That's the way that it goes.
All right, so everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.
This group was founded by and for those of you who have heard this introduction, please listen again for two reasons.
One, because what you hear today is not what you heard yesterday.
And two, because there are new visitors, new attendees to the group, including our speaker.
So it's also relevant to you.
Dr. Lawrence Pilewski will call you Larry for the purposes of our friendly group.
So this group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost of Wales in mid 2021 during the darkest days of the COVID
scam responses with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower and activist.
His medical specialty is radiology.
Sadly, the need for this group is increasing, not decreasing.
The forces of evil globally are not disappearing.
As we know with the World Holocaust Organization, sometimes called the World Health Organization.
I'm Charles Coviss, the moderator of this group.
I'm Australasia's passion provocateur.
And my jacket is red because red is the color of passion.
I've practiced law for 20 years before changing career 30 years ago.
And over the last 11 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine damage and damage from bad
medical advice. I'm also chief executive officer of an industrial hemp company based here in Australia.
The people who attend this group are indeed passionate about the aims of this group.
We comprise lots of professions, doctors, lawyers, naturopaths, homeopaths, healers,
journalists, engineers, writers, researchers, scientists, filmmakers, dentists, nurses, investors,
financiers, patent experts, professors and educators, primate experts, thinkers, peacemakers,
philosophers and troublemakers. Larry, there's plenty of troublemakers here.
The world needs troublemakers. And we're from the UK, USA, Australia, Canada, Argentina, Sweden, Norway,
Borneo, New Zealand, South Africa, Czech Republic, Germany, Austria and from other places.
If you are from another country, please put it in the chat. If this is your first time here, welcome
and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat. We ask that you show your name on the screen so we
know who you are. If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have a radio or TV show or you have
written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you and find you.
This group meets at least twice weekly in a true spirit of exploration and discovery to increase
our understanding of what's going on and how to more effectively preserve and fight for truth,
ethics, justice, freedom and health. Most of us understand that we're in the middle of World War
Three and that there are various battle lines as part of this war. Some of us believe we are in a
continuation of World War Two or this might even be the 5G war. Most of us understand the development
of science. As Carl Sagan wrote, science requires an almost complete openness to all ideas. On the
other hand, it requires the most rigorous and uncompromising scepticism. The meeting runs for
two and a half hours, after which for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram
meeting. Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join. We will listen to Larry
Pelewski, our guest presenter, for as long as you wish to speak, Larry, and then we have Q&A.
If you wish to ask any of you a question, raise your hand using the reactions tab on the bottom
of your screen. Stephen Frost, via long established tradition, will be asking the first set of
questions. There is no censorship. It's a free speech environment, but we have proper, efficient
and effective moderation. Be patient with the process of the meeting. Different people have
totally different views about what is important, what is relevant and what is nonsense in the
circumstances in which we find ourselves. Free speech is crucially important in our fight to
preserve our human freedoms. And for those who have not been exposed to communism, my parents
were refugees from communism from Hungary. And the communist strategy is always to start with
the liberation of free speech. The tragedy these days is that a majority of people would
choose security ahead of freedom and then end up with neither. This group can help you to identify
your beliefs and perhaps help you change those that no longer serve you. This group can help you
raise your self-awareness. If you find yourself upset by anything that's said, look inside yourself.
That's where your upset originates. If you're offended by anything, be offended. We are genuinely
not interested. We reject the offence industry that requires nobody to say anything that may
offend anybody. I have a list of nine standard responses to someone who claims to be offended
by something that I said. If you want a copy of the nine standard responses, I'm happy to share it.
I urge you never to apologise to someone who claims to be offended. Decide to have an open
mind. It's the fastest way to learn. We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.
And our guest speaker, Larry, is certainly loves children. He must love children if he's a
paediatrician. Fear is the opposite of love. Fear squashes you, suppresses you, depresses you. That's
where depression comes from. Love, on the other hand, expands you, emerges, energises you, enhances
you. Loving those with different views to your own is a challenge and we encourage you to embrace
that challenge. If you have a solution or a product that will help people, put the details into the
chat. If you have links and resources that will be helpful, put them into the chat also. The meeting
is recorded and is uploaded within a couple of days onto the Rumble channel. I will put the link
into the chat. Now, welcome to Dr. Lawrence Pilewski. Larry, who we thank you so much for
giving us your time and wisdom and insights. We've been having some drama. Sorry for the late notice,
everybody, but I'm pleased to see that we've got 57 people here. Well done, Stephen Frost,
for running around. Thank you, Stephen, for creating this group, for organising, Larry.
And Stephen, before we get to Larry, would you like to say anything?
Well, thanks to Shasta for helping me and to Curtis Cost as well, he helped and various other
people. But anyway, Larry, I'm sorry I got your name wrong. I've obviously been reading too much
about Pavlov and I managed to get a V. Very good. It's seductive, isn't it, to put the V
before the L. Pavlevsky, it sounds even better than Pilevsky, Larry, on the... So you might wish to
change your name, but anyway, thank you so much for coming on at short notice. Very brave of you.
And thank... Well, actually, we're a pretty nice crowd, so I don't think you'll find it stressful.
And Larry, do you want to... You just got to talk or do you want to share your screen? I can make you
a co-host if you wish. No, no, I'm happy to start talking and... Beautiful. I will talk for a shorter
time than you're allotting me because I much prefer a back and forth conversation than me just
droning on. So thank you for this opportunity. I'm glad I was able to accommodate for this
opportunity. And thank you, Curtis and Shasta, for reaching out to me. What an introduction, Charles.
That was quite... I was very taken by what you read and I appreciate it. So for people who are
not familiar with me and my work, I'm a licensed pediatrician in New York State in the United
States and I graduated NYU School of Medicine in 1987 and did a pediatric residency at Mount Sinai
Hospital from 1987 to 1990. And after that, I did a one-year fellowship in the outpatient department
at NYU School of Medicine at Bellevue Hospital where I also worked in the emergency room.
And so for the first nine years after finishing medical school and residency and fellowship,
I worked in a pediatric emergency room in the Bronx in New York. I covered a private practice
on weekends on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. I ran a pediatric intensive care unit at a hospital
in Manhattan. I covered the newborn nursery, the neonatal ICU, high-risk deliveries. I covered the
inpatient pediatric ward. I taught residents and medical students. I worked in the emergency room
at the same hospital and then eventually I worked in an outpatient clinic at that same hospital.
And so over those nine years, I did what I was taught to do in medical school. I
critically thought. And over the nine years, I saw that there was an apparent presentation of things
in my experience that didn't match what it was that I was told should happen in the world of medicine
out of residency. And instead of just trying to fit what I was seeing into the model of what I was
told, I started to be really curious about what I was seeing that was different from what I was told.
And lo and behold, I started to move into directions that many of my colleagues in
my allopathic training were unable to hold space for, one of which was nutrition as a
field of medicine. And then of course, the big subject of vaccines. And that started in about
1998. But if I go back even further, I realized that 1991 was the first time that I questioned
vaccines without realizing that I was questioning vaccines when the hepatitis B vaccine was mandated
for every newborn. And I thought, wait a second, there's never been a disease that we vaccinated
for that didn't affect the population that were vaccinating. And so it just seemed strange to me
that were we given a vaccine. And it wasn't until about 1998 when I realized from a mother who came
up to me and said, Dr. Larry, did you know there's mercury in vaccines that I actually started
researching the subject. So fast forward to 2020. When I first heard about the illness called
COVID, I was very taken aback by what was reported and how the diagnosis was made.
And then when I got COVID myself in March, April of 2020, and felt the symptoms,
I knew right then and there that this was a poisoning of epic proportions. And that poisoning
was very common with the same symptoms of people who were presenting all around New York that my
colleagues were seeing. And I have been delving into the subject of viruses and what viruses can
and can't do for well over 10 years. And I knew that this could not be a viral illness.
And based on the way that the symptoms were presenting, I knew that we were not doing what's
called a differential diagnosis. I knew that we were not looking at all of the things that could
be causing the kind of serious symptoms we were seeing, which did not look like flu-like symptoms
at all. Flu-like symptoms, whether you call it a virus or not, even though it's not a viral
illness, flu-like symptoms almost always look like material coming out of the body. There's
mucus coming out of the nose. There's mucus coming out of the chest. There's cough that's productive.
There's fever. There's vomiting. There's diarrhea. There's rashes. Things are moving out of the body.
This illness had very few of those common symptoms. In fact, it was a presentation of symptoms that
looked like something was going in the body. And the dry cough and the inability to maintain
oxygen levels while still having adequate carbon dioxide levels made this more of a blood disorder.
And so many of us in New York who were seeing this for the first time said, this is a blood
disorder. This isn't a respiratory disorder. And we were silenced. We were censored. And many of
the doctors were moved from certain positions in their hospitals to other positions. And then
doctors around the world who were saying, this is a blood disorder, were then censored. And then
sometime late in 2020, the article came out. I don't remember exactly which journal it was
that said COVID-19 is a blood disorder, not a respiratory disorder. And so from the very beginning,
it was very clear to many of us who were doing a differential diagnosis that these symptoms were
not typical of a flu and were much more like a poison. And all of that conversation was squelched.
And for a scientific method, that was dangerous. And we realized that as doctors and other
practitioners were getting people better with non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical interventions,
we realized that they were getting censored as well, which meant that somebody was trying to make
a certain narrative happen and somebody was trying to make another narrative disappear.
And so it became very clear to those of us who do differentials, who critically think,
who are willing to be wrong, but at least have a discussion, a debate or a dialogue,
we're all being pushed away. And you saw people who were getting better with the protocols that
many physicians and health practitioners were using all over the world. And that information
was squelched. And we knew that it was being squelched because the EUA couldn't be used
for an experimental injection if there was an adequate solution for improving people's symptoms.
And so you have a layer of lies and difficulties trying to get the truth out
regarding what was getting people sick. And then you had another layer of lies about how practitioners
were getting people better. And that was being squelched. And of course, there's issues around
the mask and lockdowns and whoever quarantines healthy people and the whole idea that a mask
actually might make you sicker rather than make you healthier. But when those of us
who were looking at the ingredients of this shot that we were getting some information about,
we were looking at it at the end of 2020. I did a podcast for Canada in October, November 2020.
And after researching the information, I made a statement that this shot was a murder weapon.
And lo and behold, it appears that that's the case. And so how could you have a vaccine,
and I use the word vaccine in italics, how can you have a vaccine for an illness that's not caused
by an infection? How can you have a vaccine for an illness that isn't infectious? And so if it's not
an infectious illness, and of course, we can talk about spread and how it seems to spread around
people in a similar environment, which may have nothing to do with contagion and have something
and have something to do with the environment completely. But how could you have a vaccine
that's not for an illness that's caused by an infectious agent? And so the question must be
raised, if there's no infection, what is this injection? And lo and behold, what many of us
have seen, and I do a podcast every Thursday evening, 7pm Eastern time in New York, called
critically thinking with Dr. T and Dr. P, where Dr. Sherry Tenpenny and I go through topics of the
day and critically think through things, and we're going to talk about the different ways that
critically think through things. And once a month, we do a five docs podcast with the two of us and
Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Lee Merritt, and Dr. Carrie Madde. And it was April 22nd of 2021,
where we did our first five docs, where we talked about the flood of stories we were hearing
about women whose menstrual cycles were being changed. And those Facebook posts were being
removed. Those people who were reporting injury were being removed. And again, more of the
censorship and the flood of reports that doctors were seeing regarding increases in cancer rates,
in increasing in menstrual cycle difficulties, increasing in infertility, increasing in
miscarriages, and then soon to see increases in heart attacks, myocarditis, strokes, cancers,
neurological problems, autoimmune diseases, fetal demise. I mean, there are nurses who are now
nurses who are now reporting in great numbers the increase in fetal demises in OBGYN and OB suites,
and how that information is being squelched, and how many people in hospitals who went in for a
motor vehicle accident were labeled COVID death, even though their death was from something
unrelated to COVID. And that was happening all over the world and how the intervention
of a ventilator was actually an inappropriate intervention for taking care of someone who was
hypoxic with different difficulty breathing, having nothing to do with a respiratory disorder,
but having to do with a blood disorder that in due time created lung pathology because of the
poisoning of the blood that then affected the lungs in addition to every other part of the body.
And so we're seeing neurological problems, autoimmune problems, etc. And the question that
I think I always raise is why would that be censored? Why would people who legitimately
have those experiences straight in front of them be told that their experience is wrong
and no one should listen to them? And why would they be censored unless there's another agenda
and so it's not a world of freedom, it's a world of tyranny where open discussion and debate is
no longer accepted. And that should raise an alert even to people who are unaware that there's a
problem. It should raise an alert to people who are just peering out into the future and saying,
and saying, what would be going on that would allow for the censorship of public discussion
and people who are interested in talking through a problem? And I think, you know,
again, as I was saying before we started the recording, most people in my experience don't
know things because we tell them things. They know things because they either have their own
experiment and their own experience in their own backyard or because someone close to them has
an experience that impacts them. But to just hand people the news that says, yeah, people are dying
in record numbers of heart attacks and cardiac arrest and myocarditis and yeah, there are hundreds
if not thousands of young professional and amateur athletes who are just collapsing all over the place.
In order for them to believe it, sometimes they really need to know someone or have the experience
themselves for that wake up to happen. And I think one of the things that I've seen, at least in the
states, that is encouraging is that parents and others who are not parents who never thought to
question the vaccine schedule are now not only questioning the truthfulness of this COVID injection,
but they're questioning the entire childhood and adult vaccine schedule. And I commend those people,
even though they may have suffered at the hands of one or more of the childhood and adult shots or
even the COVID shot itself. But we have a lot of recovery to do going forward as we come out from
under a rock and as we un-numb and un-dumb the society that we're living in as a whole.
And we realize that it is a dark, sinister agenda that is at play here.
And it's not as if there hasn't been this agenda for centuries. And I think when you tell people
or when you share with people that your experience and your knowledge and your research shows
that there is a dark agenda going on, their first response is, no, that could never happen. Our
government wouldn't hurt us. That's not possible. How could that possibly happen? They have our best
interest at heart. And you see, we have a rear view mirror that's blocked. There's a towel over it,
or there's masking tape over it, or it broke or it fell off. Because we forget that history does
repeat itself. And the cleverness, and I use that word in italics, of the people behind the agenda
is that they know, they know that people have retrograde amnesia. They know it happened in the
past, but they just can't fathom that it would happen in the present. And that's an unfortunate
sort of cognitive dissonance. And that's one of the ways in which those who are in charge of
this sinister agenda get their agenda through with their propaganda and with their lies.
Because they know that people are desperate for an authority outside of them to whom they can
offer their worship and their idolization. And I think it's the book Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky,
where he said, I'm paraphrasing, so long as people are free, they're going to incessantly and
needingly look for someone or something to worship. And this is very true, that we have
had centuries worth of an outsourcing of our knowledge base, an outsourcing of our worship
in order to feel like we are okay. And that freedom, that sovereignty has been surrendered
through centuries. It's an issue of shifting of consciousness. And I think we are at a time in
the world where we are shifting the consciousness. We are realizing on a huge global level that we
can no longer allow a source outside of ourselves to tell us what's true. And that we must go inside.
And whether people worship the God, a God, spirit, soul, Buddha, or even atheists, we realize that the
most important thing is for us to go inside and check how we know things. And I've often taught
to parents and in my lectures and podcasts, that there are three ways to know things.
One is intuition, where you hear things, you see things, you think of things, you know things,
and you look at things and you say to yourself, let me check in. Let me see if on a body scale,
on an autonomic nervous system scale, what I'm considering could be true. The second way is that
we have experiences. We experience, we experiment, we trial and error, we go over and over and over
things, we research, we have experiments, and we come to know things because we've actually gone
through the mud and we've come to know things. And if anybody knows kids, has kids, studies kids,
that's how kids learn. That's how kids learn. They learn by being curious and being okay with
uncertainty and unknown. And they go forth doing things to have experiences so that they then can
incorporate that knowledge and that wisdom into themselves. And then the third thing, the way we
know things is because we are told. And unfortunately, over the number of years that I've been alive,
especially since I've been in college from 40 plus years ago, I have watched a slow drain
of the first and second ways of gaining knowledge and a massive amplification of knowledge based on
what they say. And I think we are at a tremendous crossroads. And if we are going to truly shift
the consciousness in our world, I think it's going to start with parents. And the way I believe it's
going to start with parents is that we stop giving kids the answers to everything that we want them
to know. And we stop doing things for them. We stop making it easier for them. And we allow kids
to start to figure things out for themselves. Because I have watched over the last 30 plus years
a growing set of parents that is bringing up kids who have to rely on an outsourcing of knowledge.
Because the parents are being so over loving that they're doing it for their kids
almost all the time. So the kids never have to feel what it's like to learn something through
child and era. Because the parents just don't want their kids to feel uncomfortable anymore.
And so if we're going to change the next set of our generation, I feel and strongly that there's a
different kind of parenting that's required where we go back to guiding children to learn things
and not giving them the answers. So that when they try something and then they look up and they say,
give me the answer, you say, yeah, I'd love to give you the answer, but I want you to find it
yourself. You know, it's that video I once saw of a kid, maybe four years of age, who was
leaping up onto a stool to try to make it happen. And he must have fallen about four, five, six times.
Sometimes he fell flat on his face. And the person who was videotaping him, which I think was his dad,
just stood there and watched. And then as the kid kept doing it, he got closer and closer and closer
until he finally got on the stool and he stood up there in a victory, screamed like this, yes.
And you knew that this kid had learned something. You knew that this kid had developed
a sense of confidence, a sense of ability to try even though failure was happening.
And then the kid can go forth and still in his curiosity do more. And we have lost that kind of
parenting in our society because the comments that I've heard over the last 30 years from,
I don't know how many hundreds if not thousands of parents, is, well, I don't want my kid to feel bad.
And so you take away half of life when you take away the discomfort because we who are older
know that wisdom comes from the opportunity to go through a trial and error and the depth of pain
and loss and sorrow that's required in order to come up with something new and something wow.
And that starts when an infant becomes a toddler because the infant becoming a toddler is
unbelievably full of curiosity. And if we watch what's happening in our world,
there's no longer any curiosity. There's just this swallowing of an outside comment
that must be true because they said it. And so if they said it, why would I have any reason to
question it? And for those of us who have done our homework, we know that the agenda is to stop
people from thinking. We know that the agenda is to stop people from using their critical mind
because otherwise if you used your critical mind, you might actually see what's underneath that rock.
And so we are at a crossroads not just in medicine, not just in science,
not just in media, not just in government, but we're at a crossroads in consciousness.
Where we are actually really required to go further inside and ask ourselves what's true
and where do we get that truth from and how do we arrive at our thought process and our knowledge
and our wisdom. And it's not going to come from an internet source. It's not going to come from a
video game. It's not going to come from a cell phone and it's not going to come from a computer.
It's going to come from us really allowing ourselves to toil and experiment and explore
and engage in trial and error so that our knowledge can never be taken away from us
because it's our experience. So no one can tell me that my experience is wrong.
No matter how much they try, I know that if I saw a kid get a shot and die
because it happened in front of me, I know no one can take that away from me. And if we watch
the whole concept of gaslighting and we watch what's happened over decades of parents who have been
gaslit when their children have gone to the pediatrician or the family doc for their
pediatric routine visits and the kids were never the same after their shots and the parents would
see their kids not the same and the doctor would privately say, yeah, it was probably the shots,
but never write it in the chart or never agree to speaking about it in public. We've been seeing
that for decades. So what's happening now with the COVID injection is the same playbook. It's just
amplified on a much larger scale. And so with the CDC recommending this murder weapon to children
in the United States in order for get into school, and we know that state governments in the United
States and departments of health are very apt to simply accept that if the CDC made the
recommendation, it must be a good one and will implement it even though the injection is only
authorized and not licensed for or approved for use in the pediatric schedule. We know that there's
going to be a crossroads where parents are either their parents are going to be faced
with one crossroad or another, either take your kid out of school or allow the state to tell you
what's best for your kid, which has been going on for a long time now is now amplified in so many
ways, especially regarding the curriculum and the transgender movement and the clinics and the whole
lot. And we're going to need parents to decide, do I take my kid out of school and save my kid
from a harmful intervention or do I send my kid to the wolves, to the state and worry whether or
not I'm going to get my kid back, worry whether or not my kid's going to ever walk again, worry
whether or not my kid's heart is going to work, worry whether or not my kids are ever going to be
able to have children so that I can be a grandparent. And that's really where we are in the United
States and it's a race. It's truly a race to see whose voices are louder and who's going to comply
and who's not going to comply. And so all the information in the world, all the publication of
data in the world, I don't know is sufficient. I think and I've experienced that most of what
moves the needle is the experience that people are going to have to go through. And in my experience,
the only thing that moves the needle in the world is your purchasing power. And if you stop buying a
product, if you stop buying a product, then whoever's in authority will eventually listen.
But as long as you're buying the product, you are complying to their agenda and you will succumb
to the consequences if you can even identify what the consequences are from the choices that you make.
So I'm going to take a breath and stop right there.
Wonderful. Larry, wonderful. I'll show, I want to share a screen just very relevant
to what you just talked about. Here it is. Here's the hypnotizing of the masses.
So it's just a beautiful depiction of let's distract people. Let's stop them thinking. Now
the other, the before we get to Stephen, you talked about the,
you talked about the need to worship and you quoted Dostoevsky and
that need to worship is where we get celebrity worship, it appears, you know, we just love
celebrities and so we're putting them on a pedestal. John Rappaport beautifully, I've been
a fan of his for 15 years. He says that he articulates it very well. He says our system
through planning, through the planning that you're talking about Larry has made the doctor royalty.
And so it is inconceivable that our king could do harm to us and so that's the other challenge
that we face. We've had a century of honoring and in Australia the government honours system,
the disproportionate awarding of honours to anyone to do with the medical profession is
extraordinary and so the whole game is everyone's got these badges on them that they've got an
honour from the government. Oh you must be, so the system supports that.
Charles, I remember when I was a kid, I remember observing that because the United States doesn't
have a royal family, I remember having discussions with people and hearing people talk about
the fact that we allow our royalty to be Hollywood and we allow our royalty to be government
governmental politicians and we allow our royalty to be medical doctors and don't think that's
a coincidence. You know and the propaganda, I mean you go way back to many of our grandparents
who would say you know if the doctor said it therefore it's true and that has passed itself
down over generations and I remember you know speaking to mothers along the way
when they were starting to learn the side effects of the childhood injections in their kids,
the male doctors would get extremely, extremely offended that the mothers would actually question
something that they did but as women started to become pediatricians some of that started to
shift although you had the women who acted like the men like how dare you I'm the authority but
some of it started to shift when women were becoming pediatricians and they started to have
their own children but yeah we definitely have this need to idolize that which is outside of us
because you know it somehow gives us a sense of comfort that we can identify, we can know ourselves
you know and you know go back to child development, how does a baby know him or herself
through the eyes of the mother? Yeah and so who knows if that's really happening
and so if that developmental stage is missed then of course there's going to be a need to know
thyself through the eyes of others instead of knowing thyself through thine own eyes.
But Lawrence very very few people know themselves these days. Yeah hence the challenge that's what
this group is about as Stephen as we know this is an opportunity for self-awareness to know ourselves
now last thing before we get to Stephen. Charles the important point is that many people think
they know themselves but they haven't got a clue. Well you don't know that that's the other point.
I'm willing to say that I do actually because they're not effective members of society.
Yeah well I'm willing to say I'm learning myself. Sure because they're all trying yes. Yeah the last
the last point before we get to Stephen's questions it's you talked about the need
and we've talked about it in this group Larry and his twice weekly meetings that the move the needle
through purchasing power and then why don't we move the needle through purchasing power and the
answer is because of convenience. Right. I don't you know it's convenient now then look at the genius
of the masters who are driving us because coming back to what you said parents are trying to make
life easy for their kids. So of course kids have grown up oh gosh life is meant to be easy and
therefore why would I not choose the convenient way. That's our mental challenge to to do the
difficult way. So again this is again about outsourcing our comfort and so how many people
in the world I don't know I can't tell you but how many people in the world got a shot because
they had to go on that cruise or got a shot because they otherwise wouldn't be able to go to the
wedding or got a shot because they couldn't go to the theater or the movie or the doctor gave the
shot because he had his mortgage to pay. Right so yeah so my concern is where are we deciding
about what's in our best interest versus what we like or what we want or this idea that my life
will die if I don't go to the wedding my life will die if I don't go on the cruise and that's
where we get back into those primal fearful hindbrain you know reptilian brain experiences.
So Lawrence so the shallowness of contemporary life is remarkable it's really when you really
think about what's going on and this going to weddings and funerals of people they never even
like you know especially funerals and so people at both weddings unfortunately and funerals who
aren't there for the right reasons in my opinion which is why I hate both
but so that's one thing but also you're absolutely right on over these overprotective parents and
stupid teachers in schools who are saying that they're protecting the children so people learn
by suffering it's just nonsense we need to challenge this at every opportunity and you're
you're a brilliant communicator Larry you so I think your biggest strength is that people when
they listen to you you have this authenticity about you as a human being not only as a
pediatrician but of course you know about children well not all pediatricians know about children but
you do and any good mother will sense that so you have a very good platform to speak from and people
will believe you I mean I believe you you know I can hear from the way you talk what you say
I'm talking
excuse me interrupted by my own wife anyway um sorry Larry that's okay
so um I wonder so um you were talking about uh that so essentially I think you were you were
talking about they have interfered with our consciousness and in particular in my opinion
they target they've deliberately targeted children because why bother with people who've lived 50,
60, 40 years you know it's too difficult maybe to change them so start with the children let's
do a full frontal attack on children and target them with this nonsense at school you know we
need to charge it if I had school-aged children now I definitely wouldn't allow them to go to
school and anybody on this call uh needs to listen to someone like you who clearly has thought about
these things very deeply and you speak with massive authenticity I think both as a doctor
and as a human being wow thank you very much Stephen that's very sweet thank you um I want
to take what you just said and and go down a rabbit hole because um I'm I'm okay saying
that it's always been about getting the children it's never been about just taking down the
population it's there's a there's in my research and in my understanding of what's going on in the
world today it has always been about child sacrifice child killing sex trafficking rape
pillage and this satanic if I might say uh uh custom of using the child as the greatest sacrifice
to their god Baal or whoever it was and so the idea from my perspective and watching my you know
in my research over the decades of shots and seeing what is in the shots and understanding
what is in the shots and the absolute inability of the medical profession to read the science
about what's in the shots for that cognitive dissonance and really understanding that if you
read the chemical nature of the shots you will clearly see that it is meant to destroy the brain
and the immune system I mean there's there's no doubt I mean anyone who has a simple understanding
of science can just look at the ingredients look up to toxicology and understand that there's a
direct correlation but in my experience it's always been about taking down the children
and so they went and end around when it came to giving this shot to children even though there
was never a problem with this illness in the pediatric population and they they've captured
it and they are they are glorified for them they're like salivating that they have the the the
capture of the children because that's been their goal the whole time yeah yes it's capturing it's
capturing the children and the global the global organization for anti-trafficking I know the former
CEO the number of children trafficked each year globally is a minimum of 10 million so Larry we've
got a big we've got a big challenge before us of of doing what you're saying protecting you know
so here's this dilemma isn't it we want to protect the children but we have to make life tough for
them otherwise they're not going to be able to do anything so we've got some questions Stephen are
you here with your questions we've got Winston and Jeremy with questions but but we but Larry
Stephen traditionally has the first set of questions yeah I'm just so um Lawrence I'd be
really interested to hear your views on um how we attack schools and the education system for the
nonsense that they're feeding children at the moment and you know maybe it was bad
when I was at primary school but it's 10 times worse now how how do we actually get and also
you know you say um that we should uh stop and I agree we should stop uh
paying in we should stop buying things you know how do we get everyone to understand the importance
of that and to put aside their stupid desires you know to buy things that they convinced themselves
that they need when in fact they don't need them at all they just want them right and a week later
a week later they've forgotten all about it it was all about buying and impressing whomever I don't
know pressing themselves um they don't even know why they bought it after they've forgotten they
bought it a week later how do we educate people around this kind of nonsense you know so so um
I mean I don't think I have the the answer but I have an answer um and I'm curious to hear people's
response to it um I don't believe in attacking the school system at all I think that's a waste of
time and the reason I think that's a waste of time is because you're asking daddy to be good to
you now and not abuse you and not hurt you anymore you're going to the abuser you're going to the
tyrant and saying please don't hurt me anymore instead I wouldn't think you Larry I wasn't
thinking of saying meekly oh please don't do that I was thinking of telling them to do their damn
job and educate the children I think it's a waste of time and here's why they're not going to listen
because they don't have to because people keep sending their kids there people are still going
right so you know it's like in in New York there's a basketball team called the New York Knicks
and they've been horrible for years and the owner is not well liked at all but every night
the Madison Square Garden in New York is sold out so why does he have to worry about public opinion
of him or the Knicks right and I think that's similar to what I'm saying is you're trying to
ask something that is immovable be different instead of saying I'm going to create something new
in an environment that it works for me and works for others so I'm not even going to ask you to be
different it's like it's like let's say there's one supermarket in a town and it has the worst produce
it has the worst meats and and and animal products but it's the only thing that people have
and they keep going to the person and saying we want better stuff and it never changes so what
if the people get together and through classic economics market economy they put the money up
to open a new supermarket and they work with the farmers and they work with the distributors
who are going to give them better products what's going to happen to the old market
no one's going to go and that market will close that's always been the way societies change
is you know given given how lazy people are and how averse they are to taking responsibility for
their own lives right how on earth are we going to convince enough people for long enough to create
the uh the cooperative supermarket for lack of a better word the the thing is is that
you know very early on in my career um I was told um I try to convince people all the time
I try to coerce people I try to persuade people and what I realized was that that was the paradigm
that we were suffering from I'm the doctor listen to me I know better and what I'm now realizing
and have been for years is that that's not the way people move they move because they see something
different happening and in a conversation they say oh yeah you know I buy my stuff at this
supermarket oh yeah I don't go anymore oh really why don't you go anymore yeah because I'm actually
part of a group that now shops here oh really you shop over there now hum that's interesting give me
the name of it where is it sure and I feel that it always starts from the bottom up not from
trying to change institutions institutions don't have to change they never have to change
and maybe though the people who who decide to shop at the new place they're not doing it for the best
of motives you know they may be doing it because they like they respect that person they want to
be like that person you know so but it doesn't really matter I suppose how we how we achieve it
the idea that I'm trying to put forth is you know our Buckminster Fuller to me said it best and I'm
going to paraphrase it uh if you want to affect change you don't try to change what's there
you try to build a new system that makes the old one obsolete absolutely and actually when I think
about it Larry that's what we did with this group we just formed something different I didn't even
realize it was different I just knew that it was probably best to create something in my own
vision as opposed to the previous incarnation of this group which was taken over by scientists
right and Larry Larry I hope Larry I hope you can I hope you can see
Buckminster Fuller's Dimexian map behind my head I can't see it but thanks
see my passion my passion hasn't been to make daddy listen to me no there's no reason to
daddy continues to abuse me why do we keep going back asking daddy to make it better for us
but the problem is uh Lawrence that um many people most people in fact seem to like being abused
how do we deal with us that's okay because because we are not going to change everyone's minds
we're going to it you know be the change you want to see in the world is much more
transformative than hitting people over the head with the truth but Larry you talked about parents
I absolutely agree with you the parents over protect their children and so do the grandparents
they're all thinking about how can we entertain the children oh let's take them to to um what's
a place in Paris you know and Florida they've got another one uh you know the places Disney
World or whatever it is and they're all trying to gain the popularity of their children they
haven't got any courage with their own children for god's sake so they they call you know they
can't risk being unpopular with their own children they don't seem to realize that as parents and as
grandparents instead of doting on their children they damn well need to show the children what life
is about through reading to them for a start but very few parents read to their children so sorry
I'm so oh no no I I think we're saying the same thing um similar things anyway but I'm of the
belief as I said in my presentation that we must start with parenting and child education
and teaching parents how the brain develops how children develop how we need to move in a different
direction but I also don't feel that banging people over the head with the truth ever works
and I truly believe that what moves the needle is people having an experience with you
that gets them interested in what you now believe or what you're now interested in I don't want to
judge these parents for going to Disney but I would say oh that's nice and this is what happens
in my practice there are parents who say oh that's nice but I don't do that with my kids
correct and that gives the other family an opportunity to open a conversation that says
huh why is that right if we say to parents you shouldn't take your kids to those places
no I wasn't suggesting that I wasn't I know you're not but I'm just saying because we're so
big on trying to convince people and get people over to our side I think the best way to get
people to our side is to be the side it because people will take interest when they start looking
over and going but how come you're going over there like what is it like how many families in
my practice have kids who are miles and miles and miles advanced in their development over
other kids on the playground and some parents actually lean in and say how come and then the
parents can say well we don't give shots to our kids you know what Larry Larry I think that um
you know Jordan Peterson I don't really know him the clinical psychologist Canadian he's
absolutely brilliant he's got a reading list on his website and I for one am very interested in
that reading list and I think others are too I think someone like you a very respected um
pediatrician um and with this authenticity which I talked about before you know you could do that
you could put you could let it be known that you've got a list of books a hundred books
on your website you know advice so that people actually have got something to turn to and think
some will think I'm going to read every single one of those books because I've thought that about
Jordan Peterson's books I haven't had time to look at them recently but I keep meaning to look um
so I'm sorry I want to tell you a funny story sure um a mother emailed me about three or four years
ago and uh she reminded me that I saw her son in 1999 now I wasn't even 40 years old yet
and she said Dr. Pilevsky I've been following your work and I just want to let you know that when I
when you saw my child in 1999 I asked you what book I should read to help bring up my child
and you stopped for a second you turned to my son you pointed to him and you said
read that book that's the book to read and she said she said I said to her read that book
when I was pointing to her child and she said that was the most salient and brilliant information
she had ever gotten from a doctor because the problem is and I'm not saying that books aren't
helpful the problem is that we try to go here to get answers when the issue is right in front of us
right in front of us and she got it and she said that it helped her take care of her child
so much differently because she was connected to the child instead of flipping through books
while the kids playing over there and so I'm not saying books aren't important but what I'm saying
is that we are in need of returning parents to connecting to their child in a way that we haven't
done and I'm happy to lay that out because I've been talking about it and lecturing about it
and teaching it for a while but now's not the the the form but Larry I think it's very important
that people like you and me for that matter and all the people on this group there are many
brilliant people on this group that they realize how important they are in their children's eyes
and pay attention to what their children think and try to guide them in this crazy world we're in
one of the things I wanted to mention was that I meet people all the time so 40 miles away from
where I'm sitting now Bertrand Russell you know the famous British philosopher lived
I always and he died I can't quite remember when but I was always very sad after he died that I
hadn't actually gone to knock on his door so I was only a child but even so I wished I had done that
because I could see that you know bearing in mind what I understand the importance of what you're
saying but you know talking to someone like Bertrand Russell would have been an incredible
experience which I think would possibly life-changing but so I wanted to ask you
about I meet people all the time here in North Wales who they have the opportunity to meet
someone interesting and they can't make the time to do it they they're having an interesting
conversation with someone this is another example and they haven't got time to finish the conversation
because they've got to do some inane task you know it's more important than finishing the
conversation so people don't seem to understand the value of wisdom and if they have a chance
to hear some wisdom they don't want to listen to it and my feeling is that they are convinced
that they will never ever need to be wise so why do they need to try to become wise
they don't even know what the word wisdom is so what I'm trying to say is they're not suffering
enough which is exactly what you were describing earlier they're not suffering enough there's no
incentive for them and now I say to them well you better wake up because the government the
tyranny is around the corner and they just smile
Well yeah I don't feel like it's my job as a human being to do anything more than
listen to them share my experience have compassion for them and just remember that
but Larry you could influence them in a very positive way only if they're open to it and only
if they're interested in my experience and I know that when you plant a seed Stephen
the flower takes a while to bloom it doesn't happen overnight and my experience I have had
so many families over the years who I didn't see for five ten years almost 20 years say to me
you said one thing in 2004 and I just want you to know that it changed my life and these are the
things that we're responsible for we're responsible for planting seeds sharing our experience and
and having a conversation that doesn't judge that just allows for the differing of opinions
and says you know yeah I understand you feel that way but I just want to let you know that
I have a different experience and you plant that seed by sharing a different experience
not by telling people at least from my perspective you need to know this because that didn't work
when I was an earlier younger doctor in fact it was offensive from my perspective and what came
back as feedback so I think that the way in which we share experiences the way in which we talk to
people is part of the shift in consciousness in addition to parenting our kids different sure
I think I think we agree on many things most things I would say but I haven't got your patience and I
know that and I'm sorry I'm sorry to all those people on the call who think that I go on too
long with these questions but I'm trying to I'm trying to give you a chance to show who you
really are to the group but so my intentions are good but they don't always come off no I
love your questioning okay I grew up in New York I grew up in New York Stephen yeah you're very
generous you're very generous that's it all right so excellent excellent let's get on to the other
questions everybody start putting your hands up because Stephen Larry you must know that
Stephen could ask questions for the next two hours as could each one of us you know so it's
a constant bat Stephen's going I want to ask this question but there are other people so anyway
Stephen gets the last and Stephen gets the last set of questions Larry so Stephen just be patient
till the end and he always finishes this is a point of course um because I'm not doing it
more than all the while anyway for my sake I'm trying to I'm trying to show off the guest in a
good light because we've invited the guests and they've been good enough to come on for no money
so um yeah I think that you haven't paid Larry money what no we haven't paid him we'd like to
pay you Larry but are you worth it but we can't we haven't got any money ourselves that's it oh
and that's another thing Larry people bemoan the fact that they haven't got money all right come on
stay with us David we're going to another another channel here come on Winston our favorite ex
psychiatrist or you're still practicing psychiatry Winston no no no no I am just
I know I know but thank you for the opportunity thank you Dr. Polevsky I think I got that
pronunciation right and for a thought-provoking discussion um I will attempt to look at some of
the things myself in my own life that you have suggested however you've confused me
confuffled my mind a bit I understand that there has been some sort of uh dilemma
uh differences in opinion between whether COVID whatever that really is COVID-19 now 23 and ongoing
is uh respiratory disease or a blood disease now from my readings which have been quite has been
quite a bit in addition to which I have communicated with uh two professors uh Bagby and um Yidin
uh regarding this and I also listen to McCulloch who talks about the providing nasal rinse and so
on I have to ask it is in my impression that COVID whatever it is really is a respiratory
disease that lodges itself in our nasal passages forget anatomically what those are called which
is why Dr. McCulloch suggests we rinse with 10% pylori and other solutions as well um so and that's
why the lungs are affected there is CD4 CD8 cells that nobody talks about it talk about antibodies
um but my question is having regards anatomy and
a lot of us here have had anatomical studies we know that the blood and the air do not mix apart
from the the diffusion gradients with respect to the air carbon dioxide and so on so my question
to you is so if um COVID is primarily a blood-borne illness how does how does
first of all the organism get into the bloodstream bearing in mind it does not mix and I don't think
it could pass by air and then secondly how does it affect the lung and it has been my impression
that that one of the that the issue is in terms of the blood is that the injection whatever is
injected into people causes the harm in the blood um and so um so I'd like you to clarify
elucidate for me those issues thank you Dr. Winston um okay I'm going to take a deep breath
and plow into this so um we currently live in a world where everything that happens regarding
illness is reframed as an infection everything at least in the pediatric world anytime someone gets
sick there's a bug going around anytime someone is sick you have an infection you need a medication
there's a virus going around and we have never questioned that we have never taken the time
to actually delve into some of the deeper sciences to understand whether the reason people get sick
is only related to an infectious agent and so there's a huge controversy in the world right now
and it is volatile and it is very difficult to navigate because of its volatility and that issue
is around viruses and I remember learning in medical school that viruses are inert that they're
not real organisms that they have no ability to self-replicate and that all a virus is is
is a group of genetic instructions DNA or RNA that in and of itself have no capacity to do anything
unless these pieces of genetic materials were embedded inside a cellular mechanism
either in a human a plant an animal or bacteria
and so even from medical school 40 years ago and even before that when I studied science
we were taught that viruses in and of themselves cannot be infectious because they can only replicate
if they have a an in inside genetic host and so somehow we forgot that
but then over the years as the idea of viruses was continuously thrown at us
we started to realize that there is no such thing as an isolated virus
that actually no one has ever seen a viral particle we have created a pictorial of a viral
particle but we have never truly seen a virus or ever seen a virus in action and so when we take
a step back and hear that you know we go what is that I mean I had a public discussion with Dr.
McCullough about this whole idea of viruses not viruses and he looked at me on a panel and he
said if you're right Larry the whole system of western medicine will collapse and sort of I left
it there I didn't respond to him because in fact there are some brilliant scientists and medical
doctors who are more and more showing that we've never seen a virus and if you tell me that we have
because of the electron microscope I can paint a black and white dot on a black and white picture
and tell you it's anything if you'll believe it because that's not evidence of a virus and so
let's go back to what the medical school books say about viruses before we get to the fact that
viruses don't exist let's go back to what we're told viruses cannot replicate themselves again
there's no such thing but let's just stay with what we know what we think we know viruses can't
replicate they need a host to do it they're a millionth of an inch long
and we've never seen a virus enter or exit a cell we can't see it and therefore we haven't been
able to even isolate it because it's so tiny and so if we take another step into this subject
we realize that the human body contains genetic material in our chromosomes most of which is
considered junk dna but in fact only one and a half percent of our dna codes for the physical
body now if i'm to trust the human genome project they found that almost 50 percent of the material
in there codes for what they call viral particles but that's not infectious those are pieces of
genetic material that are inbred inborn part of our own genetic code that actually participates
in cellular metabolism and then we realize that we have over 100 trillion bacteria lining our bodies
and we know that inside bacteria are multiple multiple copies of what's considered or thought
to be viral particles not infectious at all and then when we realize that the cells of the body
except the red blood cells have thousands of mitochondria which were bacteria and those
bacteria contain dna or rna of what's known to be viral particles we realize that even from
the possibility that viral dna and rna does exist in our body we're infested
we're never not exposed to genetic material that's non-human
we're constantly circulating genetic material that is extricated from our genome that's extricated
from the mitochondria and that's extricated from the bacteria that line our body and so if you put
a nasal swab into your nose and you put a nasal swab into or a swab into the airway
how do you know that the genetic material that you're classifying isn't part of your own cells
how do you know that the genetic material that you're isolating isn't part of the bacteria that
are exploding in the linings of your body how do you know that the genetic material that you're
isolating isn't from something that you breathe in and how do you know that it's causing the
condition that you have and so these are questions that even virologists are looking at because we
know that what we've classified as a virus may not be what we think it is and so taking that
for another fork in the road we exclude the possibility that anything else could be giving
you the symptoms you're getting so we exclude air that you're breathing in that can make you sick
we exclude food that we're eating that can make you sick we exclude injected material that we
inject that can make you sick we exclude skin care products that you can be putting on your skin
that make you sick we exclude electromagnetic radiation that you could be exposed to that make
you sick we exclude nervous system stress that you could be exposed to that could all of these
things create inflammation in your body we exclude poisons toxins and we even exclude the possibility
that we were poisoned as the reason we could have gotten sick and that's why i said very early on
we have not done the proper differential diagnosis when people get sick and the first
set of people who are getting sick presented with dry cough headache hypertension
difficulty breathing and when examined had low po2s low oxygen levels and normal carbon dioxide
levels now i was an er an intensivist and i know a differential when you're hypoxic you must do a
differential and the differential is hypoxia what's your pco2 what's your blood gas
what's your acidosis or alkalosis and the very first set of patients including the continued
set of patients were patients who had as a differential for hypoxia not a respiratory
etiology but a blood etiology and so for those of us who are convinced pretty strongly
that we were being poisoned with nanoparticle materials that would truly explain how the blood
was no longer able to bind to oxygen including the possibility that electromagnetic waves
were affecting the binding of oxygen to red blood cells and it's only later on that the lungs would
be affected because of the hypoxia from the oxygen dislodging from the red blood cells
the red blood cells and so we never did a differential diagnosis we myopically said oh
it must be a virus without even understanding what a virus is and what a virus isn't or what
a virus can do what a virus can't do and we extracted pieces of dna that were actually
characterized from a computerized program that then gave us the genome of the virus
so the genome of the virus was made known because of a computerized estimation of what the infectious
agent is now all you're getting is a strand of genetic material that doesn't tell you
that it's infectious and in fact even the pcr even the pcr doesn't tell you that you have a virus
all it tells you is that you've amplified the presence of genetic material but you can't
attribute that to a foreign matter because you have genetic material that you're extricating from
your cells and you have genetic material that you're extricating from microorganisms that are
lining your body and so we can never know by doing a swab of a surface lining where that genetic
material is coming from because genetic material comes out of our cells from our genome comes out
our cells from our mitochondria comes out of the bacteria that are lining our body
and the assumption has always been and will always be until we shift this consciousness
that you don't get sick unless some organism gets into your body when in fact the human body
is so filled with genetic materials that we have never ever identified
well I must thank you for that
one lengthy lengthy thorough but wonderful answer which I'm indeed grateful so it seems to me that
what you're saying then um without belaboring the point is that first of all the nasal swabs
are a waste of time and secondly what is it we're not sure what is injected into people and why what
if any benefit there is or whether the opportunity was just taken to poison people the injections
I think you said it really really well doctor okay well I'm sorry
you still adopt yeah yeah he's both yeah yeah no I was I was kind of um yes
he understands things we don't well that's why I went into the medical because I knew he was a
doctor so I went a little advanced for those of you that's that's very good for people to think
about that 17 minute monologue larry and everybody please you know go back that was at the at the
820 or well anyway at the 17 minutes larry is good winston are we done with you before we get to
jeremy you you muted winston
winston you muted I think we're done okay yeah yeah so I just want to say I thoroughly enjoyed
what you said and appreciated your discourse your monologue thank you very much appreciate it
thank you winston jeremy jeremy the forbes yes sir thank you charles um first I'd like to thank you
dr polewski for certainly a fascinating and insightful presentation particularly as it
regards germ theory versus terrain which I guess is what it was um I have more of a comment
about the discussion of how to get through to people uh have some thoughts on that um
but first let me say uh I particularly agree with your comments about uh the futility of trying to
change institutions I think the solution just as you suggested is to stop patronizing them whether
they're particularly the schools you clearly cannot send your kids to these institutions that
are filling kids heads with mush and worse um so going back to the uh how to get through to people
I think um it has to be kept simple obviously and the message that comes out at us
uh machine gun like is safe and effective I really believe that it's very difficult
to challenge the safe side of things not from our point of view because we have all the evidence
on our side but when it comes to addressing a lay person who has no idea about medicine
convincing him that the vaccine that he's taking is not safe and may kill him is it
well that's met with rejection pretty quickly on the other hand the effective side can be challenged
quite simply uh going back you know going back to the authority what do the authorities say to us
the authorities will never admit uh to the lack of safety however they have recently admitted
that these vaccines do not protect you from becoming infected with covid nor do they prevent
you from transmitting it to others should you have coded whatever that is so to me that begs
the question even in the lay person as to well then why am I getting vaccinated right and I think
if you can hit them with that logic um just those two things alone the fact that you are not protected
and you're not protecting your family or your friends or your neighbors should you get coded
it should end the argument right there why then are you submitting to this coercive instruction
that you need to be jabbed constantly your thoughts please so thank you thank you for
bringing that up because it it opens up the door for many possible conversations so I'll address
it from a couple one is um I would never use the language you're using because to me it's not a
vaccine so I'm not so so I would never approach it that way but I understand using that approach
the second thing is have you ever taken a north pole of a magnet and then another north pole of
a magnet and tried to bring them together yes because that way to me is two north poles of
magnets coming together because you're trying to take information
and bringing it to other information and to me it's butting heads it's two north poles of magnets
because remember how do people know things like that person you're speaking to doesn't know his
or her information because he or she has researched it or experienced it he or she knows it because
they've been told and now someone else comes along and tells them something else and so you're
bringing north pole with north pole well I don't see it that way because I think they're more likely
to be exposed to the recent information from Walensky and company even on mainstream media
they have admitted that it doesn't stop transmission and they've heard that message I agree with you
but in my experience I will tell you that bringing more information to someone who's already accepted
information from someone else isn't as effective so what I find effective is a different approach
so sort of how do you bring a south pole of a magnet to their north pole of a magnet and so
my approach has been the following if you say to me well I believe it's safe
and I go and I say to you well I don't believe it's safe we have a problem
if you come to me and say you know I was told it's safe and I say to you really how do you know that
you've started a very different conversation because you have welcomed that other person
that other person into your heart right you have actually allowed that other person to show his or
her real knowledge base and what you start to realize very gently and compassionately
is it's a house of cards and so once you do see that you then say to them huh well you know
that's really interesting I just want you to know that in my research and in my experience I found
this and so you're not coming to them with information you're coming to them with your
heart and you're actually welcoming their head their being to drop from their head
into their heart so they can actually lean in and say huh because are you going to say
well your research and your experience is wrong you can or are you going to say huh how come you
found something so different than what I found and you just opening the possibility of a what I feel
is a more relational dialogue than a head-to-head dialogue which in my experience
doesn't work it just again because I've been teaching parents for over two decades the
dangers of shots and I have found that if I tell them information that's different from their
information I get very little but if I share with them hey you know I just want to let you know
this is what I've researched this is what I've seen this is how I understand it what do you think
they're more likely to lean in because it's not attacking because when you when you bring
information to somebody whose house of cards is only known to you and they realize that they're
knowing things only because they listen to someone outside of them it doesn't work it just doesn't
work it crashes because no matter how much logic you bring I have found it's less effective that
doesn't mean you won't be able to plant a seed and get somewhere but I have found in the trials and
tribulations of trying to reach people and failing and insulting people and going at it head to head
because you're smart now I'm smart now you're smart now I'm smart it hasn't been as effective
all I'm doing is sharing with you another way that I do it that I have found really works
different than just bringing information I try to welcome them in if someone says Dr. Larry you're
killing kids oh really can you explain to me how that's true for you that's a very different
response then no I'm not you don't know what you're talking about so we've done the information
done the information information and it's failed because otherwise we would have succeeded already
very good very good Jeremy great great stuff great conversation and all of us learn
we've had many conversations here Larry about how do we get how do we get through and that's part
of what I said at the start on the question if someone says Jeremy I'm offended by what you said
and one of the nine responses is that's interesting how do you mean and just shut up
and most people who say they're offended their mouths will go like this and nothing will come
out because they they're so used to people apologizing and genuinely say how do you mean
Jeremy I was never brought up to understand how to resolve conflict conflict resolution was not a part
of my growth as a kid but it had to become part of my growth as an adult so I had to learn you know
how do I hear somebody who has a differing opinion than I do if I say you're wrong or you don't know
what you're talking about I lose and I was good at that I was really good at that but if I say
you know what I just want to let you know that this is my experience of what you did this is my
experience of what you said this is how I feel in response to what you are doing it allows for a
greater leaning in than if I said you made me mad which is never true you don't make me mad I chose
to react in a mad way in response to what you did or said and these are things that none of us most
of us don't grow up with but we think that if we can drive home more information we're going to
win that hasn't worked so I don't disagree with you particularly with that comment I was looking
for things that people when it comes to the messaging of safe and effective how to break
that down you're not going to do it as you say with information concerning safety even though
it's all around them they still won't pay attention to it but the message that these vaccines
don't protect you against transmission or getting COVID-19 yourself those are pretty simple and easy
to understand and they're being voiced and admitted to by their own authorities so-called
authorities maybe as a compromise between what your your views and mine are or maybe to ask people
to ask their doctors ask your doctor next time you see him and he's asking you to get the next
booster doctor is this going to protect me from getting COVID-19 or transmitting it to my friends
so so I appreciate that because what I feel you're suggesting is asking the person to go back into the
lion's den no just next time they're in no that's the lion's den because the doctor is not going to
say it's not safe or effective they're not going to open he's going to be out of line
with mainstream media comments but that's that's the that's the thing we've been seeing for decades
the doctor has been repeating the party line but if someone said to me well I feel that that my
doctor said the the shot is safe again I would open with tell me what that means I'm curious
about your understanding of safety and then when the opening is there I say well I just want to
let you know that I have a different approach to it and I actually have found in my research that
it's not safe all right we gotta we gotta move we're gonna move on we're gonna run out of time
but excellent point yes please I have 10 minutes because I gotta go somewhere okay this will be
quick good all right Alex Alex Craner Shasta and then Stephen three more Alex Shasta and Stephen
thank you Jeremy
Alex you you muted
you're talking to me no okay apologies there he is I I I couldn't see my unmute button
Dr. Polerski thank you for the for the wonderful presentation I do have an important question for
you but before I wanted to share something with you and the group relevant to the origin and causes
of of the pandemic which I you know like I picked up in the in the early days of the pandemic
and I think you might find find it of interest namely I'll give you two data points
first data point I listened to to an interview with Dr. Alek Racic he's a he's a Serbian doctor
he's a fairly high caliber in Serbia manager of of one of the hospitals president of the you know
association of doctor blah blah whatever and he was saying that you know I've been I've been
seeing patients coming into this hospital during the respiratory infection seasons for 30 years
I know what to expect I've seen so many and he said that when the when the pandemic started
it was completely different and said that these people would come in with the with the symptoms
that their condition would deteriorate very rapidly and that he has never seen anything
of the sort in his entire career and he said when he looked at the at the at the x-rays of the
people's lungs he said like there is no way that the coronavirus can do this to people's lungs
but they were forbidden from doing any autopsies and then he said some of my colleagues in Germany
actually do autopsies and they found not only where there was the lung severely damaged
there is no virus known to man at all for women that can do this this simply isn't known to medicine
and he said this is this is the interesting part that I found he said the only pathogen that I know
of that can do this kind of damage to human tissue is sarin gas second data point I was
I randomly was listening to a radio program in Croatia where a doctor a retired doctor an old
lady called in and she explained her experience at one of the two hospitals in oh sorry I'm
laughing at this tessalina's comment so she said that she was admitted to a hospital in zagreb with
covid symptoms now two hospitals in zagreb one had mortality rate for people admitted with covid
symptoms of 80 80 one of them had a 15 okay she was admitted to the one with 80 and she was a
retired physician so she knew a little bit about how things went she was admitted in the hospital
they took her straight to the covid department where only certain doctors and certain nurses had
access but it was with a key and she said these doctors didn't know what they were doing she said
it was very suspicious they didn't seem to really be doctors or nurses and she said they tried to
sedate me and put me on a ventilator and she's a doctor so she said look I do not have hypoxia
it's wrong for you to put me on a ventilator don't put me on a ventilator and then a doctor and two
nurses tried to forcibly put her on a ventilator so there was a struggle and she managed to tear
herself away and escape onto the balcony and call for help thankfully her son was underneath in the
parking lot in the beneath the hospital and he was able to come and rescue her or take her out
of the hospital well here's an interesting part that she said she said that while as they were
struggling that this oxygen went on her face and that it was stinky oxygen and she said that where
it went on her skin it burned her skin okay so that's the two uh so i don't know could it could
there have been tampering with oxygen tanks to produce the panic and the mortality statistics
and so on also very unusual that one hospital would have 80 percent mortality and one of them
15 percent mortality obviously then a virus was a virus wouldn't have been the only variable there's
something else going on but nobody's you know nobody's talking about this particular part
or investigating it uh alex thank you that that speaks as examples of what many many doctors
across the world have been experiencing i put a link in the chat of a doctor from israel
who had an experience similar to what you're describing and if anyone there are two parts
and if anyone is interested uh please get it um and and listen to it um uh it's very very important
there was i mean this is the hardest thing i'm going to say there was a concerted effort to
kill people that's the hardest thing for humans to fathom but we have been experiencing that for
centuries this is not new the desire to kill people lower the population has been a desire
for centuries there are people who are involved in this pandemic whose family lineages have been
doing this for centuries this is the culmination of an attempt so when you see medical doctors
who were putting people on ventilators because they knew that if they put people on ventilators
they were more likely to die and the doctors were ignoring clinical applications of what they were
seeing and instead following protocols and algorithms like you're describing people died
and so there are many people who were in the hospital were labeled with covid who were put
on ventilators because they were labeled as covid and given medications that sedated them
and that put them into renal failure kidney failure and killed them and that is so difficult
for humans to understand that this has been going on in hospitals all over the world why
because the numbers of people dying from this pandemic were insufficient
whatever they were poisoning us with didn't work fast enough it didn't kill us fast enough
so they were now inappropriately making diagnoses for people with covid who weren't suffering covid
symptoms and putting them on ventilators and leaving them isolated for days and there are
and there are reports if you watch the link that i just showed you there were reports where doctors
and nurses would leave patients for hours in certain areas of the hospital without attending to them
them.
So there was a top-down agenda to reduce populations and the monies that hospitals were given
for incentives for diagnosing people with covid and for putting people on ventilators
was astronomical and doctors received bonuses so hospitals received bonuses and doctors received
bonuses. I mean this is this is as I mean dark as you can go we were not as a medical profession
following clinical courses we weren't okay the patient has this then this is the appropriate
decision tree to treat this no doctors had to follow a protocol that they were given by the
hospital to take care of that patient even if it was unwarranted.
Beautiful, come on we gotta wait Larry you gotta go we got two more we got Shasta and then Stephen
there's one more I gotta go I gotta go I gotta go I know I know but Shasta has to ask you one question
Alex brilliant thank you thanks Alex I just wanted to say thank you I really appreciate
um all of you doctors inquiring into differential diagnosis and um and using your discernment to
make your medicine safe and I really appreciate what you all are doing thank you very much I'm
gonna head over I'm gonna hand it over to Stephen well done Shasta well said Shasta Alex
I think what Alex said is very important to consider so Alex if you could stay on and we can
have a talk about that when unfortunately Larry has to leave so um which is a pity because uh you
well I just wanted to think can someone on the call research um wasn't there an attack on the
London underground a sarin attack do you remember does anybody remember that yes the Tokyo Tokyo I
think no oh Tokyo yes we need to yeah so we need to research that what on earth was printed at the
time and afterwards was there an investigation and if there was an investigation was a report
produced by the Japanese government I don't know we need to find out because what so Alex are you
suggesting that those two pieces of data as you put it were connected but anyway let me just uh so
Larry do you want to go you've got to go over here yeah I do okay so thank you very much for coming
on we're very grateful to you and thank you very insightful and um I hope we can work together um
so I oh I haven't got your email address I've got your assistant's email address I think but
that's fine that's good for now all right yes very good okay so so I just want to say um thank you
um I tend to live in a bubble in my own little world and uh to offer these perspectives
in a safe space is rare in the world in which we live today and I just want to thank you for holding
the space uh I'm happy if you disagree um it's all right uh I hope I didn't offend anybody
but I don't think I hope you did uh you know and if I did you know I did um but I I appreciate an
opportunity on such a large scale to to air some things that may be new to people or maybe you know
confirmation to people or whatever so they recognize that I think you have wonderful
insights which when so very few people can articulate such insights never mind notice them
um and when but when they do hear them they recognize them and so I think that's the power
of what you're saying so maybe so hopefully um people around the world will notice you uh
Larry as a result of you coming on and helping us
thank you guys I appreciate it stay well stay well thank you Larry bye
okay so so question no well this this is all important stuff and we'll go on the recording
let's go back to Alex Stephen and just to stay there so this is this question Alex remember
Charles is the is the writer who wrote the brilliant book which ended up getting banned
not once but twice I remember who Alex is yeah worry about that but actually actually
Stephen that's a good point I might remember but many in the audience won't so Alex give us a bit
of background on your book because Alex has as you've presented to us as well Alex it was a great
story yes thank you well no I what I was presenting here was a story about Theranos which
which is not part of my book my my book was called Grand Deception that's one of the three books I
published all of them got cancelled anyway but the one that got banned first was um by the by the
by the intervention of one of the advisors to John Kerry in the US State Department and the book is
about it's a geopolitical treaties about the the relationship between Russia and the western world
I published it in 2017 and I kind of predicted that there would be war between the two sides
and my whole point was to try to unmask the you know the the group of the the the occult
oligarchy in the west is dragging us into into World War Three so uh that's that's the that's
the banned book and then later everything else got cancelled as well so with the benefits of um
the hindsight of what's happened in the last few months you know the Ukraine War what do you think
is the reason for this war which doesn't seem to have you know I can see why Putin is feels
threatened and why he feels he has no alternative but do you think that so the but having said that
um the the west seems to be in a cult behind Ukraine and I just don't and it's the idea to
confuse people on every front so the food crisis the energy crisis the uh cost of living crisis
ridiculous name um which the government don't seem to have any responsibility to solve
for the first time ever I just wonder Alex you're a great geopolitical analyst what do you think
is going on with all these different agendas nothing makes sense any longer is that the idea
to destabilize us by arbitrariness well I think there's all kinds of everything mixed in there but
the the the underlying cause of the conflict in Ukraine is not so complicated to understand
first of all uh you know there's there's the empire which is you know the it's a reincarnation
of the British Empire which has you know just kind of shifted its its its um balance of power
to the United States the empires for more than 200 years now the empire's overarching
imperative has been to maintain uh hegemony over the Eurasian landmass
and the reason is simple that's where most of the resources are uh 70 percent of the earth's
energy reserves uh more than 70 percent of the global GDP two-thirds of the world population
and so on and so forth now uh the uh oh thank you Abby um the the neither the neither Great Britain
nor the United States nor NATO have the military might to police and control this all militarily
so the recipe for the last 200 years has been divide and conquer so you always wanted to make
sure to divide uh the the geography into small weak political entities that are constantly
on the verge of conflict and then you use your own intelligence service services and secret diplomacy
to pit them one against the other to fund them when they want to go to war to arm them
and to make sure that they're that they're dependent on you and that um nobody emerges
strong enough to be your rival for dominance over this landmass and so this this strategy has been
explicitly formulated already uh at the beginning of the 20th century by um by Halford Mackinder
but it's been then reformulated and restated practically verbatim by people like Zbigniew
Brzezinski who was you know Henry Kissinger's protege and most recently by uh by undersecretary
of in the state department named Wes Mitchell and basically he said it explicitly that the
administrations and this is Trump administration the administration top priority was to maintain
uh US dominance over the Eurasian landmass and to prevent a rival from emerging especially to prevent
two or more rivals who could together dislodge the empire from the Eurasian landmass. This was
this was stated in 2018 and this is exactly what has happened. Now the purpose of the war in Ukraine
was to try to cut Russia down to size namely you know Russia has emerged as a as a strong power
on the on the continent that can say no they can they can you know resist the dictate of the empire
and so Ukraine was used to drag Russia into a conflict hoping that it would become you know
another Afghanistan a quagmire where Russia would end up weakened and then eventually they were able
to destabilize it and regime change it and ultimately to divide it into five or more
smaller political entities. So that's the that's why the west has been so consistently
escalating rather than de-escalating and then another dimension to the whole thing is that
they thought that they would crush Russia with economic sanctions but that didn't happen except
it boomeranged and now it has created a devastating crisis in the west energy crisis food crisis and so
forth and they are actually making it worse deliberately. I can't imagine why because if you
try to deconstruct their strategies even at them being sinister if you try to deconstruct them to
some logical end they make sense in a unipolar world you know going for renewable energy makes
sense if the whole world has to adopt it going for vaccine certificates makes sense if the whole
world adopts it not if one block is completely on a different standard and uses fossil fuels and has
a burgeoning steel production and so forth then they just have an advantage but the fact that
they're persisting and continuing with these with these same plans and same agendas that they
formulated 20 or 30 years ago is just I think they're delusional they can't accept that their
gambit has failed and so you know ultimately what always happens in these situations is that the
small man pays the price or woman. And who is the small man Ukraine? Oh no all of us all of us.
Right okay well you know there's going to be there's inflation there's going to be more inflation
but arguably Russia has become stronger because what happened hasn't it? Yes yes absolutely.
So not only did they fail but they they doubly failed. Yes they doubly failed and not only
because Russia has become stronger but because you know China understands that they're next
and you know in the same way that the the western powers have been able to
carve Ukraine away from Russia and turn it into an enemy and then make Ukrainian military might
the bludgeon with which to strike at Russia they if they if they manage to defeat Russia and take
it over they could do the same with Russia against China. Sure. You know they could turn Russia's
military might against China so it is absolutely essential for China to have Russia's back and to
see through the see Russia through the victory and so now they've achieved not only strengthening
Russia but creating a really existential alliance between these two powers. I see and so there was
a time Alex when you spoke to us I think that you weren't sure where China was in this but now
you're saying that China has realized they need to get with Russia is that right? We we weren't
you weren't sure last time we spoke or you spoke? No I think I was referring to an earlier time
when I where I wasn't you know because you know one thing that empires always do and I
I'd like to just define the empire because you know like the way we study history almost
invariably the empires are conflated with nations you know like we had British Empire and American
Empire and Spanish Empire and French Empire and Dutch Empire and so forth but the the empires
are not national by their nature you're always looking at at an oligarchy at a at a at a network
of vested interests that has to use the nation for its political and for its military muscle
but the empire is defined by the oligarchy that benefits the most from it and it's never the
people people always end up disenfranchised and impoverished at the end of it so the empire needs
the host and once it exhausts the host it switches the way the same way that when they exhausted Great
Britain they just simply switched to the United States co-opted its you know military political
economic power to continue building the empire and they planned to move next to China and if you look
at the statements by you know Brzezinski and Kissinger and Soros they fully expected that
their next global cup and I until until a few years ago I didn't quite understand whether China
actually accepted this role and was going to be their next global cup or if China was playing them
and now I'm certain that China was playing them and that they drew them in but not to serve them
but in order to behead them. Alex, people are asking for your books. Tom Rodman has put a link
in there for The Grand Deception. How do people get hold of your writings?
My book Grand Deception is available on pages of Red Pill Press but I'm for people who don't mind
reading in PDF. I'm very happy to share the PDF free of charge so I don't know how I could
transmit them. You can send it to me and I can put it there or else you can put it in the chat now
but no you're on your phone you can't do it if you send it to me we'll put it on the chat for
our next meeting. Okay yeah yeah yeah with pleasure. Alex, can you update us on what's happening in the
financial world because you are a former hedge fund manager I think you told me. Yes yes correct.
You see what people who don't know the financial world don't realize that who yes they don't realize
that you have charge of a lot of money as a hedge fund manager and you need to make good decisions
because you have the possibility to lose a lot of money for those people who trust you to and that
means you have to do a lot of research you have to dig down and I just wonder how things are going
and what do you think about the power of the United States has that declined in your view
you know through these injections and the infiltration of how should I say treasonous
types in the United States government and in the military do you think that the the power of the
United States has declined and yeah so the financial world and the United States military
power and will to win which it did exist before but it seems to dissipated yes so
the United States power has definitely is definitely in decline and it's in terminal
decline but I don't know how long it might take but these things never happen overnight
and is that a lack of will or is it you know so what what what was that why why it's
if you deconstruct it it always leads to the fact that we have a fraudulent monetary system it's a
Ponzi scheme and this Ponzi scheme is stable only for for as long as it grows as soon as it stopped
growing there's a mathematical certainty that you're going to have a certain
percentage of participants in the game who are going to go be going bankrupt and now what you
see for example in in Europe is that bankruptcies are at the highest levels on record and this is
this is all because they're trying to you know like they're trying to prevent inflation from
destroying the currency by quantitative tightening and raising interest rates but when you're raising
interest rates and already you know nearly 40 percent of all the companies listed on on on New
York Stock Exchange are not making any profit and more than 20 percent of them are zombies meaning
that they cannot even service their the interest on their debts from their free cash flows and now
if you're raising interest rate you're going to push a lot of them into bankruptcy and when you
push a lot of them into bankruptcy you're going to pull banks into bankruptcy because they're going
to have all these this bad debt on on their books and so the only way out of this is either you
let it happen you you let bank run bank runs happen or you're going to have to backstop them by
printing money and providing all the money to the banks to cover the bad debts or you know
to be more accurate they're going to be buying corporate bonds so that the corporations have
the liquidity to pay back their debts even though they're not profitable they're not efficient
they're not they're zombies so the result the ultimate result of this is inflation so we're
going to have a lot more inflation and so somebody somebody asked in the chat how to protect yourself
i spent eight years of my life managing something called an inflation hedging fund
so i you know over those eight years i think if if an article or book had the word inflation
in it i i probably read it there are two there are two effective ways to to hedge against inflation
one of them is farmland the other one is commodity futures exposure to commodity futures because as
the price of companies sorry as the as the purchasing power of the currency
erodes the prices of commodities go up because it's it's it's it's real stuff you know oil
copper gold coffee wheat prices of all of that goes up so that's how you would offset now i
wouldn't i wouldn't advise anybody to try to trade commodities on their own but there is
um i no longer manage money so i'm not i'm not selling um i'm not selling a service here but
basically you would want to look into cta hedge funds cta stands for commodities trading advisor
and somebody said here that hedge funds always lose clients money which which is partly true
but not entirely ctas have had you shouldn't laugh but we are no i know i know but it's you
know like there's some truth to it there is some truth to it but you know usually investors investors
help that because they always chase after performance you know they see they see a
fund performing well and then they go in and then when they have two or three months of drawdowns
then they pull out and they make a loss and maybe the fund itself is a good fund but the investors
jump in for wrong reasons and they jump up for the wrong reasons so anyway you know like if you
want to look into ctas commodities trading advisors they have had stellar performance the good ones
for decades like literally going back four decades five decades even and they particularly do well
if commodities are going up because they they always they always trade commodities inside of
their portfolios so if if you have an opportunity i was i would encourage you to do that do that i
i don't do that anymore so uh i couldn't i couldn't offer to help but you know the
that would be alex would you be would would you be willing to come on again and uh because i
i've always thought you're really brilliant uh and talk about empires i think people would be very
interested in the in the rise and fall of empires and the history your history of the rise and fall
of empires would be very interesting oh yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah with pleasure with great pleasure
absolutely how long did it take you to prepare for that though alex i mean we don't expect a
phd thesis but you know just to kind of talk to us uh on a level which is above ours you know
uh well i would say two weeks is that is that fair and we couldn't yes okay right now very good
okay we got we got five minutes ago i want to share a chart with you alex sorry everyone sorry i have
to somebody mentioned real estate i have to jump in because there's a misconception real estate is
not a good inflation hedge empirically it's an empirical fact and what happens is that you already
have real estate prices pumped up to i think something like 200 year highs in in in in
in strong inflationary environments people generally lose purchasing power they cannot keep up
so you'll see uh the real estate not keeping up with inflation it's not necessarily that
prices are going to go down in nominal terms but they don't keep up with inflation and
just to give you an illustration of what happened at the end of the
weimar inflation 100 years ago in germany is that by the time the whole crisis unraveled
you could buy a six-bedroom house in nice neighborhoods of berlin
for 100 okay a six-bedroom house on the outskirts of berlin for 100 dollars
alex when was that 19 december 1922 wow because the money became worthless and people had no
money no purchasing power whatsoever they lost everything and so they you know like they had
this in these real estate investments and they they they needed you know like they needed to
restructure their lives they were like give me 100 bucks i'll take the house because there were all
these empty houses people always over invest into real estate explanation what i mean by farmland
is like literally if you can a plot of land that you can use or that somebody can use for you
very good okay so i want to share this chart that wasn't prepared by us it it was shared last week
and this reinforces what alex has been sharing with us it's a useful chart to understand so
you no longer are confused and this shows who the policymakers are in this whole game of russia
ukraine now jerry brady and others and i agree these five circles here should be above the bank
of international settlements and central banks these players here they make the policy then we've
got the united nations and all these entities distributing the policy national governments
a third level down everybody they do as they're told and then we've got the mainstream media as
the policy propagandists and then there's us and let me just read the words beside you and i on
this call we the people are the subjects of the policies that cascade down as alex just said the
little people we the people that cascade down through the g3p system the global public private
partnership these are funded via tax and public borrowing which benefits the bis of the banks
and the people in the circles the system is designed to exploit us but we are an increasingly
unnecessary component as the g3p seeks to transform the global economy based upon the
financialization of nature and hence and hence larry palevsky's point of the depopulation we are
or as we offer here we're the useless eaters and so and so that's the game plan be no longer confused
thank you alex beautiful we've got jeremy and then steven we've got three four five more minutes
so alex is going to present to us more stevens they're well done on organizing that jeremy
yeah quick question alex is quite obviously we're facing bailouts which are going to be paid
as usual by the taxpayer through inflation and printing of money what about bail ins
do you see a potential for bail ins whereby the banks or whoever's left standing seizes
the assets of the depositors
um am i muted no okay um uh no i um jeremy i i don't think that's very likely i could be wrong
but i don't think it's very likely because i think that the uh the amount of debts and the amount of
liabilities that exist in the system uh eclipse the the depositors so if you if you even if you
bailed in everybody and basically confiscated everybody's assets you wouldn't plug up the
holes and but you know like what would what would happen is that suddenly everybody would instantly
from one day to the next lose all their purchasing power so uh economy would grind grind to a halt
and all of the all of the corporations that their credit that they that they own bonds in uh would
have no business so it would be it would practically be a collective suicide of the
system i think so you know even though after after the financial crisis of 2008 they created the
legal framework to be able to bail in the depositors i don't think they're gonna they're
gonna do it it would be like a poison pill uh but you know they'll do what they always do
and that is print money and they will print money until the currency goes you know to very close to
zero actually i asked the question because i have a friend my best friend in the world is croatian
and he uh he lived in bosnia and uh in varash near sari evo and he he has told me stories about
what happened to his parents when money was seized from their bank accounts uh way back when i don't
know the details but sound to me like a bail in but that was a communist regime of course
uh well what what period was he talking about um i'm guessing this would have been in the 50s and
60s 60s okay i that's before my time well you know like i remember the 70s and the 80s and you
know like we had for as long as i could remember we had uh economy was crap it was stagflation
uh all the time but we never had bank failures uh and we never had bank runs and so you know that
simply tells you that they that the central bank printed up all the money that they needed to
backstop all the bank losses and corporate losses and you know what you get instead is uh you know
the the merry-go-round goes round but the currency eventually fails
thank you okay so um so jerry brady has put the link in for boom finance and economics everybody
so go on that link you can subscribe to that it's a weekly newsletter i recommend it you know jerry
is read by many central bank decision makers so the links are there from the chat uh alex thank
you for sharing your experience knowledge thank you everybody for being here it's there two and
a half hours just if i if i manage it i will just now try to upload my book to the chat if i find
the book so if i if i manage it will appear okay we'll okay we'll wait we'll go for two or three
minutes and give you a bit of time okay thank you do you know how to do it alex uh i'm i'm
working on it i'm working on it right now i'm very good all right so while we're waiting
while we're waiting for alex well well so you so there are some people here who can help you to do
it if you don't know if you can do it steven if he's a bond trader he can organize an upload of a
document steven it's it's only no it's only a question whether i have the book on my phone
that's that's that's the only thing i'm not yeah i understand yeah yeah so it wasn't what you thought
charles he knows how to he knows that's right if he's got it on his phone that's the question
so there are some people here on their on their phones um all right so the it's now wednesday
morning and any any major announcements steven have you got someone for sunday
and are there any can i raise my hand please shasta um dr steven and charles um yesterday
when i was trying to track people down um a few people are interested um there's this um
my cycle story uh which has christian northwip and and a lady named tiffany and they're interested
at least tiffany's interested in being on to share about that um dr tom cohen is interested
in being on your show and there's and dr and dr amanda bulmer very much wants to she just needs
a head she needs to be invited ahead of time to get babysitting very good but she she wants to do
it and then there's this brad who is a retired lieutenant colonel who quit nine months before
his 20 year when he would have been able to retire because he he felt it was the right thing to do
so those are all four people that i have contacts for you that are interested are you guys okay with
all four of those with me communicating sharing them with you yes if you can share those with
just and i also thought so shasta um what about your dad your father you've mentioned him that
i don't know where he's what he's up to right now with any of this but i could but if you if you want
a if you want a um phd in botany um and a doctor of herbology and holistic medicine doctor i have
another one i can think of very good but i i feel like you're wanting more mds since this is a medical
doctor and you guys are out to figure out as well as we want priests and archbishops i've got a lot
of amazing amazing connections with holistic health people if if you want me to bring them on
you did mention someone someone at the church um pastor mike i'm going to go talk to him on sunday
because he stood up to the tyranny so those are five five people so i'm going to talk to
dr tom cohen today and if it's okay with you i'll tell him you guys are interested
in having him because he would like how much did that church uh rack up in fines almost a three
million dollar fine still right now that he that that church is fighting and he just never he only
was closed for two months and that was it and he said forget it okay yeah and that's the main thing
so he's still smiling justa yeah he's still smiling oh good alex you found it no no sorry
wrong wrong document please ignore it i wanted to check what the document was and instead i uh
uploaded uploaded please ignore alex have you put a secret document there
no you can ignore it it's a it's a journal it's a it's an article but i very good no it looks like
i don't have it on my phone i'm sorry but then next time i will alex were you going to upload
the grand deception yeah that's what i was going to do it's already the link to the pdf has already
been posted a couple of times oh okay yes but yeah but that doesn't mean to say people can find it
okay so alex if you email it to me or charles or both uh we'll get it we'll distribute it or we put
it on the next chat okay yes i'll do that thank you all right everybody um we'll be back thank you
stop the recording