1 0:00:00 --> 0:00:07 So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International. 2 0:00:07 --> 0:00:14 In today's meeting, this community was founded four years ago by Dr. Stephen Frost, a medically 3 0:00:14 --> 0:00:18 a British trained medical doctor with a passion for truth. 4 0:00:18 --> 0:00:22 As a seasoned whistleblower and activist, Stephen founded this group to champion truth, 5 0:00:22 --> 0:00:25 ethics, justice, freedom and health in the face of global challenges. 6 0:00:25 --> 0:00:30 I'm Charles Covess, your moderator, and Australia's passion provocateur. 7 0:00:30 --> 0:00:35 I wear my red jacket because red is the colour of passion to remind you to be passionate 8 0:00:35 --> 0:00:36 about everything that you do. 9 0:00:36 --> 0:00:43 After 20 years as a lawyer, I shifted gears 32 years ago to become a professional speaker, 10 0:00:43 --> 0:00:44 amongst other things. 11 0:00:44 --> 0:00:48 And for the past 14 years, I've guided parents and lawyers in addressing vaccine injuries 12 0:00:48 --> 0:00:50 and medical failures. 13 0:00:50 --> 0:00:55 In fact, medical failures are the number one cause of death these days in America, according 14 0:00:55 --> 0:00:59 to the latest data that I've been mentioning on numerous occasions. 15 0:00:59 --> 0:01:04 I'm also chief executive of an industrial hemp company that is going to make a massive 16 0:01:04 --> 0:01:11 positive difference on America, on Australia, and on Europe and on each one of your lives. 17 0:01:11 --> 0:01:17 At this time, we remember Rainer Fulmick, unlawfully incarcerated in jail in Germany 18 0:01:17 --> 0:01:22 following a show trial, and the Netherlands, what's the name of the Netherlands doctor 19 0:01:22 --> 0:01:30 who's been fighting the government, has now been harassed and jailed and attacked by the 20 0:01:30 --> 0:01:31 system. 21 0:01:31 --> 0:01:36 Anyway, we think also of any lawyers fighting the good fight for truth, freedom, justice 22 0:01:36 --> 0:01:37 and ethics. 23 0:01:37 --> 0:01:43 Our group is a dynamic blend of voices of doctors, lawyers, homeopaths, journalists, 24 0:01:44 --> 0:01:50 professors, peacemakers, and bold troublemakers hailing from corners of the globe. 25 0:01:50 --> 0:01:55 Many of us once viewed vaccines as benign, now many wear the badge of passionate anti-vaxxers 26 0:01:55 --> 0:01:57 with pride. 27 0:01:57 --> 0:02:03 And I'm certainly one of them, and I would never take a vaccine of any description because 28 0:02:03 --> 0:02:09 not one of them has ever been properly tested for safety and efficacy. 29 0:02:09 --> 0:02:12 First time as you're warmly embraced, introduce yourself in the chat, share where you're from, 30 0:02:12 --> 0:02:13 and let's connect. 31 0:02:13 --> 0:02:16 Got a podcast, book, newsletter or show? 32 0:02:16 --> 0:02:20 Drop the links in the chat so we can amplify your work and stay connected. 33 0:02:20 --> 0:02:25 We're in the thick of a global struggle of World War III with medical and scientific 34 0:02:25 --> 0:02:28 battles among 12 battlefronts. 35 0:02:28 --> 0:02:32 Another of the 12 battlefronts is the spiritual battlefront. 36 0:02:32 --> 0:02:37 Five and a half years into this fight with more to come, there's no room for being tired. 37 0:02:37 --> 0:02:40 Stay strong, stay healthy, listen to the advice that you get in these meetings. 38 0:02:41 --> 0:02:42 There's some wonderful resources. 39 0:02:42 --> 0:02:46 If you have a health problem, put a request into the chat. 40 0:02:46 --> 0:02:52 There's some amazingly skilled, knowledgeable people in this group. 41 0:02:52 --> 0:02:56 Science we know has never done it, thrives on challenge and inquiry. 42 0:02:56 --> 0:03:01 Some here believe in viruses, others see them as fiction, and many are still exploring all 43 0:03:01 --> 0:03:03 views fuel their dialogue. 44 0:03:03 --> 0:03:08 And I note people keep making comments in the chat on the recordings on the Rumble channel, 45 0:03:08 --> 0:03:13 and they go, you are all idiots to even allow the possible existence of viruses. 46 0:03:13 --> 0:03:15 So there you are, you're all idiots. 47 0:03:15 --> 0:03:19 If you have any open mindedness around viruses. 48 0:03:19 --> 0:03:22 These two and a half hour sessions are action oriented. 49 0:03:22 --> 0:03:29 After the meeting, Tom Rodman hosts an optional Telegram video chat. 50 0:03:29 --> 0:03:33 We'll hear from our guest presenter today, Dr. Clayton Baker from the US. 51 0:03:33 --> 0:03:35 What part of the US are you in, Clayton? 52 0:03:35 --> 0:03:37 I'm in New York State. 53 0:03:37 --> 0:03:38 Beautiful. 54 0:03:38 --> 0:03:39 So Clayton's from New York. 55 0:03:39 --> 0:03:42 We'll have a following his presentation. 56 0:03:42 --> 0:03:47 Stephen Frost asks the first set of questions for 15 minutes. 57 0:03:47 --> 0:03:51 There's a free speech haven appropriately moderated to keep ideas flowing. 58 0:03:51 --> 0:03:55 Free speech is our weapon to safeguard our liberties. 59 0:03:55 --> 0:03:58 If something offends you, own it. 60 0:03:58 --> 0:04:04 We sidestep the outrage culture and its demands to silence truth as we sidestep the 61 0:04:04 --> 0:04:05 triggering culture. 62 0:04:05 --> 0:04:08 Don't say anything you might trigger somebody. 63 0:04:08 --> 0:04:11 We choose love over fear. 64 0:04:11 --> 0:04:13 Fear binds and sickens. 65 0:04:13 --> 0:04:15 Love liberates, heals and inspires. 66 0:04:15 --> 0:04:18 These twice weekly meetings are far from mere talk. 67 0:04:18 --> 0:04:23 They've birthed real world actions and alliances. 68 0:04:23 --> 0:04:27 A key tactic in our fight is exposing medical crimes on social media, 69 0:04:27 --> 0:04:32 rallying behind the demand of medical truth now coined by John Rappaport. 70 0:04:32 --> 0:04:37 I urge all of you to demand medical truth now. 71 0:04:37 --> 0:04:40 This call can unite humanity in a search for accountability. 72 0:04:40 --> 0:04:44 And Mark Dyer, well done to you for calling for medical truth now. 73 0:04:44 --> 0:04:47 And as soon as you shine a light on truth, a lot of people go scurrying. 74 0:04:49 --> 0:04:51 Share solutions, products or resources in the chat. 75 0:04:51 --> 0:04:55 The meetings are recorded and uploaded on the Rumble channel. 76 0:04:55 --> 0:04:58 And we're thrilled to welcome our guest presenters today. 77 0:04:58 --> 0:05:01 Dr. Clayton Baker from New York State. 78 0:05:01 --> 0:05:03 Thank you for sharing your time with us. 79 0:05:03 --> 0:05:08 I'll give you a quick intro for those who didn't get the invitation. 80 0:05:10 --> 0:05:14 So Clayton is the 2025 Brownstone Fellow. 81 0:05:14 --> 0:05:15 And I'm a big fan. 82 0:05:15 --> 0:05:21 I've been a long time subscriber to Brownstone Institute. 83 0:05:21 --> 0:05:23 Jeffrey Tucker is the Clayton, the founder. 84 0:05:23 --> 0:05:24 That's right. 85 0:05:24 --> 0:05:25 That's correct. 86 0:05:25 --> 0:05:27 Congratulations on being a Brownstone Fellow. 87 0:05:27 --> 0:05:31 And you're a senior fellow with the Independent Medical Alliance. 88 0:05:31 --> 0:05:36 You're an internal medicine physician with 25 plus years in clinical practice. 89 0:05:36 --> 0:05:39 You've held numerous academic medical appointments 90 0:05:39 --> 0:05:41 and your work has appeared in many journals, 91 0:05:42 --> 0:05:44 including the Journal of the American Medical Association 92 0:05:44 --> 0:05:45 and the New England Journal of Medicine. 93 0:05:45 --> 0:05:50 From 2012 to 2018, Clayton was clinical associate professor 94 0:05:50 --> 0:05:53 of medical humanities and bioethics at the University of Rochester. 95 0:05:54 --> 0:05:58 And Clayton is the author of the book, The Medical Masquerade. 96 0:05:58 --> 0:06:01 A physician exposes the deceptions of COVID. 97 0:06:02 --> 0:06:05 Available at Amazon, Barnes and Noble and Lulu. 98 0:06:05 --> 0:06:10 So Clayton, can you put that link into the chat? 99 0:06:11 --> 0:06:12 The Medical Masquerade. 100 0:06:12 --> 0:06:14 In fact, easy to find. 101 0:06:14 --> 0:06:19 And you can follow Clayton on X at CJ Baker MD. 102 0:06:20 --> 0:06:24 So thank you also to Stephen Frost for starting this group. 103 0:06:24 --> 0:06:27 Clayton, type that in there so people can buy your book. 104 0:06:27 --> 0:06:28 I will. 105 0:06:28 --> 0:06:34 And the link in there and your ex Twitter and your ex handle, ex.com handle. 106 0:06:35 --> 0:06:35 I will do that. 107 0:06:36 --> 0:06:37 Well done on writing a book. 108 0:06:37 --> 0:06:40 I've written two books, co-authored another two books. 109 0:06:40 --> 0:06:42 It's a lot of work and there are some people here. 110 0:06:42 --> 0:06:44 I think Jerome Corsi has written 30 books 111 0:06:45 --> 0:06:47 and Dave Raznick's written a number of books. 112 0:06:47 --> 0:06:50 Clayton and Thomas Bender's probably written a few books 113 0:06:50 --> 0:06:51 and Robert Harper's probably written a few books. 114 0:06:53 --> 0:06:54 And on we go. 115 0:06:55 --> 0:06:56 Over to you, Clayton. 116 0:06:56 --> 0:06:57 Thank you for joining us. 117 0:06:58 --> 0:06:58 Very well. 118 0:06:58 --> 0:07:00 Thank you very much for having me. 119 0:07:00 --> 0:07:02 And Stephen, thank you for contacting me. 120 0:07:02 --> 0:07:05 It's a real pleasure and honor. 121 0:07:05 --> 0:07:06 I'm familiar with this group. 122 0:07:07 --> 0:07:14 I've seen your, I've sort of, I think way back a couple of years ago, kind of, 123 0:07:14 --> 0:07:16 what's the word? 124 0:07:17 --> 0:07:18 Skulked is the wrong word. 125 0:07:18 --> 0:07:19 What do they call it? 126 0:07:19 --> 0:07:19 Lurking. 127 0:07:19 --> 0:07:24 I think when you just go and listen in to an online thing. 128 0:07:25 --> 0:07:26 We like lurkers here. 129 0:07:26 --> 0:07:27 We like trolls as well. 130 0:07:27 --> 0:07:30 As soon as they shine their head, we chop them off. 131 0:07:30 --> 0:07:36 And if no one's criticizing you, then you're really not coming up with new ideas. 132 0:07:36 --> 0:07:38 So we get plenty of criticism. 133 0:07:38 --> 0:07:41 So Clayton, I'm glad you've had access to us. 134 0:07:41 --> 0:07:43 So you know what we like. 135 0:07:43 --> 0:07:48 And I'm genuine when I say, you know, it's a free space environment, 136 0:07:48 --> 0:07:51 but relevant to the topic that we're talking about, whatever you're talking about. 137 0:07:52 --> 0:07:52 Correct. 138 0:07:52 --> 0:07:58 So, well, Stephen and I spoke a little bit yesterday and there were two issues that 139 0:07:58 --> 0:08:02 I've written about was a number of issues I've written about, but there's two that 140 0:08:02 --> 0:08:05 he expressed, I think some interest in having me talk about. 141 0:08:05 --> 0:08:10 I know you all have had Kirk Moore from Utah in the United States on the show. 142 0:08:11 --> 0:08:20 And as you all may know, Kirk Moore is a physician in the United States who in 2021 and 22 took 143 0:08:20 --> 0:08:25 action on his own to protect his patients from the COVID jabs. 144 0:08:26 --> 0:08:33 And he, for those people who wish to do so, he provided them with false COVID 145 0:08:34 --> 0:08:39 documentation in the form of these little ID cards that they were producing for everyone who 146 0:08:39 --> 0:08:40 got the vaccines. 147 0:08:41 --> 0:08:45 Without them, there were in various states in the United States, it was different in each state, 148 0:08:45 --> 0:08:51 but you would be denied access to certain aspects of polite society or even being able to go to 149 0:08:51 --> 0:08:55 your job or whatever if you didn't have evidence that you had been vaccinated. 150 0:08:56 --> 0:09:01 And so Kirk took it upon himself, along with a couple of people in his practice, to provide 151 0:09:01 --> 0:09:07 people who wished vaccine cards that were given despite the fact that they had not actually 152 0:09:08 --> 0:09:09 received the vaccine. 153 0:09:10 --> 0:09:15 And he was subsequently brought up on criminal charges in the United States for doing this. 154 0:09:17 --> 0:09:23 In January 2023, he was charged by the US Department of Justice, run by the 155 0:09:25 --> 0:09:31 AG under Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, with offenses that could have totaled up to 35 156 0:09:31 --> 0:09:32 years in prison for this. 157 0:09:33 --> 0:09:38 Now, of course, the charges that he was charged with were not obviously violent 158 0:09:39 --> 0:09:40 crimes or anything of that nature. 159 0:09:40 --> 0:09:46 It was things like conspiracy to defraud the United States because he was supposedly issuing 160 0:09:46 --> 0:09:51 these fake vaccination cards, conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government 161 0:09:51 --> 0:09:56 property for allegedly getting rid of these COVID vaccines, and so on. 162 0:09:56 --> 0:10:02 So it was all these very, how shall I say it, indistinct kind of, not thought crimes, 163 0:10:02 --> 0:10:09 but these sort of nonviolent sort of crimes that were somewhat cooked up as basically 164 0:10:09 --> 0:10:11 thwarting the desire of the federal government. 165 0:10:13 --> 0:10:24 And despite President Trump winning the 2024 elections, this year he was up on trial, 166 0:10:24 --> 0:10:30 and Trump's new Department of Justice was continuing to pursue this case. 167 0:10:31 --> 0:10:39 It became kind of a cause celebre in the United States, and they actually went through the first 168 0:10:39 --> 0:10:45 three days of the trial, and by all accounts the trial was not going well for the prosecution. 169 0:10:45 --> 0:10:53 And during the weekend break in the trial, the attorney general, Trump appointed and 170 0:10:53 --> 0:10:59 approved attorney general, a woman by the name of Pam Bondi, decided to drop the case. 171 0:11:00 --> 0:11:06 And it was interesting because what she had said, two things that she had said was that, 172 0:11:08 --> 0:11:09 I'm going to read it for you. 173 0:11:09 --> 0:11:15 She said, at my discretion, the Justice Department has dismissed charges against Dr. Kirk Moore. 174 0:11:15 --> 0:11:19 Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. 175 0:11:20 --> 0:11:22 He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. 176 0:11:22 --> 0:11:23 It ends today. 177 0:11:24 --> 0:11:26 And then she added another, this was all on Twitter, 178 0:11:27 --> 0:11:32 this would not have been possible without Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, 179 0:11:32 --> 0:11:33 who brought the case to my attention. 180 0:11:33 --> 0:11:37 She's been a warrior for Dr. Moore and for ending the weaponization of government. 181 0:11:38 --> 0:11:41 But when all of this happened, I actually know Kirk a little bit. 182 0:11:42 --> 0:11:47 Over the years, he and I have spoken, and we've kind of become internet friends, if you will. 183 0:11:47 --> 0:11:49 We've not met in person yet, but I hope too soon. 184 0:11:50 --> 0:11:56 And we were in conversation at various points throughout this whole ordeal. 185 0:11:57 --> 0:12:04 And anyway, when that happened, I got in touch with him and I wrote this article for Brownstone, 186 0:12:04 --> 0:12:09 which came out a couple of days after he was exonerated. 187 0:12:09 --> 0:12:12 It's called The Exoneration of Kirk Moore and the Trial of Pam Bondi. 188 0:12:12 --> 0:12:15 It was on July 16th, I think those three or four days afterwards. 189 0:12:16 --> 0:12:19 And my thesis in this essay was two things. 190 0:12:19 --> 0:12:23 It was number one that it was highly unlikely that 191 0:12:24 --> 0:12:27 Attorney General Bondi was not aware of this case. 192 0:12:27 --> 0:12:32 It was just too prominent and she's a very media intense kind of person. 193 0:12:32 --> 0:12:34 I know many of you are not from the United States, 194 0:12:34 --> 0:12:39 so some of the national players in the US of A are not necessarily 195 0:12:40 --> 0:12:41 on your radar screen all the time. 196 0:12:41 --> 0:12:48 But she's a fairly media forward kind of personality, 197 0:12:48 --> 0:12:53 and she's gotten a lot of criticism for basically being, 198 0:12:54 --> 0:12:59 to a lot of people's minds, not very aggressive with a lot of the COVID era criminals. 199 0:12:59 --> 0:13:02 And a lot of other people in the United States have been guilty of, 200 0:13:03 --> 0:13:08 for example, offenses against free speech during the last five years. 201 0:13:08 --> 0:13:13 She kind of talks a good game, but there really haven't been many arrests or charges against anybody. 202 0:13:14 --> 0:13:20 And so at any rate, going into the case, it was pretty clear that 203 0:13:21 --> 0:13:24 her Justice Department, and in fairness to her, 204 0:13:25 --> 0:13:31 what it may be like in other nations, I suspect it's not dissimilar. 205 0:13:31 --> 0:13:34 In the United States, we have such an absolutely gigantic, 206 0:13:34 --> 0:13:39 just an absolute leviathan of a fourth branch of government, 207 0:13:39 --> 0:13:42 which is what is sarcastically called nowadays. 208 0:13:42 --> 0:13:49 Basically, the unelected permanent bureaucracy is so ginormous and just so 209 0:13:51 --> 0:13:54 self-perpetuating that you can bring in a new administration 210 0:13:54 --> 0:13:59 and they can literally never get full operational control over the government. 211 0:14:00 --> 0:14:02 So in fairness to her, she probably did not have, 212 0:14:02 --> 0:14:07 does not even now have full operational control over the Department of Justice, 213 0:14:07 --> 0:14:10 because there's so many career lawyers and career bureaucrats. 214 0:14:10 --> 0:14:13 However, she certainly has the ability to dismiss a case, 215 0:14:13 --> 0:14:19 a prominent case that she finds to be inappropriate. 216 0:14:19 --> 0:14:21 And this did not happen literally until the 11th hour. 217 0:14:23 --> 0:14:25 There was probably a good chance that either way, 218 0:14:25 --> 0:14:30 she was going to have a lot of egg on her face if this case was allowed to go to completion. 219 0:14:30 --> 0:14:37 Well, anyway, gratefully, they did drop the case, as I stated. 220 0:14:38 --> 0:14:40 Again, she kind of did this victory lap. 221 0:14:41 --> 0:14:47 But as you all may know, one of the absolutely concurrent problems that she was facing with 222 0:14:47 --> 0:14:54 at the time was tremendous public outrage over the fact that early on, 223 0:14:54 --> 0:14:57 she had said we're going to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. 224 0:14:57 --> 0:15:01 And then in a week or two prior to the Kirk Moore case was saying, 225 0:15:01 --> 0:15:05 well, there really are no Jeffrey Epstein files to speak of. 226 0:15:05 --> 0:15:09 And it's really not something we're going to get into. 227 0:15:09 --> 0:15:12 And there was a tremendous amount of gaslighting going on. 228 0:15:13 --> 0:15:16 So she was under tremendous pressure based on that. 229 0:15:16 --> 0:15:22 And on top of that, very early on in her tenure, after she had been confirmed, 230 0:15:23 --> 0:15:25 she had dropped a case against Pfizer. 231 0:15:25 --> 0:15:29 Of course, another one of the great COVID era villains for 232 0:15:32 --> 0:15:36 illegal practices abroad in places like Mexico. 233 0:15:36 --> 0:15:39 And as it turned out, when she was in private practice, 234 0:15:39 --> 0:15:43 one of her clients in the past had been Pfizer Corporation. 235 0:15:43 --> 0:15:47 So she was facing a tremendous amount of criticism. 236 0:15:47 --> 0:15:50 And this case didn't seem to be going well. 237 0:15:50 --> 0:15:58 And finally, she dropped the case and Kirk was exonerated. 238 0:15:59 --> 0:16:02 So one of the theses of my statement was that, 239 0:16:03 --> 0:16:08 obviously, no matter how you come to a good result, we're thankful for a good result. 240 0:16:08 --> 0:16:11 And I took some time to go back and say, look, 241 0:16:12 --> 0:16:16 what do someone was talking about Muhammad Ali earlier in the pre-conversation. 242 0:16:16 --> 0:16:27 And this is something that came to mind for me is that a lot of the great minds 243 0:16:28 --> 0:16:34 in ethics in general and in natural law theory were very 244 0:16:36 --> 0:16:42 of one mind with the issue of what do you do when you're faced with a law that is patently unjust. 245 0:16:43 --> 0:16:50 And I started my essay by quoting St. Augustine, who was widely considered to be the father of 246 0:16:51 --> 0:16:55 natural law theory, who said an unjust law is no law at all. 247 0:16:55 --> 0:16:59 Then taking it down to Thomas Jefferson, who, of course, was the principal 248 0:17:00 --> 0:17:04 author of the Declaration of Independence in American history, said, if a law is unjust, 249 0:17:04 --> 0:17:08 a man is not only right to disobey it, he's obligated to do so. 250 0:17:09 --> 0:17:17 And down to Henry David Thoreau, who was a transcendentalist philosopher in the United 251 0:17:17 --> 0:17:23 States, well-known in the United States history, who said that anyone in a free society where the 252 0:17:23 --> 0:17:28 laws are unjust has an obligation to break the law. And then, of course, Martin Luther King, 253 0:17:28 --> 0:17:32 who said one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. 254 0:17:33 --> 0:17:40 And my conclusion from this was I regard Kirk, I mean, Kirk's a personal friend of mine, 255 0:17:40 --> 0:17:46 but I regard him as a hero. And I can't help but think based on their written record that 256 0:17:46 --> 0:17:54 St. Augustine and Thomas Jefferson and Thoreau and MLK wouldn't, I think they would agree with me. 257 0:17:56 --> 0:18:02 And I think that it's funny because once you're long dead or once you've been assassinated by the 258 0:18:02 --> 0:18:08 deep state like Martin Luther King was, then it's OK to make you a hero and it's OK to say that you 259 0:18:09 --> 0:18:14 name streets after you and schools after you and whatnot and appreciate the fact that you're 260 0:18:14 --> 0:18:23 willing to stand up to tyranny even within your own country. But when it's actually happening, 261 0:18:23 --> 0:18:29 you're vilified and you are imprisoned. I went back and did some research. It turned out that 262 0:18:29 --> 0:18:35 Martin Luther King was arrested 29 times over the course of his life. Henry David Thoreau spent time 263 0:18:35 --> 0:18:41 in jail for refusing to pay his taxes on account of what he thought was the injustices of slavery 264 0:18:41 --> 0:18:48 and the injustices of the Mexican War. And, of course, Thomas Jefferson had a price on his head 265 0:18:48 --> 0:18:55 throughout the whole revolution. So, you know, all of these guys were basically criminals 266 0:18:56 --> 0:19:06 for following through on this notion of a natural law based notion that unjust laws are 267 0:19:06 --> 0:19:12 not to be obeyed. And yet, you know, 100, 200 years later, I guess a little quicker in the case of MLK, 268 0:19:12 --> 0:19:18 but he had to pay with his life to get this kind of, I guess, acceleration in his posthumous 269 0:19:18 --> 0:19:25 reputation. You know, then if you, after the fact, when you're long gone, then they 270 0:19:25 --> 0:19:33 consider you to be a hero. And, you know, again, it just takes me back to the issue of, again, 271 0:19:33 --> 0:19:38 someone who was well known to Martin Luther King was, you know, with the Vietnam War, of course, 272 0:19:38 --> 0:19:45 was Muhammad Ali, who we see a very similar treatment in terms of a famous athlete with 273 0:19:45 --> 0:19:50 what happened with Novak Djokovic in the tennis world at the time of the COVID vaccines. 274 0:19:50 --> 0:19:55 You're basically going to be vilified and you're basically going to be told that you can't 275 0:19:55 --> 0:20:01 ply your trade and you're a disgrace and you're a coward and you're all these other terrible things. 276 0:20:01 --> 0:20:06 And yet you come out the other side, if you stand tall, you come out the other side stronger. 277 0:20:07 --> 0:20:13 Unfortunately, a lot of other people, you know, it doesn't stiffen the spine, I guess, of too many 278 0:20:13 --> 0:20:19 people who are willing to give you credit later on. So I thought that this was interesting from 279 0:20:19 --> 0:20:25 a historical standpoint and from a philosophical standpoint that, you know, what Kirk chose to do 280 0:20:25 --> 0:20:32 was, I think, heroic. I think it was in certainly, I mean, I think that the evidence is overwhelming 281 0:20:32 --> 0:20:38 based on the quotes, which I verified of all of these, you know, accepted to be great thinkers 282 0:20:38 --> 0:20:45 from St. Augustine on down. And, you know, this is just the historical pattern. You know, there's 283 0:20:45 --> 0:20:49 not much new under the sun that if you choose to do this, this is the path that you're going to 284 0:20:52 --> 0:20:58 follow. And, you know, I guess the optimistic thing that I would say to a lot of people is, 285 0:20:58 --> 0:21:03 you know, he wasn't destroyed, he wasn't obliterated, he came out the other end. And, 286 0:21:04 --> 0:21:08 you know, I was joking with him. It's kind of like the quote in Star Wars where he says, 287 0:21:08 --> 0:21:13 if you kill me, I'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine. And fortunately, 288 0:21:13 --> 0:21:18 he didn't get killed. But I think he's got a moral authority now that the people that tried to do this 289 0:21:18 --> 0:21:24 to him simply don't have. The final thing that I said in my article that I thought was hopeful was, 290 0:21:24 --> 0:21:30 you know, we really need to point out to our people in positions of power, whether it's our AG, 291 0:21:30 --> 0:21:34 Pam Bondi, who for all of her faults is infinitely better than Merrick Garland. 292 0:21:35 --> 0:21:42 It's absolutely inconceivable that such a result would have come out of a continuation of a Garland 293 0:21:42 --> 0:21:50 run Department of Justice. But I think we need to, regardless of what their imperfect 294 0:21:50 --> 0:21:56 motivations may have been, I think it's important that we do give credit where it's due when people 295 0:21:56 --> 0:22:00 do make the right decision. And I think it's really important that we encourage them to say, 296 0:22:00 --> 0:22:05 look, this guy was right. You finally came around better late than never and all that. 297 0:22:05 --> 0:22:11 And you need to take this example and see that you doing the right thing under perhaps unpopular 298 0:22:11 --> 0:22:17 circumstances is a winning strategy. It's a winning strategy, ultimately, to kind of go 299 0:22:17 --> 0:22:26 through the fire. So that was sort of a summary of the essay that I wrote that I think may have 300 0:22:26 --> 0:22:34 attracted Kirk and Stephen's interest. I probably would have been quicker just to read it to you, 301 0:22:34 --> 0:22:41 but there's the summary. So I'd be welcome to hear what anyone else had to say. The other article 302 0:22:41 --> 0:22:47 that people have taken an interest in, and it's the first article in my book that may be worth 303 0:22:47 --> 0:22:51 looking at from the standpoint of you all because you all have such an interest in ethics was 304 0:22:52 --> 0:22:56 the first one I actually wrote for Brownstone. It's called The Four Pillars of Medical Ethics 305 0:22:56 --> 0:23:01 Were Destroyed in the COVID Response. This is back two years ago now, a little over two years ago, 306 0:23:01 --> 0:23:09 May of 2023. And it's the first major one in my book here. That's out of focus, but that's okay. 307 0:23:09 --> 0:23:16 But essentially what I did is I took it as kind of an exercise to go through all of the 308 0:23:17 --> 0:23:24 fundamental tenets of medical ethics, autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and then 309 0:23:24 --> 0:23:31 go on into the sub-topics within that. So for example, autonomy, of course, a lot of that is 310 0:23:31 --> 0:23:38 informed consent, and informed consent has multiple sub-characteristics and so on. 311 0:23:38 --> 0:23:44 And I essentially went through those with a review of what happened during COVID and realized that 312 0:23:44 --> 0:23:52 literally every single one of these major pillars and these sub-tenets were, it wasn't just some of 313 0:23:52 --> 0:23:57 them were dispensed with, they all were dispensed with. The whole concept of medical ethics was 314 0:23:57 --> 0:24:02 completely thrown out the window, was just declared null and void, and was just dismissed with for 315 0:24:03 --> 0:24:09 at least two years. And we're still clawing our way out of it now. And we may, who knows 316 0:24:09 --> 0:24:15 whether we ever really will get fully out of it. So I had expected that to be a 317 0:24:17 --> 0:24:21 thousand word essay or something, talking about the four main tenets. And I went through the whole 318 0:24:22 --> 0:24:28 basically the whole textbook on medical ethics and found that not a single aspect of it, not 319 0:24:28 --> 0:24:36 a single substantial aspect of it was retained intact. So we're dealing with something where it 320 0:24:36 --> 0:24:45 simply was a matter of tossing everything aside. And I think that part of the reason for that, 321 0:24:45 --> 0:24:50 isn't it something that we all need to, in my opinion, be aware of, is that this was really a 322 0:24:50 --> 0:24:53 military operation at the end of the day. It certainly wasn't the United States. It was 323 0:24:53 --> 0:25:01 basically turned over to Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense to the point 324 0:25:01 --> 0:25:08 where you're basically, they're taking a sort of a martial law kind of standing on this. And when 325 0:25:08 --> 0:25:14 you apply martial law, what happens to habeas corpus, what happens to other fundamental rights, 326 0:25:14 --> 0:25:20 they get tossed aside. And so I think one of the things we have to be willing to do is to realize 327 0:25:20 --> 0:25:24 that that's what happened, that it's not an accident that the ethics were thrown away. It's 328 0:25:24 --> 0:25:32 basically because without telling us, all of our, we were all placed under martial law and they 329 0:25:32 --> 0:25:39 don't have a right to do that. As we all know, they have no right to say, well, the plagues come to 330 0:25:39 --> 0:25:44 town, therefore your rights are null and void. That's not in any constitution, certainly not in 331 0:25:44 --> 0:25:50 the United States Constitution. And I'll say one other thing about that. I had a friend who was a 332 0:25:52 --> 0:25:57 cardiologist and I met him in the hardware store in the middle of 2020 when things were just 333 0:25:57 --> 0:26:06 starting to reopen. And I said, this is insane. I said, we have a bill of rights. And he said to me, 334 0:26:06 --> 0:26:14 well, the founding fathers didn't know much about infectious disease. And I said, oh, really? 335 0:26:15 --> 0:26:19 You didn't know that Thomas Jefferson lost a couple of his kids to cholera, did you? You didn't 336 0:26:19 --> 0:26:26 know that George Washington survived smallpox. He had smallpox. Or that Benjamin Rush, who was a 337 0:26:26 --> 0:26:30 physician, who was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence after it was over, 338 0:26:30 --> 0:26:37 went over to England to get the Edward Jenner vaccine. He was interested in that. So these 339 0:26:37 --> 0:26:42 people had absolutely no clue about infectious disease, but they had all lost family members. 340 0:26:42 --> 0:26:47 They had a much better idea of infectious disease than we did because it was a constant threat. 341 0:26:47 --> 0:26:51 And yet there was nothing written in here that you have a right to assembly, you have a right 342 0:26:51 --> 0:26:56 to worship, you have a right to speech, you have a right to all these other fundamental to earn a 343 0:26:56 --> 0:27:03 living unless cholera comes to town. That was not written into it. And they knew darn well that 344 0:27:03 --> 0:27:09 that was a possibility. So I think all of these arguments takes us into one other area that I 345 0:27:09 --> 0:27:13 could talk about if people are interested. It's just basically the history of public health. 346 0:27:13 --> 0:27:24 And history, public health as a subtopic of medicine is really going all the way back to 347 0:27:24 --> 0:27:31 Rudolf Wirkow in Germany is really a quasi-military concept from the very beginning. 348 0:27:31 --> 0:27:37 And it really was even in Wirkow's day considered to be a potential method of state control. 349 0:27:37 --> 0:27:43 The Prussians like to do that kind of thing. And that's absolutely where it began. That's 350 0:27:43 --> 0:27:47 absolutely where it came from. It came down through the Rockefeller Foundation and so on, 351 0:27:48 --> 0:27:53 that these are in the United States, that this is a method of population control. 352 0:27:54 --> 0:27:59 The Centers for Disease Control, I think it's less about disease and it's more about control. 353 0:28:00 --> 0:28:05 But anyway, we can get into that some more if you want. So I've tossed out a bunch of ideas and I 354 0:28:05 --> 0:28:09 don't know if people have any interest in talking about that. 355 0:28:09 --> 0:28:15 Clayton, it's Stephen here. We'd be very interested in a ported history of public health. 356 0:28:15 --> 0:28:20 Because I remember professors talking at medical school about public health, 357 0:28:20 --> 0:28:25 but we weren't clued up, or at least I wasn't clued up enough to understand what they were 358 0:28:25 --> 0:28:31 saying. But I remember essentially that the suggestion was from some of these professors 359 0:28:31 --> 0:28:38 that public health was dangerous from the point of view of the public. They could be used as a weapon 360 0:28:39 --> 0:28:44 by governments of the future. So I think it's, they knew then, you see, some of them did. 361 0:28:45 --> 0:28:47 Not all, but some of them. 362 0:28:47 --> 0:28:55 Yeah, I think you're fortunate that you had people teaching it to you that were as open about it as 363 0:28:55 --> 0:29:01 that. Because quite frankly, I was taught that, at best, I was taught, and I went to medical school 364 0:29:01 --> 0:29:07 in Canada at McGill University, which back then was still quite British in its style, more so I 365 0:29:07 --> 0:29:15 think than American. I felt I got a very solid basic education, such as it was at the time. 366 0:29:15 --> 0:29:22 But what I heard from public health was, look, that it really started out, and again, I think 367 0:29:22 --> 0:29:27 they were honest at that time about what it constituted to some extent, because it hadn't 368 0:29:27 --> 0:29:33 been totally captured by pharma and by, I think, military mindset at that time, although I think 369 0:29:33 --> 0:29:38 there was a danger of it. When I was taught about public health, you started with, say, 370 0:29:38 --> 0:29:44 John Snow and the pump handle in London for the cholera epidemic, and you said, okay, this is how 371 0:29:44 --> 0:29:50 someone does this detective work to figure out where infectious disease is coming from. 372 0:29:50 --> 0:29:56 And even if you don't know the exact mechanism, you can make interventions that improve public 373 0:29:56 --> 0:30:06 health and prevent mass illness. And then it proceeded on to invariably, to some extent, 374 0:30:06 --> 0:30:12 talking about vaccination. And of course, the whole vaccination story or the whole vaccination 375 0:30:13 --> 0:30:20 mythos that exists kicks in soon thereafter. I think one of the big problems with that is that 376 0:30:20 --> 0:30:27 there's a gigantic disconnect in the facts with vaccination. And I don't have the pictures in 377 0:30:27 --> 0:30:34 front of me, but the reality is that most of the public health benefits in terms of reduction in 378 0:30:34 --> 0:30:43 disease from sanitation, clean water, and so on, had already happened and had already achieved 379 0:30:43 --> 0:30:51 the overwhelming amount of benefit that we were going to achieve prior to the institution of most 380 0:30:51 --> 0:30:56 vaccines. Now, of course, smallpox would be an exception because that had been around for 381 0:30:56 --> 0:31:07 over 200 years. But the modern ones, post-date decreases in infectious disease outbreaks 382 0:31:08 --> 0:31:15 in terms of instituting these vaccines as the cure. That kind of has conveniently been swept 383 0:31:15 --> 0:31:19 under the rug, although fortunately it's coming back to the fore once again, and people are 384 0:31:19 --> 0:31:24 becoming more aware that, for example, tetanus, you know, there's about 30 cases of tetanus in 385 0:31:24 --> 0:31:32 the United States every year, those 330 million people in the United States. So your odds in your 386 0:31:32 --> 0:31:40 lifetime of being hit by lightning are supposedly around one in 30,000. So, you know, your odds of 387 0:31:40 --> 0:31:47 getting tetanus are dramatically less than being struck by lightning. And, you know, a large 388 0:31:47 --> 0:31:51 percentage of patients, I take care of patients, I would say a lot of my patients are way beyond 389 0:31:51 --> 0:31:56 10 years. Technically, they should be due for a tetanus booster. So if you really need a tetanus 390 0:31:56 --> 0:32:01 shot every 10 years, it ain't that that's keeping it down to 30 cases a year. It's that it's 391 0:32:01 --> 0:32:09 exceedingly rare. The reality is that most of tetanus, when it was a problem, was because there 392 0:32:09 --> 0:32:16 was a lot of horse manure and dead horses, quite frankly, in the large cities in the United States. 393 0:32:16 --> 0:32:26 And that was the vehicle through which people would contract tetanus. But now, you know, there 394 0:32:26 --> 0:32:30 really isn't a lot of horse manure, and even in New York City, I was just in New York City, there's 395 0:32:30 --> 0:32:36 manure, but it isn't horses. But anyway, it's, you know, that's just simply the case that once you got 396 0:32:36 --> 0:32:43 past this primary source of the infection, you really don't see that anymore. Now, the notion 397 0:32:43 --> 0:32:49 that you need a tetanus shot every 10 years just seems statistically implausible. Furthermore, 398 0:32:50 --> 0:32:54 you know, nowadays, at least in the United States, you don't get it just a tetanus booster, 399 0:32:54 --> 0:32:59 you get a Tdap. So you get tetanus diphtheria and pertussis, which means you're getting a 400 0:33:00 --> 0:33:06 cocktail of three, because one of them supposedly needs a booster. And so, you know, we really start 401 0:33:06 --> 0:33:12 very quickly, even with that one vaccination, we start seeing how this becomes a bit of a shell 402 0:33:12 --> 0:33:18 game. We've got a problem, which is trying to present, which is exceedingly rare, 403 0:33:19 --> 0:33:24 we've in which the primary problem for which has already been established and taken care of. 404 0:33:24 --> 0:33:30 Then we've got this subscription model where people are supposed to continue to be on it, 405 0:33:30 --> 0:33:35 even though it's not clear that they need it. You know, we're not testing titers, we're just saying 406 0:33:35 --> 0:33:41 this is the rule of thumb that you're supposed to do. And essentially, if you run into the office 407 0:33:41 --> 0:33:46 and into the office or into the emergency room, and you're more than now they're saying seven to 408 0:33:46 --> 0:33:51 10 years out, so you're more than seven years out, and you cut yourself on something, you know, 409 0:33:51 --> 0:33:58 now you're due for this cocktail of three shots. There's really not good basis behind it in any 410 0:33:58 --> 0:34:06 way, shape or form. It's a shell game. And this is what we're dealing with in so many different 411 0:34:06 --> 0:34:14 ways with all of these products. There's really not good. It's just partly habit, it's partly 412 0:34:14 --> 0:34:23 coercion. And that's what we're faced with in terms of modern, quote unquote, public health. 413 0:34:23 --> 0:34:28 I think the other thing that I really would point out, and this is going to sound perhaps a little 414 0:34:28 --> 0:34:35 bit dark for people, but I think it's important to say, is that in my opinion, and I've written 415 0:34:35 --> 0:34:44 extensively on this, the entire concept of this pandemic preparedness situation is a, it's, 416 0:34:44 --> 0:34:49 I think the term is improper, but it's what we hear all the time is a Hegelian dialectic. 417 0:34:49 --> 0:34:58 The likelihood that those SARS viruses that the Bat Lady got out of those caves in southern China 418 0:34:59 --> 0:35:05 back in the 2010s would have ever caused COVID if they hadn't been sent all around the world to 419 0:35:05 --> 0:35:12 Ralph Baric's lab in North Carolina and maybe to the Naid lab in Montana, maybe somewhere else, 420 0:35:12 --> 0:35:17 and certainly back to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If those had been just, if those bats 421 0:35:17 --> 0:35:23 had been left alone and if nobody had been weaponizing those viruses, COVID never would 422 0:35:23 --> 0:35:28 have happened. But the whole precept or the whole excuse or the whole justification that they give 423 0:35:29 --> 0:35:35 for this whole operation is, well, we have to find these things and we have to monkey with them or 424 0:35:35 --> 0:35:40 else they're going to cause trouble. But in fact, I don't even think they're misguided in that. I 425 0:35:40 --> 0:35:44 think they know darn well that they're weaponizing these viruses and then they're providing, it's 426 0:35:44 --> 0:35:50 the classic problem reaction solution type of thing. And that's the whole, that's the entire, 427 0:35:50 --> 0:35:55 entire pandemic preparedness model. It's deliberately creating the problem. It's 428 0:35:55 --> 0:36:01 deliberately creating the reaction, the panic and whatever, and then they have the solution. 429 0:36:01 --> 0:36:07 And I think we really have to realize that now it's not even, I think it's a three stage kind of 430 0:36:07 --> 0:36:13 situation. If we look back at public health, it's this old concept, legitimate concept that there 431 0:36:13 --> 0:36:19 are interventions we can make, like cleaning up the water supply or getting the horse manure off 432 0:36:19 --> 0:36:25 the street that actually help. But then we managed to realize we can't really make a ton of money 433 0:36:25 --> 0:36:30 doing that. We can make a ton of money producing vaccines. So we insert the vaccines in there as 434 0:36:30 --> 0:36:36 the next step in the process. And then we don't make enough money doing that. Why? We'll actually 435 0:36:36 --> 0:36:42 make the pathogen with the custom made, custom made vaccine to go with it. And so it's kind of 436 0:36:42 --> 0:36:48 a three step degradation of public health from something legitimate, perhaps back in John Snow's 437 0:36:48 --> 0:36:54 day to something completely, frankly, evil in Anthony Fauci's day. And I think this is a long 438 0:36:54 --> 0:37:03 downward slide that we've seen that area of supposed scientific inquiry descend to. 439 0:37:05 --> 0:37:11 And indeed I interviewed Carrie Mardet on tetanus. She's quite an expert on tetanus. 440 0:37:11 --> 0:37:16 And even that word, you know, what is tetanus in this whole conversation? You know, how do you know 441 0:37:17 --> 0:37:25 you've got tetanus? So having heard Carrie on it, and I certainly wouldn't take a tetanus shot 442 0:37:25 --> 0:37:31 because I stood on a rusty nail in that whole game. And she looked for that research on the evidence 443 0:37:31 --> 0:37:39 of the efficacy of those shots. So are you ready for questions, Clayton? Sure. Those wonderful three 444 0:37:39 --> 0:37:45 topics. I'll have you know that I live in a suburb in Melbourne, Australia. The suburb next to us 445 0:37:45 --> 0:37:51 is called Clayton. So there you are. Must be named after your family, although they might be in the UK, 446 0:37:51 --> 0:37:59 a place called Clayton. Now the risks that people pushing back against unjust laws, 447 0:37:59 --> 0:38:06 I've also mentioned in this group last in July last month, every signatory, the 56 signatories 448 0:38:06 --> 0:38:10 to the US Declaration of Independence committed technical treason. They all put their lives on the 449 0:38:10 --> 0:38:18 line to sign that declaration. So we've often had the conversation in these meetings Clayton, where 450 0:38:18 --> 0:38:24 if we're not willing to suffer for freedom, then we're bullshitters. So that willingness to fight 451 0:38:24 --> 0:38:30 for what we believe in these issues. And if we don't, we will certainly, we will certainly lose 452 0:38:30 --> 0:38:36 them. And I have I've practiced law for 20 years, I have many, many lawyers, friends in high places in 453 0:38:36 --> 0:38:40 Australia. And when I say to them, I'm appalled at the attacks on freedoms, they say, what are 454 0:38:40 --> 0:38:48 you talking about? So the lawyers even within the system cannot have observed no attacks on freedoms. 455 0:38:48 --> 0:38:54 They think like most doctors, what's happened is, you know, totally acceptable. We're protecting people. 456 0:38:55 --> 0:39:04 So and lastly, the Magna Carta in 1215 came about because of the king acting in unjust ways. So 457 0:39:05 --> 0:39:12 we have the legacy, the 800 plus years legacy, in fact, 810 year legacy of the Magna Carta. 458 0:39:13 --> 0:39:18 All right, Stephen, over to you for the next 15 minutes, a whole bunch of very interesting topics. 459 0:39:18 --> 0:39:21 And then we go to other questions from lots of other people. I'm sure there will be because I've 460 0:39:21 --> 0:39:27 got a stack of questions. Go Stephen. Yeah, so Clayton, thank you very much for that presentation. 461 0:39:28 --> 0:39:33 And I just wanted to ask you, you're in New York State and New York State, as I 462 0:39:33 --> 0:39:39 understood it from the UK was really badly affected during the so called pandemic, 463 0:39:39 --> 0:39:46 which wasn't a pandemic, in my opinion. So and California and I think those are probably the 464 0:39:46 --> 0:39:53 two worst states, but I think the New England states were pretty bad too. But I think the 465 0:39:54 --> 0:40:00 most the worst damage was done in to businesses and such like was probably done in California 466 0:40:00 --> 0:40:06 and New York. And it was a shock to me that they were as woke as they were. I wonder whether you 467 0:40:06 --> 0:40:15 can remember in the details of how life was in New York and what you thought of what was going on in 468 0:40:15 --> 0:40:24 2020 and 2021 and 2022 for that matter, because actually the pandemic was official until the 469 0:40:25 --> 0:40:33 11th of May 2023, when for the first time people who haven't been vaccinated could actually enter 470 0:40:33 --> 0:40:42 the United States. So medical apartheid for from October 2021 to May the 11th of 2023. 471 0:40:42 --> 0:40:49 I just wondered what your idea of what was going on in the United States, your reaction to it, 472 0:40:49 --> 0:40:57 compared with New York and how bad was life really in New York State with of course New York City 473 0:40:57 --> 0:41:07 and Los Angeles, two big targets for these freaks? Yeah, thank you for that. I would say that it was 474 0:41:07 --> 0:41:14 pretty bad. New York City, of course, was the worst because New York City has a whole 475 0:41:14 --> 0:41:22 level of governance, if you want to call it that, misgovernance on a daily basis that the rest of 476 0:41:22 --> 0:41:29 the state doesn't have, but it does have also the population center. So we travel along with it. 477 0:41:30 --> 0:41:40 And so as you may know, we were one of the initial areas where there was this tremendous 478 0:41:40 --> 0:41:47 intensity of deaths or purported deaths. And there were certainly deaths in New York City. 479 0:41:47 --> 0:41:55 How many of them were due to the treatment protocols is arguable. But that was definitely 480 0:41:56 --> 0:42:04 something that was very prominent in the very early stages of the 2020 even, you say, 481 0:42:04 --> 0:42:08 in the first three months of the pandemic, say March, April, May, 482 0:42:09 --> 0:42:14 that was the era shortly thereafter in which they started sending the patients back to 483 0:42:15 --> 0:42:21 the nursing homes that were recovering from COVID. And you had all those additional nursing home 484 0:42:21 --> 0:42:25 deaths that happened in a number of states. And of course, New York State was one of those. 485 0:42:25 --> 0:42:37 I recall in mid-2020, I'm in Rochester, which is about five hours from New York City by car, 486 0:42:37 --> 0:42:42 that they actually took, it was actually earlier than that, it was probably April, 487 0:42:43 --> 0:42:48 they took, were asking for volunteers and physicians to go down and spell some of the 488 0:42:48 --> 0:42:55 people that were so exhausted in New York City. And I actually considered doing that. 489 0:42:55 --> 0:43:01 We had a child at home that was having issues, not COVID related, but was out of school and 490 0:43:01 --> 0:43:06 was struggling. And so I didn't end up going, but I had one fairly close friend who did. 491 0:43:06 --> 0:43:13 And the fascinating thing was she went down for a week and did nothing, was not really employed in 492 0:43:13 --> 0:43:18 any meaningful way. This is a pediatric emergency room physician, so somebody who had 493 0:43:18 --> 0:43:26 the skillset to be able to man an inpatient ward or man potentially an ICU or something if necessary 494 0:43:26 --> 0:43:34 and really was kind of standing by for a week. So again, nothing made sense. Life was difficult 495 0:43:34 --> 0:43:40 because we were essentially locked down. You could go to the grocery store, you could go to the home 496 0:43:40 --> 0:43:49 depot, which is our big box hardware store kind of thing, and a couple of other places, the Walmart 497 0:43:49 --> 0:43:55 and so on. But you couldn't, all of the small town, all the smaller businesses were shut down. 498 0:43:56 --> 0:44:04 Now how it was, of course the liquor stores were open. How you could be safe going and buying booze 499 0:44:04 --> 0:44:12 or buying two by fours at the big hardware store, but be in danger if you went to the 500 0:44:12 --> 0:44:20 corner store was never spelled out to anybody. The schools were closed and the kids were all doing 501 0:44:20 --> 0:44:24 completely quote unquote remote learning, which meant they were doing absolutely nothing. 502 0:44:25 --> 0:44:31 And it was pretty much a given that we were not going to get the kids back into school during that 503 0:44:32 --> 0:44:39 school year. Now myself as a practicing physician for about two weeks, I was told I couldn't come 504 0:44:39 --> 0:44:43 into the office, but soon they let me go into the office and I went in the very first day I could. 505 0:44:43 --> 0:44:48 And I said, I don't want any remote, any remote nonsense. Just I'm supposed to take care of my 506 0:44:48 --> 0:44:52 patients. Let me go and take care of my patients. And for the most part, I was able to do that. 507 0:44:53 --> 0:44:59 But did they make you, so did they make you, for example, wear a mask to treat your patients? 508 0:44:59 --> 0:45:07 They instructed everyone to wear that. Yeah, you had to at that point to wear a mask and all that 509 0:45:07 --> 0:45:11 stuff just while you're in the office. Absolutely. I'm an employed physician. So yes, I was told to 510 0:45:11 --> 0:45:18 do that. I can't say I was 100% compliant, but I was certainly instructed to do it. 511 0:45:21 --> 0:45:26 Did you realize then, Clayton, that it was an important psychological thing, the mask, 512 0:45:27 --> 0:45:33 so I never wore a mask at any time, even though people were telling me I just wouldn't do it. 513 0:45:33 --> 0:45:41 I just knew that if I wore a mask that would make me worse. I knew I had to resist it to survive. 514 0:45:42 --> 0:45:50 But obviously, I understand that other people didn't, but was there a lot of pressure on 515 0:45:50 --> 0:45:55 people in New York State, for example, upstate New York to wear a mask? 516 0:45:55 --> 0:46:01 Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. The masking was, if you went into the store, I remember going into, 517 0:46:01 --> 0:46:07 now again, I don't know how many of you are from foreign, not from the United States, 518 0:46:07 --> 0:46:13 perhaps I'm the foreigner here, but some of the places that are sort of, everyone knows in the 519 0:46:13 --> 0:46:20 United States because of these giant conglomerates, but you'd go into Costco, which is the big box store 520 0:46:20 --> 0:46:25 where you buy too much of everything, too many paper towels and all that. 521 0:46:25 --> 0:46:29 And I would not wear my mask. I just wouldn't do it. And I would be, most people would look 522 0:46:29 --> 0:46:35 askance at me and then every so often I'd take crap from people. More than once I walked out 523 0:46:35 --> 0:46:42 of stores because they wouldn't cash me out. So it was pretty bad. And this went on for a while. 524 0:46:42 --> 0:46:49 I mean, this went on for most of 2020 and into 2021. In some ways, it got worse in 2021 because 525 0:46:49 --> 0:46:55 that's really when once Biden was declared the winner, magically the vaccines were considered 526 0:46:55 --> 0:47:00 to be something everyone wanted to take. There was actually some pushback against the vaccines 527 0:47:02 --> 0:47:09 at the very end of 2020 while the elections were going on because they were Trump's vaccines. 528 0:47:09 --> 0:47:12 And if they were Trump's vaccines, a lot of people said, I'm not going to take them. 529 0:47:12 --> 0:47:20 I mean, I'm in a relatively, you know, I'm in a place that's 55 Democrat, 45 Republican on a good 530 0:47:20 --> 0:47:30 day. And of course, New York City is probably 80, 20. So, you know, this was the mindset. But then 531 0:47:30 --> 0:47:34 once Biden was declared the winner, you know, then there became this very strong push. And particularly 532 0:47:34 --> 0:47:42 when his administration took over, there's a very strong push for mandatory vaccination. 533 0:47:42 --> 0:47:47 And then it became an issue of not being able to participate in society, even though things had 534 0:47:47 --> 0:47:53 opened up if you did not have your vaccine cards. And that's where the whole issue that came up with 535 0:47:53 --> 0:48:00 with Kirk Moore. So this is now into 2021. Taking it back to the summer of 2020, you know, 536 0:48:00 --> 0:48:05 we're basically at home. Most of the time you'd go and you'd shop and whatever, but you mostly 537 0:48:05 --> 0:48:12 stayed at home. And a lot of people, there's all these rules about large gatherings. You weren't 538 0:48:12 --> 0:48:17 supposed to meet people for Thanksgiving, which is a big holiday in the United States. This was in 539 0:48:17 --> 0:48:22 November. But in the summer, you know, basically a lot of people would just go to work and come home 540 0:48:22 --> 0:48:26 and do very little else. Of course, that's deadly for these small businesses, restaurants and 541 0:48:26 --> 0:48:32 whatnot. But that's what was going on. And it was clear to us, a lot of the parents, and I had three 542 0:48:32 --> 0:48:37 kids in high school at the time that it was in New York, at least where we were, it was very unlikely 543 0:48:37 --> 0:48:43 that these kids were going to get back into in-person schooling in the fall of 2020 into 2021. 544 0:48:43 --> 0:48:47 By then, of course, we knew very, very well that, you know, the schools have been open in Scandinavia 545 0:48:47 --> 0:48:53 all along. Everyone was fine. Kids don't get sick from COVID. Nobody dies from COVID. That's under 546 0:48:53 --> 0:49:01 a very, you know, under 40. And so that's when I really became very strongly active. 547 0:49:02 --> 0:49:06 I guess you would call politically because I was pushing very, very hard to try and get schools open 548 0:49:06 --> 0:49:12 for the kids. I thought this was low hanging fruit. I thought this was an absolute no brainer. And of 549 0:49:12 --> 0:49:16 course, in many other states in the United States, the schools were fully open by the fall of 2020, 550 0:49:16 --> 0:49:20 but not in New York. There were a couple of districts, a couple of rural districts that 551 0:49:20 --> 0:49:26 quietly kind of got the job done. And there was actually one county in Long Island, actually quite 552 0:49:26 --> 0:49:32 near New York, but which is more conservative, that the parents were just, I guess, just effective 553 0:49:32 --> 0:49:35 enough that they managed to get their kids back in school all day. Now those kids are in school and 554 0:49:35 --> 0:49:39 they're wearing masks and there's plexiglass and there's insanity all around them, but they're 555 0:49:39 --> 0:49:47 physically in school and they're getting an education. The best they were able to do or the 556 0:49:47 --> 0:49:54 best they were willing to do where we were was two days a week in school. It was never explained 557 0:49:54 --> 0:49:59 why that Wednesday nobody was in school. It was you were in Monday, Thursday, or you were 558 0:49:59 --> 0:50:05 Tuesday, Friday, and then everyone got the day off on Wednesday. And that was just insanity for that 559 0:50:05 --> 0:50:14 whole 2020-2021 school year for the kids. And then- Was that 20 or 21 or both? 560 0:50:15 --> 0:50:23 So right. So if we look back and you look at that March 16th, I think it was, that the declaration 561 0:50:23 --> 0:50:29 in the United States, 16th or 18th, was that we're locking down, the two weeks to flatten the curve. 562 0:50:31 --> 0:50:38 It was pretty clear within a few weeks after that that the schools simply weren't going to be opened 563 0:50:38 --> 0:50:42 in most of the United States for the rest of that school year. And in the United States, 564 0:50:42 --> 0:50:49 the school year is basically September through end of May, early June. So once the summer vacation, 565 0:50:49 --> 0:50:54 which is late June, July, and August, and then right after Labor Day, which is beginning of 566 0:50:54 --> 0:50:59 September, the kids all go back to school. During that summer, there was a lot of effort by myself 567 0:50:59 --> 0:51:04 and others to get the schools fully open in the fall. But that was the period of time when 568 0:51:04 --> 0:51:08 Randy Weingarten, who was that horrific human being in the United States- 569 0:51:08 --> 0:51:15 Oh, the interesting- Wait a minute, Clayton. Oh, yeah. Someone- 570 0:51:15 --> 0:51:21 So, yeah, no, no problem. So that was when the whole kerfuffle went up about getting the schools 571 0:51:21 --> 0:51:27 opened and the teachers unions and so on managed to keep them shut. And so we had this hybrid 572 0:51:27 --> 0:51:33 learning. So we had our cohort split in half, our classes split in half. Half the kids would come 573 0:51:33 --> 0:51:38 in one day, half the kids would come in another day. And since the five-day week, nobody came in 574 0:51:38 --> 0:51:44 on Wednesday. It was just out of insanity for that whole year. And then once we had actually, 575 0:51:44 --> 0:51:50 by March, in our part of New York State, myself and about 20 other people had gotten together and 576 0:51:50 --> 0:51:55 we had put together a lawsuit for the entire state of New York to open up the schools. 577 0:51:56 --> 0:52:05 And it was going to court. And we had internal intelligence that someone had leaked from one of 578 0:52:05 --> 0:52:10 our schools that they had a plan. At least one of the districts had a school to reopen the schools 579 0:52:10 --> 0:52:15 because they thought they were going to lose the case. Unfortunately, the judge at the 11th hour, 580 0:52:15 --> 0:52:20 literally the night before the hearing, recused himself from the case, gave no explanation as to 581 0:52:20 --> 0:52:25 why he had a conflict of interest because by law he didn't have to. And the case was completely 582 0:52:25 --> 0:52:30 torpedoed because they would have to assign a new lawyer and a new judge and all that sort of thing. 583 0:52:30 --> 0:52:37 So we had literally no recourse at that point until the school year was over. So it was bad. 584 0:52:37 --> 0:52:43 We didn't have essentially legal remedies for what we were trying to do. And I was involved at a 585 0:52:43 --> 0:52:51 legal level. I wrote a number of expert affidavits for businesses that were trying to open for 586 0:52:52 --> 0:52:56 kids' sports, that kids could at least play sports outside of school if they couldn't 587 0:52:56 --> 0:53:03 go to school. So I was involved in multiple, multiple of those cases. We won some, we lost 588 0:53:03 --> 0:53:09 but in terms of the schools, there was just too much going on behind the scenes. To some extent, 589 0:53:09 --> 0:53:19 the teachers unions were really running the CDC at that point. So it was just a horrendous situation 590 0:53:19 --> 0:53:25 for the full school year of 2020 into 2021. And we were still fighting- 591 0:53:26 --> 0:53:27 Sorry, go ahead. 592 0:53:27 --> 0:53:31 No, I was just going to say we were still fighting that next summer because there's no guarantee 593 0:53:31 --> 0:53:36 that going into the fall of 2021 that they were even going to have the schools fully open. Now, 594 0:53:36 --> 0:53:40 of course, down in Florida, they'd been open that whole previous school year and their results were 595 0:53:40 --> 0:53:44 better than they were in New York, but it made no difference. People are very provincial. They don't 596 0:53:44 --> 0:53:50 think outside of their own, they don't gather information outside of their own small area. 597 0:53:50 --> 0:53:55 And it was just a constant struggle for over two years. 598 0:53:56 --> 0:54:03 Yeah. So Clayton, you're in New York state. That's one of the worst parts. Of course, 599 0:54:03 --> 0:54:08 New York City was the worst part of New York state, but I think New York state was pretty 600 0:54:08 --> 0:54:14 bad because I knew some people in and know some people in New York state. And so, and I wonder, 601 0:54:14 --> 0:54:20 how long was it before you realized that you were essentially on your own in 2020? And when did you 602 0:54:21 --> 0:54:26 begin to realize that there were some people around you who had some understanding of what was going 603 0:54:26 --> 0:54:32 on and actually agreed with you or were there none? Did you feel very alone for like two years? 604 0:54:33 --> 0:54:40 No, I would say that there was a small but very mobile or mobilized group of people. Actually, 605 0:54:40 --> 0:54:45 it was interesting. My county, which is Monroe County, which is in, it's the county that basically 606 0:54:46 --> 0:54:53 surrounds Rochester, was actually had a, was kind of a hotbed down in the southern part of the state 607 0:54:54 --> 0:55:01 in Long Island. And where we were, were kind of hotbeds of descent. How successful we were, 608 0:55:01 --> 0:55:06 I think we had some successes, but we were, there was just a number of people that happened to 609 0:55:06 --> 0:55:12 cluster there. And we had a group of about 5,000 parents who were on a Facebook page, 610 0:55:13 --> 0:55:18 about 5,000 parents who were on a Facebook group. And it was heavily censored, but we still managed 611 0:55:18 --> 0:55:25 to get the information out. And we ran these lawsuits, we petitioned, we protested, we 612 0:55:26 --> 0:55:33 raised a pretty good stink throughout the whole time. And we managed to get some changes through. 613 0:55:33 --> 0:55:38 I think it could have been worse. I think that large parts of New York state might not have opened 614 0:55:38 --> 0:55:44 for school, for example, initially in that fall period, if we hadn't continued to be active. 615 0:55:44 --> 0:55:49 And I think we came very close to successfully opening the schools in that March of 2021 until 616 0:55:49 --> 0:55:55 we were torpedoed by this judge. So I think that there were certainly were people I knew, 617 0:55:55 --> 0:55:57 but it's a very small group. It was maybe 618 0:56:00 --> 0:56:08 half a dozen, 10 really, really active people and hundreds to a couple of thousand of like 619 0:56:08 --> 0:56:13 minded people that will sort of back you quietly, but won't truly speak out. 620 0:56:14 --> 0:56:20 It was not totally alone. I was grateful for that. But I was the only physician in 621 0:56:21 --> 0:56:28 my part of the state, I would say. There was one other physician's assistant who was very vocal, 622 0:56:28 --> 0:56:36 but I was one of two physicians or physicians assistants in an area of a couple million people. 623 0:56:36 --> 0:56:42 If you take Buffalo and Rochester combined, two people in the medical field, 624 0:56:43 --> 0:56:46 it's a very small number of people that were willing to really stick their necks out. 625 0:56:48 --> 0:56:54 Yeah. So I don't think a lot of people realize how brave Kirk was because he did what all the 626 0:56:54 --> 0:56:59 doctors should have done all around the world. The ones who hadn't kind of resigned from the 627 0:56:59 --> 0:57:05 general medical council like I, because I didn't want them snapping at my heels when I knew I had 628 0:57:05 --> 0:57:13 things to do. But yes, had I been working with patients in 2020, I think Kirk was the example. 629 0:57:14 --> 0:57:21 So when you're faced with a fraud pandemic, well, I don't believe pandemics are possible actually, 630 0:57:21 --> 0:57:28 but I think it was a fraud pandemic, then you have, and they say that they have to isolate people, 631 0:57:28 --> 0:57:35 human beings, highly social animals from each other because there's an emergency pandemic 632 0:57:36 --> 0:57:41 response. I think we have every right to break the law. All right. We're up 20 minutes. 633 0:57:43 --> 0:57:52 He's on the call. He understood that and he acted good for him. Yep. Correct. Very well said. And 634 0:57:52 --> 0:57:57 that's the risk we have to take. We have to be willing to suffer. Oh, that's not criticism of 635 0:57:57 --> 0:58:04 you, Clayton. I got some trouble. I didn't, I wasn't up on federal charges, but I got, I 636 0:58:05 --> 0:58:10 probably spent $10,000 in legal fees, but I was, I didn't get in the same amount of trouble that 637 0:58:11 --> 0:58:18 Kirk did. All right. Let's get into the questions. Now we had Anders hand up, but then it's down. 638 0:58:19 --> 0:58:23 Anders, your hand wasn't taken down. Let's just fall down. What's your story? And then we've got 639 0:58:23 --> 0:58:31 Albert. Maybe Charles, you can encourage people to ask questions because without the questions, 640 0:58:32 --> 0:58:36 the questions will come. I've got plenty of questions while I'm waiting for questions. 641 0:58:36 --> 0:58:42 I want John Baudwin. I'm very sure. And I want John Baudwin to tell us about his latest court 642 0:58:42 --> 0:58:47 case, but Anders, do you want something or shall Anders go? We've got Albert, I mean. 643 0:58:49 --> 0:58:53 Well, Anders is not usually shy, but anyway, no, we can't hear him. 644 0:58:55 --> 0:58:58 Okay. Hello. Hello. Yeah. Yeah. Now we can hear you. 645 0:58:58 --> 0:59:14 And it was great to hear you, Dr. Baker. It was a good testimony of what's going on. 646 0:59:15 --> 0:59:28 I don't want to tell too much. Let's say I'm in Norway and I am doing my own stuff. I would say 647 0:59:29 --> 0:59:41 your testimony is really great. And I'm not going to go too deep into 648 0:59:42 --> 0:59:53 questioning you, but it is a really interesting story. You have a marvelous story 649 0:59:54 --> 0:59:59 for presentation. And I just wonder what is the 650 0:59:59 --> 1:00:17 what is the contest to the marvelous story of, let's say, there are so many 651 1:00:17 --> 1:00:29 contests to this story. What do you have to say of, let's say, I'm trying to figure the best way 652 1:00:29 --> 1:00:42 to say it. You have a story. What is your story to the major mass 653 1:00:43 --> 1:00:55 death of people who is dying in recent time? Linked to, let's say you can call it for 5G. 654 1:00:55 --> 1:01:06 You can call it for many other stories, which is linked to, let's say, 655 1:01:06 --> 1:01:20 mass determination of those who are subject to master demonization of, let's say, 656 1:01:20 --> 1:01:35 those who are dying outside the statistics of master. And who is dying? People are dying across 657 1:01:35 --> 1:01:59 the board. Do you know that about 130 to 140 million died the last 20 years? And how did it happen? 658 1:01:59 --> 1:02:07 Have you any idea? Yeah, I would say that. Thank you for the kind words and for your question. I 659 1:02:07 --> 1:02:17 would say a couple of things in response to that. I think that there's in many ways, I think that 660 1:02:17 --> 1:02:23 the whole covid disaster was obviously for many of us was a wake up call. You know, obviously it 661 1:02:23 --> 1:02:29 made us very much aware that this was not an accident, that this was in large part very much 662 1:02:29 --> 1:02:39 deliberate. And I spoke earlier that we have this whole technique, if you will, or this whole 663 1:02:40 --> 1:02:45 mode of action that a great many people in power in our world, not just in the United States, 664 1:02:45 --> 1:02:53 not just in Europe, but throughout the world utilize of creating a problem, generating a 665 1:02:53 --> 1:02:58 reaction and then proposing what the solution is. And I think that's what we saw during covid. 666 1:02:58 --> 1:03:09 I think it's absolutely the basis of the of the scam that is the pandemic preparedness so-called 667 1:03:09 --> 1:03:16 racket. And I think it's, for example, what's going on right now with geoengineering. You know, 668 1:03:16 --> 1:03:22 there's a tremendous amount of stuff going on over our heads that we need to become aware of the 669 1:03:22 --> 1:03:31 amount of toxic spraying that's going on. That's a new subject of really key interest for me, 670 1:03:32 --> 1:03:36 which is happening at various different levels. Part of it's our government, 671 1:03:36 --> 1:03:44 our governments under the pretense of protecting us from climate change are dimming the sun and 672 1:03:44 --> 1:03:51 blocking out sunlight and essentially polluting the atmosphere. But as we, some of us are becoming 673 1:03:51 --> 1:03:58 increasingly aware, this is not for that purpose. I believe part of it is a depopulation agenda. 674 1:03:58 --> 1:04:02 I mean, you don't spray aerosolized aluminum over the whole planet. But if you want people to 675 1:04:02 --> 1:04:10 flourish, if you want life to flourish, we know that aluminum is solely toxic to us. And we also 676 1:04:10 --> 1:04:17 know that the weather is being weaponized. It's been weaponized since essentially in some ways 677 1:04:17 --> 1:04:22 since the end of World War II. We know that the U.S. government severely weaponized the weather 678 1:04:22 --> 1:04:28 during Vietnam with Operation Popeye. We know that the U.S. government created a lot of 679 1:04:28 --> 1:04:39 the deadly hurricane that struck South Carolina, I believe in the 60s. That was Operation Cirrus. 680 1:04:39 --> 1:04:44 And we know that there was a similar disaster, at least one in Wales back in the 60s, which the 681 1:04:44 --> 1:04:50 British government never admitted to. And those are peanuts compared to what's going on now 682 1:04:51 --> 1:04:57 over our heads. We can get into the 5G, we can get into Nexrad, we can get into Harp 683 1:04:57 --> 1:05:04 and all these other technologies. So, you know, if we look in that area, what is the pretext? 684 1:05:04 --> 1:05:08 The pretext is, oh, well, we have from a defense standpoint, we have to have these defensive 685 1:05:08 --> 1:05:13 techniques because otherwise other nations will do this to us, which is exactly the reason we 686 1:05:14 --> 1:05:20 built more atomic weapons and nuclear weapons than we could ever use, blow up the world 100 687 1:05:20 --> 1:05:30 times over. And then we have the additional issue of all of this monetary control, which is coming 688 1:05:30 --> 1:05:37 out in Europe, which is really very terrifying. You know, so I think that there really is multiple 689 1:05:38 --> 1:05:45 mechanisms by which our, I hate to call them elites, I call them the parasitic elites because 690 1:05:46 --> 1:05:54 there's nothing elite about just, parasitism is not an elite form of life. But at any rate, 691 1:05:54 --> 1:06:00 I think that this is something that we're becoming very much more aware of. And maybe it's a mixed 692 1:06:00 --> 1:06:06 blessing, but maybe that's a blessing of the COVID era that I think so many more people know that all 693 1:06:06 --> 1:06:12 of these different things are going on, that they are largely problem, reaction, solution, kind of 694 1:06:12 --> 1:06:17 Hegelian dialectics, and we need to do what we can to stop them. 695 1:06:17 --> 1:06:22 Thank you, Anders. And Anders, I will- 696 1:06:22 --> 1:06:28 So I'll just forward the question to Thomas Binder. I think everything is clear. What you say is very 697 1:06:31 --> 1:06:39 good answer. I just want to have more people to understand we are into a big problem. Thomas, 698 1:06:39 --> 1:06:39 do you agree? 699 1:06:43 --> 1:06:46 We've got many Trojan horses for totalitarianism, it seems, Clayton. 700 1:06:48 --> 1:06:51 Sorry, I didn't listen to your question. Yeah. 701 1:06:54 --> 1:06:59 We'll get to Thomas when he talks. But Anders, you've raised a good point, and we are under 702 1:06:59 --> 1:07:04 attack in many fields. So thank you, Anders. Well, from one AB to another, Albert Benavides, 703 1:07:04 --> 1:07:09 how about that? Talk about ironic for all those possible combinations of initials. 704 1:07:11 --> 1:07:16 Thomas, put your hand back up because it came down automatically. Albert. 705 1:07:17 --> 1:07:22 Dr. Baker, it's a pleasure to meet you. My name is Albert Benavides, San Jose, California. 706 1:07:24 --> 1:07:33 I'm the bears guy. And my little battle station is just to shout out that I believe that the 707 1:07:35 --> 1:07:40 people running bears are the very same people that are manipulating the data and obfuscating 708 1:07:40 --> 1:07:49 the data. And we just do not have a true, honest, ethical pharmacovigilant system that was obligated 709 1:07:50 --> 1:07:59 by the 1986 Vaccine Act. But with that being said, I think there's a real important case in 710 1:07:59 --> 1:08:04 your neck of the words, I believe, with Deborah Conrad and Attorney Warner Mindenhall. 711 1:08:05 --> 1:08:09 Sure. Sure. Deb's a friend of mine. Actually, I know both of them quite well. 712 1:08:10 --> 1:08:16 Excellent. I figured you must because I think that's right in your backyard there. 713 1:08:17 --> 1:08:25 I'm not familiar with New York, but I hear that Rochester area. But my question was, 714 1:08:26 --> 1:08:35 how do you feel about that? Are you involved with that? And specifically, if Deborah is 715 1:08:36 --> 1:08:41 a contact of yours, I was always wondering in all of those reports that she filed, 716 1:08:43 --> 1:08:49 were there any reports that were never published? Because, and I'll put that in the comment section 717 1:08:49 --> 1:08:58 now, is that even Bobby Kennedy knows that not all legitimate reports received are even published. 718 1:09:03 --> 1:09:09 Just like Breanne Dressen of React 19, her report that was filed was never published. 719 1:09:11 --> 1:09:18 And that's beyond underreporting factor. This is a whole different underreporting. 720 1:09:19 --> 1:09:26 The stuff they receive and don't publish, nefariously do not publish. So anyways, 721 1:09:29 --> 1:09:38 I'm glad to know that you are familiar with that and possibly a part of that. But 722 1:09:39 --> 1:09:42 how do you think that case is going to work out? 723 1:09:43 --> 1:09:49 Okay. So yeah, thanks for the question, Albert. It's nice to put a face to a name because I'm 724 1:09:49 --> 1:09:55 familiar with some of your work with the VAERS data. For those of you who aren't totally familiar, 725 1:09:55 --> 1:10:00 maybe I can give a real quick summary. So Deb Conrad actually was the PA that I mentioned that 726 1:10:00 --> 1:10:06 was the only other person in my neck of the woods who was really particularly active during the COVID 727 1:10:06 --> 1:10:15 era. And what Deborah was a physician's assistant, very trusted long-term employee of a hospital. 728 1:10:16 --> 1:10:27 And she was put in charge early on in the COVID period to be in charge of various aspects of the 729 1:10:27 --> 1:10:32 COVID care area. And this is back when many of us thought, well, maybe this thing is legitimate. 730 1:10:32 --> 1:10:38 And she did at the time. And she realized that it was her responsibility once the vaccines came 731 1:10:38 --> 1:10:44 out in 2021 to follow the rules. And the rules in the United States are as if you see a clear 732 1:10:44 --> 1:10:51 vaccine injury, you have to file it in this VAERS system, this vaccine adverse event reporting 733 1:10:51 --> 1:10:56 system. That's what VAERS stands for, I believe. And it's a very clunky system. It's a very 734 1:10:56 --> 1:11:05 difficult system to, it's not easy to report. It takes a lot of effort and you have to input a 735 1:11:05 --> 1:11:10 lot of information. But she became absolutely, she was seeing a tremendous number of these 736 1:11:11 --> 1:11:19 adverse reactions and she took it upon herself to report all of them. And what she found very 737 1:11:19 --> 1:11:25 quickly was she was told by her employers and by her supervisors to stop doing it. 738 1:11:26 --> 1:11:32 And she said, well, no, this is wrong. This is, I'm legally responsible to people. She worked 739 1:11:32 --> 1:11:36 with the emergency room and the emergency room people saw an awful lot of these because people 740 1:11:36 --> 1:11:42 would come back in hours or days or whatever after getting a shot with these reactions. 741 1:11:44 --> 1:11:48 And so she had this backlog of cases and people were saying, well, you know, we're being told not 742 1:11:48 --> 1:11:53 to do it. We're being told, she said, I'll do it. So she started taking a lot of them home herself. 743 1:11:53 --> 1:11:57 She was doing them on her spare time. She was literally entering many, many of these various 744 1:11:57 --> 1:12:06 reports and she ultimately was essentially fired for doing so. So she raised a lawsuit against the 745 1:12:07 --> 1:12:13 health system, the hospital that she worked for. And this has gone through and has not been 746 1:12:13 --> 1:12:19 dismissed like many other similar ones have, but is what was made it through to discovery right now. 747 1:12:19 --> 1:12:24 And now with discovery, you know, the can of worms for this particular 748 1:12:26 --> 1:12:35 health care system is about to open because every one of these failures to report constitutes a 749 1:12:35 --> 1:12:44 significant breach of the law. And if she can demonstrate that she was, you know, told not to 750 1:12:44 --> 1:12:51 do it, well, then that's even worse. So you're talking about an absolutely gigantic potential 751 1:12:51 --> 1:12:56 case. And it did recently proceed through to the discovery phase. So it's all out. You know, 752 1:12:56 --> 1:13:02 it's like the thing I just saw. I can't verify it, but that, you know, Macron had sued who was the 753 1:13:03 --> 1:13:10 person in the United States, the Candace Owens. Yeah, Candace Owens. It sued Candace Owens for 754 1:13:10 --> 1:13:15 claiming that his wife was a man. And now he's dropped it because he realized that, you know, 755 1:13:15 --> 1:13:21 there's going to be discovery. So obviously discovery is a big deal. And so we're reaching 756 1:13:21 --> 1:13:26 that phase now with that case. I'm not directly involved in the case, although I know Warner, 757 1:13:26 --> 1:13:32 men and all the, the lawyer very well. I've worked with him a little bit in other issues 758 1:13:32 --> 1:13:37 and I know Deb very well. And the interesting thing, one of the interesting things about Deb 759 1:13:37 --> 1:13:48 is the, I didn't know Deb prior to COVID, but I will tell you this, I met a lot of just really 760 1:13:48 --> 1:13:59 great people through COVID because the people that did find the need or felt compelled to stand up 761 1:13:59 --> 1:14:04 to this are some of the best people I've ever met. And Deb is one of the finest human beings 762 1:14:04 --> 1:14:11 you could ever hope to meet. And, you know, the notion that you would just try to destroy her for 763 1:14:11 --> 1:14:19 doing her job, it really shows the degree of cynicism and the degree of, there's really not, 764 1:14:19 --> 1:14:23 you know, it's kind of this Hannah Arendt banality of evil kind of thing that you've got these people 765 1:14:23 --> 1:14:28 who trusted her and worked alongside her for better part of 20 years. And now they're just 766 1:14:28 --> 1:14:34 going to destroy her because she insists on doing her job and following the law. It's, it's, it doesn't, 767 1:14:34 --> 1:14:40 it does not say good things about human nature. But hopefully, yeah, we're at a point now, I guess, 768 1:14:40 --> 1:14:44 in that case where she and Warner, and Warner's a bulldog, he's not going to stop. 769 1:14:46 --> 1:14:48 It could blow a lot of the various situation wide open. 770 1:14:50 --> 1:14:56 Thank you. Thank you, Albert, for the question. It's a great reminder of the sometimes the price 771 1:14:56 --> 1:15:02 we pay for fulfilling our obligations. Now Kirk Moore is here. So Kirk, if you want to say anything, 772 1:15:03 --> 1:15:07 most welcome, but nothing bad has been said about you. Clayton only said good things about you, 773 1:15:07 --> 1:15:15 and we've been singing your, singing your praises. We've got just one second, I had a thought 774 1:15:15 --> 1:15:21 coming across there with VAERS. We've got the same problem in Australia, it's called DAEN, 775 1:15:21 --> 1:15:30 Database of Adverse Events National, DAEN. And it's also proven to be significantly defective. 776 1:15:30 --> 1:15:36 Albert has worked with Sharon Cousins, who has been doing a fair bit of work here in Australia. 777 1:15:36 --> 1:15:42 And so the data upon which people quote, and indeed, I shared a research paper, someone said 778 1:15:42 --> 1:15:46 to me, look, here's the research paper that proves having vaccination reduces your chance of heart 779 1:15:46 --> 1:15:54 problems. And I go, wow. And whilst you've been published in the New England Medical Journal, 780 1:15:54 --> 1:15:59 I think the retired editor says that less than half of those published research papers 781 1:16:00 --> 1:16:05 can be relied upon. So all of us have heard that many times. And the other thing I wanted to say, 782 1:16:05 --> 1:16:11 Clayton, was Warner Mendenhall has presented to us three times here so far. So we know Warner well, 783 1:16:11 --> 1:16:19 and he's also doing great work in fighting for our rights. So Clayton, we used to supply 784 1:16:19 --> 1:16:26 Warner with clients. Wonderful. Yeah. Yeah. All right. Thomas is here. TB. 785 1:16:27 --> 1:16:29 Talking about tetanus, we've got the TB man here. 786 1:16:32 --> 1:16:39 Yeah. Oh, Thomas Bindey. He's in Switzerland. Is that right, Thomas? But Thomas, Kirk needs to 787 1:16:39 --> 1:16:47 understand, Thomas, that you're a potential ally for him because, you know, Kirk Moore, the guy who 788 1:16:47 --> 1:16:54 was, yeah, they stopped the case, Pam Bondi. But Kirk probably doesn't know you. So maybe he does. 789 1:16:55 --> 1:17:02 But Kirk, you need to know that Thomas was put in, was it a closed psychiatric hospital, Thomas, 790 1:17:02 --> 1:17:09 for nine days, and you're a doctor. Well, at Easter 2020, I was arrested by an anti-terrorist 791 1:17:09 --> 1:17:17 squad because of my COVID information of the public and sent to Rooney Bean for six days. 792 1:17:18 --> 1:17:24 But they could not do me any harm because I never broke, I never did anything wrong. I never broke 793 1:17:24 --> 1:17:31 any law. And this was, this is the reason, Kirk, Kirk, you certainly, you have all my support. 794 1:17:32 --> 1:17:38 And I'm happy what happened to you, of course. But please do not understand me. I would like 795 1:17:38 --> 1:17:48 to discuss which is the best strategy if you want to resist the whole evil agenda in general 796 1:17:49 --> 1:17:56 and such pandemics in particular. Because I chose another approach. Of course, my decision was 797 1:17:56 --> 1:18:06 somewhat made easier as after my arrest. I was, I knew, of course, I'm under observation now. 798 1:18:06 --> 1:18:14 I cannot do any mistake. They are, they are just waiting for a mistake. So for example, to, to 799 1:18:16 --> 1:18:24 make, to write mask certificates that they do not have to wear masks only after internet contact 800 1:18:24 --> 1:18:31 and not after having seen my patients in my practice. I'm a cardiologist, by the way, 801 1:18:31 --> 1:18:37 in the private practice. My approach was the following. Look, if you want to 802 1:18:38 --> 1:18:46 overcome totalitarianism, resist totalitarianism, we may not comply. The only weapon we have is 803 1:18:46 --> 1:18:56 civil disobedience. If we give those such, for example, mRNA transfection exception, 804 1:18:57 --> 1:19:06 exceptions to the patients, we must also know that there is another that this patient will comply. 805 1:19:08 --> 1:19:13 I told to all my patients, look, you have to decide what is more important in your life, 806 1:19:14 --> 1:19:24 your profession, your education, going on holidays, or just to resist. Do not accept the vaccine. Do 807 1:19:24 --> 1:19:31 not wear a mask. Do not accept anti-social distancing and so on and so forth. For example, 808 1:19:31 --> 1:19:38 the students, I say, they take a year off university. I mean, you can do many even more 809 1:19:38 --> 1:19:46 interesting things and learn a lot in a year while you are not in university. So I, I did not write 810 1:19:46 --> 1:19:53 such exemptions also because I was under observation. So observation. So this decision to do this 811 1:19:53 --> 1:20:02 was easy for me, but we must, we must tell the patients that they should not comply. 812 1:20:02 --> 1:20:10 Civil disobedience. Do not wear a mask. Do not accept the vaccine. Do not accept, accept anti-social 813 1:20:10 --> 1:20:18 distancing because only with this method, when they do the next try, when they try it again, 814 1:20:19 --> 1:20:27 only maybe 10 or 20% of the people will disobey. And this is, this is the only way out of this. 815 1:20:27 --> 1:20:34 There is no savior. There is no wonderful Maga, Maha or whatever. I mean, the more time 816 1:20:35 --> 1:20:45 passes, we must realize that Maga and Maha are the other scams. If you ask me. So the question to 817 1:20:45 --> 1:20:51 you and to all of you is, should we not rather choose this approach? Yeah. 818 1:20:56 --> 1:21:00 So who's going to answer that? Clayton, are you going to answer it? And Kurt may have a go at it. 819 1:21:02 --> 1:21:06 I'll say something very quickly. The first thing I would say is it's nice to meet you, 820 1:21:06 --> 1:21:14 Thomas. I have followed you on Twitter for, I still can't call it X, but I don't know why, 821 1:21:14 --> 1:21:21 but I have followed you for a long time and I know a little bit about your trials and tribulations 822 1:21:21 --> 1:21:30 and it's very nice to make your acquaintance finally, even if it is on Zoom. But perhaps 823 1:21:30 --> 1:21:36 someday we'll meet in person, but very nice to make your acquaintance. I agree broadly with what 824 1:21:36 --> 1:21:40 you're saying. It really has to be a change in mindset. And one thing that I've been thinking 825 1:21:40 --> 1:21:51 in particular is I think that one step we need to take, in my opinion, all of us here that I think 826 1:21:51 --> 1:21:58 see the world differently than many others, I really think that we need to start outreaching to 827 1:21:59 --> 1:22:06 very, to the young people because, you know, it's easy for me to say, you know, I'm in my 50s. 828 1:22:06 --> 1:22:11 I've had, you know, I've had, I don't have, I'm not going anywhere. If anything happens to me, 829 1:22:11 --> 1:22:18 it's probably the deep state. But anyway, but that said, I've had a, I've been very fortunate. I've 830 1:22:18 --> 1:22:25 had a charmed life in many ways and I don't think that's really in the cards for young people if 831 1:22:25 --> 1:22:29 they don't wake up. You know, I think that this is going to be a very different world in a short 832 1:22:29 --> 1:22:37 period of time if the resistance doesn't come more strongly than it is right now. I think that 833 1:22:37 --> 1:22:42 there's some awakening, but I don't know that the awakening is adequate. And I really think we need 834 1:22:42 --> 1:22:47 to start looking at the younger generation and saying, look, you know, you need to realize that 835 1:22:48 --> 1:22:53 the people that are at the very top do not have your best interests in mind. In fact, they may 836 1:22:53 --> 1:23:03 not even have your existence in mind. And a lot of young people have an inkling of that, 837 1:23:03 --> 1:23:07 that older people don't. You know, one of the things that I was very disappointed with in COVID 838 1:23:08 --> 1:23:19 is how willing the old were to sacrifice the young, which I found to be utterly disgusting. 839 1:23:19 --> 1:23:24 You know, I can see people keeping their, I mean, I wasn't particularly good at doing it, 840 1:23:24 --> 1:23:29 but I can identify with people saying, I'm going to keep my head down and ride this out and 841 1:23:30 --> 1:23:41 hope that things get settled. But to just be so blatantly selfish at the level of, 842 1:23:41 --> 1:23:48 let's close the schools so that under some, of course, bizarre senseless rationale, 843 1:23:48 --> 1:23:53 but even if you believe the rationale under this bizarre senseless notion that we're protecting 844 1:23:53 --> 1:23:59 the people in the nursing homes, you know, it's like, you know, these kids need to go to school. 845 1:23:59 --> 1:24:05 These are their formative years. You know, the years from five to 20 or five to 25 are the most 846 1:24:05 --> 1:24:10 important years in your life. And you're going to take years away from these children so that the 847 1:24:10 --> 1:24:16 people in their eighties or nineties can live two more years. I mean, that was literally kind 848 1:24:16 --> 1:24:21 of the equation that was thrown out there and how people didn't just totally reject that is absurd. 849 1:24:21 --> 1:24:27 I mean, I rejected that as absurd. That's wrong. And, you know, the notion of kids are resilient. 850 1:24:27 --> 1:24:32 That's what we would hear from kids are resilient. Well, they better be the way we're treating them, 851 1:24:32 --> 1:24:36 the way that they're treated in our societies. I hope they're resilient because they aren't going 852 1:24:36 --> 1:24:42 to survive if they, if they, if they aren't. And so that was one thing that just really disgusted 853 1:24:42 --> 1:24:47 me. And, you know, I would think, you know, you really start to wonder if you have a, if the, 854 1:24:47 --> 1:24:52 if the species has a bit of a death wish, if you're going to sell out your young generation for your 855 1:24:52 --> 1:24:57 old generation as readily. And then I go back and you look at history though, and history tells you, 856 1:24:57 --> 1:25:02 you know, what's the whole history of warfare. The whole history of warfare is old men arguing 857 1:25:02 --> 1:25:07 and young men dying. So really this is probably not very different from the way it's always been, 858 1:25:07 --> 1:25:13 but it does not speak well to our species. And I think that one place I hope to go, 859 1:25:13 --> 1:25:18 and I hope other people will go is to, is to tell young people who also have a little more 860 1:25:18 --> 1:25:21 plasticity in their brains yet. They're not quite so set in their ways and say, look, 861 1:25:22 --> 1:25:26 these people are lying to you. You know, it's the same thing as we heard in the sixties and how much 862 1:25:26 --> 1:25:31 of that was a sci-op, I don't know, but I don't trust anyone over 30 because most of the people 863 1:25:31 --> 1:25:35 over 30 that are in charge, I don't think are particularly trustworthy. So anyway, that's, 864 1:25:35 --> 1:25:39 that's one thought that comes to mind based on Thomas's commentary. 865 1:25:40 --> 1:25:46 So Thomas and Clayton, how do we make that connection with young people then to get them, 866 1:25:46 --> 1:25:52 you know, we've got a serious thing to tell them, but how do we get to them when their own parents 867 1:25:52 --> 1:25:57 don't talk to them and their own grandparents, but the grandparents love, of course, idolizing 868 1:25:57 --> 1:26:03 their grandchildren, but they don't teach them anything. So, so how do we get to these children? 869 1:26:03 --> 1:26:09 Because I agree with you, if we don't, the human species is absolutely sunk and I can see signs of 870 1:26:09 --> 1:26:15 it. They're all on their mobile phones. They just waiting for leaders as I can see it, who can lead 871 1:26:15 --> 1:26:19 them out of the mess that they find themselves in because they can't buy a house in the UK. 872 1:26:19 --> 1:26:26 They can't do anything. They know it, but they can't formulate what it is that's wrong because 873 1:26:26 --> 1:26:33 they haven't no experience of life. And we need to lead them out of this. I agree with you, Clayton. 874 1:26:33 --> 1:26:40 What do you think, Thomas? I think we should not underestimate the young people. I mean, just 875 1:26:40 --> 1:26:45 an example in Switzerland, we had the chance in Switzerland, we have some element of direct democracy. 876 1:26:46 --> 1:26:53 So we had the chance to vote three times about a referendum against the COVID law. 877 1:26:53 --> 1:27:02 The COVID law gave the government the opportunity to install those insane, all those insane measures 878 1:27:02 --> 1:27:13 that were not constitutional until without this COVID law. Okay. And the public voted three times 879 1:27:14 --> 1:27:21 for this law against the referendum. So for the law, for the government, with about two thirds to 880 1:27:21 --> 1:27:32 one third. But the youngest voters, those from 18 to 35, I guess, they voted against the COVID law 881 1:27:32 --> 1:27:41 by 56%. And this was always gave me always some hope. The problem is not the young. 882 1:27:42 --> 1:27:50 Problem is our generation. I'm six, I'm becoming 64 in September. The problem is our generation 883 1:27:50 --> 1:27:57 that still believes that the mass media, especially the public broadcasters in Switzerland, 884 1:27:58 --> 1:28:05 and in the whole Europe, of course, we have the public broadcasters whom we are obliged to pay 885 1:28:05 --> 1:28:14 in Switzerland one franc per day, 365 francs per year, so that they inform us objectively. 886 1:28:15 --> 1:28:21 And the problem is my generation who still believes that what our public broadcaster 887 1:28:21 --> 1:28:29 tells them is the truth. And they cannot imagine, and they could not imagine, that such an insane 888 1:28:29 --> 1:28:35 terrorist cardiologist like Thomas Binder in social media blogs and so on and so forth, 889 1:28:35 --> 1:28:42 tells the truth. And the public broadcaster is the lie. This is the problem. If you ask me, 890 1:28:42 --> 1:28:47 it's not the younger generation. The younger generation gives me much hope because they 891 1:28:47 --> 1:28:56 inform not in the mainstream media. They look for information. Look, we are, the public, 892 1:28:56 --> 1:29:04 the broadcasters bombard us every day with information 24-7, but always with information 893 1:29:04 --> 1:29:11 we are not interested in. And the things that we are interested in, we are never bombarded with. 894 1:29:11 --> 1:29:17 So we have to search to get informed actively. The younger generation does this much more 895 1:29:18 --> 1:29:27 than our generation, especially over 70 years. I think the average, the median age of the consumer 896 1:29:27 --> 1:29:37 of the Swiss public broadcaster is above 65 now. So almost no young people still consume those 897 1:29:37 --> 1:29:42 media. And I think that the future, the younger, the young people are the future. I have two 898 1:29:42 --> 1:29:52 children, two grandchildren. And yeah, honestly, what was our motivation to do everything we did? 899 1:29:52 --> 1:29:57 It was of course that our children, our grandchildren, all children, all grandchildren 900 1:29:57 --> 1:30:06 should have a good life as we had after the Second World War and not grow up in an insane 901 1:30:06 --> 1:30:13 technocratic world as a slave. That's my two cents at least. 902 1:30:16 --> 1:30:25 Yeah. And John, if you don't mind, Kirk has got his hand up, but maybe Kirk has some views on 903 1:30:25 --> 1:30:29 this subject as well. Kirk, you can speak if you want to. You're muted at the moment. 904 1:30:30 --> 1:30:41 Yeah. Steven, can you guys hear me okay? Sure. Okay. And thanks for having me up. I just wanted 905 1:30:41 --> 1:30:46 to give my little two cents worth in there for Thomas and his question regarding. And I mean, 906 1:30:46 --> 1:30:52 again, I think Clayton said it kind of agree a little bit with everything. I think the younger 907 1:30:52 --> 1:30:57 generation, we have to give them maybe a little bit more credit than what we tend to. I think 908 1:30:57 --> 1:31:04 it's a generalized apathy. I struggled with what I was doing from the standpoint of allowing people 909 1:31:04 --> 1:31:09 to not have the civil unrest and to just push back. Because I think that if people would push 910 1:31:09 --> 1:31:17 back, then we wouldn't be here right now. I think it came though more from our medical community. 911 1:31:17 --> 1:31:23 If we'd have just had 10% of our doctors in the United States alone push back, we have over a 912 1:31:23 --> 1:31:28 million doctors in this country. And if we'd have had 10% of them just say, no, we're not going to 913 1:31:28 --> 1:31:32 do it. And then have a certain percentage of nurses say, we're not going to do it. As opposed to 914 1:31:33 --> 1:31:38 the handful of people, I think Clayton and I can probably come up with a list of 25 or 30, 915 1:31:38 --> 1:31:45 maybe 100 docs that really were pushing back vocally against everything that was happening. 916 1:31:45 --> 1:31:53 You know, Deborah Conrad, you're in a population of 2 million people 917 1:31:54 --> 1:32:00 and you know of one other person that was pushing back. That's crazy. I'm in a population of 918 1:32:02 --> 1:32:10 2 million, give or take here in the Salt Lake Valley, even Provo, 2.5 million. And again, 919 1:32:10 --> 1:32:14 I'm the only one that I know of that was pushing back. That is just far too few. 920 1:32:16 --> 1:32:22 It's a generalized apathy. It's a generalized feeling that the government is looking out for us. 921 1:32:22 --> 1:32:26 Clayton, what you were saying about the 1960s, you know, look, I don't trust anybody. I don't 922 1:32:26 --> 1:32:31 trust anything that the government ever said. You know, I was pushing back against vaccines, 923 1:32:31 --> 1:32:37 getting all the way back to 2000, 2005-ish timeframe. I've gotten to fights with all of 924 1:32:37 --> 1:32:41 my colleagues and people ask me this question all the time. How many of your colleagues have 925 1:32:41 --> 1:32:47 come back to you and said, oh Kirk, I'm sorry for, you know, canceling you. I'm sorry for not being, 926 1:32:47 --> 1:32:53 I'm not calling you for not, you know, not helping you or whatever since all of this happened. Not 927 1:32:53 --> 1:32:58 one. Not one. I haven't had any of my classmates from medical school. I haven't had any of my 928 1:32:58 --> 1:33:03 colleagues that looked at me and said, oh Kirk, you're, you know, you're crazy about what it is 929 1:33:03 --> 1:33:08 you're doing. The people that already knew what I was doing, hey, they're still there, but not one 930 1:33:08 --> 1:33:13 of those people that, you know, disagreed with what I was doing have come back and said anything. 931 1:33:14 --> 1:33:20 So again, I think it's an education thing. I think it's, I agree with Thomas. We need to push 932 1:33:20 --> 1:33:26 back. We need to do this as a, you know, civil unrest. I think there is a huge, you know, 933 1:33:26 --> 1:33:32 monetary thing like Clayton mentioned. You know, they're going to control the monetary system. 934 1:33:32 --> 1:33:37 And therefore with that, they're going to control all of society. They're going to control what you 935 1:33:37 --> 1:33:41 spend it on, what you don't spend it on, where you can spend it. And people just don't see that 936 1:33:41 --> 1:33:48 coming. And unless they do start seeing it coming, then we're, you know, this is the end of times as 937 1:33:48 --> 1:33:58 far as I'm concerned. Sorry, guys. Thomas or Clayton or both, do you want to comment on 938 1:33:58 --> 1:34:06 what Kirks just said? Of course. I mean, I could not understand as a doctor, of course, 939 1:34:07 --> 1:34:15 first of all, I blame my fellow doctors, of course. I mean, and if only one or two percent 940 1:34:15 --> 1:34:22 would have resisted and found one percent of journalists who gave us the opportunity 941 1:34:22 --> 1:34:29 to reach the public in the mainstream media. Of course, this could not have happened. The 942 1:34:29 --> 1:34:36 whole nonsense narrative would have collapsed within a week or so. But just to explain to you, 943 1:34:36 --> 1:34:44 I mean, how there was a total brainwashing of the doctors within days, worldwide, globally, within 944 1:34:44 --> 1:34:51 days. How did indoctrination of the general practitioners happen in the province of Arga, 945 1:34:51 --> 1:34:58 where I live in Switzerland? At the beginning of March, there was a weekly Zoom meeting on Friday 946 1:34:58 --> 1:35:10 at 12.15 or so, where the two main infectious of our two main hospitals, the government, 947 1:35:11 --> 1:35:19 the regional government and the general surgeon of my province made a Zoom meeting for all GPs. 948 1:35:20 --> 1:35:26 So there we could learn what is COVID, how we must treat it and all this. And in the third 949 1:35:29 --> 1:35:37 meeting, I really got angry. I told them, hey, fellow doctors, come back to reality. Come back 950 1:35:37 --> 1:35:44 to science. Everything you tell is a lie, it's nonsense. We already know by now that this virus 951 1:35:44 --> 1:35:51 is not more dangerous than influenza, highly likely even less dangerous, etc., etc. I explained 952 1:35:51 --> 1:35:59 the fake PCR test that can never prove an infection without considering the clinical 953 1:35:59 --> 1:36:07 symptoms of a patient, etc. And they closed my microphone. They closed my microphone. They had 954 1:36:07 --> 1:36:14 no answer. They closed, they shut me down. And all other questions of the GPs to these people, 955 1:36:14 --> 1:36:23 the infectious and the government were about money. What do we have to do not to lose money 956 1:36:23 --> 1:36:30 during this pandemic? Because at that time, the government decided that we doctors may only see 957 1:36:30 --> 1:36:39 emergency patients. So my practices were half empty. And I always say as my practice was half 958 1:36:39 --> 1:36:47 empty, I had time to think. And if I have time to think, I'm becoming dangerous. But this is how it 959 1:36:47 --> 1:36:55 works. Within days, my fellow doctors were completely brainwashed. They were afraid of 960 1:36:55 --> 1:37:02 seeing the patients. They told their patients, you have COVID, do not come into my practice, 961 1:37:02 --> 1:37:09 come again if it's over. I mean, it's absolutely ridiculous. I mean, if there really was a 962 1:37:09 --> 1:37:14 pandemic of a killer virus, that is a biological impossibility, by the way. But if there was, 963 1:37:15 --> 1:37:21 who would treat the patients? Never ever the doctors, because obviously they are the first 964 1:37:21 --> 1:37:30 to run away. I always said it's a pandemic of of chowards. Yeah. Amazing. Yeah. So that was my first 965 1:37:30 --> 1:37:35 thought, Thomas, that the doctors were essentially frightened of the so-called pandemic, which was a 966 1:37:35 --> 1:37:44 fraud. The whole thing didn't make sense, you know. So, but you know, I didn't realize at the time in 967 1:37:44 --> 1:37:51 2020, I knew that it was a global coup d'etat in March 2020. But I couldn't get my head around 968 1:37:51 --> 1:37:59 that my colleagues to almost all of them, I mean, almost all of them couldn't understand what my 969 1:37:59 --> 1:38:04 position was. Absolutely. And they wanted to close me down. I was very dangerous to be around. 970 1:38:08 --> 1:38:16 Anyway, so our fellow doctors also believe in the official narrative about 9-11, about CO2, 971 1:38:16 --> 1:38:21 induced climate change and all that stuff. And these are the most important things. 972 1:38:21 --> 1:38:30 I think I'm absolutely sure 99.9% of the people here were critical before COVID. 973 1:38:31 --> 1:38:37 For example, me, I guess in about 2007, I saw World Trade Center collapse in three or four. 974 1:38:38 --> 1:38:46 This was when I took my red pill. So then I went into 9-11. And within two days, it was clear it was 975 1:38:46 --> 1:38:54 total nonsense. Then I was looking into the climate change narrative, etc, etc. And all those 976 1:38:54 --> 1:39:02 big narratives are wrong to prove and otherwise. This is, of course, our approach here. But the 977 1:39:02 --> 1:39:08 approach of most of our fellow doctors is that they still believe, like the child that believes in 978 1:39:08 --> 1:39:11 the Christ child, the Santa Claus and Easter Bunny. 979 1:39:14 --> 1:39:22 So Thomas, my curve upwards was Dr. David Kelly and fighting the British government over that, 980 1:39:22 --> 1:39:32 except I didn't realize it was a fight. They did. But then I decided that 9-11 was a hoax or whatever. 981 1:39:32 --> 1:39:39 And I managed to find Dylan Avery, the director of the brilliant documentary about 982 1:39:39 --> 1:39:43 9-11 called Loose Change. And there were several versions of it. 983 1:39:45 --> 1:39:49 So I managed to find him on Facebook and started chatting to him until he said, 984 1:39:51 --> 1:39:58 I wish 9-11 had never happened. And I said, why? And he said, because it's... 985 1:39:58 --> 1:40:06 So he was only 18 when he first made the first version of Loose Change, which was about 986 1:40:06 --> 1:40:13 9-11 being an inside job, you know. And he said that his whole life had changed when he made 987 1:40:13 --> 1:40:22 that film. And whenever he met anybody, who most of the time he didn't know who the people were 988 1:40:22 --> 1:40:27 who were talking to him and who revered him, all they wanted to talk about was 9-11. So he 989 1:40:27 --> 1:40:35 could never get off the subject. But it just shows what young people are capable of if they 990 1:40:35 --> 1:40:41 meet the right people, you know, if they feel... He was a brilliant filmmaker, even at the age of 18. 991 1:40:42 --> 1:40:49 So anyway, John Bauduin... But please stay on Thomas and Kirk, and Clayton, of course. 992 1:40:50 --> 1:40:58 John Bauduin has been in New... Sorry, where was it now? Massachusetts. And he managed to get 993 1:40:59 --> 1:41:04 all the death certificates for the whole state of Massachusetts, which is a remarkable 994 1:41:04 --> 1:41:08 accomplishment because... And I knew about death certificates from the David Kelly case, 995 1:41:08 --> 1:41:12 the importance of death certificates, what is written on the death certificate, particularly 996 1:41:12 --> 1:41:18 the cause of death, the importance of coroners and all the rest of it, and the importance of 997 1:41:18 --> 1:41:22 post mortems. And of course, they were cancelled. The post mortems were cancelled, 998 1:41:22 --> 1:41:26 and so were the coroners in 2020. Sorry, did you want to say something, Clayton? 999 1:41:27 --> 1:41:31 Yes, I'm going to turn it over to John at this point, because as I think I'd mentioned to you 1000 1:41:31 --> 1:41:36 yesterday, I have a hard stop. So if you'll forgive me, I'm going to have to... I have something at 1001 1:41:36 --> 1:41:44 five that I have my time that I absolutely have to attend. So yes, okay. I'd love to come back 1002 1:41:44 --> 1:41:48 another time and speak with you all. I thank you all for your attention and for having me. 1003 1:41:48 --> 1:41:54 It's a real honour to be here with all of you, and a pleasure to speak with you. So thanks so much, 1004 1:41:54 --> 1:41:58 and I'll step aside and let John take over. And Clayton, if you watch your emails, 1005 1:41:58 --> 1:42:04 you'll get invited to all the meetings now every Sunday and Tuesday. Obviously, you may not be able 1006 1:42:04 --> 1:42:09 to come, but you're very welcome anyway. Thank you so much. Thank you all very, very much. 1007 1:42:09 --> 1:42:10 Thank you.