All right, everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics.
I'm your moderator in Australia where it's 5 a.m. in the morning.
And I am Australia's passion provocateur.
This is a place of passion.
That's why I wear my red jacket to remind you, you come here.
This was a reminder to all of you to be passionate.
And the example of Anna and Stephen Frost, who started this group and the presenters
that we have are passionately fighting for truth, for justice and freedom.
And when you look at all of the wars that have been fought by many,
by almost all countries, have always been about freedom.
So and the freedom that Anna was just talking about, the freedom to speak up,
the freedom to speak your mind.
So we're here in a true spirit of exploration and discovery.
James, you probably know because you've joined us previously that
we have doctors and lawyers and journalists and engineers and writers and researchers
and nurses, investors, dentists, financiers, all sorts of strange people, not just doctors.
Most understand we're here in World War Three.
And if you haven't, if you missed Daniel Estreland's presentation on Monday, then
was it on Monday, Sunday, then please reacquaint yourself of who's behind World War Three.
We go for two and a half hours.
James, we do your presentation and then Q&A.
Hopefully you can stay as long as you can.
And then we have a less moderated, less controlled telegram video chat.
For those who have more time, there's no censorship and but there's proper moderation.
So so there's an important distinction, everybody.
You are you don't get censored because I say that's enough.
We're moving on. It's just it's a constant battle between all these wonderful people
that you are and all have opinions.
And that's the interesting thing.
You have many different opinions about many different things.
So we are here to have a conversation, free speech, crucial, as I said, no censorship.
And we understand the development of science.
Michael Crichton quotes.
When somebody tells you the science is settled, reach for your wallet.
We are here and we come from love, not fear.
And that's all about passion as well.
Passion comes from your soul, your spirit.
So does love. Fear comes from your mind.
We are not driven by fear.
Have an open mind, particularly welcome to new to new first time attendees.
If this is your first time, please introduce yourself in the chat
and please have your name displayed on your screen.
Now, James Thorpe is a superstar.
Many of us saw someone just put a note in there.
You're on the Epoch Times, James.
I've been we've been watching your data and we're looking forward to you sharing your genius.
And hopefully the hurricane doesn't arrive before you finish.
Thank you, Charles. Can you hear me OK?
Yep. And I'm going to share my screen.
Let me know if you can see my screen.
Yep. Can do. All good.
You see it? Good. Yep.
Well, first off, I want to thank you, Charles.
And thank you, Stephen, for your incredibly brilliant platform.
It's such an important beacon of truth worldwide.
And to all my brothers and sisters around the world, thank you for joining us.
I very much appreciate the opportunity to share some of the data
that I have with you and with this very special family worldwide.
So I see today that there's there's a few notable early recent publications that are on review.
And but mostly I would like to spend most of the time on the data that we have accumulated
on this side of the pond.
And thanks to a lot of my co-authors that really deserve credit for this work.
I know Albert Benavides, the world expert, and is with us.
And he's presented in this platform.
I see several other notable individuals around the world, some from down and under.
I don't want to call them out because I know it's a tense situation.
Some from Canada. I see Dr. Mahalika.
She won't mind me calling her out because she's been on the show.
She's a fellow truth.
And yeah, thank you very much.
So I'm going to review what we've seen in women of reproductive age.
See if I can see my slide transitioning for you there.
Can you see my slides?
Is James all good?
Yep.
How much?
How much do you think?
James?
All good.
Yep.
How much?
How long do you want me to go, Charles?
45, 50 minutes?
Hour?
Look, because we're here for two and a half hours, so please, you know,
give us, don't rush it because what you share is so important for all of us to understand
and to be, and really to be rejuvenated into what's happening to our humanity.
Well, thank you, Charles.
And I love that passionate red jacket.
It's very appropriate.
Thank you.
So I don't have any conflicts of interest.
Do you guys?
And you know, I've made it, I think that it's,
it's part of presenting or publishing or voting to, or being employed or being a member of the
human race.
We always upfront our conflicts of interest, right?
I don't have any, but if we're asking people for conflicts of interest,
what happened to this, to the rest of the world?
What happened to the powers at be?
Where are their conflicts of interest?
The FDA and the CDC have an operating budget of millions of dollars and over 40%
of their operating budget is provided by cash from the vaccine pharmaceutical industry
and from royalties that they own on the patents.
Now, if that's not the Fox guarding the chicken house, I don't know what is.
In 1986, the FDA and the CDC were on their knees to the government.
Two in the United States of America and to president Reagan begging for immunity,
not sovereign immunity, but legal immunity, not quite sovereign like an ambassador has,
but it's pretty close and it's pretty tight.
And he gave it to them.
And then the vaccine industry went rampant with massive disgusting profits at the expense of
the human race.
And what I'd like to do is talk about these conflicts of interest a little bit on this slide.
So what is it about the 21 advisors who voted and pushed the FDA and the CDC
to push this legal vaccine on children aged six months to 11?
How does that happen?
Well, there are no data.
Everybody knows there are no data.
It's just like the emperor, the naked emperor and the emperor's clothes syndrome.
There are no long-term data despite what the critics state.
There are none.
Zilchow zero.
The efficacy of the vaccine was never 95%.
That was artificial fake relative risk reduction.
The absolute risk reduction was more like 0.9% reduction in disease.
These are some of the games that they play and they played for a long time
but they're in our face much more egregiously now.
What about Eric Rubin, the editor-in-chief of the flagship fraudulent journal
of the medical industrial complex?
It's no longer this is all supported and they're all on the take.
He goes and he votes to push this legal vaccine in children
that have zero risk of dying from COVID.
Literally there are experts in the United States of America
that contend that there has been no child 0 to 18 that has died from COVID-19
in the United States of America as a sole cause.
They've died with COVID-19 with a PCR but the ones that have died
have multiple other catastrophic comorbidities.
Give you some real numbers.
You can procure this data from the CDC itself across Florida, across Texas.
There are just this year there's less than 50 children that have died from COVID-19
and they all have major comorbidities.
So when we look at trying to make a difference in pregnant women or in children,
there is no risk-benefit ratio.
It's dramatically lopsided and the vaccine using it in pregnancy and using it in children
is a huge disaster with five to tenfold, maybe a hundredfold increase in complications
compared to the alleged number of lethal COVID-19 cases that could prevent.
So what about Eric Rubin?
How did he get in this position?
How does he stand up in front of the FDA in May or April whenever it was and say,
well, we don't have any data but we're just going to roll the vaccine out in children
and see what happens?
That's what he said and go look it up yourself.
Do your due diligence.
It's all over the internet.
Does Dr. Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the flagship journal of the Medical Industrial Complex,
have any conflicts of interest?
I don't know.
I think history will show that he does.
I think it's my opinion that history will show that he has a lot of holdings
and so do all the other 21 advisors to the FDA that pushed that egregious
recommendation through the FDA.
History will show their conflicts of interest.
What about the lead authors of the fraudulently published medical journals?
What about all of them?
They don't get to escape this room.
They have demonized and...
I'm sorry, James.
I'm sorry.
Can you hear me?
Keep going, James.
Yes, again, keep going.
They have illegally, unethically, immorally, and fraudulently pushed not just altered data,
they have pushed and published completely fraudulent data that is not just fraudulent.
As in the case of lead author, Tommy T. Shimabukuro, and the 19 or 20 other authors
on the New England Journal of Medicine article 13 months ago, June of 2021,
which is completely fraudulent.
Can you imagine them having the audacity to state that the vaccine is safe in pregnancy
when there's no outcome data?
When the vast majority of the patients weren't even followed up to see the outcome of the
pregnancy and when they shape, shift, and fraudulently dilute the real spontaneous
abortion rate or miscarriage rate, the denominator, the 700 patients that received
the COVID-19 vaccination in the third trimester, when it was impossible to have caused
a miscarriage because a miscarriage can only occur before 20 weeks.
They put those numbers in the denominator and they reduce the real incidence of miscarriage
in their study from 82% to population normal of 12 or 13%.
This is called fraud.
They have a lot of blood on their hands.
By the way, do your due diligence.
Look and see how many of those authors are employed by the federal government.
You'll be shocked to see, I think, that all of them are.
Dr. Albert Benavides has some very interesting screenshots of FOIA requests from attorney
Aaron Ciri that show the CDC and the FDA communicating with Tommy T. Shimabukuro.
Isn't that interesting?
Kind of a wink, wink, and a nod, nod, get rid of some of these disastrous cases.
You've heard that from Albert.
So where is the responsibility of the leaders of this ministry, the doctors, the doctors,
of this medical industrial complex, the hospitals, the FDA, the CDC, the fraudulent
medical journals, the fraudulent agencies, NGOs that are pushing this?
Where is all their honesty?
There is none left.
I want to just before I get into the obstetrical stuff, I want to review just some really key
studies that have been published just in the last 48 hours.
Your new king over there on the other side of the pond, what's his name?
King what?
Whatever his name is.
King Charles, is that it?
King Charles III or the V, whatever.
I want you, my colleagues over there, I want you to get this Dr. Malhotra, the famous cardiologist
from England, I want him knighted.
I want him officially knighted because he deserves to be knighted and if King Charles
doesn't knight him, then I'm going to knight him into the kingdom of truth from maybe confer
a knighthood from this brilliant gathering here.
He deserves to be knighted.
He came out, he was double-backed, so I don't know if he got his boosters.
He was pushing the vaccine all over your news media on the TV and this is a gentleman,
a real person who has the academic, the spiritual, emotional, ethical, and moral integrity
to reevaluate the data and say, I was dead wrong.
Stop the vaccine.
Can you imagine that?
That takes a lot of courage and there is no greater crown for an academician or a member
of the human race to admit that they were wrong, do an about face, what I call an academic
metanoia and like I've done, apologize for making a mistake and the consequences that it's caused.
So I applaud this man.
It's Dr. Robert Malone, another one of my heroes, the creator of the mRNA vaccination,
did a brilliant substack yesterday if you haven't seen it.
Please fetch it and go read it.
It's very, very important and germane to our group here, our family around the world.
This was just published today or yesterday.
This is a great example of Hannah and colleagues and this is another classic
corrupted journal of JAMA and the medical industrial complex.
They love the journals Lancet, JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine,
and you can put countless numbers up there.
They're all terminally corrupted and should be disbarred and taken down.
So finally, what is it now we've had, is it eight?
Let's see, it's been since mid December 2020, you know, we're going on 48 months, shy of 40
months, let's call it, of this vaccine pushing to the general population, to pregnant women,
to breastfeeding women.
Wait a minute, this can't be true, is it?
So how can this be?
So they're just now publishing studies on the effect on breast milk.
This is the kind of nonsense that should have been.
This is a very dangerous, very serious, it's not a vaccine, it's a genetic experimental therapy.
And they found that it was, they thought that a day late,
almost two years short, and they come up with this minuscule, you know, five out of eight samples of
breast milk tested, has mRNA in them, and then they try to whitewash this and marginalize.
Wait a minute, no, this should have been done years ago before the vaccine was ever rolled out
into the general population.
Remember, the vaccine, according to the Shimabukuro study, and according to Pfizer's own data and
internal documents, if given during the first trimester, it has an abortion rate
equaling that of the abortion appeal, RU486, methacrystal.
Do your due diligence, look it up, I'm not making this up, I couldn't make this stuff up.
The most accurate data that we have estimating the miscarriage rate from a COVID-19 vaccination
in the first trimester is north of 80%. And guess where that comes from?
That comes from Shimabukuro, who tried to manipulate the data.
And by the way, don't tell me that was an accident.
I did my due diligence, there's three OBGYN docs that are on that publication.
And if Eric Rubin didn't have the brain to edit it, which I know he did, and all the rest of the
authors, I know that the three obstetricians wouldn't have missed it. I have a strong suspicion that
Shimabukuro article was ghostwritten by Pfizer. That's my suspicion, and I stick by it.
Because if you look at the Pfizer document, 5.3.6, just Google it, and you pull down that 30 page
document, you go to page seven, 1,223 dead people after the vaccine in less than 90 days.
And 46% of the 270 pregnant women had adverse complications from the vaccine.
So if the FDA in the United States of America puts a black box warning on RU-486 and says,
this is a really dangerous drug because it can cause miscarriage and loss of pregnancy,
and it can't be used in the general population, and it's got the black box denotation from the FDA.
And it requires extensive informed consent because of its potential risk on pregnancy.
Isn't that kind of oxymoronic that there's not a black box warning
on a COVID-19 vaccine on pregnancy, or at all?
So the authors try to whitewash this finding. And I will say that in my review of the literature and
what's going on, it's a very dangerous proposition to get a vaccine while you're breastfeeding.
I know of two cases for certain, and there's many, many more. There's probably
probably 100 or 1,000 more. But I know of two that I can vouch for the RASIA,
and I can provide you evidentiary links to this. One of them, a toddler died at five months,
literally. The mother was forced to get a vaccine by employer. The mother took the vaccine
on the day before her first breastfeed. Breastfed the kid, the baby. This toddler got immediately
upset. The baby could never be cajoled and went downhill, required administration,
admission to the hospital, and died dead, no longer with us. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura.
A classic vaccine response. Now, this particular case, for all of the naysayers of the database
of VAERS, or UK Yelacar, or user vigilance of the WHO, or I should say of the European
Medicines Agency, and also the tool of WHO, the VAERS vigilance, or the WHO Vigi access.
So they all show the same thing. They all show damning, really concerning
adverse events, deaths, and complications from this vaccine. So these perfectly healthy babies,
it really meets the standard criteria of causality, at least in one of these cases. If you look at
the criteria for causality, and there's nine of those criteria, which are clearly enumerated
enumerated in the epidemiological literature, these cases meet, many of these cases meet
the Bradford Hill criteria for causality. The other case was in a six, the baby that died was
a six-weeker, went on to immediately, after the breastfeed, went on to develop severe
autoimmune disease, an atypical Kawasaki-like syndrome, and died. Now that death occurred,
you know, weeks or a month or so after, but is clear. And there's many, many more than that.
I do want to move on to really what I'm here to talk to you about. And this study is submitted
for publication. It will be published. I guarantee it will be published. And I want to
acknowledge my co-authors and my co-investigators who were immensely helpful. Dr. Claire Rogers,
a physician assistant in Rome, Georgia, Michael Duskovich, PhD, model and expert,
Stuart Tankersley, a brilliant family practice doc, lives close by me, a military whistleblower,
Albert Venedydez, who needs no introduction, he's with us. He's the world expert on bears,
doing incredible work. Megan Redshaw is one of my colleagues. She's a younger attorney colleague,
brilliant researcher and writer. She's associated with the Children's Health Defense, RFK Juniors,
and she's also their lead counsel and also the lead counsel of TrialSec News. And then finally,
Peter McCulloch, and I don't think he needs an introduction. You all know Peter. And
I'm, this is basically a thumbnail abstract of our data. So we looked at,
very important, that we use the government data. And on a subsequent study, this has not been the,
there's data that we use is fresh. It's virgin. It's got all of the CDC and FDA's attempts to try to
limit the danger signals coming out of it that have been uncovered by Albert Venedydez.
But none of, we left it intact. We didn't touch it. The next series of our publications will be
cleaning the data like Albert Venedydez has done and correcting some of the obvious fraudulent
manipulation of the CDC and the FDA to try to thwart the danger signals. They have maliciously
and aggressively used a scheme of tactics, some of which are not too sophisticated,
that Albert Venedydez has shown us. And subsequent publication, we're going to do a publication on
the corrected data of Albert and you'll see that it's much worse. So we chose, we put our heads
together. We all chose to use the influenza vaccine as a control group. Why? Well, because
the influenza vaccine, and I'm not an anti-vaxxer. I've done my confession in front of this group
before. I was a mainstream medical physician, extensively published. I was a journal reviewer.
I tested for the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology. I was a member, not only was I
a member of the Society of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, but I was a board of directors and
leader for three or four years at the turn of the century. So I'm not, I was in mainstream medicine
and I was pushing vaccines up until 10 years ago or so. But I was big on the influenza vaccine. It
was approved by the FDA and the CDC in 1997, later 1997. So we chose to start our study
in January 1st, 1998. And we continued up until June 30th of this year, just a few weeks ago.
So again, recognizing that the influenza vaccine has been now extensive safety, you know,
60 plus years. The safety signal out of errors doesn't look bad, looks pretty good.
But we chose to use that as our control group. I think, if I'm correct, doing the math, I think
that's 284 months since January 1st, 1998 to June 30th, 2022. So that's 284 months. Somebody can do
the math here, I think it is. And versus only 18 months or so of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Now, one of the things that we did was, I did all the simple statistics. I used just odds,
ratio, and relative risk, which were crosstabs, comparison of ratios, which was pretty easy.
But my brilliant, beautiful bride, who's an attorney, would not let me discuss any of
that until multiple other people verified it, including a PhD modeling expert in mathematics.
Well, he came back and he said, yeah, it's right on. The stats are right on, but we can do some
much more sophisticated modeling. We can come up with three sets of models. One of the adverse
events per shot, one with the adverse event per person vaccinated, and a third adverse event per
time period. So we got numerators and denominators for all of those. How do we get denominators?
Pretty easily. You can go in and do exercises with multiple different
websites, including the CDC, the WHO, GATA around the world, several other sites. And then you can
estimate the number of COVID-19 vaccines are easy. They're on the world meter. The influenza
vaccine is a little bit more difficult, but you can easily get a very good estimate of the denominator.
And that can be achieved by looking at points in time, using all those references, doing models,
doing Monte Carlo simulations, and pretty accurately come up. The beauty of our model here is that
even if we were off by tenfold, which we're not, it wouldn't change. The data and statistics are so
robust that it wouldn't change. It wouldn't change when I know the conclusions. Of course,
we didn't do any interventions because this is all de-identified data. And the main outcomes are
proportional reporting ratio from the various data. And this in a nutshell is our data, our
results. The COVID-19 vaccines, when compared to the influenza vaccines, were associated with an
astronomical risk first before pregnancy, an astronomical risk, p-values essentially zero,
of menstrual abnormalities, very concerned with menstrual abnormalities before pregnancy.
In pregnancy, a substantial risk of miscarriage. And I'll go through the observations on subsequent
slides. There's a substantial risk of fetal malformations, a major fetal malformation
called a cystic hygroma. Cystic hygroma is a malformation of the lip channels that connect
the lymph system to the venous system and seems to be focused in the neck, get massive swelling,
tissue swelling, heart failure and death. Now, some of those babies can go on and survive,
but many of them don't. A massive increase. This is interesting. Fetal chromosomal abnormalities
are significantly increased. And by the way, I chose all of the, there's thousands of symptoms
or complications in BEARS database that you can choose from. I chose these not before I went in
looked at BEARS. Before I went and looked at BEARS, I selected several issues that I wanted to focus
on in BEARS to see if they have outcomes. And indeed they did. So cystic hygroma was one of
them. The reason why I looked at fetal chromosomal abnormalities, because in the Pfizer download,
that by the way, they tried to suppress for 75 years. It was just released April 1st, April.
It's an April Fools joke from Pfizer's. Oh yeah, April Fools. Yeah, we've been killing and maiming
a lot of you around the world. No big deal. Nothing here to see. We'll just move on. They tried to
suppress that data for 75 years. But if you go and look at that data on page seven of that document,
just Google it. Was it 1,223 deaths? And on page 12, there's 46% of the pregnant women that had
adverse effects. There were also some of those adverse effects were chromosomal abnormalities.
And it makes sense because anything that causes a massive amount of inflammation in the development
of the embryo and the fetus will result in embryonic or fetal death, embryonic or fetal
malformation. There's eons of data that we've focused on for 40 years. Robert Romero is a
maternal fetal medicine physician. He's much my senior, but for 40 years, his whole career has
been focused on inflammation, the maldevelopment, embryotoxic, fetotoxic effects of inflammation.
But we also see in addition, one of the 13 unspeculable variables we looked at here
was a significant risk of cardiac abnormalities. That's how it is versed in theirs, cardiac
abnormalities. Also, independent cardiac malformation significantly increased. Also,
cardiac disease and also cardiac arrest in the fetus. A substantial increase in the COVID-19
vaccinated compared with the influenza vaccinated pregnancies, dramatic increase in fetal growth
restriction, interuterine growth restriction, substantial increase in abnormal Doppler
velosimetry of the abnormal fetuses due to the abnormal placenta in those patients, those fetuses
that had been exposed to the COVID-19 vaccine compared with those that were exposed to the
influenza vaccine. Also, a substantial increase in risk of placental, arterial, and venous blood
clot. No surprise there, right? Dr. Peter McCullough wouldn't be surprised, he wasn't surprised at all
through any of it. Also, substantial increase in what we call oligofibromia or reduced amniotic
fluid line. No surprise there because it's very, there's many different mechanisms which I'll
maybe go through, but it's not surprising at all that there's severe placental dysfunction
related to the very inflammatory effects of the vaccine. I'll show you some of those in
placental ultrasounds. So when we have the placenta not working, we get
growth restriction of the fetus, we get depth of the fetus. We've seen depth of the fetus,
significant risk. So our conclusions from all of these illustrious co-authors that I have,
we need to have a moratorium on the vaccine worldwide, a moratorium for sure in pregnancy
and breastfeeding modes. I won't dwell a lot, this is one of the, oh my gosh, don't show us this,
but you don't have to read all the stuff. I just want to show you that we have all of the raw data,
I just want to show you that we have all of the raw data, all of the raw data is in here. So we've
got on the front part of the slash, you've got the actual number of adverse events from the
COVID-19 vaccination. On the other side of the forward slash, you've got the number of actual
raw data from the influenza vaccines. So you can see in this, by the way, these are all global.
This is global, this is not US, this is all global. And you see four columns of data here.
The first one would be for each shot, in other words, adverse event per vaccine per shot.
Remember, several people had more than one shot. The second column would be the adverse
event per time, per unit of time. And the third one is the abnormal event per person vaccinated.
So it doesn't matter how you slice the cheese, there's a major dangerous signal emanating from
this data. Now, table two is the exact same format, except this is just a US data. I won't spend a lot
of time on that. Table three is a relative risk by time, dose, and person vaccinated.
Some of these P values, I mean, when you get down to a P value of 10 to the minus seven or eight,
that's statistical improbability. I love forest charts. This is a forest plot. And on forest plots,
we're looking at odds ratio or relative risks denoticated by the marks here.
And the flanking the marker, the box, if you will, on its side, on its angle, are the 95%
confidence intervals. Now, I want you to know a very important thing about this graph. This is a
semi logarithmic graph. Why did we do that? Well, this relative risk, where you're sitting and you're
viewing this monitor, this dot, this square would be all the way out about a mile to your right side
if this wasn't a logarithmic graph. It would be that far off the graph. Just look at the right side
and it would be to your right about a mile or a half a mile. That's how far away it would be.
By the way, the CDC and the FDA clearly denote, we've referenced that, that whenever there's an
odds ratio or relative risk of two or greater, that's a danger signal and it needs to be
investigated. These are so far away from two. You'll see here 1,192 times that by 100 and you'll
get the percent of the increase, but this is a increase of 1,192 fold of abnormal menses,
women that were menstruating normally before. So, a 57 fold increase in miscarriage. So,
this is perfectly consistent with Tommy T. Shimabukuro, the New England Journal of Medicine
article, that tried to hide it and also right on spot with what we're finding with the Pfizer 5.3.6
post-marketing analytics themselves. The risk of miscarriage is upwards to 80%. This is very,
very consistent with that. Very consistent. Fetal malformation, 20 fold increase. Fetal
cardiac disease, 16 fold increase. Fetal growth restriction, 56 fold increase. Abnormal fetal
surveillance, 25 fold increase. Stillbirth, 38 fold increase. Oligo-hydramyl, low amniotic
fluid volume that is consistent with abnormal placental function, 16 fold increase. So,
very, very upsetting data, but this is perfectly consistent with what I've seen in my very large
volume of skeptical cellographic practice. So, as I suggested before, this is also, golly,
a slide that's difficult to look at, but I don't expect you to read all these things,
but I would expect you to be overwhelmed by the amount of independent sources that
totally corroborate various data. So, the problem is that
there's been a massive number of professionals, attorneys, legislators,
physicians, sowing a seed in preparation for the rollout of the pandemic.
And I know that sounds a little conspiratorial, but facts are facts. When you have a patent
on a COVID-19 vaccination that dates back to the turn of the century, that doesn't quite add up.
When you have all the internal communications, which Dr. Peter Bregan
has so well illustrated in his book with his beautiful bride, Ginger Bregan, this book is
there's 600 pages. It's extraordinarily well referenced with 1100 references. It's a massive
goldmine, and buy one and keep it, because they're erasing the data from the internet
every single day. And there are a accumulation of irreconcilable, irrefutable, undeniable facts
that show that this was set up. This was a plan. We will execute the drugs in the medical literature
by the medical industrial complex that we know to be effective against SARS-CoV. And that was done
before the SARS-CoV outbreak. Example, hydroxychloroquine, extraordinarily effective.
I've used it for 40 years in pregnancy. I know it to be safe. Africans have used it for longer.
I used it in pregnancy in the first trimester in patients with autoimmune disease. I knew that was
safe, but yet the UN and the WHO and Fauci slandered it and in essence, villainized it
in publication in the Lancet Journal. Look it up. Dr. Mandeep, M-A-N-D-E-E-P, M-E-H-R-A,
chief cardiovascular surgeon at Boston, Brigham and Winmans. This article, I suspect, was ghost
written as well. Now he went a little bit further. They completely falsified the data. They didn't
change it around like Shimabukuro did. They completely falsified the data. They did the same
thing with ivermectin. The science is in, and Charles, excuse the expression. I know you don't
like this expression, but the verdict is out. The science is in. Early treatment of COVID-19
is extraordinarily effective, as in 99.99 percent, according to Dr. Ben Marl, who has personally
treated 275,000 patients with his early treatment regimen. These are all safe nutraceuticals and
vitamins, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They had to remove that. They had to get that out
of the way, otherwise they couldn't be making trillions of dollars. It would have been illegal
to move towards an emergency use authorization if those drugs were left on the table, because it
would be illegal by the CDC and our government. It would be illegal. So they have manipulated a lot
of laws, a lot of doubt, a lot of falsified information, and a lot of new laws to protect them
after this plandemic was executed. A lot of those are seeding, sowing doubts of the veracity of the
various data. We have funding back in mid 2006, 2007 to upgrade the various data system to the
equivalent of that of the DMED database. For those of you who don't know the DMED database,
it is the medical epidemiologic database, which is the most sophisticated database
in the world. I have the audacity to say that. It is. We were going to do that. We have funding to
do that with electronic medical records. In other words, it's not a passive system that's actively
taken up from medical records of physicians documenting on the chart. That was put on hold
by the FDA and CDC and by the pharmaceutical company. Why? Why do you think? I believe so
that they could continue to manipulate and do these shenanigans. The DMED database, they had to go
back. The whistleblowers called whistle, blew the whistle on the DMED database. They were crucified.
The only thing they could say was, oh, you know, gosh, we didn't see this before, but there's been
five years of data error in DMED database. So none of the findings that the whistleblowers find were
real. The most accurate database in the country, these flight surgeons and physicians and
cardiologists in the military are seeing pilots and active duty people drop like flies.
And yet, and they call them out on it and they get threatened. And then the only excuse they had is,
oh, well, there was a corruption in the database for five years. No, I don't think so. But they
sowed a lot of seeds in the verbiage of bears on the CDC website. Oh, it's association. That's not
causal. Well, of course, there's never been. It's very difficult to determine causality.
But anyways, just go through the UK government themselves. And I'll show you this on a subsequent
slide. Of all things, the UK data, and I just found this out, the UK government website
strongly advocates against the use of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy and breastfeeding mothers.
I can prove it to you. I'll show it to you. I didn't believe it. I just discovered it a month ago.
It's a classic maneuver by the medical industrial complex and by the pharmaceutical companies
that put a lot of, you know, 100 pages of trash, nonsense, worthless information. And then at the
end of them, that section will drop a nugget, which they did in this one. So why did they do that?
It's very easy because they have plausible deniability. When the House of Cards drop,
like it has in 75 countries, and you got the government in Austria blaming you, the physicians,
because you, physician, did not get informed consent. It's your fault, physician. It's not
our fault because we didn't recommend it. It's right in our website. Isn't that the perfect?
There's no way the UK government can get sued. So that's what I think. The UK yellow card
system, it's the exact same as various is worse. The European Medicines Agency,
you drew a big vigilance. It's the exact same as various worse. The WHO, World Health Organization's
you drew vigilance. It's the same nonsense, horrible outcomes. You got Edward Dowd
documenting 61,000 dead millennials just in six months of last year. Let that soak in.
61,000 dead, healthy, young, beautiful, millennial human beings dead in six months.
They all died from fentanyl? No. They all died from suicide? No. They all died from COVID-19?
No, they did not. These are young, healthy individuals.
When I was a millennial, I was 24 years old with my brother, Kent Thorpe, and my research partner,
my mentor, and we went to medical school at Wayne State University School of Medicine.
In 1976, the influenza vaccine, the swine flu vaccine caused 26 deaths.
It was immediately ripped out of the market. But when we were back then, it took 15 years to kill
58,500 of my contemporaries at the time who were millennials through the Vietnam War. That's
15 years of death and destruction of a war to kill 58,500 of my contemporaries when I was a millennial.
Let that sink in. 61,000 dead millennials in six months. Same with One America Insurance Company.
One America Insurance Company is one of the largest insurance companies, and the CEO, Mr.
Davis, in Indianapolis, Indiana, shows an all-cause mortality rate up 40%.
Now, let's put that into context. A 10% increase in all-cause mortality is a black swan 200-year
event of three sigma. It's a three sigma, three standard deviation event above what is expected,
and it's a major catastrophic death now for the insurance payouts. That's 10%. This was a 40%,
so we're looking at 12 sigma event. It's the same thing with Lincoln Insurance Company.
It's the same thing with there's 32, 33 young, beautiful, dead Canadian physicians.
That's unprecedented. We have longevity data on this. This has never occurred in the history of Canada.
They're from the vaccine. You have 1,354 dead or severely affected athletes,
922 of whom were dead. This is unprecedented. These are young, healthy human beings at the peak,
the pinnacle of their physical health, and they're dead. They're no longer with us.
All-cause mortality by anybody's, every government's
reconnaissance is way up in every single country. Funeral directors worldwide note a massive increase.
Child newborn casket producers, they've never had to produce so many in their entire history.
Dr. Palmer's and Dr. Bobke, unequivocal, 93% of the people dying from the vaccine are proven to be
dead and killed by the vaccine by massive spike protein endothelitis in nearly every organ system
in the body. Dr. Arne Burkhart of Germany, the pathologist, exactly the same. Alexandra
Sasha Latipova, I think she's been on this forum. She has procured, she's a whistleblower from the
pharmaceutical industry, and I've met with her. She has showed documents showing irrefutably
that the toxicology, the reproductive toxicology studies in animals were completely altered and
fabricated with the deletion of severe birth defects in the animal dams in the fetuses,
and I'll show you some of those. You've got Richard Hirschman, the embalmer. I don't know
any of those, any of you all that were tuned in yesterday. He had a brilliant presentation
at the Idaho legislature. I was on the panel as well, and he's brilliant, and his story is
brilliant. If you get a copy of that, maybe he could visit with us. Albert Bennett V-Days,
he needs no introduction. Dr. Daniel Magas of Canada, he and I are in contact. He's a
brilliant emergency doctor. We've done a lot of work together. We are correlating all the adverse
and skeptical outcomes from Canada, which has just been unbelievable. The massive number of fetal
deaths still birthed just in Waterloo area in Ontario. I mean, these are documented. They're
unprecedented. Of course, Dr. Peter McCullough has a massive amount of data. The DMEB,
U.S. Military Database, World Council for Health has a massive amount of data. They're calling for
complete ban of all COVID-19 vaccination. And then you have our publication from April
that is COVID-19 and the corruption of medical science. And that's part three, which was published
in March. I studied, reviewed, and outlined in a Word document 1,366 peer-reviewed publications.
I wrote them all. I studied them all. And I documented them all. And I published them all.
The journal, the Gazette of Medical Sciences, was so impressed that I delayed all these,
that they published an appendix to the actual publication with every single one of these
references published on it. And I formatted them in a table so you can look up the subject of the
adverse event or the death, my subject. And going back to those two babies that died after
breastfeeding, they're dead, they're no longer with us. They were caused by thrombotic thrombocytopenic
perfora and also by autoimmune disease. Those are the huge lion's share of those complications
that I documented were from those two causes. Huge numbers. It's not safe. And focusing on
the 1,366, that was bad publications, all peer-reviewed, all in the medical literature,
it's stunning. Now there's over, and we're doing numbers, we're up to over 2,000 now.
Imagine that. I go back for a whole century, a whole century looking at all other vaccines.
There's hardly any. You cannot come anywhere close to even 1% of those.
It's stunning. This in of itself
proves that this is a very dangerous vaccination.
Multiple countries have now, over 75 countries have banned the use of the vaccine,
either totally or in certain segments of their population, never mind banning all the ridiculous
stringency, social distancing and masks and travel. And by the way, in the process of doing
another study at this time, outlining the effects of all those. Costa Rica, all the Scandinavian
countries, Uruguay, Germany, Italy, Denmark, 78 other countries, probably more by now.
Denmark, 78 other countries, probably more by now. And then you've got the Steve Kirsch
formal. And I see my buddy Lenny that is watching, and Lenny's a brilliant investigator.
He puts together questionnaires and he's a doctor for the brassica, Steve Kirsch's formal survey
data undeniable showing unbelievable risks of the vaccine. And then if you're going to throw out
all the 32, probably 40 different references by now, then are you going to believe Pfizer themselves?
I've been through that data. Pfizer themselves told you that their vaccine is deadly.
You're going to believe them? I would. Here's a, if you don't believe me,
I've been going on here about 40 minutes or 45 minutes or so. So Charles just cut me off when
you want to, but this is right out of the bloody UK website. Look it up. You can read as well as I.
The UK government has never recommended the use. They said, do not take the COVID-19 vaccine in
pregnancy. Do not give it to breastfeeding moms. Too bad it was buried. I only discovered this,
you know, like a month ago. I couldn't believe it.
So James, James on this question, if you go for another 10 minutes, this is, there are so many
questions, comments. I'm sure people have, but it's just stunning what you're sharing with us.
If you want to go for 15 minutes, that's fine as well, but about 10 minutes and then
great opportunities for questions. Gotcha. Okay. It's 3.11 here, central time.
Hurricane's not banging on my fanny out here. So excellent. So I'll go to 3.20 or something.
Okay.
This is Sasha, Sasha Lattie-Bowes. And we did this, she broke this in the ET Times
and I commented on it and I reviewed it all and she and I have met formally and I interviewed her.
And she's a real deal. She's an extraordinarily brilliant young woman.
And there's no question that this caused severe skeletal dysplasia in the rat fetuses.
I won't go through all the reproductive toxicology. They hit them. They buried them. They lied about
them. Can you imagine? I mean, whoever did this, perpetrated this disaster? I mean,
mass killing all over the world by perpetrating fraudulent data,
the new MO of the medical industrial complex.
This is a lethal skeletal dysplasia on my side of the equation. I don't deliver too many rats,
we do ultrasound on too many rats, but this is in essence what it showed was when there's a
skeletal dysplasia of which there's over 200 different genetic and various causes.
Some of them are lethal and the ones that are lethal are caused by the ribs aren't able to
grow so the lungs don't grow. So the fetus can go all the way to turn, but yet as soon as the
umbilical cord is cut, babies die because they don't have any lung tissue because the chest
can't expand and that's why we call it a bell-shaped chest. See, this is the abdominal
circumference or diameter. This is a thoracic diameter. They should be equal and you see a
bell-shaped chest. This is a radiograph of a baby after birth and this is the stillbirth. I'm sorry,
it was not a stillbirth. This was a newborn baby that died because it couldn't sustain life.
So this is an abnormal placenta. This is the pattern that I'm seeing six to eight weeks
after Pfizer vaccine and I don't have a lot of time to review this. I've got a few minutes left
here, but you see the very dense calcification which is really abnormal and it's around each
of the organelles if you will, what we call cata-leadens of the placenta. You see an area
here that's infarcted. This is a very abnormal looking placenta. This is what I'm seeing about
six to eight weeks after the vaccine is injected. Now fortunately in my practice on the vaccine,
if the medical records are accurate in the you know in the discrete peaks that I can look in the
clinical side, there's a lot of patients that are not taking the vaccine anymore. So and by the way,
kudos to you Charles and to you Stephen because you know there's only five percent of the people,
five percent of the kids worldwide that are getting this vaccine and that's because of your
truth and that's because of all of us in the world putting the word out. People will not admit it
that they're not better than me and their kids. They know better than that. I want to do a shout
out to one of the young rising heroes that is fortunate enough to be on my team and her name is
Tiffany Carado and she's the CEO and Leonard Murphy is part of his team and many others.
You know we have Christiane Northrup, just an incredible physician. Many of you know her and
you know we have Dr. Brian Hooker, we have Sue Peters, we have just Warren Geek, so many
incredibly brilliant people but Tiffany went and started a survey and I want to say 80 or 100,000
whatever respondents were deleted because the purveyors of truth didn't like, they like these
victims, they're like throwing them under the bus and taking away their platform. Now with Tiffany,
that's not going to work with Tiffany Carado so she started her own website,
started her own questionnaire and we got on a protected website mycyclestory.com. We published
our first manuscript from this and I don't have time to get into it but you should read it.
This here is a decidual cast, this is a relatively rare event. That publication of these over the last
century have yielded only about 40 or so, maybe 50 related cases in the medical literature.
We found 294 in half a year last year. Something is going on very very wrong. Usually decidual casts,
this is kind of get a visual of this, this is a perfect cast if you will of the intrauterine cavity.
It's a perfect triangle so all this white tissue is actually an anematrial tissue that decidual cast
so all this white tissue is actually an anematrial tissue that decidual base cells
that's shut off intact. I don't have time to go through all the mechanisms. I don't have time
to go through, this is our most recent publication, COVID-19 energy protein folding and pre-end disease.
We postulate, we believe, my partners, research partners and I think others, I think Dr. McCullough
I think others believe that part of the collapse is a development in vivo, a massive
clot that is mostly protonaceous and it's related to an energy deficit. It's related to the fact that
vaccine causes a massive deprivation of energy in the mitochondria, the nuclear, the cytoplasmic,
and the cellular level. Where does the energy go? It's being depleted into the production of spike
protein so the energy is hijacked and many of you may not know this but it takes an extreme amount
of energy for the physiologic folding and unfolding of all biomacromolecules whether it's
DNA, it's lipid, it's phospholipids, it's large proteins and our creator designed those so they
have a function so that they in certain milieu they have to change to a physiologic function.
If they misfold then they aggregate in the glutinous and this is what's happening in vitro.
This is where Richard Hirschman is getting these massive clots and all the embalmers are.
This is what's killing many patients, the micro and the macro clotting. They form in the vena cava.
They form in the vena cava. Look at this, look at these clots. Look at these clots. They've never,
the embalmers have never seen this before before the vaccines started going out. These are massive
clots. This is, look at this ruler. This is a massive clot next to the corpse.
These are not occurring after death. These are pre-mortem clots as a cause of death. They've
never seen these before. This is the clots washed off in saline so the red, this is largely very,
very different than the standard deep vein thrombosis that we saw pre-pandemic. These are
not remedial. They're not cured. They're not fixed by standard therapeutics of heparin and
low-moderate weight heparin. It's from a crowd of artery. There's several of them. I can't vouch
for the veracity of this clot in the middle. Allegedly, I believe that this is a clot which
was taken out in vivo by a cardiothoracic surgeon after cracking the chest.
I'm going to stop here. Y'all, I love you all. I'm so honored to be able to present our data to you.
Let's get the word out. Let's stop this vaccine.
Thank you, David. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, James.