1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:11
So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.

2
0:00:11 --> 0:00:19
And Glenn, you have a short statement to make that is relevant to the Donald Trump attempted

3
0:00:19 --> 0:00:21
assassination attempt.

4
0:00:21 --> 0:00:23
It appears.

5
0:00:23 --> 0:00:24
I do.

6
0:00:24 --> 0:00:29
As I've described to this group, I'm part of the American Patriot Civil Defense Net.

7
0:00:30 --> 0:00:37
Team is linked with the Department of Defense, a very significant and high intel group.

8
0:00:37 --> 0:00:42
And we broadcast shows on Brumble under L4ATV1.

9
0:00:42 --> 0:00:44
And here's a prepared statement.

10
0:00:44 --> 0:00:46
So it's not ad hoc.

11
0:00:46 --> 0:00:49
It was fully prepared, and I'm reading it to you directly.

12
0:00:49 --> 0:00:51
A little update.

13
0:00:51 --> 0:00:59
The shooter in the case of the event with President Trump.

14
0:00:59 --> 0:01:02
His name is Thomas Matthew Crooks.

15
0:01:02 --> 0:01:07
Now that has been reported, but most of the other information about him has been either

16
0:01:07 --> 0:01:10
buried or not misreported.

17
0:01:10 --> 0:01:17
He is a heroin and coke dealer distributor, manufacturer with five unjailed convictions

18
0:01:17 --> 0:01:23
under his belt in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, per public records.

19
0:01:23 --> 0:01:27
But dates are altered in some of those records.

20
0:01:27 --> 0:01:32
One of Hunter Biden's drug dealer buddies reportedly hired him.

21
0:01:32 --> 0:01:35
He was Hunter Biden's.

22
0:01:35 --> 0:01:41
It was Hunter Biden acting for Joe Biden, securing and protecting the big guy franchise

23
0:01:41 --> 0:01:46
from the Biden crime family for four more years.

24
0:01:46 --> 0:01:52
He is a stone cold crime wave, Hunter, like father, like son.

25
0:01:52 --> 0:01:55
You can take that to the bank.

26
0:01:55 --> 0:02:02
The FBI is going to cover it up the way they did the rigged election, their January 6th

27
0:02:02 --> 0:02:10
hoax and the laptop from hell and help try framing Trump multiple times.

28
0:02:10 --> 0:02:19
The Justice Department is not well, nor are Soros, Clinton, Biden, Pelosi, Mayorkas, Garland,

29
0:02:19 --> 0:02:22
et cetera, families.

30
0:02:22 --> 0:02:28
So with that one other point around things that are being reported, it is not an inside

31
0:02:28 --> 0:02:39
job with the execution team, meaning the...

32
0:02:39 --> 0:02:40
Blanking out their name.

33
0:02:40 --> 0:02:44
The detail that was covering Trump is very honest.

34
0:02:44 --> 0:02:49
The major failure that we had here was in that ring, there was a local policeman.

35
0:02:49 --> 0:02:51
He was advised that there was somebody on the roof.

36
0:02:51 --> 0:02:56
Instead of calling it in and calling for backup, he climbed up the ladder, the gunman turned

37
0:02:56 --> 0:02:59
on him and then he fell off the ladder.

38
0:02:59 --> 0:03:04
Other than that, that was a stupid mistake by a local policeman.

39
0:03:04 --> 0:03:07
Other than that, you have righteous people taking the actions.

40
0:03:07 --> 0:03:09
And thank you for the time.

41
0:03:09 --> 0:03:10
Thank you, Glenn.

42
0:03:10 --> 0:03:17
And welcome to today's discussion with Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.

43
0:03:17 --> 0:03:21
This group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost over three years ago with a desire to pursue

44
0:03:21 --> 0:03:27
truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health and the proper application of law very relevant

45
0:03:27 --> 0:03:29
to today's presenter.

46
0:03:29 --> 0:03:32
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower

47
0:03:32 --> 0:03:33
and activist.

48
0:03:33 --> 0:03:36
His medical specialty is radiology.

49
0:03:36 --> 0:03:39
I'm Charles Covets, the moderator of this group.

50
0:03:39 --> 0:03:43
I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago.

51
0:03:44 --> 0:03:48
And over the last 13 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine

52
0:03:48 --> 0:03:52
damage and damage from bad medical advice.

53
0:03:52 --> 0:03:56
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.

54
0:03:56 --> 0:04:01
On the issue of vaccine damage, I note that Stanley Plotkin, a proponent for the last

55
0:04:01 --> 0:04:07
40 years about the amazing safety and efficacy of childhood vaccines, has now co-authored

56
0:04:07 --> 0:04:15
an article acknowledging, acknowledging due to the good work of Del Bigtree and the Highwire

57
0:04:15 --> 0:04:23
that childhood vaccines have never been properly tested for safety or efficacy ever.

58
0:04:23 --> 0:04:33
And I urge all of you to understand the profound importance of that statement of the fraud

59
0:04:33 --> 0:04:36
that's been perpetrated on humanity from these childhood vaccines.

60
0:04:36 --> 0:04:47
And I urge you all to get hold of the Aaron Ciri article to show to all of your friends

61
0:04:47 --> 0:04:51
who ever say that childhood vaccines are a good idea.

62
0:04:51 --> 0:04:59
I state also on the record that I've yet to meet a parent who refused to vaccinate their

63
0:04:59 --> 0:05:03
children who regrets that decision.

64
0:05:03 --> 0:05:06
If you know of any, please let me know.

65
0:05:06 --> 0:05:09
Or please let us know.

66
0:05:09 --> 0:05:15
We comprise lots of professionals here and we're from all around the world.

67
0:05:15 --> 0:05:18
If this is your first time here, welcome and introduce yourself.

68
0:05:18 --> 0:05:19
I apologize for my cough.

69
0:05:19 --> 0:05:22
It's 5 a.m. in the morning here in Melbourne, Australia.

70
0:05:22 --> 0:05:26
I don't know what's happened.

71
0:05:26 --> 0:05:29
Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War III and that the medical science

72
0:05:29 --> 0:05:36
battle is only one of 12 battle fronts of this latest World War.

73
0:05:36 --> 0:05:41
One of the other battle fronts is the legal front, is the legal, is the proper application

74
0:05:41 --> 0:05:47
of law that Chris Coverdale, our guest today, is going to be talking about.

75
0:05:47 --> 0:05:51
Most of us understand that the science is never settled.

76
0:05:51 --> 0:05:56
The meeting runs for two and a half hours after which, for those with the time, Tom

77
0:05:56 --> 0:05:58
Rodman runs a video telegram meeting.

78
0:05:58 --> 0:06:01
Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join.

79
0:06:01 --> 0:06:05
We will listen to our guest presenter, Chris Coverdale, for as long as Chris wishes to

80
0:06:05 --> 0:06:07
speak and then we have Q&A.

81
0:06:07 --> 0:06:13
Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asked the first questions for 15 minutes.

82
0:06:13 --> 0:06:16
If you're offended by anything, be offended.

83
0:06:16 --> 0:06:17
We are lovingly not interested.

84
0:06:17 --> 0:06:23
We reject the offense industry and we reject the triggering industry.

85
0:06:23 --> 0:06:28
The triggering industry that says don't say a particular thing because it may trigger

86
0:06:28 --> 0:06:29
somebody.

87
0:06:29 --> 0:06:34
We call BS on that proposition.

88
0:06:34 --> 0:06:38
We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.

89
0:06:38 --> 0:06:40
Fear is the opposite of love.

90
0:06:40 --> 0:06:44
Fear squashes you.

91
0:06:44 --> 0:06:46
Fear enslaves you.

92
0:06:46 --> 0:06:49
Fear takes away your freedoms.

93
0:06:49 --> 0:06:54
Love on the other hand expands you and liberates you.

94
0:06:54 --> 0:06:58
The meeting is recorded and is uploaded onto the Rumble channel.

95
0:06:58 --> 0:07:05
And now welcome to our presenter, Chris Coverdale, and for the purposes of the recording, for

96
0:07:05 --> 0:07:15
those who didn't receive the meeting invitation, I will tell you about Chris Coverdale.

97
0:07:15 --> 0:07:19
After 25 years running a behavioral science and engineering consultancy firm and four

98
0:07:19 --> 0:07:23
years investigating fraud and corruption in government and large corporations, Chris became

99
0:07:23 --> 0:07:30
a full time peace activist in 2002 when he discovered that the UK government had for

100
0:07:30 --> 0:07:33
many decades been deceiving Parliament.

101
0:07:33 --> 0:07:39
Her Majesty's, now His Majesty's military forces and the public over the illegal criminal

102
0:07:39 --> 0:07:42
nature of war and the funding of war.

103
0:07:42 --> 0:07:48
Having helped to set up legal action against war and make war history, Chris Coverdale

104
0:07:48 --> 0:07:52
has had numerous attempts to prevent Britain's leaders and taxpayers from their criminal

105
0:07:52 --> 0:07:59
participation in war, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

106
0:07:59 --> 0:08:06
Since 2017, Chris has been developing a lawful taxation trust method of paying all taxes

107
0:08:06 --> 0:08:11
and financial payments to government into trusts on the condition that public authorities

108
0:08:11 --> 0:08:16
can only obtain the money when the trustees receive proof that none of the money will

109
0:08:16 --> 0:08:21
ever be used for criminal purposes and that the government is acting in full accord with

110
0:08:21 --> 0:08:28
the UN Charter and the UN Declaration on Principles of International Law.

111
0:08:28 --> 0:08:34
And I was a lawyer for 20 years, I was an international tax lawyer.

112
0:08:34 --> 0:08:42
I understand trusts intimately and we are dealing with this as medical doctors for COVID

113
0:08:42 --> 0:08:49
ethics and governments, the behavior of governments and the use of trust is a wonderful, very

114
0:08:49 --> 0:08:50
interesting idea.

115
0:08:50 --> 0:08:54
So, Chris, welcome to the program, to the meeting.

116
0:08:54 --> 0:08:57
Stephen Frost, thank you for organizing this group.

117
0:08:57 --> 0:08:59
And Chris, we are in your hands.

118
0:08:59 --> 0:09:06
So we look forward to hearing you and then and then having a great discussion about the

119
0:09:06 --> 0:09:08
issues that you raise over to you.

120
0:09:10 --> 0:09:12
Thank you very much, Charles.

121
0:09:12 --> 0:09:18
One thing and thank you, Alex Craner, for recommending you to speak to us.

122
0:09:18 --> 0:09:23
Alex is a great friend of the program, has presented to us on a number of occasions.

123
0:09:23 --> 0:09:24
So thank you, Alex.

124
0:09:24 --> 0:09:25
Over to you, Chris.

125
0:09:26 --> 0:09:27
Thanks, Charles.

126
0:09:28 --> 0:09:33
OK, well, you've got most of my background there in that intro.

127
0:09:34 --> 0:09:43
So my original management development, organization development and cognitive engineering

128
0:09:43 --> 0:09:49
activity leads me to constantly focus on solutions.

129
0:09:49 --> 0:09:52
And that's really what I've been doing for the last 20 years.

130
0:09:52 --> 0:09:57
How do we solve the problems we're faced with, the tyranny?

131
0:09:57 --> 0:10:04
So really, what I want to talk about today is several of the solutions that are available

132
0:10:04 --> 0:10:10
to us all around the world to stop our governments and take back control.

133
0:10:10 --> 0:10:18
So in 2002, I was investigating fraud and corruption in the Foreign and Commonwealth

134
0:10:18 --> 0:10:28
Office in London and discovered that we had been deceived for more than 75 years over

135
0:10:28 --> 0:10:30
the illegality of war.

136
0:10:31 --> 0:10:36
Our government had been telling us that what they were doing overseas in relation to

137
0:10:36 --> 0:10:37
was legal.

138
0:10:37 --> 0:10:45
And many times they would say it has been authorized by the UN Security Council operating

139
0:10:45 --> 0:10:48
under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter.

140
0:10:50 --> 0:10:53
I started to look at this and I found that was a lie.

141
0:10:53 --> 0:10:55
Absolutely incorrect.

142
0:10:55 --> 0:11:01
The UN Security Council can never authorize the use of armed force.

143
0:11:02 --> 0:11:11
The UN Charter, which is the law, international law agreed now between 195 nations, says very

144
0:11:11 --> 0:11:22
clearly in its purposes that we agree never to threaten or to use force and to settle

145
0:11:22 --> 0:11:24
all disputes peacefully.

146
0:11:25 --> 0:11:29
Those are the two prime statements that we have to make.

147
0:11:29 --> 0:11:35
Those are the two prime statements in the United Nations Charter to which we are all

148
0:11:35 --> 0:11:36
signed up to.

149
0:11:38 --> 0:11:45
Of course, looking at this and Britain's history, I discovered that I now know that we have

150
0:11:45 --> 0:11:55
fought somewhere between 80 and 85 illegal wars since 1945, killing somewhere between

151
0:11:55 --> 0:11:58
six and nine million people.

152
0:11:58 --> 0:12:04
It's difficult to get the exact numbers, but one way or the other, we have murdered six

153
0:12:04 --> 0:12:11
to nine million men, women and children since we promised never to threaten or to use force.

154
0:12:13 --> 0:12:18
So it was when I discovered that that I was horrified and started to think, well, what

155
0:12:18 --> 0:12:20
are we going to do about this?

156
0:12:21 --> 0:12:25
Now, the first thing we did was, together with some colleagues, tried to take out an

157
0:12:25 --> 0:12:33
injunction at the High Court in the Royal Courts of Justice in London, an injunction

158
0:12:33 --> 0:12:43
to prevent Tony Blair and the cabinet and the monarch at that time to stop the Iraq

159
0:12:43 --> 0:12:45
War, which was upcoming.

160
0:12:45 --> 0:12:51
This was January 2003, and we eventually went to war in March 2003.

161
0:12:52 --> 0:12:55
Now, unfortunately, they paid no attention to that.

162
0:12:55 --> 0:13:01
We failed to get the injunction and they gave two reasons.

163
0:13:01 --> 0:13:06
One is that there was no way it could be classified as genocide.

164
0:13:07 --> 0:13:16
And the second was, both of which we had put into our argument, the second was that we

165
0:13:16 --> 0:13:23
would not be attacked in London by rogue Iraqi terrorists.

166
0:13:26 --> 0:13:33
So anyway, once we'd failed in that, the war with Iraq started and we were already at war

167
0:13:33 --> 0:13:35
in Afghanistan.

168
0:13:36 --> 0:13:43
And we were reckoning that we were killing up to 100,000 people, men, women and children

169
0:13:43 --> 0:13:55
in the first 18 months of the Iraq War in Iraq and probably half that number in Afghanistan.

170
0:13:55 --> 0:13:58
So the figures were just unbelievable.

171
0:14:01 --> 0:14:02
So we did a number of things.

172
0:14:02 --> 0:14:09
We had a look at what does the law say in this country?

173
0:14:09 --> 0:14:16
Now, one of the problems that had been raised by many people was that we can't prosecute

174
0:14:16 --> 0:14:19
or stop our leaders based on international law.

175
0:14:20 --> 0:14:27
If an international law is agreed, it only comes into effect in domestic legislation

176
0:14:28 --> 0:14:32
when it has been ratified by Parliament and the monarch.

177
0:14:32 --> 0:14:38
I looked at two of the key laws and the one that had been most recently introduced was

178
0:14:38 --> 0:14:45
the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which set up the International Criminal

179
0:14:45 --> 0:14:47
Court in The Hague.

180
0:14:48 --> 0:14:55
And Britain had ratified that and it had been enacted as the International Criminal Court

181
0:14:55 --> 0:14:57
Act 2001.

182
0:14:57 --> 0:14:58
2001.

183
0:14:59 --> 0:15:07
And also, because we have two different systems of law in Britain, it was the International

184
0:15:07 --> 0:15:09
Criminal Court Scotland Act.

185
0:15:10 --> 0:15:18
Scottish law is based on Roman law, whereas English and Welsh law is common law, if you like.

186
0:15:20 --> 0:15:23
So both these acts of Parliament have been brought in.

187
0:15:23 --> 0:15:29
And what struck me was when I read them, I thought, well, why doesn't anybody apply them?

188
0:15:30 --> 0:15:37
The important thing about the International Criminal Court Act is that it introduced not

189
0:15:37 --> 0:15:44
only a law enforcement, an international law enforcement authority for the first time in

190
0:15:44 --> 0:15:44
history.

191
0:15:45 --> 0:15:47
It had taken 60 years to get it set up.

192
0:15:48 --> 0:16:01
But in Britain, the Queen at that time, the monarch, enacted its interlaw in the UK.

193
0:16:01 --> 0:16:08
And in doing so, she handed over jurisdiction over six crimes to the International Criminal

194
0:16:08 --> 0:16:09
Court in The Hague.

195
0:16:10 --> 0:16:17
She put herself and every British resident and citizen under the jurisdiction of the

196
0:16:17 --> 0:16:20
International Criminal Court for six crimes.

197
0:16:21 --> 0:16:23
Now, the six crimes are important.

198
0:16:24 --> 0:16:36
They are war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and conduct ancillary to war crimes,

199
0:16:37 --> 0:16:43
conduct ancillary to crimes against humanity, and conduct ancillary to genocide.

200
0:16:44 --> 0:16:51
Those are the six crimes, universal crimes, that apply around the world and in particular

201
0:16:51 --> 0:16:52
in Britain.

202
0:16:54 --> 0:16:58
So I started to look at, well, what do we mean by these crimes?

203
0:16:59 --> 0:17:05
And the definition of the crimes is very clearly laid out in the legislation.

204
0:17:05 --> 0:17:10
But nobody in government or parliament or anywhere else seems to follow it.

205
0:17:11 --> 0:17:16
First of all, none of the MPs I spoke to at the time had heard about the International

206
0:17:16 --> 0:17:21
Criminal Court Act, which had been passed just a year earlier.

207
0:17:22 --> 0:17:28
It came in in 2001, and I started to investigate it in 2002.

208
0:17:30 --> 0:17:31
They didn't know about it.

209
0:17:32 --> 0:17:39
And it appalled me because looking at the definitions in the legislation, it was quite

210
0:17:39 --> 0:17:47
clear that everything we were doing in Afghanistan and Iraq was not only a number of war crimes,

211
0:17:48 --> 0:17:51
but also crimes against humanity.

212
0:17:51 --> 0:17:55
And most importantly, it met the definition of genocide.

213
0:17:56 --> 0:18:04
So what was happening in Afghanistan and Iraq was that we were killing people because of

214
0:18:04 --> 0:18:08
who they were, not because of anything they had done to us.

215
0:18:10 --> 0:18:11
They committed no crimes.

216
0:18:11 --> 0:18:13
They had attacked no British citizens.

217
0:18:14 --> 0:18:20
We were just killing them because our government, together with George Bush's

218
0:18:21 --> 0:18:29
administration in America, had decided that they wanted to take over Iraq's resources

219
0:18:30 --> 0:18:38
and Afghanistan's resources, and in particular the oil, to move the oil from Central Asia

220
0:18:41 --> 0:18:48
through Afghanistan, for access by the Americans.

221
0:18:49 --> 0:18:59
So going back to the actual crimes, the crime of genocide, which we have now committed,

222
0:19:00 --> 0:19:04
seven military genocides since 2001.

223
0:19:04 --> 0:19:15
Every time we attack a country, we are attacking people with high explosive bombs and rockets

224
0:19:15 --> 0:19:21
and missiles and so on, knowing that when they land and explode, local people will be

225
0:19:21 --> 0:19:21
injured and killed.

226
0:19:23 --> 0:19:31
And we know that in the first shock and awe attacks on Baghdad and then the attacks on

227
0:19:31 --> 0:19:38
Fallujah and all the other military activities that went on led to the deaths of at least

228
0:19:38 --> 0:19:43
100,000 innocent Iraqis in the first 12 months.

229
0:19:45 --> 0:19:53
So that met the crime of genocide and the conditions that one has to prove in court

230
0:19:53 --> 0:19:58
in order to convict a person of genocide.

231
0:19:59 --> 0:20:09
It's quite interesting that, again, going into the detail of it, I asked up to 35, maybe 40 MPs,

232
0:20:09 --> 0:20:12
did they know about the International Criminal Court Act?

233
0:20:13 --> 0:20:20
Did they know about the International Criminal Court Act elements of crimes regulations?

234
0:20:21 --> 0:20:27
And none of them knew about that last issue, and it is the most important of all.

235
0:20:27 --> 0:20:35
What it does is it takes each crime and it defines it in detail, laying out what you have to prove

236
0:20:35 --> 0:20:43
in court in order to convict a person of genocide by killing or genocide by causing bodily and

237
0:20:43 --> 0:20:51
mental harm or genocide by creating conditions inimitable to life.

238
0:20:53 --> 0:20:57
These are three of the five main subheadings of genocide.

239
0:20:58 --> 0:21:04
Each of them is defined in detail in the legislation, but nobody knows it, nobody follows

240
0:21:05 --> 0:21:07
and certainly not our government lawyers.

241
0:21:09 --> 0:21:12
So Lord Goldsmith, who was the Attorney General at the time,

242
0:21:13 --> 0:21:16
kept saying that, yes, it would be legal.

243
0:21:16 --> 0:21:26
It had been authorised under Security Council Resolution 678, 687 and 1441.

244
0:21:26 --> 0:21:29
Again, when I looked at that, I found that was rubbish.

245
0:21:30 --> 0:21:35
The Security Council cannot authorise the use of armed force.

246
0:21:37 --> 0:21:43
Article 41 of the UN Charter, one of the most important articles the world has,

247
0:21:43 --> 0:21:51
says quite clearly, the Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of

248
0:21:51 --> 0:21:56
armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions.

249
0:21:57 --> 0:22:02
Now that couldn't be clearer, not involving the use of armed force.

250
0:22:04 --> 0:22:07
But of course, our government ignores that over and over again.

251
0:22:07 --> 0:22:15
And as I say, we fought maybe 83 illegal wars, something like that, since 1945,

252
0:22:15 --> 0:22:18
ignoring that agreement completely.

253
0:22:18 --> 0:22:24
So that was the issue of trying to get someone to pay attention.

254
0:22:24 --> 0:22:32
And really, for many years, we reported these war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide

255
0:22:32 --> 0:22:39
to every police force in Britain, going into police stations or writing to the chief

256
0:22:39 --> 0:22:41
constables and so on.

257
0:22:41 --> 0:22:45
It was over 300 attempts to do that over a period of six years.

258
0:22:46 --> 0:22:55
Now of those 300 attempts, five of them got as far as the War Crimes and Crimes Against

259
0:22:55 --> 0:22:57
Humanity Unit at New Scotland Yard.

260
0:22:58 --> 0:23:03
Now I'd never heard of that unit, but I became aware of it quite quickly.

261
0:23:03 --> 0:23:11
Anyway, those five reports got to the War Crimes Unit.

262
0:23:11 --> 0:23:17
And on one day, I was called into the unit and they said, well, look, you've got all

263
0:23:17 --> 0:23:18
this evidence.

264
0:23:18 --> 0:23:19
Can you please explain it to us?

265
0:23:21 --> 0:23:28
So I spent 15 hours, five sessions of three hours at a time, and I was told that I had

266
0:23:29 --> 0:23:36
15 hours, five sessions of three hours at a time with the police officers in that unit,

267
0:23:36 --> 0:23:42
going through all the details of the crimes committed by our leaders, by Tony Blair,

268
0:23:42 --> 0:23:50
Jack Straw, Gordon Brown, Lord Goldsmith, and the rest of the cabinet, basically,

269
0:23:50 --> 0:23:54
and also the chiefs of the defence staff.

270
0:23:54 --> 0:23:58
So having gone through all the detail, after the first couple of hours, they were pretty

271
0:23:58 --> 0:24:04
cynical about, you know, who is this mad guy reporting war crimes.

272
0:24:05 --> 0:24:08
However, they did listen and we went through it in detail.

273
0:24:09 --> 0:24:12
And after a couple of hours, they realised, well, there was something to it.

274
0:24:12 --> 0:24:13
This is what the law says.

275
0:24:14 --> 0:24:15
This is what has happened.

276
0:24:15 --> 0:24:17
That is quite obviously a criminal offence.

277
0:24:18 --> 0:24:24
So eventually, they were happy to pass on all the information that we've given them,

278
0:24:25 --> 0:24:29
they said, to the Crown Prosecution Service.

279
0:24:29 --> 0:24:35
Now, in Britain, the Crown Prosecution Service are responsible for prosecuting criminal

280
0:24:35 --> 0:24:36
offences of this nature.

281
0:24:38 --> 0:24:43
The Crown Prosecution Service went through it in some detail, and then the woman who

282
0:24:43 --> 0:24:48
was in charge, a senior member of the Crown Prosecution Service, was promoted to a better

283
0:24:48 --> 0:24:50
job in the north of England.

284
0:24:50 --> 0:24:58
And the project, whatever you like to call it, the crime report, was passed to the most

285
0:24:58 --> 0:25:00
junior person in the office.

286
0:25:00 --> 0:25:06
He had it for about six weeks and finally came back to us with a letter from the Crown

287
0:25:06 --> 0:25:12
Prosecution Service saying that the Crown Prosecution Service was responsible for the

288
0:25:12 --> 0:25:18
saying, well, we're not going to go ahead with the prosecution of Blair and Straw,

289
0:25:18 --> 0:25:25
Hoon, Goldsmith, all the rest of the ones that you have reported to us on the grounds

290
0:25:25 --> 0:25:35
that you have not provided evidence of intent to commit war crimes, intent to commit crimes

291
0:25:35 --> 0:25:39
against humanity, or intent to commit genocide.

292
0:25:40 --> 0:25:42
And therefore, we're not going to go ahead with it.

293
0:25:43 --> 0:25:48
Now, that was a really poor excuse because it's not for the public or the witnesses to

294
0:25:48 --> 0:25:51
the crimes to prove intent.

295
0:25:51 --> 0:25:54
That is the job of the Crown Prosecution Service.

296
0:25:54 --> 0:26:00
They need to go through the detail and they can't take someone into court and prosecute

297
0:26:00 --> 0:26:06
them unless they are absolutely clear for themselves of what's called the mens rea,

298
0:26:06 --> 0:26:08
the intent to commit genocide.

299
0:26:08 --> 0:26:13
Now, we have provided pages of evidence of intent.

300
0:26:13 --> 0:26:20
We've gone through it in detail and it's quite important to know that there's a document

301
0:26:20 --> 0:26:25
called Accounting for Genocide up on our website which people can have a look at in detail

302
0:26:25 --> 0:26:26
later on.

303
0:26:28 --> 0:26:32
I'll give you the details of the website later.

304
0:26:33 --> 0:26:42
But an example of intent to commit genocide took place, for instance, in Parliament in

305
0:26:42 --> 0:26:51
the debate on March 18, 2003, when Parliament debated whether or not to go to war with Iraq.

306
0:26:52 --> 0:26:57
It was a long debate and the first person to speak was obviously Tony Blair.

307
0:26:57 --> 0:27:03
He put the motion to the House and asked everybody to go with it.

308
0:27:06 --> 0:27:10
The last person to speak was the Foreign Secretary, who was Jack Straw at the time.

309
0:27:12 --> 0:27:15
It was interesting how he responded.

310
0:27:15 --> 0:27:18
He said, well, we've had a good debate tonight.

311
0:27:20 --> 0:27:24
We know there will be consequences of our decision tonight.

312
0:27:24 --> 0:27:27
Some of our troops will be killed or may be killed.

313
0:27:28 --> 0:27:33
So too will innocent Iraqi civilians.

314
0:27:34 --> 0:27:37
I urge you to vote with the government tonight.

315
0:27:39 --> 0:27:43
Now, if you look at that statement, it is appalling.

316
0:27:44 --> 0:27:49
What he was urging people to do was to kill innocent Iraqi civilians.

317
0:27:49 --> 0:27:57
Genocide is when you kill someone because of their nationality, their ethnicity, their race, or their religion.

318
0:27:58 --> 0:28:01
And this was killing people because of their nationality.

319
0:28:02 --> 0:28:07
So here he was urging Parliament to commit genocide.

320
0:28:08 --> 0:28:16
The horrifying thing for me was that having said that, the debate finished and the MPs trouped

321
0:28:16 --> 0:28:20
through the lobbies, either to vote for it or to vote against it.

322
0:28:21 --> 0:28:32
And the bit that really worried me was that 412 MPs voted in favour of genocide of the Iraqi people,

323
0:28:32 --> 0:28:37
of going to war, of killing men, women and children because of who they were.

324
0:28:39 --> 0:28:41
So it was appalling.

325
0:28:42 --> 0:28:45
But however, nobody else seemed to see that this was a problem.

326
0:28:45 --> 0:28:46
They carried on.

327
0:28:46 --> 0:28:51
As you know, nobody would listen to the anti-war brigade.

328
0:28:52 --> 0:28:56
And anything we said was almost banned straight away.

329
0:28:56 --> 0:28:58
We weren't able to get on to the mainstream media.

330
0:28:59 --> 0:29:03
And typically, we had a lot of problems.

331
0:29:04 --> 0:29:08
Now, simultaneously to this, trying to do this, I had this question,

332
0:29:08 --> 0:29:14
continuously to this, trying to do this, I had discovered that conduct ancillary to genocide

333
0:29:15 --> 0:29:19
includes any behaviour that is aiding and abetting the crime.

334
0:29:20 --> 0:29:28
And the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Article 25, which is the key

335
0:29:28 --> 0:29:35
criminal responsibility article, says quite clearly anyone who aids and abets the crime

336
0:29:35 --> 0:29:37
is committing the crime.

337
0:29:38 --> 0:29:45
And this includes providing the means for the commission of the crime.

338
0:29:46 --> 0:29:50
And so when we looked at what does it mean by providing the means for the commission of the

339
0:29:50 --> 0:29:56
crime, it was quite obviously providing the troops and the weapons and the money,

340
0:29:56 --> 0:30:04
most importantly the money, to fight the war and the supplies and the training and everything else.

341
0:30:06 --> 0:30:13
So having discovered that the money was a key issue, I realised that paying tax,

342
0:30:14 --> 0:30:20
would be knowing that it would be used to commit, some of it would be used to commit genocide,

343
0:30:21 --> 0:30:25
was a crime of conduct ancillary to genocide.

344
0:30:26 --> 0:30:30
So my immediate response was, I've got to stop paying all taxes.

345
0:30:31 --> 0:30:34
This applies today, by the way, so it is still there.

346
0:30:35 --> 0:30:43
Every time we pay tax, we give our consent to the way the money will be used by the government.

347
0:30:44 --> 0:30:46
And that's the bit that horrified me.

348
0:30:46 --> 0:30:49
So in 2003, I stopped paying tax.

349
0:30:50 --> 0:30:56
And in particular, the big tax in this country that I was paying was the council tax.

350
0:30:56 --> 0:31:02
So I stopped paying council tax and income tax and one or two other things.

351
0:31:02 --> 0:31:09
So I did that for nearly 10 years around South London, West London, all around there.

352
0:31:09 --> 0:31:13
And I didn't get into any trouble for it.

353
0:31:13 --> 0:31:19
They constantly took me to court and that sort of thing, but I managed to get out of it and get away.

354
0:31:19 --> 0:31:27
Anyway, in 19, sorry, 2014, I moved to Rye and Sussex and started the same thing there.

355
0:31:27 --> 0:31:33
And as a result of that, and one other thing that's important, I started because of my

356
0:31:33 --> 0:31:41
investigatory abilities, looking at crimes in large organisations in the boardrooms of large

357
0:31:41 --> 0:31:48
organisations and government departments, which I'd been doing for four years from 1998 to 2002.

358
0:31:49 --> 0:31:54
I have quite a lot of experience of exposing myself to the reality of crime.

359
0:31:54 --> 0:32:01
And in 2002, I have quite a lot of experience of exposing, investigating and exposing corruption.

360
0:32:03 --> 0:32:11
When I arrived in Rye, I discovered all sorts of corruption going on in the local council and in

361
0:32:11 --> 0:32:19
the town council and in the area, including with our MP, Amber Rudd, who later became Home Secretary.

362
0:32:19 --> 0:32:29
So I raised that. Now, as soon as I raised that, within 10 days, I was sent to prison,

363
0:32:31 --> 0:32:35
not for raising that, but for willful refusal to pay tax.

364
0:32:38 --> 0:32:44
So I tried again the following year and again the following year I was sent to prison and

365
0:32:44 --> 0:32:47
I tried again the third year and the third year they sent me to prison.

366
0:32:48 --> 0:32:50
So they're pretty rough down there, let's put it that way.

367
0:32:52 --> 0:32:57
It was after that that I thought I've got to find a different way around this. This is ridiculous.

368
0:32:57 --> 0:33:03
I'm trying to uphold the law as I see it and no court in the country seems to be able to understand

369
0:33:03 --> 0:33:12
what I'm trying to do or uphold and enforce the law. So that was when I came across the issue or

370
0:33:12 --> 0:33:23
thought about in detail how trusts could be used to pay our taxes. The important thing about this

371
0:33:23 --> 0:33:34
is it's a conditional trust, a discretionary revocable conditional trust. Now what I do is

372
0:33:34 --> 0:33:41
to put my taxes in trust for the council saying, yes, I'm very happy to pay it,

373
0:33:41 --> 0:33:47
but only if you prove to me that not a penny of it will be used for a criminal purpose.

374
0:33:48 --> 0:33:54
And in particular, for the criminal purposes of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide.

375
0:33:55 --> 0:34:04
And later I discovered the Terrorism Act 2000 for terrorism and they've never been able to do that.

376
0:34:04 --> 0:34:14
So since 2017, I've put all my taxes in trust for the year and they have not been able to claim them

377
0:34:14 --> 0:34:18
because they can't prove that none of the money will be used for a criminal purpose.

378
0:34:20 --> 0:34:26
The nice thing about it is it's a revocable trust. So they have until the last day of the financial

379
0:34:26 --> 0:34:35
year. In our case, in this country, taxes are the last day of the tax year is April the 5th.

380
0:34:37 --> 0:34:46
So I write it into the trustee to say you can have the money providing you can and it'll be yours

381
0:34:46 --> 0:34:52
and my trustee will hand it over to you if you can prove that it's not being used for a criminal

382
0:34:52 --> 0:35:03
purpose. If you don't, however, on April the 6th, the trustee will remove your right to claim the

383
0:35:03 --> 0:35:11
money and pass it to the secondary beneficiary. And the secondary beneficiary is you. In fact,

384
0:35:11 --> 0:35:21
it was me. So in a sense, what it does is it enables them to have a year to claim the money

385
0:35:21 --> 0:35:29
if they can by stopping warfare, stopping the killing and upholding and enforcing the UN Charter

386
0:35:29 --> 0:35:35
and the UN Declaration on Principles of International Law. So far, they've not been able to do that.

387
0:35:36 --> 0:35:43
Last year and a half or two years now, we've been spreading the word and more and more people are

388
0:35:43 --> 0:35:51
joining in and signing up to these Taxation Trusts, conditional taxation trusts. And I'm

389
0:35:51 --> 0:35:59
pleased to say that it's working. We tell it's working because what happens for me, for instance,

390
0:36:00 --> 0:36:08
every year since 2017, they seem to write off my debt and then start again the following year.

391
0:36:09 --> 0:36:14
So I get all the demands and everything else and summonses and the bailiffs coming around and so on.

392
0:36:15 --> 0:36:23
However, at the end of the year, I get a new demand for the coming year. For instance, this year,

393
0:36:23 --> 0:36:33
having not paid council tax for six years, they sent me a bill saying, according to our records,

394
0:36:33 --> 0:36:43
you owe us £166. So I was quite amused by that. So basically, the £12,000 or thereabouts that I

395
0:36:43 --> 0:36:53
had not paid had been written off. One or two developments to this and the important thing we've

396
0:36:53 --> 0:36:59
now discovered is that we really need to get our companies and corporations to understand that

397
0:36:59 --> 0:37:10
every time they take PAYE, that's pay as you earn from an employee's salary and what's called a

398
0:37:10 --> 0:37:16
national insurance contribution, they take that every month and the company hands it to the revenue

399
0:37:16 --> 0:37:25
and customs. Now in doing so, the company directors are committing serious crimes of conduct ancillary

400
0:37:25 --> 0:37:31
to genocide. So what we're trying to do, we've got five or six small companies already on board

401
0:37:31 --> 0:37:41
with this, is to get the companies themselves to set up trusts for their employees. In the same way,

402
0:37:41 --> 0:37:49
a conditional revocable discretionary trust for all their employees, for all the payments of PAYE

403
0:37:49 --> 0:37:55
and national insurance that have been taken from their salaries during the year are placed in the

404
0:37:55 --> 0:38:03
trust and at the end of the year, if the government hasn't met the conditions, then the employees get

405
0:38:03 --> 0:38:13
the money back. In addition to that, they get a 12.5% employer's contribution back because that

406
0:38:13 --> 0:38:23
also has been withheld from the government in trust for them to take. So anyway, very briefly,

407
0:38:23 --> 0:38:30
that seems to be a solution that's working. There are one or two other things, perhaps we can talk

408
0:38:30 --> 0:38:37
about them later on, but very briefly, one of the main ways of ensuring that we bring back the power

409
0:38:37 --> 0:38:46
to us is to set up our own corporations as cooperatives and take back control locally over

410
0:38:46 --> 0:38:52
all our affairs. Now, the great benefit that the corporations have is that they write their own

411
0:38:53 --> 0:38:59
article association, their own internal laws, and we can be doing that in every

412
0:38:59 --> 0:39:10
constituency in Britain. We're looking at 650 constituencies and we want 650 cooperatives

413
0:39:10 --> 0:39:19
where we own the local cooperative, we manage and take over the activities from the local councils

414
0:39:19 --> 0:39:25
and we start to run our own affairs. So that's a whole new area that perhaps on another time we can

415
0:39:26 --> 0:39:32
go into more detail on at a later date. And then there are a number of things that we've got to do

416
0:39:32 --> 0:39:38
setting up our local parliaments. One thing that many people don't know is how many people here

417
0:39:38 --> 0:39:46
know how many parliaments there are in Switzerland? Does anybody know? Well, there are all the cantons,

418
0:39:47 --> 0:39:57
if you count those as parliaments. Absolutely. There's 26. 26 cantons and there's one corporate

419
0:39:57 --> 0:40:05
one, so 27 there, but also the communes have their own parliaments. Not all of them have, there's

420
0:40:05 --> 0:40:14
2,100 communes and several of them joined together. So there are in total over 400 parliaments in

421
0:40:14 --> 0:40:21
Switzerland with six and a half million people and their laws and other ways of operating are

422
0:40:21 --> 0:40:29
very important for democracy worldwide. So their parliaments, they get the laws together and they

423
0:40:29 --> 0:40:35
work on it a lot of time, but it doesn't become law until it has been agreed by all the people

424
0:40:35 --> 0:40:43
in the referendum. So in the last four years, three years, I think they've only had 12 new laws.

425
0:40:44 --> 0:40:50
Whereas in this country, we've had hundreds. Anyway, I won't go into too much more detail.

426
0:40:50 --> 0:40:55
I think that's briefly telling you about the sort of things that we're doing. There are a lot of

427
0:40:55 --> 0:41:03
other simple solutions that we can go into on some other time. So over to you, Charles.

428
0:41:03 --> 0:41:09
Thank you. Thank you, Chris. And before we get to Stephen, I want to make a couple of points.

429
0:41:10 --> 0:41:18
Please do. I was a tax lawyer for 20 years. I wanted to understand what a trust is, because

430
0:41:18 --> 0:41:24
Chris, we've got people from all around the world here and we use the word trust quite easily and

431
0:41:24 --> 0:41:31
discretionary trusts and unit trusts and fixed trusts and revocable trusts. The important thing

432
0:41:32 --> 0:41:39
in using that term all around the world is it's a simple proposition to create a situation where

433
0:41:39 --> 0:41:46
I look after a piece of property in trust for you. There are three things that need to happen. You

434
0:41:46 --> 0:41:53
need to create a trust. There needs to be property. There needs to be a trustee and there needs to be

435
0:41:53 --> 0:42:00
a beneficiary. And so the best example of that, that most of you would be aware of is a will.

436
0:42:00 --> 0:42:09
Under a will, someone dies, the executives become the trustees. They're holding your assets on

437
0:42:09 --> 0:42:15
behalf of the beneficiaries. That's all. So just picture this pen, and I used to describe this to

438
0:42:15 --> 0:42:21
the doctors, Stephen, back in the mid 1970s when I was explaining trust to them because their income

439
0:42:21 --> 0:42:26
exploded when Medibank was introduced into Australia, when the practice of medicine became

440
0:42:26 --> 0:42:32
a menage à trois, Chris, where it seems to be a doctor-patient relationship and the government

441
0:42:32 --> 0:42:40
put his nose in. So this is a pen. I can give this to Chris. Chris, I want you to hold this. Stephen,

442
0:42:40 --> 0:42:50
I want you to hold this pen as the trustee of this, trustee to hold this pen for my children.

443
0:42:50 --> 0:42:56
And I'll give a piece of document that makes, appoints you, Chris, Stephen, as the trustee to

444
0:42:56 --> 0:43:03
hold this pen in trust for my children and their grandchildren. That's all a trust is.

445
0:43:03 --> 0:43:08
And when you just grasp that concept, you could use a nominee. Many of you've been in financial

446
0:43:08 --> 0:43:15
services, a nominee is somebody who's holding some assets for somebody else. And then what Chris is

447
0:43:15 --> 0:43:21
talking about with discretionary, revocable conditional trusts is that the document that

448
0:43:21 --> 0:43:28
sets up this trust has all those provisions in it. So I've worked on 200 page trust documents and

449
0:43:28 --> 0:43:33
they're very good for death duties. And the Gulbenkians, Stephen, I don't know if you

450
0:43:33 --> 0:43:41
remember that from the UK, the Gulbenkian family through testamentary trusts have controlled

451
0:43:42 --> 0:43:46
resources passing down through generations. That's how the wealthy control their money

452
0:43:46 --> 0:43:50
through trusts. So that's what I want. And the one thing I wanted to say, and the second,

453
0:43:51 --> 0:43:58
I think as a proposition, the thought that I had, Chris, when you were going through this,

454
0:43:58 --> 0:44:05
we need to set up in each country for us in this group, and I put this on the recording,

455
0:44:07 --> 0:44:13
we now need to set up a process for tracking new legislation, Chris, because you really

456
0:44:13 --> 0:44:19
raised this point, all this material comes into parliament in Australia, and the citizens are not

457
0:44:19 --> 0:44:24
tracking it because we used to have trustworthy politicians, perhaps. And what we now have to do

458
0:44:24 --> 0:44:30
is to start tracking, set up systems to track every piece of new legislation that comes in,

459
0:44:30 --> 0:44:36
because your point is well made that most of the politicians in the UK aren't aware of the

460
0:44:36 --> 0:44:42
legislation that's passing, including the International Criminal Court Act. So I've taken

461
0:44:42 --> 0:44:48
note of that, of gosh, that's a very interesting thing of make, and there's a way to track it,

462
0:44:48 --> 0:44:52
because all parliaments publish the new legislation that's coming. So great suggestion,

463
0:44:53 --> 0:44:57
and thank you for the great work you've done, and I honour the courage that you've had in going to

464
0:44:57 --> 0:45:03
prison. Not many people here have gone to prison as best I can tell, including Stephen. So Stephen

465
0:45:03 --> 0:45:08
Frost, next 15 minutes over to you. Have you been to prison, Stephen? No, I haven't. No, I haven't.

466
0:45:09 --> 0:45:13
They probably would have liked to have put me there, though. Well, yeah, that's a different

467
0:45:13 --> 0:45:20
business. When I was exposing criminal activity involving Class A controlled drugs in the British

468
0:45:20 --> 0:45:27
military, they were doing it by other means, Charles. I think Chris knows what I mean.

469
0:45:27 --> 0:45:33
So Chris, I remember your name. Thank you, Charles. I remember your name. I was struggling

470
0:45:33 --> 0:45:40
to remember what I remembered you for, and then I found an email by chance yesterday from you,

471
0:45:41 --> 0:45:47
or me to you, I can't remember. So anyway, it brought it back to me that I used to read

472
0:45:47 --> 0:45:54
what you were writing about the legality or illegality of the Iraq War, and I was something

473
0:45:54 --> 0:45:59
of an expert in inverted commas on that too. So I was very interested in what you were

474
0:46:00 --> 0:46:10
writing about. So, but my forte was apparently was David Kelly, Dr David Kelly. Oh, yes. And so I was

475
0:46:10 --> 0:46:18
one of the three doctors who broke the narrative, which was that they were trying to put it about

476
0:46:18 --> 0:46:25
via the Hutton Report and the Hutton Inquiry, which purported to be a public inquiry, but we

477
0:46:25 --> 0:46:32
found out it wasn't, and the evidence wasn't being heard under oath. They were trying to put it about

478
0:46:32 --> 0:46:38
that he had committed suicide, but we didn't succeed in getting an inquest, which was our lever.

479
0:46:40 --> 0:46:45
But for legal reasons, essentially, we had to go to the Supreme Court twice, and there's just no

480
0:46:45 --> 0:46:52
way we could do that. But we did change public opinion without an inquest. So in a way, the

481
0:46:52 --> 0:47:00
inquest wasn't needed, ironically, in the end. And so I don't know whether you know me or know my name.

482
0:47:00 --> 0:47:09
Well, I remember now, yes, David Halpin was the key person I was working with. I think there was a

483
0:47:10 --> 0:47:17
David Halpin and somebody what's in in Scotland? No, no, no, he wasn't one of the original. He was

484
0:47:17 --> 0:47:23
a doctor. He was in Scotland. He came on later. Oh, yeah, right. Yes, I remember. But the original

485
0:47:23 --> 0:47:31
three were one in South Africa, who he was, so Senate. All right. He was an anesthetist in South

486
0:47:31 --> 0:47:38
Africa, interestingly, and David Halpin in North Devon and me in Wales, North Wales. And so and we

487
0:47:38 --> 0:47:44
were put together by someone who had noticed on the Internet. We didn't know this person. Her name

488
0:47:44 --> 0:47:52
was Rowena Thursby. She found us and contacted us via an intermediary and asked us whether we

489
0:47:52 --> 0:47:57
would consider working together because we were saying not exactly the same thing, but pretty,

490
0:47:57 --> 0:48:05
you know, suggesting that it wasn't suicide. And anyway, I won't go into that. But that's how I knew

491
0:48:05 --> 0:48:16
you. So and so I don't know if you know this, but today I read in the emails, it's amazing what you

492
0:48:16 --> 0:48:23
find if you try to keep your memory and think, keep thinking when you're reading your emails.

493
0:48:23 --> 0:48:30
So Suella Braverman was the attorney general. I had forgotten this if I ever knew it, actually.

494
0:48:30 --> 0:48:37
Suella Braverman was the attorney general in 2020. Yeah. And one of the things that was raised in

495
0:48:37 --> 0:48:43
the email, which I saw was that actually she'd written a legal advice as the attorney general,

496
0:48:43 --> 0:48:51
as the principal law officer for the United Kingdom government for the lockdowns. Prior to the

497
0:48:51 --> 0:48:58
lockdowns. But nobody's ever seen that legal advice. And the story today was that Suella Braverman was

498
0:48:58 --> 0:49:04
talking about was rowing back essentially and saying that suggesting from a quote which I saw

499
0:49:05 --> 0:49:12
that, you know, that we should never have gone into lockdowns because it was the worst option

500
0:49:12 --> 0:49:20
for this country. Yeah, so she's, but the point was made that she's written the legal advice,

501
0:49:20 --> 0:49:27
which no one's seen. I haven't seen it. I don't know anybody who has. And so if she's rowing

502
0:49:27 --> 0:49:34
back now and she was putting that opinion about back then, and she was ignored by the forces in

503
0:49:34 --> 0:49:39
the United Kingdom, even though she was the attorney general, that's important because I

504
0:49:39 --> 0:49:47
remember the attorney general's advice was extremely important in, according to Professor

505
0:49:47 --> 0:49:54
Philip Sands, the international law expert at University College London, in his wonderful book

506
0:49:54 --> 0:49:58
Lawless World. I don't know if you know that. Have you read it? I do indeed. Yes, I've talked to him about it.

507
0:49:58 --> 0:50:05
Absolutely. I've talked to him about absolutely wonderful chapter in that book where he talks

508
0:50:05 --> 0:50:13
about the legal advice. So the point is that the legal advice was absolutely crucial in deciding

509
0:50:13 --> 0:50:21
the illegality or otherwise of the Iraq war. And the same point, because I know about that, I knew

510
0:50:21 --> 0:50:29
about today, I knew that the legal advice about the lockdowns in this country is extremely important

511
0:50:29 --> 0:50:35
for exactly the same reason. And I hadn't thought of it previously. So we need to get that legal

512
0:50:35 --> 0:50:41
advice of Suella Bravermans somehow or other. I just mentioned it because I think I thought you

513
0:50:41 --> 0:50:49
might be interested. Absolutely. I'm definitely interested. It's fundamental. What I've discovered

514
0:50:49 --> 0:50:57
was that some of the legal advice that Lord Goldsmith gave for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars

515
0:50:57 --> 0:51:04
was finally brought out during the Chilcot report. And Chilcot managed to get some of that

516
0:51:04 --> 0:51:11
information out. But they are still keeping the legal advice to themselves. The real problem is

517
0:51:11 --> 0:51:18
that the attorney general, he or she sees themselves as the advisor to the government

518
0:51:18 --> 0:51:26
rather than the explainer of the law to the people. And those are two totally different roles.

519
0:51:27 --> 0:51:35
And nobody is explaining the law, the laws of war and peace, for instance, nobody has in the last

520
0:51:35 --> 0:51:43
75 years explained those laws to the people or the armed forces or the civil service or anybody

521
0:51:43 --> 0:51:49
else. And this is a major problem we have, a systemic problem in Britain. But Chris,

522
0:51:49 --> 0:51:54
whether there are laws for it or not, I'm sure there must be something somewhere that the government

523
0:51:55 --> 0:52:02
is the servant of the people, correct? That's what people think anyway. Is that codified in law,

524
0:52:02 --> 0:52:08
to your knowledge? Well, yes, it certainly is in terms of 1689 or thereabouts.

525
0:52:09 --> 0:52:13
So the government can't say that they're following the legal advice of the attorney general

526
0:52:13 --> 0:52:19
if that conflicts with the interests of the people. So in the lockdowns, for example, and indeed in the

527
0:52:20 --> 0:52:26
Iraq war, you know, the population of this country don't want their taxes to be used for illegal wars.

528
0:52:26 --> 0:52:33
So, yeah, I can't see that the government saying, oh, we followed the legal advice from our attorney

529
0:52:33 --> 0:52:44
general, lessens the problem for them. Can you? It does in the sense that we have a very corrupt

530
0:52:45 --> 0:52:51
legal system, justice system in this country. I always used to believe in it until perhaps

531
0:52:52 --> 0:52:58
some 15 years ago. And every year I go to a court, I get more and more

532
0:53:00 --> 0:53:06
disgusted by the constant manipulation of the law to benefit the government and local.

533
0:53:06 --> 0:53:15
Absolutely. The problem is the judges. I never hear any lawyers criticising judges or criticising

534
0:53:16 --> 0:53:22
the possibility that there may be lots of corrupt judges. So they seem to want to defend the legal

535
0:53:22 --> 0:53:27
system or they probably know that it's a ticket to lose your licence as a lawyer if you start

536
0:53:27 --> 0:53:32
criticising the courts and the judges. But the fact is the judges are still human beings, whether

537
0:53:32 --> 0:53:38
they're judges or not. And so they've got all the human frailties as far as I'm concerned. And the

538
0:53:38 --> 0:53:45
capacity for them being or the potential for them being bribed or coerced is massive, given the

539
0:53:45 --> 0:53:51
stakes that exist, especially when the government is involved in the case. But the government, of

540
0:53:51 --> 0:53:58
course, is the servant of the people. But that seems to get lost. It does so often. I mean,

541
0:53:58 --> 0:54:05
you're so right. I wish they would understand that more people would understand it. However,

542
0:54:05 --> 0:54:13
all the judges, for instance, in the last few years have after Lord Denning, who died in the

543
0:54:13 --> 0:54:23
80s, something like that, not a single judge has repeated the fact that the people are sovereign.

544
0:54:23 --> 0:54:29
They keep saying Parliament is sovereign or the monarch is sovereign or whatever it is.

545
0:54:30 --> 0:54:36
And they forget about the people being sovereign. And this is what we have to remind them of again.

546
0:54:36 --> 0:54:41
So the declaration indeed, the four pager rather than 80 pager

547
0:54:44 --> 0:54:49
on the website lays out quite clearly that we are declaring our sovereignty

548
0:54:50 --> 0:54:59
as individual men and women and taking back our power. And the nice thing about the one thing I

549
0:54:59 --> 0:55:14
wanted to add for Charles was to say that the main issue about taxation trusts is that the tax

550
0:55:14 --> 0:55:23
no longer belongs to you when you've put it in trust. So you have paid your tax when you put it

551
0:55:23 --> 0:55:30
in trust for the beneficiary being the government. And the important bit is that you then,

552
0:55:31 --> 0:55:37
if you put on a time limit to it and say you must achieve this by the end of the year,

553
0:55:38 --> 0:55:45
the secondary beneficiary can be you. And you're absolutely right. There's the settler, the trustee

554
0:55:45 --> 0:55:52
and the beneficiary are all part of it. And you cannot be a beneficiary of your own trust. That's

555
0:55:52 --> 0:56:00
illegal and criminal. But you can be a secondary beneficiary if the primary beneficiary doesn't

556
0:56:00 --> 0:56:06
meet the needs of the trust. So an example for that, just a quick one, when you're making a will

557
0:56:06 --> 0:56:11
and you want to leave your money to your grandson or something and you say, right,

558
0:56:11 --> 0:56:20
I leave a hundred thousand pounds to Johnny, providing he doesn't marry Sally and he

559
0:56:20 --> 0:56:27
joins the family firm by the age of 25. Now, if he meets those conditions and he doesn't marry Sally

560
0:56:27 --> 0:56:32
and he joins the family firm, then he gets a hundred thousand pounds. If he doesn't meet the

561
0:56:32 --> 0:56:40
conditions, the trustees are bound in law to hand the money over to the secondary or tertiary

562
0:56:40 --> 0:56:46
beneficiaries in the will. So that is one of the fundamentals of what we're trying to do here,

563
0:56:46 --> 0:56:54
is to make sure that this is entirely lawful and we are following the system that the top 50,000

564
0:56:54 --> 0:57:00
or a hundred thousand people in Britain follow all the time to hide their money from the taxman in

565
0:57:00 --> 0:57:07
the Cayman Islands or Gersey, Germsey, the Isle of Man, all the other tax havens around the world.

566
0:57:08 --> 0:57:15
And we are using this entirely lawfully in England and Wales and in Scotland.

567
0:57:17 --> 0:57:25
To using the same system for the benefit of taxpayers and the world as a whole to try and stop war.

568
0:57:28 --> 0:57:37
Chris, when they put you in prison for not paying tax, income tax was it, or council tax?

569
0:57:37 --> 0:57:44
Council tax, willful refusal was the term they used. But couldn't you appeal that on the grounds

570
0:57:44 --> 0:57:50
that actually, were they saying that the willful refusal extended back many, many years as it did?

571
0:57:51 --> 0:57:58
No, it was just for that year, even though they knew that it had gone back. I mean, in Rye,

572
0:57:58 --> 0:58:01
in that area, it was the first year that I'd appeared in front of them.

573
0:58:02 --> 0:58:09
Yeah, I see. But isn't it a defense that you'd lived in London prior to Rye and that you had

574
0:58:09 --> 0:58:15
not been pursued for exactly the same alleged criminal offense?

575
0:58:16 --> 0:58:25
Yes, I mean, basically, they pay no attention to my argument at all. So when I got in court,

576
0:58:25 --> 0:58:34
for instance, in Rye, in Hastings, which is the court for Rye, the judge before she sent me to

577
0:58:34 --> 0:58:40
prison said, I had quoted the International Criminal Court Act and I was trying to uphold

578
0:58:40 --> 0:58:47
and enforce the law. The judge said to me... Even in a civil case, they have to listen to you,

579
0:58:47 --> 0:58:52
and particularly in a criminal case where they're going to, the judge is intending to send you to

580
0:58:52 --> 0:58:59
prison on behalf of the government, you would think that they are absolutely required to listen to

581
0:58:59 --> 0:59:03
you. So why didn't they listen to you? Well, basically, we have one of the most corrupt,

582
0:59:04 --> 0:59:12
I have to say, Southeast, East Sussex and this area is one of the most corrupt in the country

583
0:59:12 --> 0:59:20
and is dominated by the Masonic groups, if you like, in each of the police, the crime prosecution

584
0:59:20 --> 0:59:30
service, the council, the judges and others. Basically, I even had quoted to me when I quoted

585
0:59:30 --> 0:59:37
the International Criminal Court Act 2001, the judge said to me that doesn't apply in this court.

586
0:59:38 --> 0:59:48
I couldn't believe it. But by the way, it's not a criminal offense. It's a civil offense. It's the

587
0:59:48 --> 0:59:56
only civil offense hangover from the days of debtors prison. Well, how can you send someone

588
0:59:56 --> 1:00:03
to prison for a civil offense? As I say, it's the last thing. I think it's finished now, but certainly

589
1:00:03 --> 1:00:13
I was three years in a row because I had not handed the money to the council. But there was a

590
1:00:13 --> 1:00:19
precedent in London. They hadn't sent you to prison. So how could East Sussex send you to prison?

591
1:00:19 --> 1:00:25
Why didn't your lawyers argue that? Well, first of all, I couldn't afford any lawyers. And secondly,

592
1:00:25 --> 1:00:33
the duty lawyers are all in the pocket of the courts and they refused to argue my case.

593
1:00:34 --> 1:00:39
Yeah, they refused to argue certain things. So in my case, they refused to say certain things that

594
1:00:39 --> 1:00:44
I was begging them to say. And I was very suspicious. Well, one of the things one of my

595
1:00:44 --> 1:00:51
lawyers was the one of the most famous lawyers in the country. I don't want to name him. And the

596
1:00:51 --> 1:01:01
judge who had purple hair, by the way, or was it pink? Well, purple pink. So I said to him,

597
1:01:02 --> 1:01:08
do you think it's appropriate that a judge in such a high profile case with you representing me?

598
1:01:09 --> 1:01:17
I said that she comes here with pink hair and dressed as she did, you know, you wouldn't get

599
1:01:17 --> 1:01:26
tubs for her. Anyway, I'm not a snob, but you know, I think that I think I think the judge maybe

600
1:01:26 --> 1:01:31
should pay attention to the judges should pay attention to the way they dress, because actually,

601
1:01:31 --> 1:01:38
if they don't, they might get judged by the people they're judging. So 15 minutes, they stay. I just

602
1:01:38 --> 1:01:45
think that but anyway, he she was asking so she knew exactly who my lawyer was the famous lawyer.

603
1:01:46 --> 1:01:52
But she insisted on getting him to to spell out his name to the court.

604
1:01:55 --> 1:02:01
It was just ridiculous. Honestly, the whole thing was a farce. And I did notice that the lawyers,

605
1:02:01 --> 1:02:06
you know, not just those lawyers, various lawyers wouldn't argue certain points, which I thought

606
1:02:06 --> 1:02:11
were important. And I and but I couldn't get never got could get an answer as to why not. And

607
1:02:11 --> 1:02:19
I think it was to do with being seen to be critical of the courts. So eventually that that came out,

608
1:02:19 --> 1:02:24
they actually said it looks, you know, I couldn't say that I wanted to withdraw my appeal on access

609
1:02:24 --> 1:02:29
to justice grounds. But I insisted they did that. And they said, I said, Why are you so worried

610
1:02:29 --> 1:02:34
about that? And because they will come after you. They'll think you criticizing the courts. I said,

611
1:02:34 --> 1:02:39
Well, I am criticizing the court. And that's why I'm withdrawing my appeal. That's what the access

612
1:02:39 --> 1:02:47
to justice grounds is. And they said, Oh, well, I said, Why can't I do that? I did do it in the end.

613
1:02:47 --> 1:02:52
But but they said, Oh, the law, the court will come the judge will come after you for costs,

614
1:02:52 --> 1:03:01
will reward costs against you. Outrageous. So so so we did argue that after a big argument. And then

615
1:03:02 --> 1:03:04
but they never came after me because

616
1:03:05 --> 1:03:12
Well, that's very good. You've been more successful than me. I was charged in a case in London,

617
1:03:13 --> 1:03:19
when it which went up to the Court of Appeal when all the protesters were pushed out of

618
1:03:19 --> 1:03:27
Parliament Square. I don't know if you remember that it was about 10 years ago. And the there was

619
1:03:27 --> 1:03:37
eventually there was five different individuals in the case. Three of us were litigants in person,

620
1:03:37 --> 1:03:44
and two of them were had ranks of barristers and solicitors supporting them. Yeah. And Lord

621
1:03:44 --> 1:03:53
Neuberger, who was the head of the court at the time, the Court of Appeal, awarded costs of

622
1:03:53 --> 1:04:02
£133,800. Against you and the three litigants in person and not against any of the others.

623
1:04:03 --> 1:04:11
So there we were three of us, one university professor, myself and one homeless man,

624
1:04:14 --> 1:04:22
supposedly pay £133,000 costs. And was it ever paid? Luckily, I remembered

625
1:04:22 --> 1:04:30
at the just at the last minute, he awarded the cost to the litigants in person. And in the original

626
1:04:30 --> 1:04:37
case, one of the litigants in person was a statement that applied to anybody who visited

627
1:04:37 --> 1:04:45
Parliament Square. And I worked out that roughly there were 60 million people in a year,

628
1:04:45 --> 1:04:51
who either go through Parliament Square or visit Parliament Square or pass by.

629
1:04:52 --> 1:05:01
So I said to Lord Neuberger, well, I'm assuming that £133,800 has to be split between 60 million

630
1:05:01 --> 1:05:09
and three people. Because he'd made the judgment or the order. That's what happened. Love it. All

631
1:05:09 --> 1:05:16
right, we're gonna move on. But you know, Chris, Stephen will come back and there's, there's,

632
1:05:17 --> 1:05:22
there's so many elements to unpack. But one of our attendees, Chris, I won't name him at the moment

633
1:05:22 --> 1:05:28
has asked whether you're willing to adopt him. He wants you to be his dad, and he will work for

634
1:05:28 --> 1:05:37
you for nothing. So there you are. So I will, I will. I love the idea of working for me for nothing.

635
1:05:37 --> 1:05:43
I think the adoption process in this country is a bit dodgy. Well, this this guy would be a useful

636
1:05:43 --> 1:05:49
ally for you to work for. I'm looking for people we've set up a property as an organisation,

637
1:05:49 --> 1:05:54
and we're looking for people who'd like to join us and work on the principle of getting a bit more

638
1:05:54 --> 1:06:00
integrity in public life. That's very good. Very good. And Stephen Frost, well done on your work

639
1:06:00 --> 1:06:07
that you've done. You've clearly stood up for the truth. And the law, the obligation of the duty of

640
1:06:07 --> 1:06:14
lawyers, primarily first, first preference, first requirement of lawyers is their duty to the court.

641
1:06:15 --> 1:06:21
Secondly, to their clients. So, Stephen, you've shone a light on that fraud where

642
1:06:21 --> 1:06:26
that was my training ground. Yeah. Had I not gone through that experience, I wouldn't have been

643
1:06:26 --> 1:06:34
equipped for 2020. Yeah. And David Kelly was part of it anyway. So that's we now have that's that's

644
1:06:35 --> 1:06:41
the gift, isn't it? And look at the gift of COVID is these meetings. Okay, we go to Peter Underground

645
1:06:41 --> 1:06:50
now, Chris, or Peter, you maybe Peter, Peter Underwater. The water indeed here in South Africa.

646
1:06:50 --> 1:07:01
Yeah. Chris, stunning, absolutely stunning presentation. Thank you so much. I will take you

647
1:07:01 --> 1:07:13
back to 1963 when I joined the war office, HMG. And I can tell you, after six months, I discovered

648
1:07:14 --> 1:07:24
the infeccies of what was going on. And I left very quickly. I went off to do other things.

649
1:07:25 --> 1:07:37
I thank you so much. Subsequently, I worked for the citizens advice bureau in UK for 10 years or more.

650
1:07:38 --> 1:07:47
And we still are our group still stick together. Old guys. We're going back a long way.

651
1:07:47 --> 1:08:00
But we work to discover the truth. And you've done that, my friend. And I applaud you in all the work

652
1:08:00 --> 1:08:11
you've done. I'd like to join you, your group. Thank you so much. Delighted. Thank you very much.

653
1:08:11 --> 1:08:19
Just as a matter of fact, I joined Shell in 1964 as a management trainee. And I learned

654
1:08:19 --> 1:08:26
very similar things to you in the Ministry of Defence. We're up to the core.

655
1:08:30 --> 1:08:38
Absolutely. It's horrendous, my friend. It's horrendous. We are working together as a group.

656
1:08:39 --> 1:08:45
Glad to join you. Thank you. So can I just add one thing there very quickly?

657
1:08:47 --> 1:08:53
When I was looking at corruption and fraud and corruption between 1998 and 2002,

658
1:08:53 --> 1:09:01
I looked at eight FT100 companies, the boardroom corruption on those eight companies, and seven

659
1:09:01 --> 1:09:09
government departments. And everywhere I looked, I found corrupt practice in spades.

660
1:09:11 --> 1:09:17
It is horrendous. And we've always been brought up to believe that the British government is

661
1:09:18 --> 1:09:23
above all that. And we don't do it. But it's quite the opposite. Yeah, they're the worst.

662
1:09:25 --> 1:09:28
Thank you so much, Chris. Delighted.

663
1:09:32 --> 1:09:40
Who's next? Charles, you're muted. Sorry. Chris, you've got volunteers, plenty coming forward.

664
1:09:40 --> 1:09:45
And that's wonderful. Now Janet is next because she keeps going behind Mark and then Mark Steele.

665
1:09:45 --> 1:09:53
Janet. Yeah, hi. Thank you. Do you consider that the UK government is an accessory to genocide in

666
1:09:53 --> 1:10:01
Gaza? If so, have you taken any steps to remedy that? And if not, are there any steps we can take

667
1:10:01 --> 1:10:08
which could potentially be taken? Yeah, can I just say one thing? That

668
1:10:10 --> 1:10:17
the government itself is not an accessory. The whole point about the International Criminal

669
1:10:17 --> 1:10:26
Court Act is that it applies to individuals. So Rishi Sunak or Boris Johnson or any one of the

670
1:10:27 --> 1:10:33
members of the British government, they are committing crimes of conduct ancillary to

671
1:10:33 --> 1:10:39
genocide, but a government doesn't. Governments are held to account in the International Court

672
1:10:39 --> 1:10:46
of Justice. Individuals are held to account in the International Criminal Court. So we can do

673
1:10:46 --> 1:10:52
something about it. And you're absolutely right. The crime is conduct ancillary to genocide.

674
1:10:53 --> 1:10:58
And in fact, I'm doing something right now about it. I don't want to talk too much about it until

675
1:10:58 --> 1:11:08
we get the information out. But we have all the evidence we need to prove that politicians,

676
1:11:10 --> 1:11:20
civil servants, the monarch and others have committed serious crimes of conduct ancillary

677
1:11:20 --> 1:11:26
to genocide. One thing that people don't realize is that the Queen, when she was monarch,

678
1:11:27 --> 1:11:33
every time she sent our troops overseas and they started murdering men, women and children,

679
1:11:33 --> 1:11:41
wherever it was, she committed a crime of conduct ancillary to genocide. That was the times after

680
1:11:41 --> 1:11:50
2001 when that crime came into effect in the UK. Now, normally with the monarch, they are excluded

681
1:11:50 --> 1:11:58
from these crimes unless there is a specific statement in the law which says that they are

682
1:11:58 --> 1:12:08
included. And luckily, Section 78 of the International Criminal Court Act makes it quite clear this act

683
1:12:08 --> 1:12:15
applies to the Crown and all subjects of the Crown and all property of the Crown. So do have

684
1:12:15 --> 1:12:21
a look at Section 78 and you'll realize that every single member of our government, every

685
1:12:22 --> 1:12:30
corporate taxpayer and banker and others who are handing money over to the government

686
1:12:31 --> 1:12:37
in large quantities for the corporate people is committing a criminal offense of conduct ancillary

687
1:12:37 --> 1:12:44
to genocide. Thank you. Well said. Well said, Chris, and thank you, Janet.

688
1:12:44 --> 1:12:50
Mark Steele, doing great work, Chris, and I hope you two collaborate intensely. Mark?

689
1:12:52 --> 1:12:59
Fantastic to hear your information, Chris, and you are obviously early in the fight against these

690
1:13:00 --> 1:13:13
murderers. My sorted background is the electronic weaponry deployment 5G in particular, and what I've

691
1:13:13 --> 1:13:22
recently discovered is that the low emission zone networks, these 15 minute zones, are littered with

692
1:13:22 --> 1:13:33
laser weapon systems. So we've got these, what are demonstrably not ANP or cameras. They have

693
1:13:33 --> 1:13:41
got laser diodes. There's several of them. There's 24 actually in a weapon and they are category 4.

694
1:13:42 --> 1:13:47
So I've done quite a bit of work with the Blade Runner guys who are cutting them down faster than

695
1:13:47 --> 1:13:54
Mayor Carnage can put them up, but there's a significant environmental risk to this technology.

696
1:13:54 --> 1:14:01
TFL have told me that there's no radar there. There is. I have the technicalities of it as well

697
1:14:01 --> 1:14:07
as the hardware. So they've said there's no radar, there's no lidar, it's just this ANP or camera.

698
1:14:07 --> 1:14:12
That's completely false. This is fusion technology, extremely dangerous and would

699
1:14:12 --> 1:14:20
absolutely cause mass murder. So there's a potential, obviously with the work that you're

700
1:14:20 --> 1:14:25
carrying out in a minute, with the information that I have and the technicalities and the problem

701
1:14:25 --> 1:14:30
that the government have, it's irrefutable. I can show that these are weapons systems,

702
1:14:31 --> 1:14:38
energy weapons that the current government, Mayor Carnage, we have them in Birmingham,

703
1:14:38 --> 1:14:41
we've got them in Manchester, we've got them in Leeds and these are a latent

704
1:14:42 --> 1:14:49
15 minute city kill box. That's what they're planning. It isn't connected with the contamination

705
1:14:49 --> 1:14:55
that was in the COVID-19 injection, which we now have enough evidence to show that that was

706
1:14:55 --> 1:15:01
actually a biochemical weapons injection, but it's a technological play that is absolutely

707
1:15:01 --> 1:15:10
interconnected with the 5G network, 5G wireless body area network. So it was a track trace

708
1:15:10 --> 1:15:16
termination technology that was developed by the DOD for tracking wet well on the battlefield for

709
1:15:16 --> 1:15:24
an extermination. So most people at the minute, so we've got this very, very serious potential

710
1:15:24 --> 1:15:32
attack on the people, unfortunately, who were victims of taking that technological injection.

711
1:15:33 --> 1:15:39
It's got a track trace termination technology. It's the graphite ferritic nanometre material antennas

712
1:15:39 --> 1:15:45
that we tracked in this battle space and the future battle space is a 15 minute city. So

713
1:15:46 --> 1:15:50
any sort of information that you need in relation to that to show that the British

714
1:15:50 --> 1:15:56
government are currently planning a mass murderous genocide. They've already committed genocide.

715
1:15:56 --> 1:16:01
The nanoparticular contaminants that were in the vaccines co-sterilization

716
1:16:01 --> 1:16:07
wants to get to the reproductive parts. The evidence is quite damning in relation to that.

717
1:16:07 --> 1:16:15
So I think, you know, we can really assist with, you know, the work that you've done previously

718
1:16:16 --> 1:16:21
to assist and to show that the government are absolutely out of lunch. And unfortunately,

719
1:16:22 --> 1:16:29
your judges, your barristers, they're all target acquired. Most of them have taken the injection.

720
1:16:29 --> 1:16:37
Most of them can be eliminated whenever or however the control as the AI weapon system,

721
1:16:37 --> 1:16:46
it's basically Microsoft's, Microsoft's Azure, which is the Lockheed military 5G military

722
1:16:46 --> 1:16:50
operating platform. It's an AI operating system and it operates all of this type of

723
1:16:50 --> 1:16:57
technology that's installed in street lights, as well as these laser guns and the environmental

724
1:16:57 --> 1:17:05
detriment is significant. Radar in particular, as well as the LIDAR system and I've currently

725
1:17:05 --> 1:17:11
had a number of communications with TFL. I've got an ICU case against them because they've

726
1:17:11 --> 1:17:18
deceived me. It's one of two things. Either they do not know what they have deployed in relation to

727
1:17:18 --> 1:17:29
this ULAS directional weapon system or they've just lied or don't know what it is. So either

728
1:17:29 --> 1:17:37
way they're stuck between a rock and a hard place. Mark, I really appreciate the work you've been

729
1:17:37 --> 1:17:43
doing there. I think it's excellent. It really is. We need to bring this understanding to the rest

730
1:17:43 --> 1:17:49
of the world and certainly to the England and Wales very rapidly. And I would recommend having

731
1:17:49 --> 1:17:55
a look at the legislation on genocide because you're absolutely right. If you are intentionally

732
1:17:55 --> 1:18:03
killing people and knowingly killing people, you don't have to say I am deliberately doing it.

733
1:18:03 --> 1:18:08
If you are knowingly killing people because of their nationality, because they happen to be

734
1:18:08 --> 1:18:15
living near a mast or anything else, then you can start charging them with conduct ancillary to

735
1:18:15 --> 1:18:22
genocide. The big companies that are putting up these masts. So I would recommend having a

736
1:18:22 --> 1:18:29
look at the detail of the legislation on genocide. It doesn't just apply in war. It applies

737
1:18:29 --> 1:18:37
particularly also to the medical situation that we've been through in the last four years. I think

738
1:18:37 --> 1:18:45
we have committed at least five genocides in relation to that in the UK. And I'm sure it

739
1:18:45 --> 1:18:50
applies in just about every other country that's listening to this programme. Brilliant. Well,

740
1:18:50 --> 1:18:56
fantastic, Chris. I mean, unfortunately, you spent a little bit of time in prison

741
1:18:57 --> 1:19:03
due to your resistance to this crime. But this has been basically, these weapons are being deployed

742
1:19:04 --> 1:19:09
on the mainland of the United Kingdom, which is treason. So it's treason as well as the

743
1:19:09 --> 1:19:14
genocidal agenda because these are demonstrably weapon systems that are deployed on top of us.

744
1:19:14 --> 1:19:22
Yes, no, let's go for both of them. Brilliant. So which of those crimes, Charles, in your opinion,

745
1:19:22 --> 1:19:29
and Chris and Mark, so you bring up treason. I agree treason seems to me to be the biggest crime

746
1:19:29 --> 1:19:37
of war. But maybe it's outpunched by genocide or crimes against humanity. What do you think, Chris?

747
1:19:38 --> 1:19:45
And Charles? I'm of that belief, yes. I believe that the legislation, the important bit is that

748
1:19:45 --> 1:19:53
the legislation on genocide has been updated and updated. And in 2001, with the introduction of the

749
1:19:53 --> 1:20:00
elements of crimes regulations, it is now so tight, it is almost difficult to get around it. So I

750
1:20:00 --> 1:20:07
believe go for the crime of conduct ancillary to genocide as the best route for the moment.

751
1:20:08 --> 1:20:17
Treason tends to be rather generalized and comes from, you know, way back 300, 400 years as well.

752
1:20:17 --> 1:20:23
But Chris, do you think that what's happened in the last four years was treason? Because I do.

753
1:20:23 --> 1:20:29
But anyway, you don't have to. I've really been focusing on seeing it as genocide.

754
1:20:30 --> 1:20:37
Rather than treason, I think there's more mileage in charging people with conduct ancillary to

755
1:20:37 --> 1:20:43
genocide. Now that we have the International Criminal Court and the ICJ has said what's

756
1:20:43 --> 1:20:51
happening in Gaza is likely to be genocide, we have a greater understanding of that crime

757
1:20:51 --> 1:20:58
around the world. And therefore, let's go with that. Sure. And this one, genocide, are you able

758
1:20:58 --> 1:21:05
to explain to us the difference between, I have known this, but it slipped from my mind, genocide

759
1:21:05 --> 1:21:09
and crimes against humanity. So I don't know whether you know, but Philippe Sands, we mentioned

760
1:21:09 --> 1:21:15
earlier about lawless world and torture team, he wrote a third brilliant book. And that name of

761
1:21:15 --> 1:21:23
that book was East Street, West Street. And it was set in a town, Lviv, I think it is called,

762
1:21:23 --> 1:21:31
which has been in Germany, sorry, was it Poland or Ukraine at various times? Or was it Germany? I

763
1:21:31 --> 1:21:38
can't quite remember now. So anyway, on the border and in that town, as it happens, the father of the

764
1:21:38 --> 1:21:47
crime of genocide, the one who became the world expert on genocide was born. And also, weirdly,

765
1:21:47 --> 1:21:54
the father of what he the kind of one who knew knew most about crimes against humanity. He was

766
1:21:54 --> 1:22:04
also born in that city. Did you know that? No. All this is recounted in Professor Philippe Sands is

767
1:22:05 --> 1:22:11
brilliant book, third book that I know of anyway, East Street, West Street. And torture team is a

768
1:22:11 --> 1:22:16
pretty amazing book too. And you know lawless world, you know how good that is. Indeed. Yeah,

769
1:22:16 --> 1:22:20
so I thoroughly recommend East Street, West Street to you. But problem is, I don't know.

770
1:22:23 --> 1:22:29
Can I just make one quick comment? It is important to understand the definitions of

771
1:22:29 --> 1:22:35
crimes against humanity and the definitions of genocide. And that's why I do recommend anybody

772
1:22:35 --> 1:22:41
who wants to get into this area to have a look at those definitions in the International Criminal

773
1:22:41 --> 1:22:48
Court Act, Elements of Crimes Regulations 2001. Chris, one thing I think to ask about private

774
1:22:48 --> 1:22:53
prosecutions, because I believe we have a number of people who were maybe able to run a private

775
1:22:53 --> 1:23:00
prosecution like Carnage, Le Maire Cohn. We've also got Matt Hancock. Matt Hancock admitted

776
1:23:00 --> 1:23:07
in a WhatsApp post that there was an antenna. There is. It's a graphite ferritic nanometallite

777
1:23:07 --> 1:23:13
antenna in the vaccine. So we have the spectrum analysis. We know exactly what was in it. We know

778
1:23:13 --> 1:23:22
the DOD patents for it. He's admitted in a WhatsApp post that this did and was an antenna injection.

779
1:23:23 --> 1:23:29
So he's admitted to the crime. And I think a private prosecution, but also the 15 minute

780
1:23:30 --> 1:23:37
city narrative is all about radiation. And one of the things where we heard Carn not long ago

781
1:23:37 --> 1:23:43
talking about this heat temperature increase in cities. This is the ubiquitous increase in

782
1:23:43 --> 1:23:48
radiation emissions from 5G, where they put thousands, hundreds of thousands. I mean,

783
1:23:48 --> 1:23:56
Birmingham City Council put 107,000 100 milliwatt transmitters. One milliwatt will cause a

784
1:23:56 --> 1:24:02
temperature increase. These were 100 milliwatts each. They've got a 10 mile footprint. Now focus

785
1:24:02 --> 1:24:09
to play with the aperture, which allows for quality, basically a weapon system, 107,000

786
1:24:10 --> 1:24:16
across every single street light in Birmingham, switched on in 2019. So temperature increase

787
1:24:16 --> 1:24:24
and cause a climate emergency. And these radiation levels are catastrophic, not only to, you know,

788
1:24:24 --> 1:24:31
individuals who suffer EHS, but also the environment, small insects, the light emitting

789
1:24:31 --> 1:24:38
diodes or biologically toxic to all life for 50 nanometers frequency in most of these LEDs.

790
1:24:38 --> 1:24:45
The Kelvin rate is when from the orange lights from 2000 to about six and seven thousand Kelvin

791
1:24:45 --> 1:24:53
and these street lights don't even have a diffuser. So they're not orange. They're very dangerous.

792
1:24:53 --> 1:24:58
They're basically weapon, the weapon systems. They've been designed to cause bodily harm.

793
1:24:58 --> 1:25:03
The definition of a weapon. So we have to do something about it. And I think a private criminal

794
1:25:03 --> 1:25:09
prosecution is a very good idea, Mark. Excellent. I'll go with that. If you need my help on it,

795
1:25:09 --> 1:25:16
contact me and I'll do what I can to add something to the case. Brilliant. Fantastic. Thank you very

796
1:25:16 --> 1:25:20
much, Chris and great for your work. It's absolutely brilliant. Charles, the policy and touch. He has

797
1:25:20 --> 1:25:31
all of my details. So, so Mark, you put into the chat and I'll send you the documents in the chat,

798
1:25:31 --> 1:25:37
Chris, but you put into the chat that the judge in your case newspaper article, Mark, and one of the

799
1:25:37 --> 1:25:46
issues I've said often to this group is when judges start losing their loved ones, they will, they will

800
1:25:46 --> 1:25:50
change their tune. And the article that the article that you have posted, Mark, talks about

801
1:25:50 --> 1:25:56
a judge being concerned about these five G towers. How long ago was that article, Mark?

802
1:25:58 --> 1:26:03
In 2018, the government tried to take me to court to gag me. They said I was a conspiracy theorist

803
1:26:03 --> 1:26:06
and I was frightening people by telling them that the government planned to kill them.

804
1:26:08 --> 1:26:14
That case went to court. It was a civil court procedure where the government had decided

805
1:26:14 --> 1:26:18
they had to gag me because I was telling people that government were planning to kill them.

806
1:26:19 --> 1:26:25
We got to court, the light significantly deceived the judge. It became pretty obvious that the

807
1:26:25 --> 1:26:30
expert witnesses that they had on their side didn't understand what five G was. They didn't

808
1:26:30 --> 1:26:35
have it, you know, they were basic electronics guys. So they didn't understand what five G was.

809
1:26:35 --> 1:26:40
I had no understanding of the antenna design and the weaponization of electromagnetic radiation in

810
1:26:40 --> 1:26:46
it. So the judge, as we got through the case, and they did basically make a fool of themselves

811
1:26:46 --> 1:26:51
quite a number of times, he said, I'm going to read a skeleton argument. My skeleton argument showed

812
1:26:52 --> 1:27:00
that five G's weapon system, it's yet to kill. After that, after the resets and he came back

813
1:27:00 --> 1:27:06
after lunch, he basically said the five G system, see the public have a right to know the five G

814
1:27:06 --> 1:27:12
risk must be debated. Money also said was I was an expert in this particular field where the

815
1:27:12 --> 1:27:16
government been saying I was a conspiracy theorist and I'd made it up. And I was telling people that

816
1:27:16 --> 1:27:20
they were trying to kill them. Well, they are trying to kill you. It's pretty obvious now

817
1:27:20 --> 1:27:25
they're trying to kill people. I mean, imagine in 2018, it was a bit off the wall at the time.

818
1:27:27 --> 1:27:33
People trying to gather their thoughts in relation to these electronic weapon systems that have been

819
1:27:33 --> 1:27:40
installed in street furniture. But I knew as early as 2016 that something was very, very

820
1:27:40 --> 1:27:48
untoward in relation to the light emitting diodes, the fact of the increase in the optical radiation

821
1:27:48 --> 1:27:54
footprint, as well as the fact that they were built to cause point light source. You never want

822
1:27:54 --> 1:28:01
artificial light and a point light source emission. And what we had were had point light source,

823
1:28:01 --> 1:28:05
what had the head, the lights were cranked to such a degree where they would create the point

824
1:28:05 --> 1:28:14
light source, but they had no diffuser. You have 2200 Kelvin high pressure sodium, which is orange

825
1:28:14 --> 1:28:22
for a reason. The optical radiation emissions is 2200 Kelvin. It has that orange glow. It has a

826
1:28:22 --> 1:28:29
diffuser to stop point light source. And what you definitely don't want is pulse with modulated

827
1:28:29 --> 1:28:35
optical radiation emissions because the value of the photon in that range is extremely high.

828
1:28:36 --> 1:28:43
So we had a pulse modulated bare elements, bare optical radiation elements, 450 nanometers

829
1:28:44 --> 1:28:50
at about 6 and 7000 Kelvin. These were weapons. They've deployed weapons on my streets as LED

830
1:28:50 --> 1:28:54
streetlights. And I call that soft kill. It's obviously not going to kill you immediately.

831
1:28:54 --> 1:29:00
Unlike the laser weapons that they deployed on the streets of London, these low emission

832
1:29:00 --> 1:29:07
zone guns, these laser guns, they are weapons and can kill you in a heartbeat. They've got massive

833
1:29:07 --> 1:29:15
capacitance inside the laser diodes. I got a bit of intel the other day where they are, you know,

834
1:29:15 --> 1:29:23
anything from 700 milliwatts to 1200 milliwatts, anything over 500 milliwatts, a class four laser.

835
1:29:23 --> 1:29:30
That's the most dangerous laser that can be produced. So you had well over that inside,

836
1:29:30 --> 1:29:35
but also you have 24 elements. There's 24 elements in the front of that laser gun.

837
1:29:36 --> 1:29:42
So you've got 24 elements times anything from 700 milliwatts to 1200 milliwatts.

838
1:29:45 --> 1:29:52
One milliwatt. That's the 8-nerve guideline, the 8-nerve guideline, which the government uses as

839
1:29:52 --> 1:30:03
standard for their output for radiation is one milliwatt. And we're talking about 24, 700 or 1200

840
1:30:03 --> 1:30:09
times 24. So don't go so much in the technology. That's you and Chris got to work out because Mark,

841
1:30:09 --> 1:30:14
you're pointing out to us as a question that Stephen asked, what's the difference between

842
1:30:14 --> 1:30:20
genocide and crime against humanity? Well, it seems to me that these five G-towers are not so

843
1:30:20 --> 1:30:27
much genocide as a crime against humanity. And your knowledge on this and how to use that for

844
1:30:27 --> 1:30:34
each of the municipalities that we live in right around the world, you know, everyone, we need to

845
1:30:34 --> 1:30:41
understand Mark as a resource to understand the questions to ask of our local councils. And Chris,

846
1:30:41 --> 1:30:50
your knowledge of the law here working with Mark, I think is going to be very, very, a very powerful

847
1:30:50 --> 1:30:56
combination as well as the guy in the US who's going to be working on this. Okay. Plus Anders.

848
1:30:56 --> 1:31:02
All right, Mark. Great. Great. Sorry. The other issue is in the judges, children and grandchildren

849
1:31:03 --> 1:31:09
dying. That's that's when the judges, Chris, you know, are going to come on and say, wow, I'm now

850
1:31:09 --> 1:31:18
I'm suffering. Now I'm going to take it seriously. So so, you know, it's creating a thought in my mind.

851
1:31:19 --> 1:31:25
Mark Crispin Miller does a wonderful job of each week publishing his sub stack with people who have

852
1:31:25 --> 1:31:33
died suddenly. You know, people who should not have died. And that litany of examples

853
1:31:35 --> 1:31:40
is a way to bring to a judge's attention. Look what's happening and there's no explanation. So,

854
1:31:40 --> 1:31:45
Mark, great work. You two, I'll put you in touch with each other. Thanks. Thanks, Chris.

855
1:31:45 --> 1:31:52
Thank you. Anders. Anders is also on the 5G, 5G battleground. Anders.

856
1:31:55 --> 1:32:05
Yes. Hello. Hello, Chris. I'm a Norwegian guy. We were a team of four Norwegians who filed

857
1:32:06 --> 1:32:17
four cases to the ICC in Haig in May 2021 based on evidence of how the so-called vaccines were

858
1:32:17 --> 1:32:29
killing. And we based the filing on an Israeli filing. I had a contact with a lawyer in Tel Aviv

859
1:32:30 --> 1:32:43
and unfortunately the Israeli case against, let's say Netanyahu at the time, was dismissed in Haig

860
1:32:43 --> 1:32:55
end of April 2021 due to lack of standing because the Knesset had not ratified the

861
1:32:55 --> 1:33:07
new ICC legal matter. It was, let's say, approved halfway but not full way. So,

862
1:33:07 --> 1:33:16
it was not valid. That was the answer from ICC. We filed cases for Norway, for Denmark, for Sweden,

863
1:33:16 --> 1:33:25
for Poland. We had a lot of evidence. After four, five, six months, the last case was dismissed that

864
1:33:26 --> 1:33:33
they are not going to look into it until it was dismissed in the home jurisdiction of, let's say,

865
1:33:33 --> 1:33:43
in this case Norway, Denmark, Sweden, etc. The cases in Norway was filed in June 2021 in 17

866
1:33:43 --> 1:33:50
district courts and they were all dismissed by administration in an Oslo

867
1:33:51 --> 1:33:58
judge district court by basically saying they don't want to look into it.

868
1:34:01 --> 1:34:08
What we thought at the time was that, okay, there were many other court cases in ICC filed from

869
1:34:08 --> 1:34:14
two different legal teams in England, from Netherlands, from France, from Czech Republic

870
1:34:15 --> 1:34:21
and other countries. And everyone, it was Mike Yeeden was part of one,

871
1:34:22 --> 1:34:33
no case was put in. It was a British-Canadian judge in ICC. ICC is controlled by United Nations.

872
1:34:33 --> 1:34:43
Not a single case has been brought in against Western countries. So what we saw, I think it was

873
1:34:45 --> 1:34:53
2023 or 2022, the ICC by the pressure of politicians, Boris Johnson, etc. through

874
1:34:53 --> 1:35:06
this court in Netherlands, in Hague, they put a court case which got standing against Russia

875
1:35:08 --> 1:35:16
and they kind of made a criminal referral to Putin, but Russia has not subscribed to the court.

876
1:35:17 --> 1:35:27
But ICC even so followed their, let's say, political directive from London.

877
1:35:28 --> 1:35:35
So I would very much like to believe that ICC is a venue which can do something.

878
1:35:36 --> 1:35:42
But let's say we have three, four years of experience and it has proved that it is political.

879
1:35:42 --> 1:35:46
Paul Foss Yes, you're quite right. I mean,

880
1:35:47 --> 1:35:52
thank goodness there are people like you doing these things. It's very important. The more

881
1:35:53 --> 1:36:00
people start reporting the crimes and trying to get a case started, the more likely we are to win

882
1:36:00 --> 1:36:07
in the long run. Could I just add one thing that I think is important in this country? We've done

883
1:36:07 --> 1:36:16
several approaches to the ICC to try to get them to start proceedings against our leaders,

884
1:36:16 --> 1:36:23
starting off with Blair and others. What we were told, and what I've now discovered is important,

885
1:36:23 --> 1:36:31
is that the actual Rome statute, I forget which article it is, it's somewhere between 13 and 19,

886
1:36:32 --> 1:36:44
says that we have to take the case in our own country before going to the ICC. And only if our

887
1:36:45 --> 1:36:54
courts are unwilling or unable to take the proceedings forward can we go to the ICC.

888
1:36:54 --> 1:37:02
So we have to first of all really start the case in our domestic courts and only when they

889
1:37:02 --> 1:37:07
have been turned down again and again can we go to the ICC direct.

890
1:37:08 --> 1:37:15
Yeah, the problem is that we did it in a little bit in a different way, but we filed in June 2021

891
1:37:16 --> 1:37:22
in Norway, but the district court dismissed the case.

892
1:37:25 --> 1:37:29
Yeah, I know. I mean we have very similar problems.

893
1:37:33 --> 1:37:42
Our courts are corrupt. So there is the chicken and the egg there. So if we would be able to get

894
1:37:42 --> 1:37:47
a standing in the national court and then use that as a base for the ICC,

895
1:37:49 --> 1:37:58
but there were many cases filed in England too, and nobody was accepted. No case was accepted.

896
1:37:58 --> 1:38:07
No, it's been the case all the way down the line. We filed the first one in 2003. 17 senior

897
1:38:07 --> 1:38:16
MPs and lawyers signed the letter to the ICC. It was Ocampo at the time was the prosecutor,

898
1:38:16 --> 1:38:21
and that was turned down. And everything that we've done since then has been turned down.

899
1:38:21 --> 1:38:27
I did get quite an amusing letter from one of the times I went to the ICC. It was addressed,

900
1:38:27 --> 1:38:33
instead of to Chris Coverdale, it was addressed to Christ Coverdale. I thought that was an

901
1:38:33 --> 1:38:37
interesting slip of the tongue. I love it.

902
1:38:37 --> 1:38:48
And also it is a legal possibility. It is under the Rome Charter and otherwise under United Nations,

903
1:38:49 --> 1:38:54
and on the other side it is controlled by British Crown judges.

904
1:38:54 --> 1:38:54
Yep.

905
1:38:56 --> 1:39:05
All right. So where that leads to, and it's a mindset, and Chris, you are both, and Mark,

906
1:39:07 --> 1:39:12
we've got people on this call who have a deep understanding of the human body.

907
1:39:15 --> 1:39:21
Now, the human body is incredibly complicated. There are people on this call who would have all

908
1:39:21 --> 1:39:28
sorts of various opinions about how to solve a problem with your body. On top of that, each

909
1:39:28 --> 1:39:35
body represented on this call live today is different. Chris and Anders and I, we have

910
1:39:35 --> 1:39:45
different bodies. Now, there are seven layers of laws, and what we have to understand is these

911
1:39:45 --> 1:39:54
seven layers, which come from natural law or God's law. That's the 1688 legislation that

912
1:39:54 --> 1:40:00
you're referring to, the monarch's oath at that time that we still have the benefit of. We have

913
1:40:00 --> 1:40:06
natural law, then we have international law, then we have national constitutions, then we have

914
1:40:06 --> 1:40:13
national laws in constitutions, then we have local laws in constitutions, then we have contractual

915
1:40:13 --> 1:40:20
agreements, and the application of law to the interpretation of those contractual agreements.

916
1:40:20 --> 1:40:25
So everybody stop looking for a black and white answer. And in my experience, I've had a law

917
1:40:25 --> 1:40:33
degree now for 51 years. Chris, what you are doing, and the conversation with Anders, I recommend that

918
1:40:33 --> 1:40:41
you two have, and Chris with Stephen, Chris with Mark Steele, what lawyers do is they have coffee

919
1:40:41 --> 1:40:50
in the morning, and they go and see King's Council, they go and shoot the breeze. Hey,

920
1:40:50 --> 1:40:55
what are we going to do about these 5G towers? What are we going to do about crimes against humanity?

921
1:40:55 --> 1:41:05
And there will be someone who says, oh, I remember a case back in 1927 that held this, and that

922
1:41:05 --> 1:41:12
won't have been raised by any court. And there's all this vast amount of knowledge, and it's this

923
1:41:12 --> 1:41:19
willingness to dig as Mark has been, as Anders has been, as each one of you has been. And I just want

924
1:41:19 --> 1:41:26
us in this environment to understand the law is as complex as the human body, and we just keep at it.

925
1:41:26 --> 1:41:35
And every time we lose, it helps us take the next step closer to winning. So it's, you know, and each

926
1:41:35 --> 1:41:41
time a judge behaves badly, it gives us another piece of ammunition to raise, to then present to

927
1:41:41 --> 1:41:47
other lawyers and awaken more lawyers so they start to see the fraudulent system that we are part of,

928
1:41:47 --> 1:41:53
just like doctors need to be shown the fraudulent nature of the medical system that we're in.

929
1:41:55 --> 1:42:01
I agree, and it's really understanding the system that is important. I've spent most of my time

930
1:42:01 --> 1:42:07
trying to really understand the social system, the governance system, and that the governance

931
1:42:07 --> 1:42:14
system in Britain operates differently, and one has to make sure that we dig down deep into finding

932
1:42:14 --> 1:42:22
out what is the underlying cause of the problems, rather than tackling the symptoms. So yes, I'm

933
1:42:22 --> 1:42:29
completely with you. So, and with slight nuance there, Chris, can you explain, I love the idea,

934
1:42:29 --> 1:42:37
and it's happening in Australia. You talked about it. I know this is focused on the UK, but

935
1:42:38 --> 1:42:43
there's a different answer to every country, and you know, Tom is in the US, we've got plenty of

936
1:42:43 --> 1:42:52
people in the US here, but local municipalities, the Swiss example that you give of 400 parliaments

937
1:42:52 --> 1:43:01
in Switzerland, and Richard Voebs did a presentation on, it was an allegory, if you like,

938
1:43:01 --> 1:43:08
of setting up these new community groups. How practical is that? Because the other principle

939
1:43:08 --> 1:43:14
that I share that I learned from other lawyers is laws without clause aren't laws. So similarly,

940
1:43:14 --> 1:43:19
judgment of the International Criminal Court is of no value if there's no enforcement,

941
1:43:20 --> 1:43:25
or a common law court that we set up that comes, that has declared that Ryan Ofolmik should not be

942
1:43:25 --> 1:43:32
in jail, he is still in jail, because there's no enforcement capability. How do, in the UK,

943
1:43:32 --> 1:43:37
stick to that for the moment, how does a group of people come together to create a new

944
1:43:37 --> 1:43:41
local municipality and ignore the one that's chasing you for money?

945
1:43:43 --> 1:43:48
Yeah, that's a very good question, Charles. I've been working on this for quite some time.

946
1:43:49 --> 1:43:54
I think one of the important things is to look at the models that do work worldwide. Now,

947
1:43:55 --> 1:44:02
the particular one that I'm going for in the UK is called a multi-stakeholder, limited liability,

948
1:44:02 --> 1:44:11
community platform cooperative. It's a bit of a mouthful, but it's basically, the law changed in

949
1:44:11 --> 1:44:19
Britain in 2014, making it possible for cooperatives to act in the same way that

950
1:44:19 --> 1:44:25
multi-national businesses operate. The big difference being the cooperative is only

951
1:44:25 --> 1:44:31
controlled by its members, whereas the big businesses are only controlled by shareholders.

952
1:44:33 --> 1:44:41
And we need to ensure that, for instance, we tried to set up in the Hastings and Rye constituency,

953
1:44:41 --> 1:44:49
Hastings and Rye community cooperative. Now, providing we set it out, set out the

954
1:44:49 --> 1:44:57
articles of association and we aim at being a cooperative and not a shareholder-owned company,

955
1:44:58 --> 1:45:04
then that model is a very useful one. Now, one of the biggest in the world is in northern Spain

956
1:45:04 --> 1:45:15
called Mondragon. Now, they have 85,000 members and about 30,000 employees worldwide

957
1:45:15 --> 1:45:22
in 17 different countries. And they were set up and they still are the world's biggest cooperative.

958
1:45:23 --> 1:45:28
Well, they weren't set up that way. They are now the world's biggest cooperative and very effective.

959
1:45:28 --> 1:45:36
They have their own university, their own courts, their own training systems and education systems,

960
1:45:36 --> 1:45:44
their own hospitals and banks and so on. So bit by bit, they have grown into a self-organizing,

961
1:45:44 --> 1:45:51
self-controlling community. And that's the sort of thing that is quite possible for us to do,

962
1:45:51 --> 1:45:56
particularly now that we've changed the law, making it possible for cooperatives to have the same

963
1:45:57 --> 1:46:08
benefits of limited liability and having business owners or cooperative members alongside

964
1:46:08 --> 1:46:13
individual members. And the great thing is that we can, for instance, in our local co-op,

965
1:46:15 --> 1:46:25
have Shell or BP or somebody join, but they only get one vote in our meetings alongside one vote

966
1:46:25 --> 1:46:32
for every individual member. So it brings back the power to a certain equality locally.

967
1:46:35 --> 1:46:42
Chris, may I say that perhaps building societies originally were set up that way?

968
1:46:43 --> 1:46:49
Yes, I agree. I mean, we need to go back to the old systems that work.

969
1:46:49 --> 1:47:00
Yeah, I'm with you 100%. I always applaud cooperatives and the building societies of old,

970
1:47:00 --> 1:47:04
but Maggie came in and destroyed them, didn't she?

971
1:47:05 --> 1:47:06
You're right.

972
1:47:08 --> 1:47:13
So, and then Jerry Brady suggests, and Peter Underwood would know this, and some of you will

973
1:47:13 --> 1:47:18
remember the concept of sortition. Chris, have you heard of sortition? Where do you think it's

974
1:47:18 --> 1:47:26
Chris? Have you heard of sortition where leaders are elected by ballot? You nominate for leadership.

975
1:47:27 --> 1:47:35
What that weeds out is the psychopaths. And it's within these cooperatives of Mondragon, everybody.

976
1:47:35 --> 1:47:41
Thank you, Siobhans, for putting the link into the chat. I remember reading about Mondragon a long

977
1:47:41 --> 1:47:52
time ago. So the leadership clearly of Mondragon, it's been going for decades, has worked. It hasn't

978
1:47:52 --> 1:47:59
been taken over by psychopaths. And it can't be because of the nature of its structure.

979
1:48:02 --> 1:48:09
It's individuals, you can only be individual members and corporate members, but you all have

980
1:48:09 --> 1:48:15
one vote. And because of that, and having limited liability, you make your own rules.

981
1:48:16 --> 1:48:24
And if you start, you can't be taken over because there's no shareholding. And that's very important.

982
1:48:24 --> 1:48:31
If you set it up as a cooperative by shares, then somebody with lots of money can come in and buy

983
1:48:31 --> 1:48:38
the shares and take over the cooperative. Yeah. Well, if it's limited liability and a cooperative

984
1:48:38 --> 1:48:46
by guarantee rather than by shares, then you do not have that possibility. Everybody has a

985
1:48:46 --> 1:48:54
guarantee of say, 100 pounds or one pound, whatever it is. But there's no shares to be taken over.

986
1:48:55 --> 1:49:00
Yeah, very good. So everybody think about cooperatives because each country has different

987
1:49:00 --> 1:49:05
laws on cooperatives. It's a great idea. Now, Chris, before we go to Stephen, because we haven't

988
1:49:05 --> 1:49:13
got any hands up, we've got half an hour to go. The other question I want that you've raised

989
1:49:13 --> 1:49:25
it earlier, what's your thinking of creating a process to shine a light on all legislation

990
1:49:25 --> 1:49:33
that's before the parliament? You know, that's the same. I'm thinking about this for Australia.

991
1:49:33 --> 1:49:38
We've got six states, you know, plus the national law. So I would. And it seems to me that there are

992
1:49:38 --> 1:49:44
plenty of people and finding out the legislation that's coming before parliament is very easy to

993
1:49:44 --> 1:49:49
do. It's all online. It's not hidden. It's just that people don't have time to look at it. But if

994
1:49:49 --> 1:49:56
we set up a process to examine those laws and we shine a light on it, then I think we could

995
1:49:56 --> 1:50:01
stop shitty laws coming into enforcement. What's your, have you looked at that yet?

996
1:50:01 --> 1:50:08
I have indeed. And that was one of the reasons I suggested having a look at how things work in

997
1:50:08 --> 1:50:17
Switzerland, because Switzerland hasn't had an external war in 850 something years. And

998
1:50:19 --> 1:50:25
their lawmaking process is slow and deliberate and careful and cooperative.

999
1:50:26 --> 1:50:35
And they don't have all these lobby groups from big corporations, as far as I can find out,

1000
1:50:37 --> 1:50:46
forcing their attention on our MPs as happens in the UK. They have, for example, so if a law

1001
1:50:46 --> 1:50:52
comes up from one of the cantons, it is discussed in parliament. They have to have a certain amount

1002
1:50:52 --> 1:51:01
of people sign up to get it going in the first place, rather like California does. And then it

1003
1:51:01 --> 1:51:10
goes to the two parliaments, the equivalent of our House of Commons and House of Lords or Senate and

1004
1:51:11 --> 1:51:19
Congress. It goes to one, they look at it and they cooperate in trying to get it into a format. They

1005
1:51:19 --> 1:51:25
pass it to the others. They have a look at it. They bring up any difficulties and make changes

1006
1:51:25 --> 1:51:33
and they pass it back to the first. And that process happens three times. So in other words,

1007
1:51:33 --> 1:51:40
it's looked at up to six times. And if they still can't get agreement, then it's dropped and will

1008
1:51:40 --> 1:51:45
come back in four or five years time. If they do get agreement, they then have to go out to the

1009
1:51:45 --> 1:51:54
cantons and have a national referendum on it. And it does not become law until everybody or 51% or

1010
1:51:54 --> 1:52:04
whatever the percentage is, depending on the law, has been agreed by the people. And that's the sort

1011
1:52:04 --> 1:52:13
of process that we need to develop in this country. The party system is really causing us major

1012
1:52:13 --> 1:52:23
problems. And the fact is that people are putting the government to oppose the government and the

1013
1:52:23 --> 1:52:30
government opposes the opposition. It's constant competition. And really what we need is cooperation

1014
1:52:30 --> 1:52:38
through and through to come up with a new law which suits everybody, not just the lobbying group or the

1015
1:52:38 --> 1:52:41
energy companies or whoever it is, is putting it forward.

1016
1:52:41 --> 1:52:43
– Yep. Very good.

1017
1:52:43 --> 1:52:50
– So Chris, what went wrong in Switzerland in 2020 then? Because they had lockdowns in Switzerland,

1018
1:52:50 --> 1:52:51
as far as I understand.

1019
1:52:51 --> 1:52:56
– I don't know the answer to that one, I'm afraid. I don't know.

1020
1:52:56 --> 1:53:01
– All right, Peter, and then we'll go to Stephen and we'll finish in half an hour.

1021
1:53:01 --> 1:53:09
– So let me introduce the group to the South African or African concept of Ubuntu.

1022
1:53:09 --> 1:53:10
– Oh, lovely.

1023
1:53:10 --> 1:53:23
– Ubuntu. It is all about cooperation. And working together as a group, I put out my

1024
1:53:24 --> 1:53:37
letter from South Africa on Saturday. And it was focused on the wolf pack. Wolf packs

1025
1:53:38 --> 1:53:45
survive because they work cooperatively. That's what I wanted to say.

1026
1:53:45 --> 1:53:54
– Yes, I had a good session. We had the one small town group and Michael Tellinger has been pushing

1027
1:53:54 --> 1:53:58
Ubuntu in this country. And I think it's a brilliant idea. I really do.

1028
1:53:58 --> 1:54:06
– Yeah, absolutely, Chris. I'm with you 100%. I'm sorry, I'm suffering from the

1029
1:54:08 --> 1:54:09
winter.

1030
1:54:09 --> 1:54:12
– You're suffering from what, Peter?

1031
1:54:12 --> 1:54:18
– The winter. We've got a winter here at the moment. It's driving me nuts.

1032
1:54:18 --> 1:54:23
– Well, Peter, I'm so glad. I'm just glad that you didn't say you've got COVID.

1033
1:54:25 --> 1:54:33
Because there is no COVID. But anyway, I wanted to ask Chris. I think you said, Chris,

1034
1:54:35 --> 1:54:40
amongst all the other stuff you said, you said there'd been five genocides in the last four

1035
1:54:40 --> 1:54:43
and a half years in the United Kingdom. Is that correct?

1036
1:54:43 --> 1:54:48
– Five medical genocides and seven military genocides.

1037
1:54:48 --> 1:54:49
– So what are they then?

1038
1:54:49 --> 1:54:58
– Well, the seven military genocides are Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and then the

1039
1:54:58 --> 1:55:06
support for the Ukraine, the Yemen, and Gaza, Palestine. Those are the seven military genocides.

1040
1:55:07 --> 1:55:13
And the five medical ones are really to do with the COVID response, the

1041
1:55:15 --> 1:55:22
Madazelan murders in the care homes, for instance, the lockdown and the suicides and others that

1042
1:55:22 --> 1:55:30
happen for small businesses and so on. The putting out the DNR, do not resuscitate

1043
1:55:31 --> 1:55:38
instructions. The injections themselves, and I forget the fifth one.

1044
1:55:40 --> 1:55:44
It'll come back to me anyway. So each one of those is a separate

1045
1:55:44 --> 1:55:52
genocide, which has led to the deaths of at least 10,000 British citizens because they were

1046
1:55:52 --> 1:55:56
residents of Britain and not any other reason.

1047
1:55:57 --> 1:56:02
– Well, the other genocide would be that it was a PSYOP. It was a government PSYOP, wasn't it?

1048
1:56:03 --> 1:56:09
That the result of what they did in 2020 was that huge numbers of people in the United Kingdom,

1049
1:56:09 --> 1:56:16
and because it was the United Kingdom all around the world, were psychologically tortured by their

1050
1:56:16 --> 1:56:16
own government.

1051
1:56:16 --> 1:56:21
– Not only a PSYOP, but assault, literally assault, Stephen.

1052
1:56:21 --> 1:56:29
– Sure. So people don't understand that human beings are very highly social animals.

1053
1:56:30 --> 1:56:36
We need company. So any government in the world should have been, all the governments in the world

1054
1:56:36 --> 1:56:42
and all the doctors should have been aware of this, and that lockdowns were against human nature

1055
1:56:42 --> 1:56:48
and therefore harmful. And if you isolate a human being long enough, he or she will die.

1056
1:56:49 --> 1:56:55
Particularly a baby, of course, it's obvious, a child even, but adults will as well. And I don't

1057
1:56:55 --> 1:57:00
know whether you're aware of the, you might be able to use it in one of your private prosecutions,

1058
1:57:00 --> 1:57:07
Chris. You need to cite the very important experiments, the Universe 25 experiments.

1059
1:57:07 --> 1:57:10
– Can you say that again?

1060
1:57:10 --> 1:57:13
– Universe 25 experiments on mice.

1061
1:57:13 --> 1:57:14
– Oh, right.

1062
1:57:14 --> 1:57:27
– And the 25, I thought it related to 2025, but no, apparently the government, the experiment was

1063
1:57:27 --> 1:57:33
so important that they repeated it 25 times to make sure that the results were correct.

1064
1:57:35 --> 1:57:44
So, and what it was about was that they, the mice were essentially, they had very good conditions,

1065
1:57:44 --> 1:57:49
they had as much food and water as they needed, but they weren't allowed, I don't think they were

1066
1:57:49 --> 1:57:59
given too much food. They had space initially, but then the population increased, and then it

1067
1:58:00 --> 1:58:09
became apparent that there was a lack of interest in sex, and thereby the population eventually

1068
1:58:09 --> 1:58:15
started to reduce, but there were a whole group of males who were not interested in reproducing,

1069
1:58:15 --> 1:58:20
and the females, I can't remember all the details now, but it's an extremely important

1070
1:58:20 --> 1:58:29
experiment in my view, and it was allegedly done by an individual, but it was done for the government,

1071
1:58:29 --> 1:58:38
or for governments, and that would fit with the 25 times bit, you know, that, so I think that it

1072
1:58:38 --> 1:58:46
was actually an exercise in, you know, into getting the mice into a state where they didn't

1073
1:58:46 --> 1:58:50
want to live anymore, and I think that's what the lockdowns were about. They were about causing

1074
1:58:50 --> 1:58:56
human beings so much suffering that they didn't want to live. We have to think about what the

1075
1:58:56 --> 1:59:02
possibilities in the minds of these people who perpetrated what they did in the last four years,

1076
1:59:02 --> 1:59:07
what was in their minds, and I think anything is possible, and I think that there was a will to

1077
1:59:09 --> 1:59:15
how shall I say, and there is a will to continuing will to isolate human beings from

1078
1:59:15 --> 1:59:21
each other and generations from each other to drive wedges everywhere between human beings,

1079
1:59:21 --> 1:59:27
and this is wrong in my opinion, and we need to call them out on every attempt to turn men

1080
1:59:27 --> 1:59:34
against women and women against men in particular, because the women need protection in times of

1081
1:59:35 --> 1:59:40
lack of safety, so we've always cooperated, men and women, but not just,

1082
1:59:42 --> 1:59:52
the wars that are created by politicians and others between generations, children

1083
1:59:52 --> 1:59:57
who think that because their grandparents, their parents, don't understand computers as well as they,

1084
1:59:58 --> 2:00:04
they are led to believe that that means they can't learn anything from their elders,

1085
2:00:04 --> 2:00:11
that's ridiculous, and similarly the adults, the parents and the grandparents have lost confidence

1086
2:00:12 --> 2:00:16
and they believe all this crap that if they don't understand computers they have nothing to teach

1087
2:00:16 --> 2:00:23
their children, it's nonsense, absolute nonsense, we need wisdom, and I think that the problem

1088
2:00:24 --> 2:00:33
is exacerbated by these phones, social media, computers, the love of stuff that cannot be

1089
2:00:33 --> 2:00:38
regulated by anybody, because it's so damn complicated for human beings that they don't

1090
2:00:38 --> 2:00:42
know how to regulate it, anything that cannot be regulated in my opinion needs to be put in the bin

1091
2:00:43 --> 2:00:46
because it's bad for human beings and we're seeing that now.

1092
2:00:47 --> 2:00:57
Yes, I fully agree with you, we need action to change the system, it's wrong and it's

1093
2:00:57 --> 2:01:03
causing us immense problems. Sure, education is absolutely key and I don't know how we're going to

1094
2:01:03 --> 2:01:11
do that. A good start is to get a good criminal case going against our leaders for conduct,

1095
2:01:11 --> 2:01:18
ancillary to genocide and that will spread rapidly around the world. I would love to see

1096
2:01:18 --> 2:01:25
Tony Blair convicted in court of genocide and sent to prison and that would have effects

1097
2:01:25 --> 2:01:32
right around the world immediately. Again, perhaps Matt Hancock, prosecuted for conduct,

1098
2:01:32 --> 2:01:42
ancillary to genocide for his role in the COVID-19 experiment. Yes, so in particular I think the

1099
2:01:42 --> 2:01:46
lockdowns have been overlooked, the governments are trying to put it about that actually they

1100
2:01:46 --> 2:01:51
should have brought in the lockdowns earlier and it's absolute nonsense. In my opinion as a doctor

1101
2:01:52 --> 2:01:59
there was no pandemic and there was no disease called COVID-19, no respiratory disease, so what

1102
2:01:59 --> 2:02:04
was it about them? Was anything true of what we were told in the last four years? I think not.

1103
2:02:06 --> 2:02:11
I agree and perhaps it's also worth pointing out the Nuremberg code,

1104
2:02:12 --> 2:02:17
yes very important, which is essential in those sort of situations which makes it a criminal offence

1105
2:02:17 --> 2:02:26
if you don't explain to people before having the injection the likely effects. Absolutely and do

1106
2:02:26 --> 2:02:33
you know this? So in my opinion no doctor in the world knew what was in these injections so it's

1107
2:02:33 --> 2:02:38
absolutely impossible for any doctor in the world to obtain informed consent. So why in the world

1108
2:02:38 --> 2:02:45
were they recommending it all over the world, these damn doctors and my colleagues? I'm very angry with

1109
2:02:45 --> 2:02:52
them. I think the money plays a big role in everything. But Chris also where were the lawyers?

1110
2:02:53 --> 2:02:59
The lawyers just they were more concerned about getting their law firms into trouble and losing

1111
2:02:59 --> 2:03:06
business than thinking about where this was all going and the effects on their grandchildren and

1112
2:03:06 --> 2:03:14
their children if they cared. Yeah I agree. I've found the lawyers and law firms and justice system

1113
2:03:14 --> 2:03:21
in this country is right at the seat of the problem. Yeah and look at the Letbe case. I don't know

1114
2:03:21 --> 2:03:26
whether you know about the Letbe case, the nurse in Chester, the counters of Chester? Yeah I don't

1115
2:03:26 --> 2:03:32
know much about it but I just heard about it yes. Yeah so that looks like a miscarriage of justice.

1116
2:03:33 --> 2:03:39
We've got the post office thing, what nurse is that about? 800 people is it went to where

1117
2:03:39 --> 2:03:46
were found guilty of criminal offences. These postmasters and postmistresses you know they

1118
2:03:46 --> 2:03:52
were chosen because they were trustworthy and then 800 of them are found guilty of criminal offences

1119
2:03:53 --> 2:03:59
and all the time it was due to a damn computer system which was not you're not allowed to question.

1120
2:04:01 --> 2:04:07
And it says something about our justice system that that could happen. It really does. Absolutely.

1121
2:04:07 --> 2:04:15
Rather likely 559 MPs who voted in favor of continuing the bombing of Libya when David

1122
2:04:15 --> 2:04:26
Cameron had started it three days earlier and 559 MPs voted in favor and 14 against.

1123
2:04:28 --> 2:04:38
Yes I have to say Chris only six MPs turned up to Andrew Bridgens. Yes.

1124
2:04:38 --> 2:04:46
I just have to say that. Oh by the way Chris you might be able to help Andrew Bridgen because I

1125
2:04:46 --> 2:04:52
found out after the election he only you know allegedly only got 1500 votes well last time he

1126
2:04:52 --> 2:05:00
got 35 000 so how on earth can he have become so. You are so right Stephen you're so right I

1127
2:05:00 --> 2:05:08
Marked that he had 35 000 at the

1128
2:05:11 --> 2:05:21
the interim election and then in the final election he got 1500.

1129
2:05:22 --> 2:05:33
No no the previous election the previous general election he got 35 000. Yeah. He was a conservative

1130
2:05:33 --> 2:05:39
it was a former labor seat he was in beating his majority it was 20 000 majority I think and

1131
2:05:39 --> 2:05:45
previously it was a labor seat so you can see how successful he was there is no way British people

1132
2:05:45 --> 2:05:52
would desert someone like Andrew Bridgen who was talking from the heart. Absolutely Stephen you're

1133
2:05:52 --> 2:05:57
so right. Can I just make finish the point so there's no way the British people would desert

1134
2:05:57 --> 2:06:04
someone like that so the British people are good people generally of course there are bad eggs

1135
2:06:04 --> 2:06:09
there are bad eggs in every country but but um there's no way they could be so disloyal and

1136
2:06:09 --> 2:06:16
1500 that was their big mistake they wanted to totally humiliate him with a terrible figure for

1137
2:06:16 --> 2:06:23
him and say to him essentially look no one's listening to you Andrew. Can you say Stephen that

1138
2:06:24 --> 2:06:32
the British. The point I want to make is they made a big mistake in making the number so damn small

1139
2:06:32 --> 2:06:37
that it was obvious to anybody who understands numbers that that there's no way that that could

1140
2:06:37 --> 2:06:45
have occurred that's the point. Yeah you are so right Stephen how the hell can we believe in the

1141
2:06:45 --> 2:06:55
British constitution and its electoral system. Yeah but the British people go to work they all

1142
2:06:55 --> 2:07:01
worst thing you can do in Britain is cause a fuss about anything so they go to work they don't

1143
2:07:01 --> 2:07:06
complain oh mustn't complain no that's the last thing we must do it doesn't matter how long the

1144
2:07:06 --> 2:07:15
queue is if it's a mile long you mustn't complain. Yeah I think the system we can

1145
2:07:15 --> 2:07:22
focus on is the actual counting of the votes unfortunately all the papers are destroyed as

1146
2:07:22 --> 2:07:28
soon as it's over we there's no checks on it at all and we have to find a way of checking every

1147
2:07:28 --> 2:07:35
single vote absolutely what happened in that situation the corruption in the voting system

1148
2:07:35 --> 2:07:42
in this country has been going on for at least 25 years since. Agreed absolutely Chris. We've got

1149
2:07:42 --> 2:07:52
an expert on voter fraud in America he's a good he is a absolutely brilliant with computers and

1150
2:07:52 --> 2:07:56
so he's worked out but didn't understand the importance as I understand it but Jerome Corsi

1151
2:07:56 --> 2:08:01
who wrote the book about JFK which came up his assassination which came out recently

1152
2:08:01 --> 2:08:08
um he understood the importance of it so he so this guy this brilliant guy working on his own

1153
2:08:08 --> 2:08:17
finds a an algorithm in the voting records for New York state yeah so an algorithm by definition

1154
2:08:18 --> 2:08:28
is evidence of fraud yes so and he's we also have evidence of fraud in Scotland for the um the

1155
2:08:28 --> 2:08:38
original um um separation debate um yeah you're right Chris so he worked out how is it happened

1156
2:08:38 --> 2:08:48
in America and so Jerome Corsi he confirms that it's likely that um they use the same method in

1157
2:08:48 --> 2:08:57
the UK in the recent elections to novel Andrew Bridgen for example yes I agree with that

1158
2:08:58 --> 2:09:06
that's amazing I learned a bit about this when I was standing for parliament in 2005 in the Wimbledore

1159
2:09:06 --> 2:09:15
constituency uh I then found it out from experience just how corrupt the whole thing is jeez

1160
2:09:17 --> 2:09:24
I'm horrified I I've worked in the citizens of vice bureau for at least 10 years

1161
2:09:24 --> 2:09:34
and believed that we had uh a viable system no I'm completely

1162
2:09:36 --> 2:09:43
disenchanted they made a massive mistake in that 1500 for Andrew Bridgen because people like me

1163
2:09:43 --> 2:09:48
and other people around the world are very interested in this voting fraud now for the

1164
2:09:48 --> 2:09:55
United Kingdom as well as the United States yeah yeah you're right Stephen it's frightening my

1165
2:09:55 --> 2:10:03
friend thank god I'm in South Africa it's like the psychopaths who bring their attempt themselves to

1166
2:10:03 --> 2:10:11
the attention of the um police in serial murders you know they just cannot resist taunting the

1167
2:10:11 --> 2:10:15
police and they bring they bring themselves to the attention of the police and start suggesting

1168
2:10:15 --> 2:10:22
things because they want to be they want to achieve notoriety or whatever or or and eventually

1169
2:10:22 --> 2:10:28
they get caught by their own vanity yeah and I think that's what's happened in the case of

1170
2:10:28 --> 2:10:33
Andrew Bridgen's election you're right Stephen you're right my friend but the point is Chris

1171
2:10:33 --> 2:10:40
that we we've worked out that there's something wrong with that election in particular uh and we

1172
2:10:40 --> 2:10:47
need to work out how we can go for certain people who are responsible who are also vulnerable if

1173
2:10:47 --> 2:10:56
you understand me yes well I believe that we we've got to go for the top right now um so I'll come

1174
2:10:56 --> 2:11:02
back to you when we've got that underway yeah Chris you're absolutely right I've just written

1175
2:11:03 --> 2:11:14
um an article on starma I've tracked this guy for some years now he is a snake in the grass

1176
2:11:15 --> 2:11:21
and I'm going to be writing a a sub stack uh in the next couple of weeks

1177
2:11:21 --> 2:11:33
because I know he's wef there's no doubt about that and he's absolutely committed to globalist

1178
2:11:34 --> 2:11:41
uh attention yes and has anybody on this call noticed Chris have you noticed and Peter for that

1179
2:11:41 --> 2:11:46
matter uh but others as well has anybody looked into starma's eyes and thought those are weird

1180
2:11:47 --> 2:11:55
eyes he looks scared to death he looks absolutely terrified absolutely he's controlled Stephen

1181
2:11:57 --> 2:12:01
he looks as though he's in the headlights and I so he's supposed to be a barrister

1182
2:12:03 --> 2:12:11
I think he's a barrister isn't he or is he a solicitor no he was he was um he was a barrister

1183
2:12:11 --> 2:12:19
he let that guy um jeez uh I can't remember the name yeah he must he must be the most

1184
2:12:19 --> 2:12:27
frightened barrister I've ever seen them well he let Savile get away he let Jimmy get away

1185
2:12:31 --> 2:12:40
I will never forgive him for doing that yeah I forgot the names uh so yeah exactly

1186
2:12:41 --> 2:12:44
but there was another case that he was instrumental in which was that now um

1187
2:12:45 --> 2:12:53
well I I had direct experience with him um because we reported uh Blair and others for war crimes and

1188
2:12:53 --> 2:12:59
he was the DPP who turned it down yes wasn't actually in his name he got other people to

1189
2:12:59 --> 2:13:07
sign the letter but he was in charge of the DPP when when we tried to prosecute Blair and the

1190
2:13:07 --> 2:13:13
rest of them for genocide and crimes against humanity yeah and let us not forget as well it's

1191
2:13:13 --> 2:13:19
um so he also got thrown out of a pub by that publican in Bath

1192
2:13:23 --> 2:13:27
do you ever see that I saw the video it was absolutely brilliant

1193
2:13:30 --> 2:13:34
he literally got thrown out and his staff were absolutely mesmerized they couldn't understand

1194
2:13:34 --> 2:13:40
how anybody would want to throw Stammer and his crew out you know Christ he's bloody

1195
2:13:41 --> 2:13:47
he am now for God's sake yeah so and also we should say on this call for the record

1196
2:13:48 --> 2:13:55
that Stammer I think it was in a BBC Newsnight program I think it was Kirsty Wark who said where

1197
2:13:55 --> 2:14:01
would you rather be she didn't say Kiers Stammer but it was Kiers where would you rather be uh

1198
2:14:02 --> 2:14:10
Davos or Westminster he thought absolutely and he said Davos and she smiled it was some kind of

1199
2:14:10 --> 2:14:16
inside joke in the BBC at the public's expense it was just ridiculous you're so right Stevie

1200
2:14:20 --> 2:14:21
I need an archivist

1201
2:14:22 --> 2:14:31
yes well we we've got to do some I promise you we will be working on this and um any support we can

1202
2:14:31 --> 2:14:37
get to get that man and most of the others into prison could we bring a private prosecution against

1203
2:14:37 --> 2:14:45
Kiers Stammer for um putting the country at risk by saying that he prefers the Davos where the

1204
2:14:45 --> 2:14:51
World Economic Forum meets every January to Westminster that's that's behavior

1205
2:14:52 --> 2:14:59
consistent with treason as far as I can see well I think there's better evidence of him saying for

1206
2:14:59 --> 2:15:12
instance he supports um the Netanyahu's um removal of the food and medical supplies and the food and

1207
2:15:13 --> 2:15:17
medical supplies and other things and he thinks that's a good thing

1208
2:15:17 --> 2:15:24
that is a direct statement of genocide in uh in support of um the Israeli government

1209
2:15:25 --> 2:15:33
yes you're so right and Chris I think he was absolute genocide it's Zionism Chris I think he

1210
2:15:33 --> 2:15:39
was planning a genocide for the anti-vaxxers as well because he said we must we must deal with

1211
2:15:39 --> 2:15:45
the anti-vaxxers and if yes he said we must join with the opposition to do it I'm prepared to do

1212
2:15:45 --> 2:15:52
it sorry with the conservative government at the time uh so dealing with the anti what did he mean

1213
2:15:52 --> 2:15:58
dealing with the anti-vaxxers was he gonna he did say that Stephen I've actually printed that out

1214
2:15:58 --> 2:16:08
in my letter that's coming out recently or in the next couple of weeks he said we have to deal with

1215
2:16:08 --> 2:16:17
the anti-vaxxers yeah that's what I said Peter that's what I said I said that yeah we have to

1216
2:16:17 --> 2:16:26
do what on earth did he mean by deal with them well he meant we have to eliminate them well exactly

1217
2:16:27 --> 2:16:34
that's yes exactly that's what he was kind of a hate crime wasn't it putting thoughts in the

1218
2:16:34 --> 2:16:41
minds of the public you know it's absolutely this is like this is insightful behavior absolutely

1219
2:16:42 --> 2:16:48
absolutely so we already knew that well we did that the British population had been

1220
2:16:49 --> 2:16:55
psychologically tortured so long-term starmer and you know we had Matthias Desmet who's a professor

1221
2:16:55 --> 2:17:01
of psychology or whatever and he was saying that we don't know where this could end you know we

1222
2:17:01 --> 2:17:07
don't know when when there could be atrocities triggered it could happen at any time it was you

1223
2:17:07 --> 2:17:13
know I was saying whoa we could have an atrocity you know killing people uh you know because they

1224
2:17:13 --> 2:17:19
were in a cult essentially I think that's what he was saying he never used the word but but um uh so

1225
2:17:19 --> 2:17:25
we could have these atrocities and there's kios dharma uh who's now the prime minister of the UK

1226
2:17:25 --> 2:17:30
saying we must deal with the antivaxxers absolutely you couldn't make it up

1227
2:17:33 --> 2:17:40
so anyway Chris we've come to an end Chris you've done very come to a fiery end yeah sorry about that

1228
2:17:40 --> 2:17:46
no no we've come to a wonderful appropriate end inspiring us to all take responsibility for next

1229
2:17:46 --> 2:17:52
steps that need to be taken and Chris you know congratulations on your courage on your willingness

1230
2:17:52 --> 2:17:58
to to stand up for what you believe that many people on this call do the same and listening to

1231
2:17:58 --> 2:18:05
you and those watching this recording must understand that if we want to fight back against

1232
2:18:05 --> 2:18:10
this we need to be willing to suffer now anyone who's gone to war ever any country you know when

1233
2:18:10 --> 2:18:15
the when the average person is in the military when the australians went to world wars one and two

1234
2:18:17 --> 2:18:22
the people in the military most of them suffer we have to be willing to suffer and Chris

1235
2:18:22 --> 2:18:27
you are a wonderful example to us of the willingness to suffer for your beliefs if you're

1236
2:18:27 --> 2:18:33
not then it's not a belief you're just talking shit so let's not talk shit let's act thank you

1237
2:18:33 --> 2:18:38
Chris for being here Stephen thank you for organizing thank you again officially I think

1238
2:18:38 --> 2:18:44
actually one of the jobs that's very much underrated in in the present situation which we're in after

1239
2:18:44 --> 2:18:49
four and a half years of this nonsense and long before probably except I wasn't really fully aware

1240
2:18:50 --> 2:18:58
is that one of the most important resources I think are archivists otherwise known as librarians

1241
2:18:58 --> 2:19:03
we need librarians we need them to catalog all this stuff that we've talked about tonight but

1242
2:19:03 --> 2:19:09
all the other stuff we know in our heads which we can't possibly manage on our own in on our

1243
2:19:09 --> 2:19:16
computers you know and we need to realize this and get some very very good librarians I've been

1244
2:19:16 --> 2:19:23
saying this for some time to document everything and to be able to find it again so remember the

1245
2:19:23 --> 2:19:30
algorithms in the voting fraud in America the importance of those was that they could not only

1246
2:19:30 --> 2:19:36
create a hundred identities for one person but that they could hide those identities so that

1247
2:19:36 --> 2:19:42
nobody would find them but guess what when there was a problem in a state or whatever

1248
2:19:43 --> 2:19:51
they could stop the counting and then find all these identities secretly so

1249
2:19:51 --> 2:19:57
so even you're so right my friend librarians and what we're talking about all right we've got the

1250
2:19:57 --> 2:20:04
message come on no no I mean it just so we can store the information and then pick it up for us

1251
2:20:04 --> 2:20:11
when we need it because they so they have a sixth sense so they know what we want yeah there are

1252
2:20:12 --> 2:20:17
plenty of librarians and they can find the information that is useful to Chris

1253
2:20:17 --> 2:20:23
no there are people on this call who are librarians Tom Rodman is JJ Cooey as Tom Rodman points out

1254
2:20:23 --> 2:20:29
there are collectors here of information so well they well they haven't made their okay right

1255
2:20:29 --> 2:20:35
okay they haven't made themselves known Charles well no we don't need to that's the beauty Stephen

1256
2:20:35 --> 2:20:40
of having well no you missed the point Charles because what I'm saying is we need people who can

1257
2:20:40 --> 2:20:45
store the information well create one a point who's going to appoint them no you've made the

1258
2:20:45 --> 2:20:52
point you want government to set up a librarian no thank you no I was trying to explain

1259
2:20:54 --> 2:21:06
20 000 files of data already okay we're finishing Tom go quick I think could I just add one last

1260
2:21:06 --> 2:21:13
thing Charles yep I think it's important that we've got to get past the data phase into action

1261
2:21:13 --> 2:21:20
and one of the simplest things everybody can do is to stop paying for what's happening stop paying

1262
2:21:20 --> 2:21:28
tax nice beautiful message Tom what do you want to say before we finish oh okay well the telegram

1263
2:21:28 --> 2:21:35
channel is intended for that the hashtags are a way of aggregating data we can export the telegram

1264
2:21:35 --> 2:21:43
to a flat file which I do periodically my telegram my primary telegram account was clobbered for no

1265
2:21:43 --> 2:21:51
apparent reason so I'm telegrams wonderful but I'm still angry at them also um yeah I keep I keep

1266
2:21:51 --> 2:21:59
things and uh I have a lot of information in one text file and because you try signal Tom

1267
2:22:00 --> 2:22:07
the signal doesn't have a lot of the features that telegram have has okay but I mean yeah we

1268
2:22:07 --> 2:22:15
got to use everything um okay thank you excellent all right everybody they're out at Chris the fact

1269
2:22:15 --> 2:22:18
that you don't know actions being taken none of us know all the actions that are being taken there

1270
2:22:18 --> 2:22:22
are plenty of actions being taken and you are an ongoing inspiration keep taking more action

1271
2:22:23 --> 2:22:28
so we will and and the state is going to create a library sorry yeah Charles I saw three very

1272
2:22:28 --> 2:22:34
important things in my emails today and and other elsewhere um and I thought how am I going to

1273
2:22:34 --> 2:22:38
remember those and I just wish I had somewhere to put this stuff because I know in a week's time I've

1274
2:22:38 --> 2:22:44
completely forgotten about them it may come up I may remember in a week's time I may not good well

1275
2:22:44 --> 2:22:51
you need to be put it in one file put everything in one file learn how to search it Tom that's not

1276
2:22:51 --> 2:22:56
the point so we've got Chris Coverdale he's a bit more organized than me say there are others

1277
2:22:56 --> 2:23:01
you know like um okay hang on Stephen we know you're a genius at certain things and you're

1278
2:23:01 --> 2:23:06
not a genius at collecting information you need an assistant and there's someone on this call

1279
2:23:06 --> 2:23:12
or recording who's a who's got nothing to do who says I will become Stephen Frost's

1280
2:23:13 --> 2:23:20
personal assistant okay we're going thanks Chris thanks everybody

1281
2:23:21 --> 2:23:27
finding the information storing it Charles and then refinding yes that's what your virtual

1282
2:23:27 --> 2:23:33
assistant will do for you Stephen you don't pay them money they'll help you because they're inspired

1283
2:23:33 --> 2:23:40
by what you want to create Charles I don't want to computer as my assistant Stephen you have to

1284
2:23:40 --> 2:23:45
want to learn if you don't want to learn IT stuff I mean but if you do want to learn it then

1285
2:23:45 --> 2:23:49
how do you learn it now