to be able to communicate that to us anymore, because they don't care about

316
0:39:02 --> 0:39:08
people. That's the problem. They do not care. It was total confusion to an onlooker.

317
0:39:08 --> 0:39:15
So I was shocked at the level. And you were brilliant. And so was Christian Therese.

318
0:39:16 --> 0:39:23
And Ivan Sinčić as well. You three were the ones who made the best speeches, all on our side.

319
0:39:23 --> 0:39:31
And I just, whoa. So, yes, who was the chair of the committee? She was totally incompetent as well.

320
0:39:32 --> 0:39:37
Oh, she is. She has a push over though. She really is. I mean, you know, we kind of figure it out by

321
0:39:37 --> 0:39:45
now. If we say something and she interrupts or whatever, you know, we just blow her over.

322
0:39:45 --> 0:39:51
And she usually just sits there and does nothing. And at one time it was like she reprimanded

323
0:39:51 --> 0:39:58
Christian Therese for having spoken 20 seconds longer or 30 seconds longer than it was supposed

324
0:39:58 --> 0:40:03
to. And then she was going on and telling him, well, the next time I will deduct 40 seconds from

325
0:40:04 --> 0:40:11
your next speaking time. And then he went on for another three minutes telling her off how she is

326
0:40:11 --> 0:40:17
not supposed to do this and how she cannot do this. So she's a complete pushover. Yeah, she is.

327
0:40:17 --> 0:40:25
Is she Dutch? I'm sorry? Is she Dutch? Yeah, she is. Yeah, sorry, Belgian.

328
0:40:26 --> 0:40:33
Belgian, yeah, Flemish Belgian. Yeah. Who is Mrs Small? Was that clarified?

329
0:40:34 --> 0:40:42
Mrs Who? Small, the Pfizer executive. Oh, yeah, she was, she was, I think, the vice president of Pfizer.

330
0:40:42 --> 0:40:49
Wow. Who was sentenced, who, Borla sent instead of coming himself. She was terrible. She was trying

331
0:40:49 --> 0:40:55
to cozy up to the chair. I know. And the chair was allowing it.

332
0:40:56 --> 0:41:03
I know. See, that's what I keep saying. I mentioned it somewhere before. The chair

333
0:41:04 --> 0:41:10
considered to run or thought she should run this committee to protect them from our questions,

334
0:41:11 --> 0:41:17
which is not her job. She is supposed to conduct a proper meeting. But, you know, she's always kind

335
0:41:17 --> 0:41:22
of like, in the first couple of meetings. Oh, thank you so much for coming. She's saying.

336
0:41:23 --> 0:41:29
I know. It's like, yeah, but she's like, in the beginning, when she didn't realize she was

337
0:41:29 --> 0:41:33
basically outnumbered in that committee, because we all pushed to get on that committee.

338
0:41:35 --> 0:41:42
She was like, really, you know, constantly looking at how she, how she can cut us off

339
0:41:42 --> 0:41:49
when we're speaking. So it's like, yeah, she was, she was really annoyed by our presence.

340
0:41:50 --> 0:41:56
And she was really nervous whenever one of us, she would have to give the floor to one of us,

341
0:41:56 --> 0:41:58
because she knew, oh, this isn't going to go well.

342
0:41:58 --> 0:42:04
Exactly. I'm terrified when you started to speak. Christine, she looked terrified when you started

343
0:42:04 --> 0:42:12
to speak. I know. Yeah, she is terrified of me by now, because she knows she cannot shut me up.

344
0:42:13 --> 0:42:18
She tries to, but she cannot shut me up. Good. But Mrs. Small, I noticed, was Welsh.

345
0:42:20 --> 0:42:27
And I don't know what the qualifications were to be vice president of Pfizer, but she was just a

346
0:42:27 --> 0:42:33
useful idiot, as far as I could see. Yeah. Yeah. I'm giving a giving a speech to the EU

347
0:42:33 --> 0:42:38
about the importance of Pfizer in the last two and a half years. It was like a,

348
0:42:38 --> 0:42:44
it was like an advertisement. I know. I know. I recommend everybody on this call watches it.

349
0:42:45 --> 0:42:51
Yeah. But that's what that committee was supposed to be. It wasn't supposed to be a committee to

350
0:42:51 --> 0:42:59
get answers for the people. It was a committee to find out at what, what did they do wrong

351
0:42:59 --> 0:43:05
when failing to get people what they wanted them to do. That's what they were trying to find out.

352
0:43:06 --> 0:43:12
How could they become better in dictating to people what to do? You know, that was,

353
0:43:12 --> 0:43:19
was their objective. But we flew into hell. I don't usually comment on physical appearance,

354
0:43:19 --> 0:43:27
but what a specimen the Welsh lady was. Looked as though she drank too much C2H5,

355
0:43:28 --> 0:43:34
C2H5 OH to me. Sorin would like to speak. He said, can I speak?

356
0:43:35 --> 0:43:39
Keep going, stay with your questions. And then we'll do the questions in the normal force.

357
0:43:39 --> 0:43:46
Don't worry about that. So we think that Mrs Small is vice president of Pfizer of a section,

358
0:43:46 --> 0:43:50
because if you remember, Mike Eden is a vice president, was a vice president too,

359
0:43:51 --> 0:43:57
of the respiratory section, I think. So I just wonder whether she's just one of the vice

360
0:43:57 --> 0:44:03
presidents, but I wonder how many vice presidents they've got. I can, I can chime in. There's

361
0:44:03 --> 0:44:10
probably about 70. I had to write a lot of recommendations for a person to be promoted

362
0:44:10 --> 0:44:17
to vice president. It can't be that high a position. No. Well, I think that lady would

363
0:44:17 --> 0:44:25
have struggled to get a university degree, but maybe I'm harsh. Charles? Okay. Well, I haven't

364
0:44:25 --> 0:44:29
finished, but never finished. Well, if you've got another couple, you've got a couple of questions.

365
0:44:29 --> 0:44:34
If you've got a question, ask because we do the normal way. It's your privilege to ask the first

366
0:44:34 --> 0:44:39
questions and then it's my privilege to ask the next question. And then we'll go to Peter Hooger

367
0:44:39 --> 0:44:49
from Wales. I'm okay for the moment. Okay. Good. So, so Christine, what's your sense of your

368
0:44:49 --> 0:44:55
colleagues, you know, in terms of earlier this year, there weren't many of you and, you know,

369
0:44:56 --> 0:45:01
then we have stories like Alberta, we have the Australian government report from a very high

370
0:45:01 --> 0:45:08
level bureaucrat about the amazing failings of state and federal governments in Australia

371
0:45:08 --> 0:45:16
in the response. So, so what's, you know, with your EU colleagues, are the numbers on your side

372
0:45:16 --> 0:45:23
increasing? That's the essence of what I'd like to understand. Yeah. Okay. It's in the beginning,

373
0:45:24 --> 0:45:32
it was just really a very small minority. You know, you spoke to colleagues on the hallway

374
0:45:32 --> 0:45:40
when you met them, but no one really wanted to say anything about it. So, and this whole thing

375
0:45:40 --> 0:45:46
started with four, four of us, four MEPs, we started out. So there was Christian Turhasch,

376
0:45:46 --> 0:45:54
that was Ivan Sinčić, that was myself and that was Francesca Donato. And yeah, it was just the

377
0:45:54 --> 0:46:03
four of us. And then it just took off from there. And in the first few months, there wasn't

378
0:46:03 --> 0:46:10
really much happening. They did take note of the fact that we, yeah, basically,

379
0:46:11 --> 0:46:17
plow in all records on our social media, staff throughout the house, they contacted us.

380
0:46:19 --> 0:46:24
And suddenly, you know, we walked through the building. I mean, there were people left and

381
0:46:24 --> 0:46:31
right just acknowledging us, giving us thumbs up. And it was many staff though. And yeah, well,

382
0:46:31 --> 0:46:38
then things started shifting. And we got these colleagues asking us about, you know,

383
0:46:39 --> 0:46:45
what made us do it? And, you know, how do we get started? And what can they do to help us?

384
0:46:45 --> 0:46:53
So we started expanding. So by now, we are 12 MEPs who are willing to show their face

385
0:46:53 --> 0:47:02
in public and speak up about it. And but in the background, there is a lot more MEPs, but they're

386
0:47:02 --> 0:47:13
not yet willing to speak up about it. They have concerns that their parties will not like them

387
0:47:13 --> 0:47:19
anymore. They won't get reelected on the list. And you know, that whole thing. So this is happening.

388
0:47:19 --> 0:47:27
But in this committee, this is actually rather unique, because usually, in the committees,

389
0:47:27 --> 0:47:34
we are completely outnumbered. So you have like 38 committee members, and we're sitting there with

390
0:47:34 --> 0:47:42
three or four people max. So on this committee, it's different, though. I wouldn't say that they

391
0:47:42 --> 0:47:49
don't even have the majority anymore. They are way outnumbered. And it's now even MEPs from the

392
0:47:49 --> 0:47:56
Greens and from the left that are critical too. But like I said, they face some repercussions

393
0:47:56 --> 0:48:03
in their within their parties. They are doing a good job on the on the committee right now.

394
0:48:03 --> 0:48:10
But behind the scenes, at least we've been told they have to answer to their party to their group

395
0:48:10 --> 0:48:15
what they the kind of questions they ask in this committee meeting. But like I said,

396
0:48:15 --> 0:48:22
the situation is not as desperate in this committee. And things are, in fact, changing.

397
0:48:23 --> 0:48:30
And you kind of can see that because now when we walk through the building, we do not only get

398
0:48:30 --> 0:48:38
recognition from staff who suffer probably the most from all of this madness, but from other MEPs as

399
0:48:38 --> 0:48:48
well. So things are changing. Luckily, they do. I would have hoped to have this process starting

400
0:48:48 --> 0:48:54
a little sooner. But it's better late than never, I guess. Thank you. That's wonderful. That's

401
0:48:54 --> 0:48:59
wonderful news. And it's a beautiful example to all of us, just like Danielle Smith, that we just

402
0:48:59 --> 0:49:07
keep at it. We keep at it. We get exactly. Now, one other one other issue that Peter Huger,

403
0:49:07 --> 0:49:11
before we go to him, and he's a lawyer, Anna de Buisere has got her hand up, we'll get to her.

404
0:49:11 --> 0:49:18
Christine, on this issue of of Pfizer contracts not being disclosed is relevant to all of us on

405
0:49:18 --> 0:49:25
this call for our respective countries. And I urge all of you to be aware that under constitutional

406
0:49:25 --> 0:49:31
law, there may well be some angles to take, because government says it's commercial in confidence.

407
0:49:31 --> 0:49:37
This bullshit, it's total bullshit. Because if you're spending if you want government money,

408
0:49:37 --> 0:49:41
nothing that none of your contracts should be commercial, it should be in confidence,

409
0:49:41 --> 0:49:48
except a particular patent. And even if it's a patent, the patent is published. So as a matter

410
0:49:48 --> 0:49:54
of constitutional law, all of us should do the exploration. I don't expect you, Christine, to

411
0:49:54 --> 0:50:00
comment on that. But I really urge you to find lawyers who can attack that angle. I'm pushing

412
0:50:00 --> 0:50:06
that angle here in Australia as well. Right. So so they cannot say, Oh, you're you as a taxpayer,

413
0:50:06 --> 0:50:12
are not in charge to have that information. I know. I mean, we are we are pushing for that.

414
0:50:12 --> 0:50:18
We are working on that. And the thing is, up until now, like I said, it's changing now,

415
0:50:18 --> 0:50:27
but up until now, it was it was really difficult, because public opinion was not on our side on that.

416
0:50:27 --> 0:50:34
So if we, you know, criticize that we hadn't been provided with the with the contents of the of the

417
0:50:34 --> 0:50:41
contracts yet. And, you know, people were immediately labeling you as a covid yet.

418
0:50:41 --> 0:50:49
And, you know, you're just trying to kill people. It just last week, we had a rally, a protest,

419
0:50:49 --> 0:50:54
really. And there was a guy who was running around accusing all of us we had killed thousands and

420
0:50:54 --> 0:51:02
thousands of people, you know. So it really was difficult. And as long as public opinion

421
0:51:03 --> 0:51:08
is behind government, you can raise whatever issue you want. You can, you know,

422
0:51:09 --> 0:51:17
ask them whatever they will not do it. They will start moving once public opinion pushes them to.

423
0:51:17 --> 0:51:23
And that, you know, it's a long process. But I think we are getting there and we're seeing

424
0:51:23 --> 0:51:29
first results. Excellent. Excellent point, Christine. Hence the leaflet strategy, everybody.

425
0:51:29 --> 0:51:35
OK, Peter Hogan, next question, then Sorin. Brilliant. Thank you, Charles. And once again,

426
0:51:35 --> 0:51:39
Christine, lovely to speak to you and thank you for everything you do. You don't realize how much

427
0:51:40 --> 0:51:46
you lift our hearts and you give us hope because we are the little people that are being harmed.

428
0:51:46 --> 0:51:51
And you are a big person that is representing us. Unfortunately, the people in our country, apart from

429
0:51:52 --> 0:51:56
in Ray Strom's case at the moment, he's got somebody in high office

430
0:51:56 --> 0:52:03
looking good and hopefully they'll help us, you know. But at the moment, we've got a problem.

431
0:52:03 --> 0:52:10
And I think that in the absence of a military paramilitary or even a police coup, because our

432
0:52:12 --> 0:52:19
government and parliament is inert, I feel that the very medium that is frustrating us,

433
0:52:20 --> 0:52:26
mainstream media, the news, social media, Facebook, etc., with all their controlling

434
0:52:26 --> 0:52:32
and their lies, but they are key in this war. We all know that they are controlled.

435
0:52:33 --> 0:52:39
So, Christine, I'll give you an example. Sky News reported today that they've recognized the

436
0:52:39 --> 0:52:46
Sir Christopher Chope MP. I'm sure you know him. His all-party parliamentary group, which convened

437
0:52:46 --> 0:52:54
last week and it reconvened. It convened on the day that Liz Truss fell on her sword or was thrown

438
0:52:54 --> 0:53:02
onto her sword. And that just covered the all-party parliamentary group hearing completely.

439
0:53:02 --> 0:53:07
And then they had another one yesterday. I've heard nothing much from them.

440
0:53:07 --> 0:53:12
Apart from today, Sky News reporting that the UK government will not open an inquiry into the

441
0:53:12 --> 0:53:18
vaccine damage. I posted the link earlier. Now, the Daily Mail, however, they covered

442
0:53:18 --> 0:53:25
Sir Christopher Chope's APPG, all-party parliamentary group, hearing his demands for

443
0:53:25 --> 0:53:33
vaccine injury clinics to be held at hospitals, etc., the same as vaccine injection clinics.

444
0:53:33 --> 0:53:42
So they are reporting a lot more at the moment. The truth, if you like, our side. So my question,

445
0:53:42 --> 0:53:48
how can we, and I mean you and your people, and the more powerful people like the PM of Alberta,

446
0:53:48 --> 0:53:55
how can they get more earth-shattering mainstream media coverage to wake more people up to the truth?

447
0:53:58 --> 0:54:02
Ah, that's a good question. If I knew the answer to that, we didn't have any problems.

448
0:54:03 --> 0:54:10
Is there any way, apart from I feel that the newspapers are moving slowly.

449
0:54:10 --> 0:54:10
Yes, they are.

450
0:54:10 --> 0:54:16
They have a very cultural saying in Britain called covering your ass. I think they're doing

451
0:54:16 --> 0:54:25
that a little bit at the moment because they believe that public opinion is moving. So how

452
0:54:25 --> 0:54:28
can we give it a kick up that ass, Christine?

453
0:54:28 --> 0:54:36
Well, like I said, I mean, we've pretty much done all we could. So now it's really up. We need to

454
0:54:36 --> 0:54:44
keep pushing, obviously. And we will do that. We will do that in the committee. On social media,

455
0:54:44 --> 0:54:52
I mean, YouTube just deleted another video of mine. I got a lawyer involved and he wrote the

456
0:54:52 --> 0:54:56
letter. And then the two videos they had deleted before, they just unblocked again. And now they

457
0:54:56 --> 0:55:04
deleted the third one. So anyway, it's like, yeah, they're trying to do whatever they can to kind of

458
0:55:06 --> 0:55:15
prevent from what's going to happen anyway, or to prolong it even. But the corporate

459
0:55:15 --> 0:55:20
media, like the newspapers and TV stations and so on, I mean, they rely on people wanting to watch

460
0:55:20 --> 0:55:29
them and wanting to read them. And I do notice a shift in there too. They are starting to report

461
0:55:29 --> 0:55:36
on vaccine injuries and pretty much questioning what's going to happen. And I think that's

462
0:55:36 --> 0:55:45
they are starting to report on vaccine injuries and pretty much questioning the measures,

463
0:55:45 --> 0:55:53
the restrictions and all of that. They're starting now. We see the beginning of it.

464
0:55:55 --> 0:56:03
My biggest fear only is that by the time that all of this will be out in the open and will be on

465
0:56:03 --> 0:56:11
broad daylight, by that time, people will have completely other problems. And that's kind of

466
0:56:11 --> 0:56:17
like what the governments are banking on now too, I think, with fall coming, not knowing how to pay

467
0:56:18 --> 0:56:25
the energy prices, inflation, not knowing where to get food from. I was shopping last Saturday.

468
0:56:26 --> 0:56:32
Usually I don't shop anymore. My daughter does something was missing. And I was just shocked to

469
0:56:32 --> 0:56:41
see these stores. I mean, the shelves were emptied. They simply don't have stuff anymore to put on

470
0:56:41 --> 0:56:50
the shelves. So in a few weeks, people will have other problems and they will no longer care

471
0:56:50 --> 0:56:57
what the government did the past two and a half years. And by the time this next crisis is over,

472
0:56:58 --> 0:57:04
people have forgotten. I mean, it's not the first time that something like this happens. People

473
0:57:04 --> 0:57:14
forget. They always forget. And it's beyond me how anyone could forget anything like that.

474
0:57:15 --> 0:57:22
I don't get it, but it will happen again. Yep. Well, when their children have died and their

475
0:57:22 --> 0:57:29
grandchildren have died, they won't forget. And I bring to everyone's attention that the legal

476
0:57:29 --> 0:57:35
system, whilst corrupted to a large degree with judges influenced by government and public opinion,

477
0:57:36 --> 0:57:43
when the grandchildren of judges start dying, the judges will change their behaviour as well.

478
0:57:44 --> 0:57:52
So, you know, and it is my view that every case, the lawyer for our side should be number one,

479
0:57:52 --> 0:58:00
asking the judge to recuse themselves if they've taken the jabs. They should, and the argument

480
0:58:00 --> 0:58:07
should be put. Doesn't matter if it loses. It should be put. Number two, lawyers on our side

481
0:58:07 --> 0:58:14
must speak the truth. And Brother Alexis Buñolo on Sunday pointed out to us that what the Bible

482
0:58:14 --> 0:58:21
says, the truth is a sword, but you have to pick it up. And if you don't speak truth in court,

483
0:58:21 --> 0:58:28
you won't get the impact. And that truth is that counsel for our side has to point out to the judge,

484
0:58:28 --> 0:58:32
Your Honour, the evidence shows that your grandchildren will die if they have this

485
0:58:32 --> 0:58:39
bio weapon injected. And it doesn't matter if the judge says you are in contempt, doesn't matter.

486
0:58:39 --> 0:58:46
And so each one of us doing these steps, just like Christine is showing us, helps the process. And

487
0:58:46 --> 0:58:51
when more judges turn, because Christine, you're right, in Alberta, I wonder how the judges will

488
0:58:51 --> 0:58:57
behave because of this shift of Danielle. You watch what that ripple effect is. Okay, on we go.

489
0:58:57 --> 0:59:01
Sorin, welcome. This is your first time asking a live question. Is that correct?

490
0:59:03 --> 0:59:06
Yes, it is correct. I've been here from the initial group,

491
0:59:07 --> 0:59:14
doctors for COVID ethics. I think it was last year. And lately, I've been diluting my

492
0:59:14 --> 0:59:22
participation due to other activities. Now, I'm from Israel, and I'm one of the founders of

493
0:59:22 --> 0:59:31
a professional front for ethics. And one of our members is disclosed and then

494
0:59:33 --> 0:59:39
showed the cover up of the Israeli Ministry of Health about the

495
0:59:40 --> 0:59:49
side effects, severe side effects of the jab. And my question is, Christine, if you would like some

496
0:59:49 --> 0:59:57
cooperation from her because she has a lot of information about the material of Pfizer and

497
0:59:58 --> 1:00:05
some documents from the FDA and so on. And I know you have an ongoing investigation where there is

498
1:00:06 --> 1:00:16
this lady from Romania, Laura Condruza, if I'm right. And maybe there's a place for some

499
1:00:17 --> 1:00:23
cooperation between those two ladies. And then another question is,

500
1:00:24 --> 1:00:34
beside the group of MEPs like you that are non-aligning with the narrative,

501
1:00:34 --> 1:00:44
are there any governments at all that are trying to break out of this kind of siege?

502
1:00:46 --> 1:00:56
And last question first, not that I know of. I mean, even thinking about governments that would,

503
1:00:56 --> 1:01:06
you know, be rather more along my side of the political scale than others. And it would be

504
1:01:07 --> 1:01:20
probably the Polish government, Hungary, Viktor Orban. But no, I couldn't say that they

505
1:01:21 --> 1:01:30
said anything along the lines that whatever was done was not correct. So I don't, unfortunately,

506
1:01:30 --> 1:01:37
I don't see any signs as far as European governments are concerned that they would

507
1:01:38 --> 1:01:46
shift their opinion on that. I don't see any governments. Sorry. Yeah, about the documentation

508
1:01:46 --> 1:01:53
or that contact you may have about having the FDA and Pfizer documentation. That would be great

509
1:01:53 --> 1:02:02
if you could forward this to me. I will review it or have my colleagues do it,

510
1:02:03 --> 1:02:11
you know, if it's above, basically above my pay grade even. So yeah, absolutely. I would appreciate

511
1:02:11 --> 1:02:21
that. Can you leave me a contact? If you put your email address into the chat, sorry, and we'll make

512
1:02:21 --> 1:02:26
sure that Christine gets it. Well, okay. If you could email me, sorry, and then it doesn't get

513
1:02:26 --> 1:02:35
forgotten. Yeah. Okay. So in the chat or to send it to you? Just email me and remind me that you

514
1:02:35 --> 1:02:43
want to speak to Christine and I'll just. Okay. Okay. Very good. Okay. Thanks. Bye bye. Very good.

515
1:02:43 --> 1:02:50
And, and sorry, just before you do go, a question to you is being put to us that, you know, Israel

516
1:02:50 --> 1:02:56
is being, is being, has been so overjabbed. It's being, you know, it's, it's the example to the,

517
1:02:56 --> 1:03:00
to the globalist of how to wipe out a population. Is that true or what?

518
1:03:02 --> 1:03:10
Well, it used to be true. It's not true anymore because the, the, a hesitancy has increased.

519
1:03:11 --> 1:03:22
And if we had something like a 4.8 million individuals being vaccinated with the first

520
1:03:22 --> 1:03:34
and second dose, a so-called vaccine, it's not a vaccine by, by far. Now it, even, even though it

521
1:03:34 --> 1:03:46
was approved for children, six months to five years old, it is less, it is less than half a mil.

522
1:03:48 --> 1:03:54
And really it's, it's, it's dropping, it's dropping and they don't really know how to do,

523
1:03:54 --> 1:04:02
what to do. And now they're trying to combine it with a, with a flu shot to have a dual, dual,

524
1:04:02 --> 1:04:12
so-called vaccine and about, and about the polio that was mentioned here before in Christine's

525
1:04:13 --> 1:04:23
presentation. We had a short spike of polio eruption here, but it happened

526
1:04:23 --> 1:04:34
it happened just after they, they had some, some, you know, see the oral, the stock,

527
1:04:34 --> 1:04:42
the oral vaccine, they use it. So they had a short period of use and shortly after there was a burst

528
1:04:42 --> 1:04:51
of, of cases. And then it was stopped again. It was the, the weakened virus. It wasn't the,

529
1:04:52 --> 1:05:04
the dead, dead virus. So they're trying all kinds of tricks to lure people into getting the, the

530
1:05:04 --> 1:05:11
jobs. It doesn't work. It doesn't work anymore. And next week we're going to have an election.

531
1:05:11 --> 1:05:17
So we'll see all that is wonderful. Soren, that is wonderful news. Everybody.

532
1:05:17 --> 1:05:23
That is wonderful news that just please note that huge jab hesitancy in Israel. Soren,

533
1:05:23 --> 1:05:31
thank you for sharing that. Yeah. Also, but I also urge Christine to use, to use this information and

534
1:05:33 --> 1:05:40
try to put this in, in, in the mainstream media, especially this, this candle that came out

535
1:05:41 --> 1:05:46
when, when the ministry of health was exposed, was exposed by trying to cover up the

536
1:05:47 --> 1:05:54
severe side adverse effects. Because we've been trying, Aaron's theory already mentioned it and

537
1:05:55 --> 1:06:02
but he's in the United States. I guess you need some support in, in, in Europe. Well about the,

538
1:06:02 --> 1:06:12
the adverse side effects. I have been commenting on that for, oh gosh, I don't know even how long,

539
1:06:12 --> 1:06:18
because you can, you can actually see it in the data. When you look at EMA, there is,

540
1:06:19 --> 1:06:27
you look just the first seven months of the, the mRNA rollout, you had 20 times more severe

541
1:06:27 --> 1:06:36
side effects and 23 more, 23 times more death than all other vaccines combined over the last

542
1:06:36 --> 1:06:44
20 years. But you can immerse it down to people's ears. It does not resonate. They don't get it.

543
1:06:44 --> 1:06:50
It's being dismissed as fake news. It's da da da, whatever. And I mean, I've been saying this for so

544
1:06:50 --> 1:06:56
long in committee. I don't know how many times I've mentioned. No, no, but Christine, what I meant is

545
1:06:56 --> 1:07:03
we exposed, there was a zoom meeting, a secret, not secret, but it was supposed to be confidential

546
1:07:03 --> 1:07:13
zoom meeting of the Ministry of Health seniors and somebody leaked it out. And it's leaked to us.

547
1:07:14 --> 1:07:19
Okay. Okay. So we can, you can use this one. Okay. To show, to show

548
1:07:19 --> 1:07:28
Okay. Yeah. This is something to, this, this we are trying to resonate because, you know,

549
1:07:28 --> 1:07:36
it's the rumble, all the, the small media. Okay. But we need to resonate it and to bring it at

550
1:07:36 --> 1:07:44
least to one or two mainstream media channels. Yeah. If you could get me that, then I will get

551
1:07:44 --> 1:07:50
I will, I will, I will try and because it's in Hebrew and I'll try to see if there is something

552
1:07:50 --> 1:07:56
with the, with the English subtitles. Okay. Okay. Excellent. Okay. I'll, I'll send, I'll send the

553
1:07:56 --> 1:08:04
Stephen Frost my email address and forward it to you. Actually, you know what? I could just put my

554
1:08:04 --> 1:08:11
email address in the chat right here. Okay. Christine, if you're happy to do that. Yeah.

555
1:08:13 --> 1:08:17
Okay. So that's right, Christine, if you put your email in the chat, Christine,

556
1:08:17 --> 1:08:22
that's the easiest of people can send that. Soren, wonderful news. Well done. Great to have you here.

557
1:08:24 --> 1:08:29
Thank you. So James Gorgusky, another warrior. We're all warriors on this call.

558
1:08:30 --> 1:08:34
Um, Christine, it's an honor to meet you here. I'm going to dive right in. Everything you've done has

559
1:08:34 --> 1:08:40
been fantastic. And we're on the same team. I would like to bring you some evidence. I'm going to put

560
1:08:40 --> 1:08:46
my information in the chat and hopefully you'll be able to save it. And I obviously now have your

561
1:08:46 --> 1:08:52
email, you have mine. Hopefully the communication will continue. There's, it's highly unlikely that

562
1:08:52 --> 1:08:57
it's highly unlikely that you're aware of what I'm about to say. If you are, that's wonderful.

563
1:08:58 --> 1:09:07
The WHO actually Tedros just recently created a review committee essentially to take over the

564
1:09:07 --> 1:09:13
negotiations that are supposed to be done by the delegates through the working group for amendments

565
1:09:13 --> 1:09:19
to the international health regulations. This week, as we speak, they're having quote unquote,

566
1:09:19 --> 1:09:29
private meetings to discuss 12, I'm sorry, 14 nations proposed amendments to the international

567
1:09:29 --> 1:09:38
health regulations. Um, it's very clear that those documents are being kept hidden at the moment. Um,

568
1:09:39 --> 1:09:48
one of the folks that I know in the UK just this morning got a FOIA request response saying,

569
1:09:48 --> 1:09:51
yes, we have those documents. They do exist, but you can't have them.

570
1:09:52 --> 1:10:00
And the most important aspect of it for you, I believe, is that the Czech Republic submitted

571
1:10:00 --> 1:10:09
amendments on behalf of the EU. And so my request to you, if you would be so kind is to see if you

572
1:10:09 --> 1:10:17
could obtain the documents that the WHO is obligated. And I have evidence that they clearly have

573
1:10:18 --> 1:10:27
taken the 14 proposals from the 14 nations and shared it with all 194 member nations. So,

574
1:10:27 --> 1:10:35
you know, every nation in Europe, it's not that the EU votes in the WHO, but yet the Czech Republic

575
1:10:35 --> 1:10:42
spoke on behalf of the EU nations. And it's like, well, you know, where were those secret negotiations

576
1:10:42 --> 1:10:49
giving the Czech Republic the okay to speak on behalf of all of Europe? Um, those documents

577
1:10:49 --> 1:10:59
are currently being, um, discussed in private by a appointed review committee that arguably

578
1:11:00 --> 1:11:06
Tedros has stuck into the middle of the negotiating process to try to control it,

579
1:11:06 --> 1:11:12
where it's supposed to be a technical advisory committee that after all of the negotiations

580
1:11:12 --> 1:11:19
have happened, then the review committee would advise on the dotting of the I's and the crossing

581
1:11:19 --> 1:11:26
of the T's and all that sort of stuff. It appears that there may be some conflict amongst the 14

582
1:11:26 --> 1:11:33
nations, North versus South, you know, colonialistic behavior via, you know, they're all fighting for

583
1:11:33 --> 1:11:38
equity. And so my simple request, and, you know, I'm at your service, you've got my contact

584
1:11:38 --> 1:11:45
information, if there's anything I can do to help you. Yeah, absolutely. One of the contact people

585
1:11:45 --> 1:11:52
was at, I know someone very well who was at the Global Health Summit, so she can give you a report

586
1:11:52 --> 1:12:02
or your staff report on all of that. The amendments proposed by 14 nations should be publicly available.

587
1:12:02 --> 1:12:07
And if you could help make them public, that would be spectacular. Okay. And Christine, can I ask you,

588
1:12:08 --> 1:12:15
Christine, can it possibly be constitutional or whatever it's called for the EU, for the, for the

589
1:12:15 --> 1:12:26
Czech Republic to be secretly dealing with this on behalf of the EU? Did you know that? No, I didn't

590
1:12:26 --> 1:12:31
know that. That's what I was just going to come back to. So if I understood that correctly.

591
1:12:33 --> 1:12:41
The Czech Republic submitted these amendments on behalf of all EU member states or on behalf of

592
1:12:41 --> 1:12:50
only 14 member states? No, there were 14 countries from around the world, the Czech Republic,

593
1:12:50 --> 1:12:55
and all of the documents are in what I sent you. And if anybody has any questions, by all means,

594
1:12:55 --> 1:12:58
anybody can call me anytime. I'd be happy to explain it and clarify and give them a briefing,

595
1:12:58 --> 1:13:09
all that stuff. Four of the 14 submitted on behalf of a group of nations. The Czech Republic

596
1:13:09 --> 1:13:13
submitted on behalf of, I'm not blaming the Czech Republic for doing anything bad. It's just that,

597
1:13:13 --> 1:13:21
you know, they're speaking for a group of nations. Yes. James, I am from the Czech Republic. Maybe I

598
1:13:21 --> 1:13:27
can explain. It's because the Czech Republic is presiding the European Union at the moment.

599
1:13:27 --> 1:13:32
That may very well be why they chose. Yeah, they have the presidency for six months.

600
1:13:33 --> 1:13:39
So one would think that there was some discussion. That doesn't give us the opportunity to secret.

601
1:13:39 --> 1:13:45
Well, I don't know whether it's in secret. Okay. But that's what I'm sorry. I think the point is

602
1:13:45 --> 1:13:55
this. 14 amendments. That's what you said were being proposed for 14 proposals from 14 nations

603
1:13:55 --> 1:14:02
with multiple articles probably being amended in each. Right. Okay. So maybe the number 14 is

604
1:14:02 --> 1:14:13
coincidental. So what was happening in July with the world, the WHO World Summit, they were going

605
1:14:13 --> 1:14:22
to discuss 14 amendments to the WHO treaties, but it failed because due to public pressure,

606
1:14:22 --> 1:14:32
because I've been all over that WHO renegotiation of the treaties, the United States withdrew 12.

607
1:14:33 --> 1:14:36
No, no, no, no, no, no, no. I've been, I was the person who revealed all that.

608
1:14:36 --> 1:14:41
Please understand. This is not about the treaty at all. It's got nothing to do with the treaty.

609
1:14:41 --> 1:14:47
Oh, okay. There are amendments, nothing to do with the treaty. That's a decoy in many ways. Okay.

610
1:14:47 --> 1:14:51
And I was actually the person who dug up the stuff about the Biden amendments. That was 13.

611
1:14:52 --> 1:15:00
Okay. These are amendments that are now being discussed this week by a secret newly formed

612
1:15:00 --> 1:15:06
committee that stepped into the negotiating process in front of the working group for

613
1:15:06 --> 1:15:11
amendments to the international health regulations, which are scheduled to meet in mid November.

614
1:15:11 --> 1:15:15
I don't want to bore everybody with all the details. By all means, reach out to me at any

615
1:15:15 --> 1:15:23
point in time. Yeah. Those documents absolutely exist. They have been shared by

616
1:15:23 --> 1:15:30
Tedros and the WHO with all 194 member nations, and they will not make them public.

617
1:15:32 --> 1:15:39
Okay. And as a member of parliament, if the Czech Republic, the EU parliament,

618
1:15:39 --> 1:15:44
if the Czech Republic is speaking for the EU, I would have have to imagine that they didn't tell

619
1:15:44 --> 1:15:53
you. Okay. I will definitely be in contact with you about this one. Thank you. Thank you. It's

620
1:15:53 --> 1:15:58
an honor. Appreciate it. Yeah. That's what I need to get on. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Charles,

621
1:15:58 --> 1:16:03
for the time. Appreciate it. Well done, James, on all the work that you're doing. James is a

622
1:16:03 --> 1:16:08
wonderful resource for you, Christine. And like previous meetings, James, Christine, you know that

623
1:16:08 --> 1:16:14
we are here. If you need something, please send an email to Steve and we'll get the message out.

624
1:16:14 --> 1:16:20
Okay. So we're all here to, because you get swamped the same way that we do with that fire

625
1:16:20 --> 1:16:26
hose of information. Yeah. If you need help on stuff, please ask. Christine, if you need experts,

626
1:16:27 --> 1:16:31
just ask me and I'll tell you whether we've got anybody in the particular field you're looking for,

627
1:16:31 --> 1:16:37
experts, or maybe you just want to be put in touch with maybe 10 people. I could do that as well.

628
1:16:38 --> 1:16:43
Okay. 10 people of my choosing. And then I could just see whether you like the ones I

629
1:16:44 --> 1:16:50
have. So I think I put you in touch with the Garnet inside. So that's it. That's good.

630
1:16:50 --> 1:16:56
Do you get that email, Christine? I might have. I haven't reviewed it yet though.

631
1:16:57 --> 1:17:02
Okay. I've introduced you to artificial Garnet, I think, but hopefully it's come to you.

632
1:17:03 --> 1:17:10
Okay. And so Christine, James Rogusky is an absolute go-to person for your staff and you

633
1:17:10 --> 1:17:18
on who matters. Okay. And the 12 of you. So he's depth of knowledge on who strategies is excellent.

634
1:17:18 --> 1:17:23
I'm here to serve. So don't be afraid to reach out. Okay. Excellent. Thank you.

635
1:17:25 --> 1:17:28
All right. Jeff Pilot from the UK. He's not a pilot.

636
1:17:30 --> 1:17:36
Thanks, Charles. Thanks. I'm not a pilot, but I am a scientist in the UK. So that's a by way

637
1:17:36 --> 1:17:42
of introduction, Christine. And like everyone else has said, great work that you're doing in

638
1:17:42 --> 1:17:50
the European Parliament. So I'm currently deep, had my head quite deep in a lot of data

639
1:17:50 --> 1:17:57
regarding the vaccine. I'll take your lead and we'll call it an injection because I'm going to,

640
1:17:57 --> 1:18:04
we'll be in court in the foreseeable future, trying to prevent my kids having the second dose

641
1:18:04 --> 1:18:11
of the Pfizer jab as the ex-wife wants them to be vaccinated. So that'll be quite interesting to see

642
1:18:11 --> 1:18:18
how it goes. And, you know, it will be not just fighting for this, the second dose of the Pfizer

643
1:18:18 --> 1:18:25
jab, but also any subsequent jabs. And I'll take your advice, Charles, that you gave, you know,

644
1:18:25 --> 1:18:29
to ask the church to accuse themselves if they've been vaccinated. I don't know how

645
1:18:30 --> 1:18:38
that will go, but it's a good point. Christine, I'm just stunned, you know, with the data.

646
1:18:39 --> 1:18:48
And there is, you know, I just have to ask a question direct. Do you believe this is just

647
1:18:48 --> 1:18:53
a case of corruption and power and control, or do you think there's a darker depopulation of gender

648
1:18:53 --> 1:18:59
replay? Because the number of deaths, side effects, it's just horrifying.

649
1:19:01 --> 1:19:07
Yeah, I know. To be honest, I do not have an answer for that question.

650
1:19:10 --> 1:19:17
It seems as though, I mean, it's kind of like, you know, the pharma industry, like I told that,

651
1:19:18 --> 1:19:25
that from, what was her name? I don't remember. I don't consider them to be stupid, you know,

652
1:19:25 --> 1:19:34
so they must have known that this stuff is not working. And it might possibly even be harmful.

653
1:19:34 --> 1:19:41
But at least they should have known that it's not doing anything, at least not what they promised

654
1:19:41 --> 1:19:47
it would do. So as far as their motive is concerned, yeah, they just wanted to make

655
1:19:47 --> 1:19:55
money, obviously. So but the point is, did the governments know? And they are not stupid either.

656
1:19:55 --> 1:20:00
So they must have known something. I mean, and considering how close apparently,

657
1:20:01 --> 1:20:07
from the line is with Borla. I really don't see how she could not have known.

658
1:20:08 --> 1:20:13
And there is going to be other government members, they must have known something.

659
1:20:14 --> 1:20:21
So I don't know if it's just limited to them being corrupted, and just wanting, you know,

660
1:20:21 --> 1:20:28
to make money of or if there is a really, really devious and evil agenda behind this.

661
1:20:29 --> 1:20:37
And some extent, it must be an evil agenda, because just deceiving the people, you know,

662
1:20:38 --> 1:20:45
wasting all of his taxpayers monies, putting their life at risk, that is that is evil in and of itself.

663
1:20:47 --> 1:20:53
But is it truly a depopulation agenda? I don't know. I really don't know.

664
1:20:54 --> 1:20:59
Me too. And I talked to, you know, friends, and I say, I hate to even think that. I really hope

665
1:20:59 --> 1:21:05
it's not. Because I myself, I work in, you know, the pharmaceutical industry, I design clinical

666
1:21:05 --> 1:21:12
trials. And I know how robustly we do it. And the standards we have to meet. And then when I read

667
1:21:12 --> 1:21:19
that Pfizer gets approval following, you know, a few, I don't know what you call it, kitchen

668
1:21:19 --> 1:21:26
experiments on a rice mice or rats, you know, it's, I know, stunning to see what goes through the FDA

669
1:21:26 --> 1:21:36
for these injections. Yeah. Yeah. But I mean, they're so intertwined, you know, just to see that

670
1:21:36 --> 1:21:43
that EMER, the European medicine, the medicines agency is what funded 86% of their budget is funded

671
1:21:43 --> 1:21:50
by pharmaceutical companies. Hello? That's never been allowed. I know, of course not.

672
1:21:51 --> 1:21:58
I mean, they're basically funding the agency that approved that approves their vaccines.

673
1:21:59 --> 1:22:05
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, as it turned a long time ago in the pharmaceutical industry, they,

674
1:22:05 --> 1:22:11
I think the word is self policing, you know, the FDA, MHRA relied on the pharmaceutical companies

675
1:22:11 --> 1:22:17
and self policing. And that's, that's great. If you've got reputable people doing that,

676
1:22:17 --> 1:22:22
so listen, and the scientists do, but then when that data goes into the hands of the marketeers,

677
1:22:22 --> 1:22:26
or, you know, a statistician that's asked to spin it in a certain way,

678
1:22:27 --> 1:22:34
that self policing can easily be prompted. You already see that they, they, they have something

679
1:22:34 --> 1:22:40
to hide. And you can tell just from them sitting in the committee, the way they answer the question,

680
1:22:41 --> 1:22:47
the way they they swirl around the way, you know, they really feel really uncomfortable

681
1:22:47 --> 1:22:52
having to answer those questions. And they're so concerned about, you know, choosing the right

682
1:22:52 --> 1:22:58
words and not saying too much. And, you know, you can tell they are hiding something.

683
1:22:59 --> 1:23:07
I agree Christine. Yeah. She was that Mrs. Small was absolutely terrified of the questions which

684
1:23:07 --> 1:23:16
were coming, although she was trying to look calm. I know. There was this other, what company was

685
1:23:16 --> 1:23:23
she from? Gosh, I forgot. That was the one I asked who lied that the pharmaceutical companies lie to

686
1:23:23 --> 1:23:27
the government or the governments knew the truth and they lied to the people. I mean, the way she

687
1:23:27 --> 1:23:37
answered my question, gosh, it hurt. It really hurt. She was stammering and stirring and you know,

688
1:23:37 --> 1:23:44
who was that Christine? Was that small? No, no, that wasn't small. That was the committee before

689
1:23:44 --> 1:23:52
Alexa Smith Klein. No, I've, what was the, what was the other pharmaceutical companies?

690
1:23:52 --> 1:24:01
Oh, AstraZeneca you mean? Yeah. Her it was AstraZeneca. Right. Yeah. Well, if you get a chance,

691
1:24:01 --> 1:24:09
just look at my videos. Yeah, it's terrible. Yeah. You're right. Because one of my good friends,

692
1:24:11 --> 1:24:15
he has dinner quite a lot with one of the directors at Pfizer. I think she's a legal lady or something.

693
1:24:16 --> 1:24:22
And he, you know, he asked her, he said, do you feel embarrassed? Yeah. And she said, yeah, you

694
1:24:22 --> 1:24:28
know, a lot of us do. And I can't remember the age figure she put on it. But it was something like,

695
1:24:29 --> 1:24:34
we don't believe anyone under the age of 30 or 40, I think it was 30, should be having this vaccine.

696
1:24:35 --> 1:24:41
Yeah. Wow. Was that in evidence? No, no, no. This was around the dinner table.

697
1:24:42 --> 1:24:49
He has her over for dinner quite a bit. You know, and he's. So why isn't she writing to her MP then?

698
1:24:52 --> 1:24:57
I don't, I mean, you know, I think people want to protect their lives, you know, I think

699
1:24:58 --> 1:25:02
people have got lives they want to. What is the point of protecting your life when everybody

700
1:25:02 --> 1:25:09
around you is dying? I just don't get it. Honestly, I really don't. Neither do I. I don't know how these

701
1:25:09 --> 1:25:14
people can look in the mirror. You know, it's not as if, you know, the side effect is, I don't know,

702
1:25:14 --> 1:25:20
like a bad batch of coffee at Starbucks. No side effect. Yeah. People got any self-respect.

703
1:25:21 --> 1:25:26
How on earth can you be happy if you have no self-respect? And if you don't,

704
1:25:27 --> 1:25:35
but there's also the delusion factor. So I'm sorry, two things, two things, Jeff,

705
1:25:35 --> 1:25:40
that's wonderful information. Everybody please remember Jeff has offered and Christine Jeff is

706
1:25:40 --> 1:25:46
also a resource for you as is Craig Pardacouper, who will be asking a question shortly. But Jeff

707
1:25:46 --> 1:25:52
and both Jeff and Craig have both offered their respective services to help you put data together

708
1:25:52 --> 1:25:58
because these guys are great on data. Craig Pardacouper is a genius, Christine.

709
1:25:58 --> 1:26:02
Yeah, but Jeff's pretty, Jeff's excellent too. Thanks Charles.

710
1:26:05 --> 1:26:10
Jeff and Craig have both made that offer. Okay. So if you've got a case, you need data or Christine,

711
1:26:10 --> 1:26:15
you want to do a presentation. These guys, you really get your staff to talk to them. So hey,

712
1:26:15 --> 1:26:21
how do we present the information so it has an impact? That's number one. Number two, what Jeff

713
1:26:21 --> 1:26:29
reminds me talking about videos, we've all seen the promos on the real Anthony Fauci movie made by

714
1:26:29 --> 1:26:36
Jeff Hayes. Please everybody, it is worth, particularly this group, I watched it on the

715
1:26:36 --> 1:26:43
weekend. It is a wonderful review of how all this came about and it will take you right back tonight

716
1:26:43 --> 1:26:51
to 2020. And it's important. It's only an hour and 40 minutes. It will help. It just reminds us

717
1:26:51 --> 1:26:57
of the journey that we've been on. And it will remind you of information that you know, it'll

718
1:26:57 --> 1:27:02
bring it to the forefront and go, gosh, that's true. And I urge all of us to watch that movie.

719
1:27:02 --> 1:27:08
It doesn't matter. I think, I don't know, it's probably going to cost $20 after the free viewing

720
1:27:08 --> 1:27:15
to buy a copy. Well worth buying a copy and sharing it. Which one is it, Charles? Which one

721
1:27:15 --> 1:27:20
are you talking about? It's the movie called the real Anthony Fauci movie. Oh yes, okay, based on

722
1:27:20 --> 1:27:30
the book. Yes, very good. Yeah, it's very, very good. And it reminded me how I'm so into this

723
1:27:30 --> 1:27:35
stuff that I had forgotten. That's the value of watching this one and a half hour movie while

724
1:27:35 --> 1:27:39
you're having a glass of wine, Christine, and all of us. Jeff, can I ask you, are you in touch

725
1:27:39 --> 1:27:49
with Sasha Latopova? No. Oh, you should be because she's got a hispy in the pharmaceutical

726
1:27:49 --> 1:27:54
industry too, but she's absolutely brilliant. She works with Craig Bartekuper who's on the call.

727
1:27:56 --> 1:28:03
Okay. So if you email me, Jeff, I'll put you in touch with Sasha. Okay, thank you. All right.

728
1:28:03 --> 1:28:09
Thank you. Thank you, Jeff. Anna, our favourite lawyer from the UK, Christine. You've met before.

729
1:28:14 --> 1:28:15
Anna, you're muted.

730
1:28:17 --> 1:28:21
Sorry, yeah, my favourite's playing up there. That's why I haven't got the

731
1:28:21 --> 1:28:28
picture on. First of all, Christine, thank you. I echo others. You're my absolute heroine.

732
1:28:28 --> 1:28:35
I admire your work so much and your tenacity and your strength and courage, and I truly

733
1:28:35 --> 1:28:42
appreciate it. So thank you. But the next question is, going back to what you were saying about this

734
1:28:42 --> 1:28:49
commission proposals about 2023 and the fact they're going to reintroduce lockdowns and masking and

735
1:28:49 --> 1:28:57
social distancing and the fact that they want to, you know, get everybody injected. How many of

736
1:28:57 --> 1:29:08
these people are qualified lawyers who are in these meetings? You mean the COVID committee right

737
1:29:08 --> 1:29:14
now? Yeah. When they're coming up with proposals, how many of them are qualified lawyers sitting in

738
1:29:14 --> 1:29:22
those meetings? That was not done in the committee. This is a proposal, I was talking about an action

739
1:29:22 --> 1:29:29
plan that was put out by the EU commission. Right. So same question. How many qualified

740
1:29:29 --> 1:29:34
lawyers are in these meetings? I don't know. I have no idea. One of the things I'm finding,

741
1:29:34 --> 1:29:42
Christine, is this basically. I'm sure this is the same for most EU countries.

742
1:29:43 --> 1:29:48
Nobody in the UK has been taught law for generations at school. When they go into their job,

743
1:29:48 --> 1:29:55
they're taught minuscule amounts of bits of law here and there. And it seems to me that the average

744
1:29:55 --> 1:30:01
person doesn't take it upon themselves to educate themselves about the law. So in other words,

745
1:30:01 --> 1:30:07
you've got all these people meeting and coming up with all these proposals and policies absolutely

746
1:30:07 --> 1:30:13
clueless about the governing law. And so when they're there saying, oh, you know, we've got to

747
1:30:13 --> 1:30:19
mandate, you know, forcibly injecting everyone, essentially, they don't seem to understand that

748
1:30:19 --> 1:30:26
that amounts to a prohibited act of unlawful warfare, which invokes the right to self-defense

749
1:30:27 --> 1:30:34
using reasonable force under the warfare conventions. So essentially, it seems to me that

750
1:30:34 --> 1:30:40
what you've got is a bunch of non-lawyers coming up with these things that actually is a declaration

751
1:30:40 --> 1:30:47
of war, which the people are hearing loud and clear as such, those of us who are awake,

752
1:30:47 --> 1:30:55
to the extent that they are talking about civil war. Because if you come for someone

753
1:30:55 --> 1:31:02
with a weapon in your hand, be it an injection, a knife or anything else, you absolutely have the

754
1:31:02 --> 1:31:09
right to fight back. And if they're talking about entering into people's homes to get them injected,

755
1:31:09 --> 1:31:14
the number of people I've heard who have said, if anyone even thinks about coming into my home,

756
1:31:14 --> 1:31:21
they will be taken out. They will be killed. Right. Right. Now social media is full of

757
1:31:22 --> 1:31:29
images and guillotines, ropes, you know, people are baying for justice and baying for blood.

758
1:31:29 --> 1:31:35
And I think, well, this is this all could be sorted. If you actually had a bunch of lawyers

759
1:31:35 --> 1:31:42
who knew the actual law, discussing these ideas and proposals and saying to the politicians or

760
1:31:42 --> 1:31:47
the public health officials, don't you even think about doing that? It's a complete breach of the

761
1:31:47 --> 1:31:55
law. That's kind of like what didn't happen now, did it? They were just talking about it. And I

762
1:31:55 --> 1:32:02
mean, I remember, you know, the media, they were full of what they threatened to do to unvaccinated

763
1:32:02 --> 1:32:11
people. You will not get treated in hospital. We'll kick you out of the healthcare system.

764
1:32:11 --> 1:32:16
So if you should catch COVID, then you have to pay, you know, for it by yourself. I mean,

765
1:32:16 --> 1:32:22
these were all threats. And yes, there were some talk about, you know, then we will force vaccinate

766
1:32:22 --> 1:32:28
people. Yeah, there should be house visits and all. It was talk. It was just, but that's-

767
1:32:28 --> 1:32:35
Sorry, Christine, it wasn't. In this country, it happened. People did go into their homes and,

768
1:32:35 --> 1:32:40
you know, inject the vulnerable. And, you know, under the Coronavirus Act,

769
1:32:40 --> 1:32:46
schedule 21 of it, they have the right to come into your home and take samples from you and etc.

770
1:32:46 --> 1:32:53
Now, that act is unlawful. It's ultra-violet. They don't have the power to follow through on it.

771
1:32:53 --> 1:32:59
So in that sense, it's a threat, but they've reportedly made it into law. And the thing is

772
1:32:59 --> 1:33:05
that this is what they're trying to do. These people who are complete non-lawyers, total disregard

773
1:33:05 --> 1:33:10
and disrespect and ignorance of the law and making up all this stuff. And because everyone else is

774
1:33:10 --> 1:33:17
also clueless and lawless, they're getting away with it. Yeah, I know. But for us lawyers on the

775
1:33:17 --> 1:33:24
sidelines, it is infuriating because, Christine, I'll say this one more thing. I'm on a bit of a

776
1:33:24 --> 1:33:32
rant, sorry, but I have not yet met a single lawyer or a single doctor or a single soldier

777
1:33:32 --> 1:33:39
who has actually read any of the Nuremberg judgments. Not a single one. Now, I have,

778
1:33:40 --> 1:33:44
I've studied them extensively. I gave a presentation to this group, I think it was last week,

779
1:33:44 --> 1:33:52
on the medical cases judgment. Because as you may know, I'm an army officer as well. So I have a

780
1:33:52 --> 1:33:58
duty to uphold the law of armed conflict and to make sure everyone else is doing so. But when you

781
1:33:59 --> 1:34:06
read those judgments, they absolutely govern what's been going on. But unless you've read

782
1:34:06 --> 1:34:13
those judgments, you wouldn't understand the law and ethics that applied then and continues to apply

783
1:34:13 --> 1:34:21
now, but has just been expanded on. Yeah, so that's where I cannot understand how, you know,

784
1:34:21 --> 1:34:27
we the citizens are being made to suffer because whoever are making these decisions aren't, in fact,

785
1:34:27 --> 1:34:32
lawyers. Where are the lawyers? Who's advising Ursula van der Leyen when she says we're going

786
1:34:32 --> 1:34:38
to mandate vaccines? Who's told her that it's okay to say that? But Anna, the lawyers have been

787
1:34:38 --> 1:34:44
pathetic in the UK too, and all over Europe and all over the world. In fact, you are the exception.

788
1:34:45 --> 1:34:52
Well, I'm, I, the point is, the point is Ursula van der Leyen, for example, must have a lawyer

789
1:34:52 --> 1:34:58
who is advising her on some of her statements, surely. So before she went out and said-

790
1:34:58 --> 1:35:04
The lawyers in the EU, I think I'm right in saying Christine, they are anonymous and they have the

791
1:35:04 --> 1:35:11
right to be anonymous. I don't know, is that right? They certainly were with the Data Protection Act,

792
1:35:11 --> 1:35:18
which was, what was that, 2018, that law. What was it called? The data protection.

793
1:35:20 --> 1:35:27
They had to change the whole internet, because of it. So those lawyers who drafted those laws,

794
1:35:27 --> 1:35:33
that law, or whatever it's called, they were protected, their anonymity was protected.

795
1:35:34 --> 1:35:38
GDPR. GDPR, yes, thank you very much. 2018, yes.

796
1:35:40 --> 1:35:45
So the point is, Christine, we don't know, in other words, we don't know who the lawyers are

797
1:35:45 --> 1:35:52
that are advising the likes of Ursula or the EU Commission. No, no. How do we find out? How do I,

798
1:35:52 --> 1:35:58
for example, as a UK lawyer, get to speak to one of those lawyers about what the hell's going on?

799
1:35:58 --> 1:36:03
You know what, I don't think you would be able to get that information, because they're not acting

800
1:36:03 --> 1:36:13
as lawyers per se, they're staff. Yeah. You know, they were hired in their capacity to know the law,

801
1:36:14 --> 1:36:18
but they are not acting as lawyers, so I don't think you have any,

802
1:36:19 --> 1:36:23
you wouldn't get that information. In-house lawyers, I think they are, and they're like the

803
1:36:23 --> 1:36:30
government's legal department. They used to be. Yeah, exactly. But it is like, yeah,

804
1:36:30 --> 1:36:39
they work there, they're staff, you know. Sure. Thank you, Christine. I'm afraid the longer I do

805
1:36:39 --> 1:36:45
my due diligence on this, the more despair I have, because I've met so many people in their

806
1:36:46 --> 1:36:50
business. Anna, why don't you connect up with Christine as well? Yeah. Yes, we'd love to. I'd

807
1:36:50 --> 1:36:56
love to. Sure, because we've seen the same thing in Germany. You know, there were a couple of

808
1:36:57 --> 1:37:05
lawsuits against the mask mandates and all of that, or when they tried to forbid protests and

809
1:37:05 --> 1:37:13
all of this. I mean, the judges, they basically, they did not do their job. Yeah. They completely

810
1:37:14 --> 1:37:21
screwed up the very foundation on which they should pass judgment on. It's like, you know,

811
1:37:22 --> 1:37:32
now the sheer possibility of something or someone getting possibly infected is enough to shut down

812
1:37:32 --> 1:37:39
an entire protest. Yeah. It's ridiculous. It is ridiculous, but it happens. But I will say this,

813
1:37:39 --> 1:37:44
though, that I'm getting increasingly frustrated and annoyed with people when they sort of say,

814
1:37:44 --> 1:37:50
oh, well, you know, everyone else should be sorting this out. When in fact, if everyone actually just

815
1:37:50 --> 1:37:54
read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, they

816
1:37:54 --> 1:37:59
actually read it, that none of this would be happening, because each citizen would be perfectly

817
1:37:59 --> 1:38:05
capable of citing and upholding their human rights, rather than expecting one judge to make a decision,

818
1:38:05 --> 1:38:11
which nobody reads anyway. Nobody reads the judgments. Yeah, but see what they're doing.

819
1:38:11 --> 1:38:17
They're redefining everything. So, you know, fundamental rights are now privileges.

820
1:38:18 --> 1:38:21
And people just- But they can't do that because each human rights-

821
1:38:21 --> 1:38:24
No, of course they can do this. But each member state has actually given an

822
1:38:24 --> 1:38:30
undertaking in those human rights instruments to promote respect and uphold. So they can't

823
1:38:30 --> 1:38:35
derogate from those and then diminish it to a privilege. Who the hell do these people think

824
1:38:35 --> 1:38:42
they are? I know, but once again, once you've told people often enough that it's the government

825
1:38:42 --> 1:38:47
that decides what fundamental rights you can exercise at this moment, then-

826
1:38:47 --> 1:38:51
No, that's not true, though. But that's not true, you see. But that's because they're ignorant of

827
1:38:51 --> 1:38:55
the law. And this is one of the problems. You know, that people are telling each other all

828
1:38:55 --> 1:39:01
these nonsense statements. Exactly. But the people started to believe it.

829
1:39:02 --> 1:39:08
So now they're on the mindset is, well, if the government tells me I can't leave my house because

830
1:39:08 --> 1:39:14
I'm a threat for public health, then yeah, they no longer consider leaving their house as their

831
1:39:14 --> 1:39:19
fundamental right. That's the problem. Well, what I'm doing here, Christine, is I've been

832
1:39:19 --> 1:39:23
helping people understand their fundamental rights. So I just gave a talk last day, which

833
1:39:23 --> 1:39:27
I'll share with the group, where I go through the history of our rights here in the UK,

834
1:39:27 --> 1:39:33
which was many jurisdictions derive their fundamental rights from our jurisdiction.

835
1:39:33 --> 1:39:38
And people realize that you don't get a group of bureaucrats at one point in time,

836
1:39:38 --> 1:39:43
you can give or take rights. I'm 100%.

837
1:39:45 --> 1:39:52
So George Orwell was talking about words and that you can't have a conversation

838
1:39:52 --> 1:39:57
if you haven't got the words to express the ideas. And exactly the same thing. I've just thought of

839
1:39:57 --> 1:40:04
it now, actually, if you've got people who've got no idea what the law is, including the legislators,

840
1:40:05 --> 1:40:10
then they have conversations which you might as well not have. And actually, you could argue,

841
1:40:10 --> 1:40:16
make things 10 times worse with total confusion with everybody thinking that they can put forward

842
1:40:16 --> 1:40:21
their point of view and nobody knows what the hell they're talking about. Exactly. Exactly.

843
1:40:21 --> 1:40:27
Which is why I bang on about the law, because the law hasn't been written by any of us. It's

844
1:40:27 --> 1:40:34
not our opinion. It says what it says. But if you haven't actually read what it actually says,

845
1:40:34 --> 1:40:40
then everybody's just expressing an opinion. It's not what the law actually says.

846
1:40:41 --> 1:40:50
Yeah. Even if you have read it, then arguably people wouldn't be able to remember 10% of what

847
1:40:50 --> 1:40:55
they've read. Yeah. But the thing is that the human rights instruments are dead easy to read.

848
1:40:55 --> 1:41:00
They're written in plain English. They're not in complicated legalese. They're in very short

849
1:41:00 --> 1:41:05
paragraphs. Most people have got a printer or they can access a printer. So I've said to people,

850
1:41:05 --> 1:41:11
look, print off the key relevant articles, right? And put them in your handbag or pocket and cite

851
1:41:11 --> 1:41:15
them from that. You don't even have to remember them. You know, the Magna Carta, when it was first

852
1:41:16 --> 1:41:22
published, had to be published everywhere, right? So that people could actually cite it. They

853
1:41:22 --> 1:41:27
didn't have to remember it. Well, even better than that, Anna, we can buy you a

854
1:41:28 --> 1:41:34
20 t-shirts, say, with those points on them and you can walk around London.

855
1:41:34 --> 1:41:38
Yeah, that's another idea. Leaflets, leaflets with all the links.

856
1:41:39 --> 1:41:48
Great. Yeah. All right. All right. On we go. Now, sometimes people make the comment,

857
1:41:49 --> 1:41:55
well, you know, what are we achieving? Well, that's like saying to a soldier who shoots in a war in

858
1:41:55 --> 1:42:01
World War II, one soldier shoots another and says, well, what did that achieve? You know, and so each

859
1:42:01 --> 1:42:08
step that we take matters. That's the point. Each time Christine speaks, it matters. Each time Anna

860
1:42:08 --> 1:42:14
speaks, it matters. And none of us know the precise impact of what each one of us is doing.

861
1:42:14 --> 1:42:20
That's why we have to keep doing what we're doing. You just don't know. Yeah, absolutely.

862
1:42:22 --> 1:42:27
All right. Maverick, who lives in Canada, who's gone back home to France and is in France today,

863
1:42:27 --> 1:42:35
Christine? Mrs Anderson, everybody. Nice to see you all again. I arrived in one piece,

864
1:42:36 --> 1:42:42
in case you were wondering. And my father is out of trouble for those who knew. Mrs Anderson,

865
1:42:42 --> 1:42:50
I noticed you a couple of times now. I've seen footage of you over the internet and a couple of

866
1:42:50 --> 1:42:57
other deputies. And I'm pretty, pretty proud of you to see that we actually have some people still

867
1:42:57 --> 1:43:03
in the government that are able to put their integrity before their careers. And that means

868
1:43:03 --> 1:43:09
a lot to me, including, if I can mention him, Christian Therese, who, by the way, is doing a

869
1:43:09 --> 1:43:14
great job, as you do, of releasing videos in English. So I have three little questions,

870
1:43:14 --> 1:43:20
which one you already answered partially. So I'm just going to go very quickly through with it.

871
1:43:21 --> 1:43:28
I've noticed that down. So yeah, you've been from Germany, representing Germany.

872
1:43:29 --> 1:43:36
Are you, you happen to be aware of any police investigation on Ursula von der Leyen and Albert

873
1:43:36 --> 1:43:44
Buller by the, over there, it's called the Bundespolizei, which is federal police. And if so,

874
1:43:44 --> 1:43:50
I mean, maybe, maybe you know about it. That was my first question.

875
1:43:52 --> 1:43:57
No, I'm not aware of any investigation, investigation from the Bundespolizei on

876
1:43:58 --> 1:44:10
von der Leyen and Buller. All I know is about the EU state district attorney. She, or they open an

877
1:44:10 --> 1:44:19
investigation on von der Leyen on the EU commission. Thank you. My second point,

878
1:44:21 --> 1:44:26
where at this point, where the damage is done already, pretty much all across the world,

879
1:44:26 --> 1:44:34
if you had any wishes, any wish would be granted to you. What is it that you will be awaiting

880
1:44:34 --> 1:44:42
from the people in Europe? From the people in Europe? Yeah, European population.

881
1:44:45 --> 1:44:53
I would just wish they'd wake up and they would stop trusting their governments. And they would

882
1:44:53 --> 1:45:00
pretty much become what I always thought to be, you know, what democratic or citizens

883
1:45:01 --> 1:45:09
democracies do, question their government and be critical of things going around them and not just,

884
1:45:09 --> 1:45:21
you know, I don't know, follow and do whatever they're told. And yeah, what I, I guess what I

885
1:45:22 --> 1:45:32
hope most for is that people would not start ratting out their neighbors and pretty much denounce

886
1:45:32 --> 1:45:38
them and yeah, check up on them. Because there is, you know, some deadly virus going around,

887
1:45:38 --> 1:45:46
you aren't supposed to invite guests to your house and stuff like that. So yeah, basically pretty much

888
1:45:47 --> 1:45:56
things that are going on and are known to dictatorships. I really wish people would stop

889
1:45:56 --> 1:46:05
doing that. Okay. Thank you. And if I, if I may say the, unfortunately, the history of both of

890
1:46:05 --> 1:46:14
our countries has left many marks as far as rattling people out in that regard. And that's

891
1:46:14 --> 1:46:22
unfortunate. Our government, even when I was part of the forces, and I've seen it firsthand under

892
1:46:22 --> 1:46:31
the uniform, we did a great job at keeping the population divided and telling on one another.

893
1:46:32 --> 1:46:37
My last and third point, I've reached out personally a couple of times to Christian

894
1:46:37 --> 1:46:44
Teres without success. I know he's very busy, so no hard feelings there. You can tell Maverick said

895
1:46:44 --> 1:46:51
hi. You answered this question and this point partially because I already have your contact.

896
1:46:51 --> 1:47:00
And I have a document here that may actually interest you. Christian Teres mentioned recently

897
1:47:01 --> 1:47:12
that the agreements started in 2017 between Moderna, Therapeutics and I don't know if he was

898
1:47:12 --> 1:47:17
talking about the European Commission or the US government. However, I have here a document,

899
1:47:17 --> 1:47:25
which is a confidential disclosure agreement from 2015. Would you like to hear what it is about?

900
1:47:25 --> 1:47:33
Yes. In five lines. Yeah. Confidentially information disclosed under this agreement

901
1:47:33 --> 1:47:41
is described as for the NIAID, which is National Institutes of Allergy and Infection

902
1:47:41 --> 1:47:53
Diseases or DISEs, depending on which side you're on. For the NIAIDs, proprietary information and

903
1:47:53 --> 1:48:04
data relating to the development of vaccine for HIV, influenza, Ebola, MERS and development of

904
1:48:04 --> 1:48:14
broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for preventative and therapeutic use. I said neutralizing.

905
1:48:15 --> 1:48:22
Collaborator Moderna's proprietary and confidential information related to design and manufacture of

906
1:48:22 --> 1:48:30
a messenger RNA platform and messenger RNA construct for treatment and prevention of disease.

907
1:48:30 --> 1:48:41
And this is not 2017. It is 2050. There's about 166 pages. It took me four hours during my flight

908
1:48:41 --> 1:48:47
from Toronto to here France to read it. If you're interested, you're more than welcome to have it.

909
1:48:47 --> 1:48:54
It fell off a truck somewhere. I fell off a truck somewhere. Oh gosh. I love documents falling off trucks.

910
1:48:55 --> 1:49:02
Yeah. The last one that I may send you as well. I think you have it. It's also confidential.

911
1:49:02 --> 1:49:11
It's cumulative analysis of post-authorization adverse event report of PF07302048 BNT, which is

912
1:49:11 --> 1:49:19
Standforce BioNTech 162B2 received throughout February 2021. So the pages that everybody was

913
1:49:19 --> 1:49:23
looking at on the internet with the nine pages a side effect, that's all nice and dandy.

914
1:49:24 --> 1:49:31
I like to see the first part of the document, including their, what they call a conclusion,

915
1:49:33 --> 1:49:39
which is nothing about a conclusion for me. So if you want that as well, which explains the nine

916
1:49:39 --> 1:49:47
pages of, excuse me, bullshit that is at the end, you can have it as well. And I think you

917
1:49:47 --> 1:49:55
should show this to Christian Therese because the last ones that he received were redacted.

918
1:49:55 --> 1:50:05
I have them not redacted. Okay. Excellent. Yeah. If you could send them to me, that would be really

919
1:50:05 --> 1:50:12
great. I don't know what's going on with Christian Therese. I've been trying to get a hold of him

920
1:50:12 --> 1:50:21
since last night to trying to get him on here. But I phoned his staff and even they didn't know

921
1:50:21 --> 1:50:26
where he was and how to reach him. So I don't know what's going on with him. But that's all good. I

922
1:50:26 --> 1:50:32
consider that you represent him since you guys are on the same team. Right. Yeah. But yeah,

923
1:50:32 --> 1:50:35
I really appreciate if you could send that to me. Thank you. Yes, I will. Definitely.

924
1:50:36 --> 1:50:42
Thank you so much. Thank you, Christina. Great work Maverick. Thank you. Thank you. Wonderful.

925
1:50:43 --> 1:50:54
All right. Craig Pardigupa. You muted Craig. Craig's in Africa somewhere. We don't know his

926
1:50:54 --> 1:51:02
country. I'm in a good country at the moment. Is Tanzania. Very good.

927
1:51:07 --> 1:51:13
It was mentioned a bit earlier about Israel, the studies coming out of Israel regarding the

928
1:51:13 --> 1:51:20
commission that was set up by the Israeli government to investigate the side effects

929
1:51:20 --> 1:51:29
of the vaccines. And they found that 50% of the reported side effects lasted longer than six months.

930
1:51:30 --> 1:51:38
So that means that the side effects were surprisingly persistent, which means in a takeaway

931
1:51:38 --> 1:51:43
for the public that when people consider the vaccine, they've been told that they only last

932
1:51:43 --> 1:51:53
maybe a few days. And they're not told that a large percentage of the side effects last more

933
1:51:53 --> 1:52:00
than six months, which would obviously lead to people choosing not to have the vaccines,

934
1:52:00 --> 1:52:04
because they'd realize that they would lose their job if you're sick for six months.

935
1:52:05 --> 1:52:09
And no, there's no employer that could tolerate that because it would destroy their business.

936
1:52:10 --> 1:52:17
So by emphasizing it's a new angle, because everyone's heard of side effects, but people are

937
1:52:17 --> 1:52:24
just unaware of how long they last. So effectively, by pushing the persistence of adverse effects,

938
1:52:28 --> 1:52:35
it would be a really good sound bite to give the message to people that taking the vaccine is not

939
1:52:36 --> 1:52:44
a way to keep your job. It's a way to lose your job. It's not a case of no jab, no job. It's a

940
1:52:44 --> 1:52:51
case of jab, no job. So I think it's a really interesting thing. And I've put a link in the

941
1:52:51 --> 1:53:01
chat to the study, which I summarized in a PDF. So it's very bullet pointed, so you'd find it

942
1:53:01 --> 1:53:12
easy to consume. And that was for Israel. You may not be aware of the...

943
1:53:14 --> 1:53:22
I did a similar report for Belgium. Belgium, it's really interesting, the adverse effects in Belgium.

944
1:53:24 --> 1:53:30
A huge percentage of the reports are disabilities. Comparing it to the UK, for example,

945
1:53:31 --> 1:53:41
in the UK, 21% of the reports resulted in a disability. Whereas in Belgium,

946
1:53:42 --> 1:53:48
93%, it was like an extreme number of disabilities in one country.

947
1:53:49 --> 1:53:58
And it could again be used as a way of waking people up. So I can send you a link on that too.

948
1:53:58 --> 1:54:09
So just so you know, Christine, Craig founded the famous website, How Bad Is My Batch?

949
1:54:10 --> 1:54:18
So he's been looking at batches all over the world. And from his findings, we learned months ago

950
1:54:18 --> 1:54:25
that there was... I think Ryan Offormik still holds up view that there's... and

951
1:54:25 --> 1:54:30
Mike Eden, do they still hold up view, Craig, that you had proved intent to commit

952
1:54:31 --> 1:54:38
crime? Well, intent to commit was fairly obvious since about February, because

953
1:54:40 --> 1:54:46
the information about adverse effects was pretty obvious. I think by February,

954
1:54:48 --> 1:54:53
more than a thousand people had died. And there were something like 42,000

955
1:54:56 --> 1:55:03
adverse effects. And they knew that the vaccines were bad then, but they still didn't stop.

956
1:55:03 --> 1:55:08
So then after that point, they knew. And anything after that was intentional.

957
1:55:13 --> 1:55:20
Yeah, I mean, the batches do vary in toxicity.

958
1:55:20 --> 1:55:23
The other thing I'd like to mention,

959
1:55:25 --> 1:55:29
I would like to ask you, Christine, if people are waking up more in Europe.

960
1:55:29 --> 1:55:37
In England, we have 50% of the population now rejecting the third vaccine, the third dose.

961
1:55:37 --> 1:55:46
I think it was something like 70% took the first and second doses, but it's gone down another 20%.

962
1:55:46 --> 1:55:51
So it's 50% now. So it's a 50-50 split in the population. And would you say that applies

963
1:55:51 --> 1:56:01
through Europe? For Europe, I can't say. For Germany, I can say, though. In Germany,

964
1:56:01 --> 1:56:06
there is... out of 83 million, there is still 18 million people completely unvaccinated.

965
1:56:07 --> 1:56:12
And from all I can say, they will remain unvaccinated.

966
1:56:13 --> 1:56:19
And yes, the uptake of now we're up to the fourth booster, I think,

967
1:56:20 --> 1:56:27
that had dropped dramatically. At the third, that was still way up there in the 60s, I would say,

968
1:56:27 --> 1:56:37
60%, a little more maybe. The fourth booster, now people were not taking it. It dropped like

969
1:56:38 --> 1:56:45
way to 30% maybe. And now they're talking about a fifth one. And well, there is a

970
1:56:47 --> 1:56:52
small percentage, they still believe in the whole shebang and they will get the sixth and the seventh.

971
1:56:52 --> 1:57:00
They get the hundredth booster they have already. But no, the uptake here is very limited to now.

972
1:57:00 --> 1:57:07
Now the uptake here is very limited to now. And I basically see the same thing happening

973
1:57:07 --> 1:57:19
as you did in England. Thank you. Can I just... if Anna de Bruyce is still online, I'd just like to say

974
1:57:20 --> 1:57:28
that regarding the need to educate about the law, which would produce greater

975
1:57:30 --> 1:57:35
give people greater confidence in standing up for themselves, I would like to create...

976
1:57:37 --> 1:57:49
to put the laws onto my website in a clear and distinct format so people can know what the laws

977
1:57:49 --> 1:57:59
are. And currently, I get about 100,000 visitors a day. So that means that the laws will be

978
1:58:00 --> 1:58:08
more well known, which would then strengthen people's ability to resist the infringement of

979
1:58:08 --> 1:58:17
their rights. So I'll be happy to work with Anna de Bruyce to do that. And it would be like a

980
1:58:18 --> 1:58:25
large section on the website devoted to clearly and distinctly laying out the principles of law

981
1:58:25 --> 1:58:32
so that people can claim those rights and know how to act on them. Because one of the things

982
1:58:32 --> 1:58:40
Anna was saying was that people just cave in and submit to whatever the government mandates based

983
1:58:40 --> 1:58:46
on authority. But when they know the law, they'll no longer need authority because they'll be experts

984
1:58:46 --> 1:58:54
in their own rights. And also the idea that people are intimidated by force. And when they see loads

985
1:58:54 --> 1:59:02
of police charging into protests, they think that that is an exercise of law. But in fact,

986
1:59:03 --> 1:59:09
being arrested, once you end up in a court of law, I would imagine that you'd have quite strong

987
1:59:09 --> 1:59:25
a case to just have your cause, have the charges dismissed if you, for example,

988
1:59:25 --> 1:59:30
had your right, knew your rights. So I think basically the real arena of the law is the court

989
1:59:31 --> 1:59:38
rather than the street. And whilst the police might try to enforce the law, the most they can do is

990
1:59:39 --> 1:59:45
put you into court when you'd win. So I think it's like a really good thing. I'd like to work with

991
1:59:45 --> 1:59:57
Anna to do that because I think the laws can be made really crystal clear. It can be simplified

992
1:59:57 --> 2:00:03
and made so clear and powerful. I think that's what I'd like to do. One of those that.

993
2:00:04 --> 2:00:09
Well, I'd love to do that with Craig. And that's music to my ears. And thank you so much because

994
2:00:09 --> 2:00:15
I've been deplatformed. And so, you know, I've only got a few thousand followers on my telegram

995
2:00:15 --> 2:00:21
channel now because I've had to come off Twitter and Facebook, et cetera. And so, yes, as much

996
2:00:21 --> 2:00:27
exposure as possible, because, you know, when I do teach people the laws in these sort of conferences

997
2:00:27 --> 2:00:34
and workshops and stuff, I literally see them grow in front of me, you know, in confidence and

998
2:00:34 --> 2:00:40
height and demeanor. And they say it's so empowering and has been incredibly helpful. You know,

999
2:00:41 --> 2:00:47
I've had phone calls from people in the Caribbean, for example, who have said they couldn't access a

1000
2:00:47 --> 2:00:56
lawyer, but they use my material to win their employment battles. So, you know, if my hope is

1001
2:00:57 --> 2:01:01
to make the law as accessible for everyone as possible, because the vast majority of people

1002
2:01:01 --> 2:01:07
can't afford to pay a lawyer to explain the law to them. So it's an access to justice issue.

1003
2:01:07 --> 2:01:12
And it's in all our interests that, you know, as many of us as possible know how to uphold the law.

1004
2:01:12 --> 2:01:17
So we minimize the harm that we're causing to each other. Wonderful. Wonderful. Craig,

1005
2:01:17 --> 2:01:22
can you put your website? Can I just comment on that? Because I just thought of something,

1006
2:01:22 --> 2:01:25
you know, when you're speaking about the law, we had this happening in Germany

1007
2:01:27 --> 2:01:34
during various protests. And the people, they were literally not doing anything but standing there

1008
2:01:34 --> 2:01:41
and holding a copy of the German Kundgesetz, the German Constitution. That's all they were doing.

1009
2:01:42 --> 2:01:45
But you know what happened? They got arrested by the police.

1010
2:01:45 --> 2:01:48
Because the police aren't lawyers either.

1011
2:01:49 --> 2:01:58
I know. But the point is, that's what the people see. And that's intimidation, pure intimidation.

1012
2:01:59 --> 2:02:06
It is not about the law at this point. It is intimidation. It is showing the masses,

1013
2:02:07 --> 2:02:12
oh, if you stand there and you flash your Kundgesetz in my face, that's what's going to

1014
2:02:12 --> 2:02:17
happen to you. And the next time around, you know, it's going to be only what, not five people,

1015
2:02:17 --> 2:02:24
only two standing there with the Constitution, but thousands of people see it yet again. And these

1016
2:02:24 --> 2:02:29
pictures are being flashed all over the news. And you know, the next time there isn't going to be

1017
2:02:29 --> 2:02:34
10,000s of people protesting, it's only going to be five and then it's going to be 2000. And that's

1018
2:02:34 --> 2:02:41
how they do this. So I fully appreciate, you know, yes, we do have to educate people on the law.

1019
2:02:41 --> 2:02:50
But as long as we do not find any mechanism to break the official narrative, and yeah,

1020
2:02:51 --> 2:02:56
break the cycle of intimidation, which is really totalitarian, what they're doing,

1021
2:02:58 --> 2:03:05
we won't stand a chance. I agree. But what Craig was just saying, I think it was Craig,

1022
2:03:06 --> 2:03:10
about the fact that, you know, so you get arrested, you get intimidated, you get arrested,

1023
2:03:10 --> 2:03:15
you get roughed up a bit, and ultimately you end up in court winning. So what have the police

1024
2:03:15 --> 2:03:21
officers done, right? So people need to put on their big man pants and realise that, you know,

1025
2:03:21 --> 2:03:27
these people in uniform acting as the bullies in the playground, that's all they are. That's all

1026
2:03:27 --> 2:03:30
they are. They're not going to go around killing everyone. They're not even going to go around

1027
2:03:30 --> 2:03:34
seriously beating up everyone. So all they're going to do is shout and get in your face and

1028
2:03:34 --> 2:03:41
maybe rough handle you. I mean, is that really the worst? Is that the worst? And if that is the worst,

1029
2:03:41 --> 2:03:46
then really can't people stand up to that? And I think, you know, what we've done in the UK is we

1030
2:03:46 --> 2:03:52
veterans have gone out to the local communities and we've supported them in going to confront the

1031
2:03:52 --> 2:03:58
police and going to the hospitals and going etc. to show the civilians how you hold the line against

1032
2:03:58 --> 2:04:05
an armed person, but don't get stood down. And if that means being arrested, then fine,

1033
2:04:05 --> 2:04:09
go through the process. Once you're in the court, once you're in the police cells,

1034
2:04:09 --> 2:04:14
you can chew their ears off. And what we found was that the vets who were brave enough to go through

1035
2:04:14 --> 2:04:19
that whole process had an amazing time in the police station, because a lot of the people were

1036
2:04:19 --> 2:04:23
saying, you know, well done, and you know, we need more of you to sign up. And we're in a difficult

1037
2:04:23 --> 2:04:29
position because unless more of you stand up, you know, there's not a lot we can do. Right?

1038
2:04:29 --> 2:04:37
Right. I totally agree. Like I said, the point is just, you know, you will always only have

1039
2:04:37 --> 2:04:44
a very small minority of people that will stand up no matter what. And even if they get arrested,

1040
2:04:44 --> 2:04:51
you know, I'm kind of like that. So what let them? But the vast majority, however, unfortunately,

1041
2:04:51 --> 2:04:57
they just want to get by somehow. And they don't realize. I agree. I agree. But also the feedback

1042
2:04:57 --> 2:05:05
I get is that a lot of people want to do more, but they don't know how. They're avidly watching the

1043
2:05:05 --> 2:05:10
people who are on the front line doing these things. And then they're getting the courage up

1044
2:05:10 --> 2:05:16
and the protocols and the templates, get a gang together and they do it as well. So it's a ripple

1045
2:05:16 --> 2:05:23
effect. Right. So we don't need everybody. We only need a core group of people to show how everyone

1046
2:05:23 --> 2:05:29
else how to do it, how to stay calm, which I can't always do, I have to confess. But you know, how

1047
2:05:29 --> 2:05:34
to cite the law correctly, how to stand your ground if they do put you in a police wagon,

1048
2:05:34 --> 2:05:39
how to make the most of being then able to chew the ears off of the police and get as many of them

1049
2:05:39 --> 2:05:44
onside, etc. So you see it as a great big game of chess, and it's no longer something to be scared

1050
2:05:44 --> 2:05:53
of. Yeah, that's how we need to get people to think, I think, personally. Yeah, I totally agree

1051
2:05:53 --> 2:06:01
with you on that. When I look at the situation in law, I can see that obviously there's employment

1052
2:06:01 --> 2:06:08
rights which are being infringed. There are doctors rules and regulations such as do no harm to being

1053
2:06:08 --> 2:06:14
infringed. Probably also there's quite a few doctors regulations that are being infringed.

1054
2:06:14 --> 2:06:23
There's GDPR being infringed because people's, you know, they're bio biometrically taking people's

1055
2:06:23 --> 2:06:28
details and putting them into databases so that they can control payments. And the civil rights

1056
2:06:28 --> 2:06:34
being infringed. There's so many. It's interesting that on each of these levels, Anna, we could

1057
2:06:34 --> 2:06:43
formulate an approach which would then be be a tool for people to use in different situations,

1058
2:06:43 --> 2:06:49
like whether it's GDPR, employment, dealing with doctors who want to vaccinate you,

1059
2:06:50 --> 2:06:57
you know, children's rights. Each of these things is like has a body of simple principles associated

1060
2:06:57 --> 2:07:02
with it and giving people those tools would make them very much stronger in each of those situations.

1061
2:07:03 --> 2:07:07
Exactly my aim. And what I've done, sorry to interject because I'm getting really excited

1062
2:07:07 --> 2:07:14
at your enthusiasm and your willingness to collaborate, is that I've done what I've called

1063
2:07:14 --> 2:07:20
the applicable legal framework to the COVID-19 pandemic for want of a better title. And essentially

1064
2:07:20 --> 2:07:26
I've set out obviously its UK perspective. So, you know, that we'd have to get a team of international

1065
2:07:26 --> 2:07:32
lawyers to put together their country's stuff. But, you know, from the UK's perspective, currently

1066
2:07:32 --> 2:07:38
it runs to about 400 pages thus far. And it sets out all the laws that I've been able to identify

1067
2:07:38 --> 2:07:45
covering exactly all those different areas. Right. Now the idea of that document, whilst it's vast,

1068
2:07:45 --> 2:07:49
is that people can cherry pick the bits of law out of that that apply to their situation.

1069
2:07:49 --> 2:07:56
So it's a compendium, if you like. It needs more work and an index and, you know, links, etc. So

1070
2:07:56 --> 2:08:01
I'd be very grateful for some help on it because I've been trying to find people who can help on it.

1071
2:08:01 --> 2:08:05
But I've also, I'm in the middle of drafting because we hope to present it to the police this

1072
2:08:05 --> 2:08:14
weekend, a formal request for an investigation into the crimes that I'm alleging. Now the war

1073
2:08:14 --> 2:08:22
crimes team of the Metropolitan Police, the SO15 team, should be investigating these crimes, right,

1074
2:08:22 --> 2:08:30
because they include genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity. But I've listed around 35 crimes

1075
2:08:30 --> 2:08:36
and breaches of human rights violations. And what I've done is I've made the allegation of,

1076
2:08:36 --> 2:08:41
you know, which crime it is. So conspiracy to commit murder, for example, gross negligence,

1077
2:08:41 --> 2:08:48
manslaughter. Then I've cited the governing statute. I'm also doing the case law and any common law

1078
2:08:48 --> 2:08:54
that applies and any international law that applies. Again, so that anyone could take that

1079
2:08:54 --> 2:09:02
to their local police or to, you know, whoever with the right law being cited. Because when you

1080
2:09:02 --> 2:09:08
watch so many people going into the police station, onto the vaccine clinics, it's so frustrating

1081
2:09:08 --> 2:09:14
because you've got people, you know, the truth is, citing the law incorrectly and, you know,

1082
2:09:14 --> 2:09:20
halfheartedly and unable to follow through with proper submissions. And then you've got these

1083
2:09:20 --> 2:09:25
police who I now know only spend 16 weeks at policing college and goodness knows how little

1084
2:09:25 --> 2:09:32
of that is devoted to the law, also arguing points of law that they are also clearly clueless about.

1085
2:09:32 --> 2:09:35
And of course, the public are watching that thinking, well, some of these people must be

1086
2:09:35 --> 2:09:42
citing the law correctly. And none of them are. And so everyone's absolutely hopelessly clueless

1087
2:09:42 --> 2:09:47
about what really is going on with the law. And that includes the police and the military as well,

1088
2:09:47 --> 2:09:54
and the air force, because these people are being literally ordered to take vaccines which are

1089
2:09:54 --> 2:10:03
crippling them. And if we can bring the military and the other forces onto our side by protecting

1090
2:10:03 --> 2:10:09
them through giving them the principles of law, which actually defend them, then we've all,

1091
2:10:10 --> 2:10:16
we'll win their hearts and they will defend us when the time comes instead of trampling us.

1092
2:10:16 --> 2:10:22
So I think it's really important to give all these groups, especially in a sense,

1093
2:10:22 --> 2:10:29
the military and the police and the air force, the actual real laws to defend them.

1094
2:10:29 --> 2:10:33
Yeah, exactly that. And I'm working with a great team of veterans. And in fact,

1095
2:10:33 --> 2:10:37
last night at one o'clock in the morning, we were finalizing our conversation about next steps,

1096
2:10:38 --> 2:10:44
which was precisely that, that, you know, as a team of veterans who are recognizing these acts

1097
2:10:44 --> 2:10:49
as prohibited acts of unlawful warfare, we have a duty to uphold the law of warfare.

1098
2:10:50 --> 2:10:55
And so we must, you know, collaborate. We've been collaborating, obviously, all this time,

1099
2:10:55 --> 2:10:59
but, you know, people are finally now really wanting to do something because their loved

1100
2:10:59 --> 2:11:03
ones being affected, you know, it's been a lot of talk and not enough action.

1101
2:11:04 --> 2:11:06
They're all stuck in a cult. That's why.

1102
2:11:06 --> 2:11:10
Well, most of these people are retired and thankfully they're senior,

1103
2:11:10 --> 2:11:12
you know, so these are people in their 50s.

1104
2:11:12 --> 2:11:13
They're in a cult too.

1105
2:11:13 --> 2:11:17
No, no, no. But I mean, they've left the military for some of them for quite some time,

1106
2:11:17 --> 2:11:20
some of them for most of their lives, you know, they were in it when they were much younger.

1107
2:11:21 --> 2:11:26
So they've been a lot of them are being out for quite a long time.

1108
2:11:26 --> 2:11:33
All right, we're gonna move on. We've got only 15, 17 minutes. Craig, can you put your website,

1109
2:11:33 --> 2:11:37
please? Anna and Craig will liaise, Craig, your website so that we can all get the benefit of

1110
2:11:37 --> 2:11:40
sharing that as well. And well done.

1111
2:11:40 --> 2:11:43
Well done, Anna and Craig. I'll pass the email to Christine.

1112
2:11:45 --> 2:11:49
Excellent. Well done, Anna and Craig. James, and then Janet.

1113
2:11:51 --> 2:11:56
I'll be as brief as I can. When I raised my hand, I was going to ask a question or say some stuff

1114
2:11:56 --> 2:12:01
about the previous topic. But since Craig and Anna had that conversation, I just put all my

1115
2:12:01 --> 2:12:07
information again in the chat. Please reach out to me. Absolutely want to work with you on that,

1116
2:12:07 --> 2:12:13
as well as taking back the language. So thanks for that conversation. Please get in touch with me.

1117
2:12:15 --> 2:12:21
Christine, the news coming out of Europe for the last maybe two weeks or however long it's been

1118
2:12:21 --> 2:12:27
about this whole thing with Pfizer, and oh my goodness, you know, transmission and all that.

1119
2:12:28 --> 2:12:33
Probably many of the people here are already going to know what I'm about to say, but I'm

1120
2:12:33 --> 2:12:40
going to try to condense it so that it is something that the average person could repeat.

1121
2:12:43 --> 2:12:52
Anybody who actually read the publicly available Pfizer clinical trial documents

1122
2:12:53 --> 2:13:03
that were used by the FDA would have known in December of 2020 that the clinical trial

1123
2:13:03 --> 2:13:10
endpoints did not study death, did not study severe disease, did not study hospitalization,

1124
2:13:10 --> 2:13:17
did not study transmission. Anybody who spoke of those things afterwards was committing fraud.

1125
2:13:18 --> 2:13:26
The study didn't study those things, and that's not like FOIA requested document. This is publicly

1126
2:13:26 --> 2:13:34
available stuff that the FDA abused to approve things. The thing that everybody really seems to

1127
2:13:34 --> 2:13:45
just skip over is that the endpoints that they did study were simply diagnosis of COVID, which was an

1128
2:13:45 --> 2:13:56
abomination to begin with. It was a positive PCR test with no defined cycle threshold and no recorded

1129
2:13:56 --> 2:14:05
threshold, along with one other symptom, a cough, a fever, what have you. The key thing that

1130
2:14:05 --> 2:14:12
everybody just, you know, many people here probably know, but nobody's talking about, is the fraud was

1131
2:14:12 --> 2:14:20
self-evident in that if in the United States, if you got a jab and then you waited 30 days,

1132
2:14:20 --> 2:14:28
got a second jab and waited 13 days or 14 days, when they cut the line, if anything bad happened

1133
2:14:28 --> 2:14:37
to those people, they were counted in the unvaccinated category. That's just blatant fraud

1134
2:14:37 --> 2:14:47
on its face. The fact that the FDA approved that fraud, and it's been so maddening now,

1135
2:14:47 --> 2:14:57
oh my God, nobody knew. Everyone knew. I know. The fraud is prima facie. All you had to do is

1136
2:14:57 --> 2:15:03
look at the study. Yeah, they never claimed to reduce death, to reduce hospitalization,

1137
2:15:03 --> 2:15:10
to reduce transmission. And yeah, some of the Pfizer people mistakenly got into the media

1138
2:15:10 --> 2:15:17
and said those things. Okay. They said what they said in the study, and the FDA approved it

1139
2:15:17 --> 2:15:23
fraudulently. And then everybody in the media said whatever it is they said with absolutely no

1140
2:15:23 --> 2:15:33
scientific back. Yeah, I know all of that. And we knew all of that. The ones that from the

1141
2:15:34 --> 2:15:45
very beginning, if you will, started questioning the whole narrative. So yeah, I knew this vaccine

1142
2:15:45 --> 2:15:51
isn't going to stop transmission. This vaccine isn't going to stop you getting infected. I knew

1143
2:15:51 --> 2:15:57
all of that. The point is- They make it sound like Pfizer revealed something last week or two weeks

1144
2:15:57 --> 2:16:01
ago or whatever. Yeah, exactly. That's what I was just trying to get at. You just had eyes to see and

1145
2:16:01 --> 2:16:07
ears to hear. Right. No, the thing is, we knew that. Anyway, so that's all I really wanted to

1146
2:16:07 --> 2:16:14
say. Yeah, no, we knew that. But we had no way of getting it out to the people. I mean, we talked

1147
2:16:14 --> 2:16:22
about it for a long time. People would not listen to it. It was fake news, and we were killing people

1148
2:16:22 --> 2:16:32
by spreading this information. So we were not getting through. And the point is, we now had a

1149
2:16:32 --> 2:16:41
representative of Pfizer, and she in committee said, no, we never even tested that. So that is

1150
2:16:41 --> 2:16:48
getting through to people finally, because here is someone from Pfizer. It's not these nerds. It's

1151
2:16:48 --> 2:16:55
not these Nazis like me spreading fake news. Representative of Pfizer, and she answered the

1152
2:16:55 --> 2:17:03
question in such a way. That actually, we were capable of transporting to the people. And that

1153
2:17:03 --> 2:17:10
created huge shockwaves throughout the world. I don't know why they would not have listened to us

1154
2:17:10 --> 2:17:17
before. We had all the documentation. We had all the information. We knew all of that. We knew they

1155
2:17:17 --> 2:17:25
committed fraud the entire time. But once again, people would not listen to us. It's as simple as

1156
2:17:25 --> 2:17:32
that. And that's what I meant. And that's why stress, it's so important. We need to get through

1157
2:17:32 --> 2:17:40
to people. If one's public opinion starts shifting, then it's a whole other ballgame. But as long as

1158
2:17:40 --> 2:17:46
they control the narrative, and as long as they are capable of shutting you down, deplatforming

1159
2:17:46 --> 2:17:54
you, deleting your videos, doing whatever, for as long, they will have the upper hand. So you need

1160
2:17:54 --> 2:17:59
something which seems to be completely insignificant, as far as we are concerned,

1161
2:17:59 --> 2:18:08
because we knew all along. But we knew she said that I was am nailed it. I knew this was gonna

1162
2:18:08 --> 2:18:15
break it. That's the next nail in the coffin. You know, it's kind of like it's difficult.

1163
2:18:15 --> 2:18:19
And she laughed at the same time, Christine. She laughed at the same time.

1164
2:18:21 --> 2:18:28
Say again? She laughed at the same time. Yeah, I know. But you know, we didn't know that. No,

1165
2:18:28 --> 2:18:35
or whatever she said. Yes. Yeah, yeah. It's a no. Yeah, some really, but we knew I mean, she said,

1166
2:18:35 --> 2:18:41
I saw her. And I was like, damn, that was it. And we're gonna make something out of that one.

1167
2:18:41 --> 2:18:48
So, you know, that's kind of like the work we kind of have to do. You know, to pull it, it's like

1168
2:18:48 --> 2:18:55
picking their noses for, you know, a shred of information. But once we do get some, and she may

1169
2:18:55 --> 2:19:01
not even realize what you were saying at that point, to be quite honest. But I knew that that's it.

1170
2:19:02 --> 2:19:09
That is gonna gonna, you know, change the entire narrative now. And it did. It did.

1171
2:19:09 --> 2:19:14
Yeah, but it frustrated. I get that. And we're moving at the speed of science, aren't we?

1172
2:19:14 --> 2:19:23
No. What is that even the speed of science? Speed of light. I think. I know the speed of light. I know that.

1173
2:19:23 --> 2:19:31
186,000 miles a second. It's ridiculous. It's just crazy.

1174
2:19:32 --> 2:19:41
Yeah. All right. So, Janet, Janet, then Rh, who I presume is Russ, but Janet, you next,

1175
2:19:41 --> 2:19:48
Rh, then Stephen for final questions. I will give you a fair warning. I will leave at 11.30.

1176
2:19:48 --> 2:19:55
Well, it's gonna be. Yeah, we're finishing at 11.30. Yes. So go Janet. Great.

1177
2:19:56 --> 2:20:04
It's a very quick question for Anna, please. I think you said that in a war setting,

1178
2:20:05 --> 2:20:12
there was a right to self-defense. Now, here in Wales in the UK, the local police have been telling

1179
2:20:12 --> 2:20:18
people that there is no longer a right to self-defense in UK law. And I was wondering

1180
2:20:18 --> 2:20:26
if that is correct. Oh, the police love to make up whatever comes into their head.

1181
2:20:27 --> 2:20:32
That's absolute nonsense. So people have a right to self-defense in any situation.

1182
2:20:33 --> 2:20:40
Okay. In a war situation, right? It's a fundamental human right to protect yourself

1183
2:20:40 --> 2:20:47
from someone trying to hurt you. Right. Thank you. That clarifies. So what the law says is that you

1184
2:20:47 --> 2:20:54
can use a reasonable force to defend yourself. So if someone comes at you with a fist, you're

1185
2:20:54 --> 2:20:59
entitled to use your fist back at them. If they've got a knife, you're entitled to pick up a knife.

1186
2:20:59 --> 2:21:05
If they come at you with a fist, you can't pick up a knife. Right. But you have absolute right to

1187
2:21:05 --> 2:21:10
self-defense. And for the police to say that is absolute nonsense. And of course, you know,

1188
2:21:12 --> 2:21:16
they've seen people turning up and saying, we're going to arrest you. And I think they're beginning

1189
2:21:16 --> 2:21:22
to panic because, you know, the fact is there's more and more people realize that these are

1190
2:21:22 --> 2:21:27
bioweapons being deployed against them. You know, those are weapons being deployed. So they've got

1191
2:21:27 --> 2:21:37
the right to pick up a weapon. Yes. Do you have the right to self-defense if a police officer

1192
2:21:37 --> 2:21:44
attacks you without provocation? Absolutely, you do. And I've ended up in a fight with a policeman.

1193
2:21:44 --> 2:21:49
I can't remember who threw the first punch, but the two of us ended up on the floor fighting and

1194
2:21:49 --> 2:21:57
he called in three vans for backup. And absolutely. I know you should have called in the army.

1195
2:21:59 --> 2:22:06
I was the army. But it was one on one, right. And I, you know, he and I said to him, I absolutely

1196
2:22:06 --> 2:22:10
have the right to self-defense. But you know, the fact is he was bigger than me. And so he won.

1197
2:22:11 --> 2:22:15
But you know, you have the right to defend yourself if someone attacks you. It doesn't

1198
2:22:15 --> 2:22:19
matter who they are. Thank you. That's great. Thank you.

1199
2:22:21 --> 2:22:24
Thanks. Thanks, Janet. Russ from Canada.

1200
2:22:26 --> 2:22:30
Yes. Hi there. Thanks, Charles. And thank you, Christine, for raising awareness. Your

1201
2:22:30 --> 2:22:36
efforts have been extremely effective in breaking through the mainstream narrative. And for that,

1202
2:22:37 --> 2:22:42
I congratulate you. As some background, I spent 12 years in the Canadian Parliament and I've been

1203
2:22:42 --> 2:22:47
to the European Parliament a number of times. I just have some questions related to the process

1204
2:22:47 --> 2:22:52
that you used to set up this committee. Is it a standing committee or an ad hoc committee would

1205
2:22:52 --> 2:22:56
be my first question. The COVID committee is a special committee.

1206
2:22:57 --> 2:23:03
Okay. And is it, is there all party representation or is it just the members that we see at the news

1207
2:23:03 --> 2:23:11
conferences? No, it's an all party representation. It's by the groups, you know, the de Hont

1208
2:23:12 --> 2:23:21
procedure. So my group has three regular seats and we have three substitute seats. And ECR,

1209
2:23:21 --> 2:23:28
that would be where Christine Cherhasch is in and Rob Ross. They also have, I think, three regular

1210
2:23:28 --> 2:23:36
seats and three substitute seats. But we all decided we are all going to be there. So all six

1211
2:23:36 --> 2:23:45
of us are generally there. So, and yeah. But it's all our party representation. Yes.

1212
2:23:45 --> 2:23:51
Okay. And what reaction have you received from your colleagues, the other MEPs, as you've gone

1213
2:23:51 --> 2:23:56
down this path? I would imagine initially there was probably a lot of skepticism, but do you see

1214
2:23:56 --> 2:24:05
them persuaded or supporting your calls for action? Okay, I kind of want to split that up

1215
2:24:06 --> 2:24:15
between the reactions from members of my group, respectively my party. Within my party, there was

1216
2:24:15 --> 2:24:22
not an issue with that at all. They kind of saw it like that. They just thought I went a little

1217
2:24:22 --> 2:24:31
overboard with some of my statements. But now they've come to realize it was exactly the

1218
2:24:31 --> 2:24:41
right thing for me to do. And as you mentioned, I was capable of breaking our bubble, if you will.

1219
2:24:42 --> 2:24:49
I reached people that we would have never thought of reaching with those kind of messages.

1220
2:24:49 --> 2:24:57
So in my group, there is a few people, especially Italians. They had this nasty

1221
2:24:57 --> 2:25:06
Bergamo thing, which by the way, I will be going next week. So they were kind of hesitant. Well,

1222
2:25:06 --> 2:25:11
COVID is really bad and it's a terrible virus and we need to constrain it and we need to do

1223
2:25:11 --> 2:25:19
whatever we can. But in the other groups, especially the left and the green,

1224
2:25:19 --> 2:25:28
initially, they hate me anyway because I'm so outspoken and I usually trash their sick ideologies.

1225
2:25:29 --> 2:25:35
So they just looked at me the way they always did and now it was even worse because I was

1226
2:25:36 --> 2:25:44
somewhat making way and being successful. So they hated that even more. But it started,

1227
2:25:44 --> 2:25:49
like I said, shifting. And as I said earlier, in the beginning, it was really just staffed

1228
2:25:49 --> 2:25:57
in the building that saluted us and applauded us and were basically with us. But it's starting

1229
2:25:57 --> 2:26:04
to shift. Like I said, when I go through the building right now, there is a lot of MEPs from

1230
2:26:04 --> 2:26:09
other groups that don't particularly like me, but they respect me for what I've done.

1231
2:26:10 --> 2:26:16
And they kind of realize, maybe it's because they realized they would have never had the guts

1232
2:26:16 --> 2:26:23
to do that, just stand up and basically risk everything, being even ostracized in parliament.

1233
2:26:24 --> 2:26:34
So yes, I think it's a mixture of respect that I did do that. And now, of course,

1234
2:26:34 --> 2:26:40
I come to realize that, yeah, well, she kind of was right after all. So, oh well, we kind of

1235
2:26:40 --> 2:26:47
have to see how we get on her side or at least let her know that she wasn't completely wrong with that.

1236
2:26:49 --> 2:26:53
Where can you take it from here? Is there an opportunity to bring about legislative change?

1237
2:26:53 --> 2:26:57
Do you feel that you're approaching a majority in the chamber?

1238
2:26:59 --> 2:27:07
That's completely out of the question. Because, I mean, if you look at the House, there are 705

1239
2:27:07 --> 2:27:16
MEPs. And if things are going really well for us, really well, we have 120 votes in the House.

1240
2:27:17 --> 2:27:24
So on that particular issue now with COVID, depending on what is regarding, maybe with

1241
2:27:24 --> 2:27:30
the contracts, if there was ever a vote or something like that, we might reach possibly

1242
2:27:30 --> 2:27:41
180, maybe 200. That's it. Because then all the other MEPs, they want to be reelected,

1243
2:27:41 --> 2:27:49
and they will not upset their party lines, and they will not upset their groups. So they would

1244
2:27:49 --> 2:27:55
never vote against whatever Ursula von der Leyen said, or you know what I'm saying?

1245
2:27:57 --> 2:28:05
The party discipline takes over once again. So if I really had to put a number on it,

1246
2:28:05 --> 2:28:15
I would say 200 max. So there is no legislation. I mean, the new Parliament doesn't even have the

1247
2:28:15 --> 2:28:21
competence to propose legislation. Remember, we're the castrated circus here.

1248
2:28:21 --> 2:28:30
Right. So really, the best you can do is to use this to amplify the message, to communicate broadly,

1249
2:28:31 --> 2:28:35
and try to persuade as many. But there will be no legislative or even...

1250
2:28:35 --> 2:28:47
No, no. So what we can do is, like you said, raise awareness, wake people up, and hopefully

1251
2:28:47 --> 2:28:53
that will have enough effects into the member states, especially the ones that are critical

1252
2:28:53 --> 2:29:00
of government to begin with, like the Eastern European countries. They're generally more

1253
2:29:00 --> 2:29:10
skeptical of governments. So the effects will have to unfold there. That's pretty much the only thing

1254
2:29:10 --> 2:29:19
we can do. And of course, what we also do is we disturb their circles. They want to live in this

1255
2:29:20 --> 2:29:29
brilliant bubble here, champagne and whatever sandwiches. They don't like being disturbed,

1256
2:29:29 --> 2:29:35
and they don't like being exposed. And that's what we do. And what we will also push for is,

1257
2:29:35 --> 2:29:43
I mean, I keep telling people they should look at who voted for what in this place, especially when

1258
2:29:43 --> 2:29:50
it came to COVID and the digital green certificate, the COVID certificate, and all of that. They should

1259
2:29:50 --> 2:29:58
take note of who voted for that crap. And they should never ever vote for any MEP that was in

1260
2:29:58 --> 2:30:06
support of that ever again. So we're trying to build up pressure on the MEPs to stay within

1261
2:30:06 --> 2:30:14
their party lines, to increase the pressure on them. And if they don't change their position

1262
2:30:14 --> 2:30:23
because of conviction, well, at least let them do it. So they are in fear of being reelected.

1263
2:30:23 --> 2:30:30
Thank you so much for taking the time for this group and answering all these questions. I came

1264
2:30:30 --> 2:30:35
late, so hopefully it'll be recorded and I'll be able to catch the first part. I did send a private

1265
2:30:35 --> 2:30:39
message if you'd like to continue this conversation offline. We're hoping to do something similar.

1266
2:30:39 --> 2:30:44
Russ, if you'd like to be putting contact with Christine, just email me and I'll pass it on.

1267
2:30:45 --> 2:30:55
Okay, before I forget, could either Steve, could you copy the content of the chat and send it to me?

1268
2:30:55 --> 2:31:00
Because for some reason, I mean, this seems to be a wrapping device.

1269
2:31:00 --> 2:31:03
You can't save it on a tablet. That's good. All right, just quickly.

1270
2:31:03 --> 2:31:09
Christine, there'll be a video and maybe you'd like to submit the video to, I'm not sure what

1271
2:31:09 --> 2:31:17
I think of this guy, but he's got a massive audience on YouTube. So the events in European

1272
2:31:17 --> 2:31:24
Parliament, he did a, so John Campbell, his name is, he's a nurse. He called himself a doctor.

1273
2:31:24 --> 2:31:30
He is a doctor. I think he's a PhD. And a lot of people think he's a doctor. But anyway, so he's

1274
2:31:31 --> 2:31:34
kind of, he was promoting the vaccine and then he changed and the, you know,

1275
2:31:35 --> 2:31:39
he's trying to stay on YouTube. So it's very difficult to know where he is,

1276
2:31:39 --> 2:31:46
but he's got a massive audience. And so within three days of those,

1277
2:31:47 --> 2:31:53
him doing his, there were a million views and it was all about Christian Therese and you and

1278
2:31:54 --> 2:32:04
Ivan Sincic and more. So yeah, so there'll be a video of this and we need to

1279
2:32:04 --> 2:32:12
get the video of this to him because hopefully he'll do another video, which will attract another

1280
2:32:12 --> 2:32:21
couple of million this time, maybe. Oh, 31,000 comments on YouTube about this video.

1281
2:32:22 --> 2:32:28
Okay. And you need to read them because you know, some people on here are very

1282
2:32:28 --> 2:32:35
exercised by what's going on. But if you read those comments, you'll see 31,000 in three days.

1283
2:32:36 --> 2:32:43
Say the name again. It's John Campbell, Dr. John Campbell. As I say, I'm not sure what his position

1284
2:32:43 --> 2:32:51
is. Okay. But anyway, people seem to like him and now he's publishing what you've been doing in

1285
2:32:51 --> 2:32:58
European Parliament. Excellent. Yeah. Okay. So quickly, because we're tight. Thank you, Russ.

1286
2:32:59 --> 2:33:03
We'll get the chat to you and chat to Christine Craig quick because we've got to go.

1287
2:33:07 --> 2:33:13
Craig, you're muted, I think. Just want to say, I really love your idea of who voted for this crap

1288
2:33:13 --> 2:33:20
because basically that exposes the politicians who are making bad political voting. And by

1289
2:33:20 --> 2:33:26
threatening their voters base because they realize that by being exposed in that way,

1290
2:33:26 --> 2:33:32
people won't vote for them. So I think it's a brilliant idea to have a database or something

1291
2:33:32 --> 2:33:39
whereby people can see who voted for what crap, basically. And then they can, people can say,

1292
2:33:39 --> 2:33:45
my God, they voted for that. They're obviously useless. It's brilliant idea. I don't know how

1293
2:33:45 --> 2:33:50
legal it is for me to do it with GDPR, but I think it's really worth looking into to try and...

1294
2:33:52 --> 2:34:01
The voting records are open. So you're able to retrieve them from the EU Parliament. I know

1295
2:34:01 --> 2:34:07
they put it out. If you drop me a note, I'll get some of my assistants to assist you with that,

1296
2:34:07 --> 2:34:14
to find that. But that's public record. You can retrieve that. That's no problem at all.

1297
2:34:15 --> 2:34:20
I think I'm a great believer in exposing individuals in this thing, because most of

1298
2:34:20 --> 2:34:25
the bad actors are hiding behind labels and literally hiding behind masks. So it's kind of

1299
2:34:25 --> 2:34:30
it when you take away the mask, they didn't, they just, they just freak and it's like brilliant

1300
2:34:30 --> 2:34:38
strategy. Yeah. So great. Yeah, definitely. Are you going to... And the other thing, and so Christine's

1301
2:34:38 --> 2:34:43
staff will help you on that. The other thing to note, there may well be somebody who has already

1302
2:34:43 --> 2:34:48
done that work. If you have a search of someone might, amongst this group, might know that there

1303
2:34:48 --> 2:34:54
have been people who have been analysing who's voting for what. So maybe that work's already

1304
2:34:54 --> 2:35:00
been done. Christine, I've got three quick questions, Charles, very quickly. Christine,

1305
2:35:00 --> 2:35:07
would you like to give evidence to the UK inquiry into how the COVID-19 pandemic was handled by the

1306
2:35:07 --> 2:35:17
British government? Do I need evidence for that? I don't think so. You're a legislator in the EU

1307
2:35:17 --> 2:35:23
Parliament. I think, you know, you can give evidence to the British inquiry. So I don't know how it

1308
2:35:23 --> 2:35:29
works, but presumably you could, I could suggest that you give evidence. If you're prepared to do

1309
2:35:29 --> 2:35:38
it, that would be. But yeah, you know what? Why don't you... We should talk about this. Why don't

1310
2:35:38 --> 2:35:45
you call me? Yeah. So the EU investigation into Von der Leyen, the way the contract... I wanted to

1311
2:35:45 --> 2:35:51
ask you, do you normally see the contracts with big contracts that are awarded by the European

1312
2:35:51 --> 2:35:57
Parliament? This, by the way, was the biggest contract ever awarded by the EU, I think. Yeah,

1313
2:35:58 --> 2:36:05
might very well have been. Usually it's, yes, we are allowed to look at the contracts.

1314
2:36:06 --> 2:36:13
There are some portions redacted, of course. Okay. But that's, you know, minor parts and

1315
2:36:13 --> 2:36:21
really not crucial parts. But in these contracts, I mean, pretty much everything is redacted.

1316
2:36:21 --> 2:36:27
Exactly. Has that ever happened before with any contract? Not that I know of. It just so happened

1317
2:36:27 --> 2:36:33
it was the biggest contract ever. Exactly. I mean, they didn't as much as redacted the page

1318
2:36:33 --> 2:36:40
numbers. So you would not be able, you know, to see, oh, there's a page missing or, you know,

1319
2:36:40 --> 2:36:45
whatever. Or is it even all pages? I mean, seriously, yeah, they meant business this time

1320
2:36:45 --> 2:36:51
in redacting. Yes. And one last question. Do you have any idea, it doesn't matter if you don't know,

1321
2:36:51 --> 2:36:59
but do you have any idea how many deaths, in my opinion, that have been worldwide

1322
2:36:59 --> 2:37:07
due to these shots? How many deaths? Yeah. I'm sorry, didn't get that. Yes, yes, due to these shots.

1323
2:37:08 --> 2:37:18
So this is my- Due to these shots. I think you asked me that before, and I grossly underestimate

1324
2:37:18 --> 2:37:23
it because I cannot, I cannot, for the life of it, cannot come up with reasonable numbers

1325
2:37:23 --> 2:37:32
when it comes to estimates. I think you told me it was like, what, 20 million, something like that?

1326
2:37:32 --> 2:37:38
It is 20 million, yeah. Yeah. Oh. And that's arrived up with the 75,000 for the four, sorry,

1327
2:37:38 --> 2:37:44
three jurisdictions, Europe, USA, UK, combined population of 750 million.

1328
2:37:45 --> 2:37:52
Oh, sorry, 800 million. And the population of the world is eight, approximately eight billion,

1329
2:37:52 --> 2:37:59
called it. Right. So if we say that half of those eight billion got vaccinated, that's four billion.

1330
2:37:59 --> 2:38:08
And we're talking about, so, and it's 75,000 times. We think it's 1% that have been reported. It was

1331
2:38:08 --> 2:38:14
said to be one to 10%, but now people are kind of getting that down to 1%. And those are only the

1332
2:38:14 --> 2:38:21
short-term deaths, by the way, 20 million short-term deaths. We have no idea medium term or long term.

1333
2:38:21 --> 2:38:27
And all the people who will die younger than they would have done, have they not been shot. Yeah.

1334
2:38:27 --> 2:38:34
Yeah, that's true. Brain injury and heart injury. All right. Come on, Stephen, you'll keep talking

1335
2:38:34 --> 2:38:37
if I let you keep talking. Well, I think that's a pretty important point, Charles. We need to have

1336
2:38:37 --> 2:38:44
some idea. They're all, Christine's got the number, 20 million. And one of my friends has suddenly

1337
2:38:44 --> 2:38:48
developed cancer, of course, but he got jabbed for convenience. So we're all going to get these

1338
2:38:48 --> 2:38:54
turbo cancer experiences, aren't we? So, so that's another medium term deaths. Well,

1339
2:38:54 --> 2:38:59
okay. There'd be some short-term death. Most of them, there may be some long-term deaths, of course.

1340
2:38:59 --> 2:39:06
Yeah. But the plausible possibility, the longer the interval between the injection and their death.

1341
2:39:07 --> 2:39:13
Yeah. All right. Well, it's 11, it's 1140 for Christine. She has to go to bed. You have to go

1342
2:39:13 --> 2:39:19
to bed. Everybody has to go to bed. Yeah. Five o'clock tomorrow morning. Oh, yes. Sorry to hear

1343
2:39:19 --> 2:39:26
that. All right. Thank you, Christine. Everybody. Big round of applause for Christine. Great work.

1344
2:39:26 --> 2:39:32
Christine. Thank you again. Thank you so much for having me. Give them a hard time in Brussels.

1345
2:39:32 --> 2:39:38
Oh, I always do. You know that. With our love. With our love. That's right. Thank you so much,

1346
2:39:38 --> 2:39:44
guys. You have a good one. Bye. Thanks. Bye. Thank you. Bye. Bye. Thank you so much.

1347
2:39:45 --> 2:39:55
All right, everybody. That's it. Sunday. We've got Bishop Vagano, correct? Archbishop. Archbishop.

1348
2:39:56 --> 2:40:02
Yes, archbishop. So questions, please send them to me or to Steve. If you send them to me, then I can

1349
2:40:02 --> 2:40:08
coordinate them and send them off to the archbishop. Some, some, we've already got about 10 questions,

1350
2:40:08 --> 2:40:14
Stephen. So please, what would you and the archbishop wants written questions so that he knows what he's

1351
2:40:14 --> 2:40:22
going to be addressing everybody. So send the questions and we will forward them to the archbishop

1352
2:40:22 --> 2:40:27
before he addresses us. Thank you for being here. Thank you for the wonderful chat. Stephen, I will

1353
2:40:27 --> 2:40:34
send you the chat. Jeremy Forbes does a good job editing the chats as well. Thank you, Jeremy,

1354
2:40:34 --> 2:40:43
for that. Thank you for all of your suggestions and comments. And Daria, yes, people keep figuring

1355
2:40:43 --> 2:40:47
out we've got about another two days before we have to send the questions. So there's a bit of

1356
2:40:47 --> 2:40:53
time to do your thinking about the best questions. Stephen, again, well done for organizing this group.

1357
2:40:54 --> 2:41:01
Well done for starting this group when you did. And on we go, everybody. And there's no time for

1358
2:41:01 --> 2:41:07
despair. We don't despair. We fight the fight. Have a wonderful Tuesday night and Wednesday.

1359
2:41:08 --> 2:41:14
And I look forward to being with you. We all look forward to being with you all again on Sunday or

1360
2:41:14 --> 2:41:19
Monday morning for we poor people in Australia. Excellent, Charles. Thank you for getting up so

1361
2:41:19 --> 2:41:26
early. Yes, Charles. Twice a week. Consistently for a year, Charles. Very good.

1362
2:41:26 --> 2:41:37
Yeah, it's been a big journey. And as Daria says, surrender is not an option. And the sword of truth

1363
2:41:37 --> 2:41:42
is available for us, but we have to wield it. So don't just look at it, but wield it. Thanks, everybody.

1364
2:41:43 --> 2:41:45
Bye. Thank you. Bye.