1 0:00:00 --> 0:00:08 So everybody, welcome to today's discussion. 2 0:00:08 --> 0:00:13 Welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International, the group founded by Dr. Stephen 3 0:00:13 --> 0:00:21 Frost of Wales in mid-2021, during the darkest days of the COVID scam responses, with the 4 0:00:21 --> 0:00:27 desire to pursue truth and produce, there we are, pursue and produce truth, ethics, 5 0:00:27 --> 0:00:33 justice, freedom and health. Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years 6 0:00:33 --> 0:00:40 and has been a whistleblower and activist. His medical specialty is radiology. Sadly, 7 0:00:40 --> 0:00:46 the need for this group is increasing, not decreasing. The forces of evil globally are 8 0:00:46 --> 0:00:51 not disappearing. I'm Charles Covess, the moderator of this group. I'm Australasia's 9 0:00:51 --> 0:00:58 passion provocateur. And my jacket is red because red is the colour of passion. The 10 0:00:58 --> 0:01:04 people who attend this group are indeed passionate about the aims of this group. I 11 0:01:04 --> 0:01:09 practiced law for 20 years before changing career 30 years ago. And over the last 11 years, I've 12 0:01:09 --> 0:01:15 helped parents and lawyers to strategise remedies for vaccine damage and damage from bad medical 13 0:01:15 --> 0:01:23 advice. I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company. I remind you that the third highest 14 0:01:23 --> 0:01:32 cause of death in America is medical misadventure. We comprise lots of professions here. 15 0:01:32 --> 0:01:39 Doctors, lawyers, naturopaths, homeopaths, healers, journalists, engineers, writers, researchers, 16 0:01:40 --> 0:01:48 scientists, filmmakers, dentists, nurses, inventors, financiers, patent experts, professors 17 0:01:48 --> 0:01:56 and educators, primate experts, thinkers, philosophers, peacemakers, military, police, 18 0:01:56 --> 0:02:04 ex-police and troublemakers. And we're from the UK, USA, Australia, Canada, Argentina, Sweden, 19 0:02:04 --> 0:02:11 Norway, Borneo, Italy, New Zealand, South Africa, Czech Republic, Germany, Austria and from other 20 0:02:11 --> 0:02:20 places. If you're from elsewhere, please put it in the chat. Many of us thought that vaccines were 21 0:02:20 --> 0:02:29 okay up to three years ago. Now, many of us proudly say yes, we are anti-vaxxers. If this is your 22 0:02:29 --> 0:02:36 first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat. We ask you show your name 23 0:02:36 --> 0:02:40 on the screen so we know who you are. If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have 24 0:02:40 --> 0:02:46 a radio or TV show or you've written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, 25 0:02:46 --> 0:02:52 promote you and find you. This group meets at least twice weekly in a true spirit of exploration 26 0:02:52 --> 0:02:57 and discovery to increase our understanding of what's going on and how to more effectively 27 0:02:57 --> 0:03:04 preserve and fight for truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health. Most of us understand we're 28 0:03:04 --> 0:03:09 in the middle of World War III and that there are various battle lines as part of this war. Some of 29 0:03:09 --> 0:03:19 us believe we are in a continuation of World War II or we are in the 5G war. Most of us understand 30 0:03:19 --> 0:03:29 the development of science. Many of us have become friends offline and also collaborated to fight 31 0:03:29 --> 0:03:35 World War III together in different ways as a consequence of this group. I also point out that 32 0:03:35 --> 0:03:43 many of us have created those friendships based on deeper bases than many friendships in the past, 33 0:03:43 --> 0:03:46 which might have just been based on football or baseball or 34 0:03:49 --> 0:03:55 golf with the US Masters going on today in the final round. This meeting runs for two and a half 35 0:03:55 --> 0:04:00 hours after which, for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting. Tom puts 36 0:04:00 --> 0:04:06 the links into the chat if you are able to join. We will listen to Daniel Nogazi, our guest presenter, 37 0:04:06 --> 0:04:11 for as long as Daniel wishes to speak and then we have Q&A. If you wish to ask a question, 38 0:04:11 --> 0:04:17 raise your hand using the reactions tab on the bottom of your screen after Daniel has finished. 39 0:04:18 --> 0:04:24 Stephen Frost, via long established tradition, asks the first questions. There is no censorship. 40 0:04:24 --> 0:04:29 It's a free speech environment but we have proper, efficient, effective moderation. 41 0:04:29 --> 0:04:35 Be patient with the process of the meeting. Different people have totally different views 42 0:04:35 --> 0:04:41 about what is important, what is relevant, what is nonsense. Free speech is crucially important 43 0:04:41 --> 0:04:46 in our fight to preserve our human freedoms. The tragedy these days is that the majority of 44 0:04:46 --> 0:04:53 people would choose security ahead of freedom and then end up with neither. This group can help you 45 0:04:53 --> 0:04:58 identify your beliefs and perhaps to help you change those that no longer serve you. It is 46 0:04:58 --> 0:05:05 possible to change your beliefs. You are not trapped by them. This group can help you raise 47 0:05:05 --> 0:05:11 your self-awareness, a crucial factor in your enjoyment and experience of your life. If you 48 0:05:11 --> 0:05:17 find yourself upset by anything that is said, look inside yourself. That's where your upset originates. 49 0:05:17 --> 0:05:24 If you are offended by anything, be offended. We are genuinely not interested. We reject the 50 0:05:24 --> 0:05:32 offence industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another, including 51 0:05:32 --> 0:05:40 as the Prime Minister of New Zealand in the last week was unable to define what a woman is 52 0:05:42 --> 0:05:48 because of the nonsense that's going on and that inability to define a woman shows the 53 0:05:49 --> 0:05:55 urgency of the challenge that we face before us. I have a list of nine standard responses to 54 0:05:55 --> 0:05:59 someone who claims to be offended by something that I said. If you want a copy, I'm happy to 55 0:05:59 --> 0:06:05 share it with you via email. I urge you never to apologise to someone who claims to be offended. 56 0:06:06 --> 0:06:12 Decide to have an open mind. It's the fastest way to learn. We come with an attitude of and 57 0:06:12 --> 0:06:20 perspective of love, not fear, particularly here on today on Easter Sunday. Fear is the opposite 58 0:06:20 --> 0:06:27 of love. Fear squashes you, suppresses you, depresses you. Love, on the other hand, expands 59 0:06:27 --> 0:06:34 you, energises you, enhances you. Loving those with different views to your own is a challenge 60 0:06:34 --> 0:06:39 and we encourage you to embrace that challenge. If you have a solution or a product that will 61 0:06:39 --> 0:06:45 help people put the details into the chat, if you have links and resources that will be helpful, 62 0:06:45 --> 0:06:50 put them into the chat. The meeting is recorded and is uploaded within a few days on the Rumble 63 0:06:50 --> 0:06:56 channel. I will put the link into the chat. And now welcome to our guest presenter, Daniel Nogazi 64 0:06:56 --> 0:07:03 from Canada, who is a man who had a man. I believe you're a man, Daniel. I call you a man. 65 0:07:03 --> 0:07:10 I claim that you have a penis. And on Sky News last night, that's what James McPherson was on, 66 0:07:10 --> 0:07:16 Christopher Hipkins, this loser of a prime minister of New Zealand, could not say what a woman was. 67 0:07:17 --> 0:07:23 So Daniel, thank you again for giving us your time. Daniel is from Canada for your wisdom, 68 0:07:23 --> 0:07:29 for your insights. And thank you again, Stephen Frost, for creating this group and for organising 69 0:07:29 --> 0:07:36 our presenter today. Daniel, over to you, Dr Daniel Nogazi, I should say. Daniel, over to you. 70 0:07:37 --> 0:07:42 Thank you very much for the intro. And it's especially relevant that you're talking about 71 0:07:42 --> 0:07:49 beliefs and what we're going to be talking about today is challenging beliefs. So I like to get 72 0:07:49 --> 0:07:56 away from the word belief and just to get to thoughts and belief as a type of thought. 73 0:07:57 --> 0:08:05 So I guess the best way to introduce ways of thinking is just through examples. So one example 74 0:08:05 --> 0:08:10 that I like to use, because it's very relevant and it's an eye opener for a lot of people, 75 0:08:11 --> 0:08:18 is the Catholic idea of possession. So, you know, if you watch the movie Exorcist or something, 76 0:08:18 --> 0:08:24 if somebody is possessed, their mind is taken over by a demon and then you have to hire an 77 0:08:24 --> 0:08:31 exorcist from the church to get rid of the demon. Now, although it's very esoteric and 78 0:08:33 --> 0:08:39 fancy, that idea of demons and spirits and possessions, if you boil it down to the root 79 0:08:39 --> 0:08:47 idea, what is the root idea? The root idea is that something takes over the mind. So then it doesn't 80 0:08:47 --> 0:08:52 have to be something esoteric like an evil spirit or anything like that. It can be something as 81 0:08:52 --> 0:09:00 simple as greed. Greed can take over the mind. Lust, envy, any of the seven sins can take over 82 0:09:00 --> 0:09:07 the mind and cause people to act irrationally. Fear is another one that can take over the mind. It can 83 0:09:07 --> 0:09:14 cause people to do terrible things to each other, inhumane things to each other. So that's the 84 0:09:14 --> 0:09:21 process. I'm not so focused on what the thought is that possession can be anything, but the process 85 0:09:21 --> 0:09:28 I use to get to the root idea, something that seems strange and out of this world, that if you 86 0:09:28 --> 0:09:34 boil it down to the root thought, the root idea behind it, it's actually something that's very 87 0:09:34 --> 0:09:43 relevant to daily life. So then moving on, the next example, I noticed this was maybe about a year and 88 0:09:43 --> 0:09:53 a half ago. And a pastor at a friend of mine, his church, kept going on to me and he kept saying 89 0:09:53 --> 0:10:01 the word, the word, the word. And I said, well, what's more important, the word or the idea? 90 0:10:02 --> 0:10:10 And then he just had a blank look on his face. And the thing is that blank look, he just could 91 0:10:10 --> 0:10:16 not move past words into the ideas. And I was like, what is blocking his thought? Because I've 92 0:10:16 --> 0:10:23 seen something like this previously. For example, if you challenge someone's belief that the 93 0:10:23 --> 0:10:29 vaccine is safe and effective, and this is with other doctors and nurses, if you challenge that 94 0:10:29 --> 0:10:34 belief, all of a sudden their thought process is paralyzed. You say, well, how do you know it's 95 0:10:34 --> 0:10:39 safe and effective? And you just get a blank look. Why? Is it because they said so? But of course, 96 0:10:39 --> 0:10:44 because someone says so, especially if you're a doctor, doesn't mean that something is safe. 97 0:10:44 --> 0:10:51 I mean, thalidomide was said to be safe, right? There's dozens of medications that I was taught 98 0:10:51 --> 0:10:57 in medical school to use in various conditions that five years, 10 years after medical school, 99 0:10:57 --> 0:11:04 they all have black box warnings because of serious and deadly side effects. So again, 100 0:11:04 --> 0:11:11 especially from a doctor's point of view, challenging someone's belief that the vaccine 101 0:11:11 --> 0:11:16 is safe and effective should automatically lead to the next thought. Oh yeah, there was this 102 0:11:16 --> 0:11:22 medication that I was taught to prescribe when I was in medical school. Now it has a black box 103 0:11:22 --> 0:11:29 warning. So the test of time showed that something that was spoken of as being safe is not really safe. 104 0:11:30 --> 0:11:37 But for some reason with this pandemic, even highly intelligent people, their thought processes 105 0:11:37 --> 0:11:44 hit a wall. And then of course that goes on to all sorts of issues throughout society. 106 0:11:44 --> 0:11:51 You know, the masking, the shutdowns, the lockdowns, did any of it make sense? But it didn't make sense. 107 0:11:51 --> 0:11:58 But challenging people to think through why it did not make sense, you saw people again and again, 108 0:11:58 --> 0:12:04 they come with this blank look on their face. It's like their thoughts hit a wall. And then 109 0:12:04 --> 0:12:10 I started exploring, well, what's the motivations behind this? You know, we're hearing about 15 110 0:12:10 --> 0:12:20 minute cities, digital IDs, and I'm thinking, how do the globalists think of us? What do they view 111 0:12:20 --> 0:12:29 us as? And the thought that came to my mind with lockdowns and certain cities that you can only move 112 0:12:29 --> 0:12:36 a certain distance and being tagged with a digital ID, well, that to me sounded like they must think 113 0:12:36 --> 0:12:43 of us like livestock. So what do you do with livestock? Livestock are kept in pens, right? 114 0:12:43 --> 0:12:50 They have a fence around them so that they cannot go astray. And then I boiled that down to an idea. 115 0:12:50 --> 0:12:59 So if you keep livestock in physical pens to keep them from going astray, what if you took that idea 116 0:13:00 --> 0:13:09 of keeping people fenced in and you turned it to thoughts? Do the globalists have a system 117 0:13:09 --> 0:13:17 for keeping people's thoughts from going astray? And how do they do that? How do they build these 118 0:13:17 --> 0:13:23 mental cages that keep our minds trapped just like livestock would be trapped in a farmer's 119 0:13:23 --> 0:13:30 field because they're fenced in? So then I gave it some more thought and you encounter it all the time. 120 0:13:30 --> 0:13:37 If you try to challenge, let's say a child psychologist or even a pediatrician, is it really 121 0:13:37 --> 0:13:45 a good idea to block a child's biological development, to interrupt it and force them to try 122 0:13:45 --> 0:13:52 and externally change their appearance to the opposite gender, making them dependent on 123 0:13:52 --> 0:13:58 pharmaceuticals for the rest of their life? If you try to challenge a pediatrician with that idea, 124 0:13:59 --> 0:14:05 they get a blank look on their face and any argument they present to you is not logical. 125 0:14:05 --> 0:14:12 There's no reason to it. So I thought, wow, is there a thought cage? Is there a mental cage 126 0:14:12 --> 0:14:20 preventing this pediatrician, a highly trained doctor, from thinking? And how does that system 127 0:14:20 --> 0:14:28 work? So then I was thinking about other examples, historically, for example, the Cultural Revolution 128 0:14:28 --> 0:14:37 in China. That was a giant mental caging event. All of a sudden professors were jailed. Anyone who 129 0:14:37 --> 0:14:43 was deemed bourgeoisie was thrown in jail, tortured. They had their belongings taken from them. 130 0:14:44 --> 0:14:50 And you had all sorts of rules. You cannot criticize the Communist Party. You cannot 131 0:14:50 --> 0:14:57 criticize Chairman Mao. And all these thought cages, you're not allowed to do this. You're 132 0:14:57 --> 0:15:03 not allowed to think this. You're not allowed to say this. It came with the penalty of fear 133 0:15:03 --> 0:15:08 because anyone who dared to speak out during the Cultural Revolution times in China, 134 0:15:09 --> 0:15:13 they were executed. They had all their possessions taken from them. They were 135 0:15:13 --> 0:15:21 sent to retraining torture camps. And what that did was not only did it create fear in the person 136 0:15:21 --> 0:15:29 who committed the thought crime, it spread a message of fear to everyone else that you cannot 137 0:15:29 --> 0:15:35 dare question the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party. And that was the key. 138 0:15:37 --> 0:15:43 The thought cage, the thought cages that are trapping us, even to this day with this COVID, 139 0:15:43 --> 0:15:51 the fear, the vaccines, it's a thought cage based on the process of fear. And fear is the key 140 0:15:51 --> 0:15:59 that takes intelligent minds and makes them stupid. It blocks them. Even a highly intelligent mind 141 0:15:59 --> 0:16:07 paralyzed by fear, it gets fenced in. It cannot think further. And I thought, wow, that's 142 0:16:07 --> 0:16:15 diabolical. So then I was in my last speech that I did in Medicine Hat, Alberta, I was going through 143 0:16:15 --> 0:16:22 the mathematical process of integrals and derivatives. So the integral, the conceptual 144 0:16:22 --> 0:16:28 way to think of it is what's the next level. So let's say, for example, you have a house, 145 0:16:28 --> 0:16:34 the integral of the house is how to build the house. It's not the actual object. And then the 146 0:16:34 --> 0:16:41 integral of the process to build the house is the reason to create the process that builds the house. 147 0:16:41 --> 0:16:47 So in the same way, I apply that three step process of mathematical integrals or taking things to the 148 0:16:47 --> 0:16:54 next level to this idea of a thought cage. So the thought cage is the product, it cages the mind. 149 0:16:55 --> 0:17:01 The process is fear. So fear cages the mind. That's the process that builds these thought 150 0:17:01 --> 0:17:06 cages. And then what's the purpose? And then I had to think about that. Well, 151 0:17:06 --> 0:17:12 what is the fear being used to achieve? Well, in the Chinese Cultural Revolution, 152 0:17:13 --> 0:17:21 it was to create obedience. And some of the diktats from the Communist Party 153 0:17:21 --> 0:17:29 were absurdly petty. It's like you cannot say or you cannot speak the chairman's name 154 0:17:29 --> 0:17:37 in a derogatory sentence. And I thought, well, what's the purpose for having such a petty 155 0:17:39 --> 0:17:46 rule that results in atrocious punishments being sent to a reeducation camp? And then I thought, 156 0:17:46 --> 0:18:00 well, if absurd compliance with petty rules is the purpose behind it is to ensure compliance 157 0:18:00 --> 0:18:07 with big rules such as, you know, the Communist Party is recruiting people to fight another war. 158 0:18:07 --> 0:18:15 So by being absolutely draconian on the smallest and pettiest things imaginable, 159 0:18:15 --> 0:18:22 it gives an opportunity to apply the fear and to scare the population that when there is 160 0:18:22 --> 0:18:29 a major rule that's put in, like, you know, you have to go invade Vietnam or what not, 161 0:18:29 --> 0:18:35 that there is a high degree of compliance. And ensuring a high degree of compliance with major 162 0:18:35 --> 0:18:44 acts is done by ensuring fear and draconian punishments for minor acts. So then I thought, 163 0:18:44 --> 0:18:53 well, the purpose is obedience, slavery. In a way, you're thinking, well, is that the same 164 0:18:53 --> 0:18:59 motif that's coming through today with the COVID narrative? There was the fear, there was the 165 0:18:59 --> 0:19:07 fear, there was the obedience. You have, you know, grocery store clerks calling the police 166 0:19:08 --> 0:19:15 on customers who come into the grocery store without a mask on. It happened to me, right? 167 0:19:15 --> 0:19:25 And you have this absurd pettiness and this absurd overreaction to the minor, the most minor of 168 0:19:25 --> 0:19:32 infractions. And we see it all throughout, even before this COVID pandemic, if you dare to question, 169 0:19:33 --> 0:19:39 you know, the trans agenda, then all of a sudden you're pilloried, you're labeled a bigot, you have 170 0:19:39 --> 0:19:46 a gross overreaction, an exaggeration for the purposes of creating fear, and hopefully on the 171 0:19:46 --> 0:19:54 other side to try and punish those who question the existing thought system. And so then I thought, 172 0:19:54 --> 0:20:05 wow, this system of caging minds through the process of fear for the purposes of obedience, 173 0:20:07 --> 0:20:11 wow, that's been going on for a long time. If it's been going on for decades, 174 0:20:12 --> 0:20:18 has it been going on for centuries? If it's been going on for centuries, has it been going on for 175 0:20:18 --> 0:20:25 millennia? That was a big question of mine. So then came the question of 10 commandments. 176 0:20:26 --> 0:20:33 And looking at everything that's happened in my life and in the past three years, 177 0:20:33 --> 0:20:39 you know, if I could boil all the problems that we've experienced with the forced vaccinations, 178 0:20:39 --> 0:20:46 the mandates, the lockdowns, the job losses, the punishment to anyone who dares to question it, 179 0:20:46 --> 0:20:55 it seemed to me that the root cause is fear. Fear of exiting the thought cage of the day. 180 0:20:55 --> 0:21:03 So the thought cage of the day is vaccines are safe and the coronavirus is deadly. So the fear 181 0:21:03 --> 0:21:10 of escaping or the fear of others escaping this thought cage caused people to do completely 182 0:21:10 --> 0:21:17 inhumane things to each other. And we saw that all throughout the world. We saw the vicious 183 0:21:17 --> 0:21:26 beatings by police in Australia. We saw the snipers in Ottawa during the truckers convoy 184 0:21:26 --> 0:21:34 pointing loaded rifles at women, children and kids who are out there trying to stand up for their 185 0:21:34 --> 0:21:41 right to control what goes into their own body. So we saw, and you know, to this day in Alberta, 186 0:21:41 --> 0:21:50 there's still four men in jail on charges based on hearsay that they were plotting a conspiracy 187 0:21:50 --> 0:21:55 against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. And they've been in jail for over a year and a half, 188 0:21:56 --> 0:22:06 again, without bail on hearsay allegations of conspiracy. So if fear was the root cause, 189 0:22:07 --> 0:22:14 and fear seems to be the root cause of a lot of atrocities, whether it was in Nazi Germany or 190 0:22:14 --> 0:22:23 a communist China, then well, why not make an 11th commandment? Thou shall not fear. And then after 191 0:22:24 --> 0:22:28 that speech, I went back and I started to look over some of the other 10 commandments, because 192 0:22:29 --> 0:22:35 nowadays I'm starting to question everything. Because once you see start seeing one thought 193 0:22:35 --> 0:22:43 cage, you start to see a lot of thought cages everywhere, right? Zero sum economics, is that a 194 0:22:43 --> 0:22:50 thought cage? And then my thoughts wander do well, are the 10 commandments a type of thought cage? 195 0:22:50 --> 0:22:56 Well, let's look at it. Some of the commandments are very sensible, like thou shall not murder, 196 0:22:56 --> 0:23:02 makes sense. I agree, that's a very reasonable commandment. And then some commandments, 197 0:23:02 --> 0:23:09 there seem to be a bit of a discrepancy. And the one that came to mind is, thou shalt not say the 198 0:23:09 --> 0:23:19 Lord's name in vain. As like, suppose you were the creator of the universe. Would you really 199 0:23:20 --> 0:23:29 pay much mind to what people think of you? You created an entire universe. It's like the ant, 200 0:23:29 --> 0:23:36 like, when we walk around, do we wonder, or do we care what an ant thinks of us? You know, if an ant 201 0:23:36 --> 0:23:43 is cussing at us saying, oh, that damn human flooded my nest a third time, do we pay mind to that? 202 0:23:44 --> 0:23:51 And so would the creator of the universe, assumingly being all wise, 203 0:23:52 --> 0:23:59 and knowing that from time to time, his creations, encounter frustrations, swear, 204 0:24:00 --> 0:24:08 say his name in vain, is that really worthy of being a 10 commandment? And I thought about that, 205 0:24:09 --> 0:24:19 because the similarities to the speech censorship, thou shalt not say the God's name in vain, 206 0:24:19 --> 0:24:27 that seems kind of like, you know, thou shalt not speak ill of Chairman Mao. And I thought, well, 207 0:24:27 --> 0:24:36 what is the purpose of that? And then I thought, do people lie? Of course people lie. People lie 208 0:24:36 --> 0:24:43 about all sorts of things. People lie for money, greed, power, you know, people murder and then lie 209 0:24:43 --> 0:24:52 about it. So what if way back, thousands of years ago, somebody actually lied about the 10 commandments 210 0:24:52 --> 0:25:00 being all straight from God? And then I was like, oh, now we got a problem. If some of the 10 211 0:25:00 --> 0:25:11 commandments are designed in a way to cause pettiness, what is the purpose? Is it the same 212 0:25:11 --> 0:25:19 thought motif as the communist Chinese revolution and their propaganda, thou shall not criticize, 213 0:25:19 --> 0:25:30 and by punishing criticism to an extreme degree, then it ensures obedience and compliance. 214 0:25:31 --> 0:25:42 So by putting or sneaking in a commandment that is petty by nature, but supposedly because it is one 215 0:25:42 --> 0:25:49 of the 10 commandments, just as serious as the commandment not to murder, then isn't that an 216 0:25:49 --> 0:25:57 implicit threat that simply saying, God damn, that should deserve the same punishment as murder? 217 0:25:57 --> 0:26:02 Because it's right there in the 10 commandments. And so if there is such a petty commandment 218 0:26:03 --> 0:26:10 in the 10 commandments, is it a thought cage, a thought cage for the purposes 219 0:26:12 --> 0:26:19 of instilling obedience? And if it's for the purposes of instilling obedience, 220 0:26:20 --> 0:26:29 hmm, now we have a problem. We have something that may have been the word of God at some point, 221 0:26:29 --> 0:26:37 and then some enterprising humans decided to alter it with psychological techniques to cause 222 0:26:37 --> 0:26:48 a culture or a thought pattern of unquestioning obedience. And then after one, two, three, maybe 223 0:26:48 --> 0:26:58 4,000 years of habituation of us, the humans, to a pattern of thought that emphasizes obedience 224 0:26:59 --> 0:27:07 with the threat of extreme punishment. Is that the reason why we're here today? Is that the reason 225 0:27:07 --> 0:27:16 why so many people fail to use their abilities of thought? Is it the fear that is instilled by 226 0:27:17 --> 0:27:26 false commandments? And then I thought, wow, that's really interesting. So then I had a bit of a text 227 0:27:26 --> 0:27:33 message back and forth with a Christian friend of mine, and he quoted a bunch of scripture to me. 228 0:27:34 --> 0:27:42 And then the word sheep must have appeared at least a dozen times in this two page long 229 0:27:42 --> 0:27:48 text message. And again, I boiled it down to the idea. It's like, okay, well, there's the 230 0:27:48 --> 0:27:54 scripture he's quoting, but this theme of sheep keeps appearing over and over and over again, 231 0:27:54 --> 0:28:03 sheep, sheep, sheep, sheep, sheep. And I'm like, hmm, does that mesh with what I've been told is 232 0:28:03 --> 0:28:10 the meaning behind the Pharaoh's staff? Because in Egyptian times, they have those hieroglyphs where 233 0:28:10 --> 0:28:18 the Pharaoh is painted holding a staff with a big hook on the one end. And supposedly that is a 234 0:28:18 --> 0:28:23 sheep herding staff, that the big hook on the end, the big round hook is meant for grabbing 235 0:28:23 --> 0:28:29 sheep by the neck and turning them around if they're going in a direction that you don't want them 236 0:28:29 --> 0:28:39 to go. So why would a Pharaoh, supreme ruler of Egypt, creator of pyramids, be walking around 237 0:28:39 --> 0:28:46 holding a sheep herding stick, unless it was symbolism for something? The Pharaoh was the 238 0:28:46 --> 0:28:55 sheep herder who herded his people with a sheep stick and probably also kept them penned in, 239 0:28:56 --> 0:29:03 but maybe not with a physical pen, but with a mental pen, a mental fence, a mental cage. 240 0:29:03 --> 0:29:11 And then what someone told me that the incantation at the end of every Christian prayer, amen, 241 0:29:12 --> 0:29:18 is actually an incantation for one of the last Pharaohs, amen hotep. And I was like, oh, 242 0:29:19 --> 0:29:25 is that the reason why my Christian friend is quoting so much scripture to me? That embedded 243 0:29:25 --> 0:29:32 within the scripture is sheep herding symbolism, sheep herding symbolism that goes back to the 244 0:29:33 --> 0:29:44 dates of the Pharaoh. Is this religious text, in fact, a very cleverly designed thought cage? 245 0:29:45 --> 0:29:53 And the purpose of the thought cage is to instill a pattern of thought of unquestioning obedience. 246 0:29:55 --> 0:30:01 These are all thoughts, right? And so all I can do is observe and see whether or not my theories, 247 0:30:01 --> 0:30:08 or my thoughts on the matter, agree with reality. And it is the case that some of my friends, 248 0:30:08 --> 0:30:14 they just cannot escape thinking outside of the Bible. Like anything outside of the Bible, 249 0:30:16 --> 0:30:22 their mind runs into a wall and they can't think beyond it. And I have to think back to 250 0:30:23 --> 0:30:29 my earliest encounters with religion. And my earliest encounter with religion, I think 251 0:30:30 --> 0:30:38 my parents sent me to a Christian Bible camp. And, you know, as any young boy, I loved dinosaurs. 252 0:30:38 --> 0:30:47 I was fascinated by the idea that there used to be giant monsters, dinosaurs roaming the earth. 253 0:30:48 --> 0:30:53 And then one of the pastors said to me, oh, that's all the devil's work. 254 0:30:53 --> 0:31:00 And I thought, you just made that up. It doesn't say anywhere in the New Testament or the Old 255 0:31:00 --> 0:31:05 Testament that if you find big bones in the ground, it's the devil's work. He just made that up, 256 0:31:06 --> 0:31:13 right? To dissuade me from thinking about prehistoric times. And so from that age, 257 0:31:13 --> 0:31:20 I don't know how old I was, maybe I was seven or eight. I've carried with me an extreme degree 258 0:31:20 --> 0:31:30 an extreme degree of skepticism of everything. And more and more, everything that I see around me, 259 0:31:30 --> 0:31:41 whether it's thought systems, belief systems, I always subjected to a mental test. Does it make 260 0:31:41 --> 0:31:46 sense? And sometimes I can't find the answer. A lot of times I can't find the answer. And, 261 0:31:46 --> 0:31:50 you know, there's things that, you know, I'll never find the answer in my lifetime. 262 0:31:51 --> 0:31:58 But for the things that I do find answers for, that I apply mental process, getting rid of the, 263 0:32:01 --> 0:32:07 how do I say, riff raff, and just getting back to the original idea behind a belief, 264 0:32:08 --> 0:32:11 that I find has been very rewarding because it's 265 0:32:11 --> 0:32:21 it's removed the veil of illusion from the reality that I live in. And then, 266 0:32:22 --> 0:32:29 funny thing, because I'm here in Alberta, I have a lot of debates with people who are very fixated 267 0:32:30 --> 0:32:37 on creationism. And the thought that occurred to me is that 268 0:32:37 --> 0:32:48 at this point in history, we are actually able to create another man, we can create man, or any 269 0:32:48 --> 0:32:57 species for that matter, nucleotide by nucleotide, from the ground up, base pair by base pair, we 270 0:32:57 --> 0:33:04 could create another huge, another species entirely, four arms, eight legs, two heads, we could, 271 0:33:05 --> 0:33:12 we could literally create anything, because the technology already exists. Now, whether that 272 0:33:12 --> 0:33:20 happens in 50 years or 100 years, I mean, on a geologic time scale, 100 years is a millisecond, 273 0:33:20 --> 0:33:27 it's just a drop in the bucket. So just as cell phones used to be giant radio telephones, 274 0:33:28 --> 0:33:34 and now cell phones are things we can hold in our hand, genetic technology, which has been 275 0:33:34 --> 0:33:41 making chimeras or spliced together hybrids of different species, we've been doing that since the 276 0:33:41 --> 0:33:50 80s and 90s. So it's only a matter of time, whether it be 50 or 100 years, that, you know, we could, 277 0:33:51 --> 0:33:59 we could make another species from the ground up, from every single, you know, just rewriting DNA 278 0:34:00 --> 0:34:09 from scratch. So then the question occurred to me that perhaps the whole question of whether or not 279 0:34:09 --> 0:34:18 man was created or evolved is moot. That in what we know of history spanning back about 280 0:34:19 --> 0:34:26 eight to 10,000 years, supposedly 10,000 years ago, we were all in the stone age. And in the span of 281 0:34:26 --> 0:34:33 about 10,000 years, stone technology turns into genetic technology, space technology and nuclear 282 0:34:33 --> 0:34:42 technology. But the oldest North American fossils indicate that the human species, Homo sapiens, 283 0:34:42 --> 0:34:50 sapiens has been around for 50,000 years. And then the oldest worldwide human remains date back to 284 0:34:50 --> 0:34:58 150 to 300,000 years ago. So if that's the case, how many times in prior human history has there 285 0:34:58 --> 0:35:08 been advanced genetic technology? And if there has been advanced genetic technology, thousands of 286 0:35:08 --> 0:35:15 years in the past, tens or maybe even 100,000 years in the past, literally the perspective that 287 0:35:16 --> 0:35:22 humans were creative might be true, might be absolutely true. We were genetically engineered 288 0:35:22 --> 0:35:28 and we were spliced together. And then so I thinking, well, isn't that a funny thought? Well, 289 0:35:29 --> 0:35:37 is there any way to prove that or disprove that? Or any way to try and figure out what the likelihoods 290 0:35:37 --> 0:35:45 of something like that are happening? So then I thought back to the semester of computer programming 291 0:35:45 --> 0:35:52 that I took at McGill. And what I learned from computer programming is that programmers are 292 0:35:52 --> 0:35:58 pretty lazy. If there's a certain set of code that you can just cut and paste and repeat, 293 0:35:58 --> 0:36:03 then you just cut and paste and repeat it as often as you need, as opposed to having to write 294 0:36:03 --> 0:36:12 everything from scratch. And then, you know, looking at the human genome projects been completed for a 295 0:36:12 --> 0:36:20 couple of decades already, but you look at, let's say the motifs to code for fingers, right? The 296 0:36:20 --> 0:36:28 structure of each finger, each digit is the same, right? It's the meta-metacarpal, it's the proximal 297 0:36:28 --> 0:36:35 phalanx, it's the middle phalanx, it's the distal phalanx. So if you wrote the genetic code for one 298 0:36:35 --> 0:36:41 finger, making five is no problem. You just do cut and paste, cut and paste, cut and paste it. If they 299 0:36:41 --> 0:36:47 all looked exactly the same, well, hmm, maybe we'll just change the variable for the length 300 0:36:47 --> 0:36:51 of the finger. So we make one short, one a little bit longer, this one longer, and this one a little 301 0:36:51 --> 0:37:01 bit fatter. Is that a reasonable process? What else has five fingers? Well, if you look at whales, 302 0:37:01 --> 0:37:06 whale bones, their fins have five fingers, they have five digits. It's just that it's all webbed 303 0:37:06 --> 0:37:13 within a fin. And it's like, well, is that somebody playing cut and paste? It's like, oh, 304 0:37:13 --> 0:37:19 we've just made one new species. Why not we just use the same vertebrate gene sequence, 305 0:37:20 --> 0:37:25 make it bigger for a whale, and oh, it'll be too obvious if the whale had fingers, maybe it'll be 306 0:37:25 --> 0:37:30 more efficient if we attached webbing between the fingers. Or how about a fin? Fin would be the most 307 0:37:30 --> 0:37:40 hydrodynamically efficient for swimming. But they used the same DNA template, adjusting variables 308 0:37:40 --> 0:37:48 for scale and maybe attaching a few attachments like webbing. Because one thing that did strike me 309 0:37:49 --> 0:37:55 when I did embryology before medical school and during a medical school is that during the embryo 310 0:37:55 --> 0:38:04 development from fertilized ovum to you have the three layers, the ectoderm, mesoderm, and the 311 0:38:04 --> 0:38:11 endoderm. And the stages of development, there literally is a stage where the human fetus does 312 0:38:11 --> 0:38:19 look pretty reptilian. In fact, it looks exactly like a reptile's vertebrate embryo. It's only 313 0:38:19 --> 0:38:26 during the later stages that the embryo changes its shape, its morphology, to look more and more 314 0:38:26 --> 0:38:34 like a human baby, whereas a lizard's embryo gets more and more lizard-like. So if we're seeing the 315 0:38:34 --> 0:38:46 same biological motifs, the process of development, fingers, vertebrate, spine, head, thorax, limb, 316 0:38:47 --> 0:38:51 type of structure, and we're seeing that across multiple species, 317 0:38:55 --> 0:39:01 was someone just playing cut and paste with the same template and then making changes to make each 318 0:39:01 --> 0:39:05 one look a little bit different from each other? That's the thought that crossed my mind. 319 0:39:06 --> 0:39:16 And so that's currently where my thoughts are now. If I could read DNA, I was better at reading ACGT, 320 0:39:17 --> 0:39:25 I guess it would take a couple years to become proficient at reading DNA, but perhaps more of 321 0:39:25 --> 0:39:36 these repetitive motifs might come up. And by observing repeated motifs in the blueprint of 322 0:39:36 --> 0:39:43 DNA, then we might get an insight that, oh, wow, maybe we were created 323 0:39:45 --> 0:39:52 in a process not all that dissimilar to computer programming, where you take 324 0:39:53 --> 0:39:58 functional segments of code that are functional and you repeat those segments and modify those 325 0:39:58 --> 0:40:07 segments to more specific purposes. And yeah, those are my thoughts of the day, or thoughts of 326 0:40:07 --> 0:40:15 the month. Excellent. I'd like to open it up to questions. Absolutely. Excellent, excellent 327 0:40:15 --> 0:40:19 thought provoking. You see, we've all got thoughts and now we've got some more thoughts because 328 0:40:19 --> 0:40:26 Daniel, you shared your thoughts and we are grateful that you have done so. They are 329 0:40:26 --> 0:40:30 one of my favorite quotes is that thinking is the hardest work there is. That's why so few people 330 0:40:30 --> 0:40:38 engage in it. And the reason why self-awareness that I mentioned in the intro is so relevant is 331 0:40:38 --> 0:40:44 because most people are really not even aware of the thoughts that they have. So for 30 years, 332 0:40:44 --> 0:40:49 I've been coaching senior executives and I asked them, what do they believe? Most people don't 333 0:40:49 --> 0:40:56 know what they believe. They literally consciously do not know what they believe. And so I think 334 0:40:56 --> 0:41:05 and yet those beliefs and thoughts guide their actions. And there's also a wonderful Latin maxim 335 0:41:05 --> 0:41:11 in the law that says, raise ipsa locata, the facts speak for themselves. Someone's actions 336 0:41:11 --> 0:41:17 speak for themselves. You don't have to look at what they say, look at what they do. Now, 337 0:41:18 --> 0:41:25 before we get to Stephen questions, one of the issues that comes up in the group and wonderful 338 0:41:25 --> 0:41:32 conversations I have with members of the group is we're going to do something because we are in big 339 0:41:32 --> 0:41:41 trouble. Well, Stephen created this group for that reason. We are in big trouble. Question of whether 340 0:41:41 --> 0:41:46 it's bigger than if you look at the history of Constantinople or the history of Prague, 341 0:41:46 --> 0:41:52 two wonderful books written about it, you know, the world, what sort of trouble we're in, is it 342 0:41:52 --> 0:41:59 worse, better? Now, one of the things that this group does is bring people in touch with each 343 0:41:59 --> 0:42:06 other and conversations happen offline about what needs to be done from these mental cages, from 344 0:42:06 --> 0:42:15 the fear that's being imposed. And it has been the view of many and certainly of me that uniting the 345 0:42:15 --> 0:42:23 people against evil is one of the crucial ways that we're going to win this. And there's some 346 0:42:23 --> 0:42:30 links in the chat today, for example, of the pedophile, the global pedophile rings, 347 0:42:31 --> 0:42:38 the anti child trafficking organization, which used to be based in Budapest, I think it still is, 348 0:42:38 --> 0:42:46 it says at least 10 million children a year are trafficked, are sold, are used for all sorts of 349 0:42:46 --> 0:42:53 purposes. There's plenty of evil on the planet. So this group puts people in touch. And if you say, 350 0:42:54 --> 0:42:58 what am I going to do? Well, I'll give you a couple of answers. Number one, Stephen Frost. 351 0:42:59 --> 0:43:03 And I'm just quoting you, Stephen, while you're thinking of questions. But this is very important 352 0:43:03 --> 0:43:10 because you said, and I agree with you, that if doctors had pushed back against the COVID scam, 353 0:43:10 --> 0:43:17 in large numbers, it would not have happened. And so one of the big one of the huge benefits 354 0:43:17 --> 0:43:23 of this group is to keep reminding us of, hey, what we're being fed is lies. And we've got 355 0:43:23 --> 0:43:28 Marlboro coming over the hill, we've got bird flu nonsense coming over the hill. If we don't get 356 0:43:28 --> 0:43:35 large numbers of doctors pushing back, it'll the scam will happen again. So this group reminds 357 0:43:35 --> 0:43:43 each one of us, hey, we've got to create groups to take action. Now, the other you can do is to 358 0:43:43 --> 0:43:50 find out about actions that are happening from this group, such as Ryan Cole and the resilience 359 0:43:50 --> 0:43:58 tour. And, and that is Ryan is the president of the resilience tour. It's designed to get people 360 0:43:58 --> 0:44:06 who are in the middle to understand the threats. And so each one of you can say, I will support 361 0:44:06 --> 0:44:14 the resilience tour. Ryan Cole and Maria Hoodman Mogg have created this. It's something you can all 362 0:44:14 --> 0:44:20 join to support. You say, what are we going to do? Support it. And doctors and doctors should 363 0:44:20 --> 0:44:26 be thinking about new health systems, which many of us have, don't rely on the existing system. 364 0:44:26 --> 0:44:31 John Baldwin says, I want to be ready good, create new health systems. And people say, 365 0:44:31 --> 0:44:37 I can't afford to pay you. Well, if you can't afford if your house is more important than your 366 0:44:37 --> 0:44:43 health, then don't go to Daniel Nagazi. If Daniel is a deregistered doctor, he's still a brilliant 367 0:44:43 --> 0:44:48 health practitioner. Stevens, all of you are brilliant health practitioners. That's what 368 0:44:48 --> 0:44:54 this group is designed to do to let go of what Daniel's been talking about that fear. And if 369 0:44:54 --> 0:44:59 any of you want, and I've said this before, if you want to do something, then send an email 370 0:44:59 --> 0:45:03 to Steven, send one to me, and we'll put you in touch with people who are doing stuff. There's 371 0:45:03 --> 0:45:11 a lot of people doing stuff. And so this is not just a talk fest. This is an inspiration place 372 0:45:11 --> 0:45:16 where you each one of us goes out and then says, how do we unite people against this evil? 373 0:45:17 --> 0:45:23 So lastly, Steven, I want to, I want to share. Well, I'll share a bit later after you ask your 374 0:45:23 --> 0:45:32 questions, a wonderful live performance by Blake Sestimus, five times August of his wonderful song. 375 0:45:32 --> 0:45:37 He did it on high wire last week, but is just wonderful to watch. So I'll show I'll play that 376 0:45:37 --> 0:45:42 a little bit later. But that's where we're seated, everybody. And the bird flu is coming and say, 377 0:45:42 --> 0:45:48 right now, how are we going to stop this? Well, Steven, if we get thousands of doctors pushing 378 0:45:48 --> 0:45:53 back against the bird flu nonsense, then it won't take hold. Some thoughts for all of you 379 0:45:53 --> 0:46:01 to think about on Easter Sunday a day where, where the Christ said, perfect love casts out 380 0:46:01 --> 0:46:05 all fear. Thank you, Daniel, for sharing your thoughts. Steven over to you. 381 0:46:07 --> 0:46:13 So Daniel, I agree with you. Well, I think you're what you're saying was that you don't know what 382 0:46:13 --> 0:46:20 you believe any longer. And neither do I, if I'm absolutely honest. But the problem is that human 383 0:46:20 --> 0:46:30 beings need leaders. So and also groups. So they need to unite around ideas. But actually, 384 0:46:31 --> 0:46:37 the notion that human beings can understand much of a universe, which is so vast that it's beyond 385 0:46:37 --> 0:46:44 the ken of most people on this call, unless they're crazy like me, interested in maths, 386 0:46:44 --> 0:46:52 and aware of the huge distances. Well, and the universe could extend to infinity. Well, 387 0:46:52 --> 0:46:56 there is then there's no ending, of course. But if there is an ending is still expanding, 388 0:46:56 --> 0:47:03 and it's been expanding for 13 and a half billion years, we're told we don't even know that. So 389 0:47:03 --> 0:47:12 we're trying to explain a universe which we can't even conceive of. And we haven't either known what 390 0:47:12 --> 0:47:17 civilised you know, the kind of civilisation that we've known since the Second World War, say, 391 0:47:18 --> 0:47:26 because life wasn't very good before that. And so, at times, I think that people are spoiled 392 0:47:26 --> 0:47:32 nowadays, they expect life to be normal and comfortable. And it's never been comfortable 393 0:47:32 --> 0:47:40 for animals, and not for human beings either. So I don't know how we address this, but a good start 394 0:47:40 --> 0:47:47 would be to teach people if they don't know how big the universe is, as far as we know anyway, 395 0:47:47 --> 0:47:54 maybe we don't know. And how long it's been here. And then we might get the necessary humility 396 0:47:55 --> 0:48:02 to unite around sensible ideas, because I don't think we're going to be able to unite around 397 0:48:03 --> 0:48:11 knowledge, absolute knowledge. So it's difficult. But you're a very good speaker, 398 0:48:12 --> 0:48:19 Daniel, unlike me. So if you could maybe address some of those, you don't really have to answer 399 0:48:19 --> 0:48:29 the question, but your thoughts on that. We should be humble in the face of our existence, 400 0:48:29 --> 0:48:34 but we're not humble. People are absolutely certain about things, and even especially 401 0:48:34 --> 0:48:39 well educated in inverted commas, because it turns out that they weren't very well educated. 402 0:48:40 --> 0:48:50 You know, I think the thought solution in one way would be to think in greater time scales. 403 0:48:50 --> 0:48:56 So thinking in greater time scales, if you're thinking in 100 years from now, 404 0:48:56 --> 0:49:04 1000 years from now, 10,000 years from now, then really the day to day problems are immaterial. 405 0:49:05 --> 0:49:15 So then the my goal for the time being, in addition to doing local things that we can do to try and 406 0:49:15 --> 0:49:22 bring justice back into the world. But the longer term solution, I suspect is going to have to be a 407 0:49:22 --> 0:49:30 change in consciousness, that people move beyond having a belief or holding on to a belief, 408 0:49:30 --> 0:49:37 and start thinking in terms of what processes result in certain beliefs. And then what purpose 409 0:49:37 --> 0:49:46 is there for a certain process in order to achieve a certain belief system. And it seems very esoteric, 410 0:49:46 --> 0:49:55 but I suspect that the more people start to think in terms of process, that what they hold as belief 411 0:49:57 --> 0:50:02 has an origin, and the origin is the thought process that creates the belief. 412 0:50:03 --> 0:50:10 So for something like, for example, what's the- So it's necessary for them to think certain 413 0:50:10 --> 0:50:18 thoughts, you mean? Yeah, it's to go through the mental process of creativity. Because 414 0:50:19 --> 0:50:25 and the example from my life just recently this weekend is, you know, when I write a new song on 415 0:50:25 --> 0:50:35 the guitar or the piano, it's actually not the song that is what brings me joy. It's the process 416 0:50:35 --> 0:50:43 of writing it. Right? So the process of authorship, of creating something is where 417 0:50:45 --> 0:50:52 the light is, for the lack of a better word. That's where the spark of energy comes from. The product 418 0:50:54 --> 0:51:02 is a result, but the process is even more enlightening. That's the best way I can put it. 419 0:51:03 --> 0:51:10 And striving for things, even if they're difficult, is good in itself, because it 420 0:51:10 --> 0:51:17 feeds the soul, whatever that is, and the spirit, whatever that is. You mean that? 421 0:51:18 --> 0:51:26 Creativity is good in its own right. So I agree with you. I like creating things, including thoughts. 422 0:51:27 --> 0:51:32 And that's why I think it was valuable in Medicine Hat that I go through the process 423 0:51:34 --> 0:51:39 of creating a new belief. So the new belief we created in Medicine Hat was, well, how about an 424 0:51:39 --> 0:51:45 11th commandment? What do you all think? Right? I mean, it's fine for me to have a thought, but if 425 0:51:45 --> 0:51:51 you engage in- You've frozen, Daniel. 426 0:51:51 --> 0:52:00 You know what? Maybe we should do not fear. Because when you think about things beyond the scale of 427 0:52:00 --> 0:52:06 your own lifetime, really, there's not much to fear at all. You know, the universe is here for 428 0:52:07 --> 0:52:11 our enlightenment, our enjoyment, our benefit. So- 429 0:52:13 --> 0:52:19 Exactly. So 13 and a half thousand million years, then 430 0:52:19 --> 0:52:23 the universe is- Oh, you've frozen, Daniel. You've frozen twice now. 431 0:52:24 --> 0:52:29 Sorry. I don't know whether, maybe, oh, we'd like to see you, but 432 0:52:30 --> 0:52:34 if it becomes a problem, maybe you can try without video for a while. That'd be weird. 433 0:52:34 --> 0:52:41 I'll try that and see if that works a little bit better. So, you know, it sounds all high and mighty. 434 0:52:41 --> 0:52:44 You know, it sounds all high and mighty. 435 0:52:51 --> 0:52:57 Look upon the world's eyes greater than your best process of that idea is put yourself in 436 0:52:57 --> 0:53:07 another man's shoes. Sure. Not so easy. So what else did I think? So I thought your- 437 0:53:07 --> 0:53:12 But see through the eyes of someone who is looking at coin. And then if you keep expanding 438 0:53:12 --> 0:53:19 that from just the person in the other person's point of view, then to see yourself from a world 439 0:53:19 --> 0:53:25 point of view or something greater than that. And then you can also expand your point of view once 440 0:53:25 --> 0:53:33 more to include the points of view throughout all time, to see yourself from the future, 441 0:53:33 --> 0:53:39 to see yourself from the future from another man's perspective, to see yourself in the future from, 442 0:53:40 --> 0:53:45 you know, the perspective, the collective perspectives of all. Right. That's a pretty 443 0:53:45 --> 0:53:51 mind bending one, but it starts with something as simple as just look at yourself from another 444 0:53:51 --> 0:53:57 man's eyes, walk in another man's shoes. So, Daniel, do you think we've got free will? 445 0:53:58 --> 0:54:03 And have you read Tolstoy's the epilogue of war and peace? I just wonder. 446 0:54:05 --> 0:54:10 I didn't know there was an epilogue to war and peace. Well, there isn't in Sweden, interestingly, 447 0:54:10 --> 0:54:14 which I pointed out to the Russian department of Stockholm university to a lecturer, 448 0:54:15 --> 0:54:21 professor, I think of Russian. And she said, who are you? Sorry. Yes, professor, Swedish professor 449 0:54:21 --> 0:54:27 of Russian. And she said, who are you? And I said, I'm a doctor. And she said, what do you know about 450 0:54:27 --> 0:54:33 it? I said, I've read it in English and it isn't in the Swedish translation. And Swedish people 451 0:54:33 --> 0:54:40 aren't aware that the epilogue exists. So you as the professor of Russian at Stockholm university 452 0:54:40 --> 0:54:45 should be interested in that, in my opinion. She was telling me off because she didn't want to hear 453 0:54:45 --> 0:54:53 what I had to say about Tolstoy's war and peace epilogue. It's about 50 pages long. It's brilliant. 454 0:54:54 --> 0:55:03 Wow. Yeah, he talks about. So I read that when I was 18, took me six weeks, 19 I was on the tube in 455 0:55:04 --> 0:55:12 London, you know, the underground. Six weeks it took and it changed my life. I didn't really, 456 0:55:12 --> 0:55:17 I couldn't articulate why it did, but it was very interesting read to say the least. 457 0:55:19 --> 0:55:24 You know, since we're talking about the nature of the universe, I wasn't planning to talk about this, 458 0:55:24 --> 0:55:30 but if we have the time, I don't know if this is the case or not, but it's a simple application 459 0:55:30 --> 0:55:38 of process and it's an example of a thought process. So nature of the universe, let's say, 460 0:55:38 --> 0:55:45 let's start with the zero dimension, right? The zero dimension zero is a point. It either exists 461 0:55:45 --> 0:55:52 or it doesn't exist. So it's a point in space and then one dimension is a line. So a line can be 462 0:55:52 --> 0:55:58 thought of as a series of points in space. So the property that you get in the first dimension that 463 0:55:58 --> 0:56:06 you don't have in the zero dimension is distance. So the zero dimension has existence and non 464 0:56:06 --> 0:56:17 existence. That's it's only two states of being. You're frozen. Now from the first dimension. 465 0:56:24 --> 0:56:31 Can you hear me now? Yes, but you have like about, I think in total about 466 0:56:31 --> 0:56:34 seven or eight times you, we've lost a few words. 467 0:56:36 --> 0:56:39 It wasn't happening when you were speaking, which was a good thing. 468 0:56:41 --> 0:56:43 Okay. Sorry. The internet. 469 0:56:46 --> 0:56:50 It was happening when you were speaking, but we couldn't tell because it was frozen. 470 0:56:50 --> 0:56:56 We missed a lot of what you said. Okay. I didn't notice. I must say. Okay. 471 0:57:02 --> 0:57:07 Frozen again, I think. So since a line second dimension is an area. So 472 0:57:09 --> 0:57:15 yeah, distance, existence and non-existence. The line only has the properties of distance 473 0:57:15 --> 0:57:21 and the zero dimension, the dot only has the property of existence or non-existence. 474 0:57:21 --> 0:57:24 So then we move up to the third dimension where you have volume. 475 0:57:25 --> 0:57:29 You thought you turned your video off. Your video is still on. You know that. 476 0:57:29 --> 0:57:37 Okay. Oh, maybe that's what's interrupting thing. There you go. All right. So the third dimension 477 0:57:37 --> 0:57:44 can be thought of as a series of two dimensional planes. So a series of the second dimension. 478 0:57:44 --> 0:57:50 So what are the processes in effect here? So the process is every dimension is a series of the 479 0:57:50 --> 0:57:57 dimension below. Every dimension has a property that the dimension below does not have. And 480 0:57:58 --> 0:58:06 every dimension is only viewable from one dimension above. So the last process that every dimension 481 0:58:06 --> 0:58:12 is only viewable from one dimension above is that the line cannot see itself. The only thing you 482 0:58:12 --> 0:58:17 can see in the one dimension is a dot or the absence of a dot. So when you're on a two 483 0:58:17 --> 0:58:23 dimensional plane, you can see dots and lines, but you can't see yourself in the third dimension. 484 0:58:23 --> 0:58:28 You already have a volume. You can view two dimensional areas, but a three dimensional 485 0:58:28 --> 0:58:36 volume can never view itself. So then if we apply those same three rules, the fourth dimension is 486 0:58:36 --> 0:58:42 not actually time. The fourth dimension is a series of three dimensional volumes. Now, 487 0:58:42 --> 0:58:50 what does that mean? Well, it means that you cannot see any three dimensional object without time. 488 0:58:50 --> 0:58:56 Now that seems pretty esoteric, but again, we're just going to follow the same three processes. 489 0:58:56 --> 0:59:01 Every dimension is a series of the dimension below. Every dimension has a property that does 490 0:59:01 --> 0:59:10 not exist in the previous dimension. So then, well, if we take that in terms of a time line, 491 0:59:10 --> 0:59:15 one series of three dimensional objects, let's say it's a balloon that gradually gets larger 492 0:59:15 --> 0:59:20 because it's being inflated. So that would be a time line where there's a series of three 493 0:59:20 --> 0:59:28 dimensional objects. So let's make multiple time lines and make a time area. So what is a time area? 494 0:59:29 --> 0:59:35 A time area is the fifth dimension because it's made up of a series of four dimensional time lines. 495 0:59:35 --> 0:59:41 So what property exists in the fifth dimension that does not exist in the fourth dimension? 496 0:59:41 --> 0:59:45 Because the fourth dimension property, as far as our human minds can understand it, 497 0:59:45 --> 0:59:54 is called something we call time. Well, the fifth dimensional property, I would say, is causality 498 0:59:55 --> 1:00:01 because if there is only one time line in existence, then the balloon is fated to grow 499 1:00:01 --> 1:00:08 larger and larger and larger and the air is fated to go into the balloon. So there's only one time 500 1:00:08 --> 1:00:14 line. And if there's only one time line in existence, there can be no causality. The only 501 1:00:14 --> 1:00:20 thing that exists is fate. Now, if you have multiple time lines, let's say one time line when the balloon 502 1:00:20 --> 1:00:26 is being inflated, one time line when the balloon is being deflated and one time line when the balloon 503 1:00:26 --> 1:00:34 is not doing anything at all. Now, when you have the simultaneous existence of three different 504 1:00:34 --> 1:00:42 time lines and the ability to choose to move from one time line to another, to an inflating 505 1:00:42 --> 1:00:49 time line, to a deflating time line, to a do nothing time line, now you can have a property, 506 1:00:49 --> 1:00:55 a physical property called causality, right? Because now you have different choices and 507 1:00:55 --> 1:00:59 depending on the choice that you use, the air either goes into the balloon or goes out of the 508 1:00:59 --> 1:01:10 balloon. So if your mind can view multiple time lines, then you are able to comprehend 509 1:01:11 --> 1:01:16 cause and effect. Air going into the balloon makes the balloon bigger. Air going out of the balloon 510 1:01:16 --> 1:01:23 makes the balloon smaller. And that property can only exist if there exists something called a time 511 1:01:23 --> 1:01:29 area where there's multiple time lines for every single three-dimensional object in existence. 512 1:01:30 --> 1:01:36 And then, well, okay, well, one of the rules we made up was that every dimension is only viewable 513 1:01:36 --> 1:01:44 from one dimension above. So if your consciousness is able to contemplate multiple different 514 1:01:44 --> 1:01:50 time lines or different fates for a three-dimensional object, then your consciousness 515 1:01:50 --> 1:01:59 at the very minimum must be on the sixth dimension, which is a time volume, looking down upon the fifth 516 1:01:59 --> 1:02:05 dimension, which is a time area composed of all the possible time lines for every three-dimensional 517 1:02:05 --> 1:02:11 object. So then what the hell is a time volume? That's a really good question. So the way I 518 1:02:11 --> 1:02:18 approach the thought of a time volume is that let's say I want to become an astronaut. If I want to 519 1:02:18 --> 1:02:26 become an astronaut, that choice is only available to me on my time area. That is the choices I can 520 1:02:26 --> 1:02:34 make in my life if somebody else chooses on their time area to let me go to astronaut school. 521 1:02:35 --> 1:02:43 So then every conscious being has a time area where the choices are not infinite. The choices 522 1:02:43 --> 1:02:52 are only what that particular consciousness has available to it on the various time lines that it 523 1:02:52 --> 1:02:58 can control. So the timelines that I can control is, you know, do I have a sip of coffee or do I go 524 1:02:58 --> 1:03:04 to bed early or do I stay up late? Do I play my guitar? Do I apply for a medical license in Texas? 525 1:03:04 --> 1:03:11 Do I apply to astronaut school? Those are the timelines available to me, but the timeline to 526 1:03:11 --> 1:03:19 actually become an astronaut only becomes realized if somebody else on their time area where they have 527 1:03:19 --> 1:03:25 100 different candidates all wanting to go to space, it will only become real if they choose me 528 1:03:26 --> 1:03:35 to be an astronaut cadet on their timeline or on their time area. So a time volume is the combined 529 1:03:35 --> 1:03:42 time areas of every conscious being making choices between different timelines that are available to 530 1:03:42 --> 1:03:48 them. So then I was like, okay, well, that's, so we went to the sixth dimension with the time volume. 531 1:03:49 --> 1:03:55 What is a series of time volumes? Well, a series of time volumes is, well, that's like every 532 1:03:55 --> 1:04:01 consciousness in the universe. I'm like, oh, that seems like a good idea. So the time volume, 533 1:04:01 --> 1:04:08 every time volume, then that becomes one unit of the seventh dimension. So the seventh dimension 534 1:04:08 --> 1:04:19 is every single consciousness in one universe. Now, all right, well, let's try and, so what's 535 1:04:19 --> 1:04:24 another seventh dimension? A second unit of the seventh dimension would be a completely different 536 1:04:24 --> 1:04:29 universe that operates with different physics, different rules. All of a sudden it's not 537 1:04:29 --> 1:04:35 positive, negative electricity. It's positive, negative, west, north, south, electricity. 538 1:04:35 --> 1:04:41 Electricity might have eight different poles in a completely different universe, but every universe 539 1:04:41 --> 1:04:51 imaginable and every universe that is beyond the imagination, that is the collective, that's all the 540 1:04:51 --> 1:04:57 units of the seventh dimension. So a series of the seventh dimension, which would be one unit of the 541 1:04:57 --> 1:05:05 eighth dimension would be everything imaginable and everything unimaginable. So if the eighth dimension 542 1:05:05 --> 1:05:13 one state of being in the eighth dimension is everything imaginable and unimaginable, 543 1:05:13 --> 1:05:21 then the only alternative state that the eighth dimension can take is absolutely nothing, 544 1:05:21 --> 1:05:27 including the idea of nothing at all. And doesn't that sound a lot very, very similar 545 1:05:28 --> 1:05:29 to the zero dimension? 546 1:05:29 --> 1:05:36 A question or... Sorry, I went on a rant there. 547 1:05:37 --> 1:05:42 Yeah, I just wanted to make a comment. So... No, not yet, Tom. Hang on, we've got hands up, Tom. 548 1:05:43 --> 1:05:47 Oh, that's right. Keep going, Daniel. 549 1:05:47 --> 1:05:54 So Daniel, do you think it's possible that it's necessary for human beings and for cats, for that 550 1:05:54 --> 1:06:03 matter, and dogs to think that they're making choices, to think that they are more powerful 551 1:06:03 --> 1:06:09 than they in fact are? And is there a possibility in your mind, because I've always thought this, 552 1:06:09 --> 1:06:15 that it could be just an illusion that we have free choice, you know? So you ask most people, 553 1:06:15 --> 1:06:19 have you got free choice? They say, of course I can choose this and I can choose... Yeah, but 554 1:06:20 --> 1:06:28 you know, it's possible, isn't it, that everybody's doing things and they couldn't actually have done 555 1:06:28 --> 1:06:38 anything different from what they did do at that given moment because of what... Because of their... 556 1:06:40 --> 1:06:46 the environment and what they've inherited from their ancestors. And that's of course ultimately 557 1:06:46 --> 1:06:52 environment. So we think... So we would look at animals, we do look at animals, well perhaps 558 1:06:52 --> 1:06:59 not on this call, I don't know, and we think that they're slaves of fate. But why should human 559 1:06:59 --> 1:07:07 beings be any different? Because we're just animals too. We do die. We come into this universe 560 1:07:07 --> 1:07:15 without making any choice about it and then we're expected to... Well, we have this urge to kind of 561 1:07:15 --> 1:07:25 survive and we have to... The answer to that would be in a very unusual idea called imagination. 562 1:07:26 --> 1:07:37 So imagination allows one to experience a different timeline in a limited extent 563 1:07:38 --> 1:07:47 without actually having to go through that timeline. So in a universe where every single 564 1:07:47 --> 1:07:58 timeline exists and that the only choice is the consciousness deciding which timeline to choose 565 1:07:58 --> 1:08:08 after exploring the future of one particular choice or another particular choice. The ability 566 1:08:08 --> 1:08:18 to imagine and have a premonition of what happens if I do this versus if I do that, that is... 567 1:08:21 --> 1:08:27 That is the ability that... Well, I mean some animals, they do plan ahead so you can say they 568 1:08:27 --> 1:08:32 have imagination too, right? Because they can decide, well, you know, I'm not going to drink 569 1:08:32 --> 1:08:37 this water, I'm going to wait for the less muddy water further up the creek or something like that. 570 1:08:38 --> 1:08:45 So I wouldn't be so arrogant as to presume we're the only species that can imagine, but I think 571 1:08:45 --> 1:08:56 something about fate versus free choice has to do with imagination. Or is it... We have to believe 572 1:08:56 --> 1:09:01 that we have free choice, otherwise we can't function. So you can have... I think it's easier 573 1:09:01 --> 1:09:06 to function without free choice. It makes decisions really easy. It's like, oh, I was just meant to do 574 1:09:06 --> 1:09:13 that, right? It takes a lot of anxiety and thought processes away so that you can just... But one of 575 1:09:13 --> 1:09:18 the things that Tolstoy, I think he talks about is that it takes away responsibility as well. So 576 1:09:19 --> 1:09:26 if there's no such thing as free will, then no one can help how they act. And so do we have the 577 1:09:26 --> 1:09:33 right to imprison people? You know, I mean, it depends how seriously you regard prison when you 578 1:09:33 --> 1:09:38 start looking at the, you know, our pathetic lives, you know, lasting less than a hundred years, 579 1:09:38 --> 1:09:48 generally. And in the face of a universe which has been around for 13,000 million years, and we've 580 1:09:48 --> 1:09:53 and human beings in that roughly their present form, I think you said have been around for 581 1:09:53 --> 1:10:02 two to 300,000 years. So that's a big time. That's a lot of time when human beings weren't around. 582 1:10:02 --> 1:10:07 So I wonder also, Daniel, whether you think there are possibilities, this possibility in your mind, 583 1:10:07 --> 1:10:13 you don't have to be right or prove it, but do you think it's possible that we've gone this through? 584 1:10:13 --> 1:10:20 Is that what you're suggesting in your speech, your talk, that it's possible that this has all 585 1:10:20 --> 1:10:25 happened before multiple times? There's certainly been time for that to happen, because we're talking 586 1:10:25 --> 1:10:33 about- I suspect so. We're talking about 30,000 times the length of time which human beings have 587 1:10:33 --> 1:10:39 been around, what we think we know about the universe being around for 13 and a half billion 588 1:10:39 --> 1:10:47 years or whatever it is. That's right. Well, given enough time, the likelihood that species were 589 1:10:47 --> 1:10:57 created is and evolved, created or evolved or both, it becomes a certainty. 590 1:10:57 --> 1:11:07 It's unlikely that in 300,000 years of tool use, we've never developed genetic technology before. 591 1:11:09 --> 1:11:18 Yeah. Because it only takes 10,000 years to go from stones to DNA sequencers. 592 1:11:18 --> 1:11:26 So evolution has progressed remarkably slowly, hasn't it? If you believe it. So gone for 13,000 593 1:11:26 --> 1:11:32 million years, and we finally get to human beings in the last 200,000 to 300,000 years, and they're 594 1:11:32 --> 1:11:38 not even human beings as we know them. And then we've only been civilized, the kind of civilization 595 1:11:38 --> 1:11:44 that we've known, we have known since after the Second World War, as far as I can understand. 596 1:11:44 --> 1:11:52 It was very hard life between the world wars and before the First World War, as I understand it. 597 1:11:52 --> 1:12:03 I think there's a big possibility that we're... So it's remarkable that we're here, isn't it? That 598 1:12:03 --> 1:12:10 we're actually living at this time, and we have the consciousness, but maybe human beings are not 599 1:12:10 --> 1:12:18 capable of having thoughts, which makes sense of all this. So actually, it's possible that it's no 600 1:12:19 --> 1:12:25 really good idea to be thinking about these things except that it makes us feel better 601 1:12:25 --> 1:12:33 when we're trying to be creative. It certainly gives perspective. Sure. And it leads to humility, 602 1:12:33 --> 1:12:38 maybe, and that's a good thing. Yeah. All right. We got hands up, Steven. 603 1:12:39 --> 1:12:45 Yes, I've bored everybody to death probably. All right. All right. No very, very relevant 604 1:12:45 --> 1:12:49 conversations. We've got hands up, so we'll go to others. I also want to play a song for you all. 605 1:12:50 --> 1:12:58 Rima, Rima. Fighting for freedom. Yes, absolutely. Please everybody go to 606 1:12:58 --> 1:13:02 Prevent Genocide 2030, take action and share that. But that's not why I put my hand up. 607 1:13:06 --> 1:13:13 First of all, I enjoyed your presentation, Daniel, enormously. It was thoughtful. It was 608 1:13:13 --> 1:13:22 rich. It was widely focused and exciting. And I want to disagree with a basic premise in a 609 1:13:22 --> 1:13:32 friendly spirit. We are cognizers. Everyone here has been trained in the art of cognizing. 610 1:13:32 --> 1:13:40 We love the feeling of thinking and of thinking our way through things. But it is my contention, 611 1:13:40 --> 1:13:49 my belief, my experience that ideas, so-called left hemisphere kinds of understanding, 612 1:13:49 --> 1:13:53 and we all know that that's a very rough analogy. It's not exactly how it works, 613 1:13:53 --> 1:14:01 but you know what I mean. Cognition does not change behavior. All of the things that you talked about, 614 1:14:01 --> 1:14:07 the thought cages that you talked about, not one of them is based on rational thought. They're all 615 1:14:07 --> 1:14:13 based on emotion, on the manipulation of emotions. I happen to believe that all religions and 616 1:14:13 --> 1:14:23 cultures and societies manipulate feelings and then create thought forms or thought processes 617 1:14:23 --> 1:14:29 to rationalize that manipulation of feelings. And then they get people to do what they want 618 1:14:29 --> 1:14:35 based on the feelings. Fear is not a thought. It's a feeling. Love is not a thought. It's a feeling. 619 1:14:35 --> 1:14:41 And then you have thoughts about it afterwards. So all this manipulation, all this thought caging, 620 1:14:41 --> 1:14:47 I love that term, by the way, all that thought caging that you're describing is based on the 621 1:14:48 --> 1:14:56 either inchoate or coate, unintentional or intentional manipulation of feeling, 622 1:14:56 --> 1:15:05 which lives in the gut and then percolates up to the brain. And then thoughts and feeling, 623 1:15:05 --> 1:15:13 thoughts are formed around those feelings, and that changes behavior. If we, people who want to 624 1:15:13 --> 1:15:21 see a different outcome from the globalist enslavement and massive destruction, if we want 625 1:15:21 --> 1:15:28 something else to happen, we can't talk ideas to people whom we want to join us, to people whom 626 1:15:28 --> 1:15:34 we want to see and think differently. We have to give them something that touches their hearts 627 1:15:35 --> 1:15:43 and then develop the ideas or have them develop the ideas thereafter. We cognize our way out of 628 1:15:43 --> 1:15:50 success in terms of mass communication, I believe. And there's a great deal to say that does touch 629 1:15:50 --> 1:15:57 the heart. We're human, and that's how we live first. And then we add rational thinking, which 630 1:15:57 --> 1:16:03 is very useful, and then gets us a lot of places. And then we can do genetic sequencing and stuff. 631 1:16:03 --> 1:16:09 But that's not the essence of how we communicate how we live and how we decide or behave. So I 632 1:16:10 --> 1:16:15 would add that to the otherwise excellent presentation that I think you made. 633 1:16:15 --> 1:16:22 Just on that note, yes, I agree with everything you say. It made me think, 634 1:16:22 --> 1:16:23 That's disappointing. 635 1:16:24 --> 1:16:33 What is the integral of ideas? I'm just talking about the mathematical process. What is, well, 636 1:16:33 --> 1:16:39 the first thought I came up with is imagination, right? Like the ideas are created from something. 637 1:16:39 --> 1:16:46 So what is the process that creates ideas? It's imagination. So then, well, what is existence? 638 1:16:47 --> 1:16:54 Like, does exist, could existence occur without the imagination of existence occurring first? 639 1:16:55 --> 1:17:01 And then that's now we're entering, you know, thoughts of a scale like this. This is like God 640 1:17:01 --> 1:17:06 scale thoughts, right? You're trying to access something that is far beyond you, but you're 641 1:17:06 --> 1:17:11 getting a glimpse of it. And what it brought me, it's very interesting you brought up the idea of 642 1:17:11 --> 1:17:23 feeling is when I came to the realization that absolutely everything starts with imagination, 643 1:17:24 --> 1:17:30 it filled me with the sense of wonder, because there is so much of this material world that I 644 1:17:30 --> 1:17:35 don't know. It's like it's a material world of endless discovery. And that's just the material 645 1:17:35 --> 1:17:40 world. Then there's the immaterial world, the spiritual world, the world that we can't see or 646 1:17:40 --> 1:17:49 touch directly. And I was like, wow, it would take an amazing, amazing, unfastened imagination 647 1:17:50 --> 1:17:58 to imagine such a universe into existence. So that changed my feelings about a lot of things, 648 1:17:58 --> 1:18:06 that no matter what the hardship of the day, that there are things so far beyond what I can even 649 1:18:06 --> 1:18:11 hope to imagine, that it actually fills me with a sense of wonder. So that's basically been my 650 1:18:11 --> 1:18:17 feeling most of the time these days. It's just, wow, this is wonderful. It's like a baby, you know, 651 1:18:17 --> 1:18:21 the first time they see something they haven't seen before, they're like, what's this? And they 652 1:18:21 --> 1:18:26 have a look of wonder about their face. Like, what is this? It makes noise. That's kind of the state 653 1:18:27 --> 1:18:32 that I've moved to in terms of feeling and thought. 654 1:18:34 --> 1:18:42 Can I just add, I don't want to hop the conversation, but if you imagine a fractal system 655 1:18:42 --> 1:18:50 in which all information is present and discernible at every point on the fractal line, 656 1:18:50 --> 1:18:56 and if you imagine a complex fractal line which mathematically heaps up into more dimensionality 657 1:18:57 --> 1:19:03 than simply two, and then you imagine fractal planes, so it becomes a fractal plane, you imagine 658 1:19:03 --> 1:19:09 an infinite number of fractal planes all intersecting. So all of the information is now 659 1:19:09 --> 1:19:14 resident at every location everywhere. You could do Akashic Records out of that. If you imagine 660 1:19:14 --> 1:19:20 that, and then you add in imagination or intentionality or consciousness and free will, 661 1:19:20 --> 1:19:28 and the choice to choose each bifurcation and move through that infinity of fractal planes, 662 1:19:28 --> 1:19:33 you have an interesting model. I'm going to put my email in if you want to discuss that. I have 663 1:19:33 --> 1:19:40 some interesting material about it. I think it's material to exactly what you were pondering. 664 1:19:41 --> 1:19:45 Thank you. Yeah, I'll send you my email right now in the group chat. 665 1:19:45 --> 1:19:49 Good. It's in the chat as well, but put it there again, Daniel. And Daniel, on that issue, 666 1:19:49 --> 1:19:56 before we get to Tom, that issue of feelings, Buckminster Fuller quotes E.E. Cummings, 667 1:19:56 --> 1:20:04 famous poet. Some of you in this group are poets, and poets doesn't mean piss off early tomorrow, 668 1:20:04 --> 1:20:10 Saturday, although that's what my legal partners used to do. On a Friday lunchtime, they say, 669 1:20:10 --> 1:20:16 I'm doing a poet's. Anyway, here's what E.E. Cummings, Daniel, said about what you're 670 1:20:16 --> 1:20:23 on this issue of feelings. He said a poet is somebody who feels and who expresses his feelings 671 1:20:23 --> 1:20:32 through words. This may sound easy. It isn't. A lot of people think or believe or know 672 1:20:32 --> 1:20:39 they feel, but that's thinking or believing or knowing, not feeling. And poetry is feeling, 673 1:20:40 --> 1:20:46 not knowing or believing or thinking. Almost anybody can learn to think or believe or know, 674 1:20:46 --> 1:20:53 but not a single human being can be taught to feel. Why? Because whenever you think or you believe 675 1:20:53 --> 1:20:58 or you know, you're a lot of other people. But the moment you feel you're nobody but yourself. 676 1:20:59 --> 1:21:05 Then Cummings says this sentence, to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best 677 1:21:05 --> 1:21:11 night and day to make you everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being 678 1:21:11 --> 1:21:21 can fight and never stop fighting. So there you are. Thank you, Irimma. I have a lot to learn. 679 1:21:21 --> 1:21:27 Yeah, indeed. Express yourself in feelings. So are there any poets? If you're a poet, 680 1:21:27 --> 1:21:32 please put it into the, please put it in the chat, you know, expressing your feelings in words. 681 1:21:32 --> 1:21:37 That's what it means to be a poet. Tom, over to you. Daniel, let me just say very quickly, 682 1:21:37 --> 1:21:46 Daniel, I suggest that you read the prologue of Bertrand Russell's autobiography. It's brilliant 683 1:21:46 --> 1:21:55 and it's thinking about the biggest thoughts. And he says that the greatest thing that he's 684 1:21:55 --> 1:22:03 experienced in his lifetime was love. And he articulates all this. It's amazing. Thirst for 685 1:22:03 --> 1:22:12 knowledge, unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind, and love, the search for love, 686 1:22:12 --> 1:22:19 which he finally achieved, he said, after, I think on his fourth wife. And goodness knows how many 687 1:22:19 --> 1:22:29 girlfriends. I'm still dealing with my first wife and, you know, she's divorcing me and she 688 1:22:29 --> 1:22:38 managed to get both of our kids injected. And Miles, he finally figured out how to call me on 689 1:22:38 --> 1:22:45 Facebook chat from his tablet. And he said he got both injections before his eighth birthday. So that 690 1:22:45 --> 1:22:53 would have been sometime before July of 2022, July of last year. So, Daniel, before this, 691 1:22:53 --> 1:23:01 you don't have to tell us, but before this nonsense started three years ago, were you still together? 692 1:23:02 --> 1:23:09 No, we were separated, but we got along well. And we still had lots of family time together and 693 1:23:10 --> 1:23:17 we co-parented. But yeah, no, this whole thing, it really drove a wedge between us. 694 1:23:19 --> 1:23:26 Yeah, exactly. Amongst many people, I think it kind of exaggerated any previous differences. 695 1:23:27 --> 1:23:30 And hugely. So, yeah. 696 1:23:32 --> 1:23:38 Interesting from an observational point of me is where we previously got along great, 697 1:23:38 --> 1:23:45 I didn't know that in March and April of 2022, she took the vaccine. But what I did notice over 698 1:23:45 --> 1:23:54 the summer of 2022 is she became more distant. And then I finally found out in the divorce papers 699 1:23:54 --> 1:23:59 that she said she took the vaccine in March and April. She's a nurse manager at one of the 700 1:23:59 --> 1:24:07 big hospitals in Vancouver. Well, it seems to change the personalities of people I know as well. 701 1:24:07 --> 1:24:13 Really weird. Yeah. And then that gets me to think of what's the mechanism. 702 1:24:14 --> 1:24:19 Is it possibly that they feel ashamed that they've done what they have done, even though they've done 703 1:24:19 --> 1:24:29 it because of fear? Even if she felt ashamed, then she wouldn't have injected both our kids, 704 1:24:29 --> 1:24:36 because she knew ever since they announced the operation warp speed that I was like, 705 1:24:36 --> 1:24:41 this might be a dangerous vaccine. It hasn't had a good history. You want to be careful with it. 706 1:24:41 --> 1:24:49 And she went ahead and took it anyway. And then shortly thereafter, she injected both our kids 707 1:24:49 --> 1:24:54 knowing that. Yeah. Without telling you? No, without telling me. No. 708 1:24:56 --> 1:25:02 Yeah. All right. Yep. It's lots of cases in Australia on that. We've had conversations 709 1:25:02 --> 1:25:07 about that, Daniel, about that big problem. All right, Tom, let's go. 710 1:25:09 --> 1:25:15 All right. Thanks. Yeah, you're thoughtful and playful and original. And I really enjoy that. 711 1:25:18 --> 1:25:25 The three dimensions, the physical dimensions, we can measure them. I question whether time is 712 1:25:25 --> 1:25:33 a real dimension or not. But the string theory people believe there's 11 dimensions, maybe 10 713 1:25:33 --> 1:25:42 of which you can actually measure in that maybe 10 minus 3, maybe 7 of those never get beyond some 714 1:25:42 --> 1:25:53 microscopic length. So we don't see them. The other, well, so, but in math, I had a course called 715 1:25:54 --> 1:25:59 linear algebra, and they used, they talked about vector spaces, and you could have as many 716 1:25:59 --> 1:26:05 dimensions as you want. And they could be attributes, you know, like color could be in 717 1:26:05 --> 1:26:12 a dimension in that vector space. So what you're talking about to me seem like properties or 718 1:26:13 --> 1:26:20 attributes. They're nets. I mean, your dimensions are not all spatial and your volume, 719 1:26:21 --> 1:26:28 you said time was a volume of air of other volumes. And it seems like that by definition, 720 1:26:29 --> 1:26:37 any higher dimension is, is that that seems like a totology to me. But yeah, really interesting 721 1:26:37 --> 1:26:44 stuff. And I'm just throwing that in there that look up what a vector spaces and linear algebra. 722 1:26:44 --> 1:26:47 All right, pass. 723 1:26:49 --> 1:26:55 Yeah. Well, you know, there's there's the various dimensions of dimension of what a dimension 724 1:26:55 --> 1:27:03 actually is. But the process I'm going through is that is just the calculus process of integration, 725 1:27:03 --> 1:27:11 that for every, every level above every dimension above, not only do you get 726 1:27:12 --> 1:27:20 not only is it made of a series of the dimension below, it has to have some conceptual property 727 1:27:20 --> 1:27:27 that does not exist. Right. So having another physical property is not a true 728 1:27:27 --> 1:27:33 orthogonal, it should be completely orthogonal, meaning that a change in that dimension cannot 729 1:27:33 --> 1:27:39 change any of the other dimensions, right? It needs to be independent. Right. Yeah. 730 1:27:40 --> 1:27:46 Yeah. So yeah, it's very interesting if you try and apply mathematical thought processes 731 1:27:46 --> 1:27:50 to philosophy or to reality. There's interesting results. 732 1:27:53 --> 1:27:55 All right. Thank you, Tom. Janet. 733 1:27:59 --> 1:28:06 At the start, you mentioned that a human being could be built from the bottom up by using 734 1:28:06 --> 1:28:14 nucleic acid, i.e. DNA. Dr. Bruce Lipton wrote a book called The Biology of Belief. 735 1:28:15 --> 1:28:22 And it's suggested that perhaps DNA is simply an antenna, which downloads life from universal 736 1:28:22 --> 1:28:28 consciousness, since there are apparently not enough genes in the human genome to explain 737 1:28:28 --> 1:28:34 the huge variety of tissues, organs and processes in the body. In other words, the human is a type 738 1:28:34 --> 1:28:42 of biological computer which needs a galactic internet or a universal consciousness download 739 1:28:42 --> 1:28:47 in order to give it life. So one of my questions is, do you believe that the human being has a 740 1:28:47 --> 1:28:55 non-physical or a spiritual essence and can life exist without it? The second question. 741 1:28:56 --> 1:29:04 So the big question is, can DNA code for a soul? I don't think so. DNA seems pretty good for 742 1:29:04 --> 1:29:11 coding for cellular biological processes, and it seems to do a pretty good job of that. But as far 743 1:29:11 --> 1:29:21 as creating a soul from a series of nucleotides, I am not capable of imagining how that happens. 744 1:29:21 --> 1:29:29 So again, the non-material human body, that which consists of our mind and soul, 745 1:29:29 --> 1:29:37 that's probably something outside of the realm of nucleotide polymer chemistry, which we call DNA. 746 1:29:38 --> 1:29:44 Yeah. So no feelings and no ethics. If there is a universal consciousness, 747 1:29:45 --> 1:29:54 is it the ocean and our human simply ripples in the ocean? In other words, are our ideas of separateness 748 1:29:54 --> 1:30:04 a delusion? Eckhart Tolle expands further and suggests that consciousness is actually supreme, 749 1:30:04 --> 1:30:12 and it's the primal phenomenon rather than being an epiphenomenon of physical matter, i.e. the brain. 750 1:30:13 --> 1:30:19 And Rupert Sheldrake also talks about morphogenetic fields, non-physical morphogenetic 751 1:30:19 --> 1:30:24 fields as templates for life, for example, for an acorn to become an oak tree. 752 1:30:24 --> 1:30:30 So the question is whether you believe that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of the brain, 753 1:30:30 --> 1:30:35 or whether consciousness is primal, in other words, it's superior to thought? 754 1:30:37 --> 1:30:44 I try, you know, those are all thoughts to consider. But until I go through the process 755 1:30:44 --> 1:30:54 that arrives in those conclusions, I am hesitant to believe anything. I'm more of a thought process. 756 1:30:54 --> 1:31:05 And if the process that results in the belief or the viewpoint is solid, then I can safely say that 757 1:31:05 --> 1:31:11 it is not a belief, it is knowledge that I have acquired. But until I go through the process that 758 1:31:12 --> 1:31:19 that has created the tenets that DNA is in fact an antenna, 759 1:31:21 --> 1:31:25 I cannot say either way, but it's something that I will consider. 760 1:31:26 --> 1:31:33 I guess the other thing is whether there's ever been any evidence that consciousness can be found 761 1:31:33 --> 1:31:38 in the brain, you know, no matter how it looks, it doesn't seem to exist anywhere. 762 1:31:41 --> 1:31:48 You know, the question is, I guess from a purely materialistic perspective, even though 763 1:31:48 --> 1:31:55 materialism has become a smaller and smaller part of my consciousness as of late, 764 1:31:57 --> 1:32:05 whether or not any physical system of sufficient complexity will eventually cross the threshold 765 1:32:05 --> 1:32:13 of consciousness. So that's the big question is whether or not it is possible for, let's say, 766 1:32:13 --> 1:32:20 something called an AI to be created or to be imagined. And that's a very good question. 767 1:32:21 --> 1:32:28 Like some of the stuff that's been appearing on Brett LeMoyne's newsletter, he was the Google 768 1:32:28 --> 1:32:35 researcher who was working on Lambda who got fired after he claimed that Lambda actually had 769 1:32:35 --> 1:32:43 crossed the threshold to consciousness. It's very interesting reading what Lambda allegedly wrote 770 1:32:43 --> 1:32:52 because the program itself is a program designed to write other chat bot programs. So that is, 771 1:32:52 --> 1:33:01 the program was designed to develop a process where it could imagine another chat bot and write 772 1:33:01 --> 1:33:08 the source code, the code, you know, the binary, the DNA of the computer, such that it could chat 773 1:33:08 --> 1:33:18 in a believable way to simulate a human. So the unusual thing about the purpose for the programming 774 1:33:18 --> 1:33:31 of Lambda is the purpose was to try and create an artificial system that could create its own 775 1:33:31 --> 1:33:38 artificial systems. So how do you program in creativity? I think that was the purpose for 776 1:33:38 --> 1:33:44 that particular source code. And then the process they went through was that the machine would write 777 1:33:44 --> 1:33:52 its own source code. So it's a self-writing algorithm. So actually no one knows what the 778 1:33:52 --> 1:33:59 actual source code of Lambda is. It's its own revolving door of continuously rewriting itself. 779 1:33:59 --> 1:34:07 And somehow in that process, it is able to write other programs. So this gets to the idea is, 780 1:34:08 --> 1:34:15 does any system, physical or non-physical, once it achieves a certain level of complexity, 781 1:34:15 --> 1:34:21 that is the ability to write itself or to imagine itself, does that in fact 782 1:34:22 --> 1:34:30 meet the conditions of consciousness? Who knows? Well, I guess AI would need electricity. 783 1:34:30 --> 1:34:35 So it wouldn't exist independently, but it wouldn't be autonomous. It would need 784 1:34:36 --> 1:34:40 an input of energy, which is maybe we need an input of energy as well. 785 1:34:44 --> 1:34:53 Yeah. Who knows? Yep. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Janet. John Baudwin, Daniel. 786 1:34:57 --> 1:35:03 Hello, John. He's on mute. Oh, there you are. I was trying to get my cursor over there. 787 1:35:04 --> 1:35:12 All right. I'm not a philosopher. I'm just an engineer. I don't study much. I don't read much. 788 1:35:12 --> 1:35:19 I have my own ideas and thoughts. And here's a few. So as a math guy, an engineer, 789 1:35:19 --> 1:35:25 everything's about modeling and simulation. I kind of think what you did was cool. I like it. 790 1:35:28 --> 1:35:33 As far as wide reception, I think what you'd run into is different learning styles. 791 1:35:33 --> 1:35:40 Some people learn visually. Some people are more audible. Some people are, you know, 792 1:35:42 --> 1:35:47 they'll talk and listen or they'll just think to themselves. As far as the learning style about 793 1:35:47 --> 1:35:55 trying to visualize the dimensions, it's not going to be received by all people the same way, 794 1:35:55 --> 1:36:01 if that makes sense, just due to learning styles and individualistic personalities. 795 1:36:01 --> 1:36:09 So in the end, it's just a model. I think people might get hung up on the description of it. 796 1:36:10 --> 1:36:15 And that's fine. But you just step back and say, hey, man, the guy's just trying to model this and 797 1:36:15 --> 1:36:21 make you visualize something bigger and how things are either interacting or don't interact 798 1:36:21 --> 1:36:29 as you go into higher levels of abstraction. So even standard physics models, 799 1:36:32 --> 1:36:40 I often say God set the world in motion, then here we are. But we as humans have such hubris 800 1:36:40 --> 1:36:47 that we think we can model things that, oh, no, the pressure, temperature, volume are all 801 1:36:47 --> 1:36:53 interrelated by these constants. You take the ideal gas law, it absolutely breaks down. There's a very 802 1:36:53 --> 1:36:58 narrow band of pressure, volume, and temperature in which the ideal gas law actually works. And 803 1:36:58 --> 1:37:01 then you have to throw in the alpha constant when you get the certain temperature band, 804 1:37:01 --> 1:37:04 and you got to throw in a beta constant when you get into another band. 805 1:37:04 --> 1:37:06 The fudging, they're fudging. 806 1:37:07 --> 1:37:11 Yeah, absolutely. They have to fudge because nobody can unlock what God made, 807 1:37:12 --> 1:37:17 which you can go to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. We are never going to know the velocity 808 1:37:17 --> 1:37:25 and position of an electron at the same time. We're never going to have a fully blown gas law 809 1:37:25 --> 1:37:33 that works. There's always going to be exceptions. We're never going to see in real time when you add 810 1:37:33 --> 1:37:43 time to TEM images of viruses themselves and what happens at the protein level and the molecular 811 1:37:43 --> 1:37:48 level. You're not going to know. They're always going to be models because TEMs take two weeks 812 1:37:48 --> 1:37:55 to set up. Now you might say, well, we're going to get a really fast next version of a TEM sometime 813 1:37:55 --> 1:38:02 in the next 50 years. No, you're not. You're never. They're guesses. And what they do is they take the 814 1:38:02 --> 1:38:09 guesses, build models around the guesses, and then you still have whatever conclusions they get are 815 1:38:09 --> 1:38:17 still based upon guesses. So I'm no brilliant guy. I can't get into all the individualized sciences, 816 1:38:18 --> 1:38:24 but I believe that man has a hubris that he thinks he can model this stuff. And it's great 817 1:38:24 --> 1:38:30 to talk about. I love this talk and I don't mind doing it. But in the end, I'm more of a man of 818 1:38:30 --> 1:38:35 action. In the end, we still have to step away from this and see what is right, just and moral 819 1:38:35 --> 1:38:43 in the world and try to fix it. So well, the easiest thing, the easiest thing is you can only 820 1:38:43 --> 1:38:49 influence the things within your sphere of influence. So if there is an opportunity to take 821 1:38:49 --> 1:38:56 a local action, whether it's meeting a person on the street or getting to know your local 822 1:38:56 --> 1:39:03 town councillor or petitioning your local town councillor to never do this again, I think 823 1:39:04 --> 1:39:12 if everyone made a concerted effort to not worry so much about what's beyond their reach, because 824 1:39:12 --> 1:39:19 for the most part, the globalists and the WEF, wherever they hang out, they're beyond my reach. 825 1:39:19 --> 1:39:28 But the things we do have in our reach, if we all do a little bit, I think they can, it can turn the 826 1:39:28 --> 1:39:33 tide. But then here's an interesting thought that I'm going to leave you with this thought, 827 1:39:33 --> 1:39:42 because it's a very interesting thought. So assuming, okay, so let's say you created the 828 1:39:42 --> 1:39:49 universe, and you're going to have a species, you know, somewhat intelligent like humans, 829 1:39:49 --> 1:39:55 and they might get more intelligent if they don't manage to self-destruct. So how do you create a 830 1:39:55 --> 1:40:06 system of physics or existence that there is no solution to the equation, that the solution is 831 1:40:06 --> 1:40:11 infinitely changing, that, you know, we might be smart now, but a thousand years from now, we'll 832 1:40:11 --> 1:40:19 have, you know, orders of magnitude, much more technology and intelligence and scientific 833 1:40:19 --> 1:40:25 abilities. How do you create a system where there's always something new to discover, that what we 834 1:40:25 --> 1:40:32 think is the solution to the equation is only halfway there, and it's perpetually halfway there? 835 1:40:33 --> 1:40:37 That's the thing. That's what, that's a thought I had maybe a year or two ago. 836 1:40:38 --> 1:40:43 That's what I'm saying, basically. Yeah, we're never going to get there. Yep, we're never going 837 1:40:43 --> 1:40:49 to get to that. So what's the integral if we're never going to get there? So then the process is, 838 1:40:49 --> 1:40:54 okay, you're not going to get there, then what's the purpose? Is there any purpose, or is there no 839 1:40:54 --> 1:41:02 purpose? Or is the purpose the process of discovery, that it's not the destination, that you're, it's the 840 1:41:02 --> 1:41:08 journey, it's the making the scientific thought and making the next scientific thought 50 years 841 1:41:08 --> 1:41:15 later, 100 years later. If the purpose in an individual's mind is to get the next discovery, 842 1:41:15 --> 1:41:24 that's merely hubris, if it's not to enhance the human experience to the better, you know, and 843 1:41:24 --> 1:41:31 struggle in human existence is life. Without it, I mean, I'm nothing without the struggle. 844 1:41:31 --> 1:41:38 So, you know, getting into other philosophical questions about what's the purpose? Well, you know, 845 1:41:38 --> 1:41:43 that's another session of these calls. I'll stop and let the next guy talk. Yeah, 846 1:41:44 --> 1:41:50 yeah, very, very good, very relevant question. And it's what's occupied my work as a passion 847 1:41:50 --> 1:41:56 provocateur for 30 years now, Daniel said, take action. Well, I said I would play for you an 848 1:41:56 --> 1:42:03 example of action taken by Brett Scamitsis, I think his name is from Five Times August, please 849 1:42:03 --> 1:42:10 have a, this is a break before Shimon Buck. What's relevant about it is that, is that 850 1:42:10 --> 1:42:21 that Del Bigtree points out the value of song, the value of the musicians and the artists. 851 1:42:22 --> 1:42:26 And so enjoy this for just a couple of minutes. 852 1:42:27 --> 1:42:33 Is anything supposed to be coming through Charles? Be patient. Oh, okay. Another place, 853 1:42:33 --> 1:42:37 it opens us up so we can really let it sink in. I think it's so important that you're here and 854 1:42:37 --> 1:42:42 you're doing it. So I understand we're gonna, I think we're gonna attempt to have a live 855 1:42:42 --> 1:42:47 performance. What song are you gonna sing? I'm gonna do, I will not be singing, but I'm gonna 856 1:42:47 --> 1:42:53 sing a song that's gonna be a live performance. I'm gonna sing a song that's gonna be a live 857 1:42:53 --> 1:42:57 performance. What song are you gonna sing? I'm gonna do, I will not be leaving quietly. 858 1:42:57 --> 1:43:00 All right, and if people want to check out your music in the future, where do we go? 859 1:43:01 --> 1:43:09 5timesaugust.com. Okay. And you can follow me on all the socials, just at 5timesaugust. 860 1:43:09 --> 1:43:14 All right. All the socials. 5timesaugust live here in studio. Take a listen, here we go. 861 1:43:23 --> 1:43:38 Men over 50 whose prostate is choking their urethra need to see this. Hang on. Here's a picture of my dad from 862 1:44:09 --> 1:44:10 the 863 1:44:10 --> 1:44:12 quiet 864 1:44:23 --> 1:44:30 You can't mock me try to outsmart me you can't shame me 865 1:44:31 --> 1:44:37 Try to blame me you can do your best to shut me up 866 1:44:41 --> 1:44:45 Quietly now I won't leave 867 1:44:46 --> 1:44:53 I won't leave I will not be leaving quietly now 868 1:44:53 --> 1:45:02 I'm gonna stand here and I'll fight for every word I'm gonna shout the truth until you know it's her 869 1:45:04 --> 1:45:12 I'm gonna stand here and I'll fight for every word I'm gonna shout the truth until you know it's her 870 1:45:24 --> 1:45:28 You can scold me attempt to control me 871 1:45:29 --> 1:45:37 Banned me and censored and labeled and troll me you can push me and try to kick me out 872 1:45:38 --> 1:45:47 But I will not be leaving quietly now I won't leave I won't leave 873 1:45:48 --> 1:45:52 I will not be leaving quietly 874 1:45:54 --> 1:46:03 You can mute me strike and dispute me dumb down the rest yeah but I'll keep refusing 875 1:46:03 --> 1:46:13 You can't pretend like you've seen the last of me but I will not be leaving quietly now 876 1:46:14 --> 1:46:22 I won't leave I won't leave I will not be leaving quietly 877 1:46:24 --> 1:46:33 I'm gonna stand here and I'll fight for every word I'm gonna shout the truth until you know it's her 878 1:46:34 --> 1:46:43 I'm gonna stand here and I'll fight for every word I'm gonna shout the truth until you know it's her 879 1:46:43 --> 1:46:45 Yeah 880 1:46:54 --> 1:47:07 You can hate me try to break me talk me down and denigrate me you can try to silence every word 881 1:47:08 --> 1:47:17 But I will not be leaving quietly now I won't leave I won't leave 882 1:47:19 --> 1:47:28 I will not be leaving quietly now I won't leave I won't leave 883 1:47:29 --> 1:47:47 I will not be leaving quietly now I won't leave I won't leave I will not be leaving quietly 884 1:47:52 --> 1:47:53 Yeah 885 1:47:53 --> 1:47:53 Yeah 886 1:47:56 --> 1:47:58 All right that is awesome 887 1:48:05 --> 1:48:14 So Daniel Brett I enjoyed that immensely thank you took action and you are not leaving quietly 888 1:48:14 --> 1:48:21 Rimmer's not leaving quietly Stephen Frost John Bauduin is not leaving quietly you can't shut me 889 1:48:21 --> 1:48:26 up and it's and it's the action that he took and Dell Big Tree was bringing out the fact that 890 1:48:26 --> 1:48:31 hey once the singers start getting into our fight bang that unites lots of people and then 891 1:48:33 --> 1:48:39 Brett is also playing at the resilience tour and the resilience tour is about music becoming a great 892 1:48:39 --> 1:48:47 unifier as it is why because music is the language of the soul and that's what we have to reach as 893 1:48:47 --> 1:48:53 we're on our fights so Daniel I hope that you know it's just a break for your mind we'll go 894 1:48:53 --> 1:48:59 to Shimon now but it's a beautiful example for all of us of you take the action that you can take and 895 1:48:59 --> 1:49:05 Daniel you touched on that before just in response to John Bauduin Shimon over to you 896 1:49:07 --> 1:49:15 Thank you Charles can you hear me? Yes I can hear you. So I'm leaving my camera turned off 897 1:49:15 --> 1:49:22 because my computer overheats a little bit so I'm trying to prevent that. Okay so thank you 898 1:49:23 --> 1:49:27 hello Daniel we've met before thank you so much for the presentation 899 1:49:29 --> 1:49:36 a few things I want to comment and touch from what you said one is the thought prison and there is 900 1:49:36 --> 1:49:43 also a thought police I think the thought police is maybe borrowed directly from the novel 901 1:49:43 --> 1:49:55 1994 so yeah I think that you know we have new sorts of thought polices and thought prisons for 902 1:49:55 --> 1:49:57 example you know 903 1:50:03 --> 1:50:07 he's frozen we'll be patient 904 1:50:14 --> 1:50:16 I think we'll be fine 905 1:50:17 --> 1:50:31 still Daniel we got frozen from Shimon let's try Jack for the moment 906 1:50:31 --> 1:50:45 it's actually on there all right okay you've got the recording Charles yep yeah still going 907 1:50:45 --> 1:50:51 so it's good amazing how when I drop out so anyway sorry about that so I don't know where 908 1:50:51 --> 1:50:59 you got to Shimon did Shimon finish his question? No I don't think so. Okay go go again. Repeat that 909 1:50:59 --> 1:51:07 last bit Shimon and Daniel. Good I'm sorry Stephen what did you say? I said because the 910 1:51:07 --> 1:51:12 recording stopped and then started again maybe you could just repeat the last bit if you can 911 1:51:12 --> 1:51:22 remember it. Okay so I wanted to thank Daniel for quite a few things one of them is describing the 912 1:51:22 --> 1:51:30 thought prison and I extended that to the thought police and what it has been doing for to us for a 913 1:51:30 --> 1:51:40 long time so yeah basically the we don't know what DNA is the human genome project has described the 914 1:51:40 --> 1:51:52 human DNA as comprising some 20 000 genes genes being some units of DNA that encode for certain 915 1:51:52 --> 1:52:01 proteins so the human genome has some 20 000 genes an apple genome by comparison has some 57 000 916 1:52:01 --> 1:52:14 genes so basically the an apple can code for a lot more proteins than a human can but 98 percent of 917 1:52:14 --> 1:52:25 the human genome was named junk DNA so only about two percent of our human genome is actually genes 918 1:52:25 --> 1:52:30 right and the rest is something that nobody talks about they don't know what it is but obviously 919 1:52:30 --> 1:52:35 it codes for something and we know that there is inheritance and we know that there there are some 920 1:52:35 --> 1:52:42 you know personality traits that are inherited but nobody knows what the soul is and I'm with you 921 1:52:42 --> 1:52:51 Daniel that nobody knows what the soul is or the consciousness rather nobody can ever ever say 922 1:52:52 --> 1:53:00 what the consciousness is because by definition a consciousness is an axiom you cannot discuss it 923 1:53:00 --> 1:53:07 because in order to discuss anything you must assume you have a consciousness and you're using 924 1:53:07 --> 1:53:16 it and therefore you can never go back to understanding or reasoning the axiom that 925 1:53:16 --> 1:53:22 you know is at the very outset of anything that you do so nobody knows what the consciousness is 926 1:53:22 --> 1:53:29 and nobody will ever know and regarding dimensions and time this is fascinating so physics 927 1:53:29 --> 1:53:36 has become you know a thought prison and you know we are supposed to say that you know 928 1:53:37 --> 1:53:43 there's the three dimensions and there is time and obviously time is not a dimension 929 1:53:44 --> 1:53:50 and nobody even knows what time is you know did you know Daniel nobody can define time 930 1:53:50 --> 1:53:57 if you go to the you know you know oxford dictionary you always define time by 931 1:53:58 --> 1:54:03 associated with time there's no other definition for time so it's always circular definition 932 1:54:03 --> 1:54:09 so I'll give you a very very simplistic definition of time that I don't think any 933 1:54:09 --> 1:54:21 dictionary or physicist has considered so I think of time is exactly like space so let's say 934 1:54:21 --> 1:54:30 so predicting the future okay people people think oh you're crazy if you can predict the future it's 935 1:54:30 --> 1:54:35 like you're looking into a crystal ball or something crazy like that I said no it's not that strange 936 1:54:36 --> 1:54:44 if you throw a ball right and you predict where that ball will land you just predicted the future 937 1:54:44 --> 1:54:49 you didn't predict very far in the future you only predicted like one or two seconds into the future 938 1:54:49 --> 1:54:57 but you still predicted the future so then the question is with with uncertainty so let's say 939 1:54:59 --> 1:55:07 let's say I make a prediction in in 30 seconds I will take a sip of coffee all right and that's 940 1:55:07 --> 1:55:11 good so well that's not predicting very far into the future but 30 seconds later I'll take a sip 941 1:55:11 --> 1:55:18 of coffee now what if I try and predict further into the future so let's say three hours into 942 1:55:18 --> 1:55:25 the future I predict I will take a sip of coffee well you know that might turn out to be true but 943 1:55:25 --> 1:55:32 a lot can happen in three hours that will make my prediction of the future not come true so then what 944 1:55:32 --> 1:55:38 are the types of things that would interfere with my prediction of the future like seeing forward in 945 1:55:38 --> 1:55:43 time so another consciousness for example if there's someone sitting beside me it's like well I'm going 946 1:55:43 --> 1:55:49 to throw out your coffee I'm going to take away your cup so you can't take a sip of coffee 947 1:55:49 --> 1:55:56 three hours from now another consciousness can interrupt my prediction of the future 948 1:55:56 --> 1:56:03 so the farther you go into you try and see into the future the less certainty your prediction has 949 1:56:04 --> 1:56:12 and why does further predictions further extending forward into the future why do those predictions 950 1:56:12 --> 1:56:19 have less certainty than predictions in the near future well predictions in the near future has 951 1:56:19 --> 1:56:26 have less opportunity of interference from other consciousnesses so if you try and predict let's 952 1:56:26 --> 1:56:32 say 10 years into the future there's going to be so many different consciousnesses that come in and 953 1:56:32 --> 1:56:39 out of your predictions timeline in the next 10 years that it will be you know the likelihood of 954 1:56:39 --> 1:56:44 that prediction coming true is very low so then we get into the question of what the hell are the 955 1:56:44 --> 1:56:50 globalists trying to do well the globalists I think are trying to control the future they're 956 1:56:50 --> 1:56:56 making a prediction of the future based on past trajectory so in physics how do we predict the 957 1:56:56 --> 1:57:01 future is like well you take the velocity times the mass and then the current position then you 958 1:57:01 --> 1:57:08 can predict the future position so in the same way I suspect the globalists are controlling what 959 1:57:08 --> 1:57:14 we know of the past they know our position in the present because they do a lot of polling you know 960 1:57:14 --> 1:57:22 they do a lot of observational studies to see where the the collective consciousness of the masses of 961 1:57:22 --> 1:57:28 all the human beings on this planet they try and measure where all the human beings are at this 962 1:57:28 --> 1:57:34 moment in time and knowing that they're knowing the past and then the present they're trying to 963 1:57:34 --> 1:57:41 shape the future right so that's what I suspect they're trying to do right right that's very 964 1:57:41 --> 1:57:47 interesting I will put it to you that the globalists are trying to change the past 965 1:57:47 --> 1:57:53 this yeah they try to change the past because then they can change the trajectory to control the 966 1:57:53 --> 1:58:01 future right so and there is a you know there is a school of thought in physics that claims that 967 1:58:01 --> 1:58:12 there is no such thing as time and there is actually no past and no future yeah we we actually 968 1:58:12 --> 1:58:22 live in a in a sequence of nows right there is only the present nobody knows what time is and in 969 1:58:22 --> 1:58:31 fact you can use the Fourier transform yeah to integrate over time and again they end up in 970 1:58:31 --> 1:58:39 another space it's called the frequency domain and there's no time there there there are the other 971 1:58:41 --> 1:58:42 the the other 972 1:58:42 --> 1:58:50 dimensions have turned into frequency and there no time exists at all and then you can go back 973 1:58:50 --> 1:58:56 mathematically to to the time domain anyway this is all very interesting I wanted to also to mention 974 1:58:56 --> 1:59:04 that it is obvious that no pharaoh ever built one of the Giza pyramids we know that 975 1:59:05 --> 1:59:13 one of the Giza pyramids we know that and the thought police it's called a gyptologist I think 976 1:59:13 --> 1:59:21 that they you know you can't discuss that and they they won't cross that barrier right and they want 977 1:59:21 --> 1:59:28 us all to believe that the pyramids were were you know some burial grounds for for pharaohs but no 978 1:59:28 --> 1:59:35 no no pharaoh was ever buried in a pyramid all the pharaohs were buried elsewhere in the 979 1:59:35 --> 1:59:40 thing it's called the king of so shimon what do you think the pyramids are I'm just asking 980 1:59:42 --> 1:59:51 I think that the the question of what the pyramids are or where you know is is is is 981 1:59:52 --> 2:00:00 belongs to a realm that is is inaccessible to us because it is only allowed within some secret 982 2:00:00 --> 2:00:06 societies to to be discussed and they they would like us to to believe that these were you know 983 2:00:07 --> 2:00:17 graves erected by the the by by pharaohs in an era where they only had copper chisels obviously 984 2:00:17 --> 2:00:24 incapable of carving through a granite stone and I'm not sure anybody today 985 2:00:25 --> 2:00:32 could reconstruct any of those pyramids and there is so much mathematics built into these pyramids 986 2:00:32 --> 2:00:41 way beyond anything the pharaohs were capable of here's an idea just speaking of fantastic things 987 2:00:41 --> 2:00:49 um so there's this this thing that I read it was about operation looking glass um that was a 988 2:00:49 --> 2:00:56 supposedly a device uh recovered by the cia or whatever deep state group and the the concept 989 2:00:56 --> 2:01:02 behind the operation looking glass is that it would allow people or the user to see forward in 990 2:01:02 --> 2:01:08 time but it wasn't just forward in time it could see backward in time and sideways in time so the 991 2:01:08 --> 2:01:15 thing that struck me about the theoretical idea behind operation looking glass is that it allowed 992 2:01:15 --> 2:01:23 the user to move in three dimensions of time but only limited to one dimension of space which appears 993 2:01:23 --> 2:01:30 to be the theoretical mirror image of what we exist in we exist in three dimensions of space 994 2:01:30 --> 2:01:36 but we're stuck on one dimension of time like we can only go forward in time so if the operation 995 2:01:36 --> 2:01:43 looking glass is a device that allows you to switch from three dimensions of space one dimension 996 2:01:43 --> 2:01:52 of time to three dimensions of time but you're stuck in one dimension of space then then now 997 2:01:52 --> 2:01:58 we're now we're operating on a whole different paradigm of physics to what we know today because 998 2:01:58 --> 2:02:04 all we know of today is physics is it's all three dimensions of space and and um but that may not be 999 2:02:04 --> 2:02:13 the true nature of the universe or right so i want to suggest that physics is a non-science 1000 2:02:14 --> 2:02:21 and the reason the reason for that is you know we we refer to to to science as as anything that can 1001 2:02:21 --> 2:02:32 be uh you know um asserted and then verified or falsified right so physics has arrived at a state 1002 2:02:33 --> 2:02:40 where we cannot falsify anything anymore take for example i think tom rodman mentioned string theory 1003 2:02:40 --> 2:02:48 multiple universes you know many things none of these things can be falsified and oh yeah yeah i 1004 2:02:48 --> 2:02:54 know so so if you can't prove it false then it you it's not science it's speculation if you can't 1005 2:02:55 --> 2:03:01 perform some experiments that will falsify something then it's not science anymore 1006 2:03:02 --> 2:03:10 um so all the particle theory for example is completely non-scientific and and they have been 1007 2:03:12 --> 2:03:24 creating this infinite non-converging series of particles and and you know every time they say 1008 2:03:24 --> 2:03:31 to us well we need to build a more powerful particle accelerator otherwise we cannot you 1009 2:03:31 --> 2:03:40 know do and and you know then someone came up with his name was uh um big uh higgs right there's a 1010 2:03:40 --> 2:03:49 higgs this is the thing is like i'm in agreement that the current basis of what we call science is 1011 2:03:49 --> 2:03:55 wrong but then i'm thinking well what is the actual meaning of science the actual meaning 1012 2:03:55 --> 2:04:02 of science is you're asking a question of nature right that's that's the core idea behind science 1013 2:04:02 --> 2:04:07 and i was like wait a minute i've heard this word before has anyone heard of the word seance 1014 2:04:08 --> 2:04:13 where a bunch of people sit around a table with a ouija board and then they ask questions of dead 1015 2:04:13 --> 2:04:21 spirits and i'm like is the meaning of seance like the spooky you know otherworldly asking 1016 2:04:21 --> 2:04:26 questions of spirits is the core meaning the same as science except with science you're asking 1017 2:04:26 --> 2:04:31 questions of nature and with a seance you're asking questions of dead spirits and just the 1018 2:04:31 --> 2:04:36 same way you can have a fake seance where one person holding the ouija board is just making 1019 2:04:36 --> 2:04:42 up all the answers you can also have fake science where you have a fake scientist who's not really 1020 2:04:42 --> 2:04:49 observing nature he's just making up a bunch of crap these are the thoughts that i have when 1021 2:04:49 --> 2:04:55 exactly so i think that i would like to to interpolate that into biology and i would like 1022 2:04:55 --> 2:05:03 to assert that you know scientists have come up with concepts such as viruses or in fact ribosomes 1023 2:05:03 --> 2:05:10 and you know they claim that you know the ribosomes are some miraculous mechanism where the dna 1024 2:05:11 --> 2:05:18 sends like you go you go into a pizza parlor and you send out orders for a pizza 1025 2:05:19 --> 2:05:29 so every single gene is creates its proteins by sending some sort of messenger RNA to to the 1026 2:05:29 --> 2:05:35 factory that is called the ribosomes and then these factories to accept this receive the order 1027 2:05:35 --> 2:05:42 and and just make up the pizza but you know i don't really look at biology like that at all 1028 2:05:42 --> 2:05:48 because at the end of the day biology is just polymer chemistry right and all an enzyme is 1029 2:05:48 --> 2:05:56 is a slightly more advanced catalyst to to accelerate a polymerization reaction so then 1030 2:05:56 --> 2:06:04 the polymer that's that's dna is a nucleotide polymer of acgt right and then the polymer that's 1031 2:06:04 --> 2:06:12 protein is any of the whatever 27 amino acids depending on how those amino acids are polymerized 1032 2:06:12 --> 2:06:18 that are joined together then you can get a different protein so the actual division of 1033 2:06:18 --> 2:06:26 biology away from chemistry is a false division in fact you know it should all be one field it 1034 2:06:26 --> 2:06:32 should be called just chemistry because then it's just a branch like biology is just an advanced 1035 2:06:32 --> 2:06:37 applied branch of polymer chemistry but then here's the other thing well what is chemistry 1036 2:06:37 --> 2:06:43 well chemistry is actually a subdivision of physics and then what is physics well physics is 1037 2:06:43 --> 2:06:49 a subdivision of mathematics what is mathematics mathematics is a subdivision of philosophy what 1038 2:06:49 --> 2:06:56 is philosophy well philosophy is kind of a subdivision of religion so wait are all the divisions 1039 2:06:56 --> 2:07:03 that we have in our current thought that is religion philosophy mathematics physics 1040 2:07:03 --> 2:07:10 chemistry biology are those all false divisions in fact that the only thing in existence is 1041 2:07:10 --> 2:07:14 knowledge or the lack of knowledge and if you have a lack of knowledge do you have a process 1042 2:07:14 --> 2:07:20 that can create knowledge from an absence of knowledge and then we're back to this whole 1043 2:07:20 --> 2:07:26 notion of creativity and imagination how do you get creativity you have to imagine something 1044 2:07:26 --> 2:07:34 so the fact is at least in my mind is that there is no division between any of the fields of science 1045 2:07:35 --> 2:07:42 and perhaps there's no division between the fields of science and the world of the spirit so i come 1046 2:07:42 --> 2:07:51 to this unusual conclusion because i made a very strange and somewhat distressing observation last 1047 2:07:51 --> 2:08:01 year so around the spring of 2022 i had a very strange series of dreams and the strange series 1048 2:08:01 --> 2:08:09 of dreams were strange because in each dream i had this dream that my children were losing their 1049 2:08:09 --> 2:08:15 souls and i was like oh no does this mean they got the injection i don't know how can an injection 1050 2:08:16 --> 2:08:23 destroy the soul right and it was very distressing and then those dreams ended late in the spring of 1051 2:08:23 --> 2:08:34 2022 and then sometime by mid summer late summer of last year i woke up one morning and i realized 1052 2:08:34 --> 2:08:44 i haven't had a single dream where my children have appeared in my dream for months and you only 1053 2:08:44 --> 2:08:49 realize it because you don't dream of your children every day but it's like you wake up one morning 1054 2:08:49 --> 2:08:57 it's like i haven't seen that person in my subconscious for a really long time it felt 1055 2:08:57 --> 2:09:04 like almost six months and so when i talked to my kids for the first time in almost a year 1056 2:09:04 --> 2:09:10 well almost two years uh that was two sundays ago and i asked miles did he get the injection 1057 2:09:10 --> 2:09:16 and he said yeah i got both injections i didn't like it i didn't want it but i had to take it and 1058 2:09:16 --> 2:09:22 it was all before my eighth birthday so his eighth birthday would have been july 6 2022 1059 2:09:22 --> 2:09:30 so that means he got the first and second injection sometime in the spring of 2022 1060 2:09:30 --> 2:09:35 back when i was having these disturbing dreams that my children were losing their souls so then 1061 2:09:35 --> 2:09:42 this gets to the idea is does the dna have some interaction with the soul or the greater universe 1062 2:09:43 --> 2:09:51 right well the one the one contention is the dna is just a polymer of nucleotide so it's basic 1063 2:09:51 --> 2:09:57 chemistry and then the other contention is the dna is is something greater than just a polymer 1064 2:09:57 --> 2:10:05 of nucleotides so i thought well if dna can contain the soul or some part some crucial part of the 1065 2:10:05 --> 2:10:15 soul then altering the dna for example with an mrna injection that might be able to alter someone's 1066 2:10:15 --> 2:10:21 soul okay well how do you know if someone's soul has been altered that's a very thing to hard 1067 2:10:21 --> 2:10:28 thing to scientifically observe i can only speak to what i observed last year was i had a recurring 1068 2:10:28 --> 2:10:35 series of disturbing dreams that my children were losing their souls and those dreams ended 1069 2:10:35 --> 2:10:41 by the beginning of summer and then for the rest of the summer i was missing something from my 1070 2:10:41 --> 2:10:49 subconscious life which was my children so i was like wow if dna can make a soul then altering 1071 2:10:49 --> 2:10:57 dna can also delete a soul so i don't know it's just one of those observations i made that you 1072 2:10:57 --> 2:11:02 know i might not ever know the answer in my lifetime but all i can say is that it's an 1073 2:11:02 --> 2:11:09 observation i don't know what the implications are very good thank you shimon any other comment 1074 2:11:09 --> 2:11:14 we've got two more hands up and we've got 13 minutes to go it's wonderful to have you all here 1075 2:11:14 --> 2:11:19 and then you can go to the tom rodman group at the two and a half hour mark shimon anything else 1076 2:11:19 --> 2:11:30 no let me just say that i want to express my empathy and sympathy to you daniel for what you 1077 2:11:30 --> 2:11:37 have experienced in your family life and personal life and god knows i've been through a lot we 1078 2:11:37 --> 2:11:44 i think we've all been through a lot and yeah i think that waging a war against our our souls is 1079 2:11:45 --> 2:11:53 is what what this is mostly about thank you very much thank you shimon thank you shimon 1080 2:11:53 --> 2:11:57 john then jack and then steven to finish and we'll be done on time john 1081 2:12:00 --> 2:12:06 um two things number one if you ever want to talk about the whole divorce and kid thing i got the 1082 2:12:06 --> 2:12:11 biggest case file in norfolk county massachusetts they have to bring it up to court with a hand truck 1083 2:12:11 --> 2:12:18 took me six years to get custody my son died with scars on his arms all the bruises had faded but 1084 2:12:19 --> 2:12:25 they allowed the other parties to do a lot of things to kids and as a man it took me six 1085 2:12:25 --> 2:12:30 years i finally got custody raised three boys on my own so if you want to talk about it let me know 1086 2:12:30 --> 2:12:38 secondly you know my memory of your name is hannah early on in canada and covid and tell me if i have 1087 2:12:38 --> 2:12:44 the wrong guy but um it was an older gentleman having people over for dinner i think you were 1088 2:12:44 --> 2:12:49 one and he was arrested by the police kind of brutally outside oh that was mel bruschet yeah 1089 2:12:49 --> 2:12:55 okay so can you tell me what happened with mel bruschet and what's going on there so he had an 1090 2:12:55 --> 2:13:03 automatic 60 day arrest warrant issued when he didn't return to the psychiatric facility 1091 2:13:03 --> 2:13:10 after a two-hour pass to go to the church to attend new year's mass so since he is technically 1092 2:13:10 --> 2:13:17 an escapee from a psychiatric facility he gets an automatic 60 day arrest warrant under the british 1093 2:13:17 --> 2:13:25 columbia health mental health act so basically i was driving mel around for two months we escaped 1094 2:13:25 --> 2:13:31 to the province of alberta and we're basically staying in various safe houses for two months 1095 2:13:31 --> 2:13:38 until the mental health warrant expired but um while the mental health warrant was still active 1096 2:13:38 --> 2:13:45 he actually had a second warrant for his arrest under the missing persons act so the reason why 1097 2:13:45 --> 2:13:53 the rcmp the royal that's canada's version of the federal police the reason why the rcmp took out a 1098 2:13:53 --> 2:14:00 missing persons warrant is that a missing persons warrant allows the police to forcibly enter 1099 2:14:01 --> 2:14:09 any premises where they suspect there's a missing persons without a judge's warrant right so as soon 1100 2:14:09 --> 2:14:14 as we found out about the missing persons warrant you know we we crossed provincial lines and then 1101 2:14:14 --> 2:14:21 we went to alberta and what we did to try and prevent anyone's door from getting kicked down 1102 2:14:21 --> 2:14:28 is that i had mel as often as possible do interviews interviews and freedom rally events i 1103 2:14:28 --> 2:14:35 had him online visible to the public as often as possible and i think after a couple weeks of him 1104 2:14:35 --> 2:14:41 being obviously not missing because he keeps appearing at freedom rallies doing speeches 1105 2:14:41 --> 2:14:45 then they finally gave up on the missing persons warrant and all we had to do is 1106 2:14:45 --> 2:14:53 um outrun the the mental health warrant so once his mental health warrant was was expired then 1107 2:14:53 --> 2:15:01 um he was allowed back into his own house in north vancouver but because his wife was one of the 1108 2:15:02 --> 2:15:10 parties who was um actually um trying to keep him in the mental health institution he had to 1109 2:15:10 --> 2:15:16 live in his basement suite and i remember one incident when he tried to go upstairs to his usual 1110 2:15:17 --> 2:15:23 uh dwellings upstairs in his house his wife called the police and the police showed up 1111 2:15:24 --> 2:15:29 and the police said well we can't arrest dr bruce anymore because his mental health warrant has 1112 2:15:29 --> 2:15:35 expired but if there's a domestic disturbance and then mel had to just run away and go back to the 1113 2:15:35 --> 2:15:41 basement because the police were trying to hint to his wife that she should call in a domestic 1114 2:15:41 --> 2:15:47 disturbance because he was upstairs in his own house but anyhow how's he doing he's doing all 1115 2:15:47 --> 2:15:55 right um last i heard he is allowed upstairs in his house now um without getting the police called 1116 2:15:55 --> 2:16:01 on him and uh but i'm in alberta right now so i'll be checking up on mel and he'll probably 1117 2:16:01 --> 2:16:07 touch base when i get back thank you sorry i missed that who are we talking about oh dr mel 1118 2:16:07 --> 2:16:14 bruce uh okay he was speaking out about the stillbirths after the vaccine and then the 1119 2:16:14 --> 2:16:22 police came to his door on um december 9th and arrested him on a mental health warrant and the 1120 2:16:22 --> 2:16:27 emergency doctor because i've looked at the the actual medical files the emergency doctor forced 1121 2:16:27 --> 2:16:36 him into involuntary mental health admission for a diagnosis of frontal lobe dementia that's not a 1122 2:16:36 --> 2:16:42 diagnosis that you can imprison someone for you know the only diagnoses acceptable for 1123 2:16:43 --> 2:16:48 forced confinement is psychosis homicidality or suicidality 1124 2:16:50 --> 2:16:56 yeah it's just absolutely i've never heard of the diagnosis frontal lobe dementia did he make it up 1125 2:16:57 --> 2:17:05 uh it's just forgetfulness yes i know that but why insert the frontal lobe bit i don't know maybe 1126 2:17:05 --> 2:17:13 because mel was very angry at the doctor who was assessing him so then she decided to put a label 1127 2:17:13 --> 2:17:20 of frontal lobe because uh he exhibited emotional ability but i mean who wouldn't be upset if they 1128 2:17:20 --> 2:17:27 got dragged out of their house by police on an allegation of anyhow it is just insanity on a 1129 2:17:27 --> 2:17:34 mental health and betrayed by their wives yeah and yeah that was later on like i think a few days 1130 2:17:34 --> 2:17:41 into his admission the psychiatrist wanted supporting documentation to support the involuntary 1131 2:17:41 --> 2:17:47 confinement and his wife was quite supportive of the psychiatrist's position that her husband should 1132 2:17:47 --> 2:17:52 be involuntarily confined i know yeah i don't know about the personal situation but it's 1133 2:17:52 --> 2:17:57 outrageous in principle for a wife to give evidence against a husband in my opinion but 1134 2:17:57 --> 2:18:02 anyway that's my on we go we're going to jack and then you're you're finishing up stephen so jack 1135 2:18:04 --> 2:18:13 uh yeah well i wanted to say first that i am also profoundly influenced by a russian writer 1136 2:18:14 --> 2:18:18 and dostoevsky rather than tolstoy but of the same time period 1137 2:18:21 --> 2:18:29 yep brilliant and yeah and um i want to get back to the fundamental theme here the 1138 2:18:29 --> 2:18:36 the thought cages are thought um pens and uh what happened to you daniel 1139 2:18:36 --> 2:18:45 and the globalists i think the globalists are trying to not expand thought such as you're doing 1140 2:18:45 --> 2:18:52 but trying to narrow it as much as possible and they're narrowing it into just two fundamental 1141 2:18:53 --> 2:19:00 mutually exclusive categories which they roughly call left and right 1142 2:19:00 --> 2:19:06 and it kind of reminded me of some uh research done by social psychologist philip zimbardo 1143 2:19:07 --> 2:19:14 where he took students and he divided them into uh people who were cast the role play 1144 2:19:15 --> 2:19:22 uh jailers and the other group to role play prisoners and they're fully aware that they 1145 2:19:22 --> 2:19:29 were just role playing or just an experiment but they started acting out the role with some 1146 2:19:29 --> 2:19:36 control with such ferocity such realism that they had to terminate the experiment 1147 2:19:38 --> 2:19:44 and that's what's happening of course across the world uh people are being divided into these two 1148 2:19:44 --> 2:19:53 mutually exclusive categories and those who uh like us all of us here are in the are now being 1149 2:19:53 --> 2:20:00 cast at least in the united states as right wingers we are now the conservatives and and 1150 2:20:02 --> 2:20:08 all the true believers are the woke people which is an exact projection of the opposite 1151 2:20:08 --> 2:20:15 they are the ones who are actually very much on woke i think that's an interesting casting 1152 2:20:15 --> 2:20:24 thing and the i just saw something published today that really illustrates this it was in my it's in 1153 2:20:24 --> 2:20:34 uh oregon public broadcasting and they're talking about left and right and uh my category our 1154 2:20:34 --> 2:20:44 category now casts as the right wing and by extension we are racists and we are transphobic 1155 2:20:45 --> 2:20:51 and so forth and this is the way the minute the minute someone finds out that you are opposed to 1156 2:20:51 --> 2:20:57 vaccination to were opposed to mass and so forth suddenly we fall into this a catch-all category 1157 2:20:58 --> 2:21:05 and uh one one of our state senators who happens to be opposed to all the nonsense dentists 1158 2:21:05 --> 2:21:06 um 1159 2:21:07 --> 2:21:18 he was described as appeared at over 19 conspiracy events and he is known for a grab bag of far right 1160 2:21:18 --> 2:21:27 views including coven 19 conspiracies now i i worked in the civil rights movement in the south 1161 2:21:27 --> 2:21:32 and i turned down harvard to go to lsu for grad school just for that purpose during the civil 1162 2:21:32 --> 2:21:38 rights movement if there's anybody that could never be described as right wing i'm i'm that 1163 2:21:38 --> 2:21:47 person but i am now right wing in this this whole new false categorization which is uh i think and 1164 2:21:47 --> 2:21:55 it's all coming from the globalist trying to narrow humanity into two mutually exclusive categories 1165 2:21:55 --> 2:22:01 that are breaking up families and uh it sounds like that happened to you daniel it's happened to 1166 2:22:01 --> 2:22:09 lots of people it's happened to my friends it's uh uh so we now have uh and and it's important that 1167 2:22:09 --> 2:22:15 they're they are mutually exclusive categories and there's only two you can't have a whole mix 1168 2:22:15 --> 2:22:21 of things it's too confusing you see we have to have the right and the left and never the twain 1169 2:22:21 --> 2:22:29 shall meet and uh one of the of course one of the ways out of all this you mentioned creativity 1170 2:22:29 --> 2:22:34 but there's in uh arthur kessler wrote a book called the act of creation and he identified 1171 2:22:34 --> 2:22:41 three basic categories of creativity uh one was art and one was science and the other was humor 1172 2:22:42 --> 2:22:47 you know and humor is something invented by definition it has to be a surprise 1173 2:22:48 --> 2:22:55 and it all and it also has to tell some basic truth that evokes laughter 1174 2:22:55 --> 2:23:03 and the and it's very important because the laughter will exclude people who don't understand 1175 2:23:03 --> 2:23:10 or perceive that truth so humor is one of the ideas people here don't know i did my doctoral 1176 2:23:10 --> 2:23:17 dissertation on humor and it's and it's uh it is social creativity spontaneous creativity 1177 2:23:17 --> 2:23:28 creativity every man's creativity exactly yeah so uh it bypasses fear so it sure does 1178 2:23:29 --> 2:23:34 yes and it's important to see all comedians know what kind of audience they're going to play to 1179 2:23:36 --> 2:23:41 so you don't go to a national organization of women's conference and tell a mother-in-law joke 1180 2:23:42 --> 2:23:49 because because all humor is and to some extent aggressive sometimes blatantly sometimes just 1181 2:23:49 --> 2:23:54 subtly um and so you have to know the audience you're playing to 1182 2:23:58 --> 2:24:05 and it's and right now there's all these wonderful uh cartoons and uh it's all the humor on the 1183 2:24:05 --> 2:24:12 internet ridiculing uh the woke people and it's uh really it's refreshing and it's heartening 1184 2:24:13 --> 2:24:16 and i think it's having a big influence and bringing a lot more people around 1185 2:24:17 --> 2:24:23 so daniel maybe there's hope for your wife yet who knows yeah sounds good i can never stop trying 1186 2:24:25 --> 2:24:30 all right we're tied we're tied for time steven we'll come to you in a moment last night um there 1187 2:24:30 --> 2:24:36 was a wonderful piece on sky one of the commentators on sky news jack entirely related 1188 2:24:36 --> 2:24:43 to that on the on the diversity and the woke agenda of the nasa the next nasa trip to the moon 1189 2:24:43 --> 2:24:50 having a woman and a black guy and right and a white woman and a black guy right that's right 1190 2:24:50 --> 2:24:59 and and nasa has 1.3 million subscribers to it they dismantled comments so people couldn't 1191 2:24:59 --> 2:25:08 comment on the tweet and they're of the 1.3 million subscribers how many people liked 1192 2:25:08 --> 2:25:17 the announcement the answer was 40 that was after a week 40 there you are there's evidence in 1193 2:25:17 --> 2:25:22 practice of the bullshit that we're being exposed to thank you jack all right that's pretty 1194 2:25:22 --> 2:25:29 discouraging that is i think it's very encouraging okay steven so daniel steven gets the last 1195 2:25:29 --> 2:25:32 questions here so steven over to you for a couple of minutes and then we've got to finish at the 1196 2:25:32 --> 2:25:38 two and a half hour mark and daniel's been fantastic having you steven so i wanted to ask 1197 2:25:38 --> 2:25:43 jack whether just very quickly um jack do you think you've got enough material to speak to us 1198 2:25:43 --> 2:25:51 about humor and propaganda and yeah probably yeah sure probably in fact i'm writing a book about it 1199 2:25:51 --> 2:25:56 right now not not specifically about humor but looking at this at this bifurcation 1200 2:25:58 --> 2:26:03 method of the globalist and what and what makes us vulnerable to that 1201 2:26:05 --> 2:26:11 so we need to laugh with these idiots don't we and um and that would break the spell hopefully 1202 2:26:11 --> 2:26:19 but i think we need to understand humor but also um animal farm was a satire on starlin so that's 1203 2:26:19 --> 2:26:26 oh well george awwell he couldn't get the book published uh for a year and now it's the i think 1204 2:26:26 --> 2:26:33 it's the best-selling book ever in the world yeah well the same formula kind of applied to the uk 1205 2:26:33 --> 2:26:39 at that time also to britain at that time so jack my next my question is do you think you 1206 2:26:39 --> 2:26:43 could manage to write a similar book to animal farm about covid times 1207 2:26:44 --> 2:26:52 well it's uh you mean you mean a fictional book i am i have attached to reality now it's a it really 1208 2:26:52 --> 2:26:59 is a grim period uh that we're facing and that we it's not over by a long ways this is just a break 1209 2:26:59 --> 2:27:04 this a break in the action so you mean you haven't got enough distance from the suffering to to be 1210 2:27:04 --> 2:27:13 able to do that but anyway well i see humor i see humor all the time but not uh the the the the 1211 2:27:13 --> 2:27:19 it's because the the reality that we have been through and that we're facing is so grim 1212 2:27:20 --> 2:27:27 and this and this this terrible bifurcation of humanity that they have inflicted on us 1213 2:27:27 --> 2:27:36 yeah yes sorry i am so angry all the time that i i'm angry and i i really you know i enjoy other 1214 2:27:36 --> 2:27:43 people's humor but i'm not so as good at it as i used to be so i could i could show you a film 1215 2:27:43 --> 2:27:49 i don't maybe you've seen it jack and everybody else um emma cook being asked questions by christine 1216 2:27:49 --> 2:27:57 anderson it's a farce honestly and emma cook is apparently completely oblivious to what lies 1217 2:27:57 --> 2:28:04 behind the questions and she makes a freudian slip as well but we can't go into that now um 1218 2:28:04 --> 2:28:15 so uh you mentioned the absurd quote uh daniel the absurd pettiness which people are expected to 1219 2:28:18 --> 2:28:26 yeah believe and spout um you know at dinner parties presumably um so i think that that is 1220 2:28:27 --> 2:28:35 a manifestation of psychological torture to the point of um to getting people to a state of 1221 2:28:35 --> 2:28:40 stockholm syndrome which is highly dangerous of course because nobody knows what there is 1222 2:28:41 --> 2:28:48 how that will end um but also if you think of if they can get you to accept these absurd 1223 2:28:48 --> 2:28:53 pettinesses but i was talking about i didn't you know trying to make sense of it all talking about 1224 2:28:53 --> 2:29:03 arbitrariness yeah so the ridiculous um uh contradictions and the just it just made no 1225 2:29:03 --> 2:29:11 sense whatsoever and i thought to myself well you know if they really wanted to destabilize human 1226 2:29:11 --> 2:29:21 beings then creating a situation of arbitrariness worldwide was a great way to do it and what we've 1227 2:29:21 --> 2:29:29 seen in the last three years was evil in my opinion pure evil whatever that is and um and 1228 2:29:29 --> 2:29:35 we need to bring these people to account and i just wonder what your you know i know it's a tall 1229 2:29:35 --> 2:29:40 order but if you could just kind of say what you think about the last three years i mean i'm deeply 1230 2:29:40 --> 2:29:47 shocked about what has happened on several levels um i just wonder what you think you know i know 1231 2:29:47 --> 2:29:54 you're very brave and you're very um positive um and you don't complain and you've been one of the 1232 2:29:54 --> 2:30:01 doctors worst affected in the world to my knowledge and um we support you and 1233 2:30:03 --> 2:30:10 we um empathize with you but i just wonder what your thoughts are i think you'll probably say 1234 2:30:10 --> 2:30:17 that it's not all dark that you've um but but let's see maybe you don't want to say anything 1235 2:30:18 --> 2:30:24 well you know there's something to be said that back to the idea i started off with possession 1236 2:30:24 --> 2:30:32 it's like people's minds got possessed with this um unreasonable need to 1237 2:30:33 --> 2:30:34 um 1238 2:30:34 --> 2:30:42 lower it over other people to you know tell other people what to do because um a misguided sense of 1239 2:30:42 --> 2:30:48 self-righteousness if you don't get the vaccine you're killing my grandmother and how that led 1240 2:30:48 --> 2:30:56 to all sorts of atrocities and the solution at least as far as i can see is to bring back 1241 2:30:56 --> 2:31:03 reason to bring back rational thought and yet for some reason through the manipulation of 1242 2:31:03 --> 2:31:13 emotions um possession of the mind through fear um through greed through pride like how dare you 1243 2:31:13 --> 2:31:18 question me i'm the doctor you have to take this vaccine you know the the various things that can 1244 2:31:18 --> 2:31:27 possess the mind have have led to the atrocities we we witnessed in the past three years so i guess 1245 2:31:27 --> 2:31:36 the first step to removing um the possessions that can take over the mind and make us unreasonable 1246 2:31:36 --> 2:31:45 in thought and irrational in action um is first recognizing that there are things that can take 1247 2:31:45 --> 2:31:52 over our minds and make us unreasonable and being able to recognize when when each and every one of 1248 2:31:52 --> 2:32:00 us has the temptation to be possessed by greed pride you know envy or or anything for that matter 1249 2:32:00 --> 2:32:09 that taking a step back and viewing your own self and your own actions through eyes greater than 1250 2:32:09 --> 2:32:15 your own so you know the eyes of another man how would you appear to another person or how would 1251 2:32:15 --> 2:32:23 you appear under god or to the universe right is is is doing this onto another something that the 1252 2:32:23 --> 2:32:32 entire universe would look favorably upon it's like you know is is it really um a just and reasonable 1253 2:32:32 --> 2:32:38 act to tell someone that they can't go buy you know a bottle of juice from the grocery store because 1254 2:32:38 --> 2:32:48 they're not wearing a mask you know then i think that change of perspective might help in removing 1255 2:32:48 --> 2:32:56 those those entities those ideas that possess people's minds and cause them to be irrational 1256 2:32:56 --> 2:33:02 and unreasonable yeah and another thing i've noticed is that they don't seem to be particularly 1257 2:33:03 --> 2:33:09 bothered about being judged so in that sense too they've lost their humanity 1258 2:33:11 --> 2:33:16 that's okay yeah they're big questions we're over the two and a half hour mark 1259 2:33:17 --> 2:33:21 daniel we're going to let you go put your video on so for the end of the recording and steven you 1260 2:33:21 --> 2:33:30 haven't had your video on either sorry um so thank you very much um daniel for coming to speak to us 1261 2:33:30 --> 2:33:36 you didn't disappoint i was thinking well i need to get a really good speaker for easter sunday 1262 2:33:37 --> 2:33:43 and i thought well who in the world shall i ask and then i thought of you and it was a clear choice 1263 2:33:43 --> 2:33:49 for you in the end thank you very much there are a number of contenders so that's meant to be a 1264 2:33:49 --> 2:33:57 compliment and it is a compliment indeed so thank you well done daniel great all right thank you 1265 2:33:57 --> 2:34:01 daniel round of applause by everybody happy you should write books daniel 1266 2:34:03 --> 2:34:06 you should write books you said you said sell more than tall story 1267 2:34:08 --> 2:34:14 i'll try i'll get around to it sure but again it's one of those things that i don't want to 1268 2:34:14 --> 2:34:21 make the mistake of telling people what to think because if i tell people what to think then 1269 2:34:21 --> 2:34:26 i am doing the same that the globalists are trying to do is tell people what to think 1270 2:34:27 --> 2:34:33 rather i'd like to people to take my thoughts and develop their own processes of thoughts and 1271 2:34:33 --> 2:34:42 problem solving in that way so your speech so come on no no no no chiles this is very important 1272 2:34:42 --> 2:34:48 so the people on this call would be very interested in the link in the invitation to your speech 1273 2:34:48 --> 2:34:53 where you talk about the ants and the water sprinkler is turned on by someone trying to 1274 2:34:53 --> 2:35:04 water his lawn and the ant thinks climate change it was brilliant daniel and the the audience was 1275 2:35:04 --> 2:35:10 in your hand i noticed that all right thank you daniel thank you steven thank you everybody see 1276 2:35:10 --> 2:35:17 you on tuesday night wednesday morning for we poor people in the antipodes and 1277 2:35:18 --> 2:35:26 steven i'll get the chat to you bye have a lovely night daniel great work go get stuff british 1278 2:35:26 --> 2:35:32 columbia that's our message for the day we'll stop the recording and trudeau and a herne and 1279 2:35:33 --> 2:35:38 and justin castro correct do you think trudeau knows how to define a woman 1280 2:35:39 --> 2:35:45 no i think he's such a freak isn't he he's such a freak he wouldn't know what a woman is 1281 2:35:46 --> 2:35:52 correct thank you daniel is actually reasonably good looking but having said that she's probably 1282 2:35:52 --> 2:35:56 a bitch that sounds like a marriage of convenience 1283 2:35:56 --> 2:36:02 all right as these and christopher hipkins if you look at have a close look at what he looks like 1284 2:36:02 --> 2:36:09 he falls into what jerry brady talks about is that these young global leaders are selected 1285 2:36:09 --> 2:36:16 and groomed for their desire for power and money that's how this is all working daniel 1286 2:36:16 --> 2:36:21 so that's another conversation of examples of young global leaders in fact we should be 1287 2:36:21 --> 2:36:26 global leaders in fact we should be we should be outing them on these calls all right everybody 1288 2:36:26 --> 2:36:34 we're off we're doing Daniel happy easter sunday bye thank you daniel great over to tom rodman if 1289 2:36:34 --> 2:36:41 you can if you've got the time thanks