1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:12
And I'll put Thomas up here.

2
0:00:12 --> 0:00:20
So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International and today's discussion.

3
0:00:20 --> 0:00:25
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost over three years ago with the desire to pursue

4
0:00:25 --> 0:00:32
truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health. Stephen has stood up against government and

5
0:00:32 --> 0:00:39
power over the years and has been a whistleblower and activist. His medical specialty is radiology

6
0:00:39 --> 0:00:46
and overnight while I was sleeping here in Australia, the Julian Assange case decision

7
0:00:46 --> 0:00:52
was handed down. I wonder if while we're doing this recording, if anybody was that was that

8
0:00:52 --> 0:00:59
handed down? Does anybody know? Because Stephen has done a lot of work on this.

9
0:00:59 --> 0:01:05
Yes, I've just got reports Charles. I just got reports today, just minutes ago actually.

10
0:01:05 --> 0:01:11
The case was handed down. He's got time now to appeal again.

11
0:01:11 --> 0:01:14
Okay, thank you. Thank you Peter. Just quickly, I just wanted that for the purpose of this

12
0:01:14 --> 0:01:20
because Stephen has fought for Julie and Assange's freedom over the years. I'm Charles Covester,

13
0:01:20 --> 0:01:26
moderator of this group on Australasia's passion provocateur and we love passionate people

14
0:01:26 --> 0:01:31
in these meetings. I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago

15
0:01:31 --> 0:01:36
and over the last 13 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine

16
0:01:36 --> 0:01:42
damage and damage from bad medical advice. I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.

17
0:01:42 --> 0:01:47
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world. Many of us thought

18
0:01:47 --> 0:01:52
that vaccines were okay. Now many of us proudly say, yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers.

19
0:01:52 --> 0:01:56
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat

20
0:01:56 --> 0:02:02
and where you're from. If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have a radio or TV show

21
0:02:02 --> 0:02:06
or you've written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you

22
0:02:06 --> 0:02:11
and find you. Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War III and that the

23
0:02:11 --> 0:02:18
medical science battle is only one of 12 battlefields of this latest world war and

24
0:02:20 --> 0:02:25
there's no time to be tired. We're four years into what I think is going to be a seven-year

25
0:02:25 --> 0:02:28
war. I thought it was going to be a six-year war. I think we've got another three years

26
0:02:28 --> 0:02:33
to go probably. Most of us understand the development of science and that the science

27
0:02:33 --> 0:02:38
is never settled. Anybody who tells you the science is settled, they've got an agenda

28
0:02:38 --> 0:02:44
to sell you. Some of us believe that viruses exist. Some of us believe that viruses are

29
0:02:44 --> 0:02:49
a hoax and some of us are on the fence. And some commentators on this Rumble channel say

30
0:02:49 --> 0:02:56
that anybody who believes that viruses exist is a liar or a fool. So there you are. The

31
0:02:56 --> 0:03:01
criticisms are coming loud and strong. This meeting runs for two and a half hours after

32
0:03:01 --> 0:03:05
which for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting. Tom puts the

33
0:03:06 --> 0:03:10
links into the chat if you're able to join. We will listen to our guest presenter, Dr.

34
0:03:10 --> 0:03:15
Thomas Binder for as long as Thomas wishes to speak and then we have Q&A. Stephen Frost

35
0:03:15 --> 0:03:21
by long established tradition asks the first questions for 15 minutes. This is a free speech

36
0:03:21 --> 0:03:27
environment. Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.

37
0:03:27 --> 0:03:32
If you're offended by anything, be offended. We are lovingly not interested. We reject

38
0:03:32 --> 0:03:38
the offence industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another. We

39
0:03:38 --> 0:03:44
come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear. Fear is the opposite of love. Fear

40
0:03:44 --> 0:03:51
squashes you. Love on the other hand expands you. Our strength as men and women comes from

41
0:03:52 --> 0:03:59
being united. The globalist agenda is to divide us in the context of relationships with other

42
0:03:59 --> 0:04:06
human beings, understand that unity is strength. These twice weekly meetings are not just talk

43
0:04:06 --> 0:04:11
fests. An extraordinary range of actions and initiatives have been generated from linkages

44
0:04:11 --> 0:04:16
made by attendees in these meetings. If you have a solution or a product or links or resources

45
0:04:16 --> 0:04:20
that will help people, put the details into the chat. The meeting is recorded and is uploaded

46
0:04:20 --> 0:04:26
onto the Rumble channel. And now let me introduce, let me give you the bio. We've agreed that

47
0:04:26 --> 0:04:32
we will include the bio to make life easy for viewers of these recordings. And let me

48
0:04:32 --> 0:04:39
tell you a little bit just quickly about Thomas Binder. And if it was Binder, if it was in

49
0:04:40 --> 0:04:46
Australia it would say binder, but it's Binder. And Thomas studied medicine at the University

50
0:04:46 --> 0:04:51
of Zurich and received his doctorate in immunology and virology, specialised in internal medicine

51
0:04:51 --> 0:04:56
and cardiology, has 36 years of experience also in diagnostics and therapy of respiratory

52
0:04:56 --> 0:05:03
infections in hospitals and in ICUs. He's been working in his private practice in Switzerland

53
0:05:03 --> 0:05:10
for 26 years. He stood up for the return to scientificity, medicine and humanness in March

54
0:05:11 --> 0:05:18
2020 and has done so since then. On Easter Saturday evening, 2020, he was arrested in

55
0:05:18 --> 0:05:23
his practice by an anti-terrorist unit after a slanderer had made the allegations he threatened

56
0:05:23 --> 0:05:28
the government and society, was armed and had a psychiatric history, which was all wrong.

57
0:05:28 --> 0:05:35
Yet, he was detained in a closed psychiatry unit for six days because of COVID insanity.

58
0:05:36 --> 0:05:41
He was a board member of the Swiss Aletheia Humane Medicine and Science, is a core member

59
0:05:41 --> 0:05:46
of Doctors for COVID Ethics, a member of the German Physicians and Scientists for Health,

60
0:05:46 --> 0:05:52
Freedom and Democracy, is one of the 22 life scientists who wrote the Cormann-Droston

61
0:05:52 --> 0:05:58
Review Report, including addendum blogs, articles, talks and interviews you can find on Thomas'

62
0:05:58 --> 0:06:04
personal website. We put this into the chat, thomasbinder.ch. Of course, this was the extension

63
0:06:04 --> 0:06:11
for Switzerland and on ex also known as Twitter at thomas underscore binder. So Thomas, welcome

64
0:06:11 --> 0:06:18
your frequent visitor to here, looking forward to hearing what you have to say to us. Hello,

65
0:06:21 --> 0:06:26
Stephen with your nicely brushed hair and Thomas, we're in your hands.

66
0:06:26 --> 0:06:33
Welcome everybody. Thank you, Stephen, for your invitation and Charles for your kind

67
0:06:33 --> 0:06:39
introduction. I'd like to talk about my experience during the last four years and about my two

68
0:06:40 --> 0:06:47
cents on this Corona pandemic and the injections, of course, and maybe there will be some time

69
0:06:50 --> 0:06:57
about to talk about the big picture as well. Yeah, well, I was confronted with COVID like

70
0:06:58 --> 0:07:05
you all in first in January 2020 with these pictures and videos from Wuhan that I realized

71
0:07:05 --> 0:07:12
were simply too much. I mean, we saw those hoards running around in penguin suits, cannons

72
0:07:13 --> 0:07:20
mounted on lorries, allegedly spraying disinfectants in the air and people allegedly dying suddenly

73
0:07:20 --> 0:07:27
in the streets that always landed on their hands. So I thought, oh my God, what's this?

74
0:07:27 --> 0:07:34
At that time, of course, I didn't know what was going on. I didn't know what was going

75
0:07:35 --> 0:07:41
on, whether these pictures were directed against the Chinese populace or against the populace

76
0:07:41 --> 0:07:47
of the whole world. But I thought this is very strange. And then there was silence,

77
0:07:47 --> 0:07:52
more or less silence for about a month. And then one morning I woke up and in the news

78
0:07:52 --> 0:07:57
I heard now the virus is in Bergamo. Bergamo is in northern Italy and northern Italy is

79
0:07:57 --> 0:08:04
50 km from the Swiss border where I live. And I was amazed. I was surprised to see that

80
0:08:05 --> 0:08:12
like, obviously, almost everybody thought, oh, well, we have to do exactly the same as

81
0:08:13 --> 0:08:20
the Chinese did because at the same time, we got messages from Wuhan that the Chinese

82
0:08:22 --> 0:08:29
in their heroic war against the virus won. So obviously most people thought that we have

83
0:08:29 --> 0:08:36
to do exactly the same, install the same insane authoritarian unscientific measures as stated.

84
0:08:37 --> 0:08:44
And I couldn't understand the word. I mean, everything I had learned in medical school

85
0:08:44 --> 0:08:51
during my scientific education, in my practical medical life was suddenly turned upside down.

86
0:08:52 --> 0:08:59
And I was amazed that other doctors did not inform the public. So I thought, well, it's

87
0:09:02 --> 0:09:09
my duty to inform the public as a doctor. So first I wrote emails to better doctors,

88
0:09:09 --> 0:09:14
to journalists I knew, politicians I knew to inform them about what's going on. And

89
0:09:14 --> 0:09:19
the spooky thing was I never got any answer, not even an answer like, Thomas, you're crazy

90
0:09:19 --> 0:09:26
or so, just no answer. So as I could not reach out to journalists, I intensified my activities

91
0:09:32 --> 0:09:39
in social media. I wrote blogs. And on the first day before Easter 2020, I wrote a huge

92
0:09:41 --> 0:09:48
blog again where I explained the whole prevailing corona nonsense narrative, that the indications

93
0:09:49 --> 0:09:56
to test is wrong, test is wrong. Highly likely there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic

94
0:09:56 --> 0:10:03
transmission, that it is irresponsibly panicking the populace with a CFR of 2% while every

95
0:10:04 --> 0:10:11
pupil understands that the IFR is important, that is highly likely 100 times or so lower.

96
0:10:13 --> 0:10:19
So that this virus probably is even less dangerous than influenza in the range of its broader

97
0:10:19 --> 0:10:26
and sister coronaviruses and so on and so forth. And this blog was clicked about 20,000

98
0:10:26 --> 0:10:33
times in a day. So I thought, oh, well, I didn't understand why me, an ordinary doctor,

99
0:10:33 --> 0:10:40
should inform Switzerland or maybe half of the world. But well, I did it. And I thought

100
0:10:40 --> 0:10:46
in a week or so other doctors will come out, this information will spread exponentially

101
0:10:46 --> 0:10:53
and this whole corona nonsense narrative will have crashed within a week. I want you to

102
0:10:53 --> 0:11:00
go on holiday on Easter for a week. But so on Easter Saturday in the evening, I was doing

103
0:11:01 --> 0:11:07
some final work in my practice before going on holiday. And at about 10 o'clock, I was

104
0:11:07 --> 0:11:14
arrested by an anti-terrorist squad, 20 policemen. In this whole operation, 60 policemen were

105
0:11:15 --> 0:11:22
involved. And the reason was that the good acquaintance of mine, whom I sent these emails

106
0:11:22 --> 0:11:29
as well, who read my blogs, in these tweets, blogs, etc., he projected threats, threats

107
0:11:32 --> 0:11:38
against the government, against the populace. And he called another good acquaintance of

108
0:11:38 --> 0:11:44
mine, the prime minister of the canton of the province where I live in Switzerland.

109
0:11:44 --> 0:11:51
And on the phone, they decided they do not want to call me and they asked me, Thomas,

110
0:11:51 --> 0:11:57
we do not understand what you want to tell us. Maybe we meet for a corona and you can

111
0:11:57 --> 0:12:04
explain it to us again. No, they informed the chief of the state police and he started

112
0:12:04 --> 0:12:11
this whole operation. At the same time, they protected the whole government of my province

113
0:12:13 --> 0:12:19
and the train station that is opposite to my practice was closed for hours because of

114
0:12:19 --> 0:12:26
this well-known fundamentalist terrorist, Dr. Thomas Pinder. After one hour, they realized

115
0:12:27 --> 0:12:33
all allegations, there were three allegations, were wrong. The allegations were I was a threat,

116
0:12:33 --> 0:12:39
I was armed, I had a psychiatric history. They found out after an hour everything was

117
0:12:39 --> 0:12:45
wrong so they could not even issue an arrest warrant, they could not imprison me. But they

118
0:12:45 --> 0:12:52
did not apologize and send me home. Then they sent a colleague to me that had to check my

119
0:12:53 --> 0:13:00
ability to be imprisoned, although they could not imprison me. And this was an emergency

120
0:13:01 --> 0:13:08
doctor. You must imagine already at that time she wore a hardcore FFP2 mask and was shouting

121
0:13:08 --> 0:13:13
put on the mask, put on the mask, the virus, the virus. So this colleague had to check

122
0:13:13 --> 0:13:20
my mental status and she decided I was corona insane. She invented a new diagnosis and as

123
0:13:20 --> 0:13:27
insanity alone is not enough or involuntary commitment, she decided I must be self-endangering.

124
0:13:28 --> 0:13:35
Although in a tweet some days ago, because everything seemed so spooky to me, I wrote

125
0:13:35 --> 0:13:42
something like I'm 58 years old, sporty, no medication and never ever commit suicide.

126
0:13:43 --> 0:13:50
So I spent six days in closed psychiatry, the first 36 hours in a padded cell. But then

127
0:13:51 --> 0:13:58
of course I appealed and the court decided yes, they have to release me. But then in

128
0:13:59 --> 0:14:06
this psychiatric hospital a psychiatrist diagnosed mania. I would suffer from mania. So the court

129
0:14:07 --> 0:14:13
said okay, you are a doctor, you want to continue to work. So there are two possibilities. Either

130
0:14:13 --> 0:14:19
you stay in the psychiatric hospital for six weeks to have treated your mania or you can

131
0:14:19 --> 0:14:24
leave and go on and continue to work. But then you have to take a Beli-Fi, a neuroleptic

132
0:14:24 --> 0:14:31
and whether I took it or not was checked by a blood check once per week. So I decided

133
0:14:32 --> 0:14:39
to do the latter. So this was Soviet style psychiatry in Switzerland. But I never did

134
0:14:40 --> 0:14:47
something unlawful. Everything I told and wrote from March 2020 on was 100% scientific

135
0:14:49 --> 0:14:54
and evidence based so they could not really do me harm. I continued to work and of course

136
0:14:54 --> 0:15:01
I even intensified to inform the public. So I networked locally in Switzerland. I joined

137
0:15:04 --> 0:15:11
a group of Swiss, a network of Swiss doctors and scientists called Alethea, then later

138
0:15:11 --> 0:15:14
for COVID.

139
0:15:14 --> 0:15:21
In this context I have to mention one important person that is Suchary Bhakti. Of course I

140
0:15:25 --> 0:15:32
realized immediately that everything is nonsense. But of course as a doctor I could not go public

141
0:15:33 --> 0:15:40
while only searching for 99%. I had to be 200% sure. At that time I found Suchary, I

142
0:15:40 --> 0:15:47
found his YouTube videos. You can look into his eyes and within a second you realize this

143
0:15:49 --> 0:15:55
is a deeply honest, intelligent and pathetic person. I saw he is telling the same. Later

144
0:15:55 --> 0:16:02
I found Wolfgang Wodarg as well. Those guys gave me the assurance that I was right so

145
0:16:03 --> 0:16:09
that I could go public.

146
0:16:09 --> 0:16:16
It is essential that the public understands that there was no pandemic of a killer virus.

147
0:16:16 --> 0:16:22
This was mainly an RT-PCR testing pandemic because this of course is the recipe for the

148
0:16:22 --> 0:16:29
WHO to fabricate any RT or PCR testing pandemic against any alleged or real disease.

149
0:16:33 --> 0:16:40
I would like to stress that I am open to debate about everything. Whether there is a virus

150
0:16:41 --> 0:16:48
around or not I am not completely sure. I am not completely sure whether it is a testing

151
0:16:48 --> 0:16:55
pandemic by 95%, 99% or 100%. I am also ready to debate about whether there are viruses

152
0:16:56 --> 0:17:03
or not. For the moment I think this debate is not very fruitful because already now when

153
0:17:07 --> 0:17:14
we go to court the judges and the prosecutors think we are crazy. In the currently accepted

154
0:17:14 --> 0:17:21
belief system alone there are 1001 reasons to unveil this whole nonsense so we do not

155
0:17:28 --> 0:17:35
need the other stuff. If you tell the judge there are no viruses at all they even think

156
0:17:36 --> 0:17:43
we are more insane. I think this may somewhat divide us. I think we are more likely to be

157
0:17:44 --> 0:17:50
and I think this is not very fruitful in public. We can debate about everything in a closed

158
0:17:50 --> 0:17:56
circle but this is my personal opinion. You can have another opinion of course but this

159
0:17:56 --> 0:18:03
is my personal opinion. In what I say I still think there are viruses but I am not absolutely

160
0:18:05 --> 0:18:11
sure of course. I learned during these times that we have to question everything especially

161
0:18:11 --> 0:18:18
in the medical and scientific field of course. The basis of this nonsense narrative of course

162
0:18:19 --> 0:18:26
is the RT-PCR test. Even before this comes to light we have to do the RT-PCR test. We

163
0:18:41 --> 0:18:48
have to do the RT-PCR test. I mean how did we treat the flu and the cold before 2020?

164
0:18:57 --> 0:19:03
Well it is usually a self-limiting disease so we treated ourselves and after 7 days it

165
0:19:03 --> 0:19:10
was over. Sometimes it got worse and maybe day 5 when it got worse we went to the GP

166
0:19:10 --> 0:19:17
and he maybe diagnosed complicating secondary bacteria pneumonia that could still be treated

167
0:19:17 --> 0:19:24
on an outpatient basis with antibiotics and lasted maybe 2 or 3 weeks. But here the people

168
0:19:25 --> 0:19:32
were told and only when it got really worse life threatening the GP sent us to the hospital

169
0:19:33 --> 0:19:40
and only at that stage we tested for the causative germ. The GP had just to decide is it highly

170
0:19:42 --> 0:19:48
likely a viral infection or is it a bacterial infection. But in the very severe life threatening

171
0:19:48 --> 0:19:55
cases we wanted to treat specifically with antiviral drugs so then we must know the causative

172
0:19:56 --> 0:20:03
virus and only at that stage we tested. We never tested for a cold or a flu virus before

173
0:20:04 --> 0:20:11
and we did not test only for one of all possible causative germs like they did here. They did

174
0:20:11 --> 0:20:18
no longer test for influenza they only tested for SARS-CoV-2 and we did not test asymptomatic

175
0:20:18 --> 0:20:25
formally called healthy people of course. This was all totally insane. Then there comes

176
0:20:25 --> 0:20:31
the wrong test of course. PCR is not a test for an infection it is a test for the presence

177
0:20:31 --> 0:20:38
of a certain amount of a certain part of a genome of a causative of a germ. And even

178
0:20:41 --> 0:20:48
if it is 100% sensitive and specific presence of a tiny amount of somebody or a virus is

179
0:20:48 --> 0:20:55
of course does never prove an infection. The more viruses is around the lower the CTs the

180
0:20:56 --> 0:21:03
higher is the likelihood that this is the causative germ. But the PCR test result must

181
0:21:04 --> 0:21:11
always seen in conjunction with other clinical findings of course. And then of all possible

182
0:21:11 --> 0:21:18
PCR tests they chose the worst. The Cormann-Drawston testing protocol is the recipe for the worst

183
0:21:24 --> 0:21:31
RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. We could possibly imagine any advanced biochemistry student

184
0:21:33 --> 0:21:40
could do a better one within a day. And then another important if these case numbers are

185
0:21:41 --> 0:21:48
of course they these case numbers could cranked up and down according to the script by changing

186
0:21:49 --> 0:21:56
the sensitivity and the specificity of the test. I mean what many even so called experts

187
0:21:59 --> 0:22:06
allegedly do not even know by now is that a specificity of 99% does not mean 1% of the

188
0:22:06 --> 0:22:13
tests are false positives and 19% are correct. But that the meaning of specificity is highly

189
0:22:17 --> 0:22:23
dependent on the prevalence of the virus. If the prevalence of the virus is zero close

190
0:22:23 --> 0:22:30
to zero all or almost all positive tests are false positives. I explain it to lay people

191
0:22:31 --> 0:22:38
like this. If we do a pregnancy test that is 99% specific in 10,000 men we will get

192
0:22:43 --> 0:22:50
100 positives. And as the prevalence of pregnancy in men is zero all those 100 tests are false

193
0:22:50 --> 0:22:57
positives. And this positivity rate of about 1% is what we saw during the summer when there

194
0:23:00 --> 0:23:07
was no or almost no coronaviruses around. And this Drosten test was especially bad because

195
0:23:09 --> 0:23:16
it cross reacts with all the coronaviruses. There was a laboratory survey in Germany already

196
0:23:17 --> 0:23:24
in summer 2020 where the specificity of the test was 98.6%. But this specificity went

197
0:23:25 --> 0:23:32
down to 92.4% in the presence of all the coronaviruses. So it is clear that in the flu in the corona

198
0:23:35 --> 0:23:42
season that the positivity rate goes up. So whether there was SARS-CoV-2 around or not

199
0:23:43 --> 0:23:50
I am not 100% sure. But it is clear that most, most COVID cases were fabricated out of the

200
0:23:56 --> 0:24:03
thin air by mislabelling other diagnosis. Mainly influenza that miraculously disappeared

201
0:24:04 --> 0:24:11
during this time with this nonsense test. There are many proofs for this. I think that

202
0:24:12 --> 0:24:19
the best proof I call it a picture paints a thousand words. Maybe I may share my screen.

203
0:24:23 --> 0:24:30
Yes you can. Can you see it? Yep. This is a 3D picture paints a thousand words. Now

204
0:24:30 --> 0:24:37
this is the ICU bed monitoring of the famous Swiss University ETH. There we see the number

205
0:24:47 --> 0:24:54
of ICU beds. We see the date. Black curve is the total ICU bed occupancy. The green

206
0:24:55 --> 0:25:02
curve are the non-COVID patients and the orange curve are the COVID patients. Now look what

207
0:25:04 --> 0:25:11
happens. Let's look here. In the summer we have the false positivity rate of about 1%.

208
0:25:11 --> 0:25:17
And then suddenly there is an increase of the COVID patients. COVID patients arrive

209
0:25:17 --> 0:25:24
in the ICU. Then what would you expect? That the green curves myocardial infarctions, pulmonary

210
0:25:24 --> 0:25:31
embolisms, car accidents, etc. would go on straight like this. Maybe someday a little

211
0:25:33 --> 0:25:40
bit go down when they postpone operations or whatever. But at exactly the same moment

212
0:25:42 --> 0:25:49
when these curves goes up the other curves goes down and die about the same amount. And

213
0:25:49 --> 0:25:56
with the reverse of these two lines curves are almost complete mirror images. And you

214
0:25:59 --> 0:26:05
see that the total number of the ICU bed occupancy stays basically the same. You always have

215
0:26:05 --> 0:26:12
a little bit of hump in the flu season in the winter because then there are acute respiratory

216
0:26:12 --> 0:26:19
infections and the most serious cases must be mechanically intubated and mechanically

217
0:26:19 --> 0:26:26
ventilated in the ICUs. We see also that we also always had huge spare beds. Here we see

218
0:26:28 --> 0:26:35
the total amount of ICU beds. They were increased to more than 1,500 and during the alleged

219
0:26:35 --> 0:26:42
pandemic of the century they were reduced. But there were always huge spare beds. So

220
0:26:42 --> 0:26:49
there was never any overcrowding of the ICU. So this is really a picture paints a thousand

221
0:26:50 --> 0:26:57
words. This is the first proof I already mentioned in summer 2020 and nobody ever should give

222
0:27:00 --> 0:27:07
me another explanation for this curve. If you want to explain it in another way you

223
0:27:08 --> 0:27:15
must state that you are probably God for every patient that arrives in the ICU here he postpones

224
0:27:18 --> 0:27:25
a myocardial infarction, a car accident or whatever. But I think this is highly unlikely.

225
0:27:25 --> 0:27:32
I think this is really great and such graphs exist for every country. At the same time

226
0:27:33 --> 0:27:39
they explain why there was no overcrowding in any country. For example, in Germany there

227
0:27:39 --> 0:27:46
are about three times more ICU beds per capita than in Switzerland. Whereas in Sweden there

228
0:27:47 --> 0:27:53
are only about half as many per capita as in Switzerland. So if we Swiss are maybe at

229
0:27:53 --> 0:28:00
the limit in Germany they would have had enormous reserves while in Sweden they would have had

230
0:28:03 --> 0:28:10
overcrowding of the ICU. But in no country we saw this. So this was mainly a RT-PCR testing

231
0:28:12 --> 0:28:19
pandemic. And for people who do not believe that this really exists I recommend an article

232
0:28:24 --> 0:28:31
that was published in the New York Times in 2007 under the title Faith in Quick Test Leads

233
0:28:31 --> 0:28:38
to Epidemic That Wasn't. There they describe an alleged whooping cough epidemic in New

234
0:28:39 --> 0:28:46
Hampshire in 2006 where 142 people tested positive also with a nonsense PCR test. And

235
0:28:50 --> 0:28:57
then later they found out with bacterial cultures that none actually suffered from pertussis.

236
0:28:57 --> 0:29:04
So this was by 100% a PCR testing epidemic. And this is exactly what happened now. It's

237
0:29:07 --> 0:29:14
amazing that even in the freedom movement, especially the stars, they never talk about

238
0:29:15 --> 0:29:22
this. They are still blathering about the lab leak. Of course this chain of function

239
0:29:22 --> 0:29:29
research must be forbidden of course. But I think these rumors about this lab leak mainly

240
0:29:30 --> 0:29:37
serve to inflate this comparatively harmless virus into a killer virus with propaganda.

241
0:29:39 --> 0:29:46
Basically an endemic of a comparatively harmless cold virus was inflated into a pandemic of

242
0:29:47 --> 0:29:54
a killer virus with PR and PCR. And it's always a good idea to walk in the shoes of the adversary.

243
0:29:57 --> 0:30:04
If I was a psychopath who should plan such this pandemic? If I was not suicidal I would

244
0:30:08 --> 0:30:13
not release a killer virus that could hurt or even kill myself. I would of course choose

245
0:30:13 --> 0:30:20
a comparatively harmless virus or even no virus and inflate it into a killer virus with

246
0:30:20 --> 0:30:27
PR and PCR. And this is exactly what they did. And what threatens of course that the

247
0:30:27 --> 0:30:34
WHO does again at will if the modifications of the IHRs and the pandemic agreement are

248
0:30:34 --> 0:30:41
accepted and ratified in our countries. So it is of utmost importance that we bombard

249
0:30:42 --> 0:30:49
our parliamentarians with this information that they realize what's at stake. So this

250
0:30:51 --> 0:30:58
to the RT-PCR testing pandemic. The other part is insane as well of course. In 2020

251
0:30:58 --> 0:31:05
they came up with the idea of course that we can only overcome this pandemic with a

252
0:31:08 --> 0:31:15
vaccine. The idea to end the pandemic with a vaccine starts long before this modified

253
0:31:19 --> 0:31:26
RNA and DNA platform. It starts with the vaccination itself. There is no need to vaccinate against

254
0:31:27 --> 0:31:34
this comparatively harmless virus. Then we cannot effectively vaccinate against the respiratory

255
0:31:36 --> 0:31:42
virus. At least not reduce infection or transmission because the antibodies are in the blood, not

256
0:31:42 --> 0:31:48
on the mucosa of the airways. The best we can hope with a vaccine against the respiratory

257
0:31:48 --> 0:31:55
virus is to somewhat reduce generalized disease caused by viremia if the virus becomes more

258
0:31:56 --> 0:32:03
spread in the whole body. Then we cannot effectively vaccinate against the permanently

259
0:32:03 --> 0:32:09
mutating virus like coronaviruses because the vaccine always lags behind its variants

260
0:32:09 --> 0:32:16
of course. Especially if you choose only one epitope. Natural immunity of course is always

261
0:32:18 --> 0:32:24
better than the best vaccine. I explain this to lay people like this. Let's say my face

262
0:32:24 --> 0:32:30
is a virus. I infect you. Then your immune system takes a picture of my face and stores

263
0:32:30 --> 0:32:37
it. If I come around again next season mutated, so let's say with a broken nose, your immune

264
0:32:38 --> 0:32:45
system still recognizes my face also with a broken nose. But if your immune system only

265
0:32:46 --> 0:32:52
takes a picture of my nose, only one epitope, and I come around next season with a broken

266
0:32:52 --> 0:32:59
nose, it will not recognize me again. Then of course even if there was a pandemic, of

267
0:33:00 --> 0:33:07
course you cannot end a testing pandemic with a vaccine. You can only end a testing pandemic

268
0:33:07 --> 0:33:14
by ending testing. But even if it was a pandemic, you cannot end a pandemic with a vaccine because

269
0:33:14 --> 0:33:21
a pandemic ends after three months with everybody either immune or dead, while the development

270
0:33:24 --> 0:33:31
and testing for safety and efficacy of a vaccine lasts ten years. So already this was intellectually

271
0:33:33 --> 0:33:40
absurd. Then of course to choose the modified RNA and DNA platform was the apex of incidence.

272
0:33:41 --> 0:33:48
I mean it starts with the unknown dose. We inject the construction plan for the production

273
0:33:49 --> 0:33:55
of a protein foreign to the body, a prodrug, without having any control over which cells

274
0:33:55 --> 0:34:02
produce it, in what amount, and for how long. There was a guy in the 16th century called

275
0:34:03 --> 0:34:10
Paracelsus who said it's the dose that makes a poison or not a poison. So already because

276
0:34:13 --> 0:34:20
the individually produced effective dose of the spike protein was unknown, these vaccines

277
0:34:21 --> 0:34:28
could never have been approved of course. And then the problem, I mean when I heard

278
0:34:29 --> 0:34:36
of this new platform, the first thing I did was to look for the receptor on these LNPs,

279
0:34:36 --> 0:34:43
the lipid nanoparticles, who makes them enter only the muscle cells. But I didn't find this

280
0:34:44 --> 0:34:51
receptor. These were deliberately chosen so that this mRNA could be inserted in any cell,

281
0:34:51 --> 0:34:58
even across the blood brain and the placental barrier, so even be introduced into the brain

282
0:35:01 --> 0:35:08
cells and in the cells of the embryos and fetuses. And this of course was deliberate.

283
0:35:08 --> 0:35:15
This was intention to harm. There is no doubt about that, no doubt at all. If of course

284
0:35:16 --> 0:35:23
the basic flaw of this whole platform, this is important that the people understand, it

285
0:35:25 --> 0:35:32
is not only these SARS-CoV-2 gene transfections that are flawed, it's the whole modified RNA

286
0:35:34 --> 0:35:41
and DNA platform that is basically flawed, because the main toxicity comes from the auto-immune

287
0:35:42 --> 0:35:49
attack of our immune system against the foreign antigen expressing and then presenting cells.

288
0:35:50 --> 0:35:57
Our white blood cells are policing around, they see these cells carrying, presenting

289
0:35:57 --> 0:36:04
a foreign protein, they think this is an alien, and they attack it. Of course the lipid nanoparticles

290
0:36:05 --> 0:36:12
are themselves toxic. The spike itself is toxic. But if the lipid nanoparticles would

291
0:36:13 --> 0:36:20
be the main toxicity came from the lipid nanoparticles, with every dose the toxicity would increase

292
0:36:22 --> 0:36:29
more or less linearly. If the spike was, the main toxicity came from the spike, the toxicity

293
0:36:30 --> 0:36:35
would highly likely go even down with every shot, because there are more and more neutralizing

294
0:36:35 --> 0:36:42
antibodies. But as we know, especially from the Neuron course work, we know that the toxicity

295
0:36:44 --> 0:36:51
increases exponentially with every shot and with each. And this can only be explained

296
0:36:51 --> 0:36:58
by this auto-immune attack. The immune system gets trained again and again with every shot,

297
0:36:59 --> 0:37:06
so it becomes ever better in attacking and destroying those cells. So I'm convinced

298
0:37:08 --> 0:37:14
that the main toxicity comes from this auto-immune attack. And this is the basic thing of the

299
0:37:14 --> 0:37:21
whole platform. The basic thing is to coerce our body cells to produce and then present

300
0:37:22 --> 0:37:29
a protein foreign to the body. This is completely different than gene therapy where you want

301
0:37:29 --> 0:37:36
to make a cell, for example, to produce insulin or whatever, a protein from our body. This

302
0:37:36 --> 0:37:43
is no problem. But there the problem is that they produce a foreign protein. So this is

303
0:37:43 --> 0:37:50
important. The people have to refuse all modified RNA and DNA vaccines. This is especially

304
0:37:53 --> 0:38:00
important because their production is cheap and rapid, so the pharmaceutical industry

305
0:38:00 --> 0:38:07
wants to transfer all vaccines on this platform. So this is the reason why this message has

306
0:38:08 --> 0:38:15
to spread. And then, of course, the dosage is much too high. Obviously, if the dose,

307
0:38:19 --> 0:38:26
if the injections would stay in the muscle, muscle cells can regenerate. So this auto-immune

308
0:38:28 --> 0:38:35
attack would be no problem. This might work. But as I said, they enter any body cell. And

309
0:38:35 --> 0:38:42
then the dosage is high. Obviously, with physiological dosages, they could not get

310
0:38:42 --> 0:38:49
a good immune response. So the dosage is horrendous. And then, of course, the lipid normal particles

311
0:38:51 --> 0:38:58
itself is toxic, the spike is toxic, and the apex of it, the insanity is what Kevin McKernan

312
0:38:58 --> 0:39:05
was the first to found the contamination with functional plasmid DNA from the manufacturing

313
0:39:05 --> 0:39:12
process. So yeah, the idea to vaccinate against this virus was insane. Use this modified RNA

314
0:39:13 --> 0:39:20
and DNA platform was the apex of insanity. So these are the two basic things everybody

315
0:39:20 --> 0:39:27
has to understand. Now, once we have realized it is not about medicine, it is not about

316
0:39:29 --> 0:39:35
science, what is this thing about? I think we can debate about this in the Q&A maybe

317
0:39:35 --> 0:39:42
later. I guess everybody who is present here understands. If you ask me, it is the final

318
0:39:43 --> 0:39:50
battle of evil versus good. For the first time in history, the battle of evil versus

319
0:39:50 --> 0:39:57
good, the ruling psychopaths, or maybe we could better call them severe maligno-gnosyists

320
0:39:59 --> 0:40:06
that always ruled us. In ancient times, they were wearing crowns. Nowadays, they are multi-billionaires.

321
0:40:09 --> 0:40:15
For the first time in human history, they have the technical means to totally control

322
0:40:16 --> 0:40:23
and enslave us. I am absolutely sure this is the aim of this whole agenda. There is

323
0:40:23 --> 0:40:30
also a spiritual area of course. If you are good people, you have to stand up against

324
0:40:31 --> 0:40:38
this, if not for ourselves, then of course for life, for our children and grandchildren.

325
0:40:38 --> 0:40:45
Maybe I end here and I am ready to take any questions, of course, hard questions of course.

326
0:40:49 --> 0:40:56
Very good. Thomas, wonderful. I have been a professional speaker for 31 years after

327
0:40:58 --> 0:41:05
my legal career. What you have done is to honestly share your experience with the world

328
0:41:08 --> 0:41:15
there, your perspective, and each one of us has a perspective. That is the value of

329
0:41:16 --> 0:41:23
human beings and your analogies to explain complex ideas. That is what excellent educators

330
0:41:25 --> 0:41:32
do. I learned a long time ago that if somebody does not understand me, that is my fault,

331
0:41:32 --> 0:41:39
not their fault. That is because I have explained it badly. You have given us a great example

332
0:41:42 --> 0:41:49
of explaining things well to those who do not speak particular languages. I think it

333
0:41:54 --> 0:42:01
is a lesson of being open to hear other experts give different explanations of what is going

334
0:42:02 --> 0:42:09
on. I found it wonderful because in my life I am always looking for great ways to explain

335
0:42:10 --> 0:42:16
other ideas. You did that beautifully. Thank you so much for your honesty around that.

336
0:42:16 --> 0:42:21
I have a million questions, but as you know, Stephen goes first on the questions. Stephen,

337
0:42:21 --> 0:42:25
are you ready to go for the first 15 minutes? Where are you?

338
0:42:25 --> 0:42:28
Yes, sorry. I did not have my video on. I thought I had it anyway.

339
0:42:28 --> 0:42:35
Thomas, that was really great. I agree with Charles. It was a brilliant exposition by

340
0:42:37 --> 0:42:43
a medical doctor in terms which the public could understand. I think what is special

341
0:42:43 --> 0:42:49
about it is to explain things so clearly as you have just done and in a second language.

342
0:42:49 --> 0:42:54
It is not your first language, English. I know how difficult that is because I have

343
0:42:54 --> 0:42:59
learned Swedish. I have worked in Sweden as a doctor. It is really difficult to operate

344
0:42:59 --> 0:43:06
in a second language. I think the reason that what you did shows great empathy. You have

345
0:43:06 --> 0:43:12
put yourself without realising it in the position of all the people who did not understand medicine

346
0:43:12 --> 0:43:19
and you have made it simple. It is easy to understand. I think they might struggle with

347
0:43:19 --> 0:43:26
concepts, but the thing that cries out to me, Thomas, first of all, I would like to

348
0:43:26 --> 0:43:32
say that I have been for a long time. I am really shocked about what happened. I was

349
0:43:32 --> 0:43:38
shocked in 2020 and I am still shocked now. Not quite about the same things, but about

350
0:43:38 --> 0:43:44
the totality of the nonsense that is being put about. It does seem to me that you said

351
0:43:44 --> 0:43:51
this is the greatest attack on human beings ever. I think you did. It does seem to me

352
0:43:51 --> 0:43:58
that progress has not served as well, technological progress, because more or less in the birthplace

353
0:43:58 --> 0:44:05
of technology, we have fallen at the first hurdle. We cannot regulate stuff like computers.

354
0:44:07 --> 0:44:12
So if we do not know how the damn computers work, how on earth are we going to regulate

355
0:44:12 --> 0:44:17
them? That means that humanity is going to be constantly in peril. I just wonder whether

356
0:44:17 --> 0:44:23
you have thought of that. Also, I wanted to ask you about, so I do think that one of the

357
0:44:23 --> 0:44:29
features of the last four years was rampant psychological torture. It needs to be called

358
0:44:29 --> 0:44:36
out. They reduced people to a state of Stockholm syndrome. So yes, PCR test pandemic, whatever

359
0:44:37 --> 0:44:44
you want to call it. There was no pandemic in my opinion. In addition to that, these

360
0:44:44 --> 0:44:50
quite inappropriate shots, so-called vaccinations, which were not vaccinations, they said they

361
0:44:50 --> 0:44:54
were safe and effective. It turns out that they never tested for safety and they never

362
0:44:54 --> 0:45:01
tested for efficacy. So crazy. We knew that all along, of course. I am just shocked about

363
0:45:01 --> 0:45:08
the mess that we are in. I really think that people think that blindly that they must support

364
0:45:08 --> 0:45:14
computers, because it is progress. But if we cannot manage them, if we cannot manage

365
0:45:14 --> 0:45:20
computers, we need to get rid of them. We need to get rid of them. No matter all the

366
0:45:20 --> 0:45:25
things that we think are good about computers, like learning for ourselves about anything

367
0:45:25 --> 0:45:31
we want to learn about. We have to bin that if the dangers are greater than the benefits.

368
0:45:31 --> 0:45:34
And I just wonder whether you have thought about that, Thomas? If you haven't, it doesn't

369
0:45:34 --> 0:45:38
matter. We can talk about other things.

370
0:45:38 --> 0:45:45
Yes, of course, I fully agree. I mean, this hype about artificial intelligence, I mean,

371
0:45:46 --> 0:45:51
I always say who is seeking for artificial intelligence? Of course, the ones who have

372
0:45:51 --> 0:45:57
no natural intelligence. And we saw during, we realized during the last four years that

373
0:45:57 --> 0:46:04
the natural intelligence is dying out. I think one of our main problems nowadays is this

374
0:46:05 --> 0:46:12
over-specialization. I mean, I said, if I told an infectious disease, hey, look, look

375
0:46:14 --> 0:46:20
at this PCR test. This PCR test does not prove an infection. Then he answered, oh, I don't

376
0:46:20 --> 0:46:27
know anything about PCR. Ask the PCR guy. And then I tell the PCR guy, hey, this test

377
0:46:28 --> 0:46:32
does not prove an infection. He said, oh, I don't understand anything about infection.

378
0:46:32 --> 0:46:37
Ask the infectious disease. This is the problem. I think the guys like you, Stephen, and like

379
0:46:37 --> 0:46:44
me, with a broad education, broad experience, who could still see the forest, we are dying

380
0:46:45 --> 0:46:52
out. I always say we have supers. We have a specialist for every leaf, any leaflet of

381
0:46:53 --> 0:47:00
every tree. But the guys who see the forest are dying out. And we see it in all society.

382
0:47:00 --> 0:47:07
It's the same with this diamond nonsense scam. CO2 is a poison. Come on. CO2 is the elixir

383
0:47:08 --> 0:47:15
of life. Decarbonization is dehumanization. It's a death cult. It's amazing how they

384
0:47:18 --> 0:47:25
manage to brainwash the public with this. I like the allegory of Plato's cave. I always

385
0:47:26 --> 0:47:32
explain it like this. Most people are sitting in Plato's cave and on the walls, they are

386
0:47:32 --> 0:47:39
no longer the projected shadows of the symbols. But there is a huge flat screen. And our legacy

387
0:47:39 --> 0:47:46
media, our project, virtual realities on this flat screen, about 9-11 CO2 scam, pandemic

388
0:47:48 --> 0:47:55
scam. Of course, there was no pandemic. It is a testing pandemic. The test makes the

389
0:47:56 --> 0:48:00
appearance that there is a pandemic. But I fully agree. There was no pandemic, of course.

390
0:48:00 --> 0:48:07
So the people are living in this Plato's cave. And it is our duty to show the people,

391
0:48:09 --> 0:48:14
hey, there is the exit. There is the exit. You can leave this cave outside. The sun is

392
0:48:14 --> 0:48:21
shining. Most people are great people, kind people, nice people. Leave this damn Plato's

393
0:48:21 --> 0:48:27
cave with these virtual realities. Because if we live in these virtual realities, we

394
0:48:28 --> 0:48:33
have to collide with reality once. And this might even be the end of our species with

395
0:48:33 --> 0:48:36
atomic war or whatever.

396
0:48:36 --> 0:48:41
Absolutely. We look as though we are well on the way after, what is it, like 50 years

397
0:48:41 --> 0:48:47
of the kind of technology that we are talking about. And it is only 100 years ago or so

398
0:48:47 --> 0:48:54
since the motor car first came to the world. And people think it has always been here.

399
0:48:54 --> 0:48:58
And they need to be educated. But the other thing is we have got mind control to contend

400
0:48:58 --> 0:49:03
with. So we had Jason Kristoff talk to us. We have had him talk to us before. And he

401
0:49:03 --> 0:49:08
was talking about mind control. And it seemed to me while he was talking, and I think I

402
0:49:08 --> 0:49:14
said it, I meant to say it anyway, that if this level of mind control has gone on, then

403
0:49:14 --> 0:49:21
to solve the problems that we face, we need to first of all deal with the mind control.

404
0:49:21 --> 0:49:27
Yeah. So anyway, I agree with you, Thomas. I previously said what you said about over

405
0:49:27 --> 0:49:34
specialisation. It is extremely dangerous to have people who are super specialised,

406
0:49:34 --> 0:49:40
who don't have any idea about the whole which they are dealing with. So in other words,

407
0:49:40 --> 0:49:47
the hyper specialisation in medicine was always going to create a tyranny. Now, if you want

408
0:49:48 --> 0:49:54
to commit a crime, you give people bits of the crime to do, but you don't tell them about

409
0:49:54 --> 0:49:59
the whole crime. You just give them a little bit of it. So do you understand what it is?

410
0:49:59 --> 0:50:05
So that is exactly what has happened. So they have encouraged super specialisation. They

411
0:50:05 --> 0:50:11
have taken away common sense. Everything has to be worked out so that the computer can

412
0:50:11 --> 0:50:18
sort it out, so you can apply for your passport online. It is all about convenience, allegedly,

413
0:50:19 --> 0:50:25
but unfortunately people are losing their freedom by doing everything online and they

414
0:50:25 --> 0:50:30
don't realise it. It is about time that they understood this and we need to explain it,

415
0:50:30 --> 0:50:34
but I don't know what we do about the mind control.

416
0:50:34 --> 0:50:40
I think one important aspect is this. I can explain the climate scan or the Covid scan

417
0:50:40 --> 0:50:46
for an hour and then I usually get the answer. Yeah, well, it sounds somewhat reasonable,

418
0:50:46 --> 0:50:53
but I refuse to believe it. I refuse to believe that such evil people do exist. This is also

419
0:50:54 --> 0:51:01
important. So we have to educate them also about the power structure of society. What

420
0:51:01 --> 0:51:08
I call psychopaths or severe malignant narcissists. Nowadays, we are at the height of the age

421
0:51:09 --> 0:51:16
of narcissism. It started in the 1970s or so. Of course, at the height of narcissism,

422
0:51:17 --> 0:51:24
almost all power positions are occupied by severe narcissists. Many of them are not malignant,

423
0:51:25 --> 0:51:31
they are okay, but they are ignorant, arrogant. They have no slightest idea what they are

424
0:51:31 --> 0:51:36
talking about, but at the same time they think they are geniuses. And this, of course, arrogance,

425
0:51:36 --> 0:51:42
and power is a combustible mixture that someday had to blow up in our faces.

426
0:51:44 --> 0:51:48
The people above them, these are the real psychopaths, the multi-billionaires and the

427
0:51:48 --> 0:51:54
multi-trillionaires behind them. The multi-trillionaires are not even public. And

428
0:51:54 --> 0:52:02
of course, they can manipulate them easily. Look at our politicians. These are the most stupid

429
0:52:03 --> 0:52:12
people I've ever seen. It's incredible. It's incredible. If you look at Boris Johnson,

430
0:52:12 --> 0:52:18
for example, he looks like a clown. It's insane. It's completely insane.

431
0:52:18 --> 0:52:22
He is a clown, Charles. He is a clown.

432
0:52:23 --> 0:52:25
Yeah, sure. Yeah.

433
0:52:26 --> 0:52:30
The narcissism which you talk about, I've also thought about that and I've also spoken,

434
0:52:30 --> 0:52:35
but it's hard to keep all these things in your head. So thank you for reminding me about

435
0:52:35 --> 0:52:41
narcissism. Yeah. And that is encouraged by mobile phones and social media. So the twin

436
0:52:41 --> 0:52:47
addictions of mobile phones and social media, these are really deadly addictions. If they were

437
0:52:47 --> 0:52:52
addictions to anything else, they would grab attention worldwide. But oh no, we're talking

438
0:52:53 --> 0:52:57
about CO2, which they don't seem to understand. Life needs.

439
0:53:00 --> 0:53:06
It's just absolutely crazy. And to us, it's like we're constantly being gaslighted.

440
0:53:07 --> 0:53:15
You know, so I recognize myself in your words, Thomas. We've never met. You're Swiss and I'm

441
0:53:15 --> 0:53:23
British. But I just recognize myself in your disbelief of what's unfolding before us and this

442
0:53:24 --> 0:53:31
unbelievable lack of wisdom. Yes. Gaslighting, of course, is the main technique

443
0:53:31 --> 0:53:39
that the psychopaths use to manipulate us. If you explain this to the public, they come out,

444
0:53:39 --> 0:53:47
you're a crazy conspiracy theorist. Why? Why? They present their agenda on their home

445
0:53:47 --> 0:53:52
pages. On the home page of the UN, you can read agenda 23. On the home page of the World Economic

446
0:53:52 --> 0:53:59
Forum, you can read the great reset. On the home page of the WHO, you can read one half.

447
0:53:59 --> 0:54:06
This all is basically the same. And in the end, it's fascism. This is what we also have to realize.

448
0:54:06 --> 0:54:11
I mean, this is this merger. What is the definition of fascism? It's the merger of

449
0:54:11 --> 0:54:17
corporate and state power. This is exactly what we see nowadays. But of course, if they call it

450
0:54:17 --> 0:54:24
public-private partnership, this simply sounds better than fascism. They say it's fascism under

451
0:54:24 --> 0:54:33
the term public-private partnership. It's fascism. We have to stand up against fascism. They call us

452
0:54:34 --> 0:54:40
Nazis, neo-Nazis. But in reality, of course, everything is topsy turvy. They are the fascists.

453
0:54:40 --> 0:54:46
This is important. In the end, we must realize public-private partnership is fascism.

454
0:54:47 --> 0:54:54
Yes, exactly. This alone is enough. Thomas, that's brilliant. So, yeah, public-private

455
0:54:54 --> 0:55:00
partnership. So anybody looking at that might be encouraged to think, and they do think, I think,

456
0:55:00 --> 0:55:05
that you've got the best of all possible worlds, you know. You've got all the best of the public

457
0:55:05 --> 0:55:13
bit and the private bit. And you get a partnership of the two. And as you say, it's actually the

458
0:55:13 --> 0:55:20
definition of fascism and totalitarianism. And so as far as I can see, this pandemic,

459
0:55:20 --> 0:55:27
which was not a pandemic, was the Trojan horse. And I think it's the main Trojan horse because it

460
0:55:27 --> 0:55:34
induces fear. It was a Trojan horse for totalitarianism. The other Trojan horses are,

461
0:55:34 --> 0:55:39
well, the climate change agenda and all that nonsense. And then the wars around the world,

462
0:55:39 --> 0:55:47
which make no sense, you know, like Iraq didn't make any sense. You know, well, yeah. And then,

463
0:55:47 --> 0:55:55
of course, Ukraine. But the Israel war, it doesn't make any sense, except it seems to certain people

464
0:55:55 --> 0:56:03
in the USA and in the UK, I have to say. So I think that some, but there's one thing that I think

465
0:56:03 --> 0:56:10
that would work on people at the moment, if we can only get the message out. So they've used

466
0:56:10 --> 0:56:17
propaganda on us, constantly repeating slogans. I think we need to have a slogan about there not

467
0:56:17 --> 0:56:25
being a pandemic. There was no pandemic. There was no disease COVID-19, in my opinion,

468
0:56:25 --> 0:56:31
it was improperly diagnosed. So any doctor in the world should have known and you did know Thomas,

469
0:56:31 --> 0:56:39
and so did I. But yeah, I was I was disbelieving. I knew straight away that it was a fraud.

470
0:56:40 --> 0:56:47
I don't know why, but I just knew. And any doctor in the world should have known that you do not

471
0:56:47 --> 0:56:54
diagnose a viral illness with a test. Even so previously, I think I'm right in saying,

472
0:56:54 --> 0:57:02
very few so called viral illnesses were diagnosed with a test. It was always by clinical medicine.

473
0:57:02 --> 0:57:09
Well, guess what? They had a fraudulent test. But as you've explained that very well, but one thing

474
0:57:09 --> 0:57:14
you didn't mention, and I think it should be mentioned is that in my opinion, there was no

475
0:57:14 --> 0:57:21
COVID-19. It was improperly diagnosed. There wasn't a single symptom which was pathognomonic

476
0:57:21 --> 0:57:27
for COVID-19. And therefore it should not have been you should not have been tested for COVID-19.

477
0:57:27 --> 0:57:35
And that as far as I know, there are no tests. We didn't diagnose so called viral illnesses with a

478
0:57:35 --> 0:57:41
test. So flu, for example, no, you wouldn't or a cold, the common cold. No, you wouldn't. You

479
0:57:41 --> 0:57:47
didn't need a test. There were symptoms. And but there were no symptoms in COVID-19,

480
0:57:47 --> 0:57:52
which were pathognomonic for COVID-19. And I'm amazed that so many doctors have missed that.

481
0:57:54 --> 0:58:02
I fully agree. I mean, I'm somewhat careful. I'm not 100% sure. So I'm careful. I said,

482
0:58:02 --> 0:58:10
I'm not sure whether it was by 95, 99 or 100% testing pandemic. But you're right. I mean,

483
0:58:10 --> 0:58:20
I have never seen any proof that the virus called SARS-CoV-2 produces a disease called COVID-19.

484
0:58:20 --> 0:58:29
And I realized also at the very beginning, I mean, that if you what were the risk factors for COVID,

485
0:58:29 --> 0:58:36
it's where the risk factors to die. And what was the mean age of the people who died from COVID?

486
0:58:37 --> 0:58:46
It was the mean age to die. So it's really possible that 100%, 100%, every case was just

487
0:58:47 --> 0:58:53
mislabelled, mislabelling of all the diagnosis, mainly the flu as the COVID. I fully agree.

488
0:58:53 --> 0:58:58
But there's something else, Thomas, which I think is really important. I'd love to know your answer

489
0:58:58 --> 0:59:05
to this question. So we agree, you and I agree that there was no pandemic. Now, and I say there's no

490
0:59:05 --> 0:59:11
COVID-19 even. But I didn't mean that I'm certain that there's no virus. I do think there's

491
0:59:11 --> 0:59:16
possibility that there are no such thing as viruses. But I don't think it's very helpful at

492
0:59:16 --> 0:59:24
the moment to go into that. But sorry, what was it? What did I just say then? I've done the

493
0:59:24 --> 0:59:29
parenthesis and forgotten what I was going to say. So anyway, what I wanted to say was this,

494
0:59:29 --> 0:59:36
the gain of function thing. I think that's a false narrative to encourage people to play into the

495
0:59:36 --> 0:59:44
narrative. The other thing that's really important, I think, is the if there was no pandemic this time,

496
0:59:44 --> 0:59:51
has there ever been a pandemic? Will there ever be a pandemic in the future? I think not. Because I

497
0:59:51 --> 0:59:58
remembered in 2020, that when we were doing medical school, we were told by a single professor

498
0:59:59 --> 1:00:06
that deadly pandemics kill the host. So in other words, he was suggesting, I remember asking him,

499
1:00:06 --> 1:00:14
does that mean you can't have a pandemic? And he said, you may be right. So that's extremely

500
1:00:14 --> 1:00:19
important. So they can't frighten us in the future. They shouldn't be able to frighten us in the

501
1:00:19 --> 1:00:26
future. Because our, we should say, Thomas, in my opinion, there is no possibility of a pandemic in

502
1:00:26 --> 1:00:30
the future. So stop fearing this damned pandemic, because they are going to bring it up in the

503
1:00:30 --> 1:00:37
future, because that's one of their main Trojan horses for totalitarianism. I agree. I mean,

504
1:00:37 --> 1:00:45
the problem is that usually people understand under a pandemic, the spreading of a deadly

505
1:00:45 --> 1:00:53
disease around the globe. But the people was never told that in 2009, the WHO changed the

506
1:00:53 --> 1:01:00
definition of a pandemic by taking out the dangers of the causative germs. So since then,

507
1:01:00 --> 1:01:06
they can declare any seasonal flu or cold wave that's going around the globe a pandemic.

508
1:01:06 --> 1:01:14
Nowadays, they call it PHEIC, Public Health Emergency of Concern. And if you pronounce it,

509
1:01:15 --> 1:01:21
fake, fake. I mean, they are laughing in our faces, guys. They are laughing in our faces.

510
1:01:22 --> 1:01:29
They will produce one fake pandemic after the other. I fully agree, Stephen.

511
1:01:29 --> 1:01:30
David, that's 20 minutes now.

512
1:01:31 --> 1:01:40
Just one last point. So in my opinion, Thomas, we agree that the WHO should go. But I say it's

513
1:01:40 --> 1:01:48
not because the WHO is evil, which it is, and Tedros in particular, but all the others for keeping

514
1:01:48 --> 1:01:54
quiet. It's because we don't damn well need them. The WHO because pandemics cannot occur.

515
1:01:54 --> 1:02:01
It takes away the whole reason for the last four years. And I think that's what we should push on.

516
1:02:03 --> 1:02:08
Exactly. This is what I have forgotten. As you're perfectly right, there can never be a pandemic,

517
1:02:08 --> 1:02:16
for example, of Ebola. Why? Because we are getting that sick or even dead so rapidly

518
1:02:16 --> 1:02:24
that we have not many social contacts before. So it cannot spread. Only a comparatively harmless

519
1:02:24 --> 1:02:30
germ can spread globally. Yes, you are perfectly right. In that sense, there cannot really be a

520
1:02:30 --> 1:02:36
pandemic of a deadly germ. Yeah, you are absolutely right. And the same professor I mentioned,

521
1:02:36 --> 1:02:42
Thomas, he talked about the deadly virus kills its host. Therefore, there can't be a pandemic.

522
1:02:42 --> 1:02:49
That was my question to him. He was emphasizing the interplay, the very important interplay between

523
1:02:49 --> 1:02:55
transmissibility and virulence. So we had the ridiculous situation in the UK that they were

524
1:02:55 --> 1:03:02
gearing up, the government of the UK, outrageously were gearing up to cancel the second Christmas in

525
1:03:02 --> 1:03:10
the row in 2021. And they were talking about the Alpha variant. And Chris Witte, the chief medical

526
1:03:10 --> 1:03:19
officer of England, no less, a complete idiot, but very evil as well. He was talking about the

527
1:03:19 --> 1:03:24
massive transmissibility of the Alpha variant. And I was thinking, well, hang on a minute,

528
1:03:24 --> 1:03:30
that doesn't mean anything if you don't mention the virulence. And, you know, any medical doctor

529
1:03:30 --> 1:03:36
talking about transmissibility, not mentioning the virulence is a liar. Okay, let's go.

530
1:03:37 --> 1:03:43
And then this notion of a second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth wave, of course, this is nonsense as

531
1:03:43 --> 1:03:52
well. These are seasonal viruses. There was SARS-CoV-219, if it was, if it was, and then there

532
1:03:52 --> 1:04:00
comes 2021, 2022. And we are always at least partially immune against the new variants so that

533
1:04:00 --> 1:04:06
we do not die, so that we only get the cold and they are not dangerous. We do not talk about the

534
1:04:06 --> 1:04:15
300,000th flu wave since Homo sapiens, if there is really Homo sapiens, I doubt it,

535
1:04:16 --> 1:04:23
since Homo sapiens came on this planet. It is also an absurdity, a second, third, fourth,

536
1:04:24 --> 1:04:34
even Fauci himself proved that in the Spanish flu, most people died from bacterial pneumonia.

537
1:04:34 --> 1:04:42
Fauci himself, there is a paper published in 2007 or so by Fauci et al. Yeah, highly likely

538
1:04:42 --> 1:04:49
there was never such a pandemic. Thank you, that was brilliant from you. The answers were

539
1:04:49 --> 1:04:54
brilliant as well. Thank you so much. And Stephen, Chris Whitty reminds me he went to

540
1:04:54 --> 1:04:59
university to become a witch, but he only got halfway through. You can use that.

541
1:05:01 --> 1:05:07
He went to university to become a what? A witch. A witch. A witch. Oh, right. Only got halfway

542
1:05:07 --> 1:05:15
through. Very good. Okay, all right. On we go to the land of Ireland, Gerry. Thanks, Stephen.

543
1:05:16 --> 1:05:25
Gerry, you're muted. There we go. I'm not now. Thomas, I can categorically state that that was a

544
1:05:25 --> 1:05:36
fantastically intelligent, a really fantastic, intelligently held handle on the COVID pathogenicity

545
1:05:36 --> 1:05:45
hoax. And the reason I can say that with absolute confidence is that my view is that the pandemic

546
1:05:45 --> 1:05:55
views exactly. Every word you spoke, like Stephen, were words that could have come out of my Irish

547
1:05:55 --> 1:06:04
mouth rather than out of your European mouth. I'm a GP from Ireland who, I'm 12 years older than you,

548
1:06:04 --> 1:06:16
and I went through the exact same thought formation in March of 20. I saw the red flags

549
1:06:16 --> 1:06:21
and I thought there's absolutely no way are those people dying of respiratory failure.

550
1:06:21 --> 1:06:31
Being a GP, I would claim a seniority in a sense that I was on the ground. I was watching the

551
1:06:31 --> 1:06:37
people dying and I knew there was no pathogen in my community that could count. There was nobody

552
1:06:37 --> 1:06:46
any sicker than there was the previous 40 years of my winter flu experience. And as I say, the

553
1:06:46 --> 1:06:54
fact that I could recognise that there was no pathogen there. But I also saw that the authorities,

554
1:06:54 --> 1:07:01
the ICGP, the Department of Health were not contradicting the people being shot by a sniper's

555
1:07:01 --> 1:07:09
bullet in Wuhan. There's no way was that a respiratory failure, death. And that was the red flag.

556
1:07:12 --> 1:07:17
As I said, I'd like to compliment you on thinking like I do. It makes you very, very lucky.

557
1:07:18 --> 1:07:24
But what I'd like to ask about, and this is the fantastic thing, I never had the privilege of

558
1:07:24 --> 1:07:30
being committed to a mental hospital. Now, as a GP, I have committed quite a number of people

559
1:07:30 --> 1:07:37
to mental hospitals. And what we would refer to them as a pink forms, we put them in on pink forms.

560
1:07:38 --> 1:07:45
And the remarkable thing, and the thing I want to question about is, you'd be very, very slow,

561
1:07:45 --> 1:07:52
you'd be reticent to actually sign that form, because you really did. It was a horrendous thing

562
1:07:52 --> 1:07:57
to do. And it was always, you were very, very convinced that the patient was a danger to

563
1:07:57 --> 1:08:05
themselves or a danger to others. How the hell did they manage to make out that you were a

564
1:08:05 --> 1:08:11
danger to yourself, or that you were a danger to others, or that you were in a manic state,

565
1:08:12 --> 1:08:16
you were a man, you just explained that to me how they came up with that diagnosis.

566
1:08:19 --> 1:08:26
Yeah, well, I think my case explains nicely what's going on. I mean, I guess we all agree that

567
1:08:26 --> 1:08:33
the society was never divided in an amount we see now. And this doesn't happen by accident,

568
1:08:33 --> 1:08:38
this always means that a huge part of the society is living in a context of delusion,

569
1:08:39 --> 1:08:45
in a cult, in a sect. And of course, everybody says, I am the realist, you, you are the deluded,

570
1:08:45 --> 1:08:51
you are the member of a cult or a sect. And in this situation, I always say,

571
1:08:52 --> 1:08:57
the first thing we have to do is to question ourselves. And of course, I did this 100 times

572
1:08:57 --> 1:09:02
before I went public, am I absolutely sure that I'm the realist and not the deluded?

573
1:09:02 --> 1:09:11
And this question we can only answer by looking at the reality as soberly as possible. So this

574
1:09:11 --> 1:09:17
is this was my duty, I just presented the reality as I saw it to the public, so that they could

575
1:09:17 --> 1:09:25
decide who is here the insane and who is not. Insanity means you do not live in the reality,

576
1:09:25 --> 1:09:30
you live in a virtual reality. This is about the definition of insanity. So of course,

577
1:09:30 --> 1:09:36
the corona insane declared me to be the corona insane. And of course, the psychiatrist was also

578
1:09:36 --> 1:09:41
completely brainwashed. So he had to invent the diagnosis. And of course, I tweeted maybe

579
1:09:42 --> 1:09:49
until one o'clock in the morning. But this was not mania. I mean, I maybe I was a somewhat hyperactive

580
1:09:49 --> 1:09:56
enlightener, or however you want to call it. But of course, I had this information, I had the urge

581
1:09:56 --> 1:10:02
to spread this information, this had to go out. I mean, this was this was endangering the whole

582
1:10:02 --> 1:10:07
society, the livelihoods and even the lives of many people. So of course, I felt the urge

583
1:10:07 --> 1:10:15
to spread this information. And this, this, he this corona insane psychiatrist thought

584
1:10:15 --> 1:10:21
would be a symptom of mania. I mean, for example, if I was at mania, I always worked, I worked before

585
1:10:21 --> 1:10:26
this, I worked from the day after I was released. If you really have mania, you cannot work as a

586
1:10:26 --> 1:10:35
doctor. And then you will lose all patients very, very rapidly. It's, it's fully I just realized the

587
1:10:35 --> 1:10:41
contradiction in my question there. Because in March of 21, I was suspended from the Irish

588
1:10:41 --> 1:10:48
Medical Register, because I was a danger to my patients. So as I say, I just contradicted myself

589
1:10:49 --> 1:10:55
in the sense that I was deemed a danger to my patients. And that was done with two days notice

590
1:10:55 --> 1:10:59
being brought before the Medical Council, and two days notice being brought before the High Court.

591
1:10:59 --> 1:11:06
So yes, I can well see how we would be seen as a danger. There's another point that I did, again,

592
1:11:06 --> 1:11:13
I'd like to go back on Stephen's idea, you know, this concept of no virus, I think that's a huge,

593
1:11:14 --> 1:11:20
massively dangerous area to start going down. We sure as hell don't need that. You know,

594
1:11:20 --> 1:11:25
whether there's a virus or whether there isn't a virus, there was a pathogenic hoax. The pathogenicity

595
1:11:25 --> 1:11:32
of the virus was lied into existence through propaganda. And then proven as far as they're

596
1:11:32 --> 1:11:39
concerned, by a PCR test, it was 95% wrong. So you know, I think that's important. We've got to keep

597
1:11:39 --> 1:11:47
that in mind. The other thing is, you know, I'd like to point out those pregnancy tests that you're

598
1:11:47 --> 1:11:55
doing on the men, those as a GP, I've done pregnancy tests on men. That sounds crazy.

599
1:11:55 --> 1:11:59
And maybe that's a good reason why I should be committed to a mental hospital. But the fact of

600
1:11:59 --> 1:12:05
the matter is, in certain testicular cancers, offhand, I think it's a seminoma, you actually

601
1:12:05 --> 1:12:13
get HCG being produced by the tumor. So it's oftentimes not a bad idea to do a pregnancy test

602
1:12:13 --> 1:12:17
on a man if you find a tumor in the testicles before you even send them off. Because by the

603
1:12:17 --> 1:12:22
time they get to the hospital, you look awful smart if you've already diagnosed what the

604
1:12:22 --> 1:12:29
histology of the tumor is going to be. So as I say, just bear in mind, any one of those 100 men

605
1:12:29 --> 1:12:35
might just have been a seminoma. That's a matter of interest.

606
1:12:35 --> 1:12:38
I agree. Intelligent comment. Very intelligent comment.

607
1:12:40 --> 1:12:47
Just for future reference. We're talking about the gain of function. JJ Cooey,

608
1:12:48 --> 1:12:54
I don't know if you actually watch JJ's broadcast meetings here. But JJ, again,

609
1:12:54 --> 1:12:58
this comes into the gain of function. Again, I think the gain of function can be a bit of a

610
1:12:58 --> 1:13:02
red herring. And it's important that we don't go down that road on Julie. By the same token,

611
1:13:02 --> 1:13:07
there's little doubt as far as I'm concerned that 19 nucleotides were induced into the furin

612
1:13:07 --> 1:13:16
cleavage site of the spike protein. And the function of this was to increase infectivity,

613
1:13:17 --> 1:13:22
transmissibility. And it was during the development, it was actually patented in 2016.

614
1:13:22 --> 1:13:28
And it was during the development of the coronavirus to actually endeavor to get

615
1:13:28 --> 1:13:37
better into the cell for cancer therapeutics. I could well believe how they would increase

616
1:13:37 --> 1:13:44
the transmissibility or the infectability of the virus without increasing the virulence,

617
1:13:44 --> 1:13:48
because you don't know whether your family are going to get it or not. So I would go along

618
1:13:48 --> 1:13:54
with the idea that some of these viruses were in fact introduced into key sites like New York and

619
1:13:54 --> 1:14:00
that. I don't think they ever got to Selbridge, where I live in Ireland. So what I'm saying is,

620
1:14:02 --> 1:14:07
I think we should keep our mind open to the possibility that there was again function

621
1:14:07 --> 1:14:14
from the point of view of infectivity. OK, Charles, I've just about finished.

622
1:14:15 --> 1:14:20
OK, very good. I agree. I think I'll leave it at that.

623
1:14:21 --> 1:14:27
Maybe in some hotspot they released something or they turned on five gene specials.

624
1:14:29 --> 1:14:37
Or I don't know. I think so. I think most severe cases we can explain by

625
1:14:38 --> 1:14:46
miss and too late diagnosis and mistreatment. I mean, we always saw patients with white lungs

626
1:14:49 --> 1:14:55
in the intensive care units. Usually they had bacterial pneumonia that we diagnosed too late

627
1:14:55 --> 1:15:02
with multi-organ failure and ARDS and all that stuff. Now imagine what they told the people.

628
1:15:02 --> 1:15:09
They told the people, do not go to your GP when you have Covid. Go to your GP when you're healthy

629
1:15:09 --> 1:15:18
again. So those secondary bacteria, pneumonia were diagnosed too late. Absolutely. This is probably

630
1:15:18 --> 1:15:25
the main reason for many, at least of the severe cases that were then labeled as Covid in the ICU.

631
1:15:26 --> 1:15:32
We were told not to examine our patients. We were, as GPs, we were told not to bring the patients

632
1:15:32 --> 1:15:39
into our surgeries and do a social distancing. We were told I refuse to do that.

633
1:15:40 --> 1:15:47
This was the most amazing for me. This was the most amazing for me to see how our fellow doctors

634
1:15:47 --> 1:15:52
shit their pants because of this alleged killer virus. I mean, if there really was a pandemic of

635
1:15:52 --> 1:15:58
the killer virus, who would treat the patients? Certainly not the doctors. These cowards would

636
1:15:58 --> 1:16:05
obviously be the first to run away. I was saying at that stage that I would, I was screaming at the

637
1:16:05 --> 1:16:12
ICGP, my academic body, to actually do post mortems on all patients. I'd be very, very happy to see

638
1:16:12 --> 1:16:18
if there were these little blood clots in the alveolar capillaries and that. I would be very,

639
1:16:18 --> 1:16:23
very happy at that. And I was saying, it was too dangerous. And I was saying to my patients,

640
1:16:23 --> 1:16:27
I will open the patients without wearing a mask for post mortem.

641
1:16:27 --> 1:16:29
Okay, come on. We've got to go on. We've got to go on. Come on.

642
1:16:30 --> 1:16:32
Okay. Okay. I finished.

643
1:16:32 --> 1:16:40
Come on. Thank you. Well done. Well done. One of the issues that, that, you know,

644
1:16:41 --> 1:16:47
Thomas, we'll go through the questions, but there is this question, hey, let's have the debate.

645
1:16:47 --> 1:16:52
Thomas, you properly say I'm willing to be questioned on anything. On the other hand,

646
1:16:52 --> 1:16:57
there are some things, imagine having a debate on whether God exists, you know,

647
1:16:57 --> 1:17:03
you know, and, and that, that whole conversation and the same issue. And there's the question of

648
1:17:03 --> 1:17:08
the distraction, or is it useful? It's a wonderful question of opinion. And one of the mistakes that

649
1:17:08 --> 1:17:16
I think I see happen, that's why we have rules of debate and it's good. The repetition is important.

650
1:17:16 --> 1:17:21
We have this conversation here in these meetings. Some people think it's tiresome,

651
1:17:22 --> 1:17:27
but you don't have to keep saying the same thing. You know, you put, put an idea out there and people

652
1:17:28 --> 1:17:36
think about it. However, however, as I said at the intro, there are 12 at least battle lines

653
1:17:37 --> 1:17:42
in this world war that we're in Thomas, you touched on it. We have a spiritual war as well.

654
1:17:43 --> 1:17:51
And we can get so distracted on this question of virus or no virus. And those who have a whole

655
1:17:51 --> 1:17:55
firm beliefs won't be convinced one way or the other. And in the meantime, we're being killed

656
1:17:55 --> 1:18:01
left, right and center. It's like, and the whole question of gain of function. It's like discussing

657
1:18:01 --> 1:18:08
the quality of the timber on the deck chairs of the Titanic while the, while the ship's going down.

658
1:18:08 --> 1:18:12
So just a question for each of us, you know, to contemplate Rose.

659
1:18:15 --> 1:18:23
Hey Thomas, I want to take a step back and give you a little history. Can you hear me?

660
1:18:23 --> 1:18:28
Someone's got a lot of background noise that you. I'm sorry. It's me. Yeah. Let me move to a different

661
1:18:28 --> 1:18:35
location. So I want to give a little history in the U S regarding the primary care positions,

662
1:18:36 --> 1:18:42
because number one, this was intentional to remove the primary care positions and go to

663
1:18:42 --> 1:18:51
just specialties. So this has been going on a very long time in the U S intentionally. And I posted

664
1:18:51 --> 1:19:02
in the chat, my blog regarding the analogy of the blind Indian parable. So I think we have to be

665
1:19:02 --> 1:19:09
very careful in our language that there was an illness and to say that there wasn't COVID.

666
1:19:10 --> 1:19:17
I think the problem is, is it was labeled as a respiratory virus and not a desaturation problem.

667
1:19:17 --> 1:19:24
Now, whether or not it was specifically from the spike proteins, radiation, whatever, it could have

668
1:19:24 --> 1:19:32
been a combination of both, but there were people with severe desaturation issues hitting the

669
1:19:32 --> 1:19:39
hospitals. So we can't discount that. So I think we have to be very careful on how we're addressing

670
1:19:39 --> 1:19:47
the issue. So my question to you, Thomas is, I did a deep dive because I said, is there a common

671
1:19:47 --> 1:19:54
mechanism by which this is affecting the multiple organs? And I jumped on nitric oxide. Some people

672
1:19:54 --> 1:20:00
like to call it nitric oxide, nitric oxide. And in doing my deep dive, I came across the PA in

673
1:20:00 --> 1:20:11
Colorado who is giving the patients L-Arginine in the ER and then inhaling nitric oxide with the ARDS.

674
1:20:11 --> 1:20:16
They were getting better within 24 hours. And he said, Rose, are you aware of the double blind

675
1:20:16 --> 1:20:25
placebo study by the Albert Einstein Institute in Italy, where with a placebo giving L-Arginine,

676
1:20:25 --> 1:20:29
the patients were getting better and decreasing hospitalization by over 50%.

677
1:20:31 --> 1:20:36
So my question to you is, how come there isn't more focus on the nitric oxide angle,

678
1:20:37 --> 1:20:42
especially regarding whatever, if you want to say it's the spike protein specifically,

679
1:20:42 --> 1:20:48
spike protein with 5G radiation, whatever. Are you seeing any emphasis on this because there

680
1:20:48 --> 1:20:57
was so much legitimacy to it with treatment? Well, there was neglect of any treatment,

681
1:20:57 --> 1:21:03
as you know. I mean, we were told this is an absolutely new disease. This virus is an alien,

682
1:21:04 --> 1:21:10
which was not true. If it was there, it was a member of the well-known coronavirus family.

683
1:21:10 --> 1:21:16
So we knew immediately it is seasonal, usually causes a self-limiting disease.

684
1:21:17 --> 1:21:23
There is cross-immunity against it, all this stuff. Of course, this is one of the possibilities,

685
1:21:23 --> 1:21:31
how you could treat these seriously ill patients from whatever was the causative germ. I agree.

686
1:21:32 --> 1:21:40
But is there any focus now that we know? Now we do not see serious cases. There are no more

687
1:21:40 --> 1:21:46
serious cases of whatever. No more. But we're not reviewing it. And again,

688
1:21:46 --> 1:21:48
I'm looking at, you know, they're going to hit us with something else.

689
1:21:49 --> 1:21:55
So how come we're not focusing on that mechanism for what they hit us next with?

690
1:22:00 --> 1:22:08
In every hospital, we should do a review of the history of all patients who were severely sick

691
1:22:08 --> 1:22:13
and who were killed. We should do a review of all these with the knowledge,

692
1:22:15 --> 1:22:20
if our knowledge, of course, and we would find a lot of things. It's hard to...

693
1:22:20 --> 1:22:26
I think that needs to be on a radar. And I'm dumbfounded that nobody's created the invention

694
1:22:26 --> 1:22:34
for measuring NO. I'm like, you know, we measure oxygen, we measure carbon dioxide,

695
1:22:34 --> 1:22:37
but nobody's come up with a good test for measuring nitric oxide.

696
1:22:40 --> 1:22:40
This is true.

697
1:22:42 --> 1:22:47
All right. So anyways, I wanted to sort that out at you because there were so much immense,

698
1:22:48 --> 1:22:54
you know, tangible positive with that. So anyways, it's on your radar. Thank you.

699
1:22:54 --> 1:22:57
Sorry. Sorry. Nitrous oxide is laughing gas.

700
1:22:57 --> 1:23:02
Nitrous oxide is laughing gas.

701
1:23:03 --> 1:23:05
Nitric, Gary, nitric.

702
1:23:07 --> 1:23:09
I think she's talking about nitrous oxide.

703
1:23:09 --> 1:23:10
No, nitric oxide.

704
1:23:13 --> 1:23:15
It's a very subtle answer and we're known for this.

705
1:23:16 --> 1:23:18
Yes. So there is a logic to it.

706
1:23:20 --> 1:23:20
Okay.

707
1:23:20 --> 1:23:26
Well, she used both actually, Charles. So Rose used both nitrous oxide and nitric oxide.

708
1:23:26 --> 1:23:28
So that wasn't helpful.

709
1:23:28 --> 1:23:29
The last one. Yeah.

710
1:23:29 --> 1:23:32
And actually you don't measure for things. If you're a medical doctor,

711
1:23:32 --> 1:23:38
you don't measure for things like PO2 and all that nonsense. But anyway, that's taken over as

712
1:23:38 --> 1:23:44
well. You look at the patient and you look to see whether the patient is cyanose centrally or otherwise.

713
1:23:46 --> 1:23:48
Okay. Thank you. Rose, Janet.

714
1:23:50 --> 1:23:56
Oh, thank you. I've got two questions. The first one is, you mentioned that the

715
1:23:57 --> 1:24:02
condition of you getting out of the hospital was to agree to take psychotropic drugs under

716
1:24:02 --> 1:24:08
supervision. Did you actually take the drugs and how did that affect you? And how did you manage

717
1:24:08 --> 1:24:16
to get the treatment stopped? The second question is, I've spoken to some people who have tested

718
1:24:16 --> 1:24:21
themselves with a PCR test when suffering from an upper respiratory tract infection and found it

719
1:24:21 --> 1:24:28
positive. Then when they recover, the PCR then becomes negative. And I'm just wondering how that

720
1:24:28 --> 1:24:40
can be explained. Yeah. Well, of course I know the half life of this drug and they said, so I took,

721
1:24:40 --> 1:24:46
I can, I can state it here. I mean, I took two tablets the day before they checked my blood.

722
1:24:47 --> 1:24:55
But this was enough that my liver, my liver didn't like this Abilify. This was great. So I

723
1:24:55 --> 1:25:02
checked my liver enzymes after three weeks or so. They went up so I could stop it. And at the same

724
1:25:02 --> 1:25:10
time, I could free myself from this state psychiatrist control and change to a private

725
1:25:10 --> 1:25:17
psychiatrist because of course the health authorities, they wanted that I see a psychiatrist

726
1:25:17 --> 1:25:24
once per month who had to report to the health authorities if I'm mentally able to treat patients.

727
1:25:25 --> 1:25:30
And this lasted for about a year and then I could end this as well. And legally I couldn't do

728
1:25:30 --> 1:25:40
anything. I tried just to get back my weapon. My alleged arm was my weapon. I got in

729
1:25:40 --> 1:25:46
1980 when I entered Swiss military service. And when I left Swiss military service as a

730
1:25:46 --> 1:25:51
prime lieutenant 15 years ago, I stored it at home. This is usual and legal in Switzerland

731
1:25:51 --> 1:25:57
without ammunition. And they found this weapon at home, but this, I could not get back this weapon.

732
1:25:57 --> 1:26:07
It cost me about 15,000 Swiss francs for lawyers, for new psychiatric reports and so on and so forth.

733
1:26:07 --> 1:26:14
There's absolutely no chance to become right because of course the prosecutors and the

734
1:26:15 --> 1:26:23
judges are brainwashed as well. So they think I'm insane, of course. And this PCR test,

735
1:26:24 --> 1:26:30
the PCR test with the time, it becomes negative again. I didn't understand the second question.

736
1:26:31 --> 1:26:39
Yeah, well, I spoke to a few people, including one very awake doctor actually. And what she was

737
1:26:39 --> 1:26:47
saying to me was that she got ill with a upper respiratory tract infection and did a PCR,

738
1:26:47 --> 1:26:53
which was positive. And then she waited until she recovered symptomatically, did another PCR,

739
1:26:53 --> 1:26:58
and it was negative. And I spoke to other people who found that same thing. And I'm just thinking,

740
1:26:58 --> 1:27:05
well, if the PCR is actually unreliable, why is it becoming positive when they're symptomatic

741
1:27:05 --> 1:27:09
and negative when they're not symptomatic? Or is it a coincidence?

742
1:27:10 --> 1:27:16
It is not completely unreliable. I mean, it is not total nonsense. If a PCR test is done

743
1:27:17 --> 1:27:23
good, it is a parcel in the diagnosis, but it never proves an infection. But if, of course,

744
1:27:23 --> 1:27:32
if the CT is low, for example, maybe 17, so there is a high amount of this virus on your throat,

745
1:27:32 --> 1:27:41
and the symptoms are consistent with this illness, they can be correct, of course.

746
1:27:41 --> 1:27:48
Here the problem was, does this Cormann-Rosten test cross-react with many other coronaviruses?

747
1:27:48 --> 1:27:57
So, already from this, it was not useful. It is not completely useless, but it's only useful

748
1:27:58 --> 1:28:01
in conjunction with other clinical findings, of course.

749
1:28:03 --> 1:28:03
Thank you.

750
1:28:03 --> 1:28:09
Thanks, Janet. Thank you, Janet. And now we have Benjamin. And Benjamin, have you met my

751
1:28:09 --> 1:28:11
alter ego, my bubblehead?

752
1:28:12 --> 1:28:17
You like that, Thomas? That says passion on my chest.

753
1:28:17 --> 1:28:19
Great, great. Looks great.

754
1:28:19 --> 1:28:24
Spot of fun. Thank you, Janet. Benjamin, he calls himself Benjamin, as you know,

755
1:28:24 --> 1:28:29
sometimes hands Benjamin, but anyway, Benjamin for ease of thing. Over to you, Benjamin.

756
1:28:30 --> 1:28:37
Well, thank you. Yeah, the Hans Benjamin is for written, for signing. It's too long.

757
1:28:37 --> 1:28:51
Unfortunately, I was switching on too late, but so we both are Swiss, but we decide to communicate

758
1:28:51 --> 1:28:57
in English here. And several aspects, actually. One was about, as you started the discussion

759
1:28:57 --> 1:29:03
with gas lighting, and I always wondered, and even some psychiatrists even openly say that,

760
1:29:03 --> 1:29:11
oh, actually, you know, that you can consider be deluded, that only actually applies to an

761
1:29:11 --> 1:29:18
individual, but not to a collective. Now, the question is, what if a group or a whole society

762
1:29:18 --> 1:29:25
becomes deluded and an individual isn't? How do you call that? Of course, we know it's called

763
1:29:25 --> 1:29:32
gas lighting, but I mean, it shows that actually it's a very dangerous concept if you don't apply

764
1:29:32 --> 1:29:39
these sort of diagnostic criteria only to individuals, but not to whole groups.

765
1:29:40 --> 1:29:46
I mean, you certainly have to, and then maybe I may add in this context of what you witnessed,

766
1:29:46 --> 1:29:53
because I witnessed something similar, but I was not independent, but in a working environment. And

767
1:29:54 --> 1:30:02
it essentially, it forced me down the road of deciding either accepting what they were imposing

768
1:30:02 --> 1:30:11
on me with potentially lethal consequences because of heart conditions, and actually, you know,

769
1:30:11 --> 1:30:19
giving up the job. And that was pre-COVID. So, I mean, it shows these totalitarian tendencies,

770
1:30:19 --> 1:30:23
which are actually inherent and as you described as being fascist,

771
1:30:24 --> 1:30:32
and which means the coalescence really of powers, right? Because first case is bundle in Latin.

772
1:30:33 --> 1:30:40
So, yeah, so maybe first, and then I have something specific about COVID in Switzerland

773
1:30:40 --> 1:30:43
afterwards, maybe, but these are too many questions. Or do you prefer that I ask the

774
1:30:43 --> 1:30:50
third questions also? Maybe Charles does. It has to do with the PCR test, which you mentioned. And

775
1:30:50 --> 1:31:01
actually, I looked at the data in Switzerland during the late stages. That was end of 2021.

776
1:31:02 --> 1:31:12
And then as you may know, Implod, water quality agency in Switzerland, they actually measured the

777
1:31:12 --> 1:31:20
viral load in the wastewater and compared it with the positive tests. And so, and they were

778
1:31:20 --> 1:31:24
diverging and everybody was wondering what's actually going on. And it was interesting. It

779
1:31:24 --> 1:31:33
started to diverge precisely at the date when the vaccinated got tested. So, that was in December,

780
1:31:33 --> 1:31:38
and I was suddenly from mainly unvaccinated, suddenly the vaccinated got tested. And sure

781
1:31:38 --> 1:31:44
enough, you've got a wave in quote with the tested ones and no wave averaged over the population,

782
1:31:44 --> 1:31:51
which actually, in my opinion, was a tremendous proof for actually the inadequacy of the PCR

783
1:31:51 --> 1:31:57
test, A and B actually, also of the, however you call that treatment, which people took

784
1:31:58 --> 1:32:05
as, you know, called off vaccines. So, I think it was because it really changed over a weekend. It

785
1:32:05 --> 1:32:09
was dramatic and I can't show you the data. I think I sent it to Stephen at some point.

786
1:32:11 --> 1:32:17
So, yeah. So, these are three questions about, you know, this, how do you assess a group,

787
1:32:17 --> 1:32:24
you know, which turns really, you know, when a whole group actually becomes delusioned,

788
1:32:24 --> 1:32:32
how you can actually correct for that. B, yes, that these totalitarian tendencies are actually,

789
1:32:32 --> 1:32:38
they were established already before COVID that a company has, or a university in this case,

790
1:32:38 --> 1:32:45
has such a tremendous power in instrumentalizing medics for their purpose, you know. And then

791
1:32:45 --> 1:32:52
finally, this issue about the waste water plants. So, thank you.

792
1:32:52 --> 1:32:58
Yes, of course. I mean, the psychopaths managed to impose their psychopathy on the whole society or

793
1:32:59 --> 1:33:04
on a huge part of the society. This is what happened. I mean, of course, there is the

794
1:33:05 --> 1:33:10
gaslighting happens on an individual level, but also on a societal level. I mean,

795
1:33:11 --> 1:33:19
the people who do not understand how the Germans could be deluded by Hitler in the 1930s,

796
1:33:21 --> 1:33:27
I hope they understand now what happened. Obviously, the people nowadays, we nowadays

797
1:33:27 --> 1:33:34
are not better or worse than the Germans were in the 1930s. We get deluded by the same,

798
1:33:35 --> 1:33:41
basically the same psychopaths. Then this waste water testing, this is utter pardon bullshit.

799
1:33:43 --> 1:33:51
Well, another proof that there was no pandemic is this. In medical school, at my time, I guess

800
1:33:51 --> 1:33:59
it was in the second year, we learned in something called epidemiology for beginners,

801
1:33:59 --> 1:34:06
we learned that in the case of an epidemic, the first thing you have to do is to establish a

802
1:34:06 --> 1:34:12
cohort, a study cohort that is representative for the society. Maybe in Switzerland, there are

803
1:34:12 --> 1:34:18
nine million inhabitants. This will be about 1000 to 2000 people, representative for the populace.

804
1:34:18 --> 1:34:24
These you question serially, test serially with a useful test, not with a PCR test, but antibody

805
1:34:24 --> 1:34:31
test. Had we done this, we had known already at the end of April that there was no killer virus,

806
1:34:31 --> 1:34:38
that most people already were cross-immune, et cetera, et cetera. Even after four years,

807
1:34:38 --> 1:34:44
such a study cohort does not exist in any country. Either you believe that in your health

808
1:34:44 --> 1:34:50
authorities, in your government, there is nobody with the knowledge of a second year medical

809
1:34:50 --> 1:34:58
student, or you must accept that you have been totally fool. Every government knew exactly what

810
1:34:58 --> 1:35:04
they did because if not, the first thing they had to do was to establish such a study cohort.

811
1:35:04 --> 1:35:14
This is how we diagnose and control the pandemic, not with wastewater testing,

812
1:35:14 --> 1:35:20
with PCR. This is utter bullshit. Then of course, they can state, now we have in the wastewater,

813
1:35:20 --> 1:35:29
there is PCR against disease, X is positive. This then is enough evidence to start the next

814
1:35:29 --> 1:35:33
pandemic. What was the first question?

815
1:35:37 --> 1:35:49
It was the add-on between corporate fascism or university fascism was established before COVID.

816
1:35:50 --> 1:35:57
All of this could only have happened because the academics were…

817
1:36:02 --> 1:36:07
This neoliberal revolution started with the Mont Pelerin Society in 1947,

818
1:36:07 --> 1:36:12
again in Switzerland. All evil comes from Switzerland. I'm sorry about this.

819
1:36:12 --> 1:36:18
All evil organizations are located in Switzerland. They are granted immunity by our criminal

820
1:36:18 --> 1:36:32
government. Then the millionaires took over this MPS and they created hundreds and thousands of

821
1:36:32 --> 1:36:37
NGOs and they took over the universities. Of course, you must, in a revolution,

822
1:36:37 --> 1:36:45
you start by taking over the universities. What we all learned here is that the so-called

823
1:36:45 --> 1:36:50
ordinary people, I have the highest respect for the so-called ordinary people,

824
1:36:50 --> 1:36:57
they smell that something is wrong here. While the academicians are the most easy to be deluded. Why?

825
1:36:58 --> 1:37:05
They are so narcissistic, they cannot even have the idea to be wrong and not only to be wrong,

826
1:37:05 --> 1:37:12
but to be completely wrong. This is the problem. Nowadays, imagine if I was young,

827
1:37:13 --> 1:37:20
I could not study. If you study climate science, in the exam you have to write CO2 is a poison

828
1:37:20 --> 1:37:24
and blah, blah, blah. If you do not write it, you do not pass the exam. Of course, this

829
1:37:26 --> 1:37:31
neoliberal indoctrination started in the universities and then spread it.

830
1:37:34 --> 1:37:38
We must realize this is planned over decades or even over centuries.

831
1:37:39 --> 1:37:45
Also, most people cannot imagine this, but this is the time horizon of these people.

832
1:37:47 --> 1:37:56
I mean, to the last point, I think it's actually accelerating that actually these tendencies have

833
1:37:56 --> 1:38:02
been amplified by the funding scheme. I've been on committees deciding what should be funded.

834
1:38:03 --> 1:38:08
I mean, sometimes it's breathtaking. You see how your colleagues actually take decisions.

835
1:38:11 --> 1:38:18
You keep your mouth open. Because of this feedback loop, you get funding, but for that,

836
1:38:18 --> 1:38:24
you need to please those who sit on committees or write reviews, which are those who chat around

837
1:38:24 --> 1:38:32
the globe all the time. They are not necessarily the best scientists. It's actually an amplifying

838
1:38:32 --> 1:38:42
circle. Then these things can happen. With climate science, you think why is there no open debate?

839
1:38:42 --> 1:38:49
Why are people so narrowly focused? If you actually try to follow this document.

840
1:38:49 --> 1:38:57
Benjamin, that's beautiful. It's a big deal. Last week, remember, we talked about, I think it was,

841
1:38:57 --> 1:39:04
who do we have on the side? Jason. No, before last week, the climate movie was in the chat.

842
1:39:04 --> 1:39:09
Wonderful movie. Precisely that point that both of you are talking about. I urge all of you to

843
1:39:09 --> 1:39:16
have a look at it. It's entirely correct that if you don't subscribe to the particular

844
1:39:17 --> 1:39:23
climate narrative, you will not get grants and you won't pass. If you are particularly

845
1:39:23 --> 1:39:29
young, you'd be crazy to, but the experienced scientists that are speaking out, they can't

846
1:39:29 --> 1:39:34
now be harmed by the system. We all have to recognise that. That's why this conversation,

847
1:39:34 --> 1:39:40
it reminds us to look at the climate movie, 90 minutes or 80 minutes, one hour, 21. It's

848
1:39:40 --> 1:39:47
magnificent. I urge you all to watch it. Thank you, Benjamin. Well put. Jim, we're doing well.

849
1:39:47 --> 1:39:54
I urge you all to watch it. Thank you, Benjamin. Well put. Jim, we're doing well. We've got 45

850
1:39:54 --> 1:39:59
minutes to go. We've got to keep moving. Jim. Thank you very much. Great presentation.

851
1:40:01 --> 1:40:10
The issue of whether the COVID does or doesn't exist. Sorry, can you hear me? There you go.

852
1:40:10 --> 1:40:17
Yeah. The issue of the spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in vaccine or virus form.

853
1:40:20 --> 1:40:26
Do you agree that that actually exists and they made a vaccine with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

854
1:40:27 --> 1:40:38
and that it has an ACE2 receptor that binds to the ACE2 receptors in our bodies and that it has a

855
1:40:38 --> 1:40:48
furon cleavage site and a TMPRSS2 cleavage site and a GP120, which is activated if the furon is

856
1:40:48 --> 1:40:56
cleaved. Do you believe that that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein exists and that it can itself

857
1:40:57 --> 1:40:59
replicate intracellularly?

858
1:40:59 --> 1:41:08
I know that I do not. Thank you, Jim, for your question. I do know that I do not know the most

859
1:41:08 --> 1:41:17
important things. I'm not absolutely sure, but I think, yes, I think this same modified RNA encodes

860
1:41:17 --> 1:41:26
the spike protein like it is presented to us. And of course, this is toxic. This is toxic. But

861
1:41:26 --> 1:41:34
as I said, I don't think that the main toxicity of the gene transfections comes from the spike

862
1:41:34 --> 1:41:41
but from this autoimmune attack. But I think for the moment, this is my current belief,

863
1:41:41 --> 1:41:48
yes, it's actually belief. I think this modified RNA encodes the spike protein.

864
1:41:49 --> 1:41:55
We have the research, we have people like Kevin McKernan, whom I trust. He was also in our group

865
1:41:55 --> 1:42:01
of the 22 live scientists who did this external peer review of the common drosten test.

866
1:42:01 --> 1:42:10
I think this is true. That there are differences between vials, this is possible. I mean,

867
1:42:10 --> 1:42:19
there is also this question about shedding, for example. I think from theoretical considerations,

868
1:42:19 --> 1:42:27
the delusions would be that this should not be a huge problem if this thing cannot replicate.

869
1:42:27 --> 1:42:31
I don't think that the spike can replicate, but what would be possible? They are working on

870
1:42:32 --> 1:42:39
self-amplifying modified RNA. And what we, of course, do not know is whether in some vials,

871
1:42:39 --> 1:42:46
in some batches, they already tested this. There the counter argument would again be,

872
1:42:47 --> 1:42:54
if I was a psychopath, I would create a targeted bio-weapon, not a bio-weapon that is not

873
1:42:54 --> 1:43:01
untargeted. So I think this is a huge argument against all this spreading, et cetera. Also that

874
1:43:01 --> 1:43:08
chemtrails are very toxic or so. They would detoxify themselves, they would harm and kill

875
1:43:08 --> 1:43:16
themselves. So from this, of course, it is evident also that the virus is not the bio-weapon,

876
1:43:16 --> 1:43:22
the bio-weapon, of course, these are the chain transactions. These are directed, targeted. These

877
1:43:22 --> 1:43:30
I can avoid. Yes. And the spike protein, it was Albert, remember the eagle who did the

878
1:43:30 --> 1:43:39
how bad is my batch, actually showed that it may be the DNA plasmid contaminants that actually make

879
1:43:39 --> 1:43:47
the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within the vaccines, which is very interesting because the mRNA may

880
1:43:47 --> 1:43:54
die off after three hours of being thawed. So the plasmids, the DNA plasmids, of course,

881
1:43:54 --> 1:44:01
don't have to be refrigerated. So that may be a better mechanism of spreading the Jason McClellan

882
1:44:01 --> 1:44:06
designed spike protein within the vaccines. And then there's the same, there's the issue of the

883
1:44:06 --> 1:44:13
spike protein transmitting in exosomes itself as a quote virus or exosome or whatever it is.

884
1:44:13 --> 1:44:21
So, and that in itself may be the toxic bio-weapon and it may have some genetic specificity

885
1:44:21 --> 1:44:29
built into it. And that may be why we were forbidden to take hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin

886
1:44:29 --> 1:44:35
and other things. So does, and, and do you have any opinion upon why we were forbidden?

887
1:44:35 --> 1:44:39
If since, so you agree the spike protein exists and that would be a reason

888
1:44:41 --> 1:44:45
forbidden to take hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin and other medications.

889
1:44:46 --> 1:44:49
Is that correct? Or do you have any other reason why we were forbidden to take those?

890
1:44:50 --> 1:44:54
There was also a legal reason. I mean, in Switzerland and I guess in every country,

891
1:44:55 --> 1:45:02
for one requirement for an emergency use authorization of a new drug is that they are not

892
1:45:02 --> 1:45:08
other therapeutic options, that there are no other therapeutic options. So if there are other

893
1:45:08 --> 1:45:15
therapeutic options like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin or whatever, the hurdles to get

894
1:45:15 --> 1:45:20
emergency use authorization for these genes transfections would be much, would have been much

895
1:45:20 --> 1:45:27
higher. So this, if there is a treatment, if this was generally accepted that there was a

896
1:45:27 --> 1:45:33
treatment of this disease, they could never have been, they could not have allowed this,

897
1:45:34 --> 1:45:39
authorized these gene transfections. I think this is the main reason. This is the main reason.

898
1:45:39 --> 1:45:47
Yeah. So yes. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, Jim. Tom the Rodman.

899
1:45:50 --> 1:45:56
Okay. Great. Thanks so much for all you've done. And I'm aware that you're in the doctors for COVID

900
1:45:56 --> 1:46:03
ethics group. So you've seen a lot of presentations, but, and your cardiologists. So

901
1:46:05 --> 1:46:10
I'm not good at this question thing. So I'm going to go through a bunch of questions fast and you

902
1:46:10 --> 1:46:19
probably won't remember all of them, but here goes. As the cardiologist, I'm going to go through a

903
1:46:19 --> 1:46:27
cardiologist. Have you seen evidence of the arterial or venal damage that we saw by Dr. Arne

904
1:46:27 --> 1:46:34
Burkhardt from what he described that as being from the actual spike protein, not from the

905
1:46:34 --> 1:46:44
nucleocapsid of SARS-CoV-2. And then the, what about the white fibrous clots? And is there any news on

906
1:46:44 --> 1:46:55
on those and what those are? And then with respect to myocarditis, is there a routine test that can

907
1:46:55 --> 1:47:01
determine, I mean, I think there is a dye that shows the, that can distinguish between the

908
1:47:01 --> 1:47:10
nucleocapsid from SARS-CoV-2 versus the, the JAB spike. But is that something that you routinely

909
1:47:10 --> 1:47:18
can run or is that really a difficult test? And then maybe just two more questions.

910
1:47:19 --> 1:47:27
I think Suchard Bhakdi, he focuses on the, that the response to our innate or complementary immune

911
1:47:27 --> 1:47:35
system is a big problem. You know, the response in particular to the spike protein, either from

912
1:47:35 --> 1:47:42
SARS-CoV-2 or from the JAB. And then, and then somewhat similarly, JJ Cooey,

913
1:47:43 --> 1:47:51
his mantra is that it's not this particular spike protein. It's not all a skein of function work.

914
1:47:51 --> 1:47:59
It really doesn't matter that much as to what the design is. The problem is the generic

915
1:47:59 --> 1:48:06
RNA or DNA transfection process involving the nanolipid protein, that that's where the damage

916
1:48:06 --> 1:48:11
is. And that's what we have to focus on. That's what we have to stop because it's their new

917
1:48:11 --> 1:48:23
platform for really harming us. And okay, the last question is, and this one's probably more for

918
1:48:23 --> 1:48:31
biologists, but what, can we figure out what proportion of the damage is caused by the

919
1:48:32 --> 1:48:39
spike and what proportion is caused by just the nanolipid transfection? I guess that's

920
1:48:39 --> 1:48:48
kind of similar to the other question. So yeah, thank you. Great bunch of questions, Tom. Well,

921
1:48:48 --> 1:48:56
I tried to answer shortly. Well, the spike itself is thrombogenic by binding to the ACE2

922
1:48:56 --> 1:49:02
receptor of the platelets. It activates thrombocytes, thrombocytes aggregation,

923
1:49:02 --> 1:49:11
so thrombosformation. But I think that even greater damage comes from the endothelitis,

924
1:49:11 --> 1:49:19
inflammation of the vessel wall, the cells that take up the mRNA and DNA, and then express and

925
1:49:19 --> 1:49:23
present the spike on their surface and are attacked. These causes endothelial damage and

926
1:49:23 --> 1:49:31
this also activates clotting. This, of course, is, we predicted this first and foremost through

927
1:49:31 --> 1:49:37
Jared Bartley. We predicted this to happen before it happened. Then came the first reports of the

928
1:49:37 --> 1:49:47
central cerebral venous thrombosis, sinus thrombosis, etc. And of course, I see some more

929
1:49:47 --> 1:49:53
myocardial infarctions, for example, in younger patients. But in a specific case, I cannot state

930
1:49:53 --> 1:50:05
whether it was caused by the gene transfections or not. Because for this, we should have biopsy

931
1:50:05 --> 1:50:15
material that we can test. And there, you stated right, Aniburghardt, who was unhappily

932
1:50:17 --> 1:50:24
deceased last year. It's very sad. A good friend, he developed the methyl for immunohistochemical,

933
1:50:27 --> 1:50:33
finding spike protein and nucleocapsid protein. If you only find the spike, then it's

934
1:50:33 --> 1:50:39
probably caused by the vaccine. And if you find the spike and the nucleocapsid, another surface

935
1:50:39 --> 1:50:47
protein of the virus, then it's caused by the vaccine. In the blood now, there are tests. You

936
1:50:47 --> 1:50:56
can also test for the spike and for nucleocapsid, for example, in the blood. There are special

937
1:50:56 --> 1:51:01
laboratories that do more and more tests. There is one, especially in Germany, who does this.

938
1:51:02 --> 1:51:05
And the other questions?

939
1:51:10 --> 1:51:13
What about the white fibrous clots?

940
1:51:16 --> 1:51:24
I guess these huge clots that the embalmers show us, they cannot happen in living humans.

941
1:51:24 --> 1:51:34
Of course, this produces clotting. But not that huge clot. These huge clots are not compatible

942
1:51:34 --> 1:51:42
with life. If you have such a huge clot in the vein or an artery of the leg that totally obstructs

943
1:51:42 --> 1:51:48
the circulation, then you have enormous swelling, enormous pain. This is incompatible with life.

944
1:51:49 --> 1:51:54
This huge thrombus formation is just caused by this high precariculable state,

945
1:51:55 --> 1:52:05
but then is more pronounced as postmortem. These huge clots are produced postmortem.

946
1:52:09 --> 1:52:14
As I mentioned, the spike is toxic, the lipid nanoparticles are toxic. But I'm convinced,

947
1:52:15 --> 1:52:20
we, especially Michael Palmer, wrote in our book that I can highly recommend. You can find it on

948
1:52:20 --> 1:52:26
the Doctors for COVID Ethics, Doctors for COVID Ethics.org website, free for download.

949
1:52:28 --> 1:52:34
About mRNA toxicity, it's now translated into Chinese and Italian as well. I can highly recommend

950
1:52:34 --> 1:52:43
this book. There we really make the case that the toxicity comes mainly from the autoimmune

951
1:52:43 --> 1:52:49
attack against it and the foreign antigen producing and expressing cells. Maybe this.

952
1:52:49 --> 1:52:55
Thank you, Tom. Thanks much. Thank you. Thank you, Tom. Excellent questions. Mark.

953
1:52:57 --> 1:53:06
Hi, Thomas. Thank you very much for informing people to give your spine a boost. I thought

954
1:53:06 --> 1:53:17
that was a very excellent piece of advice. I have two questions. I was recently at a governor's

955
1:53:17 --> 1:53:26
meeting at a hospital, and they have decided because they are short on radiologists, that

956
1:53:26 --> 1:53:35
they are going to use AI to support the radiology department. My question is, do you see any downside

957
1:53:35 --> 1:53:41
to the use of the AI to support the radiology department?

958
1:53:47 --> 1:53:54
Well, I guess in areas like radiology, AI may be helpful. Why not? Of course, I mean, it might see

959
1:53:54 --> 1:54:02
something that the AI cannot see. But wait, I mean, we forget all the AI is nonsense. This is a hype.

960
1:54:02 --> 1:54:10
This is more and more sophisticated software, but there is never any intelligence in it.

961
1:54:10 --> 1:54:19
But I'm quite sure this is one of the few areas where sophisticated software can be helpful,

962
1:54:19 --> 1:54:28
of course, by showing things that the AI cannot see. And maybe, you know, in these imaging

963
1:54:28 --> 1:54:37
techniques, there is density you can measure, etc. So it can directly indicate this might be

964
1:54:37 --> 1:54:42
malignant tumor, this looks benign, things like this. This might be helpful, of course.

965
1:54:42 --> 1:54:50
The shortness of radiologists, I hope it does not come from too many radiologists who are

966
1:54:51 --> 1:54:54
injected and have serious side effects now.

967
1:54:55 --> 1:55:01
Well, that, of course, is something that they haven't disclosed. And the hospital was having

968
1:55:01 --> 1:55:09
a shortage of staff, and they had not done an analysis of why people were actually absent.

969
1:55:09 --> 1:55:17
Right. And it's very high. My last question is, I'm a blood donor. And when you give blood,

970
1:55:17 --> 1:55:22
you have to fill out a very large, long form, right, telling your history, etc.

971
1:55:23 --> 1:55:29
The one thing that doesn't appear on the form is have you had the COVID jabs?

972
1:55:31 --> 1:55:35
Have you any idea why they would not ask that question?

973
1:55:36 --> 1:55:42
I guess in the UK, they ask it now. But they're not completely sure.

974
1:55:42 --> 1:55:48
No, no, no, in the UK, they are not asking any questions about being jabbed. They're asking

975
1:55:48 --> 1:55:53
all sorts of other things. Well, the notion, of course, was these vaccines are effective and

976
1:55:53 --> 1:55:58
safe. And if you ask this, then of course, the people could think, why do they want to know

977
1:55:58 --> 1:56:04
whether I'm vaccinated or not? If it's not effective and safe, why should there be any problem?

978
1:56:04 --> 1:56:11
So I think this is the main reason. I mean, this would make unsecured people, why do they want to

979
1:56:11 --> 1:56:15
ask this? Is there something wrong with this vaccine or not?

980
1:56:16 --> 1:56:26
Right. But Thomas, what they actually do is the blood donor, let's say the department,

981
1:56:26 --> 1:56:33
they make statements on the antibodies that are in the blood. And they make a statement that

982
1:56:33 --> 1:56:40
they have found antibodies are very high in people that are blood donors. And they have made a

983
1:56:40 --> 1:56:48
statement to say that this is because most blood donors are vaccinated. Now, if they don't ask the

984
1:56:48 --> 1:56:54
question, are you vaccinated? They can't make that statement. Yes, but highly likely. I mean,

985
1:56:54 --> 1:57:04
if 80% are vaccinated, highly likely about 80% of the blood that is donated is effective. Yeah,

986
1:57:04 --> 1:57:11
of course you're right. But this also is a question that comes up often. I mean,

987
1:57:13 --> 1:57:22
can I have become problems by receiving blood that are vaccinated? But there also is the delusion

988
1:57:22 --> 1:57:29
argument. I mean, for example, if I was vaccinated, I maybe have 50 litres of body water. And of these

989
1:57:29 --> 1:57:35
50 litres, I give 500 millilitres, I donate 500 millilitres. So this is a delusion,

990
1:57:36 --> 1:57:43
more or less, by a factor of 100. And then these products are processed, stored, etc.

991
1:57:43 --> 1:57:54
So even if all this that I donate would survive, the recipient would only get hundreds of doses of

992
1:57:54 --> 1:58:00
a vaccine from theoretical considerations. So I don't think that blood recipients are

993
1:58:00 --> 1:58:09
really in danger. And especially, the indication for blood reception must be very strict. So only

994
1:58:09 --> 1:58:16
in life-threatening situations. In life-threatening situations, the risk-benefit calculation to get

995
1:58:16 --> 1:58:24
blood maybe by vaccinated or not is of course on the side to get the blood.

996
1:58:27 --> 1:58:33
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mark. All right, two more. And then Stephen, good work. Anders.

997
1:58:37 --> 1:58:44
Yes, hello. I am not a medical doctor, but I've done, let's say, some research the last

998
1:58:44 --> 1:58:59
15 months. And I was in the belief that there was a virus. However, during the research,

999
1:58:59 --> 1:59:07
I found that was not the case. There was a lot of problems to do research because

1000
1:59:07 --> 1:59:13
the information we are told, for example, this narrative of this mRNA and this LNP,

1001
1:59:14 --> 1:59:22
this was supposed to be what is in the jab. But what we do know now is that, well, this LNP,

1002
1:59:22 --> 1:59:34
they turn out to become hydrogel. There are many different types of polymer, and these are highly

1003
1:59:34 --> 1:59:41
problematic because part of them are charged, surface-charged positive. That's one issue.

1004
1:59:42 --> 1:59:51
This has been identified by several scientists, including Dr. Ana Maria Mijajea and also

1005
1:59:51 --> 2:00:01
the La Quinta Colonna and Robert Young. But much worse is that these jabs contain a lot of

1006
2:00:01 --> 2:00:10
graphene oxide and a number of different types of nanometals. And it is confirmed that these are

1007
2:00:11 --> 2:00:20
getting together, becoming crystallized inside the hydrogel. And they are making antennas,

1008
2:00:20 --> 2:00:31
and they are actually receiving radio signals from not only 4G, 5G, what I believed was the case,

1009
2:00:32 --> 2:00:46
but also terahertz from the light sources of the LED lamps at home and in the streetlights. And this

1010
2:00:46 --> 2:00:54
type of radiation is, I thought it was the correlation I found rural and metro. There is

1011
2:00:54 --> 2:01:00
an enormous excess mortality in the metro where they have the 5G. And you have an enormous,

1012
2:01:01 --> 2:01:10
well, you have nothing, no excess mortality in upstate New York in, let's say, rural USA for

1013
2:01:11 --> 2:01:18
80-plus year old people, even they were jabbed. So what seems to be the case is that there is

1014
2:01:18 --> 2:01:27
magnetic material which reacts to radiation, and old people, they do not use the phones as much as

1015
2:01:27 --> 2:01:34
younger people. And this is a huge concern. And it seems to be that this is not just what I initially

1016
2:01:35 --> 2:01:44
thought it is about 5G, 4G radiation, but there is a huge damage coming into the body from the

1017
2:01:44 --> 2:01:55
terahertz radiation, from non, very intrusive light energies. And when I started to look at this with

1018
2:01:55 --> 2:02:03
some other people recently, we'd come across, I'm not sure you know about, I think it was

1019
2:02:03 --> 2:02:14
about Barry Trower. He's a 5G military expert in the UK, in Bristol. And he was interviewed by

1020
2:02:14 --> 2:02:23
Rainer Fulmisch. So there is a lot of knowledge about bio, about radiation in order to make

1021
2:02:23 --> 2:02:31
mind control. And this has been known, but now we also see that it is likely that the terahertz

1022
2:02:31 --> 2:02:40
frequencies have been used for mind control. And this is an area which almost nobody has any skills

1023
2:02:40 --> 2:02:48
because this is hidden or very few people look into it. So I just wonder if you have considered

1024
2:02:49 --> 2:02:57
that, let's say, there was not a virus, there was radiation, that's one. Second, this radiation was

1025
2:02:57 --> 2:03:04
not just for the 4G, 5G. I have data for Switzerland. I have data for USA, Canada, Norway,

1026
2:03:04 --> 2:03:11
Sweden, UK. There is an extreme correlation to the radiation. And there is actually an excess

1027
2:03:11 --> 2:03:24
mortality in the elderly in Switzerland in March, April 2020, in USA, in California, in Canada.

1028
2:03:24 --> 2:03:32
But it is following, let's say, the launch of 5G. But what we see now is that this launch of

1029
2:03:32 --> 2:03:43
these terahertz LED lamps and streetlights, they may have a much worse effect. And we don't really

1030
2:03:43 --> 2:03:51
know everything there because this is something people need to look into it. But to me, this seems

1031
2:03:51 --> 2:03:58
to be a big red flag. Have you been thinking about that this might be something to look into?

1032
2:04:00 --> 2:04:07
Thank you, Anders. I fully agree that EMF is not healthy. Of course, this is not healthy.

1033
2:04:07 --> 2:04:15
And what I can say is that I never got attacked as strongly as when I mentioned that there is a

1034
2:04:15 --> 2:04:23
strong correlation between 5G antennas and severe COVID cases. I mentioned that in the start. And

1035
2:04:23 --> 2:04:29
there was also a study from Barcelona who showed this. But this, of course, does not prove causation.

1036
2:04:30 --> 2:04:35
Correlation does not prove causation. It might be a hint for causation. This correlation might

1037
2:04:35 --> 2:04:46
only be because of course the 5G, this bandwidth is of course also an important part of this

1038
2:04:46 --> 2:04:51
control and surveillance network. They need this huge bandwidth. And they especially need

1039
2:04:52 --> 2:05:00
Elon Musk's satellites so that the whole world is covered. And every human being will one day be

1040
2:05:00 --> 2:05:06
either via smartphone or neural link directly connected to the artificial clouds of the

1041
2:05:07 --> 2:05:16
powers that be. Yeah, so well there I'm not sure whether there, I said before maybe in some

1042
2:05:16 --> 2:05:22
hotspots they released something or maybe they even turned on 5G in a certain specification or

1043
2:05:22 --> 2:05:29
so. I don't know. I'm not sure. What I do not find helpful and what divides us again,

1044
2:05:29 --> 2:05:35
like the theory, like the debate about the theory are there viruses or not, is this

1045
2:05:35 --> 2:05:42
stuff about graphene and the like. I mean, I looked into this and I did not find any evidence,

1046
2:05:43 --> 2:05:49
I did not find 100% evidence that there is graphene. I looked at this Compro experiment

1047
2:05:49 --> 2:05:55
with Raman laser. He said to have found graphene. But if you look at this study,

1048
2:05:56 --> 2:06:07
if this method works like this, you target the laser on the object and usually you burn this

1049
2:06:07 --> 2:06:15
laser for milliseconds and he burned it for about 40 seconds. So basically he fried what he had under

1050
2:06:15 --> 2:06:24
what he wanted to examine and there was sugar of course and carbon. And this method might have

1051
2:06:24 --> 2:06:31
produced graphene. I'm not totally sure, but I have not seen any convincing report for the presence

1052
2:06:31 --> 2:06:39
of graphene in it. And again, this divides us. I mean, it's the same in 9-11, there are the planers

1053
2:06:39 --> 2:06:47
and the no-planers. And they have a huge war between them. But the only thing that they agree

1054
2:06:47 --> 2:06:54
that of course this nonsense narrative that on 9-11 20 Muslims armed with box cutters overcame

1055
2:06:54 --> 2:07:02
the USA and the laws of nature is nonsense. And that an investigation that deserves the name

1056
2:07:02 --> 2:07:11
investigation is needed. This is enough in the 9-11 story. And here in the currently accepted

1057
2:07:11 --> 2:07:18
belief system, scientifically belief system, what we know by evidence, this is enough by 1,000 times

1058
2:07:18 --> 2:07:26
to destroy this whole narrative. So I'm very sceptic about this graphene. But it is also possible that

1059
2:07:26 --> 2:07:33
some vials there was something different. This I cannot rule out of course. Thank you Anders.

1060
2:07:33 --> 2:07:38
This is my personal opinion. Thank you Anders. This is a good question, a long question. Anders is

1061
2:07:38 --> 2:07:44
going to make your question shorter. However, I understand it's always a balance between setting

1062
2:07:44 --> 2:07:50
the agenda for the question. So I get that. And I honor the work that you're doing. And I think for

1063
2:07:50 --> 2:07:56
the rest of us, there's different people look at these recordings everybody. Just there's 53

1064
2:07:56 --> 2:08:03
people online. The maximum number today was 63. But we know a lot of people watch the recordings

1065
2:08:03 --> 2:08:09
and different people watch different recordings. And for those of you that are here all the time,

1066
2:08:09 --> 2:08:13
you think it's repetitious, but someone who's only watching this recording, you know, for the

1067
2:08:13 --> 2:08:18
first time and only heard you Anders for the first time, this might be a crucial piece of data that

1068
2:08:18 --> 2:08:25
you shared. Same with all of us. So that's the patience that we have to have in these meetings.

1069
2:08:25 --> 2:08:29
So thank you, Anders. We'll have to keep moving. Because we're going to run out of time. We've got

1070
2:08:29 --> 2:08:35
Peter, then Stephen, and thank you everybody for all the resources you put into the chat. Peter.

1071
2:08:38 --> 2:08:42
And by the way, there's another great reference Anders. I don't know if you've seen it.

1072
2:08:42 --> 2:08:50
And all of you EMRAustralia.com.au. There might be some useful resources there Anders.

1073
2:08:50 --> 2:08:57
Electromagnetic radiation Australia.com.au. It's been up for some years. A huge amount of research

1074
2:08:57 --> 2:09:03
by a lady called Lynn McLean. And there might be some stuff there or collaboration Anders that is

1075
2:09:03 --> 2:09:11
useful for you and for others and Mark's deal as well. Peter. Well, Peter might have gone to sleep

1076
2:09:11 --> 2:09:16
because he's in South Africa, Thomas. So it's very late for Peter. In fact, he has gone to sleep.

1077
2:09:17 --> 2:09:18
How about that everybody?

1078
2:09:20 --> 2:09:25
I guess in South Africa, it's about the same as here. Here it's a quarter past 11.

1079
2:09:25 --> 2:09:31
No, I think South Africa, that's true. Or maybe it's another hour later. It might be quarter past

1080
2:09:31 --> 2:09:43
12. All right, Stephen, are you there? Yeah. So, Thomas, so it's great to hear you answering those

1081
2:09:43 --> 2:09:50
all those questions as good as they were so dutifully. So it's important as you understand

1082
2:09:51 --> 2:09:56
that, yes, people watching this video, they hear not just a bit of what you think or what you

1083
2:09:56 --> 2:10:00
thought in the last four years, but as much as possible. So unfortunately, we do have to

1084
2:10:00 --> 2:10:05
repeat ourselves. And some people on our side don't understand the importance of that. So

1085
2:10:07 --> 2:10:11
I just wanted to ask you, in your opinion, so you're a medical doctor, Thomas,

1086
2:10:12 --> 2:10:18
Thomas, and you're a cardiologist specifically, but I think you said in your resume that you

1087
2:10:18 --> 2:10:22
trained as a virologist and an immunologist, was it?

1088
2:10:24 --> 2:10:30
Yeah, after finishing medical school, I was not sure whether I should go into research or into

1089
2:10:30 --> 2:10:37
clinic. So I spent one year in the department for immunology and virology, and I wrote my thesis

1090
2:10:37 --> 2:10:42
there. Yeah. So I really have more than average knowledge in this field, more than average

1091
2:10:42 --> 2:10:51
knowledge of a medical doctor. Yeah, maybe this helped me to see the tree. What we also have to

1092
2:10:51 --> 2:11:00
know, of course, I mean, I took the red pill maybe in 2007 or so. I saw the collapse of World Trade

1093
2:11:00 --> 2:11:05
Center Building 7. I think this was the moment when many took the red pill. Then, of course,

1094
2:11:06 --> 2:11:12
I realized the pre-9-11 narrative is nonsense. Then I looked into the climate

1095
2:11:14 --> 2:11:20
scam and all this, and you go down the rabbit hole, of course. So, of course, we have a huge

1096
2:11:20 --> 2:11:27
advantage. We must never forget that there are people around that still believe in everything,

1097
2:11:27 --> 2:11:33
that the legacy media serve them, especially the news. So there is a huge

1098
2:11:34 --> 2:11:41
difference between the state of knowledge between the people. We must always try to inform the

1099
2:11:41 --> 2:11:46
people according to their current state of knowledge. In people who still believe in

1100
2:11:46 --> 2:11:53
everything, if we confront them with the things we are talking about here, they refuse and we

1101
2:11:53 --> 2:12:01
can never reach them. But there, in such cases, we must spread some doubt. For example, we can show

1102
2:12:02 --> 2:12:09
for example, there was in the yellow press, there was the title, intensive care units overcrowded.

1103
2:12:09 --> 2:12:17
And then you post besides this, the official curve of the Federal Office of Public Health,

1104
2:12:17 --> 2:12:26
where you see, no, no, the occupancy of the ICU units was 75%. And the same paper five years ago

1105
2:12:26 --> 2:12:35
wrote ICU occupancy only 80%. This is uneconomic. So if you so with something like this, maybe you

1106
2:12:35 --> 2:12:44
can spread some doubt. I remember when my son realized that the story of Santa Claus was a

1107
2:12:44 --> 2:12:55
myth. One day, when Santa Claus left, he said, Papa, did Santa Claus not wear the same shoes

1108
2:12:55 --> 2:13:05
as Uncle Earth had on who left before Santa Claus came in and came back when after Santa Claus had

1109
2:13:05 --> 2:13:13
left? Like this, like we cannot confront the populace with the whole truth. Everybody has

1110
2:13:13 --> 2:13:21
to find it out themselves. Yeah. So in view of the frauds that we've been fed, and we've recently

1111
2:13:22 --> 2:13:27
heard that. So I don't know whether you know Jerome Causse, but he's the co author of the book

1112
2:13:27 --> 2:13:35
that came out about President Kennedy's assassination. And it seems to be now accepted that we have been

1113
2:13:35 --> 2:13:44
for 60 years plus fed a load of lies to the people around the world on a very, very important matter.

1114
2:13:44 --> 2:13:53
But so this was about a so-called medical emergency. But if you remember, we had the swine flu

1115
2:13:53 --> 2:14:01
pandemic in 2009, and that was proved to be a fraud. And there's a document on the Council of Europe's

1116
2:14:03 --> 2:14:08
website. I think it's their website, which of course, Council of Europe is part of the

1117
2:14:08 --> 2:14:15
European Union, one of the, I think, seven institutions. So and that, of course, that was

1118
2:14:15 --> 2:14:19
the brilliant work of Wolfgang Rudolf, who happened to be a politician at the time, but he was a

1119
2:14:19 --> 2:14:27
medical doctor. And he understood that the swine flu thing was a fraud. And essentially, he forced

1120
2:14:27 --> 2:14:33
an investigation into swine flu. And in 2010, there was a report and still up on the internet,

1121
2:14:33 --> 2:14:41
it's been up since 2020 throughout, it's never been taken down. The report is there saying that

1122
2:14:41 --> 2:14:48
the swine flu pandemic was a fraud. So why do you think it was that very, very few people, including

1123
2:14:48 --> 2:14:53
Wolfgang himself, I'm not criticizing Wolfgang, but I'm not criticizing him, but I'm not criticizing

1124
2:14:53 --> 2:14:58
people, including Wolfgang himself, I'm not criticizing Wolfgang, you know, maybe he wanted

1125
2:14:58 --> 2:15:06
to live and he knew that it was dangerous for him to say anything further on that. But so we had a

1126
2:15:06 --> 2:15:13
we had a kind of precedent for a fraud, a pandemic fraud. And there it was in black and white,

1127
2:15:13 --> 2:15:19
officially, Council of Europe document saying that the swine flu pandemic fraud

1128
2:15:20 --> 2:15:26
did occur. And it outlined the same people, the same, you know, the pharmaceutical complex,

1129
2:15:28 --> 2:15:34
and politicians and criticized. And yet, nobody seemed to want to know about this,

1130
2:15:34 --> 2:15:39
including Wolfgang didn't seem to understand the importance of those a precedent for fraud.

1131
2:15:39 --> 2:15:42
And nobody paid attention to it. Why do you think that was?

1132
2:15:42 --> 2:15:53
Yes, I agree. It also reminded me instantly on the swine flu scam in 2009. The problem is there was

1133
2:15:53 --> 2:16:02
never a public workup in the legacy media, of course. So most people have no idea what was

1134
2:16:02 --> 2:16:10
going on there. And I think the purpose, this was a kind of blueprint. I guess, as you mentioned,

1135
2:16:10 --> 2:16:16
some of the perpetrators, Ferguson and Raulston were the same already then. And I think the

1136
2:16:16 --> 2:16:22
perpetrators at that time learned two things. First, they have to have total control over the

1137
2:16:22 --> 2:16:29
virus and they have to have total control over the narrative. To have total control over the

1138
2:16:29 --> 2:16:34
narrative in the legacy media, obviously, they will combine, but you cannot have total control

1139
2:16:34 --> 2:16:42
over the virus. So they invented this PCR test, who can exist even without the virus to crank up

1140
2:16:42 --> 2:16:48
and down the case numbers according to the script. Yeah, well, Wolfgang, of course, as you mentioned,

1141
2:16:48 --> 2:16:52
he almost single handedly destroyed the swine flu scam at that time, at least in Europe.

1142
2:16:53 --> 2:16:59
Well, I think he mentioned that, didn't he? I'm not sure. Absolutely. I'm not sure.

1143
2:17:00 --> 2:17:04
He did mention it when I brought it up. I would ask him about it. But I was surprised that he

1144
2:17:04 --> 2:17:10
himself wasn't highlighting that, you know, but as I said, maybe he feared for his life because,

1145
2:17:10 --> 2:17:19
you know, he could understand what was going on was very important, but also very scary. And so

1146
2:17:20 --> 2:17:24
maybe he was thinking, you know, I want to live a bit longer because he looks a happy guy, doesn't he?

1147
2:17:25 --> 2:17:30
I don't know. You have to ask him. But yes.

1148
2:17:30 --> 2:17:37
Yeah, well, I did ask him a few times. I never got a direct answer, but that wasn't a criticism.

1149
2:17:37 --> 2:17:44
I don't know. I also, I already in March or April in Twitter, for example, I posted this Arte

1150
2:17:44 --> 2:17:50
documentation. There is a good documentation by Arte about an hour about this corona scam,

1151
2:17:51 --> 2:17:58
the swine flu scam. And I mean, if you look at this, yeah, of course, I mean, everybody must

1152
2:17:58 --> 2:18:04
realize this was the same scam, basically the same as they did now. I mean, it's the same media hype,

1153
2:18:06 --> 2:18:13
the corruption of everybody by the pharmaceutical industry, that basically the governments were the

1154
2:18:13 --> 2:18:19
the department, the selling department, the propaganda department of the pharmaceutical

1155
2:18:19 --> 2:18:24
industry and so on and so forth. Yes. Exactly. Yeah. So it was very strange to me that that

1156
2:18:24 --> 2:18:31
wasn't highlighted because it seemed to me that was one of our strongest cards, the past history

1157
2:18:31 --> 2:18:39
of the pandemics, you know, which I don't think it's possible for pandemics to occur. And by the

1158
2:18:39 --> 2:18:44
way, I wanted to emphasize that the gain of function thing, I don't think they're capable,

1159
2:18:44 --> 2:18:50
obviously, of getting around the deadly virus kills its host stuff. So the higher the, the

1160
2:18:50 --> 2:18:56
deadlier the virus or the more virulent, the less transmissible. So then the damn thing can't,

1161
2:18:57 --> 2:19:05
can't go around the world. So, so the one is. So if it's deadly, which they want, of course,

1162
2:19:05 --> 2:19:13
to kill us. Unfortunately, it won't spread because it kills the host and they have problems with

1163
2:19:13 --> 2:19:19
transmission and people don't seem to understand it. I'm sure you do. So I wanted to ask you also,

1164
2:19:19 --> 2:19:28
someone suggested that, that I was, I think they were saying that I had said there was no virus.

1165
2:19:29 --> 2:19:35
I was very careful not to say that. I said there's no pandemic and there was no COVID-19.

1166
2:19:36 --> 2:19:42
The fact that I said there was no COVID-19 does not mean to say that I deny the existence of all

1167
2:19:42 --> 2:19:48
viruses. That's a different matter altogether. So you can, you know, I can legitimately.

1168
2:19:48 --> 2:19:57
Absolutely. Yes, absolutely. Yes. I concur with everything. I, as I stated, I'm not 100% sure

1169
2:19:57 --> 2:20:06
that not 1% or so of the case. Now you're frozen, Thomas.

1170
2:20:14 --> 2:20:19
He has frozen. He must be getting late at night. Perhaps that was an important point.

1171
2:20:19 --> 2:20:29
We'll wait patiently for a moment. Usually ends in the person who this happens to

1172
2:20:30 --> 2:20:35
disappear, which he's just done. He has disappeared. We'll wait for a moment so we can

1173
2:20:36 --> 2:20:39
say. I'm already not sure what's happened. I dropped out and I'm back.

1174
2:20:41 --> 2:20:47
You froze. I don't know. So it was particularly important what you were saying. And so they

1175
2:20:47 --> 2:20:53
switched you off. They canceled you, Thomas. We didn't cancel you. They did. You know, our enemies.

1176
2:20:54 --> 2:21:00
So I wanted to ask you, so you know about biology and immunology, albeit some time ago,

1177
2:21:01 --> 2:21:07
but so I heard from a friend of mine in the UK who was an expert on HIV and AIDS,

1178
2:21:08 --> 2:21:16
and he was active at that time as a nurse, but he was working with a lot of medical doctor

1179
2:21:16 --> 2:21:23
researchers on HIV and he's extremely perceptive, this guy. His name is Kevin Corbett.

1180
2:21:25 --> 2:21:30
I recommend him to you. We were talking last summer about, so I knew about the rise of

1181
2:21:30 --> 2:21:39
virology and virologists, the power of virologists. But then you happen to mention that the influence

1182
2:21:39 --> 2:21:45
of immunologists have declined since the 80s. And I said, oh, that's really interesting. So at the same

1183
2:21:45 --> 2:21:53
time as the influence of virologists was rising, the influence of immunologists was declining. Well,

1184
2:21:53 --> 2:22:00
immunology, as you know, the immunologists who taught me at least were always saying that it

1185
2:22:00 --> 2:22:06
was a wonderful immune system. So, you know, if you like praising God, you know, for lack of a better

1186
2:22:06 --> 2:22:14
word. So and the wonders of the human immune system. And but the virus, so the biology,

1187
2:22:14 --> 2:22:19
it seemed to me, you know, in my simple mind last summer was completely opposed to that. So that's

1188
2:22:19 --> 2:22:26
the anti-human bit, the virology. And the immunology is the pro-human bit, you know, the emphasizing

1189
2:22:26 --> 2:22:32
the spirituality, if you like, the wonder of the universe, the wonder of the human immune system,

1190
2:22:32 --> 2:22:41
the brilliance of it. And the notion in virology that mere human beings, mere human beings can,

1191
2:22:41 --> 2:22:48
you know, meddle with the immune system and trick it into

1192
2:22:49 --> 2:22:54
curing their so-called diseases, you know. So I wondered whether it was a necessary

1193
2:22:56 --> 2:23:06
construct to get rid of the immunologists, to replace them with virologists in order for 2020

1194
2:23:06 --> 2:23:13
to occur. The same question about epidemiology and the same question about evidence-based medicine

1195
2:23:13 --> 2:23:20
and the same question about genomics, were these all constructed to make, to allow what happened

1196
2:23:20 --> 2:23:27
in 2020 to occur? Obviously, it took time, but that's even more evidence of evil. So was it the

1197
2:23:27 --> 2:23:33
intention of these and super specialization, which you mentioned brilliantly earlier on,

1198
2:23:34 --> 2:23:43
all these things and the notion that doctors should be beholden to protocols and guidelines?

1199
2:23:45 --> 2:23:50
So diminishing the autonomy of individual doctors, which we were taught at medical school,

1200
2:23:50 --> 2:24:00
was the best defense for the patient against evil. Well, not evil, but yes, you know what I mean.

1201
2:24:00 --> 2:24:05
So in other words, you want a doctor who is autonomous, who's an individual, is autonomous,

1202
2:24:05 --> 2:24:12
not controlled by the medical establishment in any way. They've got rid of that. Apparently, I didn't

1203
2:24:12 --> 2:24:20
ever obey any guideline or protocol. I knew there were protocols, but I just ignored them. I always

1204
2:24:20 --> 2:24:24
did what I thought I would do for my own family. Anyway, Thomas, what do you think?

1205
2:24:24 --> 2:24:33
I fully agree as always, Stephen. When I wrote my thesis in immunology and virology in the 1980s,

1206
2:24:33 --> 2:24:40
this was still one department. Virology and immunology, they were one department.

1207
2:24:40 --> 2:24:46
And somewhat later, they were separated. And since then, I agree, the virologists obviously

1208
2:24:46 --> 2:24:53
have no idea of immunology. The average medical doctor has not the slightest idea about immunology,

1209
2:24:53 --> 2:25:03
because as I mentioned, the fundamental duty of our immune system is to recognize non-self and

1210
2:25:03 --> 2:25:11
to destroy it. This you learn in the first two lectures of immunology for beginners.

1211
2:25:11 --> 2:25:18
And this is the basic thing of these gene transfections that you choose a foreign antigen,

1212
2:25:18 --> 2:25:27
a foreign protein. So this must result in this autoimmune attack. This we had known before this

1213
2:25:27 --> 2:25:35
criminal emergency use authorization. And also, I'm amazed as you, I could not believe how few

1214
2:25:35 --> 2:25:43
people, experts, virologists realized this. I mean, virologists, these are laboratory doctors.

1215
2:25:43 --> 2:25:50
Nowadays, they are not even doctors. Most of them are biologists. Epidemiologists as well.

1216
2:25:50 --> 2:25:56
Most of them are not medical doctors. They are biologists, mathematicians. They are living in the

1217
2:25:56 --> 2:26:05
same virtual modeled world as climate scientists. Epidemiology and climate science is about the same.

1218
2:26:05 --> 2:26:12
They are living in a modeled, artificially intelligent virtual world without any natural

1219
2:26:13 --> 2:26:16
reality that is totally disconnected from reality.

1220
2:26:21 --> 2:26:26
The problem is not the lack of knowledge. It is the illusion of knowledge. And these guys believe

1221
2:26:26 --> 2:26:33
they are geniuses, while in reality they are narcissistic village idiots or maybe better urban

1222
2:26:33 --> 2:26:37
idiots because the people on the countryside are the more intelligent obviously than

1223
2:26:38 --> 2:26:40
people in the city. Sorry, Stephen. Yeah.

1224
2:26:43 --> 2:26:46
Charles, why are you interrupting on this? Because it's two and a half hours,

1225
2:26:46 --> 2:26:51
long speeches. And you know the rule, Stephen, less is more.

1226
2:26:54 --> 2:26:59
That's why, because I'm the moderator because two and a half, like gosh, you know, there's 47

1227
2:26:59 --> 2:27:02
people left on the call here, Stephen. We don't have endless time.

1228
2:27:02 --> 2:27:06
And Charles, I'm not going to have an argument. Thomas, thank you so much for coming on. Very,

1229
2:27:06 --> 2:27:10
very interesting. And there's another issue that Peter woke up, Peter Underwood.

1230
2:27:11 --> 2:27:15
We tried to get you to get the question and Stephen, you had another 15, 20 minutes.

1231
2:27:16 --> 2:27:22
So I'm not being unkind. I'm always kind. I wasn't saying you were, Charles.

1232
2:27:22 --> 2:27:29
Okay, Peter. Yeah. Thank you, Charles. And thank you, Stephen. I understand your

1233
2:27:29 --> 2:27:38
enthusiasm because I guess I have woken up now. I think Thomas has already answered the question

1234
2:27:38 --> 2:27:47
I was going to ask. Do viruses exist? That's something I discussed with Jerry and many others.

1235
2:27:48 --> 2:27:56
And there's this kind of confusion out there. My sense is that a virus is a

1236
2:27:59 --> 2:28:09
kind of a genetic stream of something, whether I've read a lot about it and I've never come to a

1237
2:28:09 --> 2:28:15
conclusion. I wanted to ask Thomas, does he think that viruses are reality? Peter, he has answered

1238
2:28:15 --> 2:28:20
that. We're not going to go back on that. Watch the recording. Yeah. We've had plenty of

1239
2:28:20 --> 2:28:23
confusion around that. That's why I put my hand down, Charles.

1240
2:28:23 --> 2:28:33
Well done. And Thomas, excellent, great insights on various questions. So all of us can learn new

1241
2:28:33 --> 2:28:37
ways of expressing ideas. That's the value of these meetings. Thank you, Stephen, for organizing.

1242
2:28:37 --> 2:28:42
Thank you all for being here. Tom Rodman is running, for those of you with endless time,

1243
2:28:42 --> 2:28:50
you can join Tom on his video group. And Stephen and I will discuss whether or not

1244
2:28:50 --> 2:28:57
we have an event on Easter Sunday for some people. And this is the last day, Stephen,

1245
2:28:57 --> 2:29:05
where I started at 7 a.m. next week. Yeah. I started 6 a.m. and the week after when Australian

1246
2:29:05 --> 2:29:12
Day- 5 a.m. ends, I started 5 a.m. all through winter. So- Crazy. Crazy. Yeah. And Stephen,

1247
2:29:12 --> 2:29:16
the one thing that Thomas really, Thomas, the one thing you really said that's been really important

1248
2:29:17 --> 2:29:26
and I've taken note of this, amongst many, or clearly public-private partnerships are fascism,

1249
2:29:26 --> 2:29:33
but I loved the comment that the quote, billionaires today, the billionaires today

1250
2:29:33 --> 2:29:42
are the kings of today. That's a lovely metaphor as well. Well, only in their own minds, Charles.

1251
2:29:42 --> 2:29:47
They're not the kings. Indeed. Very good. All right. Thanks everybody for being here.

1252
2:29:47 --> 2:29:52
Thank you, Stephen. We need to remember human hubris. Yeah. Yeah. All right. Well, that's right.

1253
2:29:52 --> 2:29:56
The psychopathic- Thank you, Stephen. Thank you, Charles. Thank you, everybody, for all you are

1254
2:29:56 --> 2:30:02
doing. And venceremos. Thank you so much, Thomas. Some of the things that we were discussing,

1255
2:30:02 --> 2:30:07
I think we need to get out to the public somehow or other. In particular, immunology and

1256
2:30:07 --> 2:30:10
virology, the interplay between those things and how they've been misused.

1257
2:30:11 --> 2:30:17
And happy Easter. If you believe in Easter and Greek Easter is two weeks after that. I don't think

1258
2:30:17 --> 2:30:22
we have many Greeks here, Stephen. But anyway, Greek Easter is two weeks later. And so may you get

1259
2:30:22 --> 2:30:28
Easter eggs delivered by rabbits. How about that? That's an interesting contemplation, isn't it?

1260
2:30:28 --> 2:30:31
All right. Have a good time. Great to be with you all. Have a couple of-

1261
2:30:32 --> 2:30:40
Charles and I aren't always arguing. So very often, especially in his winter, I praise him for his

1262
2:30:41 --> 2:30:45
sense of duty. Getting up at five o'clock every twice a week.

1263
2:30:47 --> 2:30:50
Quarter past four, Stephen, twice a week. That's right.

1264
2:30:52 --> 2:31:00
However, it's given me a new appreciation for the current affairs TV hosts who come onto our

1265
2:31:00 --> 2:31:05
screens at six a.m. in the morning or seven a.m. in the morning. And many of them get up at three

1266
2:31:05 --> 2:31:10
a.m. So I'm glad I'm not one of those. And the other is Stephen, the vegetable, the vegetable,

1267
2:31:10 --> 2:31:16
the far, sorry, the market, the markets, they get up at three a.m. to be at the vegetable,

1268
2:31:16 --> 2:31:22
fruit and vegetable markets at five a.m. starts. Amazing. Anyway, everybody who needs sleep.

1269
2:31:22 --> 2:31:25
Lovely to be with you. Happy Easter. Bye for now. Bye, Stephen.

1270
2:31:26 --> 2:31:28
Excellent, Thomas. Thank you so much.

1271
2:31:28 --> 2:31:29
Thanks. Bye bye.

1272
2:31:35 --> 2:31:37
Thanks, everybody. Have a blessed Easter.

1273
2:31:39 --> 2:31:53
Yeah. Thanks, Daria. They may be in me. Oh, gone now.