Okay everybody, so anyway, so for those of you who say the USA was the leading nation in the
world swimming and aquatic championships called FINA for you French speakers means
Fédération Internationale Natation Aquatic, anyway whatever it is.
Anyone need to make any announcements while I'm downloading Elvis?
Welcome to new, welcome to Virgil visitors. We'll be getting underway in a moment. I'm your moderator
wearing my red passion jacket in Melbourne Australia where it's now the 4th of July.
We've got people from all over the world, 58 so far Albert, well done.
There are some good news on cases but I'll wait for Stephen to come back on that in Australia
and elsewhere. David Martin's case is coming up on the 6th of July. We'll talk about that, very
important and his interview by Greg Hunter is well worth watching and then revisiting his
presentation to us on the 28th of February but he is so strong in talking about the corruption,
the criminality of Big Pharma, it's a delight to watch it only goes for 63 minutes. Has anybody
else watched that interview? Well worth watching. I can put up onto the screen.
My wife and I watched it and it was very depressing. I watched it too, I always watch
David Barton's interviews. Excellent, yeah well that's interesting that Mark said it was
depressing. I thought it was inspiring because what he said was what I believe to be the case
and what many of us here believe that we will win. The only question is how long it's going to take.
No I mean depressing when he said that 700 million people will die.
Oh yes, yes I suppose I've come to the view that those who refuse to wake up will die.
I suppose that's that is certainly my opinion is slightly different. My opinion is these people
have been you know propaganda has taken place and they've been sucked into it and what we know
people right we've got family members, we've got friends, they just don't believe anything that
you say right. It's a closed book, you can't open it. Looking beyond the tragedy of family, friends,
neighbors and so on not believing what you say and finding out later that you're right as the
deaths accelerate we are facing the greatest infrastructure collapse humanity has ever seen
making the Black Death look trivial because only half of Europe died during the Black Death
and it took quite a number of years. This is going to be a rapid almost instantaneous
collapse of in some places 70 to 95 percent of the population. What happens to infrastructure,
what happens to food, what happens to transportation, what happens to the grid,
what happens to water, what happens to any aspect of our lives that we depend on other people and
systems for and if we who are alert and unjabbed do not start planning for this now we are going
to be swept away just like everybody else in the cataclysmic collapse of society and the few
remaining will beg the so-called elite to protect them and suddenly Shazam you've got 2030
all laid out. Yes come come live in the transit villages you small remaining remnant we'll feed
you we'll protect you you'll have your 16 square meters to live in you'll have nothing and you'll
be happy. This is all I mean we are not thinking about this we bemoan and I bemoan with us
we bemoan the fact that nobody's paying attention to us but what are we doing to plan for the
inevitable these people unless we do the research now and find out how to truly detoxify not just
give glutathione but get rid of the nanobots get rid of the the god knows what all unless we're
doing this research and working on it as a kind of manhattan project deal we're participating in
our own destruction. So I remember in the last week well said I've watched a lot of reference to
your not early to your video there's a link to your video Albert by the way I haven't got a
subsequent email from you. No no no that's okay just download the link that I gave you
for the download that's okay if you have that link. Yeah I've got it all ready to go. Okay okay
no that's good we're good. So Rima just just you predicted this some how long ago is that video
that you put up some 10 years ago? Well that was 2009 with Jesse Ventura a lot of people have seen
that but I closed my practice in 2004 my medical practice with my husband because I knew I read
their documents it's not hard it's all laid out.
Yes yes so there is a question of a question in the chat Rima of you know just give us a couple
of minutes on your perspective on that preparation and by the way and by the way you know and by and
by the way you know the I've said to this group and there are always a varying population that's
what's exciting about the group we never know who's up but we've had an organic farm since 1976 46
years of no chemicals on a property 100 kilometers from where I live in the heart of Melbourne.
So and the and the value of and the value of good tree change properties in Australia is going
through the roof people are moving out of the cities into regional and rural areas so what's
your view on what you know for this what people should be doing to prepare as you say? Yes well
first of all anybody who isn't growing their own food using indoor or outdoor square foot gardening
or larger plots of land or whatever is setting themselves up for some serious problems but
beyond that you need water for food most of us can't provide our own water if we live in cities
and so on infrastructure is critical to our lives so in my mind the research that we need and you
know I've been I've been beating this drum publicly since the beginning actually since before the covid
idiocy and and I'm not getting any any response first of all we need to use laboratory facilities
to find out what's in people we need to be doing chromatography and spectrophotometry and so on
and other fairly simple laboratory evaluations to find out what people are transfecting other people
with we know that it's at least the spike protein is it also micro mRNA are people shedding or
transfecting others both the jabbed and the unjabbed with the equivalent of smart smart dust in spit
I don't know it's entirely possible second of all we need to find out what's in people
not what's in the vials we we have some ideas what's in some of the vials but what exactly is
in people now that these self-assembling nanobots have been introduced into people
what does it look like in the in the blood and the tissues of people a year past their first
shot two years past their first shot and then we have to find out what frequencies these nanobots
remember just one moment when you say we do you mean not not government bodies us well I don't
think this I know of no government body that's looking out for my welfare do you know one for
you I'm just asking when you say we all of these resources here we are we are a group of people who
are concerned about this we are alert we are alive we are communicating yep that's we excellent
good just to get clear you know it's not we're not waiting on on government I'm not looking for a
government grant right maybe I could get some money from DARPA no um all right excellent remote
yeah that is well that is well said and that is why we're here and so many of us who have been
here and Stephen well done for setting up Stephen that's the reason why Stephen set this group up
and so but there is I reject the view that no one's doing anything there's a vast amount of
stuff happening because not one of us knows everything that is happening you're absolutely
correct let me put it this way I am not aware of the results of the kind of research that I have been
begging people who have laboratories or who have facilities to I mean look there are pathologists
who are examining tissues who are there are people who are beating these drums too I'm
certainly not the only one nor are you but what I'm saying is that and and thank you for correcting
my passionate mis-speech I am not aware of coordinated communication about these questions
do we know other than speculative um uh speculative notions that are being shared
how to truly detox people from what's been injected into them I'm I'm not aware I mean I'm
I'm a nutritional physician and and Rima we're going to get to Albert you've laid that out
beautifully and thank you for that okay we're going to go back and look at Rima's video and I
would urge you remember to send it you know the thoughts that any of us have about what would be
of value to this group people send emails to Stephen please do that and say hey this is what we
Charles I just yeah I just like to say something to Rima um Rima I agree with you that far too
many people are having a summer off thinking that life is back to normal it's not back to normal
we need to sort this out and hold these people to account and tell them we're coming for them
and frighten them put them on the defensive as well because we are coming for them
let me let me do this I will put my contact information in here and again forgive me for
speaking over passionately I'm watching the world dissolve um I get passionate about it you know
this is a massive fucking disaster I mean we all need to fix it but there are lots of people on
here who feel the same way yes that's why I'm here that's why you're here right even the people on
here can't bear to think of the collapse of the human species so they put it away for a week or
two weeks you know let me have my holiday and then I'll do it and then the time comes to do something
and they don't do anything okay folks anybody who's done that I don't believe you've done that
or you wouldn't be here on a Sunday but in case in case Stephen is right Stefan is right put on
your big girl and big boy panties get over it and let's find the solutions together excellent and
Anna Anna Mihalcea we've talked about you doing a spiritual presentation we've had Jesse Romero
and Anna we need to have that conversation here at one point soon as well um Stephen can you make me
a co-host please we'll get into thank you Rima and we'll get into Albert um yeah I'm trying to
do it now um so I am signed in now uh you'll be pleased to hear but I don't seem to have all the
options when I click on more it should say click on your name and hopefully okay no I've got limited
it says spotlight for everyone rename and pin gosh so I've got two extra sorry did you change
yeah I've got the password yeah I'm signed in so I don't know what's happened yeah that's very
strange yes it says that you're the host does it yeah yes it does how's that then well so I've got
so I just go on to my name and I've got mute and more to the right of that and when I click
what happens if you click on my name and click more
oh I get the full range then good well make me a co-host
yes ah maybe yes I was clicking on my name yes um yes I made you the co-host now
brilliant well done well done well done okay um Albert so everybody remember love your passion
that's why we're here we are passionate that's why I'm wearing red because never never never
explain about your passion and there are many big with many solutions here and you know it could be
we have a day of so we have a day of solutions but there are people who'd love to hear you speak
I know I want to hear you speak on the spiritual on the spiritual battle I've had other information
from other sources that we don't have to do this alone Rima so it's a much bigger game than just
us human Charles we can't do it alone not one of us there is no way that we can do it alone
these collaborations I mean thank god the Chinese government gives us zoom yes the the collaboration
system is absolutely essential because otherwise we have no hope but with each other and with our
resources and our um uh many kinds of talents then we do have hope but only if we recognize
the problem I mean it's like a doctor you have to diagnose the underlying cause this is not how
allopathic medicine is done but that's how it should be diagnose the underlying cause and you
treat the underlying cause and the symptoms simultaneously well we have to do that
and I will have and and we have spiritual forces available to us as well yes anyway
I'll run the good news is I think we've after all these meetings we've got a very good idea
a good few of us of what's going on and um and what each party's that's affecting the whole thing
you know the economics and history um yeah many aspects which I maybe police um military um
constitutions we historians we've got historians on the group philosophers
psychologists so and we're trying to get the message we're trying to work on the messaging
because I don't know what you think but we can talk um if you email me then we can get we can
start talking um Stephen Steve is it Stephen or Stefan uh Stephen with a ph Stephen Stephen
with a ph.frost as in Jack Frost at BTinternet.com okay I'm gonna put that in the chat okay very good
or maybe you you put your you put your um email in the chat I don't want to presume no it's okay
I don't mind well everybody's got my email address I think everyone's got Stephen's email
someone please put in the chat. Do I? I don't think so. Yes. Oh well no I don't think so but I've put my
contact information there. Excellent. Rema do you get an invitation every week twice a week sorry?
No. Oh I thought I saw your email address okay if you could send me your email address then that
would be great. I will do that. Right. Okay is that your dog Stephen? Yeah that finished sorry about
that. Nice all right well everybody we have two and a half hours for our meeting as usual so it's
been most enlightening in any event and we've got logistics fixed and we've got Albert ready to go
as I say welcome to newcomers and Albert can you give us a bit of background on you and I'll show
you I'll get you excited Albert this is what I'm gonna get Albert excited about. Thank you wow thank
you thank you can you uh I don't know if you could uh well you can leave it like that or you could
put it into oh there you go you put it into presentation mode yeah um yeah so my name
my name is Albert Benavides I go by welcome to the eagle and I'm the uh I consider myself one of the
best uh VAERS auditors in the world I've been following the VAERS uh database since uh day one
of the rollout and uh so with that that's okay who's um it's hard to see all the people on him
okay keep going keep going Albert uh yeah um so I called my uh presentation the VAERS uncomfortable
treats and with that I just want to say that I think that our American VAERS is the the best um
uh adverse event system in the world but it can be better um I I think that they've hijacked it
and the people entrusted to take care of the VAERS system are doing anything but um you know but
maintaining the system so with that um I want to say my key points are that um uh you know tens of
thousands of um reports are are under classified or undercoded meaning that there is some severe
adverse events that are basically classified as office visits or none of the above that they have
not been um uh correctly uh the boxes haven't been correctly checked off and so they're they're just
flushing out as none of the above um also that um with the uh you know with the hot lots and the
toxic lots and which I truly believe and agree that there are toxic toxic lots but even with that
there are thousands of misclassified uh lot numbers meaning that there is um uh the manufacturer and
the lot number are are discombobulated there's thousands of them that tell tell us that there's
the manufacturer is Pfizer but they give us the Moderna lot or they or they say the manufacturer
is Moderna but they give us the Pfizer lot so if we clean those up I think we would get a better
idea an even more crystal clear um visualization or idea of what's real you know what's talked
toxic and what's possibly saline or a placebo something like that um so the other thing too is
that I want to bring to people's attention if they don't you know know this is that only initial
reports are made public even though they continue to capture uh to capture data internally you know
follow-up data be it um be it autopsy reports so they say or uh just whatever follow-up data at the
at the at the two-month mark at the six-month mark at the at the one-year mark uh they they follow up
with these reports but only the initial reports are made public so it actually begs the question
of how many people could could now since be dead out of the 1.3 million reports that are in there
now I wonder how many people are now since dead uh lastly the last point was that bears I believe
that bears throttles reports that these reports do not come to us or are made public organically
that that bears themselves actually keep the report they receive the report or I I should say
they receive the claim and they have up to four to six weeks to rigorously authenticate the report
to make sure that it's not a duplicate to make sure that it's not a false report and with that
very comfortable four to six weeks they still hold on to the claim in their position uh possession
before they even publish it uh you know to the public uh to the point that now there's um there's
quite a few reports that are actually been in their possession for over a year before they actually
make it public so uh if you can go to the next slide so here is um an example a side-by-side
view of med alerts on the left and the actual CDC wonder system on the right this is brand new data
this is live right now this is what it looks like right now and you can see on the right side
on the wonder system down at the very bottom it says uh the none of the above 65 nearly 65 percent
of the entire database is none of the above so what that is saying that in all of these reports
if none of the boxes are checked off that it was not life-threatening or permanent disability or
hospitalization if none of those boxes were checked off it would it would simply get default
and go into the none of the above not serious now to the casual observer uh it would say wow look
how safe and effective this is sure there's 29 000 deaths but half of them come from outside the
united states and uh you know 65 percent look like they're not serious none of the above and that's
what i want to bring to your attention that this is not true that there are thousands hundreds of
thousands of very serious um adverse effects that are basically um in the none of the above
so i'm going to show you it's by an evil intelligent design that that that number
climbs to be 65 percent of uh none of the above okay uh next slide please
okay so here's a good example uh now this is the same the same thing but now by uh
the same summary but now by ages you could see that unknown age down at the bottom wow
i think that says 26 i can't see it on the bottom of my screen but it's about 28.25
there you go 28 wow that's incredible nearly a nearly a third uh you know fourth to a third
that are unknown ages wow i mean think of this when they have four to six weeks to to rigorously
vet and authenticate a report that came into them don't you think they could have at least like
call back and say uh uh hey you know how old was this how old was this patient right they they
don't they basically don't do any any they don't offer us that help you know very rare
that they call back and say hey you know how old is this person but anyways there you go next next
slide okay so so i can tell by this none of the above and this is this is a really curious way of
of um of uh spooling this report but on the top there i'm saying that show me everything where
none of the boxes are checked so i actually have to go and say that it's not life-threatening that
the patient did not die there was no er no office visit no nothing and then i get the results in
there it's telling me wow 850 000 reports of that 1.3 are basically saying not serious none of the
above the next slide and so um you know this slide a hand here that uh you know this is an example
basically of how how there's even deaths in none of the above not serious there's actually deaths
there's actually 60 deaths here where i chose the symptom now now only a child would do so do some
kind of a a query like this it's kind of weird and obscure but i asked for all the symptoms
that had this kind of death brain death cardiac death clinical death all the different flavors
of death but i chose that the patient did not die but had those symptoms and lo and behold i got
60 deaths 60 people that that um you know follow this their symptom says death but the the box
isn't checked off so i do have some sample ids there in red five of them that you can actually
go and read for yourself but i'll show you a few here can you go to the next slide please
so here's a good example there's just another one for you to ponder here these are all kids
with with an age keep in mind there's 26 or 28 percent of the entire um the in the entire
database that doesn't have an age that we don't know what the age is but when we do know the age
what the age is but when we do know the age here we have uh 2500 kids with chest pain
and i just you know draw your eye to the bottom there where it says not serious and recovered
um you know i i question that i say you know recovered for now or that any any child that
has it gets a vaccine and has chest pain as we know now about this this jab you say wow that
that's probably i want to consider that kind of serious at least you know not to say that it's
not serious but um so there's you know that that's kind of uh revealing there 2500 okay next slide
please okay this is interesting there are 404 cases where the age is unknown
so there's no age populated there in the age field but yet their symptom is drug administered
to inappropriate age so that inappropriate age is you're not too old to get the to get the vax
to get the to get the jab you're only too young to get the jab so there you go that's these are
underage kids at the time of their at the time of their shot they they weren't of of appropriate
age and there you have eight deaths um you know uh eight permanent disabilities these are the ones
you know these are hiding because they don't come out when people you know the casual observer
spools a report in med alerts or open bears or uh the cdc wonder system and say uh you know show
show me all the deaths for all the kids because when you choose the age these ones aren't going
to pop up because they're in unknown age so you know tack on eight more deaths for kids
they're hiding right here there's there's here's 404 of them okay next slide
okay here here's an example of how this inappropriate age what what the report may look
like and this is how the report looks like in med alerts but it says that um you know inappropriate
age is technically an administration error and the fine print in the various system is to say
all administration errors like storage um leaky syringes syringes that break uh temperature
excursions expirations all of those are considered administration errors and need to be
filed into bears like religiously asap so that's why that inappropriate age it's like even a mistake
in this bizarro world of uh you know how they how this is set up even when they make a mistake
and jab somebody underage it's almost like they get credit for it because it flushes out in the
not serious none of the above so uh you know and they deliberately by design they leave the age
field blank much much of the time i don't want to say all of the time but it seems like wow every
time they do this inappropriate age a majority of the time they do not populate the actual age so
it falls into the none of the above or the unknown age and you can't you know you can't see it okay
next slide okay so we're i'm just going to flash this really fast i know it's small but at least
it's on the screen and we can go back on replay mode and you could read read these things but
all of these are basically inappropriate age but they don't have the you know the the age populated
and even that one on the left is a bundle the lower left four patients four kids on one report
that's a whole nother that's a whole nother uh uh topic of bundling multiple patients on one report
uh okay next uh slide
okay again so all of these are inappropriate ages when you look close you're like i'm like
wow these are horrible side effects and they're coming out as as um not serious none of the above
because none of the event level boxes are checked off and when they're not checked off they instantly
go to uh no they default to no and then therefore default to none of the above not serious so there's
four of them right there uh next page uh next slide
you know here's one you know i i just wanted to give it its own slide a child a baby paralyzed
okay this one notice the age it doesn't tell me anything the clue was inappropriate age and the
symptom and then it doesn't say this is a six month old this is a you know whatever it just says baby
paralyzed and there's a lot of reports that i have to pull out that i have to actually read and it
says an adolescent a neonate a teenager and it's like oh man how do i classify i can't put the the
number in the age field so in my own dashboard i'll at least populate it like that say adolescent
teenager child so at least i'll know that it was a child report okay next page
so here's another example these are these are uh you know the inquisitive child in me right here
so these are reports uh starting with the one on the left and i think that's my um that's my
embolism my embolisms so i asked for um all of the symptoms that had this embolism
but then i said okay now but but but they did not have they were not serious none of the above so
they they weren't life-threatening they didn't have an office visit didn't have emergency so
that's where i show the second bottom half of the of the query where it's not any of these fields
and um you know there you go you know however many it says that are you know
embolized and they're not serious none of the above on the right hand side uh it's all the
strokes so the same thing i'm asked 211 strokes that they're saying are not serious none of the
above so now you can now you're starting to see how this how the 65 percent of the not serious
none of the above get to be that get to climb to that height because there's so many um serious
events in the none of the above now this is you know i'm gonna pause here for a second and say
this is where people like myself jessica rose team enigma you know we kind of have to get together
standardize maybe say hey you know what okay let's on our on our own personal database let's
reclassify some of these into their more appropriate buckets like life-threatening
or hospital when it says that they're in the hospital um you know reclassify these
appropriately and then do our analysis with our toxic lots and our you know all of our other
analysis because really if you're not doing that you're shaving you're shaving all of that all of
this stuff away when you're doing it and saying oh look how you know not toxic this lot is are you
sure are you sure because there's a there's a ton in the none of the above that we we simply always
uh shave away okay next slide please
okay so uh infarctions the same thing infarctions that are not serious none of the above i mean come
on that's that's a lot i can't it's kind of small i can't see how many how many cases there were but
um there you go that's quite a bit of infarctions that are basically classified as not serious wow
okay next slide please
okay so um again um you know i've identified and reclassified currently over 20,000 reports that
in my dashboard i said i could do whatever i want this is my dashboard i reclassify these 20,000
none of the above and i put them in their more appropriate um event level as in life-threatening
or hospitalization you know i can't i i don't put anything in permanent disability because i
can't tell that it was a permanent disability so basically all of these 20,000 i'm basically
that i've that i've already reclassified and i have to do a whole bunch more this is like a weekly
thing um uh but i've reclassified them into hospitalization or life-threatening or uh
urgency room uh okay next uh next slide
uh okay no no wrong way that's okay here we go where am i okay this is a good one i watched
i saw this just a sec okay all righty so this is my are you dead or are you not dead this is a part
of my uh you know the misclassifications where they tell us that there's they're dead in the
symptoms and maybe even in the write-up but not in the box the box and the box is everything i mean
unfortunately the box is everything of what you check off in the box um but here's here's an
example of people that are basically dead but the box wasn't checked off okay next slide
these are more uh deads or not deads now there's a some philosophical debates in in some of these
reports because it'll say uh one of them says a brain death but he's not dead so yeah i get it
but this this begs the question like is the person dead now after a year later or are they still
in a coma and brain death right so that that just tells you that these only the initial report is
made public these are now these reports are now petrified in time they're not going to change um
uh okay next page
so here's the old game um of cardiac arrest so at the time when i spooled this there was
2800 cardiac arrests which produced 1900 deaths that leaves us with about almost another thousand
cardiac arrests where the person did not die and you know me as a as a hmo claims auditor where
i am deciding whether to pay to reimburse the er doc or the the admitting physician at stanford
hospital or to um or to deny reimbursement you know i read i read these um these cardiac arrests
and then i'm wondering hey wait a minute did this person ever um breathe again did he have a did he
ever did he get resuscitated and uh the one on the right is an example where i would question it
of course as an hmo claims auditor unfortunately and i hated i hated that job was that i was trying
to look for some reason not to pay as opposed to uh you know trying to to pay appropriately i was
trying to i was jaded i i was trained to be jaded i you know they i mean they they wanted to know
how much did i actually deny and not pay stanford hospital you know things like that but anyways
okay uh next next page so here's an example of a good uh cardiac arrest with resuscitation
and um you know a lot of times these critical care docs you know the last thing they tell me is
cardiac arrest that's like the very last two words in the whole soap note or the whole encounter data
or their op op report and it's like um you know is this person dead did this person you know or or
what because you don't you know according to this report you never told me that the person was
resuscitated so there's an example of a good resuscitation so what i'm saying basically to
wrap it up is that there's a ton of uh there's probably at least two or three hundred i could
safely say of cardiac arrest that i would seriously question they're probably dead but
but you know the way it's written up and who the heck knows by the way they you know they they uh
the box for did they die yes or no just checked off no i would seriously question if i had a crystal
ball and everybody was playing fair i could find another couple hundred deaths from just the people
in cardiac arrest okay next uh next slide okay so here is the official blurb right here and they
call it a reporting issue the cdc wonder system where it says basically the follow-up reports do
not appear you know even though even though the system continues to to receive uh updates
you know only the follow-up reports uh you know the follow-up reports do not appear and they call
that a reporting issue it's under reporting issues that's that's an arbitrary that's an arbitrary
issue that's one that they created um you know and my i put in there so i wonder how many people
who filed initial and severe reports are now since dead okay next page please
so here is the blurb that tells us that you know only initial reports is a new thing since 2011
because before 2011 they did they did update theirs with follow-up reports so you know it's
arbitrary that they tell us well only only initial reports are now are now made public
that that's the biggest loophole right there that that they have that you know maybe maybe
Fauci gives uh gives the ceos of uh of the university hospitals a little private memo
and he says hey if you absolutely must file a mares report make sure the person has a heartbeat
because um you know uh only the initial report's going to be made public and and the public won't
know about it when they die the following day okay so next next slide
okay so here is um administration errors there's a hundred and twenty eight thousand admin errors
at the time that i pulled this report and just to take a gander at all the different types of errors
you know it they the inappropriate age is hiding and they stuff it under the administration errors
which has uh right there 89,000 uh reports about third on the list right there but you get an idea
of where they're all at and and this this technically should be should be the the you know the um
the none of the above not serious okay 128,000 sure not not the uh 12,000
12,000 inappropriate ages uh you know are hiding in this 128,000 administration errors um but yeah
not not 800,000 reports you know not uh 65 of our entire bears database as none of the above
something is wrong um so okay next next slide
um uh charles can you read the the top for me i can't see that part
i can read it um so it says to reiterate only initial reports are made public
this report has been expecting deaths for over a year yeah there you go so if you look closely
you will see um down you know at the top when it was entered when the person was vaccinated
when his symptoms started and then down at the bottom you know you see the write-up and it says
expect death well if you go today and look at this report it still says expect death you know so the
person's been expecting to die for over a year now well this person probably most likely is dead
now but you know this we'll never know and the report will never be updated so you've written
there to finish albert you've said so it will forever be classified as life-threatening
yeah because this is this is what that's the highest level that it currently is at
um so it'll it'll be there forever as as a life-threatening it won't it won't change to either
oh he recovered he got better now he's alive or he's dead you know just stays there petrified like
that okay so next next slide please
okay here's moving on don't forget to look everywhere for covid-19 adverse events this
is like where's waldo so i'm looking at everything and you'd notice these are all
covid-19 adverse events but for whatever reasons they're classified as some other vaccine type
be it a pneumovax or an hpb or a flu vaccine um you know i won't go i won't go into i'll let you
read these later but looking closely at them if you could see it's pretty small print these were
all covid vaccines and uh some of them i could see like dengue fever being a a musta uh
and uh some of them i could see like dengue fever being a a musta uh an off stake because on the
pick list i'll uh an adverse event report dengue sits right below covid-19 because and that's why
there's like a bunch of dengue fevers that are that are vaccine adverse events that are not dengue's
they're they're actually covid-19 and um i get the clue either in the write-up or in the lot
number the lot number tells me uh uh that that's a clue that it's a moderna or a Pfizer something
like that okay next slide there's thousands by the way like this that are classified incorrectly as
a flu vaccine or a hpb or and this is the stuff we got to fix you know and then and then analyze
then do the you know the craig part of coopers and the team enigmas and the welcome the eagles and
the jessica roses uh analysis um but anyways uh next slide okay so these are good examples
of clues where you know i'll take you you know they're they're classified as something else like
a dengue fever but on the bottom uh right there's a dengue fever uh and it gave me that it gave me
this this lot number right here um the ew and i say here this is a common but excellent example
this is a Pfizer lot this is just one lot number ew whatever 0185 and you can see that about a
quarter of the way down there manufacturer uh what is it the type of the manufacturer and then the
lot number and i'm pointing to um reports it's really small i can't really i can't see it too
well but here's an example where all of these are are actually misclassified and this is common so
this is one lot number and there's probably when you add up all of the records that are misclassified
that's about that's about 10 10 reports that's about 10 10 reports so multiply 10 reports times
uh you know 20 000 unique lot numbers and that's about how how much how much um you know
over how much um not oversight how much needs to be fixed i mean they're telling us
you know it's filed under dengue Ebola meningiococcal and then unknown vax type that's another big one we
got to look at the unknown vax type and the unknown manufacturer that's another big one i read reports
and people say like oh well i know it was covid i know it was a covid job but i don't know which
if it was moderna or if it was uh pfizer and so they they you know rightfully they choose unknown
manufacturer that's fair enough but hey you know the four to six weeks bet process they ought to
go back in there and say hey you know figure out which which which uh manufacturer was it
you know help a brother out okay next uh next slide
okay so in my uh actual dashboard where i change where i actually make the appropriate change and
i change a jansen to a moderna or a jansen to a pfizer or a moderna to a jansen you know there's
my numbers and and i can tell i mean my dashboard is courtroom ready courtroom ready i can say hey
what about this what about these ones what about these ones and i have still way more to go to
these ones and i have still way more to go this is 5000 close to 5000 reports where i fixed the
manufacturer lot mismatch i mean this moves the needle this moves the needle when you're going to
analyze hot lots and toxic lots and and everything else you're gonna do you know if you're analyzing
by age you're analyzing by dose you're i mean come on we have to do this first before we get
to that next step even though you know the the data is ugly enough but i'm telling you it could be
it's gonna look a lot worse a lot uglier if we could theoretically fix cleanse the data properly
okay next page
okay so this one let's take let's take a pause in one of my dashboards i'm looking at the unknown
vax type and i see that there's i don't know how much that is 25 27 000 total reports of all 32
years and down at the bottom half you could see by year every year we were getting what maybe a few
hundred unknown vax types and then you see that it shot up right at you know i can't explain 2019
but 2020 and 2021 that it's like how do you explain now i've i've found a ton of uh basically
covet jabs in the unknown vax type because of the clue of the lot number or it straight up just
tells me right in the write-up this was a covet jab but when it doesn't do either it doesn't give
me any clue i think about this historical data and i say you know this is probably a covet jab
because of this historical data i mean it and then 2020 you look at the 2020 most of that is because
of the last half the last two weeks of december when you look at it by backstate because when the
jab rolled out that's when all the unknowns started to spike so most of that stuff in unknown
is is covet stuff so that's another thing all of us superstar grizzled analytics type we have to
factor in this unknown stuff here too this unknown vax type okay uh next slide please
okay here's a good example i just did a i just did a search for unknown vax type and that has the
word in the write-up in the symptom write-up area the word moderna i mean that's an easy one and look
at how many i find in unknown vax type so there's 24 deaths right there 41 permanent disabilities in
the word moderna just like this report on the left hand side so you know i mean this is low
hanging fruit people let's type let's tack on another 24 deaths to the to the to the back to
the death count you know this is where i say this is where i say you know i always uh poke the bear
with uh with steve kirsch with his factor 41 i hope he's listening but i keep poking the bear
and i say nope nope nope it's higher it's got to be higher it's higher you know and i could pull
out a thousand deaths conservatively extra deaths and tack it on to whatever the domestic death count
is and say okay now do your factor 41 how much does it increase um you know and i'm you know i'm
getting numbers like uh 700 000 like a million i'm of i'm in that camp that believes there's over a
million people easy that have died since you know with because of the jab and uh you know a lot of
people the actual people that died and their relatives don't even make won't even make the
connection and will not ever file a report i mean that's what the factor 41 the under reporting
factor is all about the harvard pilgrim report is all about i believe the harvard pilgrim report is
correct was right and now possibly even antiquated i'm going in i'm coming in hot
and i'm gonna say i think it's over 100 you could you could you could multiply this by more than 100
but conservatively i think yeah i could double i could double factor 41 and make it 81 just by
the the reports that i have in in bears if we can classify things properly if we can say you know
uh you know get those cardiac arrests the 550 deaths that they've deleted let's i haven't even
talked about the mass deletions but the 560 deaths or so that they've that they've deleted
and sure some of them are duplicates sure but other ones you cannot you're scratching your head
you don't know why they uh deleted them there you know presumably because it's a duplicate or false
report but still what i'm saying is that no no no that's bullshit there now they're just straight
up scrubbing data just like the dod database right that what they publish is what they want
the public to see i actually am going on record to say i don't even think they publish all legitimate
reports that they that they receive and what you know this under reporting factor i say hey wait a
minute wait a minute there's a distinction here are you talking about one percent of the reports
that they receive or or that they publish one percent of you know what what they get
they only publish one percent or that's two distinct things like you know i don't i just
don't think that they report everything that they receive all legitimate reports okay uh next slide
please
okay so you know here i already showed you this one but just to show you again so at
at this point in time there was almost 28 percent of the ages were unknown well on a weekly basis i
go in and i find the age properly written in the write-up and then i go and populate it and i i
have my database my dashboard down to eight percent so where they're telling us 357 000
reports are unknown age i have i have mine down to about a hundred and five thousand reports
or eight percent of the entire database so um that tells me there's something wrong in the
in the in the data fields like what are you doing this on purpose
purposely not the age
you tell you of that's not work properly because it seems like all of the foreign
places
we're losing you a little bit albert
they're not gonna be anyways i grass hex
albert why are we losing you
he'll come back
just everyone look at while we're waiting for elbert to come back look at that chart at the
bottom right corner
yeah
so this is on his dashboard available to lawyers in cases which is one of the resources this is a
this is an important resource this dashboard elbert can be called as a witness happy to be a
elbert can be called as a witness happy to be a witness in cases i'm there are you here charles
you got me yeah we lost the voice sorry sorry sorry yeah i got it looks like i got disconnected
there but uh yeah so uh okay so uh unknown yeah unknown ages i got my dashboard down to
eight percent so fine you know i fine tune you know get better visibility in my dashboard
okay next uh next slide please
okay this is another shot from my dashboard this is a foreign data that we don't talk about and uh
you know um it's just a visual i'm just look at the colors there um you know 15 000 deaths
are coming from foreign that's more than our domestic but they only give us uh like 40 percent
of the 40 percent less than 40 percent of all the reports are foreign but the stuff that they give
us is like way more uh severe it makes sense because that's what it's supposed to be uh let's
go to the next slide i'll point this out the blurb that says you know so it gives the definition
here of what of what uh you know what you know every now and then you know goes when the
manufacturer receives from their subsidiary you know and what's a subsidiary i think countries
all countries governments are a subsidiary to big pharma now but uh you know serious and unexpected
only serious and unexpected or both serious and unexpected okay but that begs the question why are
you giving us all this other stuff all this low level office visits and none of the above if you're
only supposed to be giving us serious and unexpected so all of that yellow stuff in there is like why are
you giving us that if it's only supposed to be serious and unexpected i don't look albert looking
at those figures can i just ask quickly yeah you see the uk 11 281 yes a 13 354 and the usa has a
population of 330 million i think the uk is about 67 million yeah that figure for the
us should be a lot higher than it is if you go on what's happening in in the uk right absolutely
so i you know is disproportionately high too see with a population of 10 million yeah and you could
see them on the graph yes sorry sorry to bother um so this is pre-salon um i was wondering if if you
were able to have any visual on on the reports on service members for the u.s because um i have
numerous reports where i cannot find them in the various system that i submitted that they've been
deleted and i previously requested a report from them that showed there were over 9953
service member reports of which like 119 died and 10 were considered serious um but
i'm sorry i'm i'm pressed for time here but i do have i do have a general who
um yeah i do have an opportunity to present to and and and i have to give him solid compelling
absolutely absolutely if you reach out to me i haven't there there is a field in there that
tells us if it's coming from military if it's coming from pharmacy if it's coming from private
um and i have looked at it and um i can update my my dashboard to include to include that i actually
do have actually do have that view i can give it i can show you where it's at but um and then
i've record all the deleted reports so i can corroborate you know whether you're what you're
seeing or what what the historical record in bears says um as as far as uh you know i i really
haven't seen that many that many uh deaths being deleted um from the military of course this is
bears not that dod that's a separate uh database but here in bears um it really it doesn't seem
like we're getting that much at all from the military into the um civilian civilian bears
so i don't know how that works um but but yeah i can uh i can definitely help you out
to uh to see what you know to tell you what what's in there point you in the right direction so you
get a good bird's eye view of exactly what what military reports are in are in bears
and this is so this is so acceptable because and i think people need to understand out of all of
the bears reports those put in on service members are so easily and readily verified
um to be true or accurate um and even the military won't respond and give us their
investigation into the reports that um that have been sent on our own service members so
that's treason teresa right yeah no not what you're saying it is it that they're withholding
evidence of crime concealment of crime in this case is treason when the military is practicing it
yeah all right so teresa any other questions because you are tight for time and we all know
the work that you've been doing
um no i really uh all i would say is i i have gotten a um quote official response back on the
dmed data and they've changed their response yet again um but they do concede even in this response
at 30 increase in pulmonary embolisms esophageal cancer and ovarian dysfunction but um not
but they but they want everyone to believe that uh vaccine has cured bianboré belz palsy
and um pretty much everything else um so so uh i appreciate everyone's help and anything you guys
can give me i do have people that are starting to open their eyes and um are willing to uh
to look closer but it's it's getting them even more dad i don't know how much more you need beyond
the dmed but um so the theirs is the last part that i can think of
hey albert hey albert this yes do you mind if i say a few words
uh jim will have the questions when albert finishes but
do you mind if i say a few words
jim will have the questions when albert finishes but uh the reason why teresa came in she has to
leave early just put your hand up and we'd be delighted to have your question let's let's
can i ask um can i ask teresa whether she could email me or or if she's happy to do put a email
in the chat but maybe she isn't yeah i absolutely am and i have data that we've never disclosed to
other people on the congenital malformations specifically the types of malformations that
that we have that i'll be working with dr thorpe and other people to to bring that forward
but absolutely thank you very much would you would you be able to speak to sometime teresa
i would love to okay um if you email me we can fix that absolutely all right thank you
very good thank you okay albert back to you okay back to share screen just a second
yeah we're almost we're almost done anyway so so yeah and what i was what i was thinking about this
um foreign uh data here that we um we kind of skip over is that i think that possibly
if we took the foreign statistics and somehow applied the the ratios to the to the domestic to
the american stuff you know i think that would be a truer representation of what's going on i
somehow think that there's maybe less barriers that the foreign data has that they're more honest
about it or something that they crosswalk it and obviously you know we have to know that we are not
getting all of the permanent disability or all of the severe effects uh severe events from foreign
by way of the definition that it that only only the unex the serious and unexpected is supposed
to cut is supposed to come over not everything i actually wish everything would come over
and then it would truly be like an international their system if every single thing came over but
no albert when it comes to deaths the uk is hiding deaths i have evidence of that oh yeah yeah i mean
everybody's hiding in death there and then they're in unison no i mean you're comparing with the u
us now if you look at the populations and on that basis you know think what the figures should be
in the uk and they've still got around about 2000 and it's been stuck at about 2000 for ages
oh man there's got to be there's got to be a lot more than that but anyway so yeah there's my um
foreign data that we never uh we you know we don't talk about foreign the bears foreign data but
here's in my visual um you know and and a lot of props a lot of thank yous to team enigma and
craig part of cooper who um who who i who i learned that there was the um the two digit country code
was in one of the data fields and then it was like oh okay now you know that makes sense now
i can gear up you know i can create this visual and we could see exactly which country
all of these foreign reports are coming from so uh so my hat's off to uh team enigma craig
part of cooper uh next slide please okay so this is uh i know that this is the same side-by-side
view of my uh total deleted reports but i have total deleted reports for all vaccines for the
since the beginning of time at least since the beginning of meta alerts which will take us back
to 2007 so uh you know all i think we're up to like 30 000 total reports that have been deleted
majority of them during this covet era and a majority of them are covet reports that
they're being deleted but um you know this is this is a view that you can look at later
okay next next slide
now this one is interesting nobody ever talks about it except me so we know what's published
and we know what's deleted that leaves the last the the third uh section of id numbers that have
never been published so every i every bears id number should be like treated like a gold
ticket we should know what which you know every single id number but yet there's about 25 000
id numbers that are unaccounted for that basically have never been published you know it's one thing
to to publish a report and then delete it okay fine in the rare cases that you go you know after
your four to six weeks of rigorous authentication you still have a reason to say oh no we have to
delete it because it's a duplicate or it's a false report okay fine so be it but what about the 25
000 basically in yellow that are unpublished this is um you know like the two-year-old
death in alaska the baby in alaska around last thanksgiving that they accidentally released to
the public and then and then pulled it back and uh never published that report that was you know
what happened to that one i mean how where are these unpublished id numbers and and you know are
they occupied with with severe events that you you know that you said oh no no this must be
but they're not i'm just saying that they're not because you know why give us a temporary id number
when you submit your report for the very first time they give you a temporary id number i mean
what's the what's the facade and the minutiae behind all of that if you're just going to
arbitrarily not report id numbers at all so anyway that deep thought uh next next page
so here's here's the example of this um this report that never was officially published
this is that two-year-old uh who baby that died in alaska six hours after they were
waxed in thanksgiving of 2021 i mean let alone what are you doing vaccine a two-year-old
that's that's an appropriate age but died six hours later seemingly as a gruesome you know
bleeding from the eyes ears nose mouth supposedly um but it was never published officially it was
available in the download files for the first few minutes and then they figured out that they
didn't um you know want to publish it and they pulled back all the files and then repopulated
the files so anyways uh this is the one i'll explain this uh erin siri um i got we got the
information to erin siri and erin siri filed a foya against they realized the value of this
but uh anyways okay next slide albert what dose did they give that baby do you know that was a uh
um i'm sorry i it had it back there does it say it in there um i think it was
Pfizer i think it was no i don't mean that did they give it adult dose oh oh you know what it
does not say but i would have to imagine i mean they didn't have child doses back then in in uh
last year of i mean not officially right exactly the points i'm making yeah yeah yeah and also
they've only got a third of the joes now haven't they yeah from what i believe but they haven't
adjusted it for babies of six months old right idiots right right yeah there's so much going
how do you realize that um well yeah i mean i was kind of like stuck on the fact that uh
that uh not you know the yes this was a baby yes you know tragically but really this speaks more
to the throttling and the how many how many how many um legitimate reports are you not making
public yes but the point i'm making um albert is that these doses are very important because you
can't be giving uh an adult dose to a child and you can't either be giving the same dose to a
to a 16 year old or a near 16 year old as a six month old baby yeah yeah it's just nonsense so in
other words it's not only concealment of crime it's incompetence as well medical incompetence
right there and just to let you know dr frost there is a lot of administration error reports
that point to that fact under dosing or overdosing and seemingly there's there's not an adverse event
other than the fact that it was an administration error and we haven't even looked at the mixing and
matching which is unprecedented as far as i know right and then now couple that with the fact that
only initial reports are made public if anything happens to these to these kids or adults for the
overdosing or the under dosing or when they say the syringe breaks well the syringe breaks
or they did give them a um you know a dose the following day a temperature excursion expiring
the dose still happened but the report is filed because it's an administration error
but think about it if anything else happen develops a few weeks down the road you know i
showed you 128 000 errors that are there because they're errors but if those errors develop into
something else we're not going to know about it that's how they shield that's how they shield
what's going on i mean part of the i mean part of how how they how that's going to happen
if only initial reports are made public and not not any of the follow-up stuff
so anyways okay if we can move on to the next slide
so this was the this was the foya that uh that erin seary made based on my work that i caught
lightning in a bottle that day and i caught that one report that is unique from all other deleted
reports because this report basically was never officially deleted it was it was technically never
published never published at all other than the first three minutes that it became available then
they pulled it back and then they tell erin seary oh no we don't have any records that doesn't exist
well basically just that they don't have any records uh which which is strange uh okay next
next slide
and this is the backstory that i'll post a link with bearsanalysis.info of how we caught it and
what we did and you know how we gave it to reached out to erin seary and how they found the value
of what we were telling them and how that transpired into a foya request okay next slide
and same same thing more just kind of more talks about the specifics about this why this
why this is so valuable this this one two-year-old death but anyways next next slide
and this was uh you know this was just showing that we when we our email when we wrote uh sent
to series uh series people um okay next slide
and again this was another the second uh part of the foya uh next slide
that's where we stored the data uh next next slide
okay now this one uh uh international person reached out to me and they said that they their
group filed a foya for the same id number exactly the same id number because they saw this the iCan
erin seary foya but they foya differently and they retrieved this email from johnny sue and
shima buruku or whatever his name is and uh on the on the right hand side you can see i highlighted
the actual id number and in here they're gonna say that they're passing it around each other
with the dates and they're saying that hey can you look at this we think it's a false claim
a false report okay that's fine so be it but that's not the point the point is is that you
they are acknowledging the id number and it was never even published that's what this is that's
what this is gonna um shed light on like hey you just told erin seary that the id number did not
exist but internally you're bouncing it around between each other trying to figure out if it's
fake or or not fake or or whatever but but really the id number if it exists that that means it's
published and you never published it so so okay what about the 25 000 other id numbers that you
never published is there any other deaths that you said oh no no no this death is a false report
you know we caught him we caught him right here saying two different things telling erin seary
that the id number did not exist and then telling this other group you know here's the email thread
of us talking about it so anyways i i reached out to erin seary to let them know that they you know
that there was another uh entity an international group i let them know who the group was
just erin's to say erin seary erin they you know they're they're lying to you because they told
this other group that that number did exist and here's the heavily redacted 16 pages of what they
what they bounced back and forth but anyways okay uh next page
okay so we're at the end here uh my friends and family and supporters next page
uh this is some reports i um some analysis i made for steve kirsch you go to next page
there was a video we could skip the video it was a three minute video but
uh next page and uh yeah i just flashed it on screen but i was doing this type of stuff for steve
when he'd ask me to hey can you analyze this or can you analyze that and i was like okay
can you analyze this or can you analyze that so next page
uh some more reports next page i just want to get them on screen um so yeah i basically did
you know all 6500 symptoms you know for two just one year one solid year 2021 of covet 19 versus
uh in all 29 years of uh of uh the verze database okay next next page
uh oh here's a here's a good one take a look closely so they they received the enter date
means the received date uh enter date 2021 what is that march 30 of 2021 and they did not make it
officially public where where it actually appeared to the public so one year later there's
thousands of reports like this now you know so i say thanks early warning system all cynically like
that but that there's a good that's proof right there proofs is in the pudding okay next page
um the mass deletions this the one on the right the right side uh yeah we're up to now this is
just the last 12 weeks where they've deleted i don't know what i can't see the number 14 000
or something they're up over 20 000 for the whole the whole covet era they've deleted 20 000 over
20 000 reports but you know more than 14 000 of these reports have just been in the last 12 weeks
and then on the left side we'll go back you go back and study that on replay but um i'm showing
that uh 30 percent of the entire database takes over 43 days to publish that's late that's after
six weeks that's after the four to six weeks vetting period they still uh are you know 32 percent
of the entire database is still delayed and then if you look at it closely uh 146 000 reports are
over 60 days late and that's inside of that uh 260 000 reports so i i tell you i basically go by
and i see well gee there's actually 40 reports that are actually 400 plus days late kind of like
that death that i showed you that took them they were sitting on the death they had it in their
possession for over a year and then they published it so that's what that's what that's all about you
can look at that later okay uh next page and this is the most toxic lot in the entire bears universe
that escapes every scatter plot every phd scatter plot known to man uh this is when we do experiments
we basically punt them off to like puerto rico or the north marianas islands but this particular
lot right here this moderna lot 032 h20a that only has a little over 200 adverse events
well guess what it actually has of those uh 200 adverse events it has um 36 deaths wow so so that
proportion is actually makes it the most toxic lot in the entire universe but when you look closely
at those 36 deaths you see that 25 of them or 26 of them whatever that came from puerto rico
it's like how can that be possible uh but anyways uh yeah next next page
this was um you know uh this is when um the expose broke uh broke either craig part of cooper or uh
sasha a lot of pova's uh analysis of the toxic lots and then and then right away we're talking
about the red states and blue states and possibly toxic lots go into more red states hey but on the
right side that's the money shot that's uh i'm gonna i'll call it team enigma's analysis
and on the left left side that was my analysis right next to theirs and i concurred i did the same
exact thing and you know almost in the right order um based on the population size of each state i
pretty much came up with the same numbers you know with the color motif the blue states in the
in the red states um but i i included our territories like puerto rico like mariana's
islands and lo and behold when i did that i saw that wow north mariana's islands is is actually
the most toxic number one um puerto rico came in at number 15 and it's like you know for for uh
a territory that size uh you know they they shouldn't be that high up but it's because they
got that toxic lot uh 032 h 20a has to do a lot with that one but anyways um so that's the
do a lot with that one but anyways um that was my analysis and i concur yeah i think that they
i think that they were sending toxic lots even to red states i mean it's just what the data
bears out but anyways uh next next slide
this um on the left side it was showing like where kentucky and tennessee were
um i did say that was all all um all deaths and then i kind of put in there for uh domestic
and territory that's the d and t i was giving you the number for um just domestics and then um on
the left side it was a slightly older slightly older you could see tennessee tennessee is the
number one state bar none just straight up deaths bigger more deaths in tennessee than new york
california texas is like how does that happen how does that happen that tennessee with their size
straight up has more deaths period than new york tennessee strange and then kentucky's right next
door and they're way up there too really strange are those absolute sorry i can't see the number
are those absolute numbers those are absolute absolute death numbers yeah absolute wow
this makes no sense why kentucky and tennessee are that high up but what oh texas has got a large
population isn't it yeah texas florida has a large california has a large population i mean a lot
larger than kentucky and tennessee what's the population of kentucky and tennessee about
a couple of million each or more uh i think a little bit more than that um but i i don't have
it at the top of my head i have a quick i have a quick hyperlink on my dashboard and you look
right at the population so we've been able to 35 35 million isn't it so you would expect tennessee
and kentucky to be above yeah yeah okay so uh we can go to the next page i think we're almost done
here uh this is just another another uh report this was my 50 demarcation um analysis where
all the blue was just the uptake of doses not not patients not people just doses and then i took um
the line at 50 like uh where where does the the jab date land where i could say 50 of the of the
adverse events happened happened uh within these doses by backstate and the other 50 on the other
side um next page i'll show you a better a better one makes sense to me so this one i realized when
i did the same thing they actually are throttling deaths deaths more than they throttle all the
other permanent disabilities um all the other events as an example at this moment in time
when there was about um when there was 7600 deaths in the bottom right hand corner i can't see but
that was around the time in late 2021 um and 7600 deaths i did a study and i figured out that half
of them or 3800 deaths all had a vaccination date uh look at tennessee seven million population i saw
a note come by tennessee had seven million people um but 3800 deaths at this time had a vaccine date
or a jab date before before whatever date that is i can't see it and i did that for every event
and this this is telling me that they actually throttled deaths more than the other more than
adverse events when i look at do it this way by a 50 demarcation okay uh next page
and albert that's exactly what they did in the uk they were generous with the permanent disabilities
i noticed on those figures there compared to the u.s but when it comes to deaths they're
under reporting uh yeah hiding i would say yeah so this is another one this is kind of scary
and i don't know what it means you know but i look at the bottom right this is march 17 2022 that
that's around that's where i did when i did this study around march 17 2022 and at that time we had
uh over we had 12 000 deaths for domestic and you can see that in doses we had what over 500
million doses and when i saw where's the 50 mark by by jab date i can see that 6 000 of these deaths
had a jab date of march 16th or older 2021 that's scary when you look at it this way i don't know if
i'm interpreting the data correctly or whatever but you know that's how today when you look at
all of the deaths for the domestic united states over 75 percent of all the deaths had a jab date
of a year ago or older it's like man where's all the rest of them what how how does that happen
it's because every week when they give us new data and they tell us you know 100 deaths for
for every 100 deaths that they they tell us domestically you look at them closely and you
look at their backs vaccination date and 40 of that hundred percent of that hundred of those
hundred deaths the vax date is like a year a year ago um yeah so some of these people are having
very delayed onsets like they got jabbed they must have been limping along for a long time long time
and then they died you know just recently but then commingled in there the person was jabbed
a year ago the person died a year ago and they're just telling about us just telling us about this
death now i mean it's crazy they are throttling the data that's what i'm talking about they're
throttling 75 percent of all deaths currently if you look at their vac state is over a year old
i mean if they would have told us back in march there was 6 000 deaths we we might have stopped
the program back then but back in march of 2021 they were telling us there was only there was like
800 deaths so but we knew we we knew there were more than that from the phisa data oh yeah yeah
absolutely that was february that was february of 2021 absolutely absolutely okay i think we're
almost done next page we'll just fly through this stuff here um yeah it's a really really tiny tiny
print but this is a death but there's three they bundled the deaths there's three toddlers on this
one three babies that are died supposedly um so yeah that's bundling um to bundle multiple deaths
and you know they delete it and this one i could not even find another toddler death in the state
of virginia period at all so why did you delete this i don't know okay next page but charles they
hadn't even got an emergency use authorization for for the for the children then so what what
on earth were they doing that injecting the babies that too that too uh bundling so this one is really
strange 726 patients dead what is going on the only thing about this is that it right in the
beginning it says that the report was received from a consumer via company representative
concerning 726 patients of unspecified sex so i highlight a second part the patients with the
capital with the plural s patients died from unknown cause of death so i started to think like
is this is this like the incredible hulk the green report like total fake like how did why didn't
why is this still in there why didn't they delete it if it's if it's a false if it's false it's still
there it's legit very rare that it actually says a company representative via company that's the
manufacturer so i take that to mean that they got it via via a company via jansen i really think
that jansen like got behind and and like you know let's stuff all let's stuff all these into one
you know into one report but anyways okay you know for what it's worth there's there's a ton
of bundled deaths of bundled uh you know there's studies we studied this or we studied that or
you know it's like a nursing home 20 people dead and then they'll say they'll say this is um you
know this is uh four of 20 this is five of 20 this is six of 20 and then when i go scoop up and say
okay i can never it's rare that i find the complete set it's like it's like they say that this is one
of 20 reports and then i go scoop them all together and i could only find like four or five of them
it's like where's the rest of them so you know that's another thing if i could unbundle you
allow me to go and unbundle all these deaths to the best of my ability and figure out i you know
this is why i could tack on that's where i say hey i could do your steve kirch and tack on an extra
thousand deaths okay next next slide
um oh so this never lies again it's a total different one and this is interesting this was
report number one of covid if you look closely there's no age it's foreign so it's not here in
the united states but it was received by two vares vares received it october 19th of 2020
i could tell by this id number starting in 890871 that's small they all start at the 900,000
october 2020 wait a minute our official day when tiffany dover passed out on tv and you know we never
heard from her again that was december 14th of 2020 this is two months before that in a foreign
country and it says that the doctor refer performing a vaccination against covid 19 without fda approval
so you know i just put in here that the entry date never lies and it's the vares data received
claims plus one day okay so that's the day that they received it and this is just another example
how timelines don't always fit the lying narrative they're lying uh okay so anyways this was actually
this is actually uh bears covid report number one and it was deleted and and again it was received
in october of 2020 but they didn't even show it to us flash it to us until um july of 2021
so how did they i don't understand they weren't in they weren't injecting in october 2020
yeah well that's the lie i mean not officially maybe this was a trial of course it usually would
say trial but then you know the write-up says oh that the doctor's doing it against without the fda
approval i mean i didn't even know they had them in a vial i didn't know they had the the juice
the elixir packaged up in a vial in october they didn't wow not according to this this was received
this was received by bears october 2020
okay that's what i'm saying something doesn't pass the sniff test and you know this receive date does
not does not lie i mean why did they but the pcr covid tests quote quote were being sold by the
millions actually by the hundreds of millions around the world we have their bills of layings
in 2017 specific for whatever uh whatever they're calling covid so it's possible that somebody
actually did die from some toxic juice that was jabbed into them at that date yeah yeah well
yeah you know to to to the narrative about the wuhan and the fish market and the whatever
whatever it came out the bat soup and all of that stuff is like hey your timelines don't fit
it doesn't seem um uh brand new it's like it's like you guys probably been working on
working on some poison for for for a while you know possibly decades but i don't know i'm just
a bean counter i'm just a bears guy so i don't want to get into that that uh debate uh but anyway
we can go to the next slide uh okay now we're done so this is my mercola article with my dashboard
next slide this was my epoch times got got mentioned in epoch times for the mass deletions
next slide and uh all my visualizations uh my my uh powerpoint will be is made available
to everybody to have um and uh my my little uh treasure trove of uh my shareable folder is
is available to you guys i got a lot of juicy stuff in there so thank you so much for allowing
me to present to you guys and i think i'm done well done albert round of applause for all that
huge amount of work and jim jim thorpe has got dressed how very he's got out of his gym gear and
anyways we'll get to you in a moment but you're looking very spiffy okay um um
stephen you go first you've been asking questions we've got other we've got a string of hands up
stephen so you know um how do you want to play this normally albert as you know stephen goes first
so albert uh could i just ask you um so i've been saying concealment of crime um how much evidence
is there from your point of view examining the data of concealment of crime oh my gosh
i think there's a ton of evidence you know i i kept saying for a long time i think they're
throttling and i mean i think that they don't they don't publish every legitimate claim that
they receive i mean that's pretty that's very damning evidence that i believe that i think i
can prove i'm trying to prove that i'm so so in my mind i'm trying to prove the most damning evidence
that i feel could be possible and that's to say hey you guys are getting a bunch of reports
and you're not publishing them even the legitimate reports sure there's going to be some duplicates
and sure there's going to be some people that are trying to file false reports but that's minuscule
i'm talking about you guys purposely sitting on on thousands possibly hundreds of thousands of reports
and not publishing them at all that that's that's people so um the inappropriate age you said not
administration oh sorry so i said not administrative area concealment of crime do you agree with that
or not absolutely some some of the reports some of the reports are are fair are legitimate the
mom snuck the snuck the kid in to get jabbed um the the kid was birthday was next week um something
you know like that there's there's a there's you know there's a little share of that but then
there's other ones that you that they say like oh the kid was six years old and we thought he was
12 years old i mean that's not that's who said that in the report the reporter yes okay that the
actual bears report said he uh you know patient was actually six years old the mother or or the
family no no the while the the the person the administer the person who administrated the jab
was the person who wrote the report saying that we thought the patient was six years old but it
turns i mean we thought they were 12 years old but the patient was actually six years old yes but from
what so am i right in thinking that even if the patient was 12 years old that was too young given
that there was no emergency use authorization at that time for that age is that right
yeah and and depending you know because it goes lower and the age is going lower and lower and
lower so you have to so why did they say 12 instead of six when actually the emergency use
authorization was only valid for over 16 isn't that right or not yeah well i mean at at the time
whatever that whatever whenever that jab was given i'm just saying that that's what the report said
either way it was inappropriate age and and maybe at the time 12 years old was an appropriate age
but but they gave a six-year-old a jab but the point is they actually wrote it in the in the
report that we thought this six-year-old was 12 that's pretty egregious right there how do you
how do you do that how do you you don't i mean who makes who makes that mistake that they think a
six-year-old is a 12 year old
um incredibly and what the report says so i just wanted to you know the figures uh so i've looked
at the figures today for the eu the uk and the us using um uh huge revigilance uh mhra and bears
the uh total deaths at the moment is well actually this was june sorry may so it it was
approaching 75 000 so it probably is 75 000 now but if you multiply that by um
uh 10 which so you said uh steve kirch says 41 under reporting factor the uh the paper from
harvard said um 100 if you remember another paper has said i think or other papers said 10 so
people said 10 to 100 um but um so steve kirch settled on 41 um jessica rose settled on uh six
to 14 according to an email she sent me david wiseman uh sorry david wiseman said six to 14
um times the figure appearing for deaths now um um was appropriate and that he could defend
anything between six and 14 jessica rose decided on six so she took the lower end of that i don't
know whether she was using the same figures anyway point is so if you use 10 say multiply 75 000 by
750 sorry uh by 10 you've got 750 000 obviously and then um if you uh bear in mind that the
total population of the eu and the uk and the uh us is uh almost bang on 750 million which is um
um a tenth of the uh world population it's actually a bit below but so so if you kind of
multiply that 70 750 000 by four say instead of uh in excess of 10 because allowing for the so
did i say 750 that meant 850 000 uh so 850 million sorry um and um so it's approximately nine times
that uh the world's population so call it four to multiply seven that is um uh three million deaths
and of course if it's um if you're using 10 times that which is what the harvard study said 100
that's 30 million so we're talking about the kind of figures that the nazi holocaust
that mount seitan's great leap forward and the great march and the uh great proletarian cultural
revolution of mount seitan so um those are the kind of figures they're huge crimes against humanity
and probably the great leap forward is that it's the biggest of them all which is estimated to be
anything from 15 to 55 million but a lot of people settle for 42 million i don't know why
that is but anyway so we're talking about huge numbers of deaths which people aren't aware of
and um so even people in this group i think would be surprised to realize the so if you use 10
10 times the um those deaths uh that we've got published um we get to a figure of um 3 million
and if we use 100 times as the harvard study suggested um then it was um it's 30 million
it's huge and you know easily enough to and peter mccullough when he was giving evidence to
was it the texas senate he said 40 000 well you know for the eu the uk and the u.s. um but actually
it's 75 000 so okay it's only twice as many but um so i just wanted to ask um
is there any strategy from their point of view that you can see and how difficult is it to fiddle
the data to conduct a cover-up with the data uh well i mean i think they're doing it now
they're doing it now by own by by telling us only um 13 or 14 000 deaths are in bears for
covet 19 jabs officially in bears when when i can you know forget you know just
put us put aside the under reporting factor um just the data that's in there now um you know with
the 14 000 i'm saying hey wait a minute i could take i could i could probably make that 16 000
just in there now you know a couple extra thousand deaths but then when you know
albert what i was trying to say was if someone was tasked with conducting a cover-up at the cdc the
cdc runs there's doesn't it yeah yeah well they're working with the fda and phisa as far as i was
and the others as far as i can see so um so they've got every reason to conduct a cover-up
but what i'm saying is how difficult is it or how easy is it to conduct a cover-up
using the data even if you know what you're doing so that there aren't crazy mistakes like you found
yeah so on the next question that my other question is who do you think is fiddling the data
if they are doing them which they are in my opinion well i think it's the very top brass of
uh of the cdc and fda who are fiddling with the data i think they're in unison globally
with the amount you know for example the amount of foreign reports that we get in every week in
comparison to what our own domestic united states domestic numbers are
you know that combination always basically mimics um what what the layman would expect for what our
what our um our up our weekly uptakes just in the united states our weekly uptake for people getting
boosters right now on the cdc tracker is abysmal thank god a lot of people are not drinking the
kool-aid but with that what what the layman what the casual observer would expect the adverse
events to be if you thought that theirs was only a couple of weeks behind and and and you know
reporting all the adverse events and that's it that the for the most part they're caught up and
and it takes them a week or two to receive a report and and make the ham make the sausage
and then and then report it out um they're they're they're mimicking they're mimicking that
that data so that it looks like it looks like they're uh you know that there is no inventory
they're they're not behind on they're not sitting on a mound of reports and they're trying to process
as fast as they can to get the reports out i don't you know uh i so albert they they they conduct
something like this then the theirs people are asked to conduct a cover-up would that be
frightening to data people in in this context from the point of view that that's so to go back to the
question that i just said you know how difficult is it to fiddle the data i was expecting you to
say very difficult but you haven't said that so far no i don't think it's difficult at all they
they determine what they want to release each week okay and and if they can do that with with
without any accountability they could say oh okay um you know only give the public a hundred deaths
this week only give the public um you know 200 permanent disabilities this week and then clearly
but clearly it is difficult albert because you found all these mistakes
well well yeah i mean i'm i'm measuring i mean i'm i'm trying to measure you know something that i
can't see but i can see it to say hey you you can't have your cake and eat it too um when you actually
look at this closely of course not everybody has the um the visual the data the visualization
dashboards that i do you know that i can see that i can just you know press the button here and all
my graphs change and oh let's look at it here let's look at it this from this angle let's look at it
from that angle um you know that's why i try to get my dashboard you know not me forget about me
go with the dashboard my dashboard doesn't lie it just it reveals the data and the data is telling
me that that they're throttling that there's all these mistakes in there all these oversights and
and there's there's no help by intelligent design they want to obscure the data they want to
obfuscate this data they don't want the truth but they haven't done a very good job of it
that's what i'm trying to say yeah no they haven't done a good job of covering covering it up but
you know my voice and and and our voice of of our side you know of the jessica roses and the crank
part of cooper's and the you know where is such a tiny you know a tiny small voice in comparison
to the to the globe yes well not if the lawyers get hold of it but anyway um so albert are you
in touch with tort calendar no all right well i'll get you in touch with him then
and um okay there's other possibilities if you if you email me um albert okay and then i'll
yeah just remind me very good so okay charles has seen well daria we've got 25 minutes and we
got eight hands up so go daria okay yeah there we go albert that was amazing i knew you were
going to just blow the lid off this and i really appreciate what you did today thanks doctor as
as i was looking at this and looking at your analysis uh we were having a conversation about
uh a while back i think tom was on it and jerry it was on tom's uh call what is it telegram anyway
about how the central banks will operate two sets of books the ones that they release to the public
and then the other ones that have whatever on there that they don't want the public to see
so as much as you've been able to pick out of what they actually put out to the public you know
there's probably another set of books somewhere and we can only imagine with horror
the extent of the damage and you in the insurance industry this is the first question i was going to
ask you is it seems to me that insurance um what are the words actuaries and uh the adjusters
claims adjusters and the companies themselves they have a certain amount of money allotted for
claims and then if that money runs out they have to go to their reinsurance and a lot of them use
like loyds of london for example so is this another is this mass death and all the insurance
claims that are going to come out of it um actually an intentional mechanism to
bring on a financial collapse do you think i know that's a lot of speculation but i just see a lot
of parallels with this sloppy reporting this very suspicious concealing of information in the wrong
part of the forms that you're doing as obfuscation like you said and what seems to be happening
simultaneously in the financial world and so and again like you said these people are all in lock
step these these corporations institutions governments are all operating off the same
page and it is of a scale that i don't think i would ever expected to see
we've never seen it before usually at some point they fight amongst themselves and everything falls
apart but this has stayed so consistent and i did post in the chat somebody brought up the
um vaccine lots going out in 2017 first of all from a pharmacy standpoint uh were they stored
properly what's in them uh and we've been talking previously about these batches getting possibly
different compounds in them and i can tell you that if even things like polyethylene glycol aren't
properly manufactured uh there's additional contaminants that can add to autoimmunity
and since these are emergency use authorized shots they could easily have adulterated
compounds in them to be further responsible for some of these side effects so i know it's a big
question but i'm just looking at this big pile of mess and then you hear Fauci saying in january of
2017 january 11 to be exact no doubt trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak in other
words he was telegraphing exactly what they had planned out and wouldn't it be great if somebody
would be a whistleblower and basically we need another um i just blanked out the guy's name
who's in russia right now uh oh snowden yeah we need a medical snowden for this you know and
because that's the only way people are going to even have a clue because for some reason we uh
it just doesn't make sense that anyone would still be on this bandwagon doctors or patients
but this denial is so powerful and at some point i think the doctors are getting pretty jaded and
they're like yeah whatever you want it you got it and still not going with the informed consent
and then you got the other ones that are kicking people out of the practice because they think for
themselves and they don't want the shots and they're right so um it's just a mess across the board
but from the insurance perspective specifically if you can address that that's what i was curious
about because i wouldn't think an insurance carrier would put up with this and you were on
the side of not paying for things because the only way to save money on health care is to not
provide it or not pay for it and um and so i i don't know the complications here must be
astronomical in terms of uh claims uh for hospital visits and everything else and if they're not
since they were covering up that these were jab related and they're just going showing up as random
other diagnoses uh so we're going to see more atrial fibrillations more strokes more dbt's
as a primary diagnosis to cover up for the fact that it's a vaccine complication so it would be
interesting i don't know if you you probably you're the only person i know personally from our group
here that has the means to look at the cms data the um for the insurance carriers that you work
with the hmos to see how many of these other diagnoses don't even mention jabs when they come
in yet are way off scale perhaps that same 40 increase as what we're seeing with the deaths
and with the vaccine complications themselves and so that's kind of in the context of the big
corporate uh world the finance world and the insurance world they're all connected and they
have to see this and they have to know it and and i don't know they can't really get out of
paying all the claims because they can't say oh you you gave consent to a experimental treatment
so you don't get your life insurance payout they they're not going to be allowed to get away with
that uh very much so anyway that's kind of what i was going to ask you about thanks yeah thank
you there so yeah there's a there's a couple of things one thing um which is really interesting
i thought about you know as far as um uh insurance coverage back for vaccines i got a um my standard
medicaid alert you know because i get all the alerts for medicaid and here in california it's
called medi-cal for california but it's medicaid right so um but it says that that the fourth dose
is now going to be uh reimbursable by medicaid what the fourth really what does that mean wait
a minute and then it says and then in the fine print it said even if the person has um
um insurance coverage but their but their insurance doesn't doesn't pick it up it doesn't cover a
vaccine that medicaid will pick it up and so i realized oh my gosh this is like
the um the medicaid and all medicaid has is they have presumptive eligibility and this comes into
play with um pregnant pregnant people pregnant ladies that you know um don't have insurance
and then they come out and they they land in the hospital somewhere and they go you know they come
out of nowhere and they got to deliver right so medicaid steps in and says okay we're going to
presume that you're eligible and this is the admins of the hospital they go we're going to
presume that you're eligible with medicaid here fill out this 30 pages we'll help you fill it out
so that we can give you this this all this medicaid id number that's already hot ready to go we just
have to assign your name to it and that's called presumptive eligibility and then now that you have
presumptive eligibility you're covered for the basic stuff for your pregnancy right so that the
hospital can get paid but something like that is what they're going to use for these um these jabs
the fourth booster so so they're going to use like anybody that's how they're going to be able to
reimburse now the government to reimburse uh Pfizer i mean we just heard that Biden spent three
you know um three three billion dollars for the next 300 doses of of vaccines i mean i wouldn't
be surprised i go wait i just got this medicaid alert saying that it's reimbursable now so what
are they going to double dip are they going to double pay are they going to double pay pharma
once for this 300 it's three billion dollars and then once you know to you know build it build it
to medicaid and medicaid's going to pay them again yeah money laundering i have no idea what's what's
going on but but uh the fourth dose is going to be is going to be covered where the first three i guess
they weren't or okay come on we're going to get moving okay less prognostication more questions
so yeah hi albert uh i just think you are amazing and i want to thank you so much for your work
i have two questions and one comment my first question relates to the differing
dashboards and as a county supervisor in my county when i asked the public health officer
will you know are you know why aren't we looking at the bears and the response that i got was that
we're not really looking at the bears we have other reporting systems in california and i asked
for a list of all the reporting areas and i think i i just went and looked for it in my two big boxes
of cobit stuff and i can't find it but it was something like 11 different organizations i think
cal ready and pfizer and maderna and there's all these different places where a physician or patient
can go or a vaccine um uh you know a vaccine distribution center can go to report an adverse
event and so i'm my question to you are are you aware of these is this going on worldwide
is this further diluting you know what we know about because it's as far as i know the 1985 or
law required that cdc put together an adverse event tracking and and responsibly you know monitor it
to see you know what are the outcomes so they could immediately stop it if things are going wrong and
so um and then my comment regarding those you know bundled i i'm those bundled deaths i wonder if
you know those off the wall things that are happening in bears is just another way to
delegitimize bears because another one of the responses i got from public health was
that um bears is not really yeah it's not credible or not credible we're not looking we're
you know we're waiting for cdc to tell us and we're waiting for cdph and this and that and so
i wonder if you could comment regarding that and then i just have one other quick question
yeah so the the credibility part and the uh you know they a lot of people a lot of and a lot of
anti-bears people will say uh you know it's not credible it because it uh in part because it's
self-reporting that anybody can report to it right yes anybody can um but it is it is a federal crime
to file a false report that's that's first first off um so be careful don't you know don't file a
false report or don't don't file if you want to sabotage it sabotage bears by by putting in a
million deaths like let's say i want to sabotage it and put in a million deaths and to make it look
all wonky like this like this one 700 deaths on one report um you know it's a felony to do that
and then the other thing that i learned since i filed my own report on behalf of my uncle
was that they um you know they asked they ask you who who who are you how are you related to the
you know to the victim to the patient and they they asked for they asked for everything but
my social they asked for my address my telephone number my you know my name i don't think they ask
for my age but you know telephone number eight you know name everything right and it's all you know
um uh you know a felony to file a false report so i'm putting all that in there and i'm realizing
you know it's going to be really tough to to sabotage and file a you know a thousand false
reports if i wanted to try to sabotage bears um so on that respect even with that there is from the
in the cdc's own website there's some fine print in there that says that 85 percent of all the
reports are are actually filled out by some form of health care worker meaning uh a doctor a nurse
a bears representative a manufacturer rep you know like a pfizer person or moderna persons
some form of health care worker from a from a old folks home or you know a nursing nursing
facility or something like that 85 percent of all the reports so you know that that that would be
my comeback like hey this is very credible theirs is very credible 85 percent are are non-health you
know filled out by by health care workers somebody that's not related to the patient and is actually
a health care worker 85 right off the bat i heard this week that you know when they redefined what
a vaccine is um you know they read maybe redefined it at the who but it wasn't statute statutory uh
you know it's statutorily um redefined so is there a statutory you know a rule that you that bears
is the dashboard is that the dashboard you know as far as i know that's the spot you're supposed to
um you're supposed to file uh you know an adverse event you can't go to some other place and what's
more what's more the doctors are actually obligated to file a report under certain conditions
you know and it's and it's kind of documented it's well documented one of the conditions um that i
know about the top of my head is if the patient gets admitted into the hospital into like you know
past emergency room and into to an admin so basically if they have to spend one night in the
hospital they have it has to be the problem is is that the physicians in the hospital don't ask
about your vax history were you vaxed recently that's what happened to my uncle may have like
may have last year when he stroked 76 the day he stroked his age group like 65 of his age group
they said had already been back you know mid 70s right year old person and he gets a stroke a month
after his second his second jab you would think that the er here in san jose regional hospital
that's who it was on the east side regional they didn't ask nobody in there asked uh have you been
backed i was in there asking them albert that's that's my medical mispractice in my um opinion
yeah yeah yeah they don't ask it's not accidental either it's not accidental it's not accidental
they're not asking because then they would be obligated then that would kick in and they would
be obligated to file the report because it says they're on the cdc that yeah yeah you know so so
they write out in their in their stops and their standard operating procedures a beautiful picture
this is how our checks and balances work and this is how we're going to do it and we're legit except
except you know in in reality in practical application they're like let's not ask if
they're about the vaccine we don't want to know it gets worse than that albert because i have
friends who are severely damaged from the vaccine and their doctor says oh no you know it's it's
not the vaccine you just have a genetic predisposition to to have this you know wow billion
beret or whatever it's you know neurological you know you can hardly walk up the stairs it's
it's horrible what's happening but i won't okay come on we're supposed to be finishing in 10
minutes there's no way we're going with all these hands up okay but can i one more question just
if i'm quick i i want to say to the backing up um are you backing all of this up a snapshot in time
and are you and and duplicating it because for and i'm and i'm thinking for legal purposes
because i would presume there's going to be monkey business around this they're going to try and
blindside you with some well theirs wasn't even the dashboard we use or you know i i don't know
how to get to the bottom of that because there's so many places to report it's the only dashboard
board that exists that um they could have used reporting but they don't even acknowledge it in
my county they don't want to talk about it um well of course they don't want to talk about it but they
have to because that's the only way that adverse events from vaccines can be recorded in the
united states isn't that right no there's 11 other you can report directly to pfizer you can
report to this cdph in california the public health at the state level they say cdc manages
the bears and they'll let us know if there's something adverse or going on with bears that
we need to know about so we don't even worry about bears they don't want to talk about it and they
don't want to look at it and so i don't know what the rule is i'd love to know if there's
a question that's not a question well if there's a lawyer or an attorney in the group that can tell
them the mayor doesn't want to do this lots lots of people don't want to do stuff but that's the
question that you put hey what if they ignored the the only place you can put it is bears that's
that's the that's the answer the fact that someone doesn't want to pay attention to is irrelevant
exactly you ask no one here knows is what's the legal structure what's the legal standing of bears
now no one's put their hand up but that's the question it's a good question
i would make your answers snappier mate yeah anything else sir charles it does sound like um
that uh oh i forgot what i was going to say now go ahead i was just going to say it becomes
relevant if you're trying to make a point that there's enough adverse reactions in bears that
we should stop the shot right now um it's relevant if they delegitimize bears and you can't make your
point well they can't really delegitimize it as far as i know it's the only place that you can
record and if you record wrongly you're charged with a federal crime so that's pretty big
just okay that's the structure let me let me state it is a mandatory requirement to
to it's a mandatory to file no one has ever been charged so that that somehow someone has been
charged and convicted never happened that's one of the reasons it's a a toothless mechanism but
to your question that is mandatory reporting it is the only mandatory reporting on a national basis
is two bars just to clear it up to the group albert can you just in one sentence clarify where
theirs stands compared with the other authorities that sue was saying 10 or 12 other places you can
record it i don't think those 10 or 12 other places come anywhere near the credibility of
theirs am i right or not yeah well so i think that you know the what i've heard the 10 or 12 other
the different types of systems that exist like cms would be a cyst would be one of those 12 systems
or um you know but but they're not i mean that's like you know it's you know medicare is that is
that system medicaid is another is another one cms albert i'm just trying to drive down to the
central point which is which is the most credible system we've got so sue says there are 10 or 12
and there's you know theirs is discredited i i would like to believe that you spend so much time
that you would say that theirs stands alone as the premier yeah theirs is theirs is the alone
premier it's the only place you can there's there's truth for health that's macula's and
dr valet's new one truth for health but um you know that that's not you know that that's a that's a
adverse events reporting system um but that's the only other one that i know that the point i'm trying
to make albert is that sue is doing the enemy's work for them by saying oh well actually there
are all these other places you can report it and uh okay well i didn't i didn't say that the public
health officer said that i was trying to point out that there are all these deaths on bears
and she was delegitimizing me on the dais to say well we don't even look at bears we have other
reporting like we report to other areas but the point i'm trying to get to sue is what is our
opinion in this group you know what okay we've got it steven we've got it okay jim hi good afternoon
thank you very much for uh this incredible conference uh and i just want to say albert
incredible work incredible job uh god bless you keep up the good work uh my name is dr jim thorpe
and i i know nobody knows me out there but i'm a board certified obstetrician gynecologist board
certified maternal fetal medicine specialist i've been in practice uh high risk obi uh i see seven
thousand high risk obis a year i'm very busy i've been extensively published i've served on the
society of maternal fetal medicine board for four years i've refereed major journals um yada yada yada
so that's who i am it's been devastating in pregnancy we just completed a focused study
and we it's in pre-print it'll be published soon epoch times uh did a article on it on friday
actually two of them uh one on the tv and one on the uh actual news site what we found was just
it's really devastating it's perfectly consistent with what i've seen we have first of all before
we get pregnant of course there's over a thousand fold increase in menstrual abnormalities which is
very concerning in terms of the miscarriage risk over 50 fold greater compared with influenza
vaccine which has been used in pregnancy since 1998 these are all odds ratios compared to
influenza vaccine okay since 1998 through the various data fetal chromosomal abnormalities
a hundred fold greater let that sink in fetal malformations 50 fold greater by the way all these
95 confidence interval are so far away from unity they don't even come close fetal cystic
hygroma a specific fetal malformation 80 fold increase fetal cardiac disorders 40 fold increase
fetal cardiac arrhythmias 50 fold greater fetal vascular mal for mal perfusions 100 fold greater
fetal growth abnormalities 40 times greater fetal uh abnormal surveillance tests be it a
biophysical profile or an nst or a doppler 20 fold greater fetal placental thrombosis blood clotting
of the placenta 70 fold greater and fetal death 35 times greater um and and albert i i need you
i need your help i'm and and god bless these brave courageous whistleblowers one was on earlier
her name is dr trece along she's a friend of mine and she's a co-author on this paper
also uh dr stewart tankersley uh both of them are active duty now they're both whistleblowers
i don't know the third one but i i'm sure that i'll be connected with them um christianne northrop
is is on our team and many others and you will see this in print soon to the point of your
very important point of verus verus is the gold standard for pharmacovigilance it always has been
it always will be of course these people um the stakeholders are trying to discredit it
because it is golden for our position and i will say to the naysayers when people first of all
people say to me well why don't you publish your stuff in the new england journal of medicine
because it's corrupted just look at uh dr eric rubin and what he's done he's a stakeholder look
at the ridiculous stuff he's published the shima bakoro article which was mentioned earlier one
year ago it's a travesty that's fraudulent there were 22 authors all of them are stakeholders
they're paid by the federal government including tommy shima bakoro i believe you can connect the
dots that was a ghost written article it was taken directly from 5.3.6 pfizer
ranch post marketing survey except one thing they took out all the fetal deaths they didn't mention
the maternal deaths nor did they mention the pregnancy complications that were 50 percent
so i i just want to bring this to the attention of everybody i i so much appreciate your time
and attention to this matter my last comment is when people dog veres and say well it's not
accurate of course it's accurate you know steve kirsch myself many others can cite 12 sources
consistent perfectly they're independent of veres and they're perfectly consistent with veres albert
i agree with you the under reporting factor is far closer to 100 than it is to 40 because nobody
in my business no physician wants to report this you understand for those my colleagues listening
in europe physicians and nurses in the united states of america we have a legal gag order on us
from all of the governing bodies all the ngo's that are attacking me the american board of ob-gyn
dr peter mccullough the american board of internal medicine pierre corey the american board of
internal medicine why are they attacking us because we are getting in their face and and they don't
like it the american board of medic ob-gyn is trying to strip me of all my credentials which
i've worked for for 40 years despite the fact that none of them have the credibility that i do
they're bureaucrats i've showed them this data they won't receive it i've asked to debate them
in the senate with ron johnson and with dr mccullough and dr corbett they won't do it so
it's very very clear so if they don't want to believe theirs what about the 12 other sources
that steve kirsch has documented perfectly consistent with veres which i've documented
as well absolutely perfectly consistent with veres if you want to throw those 12 other studies
out are you going to believe the pfizer trance itself the 5.3.6 down they tell you in the first
in the first uh 90 days of use it killed associated with death in 1223 cases and in 274 pregnant
women it was associated with major complications the shima bakura article from new england journal
medicine literally as a journal reviewer i wouldn't have let it go in a market rocher tabloid
in the grocery store he said that there and there were three ob-gyn doctors i know tommy shima
becuro is a i think he's not an ob-gyn but these doctors knew best they took 700 patients in that
study and they put those patients in the denominator for the miscarriage in the first trimester when
they didn't get their shot until the third trimester so they claimed a 13 rate of miscarriage
which is on par with the population but that's wrong if you take those 700 patients out of the
denominator that should have never ever been put in there i believe it was put in there fraudulently
the miscarriage rate is 82 guess what an 82 miscarriage rate is more effective abortifacient
than ru 486 the abortion pill which is as you know methacrystone and it's arguably more effective so
the fda demands a black box warning on the ru 486 the abortion pill and demand informed consent
where is the black box warning on the pregnancy it is more effective than aborting pregnancies
abortion thank you very much wow thanks doctor that's incredible excellent jim thank you
oh i think um sorry i think charles maybe is eating something um thank you so much jim for that and um
uh we must try to have you on as well as therese long one day if you would be prepared to do that
thank you yeah um simon
are you there simon i am yes yeah it's your turn oh it's gerard's turn okay i can i can go
okay well anyway all right sorry uh yeah well thank you very much uh uh albert fantastic as as
as usual um my question was was uh what wait i thought it was it was not my turn sorry um
should we skip to to gerard yes please please if you want i will go after him thank you okay gerard
could we try to speed up the questions and also uh albert we do appreciate you but um
sometimes you're rather long in answering like i would be um sure pardon well
i certainly yeah okay so gerard well i just want to touch on two points one is that generally
there in in any criminal enterprise there are two elements to it there's the one of the crime itself
and then there's the cover-up in the politicians and other criminals the it's usually the cover-up
that gets them such as in nixon and um watergate watergate and those and that's what what they go
down for the cover-up i would think that the the crime in this case is the principal one where we
actually where the genocide you know the the actual genocide of the the world population or the
attempted genocide is the crime and the secondary crime is in fact the cover-up i would hope then
that perhaps within the people who who are complicit in the cover-up that we would get
whistleblowers like i i i i am tired of hoping for whistleblowers within the medical profession i
suppose most of the whistleblowers are here are in these sort of groups but maybe we get some
real whistleblowers from among the statisticians and that's within theirs the the point that you
know i'd like to ask i felt and it's been touched on by dr jim torp that only somewhere between
two and a half percent and one percent historically i adverse side effects were reported in various
if that's true if it's somewhere between two and a half one percent of side effects
there is a massive number of dead people out there directly related to the messenger rna
assault and that's really really frightening am i right in thinking that it is only somewhere
between one and two percent of adverse side effects are reported to theirs yes that's what
the harvard um the harvard study showed but i mean it could so other people argue it's
ten times you know the underreporting factor is 10 the harvard study it's at 100
yeah that's that's that's pretty frightening i as i often say i'm in a battle with the irish medical
council over my been struck off the medical register and i would hope that i'll be looking
for albert and jim thorpe perhaps to come as witnesses for me in my case when i eventually
come again before the medical council and when they get around to it which is a year and a half
when they get around to it which is a year and a half later so thanks very much and jim for a
fabulous sterling work yes excellent uh albert have you um submitted an affidavit to any lawyer
no i'd love to okay well maybe i can get toad candor to do that yeah and then you could have
that gerard yeah yeah that's what i would need like you know i i i don't have any legal representation
in my in my case with the medical council as such not formally legal representation
but to an extent i want to keep it that way because i feel that lawyers often get in the way you know
um
yeah so next um question is oh are you ready simon or not yeah ready sorry sorry for that
yes thank you albert again uh thank you for for great great talk um you made me realize actually
one out of thousand two hundred belgians have a permanent disability whoa because you you put the
population next to it but actually you have to look at only the vaccinated the vaccinated
population which is less and then it's uh about six thousand on eight million which is which is
crazy and i think these lines uh would really work when we try to convince people about the dangers
of the vaccine and a lot of these uh analysis that you do could actually become really good one-liners
uh that that people can can look at and at the same time i was as you know that we've talked before
about putting all the data in from all the other uh adverse effect databases like the australian
one the new zealand one and so on i think that would be fantastic especially with your knowledge
and with your cleansing of the data and the ability to also even add deleted reports i think if there's
a tool out there that people uh like in this group can use to uh facilitate their own research uh it
would be fantastic uh how to combine your knowledge with theirs uh my question was uh i remember you
had a story also when you also put in a data and the data was changed was that from your uncle or
something thank you simon i wanted to i wanted to tell you that that story real quick but yes they
i i filled out the report on my uncle who who had a stroke he's still alive but he had a stroke
permanent disability and i videotape myself and i have a three video series you know when i got the
data back when i got my report back and it turns out that they that they changed my write-up they
omitted phrases and omitted words from my write-up and i think it kind of changed the complexity of
my firsthand account but more egregious than that they invented diagnoses and symptoms that did not
exist primarily psychosis and parkinson's that they said they that my that my uncle had and he
he didn't i went back and asked him like hey i didn't know you had parkinson's and he goes what
i don't have parkinson's so so when when i first got the report i thought oh my god they must they
must have went into his historical data and and retrieved it and put it in there because
because nowhere in my report did i ever say parkinson's or anything to that effect
so there you have it they invent they invented they they manipulated my report they they filed
a false report on my behalf and and as far as i know there is not a case like that anywhere
in existence i want to be the first one there's filed a false report on my behalf
because you know my uncle did not have my he did not he's not psychotic
and he doesn't have parkinson's but yet you guys somehow extracted that information and put it in
there i wonder how many thousands of reports they've done that to crazy thank you thanks for
bringing that up simon um so the next question is zoom user we don't know your name you're in a car
though hello oh hi it's nick honstead i don't know why you put me up the zoom
sorry who is it nick nick was cotton steady all right
your it's your go
hi nick
nick have you got a question for albert
uh he's breaking up uh i i sent you a message about uh tarso's hello uh nick you're breaking
systematically misclassifying reports here i'll turn off my video hold on yeah you're breaking
up now is this better yes that's better yeah okay hi sorry hey al um i i sent you a little
message about tarsals mom with a link to an interview with wane road she wrote a paper
where uh she showed that the hpv injuries were being misclassified uh roughly
i know about 50 of the time as not being severe
listen to the interview you can probably take a look at it reach out to her but she she knows
how to systematically go through and find the misreported reports absolutely that's what i've
been shouting that's what i've been shouting about for the longest time that there's severely you
know the 65 percent of the reports that are they're telling us are none of the above not serious that
is not true there's hundreds of thousands of reports that are super serious and very severe
and should be classified as such and i think that would change you know if in theory if we could
reclassify these that would change the complexion of what we're looking at when we're studying
toxic lots and um and uh you know dose you know uh adverse events by dose and everything i mean
there's so much uh severe adverse events sitting in that lowest level bucket of not serious that it
would just it would just it would be a game changer make it look worse what you know significantly
yeah i agree she has it laid out there you can do it's pretty systematic how to go ahead and
reclassify it to the standard that is supposed to meet the other the other point was steve
steve kirsch recently has the he keeps updating the survey but he's doing the right work which is
he's going out and validating bears which the cdc's never done um and it's damning the and
just so everyone knows uh for disabilities the the numbers are through the roof the urf is around
127 i think i put a quote in there um the under reporting factor is about 127 for disability
and where it's really showing up i think is inflation it's it's wiping out the labor
we're talking you know he he's backed it off to five percent but when i first looked at the data
i was seeing around 10 percent of people who get the vaccine are disabled permanently they can't
work i mean it's it's ursha and when you think about it and everyone can think about this
you know people in my own group you know they're retiring early like they've got kids going to
college and they just retired you know no explanation the evidence is all around us and i think that's
why they really can't cover it up and about bears um because it's a public reporting system
we get to audit it that's why they can't cover up everything and but fabulous presentation you're
fabulous presentation you're doing good work good to talk to you
oh thanks nick thanks yeah you know um just just put out there's kirsch in one of his latest surveys
said um using the polefish and he came out and he basically said the study was 770 000 deaths
in the united states 774 000 deaths and so i recalculated and i put in a message in in you
know in the comments section of that article and i said hey steve i go that just made your factor
41 go to factor 57 based on you know the conversion the conversion rate of that you know 774 000 deaths
i said it all right when are you gonna um you know what are you gonna ditch that 41 and go you know
get it you know uh adjust it to something more uh more uh realistic and uh he he actually responded
back and he said well uh you know i'm going for a bigger study with 8 000 people so because this
little study it could be off by three or four points and i said you know and i didn't write
back but i said yeah three or four points in either direction so it can you know the factor
could go up to 61 instead of 57 but anyways i keep you know i i sorry but i keep poking steve that
way i hope he doesn't get mad at me but i keep saying no because i'm in the camp you know that
whatever whoever says the highest i'm i'm coming in higher i'm like no it's got to be more because
i believe it this is eugenics i believe that this is depopulation i believe that this is poison
there's nothing good that comes from these these jabs nothing thank you nico
um gerard did you have another question or have you finished
you've muted uh gerard
gerard oh i can't hear me uh great um no no everything else that i've i i wanted to ask has
been asked by other peoples thank you very good thanks uh so glenn macco
you muted glenn
still muted
so
okay uh cj i don't know who cj is but um hi yeah it's a very quick question for albert so
yeah i missed the beginning of this so forgive me if i've missed something
the way that you described what your work is to me suggests that um well the question is this
what formal structure are you in that feeds this data to teams who can use it and weaponize it
what strikes me in this entire thing is that um there are information and service providers so
that might be heart in the uk or it could be af lds or something like that who although they
do weaponize some things because they turn them into law legal challenges what formal structures
have you got that people know that you are a data guy feeding standardized products to those teams
in an open accessible way so they can go every day see your latest report get it interpret it
because it is presented in lay accessible format with what you see explained in idiot speak that
says this data means this that those people can then weaponize that information in their fight
so whether that's a lawyer whether that's an activist doctor or whatever do you have those
structures in place and if not how can it be you know should it be is that dr cartland
yeah no thank you thank you for asking that question because sorry who is cj is it dr
i'm the pilot who was on last week ah yes now i get it i recognize the voice yes okay
very good yeah so so i was saying that um yeah so i um i've been i've been um trying to to um
get my dashboard which is which is authentic uh genuine data from from the cdc and and everything
everything matches uh except for the fact that i i go and populate the um the ages like the all
the ages the unknown ages that i could find i populate it um and where i start to deviate
is like those those 20 000 reports that i've found that are that are classified as none of the above
and i and i reclassify them those now i'm starting to deviate and starting to change the data now
it's not exactly the same as what comes out of the cdc however in hindsight doing it all again
and i will do it all again saying if i could do this again knowing what i do now i would have
i would have captured all my changes so that i have in my next dashboard my magnus opus
i'm going to have it so that you can toggle back and forth between
uh wizzy wig what you see is what you get unedited that this is how this is it matches
meta alerts and and open bears like that it has not been touched or altered in any way and then
switch over filter back to this is the cleansed data and what it looks like so you know you want
to see the the 26 percent of unknown ages here it is you filter this way and you want it now you want
to filter back to see all the populated ages you filter it and and so forth you know so on and so
on so basically i've been trying to wanting to reach out to these to peter macula and dr
valet's group or meta alerts themselves um uh you know the national vaccine institute
uh you know whatever non-profit and say hey um let's create fun you guys fund let's but let's
create another bears um system reporting system not not reporting to it but like a like an open
bears or a or a meta alerts a third one a new one the next evolution that has all the functionality
of open bears and meta alerts with the additional functionality of a interactive dashboard
which is what i which is what i got and that interactive dashboard in addition has the
the cleansed cleaned up data and or you know going back to the authentic unedited data
that's what um you know and if i can't find uh if i can't find somebody willing to like
you know hire me give me a job because i need one um i'll do it myself i'll do it i'll do it myself
just like i've been doing all of this work just as as the hill that i'm gonna die on right here um i
put my whole career on pause for this this is the hill i'm gonna die on um because yeah okay look
sorry to interrupt i understand that but my point is though that no matter whether you're going to
change your work or not your existing work is a form of this information service provision right
that's useless if people don't use it okay in any in any walk of life yeah if you're not the guy who
weaponizes it and uses the information you just provide it then nobody picks it up it never gets
used right so what is it that you need right in order to basically um get your stuff into the
hands of people who will and can use it well you know i just need people it's it's there in
tablo public i just need more people to to access that i've asked i've asked the rubin for meta
alerts hey create a um you know put a supplemental url link onto onto meta alerts and and you know
point it to mine and he said ah you know security reasons and i said hey let me help you create your
own you know under your control it doesn't have to be mine um i'll help you it'll be yours you know
you know old dog new tricks that's what i say old dog new tricks for that but um you know anybody
else on on high wire on on um on bobby kennedy's they should have a supplement you know a
supplemental link to mine or if not mine something similar and if not similar their own they should
make their own i've proved it i'm just a one horse operation pony show and this is what i've done i
mean come on we got to get to the we got to bring this to the next evolution so that's all that's
all i'm saying i'm saying this is a prototype this is what you guys this is what the cdc should have
done for us 15 years ago because tablo's been in existence for more than 15 years so albert what
you've just said now can you say can you um say to um tot conlinder yeah absolutely oh what would
you like me to say to him well he isn't here at the moment but but i'll fix a meeting yeah yeah no i
i'd love to i mean this to me and to me this is my this is my labor of love to give everybody
full informed consent because i don't think we're going to get help from the court systems quickly
i appreciate todd calendar and rands and um and siri and god bless them but it's it's a dog fight
that's going to take years um before that we got to get this out to the public so that listen to
this nobody's ever heard this before i want the kids i want the youngsters to be able to play
bears like a video game on their cell phone that's that's weird what does that mean yeah like a video
game yeah but albert do you really think that people want to do that most people don't right
the thing that you have to focus on is the three percent of people in the entire globe right who
are basically motivated to act that's it right that means that yeah there are some of those big
strategic hitters like you're talking about with with mccullar and whatever but their access and
capacity is close to zero because of what they're doing or what they're already involved in right
and so you've got a massive mountain to climb plus you're already duplicating to an extent
there's an overlap with existing open bears and stuff this is classic it problems right
so what you have to do is basically get on the strategic radar of players who use and consume
your data and weaponize it right but at the same time you have to basically make people aware that
you've got it but it's not going to go and be used in the hands of morons right who are the 95 percent
of people who are just getting on with their daily life it's the it's got to go into the hands of
weaponizers right who have the ability to act in law really that's that's ultimately where this
plays out yeah yeah and it's the question of it's a question of so for example laura sextro the unity
project one step away from robert malone uh you've got glenn macco in here with the uac uac project
depending on if he can see a use for it they're the players you need to get into i'm surprised
that you're communicating with steve kirch through his comments on his substack you should have him
in the phone line and just say steve this data set exists use it cross verify and then basically
build it into all of your own analysis that's the level you want to be at oh yeah i totally agree
and i'm i'm uh more than communication with steve you know we're here in silicon valley i've had
lunch with steve rubin owner of meta alerts or the creator of meta alerts but uh yeah it's just
getting you know it's just getting this this data out there and it's nothing proprietary to me it's
just the next evolution of meta alerts and open bears um you know so that you can visualize uh
you know this atrocity uh let alone the additional part that everything's like undercoded
and uh you know there's there's covid shots covid adverse of x filed as uh uh hpb jabs and mmr jabs
and uh you know bundling of deaths into one report i mean that's all extra extra stuff
thanks yeah uh so glenn macco hi sorry before uh my my screen started time out it blanked out i
couldn't even see where the mute button was to get on so i got that cleared up um so my comments
a couple uh jim thorpe left but uh i i had a conversation with him last october and i'll
reach out to him later today or tomorrow uh because i'm quite sure he's going to be able to play a big
part uh and the same thing to you albert uh but let me first lay out as a base position i believe
there's really really really clear evidence that the mrna vaccine treatments are obsolete
completely obsolete and and you just need to be making the correct comparison the correct
comparison of vaccine treatments with with no early treatment is what the medical system is
is recommending and that should be compared to uh the option of of dealing with early treatment
and competent doctors uh that and we we know those results are dramatically better so my point here
is the instead of comparison between different outlets of which the virus is a small count and
undercounted and and steve kirch has gone through all the cycles of doing the uh the more extensive
you've done a certain amount of work of being able to say even even the virus data has more in it if
you analyze it and if you go through it you can normalize it to better data that which would be
natural if anyone were doing a rational audit trail they simply aren't but even even with their
weight washing the data the virus data that's there the low the lowest level of which yours is
higher and steve's is higher uh the lowest level is still damning in comparison to early treatment
with competent doctors and normal respiratory handling so that's would be my comment is i think
we need to move everyone forward to do that kind of side-by-side comparison don't compare against
other players that that are using the the safety data but it's you know it varies that's that's
that's how suit for us health organization is able to ignore it by saying well you know it it has
been verified as 100 accurate okay but it has been verified as lower than the real numbers
and and so let's let's take the lowest number compare it against early treatment and say
voila if you are the public what would you pick it's going to be obvious so uh i i will get in
contact with you after this uh and uh i'm i'm working on some things with a group called mama
bears that that'll come be coming out shortly and i think it'll weave in very well thank you thank
you excellent general clinton help in any way i can is that it glenn you finished
yeah that's it thank you thank you yeah um i think uh that just leaves anna is that anna de buisere
yes hello hi hi hi yeah um sorry i can't put my video on at the moment so um hopefully you can
just hear me instead hello everybody um albert thank you so much um it's really really appreciated
i'm i'm one of the lawyers um who are looking for exactly that kind of presentation to weaponize
um because you know that's the this kind of data that's being so hidden is precisely why
you know the um culprits are carrying on getting away with it so the fact that you've done all this
work you know i really really appreciate it so what i'd like to do um is to ask you and um was
it jim thorpe who made that presentation earlier was it jim the doctor yeah what it is is that
as a lawyer speaking out um i'm now being investigated by the solicitor's regulation
authority um because apparently five members of the public have raised a complaint about me
um attending the vaccine clinics and making statements that uh there was a live criminal
investigation being conducted by the metropolitan police here in the uk now i've gone back to the
solicitor's regulation authority on several points one of which is that i say to them you don't have
jurisdiction of me in this um matter because i was not attending as a solicitor acting in um
conducting reserve legal activity i was attending uh firstly as a mom but secondly as an army officer
um and because on the evidence these are bio weapons this is bio warfare and that's being
deployed against the uk population and others obviously but my duties to the uk um and therefore
working with an extensive military network both here and abroad serving and veterans you know
we've been analyzing the intelligence and the evidence and our strategy was boots on the ground
we'll attend these clinics and demand that they are um closed down the the vials are seized uh
treated as you know evidence and the the clinic is a crime scene um on the basis that on i think it
was the 20th of december uh mark sexton retired policeman dr sam white philip highland solicitor
lois baylor solicitor spent six hours at the metropolitan police station uh in hammersmith
uh presenting their evidence copious amounts of evidence um and alleging uh around 20 crimes
including genocide crimes against humanity war crimes etc now the police issued a um
um well we were told it was a crime reference they later said it was an incident reference i
think no it was a crime number yeah okay so um but do you remember the the sort of controlled
opposition backlash later that they conducted but anyway i'll stick to the timeline so the um the
metropolitan police issued a crime reference um but only in respect to two of the alleged crimes
one of which was misconduct in public office and the second was gross negligence manslaughter
i mean you know unbelievable they could reduce 20 crimes down to two but they did issue a crime
reference in front and they gave uh you know they said that they would inform the chief constables
of all the police forces in the uk that there was now a live criminal investigation underway
and that they would make a public announcement they were given the contact details of a huge
number of experts who are willing to come forward with their evidence and other lawyers such as
myself um none of us were contacted as i'm as far as i'm aware um the public announcement was never
made uh when the apparently the chief of the chief constables of the police forces were told
apparently right but what happened was that on social media and in the newspapers there was a
massive uh opposition that you know counter offensive being run which was to deny first of
all that there was a crime reference being being issued then they were denying that there was a
live criminal investigation then they were trying to say that they'd even though they'd issued a
crime reference they were under absolutely no duty to conduct a live criminal investigation
so we veterans were analyzing this and saying right what we need to do is create that find out
what their standard operating procedures are and so the only way we're going to be able to do that
is go boots on the ground and confront them turning up with our evidence with the crime reference
with our notices of liability cease and desist orders etc and see what we could do um what
happened was we videoed that from around the country and identified their standard operating
procedures which was um yes well you're welcome to protest but um we're not going to do anything
to which we responded well we're not protesting this is a criminal investigation these are crimes
against humanity etc and the police would absolutely refuse to do anything about it
they denied being told that there had been a a crime reference they denied that the chief
constable's knew anything about anyway the whole thing is stonewashed stonewalled so what happened
was that um i went to one of the clinics on behalf of the community because they called me in very
distressed the parents and said please help us because we've already asked the police to come
in and close these clinics down the police were refusing um you know what can we do so myself and
a veteran and three members of the community uh asked the police to go and down the police refused
so we went along and of course the clinic then asked the police to come and we said please do
six police officers turned up including two cid and long story short they refused to to do it
etc and despite the fact that i brought an entire box full of evidence including the mod's manual of
armed law of armed conflict and told them these were amounting to grave breaches of the geneva
conventions all the police did and the staff was talk over me laugh at me you know etc and we had
to leave because they were going to arrest us unless we left so these complaints um you know
are now being investigated by the solicitor's regulation authority and i've said i was
anna can i just ask you did did you get the names from the solicitor's regular sra did you get the
names of the people who are allegedly complaining or they won't give me those details and that's
fair enough to be franked as even because it is a data protection issue and you should be able to
complain anonymously right i don't object i don't know that there was a complaining well
do you know yeah i well well because i well imagine there are because whilst most people
have supported what i've done um i have heard some you know on social media some people complaining
about what i did and it's fair enough you know some people would think it's overstepping the mark
but the point i think but it's one thing to complain about it but not that you know the point is that
that's why kafka wrote the trial because um he was accused of a crime but he wasn't told what the
crime was you're accused of breaching regulations by the sra who we know are not honest um and uh
you've got no proof that any uh any complaints has been made against you well um i'm prepared to take
well first of all i'm prepared to accept that there have been complaints against me because
it's likely there would be right it was a controversial not to the sra though anna
yes oh yes absolutely because when i did it in social media people were saying oh is this a
solicitor i'm going to complain to the sra about her you know i was expecting it steve and it was
you know so i i don't have a problem with someone complaining and in fact what it does is provide
me with a perfect opportunity to have some kind of investigation conducted because of course the
police are refusing to do that yes so the solicitors what's interesting is that the mod hasn't raised
a complaint against me and indeed i've asked all kinds of members of the forces whether they um
disapprove of what i did and they also know it was absolutely in the line of duty and appropriately
conducted even swearing because as an army officer if you're not being heard swearing is actually
part of the standard operating procedure which is interesting but anyway um so the mod hasn't
raised a complaint against me yet the sra themselves didn't raise a complaint against me
so it was members of the public so their hand has been forced and what this means is it provides
us with a golden opportunity to flood the solicitors regulation authority with our evidence as to why
you know first of all there should have been a live criminal investigation and indeed
the police then said on the 22nd of february well in fact we have conducted a live
criminal investigation there's nothing to see here so either they had conducted one in which
case they hadn't conducted it properly for the reasons i said previously because they hadn't
contacted anybody you know yeah exactly or they hadn't conducted one in which case you know they
should still have been conducting one so the point is we've been conducting it you know as the first
speaker i think was saying you know when we can't rely on anybody else to conduct this we're
conducting it so the solicitors regulation is authority is now an open door and what it also
means is that everything that we military people have been doing can now be served on the notice
at the sra and indeed my veterans are already writing their statements a lieutenant colonel
submitted his para has submitted his saying this is genocide by a warfare etc so i've now got loads
of veterans and serving people drafting their statements and affidavits and putting their
evidence together but it also means that we're copying it to the mad because under the army
framework you know we have a duty to report to our commanding officers any breaches of the law
of arm come they let me drop the elders up yeah and i see seconds okay go ahead
and as i say these are grave breaches of the juneva conventions this is very very serious
and the issue i've found is that nobody i've met within the military and nobody i've met in the
legal profession has actually read the juneva conventions none of them have read the judgments
from the new and both trials which i find absolutely gobsmacking but it explains to me
why people aren't recognizing that these are indeed grave breaches of the juneva conventions
these are prohibited acts of unlawful warfare but if you haven't read the law you don't know that
they are but even if you had read the law and if you even if you had read the law if you're in a
massive gnosis then you you're not going to do anything about it yeah but the point is the law
of armed conflict is the regulatory framework of the military and the police etc so what on earth
is their excuse for not actually having read the law on it exactly exactly well especially
especially when it's appropriate to do so when when things are pointed out even if yeah okay
yeah so yes please i would love the evidence out but you know that's absolutely fantastic what
you've been able to produce and anybody else who's listening in if you're prepared to help um you know
so that we can actually use the uh solicitors regulation authority investigation as our means
of getting some form of investigation kicked off yes that's very good and hopefully hopefully the
mod will join in and then we can confront them too yeah yeah so thank you for listening
thank you very much um louise caramaris if that's how you pronounce your name yes thank you very
much and i just wanted to commend um the work of albert and all everyone else here and also um thank
charles for hosting this forum and um thank you for inviting me um yeah so just i'm here in
australia and when we're on country and um and i guess i've got a question around you know given
the the corruption and the all the corporations that we now know all sort of linked up with um
with the cabal etc um and i know here in in this country you know we have not actually um
allowed the constitution to be studied i mean lawyers have actually been dumbed down in terms
of their law qualifications and what they've been studying so we're now recognizing um how
seeped um this has been being planned for such a long time um and the need to actually get
this out to the masses so my question is um and this is something that that there's been
exploration here is utilizing internet radio and um there's multiple channels that currently i know
exist um for music um and i'm just thinking about you know all the different ways
communications out there to the mass to the mass citizens like there's here in australia we've had
um a beautiful woman by the name of kim berger she's been doing an extraordinary job of analyzing
the raw data of our equivalent of ours um here and discovered um the manipulation of the data for
2022 so the only reliable data is 2021 and it's being cleaned cleaned up but she's actually been
going out meeting with small groups in various communities and getting getting that information
um out there and kind of you know doing that more that personal engagement because you know
really breaking it down for for people um and you know through that hopefully there's more and more
whistleblowers that can come out and um you know bring this to the attention of um the masses so
yeah so that was my question around internet radio and other communication mechanisms that can be
utilized yeah no absolutely i um the film jedi got me on her uh radio station um just the other
week and i've been on some some radio stations but yeah absolutely and kim burges i think simon
de wolf introduced me to her and i know that she was doing doing uh analysis for for australia but
yeah it'd be great to come together and i think um for those of you guys who don't know um you know
i've been working with dr frost and charles covis to you know this group basically to get us all to
get us analysis types together um to kind of brainstorm think tank you know and have one of
these one of these zooms going on but you know some of it uh public and probably some of it
private we're talking um because we got a lot of things going on in the background at least at
least i do that i can't you know that i haven't said anything about yet but has to do around foya
requests and and whatnot but um but yeah hopefully uh hopefully we'll that will come to fruition
where all of us together you know um talk about the next steps albert are you in touch with um
uh what's his name uh david wiseman
no i can't say that i am jessica rose you're in touch with her aren't you uh yeah i don't
talk to her that much or hardly hardly ever i talked to steve more than anything but steve
puts us together on but yeah we we know of each other's work for sure but yeah i'd love to
great craig pala cooper and alexandra latopova yeah we that yeah i've been working with them
uh um closely for the last couple of weeks especially um because now i guess i guess they
you know people are catching wind of you know with the my my dashboard that's just the deletions
you know but i got like four dashboards of all various things they just caught wind of the
deletion one so they need to catch the rest of them so what so albert what would be useful to
you a zoom call with what you know craig pala cooper and alexandra latopova so those two and then
uh jessica rose david wiseman there uh i want to Matthew Steve Kirsch Matthew Crawford especially
because that that whole dod uh data and i know that Matthew Crawford has been asking or wanting
somebody to do a foyer or foyers or advice on how to do for because i guess you know um getting
being successful doing a foyer there's like a trick to it and like i was saying there is
there is yeah you know how to how to request how to request is how to query a foyer basically
my currently it's a very um you can ask the best questions if you know the answers
yes yes exactly and i have this international foreign uh group that reached out to me that was
successful in their they have a bunch of foyers that they've gotten and and they they they know
bobby kennedy's group knows and highwire knows of this of this international group but i want to
make sure that all of us especially like Matthew Crawford and the dod military people know of this
this particular group that i'm talking about and that's what i want to come together and
i think we're you know we all need to get to meet each other and so we could all pull in the and
push in the same direction so you never have met then you data people new did you say wise men
jessica rose steve kirch matthew crawford part of cooper and lazipova those and you that's seven
yeah all of those people except for wise men all of those i've i i know of and i and i talked
then i quasi talked to through through emails and whatnot but yeah is there more oh and uh
uh josh gets gal is another one um that i communicate with yeah or that i have in the past
have in the past very good um okay oh the pan the pan data people i've done a i've done a
um an interview with them so all of those all of those people what about clare craig are you in
contact with her no i'm not wow you know she does great work yeah hopefully we're going to get her
next on tuesday yeah i i you know i think they're gonna like they're gonna love my dashboard
yep i think they're gonna love it yeah um oh dr ericson now shasta yes hi thank you um i just
keep coming back to that i think what you just said dr steven that we need these experts to work
together because it's so much data and as albert has said he's had to clean a lot of them up but
he's just a one one person and i really am concerned about the 835 000 none of the above
and so so is albert and none of the teams have have looked into those that i know of and we don't
even know what's in there it's 60 64 percent of the reports people don't even know what's in there
so if you were me and i were you i would i would love to see you get all the get that all of those
teams together and let's let's figure out what's needed to scour the entire bears so that it really
reflects what's true and if it takes getting some sql experts as albert said then figure out who
could fund that because then you have a real accurate uh board not to say it's not accurate
it is accurate it does reflect very very much it's just there's a lot 64 needs to be looked at
i was also shasta it's very difficult to work on your own um as albert is and and we as human
beings we solve things in groups small groups i agree i i think that if they were to bounce things
off each other they could also double check each other they could vet each other's data and we'd
have a you know a very synchronized information coming all together from around the world
from different viewpoints and this you know like i said this 835 000 none of the above that is
their automatic default button i think as albert said he thinks there's hundreds of thousands of
serious reports in there but just i think there's a even in you know even the people we're working
with there seems to be variability about how um how important people see this you know yes well
albert said that it would take i i think like 10 three or three to five ssql for a month or two
to go through it but yes i i get it people are dismissing it but if every single there's
they don't want to think about um what could be coming
yeah for us to really know i mean i don't think that's true of craig part of cooper and uh
alexandra latopovic they they're really great i think but yeah they want to know steve kersh is
also trying hard but you know jessica rose is very able and david wiseman too but they won't work
with anyone it seems well that's what i mean i'll say i'll say it right here in public you know i
think kersh you know instead of betting his million dollars i bet you a million here i bet
you a million there you know put out a fraction of that in fund the the veres you know 3.2.0 uh
it's just like open bears and meta alerts has all that functionality a third one a better one
and he could do it yeah make sure exactly just sorry have you suggested that to him albert
yeah yeah and nothing well yes he's been saying i'll pay you a million dollars if you do this and
you do that but he makes sure that he i don't know you know it looks like he maybe has he paid out a
million to anybody i don't think so i don't know i'm sure he's he's a very philanthropic i know
he's helped our church out so i'm not saying that he's you know he doesn't help anybody out but you
know for what we want for what he wants to get done and what we all want to get done and want to
see you know he's not the only show in town but i'm sure he could really if he wanted if he wanted
to see it and willing to do what needs to be done you know we could we could do it his vaccine
safe and to be fair to steve he's not the only millionaire in our midst i don't think right right
that's right he's not the only show in town that's what i you know no i didn't mean that i think i
think um you know so it's it always people say when money's needed they say steve kirch you know
and that's not fair either yeah because there are lots of people there must be you know we've got
1200 people in this group so there must be people with money yeah i don't think people realize 64
percent is in the none of the above that's more than half it's it's pretty it's a lot yeah so it
and albert can't do it and neither can the other teams on their own they just can't but together i
think once they figure out that it's needed then then the request to the people who could possibly
fund it could be there and i think would be really amazing so i would like to see it happen
and you know the messaging deriving from what albert has told us tonight um there might be
different opinions about what would um uh weigh heaviest with the public um you know i'm so that
might be important but i wonder what albert thinks you know what are the if you have to
pick five points albert what would you say the public would be most interested in
of the bears data yeah what would they find the most shocking um well one is that only initial
reports are are made public i mean that alone because of that alone knowing just pondering
that for a second and how many um severe adverse events are actually in there how many of those
people are now since dead you i would bet i would bet everything i have that you could easily double
double the death count right now that alone on that one thing alone that's just one um the the
second one is what is what even shasta is referring to and what el gato malo just said today on her
on their sub stack what steve refers to all the time el gato malo um that uh of the undercoded
all the undercoded severe adverse events that are basically you know what we're talking about under
none of the above people really knew how many there were right now we can only just point to
the 60 65 percent of the entire database it's none of the above but we we don't know how much
of that is really severe adverse events i i can point to 20 000 reports and say look at these i
got 20 000 right here that are super severe i got 60 that are dead i mean that's that's the starter
that's i mean if i could find 60 that are dead and they're in none of the not serious imagine how many
there there there are all together i think those two things excellent and also there is evidence
of a cover-up and albert how much money albert do you think it would take to audit the 64 percent
well hard hardware wise like a server and you know that that thing the computer a couple of laptops
a little a little office to so that two or three two or three people can sit at
you know i'll work for uh for 30 40 bucks an hour and a couple other sqls i mean on the cheap um so
maybe two two or three people for how how long and how much money do you think well well the initial
the initial setup you know um you know the the weekly i mean a weekly just a couple people
weekly because you know the data comes out weekly and you have to like scrub it weekly and um i think
that you know the automated part that's the reason why i can't do it because i would have to be
scrubbing weekly but once we got the sql person in there to write code once the code's written
it's gonna you know it's like it's like systematic the data comes out and it gets
translated and scrubbed and cleaned within minutes and okay so how much do you think it would cost to
scrub the 64 percent and set up the code for the weekly drops
well it's about a thousand it's about um a thousand a day for for three people at that rate you
mentioned um yeah and for so five and one week for a couple of weeks for a couple of weeks to get it
to get it to where it's automated and then back down to like one person just kind of monitoring
like like steve rubin steve rubin is like a one-man show he practically runs meta alerts all by
himself okay but like what i'm asking is for the six for the 835 000 to be audited how much do you
anticipate that might cost well how many weeks would it be for three people albert approximately
well i say that again dr frost how many weeks for three people as you suggested you know
weeks for three people as you suggested you know three people um how many weeks
maybe about maybe about two or three weeks you know go through the 835 000 no no i i mean i
can go through the 835 000 in the probably about probably about a week or two if that's all i did
but if one person but then i would be the question that you know the people are asking
it's if people who are who don't understand it don't don't know what question to ask is this
you're describing the automated t-sequel or sequel translation of a fixed data set that's
that's basically one query a dba you might be able to look at that data set and write a query in
hours okay if i'm you know i understand enough about that to know right so people are asking
the wrong question right how how technically complex is it to scrub the data and then and
then automate it a dba might be able to do that in hours could they well i think it'd probably
take a little longer who the person who does something close to that is bears analysis dot
info way my my my my my yoda his name is wane and he's bears analysis dot info if you see his
he's he's an sql expert and he's written the code for most for most of this stuff are you in touch
with him albert yeah absolutely he's yeah him more than anybody i'm in touch with so why do you ask
him to do it then well he's um he he actually has like he's like a really low profile because he has
like a he has like a job where he doesn't want anybody to know what he's doing and he works in
he works in pharma actually so you have you have the opportunity here but you mean he wouldn't do
it well i mean he would participate but i don't think he would do it like per se do it but this
this is the kind of it work that you can literally farm out on the open market to a dba yeah yeah
yeah i think we could so how much do you think that would cost i i don't know shasta i don't know
there you go nobody knows yeah nobody knows but one of the other things you can do to generate
funds is whatever your partial dashboard is at the moment you could literally open that onto the web
and then basically create a window of time where people who could go and use it for two weeks and
they go shit this is amazing i can do x y and z and then you shut it off and switch it to a
subscription system and then basically say so if steve kirch wants to use this he can pay
100 a week right and just switch it to a subscription system that way at least part
whatever you've got running at the moment becomes accessible to people who want to use it yeah
yeah it is accessible right now it is public it is it is public to the world right now as it stands
yeah okay so you could why would you introduce a subscription which would be a barrier because
basically he's trying to solve a problem which is he's saying he needs money and resources
to do some extra work well if you've already got a value-add product that basically people can use
and they go shit it's free now i know about it great i'll start using it and actually it only
cost me ten dollars a week to do yeah you know what i'll chuck some i'll chuck ten dollars at it
this is how substack works this is like how everything works today right that model that
model can get you thousands of dollars in a very short space of time if your product is of use to
people and you don't even have to do it you could even base donations around that rather than
a closed off system that has to have cash all of these are standard fixes like for the problem of
money and skills and if you need a dba just put it out into the open market for for a dba for a week
so it's easy enough to pick up a dba are you the problem is the problem is that you have to
set up a set of specifications for the data you want of course yeah but so if you but if
albert knows what needs to be done he'll have that won't he well okay so so if you're familiar
with microsoft bi it's enterprise level dashboarding del big trees own it people's name was john
fitzpatrick he reached out to me early on because highwire wanted to create their own exact
interactive dashboard i gave them all the historical files for the that i was collecting
for viruses that's what he needed and he then he disappeared right and that never came to
fruition they tried i'm sharing you i'm sharing this information with with you guys but
the uh but it never came to fruition it was him and dr mehan fidel big tree and dr jim mehan
coming together to do to to create this for whatever reasons it didn't it didn't come to
fruition but the point about they were using and i still have it that they were going to use
microsoft bi but to use microsoft bi now you're talking about subscriptions to microsoft for that
the thing about the thing about the way if you think about this problem from a from a very basic
level right and i was trying to fix this problem this was my problem in this group right now this
is what i would do i would come on here and i would sell the solution that i envisage and show my
partial work which you have done okay and then i would go and ask steven why don't you email all
1200 of your users and ask them for 10 pounds each right and sell those users sell sell all
your subscribers the reason why they should give 10 quid then you'd have 12 grand up to 12 grand
and then you spend that 12 grand by share get by contracting a dba with the right skills to
read your functional spec not as easy as that why not because there is about a thousand things we
need to do so which one do we go for with limited time you try it because this is one job this to
fix this one job with albert if he knows the functional spec for his thing right yes but
here and you need to seek an sql dba and then we all backed it you're assuming
you're assuming that we all agree that this is the most important thing to do
of course but then you would have a fun drive for any other task and then people can pick
and then if albert ends up with 600 quid that's 600 quid if he ends up in 12 grand great but you
could you could do this overnight right and you could do it by emailing your people with a list
of things that you're interested in doing and asking for 10 quid it's not it's not as easy as
that because there are some people who complain about the number of emails if i start using the
lists okay but look what what you're what you're immediately doing is finding a reason to not do
something no no no no you've got no idea if you want to get involved in organizing things then
email me and then you'll find out just how difficult it is what we're doing so it's not
it's not just albert who's working for nothing i'm working for nothing i spent 15 hours hours a day
working on this yeah yeah we all are but but where albert has if albert has a specific it problem
right where people he doesn't even know the cost of it but he knows what the functional work is
and i can imagine what it is i can imagine some of what it is based on previous experience that
that if he just writes a functional spec of what he needs the dba or the sql guy to do
like and he puts it into the open market he can place it anybody who's going to pay is anything
worthwhile in this present situation surely doesn't need paying so i would so craig part of cooper
and alexandra latopova the chart um can't you work with them albert or what about scott mccloughlin
so martin neal and scott mccloughlin they may be able to literally do something for three hours
that would get you past this hurdle uh yeah yeah you know them yeah i do yeah are they reliable
because this is a problem yeah well if they if they back what you're doing yeah they've got this
they potentially have got the skills to do it so i can drop scott a line to mark tonight yeah but
are they okay they don't have to be the ideal people but you you get what i mean so a lot of
people promise a lot and then nothing happens well yeah i mean i wouldn't be i'll be but i need a
functional spec to know what the job is well albert can help you with that yeah even maybe albert and
sasha and craig could brainstorm on what it would take and then and then have a very clear proposal
albert so why don't you speak to craig and sasha and yeah well that was because they're very they're
very driven those two yeah exactly and and you know i i will i will again i have you know it was
you know up to now it was always me that reached out that reached out first i mean they've known
of me for over a year i was a sasha and craig part of cooper um you know so uh but regardless
you know that that was all part of the the idea about having having you guys the the medical
doctors for covid ethics graciously host one of these zoom meetings where it's it's kind of like
semi-private so to speak in the sense that you know more of us techie types can talk talk shop
and talk about what what we need or what we want to do or what's it going to take or whatever and
then um you know and then push in that direction but um yeah i mean i i'd love i'd love to um you
know get my message or get my dashboard in front of anybody who's willing to see it and see the
value in it um you know i'd love to make it a subscription but at the end of the day it's like
gosh i want it you know i want the people in india you know the poorest people in india that have a
to see this stuff not that you know because it has to be free i mean med alerts is free and so is
open bears and look at how many people don't know about those yep you know it's like oh
i'm just thinking ray fernandez who spoke up a bit ago he knows a lot about computers i think
are you there ray yeah i am stu um look i actually write sql um but i'm self-taught
i am and i'm happy to have a look at it but as i said earlier i think that the i know what you're
talking about with visual bi um but i use visual studio um and and all of that is free um and you
can play around and get that working on a small scale and then if you really need to then you pay
for it but you could get it working with that oh yeah i think yeah no i i talked to another uh i've
been working with another guy who's who writes in writes code in python and uh and uh i you know i
saw the vision i saw the writing on the wall because he was using his python probability
something or another to help with the data cleansing of the lot numbers and i i quickly
went i quickly went and told team enigma about them you know and i said i envision this is like
this is part of what we need when we you know when when we pull down the data weekly from bears and
then run it through this algorithm of python the python algorithm or the sql you know whatever
that algorithm is that cleans up uh lot numbers that cleans up ages you know and i know uh you
know wayne from bears analysis dot info for the for the ages you know he wrote a code it's a big
code that runs through and he and he says it goes through the write-up and it's if it says if it finds
like 11 11 year old like and then the year year space old and then year dash old you know if it
finds that then it was okay so multiply those three you know those three different way 11 year old 11
dash 11 year dash old you know all the different combinations you could write 11 year old it's like
three or four you know of course it's garbage in garbage out yeah and that's why it's so important
to have pick lists and drop down boxes where you put the numbers in so for your age you have a box
with the age unit rather than allow people to type in it but that's normal standard i would have
thought bears did that well that's what i'm saying you would have thought but no it doesn't because
it's clearly written in the write-up how old the person is but yet the um the age field is is totally
blank so okay so to fix it um you you know this this code that wane wrote is basically for you
know 400 lines so you know with the age and it's like if if it's you know from from ages zero to
age 100 if it says it this way all the different ways it could say one year old two year old three
year old you know space and then you got a mixture of capitals lowercase and application yeah all of
but sql is designed to to do that sort of stuff why did you two um communicate are you in touch
with each other no yeah i know i i am with uh with wane yeah absolutely with ray oh with ray no i'm
not in touch with i'd love to be in touch with me okay um i will um i think i think you've flicked
your email through um somewhere um but i'll um or you can email me ray and i'll pass it on can i okay
i'll do that stephen that's easier for me ray ray can i ask you are you the mk ultra guy
mk ultra oh no i don't know who no don't know about mk ultra sorry um yeah okay
steven i'll email you sorry i'll email you yeah very good yeah how do you know that you um were
good on computers i don't know i'm wondering that myself because the only person that would know
that i've dealt with this sort of stuff because i did a bit of my own analysis that's how i got
involved in this with the australian staff um and i talked a little bit with charles covesse
very early on um and then there was yeah so maybe charles spoke to you i don't know i i i have no
idea simon i've also spent some time with oh yes i wonder whether the same he's not on the call now
is he he's dropped out now because he might help as well albert that's another possible
yeah absolutely i bet you simon would if if have you spoken you're in touch with simon aren't you
yeah no we talked extensively for a while and um you know when he showed me he took me on a carpet
ride through his program and i thought oh my god i see i see the vision so he's amazing yeah we
definitely need simon in the you know at the table when we're all when we're all discussing this
so ray if you just email me and remind me that's uh that i need to include simon um yeah okay all
right well i'll do that can i just reply to one of your um invites yeah that's fine yeah that's the
only way i have absolutely fine yeah okay i don't want anybody else but i'm getting tired um so have
we had enough now thank you thank you thank you nick wants to speak now do you nick have you got
a question there yeah it's quick everyone can leave it's mainly for al quick question um
when you do your dip is that uh are you just going with it it's echoing nick for some reason it's
echoing your end i think oh really oh that's odd that's better is that better okay um
um
is is the cdc maintaining the differences in the databases or do they just override it
let's say they override it each week they just give a new set of a new set of data yeah they
blow it away so that's that's kind of the challenge in that in that to figure out to figure out what's
what's been changed from the week before what's been deleted from the week before
um now you're tracking all those files absolutely yeah so i i messaged you you
what what might be a nice easy exercise and maybe someone could help even fund the effort for you
would be to just upload every single download from the fda on to get and then you can dip it
you get you get automatic tracking of what's been added what's been deleted
and you kind of get that for free that that's kind of a nice benefit you know what i you know
and i wouldn't be surprised if that's what um steve rubin does for meta alerts because i i rely
on his heavily he has a he has a bears wayback machine attached to his little not the official
machine but he calls it the bears wayback machine and he and it you know and right away
10 minutes after it's published on the cdc his meta alerts data is updated and even talking to
him he doesn't get he doesn't get it through the conventional way the way everybody else gets it at
the cdc and they wait for it to be published his system pings that the the system the cdc system
right at the time that it becomes available and and but but to answer your to let you know
that his his wayback machine captures every single uh change and deletion um because there's more
there's more than just just what's been deleted they actually do a small changes in in lot numbers
or genders or even vaccination dates they'll change it a little bit
so um yeah yeah i have to admit his stuff's pretty good it's pretty easy to basically output
a query to get the table which is pretty nice yeah he said he said something about seven different
pieces of software that he actually uses to get to get to get the exact number his his numbers
match to the report you know that every week matches to the you know whatever the exact
1.3 million that they report his is exactly the same but but yeah i'd like to i'd like to know
more about that so i'd love to learn more and i'm sure that's all the information that he has
to learn more and i'm sure that's all the stuff that we need you know that's going you know whether
it costs money or how much is it going to cost or all of that stuff you know that's what needs to
be talked about there's probably stuff that i don't even realize um you know there exists or
there's a cost involved okay um has everybody had enough now