So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International and today's meeting.
It's now the 19th of October in the UK and the 20th of October in Melbourne, Australia.
This group was founded over four years ago by Stephen Frost, a British trained medical
doctor with a passion for truth. As a seasoned whistleblower and activist, Stephen founded
this group to champion truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health in the face of global challenges.
At this time, we remember Rainer Fullmich, German US lawyer in jail following a show
trial by the German government. We call on his immediate release. We remember Arnaud
Van Kessel, a Belgian lawyer fighting for his clients who's also in jail in the Netherlands
following political interference. And we also remember Buttonheart, a bear that is fighting
for freeing children forever from child trafficking for sex and slavery. I'm Charles Kerbis, your
moderator and Australasian passion provocateur. I wear my red jacket because red is the colour
of passion. So you've got to be passionate here and our speaker today, Jerry Brady, is certainly
passionate. I spent 20 years as a lawyer. I shifted gears 32 years ago to become a professional
speaker. For the past 14 years, I've guided parents and lawyers in addressing vaccine
injuries and medical failures. Medical failures are now the number one cause of death in the
United States ahead of heart attacks and cancer, according to the research of John Rappapour.
I'm also chief executive of an industrial hemp company. An industrial hemp is going to play a
crucial role in preserving humanity for the future. This group is a blend of voices from
all sorts of professions and from all around the world. Many of us once viewed vaccines as benign,
now many wear the badge of passionate anti-vaxxers.
We're in the thick of a global struggle we call it World War III and medical and scientific battles
among 12 battlefronts. Another one is the financial battlefront and the health battlefront. And so
there are 12 battlefronts. Another one is the spiritual battlefront.
We're five and a half years into this fight with more to come. So there's no room to be tired.
We've got another two, three years of solid work ahead of us everybody. So be up for it. Stay strong,
stay healthy. Science we know is never done. It thrives on challenge and inquiry. Some here
believe in viruses, others see them as fiction and many are still exploring. All views fuel our
dialogue. And it's wonderful having the globalists cause us to have debates around viruses that you
can hardly see. And in the meantime, so we end up arguing with each other instead of uniting
against the globalists. It's a fantastic distraction. It's very good. We'll hear from our guest
presenter Dr Jerry Brady today. This is the third time that he will be speaking to us.
And then that'll be followed by a Q&A. Per tradition Stephen Frost will open the questioning for the
first 15 minutes. This is a free speech haven appropriately moderated to keep ideas flowing.
Free speech is our weapon to safeguard human liberties. If something offends you, oh no,
we don't buy into the offence industry or the triggering industry. Those are steps to silence
truth. However, we choose love over fear. Fear binds and sickens and depresses. Love liberates,
heals, inspires. These twice weekly gatherings are far from mere talk. They have birthed many
real world actions and alliances. A key tactic in our fight is exposing medical crimes on social
media, rallying behind the demand crafted by John Rappaport that we've adopted of medical truth now.
Jerry Brady does a lot of work on fighting for medical truth now. This call can unite humanity
in a search for accountability. So we're thrilled again to welcome Jerry Brady. Jerry, we value your
insights. Thank you Stephen for founding this group. And before you get going, I will
give a short intro about you and your nefarious behaviours. No, not nefarious, outrageous
behaviours. No, not outrageous. Here's Jerry. And Jerry's going to be talking to us about,
he'll tell you what he's talking about, a number of topics that were in the invitation to you. But
Jerry is a retired Doctor of Medicine from the University of Queensland, 30 years,
patient focused clinical experience, is the founder of COVID under question cross-party
inquiry by members of the Australian Senate and Federal Parliament in 2022, is the founder of your
COVID daily newspaper, cmnnews.substack.com. Jerry, put that in the chat please. He's also the founder
of Boom Finance and Economics. That was in 2015 and COVID daily newspaper was founded in 2021.
He put that, Jerry will put that sub stack in as well. He's the co-founder of Biopharmaceutical
Research and Development Company in 1990, is the co-founder of Internet Mapping Company in 2000,
is the first to map the internet IP addresses to a geographic location. And his publications are the
COVID daily newspaper, Boom newspaper, the Boom blog, and his special interests are risk assessment,
critical thinking, ethics, decision making, global macroeconomics, global geopolitics,
the future monetary systems, global finance, high tech, currencies, investment, financial markets,
artificial intelligence. And I'm deeply depressed that there's no reference there to
helping you to improve your sex life. So Jerry, I think you need another area of activity.
Over to you. Thank you for joining us. You can share your screen whenever you wish.
Thanks, Charles. Sorry, I just thought I was muted, but I'm okay. I will share my screen
right from the get go. We've got quite a bit to cover today and I would like people to concentrate
on what I'm saying, make some notes as we go so you could ask questions afterwards.
So I'll share the screen now. I hope this all works properly.
Yep, it's coming up now. Slowly coming in. You got it. Yep, you can see that.
Okay, can you see that the great resist? Yep. Is the great resist on the screen, Charles?
Yes, it is. Good. Yeah. Okay, so I'll just have to move.
How do I move this zoom thing? I'll put it down the bottom here somewhere. Okay.
Yeah, I've got it set up now. Just to introduce myself, Charles has done that.
I've done a lot of things in my life. They're all contribute to me understanding what's going
on in the world today. Suffice to say that I waited 15 years for the SARS-CoV-2
epidemic to turn up. I was expecting it for that long. So it was no surprise to me
when it started in 2020. Now, I won't go into why I knew that, but I did know it and nothing has
surprised me since 2020. Everything has happened as I expected and is still happening as I expected.
I've spoken a lot in the last four years, five years, four to five years, to many, many community
groups about what's going on. In the early days, I had to talk to people and explain
what might come, what might happen. Slowly but surely, we've transitioned now to what is happening.
In fact, today, I'll be talking about what has happened. So a lot of the facts I present today
are now in the past. That then begs a consideration about what the future is going to be.
So I'll get started. Firstly, the first thing I've got on the screen is CNN News. It's the latest
edition of CNN News. I think it's the second-latest one. But I particularly like this cartoon here.
They will own nobody and they will be unhappy. I think this is a wonderful twist
to their plans. So that's on one of my CNN News substacks and I encourage you all to read
cmnnews.substack.com. I publish it usually once or twice a week. The archive contains thousands of
articles concerning health and the COVID phenomenon, and many, many other subjects as well.
I'll switch over to my other substack, which is Boom Finance and Economics.
You should see that on your screen now. And this is the archive of Boom Finance and Economics.
Again, there's many, many. I write an editorial every Sunday. It's published on Sunday morning,
our time in Australia. So it depends upon where you are in the world that you receive an email
you receive an email if you're a subscriber. The readership for this is not the general public.
The readership is very much aimed at the top level of economics and finance. And I have a lot of
readers from the central bankers of the world and their chief economists and their deputy chief
economists. So that's what I set out to do when I started this to achieve that audience. I have done
zero marketing. So they market this between themselves. And I've been surprised at my
readership list. It's quite extraordinary. And I think I do have some sort of impact on the world
of finance and economics now on a weekly basis. Now, today, we're going to just start by looking
at the latest edition of Boom, which is this one here. I'll switch to it now. And I'm particularly
proud of this edition of Boom this week. I think it covers a lot of things that are very, very
important. So we're going to go through a lot of that firstly today. And then I'll branch off into
some other subjects. The first thing I've got up here is the military strategy that works every time.
It's referring to the photograph, the healing ship, which is China's peace arc. And I've got below
that, please tell Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth, if they want a really effective military strategy,
they should copy China in the peace arc. In fact, I would suggest that they have dozens of peace
arcs traveling the world, giving free health care to poverty stricken places. And that would be
very effective strategy rather than threatening people with military action. I'll talk more about
that later. Let's move down. The first thing we're going to talk about is the disability
phenomenon surging in the United States. We've now got 36 million people in the United States,
the American population, who are now disabled. This is the number that's registered by the US
Bureau of Labor Statistics. You can see that in the bottom of the chart there. And this is
published by FRED, which is the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. So it's a very reliable source.
And you can see what's happening here. We have the disability growing in a straight uptrend
from 2021 onwards. Now on this chart, you can see the time span is 2015 to 2025. We've got a 10 year
time span here. So five years before COVID turned up, the COVID phenomenon, we have pretty much a
straight line. It's not really going anywhere. Disability numbers are going up and down. But
come 2021, and it just starts climbing and goes up. And it's going up in a pretty steady trend.
It's now up 20% since the beginning of this uptrend. That's a huge increase in five years.
That's based on a whole population basis. But if we look at the working age men and women,
it gets more concerning because working age men and women should be healthy, relatively healthy.
So if you start looking at the working age population, it becomes very concerning because,
as I say, this should be healthy people. But what do we see? We see the same sort of phenomenon.
Here are the years preceding. This flat curve going on for all these years of women disabled
in the civilian workforce. And then it just rockets off after 2021. And it's now up 63%
since 2021. This is very, very disturbing. Then we can look at the men. Well, the men are the same.
We've got the same pattern. But it's up only 46% since 2021. I did a big zoom call on Saturday
with a big church group around the world. And they asked me, why is there a difference between
men and women? It's a very complex question. We can deal with it later if anybody wants to know.
But women are clearly affected more than men in terms of getting disabled. There's little doubt
about that. And the trends don't appear to be weakening. In fact, you can see that last
arrow I put on the men's workforce trend seems almost like it's accelerating at the moment.
So from a financial viewpoint, the first thing I think of is, well, what's going on in the
insurance industry? Because most of these people in America are receiving private insurance benefits
when they're disabled. A certain percentage are getting public social security support,
but most of them are actually on private insurance. It comes with their employment contract.
So you start looking at the insurance industry and wonder what's going on there. Well,
this chart here is called the index of the insurance industry on NASDAQ, which is one of
these stock markets in America. And this is 12 months of data. And you can see the insurance
industry shares are simply going sideways to down, and then they just fall off a shelf at the end
here. So there's something terribly wrong in the insurance industry. Because during this period,
the American stock markets have been rising very, very strongly in one of the strongest bull markets
ever. So there's something terribly wrong with the insurance industry. Now, that is not the whole
insurance industry. It's actually the health aspect of insurance and the disability aspect.
We'll see that in a minute. This is another general index of insurance industry companies on the
S&P 500. And it's just the same pattern is going away and then starting to collapse at the end.
Now, we can look at specific companies that deal with the disability sector.
And this company called Yunom Group, UNUM, is the biggest disability insurer in the United States.
This is its last 12 months of shared price action. And you can see it's literally going nowhere. It's
the same pattern as the indexes. This is the second largest disability insurer. It's called
Prudential Financial. And you can see the downtrend over the last 12 months, which is accelerating.
Then there's this one called Aflac, again, going nowhere. These are not participating in the bull
market in the United States stocks. Then we can look at the general health insurance market.
The general health insurance market is led by United Health Group. This is the biggest
health insurer on the planet. It's got a 16.73%. You can see that there
of the market. And it's, can you hear me now, Charles?
Yes. Yeah, just a little bit of things.
Yep. Okay. I'm hanging off. Okay. I'm hanging off my phone. It said that my
internet just lagged a bit. So this is the largest company in the health insurance sector
in America. That's the last 12 months of their shares. Now, their shares are very, very concerning.
They have actually collapsed. The share price here in April of this year was $600. It's now
collapsed all the way down to $250. It's made a little rally lately, but looks a bit like it's
rolling over again. This is a terrible outcome in a bull market. Something is terribly wrong
with that company. I can tell you. This is the five year chart for that company. And you can see
it's participating in the bull market to some degree initially, and then it goes sideways.
And then you can see the collapse of 2025. There's something terribly wrong in the insurance market.
There's no doubt about it. And it's mainly in the health insurance market.
This is Elevance Health, another company. It's the second largest health insurer.
And we're looking at exactly the same pattern. A rise followed by collapse. The next one is
Centine Corporation. It's the third largest health insurer in the United States. And you can see the
pattern over the last five years. It's just fallen off a cliff in 2025. And it looks very concerning.
There's something terribly wrong going on here. The investors have voted. They voted with their
feet. They're leaving. The next largest company in the United States in health insurance is called
Humana. Humana, you're looking at exactly the same pattern of investor disinterest. The investors
have waken up and they're leaving town. This could be very concerning ultimately,
because if it continues, these companies will struggle to raise capital if they need capital.
So these are very alarming share price charts during a bull market.
Now, just to show you the bull market, this is the S&P 500 index in the United States.
And you can see the exact opposite pattern for the whole market. The market as a whole
has been going up since late 2022. And that's exactly when Boom Finance told people
I announced in Boom in 2022 that the peak of CPI inflation was behind us. This is what's happened.
And it's just a very strong uptrend. This collapse here early this year is the Trump tariff war,
which has reversed and is just accelerating rapidly away from that event.
It's the exact opposite of what's happening in the health insurance and disability insurance market.
Now, what else is happening in America? Well, apart from getting sick and disabled and unable
to work, we have increasing suicides. And American suicides are now at record levels.
They're committing suicide on a scale that's very alarming. There's a suicide every 11 minutes
in America. There's 50,000 per year. And this is the highest rate of suicide per 100,000 population.
Since 1941, which was the previous peak in the middle of the Second World War,
you got the previous peak of suicide. Now, it's alarming that we're back to that peak.
And I suspect that peak will be broken soon and the suicide numbers will continue to increase.
This chart here shows you the social security recipients in America. The numbers just rising,
rising, rising. America is a socialist state. It's not a capitalist state. It's pretty much
a socialist state. The US federal government spends $7 trillion a year into that economy.
And that's a very large expenditure from one party. So we're looking at a socialist state here,
and these are the social security recipients over time. The blue line at the top, that is the
people who are disabled and their dependents. Now, it's not as big as the previous number,
because most of the people in America are on private disability insurance.
So we've got something terribly, terribly wrong happening in the United States in regard to
sickness and inability to work. And the worrying thing that's happening in the working age
population, that will have eventually, if it continues, and I think it will continue,
that will have economic consequences that Donald Trump can't even imagine. The economy will just
simply grind lower and lower. It can't succeed with growing disabled people. Now, that'll be
a slow process, but I think it'll just slowly, slowly happen over time. We're going to look at
Singapore now and what's happening in Singapore. In Singapore, they already have digital identity.
It's called SingPass, and everybody on the island has to, if they're living there,
if they're a resident, they have to have a SingPass. This is the government digital ID system.
It covers most things that you do. You can't open a bank account in Singapore without one,
and it records all of your health records and all the taxes you've paid. This is essential for
anyone who wants to live in Singapore. So Singapore is clearly a totalitarian,
socialist state. There's no doubt about it. And again, you know, it's rare to find nations now
that you could describe in any other way. I love the way in the ad that they say,
you're trusted digital identity. Don't use any others, use ours. We're going to look at death
and disease in Singapore, and it's very, very alarming because we've got six million people
on the island who we can track very, very well. We know that they are all almost all COVID vaccinated.
Although remember, this is not a vaccine. It does not prevent disease. It does not prevent you from
spreading the disease. Therefore, it is not a vaccine. It is definitely not a vaccine. However,
we will continue to refer to it as a vaccine. Now in Singapore, 92% have certainly received
the COVID vaccines, and most of them have received multiple COVID vaccines. So this is a petri dish,
a little pot we can watch to see what happens. Now, you can look at excess death in Singapore
first, and this chart is alarming. This is all produced by another Australian. The guy, he calls
himself Ozzy 17. Ozzy 17 has worked for three of the largest pharmaceutical companies of the world
in his career in the sales area. So he really understands the pharmaceutical industry.
You can see this graph is excess mortality. It's cumulative death. So you get the numbers are
added as you go forward in time. And you can see he's done this beautiful graphic here.
The yellow section is the COVID area. And you can see the excess death numbers compared to
previous death numbers of previous years is relatively flat. It's not going anywhere.
During the horrible deadly epidemic that supposedly was killing millions of people around
the world, there was no excess death occurring in Singapore. And the graph just rumbles along the
baseline here. And then come 2021, September 2021 again, it just takes off. And these excess deaths
just continue to climb. This graph only goes to 2023, because our world and data has stopped
recording this graph on its website. I think it's just become too embarrassing to update it. But
it tells you the story. Something terribly bad has happened to this nation somewhere around
September 2021. And I would say that represents a poison being delivered to the population.
That's my argument. And I think that's what you'd expect to see. Now, this chap Ozzy 17 and his
sub stack then starts to look at a specific neurodegenerative disease called ALS, amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. It's a form of neurodegenerative disease mainly affecting the spinal cord.
And it's basically what happens is you get a muscle wasting phenomenon, weakness and then twitching
and then wasting and difficulty using the muscles of the body, and then eventually difficulty
swallowing and breathing. The disease is always fatal. There's no real cure for it, none at all,
unless you have a miracle on hand. And it's a rare disease. It's not a common disease at all.
When I practiced medicine, I did not see a single case of ALS in my medical practice. And I had a
very big medical practice specializing mainly in adult medicine. This is a rare disease. And we're
seeing a 300% increase in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis treatments in Singapore. So Ozzy 17 has
provided the sales data for a drug which is used in the modification of the disease. It doesn't
cure the disease, but it buys people more time on earth, up to a year or so or two years of extra time
or some months. The drug is called Riluzol. And you can see this chart here.
Our friend Ozzy 17 has provided the actual box numbers that are being distributed in Singapore
during this period. And he's labeled the chart pre-COVID, COVID in the middle, and then post-vaccination
with Pfizer and Moderna. Now, pre-COVID, you can see a steady demand for the drug, which is what
you'd expect. But during COVID, somehow it reduces, which is very unusual. And you would
suspect maybe some of these people died off during the COVID event. But then again, in 2021, off it
goes. You can see that the green arrows I've placed on the chart are showing you where this is going.
This is very concerning because this is a rare neurodegenerative disease. And this is the tip
of a very big disease iceberg. For me to see this, I'm shocked to see these increases in this drug.
It's one of the scariest charts I think I've seen so far in the last five years.
So we can scroll down and think about Singapore being a very vaccinated nation. And we can look at
Japan because Japan is also a very compliant and very vaccinated population. So he's gone to look
at Japan to see, is this increase in this disease happening there? And he's looked at the same data
but in a different way. He didn't have the box numbers for the drug. In Japan, he's only got the
dollar sales and numbers. But what he saw shocked him. There's a sixfold increase in the sales of
reusable. And that occurred in only one year from 2021 to 2022. He didn't have data going on from 2022.
But you can solve the drug. I'll just wait while the internet stabilises. You can see the drug in
this pre-COVID period is rolling along. The yellow section is generic drugs. The green section is
branded drug. They actually dropped during the COVID period. Again, the suspicion there is that
these patients were dying. They were fragile. You'd expect them to die off during COVID.
But then in 2021, the demand for the drug just literally explodes. It goes up sixfold
in one year. This is absolutely screaming at you as a terrible, terrible health event occurring.
It's almost like an atom bomb going off in Hiroshima again.
And then, excuse me, so being an Australian, he looks at the Australian sales for the drug.
And we're seeing a similar pattern. You can see the pre-COVID pattern, the post-COVID pattern,
and then the explosion, which is occurring this year. Now, I'm not too sure why that pattern's a
little bit different. But that's what's happening as far as these box numbers reveal. So, Aussie 17,
you can go and read the article. I think it's an excellent article. And that's just available at
Substack. And there's a link on there that takes people to that. Now, I'm going to branch away here
to look a little bit more at the facts involved here. The first thing I'm going to show you,
I've switched tabs here. You should now see, Charles, you should see. Okay. This is a website
called nextstrain.org. Now, this website is where people register the genomes, the genomic sequences
of viruses when they do the gene sequencing on viral particles around the world. If I scroll up,
it's a wonderful website, and I've been using it ever since 2020. You can see these dots here on
the screen. You can hover your mouse over the dot, and it gives you every instance of scientific
reporting of a viral particle. It tells you where it is. This one particular was discovered and
Kazakhstan. It tells you who discovered it. It tells you what date they've registered it.
So, this is happening all over the world. And so, this is registering the progress of a viral
illness as it goes forward. And you can look at all viruses. But we're particularly interested
in the COVID virus. And as you come down here to this section, this is called the frequencies
coloured by clade. So, clade is another word or scientific word for variant. You've heard the word
variant. And you can see here all these different colours. And this goes back to 2020, the beginning
of the phenomenon. And I'll just take my mouse forward like this. And you can see all of the
clades or the variants changing as time passes. Old clades die away and disappear, replacing by
new clades. And this happens again and again and again and again and again. And we're down the road
here literally dozens and dozens of different variants of this virus. This virus that we're
dealing with today is nothing like the virus back here in 2020. It's a totally different variant.
And it's the rapid rapidity of change that tells us that these viruses, coronaviruses, are very,
very unstable. They mutate very, very rapidly. And by the way, I knew this when this all started.
And I was taught in medical school, you can never create a vaccine against coronaviruses. They
mutate far too rapidly. So, anyone who set out to build any vaccine here was just ignoring
biological reality. It's impossible to form an effective vaccine against these viruses.
They just change and change and change. And they're not terribly dangerous. So, there's no point
in creating a vaccine against them. But that is a dramatic chart. And I want people to take note of
it. That's over the last five years. You can see multiple changes to variant and clade. I'll switch
over to the latest six months. And here's the last six months. And you can see that even,
you can see how rapidly the variant ratios change over time. So, even over six months,
we had a rapid change in the registrations of the various clades that we're dealing with today.
So, what about death? We've talked a lot about disability. We've talked a lot. We're now talked
about suicide. We've talked about variant variability and instability of the coronavirus
family. And we've got to say, well, what's happening in the death area? So, these charts here
are excess mortality again, for other nations. This is the cumulative deaths again. Again,
and this is deaths added up over time from a certain point in time. And it's compared to
the deaths that occurred in the previous five years, 2015 to 2019. And you can see that this
is the United States. And you can see by the end of 2023, when the Will and Data stopped producing
the chart, there's 1.35 million excess deaths, deaths that you would not have expected
compared to what was happening in previous years, previous to the COVID phenomenon.
This is a lot of people, a lot of deaths. And this is excess deaths. There's a lot more deaths
than this going on in America. But these are the excess deaths that have accumulated over time
from 2020 on. So, let's just go on to look at Australia, which is of particular interest to
people living here. And the chart is very interesting. So, in Australia, we had virtually
no excess deaths during the whole deadly, horrible virus that was supposedly killing
millions of people when it wasn't. And our excess death numbers went into decline. They were below
the normal expected numbers, projected numbers. But then again, in September 2021, there's that
date again, it turns the corner and it starts to grow. And this chart says that 37,600
excess deaths are registered by December 2023. Now, that number is higher than that now.
And I think it's easily arguable that it's close to 100,000 deaths in Australia. Now,
I've looked at these figures quite a lot. And the disability to death ratio is basically 20 to 1.
At best, it's 10 to 1, but it's probably 20 to 1. So, that means that if 100,000 Australians have
died that you wouldn't have expected to die since 2021, then probably 2 million have got some
disability in the last four years. That's a staggering number. That means every family
in this country of 26 million has probably got a disabled family member or a dead family member,
but more specifically a disabled family member. So, it's all very concerning. Now, this is a video
on Twitter, x.com. I won't play it. It's William Makus. This is a Canadian oncologist. He's well
known around the world for being a sort of rebel oncologist. But in this video, he talks about
thousands of doctors to get treatment for turbo cancers. They don't like to be public about it,
but he said they're coming to him. And his statement here is thousands of doctors are getting sick
from the COVID shots. They're having heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, turbo cancers,
because 99% of them took the shots. This is in Canada. And it's a very alarming video.
He's very clear about this. And he's clearly seeing these doctors. So, we're losing our health care
staff. They're becoming disabled. They're becoming sick. And he talks about them retiring now from
medicine in their 40s. He said doctors never usually retire in their 40s. Most can't afford to.
But now he's seeing doctors retiring because of disability in their 40s. It's a very alarming
video. And it's exactly what I predicted. I predicted that the health care sector,
the nurses and the doctors would start to become ill, and the hospitals would come under enormous
strain. And he's there just stating blatantly that's what's going on. We've got another thing
that happened in the last few weeks, which is also very alarming. And this is the fact that
we've only got one case of this. But Kevin McKernan, who's a very famous
gene sequencing expert, he has identified genetic material inside the cancer tissue
of a woman who died within 30 days of diagnosis. She had an aggressive bowel cancer. I'm pretty
sure it was a woman. And she died within 30 days. That's an unknown event in medicine to die within
30 days of a bowel cancer. Bowel cancers these days are readily treated and they shouldn't be
dying in 30 days. Now, Kevin McKernan sent some of the tissue of the cancerous material. And he
analysed that looking at the genetic material. And he discovered massive amounts of Pfizer's
vaccine sequence. He means the genetic material inside the tissue. So this should never be there.
And this shows that although it's only one case, this indicates that the turbo cancers
we're seeing are related to these so-called vaccines.
Next thing I'll do is just look at the deaths in Europe. This is a website called EuroMomo.
It registers all of the deaths in about 40 nations. It used to be 40. It's actually,
I just threw it in. It's 23 nations now. They register the deaths from all causes every week.
And this is updated every week. So you can actually watch the progress over time.
Now, these peaks of death you can see occurring in a cyclical fashion. Every year is the normal
pattern of death in Europe and in every country around the world. These peaks tend to occur in
winter. And the disease that causes these peaks of death is usually influenza. And it's usually our
disabled and elderly people dying off during the winter months due to influenza.
Now, you can see this last peak here was 2024, 2025 winter, which we've just
come out of in the Northern Hemisphere. And the deaths drop back into the normal range pretty
readily by May. And these little dotted lines here, they're the normal range for deaths of all causes
in the Northern Hemisphere. So this phenomenon is repeatable. It goes on year after year after year.
This chart goes back to 2020. So this includes the whole phenomenon of COVID. Now, according to the
media and according to the politicians, COVID was killing people all over the world all that time.
Okay, all that time. It wasn't doing that. There was a little spike of death here in early 2020,
which collapsed within eight weeks. And the whole epidemic of COVID was over within eight weeks.
And the death numbers were back to normal range. You can see clearly, I knew by here that this was
all over. And yet the politicians didn't want to let it die. They wanted to keep scaring the people.
The media wanted to stir the pot. And everybody around the world went into panic mode, thinking
that they were going to die from this epidemic here, which is all over by eight weeks. There was no
pandemic. It's impossible when you look at the death numbers. And the death numbers during this
horrible deadly virus of COVID was exactly the same as what you'd expect in a normal influenza
epidemic. And then we had another peak in the middle of winter in 2021, and then in 2022,
then 2023. You can see my mouse going up and down. And every winter, that is just completely
normal numbers. There was no pandemic. All you need to do is look at that graph. There's no argument
here. There's no point of even using the word pandemic. It did not happen. There's no such thing
as a pandemic of COVID. And this chart proves it beyond all doubt. And it proves beyond all doubt
another thing about virus illnesses. They are self-limiting. They get better and they disappear
by themselves as the herd immunity comes in. And the virus literally has nowhere to go and it dies
off. And so you don't have to do anything for viral illnesses. They all collapse. And if it's
a genetically engineered virus, if it's a bio weapon, guess what? They're more fragile. They're
even more fragile than natural influenza viruses or coronaviruses. So they actually die off quicker.
You won't see an extended epidemic of those viruses. In other words, there was no pandemic.
It is there's no point having a discussion about it. There's no point arguing. It's impossible.
So then we'll quickly go back. I want to move on to a question and answer as soon as possible.
We'll quickly go back to my website on Boom and show you the next section. I'll just wait for the
internet here. It's a little bit unstable. There we are. Is that okay, Charles? Are you hearing me
now? Yep. Yeah. All clear. Okay, good. So the next section of Boom this week is dealing with
the military threat. So the military threat is growing globally. I'm very concerned about it.
We have a American government now that is calling its Department of Defense, the Department of War,
and Pete Hegseth is the Secretary of War. He's the Secretary of War. And they are,
what they're doing is becoming a little disturbing, in particular in regard to Venezuela.
However, there's all sorts of other possible military targets that they're talking about.
Iran, China, Russia, Ukraine, Panama, Greenland, Mexico, Canada, Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Central
America, Yemen, Qatar, anyone, anywhere I say there, because really, they want to threaten the whole
world at this point. This is the sign of a hegemonic power in its death throes. It's like
watching the Roman Empire in its last days or entering its last days. And it's no surprise to
me, because if you examine the history of the United States, it's endless warfare. And it's very
sad to see, but this nation has been at war pretty much ever since it was founded. Okay, so the
um oops, that's gone back. Oh, sorry. I'll just, there we go. Sorry, I'll just go ahead again.
Sorry, I'll just have to, I hit the wrong button. So the United States is a very warlike nation.
They worship weapons. They love weapons. They love their military. It's very, very similar to Rome.
I've stood in Washington DC at the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior, and I've watched a very big
ceremony there. And while I stood there, I felt very much that I was in modern Rome. In fact,
some of the military parades that came past that day had Roman standards being held aloft as the
troops marched past, which didn't surprise me. And they were what we call the fascists of Rome.
The fascists is where the term fascist comes from. The fascists of Rome were used by the military.
So it's very concerning that this nation sees it. It can't seem to get away from its addiction to
military power. And that's really worrying. And I think Trump at the moment is our only defense
against this. I think he's relatively benign in this. He does indulge himself in the military
as a typical American, but I think he's got a good sense that America needs to turn towards peace.
And so I hope that he continues to survive as the president of the United States. I'm very worried
about people that surround him who may be not as moderate in their goals as Trump is. So I'm happy
to see Trump there and the president. I'm a very critical of him, by the way, in many respects,
in particular in regard to his lack of knowledge about economics and finance. But overall,
he's better than anybody else when he is a moderating force at the moment.
However, he's doing some things that are a little concerning. Last week, he announced that he had
secretly authorized the CIA to conduct covert action on the land in Venezuela. And he didn't
rule out invading Venezuela. This is very, very disturbing. And their excuse at the moment is that
it's all to do with what they called, you know, narco terrorism is the term they use. But look,
there's lots of drugs coming from lots of places. Why are they threatening Venezuela? It seems very
unusual to me. So this is really, this is real. It's happening. We've got a president announcing
CIA conducting covert operation in a nation that has never happened in the history of the United
States to have a president making such an announcement. So it is very concerning.
And I'm very worried about this. I think it's a bad trend. And I hope that Trump
can get some moderating influences around him about this. In the editorial, I discuss
why America, the rationales why America is interested in this obsession with military action.
And then I talk about a company, which has been founded in the last 10 years or so. And it's
called Palantir. Now people may have heard of Palantir. It's essentially a company that makes
spyware. In other words, software that spies on people and tracks what people do. And Palantir
founded by Peter Thiel and Alex Karp is a company that reflects this obsession with warfare and
military action in many ways. And but in particular, covert surveillance, it's all about
covert surveillance. This is arguably a war on the people of America, in my opinion.
Now you can see the Palantir share price, what's happening here. And during this bull market,
it is exploded in value. In fact, if you had bought Palantir shares a year or so ago,
at 10 or $20, it's gone up 10 fold. They're up to $180, $190. This makes Bitcoin look like a
very ordinary phenomenon. It makes the gold price rise look ridiculously anemic. So we've got this
explosion of interest in the shares of Palantir. And this company is dedicated to surveillance
of civilians, both inside America and outside of America. This is again a very concerning
development in my opinion. Now, what else has happened lately? Well, last week, you'll see in
the headline of my editorial, the head of the US Southern Command has resigned. His name is Alvin
Hulsley. And he is the man in charge of all of the military for South America, South of the United
States. So this is a very important command in the United States. They see South America as their
backyard. And it's extraordinary that the leading officer of the Southern Command has resigned.
And I've written there, I said that no reason is given for his departure from such a critical
command position. And this must lead to speculation that Admiral Hulsley was intolerant of waging war
against civilians in a foreign nation. And I think that is the only reason I suspect why he
has resigned. Now he may have resigned because he's sick and ill. I don't know why he's resigned. But
I suspect that he's resigned because he's very uncomfortable with the military waging war against
civilians in a foreign nation. If I was in his position, I would resign as well. You cannot
provide any legal or moral rationale for attacking civilians in a foreign nation with
a military action. It is war. And you can't really call it anything else.
Now, the size and scope of the US military buildup in the Caribbean region is fairly
significant. And I'll show you what the Wall Street Journal just published last week about it.
They had an article called What's Been Deployed. And you can see this large list here, guided
missile destroyers, jet fighters, Reaper drones, Navy ships, eight ships, operation ships,
and attack submarine Poseidon spy planes, special operations aviation regiment, B-52 bombers,
and 10,000 troops. Now, that list is very scary. That constitutes an invasion force, I think.
And it's very worrying to me personally. So then I decided to look at, well, what are the Chinese
doing while America's mounting all this military force to threaten South America and Venezuela in
particular? And I was aware of this Chinese military action. It's a very effective military
action. And they've been running this action since 2010. So this is now the 15th year of the
peace arc traveling around the world, delivering free health care to people in impoverished nations.
And you can track the ship, where it's going. It has operating theaters on board. It's very
well coordinated with the local population. They turn up in a country and they deliver
free health care. And they can see 700 patients a day. And they can do operations. They have
operating theaters. They have 100 people on board to assist, 300 beds, 20 intensive care beds,
operating theaters, clinical departments, and a rescue helicopter. So this is the Chinese military.
And it's turning up in countries all over the world and delivering this, like what I would call
cooperative peace. And I think cooperative peace is a radical idea. It just might catch on, you know.
So the hospital ship is a great initiative of the Chinese military traveling around the world. And
in the article I've put year by year with all the nations they've visited. And you can see they've
gone to nations like Djibouti, Kenya, Tanzania, the Seychelles, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia,
Myanmar, India, Pakistan, Vanuatu, Papua New Guinea. The list goes on and on. By the way,
they've actually visited the United States and Australia. Okay, because there's a lot of people
in the United States and Australia who can't get health care. So just in the numbers are staggering
when you look at them. Like in 2018, they visited 11 countries. In 2024, 13 countries. And it says
that overall they've served 45 countries and regions. And they've provided medical services
to 290,000 people and they've performed more than 1,400 surgeries. This is very good military action.
In my opinion, the United States should have 20 of these ships roaming the world.
But they don't. So I've asked people to please, please tell Donald Trump and Pete Hegdezeth.
This is a far more useful military strategy. And I've just finished this
editorial this week with a little section on Argentina because people have been fed lies about
the new Argentinian government and this guy called Yavi Emile, who's their president.
This nation is heading into worse and worse situations under his control. In particular,
the starvation and the homelessness is just getting worse and worse. And just in the last few weeks,
Malay has gone to Washington DC begging for US dollars. And they threw 20 billion at him in a
currency swap and a few more billion at the peso, the Argentine peso. It's like throwing 20 billions.
It's like throwing a coin into the Pacific Ocean. It's not going to do much.
But he's got no other choice but to beg now. He's begging for US dollars to help him save the people
of Argentina. It's not going to work. The people of Argentina are now starving. Okay, nearly a third
of the children are facing food insecurity. They're seeing scurvy in the schools, scurvy,
vitamin C deficiency, where the children's teeth and gums start bleeding, their teeth start falling
out. They're literally suffering from lack of vegetables and fruit. Worse than that, they're
now seeing children suffering from lack of vitamin B12, which can only come from meat, animal products.
And Argentina has got a giant meat industry. And yet the children are turning up with vitamin B12
deficiency and vitamin A deficiency. This is disturbing in a country that's got a very big
beef industry. So it's economic failure that's happening here. Now it started a long time ago.
It started with their almost religious dependency upon the ideology of socialism, which began at
least 60 to 70 years ago, if not more. But Malay hasn't helped it. It's getting worse under him.
And this chart here shows you the poverty pattern since 2015 for Argentina. And it's rocketed up
since Malay has taken power. There's real problems there. I've lived in Argentina,
only for a very short period. I went there for a month just to witness what was going on
about probably 12, 14 years ago now. But I was very disturbed what was happening then.
And this nation's in dire straits. So I just ended with that. So that's the end of the talk.
We can open up for questions, Charles, if that's okay. I've run through a lot of things.
But there's a lot happening. And everything is happening just as I expected.
And we need to talk about the urgency of the matter. Things aren't getting better. Things,
I suspect, may get worse. And as each individual nation has to come to the realization of what is
happening to their nation, the people have to rise up and throw off the dystopian authoritarian
position that governments are now taking in behest of the criminal gang that is running
this whole show. So I'd open it up to questions. It's becoming more concerning. So it's a matter
of urgency that we begin a discussion in every nation about what's happening here.
So have you stopped your sharing, Jerry?
Oh, yes. Sorry.
So I have a number of questions, but I won't go there. Stephen, do you want to ask questions?
As usual, how's your voice?
Unless he's fallen asleep.
Was it that boring?
No, it was excellent. But Stephen's been recovering from his illness. One question that I have for
you, Jerry, is Venezuela. I was going to talk to you about data on funeral directors in Australia.
You haven't shown us the share price of listed funeral directors anywhere.
Okay. There is one company in Australia that was in that section. I was watching it. Its share price
was rapidly, rapidly going up. And then it was taken over by a larger company. So we can't track
it anymore. I'm not aware of I haven't really looked at funeral directing companies elsewhere.
So the issue of Venezuela in terms of being concerned and, you know, in terms of what
countries should do, here's my question for you. I know numerous people in Australia who left
Venezuela over the last five years because it's fucked. Yes, it is.
Technical term. Now, I then look at Ukraine. So America goes in helping Ukraine. Now, I also
think back to the 1956 Hungarian uprising, where the Hungarians, when Russia came in with its tanks,
asked the US to help. And I look at how I look at the Venezuelan situation.
I look at North Korea. I look at Taiwan. We're talking about, hey, China invades Taiwan. Why
should America get involved? And all these geopolitical issues, Jerry, you know, and the
people of Venezuela, the president Maduro is clearly in there through fraud. And the interesting
question is, where what's the communication? We don't know the communication from the people on
the ground in Venezuela. And we talked about the hollowing out of the middle class, you know, and
then, and Trump says, well, you Maduro, you shouldn't be the president, the people didn't vote
for you. What was the other guy's name who lost Bolsonaro?
Oh, well, that's in he was in Brazil, Bolsonaro. Guaido was the previous I don't know who was the
So as you were talking, I'm thinking, yeah, that should America just sit in within its borders and
not help, you know, the dictators, the people who that's an interesting question that you made me
made me think of, you know? Well, that's the problem. That's the question that I put that
Venezuela used to be such a wealthy nation, it's clearly been socialized and communized,
and could be part of the global globalist strategy. Sure, sure. Look, the disease,
the ideological disease behind all governments now in the world, not, not just the obvious
the obvious ones, the disease is utopian socialism. The dreams of utopian socialism
are at fault. And they are those dreams exist in every nation now in the world. And hidden behind
the dreams of utopian socialism is a gang of criminal psychopaths who I think are using this
ideology to gain control of the whole planet. Right? So you can't just say, oh, it's just
communism. Well, it isn't. I mean, if you look at, say, a nation like the United States, which
supposedly not communist, it's supposedly democratic. And by the way, democracy is the
tyranny of the 51%, or even the 35%, depending upon your voting system. But if you look at the
United States, I think it's pretty much a socialist nation where the the government is now spending
$7 trillion a year. It can do that, by the way, it's not going bankrupt, it's all rubbish. You
know, there's, there's no financial crisis in the US government debt situation. But, but it means
that a lot of people in America are now dependent upon the government for their welfare. And so to
claim that it's somehow capitalist and not socialist is just ridiculous. This disease is everywhere.
And the diseases of ideology are what psychopaths use to gain power. And I think this is deliberate.
I think the United States is not what's the word, it's not. It's not any different really,
to any other nation. So, you know, it's a big nation, it's a powerful nation, but it's got this
disease deeply embedded, as well as, as just as not as much as Venezuela, for instance, but pretty
heavily involved. So in South America, the whole continent has fallen in love over time with
socialism. Argentina is probably the worst example. It's just disastrous what is happening in Argentina
and what has happened from an economic viewpoint and a financial viewpoint. They did when I was
there, they were doing crazy things. I used to go down to the supermarket every night to buy some
wine, we'd have dinner in our apartment. And as you walked into the supermarket, there was a giant
sign saying 30% discount if you use a credit card. Now, I witnessed that, I wish I'd taken a
photograph of it. What they were doing there was discouraging the use of cash. And they didn't want
people to use cash. And they told people that we don't want you to use cash. But you had to have
cash to do everything like to buy a coffee, to pay the taxi, to pay the bus, bus fare. So everyone
carried around a bag, a Hessian bag of coins, because they were making cash scarce. So they were
they were hoarding their cash to pay for their daily activities. It was bizarre. And they were
encouraging the use of credit cards, giving a 30% discount in supermarkets. This is insanity. This
is economic insanity. And at the same time as they were doing that, they were encouraging the
circulation of US dollars inside Argentina. In fact, you could not buy an apartment in Argentina
without US dollars. And as you walk down the street, every real estate agent had all their
apartments up and every price was in US dollars, not in Argentine pesos. So they were committing the
three cardinal mortal sins of economics and finance in that nation all at the same time.
I witnessed it. I thought this is insane. You're going to get hyperinflation, you're going to get
economic collapse, these people will be starving in the streets. And I told my wife that and that
was probably 15 years ago. It is all just rolled forward as I expected. If a nation does that,
there's no doubt that the political class is 100% corrupt and is being paid off by some foreign
entity to do those to put those policies in place. So they did two big things. Number one,
they adopted socialism. Number two, they committed the three mortal sins of finance.
There was no hope for this country when I visited it 15 years ago, and there's no hope for it now.
This chap, Javier Millay, has come into power and started cutting all government services.
Now you've got children who were dependent upon soup kitchens, starving to death and dying.
It's just going from bad to worse. And it's not going to turn around with this man in power.
It's a horrendous situation. And that's repeated all over the world. The disease of utopian
socialism is everywhere. And it's being used by psychopathic criminal elements to control the
planet. There's no doubt in my mind about that. We can talk about that. Okay, that's okay. We've got
questions. But what I did want to remind people, I will put the link into the New World Order book
by William Still. We've talked about it, which is the whole utopian socialism movement and worth
reading this book. It's wonderful. It goes back 3000 years of what we are now witnessing. So
the question is whether there's wakey-wakey time, but into what? So let's go to questions. Thank you,
Gerry, for presenting to us, for sharing a wonderful overview of perspectives. And
it's provocative thinking. I'm a passionate provocateur and you're a thinking provocateur.
One of the things I also urge all of you is to live with uncertainty. Stop seeking certainty.
It doesn't exist. Just live with this uncertainty and go, right, that's what we've got to do. And
each one of us has to make this decision of in a collapse environment, what are your visible and
invisible means of support? So be ready to set them up. All right, here's a man with some
visible means of support, Glenn Macco. Gerry? Hey, Gerry. Hi, Glenn. As part of the, I'm going to
be posing a question that I'd like you to give an answer back to another doctor. Dr. Kevin Stillwagon
is in the audience. Dr. Stillwagon, can you raise your hand just so it puts you up at the top of the
screen? So, Gerry, I'm going to characterize, I think, the biggest piece of data you gave us,
and that's the working age explosion of disability. How can you have a functioning
economy if the only people producing things are becoming disabled? And not only are they becoming
disabled, but the other working capable parts of their family are now responsible for
caregiving to them. So we're starting to collapse it even faster. And with that, I'm going to call
what you described in Singapore, slow release deaths, that the nature of the COVID vaccines
are designed around collapsing the birth rate with mothers and fathers with sperm and eggs,
and also killing a large number of people, but only with a delayed, in many cases several years,
of turbo-cancer or other kind of disease. And that what you gave with the ALS is basically a
canary in the coal mine. You have a sensitive group that has a condition and they're maintaining
it, but suddenly something comes along and pushes them over their edge, and now they're dying fast.
And so that's the indicator, gee, we're in trouble. And who out there is saying this in the
media? Even Secretary Kennedy, he's concentrating on dyes and Tylenol. He's not focusing on this
enormous slow release death going on with the COVID vaccine. And so before you, having an answer on
that is important, but the first thing is Dr. Stillwagen is trying to find a mechanism to
identify where the mRNA is so that people can have an idea of how much trouble they're in.
Do you see anything coming along from a diagnostic viewpoint of being able to measure
actual mRNA, either from the shot or from shedding?
Thanks, Glenn. Excellent. All great observations and you made a lot of great questions there.
Firstly, you talked about the economic impact of the working age population becoming disabled.
It is true that eventually that will have economic impact. Now, at the moment, those people
are being replaced to some degree by the migration into Western economies.
The migration is part of the whole pattern of attack on Western civilization. And so as you
have an increase of six million people disabled in total in America, that's not the number that's
in the working age population. It's much lower numbers. So it's easily replaced by migration.
So there will be economic impacts, but it's relatively marginal at this point because the
migration is covering up that problem in the working age population. The people coming in
in illegal immigration are in the working age population. So they can easily take those jobs,
most of those jobs pretty readily. And so you don't see the economic impact as being dramatic.
However, if you read BOOM on a regular basis, I document that the US economy is slowly but surely
grinding to a halt, not to collapse, but to a point where it's just not really got any growth
inside it, any growth other than US government expenditure growth. So US government continues
to spend money faster and faster and faster. The Doge thing, Elon Musk's attempts to reduce
government expenditure have had zero effect. The Tariff War has been a complete failure and will
continue to be a complete failure. In fact, I think it's going to be a very big negative to
the American economy going forward. So these two initiatives have made zero difference
to the financial status of the US economy at this point. In fact, they're both potentially
dangerous things to do. So the economic situation is very complex and not obvious. Yes, under the
hood, there's lots of bad things happening in Western economies, particularly in Europe,
but also in the United States. And I'm very concerned. Please don't spend too much time on
that. Can you get to the core question with the MRA? Yeah, well, I'll deal with ALS first,
though, because you mentioned ALS. ALS is a signal disease because it's a neurodegenerative disease.
Now, right from the very get go, the virus attacked the brain and the central nervous system and the
bio weapons did the same. So we've seen an increase in neurodegenerative diseases and
psychiatric diseases in the last five years. But the ALS is particularly worrying because it's
terminal. I mean, everyone dies with ALS. So therefore, within two to five years, that whole
group dies and has to be replaced. Now, if we continue to see it being replaced all the time
at higher and higher levels, then we've got a nation basically dying from neurodegenerative
disease. Now, I was involved in a science group that mapped what was going on inside the so-called
white clots. People have heard of the white clots. Well, they're not blood clots. They are
polymeric structures comprised of what we call fibrinogen beta chains, beta alpha, beta and gamma
chains in a very unusual ratio, combined with a lot of strange metals and other proteins.
And now that worries us because the other thing we've discovered about these
structures that are occurring inside dead bodies is that they are amyloidogenic and they appear to
be prionic. So amyloid and prions attack the brain. So we're very worried about the brain
and the spinal cord diseases because of that. So that sort of reflects what we've learned about
the so-called white clots from a biological analysis viewpoint. ALS is very rare. It's very
small numbers, but it's a signal disease. And if that starts going up and continues to go up,
that is, I would say, a very, very scary phenomenon. Going on to mRNA, can you detect whether or not
you've got mRNA in your body? Well, the first thing I'll say is this. We don't know what five
billion people have been injected with. We suspect and we are told that they have been given
mRNA technology, but we have no independent audit of those five billion people's injections.
We've been able to independently analyse a handful of vials. I mean, Kevin McKernan, I think,
has analysed about 32 vials. David Spiker has analysed a similar number. Other labs around the
world have analysed very small numbers of vials. But out there is five billion injected individuals
with 13 billion vials. There's no independent audit of what they've been given. We're just
taking it on trust that they've been given mRNA technology. Now, that might be the case, but we
just don't know. So we don't know what they've been injected with. For five years, I've been telling
people there will be DNA plasmids contained in these products. And I had molecular biologists
tell me, oh, no, no, that'll be purified. What are you talking about? But now Kevin McKernan examined
his vials for DNA contamination. He found lots of DNA plasmids. He found SV40 promoters.
And these are not mRNA technology. These are circles of DNA inside the products. And those
circles of DNA can be active and create harm inside the cells of bodies. So this is a genetic
weapon. I think it's fair to call it a weapon. Because it's not a vaccine. It's not preventing
disease. It's not preventing transmission. Therefore, it can't be a vaccine. So what is it? It's a genetic
weapon, as far as I'm concerned, delivered to every cell in the body, including all the germ
cells of the body, which are the ovaries in particular in the female population, but also
in the sperm of men. And so this could cause infertility or disease epidemics in the future
of the children of these people who have been jabbed. We just don't know. It's very scary.
So as to what can we pick up mRNA, well, we can look for spike protein. But if we don't
find spike protein, it really doesn't get us off the hook. Because as I say, we don't really know
that everybody's been given mRNA and that everybody will get spike protein in their body.
We don't know what they've been given. This is an absolute disaster. It's just a lack of knowledge.
And no government, no government anywhere has decided, oh, we better start doing massive
autopsies. We better start looking at these white cloths. We had better start looking for spike
protein in the population. No government. And that's the obvious thing you would be doing.
And you know that, Glenn, you're not a doctor, you're not a head of a public health department,
and yet you know what we should be doing. But no government is doing this. Therefore, while nobody
is doing it, there is no hope at all of us discovering the extent of the health impact
of what's happened. We have no hope at all. So we're not even beginning the independent
analysis of what's happened yet. We're not even beginning. It must come, but it'll only come through
public pressure. Kevin, would you like to say anything on this conversation? Thank you, Glenn,
for raising these issues. And Kevin, I think you did some work on the pilots as well, did you not?
Yeah, I did. And everything that Jerry mentioned aligns perfectly with what happened to the pilots.
There was definitely a 40% increase in early deaths that occurred right after the shot rolled
out. There was a tripling in pilots going on on long-term disabilities. And you know, you talked
about the workforce being replenished with migrants. I mean, that's possible, but not with pilots,
not with doctors. This is going to hurt the economy. It's deliberate. I noticed you didn't
mention lawyers, Kevin. There's a satanic level to this that people aren't getting.
It's a major deception. People have been tricked into believing that if you inject a product
into your body, it's going to make an antibody and that will protect you. Well, the science says
that, yeah, you will get an antibody, but you've got to look at the process of what happens when
that antibody gets made. And so this platform of mRNA is particularly dangerous because anytime you
induce cells of the body to make a foreign protein, I don't care what the protein is. You know,
everybody's wound up around the spike protein. It really doesn't matter. When the body starts
making foreign proteins, you will have an immediate attack on those cells. They are going to be
destroyed. And you know, the problem is we've injected hundreds of billions of these lipid
nanoparticles, each one supposedly containing mRNA. And that was a really good point you brought up,
Jerry, because we really don't know. We know for sure that there's plasmids in there, DNA plasmids.
And you know, as you said, that's particularly dangerous because they can easily get integrated
into the human genome. All it takes is a little tiny piece of DNA from that plasmid,
you know, 20 nucleotides or less. And if they closely match the human genome, they will integrate.
You do not need enzymes to do this. People seem to forget that our cells are dividing all the time.
It's mitosis. It's how we grow. It's how we replenish cells. And when that happens, the nuclear
membrane is dissolved. And if you have DNA in a plasmon form that's just kind of floating around
in the cytoplasm, it can easily get integrated into that genome of that cell. And it will stay
with that cell for the rest of that cell line's life until that person dies. And so if it starts,
you know, disrupting genomic activity that makes normal proteins, now you've got yourself set up
for chronic illness for the rest of your life that just kind of showed up out of nowhere. So,
yeah, this is all really, really dangerous. It's satanic. We have to educate people on what this
really is. They've been deceived. They've got to, you know, just stop doing this to themselves.
I mean, injecting something to make an antibody is bad enough, but when you inject the message
to start making stuff, that's where the real damage starts. And that's why I was questioning
about the mRNA, Jerry, is because if we can find vaccine-specific mRNA in a person that was not
vaccinated, that's scary. Because what does that mean? That means that there really is shedding
and people are being injured by this, whether they got the shot or not.
That's extremely concerning. So we've got to develop protocols, Jerry, on how to get this crap
out of people, whether they've been vaccinated or not. It's got to happen or we're in big trouble.
Anyway, I'm sorry I hijacked the show again. No, no, Jerry, Kevin, excellent. Well said. Jerry,
a comment, sorry, Jerry, a comment, anything else? Then we'll go to Anders.
I just want to make a comment. I agree with everything that Kevin said, with one exception.
He made one mistake. He said there were billions of, he suggested billions of, he said,
mRNA, but he said billions of mRNA are delivered by this chap. That's wrong. There are trillions,
trillions of lipid nanoparticles delivered, trillions. The estimate is 40 to 100 trillion
lipid nanoparticles. Now the lipid nanoparticles contain PEG, polyethylene glycol, which is a
poison. Just the envelope is enough. You don't have to deliver mRNA, just deliver the poison
in the lipid nanoparticle. And you can deliver that to potentially every cell in the body
and you can play havoc just with the poison. You don't have to worry about mRNA and spike
protein delivery. But it's a small criticism. Kevin is very much aware of everything that's
going on and I agree with everything he said. Thank you, Kevin. Glenn?
Yeah, small follow up. I'll just mention, sorry, I'll just mention the pilots. As you know,
Charles, I was involved in helping the pilots of Australia a lot, you and I, both of us.
But I'm very worried about the pilots. If we go to single piloted planes, I'd be really worried. But
luckily we've still got two pilots in the planes. But yes, I'm very concerned about the pilots.
To hear the numbers that Kevin just said about the number of disabilities occurring and deaths in
pilots, this should be on the front page of every newspaper. Yep. The follow up I wanted to give was
that we have an issue around this poison in that it's subclinical and routinely not showing
symptoms until virtually you have some kind of attack. It turns into an avalanche and you're
dead within minutes. So the notion we have of, well, something will come up. That'll be an
indicator you're sick and you have to have something done. Sorry, by the time we actually
see something like that, it's too late. So that's why it's so critical to be having some
kind of mechanism like being able to measure mRNA amounts in your body to say, okay, how dangerous
a ticking time bomb are you? And therefore it's absolutely critical that you start doing things
like having good natural foods, not buying anything out of a box. Very good, very good,
very good. And to tap into what you're saying, having a testing mechanism,
to monitor Glenn and everybody. That's going to be the benefit of AI in terms of, as Ian Brighthope
spoke last week, there are dangers with AI, but there are wonderful benefits of it. And
you monitoring, Ian Brighthope said again, you are personally responsible for your health. And I say
I've been saying it all the time, but you cannot rely on the system. So perhaps we'll get a
presenter here, Kevin, you might know someone, or Glenn, you might know somebody with measuring
techniques, cytokine measurements have come. Most doctors are starting to understand cytokines
and their relevance to your health status. And so perhaps someone has made up, so someone, Jerry,
has discovered a way to measure the potential harm that Glenn is talking about. Jerry, are you
aware of such testing that could be indicative for people to see what's happening with their bodies?
Yes, I am. There's people working on this problem, and they're in touch with me. I don't have time to
help all those different groups. But at the moment there are tests available for spike antibodies,
as far as I'm aware. But that doesn't really tell you much, because the antibodies may come and go
and may disappear. And the spike protein may still be present, or a prion of the spike protein,
in other words, a misfolded protein could be still present in the body. So we just, and prions, by
the way, are self-amplifying. So a prion can create another prion. So it's like a cascade of
prionic activity. So your antibody level can come and go, but if the prion activity is still going
on, it only has to be relatively small. But if it's in the brain, then you've got a big problem.
So measuring spike protein antibodies is not going to really help. Measuring mRNA is difficult,
because to measure mRNA you've got to do a gene sequence test on tissue sample. And that's what
I showed before, is Kevin McCannan just did that tissue sample analysis on the woman with the
turbo cancer. But to do that you've got to have tissue sample, and then you've got to have a
genomic sequence done, looking for specific things. So that's very high tech and not so readily
available. And who wants to do it or pay for it? No government wants to do it. Cytokine analysis
is a better idea. I think cytokines could be used as a screening procedure for the population.
And at the moment, governments really don't like doctors testing for cytokine levels. But I do think,
Charles, it's an excellent suggestion. And that is the way forward, I think, to doing a population
wide screening, who have got problems with their inflammation cascade. Cytokines go up when the
cytokine cascade develops, the waterfall or the landslide. Cytokine storm.
Storm, that's right. So I think that's an excellent idea. So that's probably the best bet
for some sort of screening procedure, would be cytokine analysis.
And I think that's going to be the benefit of AI everybody. So we'll get moving. We have a lot of
hands up. But thank you, Kevin. Glenn, thank you. Good thinking. And be careful what you put into
your body, correct, Glenn? Absolutely. All right. So Anders is going to talk to us about
stuff hitting our body. Come on, Anders. Yes. So I just want to ask a couple of questions. So
first is that actually, there has been peer reviewed scientific peer reviewed report
about six or seven types of COVID vaccines. It is done by de Blasie et al 2024, validated by
Maria Chrysler 2025. They found 55 to 60 toxic substances, non declared in the JABs. So we have
to take into that as a fact, including graphene, carbon nanotubes, magnetic materials,
lanthanides, which are, let's say, magnetic and electric in that respect that they are
amplifying 5G, 4G antennas. So we do know something about these vaccines.
So my question is, if you have been looking into those scientific reports and validation,
there are many others. David Nixon, I think is in Australia. He's one of those. And we know
Anna-Mika Shea and others, Baxas. Okay, but that's number one. Number two, let's say, you know,
let me answer that. Let me answer that question. Let me answer that question. Yes, I'm fully aware
of all of this. I can send you 3500 review peer reviewed papers on the whole COVID phenomenon,
if you would like to read them. And yes, I'm aware of all of those people. I'm aware of all
of their work. Okay, a lot of them communicate with me directly. But they're still looking at
a tiny, tiny, tiny sample of 5 billion injected people, 13 billion vials. They're looking at a
handful that we don't really know. There's no auditing of the whole process scientifically.
So yes, these are very concerning. Yes, I agree. I know all of those results. But quite frankly,
we don't know what 5 billion people have been given. We really don't. We assume, we assume they've
been given the same products, but we don't know. And we do know that there's the process one,
process two argument. We know that process one, the vaccines that were created for their so-called
clinical trials were created in laboratory for a very small number of people. But when they went
to mass production of billions of vials, they use process two. And process two is totally different
to process one. So process two is mass scale up of these products. And I know a lot about mass
scale up and protein production, because that was my biotech company was involved in doing 30 years
ago. This is old technology. But there's a lot of problems when you scale up. So look, yes, I'm aware
of all of these things. But it doesn't get us much further down the line. They're just poisons. They
should be avoided. And they're potentially described best as weapons. And they're not just a
single weapon. They've got multiple weapon systems inside. I have been telling this group, this
message for four years, the multiple weapons. There's no point talking about one weapon.
Just the lipid nanoparticle itself is a weapon. So the fact that it can penetrate into the germ cells
inside the body is a weapon system. So that means you've got to have transfection. The transfection
mechanism into the germ cell is a weapon. That goes back to the methyl pseudo-uridine insertion.
There's all sorts of things in this that should never be given to a human being. And they're
being given for a disease which doesn't really kill people. It kills fragile people. But it's
no different to flu. There's no rationale to give this to anybody. None at all. And when you look at
the variant mutation going on, it's pointless trying to even develop a vaccine. It is ridiculous
on a first principles basis. So there's no point getting down to the nitty-gritty of arguing about
weapon A versus weapon B. The whole thing is a weapon system randomly distributed in a war-like
strategy against the population of Earth. That's what's happening. So arguing about all these
little nitty-gritty, this weapon's more important than that weapon. It's not going to get us anywhere.
We've just got to go away from that. Is there a virus? Isn't there a virus? What a ridiculous
distraction from the whole thing. If you go to a child care center and look at children below
the age of five, you'll witness viral infections. They're everywhere. You go and tell a young mother
that viruses don't exist. It's ridiculous. Go and talk to anyone running a child care center.
Of course viruses exist. And guess what? They're self-limiting. They're self-limiting diseases.
When I was a doctor, I would see an outbreak of chickenpox in my suburb.
And you'd ring up the doctor on the other side of the city. In my city, it might be 100 kilometers
away, but it might be 10 kilometers away. And I'll say, are you seeing chickenpox at the moment?
And he'll say no. In other words, you can have an epidemic of chickenpox in one little
region in a city that doesn't affect the whole city. And then it's self-limiting. It just
collapses and goes away. No doctor was concerned about those things. We can get sidetracked into
all of these distraction arguments. They're pointless. They're wasting time. We've got to
get on with the general problem. Thank you, Jerry. Anders, your next question.
So I've gone into quite a lot of data collections and analysis and let's say the
development of excess mortality and excess or reduction in fertility started way before 2021.
It started in 2013-14 with 4G and it went on massively with a fertility fall, started,
let's say, about 2017-18-19. So there is an EMR component to this, which is
easily to validate by looking at a city and rural, urban rural data.
So, and this is connected to the toxicity in vaccines, including aluminum and other matters,
which access antennas. So all of these is scientifically validated. So we cannot just
say that there is virus or there is no 5G. I mean, we're not saying that. I just said that
to you. Please ask a question. I said arguing about this little tiny weapon versus that big weapon,
or it's just pointless. Second question. Have you gone into Mark Bailey's and fully read his thesis
on his... I'm not going to discuss. No, this is a distraction. It's a distraction generated by the
criminal cabal. I'm not going to discuss that. Is there a virus distraction? Please. Okay. Next
question. Question. So I was coming to Poland and I was seeing the deputy finance minister back
in March 1990. Poland was going from a communist socialist economy in 1989. And it was Leszek
Balszerowicz. He was the finance minister at the time for some years. And let's say the Polish
example has proven that Poland is now the most successful economy in Europe the last 35 years.
They went from communism to a kind of market economy. And I would say there is a parallel
to Argentina. And I believe that Argentina can do as well or better than Poland. They have a lot of
energy resources. So I think your criticism of what happened in Argentina is proven incorrect by
what has happened in Poland. Well, we can have that discussion. Nation by nation, everything is
different because they're all culturally different. I would suggest to you to go to Argentina tomorrow,
get on a plane. It's a free world. Go and fly to Argentina and look at what's happening. It's a
disaster. It's much, much, much worse than what happened in post USSR nations. Now Poland, I'm
very aware of, I followed the Polish economy very closely. It is a good success story. That's great.
They've got a very cohesive nation. They've got a nation that's cohesive in a lot of ways. And
they've been able to rescue their economy. But this is very difficult to achieve in Argentina.
Very, very difficult. It's a much worse situation. But we don't need to talk about that today.
From IMF, etc. So they needed that. Russia did not get that. It's been on top there.
Now it's 20 billion dollars, etc. for Argentina. We don't need to discuss it.
Discussing the Polish economy on this call here today is not going to change the world. I'm sorry,
I don't wish to discuss it. But it's a parallel discussion to Argentina. That's what I'm saying.
All right. Fine. Good point. But we don't need to discuss it today. There's bigger issues to discuss.
Yep. Okay. Next question, please.
Thanks, Andrews. I finished there. Great. Thank you, Andrews. Daria.
Hello, Jerry. How are you? Hi, Daria. Good to see you.
Thank you so much for this great information. I really appreciate it. You rang a bell with me
right at the very start when you started talking about disability claim increases.
And what it harkened back to for me was when I was in practice and Obamacare clicked on March 23,
2010. And that caused a massive drop in the USA of people having commercial insurance.
They lost it through their employers or they were forced to try and buy it on their own and they
couldn't afford the premiums. And even the marketplace itself was trying to funnel people
into Medicaid and Social Security disability. And I don't know if that was on your radar back then
to track those statistics. But that's why I was kind of curious because this uptick in disability
claims after the COVID plague and the vaccines is most likely at this point in time not related to
that external factor of tinkering with the insurance market but is actual organic disease
that's taking place from the toxicities. So, but yeah, people were bumping along. They had their
job. They had their insurance to pay for their chronic back pain. And that's kind of where I
was evaluating patients and treating them. And then all of a sudden a lot of people were coming
in going, I need a form so I can get disability because my employer's dropping my insurance or
some people got canceled from their jobs for some superficial reason but it was because
the insurance costs. So, yeah, I was just curious if you'd ever look back on that because
it'd be interesting to see those two upticks and to see what percentage was market manipulation
back in 2010 and beyond and then what was the actual physical maladies of various types related
to COVID and the vaccine toxicities. And in 2020 we probably saw a lot of social diseases
taking off with drugs and alcohol because people were locked out of their jobs and their
spirituality and everything else. So, but yeah, that's what I was curious about. Thank you so much.
What a great, great comments. Thank you for that. I haven't looked at the American insurance
history you're talking about, you know, what happened in the past. And so that's getting down
into a level that I haven't really looked at. I have a friend though who does look at that,
an economics friend, but that would be worth doing. I mean, you've got to just, it's very,
we don't know what these people are becoming disabled from. We're just seeing the numbers rise
and we're seeing it rise in young people relatively. So we've got a major health problem
that's manifesting in the insurance industry. There's no doubt the industry as a whole is not
affected because most insurance is home insurance, car insurance, all this other stuff that really is
not involved. That's why you've got to look at the health insurance and the disability insurance
companies, what's happening in there. So, and a good friend of mine is, does analyze those companies
as individual companies as well, but I'm not involved in that level of granularity. I'm much
more globally focused in my work. I do spend a lot of time on the US economy. The reason is because
the US economy is relatively easy to watch. And it's the largest single national, national economy.
I mean, the European economy is arguably bigger than the US economy, but it's fractured across
many, many, many nations. And the European Union is heavily, heavily corrupt. And I really don't
trust anything coming out of the European Union at all. So that's why I study the United States
a lot more because it's a big economy, 350 million people. It's one nation under one government
that's supposedly democratic. But I'm more focused globally. I know I do look at a lot
write a lot about the US economy, but I don't go down into the granularity too much. I'm sorry.
But great question. You're a neurosurgeon, an ex neurosurgeon. I think you would be
horrified to see those increases in ALS happening in Singapore.
Yeah, it's terrifying. I mean, one of my first, I had my older brother dropped dead suddenly.
My first cousin dropped dead suddenly. And then my first cousin's eldest sister died of brain rot.
And she was already behind the eight ball at Parkinson's. And after each booster shot,
she got more ALS type symptoms until the point where she couldn't walk. She couldn't eat,
couldn't swallow and died. So yeah, I'm kind of pissed off.
I had a 35 year old nephew have a cerebellar stroke. He was supremely fit. He played a grade
rugby. He was a semi-professional boxer at extreme levels of fitness and a triathlon
champion. At the age of 35, he had a cerebellar stroke and they discovered a hole in his heart
as big as a 20 cent piece. An Australian 20 cent piece is that big. Now that hole must have occurred
in the last short period of time because there's no way that he could perform at those athletic
levels with a hole in the heart that big. And it was shocking to hear what happened. He was so
lucky to survive. He's still alive, but he's struggling to recover. I'm convinced that that
hole in the heart is due to endothelitis in the septum and that that septum just fell apart.
As you would know, the structure of the heart. And then he got a clot and the clot went up and
hit the cerebellum, of course. So he had a small clot in the cerebellum, but once you've got your
cerebellar damage, it's extremely difficult to recover from cerebellar damage because your
balance mechanism is not there. Your spatial awareness is not there. And he's now still
struggling after six months to do one day of work. And that completely exhausts him. He can't do
any more. He was previously running a large company in the oil and gas industry with well
over 100 employees. It's a very big company, but he can't even work for one day now. He's 35.
It's he's in our family. I'm very disturbed about it. But what can you do? The damage is done. I'm
very worried about that. But and I have heard of so many cases have come to me about a disease,
terrible disease stories and death stories. Your family is no different to many others.
Yeah. And then, you know, that as far as that septal defect preexisting,
not even taking into account the limitation of athletic performance that would have occurred
because of that. But certainly throughout his life as an athlete, he had gotten sports
physicals and sports physicians are trained specifically to check for those kind of heart
defects and listen for. So absolutely, you're right. That had to have been a hole that got
punched through there from inflammation or possibly even ischemia, destroying the septal tissue,
you know, from spike protein circulatory damage. Absolutely. I think he played he played a grade
rugby in Australia for I think eight years. You can't do that with a hole in the heart. You just
can't do it. You know, it's impossible. And then he was a semi professional boxer. He had, he
describes his level of fitness as extreme. He said I was extremely fit, not not just fit.
I was extremely fit. You can't do that aerobic activity with a hole in the heart. Now that's an
acute event, acute event in his heart that precipitated his cerebellar brain damage.
All right. We'll better move on. Julie? We've got 30. Thanks, Dario. We've got 35 minutes. Well done,
Jerry. You're doing well. So now we've got Julie then Paula from Italy. Julie. Hi, Jerry. How are
you? So I am good. Great presentation. I swear. I love being part of everybody's presentation since
I'm disabled by the shots. My mom's a murder from the shots. I'm like looking at your chart going,
there I am. There's mom, you know, kind of thing. I know your story, Julie. Sometimes it's unnerving.
You know, I'm like listening to this going, God, I'm like the poster child here. But no, I appreciate
all of you greatly. And, you know, I think those disability numbers are probably even under reported.
I speak with vaccine injured every night and they are not getting their disability, right? They're
having to push this, that and the other. So like everything else, it's even probably worse. But
and I'm working as hard as I can here locally. And it's the testing. You hit the nail on the head.
You know, I went and got this blood transfusion in August and now I've got these spike antibody
levels through the roof. And again, people are like, well, maybe it doesn't. I'm like, you know
how do I get six bags of blood transfused? And now 30 days later, I've got 16,664 spike antibody
dilution levels and now it's increased to 18,000. So it's just, it's crazy. But hopefully there's
some work being done on that. I am and I think that, you know, my biggest concern is this nanotech,
right? So the bots, the semiconductors, the wires, and there's a guy that, you know, we're going to
go down to Sacramento to meet that does RF testing. So run the RF testing over my body,
see if there's any of these crazy weird metals and things. And, you know, maybe if there's enough of
them. But you know, we've assaulted our military with this stuff. So I don't know why. I guess
here's my question. I swear I'm all over the place. But President Trump, how do you feel about him
getting his booster shot and a flu shot? Do you believe it? And then, you know, for me, it's so
unnerving because either he didn't get it and he's bold-faced lying, which is a problem, or
he took it and now somebody's basically taking a shot at our president who could drop dead tomorrow
and has all this now tracking device all rolling through his body. And shouldn't we go arrest the
doctor that did this to him? So I put a copy of the letter from that White House doctor that did
that. So what is your view on the Trump situation with those shots? Thank you.
Okay. Thanks for those comments, Julie. I'm very aware of what happened to you because I
know what happened. And I'm very worried. But nonetheless, we can't turn the clock back. We've
got to deal with what we've got now. I'm very worried about the blood bank situation and whether
the blood banks are contaminated. And my guess is they are. And so unless you desperately need it,
I wouldn't personally have a blood transfusion unless I desperately need it. Now, in your case,
you did desperately need it. You probably would have died if you didn't have it. So you needed
red cells to carry the oxygen, otherwise you would have just succumbed. So you had no choice. You knew
that because you're a nurse and you knew exactly where you were faced. Your spike antibodies are
just measuring antibodies to the spike and they can go up and go down. And you can still be left
with the prionic abnormal spike protein molecules in your body. And they can collect in a part of
your body. So you're not out of the woods even if your antibody level goes down. And as I said,
I'd be looking more at your cytokine levels there to monitor your clinical progress. So that's just
a comment. The radio frequency tests, well, I could talk about that. And it certainly is a worry.
But I don't think we need to get involved in that too much. The Trump booster is really a concern.
He's obviously poorly advised about lots of things. I mean, he's economically very, very weak. The
tariff war is a complete joke in the economic world. I mean, there's just no way you can rescue the
economy of America with tariffs. It's ridiculous. So he's demonstrated his lack of knowledge in the
world of economics. And he's clearly now demonstrated his lack of knowledge in regard
to these COVID shots. He's in denial probably because he did Operation Warp Speed and he thinks
it was the greatest thing on earth when it actually wasn't. But I am equally concerned,
and I had a discussion with someone yesterday about my concern that this could be a
a homicidal event when he had a booster shot, because we do not know what he's really been
given. And if you ask the doctor, he said, what was in that shot? He wouldn't know. I'm sure he
wouldn't know. And that's a concern because as I said earlier, right at the get go, I said,
for all of his faults, which are many, I mean, Trump has so many faults, it's ridiculous, but
he is a moderating influence in the US government at the moment. And that's a good thing. So I don't
want to see the demise of Donald Trump. It would be bad for the United States. So I want to see him
survive and continue to be the president. I don't think he's perfect in any shape or form. In fact,
I endlessly criticise what he's doing on my economic analyses. But look, if this is another
assassination attempt, I would be very worried. Now, you can't, I want to bring up what's happened
to Joe Biden since he left office. Now, I've read a report that he's now got disseminated
prostatic cancer in his bones and spread throughout his body. And yet, in the last
six months of his presidency, I think he had a medical examination and was given the,
oh, he's perfect. He's fine. He's, you know, nothing wrong with Joe Biden. How does a doctor
do that in a man of that age and not do a PSA reading? You must do a blood test PSA of men
of that age if you're going to do a medical examination. So we don't know what his PSA
reading was when he was president. It may have been normal. If it was normal, then he's suffering
from a turbo cancer. Right. I've lost you there, Julie. You're still there? She's there. She's
there. Okay. So if his PSA was normal a year ago, then he's got a turbo cancer and his days are
numbered. If however, he had an elevated PSA last year, I want to know why the people of America
weren't told about that. And if they didn't do a PSA reading on him, then I want to know who was
the incompetent doctor involved in looking after the president of America. And I'm equally concerned
about the doctor looking after Donald Trump, because I think that most doctors are now
incompetent. I am a very strong critic of my profession now. I've been out of it for 18 years,
but I cannot believe what's happened to the profession of medicine. It's disgraceful,
what has gone on in the last five years. So look, I'm very worried now because Donald Trump has been
injected. We don't know what he's been given. And we don't know what could happen. So, and if we lose
him, we've lost a moderating influence in the US government. And that would be a tragic situation.
Thank you, sir. Thank you, Charles. Thank you, Stephen. Thank you, Julie. Now, before we go to
powder, Jerry, I'll make the observation that that Trump knows nothing about the economy. And yet the
early charts that you showed us is the stock market in the US is booming. Those two statements
don't sit. No, the stock market has nothing to do with economic health, Charles, nothing at all.
No. What? No, it's just speculative madness in financial assets. That's all it is. It's got
nothing to do with the economy. You can look at the stock market in Venezuela, it's skyrocketing up.
It's the best in the world. You can look at the stock market. But you've given us these charts on the stock
market to draw conclusions from. No, no, no, that's being playful here because there's,
you know, you're getting very subtle here that that is the money thought US was stuffed, it wouldn't be
ploughing it perhaps. No, no, no. Okay, let me reconcile that. The price of financial assets
can rise stratospherically while the economy is suffering. Even in the case of Venezuela and
Argentina, their stock markets have been rocketing up. Oh, you ought to see them. They're fantastic.
Going up, up, up, up, up. You know why? Because people are desperate to invest in something.
They don't trust their banking system, so they buy stocks. But no, that's not a signal of economic
harm at all. So there's no real correlation between stock markets going up and the health of the
economy. And the health of the economy. You can do a topic on that list. I think you bogged down
on that because I'd love to see that. It's well recognized in the world of both finance and
economics, Giles, to be honest. So it's not really. Well, I've been following the market since the mid
1970s. And that's a new concept to me. But we'll talk about it. All right, we go on. It's Paula.
What's happening with the Italian? Here you are. You're going to talk about Italy,
Gerry, in terms of Georgia, Maloney. But anyway, Paula will bring it to our attention.
Hello. First of all, thank you very much. Very informative. I'm in between France,
United Kingdom, where I lived for 25 years and worked. And then, but then, of course,
I'm also Italian. It was very interesting to hear your key sentence, Europe is too corrupted.
So I don't look at you, Sarah, I don't look at the economy going on there because it's just too
corrupted. And to me, that is a sign that is really in, we are in a huge decline in Europe.
So we really have to get ready for the worst, so to speak. And so, so thank you for that sort of
illuminating comments. I have a question about your example of the China ship. So anyway,
I apologize because I'm getting a bit off topic, maybe given that, you know, been discussing very
interesting issues on both on the genetic therapies, I call them genetic therapies,
and in the USA economy. And my question is whether you intended that as a sort of metaphor,
because taking China as a model, I have a bit of a cognitive dissonance. You know how, I mean,
have you forgotten Tiananmen? Do we know what happened during what I call the sanitary
dictatorship? I know people have been literally locked down in places. I know personal people who
just told me, oh, this week, everything is going fine, an ex-student of mine told me at the time.
But this last time they got the wrong delivery that was in Shanghai where they couldn't really
leave the apartment. They delivered toilet paper instead of food, but that's fine because obviously
she couldn't say anything. So I was wondering whether this Chinese, whether this ship was more
of a metaphor. And the other comment is, we talk about Trump, and I fully agree with your vision
about Trump. And incidentally, I suspect that if we were president on the second round, I wonder
whether all of the pilots would have gotten the shot because we know that normally the FAA would
never give pilots a medication that hasn't been approved. Normally, a medication has to be on the
market for at least a year for them to be given to pilots. I wonder whether Trump would have
authorized that. So maybe that's why it was not allowed to stay in, so to speak, in spite of the
fact that he clearly won the election. So now that brings me to the second point. We talk about these
leaders as though they have really autonomy in making big decisions. We were talking about
foreign policy, but we forgot that they are not free. I mean, as long as the state could say
many things about that. But as long as the state as a nation doesn't own a bank, and the federal
bank is not a federal, no reserve, federal reserve bank is neither federal nor reserve.
And there is no country in the world, I would say, or maybe I'm happy to be told that I'm wrong,
that own a bank. As long as the state does not own, they control the printing of the currency.
It's not sovereign. And so the leaders are not sovereign leaders. Okay. Thank you again.
Okay.
Grazie, Paola. Grazie.
Okay, quick things on what you raised. The peace arc is a metaphor. You're right. It's not going
to have much impact. But it's great PR for China. And America should launch 100 peace arc ships,
right? I would tell Trump to do that tomorrow. If he picked up the phone to get some good advice,
launch 100 peace arcs tomorrow, right? Or announce the launch. You don't only announce it.
You'll win the world back if you do that. Right. So it's just a metaphor. You're right. I'm not a
supporter of communism, because communism is just part of utopian socialism. The Chinese situation
from a command and control is clearly communist. It's clearly totalitarian. But guess what? They
have a capitalist financial system. It's what we call a pretend capitalist system. Let's call it
that. But they have excellent control of their economy. Excellent control. I follow the Chinese
economy very, very closely. They are the best managers of an economy on this planet. There is
no doubt about it. They really know what they're doing. They understand money. They understand
their economy. They understand their finance system. They are not dependent upon borrower demand.
Now, borrower demand is what drives capitalist systems. You mentioned banks at the end.
The American Federal Reserve is privately owned, but it is one of the few privately owned central
banks in the world. Most central banks in the world are owned by the governments. And central
banks, by the way, do not create money most of the time. The only time they create money is when
they do a QE program, which is very rare. Most of the money that's created in a capitalist economy
is created when a bank loan is made by a commercial bank, not the central bank. The central bank sets
the cost of money, the interest rate, but only at the short end of the curve. It's only overnight.
But the creation of money, of fresh new money, occurs when a new bank loan is created by a
commercial bank. Now, a bank can do that because, number one, it has a banking license, and number
two, it has a willing borrower. You've got to have the willing borrower. You can't create money without
a willing borrower. 98% of the fresh new money in our economies is created as a bank loan. So,
capitalist Western economies are totally dependent upon borrower demand. And if borrower demand
declines, then it's difficult to rescue your economy. You can lower the interest rates
dramatically, down to almost zero, and that will hopefully rescue it. But in China, they're not
dependent upon borrower demand because they run a capital supply system, not a capital demand system.
They can force money into their banking system. I won't get into the nitty gritty of that, but
I've addressed with you that, yes, it's communist. Yes, it's totalitarian. I'm not in favour of that.
But equally, America is not a pure democracy. There is no pure democracy on Earth.
Democracies exist as tyrannies of the 51%, or in some countries, it's as low as 35%. So,
tyranny is the norm. Don't get too carried away against this communist versus non-communist.
They're all tyrannies, basically, as far as I'm concerned. So, I think I've addressed your
things. Just one last comment about the pilots. Yes, the pilots are a great concern. They can't
be replaced, as Kevin said. I'm very worried about them, and they're an important indicator
of what could happen. So, I think I've addressed all of your questions, and I agree that the EU is
in dire straits. It's completely controlled. The European Union is controlled by the most evil
and problematic criminals in this planet, and they're just damaging the European Union.
They're damaging all the nations of the EU. Okay. Thank you, Paula and Grazia.
I got a message on Friday, Joey, that Italy and Hungary were leaving the EU, but I haven't seen
that reported anywhere else. But someone smart tell me that, number one. Number two, we've got
Bruce here who has presented to us, former FAA, Paula. Bruce says that the FAA aerospace
medical group is completely corrupted and at least complicit. So, the FAA couldn't give us
shit about pilot health because of that corruption. So, Bruce, thank you for that very useful insight.
Thanks, Gerry. All right, we've got three to go, maybe four. We're finishing in 18 minutes.
Jeremy, our favorite dentist, as you know, Gerry from the Channel Islands, our only dentist in
point of fact. Okay. Thank you, Gerry. I mean, the questions have been great this evening. They've
sort of asked a lot of things I wanted to raise. So, I just wondered, Gerry, whether you had time
with your comment tonight or maybe in another boom finance one. One is, if Trump goes into
Venezuela, are you expecting an oil shock? And what, you know, do you think we all get that?
Because oil is so low at the moment. Two, are you thinking about, do you think we're going to get
capital controls coming in in the EU? Because they seem to be setting up for that with their
CBCDs and digital currencies. And now they want us to reveal our bank accounts if we travel into the
EU, which is just unbelievable. And whether you'd like to say anything about anything more about
Palantir and Peter Thiel and the large big tech companies which seem to be surrounding Trump
and JD Vance. And they seemed, yeah, any comments on that? And what do you see?
And I wonder what you think they might be up to.
Okay, quickly on Venezuela, Jeremy. I think Trump will not invade Venezuela. I think it would be
suicide to do it. It would be a disaster for the United States. So I don't think he will do that.
They want the oil price to stay low and go lower in the United States. They think, they mistakenly
think this will harm Russia. Russia does not have to sell any oil at all to anybody. Okay,
the Russian economy is very robust. They have three of the most important elements in their economy.
They have abundant food. They're a food exporter. They grow a lot of food. They have abundant energy.
They have abundant water. Okay, and they have a big manufacturing factory. It's next door. It's
called China. They don't need to sell oil to anybody. Okay, so this idea that by lowering
the oil price, they'll harm the Russian economy and this is just ridiculous. Okay, it's not going
to happen. So that's, I think we've dealt with that. The capital controls in the UK. Yes,
I think Keir Starmer is the most evil Prime Minister you've ever had. And that's by the way,
that's making a big statement because I think Boris Johnson was up there with all of them.
Yeah. And you've got a whole string of terrible Prime Ministers. So the UK is in a terrible,
terrible situation. I think it's controlled by the criminal cabal, the global criminal cabal.
I think Starmer will go down in history as the worst Prime Minister ever. And I've been very
worried about the UK for a long time. I think it's just going to be, it's on the slippery slope.
Yeah. If you're living inside the UK, I would advise people to leave if they can.
But look, it's a terrible situation. I've been, I've lived inside the UK. I've visited many,
many, many times and nothing is getting better in the UK. Nothing. So that's very bad. And what was
the last question? Just about sort of big tech cabal that seemed to be surrounding Trump. Yes,
yes. Yes, yes. And you know, I'm very concerned. This is what we call technocracy, the technocratic
influence on the US government at the moment. These people think that technology can solve all
of mankind's problems, that all you have to do is, it's a religion. You just worship technology
and you spend trillions of dollars on technology to solve all of mankind's problems. This is a false
religion. Okay. And it's being driven by these technocrats who are surrounding Trump,
unfortunately, which is why I don't want Trump to demise, going to demise. So they are very
dangerous, these people, very, very dangerous. And a lot of them don't even know how dangerous
they are because they're unwilling, what they called, they call useful idiots. Okay. They're
useful idiots. Some of them have had money rained upon them when they've got no great skill or
ability. Right? Billions of dollars have been rained upon them. And they think that they've
got some answers to the world's problems, but they haven't. Technocracy is not the way forward.
Okay. These people are very, very dangerous. And their influence has to be muted and stopped. And
Trump is a moderating influence, I think, on that to some degree. I could speak for a long time,
Musk and Thiel and what they did as boys and what families they came from and where they got to
where they are. And I'll just say one thing about Elon Musk. His first company was purchased for
$300 million when it barely, I don't think he was making any profit at all. So who purchased it?
Compact Computer. What did they do with it? They closed it down. Why was he, why did he have $300
million rained upon him at the age of, I think he was 26, 27? It's very obvious if you know why.
But these people are having money rained upon them to act in the interests of others. And they often
don't know. They're unknowing. They think they're geniuses because, oh, well, I'm a genius. I've had
all these billions rained upon me. I must be a genius. Therefore, I should have influence on the
world. But quite frankly, they've been carefully selected, often as boys or as teenagers or young
adults. And they've had money rained upon them. They've been carefully selected. They've been
carefully promoted into positions of great power and influence. And a lot of them don't even know
what they're doing. Some do. And I think the ones who do know what they're doing, they're the
greatest concern. I can have a conversation about that on another day. I hope that's the answer to
question. It's a big issue. Thanks, Jeremy. Thank you, Jeremy. And on technocracy, I just put in the
chat the link to Patrick Wood's presentation to this group. And Patrick is the expert on technocracy
in my view, and maybe Jerry's. But I'll put the link in there. You can watch him again of the
evils of the technocratic game, where the technocrats say, leave it all to them, Jerry.
Leave it to we mere humans. We have no idea. All right, Carla Dean is a mere human.
Hello. Thank you. Hi. I would like for you to comment a little bit about
this new self-amplifying injection that's coming about with the M DNA, the next, and they call it
next spike. And of course, next in Latin, meaning violent death. I wanted to know what your just
comment on that for us, please. And thank you. Thanks, Carla. This is very worrying self
amplifying means self amplifying. It's, it's what I said before the term I used for prionic disease,
prion disease is self amplifying. So one prion, which is an abnormal protein molecule can create
another one. So it has some sort of triggering effect to create prion cascades prion. They're
like, you know, the snowfall that develops into a, you know, a dramatic collapse of a of an ice
shelf or a snow shelf. So once it gets going, it gets a momentum of itself. That's what I'm trying
to get across. So, so prion activity is self amplifying by itself, we've already got a
self amplifying situation. If, if we're dealing with prionic disease being injected into people's
bodies, which already self amplifying, and it's thought that prion disease is infectious.
So therefore you can spread a prion from one person to the next. And the most, the most obvious
example of that is the mad cow disease where they slaughtered thousands of cattle in the UK,
I think because they were a risk that people should not eat meat. Now the reason they were
worried there is because of the transmission of prions, because Kreuzfeldt-Chakhov disease,
the mad cow disease is a prionic disease. We've already got self amplification. Okay. And if you
then deliberately go to a self amplification technology, you're just boosting that. It's
extremely sinister, Carladean, extremely sinister. We are heading, I think, steadily and slowly
towards billions of people being affected either in death, premature death, or premature disability
in this planet billions. This won't happen overnight. It'll happen slowly. But it seems
that we're going down that road. So yes, it's a worrying development, but I would say it's already
we've already got it. We've already, if, if prionic activity is present, and it appears that we've got
some evidence that that's true, then we've already got self amplification. We've already got in,
we've already got shedding. Okay. Because prions can shed. So, and the shedding of a prion could be
done through people breathing, just close proximity to people. So I avoid large social
settings as much as I can now. But I, you can't avoid them completely. You can't cut yourself off
from society. I've got to go to two big social events in the next few weeks. And I know I have
to go. So, and I'm invited to speak at meetings. So, you know, you can't cut yourself off. We are
all part of this. We can't escape the threat. It's real for everybody on the planet, including our
children, our grandchildren, and their future children. This is the greatest crime ever committed.
It makes Hitler and Stalin look like schoolboy beginners. This is, this is a really, really scary
situation. Thank you. I hope that answered that question. Thanks. Thanks, Carl. Great question.
Thank you, Jerry. Two questions to go. And so, Marv and then Tom, and then we'll let you go,
Jerry. And Charles, I would like to speak as well, just briefly. Okay. Yep. No worries, Stephen.
Hey, what's this? The human species is the most adaptable species ever on this planet.
And we have, do you think we can adapt to a peaceful society? Do you think that's possible
that we could live in peace? Do you think the human species can do that? Thank you.
No. The answer is we must, we must become a peaceful society. There's no, can we do it?
We must do it. And we all must work towards that goal today and tomorrow and the day after,
because without that goal and the understanding that we can achieve it, we'll never get there.
There's, it's imperative, Marv. It's not, can we do it? It's, we must do it. And I think we can,
I think we can evolve. And I think it basically boils down to this. I think we have to understand
the role of psychopaths in human history and the role of psychopaths in our leadership.
Psychopaths are attracted to military power and to political power. They are interested in power
and control. If you read the history of mankind, it's about psychopathic behaviour over and over
and over again. The Romans crucified 11,000 men on one day. That's the biggest number they did.
Right? Psychopathic behaviour is the norm in our planet and we have to evolve
beyond that as a society. All of the politicians that I witness, almost, there are some exceptions,
they're rare, but nearly all of the politicians we witness on a daily basis clearly have psychopathic
qualities. There's just no doubt. They're very much interested and addicted to power. They want
control over people. You've got senators in your country that have been there for 40 years and more.
Why would they still be there? They're addicted to power. That's obvious. Addicted. So as a society,
yeah, sorry. Yeah. So as a society, what I want to encourage is a discussion about
psychopaths and what they do to our society, because the tribe, the tribe has to start to
isolate psychopaths and it has to start to send a very strong tribal message to psychopaths that
we will not tolerate their behaviour anymore, that we will not give them power, that we will
exclude them from power. Okay? We must rise up as a large tribe of people in each nation
and make this statement to our psychopaths and I think the psychopaths are at least 10% of the
human population. Under the Milgram experiments, you'd be familiar with the Milgram experiments,
up to 65% gave the maximum voltage to the victims. 65% when they're instructed by an authority figure.
That means that my 10% might be even higher than that and I think it is, but I think I say 10%. I
think psychopathic behaviour is contained easily within 10%. So we've got to have this discussion
about what psychopaths do, what their qualities are and we have to develop societal intolerance
of psychopathic endeavours in companies, in clubs, in political parties, in governments.
And until we do that, we can't evolve where you want us to evolve to. So we've got to have that
discussion. It's very, very important and remember this, what happens when psychopaths get control
of a nation? They can capture the nation and create a hostage situation. You're basically
hostage to your government, right? You're captured and when you're a hostage, you're at risk of
suffering from Stockholm syndrome. That's when some of the people will fall in love with their captors.
Okay? So this is when people love their dictators and love their authoritarian governments
and they've got Stockholm syndrome. So all of these dynamics have to be discussed as a whole
society and we have to elevate this whole knowledge about psychopathic behaviour and we have to
inhibit it through tribal pressure. Does that answer your question, Marv?
Yeah, yeah, that's a great discussion. I've wondered about this for decades, but I think
the psychopathy follows the power. Power is the addictive substance and once the addictive process
begins, then you have, you know, you can look at the Trump administration and it's very easy
to identify those who have addictive disorders. You know, that's what encourages me about RFK.
He has been clean and sober for 40 years. Yes, yeah, but I think that's a really good comment.
You know, under the Milgram experiments, everybody should read about the Milgram
experiments because 65% of the people who were giving the shocks would give an almost fatal shock
under the instructions of an authority figure. That's a very big slice, 65%. All of the details
surrounding the Milgram experiments need to be examined by everybody. I would encourage everybody
to go and do that. I can provide a website that shows all of that. We've got to have this discussion
as our whole society and by the way, one of the ways we can exclude psychopathic behaviour is to
have sortition as a method of electing our representatives and not voting. So sortition is
election by lottery. When you have lottery systems like they did in ancient Greece,
you block the psychopaths. They can't manipulate lotteries. So we have to have a very heavy
discussion about running our representative elections on lotteries. And the point is,
and the point, Marv, is, Jerry, just to expand on that sortition, that the people who go into
the lottery are those who want to be the leaders. That is not correct. It's not picked from the
general population. First you nominate for leadership and then sortition.
Well, no, you can have a general population, but you've got to exclude some people from the
population. You wouldn't have a sortition about people who don't want to be the leader,
surely? Yes, you would. No, you have huge incompetence. We've already got huge incompetence.
It can't get any worse. That's good. All right, we've got to move quickly because we've got Tom
and then Stephen to finish. Thank you, Marv. Good question. Okay, yeah, Jerry, you're inspiring.
Thank you for your work. And I really, I follow your sub-stacks and I think that I've lost,
I mean, they're in a different folder now. I have to go back and make sure I keep looking at Boom
and the other. I know you have at least one other one. Well, about COVID, I think focused on COVID.
So, yeah, I just helped tabulate an election and there's all kinds of conflict and everyone
fighting about the rules and so forth. And we use rank choice voting, but they wanted, they
wanted disapproval voting and then they also wanted to be able to abstain. So just a real mess.
So I have a bunch of questions. You probably are not going to answer all of them. The first one's
probably the most on point. You had looked at blood work. You had showed us early on
that both the vaccinated and unvaccinated had issues and you were getting the lab
reports. And I noticed the indigenous Canadian, you know, the Indians in Canada got together and
put out a statement saying that they were calling for an end to the vaccines. And they had in their
list of supporting people they had, Anna Mahalshia. And she's one of these, right away,
I thought I'm not going to share this because, so that's like, what do you, you know, what do
you think about the self-assembly stuff and, you know, blinking lights? I'll quickly deal. I can
quickly deal with this, Tom. Okay, let me quickly deal with this issue about the, what is, what is
nanotechnology, all right? Let's just think about that word. I can assure you, I can assure you
that these products have almost certainly got nanotechnology in them. And the reason for that,
that I can say that is lipid nanoparticles are used as their transfection mechanism.
I'll say it again, lipid nanoparticles. And when you are injected, you get 40 to 100 trillion
lipid nanoparticles injected. Now you can't see nanoparticles with a standard microscope.
You've got to do an electron microscopy, right? You can't see them. You can't get someone look
at a blood on a dark field standard microscope and say, oh, there's nanotechnology. You can't do that.
In the world of biology and in the world of physics, everything is nano, everything.
Atoms are nano, molecules are nano, right? Everything is nano. Well, we know the lipids,
they vibrate, those are self-assembling nano structures. So my point is, my point is I don't
have to do any laboratory analysis. I can just point out that just the transfection mechanism
is nanotechnology in action. If someone says there's no nanotechnology in these products,
you're a nutter. You just say, yes, there is. There's lipid nanoparticles, right? So you don't
have to have the argument. I'm referring to the electronic transmitters and the
MAC addresses and the radio transmitters. Anything and everything is possible, Tom.
We're dealing with psychopathic evil criminals who are seeking to harm and murder millions and
millions of people. Do you think they'll go, oh, well, maybe we won't give them this weapon. Maybe
we'll leave that weapon out. No, these people have a pathway. They're following a well-known path.
We can argue about all the weapons. There's not much point arguing about the weapons.
So what do you think of Anna Mahal's show?
I don't wish to give a personal opinion on a program like this. There's no point.
You're arguing about this weapon versus that weapon, this person versus that. I'm not interested
in that. There's abundant evidence. What about wealth and equality? I know you refer to Fourier,
I believe, and utopia and socialism. And certainly, like in the Marxism comes out of that.
I'm around people that are Marxists and also egalitarians that believe that there's this
ridiculous wealth inequality. You talked about the psychopaths. There's also sociopaths, right?
How are we going to, I mean, well, we naturally, if we can have a peaceful world, can we have a
world with less wealth equality? And how can that be done? Okay. Well, that's a very big question.
Look, psychopaths and sociopaths are just words that are the same thing. Don't get hung up on
any difference. There's no difference. People think psychopathy is people going around murdering
people. It's not. Psychopathy and sociopathy is at least 10% of the population. That's just a
marginal thing where people go around murdering people. And so, so psychopathy and sociopathy is
common. It's the norm. Don't be surprised by it. I think we can evolve beyond that, but we've got to
have the discussion. We've got to have the tribal discussion about what it is about the history of
mankind and make a tribal population wide decision to identify psychopathic behavior,
to have a conversation about it and to eliminate it in our institutions. And until we begin that
process, we can't succeed. So we've got to begin the process. I'm trying to get that process rolling.
And so that's my answer. We've just got to get going. We can't argue on the details. We've got
to talk about this issue, psychopathology and sociopathology. And we've got to, we've got to
exclude them through shaming. We've got to shame them out of their tendencies. Okay.
Okay. And then on the financial side, a fun thing, and then I'll go,
if I earn cash out on the market, but I have a house loan and I earn this cash and I'm not getting
it all through any connection to my bank and I pay off my loan entirely with cash, I make this
huge windfall payment. The asset for the loan goes away, but they end up with this cash
and they can put that cash into the federal reserve. So they're better off at the end.
This goes into a very complicated discussion about the origination of money and the death
of money and what happens to the money supply over time. I don't have really time to discuss it,
Tom. I will go back to what you said before about can we get a better wealth distribution?
That's more important. I think we can do that by changing our financial sector. We need a lot more
community banks. We need more state-owned banks. We have become too dependent upon shareholder-owned
banks. I have a lot of ideas about how to fix the financial system, but I have to go into a lot of
long discussion about that in terms of the money supply, which you're talking about here. It is
very, very complex what you're talking about there. Only 2% of our money supply is cash,
98% is credit. We'll never pay off 98%. Would you agree with me that that bank benefited more
than if I had used it? It doesn't matter, Tom, because 98% of your money supply is credit
and 2% is cash. If you used all of the cash in circulation to pay off the loan,
you would make almost no difference. It's not really material. It doesn't have a sufficient
weight. Last question. They attempted to have a debate between Warren Mosler, who's MMT,
and Howard Schweitzer, who represents the Just Money Sovereign Money Movement. It never happened,
but the Just Sovereign Money people don't believe in fractional reserve banking.
I don't know. You're not an MMT. You're not a Just Money. Where do you stand in that?
No. MMT is going to go one destination, and that's a communist monetary system where the
central bank controls everything. MMT is a pathway to communist monetary system. Under communism,
there's only one real bank, and the USSR only had one bank. It was the central bank. MMT is
just a pathway to that. You mentioned fractional reserve banking. It doesn't exist. There's no such
thing as fractional reserve banking. I can go into that in detail if you wish.
Well, zero reserve banking then, right?
Yes. We've already got that. I can explain that in terms of money volume, money supply,
but it's too complicated. Then sound money, you mentioned that. I'm not a sound money man.
There's no such thing as sound money. If you want to back money with an asset such as gold,
you've got to keep digging gold out of the ground to expand your money supply, or you've got to
increase the price of gold to expand your money supply.
No, this wouldn't be sound money. This would be sovereign money where the government just
issues fiat money. Yes. If the government can issue that already, it's called cash.
The government can issue cash. The treasury can issue large amounts of cash. The government could
pay every employee with a cash packet every Friday afternoon, tomorrow. You could do it-
Without debt.
No debt at all. The treasury-
So you're okay with that? You're okay with that?
Yes. Anyway, we can get into that, but yes. I'll just quickly say-
Thank you very much.
The treasury can issue cash. It's not debt. No debt. By the way, debt is not a problem.
Next, Stephen.
Thank you. Last comments to Stephen. Stephen?
Jerry, I'm trying to save my voice at the moment. I hope you'll forgive me. I would like to say that
you made some great presentations to us previously, but I think this was the best.
I think you're really in control of the questions and you keep the focus on what you want to
say and that's what good presenters should do and not be deviated by people asking questions,
which may be designed to actually take them away from the main points.
So I think you've done remarkably well. I think I accurately described you as a polymath.
Would you agree? And I have a further question, a very important question.
Are you a polymath?
I don't like to say I am. I'm a humble person.
Okay.
But I think that's enough. Yes.
I think I am.
So I want to ask you a very important question. You're a doctor, as you know, in Australia,
a retired doctor, but nonetheless, you said a very important thing to me some time ago.
You said one thing I can do, Stephen, is talk to patients.
And of course, I'm very, very disappointed with the medical profession and they're getting worse.
And I just don't know how to save them. So they think now that practice in medicine consists of
doing tests without actually talking to the patient. And, you know, I've heard a few mentions
by non-doctors on this call that, you know, the answer could be tests. No, that's what they're
putting out in the mainstream media. It's all a lie. That's not how you practice medicine.
So one of the things I would like to say to you as a medical doctor, to you,
a medical doctor in Australia, and we've always been pretty close. We agreed on cults very early
on when we were analyzing together. Lord of the Rings, I don't know whether you remember that.
And Lord of the Rings and the moment in the Golding's book, the brilliant moment when
he said, and so when the Navy officer, British Naval officer appeared on the island where the
where these savages, these boys had become savages in tribes, it said, Golding said,
some of the boys began to tell their stories to the naval officer. This was who represented order,
of course, to them. That wasn't in the book. And some of the boys began to cry. And I made
the observation to you that that was the end of the cult, you know, of the boys fighting each other
in tribes. They formed these cults and they were destroying each other. So I think that's the
natural state of human beings. That's, you know, how human beings work. They gather together and
they kind of try to convince other human beings to join their cult. But there's one thing that I'm
really concerned about, Jerry, because I think we as doctors should be able to make diagnoses.
And particularly, we should be able to, a good doctor should be able to hypothesize, and we
should be allowed to hypothesize. I think you did mention it. I think that we, most doctors have
completely talked about this for some time now. I just don't seem to be able to make any headway,
but we're not going to make any headway as human beings until we recognize that huge numbers of
people have been damaged by psychological torture by their own governments and gaslighting. And it's
blatant. And this is continuing in the UK, but other countries as well. I think that it's inevitable
when you've got that kind of psychological torture going on, inflicted by their own governments,
that there's going to be PTSD, high levels of anxiety, depression, destabilization of huge
numbers of human beings and Stockholm syndrome. And you will never ever solve the problems, in my
opinion, until we have a diagnosis of Stockholm syndrome, until proved otherwise, after the
outrages of 2020, 2021, 2022 in particular. I just want, I would like your views on that as a medical
doctor. Are you there, Jerry? You're frozen, Jerry.
You're frozen, Jerry, or have I frozen? No, you're still here.
Jerry's frozen. You've frozen him into inactivity, Stephen.
Yeah, well, he'll come back. I'd just like the answer to that question, even if it's one word.
Sorry, Jerry, we lost you then. What do you say? Yeah, hurry. Hold on. Hold on.
Hello, can you hear me? We can now, yeah. Oh, good. Okay. Now, my wife made a phone call. We're hanging
off her phone at the moment. Sorry, I'll, yes, I can remember the discussions you and I had,
I think now going on three, four years ago, where we discussed Lord of the Flies, where you said I
was the commander turning up at the beach. Yes. Where we discussed Stockholm, where I brought up
the subject of Stockholm syndrome. We had that discussion. There's nothing has changed. You're
absolutely spot on. This is exactly what's going on. And I talked about it earlier. I don't know
if you've been listening to everything, but Stockholm syndrome is clearly happening. And
we've been captured by the psychopathic criminals that control our governments. I don't think that
we're our governments are in control of themselves or their nations anymore. So we're captured. We're
hostages. And because of that, you'll get certain people suffering from Stockholm syndrome and
supporting their captors. They support their captors. They believe their captors are doing
the right thing. So a conversation about Stockholm syndrome must be part of this. I agree.
In regard to the medical profession, I read a report the other day. I don't know how accurate
it is. It said that prior to COVID in America, the trust in doctors was at 75%. And that it's
now reduced to 40%. That's a very good thing in lots of ways, because people are realising that
the medical profession misled them, misled them into a very dark future. So first thing we have
to do is rescue the medical profession. We must rescue the medical profession. So we've got to
have a strategy to do that. We've got to explain to them what they've done. We've got to get them
to admit to what they've done. And we've got to get reform in the medical profession. So
all of your comments, I agree with, they're all absolutely accurate about what's going on.
So this again boils down to the societal conversation about what's happened and
how we ended up in this situation. We are no different, no different at all to people who've
been captured in totalitarian situations in the past, such as the Romans, such as the people under
Genghis Khan, the people under Stalin, the people under Hitler. We're in the same position now.
We're all in the Nazi. I tell people we're all living now in a Nazi concentration camp.
Every one of us is living in a Nazi concentration camp. The Nazis are in control. We have to,
as a group, realise our situation. And as a tribal group, we have to shame, shame these people into
leaving their positions of power and rendering society peaceful again. So we have a very
difficult task now because a lot of the inmates have got Stockholm syndrome. They think the guards
have done a good job. Absolutely. I think huge numbers of people are suffering from Stockholm
syndrome. So I watch them very carefully every day and I see that they're very, very passive.
They're waiting for the next order. And I'm able to observe large numbers of human beings,
if you like, on the beach where I live. And it's a perfect place to observe them because they sit,
they stand and stare at the sea. But guess what? You wouldn't approach any of them for help
because they look, their whole body language is so meek, meek and waiting for the next order.
It looks like that to me, rather like the picture of the Jews standing in the mile long queue,
I think, to be shot in the back of the head. And you just think, why would you do that? You know,
why wouldn't you just take your chance and run at one of the guards in the hope that you could take
his gun away from him and then shoot a few of them before they shot you? That's right. Stephen,
I want to, you said something very interesting then, and I want to show you something. I'll
share the screen and show you that humans break up into two groups. I want to show it to you
so everybody can see this. And this is a summary of the Milgram experiment I mentioned before.
Can you see that on the screen? Not at the moment, no, but it'll come. It's saying,
oh, yes, now I can. Yes. Okay. This website is called psychotrix.com Milgram experiment.
I'll put it in the chat. Under the Milgram experiment conditions, Milgram eventually
came up with this idea that human beings divide up into these two states. One is, sorry?
Very well. I'm just on a meeting and I called you back in about half an hour.
Terrific. So it, it, people divide up into an autonomous state, autonomous state,
or an agentic state. In the, I'll read it, in the autonomous state, individuals perceive themselves
as responsible for their actions and they act accordingly to their principles and their values.
They have a sense of personal control and accountability. And the agentic state,
under the Milgram experiment, Milgram suggested that in certain situations of individual shift
into an agentic state. Here they see themselves as merely agents or instruments carrying out the
wishes of an authority figure. Responsibility for their actions is transferred to the authority,
alleviating any personal moral strain. The focus shifts, the focus shifts from the morality of the
act to the success of following orders. This, Stanley Milgram wrote these words a long time ago,
but he identified putting people into great positions of stress where they're essentially
captured as hostages, which the people were under the Milgram experiment. And they divide up into
these two states. Now I want to draw attention to his state called the agentic state. The term
analogy is very, very important because what they're talking about now is agentic artificial
intelligence. If you haven't heard that term before, go and look it up. Agentic artificial
intelligence. They're using this term deliberately. They are clearly on a pathway to controlling
human beings into an agentic state where they will simply follow orders by an authority figure.
Okay. In almost all cases, they're turning us into robots, right? Human robots. So this summary,
I'll put this summary of the Milgram experiment in the chat. And the other thing I think everybody
should look at is what Yuri Besmanov had to tell the world when he made his statements.
And hang on, I'll just put this in the chat. Milgram experiment summary. And Yuri Besmanov,
I'll get that. He made a lecture on what was happening way back in 1984, 83, 84. And I'll put
this in the chat. Give me one second. Everybody should read these two, which should read the
Milgram experiment summary. And they should watch Yuri Besmanov's lecture because Yuri Besmanov tells
the world what's coming. And he told the world in 1983, it's a beautiful, beautiful lecture.
You've got to concentrate. You've got to take notes. You've got to go back and listen to what
he's saying. It's a brilliant, a brilliant lesson for everybody to learn. So yes, yes, yes,
Stockholm syndrome is real. We are captured. We are living in a Nazi concentration camp.
We've got to learn what the Milgram experiment lessons are. And we've got to learn about Yuri
Besmanov. And we've got to understand this term, the agentic state and the role, the coming role of
agentic artificial intelligence. Okay. So I won't say any more about that. Thank you.
One more sentence, Charles, to Jerry. So, Jerry, I think the artificial intelligence,
which is being relentlessly pushed by the BBC, so it's clearly bad, that that should be pushed
when people really don't know, even the people who think that artificial intelligence is the
answer to everything, really don't know what the effects on human beings will be in the context
of what we know now about the damage that's been done to human beings all over the world
by social media, by these damned mobile phones and computers. Computers have ruined our lives.
And now they want to take over us with artificial intelligence and get us to submit to artificial.
What do you think about that? Very quickly. Yes, you're correct. You're correct. I would
encourage everybody to read about the Milgram experiment summary I put up, please, please.
Get that link. Get going. Read what you read. Listen to what Yuri Besmanov had to say and
understand that there is already a big discussion about agentic artificial intelligence. Look up
all about it. They are literally telling you what they're going to do. They are going to turn
all of the people into robots. They know they can do it with at least 65% of the population,
right? Because the Milgram experiment tells them that. So the agentic AI is the ultimate threat.
They're not using this word by happenstance. They know the word. They know why they're using it.
It's from the Milgram experiment. Everybody must learn and tell everybody they know about
the Milgram experiment. Yeah, excellent. Thank you so much for talking to us.
Charles, why are you interrupting me relentlessly and no one else? Okay.
Thank you, Jerry, for your brilliant presentation. Thanks for listening to me. Everybody,
thank you for listening to me. Thank you, Jerry. Thank you, Stephen. Thank you, everybody,
for the comments. Ciao, ciao for now. Save the chat, everybody. Ciao. Ciao, ciao.
Thank you, Jerry. Thank you.
You have a question for Tom Rodman, the group, if you've got time.