1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:07
So Jane, so the process of what Stephen is obviously having come on again, log on problems.

2
0:00:07 --> 0:00:12
So the way that we run this is you speak for, so there's a whole group now, lots of speakers,

3
0:00:12 --> 0:00:18
we're interested in your state of thinking now or whatever you would like to speak about

4
0:00:18 --> 0:00:24
in what your thinking is. You can speak for 10 minutes and then we're great at asking questions,

5
0:00:24 --> 0:00:31
I moderate the questions, or you can speak for half an hour and share your thinking,

6
0:00:31 --> 0:00:36
insights, where to now, how are we going to fight government overage, how are we going to

7
0:00:36 --> 0:00:41
fight for freedom, how are we going to get doctors being able to practice their profession. Does that

8
0:00:41 --> 0:00:51
make sense? Of course it does. Hang on, I'm talking to Jane. Thank you Charles. That's a very broad,

9
0:00:51 --> 0:00:58
uh, you know, a charge of course, and there are so many learned and experienced people. I recognize

10
0:00:58 --> 0:01:06
a lot of names even though I haven't met some of you directly. So I, you know, it's a challenge

11
0:01:06 --> 0:01:12
to kind of pull my thinking together for such a very broadly edified group, shall we say.

12
0:01:12 --> 0:01:18
But I like to start at the beginning of certain elements and maybe that'll help. And I'm,

13
0:01:18 --> 0:01:23
to get back to your original point and question, I'm happy to speak for about 10 minutes. I don't

14
0:01:23 --> 0:01:28
want to put anyone to sleep and I like to take questions. So I'd rather go that route and give

15
0:01:28 --> 0:01:35
you time. If you, I'll try to look for like 10, 10 minutes ish, and then I'll stop myself.

16
0:01:35 --> 0:01:40
Feel free to wave if I go a little bit over and then, um, and I'm happy to take any questions

17
0:01:40 --> 0:01:45
that, you know, that we have time for on your, this is your conference. So the reason I like,

18
0:01:45 --> 0:01:49
when I say I like to start at the beginning, I like to be very clear about one thing.

19
0:01:50 --> 0:01:54
And I'll be clear about other things as well, but this is not a vaccine.

20
0:01:55 --> 0:02:03
And to that end, you all must contribute as experts to stop calling it that. Why is that

21
0:02:03 --> 0:02:10
important? If somebody walks into a bank with a gun and demands the money, they've committed

22
0:02:10 --> 0:02:18
bank robbery. If you call it requesting a loan, you get very different reactions to it, don't you?

23
0:02:19 --> 0:02:28
And you get a difference in culpability with the law. So you, you are leaders and day after day

24
0:02:28 --> 0:02:33
after day, I still hear, I still hear my frontline colleagues. I won't name them to irritate them

25
0:02:33 --> 0:02:38
because I've said it to them, to their faces, stop calling it a vaccine.

26
0:02:39 --> 0:02:46
You're using the words of the criminals. They're getting away with this partly because they're

27
0:02:46 --> 0:02:50
under the umbrella of a vaccine. These are not vaccines. As many of you know,

28
0:02:51 --> 0:02:59
vaccines confer the promise of future protection and better health. These do none of this, none of

29
0:02:59 --> 0:03:06
that. In fact, they create disease. They turn your body into a perpetual bio weapon manufacturing

30
0:03:06 --> 0:03:13
organism. Now we're going to have problems for years to come. For those of you who don't know me,

31
0:03:14 --> 0:03:19
I'm a medical professional. I'm a licensed nurse practitioner. I took all my, my, um,

32
0:03:20 --> 0:03:24
residencies in the medical school at the university of Rochester in New York state.

33
0:03:25 --> 0:03:32
Uh, I treated patients in, uh, uh, ICUs and acute care settings. And then I went on to, uh,

34
0:03:32 --> 0:03:38
to run an external research lab. I did, I ran a lot of phase one, two, and three studies

35
0:03:38 --> 0:03:43
for pharmaceutical companies all over the world. And then I got recruited up into the industry and

36
0:03:43 --> 0:03:51
I spent 20 years inside the industry. It's a filthy, dirty place. In the second half of my

37
0:03:51 --> 0:03:56
20 year tenure, I started to whistle blow internally. I started to call attention

38
0:03:56 --> 0:04:02
to a lot of the crimes and finally I got out. So I don't know who's at the top or what's at the top

39
0:04:02 --> 0:04:07
of this food chain, but we're definitely on somebody's timeline that we don't even know about.

40
0:04:08 --> 0:04:13
I don't know about your countries, but I'm very concerned that my military is being decimated day

41
0:04:13 --> 0:04:19
by day to prevent a flu with a 99% recovery rate. And I'm pissed off about it.

42
0:04:21 --> 0:04:27
Right. So let's start using the language of the criminals. This is a bio weapon. This was

43
0:04:28 --> 0:04:33
began by my own government, my own country, many people in it. You all know the names and the people,

44
0:04:34 --> 0:04:39
but it's a, it's an international criminal conspiracy. And if you haven't had Dr. David

45
0:04:39 --> 0:04:45
Martin in your group to speak, then you have not been completely edified because that person did

46
0:04:45 --> 0:04:50
20 years of research on the receipts, on the patents, on the information.

47
0:04:52 --> 0:04:57
So I don't want to get too political about it, but that's my starting point to stop calling it a

48
0:04:57 --> 0:05:05
vaccine. Let's start using the right terminology. Let's face the fact that we are involved in a,

49
0:05:05 --> 0:05:11
an international worldwide global criminal conspiracy, and they're not going to stop.

50
0:05:11 --> 0:05:18
Okay. And as we go along, we're going to see many of our peers become compromised. And I want you to

51
0:05:18 --> 0:05:24
keep your antenna up for that. People who continue to call it a vaccine, people who push some of them

52
0:05:24 --> 0:05:29
now as, Oh, maybe they're a little bit safer. Maybe they're safer for elderly, but not children.

53
0:05:30 --> 0:05:34
Maybe we can ditch the injections and we can go to the pills.

54
0:05:35 --> 0:05:39
Smell new peer of year, Pfizer's packs. Livid.

55
0:05:41 --> 0:05:46
These are, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be a regular scientist or expert like yourselves

56
0:05:46 --> 0:05:51
to figure out that the mechanism of action is to explode cancer development.

57
0:05:52 --> 0:05:56
So we're, we're on a long path. If we don't try to shut this down,

58
0:05:56 --> 0:05:59
unfortunately, and I'll speak for my own country, any, you know, alone,

59
0:05:59 --> 0:06:05
um, most, most of our legislators are gone. They're, they're compromised.

60
0:06:05 --> 0:06:11
How do I know that? Because they're quiet. Because someone like Anthony Fauci can go into Congress,

61
0:06:11 --> 0:06:18
testify three times and lie when we have the documentation to prove his lies. And instead

62
0:06:18 --> 0:06:24
of going to jail or being tried for it, he's, he's out there telling us today on mainstream media that

63
0:06:24 --> 0:06:29
we better get ready for more lockdowns because the, the sub unit of the sub unit of the variant

64
0:06:29 --> 0:06:37
of the, you know, we, there is no, I tell people there is no validated diagnostic test

65
0:06:39 --> 0:06:46
for any of this. Nothing is specific and nothing's been validated for validity

66
0:06:46 --> 0:06:49
and reliability. And those of you who do research understand what that means.

67
0:06:50 --> 0:06:55
So, I mean, the CDC itself, this criminal organization, that's a patent holding company

68
0:06:55 --> 0:07:00
with 4,000 patents paid for by RTX dollars, recalled it because they knew they couldn't

69
0:07:00 --> 0:07:05
overcome it, but yet they said you could use it till the end of the year. I mean, if you got your

70
0:07:05 --> 0:07:11
car manufacturer telling you, Hey, take away, listen, your, your engine could explode at any moment,

71
0:07:11 --> 0:07:15
but you can use it till December 31st of this year. You'd think they were out of their minds.

72
0:07:15 --> 0:07:20
Well, that's what they did with the PCR test. So why do we keep responding?

73
0:07:21 --> 0:07:29
Like, you know, like knee jerk reaction to getting tested and cases, cases, cases,

74
0:07:29 --> 0:07:35
all these new fancy words, variant from mutation. I don't want to get into the whole virology thing.

75
0:07:35 --> 0:07:41
That's not my, my ball of wax, but it's, it's, it's all a joke and, and people are getting ready to,

76
0:07:42 --> 0:07:48
to knuckle down again, to bend down, to knee down again to this. We've got to do a lot of teaching

77
0:07:48 --> 0:07:52
of the public. We're doing great. We've made a lot of strides. So that's one thing that's really,

78
0:07:52 --> 0:07:57
really important. People need to understand that this is not an organic spike protein.

79
0:07:57 --> 0:08:05
I mean, I haven't seen any proof that anyone has isolated a SARS-CoV-2 organism in its whole form

80
0:08:05 --> 0:08:12
from an ill individual. So how can we validate tests against it? How do we even talk, begin to

81
0:08:12 --> 0:08:18
talk without being laughed at about variants, right? Viruses generally burn down, not up as

82
0:08:18 --> 0:08:23
they go through a population. But the point is nobody has proof of any variant. I've asked some

83
0:08:23 --> 0:08:28
of the biggest frontline doctors, really, you want to talk about variants? How do you diagnose a

84
0:08:28 --> 0:08:34
variant? Oh, sequencing. Oh, okay. Sequencing to look at a chunk of something that's made out of

85
0:08:34 --> 0:08:40
basic building blocks that could really, really be a part of anything. Right? So there's a lot of

86
0:08:40 --> 0:08:50
layers, layers, layers of deception, of lies, of corruption. And the only way out of this,

87
0:08:50 --> 0:08:58
as I, as I alluded to, is ourselves, the people, educating the people. Because I don't know about

88
0:08:58 --> 0:09:04
your countries, but in my country, not only do we not have Congress, we have a few, I, this is how

89
0:09:04 --> 0:09:10
Stephen and I got into a discussion. We have a few dog and pony shows, but until I see an indictment,

90
0:09:10 --> 0:09:15
a criminal indictment, and a trial in a legitimate court, not a simulation over in Germany,

91
0:09:16 --> 0:09:22
nothing's happening. Nothing's, and I've tussled with my own senators. It all leads to a donate

92
0:09:22 --> 0:09:28
button. And until you do something concrete and start to hold people accountable in this criminal

93
0:09:28 --> 0:09:35
conspiracy, you're part of it. Our institutions have collapsed. It's a very grim time in the

94
0:09:35 --> 0:09:41
United States. I had four grandparents who came to this country at the turn of the century legally,

95
0:09:42 --> 0:09:46
and they loved their country of origin. But they told me when I was five years old, get down and

96
0:09:46 --> 0:09:52
kiss this ground, because there is no place like this. And I never thought I'd have to fight for it

97
0:09:52 --> 0:10:00
on my charge in my generation this soon. But our institutions have collapsed. We have no DOJ,

98
0:10:00 --> 0:10:05
Department of Justice. We have no Federal Bureau of Investigation, the FBI. We have no FDA.

99
0:10:06 --> 0:10:14
It's a department advisor right now. So we don't have these formerly trusted institutions that we

100
0:10:14 --> 0:10:19
can trust. And another thing I wanted to let all of you know, I was asked last year to work with a

101
0:10:19 --> 0:10:24
couple of different legal groups that work nationally and internationally. I was asked to

102
0:10:24 --> 0:10:30
prepare an affidavit, a sworn affidavit, because I've written original protocols in pharma. I've

103
0:10:30 --> 0:10:37
written 25 page informed consent documents and had to defend them with an institutional review

104
0:10:37 --> 0:10:44
board. Right. So I, it's important, you know, to me, it's important to understand when what the

105
0:10:44 --> 0:10:49
crux of my affidavit was and is, it's still out there. It's been filed in two federal courts,

106
0:10:49 --> 0:10:55
and I don't know where else is that all of these authorizations are illegal. And the subsequent

107
0:10:55 --> 0:11:00
approvals are ill. We got to keep it real simple for the public. We got to get them on board to

108
0:11:00 --> 0:11:08
think these are illegal authorizations. There's no, they're illegal because why, if you understand

109
0:11:08 --> 0:11:14
the phases of human drug research, to bring an entity to the pharmacy shelf, you will immediately

110
0:11:14 --> 0:11:20
recognize just by reading Pfizer's protocol in clinical trials.gov, the title alone gives away

111
0:11:20 --> 0:11:28
the crime. A phase one slash two slash three. For those of you who are in clinical research,

112
0:11:28 --> 0:11:35
you understand those phases. You can't do them simultaneously. Why? Because each one is safety

113
0:11:35 --> 0:11:42
finding, dose finding, pharmacokinetics. Each, the results of each one informs the design of the

114
0:11:42 --> 0:11:48
subsequent study. And they're trying to show us that they're doing them all at once. To me,

115
0:11:48 --> 0:11:53
that's a crime. These are illegal authorizations. We don't have to go any further than that.

116
0:11:53 --> 0:11:59
Because they have, the FDA violated their own federal regulations, their own guidance documents,

117
0:11:59 --> 0:12:04
of which there are thousands on their website, which are what's required, minimum requirements

118
0:12:04 --> 0:12:12
to run trials for safety and efficacy has been bastardized. Those two terms have been bastardized.

119
0:12:12 --> 0:12:19
Because you have thresholds for data. Certain types of studies can only feed that data,

120
0:12:19 --> 0:12:29
and certain types of data from certain designs are allowed to be configured into what constitutes

121
0:12:29 --> 0:12:34
safety and efficacy. And these people, I mean, it's right there in front of you, the crime.

122
0:12:34 --> 0:12:40
They broke the blind. Why? They broke the blind so that they didn't have a placebo comparator.

123
0:12:40 --> 0:12:46
So your signals get murky, and you can claim safety and efficacy illegally, I might add.

124
0:12:46 --> 0:12:53
Right? There's been a lot of shenanigans, a lot of criminal pieces to this. So that's sort of where

125
0:12:53 --> 0:13:00
my thinking is in terms of trying to get, you know, like Dr. Martin says, and he's a mentor,

126
0:13:00 --> 0:13:03
a friend, I've been with him from the beginning. It's not just him. There are a lot of other great

127
0:13:03 --> 0:13:09
people like him, but he really stands out to me because he's fearless, and he's a good person.

128
0:13:09 --> 0:13:16
He's fearless. He's looked at the patents. He knows what's coming. He's brought out a lot of

129
0:13:16 --> 0:13:21
crimes across this whole criminal conspiracy. He's outlined the federal laws of the United States

130
0:13:21 --> 0:13:28
that have been broken, the privateers, the criminals in the conspiracy. There are many,

131
0:13:28 --> 0:13:34
many more than just the famous ones we all like to bash. So I think if we keep it simple, we need

132
0:13:34 --> 0:13:39
to get, you know, we can't get in the weeds with each other on going down rabbit holes of, you know,

133
0:13:39 --> 0:13:45
this variant and the sub two and this and that. And I mean, it's going to go nowhere while they're

134
0:13:45 --> 0:13:54
going to continue to try to perpetuate the fear, the compliance. And as Dr. Kevin Stillwagon says,

135
0:13:54 --> 0:14:00
one of my favorite lines is, you know, the food of tyrants is compliance. Let's stop feeding them.

136
0:14:01 --> 0:14:05
So I'm happy to take questions. I know some of you have seen me. I started out on the Stu

137
0:14:05 --> 0:14:11
Peter show as his medical contributor last year. A lot of great reception. Our worldwide viewership

138
0:14:11 --> 0:14:17
is up to 10 million now for the entire platform. So he invited me to start my own show and we

139
0:14:17 --> 0:14:23
launched it in February. It's the Dr. Jane Ruby show and it sits within StuPetersTV.com.

140
0:14:24 --> 0:14:28
If you've seen anything, if you have any questions or if you have any questions about what I've

141
0:14:28 --> 0:14:33
shared today, I never limit questions. If I don't know something, I'll tell you.

142
0:14:34 --> 0:14:38
And I'm happy to take any questions you have. And again, if I don't say it before people

143
0:14:39 --> 0:14:45
leave or do other things, I really want to thank you for the invitation today to be with you.

144
0:14:45 --> 0:14:51
Wonderful, Jane. Jane, thank you very much. Well done on your short exposé of your current

145
0:14:51 --> 0:14:55
thinking. That's what we're interested in because we've all been on this journey, as Adnan started

146
0:14:55 --> 0:15:00
saying. We've been on a two-year journey. Everyone on this call, almost everyone has been on this

147
0:15:00 --> 0:15:08
two-year journey. Everyone, please write that down. The food of tyrants is compliance. Now,

148
0:15:08 --> 0:15:14
put your hand up. We've got a process here, Jane, where people put their hand up. We handle them

149
0:15:14 --> 0:15:20
in order. The chat we will send to you or you can save the chat yourself because there's some great

150
0:15:20 --> 0:15:26
links in the chat that I would recommend. Wonderful. Thank you. It's well worth saving.

151
0:15:26 --> 0:15:36
Now, we, how much time have we got you for? It's 5.20 where I am. I am good until the top of the

152
0:15:36 --> 0:15:43
hour. So 40 if you want me that long. We have no troubles asking you questions for two hours.

153
0:15:45 --> 0:15:50
In terms of my moderation, now everybody, please, I need your cooperation today because

154
0:15:50 --> 0:15:56
I don't know what's happened to Stephen. He hasn't run me. We haven't got an official host

155
0:15:56 --> 0:16:03
yet, so I can't control any of you. I need you to control yourselves. I can't mute anybody,

156
0:16:03 --> 0:16:12
but this is being recorded. Jane, what we do is we make the recording available to people here.

157
0:16:12 --> 0:16:17
It's being recorded now and then this becomes valuable to share with others. Just for your

158
0:16:17 --> 0:16:24
information, the speakers that we've had over the last few weeks are Paul Marrick last week,

159
0:16:25 --> 0:16:32
Jessica Rose, Craig Pardacupa on the batch issues. I hope you get him on your show.

160
0:16:33 --> 0:16:35
I've been working with them since the beginning. Team Enigma. Yes.

161
0:16:36 --> 0:16:43
Wonderful. Peter McCulloch, Ivan Sinchich, the member of the European Parliament,

162
0:16:43 --> 0:16:48
David Martin we had on the 28th of February. Wonderful. Before that, we had Steve Kirsch,

163
0:16:48 --> 0:16:56
Anna de Buissere on legal matters, Steve Forsyth, Phil Ex-Royal Marine, Phil Hyland,

164
0:16:56 --> 0:17:04
Andrew Kaufman we had on exploring that question of the isolation. We can ask you questions for

165
0:17:04 --> 0:17:10
two hours. Everybody keep them tight. I'm sure, Jane, it's great to have you here. Well done on

166
0:17:10 --> 0:17:17
your journey and for you speaking your truth. I think everybody, we've heard often the truth

167
0:17:17 --> 0:17:25
will come out as it did with Hunter Biden's laptop last night on Sky News. New York Times

168
0:17:26 --> 0:17:32
on the paragraph 24, they said, they acknowledged that yes, it wasn't Russian disinformation on Hunter

169
0:17:32 --> 0:17:38
Biden's laptop. Miranda Devine wrote that excellent book, The Laptop from Hell. I recommend it.

170
0:17:39 --> 0:17:44
More and more evidence comes out, as you all know, in terms of the corruption that went on in the

171
0:17:44 --> 0:17:51
November 20 election. But that was yesterday that that acknowledgement came out and still the 51

172
0:17:52 --> 0:17:58
signatories from the CIA say, oh no, it's still Russian disinformation. Jane, you're quite right.

173
0:17:58 --> 0:18:05
The institutions have been captured. Who do you trust? The answer is, we've said it many times on

174
0:18:05 --> 0:18:11
this group, it's up to us and it's up to us leading the people to push back. So Jane, thank

175
0:18:11 --> 0:18:16
you. Our first question, first hand up is Liam Sturgis. Liam, I think you're from Canada. By the

176
0:18:16 --> 0:18:21
way, we've got people here from all around the world, Jane, as you would probably guess. And

177
0:18:21 --> 0:18:27
I'm from Australia, the lockdown capital of the world, Melbourne, not Melbourne, Florida. Liam,

178
0:18:27 --> 0:18:34
over to you. Yes, thanks, Charles. Yeah, I'm, hi, Dr. Jane. I'm Liam. I'm from Vancouver, Canada.

179
0:18:35 --> 0:18:42
I've been watching you on the Stu Peter show and now your own show for probably about eight months

180
0:18:42 --> 0:18:49
now. So thank you for everything you've done. Thank you. And I'm happy to that you brought up

181
0:18:49 --> 0:18:54
the fact that Fauci and others are already telegraphing the return of the lockdowns and

182
0:18:54 --> 0:18:59
the mandates due to the next variant. The same thing's happening here in Canada. So you can kind

183
0:18:59 --> 0:19:05
of see the narrative being respawned. So my question for you is have you looked into,

184
0:19:05 --> 0:19:11
and forgive me, maybe you have spoken about this, but the genetic aspects of the spike protein and

185
0:19:11 --> 0:19:19
how preliminary research suggests a spectrum of susceptibility to illness with at the very bottom,

186
0:19:21 --> 0:19:28
there's a gene that seems to appear in a specific genealogy of the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

187
0:19:28 --> 0:19:35
And then you go all the way to the other end and you have South Asian and European folks who,

188
0:19:35 --> 0:19:42
it's all based on the ACE2 receptor and the genetic variations in it. And of course, add the

189
0:19:42 --> 0:19:52
fact that vitamin D deficiency is a comorbidity for severe COVID. And that happens to affect Black

190
0:19:52 --> 0:20:01
people disproportionately. Combine that with the new Ukrainian bio lab, the allegations that perhaps

191
0:20:01 --> 0:20:10
they were developing viral weapons. Can I ask you to just clarify, what is your,

192
0:20:11 --> 0:20:17
I get all that background, what is your question for me? Yeah, what do you say to that? Have you

193
0:20:17 --> 0:20:22
looked into that or do you have anything you can contribute beyond any of that background?

194
0:20:22 --> 0:20:30
You want my honest opinion? It's navel gazing. We don't have time. I don't know how to impress

195
0:20:30 --> 0:20:36
upon people. We don't have time to dig into those nice little luxurious scientific weeds.

196
0:20:37 --> 0:20:43
This is a chimeric molecule that was developed in silico. It travels to every cell in your body

197
0:20:43 --> 0:20:49
because it's in a lipid nano particle at that level, right? The atomic level. And depending on

198
0:20:49 --> 0:20:53
where it lands, and I don't even know what else it's programmed for. If you look at the leaked

199
0:20:53 --> 0:20:59
documents between Pfizer and the EMA, they're talking about the EMA is asking them, you have 50%

200
0:20:59 --> 0:21:05
of this material that is unaccounted for. What else is in there? And they say, we need that leeway.

201
0:21:05 --> 0:21:12
Well, since then, they've discovered that there are partial RNA strands. God knows programmed for

202
0:21:12 --> 0:21:18
what. If you get into those kinds of weeds, no disrespect intended, you're going to get,

203
0:21:18 --> 0:21:24
these are red herrings. We don't have time to focus on. People are dying. Children are being attacked

204
0:21:24 --> 0:21:30
right now, five to 11 years old in my country, which is my hill that I die on, much less the

205
0:21:30 --> 0:21:37
six month olds to four. Are you out of your minds? So to me, I don't have the luxury to look at,

206
0:21:37 --> 0:21:41
you know, different cultural, you know, emphasis things. I don't even know what they're doing.

207
0:21:41 --> 0:21:47
These companies, you should be very frightened that these companies are silent. I worked in this

208
0:21:47 --> 0:21:54
industry for 20 years. If you farted the wrong way in the company, they came out with a press release.

209
0:21:54 --> 0:22:00
They came out with a correction. They were so petrified of their image. Have you ever seen a

210
0:22:00 --> 0:22:06
cutthroat in industry like this one silence together? You don't have any other companies

211
0:22:06 --> 0:22:11
saying, Hey, how did they get away with, you know, an interim analysis for a full blown approval?

212
0:22:11 --> 0:22:18
And I had to go the 15 years and $500 million. You ever wonder how, how does that happen? That

213
0:22:18 --> 0:22:25
they're all silent. There's something very bad happening. We're on somebody's timetable and I

214
0:22:25 --> 0:22:33
don't know who it is. Okay. And so we don't have a lot of time left. A lot of people have been shot

215
0:22:33 --> 0:22:39
up with this stuff. We don't even know what the long-term effects are going to be. They may become

216
0:22:39 --> 0:22:44
different types of people emotionally. They, if they make it, if they live, and I'm sorry to scare

217
0:22:44 --> 0:22:51
people, but so far it's irreversible. I put myself out on a limb a little bit because I'm asking an

218
0:22:51 --> 0:22:56
obvious question that no one seems to want to ask Dr. Malone, who's very proud of the fact that he

219
0:22:56 --> 0:23:01
invented it. Why aren't you in the lab day and night working on the antidote to this thing that

220
0:23:01 --> 0:23:07
is killing babies and children and teens, taking down elite athletes and devastating my military?

221
0:23:09 --> 0:23:13
So I don't know what the answers are to those questions, but all I know, Liam, is we don't have

222
0:23:13 --> 0:23:18
a lot of time and we need to get to as many people as possible. We need to tell them if you've taken

223
0:23:18 --> 0:23:23
it, don't take any more. If you've taken the two shots, don't take the any boosters. We're seeing

224
0:23:23 --> 0:23:30
a rapid explosion in all kinds of cancers. And here's, here's where it's the perfect crime.

225
0:23:31 --> 0:23:38
It's in Dr. McCullough wisely pointed out four buckets months ago. I have to see if I can get

226
0:23:38 --> 0:23:45
them right. Hematological, neurological, immunological, and cardiac. In those buckets,

227
0:23:45 --> 0:23:50
you're going to see so many different illnesses that it's going to be very confusing for people

228
0:23:50 --> 0:23:57
to tie it back. Hell, they can't even tie it back when they die two days after their second Pfizer

229
0:23:57 --> 0:24:02
shot. The families couldn't have been the shot. How are they going to do it six months or a year

230
0:24:02 --> 0:24:09
from now or two years from now? It's the perfect crime. It's the perfect murder design and they're

231
0:24:09 --> 0:24:14
still making more and they're going to make more types. And Pfizer just entered an agreement with

232
0:24:14 --> 0:24:25
acutis therapeutics. I don't know if you know this to make 10 new mRNA based vaccines and therapeutics.

233
0:24:25 --> 0:24:33
So even though this thing is killing people, right? They're making more for more diseases.

234
0:24:33 --> 0:24:39
Is it for the diseases they're creating? I don't know. Let's see what happens. So we've got to stop

235
0:24:39 --> 0:24:44
people from mindlessly taking these things, got to get them out of the fear. And we're going to come

236
0:24:44 --> 0:24:49
up upon a real challenge because they're about to drop another fear thing for us in the United

237
0:24:49 --> 0:24:54
States. I believe it's because the election is in November. They have to do it around June or July,

238
0:24:54 --> 0:25:00
mark my words, because they need that kind of time to lock in, get people locked down and lock

239
0:25:00 --> 0:25:06
them in with mail-in ballots because that's how they can commit fraud on the election. If they do

240
0:25:06 --> 0:25:13
it in August or September, it's too late, too late for the voting fraud. So my prediction is

241
0:25:13 --> 0:25:19
it'll probably try, they're ginning up now. They may even tweak something and drop it because

242
0:25:19 --> 0:25:25
then people do start to get sick for a few months. I know because I'm working with Dr. Eric Henson,

243
0:25:25 --> 0:25:31
attorney Tom Renz, if you know these people, and Stu to rescue them out of the hospitals.

244
0:25:31 --> 0:25:34
And also for those who have not gotten to the hospital as soon as they get sick,

245
0:25:34 --> 0:25:40
because I do think there is a bio weapon organism that they kind of seed. I'm just saying it just

246
0:25:40 --> 0:25:44
makes sense. You talk about Delta and then last summer, June, July and August, people get sick.

247
0:25:45 --> 0:25:49
Then there's a lull. Then you talk about Omicron and then people get sick October,

248
0:25:49 --> 0:25:56
November, December. Now there's a lull. I mean, hello, your scientists looks a little logical to

249
0:25:56 --> 0:26:03
me, but we'll see. We'll see if the prediction of the patterning that I'm predicting happens.

250
0:26:03 --> 0:26:05
I think it's predominantly because of our election coming up.

251
0:26:07 --> 0:26:11
Diane, thank you for that. Lee, thank you for the question. We now have James Winkle.

252
0:26:11 --> 0:26:14
Yes,

253
0:26:14 --> 0:26:20
Stephen is on the phone James. Before you go, Stephen apparently has joined us. Thank goodness.

254
0:26:20 --> 0:26:25
So he's okay. So, so sorry, Jane. I will explain later.

255
0:26:26 --> 0:26:30
Hi, Stephen. Good enough. They've recorded it so you can hear my ranting later.

256
0:26:32 --> 0:26:34
Who's recorded it? I was wondering about that.

257
0:26:36 --> 0:26:39
Stephen knows I'm a rancher. Stephen knows I'm a rancher.

258
0:26:40 --> 0:26:46
It was very good. Stephen, can you make me a co-host please while you're sitting organized?

259
0:26:46 --> 0:26:50
And so I can get this mob under control for Jane. And we've got James another 26 minutes,

260
0:26:50 --> 0:26:58
Stephen. So James, James Winkle over to you. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks, Jane, for the talk. And I

261
0:26:58 --> 0:27:06
just want to, I guess, we're currently working on a trial for these vaccine injuries. And one of our

262
0:27:06 --> 0:27:14
PhDs is in nanotechnology. So I can confirm what she's saying. I don't know if most people know,

263
0:27:14 --> 0:27:20
but the bio-distribution studies of this slip of nanoparticle, I think that only did two days,

264
0:27:20 --> 0:27:27
even though it accumulates far, far, far after that, at least according to the doctor I'm working

265
0:27:27 --> 0:27:35
with. But despite all that, I had a question since I'm in the in-between states right now. I just

266
0:27:35 --> 0:27:41
moved out of Illinois. There are a lot of doctors I speak with that have been either fired or

267
0:27:43 --> 0:27:49
in the process of just these universities, bullying them into submission, and they feel that

268
0:27:50 --> 0:28:00
they're just alone, I guess. So how would you recommend like uniting or playing more offense,

269
0:28:00 --> 0:28:05
I guess, to help some of these physicians, I'm sure, are afraid to speak up with anyone?

270
0:28:06 --> 0:28:10
Yeah. Thank you, James. Thanks for the question. And keep up the good work on your end.

271
0:28:12 --> 0:28:18
The doctors and nurses and many, many of the general public got so dependent on these big

272
0:28:18 --> 0:28:24
hospital systems that, and unfortunately, a lot of the doctors just became like salaried people,

273
0:28:24 --> 0:28:29
just like nurses, and they lost their ability to really develop the art of medicine.

274
0:28:30 --> 0:28:34
I'll say that much. What I've been talking about for the last year is I could see this coming.

275
0:28:34 --> 0:28:39
And I've said to people, you know, you can repurpose your skills when you

276
0:28:39 --> 0:28:44
step out of that hospital, or that corporation or that whatever, you don't cease to be

277
0:28:45 --> 0:28:53
a carpenter or a nurse or a physician or whatever you are, you are that those skills. And so

278
0:28:53 --> 0:28:57
you can take those. What I would suggest, James, and your question is really well founded,

279
0:28:57 --> 0:29:02
is to start where you are. Start very locally. That's really where you have the majority of your

280
0:29:02 --> 0:29:08
own power. Find alliances in your family, then you go out. Alliances in your neighborhood,

281
0:29:08 --> 0:29:13
your community, and just put together. You don't have to have 5,000 people at first. Just start

282
0:29:13 --> 0:29:19
with a few like-minded people, maybe with those same skills, and try to create a parallel service

283
0:29:19 --> 0:29:24
where you can use skills. Yeah. Are we going to take a hit in some of our salaries? Yeah. We're

284
0:29:24 --> 0:29:28
not going to have the cushy corporate salary. I know what that's like. I walked away from big,

285
0:29:28 --> 0:29:34
big money pharma. So I understand that you have to really make a gross adjustment. It's a shock to

286
0:29:34 --> 0:29:38
the system. But if we're ever going to get to the other side of this, we're going, people are going

287
0:29:38 --> 0:29:43
to need your skills, all of our skills. So we have to really think differently about it. And I think

288
0:29:43 --> 0:29:49
that's the way to go about it. I will say that anyone who, and I've been on a rant lately about

289
0:29:49 --> 0:29:56
this, when people who now stay in these systems, I don't care what the excuse is, you are complicit

290
0:29:57 --> 0:30:02
in the conspiracy to commit murder, domestic terrorism on the people of the United States,

291
0:30:02 --> 0:30:08
and conspiracy to commit murder in general. And that goes for any country. But I speak for my

292
0:30:08 --> 0:30:12
own country first, because here's where I'm licensed, and here's where I've taught nursing,

293
0:30:12 --> 0:30:17
and nursing ethics, and things like that. So I wanted to wrap that up for you. So I'm not too

294
0:30:17 --> 0:30:20
long winded, and I get other people's questions in. But thank you for that.

295
0:30:20 --> 0:30:22
Thank you. Thanks. Yes, thank you.

296
0:30:24 --> 0:30:30
You're welcome. Thank you. Thanks. Ariana, who, Dr. Love we have here. Dr. Ruby and Dr. Love.

297
0:30:30 --> 0:30:31
It's a big day.

298
0:30:31 --> 0:30:34
Now we have Dr. Six. Ariana.

299
0:30:35 --> 0:30:37
It's a big day. Nice to meet you.

300
0:30:38 --> 0:30:43
Nice to meet you, Dr. Ruby. Sorry, I'm in the dark. I'm a little bit sick too. I got,

301
0:30:43 --> 0:30:49
I got, you know, in Finland, we have that people are double jabbed now and boosted.

302
0:30:49 --> 0:30:54
And the transmission is really intense. So I'm planning on leaving because I just can't.

303
0:30:55 --> 0:31:00
Yeah, I got hit with transmission. That was around a couple people who for about an hour,

304
0:31:02 --> 0:31:10
not by, you know, by necessity. So I'm like really having a difficult time detoxifying this time. So

305
0:31:10 --> 0:31:17
for the entire year, it was okay. Anyway, anyway, I wanted to ask you, and I wanted to thank you

306
0:31:17 --> 0:31:24
for that very powerful rant. And this is exactly what people here need to hear. We all need to

307
0:31:24 --> 0:31:35
hear that. I wanted to ask you about this. Dr. Frank Zalewski. You know, remember when he held

308
0:31:35 --> 0:31:40
up that string and he was talking about these transgenic hydras and he held up the string and

309
0:31:40 --> 0:31:47
he showed that how long they will grow inside the body. I wanted to ask, do you think that that has

310
0:31:47 --> 0:31:54
something to do with these white stringy, you know, long stringy things that they're pulling out of

311
0:31:56 --> 0:32:01
veins? Yeah, thanks for the question. And again, you know, good to see you. I know you've been on

312
0:32:01 --> 0:32:05
Stu's show a lot and it's nice to see, you know, see you live and talk to you live.

313
0:32:06 --> 0:32:12
What you're referring to, first of all, the embalmer report, which I was the first one to break.

314
0:32:12 --> 0:32:17
And I say that because, you know, he went to a lot of other people and they just didn't respond to

315
0:32:17 --> 0:32:22
him. So I look, this is Mr. Richard Hirschman. Maybe some of you have heard of him. He was on

316
0:32:22 --> 0:32:28
my show a couple of times and he's been on other shows a little bit. He started, he said, I want

317
0:32:28 --> 0:32:33
to come forward. I've been seeing these white fibrous clots. They appear to be emanating out

318
0:32:33 --> 0:32:39
of a bloody end, like they're feeding off of it. Very strange. And we met with Dr. Bhakdi and Dr.

319
0:32:41 --> 0:32:47
Thomas, just blanking. Sorry, sorry. The cardiologist, the German card. Yes. Can you

320
0:32:47 --> 0:32:53
hear me? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Anyway, anyway, the cardiologist said, interestingly, it's hard to

321
0:32:53 --> 0:32:58
believe someone could live with that in their body, that it must have happened post-mortem.

322
0:32:58 --> 0:33:02
And Mr. Hirschman said, I don't believe so. Respectfully disagree because I have people

323
0:33:02 --> 0:33:07
hours later, the body's still warm and they, I'm pulling these out. What we, what, what, what,

324
0:33:07 --> 0:33:13
I don't know if it's connected Dr. Love, but I will say this. What concerned me is that, you know,

325
0:33:13 --> 0:33:18
Dr. Zalewski, if any of you haven't seen the video, it's, it's, it's a lengthy one and it's

326
0:33:18 --> 0:33:22
actually fascinating. And he's, he's not a moron. He's not some fly by name. He's really an

327
0:33:22 --> 0:33:27
interesting guy and an educated guy. But what bothered me is we didn't hear from him again.

328
0:33:27 --> 0:33:32
Like he should have been on the talk show circuit, at least among internet stuff. And I, I just, I,

329
0:33:32 --> 0:33:38
I don't mean to suggest anything. I just wish that we would have seen more replication, more of his

330
0:33:38 --> 0:33:42
work, you know, that kind of thing. And yet it's, he's kind of gone silent. I don't know if anyone

331
0:33:42 --> 0:33:47
has a chance to get to him or find him. It wouldn't be a bad idea to do so. Is there a connection?

332
0:33:47 --> 0:33:53
We don't know. And I'll tell you this, what we won't know until we get a chemical analysis of

333
0:33:53 --> 0:33:59
what this white material is now, Dr. Mr. Hirschman and other embalmers that I've talked to that

334
0:33:59 --> 0:34:05
haven't come forward yet have all said the same thing. Look, we've seen hundreds of types of

335
0:34:05 --> 0:34:10
clots white, you know, red, bloody partial, whatever, but we've never seen this thing.

336
0:34:10 --> 0:34:17
They felt it, the consistency that the break, the way it handles, they've never seen that before

337
0:34:17 --> 0:34:25
middle of the year, 2021. So it really coincides with the shots. And so I encouraged Mr. Hirschman,

338
0:34:25 --> 0:34:30
he tells me he's in the process. It's not an easy thing to do because you need to have good chain of

339
0:34:30 --> 0:34:36
custody established. You have to have, I said to him, I would encourage you to oversee your own

340
0:34:36 --> 0:34:41
samples, go, you know, fly there wherever you, when you find, and you, he should pick the lab,

341
0:34:41 --> 0:34:47
we shouldn't all pick it. So I'm waiting, he's in the process. He's made some steps forward on that.

342
0:34:47 --> 0:34:51
And we'll see once we get that chemical composition, I think that's going to tell us,

343
0:34:51 --> 0:34:55
I wouldn't say everything that's that's too much, but it'll tell us a lot. Remember,

344
0:34:55 --> 0:35:01
we're feeling our way like this through the dark. These companies, as I said earlier, are silent,

345
0:35:01 --> 0:35:10
eerily silent, no defensive pressers, press releases, nothing. They're just silent. So

346
0:35:10 --> 0:35:16
they're not disclosing, they know everything. They knew who got what, they're measuring it.

347
0:35:17 --> 0:35:23
They know what's going to happen next. They know what's going to happen to who team enigma,

348
0:35:23 --> 0:35:29
Craig Pardicooper and Sasha lot of POVA to that I work with the most, you know, brilliant, brilliant

349
0:35:29 --> 0:35:35
work. They, they, they shot us light years ahead in this mystery. And we're not where we need to be

350
0:35:35 --> 0:35:40
yet, but they really blew the door open on looking at the rates of death and destruction per lot

351
0:35:40 --> 0:35:46
number, and then finding out the hacking of the Moderna and Pfizer websites, finding out that those,

352
0:35:46 --> 0:35:51
that those lot numbers are authentic and that there could be up to 1.5 million doses per lot

353
0:35:51 --> 0:35:57
number. So they're all out there still circulating the deadly ones and in the deadly ones, you know,

354
0:35:57 --> 0:36:01
you don't know on any given day, the deadly ones could become different, right? Because these

355
0:36:01 --> 0:36:06
companies are running the tables. I've said Russian roulette, it's interesting Russian roulette,

356
0:36:06 --> 0:36:11
at least with regular Russian roulette, you're going to get one of two things air or a bullet

357
0:36:11 --> 0:36:17
to your head. With this, you have you have hundreds of chambers. So you don't know what

358
0:36:17 --> 0:36:23
you're getting on any given day, in any time point. So that lot number from a year ago,

359
0:36:23 --> 0:36:29
which is still circulating, could have totally different things in it. There's no oversight

360
0:36:30 --> 0:36:39
on anything. It's frightening. Thank you, Jane. And Ryan Cole is here, Ariana. So Ryan put a

361
0:36:39 --> 0:36:45
note in the chat. He's done some analysis. Ryan, have you got a moment to come on and just

362
0:36:46 --> 0:36:51
speak about what you just put in your analysis of what's in these bodies?

363
0:36:52 --> 0:36:54
Hopefully you can hear me. I'm at the grocery store.

364
0:36:58 --> 0:37:05
Yeah, they're they're abnormal. Certainly, they're extra cellular. Normally a clot has

365
0:37:06 --> 0:37:12
platelets and fibrin and is usually pretty a cellular. These ones, interestingly, are very

366
0:37:12 --> 0:37:16
cellular because of the amount of white blood cells that are trapped within them and then the

367
0:37:16 --> 0:37:22
protein itself. If one really wants to examine what's happening here, you need to look at the

368
0:37:22 --> 0:37:29
papers of Dr. Pretorius out of South Africa. Dr. Pretorius did some fantastic work. So if you take

369
0:37:30 --> 0:37:36
plasma and you take the platelets out of it and just put spike protein in with plasma,

370
0:37:36 --> 0:37:43
you end up with the spike protein in and of itself inducing aggregation of thrombin,

371
0:37:43 --> 0:37:50
plasmid, and causing clots without platelets. So it causes kind of an amyloid-esque protein clumping.

372
0:37:50 --> 0:37:56
So the spike is triggering it. So we know, you know, at this point, the shots are more dangerous

373
0:37:56 --> 0:38:03
than the virus itself because omicron doesn't tend to split with a fear and cleavage into an S1 and

374
0:38:03 --> 0:38:12
S2 and the S1 is the more inflammatory clotting aspect of the spike. So interestingly, just with

375
0:38:12 --> 0:38:19
the spike in these shots, we're inducing a protein clumping and then this tends to trap the white

376
0:38:19 --> 0:38:24
blood cells. It's a lot of neutrophils. It's a lot of eosinophils and then I mark these with

377
0:38:24 --> 0:38:30
the immunohistochemical markers that show an increase of surface adhesion molecules,

378
0:38:30 --> 0:38:34
intercellular adhesion molecules. So they're all sticking to each other like mad.

379
0:38:34 --> 0:38:38
So I've got a few more studies to do on them. I'm going to look for the presence of spike protein

380
0:38:38 --> 0:38:44
with within the clot proper, which I'm pretty sure I'm going to find. And so that's what we know

381
0:38:44 --> 0:38:51
so far to date, but the papers of Dr. Pretorius are a good place to start and we'll go from there

382
0:38:51 --> 0:38:58
and see what else we find. Over. Beautiful. Thank you. Thank you, Ryan. Wonderful,

383
0:38:58 --> 0:39:04
wonderful addition to that question. Now, our next question, because I know we've got you

384
0:39:04 --> 0:39:12
for another 14 minutes, James. So we've got iPhone here. Strange name. Who are you, iPhone?

385
0:39:12 --> 0:39:18
I can't remember. Look it is.

386
0:39:21 --> 0:39:27
Charles, is that possibly me, Mark Sexton? I think I came up as iPhone before. I do apologize.

387
0:39:28 --> 0:39:33
I thought I've seen that head before and Stephen has as well. Yes, Mark Sexton, Jane, is a

388
0:39:34 --> 0:39:36
former police officer in the UK. Mark, over to you.

389
0:39:38 --> 0:39:42
Thank you very much, Charles. Dr. Ruby, it's really nice to meet you. Good evening, everybody else.

390
0:39:42 --> 0:39:49
Hi, Dr. Stephen Frost. Dr. Ruby, it's a straightforward question. As a former policeman,

391
0:39:49 --> 0:39:53
I've been involved in a lot of criminal applications here in the UK.

392
0:39:54 --> 0:39:58
Senator Ron Johnson is doing a lot of work in the United States and he's having

393
0:39:58 --> 0:40:04
a lot of experts on there giving really damning, irrefutable and vast amount of evidence against

394
0:40:04 --> 0:40:12
this evil agenda. Is anything at all coming from it? Well, thanks for the question, Mark. And

395
0:40:12 --> 0:40:18
of course, you know, I'm always admiring police officer service, so I'm sure you've saved a lot

396
0:40:18 --> 0:40:27
of lives. I'm not in Senator Ron Johnson's inner circle. He certainly has taken this further than

397
0:40:27 --> 0:40:33
any of our other legislators. But you know, I insist on holding our legislators to the very

398
0:40:33 --> 0:40:39
highest standards. They're elected officials, they should answer to us. I know theoretically,

399
0:40:39 --> 0:40:44
but in reality, that doesn't always happen. I understand that they do have limitations,

400
0:40:44 --> 0:40:49
but nobody's more powerful than them. And so what I could say to you is I'm still waiting.

401
0:40:52 --> 0:41:00
I'm looking forward to anything that he moves the needle on this. I would be very grateful to see it.

402
0:41:01 --> 0:41:07
He had a lot of standard people. He had only had one woman. I'm sorry to, you know, make it a gender

403
0:41:07 --> 0:41:11
issue, but I noticed things. You know, we have a lot of brilliant women scientists that are in the

404
0:41:11 --> 0:41:17
front lines right now. Many of them are probably in this, this, this zoom tonight. But, but my point

405
0:41:17 --> 0:41:23
is I looked for a lot of other people. And I think that there's a lot of voices. Some are recycled

406
0:41:23 --> 0:41:28
over and over and over again every day. And those are the ones you just want to be careful. You want

407
0:41:28 --> 0:41:33
to keep having different voices. That's what keeps the discussion healthy and vibrant and new ideas.

408
0:41:33 --> 0:41:40
And it prevents flipping people and corruption and compromising, because if no one gets too much

409
0:41:40 --> 0:41:46
attention in the mainstream media or the mid media, you see what I'm saying? It just keeps the

410
0:41:46 --> 0:41:53
discussion from getting hijacked and bought and owned. So I'm hoping and praying that he does

411
0:41:53 --> 0:41:58
bring this to some kind of, one of the things I said to him directly, I mean, we had an interaction

412
0:41:59 --> 0:42:07
by email because he wasn't happy with my lack of, I mean, I, I, I expect more. And I said to him,

413
0:42:08 --> 0:42:15
you are Congress. You have the power to, to defund the FDA, to shut them down, to stop it,

414
0:42:15 --> 0:42:21
to call in a citizen panel of experts and reconstitute it. I mean, this is an agency that

415
0:42:21 --> 0:42:26
is literally committing domestic terrorism, a worldwide terrorism, really by extension.

416
0:42:27 --> 0:42:34
So these, these, these legislators cannot move quick enough and they should be moving beyond

417
0:42:34 --> 0:42:39
what I call, you know, just, just the theater. It's just, you know, we used to have Trey Gowdy,

418
0:42:39 --> 0:42:43
if you recall, you know, some of this in American history, recent American history,

419
0:42:43 --> 0:42:51
who oversaw the Benghazi hearings, right? There were clear crimes committed. Americans were killed

420
0:42:51 --> 0:42:56
over there while, you know, some former officials sat in a room in Washington, D.C. and watched it.

421
0:42:56 --> 0:43:03
I mean, while the, while the special operators, you know, begged for help. So, but Trey Gowdy,

422
0:43:03 --> 0:43:08
we call him, there's a, there's a phrase in Texas called all hat, no cattle. That means you're a big

423
0:43:08 --> 0:43:13
shop, but you really don't own anything. Okay. So when I say you're all hearings, no indictments,

424
0:43:13 --> 0:43:16
that was Trey Gowdy with, you never saw anything come out of the Benghazi hearing. So,

425
0:43:17 --> 0:43:24
you know, I don't want to see that happen here, but I'm afraid that so far all we have are hearings,

426
0:43:24 --> 0:43:29
right? And in the last two or three minutes, the, the, and I don't know what the arrangement was or

427
0:43:29 --> 0:43:34
the coordination, but it was in the last two or three minutes that Thomas Renz was allowed to speak,

428
0:43:34 --> 0:43:39
the attorney who at the time was the attorney for the three main whistleblowers, right?

429
0:43:40 --> 0:43:47
Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Teresa Long, Lieutenant Colonel Pete, Dr. Pete Chambers. And the reason

430
0:43:47 --> 0:43:51
I have to get off here at six o'clock is because I'm going to be interviewing the third whistleblower

431
0:43:51 --> 0:44:00
tonight, Major Dr. Sam Sigaloff, right? So just, he was given that little bit of time, you know,

432
0:44:00 --> 0:44:04
I mean, that should have been like a third of that, of that entire hearing. Now that's just

433
0:44:04 --> 0:44:11
Dr. Jane's opinion. And you know that that and 50 cents will get you a cup of coffee. But I just,

434
0:44:11 --> 0:44:17
I worry when I see things, why wasn't Dr. David Martin? You all heard him speak. He's got proof of

435
0:44:17 --> 0:44:21
so many things. It's very clear. He's got documentation that you wouldn't believe.

436
0:44:22 --> 0:44:28
And, and that should shut this whole thing down immediately, especially on our military. Why wasn't

437
0:44:28 --> 0:44:33
he at that table? Someone like him, it's not just about the women, but they're just saying there's a

438
0:44:33 --> 0:44:38
whole chunk of scientists left out, but including, you know, somebody like, you know, I'm shocked.

439
0:44:38 --> 0:44:42
Dr. Martin should have been at the head of that table, much less he wasn't even in the room.

440
0:44:42 --> 0:44:44
Why are certain people-

441
0:44:44 --> 0:44:49
I couldn't agree more. And we've got the same issue here. You may or may not be aware that

442
0:44:49 --> 0:44:53
we lodged a criminal complaint at the Metropolitan Police, which is the biggest police force in the

443
0:44:53 --> 0:44:59
UK. And the evidence that we submitted as a collective is absolutely vast, damning and

444
0:44:59 --> 0:45:05
irrefutable. And David Martin's evidence was submitted. The lawyer, Mr. Renz, his evidence

445
0:45:05 --> 0:45:11
was submitted, his videos, everything was submitted. Anybody who's in any way, shape or form got any

446
0:45:11 --> 0:45:16
kind of brain, looks at that evidence, sees the credibility of those witnesses and their expertise.

447
0:45:17 --> 0:45:22
It's nailed on that the 15 people who were named as responsible, criminally responsible and liable

448
0:45:22 --> 0:45:27
for the worst crimes ever committed in the history of mankind. The fact that they've turned around

449
0:45:27 --> 0:45:32
and said, no crimes are identified in itself is a crime, but don't worry, we're pursuing that.

450
0:45:32 --> 0:45:37
That's, that's not, we're not going away. We're like a wasp around a picnic table. We're annoying.

451
0:45:38 --> 0:45:42
So thank you for answering the question. It's nice to meet you and keep up the great work.

452
0:45:42 --> 0:45:47
Thank you so much. And yes, I've been following and glad to hear you're going to persist. Thank you.

453
0:45:48 --> 0:45:52
Well done, Mark. Okay. So we've got three more minutes because Stephen Frost, Jane, gets the

454
0:45:52 --> 0:45:58
last four minutes with you. So Leonard, commonly known Lenny. Charles, I just want to let you know,

455
0:45:58 --> 0:46:03
we've had a little, you know, modification. I do have an extra 15 minutes if you want me to stay

456
0:46:03 --> 0:46:09
longer. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, please. Excellent. Wonderful. Why not? Yep. All right. Thank you,

457
0:46:09 --> 0:46:15
Mark Leonard. Any. Hey, thanks, Charles and Dr. Ruby, long time fan, first time caller, so to speak.

458
0:46:17 --> 0:46:22
Great to have the opportunity to ask a question. So you touched on my original question earlier

459
0:46:22 --> 0:46:28
regarding the hotlots and the, from the research I've been doing with a group of docs, it's apparent

460
0:46:28 --> 0:46:36
that the estimation of only about 20% of the vaccines seem to be producing adverse events so

461
0:46:36 --> 0:46:44
far. Emphasis on the so far. So is there any science that you're aware of or any investigation

462
0:46:44 --> 0:46:51
on whether that is truly just because only about 20% appear to have the additional mechanisms or

463
0:46:51 --> 0:46:56
elements to produce the all of the horrendous effects we're seeing? Or is there some other

464
0:46:56 --> 0:47:03
mechanism that may be time delayed for lack of a better way to phrase it, that we could be

465
0:47:03 --> 0:47:11
seeing at a whole other level of effects coming, even though they may not have the same ingredients

466
0:47:11 --> 0:47:18
as the ones that produce the effects early on? Does that make sense? Yeah, absolutely. And thank

467
0:47:18 --> 0:47:23
you. Thank you for the kind words earlier. I just have to say, you know, it's, it sounds like I'm

468
0:47:23 --> 0:47:27
taking the easy way out, but you know what, there's no way to know. That's the short answer. The

469
0:47:27 --> 0:47:34
longer answer is this. And it goes back to my discussion about Congress, bring these companies

470
0:47:34 --> 0:47:41
in full disclosure or bust them up. You know, you've got the power to do that. They're the only ones

471
0:47:41 --> 0:47:49
that know what's in this stuff at any given day or time or lot number. And yet they are allowed to

472
0:47:49 --> 0:47:56
run rampant and let the rest of us struggle to try to answer those questions. What now we can put,

473
0:47:56 --> 0:48:01
we can piece pieces together, which is what we've done. We're cobbling this thing together.

474
0:48:02 --> 0:48:07
And there's enough there, I think, to be afraid to shut this thing down. There's a threshold for

475
0:48:07 --> 0:48:12
death. I mean, as we're way beyond it, but we don't have all the pieces. So it's very difficult

476
0:48:12 --> 0:48:17
to answer a question like Leonard's that is incredibly important. I want to give you just a

477
0:48:17 --> 0:48:21
little point of reference, right? A little comparator. When I first started in pharma,

478
0:48:21 --> 0:48:26
I was with a company that no longer exists called Forest Laboratories in New York City.

479
0:48:26 --> 0:48:33
And Forest Labs, I'm sure you know their history. They launched Selexa, the famous antidepressant.

480
0:48:33 --> 0:48:39
I came along shortly after that. My task was to develop and launch Lexapro, right? The lefty

481
0:48:39 --> 0:48:43
enantiomer of that molecule. But here's the point of the story. I had to learn everything about

482
0:48:43 --> 0:48:48
Selexa first. And one of the first things I learned was in the preclinical, which is animals

483
0:48:48 --> 0:48:54
and petri dishes, right? Clinical is human. In the preclinical, they run it through several

484
0:48:54 --> 0:49:00
species of animal, right? They start with the rats and they go a little bit higher. They go to dogs.

485
0:49:01 --> 0:49:09
Six beagle dogs had a heart attack and died. The FDA shut that company down for two years,

486
0:49:09 --> 0:49:12
said, go back and figure it out. Make sure it doesn't transfer to humans. You're not even

487
0:49:12 --> 0:49:17
going to get near phase one human trials until you figure that out. Turned out it was a genetic

488
0:49:17 --> 0:49:22
anomaly, not only specific to dogs, but only to beagle dogs, right? And they went on. The rest

489
0:49:22 --> 0:49:27
of this history, they made a billion dollars a year on Selexa and the rest was wonderful for them.

490
0:49:27 --> 0:49:32
But the point of my story is that kind of sensitivity to shut down, hey, shut down,

491
0:49:32 --> 0:49:36
go figure it out. You're not putting anything out in public until you figure that one out.

492
0:49:37 --> 0:49:44
We have, if the VAERS, the Harvard Pilgrim study is correct on any level, less than 1% of all vaccine

493
0:49:44 --> 0:49:50
related adverse events are captured into VAERS. I mean, come on, that's a 100 multiplier. So if

494
0:49:50 --> 0:49:56
there are 25,000 deaths in the United States in the VAERS system that they've allowed you to see,

495
0:49:56 --> 0:50:02
that's with the CDC criminal activity. I think the Harvard Pilgrim study was before that crime

496
0:50:03 --> 0:50:08
of manipulation of the numbers, or maybe it wasn't, who knows? But that's as much as 2.5

497
0:50:08 --> 0:50:16
million people are dead. What are we doing? How much more evidence do we need? Right? What more

498
0:50:16 --> 0:50:26
do we need? It's silent. It's very concerning. So. Thank you. Thank you, Leonard. Peter Hooger,

499
0:50:26 --> 0:50:33
Jane is a lawyer in UK, former police officer. Ah, nice combination.

500
0:50:35 --> 0:50:41
Thank you. Hi, Dr. Jane Ruby. Thank you so much for speaking to us. Yeah. All I can say is your

501
0:50:41 --> 0:50:47
talk wasn't a rant. It was a pep talk that many of us needed right now. And for that,

502
0:50:47 --> 0:50:51
I thank you from our hearts. Oh, well, thank you. You can thank Stephen. He,

503
0:50:52 --> 0:50:58
yeah, he does a lot of good work. He somehow, in spite of my rants in this thread we're on,

504
0:50:59 --> 0:51:03
he was kind enough to invite me in spite of all that. So I, you can thank him.

505
0:51:04 --> 0:51:10
Brilliant. Now, thank you so much. My question you've touched upon actually, if people like

506
0:51:10 --> 0:51:17
Rainer Völmich as a top barrister who took on Volkswagen Deutsche Bank, among others, can't get

507
0:51:17 --> 0:51:23
a voice as well as top doctors like yourselves, top scientists, Mark Sexton with the wonderful

508
0:51:23 --> 0:51:29
work he's done with the Metropolitan Police. You know, we are coming up against a brick wall

509
0:51:30 --> 0:51:36
in all the countries. And there's a lot of common denominators here, which feeds in obviously to the

510
0:51:36 --> 0:51:42
WEF and the one world government plans that they have. We all know this and we can't go down that

511
0:51:42 --> 0:51:48
rabbit hole tonight. But have you got any tips for the people here with all the different disciplines?

512
0:51:50 --> 0:51:54
What should we be doing? Should we just be chipping away, drilling little holes in the

513
0:51:54 --> 0:52:00
dam, hoping that it should burst? Last night, obviously, as Charles said, you know, information

514
0:52:00 --> 0:52:06
came out about the Biden family. And I looked at some of those emails earlier and yeah, they're

515
0:52:06 --> 0:52:12
shocking. But what will come of it? What tips have you got for us for getting this out there?

516
0:52:13 --> 0:52:19
You know, Peter, I, there's an old saying, if I had the answer to that, we'd all be billionaires

517
0:52:19 --> 0:52:25
and retired and, you know, sitting on an island somewhere sipping a cocktail. The point is, I don't

518
0:52:25 --> 0:52:32
mean to be flip, but the point is, there are so many layers to this. It's so complex. I once asked,

519
0:52:32 --> 0:52:39
I don't know if you are, any of you are familiar with Dr. Shiva Ayurverde. He's a very interesting

520
0:52:39 --> 0:52:45
guy. You should look up his talks and things like that. And he was on a Zoom that I was on once. And

521
0:52:45 --> 0:52:51
I asked him, what do you, how are, are we being attacked? Is it, I want to, I'm an analyst at heart,

522
0:52:51 --> 0:52:56
right? So I like to look upstream, upstream. What's at the top that's doing this thing?

523
0:52:56 --> 0:53:02
And he said, I don't think it's a top down. I think it's something called the swarm method.

524
0:53:02 --> 0:53:08
I think we're being approached. And this is something Peter, or David Martin gets into,

525
0:53:08 --> 0:53:13
he doesn't call it that, but he describes that this criminal conspiracy involves a lot of different

526
0:53:13 --> 0:53:20
people in a lot of different industries. Right. And I don't, that's a pretty incredible conspiracy

527
0:53:20 --> 0:53:25
and collaboration because it, they kind of, it's like the fire ants, you know, by themselves,

528
0:53:25 --> 0:53:29
they're nothing, but when they get together and they signal and they bite at once, they can really

529
0:53:29 --> 0:53:35
hurt you. And so it's very strange to me. I've asked General Michael Flynn this question. I've

530
0:53:35 --> 0:53:40
asked a lot of prominent people. What is your opinion on the lockstep nature of this? How do

531
0:53:40 --> 0:53:45
you get every country, every industry, every airline, right? Every, you go down to every,

532
0:53:45 --> 0:53:52
every, every, to pretty much all be doing the same thing. And I'll tell you why it, when it hit me

533
0:53:52 --> 0:53:57
early, it was almost like a tragedy opened a door for me early. And I'll make it really brief. In

534
0:53:57 --> 0:54:03
March of 2020, and you know, I'm trained medically. So I was doing all this antisepsis stuff, the

535
0:54:03 --> 0:54:09
gloves, I didn't go anywhere. I got, I got it. I got whatever this flu was. Right. And I was very

536
0:54:09 --> 0:54:13
sick for six weeks, but here's the point of the story. When my doctor called me of many years,

537
0:54:13 --> 0:54:18
that I had a great relationship with, and he said, Jane, you're positive. And I said, okay, all right.

538
0:54:18 --> 0:54:22
Whoa, whoa, whoa. We're not going to freak out. You're going to prescribe the hydroxychloroquine.

539
0:54:22 --> 0:54:27
Right. That's, that's all we knew at the time. And I said, and anything else, you know, you want me

540
0:54:27 --> 0:54:31
to take, you know, protect my lungs, whatever it is. And he said to me, I can't do that. And I said,

541
0:54:31 --> 0:54:36
you know, I'm a, I'm a prescriber myself. Right. So I'm thinking, I said, why? He said, you have to

542
0:54:36 --> 0:54:42
be in the ICU for me to give you that I HCQ. I said, well, why would you wait till I was that sick?

543
0:54:42 --> 0:54:49
And you know, something he, his next words, Peter, to me changed everything in that moment.

544
0:54:50 --> 0:54:53
I knew the world had changed. And I'll tell you what he said to me,

545
0:54:54 --> 0:54:58
Jane, you're going to have to tough this one out. And he hung up on me.

546
0:54:59 --> 0:54:59
Whoa.

547
0:54:59 --> 0:55:03
Something when I, when I started to feel better, whoa, that's not the same person.

548
0:55:03 --> 0:55:07
When I started to feel better, I started to look, I lived in Virginia and I looked at,

549
0:55:07 --> 0:55:12
why is he doing this? I looked at the state department of health. There was an edict by

550
0:55:12 --> 0:55:19
the governor who was a communist, but we won't talk about that right now. And he prohibited

551
0:55:19 --> 0:55:23
physicians and nurse practitioners from prescribing hydroxychloroquine. I'm thinking, what does he care?

552
0:55:24 --> 0:55:30
Then I started to get nosy and I started to look at other states and I saw that not only were other

553
0:55:30 --> 0:55:35
states doing it, but they were using the same language. Somebody was coordinating them.

554
0:55:35 --> 0:55:42
And that's when I almost lost it. Cause I thought, Oh my God, something very bad is happening in the

555
0:55:42 --> 0:55:49
world. But for me, it gave me the antenna really early, right? Many people, many months to go,

556
0:55:49 --> 0:55:54
whoa, wait a minute, something strange here, too much coordination. So that's where I think we have

557
0:55:54 --> 0:56:00
to focus. I don't think we can look to any, to be honest with you, I love to beat up my elected

558
0:56:00 --> 0:56:05
officials because that's what Americans should be doing. That's what we do. It's what we're known for,

559
0:56:06 --> 0:56:10
but you're not going to go anywhere with it, right? It's really going to be we, the people.

560
0:56:10 --> 0:56:14
And we, the people is about leaders like yourselves, educating people constantly,

561
0:56:14 --> 0:56:19
being consistent, teaching people, keeping it simple. Don't use the word vaccine. Stop calling

562
0:56:19 --> 0:56:24
it a vaccination. Tell people, you know, imagine if I said to a mother of a five-year-old, you're

563
0:56:24 --> 0:56:28
going to take your kid in to get that vaccine. And she's going to look at me and go, yeah, you're damn

564
0:56:28 --> 0:56:34
right. I am. I want to protect my kid. But if I say to her, you're going to take your child in

565
0:56:34 --> 0:56:39
to get injected with a bio weapon that was developed in silico on a computer that to make

566
0:56:39 --> 0:56:45
your child a perpetual spike protein factory. You know, she might tell me I'm an a-hole and,

567
0:56:45 --> 0:56:49
you know, walk away from me, but she's also going to walk away and think I better look into that.

568
0:56:50 --> 0:56:54
Yeah. Right. It's a bio weapon. What does she mean by that? What a nut, but I'm going to go look it

569
0:56:54 --> 0:57:01
up. You're not going to go look it up if you keep calling it a vaccine. Yeah. Thank you, doctor.

570
0:57:02 --> 0:57:06
You're my pleasure. Thank you, Peter. Excellent question. Dan, we've got you now.

571
0:57:09 --> 0:57:21
You're muted, Dan. Yes, you're muted. I hate doing that. I think you're muted.

572
0:57:21 --> 0:57:26
Thanks. Might be a ventriloquist or something. I just want to say thanks a lot for everything

573
0:57:26 --> 0:57:31
you're doing, Dr. Ruby, and you and Dr. McCall, Dr. Malone, Dr. Cole, all the leaders that are

574
0:57:31 --> 0:57:37
out there giving us the courage to step forward locally. I agree with your plan there. You've got

575
0:57:37 --> 0:57:41
to start locally and the courage here is contagious in the local area where I am.

576
0:57:42 --> 0:57:49
Leading on you experts and leaders in the field, give us that confidence, build the support locally,

577
0:57:49 --> 0:57:55
and I think we can create a wave. My question for you is once we create the wave of knowledge,

578
0:57:55 --> 0:57:58
that's what I'm trying to do on my own is create a wave of knowledge about how the vaccines work

579
0:57:58 --> 0:58:05
and what injuries they cause. I think we can build a huge, we can force the elected officials

580
0:58:06 --> 0:58:12
to deal with us and deal with the information at some point in time, but I don't ever see, like an

581
0:58:12 --> 0:58:20
earlier questioner was commenting, a congressional hearing never goes anywhere. Where do you experts

582
0:58:20 --> 0:58:26
see us taking this criminal conspiracy in the future so that there are charges and indictments

583
0:58:26 --> 0:58:29
that take place? It's very frustrating. We're all very frustrated here in the United States,

584
0:58:29 --> 0:58:34
seeing these hearings over and over again and nothing. What do you see happening as the

585
0:58:34 --> 0:58:38
eventuality here and how can we take care of this to prevent it from ever happening again?

586
0:58:39 --> 0:58:47
Yeah, it's a wonderful question. I wish I had more substance with which to answer it. It's kind of a

587
0:58:47 --> 0:58:52
crystal ball question, but I do have faith in people. And somebody, a very young person in my

588
0:58:52 --> 0:59:00
midst, in my family, reminded me a few months ago that in the Revolutionary War in America,

589
0:59:01 --> 0:59:07
there were only about 15, 17% of the people that were actually pulling off the revolution.

590
0:59:07 --> 0:59:13
You don't have to get everybody, but the thing that concerns me is that these shots have an agenda.

591
0:59:13 --> 0:59:18
And I don't even think we've hit the tip of the iceberg. I think there are going to be mental

592
0:59:18 --> 0:59:23
issues. I think it's going to end up overwhelming the rest of us who didn't take these shots with

593
0:59:23 --> 0:59:28
illness and deviations and piling on and things like that. And it's going to get very confusing

594
0:59:28 --> 0:59:35
for people. So I think the earlier we can educate people and inform them, the ones that are open to

595
0:59:35 --> 0:59:40
listening and edifying them, and sometimes you have to do it over and over again, I think the sooner

596
0:59:40 --> 0:59:45
we'll have at least our 15 to 17%. I mean, we probably already do, but what my fear is that

597
0:59:45 --> 0:59:51
it's not just the King of England we're trying to overthrow. This is a lot of unknown enemies

598
0:59:51 --> 0:59:58
and it's a lot of an agenda that is so sinister and so dangerous. And so, what's the word,

599
0:59:59 --> 1:00:06
it's like tentacles in terms of, like look at our military. I mean, just to see the number of deaths

600
1:00:06 --> 1:00:12
and disability with this latest explosion from the military database, which is from what I understand,

601
1:00:12 --> 1:00:19
pristine compared to theirs. You can only input it if you're a military physician and

602
1:00:19 --> 1:00:26
military physicians maintain it. There's enough death and destruction in there, right? To cause

603
1:00:26 --> 1:00:32
high ranking officers to risk their lives. Don't think they're not afraid for their lives,

604
1:00:32 --> 1:00:36
but to come out and say, people are dying every day. You have 20 and 30 year olds that are dropping

605
1:00:36 --> 1:00:41
dead of heart attacks and strokes. I mean, what are we doing? And yet we don't have anybody in

606
1:00:41 --> 1:00:46
Congress. We have nobody in any kind of law enforcement. So what will it take? I want to

607
1:00:46 --> 1:00:51
get back to your answer. I'm just going to fall back on Dr. David Martin, who said, all I need is

608
1:00:51 --> 1:00:56
one prosecutor somewhere. And we do have some judges that haven't been bought and paid for,

609
1:00:57 --> 1:01:02
even at the federal level, and they have been issuing injunctions and things like that. So we

610
1:01:02 --> 1:01:11
need to build on it. I don't know beyond that. I just am really amazed at how lockstep this thing

611
1:01:11 --> 1:01:17
is, how this has been allowed to go so far so quickly. It really concerns me.

612
1:01:18 --> 1:01:23
And I think getting things organized like you guys are doing here with doctors for COVID ethics is

613
1:01:23 --> 1:01:28
very important, you know, especially in the local, getting people together, that there are things we

614
1:01:28 --> 1:01:32
can accomplish together. I can tell you this, me and some colleagues have been out in front of our

615
1:01:32 --> 1:01:36
hospital or nearby at a busier intersection out demonstrating against the vaccine mandates. And

616
1:01:36 --> 1:01:44
it's, it's incredible. Yeah, stop calling them vaccines. Start calling them bio weapons.

617
1:01:44 --> 1:01:52
The bio weapons. Yes. It's hard to do, but once you get it, believe me, it's very contagious,

618
1:01:52 --> 1:01:57
and it teaches people a lot. And it very much concerns me that frontline doctors that are famous

619
1:01:57 --> 1:02:02
now continue to call it that. It concerns me and it raises my antenna because I've mentioned it to

620
1:02:02 --> 1:02:08
some of them over and over again, and yet they still do it. Just saying. I totally agree. Words

621
1:02:08 --> 1:02:15
matter. Very powerful. Thank you, Dan. And indeed, language drives behavior. Now,

622
1:02:16 --> 1:02:20
Jane, next question is Stephen. Stephen, before we go to any other question, because I'm,

623
1:02:20 --> 1:02:25
I want to make sure you get your questions in as the organizer of this group, Jane.

624
1:02:27 --> 1:02:35
Stephen's the guru or the initiator. Go, Stephen. Understood. First of all, Jane, so sorry for

625
1:02:35 --> 1:02:41
missing the beginning. I might as well be honest. I lay on the bed about two hours before this

626
1:02:42 --> 1:02:49
meeting, having been up too much the night before and previous nights. And I fell asleep and missed

627
1:02:49 --> 1:02:56
the beginning completely. So I'm so sorry. I just wanted to ask you, I agree with you about

628
1:02:56 --> 1:03:05
using the word vaccine. Even I fall for that. But I correct myself sometimes.

629
1:03:07 --> 1:03:12
I just wondered whether you've got any contacts in Hollywood or elsewhere,

630
1:03:12 --> 1:03:18
Egypt politics, media, military, police, who you could put us in contact with.

631
1:03:20 --> 1:03:25
And also, I'm particularly interested in you mentioned Trey Gowdy. There was another guy

632
1:03:25 --> 1:03:32
used to work with him. Jason Chaffetz. Do you remember him? I used to watch both of them on

633
1:03:33 --> 1:03:40
YouTube for hours, especially Trey Gowdy. He's one of the most successful prosecutors the United

634
1:03:40 --> 1:03:46
States has ever had. He hasn't lost a case, I believe. Unfortunately, he didn't try the

635
1:03:46 --> 1:03:51
Benghazi case. I said, unfortunately, he didn't do anything with the Benghazi case. Sure. Yeah.

636
1:03:51 --> 1:03:58
So but but someone like him, what do you know what his position is? Because if you could get

637
1:03:58 --> 1:04:06
him on board, that might make the difference because he is a prosecutor. No, no. He has a very

638
1:04:06 --> 1:04:11
cushy contract with Fox News. He's not going anywhere. And the same with Jason Chaffetz. I

639
1:04:11 --> 1:04:16
lost my respect for him because he left in the middle of a term. You know, many people would love

640
1:04:16 --> 1:04:21
to be a United States senator or congressperson. So when you get elected by the people, that's a

641
1:04:21 --> 1:04:25
very powerful thing. And I mean, I'm assuming everywhere, but in the United States, that's the

642
1:04:25 --> 1:04:31
magic, okay, the power of the people. So when I take it very seriously, when someone leaves in the

643
1:04:31 --> 1:04:37
middle of their term to take a seven or eight figure contract job, and that and Jason Chaffetz

644
1:04:37 --> 1:04:41
did that as well with Fox News. So you have to understand, I said before, and maybe you missed

645
1:04:41 --> 1:04:48
it, maybe you weren't here yet, I hold my elected officials in very, very high at very high standards.

646
1:04:48 --> 1:04:52
And I should be because they've they've asked to represent us. And that's an incredible, powerful

647
1:04:52 --> 1:04:59
honor in my country. So to me, call me crazy. But I don't think they'll do anything. I think they

648
1:04:59 --> 1:05:06
would have done it by now. And if someone had a case like Benghazi, Trey Gowdy oversaw the Benghazi

649
1:05:06 --> 1:05:10
hearings the whole time, like over a year or two. Did you ever see an indictment or anything come

650
1:05:10 --> 1:05:14
out of that? I mean, that was like taking candy from a baby, to be honest with you, as cases go.

651
1:05:15 --> 1:05:22
So no, I don't expect people like him to do anything. I think they're pretty much incentivized

652
1:05:22 --> 1:05:30
to just go along. But hang on a minute. These crimes, the worst crimes ever committed, in my opinion,

653
1:05:31 --> 1:05:37
they involve everybody, including Jason Chaffetz's family and Trey Gowdy's family,

654
1:05:38 --> 1:05:45
that themselves, except that, except that Congress and their families are exempt from taking those

655
1:05:45 --> 1:05:52
shots. Makes a difference, doesn't it? Yeah, plus their staff, is that right?

656
1:05:53 --> 1:05:58
I've heard the staff, I've heard the staff heard the staff of the White House, the current staff.

657
1:05:58 --> 1:06:06
I've heard that that can that can if that is, if that's true, that's a really key fact in the

658
1:06:06 --> 1:06:11
United States, isn't it? It's one thing that someone like you can use over and over again.

659
1:06:12 --> 1:06:22
So I think that we've got to be really creative in the techniques we use and we have to be creative

660
1:06:22 --> 1:06:32
in how we use words and how we use angles as well. But what I'm really afraid of is that they are now

661
1:06:32 --> 1:06:40
stopping these measures which were never medically justified. And I think the politicians are hoping

662
1:06:40 --> 1:06:47
that we won't remember, we want to forget the past two years, and that we will forget. And I'm

663
1:06:47 --> 1:06:54
determined that we hold them to account. And David Martin, I absolutely agree with you, he's one of

664
1:06:55 --> 1:07:02
the best people on our side. And if I had to choose one person as the leader, it would probably be him.

665
1:07:04 --> 1:07:12
Me too. And Craig Pardecuper, he is a genius. And we need to get behind him too.

666
1:07:14 --> 1:07:20
Whether he's right about everything. I was gonna say great. Yeah, absolutely great work. You're

667
1:07:20 --> 1:07:25
right. He's working so fast. And whether we agree with everything, but the work he's done has been

668
1:07:25 --> 1:07:30
groundbreaking. That Team Enigma work is, I was the first to say it, I think you missed it,

669
1:07:30 --> 1:07:37
because it was in the earlier part of either my comments or an answer to someone. But I'm Team

670
1:07:37 --> 1:07:43
Enigma all the way. And in fact, I have someone from the team on my show probably every other week,

671
1:07:43 --> 1:07:48
because they're always breaking something new from Craig's work. Exactly. So can I just ask you,

672
1:07:49 --> 1:07:54
what do you think is our best line of attack? Should we concentrate on deaths? Because when I

673
1:07:54 --> 1:07:59
actually ask people about the number of deaths, they've got absolutely no idea. And even people

674
1:07:59 --> 1:08:05
on our side have no idea. They're not good with figures or whatever. But I know that the deaths

675
1:08:05 --> 1:08:14
in the UK, the US and the EU, that's a population of approximately 850 million.

676
1:08:14 --> 1:08:24
There's 70,000 at the moment, round about 70,000, probably over. I haven't done the latest figures.

677
1:08:24 --> 1:08:29
I've been keeping, I published these figures in July of last year. I was told that they didn't

678
1:08:29 --> 1:08:35
matter. And indeed, that I shouldn't publish them as a doctor. And I still think that that's the

679
1:08:35 --> 1:08:41
most important thing to get out there. And I think using the figure of the underreporting factor of

680
1:08:41 --> 1:08:48
six, you still come to a figure of 420,000. That's Jessica Rose's figure, by the way,

681
1:08:48 --> 1:08:56
six is the under, Steve Coors says 40. And then you've got 2,400,000, sorry, 2,800,000 deaths.

682
1:08:56 --> 1:09:00
And with 100, which you were talking about, because there was a paper, if you remember,

683
1:09:00 --> 1:09:06
which said 10 to 100. I think it was talking about theirs. But interestingly, the US figures

684
1:09:06 --> 1:09:12
are right in the middle. So the UK are they're hiding deaths, in my opinion. So if you compare

685
1:09:12 --> 1:09:19
the UK figures per population to the EU's figures, then they're about the UK figures are about a

686
1:09:19 --> 1:09:24
third of what they should be compared to the United States, they're about half. So in other words,

687
1:09:24 --> 1:09:32
the US is two, twice as many deaths as you'd, sorry, twice as many deaths as you'd expect looking at

688
1:09:32 --> 1:09:41
the UK figures, sorry, the EU is three times as many. So anyway, the point is that if it's 100

689
1:09:41 --> 1:09:48
times the underreporting factor, we're talking about 7 million deaths. And then if you've got

690
1:09:48 --> 1:09:53
just that for the whole world, you know, you could say twice as many for the whole world,

691
1:09:53 --> 1:09:58
because obviously, the coverage is not as great around the world. But say twice, you're left with

692
1:09:58 --> 1:10:04
a huge figure, if you say four times, then you've got in the case of the six times you've got

693
1:10:06 --> 1:10:13
you've got 420,000 times four, so you're talking about 1,680,000. And that's the lowest. And if

694
1:10:13 --> 1:10:20
it's 100 times, we're talking about 28 million. So that's the kind of figure that grabs people's

695
1:10:20 --> 1:10:26
attention. Because we're talking in terms, you know, in the same order as 6 million, which is

696
1:10:26 --> 1:10:32
what the Nazi Holocaust was. And, and this is worse than the Nazi Holocaust, in my opinion,

697
1:10:32 --> 1:10:39
it's global. And I don't know, you know, if those figures, they really speak to me, but I don't,

698
1:10:39 --> 1:10:45
I can't get people to maybe they don't want to understand them, especially medical doctors.

699
1:10:46 --> 1:10:50
And I just wonder what you think, how can we use those figures, because I can supply those

700
1:10:50 --> 1:10:57
figures to you if you like. I know there's been a lot of work that has gone into developing those.

701
1:10:57 --> 1:11:01
And I know several of the folks that you mentioned that helped put those together.

702
1:11:01 --> 1:11:07
You know, my comment is I take a Mac, I step back and take a more macro view and say, look,

703
1:11:08 --> 1:11:17
how much of a threshold do you need? 1000 deaths, 10 million deaths. I mean, there's no threshold

704
1:11:17 --> 1:11:24
that seems to get anybody's attention. I agree. Not even not even the masses. So to not end on doom

705
1:11:24 --> 1:11:31
and gloom, I would say that we're not going to get relief from our leaders, we're going to have

706
1:11:31 --> 1:11:37
to find those pockets of judges, we're going to have to really teach people as they start to see.

707
1:11:38 --> 1:11:42
I agree with Edward Dowd said something recently, if you've heard a lot of his work with the

708
1:11:42 --> 1:11:48
insurance companies, he said something really profound. He said, people are going to find out

709
1:11:48 --> 1:11:53
and see what we've been trying to tell them, large, large masses of them. And when they do,

710
1:11:53 --> 1:11:57
there's going to be a groundswell, and they're going to be pissed off. And there's going to be

711
1:11:57 --> 1:12:02
a lot, there's going to be a tipping point. And I'm hoping that he's right. And I'm hoping that

712
1:12:02 --> 1:12:09
that tipping point becomes where we start to have parallel. I don't want to call it a tribunal. I

713
1:12:09 --> 1:12:14
mean, I don't want to get overly dramatic, but we are going to need citizen. I mean, we're going to

714
1:12:14 --> 1:12:19
have to replicate what we cannot get from our systems, right? What else do we have? What choice

715
1:12:19 --> 1:12:24
do we have? Those of us who have not gone along with this and have not taken them or have taken

716
1:12:24 --> 1:12:29
them and realized, hey, this is part of a bigger plan. I'm not going there anymore. You know, that

717
1:12:29 --> 1:12:36
that army of us is is really what we're going to need, but we're going to need to do something.

718
1:12:36 --> 1:12:40
And if we don't have it, we have to start creating it. I think that'll happen. But again,

719
1:12:43 --> 1:12:46
a previous question, we're going to have to start where we are. And I think we should start pretty

720
1:12:46 --> 1:12:52
quickly, because I'd rather have some systems, parallel systems begun, you know, working out

721
1:12:52 --> 1:12:58
some kinks, and not need them later on, than to do the opposite and be caught without anything at all.

722
1:12:59 --> 1:13:02
Because I think they are going to try to over when I say they I don't even know who that is.

723
1:13:03 --> 1:13:07
But because I keep saying, I don't know what's at the top of this food chain. But I can tell you,

724
1:13:07 --> 1:13:14
when you get the entire US military leadership to force this on our people who are dying in front of

725
1:13:14 --> 1:13:21
them every day, something's very wrong. Something or someone is in charge. I don't even know how we

726
1:13:21 --> 1:13:29
grapple it, because we don't even know what and what comprises it. Exactly. What about some so I

727
1:13:29 --> 1:13:34
mentioned Hollywood, you don't know anybody that no, no, I do have to cut, I do have to cut out,

728
1:13:34 --> 1:13:41
I apologize, Steven. But I don't know I don't know anyone in Hollywood, I would, I would not

729
1:13:41 --> 1:13:45
want to know anyone in Hollywood right now, to be honest with you. So I'm the wrong person to ask.

730
1:13:46 --> 1:13:51
You know, they've done a lot to perpetuate a lot of problems in our country. They're sort of a

731
1:13:51 --> 1:13:56
sub. So Jane, before you go on a share with everybody, and Jane, this is relevant to what

732
1:13:56 --> 1:14:02
you've been talking about this wonderful picture that came across my desk yesterday. Can everybody

733
1:14:02 --> 1:14:12
see that? So it's a monopoly, monopoly board with the people underneath. If the people stand,

734
1:14:12 --> 1:14:17
the game is over. Oh, I love that. I love that. Send that over Charles.

735
1:14:19 --> 1:14:25
So Jane, thank you so much for being with us. We understand the time frame. And thank you for

736
1:14:25 --> 1:14:29
giving us this time, Steven. Well done for organizing Jane to be with us, everybody.

737
1:14:29 --> 1:14:34
Jane, when is your show on? So we will the stupidest show we all know about and your

738
1:14:34 --> 1:14:39
show started when and what time is it on? Thank you. Thank you. It's on the Stu Peters

739
1:14:39 --> 1:14:45
network. You can look go to red voice media, red, the color red voice media or Stu Peters.tv.

740
1:14:45 --> 1:14:50
It'll all take you there. It's every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, I follow Stu right after

741
1:14:50 --> 1:14:55
his show, which is a great, great thing. People just stay with me. And I do a live show on

742
1:14:55 --> 1:15:01
brighton TV with Mike Adams, the health ranger live every Monday night. So thank you so much.

743
1:15:01 --> 1:15:06
And Steven, thank you for inviting me and thinking of all this. And Charles, you've been a great

744
1:15:06 --> 1:15:13
moderator. Thank you. It's a pleasure. So Jane, the reason I asked you was because you made

745
1:15:14 --> 1:15:21
ranted. I thought we need some spirit like that. Yeah, I rabble roused in there. I probably didn't

746
1:15:21 --> 1:15:26
make any new friends. Steven is a new one. But you know, thank you for having me guys. It's been fun.

747
1:15:27 --> 1:15:32
Everybody, stay strong. Thank you so much. Don't call it a vaccine. Yes.