And there's also a recording that I've done of the presentation back in October and back
in November to a string of doctors and other presentations and interviews that I've also
done.
So here's our great challenge.
You can all see that.
I'll minimise that.
Isn't that pretty?
Very.
So keep your, you don't have to actually keep your mute yourself or not, depending.
So we've got in talking about if I'm being badly done by in relation to jab mandates,
in relation to exemptions not being observed in relation to behaviour of Woolworth's.
Here's the seven layers of relevant laws.
Natural law, common law and God's law and add in there our inalienable rights.
And that's an important principle.
Inalienable rights.
And in your thinking around this, these rights have been under development for 807 years
since the first Magna Carta in 1215.
So it's now 2022.
That's 807 years of development.
And just because a parliament says it can do something, no, it can't.
It cannot take away inalienable rights by definition.
They're part of natural law, part of common law, part of God's law.
Then there's international laws, treaties and conventions.
So you've heard of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, the Nuremberg Code.
The question of informed consent under those international laws and treaties.
Now in Australia, those treaties don't have the force of law unless they are incorporated
into either federal law or state law by being incorporated.
But interestingly, most of the provisions of the Nuremberg Code are incorporated into our
national health law.
So there's all these treaties.
And right now, the WHO is trying to bring in a new treaty where 194 countries all give
their authority up on all health matters to the WHO whenever the WHO declares that there is
a pandemic and the WHO can declare a pandemic whenever it wants.
So be aware of that.
I'm doing a lot of work with the World Council for Health.
So then we have these international laws.
Then we have the Australian Constitution of 1901.
Then we have national laws, Australia's laws.
Then we have each state law.
Then we have regulations and orders and professional standards made under state laws
and national laws.
And then we have rights and obligations under contracts.
So looking at that list, you start to go, gosh, what applies to me?
And when you see words in a statute or when you see a reference to a natural law, then you say,
what does that word mean?
And then you get different judges interpret different things.
So my first question to any of you is, do any of you have questions around these seven layers?
We can go back to them at any time.
Now, the next question is where you work.
So starting at the bottom up, you have a contract, a relationship with an employer.
And that governs your relationship.
But then there's all these levels of law that apply using words that most people have different
interpretations of. If I said to any of you, what is a good education?
What is, you know, what is beautiful?
What is true?
We all we would all have conversations around this.
Now, it is my considered view as a I've got an Honours degree in law, a Masters degree in law,
a practice law for 20 years.
I've been in business for over 50 years.
It is my considered view that what has happened in Australia is totally unlawful and contrary to law.
Full stop.
So so if I if I went through, well, why do I say that?
Because of all of the application of all of those laws, the lockdowns, the mask mandates, the
application of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, the Biosecurity Act, the Australian
Constitution, the Charter of Human Rights, all of those laws do not give the government, state and
federal the right to do what they claim to have done.
That's what I say to you now.
I say that the TGA declaration of that these jabs are safe and effective is fraudulent and criminal.
And Simon DeWolfe and I spent a lot of time, I spent 17 hours a week in meetings of Doctors for
COVID Ethics. I moderate a lot of these meetings.
Today, we had tonight with tomorrow morning, we've got Dr.
Paul Marrick, who lost his job, one of the great physicians in in America.
Yesterday, we had Dr.
Jessica Rose, who is a superstar researcher.
So 17 hours a week, and I've spent that and I've spent the last 10 years dealing with vaccine
issues and parents whose children are damaged by vaccines.
And so I've had this 10 years legal strategy, helping a lawyer, dealing with Andy Wakefield,
Del Bigtree, Bobby Kennedy, understanding the whole vaccine game, but also preempted by my
first visit to a naturopath in 1965.
So I don't have a doctor.
I have not been in hospital for anything.
I'm 69 years of age.
And I have known since the 60s, since the 60s, of the difference between health and the medical
structure that we're engaged in.
Engaged in.
And the big idea to embrace on this is that as a society, Australia and the Western world
has made the doctor the king.
That's the decision that our society has made that if a doctor says anything about health,
don't you dare question what a doctor says unless you are a more qualified doctor.
That's the structure that we've created.
And I knew this in the mid 60s.
And then as the journey has gone on, in 1975 when I was working at the biggest law firm in Melbourne,
Malisons, something happened in 1975.
I announced this I think last Friday at the foam meeting.
You're more welcome to come to foam if you want to come to the weekly injections.
What happened in 1975 relevant to the health industry?
I don't know.
None of you are old enough to know that, but you might have read about it.
The fact is, that's when Medibank came in.
And what I was a tax lawyer with Malisons at the time and what happened was doctors incomes
went through the roof.
Why?
Because the government was now paying for much of the medical care.
The problem was that suddenly, suddenly, the patient doctor relationship
from a two way relationship became a menage à trois.
So you all know what a menage à trois is.
Beautiful three way relationships.
Hello, Lita.
Welcome.
Anybody who's coming late will be able to catch up.
So doctors ceased in 1975.
That was the beginning of the end.
And I said to doctors, I said, you are giving away your authority for money right now,
because the government is now going to control your behavior.
And all of you need to realize that every doctor,
the behavior of every doctor is now tracked by computer, by AI.
And if you're a doctor and a GP and you don't prescribe enough medications based on
what they say you should be prescribing, you will be investigated.
APRA will organize an investigation of you.
So medical practice in this country is entirely compromised.
On top of that, what I've learned over the last thing is, by the way,
five children who have had basic vaccinations that range from 40 down to 11.
I was vaccinated.
Most people over 40 are not aware of how many jabs a child has to have in the first four years
in Australia.
But did you drop out, Natalie?
She did tell me that she might be having issues and she'll have to jump back on.
It's unstable.
We'll wait for Natalie to come back since she's the instigator of this conversation.
There you are, Natalie.
Sorry.
Were you able to hear us while you were connecting to audio?
Sorry, no.
I was just, I left.
It dropped out on me, so I'm just hotspotting.
Yes, hotspotting works pretty well, everybody.
If you don't know how to do that,
put your hands up if you don't know how to hotspot.
Who doesn't know how to hotspot?
Okay, so with hotspot, Tony and everybody else, what you do is you get your mobile phone,
okay, and you hotspot it to your used Bluetooth and the gear,
you go through the phone instead of the NBN.
That's what hotspotting is.
And it's often more reliable than a $60 billion NBN network.
One of you, you can hotspot Tony through that, correct.
All the time.
I don't have NBN.
Yeah, nice.
You have to do that there.
Good.
Well, what hotspotting means, Tony, is you use a tablet to go through the phone lines
or you use your phone to get access to the internet.
Now, how many injections of vaccines does a child born in the last five years in Australia
have to have under the no jab, no pay federal government rules?
Who knows that number?
Cheryl, may?
I have a confession.
While I don't have children, at the beginning of last year, sorry, I got a job in a GP clinic.
And unfortunately, now I think about it, I was doing vaccinations and I was horrified.
At how many we were giving.
Two or three every time they came in.
So I would say 43.
Now, Tony, John, Neil, we had four or five in the first five years of life.
And that's why people over 40 go, what's the problem with vaccines?
They've saved our lives.
43.
Now, secondly, the second big thing you need to know is 1986.
What happened in the United States in 1986?
Ronald Reagan put into law the indemnity for pharmaceutical companies
for being sued for damages from vaccines given to children, not adults, but children.
Because the rate of take up of vaccines was dropping.
Now, you might say, unthinking people will say, well, vaccines got rid of polio, bullshit.
Bullshit.
Nothing to do with vaccines.
If you look at the, any chart, it's not vaccines, it's acquired immunity that does it.
And as I said, we have made our medical industry, our kings.
And anybody who questions what doctors say is a conspiracy theorist.
And you need to understand that the conspiracy, the words conspiracy theorist came out of
the Warren commission and then used freely as anybody who questions the government narrative.
Now, because of that, because of that 10 years of background in 1986,
Reagan puts this into law.
There's an argument that he didn't realize what he was signing.
And then suddenly pharmaceutical companies started pumping out more and more vaccines.
And now in America, a child in the first 16 years of age is required to get 73 injections.
So now in 1986, one in 10,000 children were autistic.
Okay.
In 1986, one in 10,000 autistic.
Today, what is the number?
How many children in America are autistic?
What's the rate?
What's the proportion?
One in 18 or something like that.
One in 32.
Oh, 32.
One in 32.
And Andy Wakefield says he's heading to one in two.
Now there's a direct correlation between levels of autism and levels of injections of these
kill shots of these poisons.
Now the medical profession says there's no evidence that autism is caused by vaccines.
There's no other explanation.
No, we don't know where we don't know what's causing autism, but we know it's not vaccines.
Total bullshit.
There has been no gold standard test done, a double blind standard test done on pumping 43
antigens into a child in the first four years of life in their life compared to none.
And we could run those tests because the Amish in America have no vaccines.
Everybody, you need to understand that.
And I wonder what other groups there are in Australia that have no vaccines.
Do any of you know?
Certainly not genetic CV.
Does anyone know of any other group in Australia like the Amish?
But the Amish for decades have had no vaccines.
And the health statistics I've seen as a control group are amazing.
Now, why this is relevant, you need to understand that the pharmaceutical industry is incredibly
powerful.
Is incredibly powerful.
The pharmaceutical industry owns politicians and not vice versa.
Politicians are owned by money and big business, not their convictions other than Neil Angus.
Many, many politicians who went to parliament as politicians of conviction have stayed there
through selling out their principles.
How do I know that?
Because Neil, I don't expect you to confirm it, but you talk to anybody.
The people who become the ministers are those who comply with the narrative.
If you question the narrative in federal government, state government,
you will never become a minister.
You will be an outlier.
Now, right, so COVID comes along.
And what I'm sharing with you is 10 years of learning around this plus the last two
years that has consumed a lot of my time.
That's why I can say to you confidently that these laws and regulations and pronouncements
are unlawful, illegal, and can be challenged.
Now, the Australian government, Scott Morrison, said we will have no mandates in this country.
He is enabling any attempts at mandates by the state governments by funding them as they're
going by allowing those states to do precisely 80, 97% of funding, I think, Neil, no, 87%
of all funds come into the federal government and then distributed to the states.
That doesn't count see GST because they go straight to the states.
It doesn't go through the federal coffers.
It's not counted in the $510 billion of tax revenue that the federal government gets
representing about 25% of our GDP, which is about $2.2 trillion.
So Greg Hunt, Scott Morrison, the decisions made over the last two years have been in
accordance with the requirements of big pharmaceutical companies, of the FDA,
of the CDC.
They're followed slavishly by APRA and the TGA.
And I hope there are some APRA and TGA officers watching this because we're coming for you
because your behaviours are illegal, corrupt, and criminal.
APRA, TGA, you are killing children and making, and there's an AVN case right now against TGA
on its declaration that these are safe and effective.
Now, do you know everybody what the federal government is doing in the case brought by
the Australian Vaccination and Risks Network in the federal court?
Do you know what the federal government is doing?
It's claiming that the AVN has no standing, legal standing.
The government does every trick it can to delay these cases, to pull every strategic
point it can so that these matters are not able to be litigated.
And then they threaten the litigants with cost orders against them.
And I'll have you know that every state government and federal government says
we require litigants to observe what are called model litigant rules.
The governments don't observe those rules.
I say that governments are guilty of another crime of obstructing the course of justice.
Obstructing the course of justice, okay?
Another crime.
So in that framework, I have evidence from another lawyer friend of mine that the federal
government is paying big business money to require mandates.
Please take that on board.
Federal government is paying money to hospitals and big business to enforce mandates.
You need to understand that.
I have letters available to me of that.
The AFL, all these sporting organizations, they are absolutely bribed to require these mandates.
So I'm saying no mandates are legal in this country and that the only way you can enforce it
is through power.
So that's why I called power.
So guess what that requires?
Natalie, guess what that requires?
Money.
And there are two organizations, there are organizations, there is money available.
I've helped set up two funds, one in Victoria, one in Queensland,
and has significant monies available.
And the question of the application of those funds, so people are giving money and I've been,
my wish is that we have 100,000 Australians, primarily health practitioners, putting in $10
into either of these funds to have a million dollars a week coming into these funds so that
we can run these cases.
There's a whole string of cases that can be run.
But what I'm saying to you is that if you have an exemption and the hospital says no,
the hospital is acting unlawfully.
But to enforce that, that's the challenge.
Okay?
That's the challenge.
And so what I say to you is we have a corrupt federal government,
we have corrupt state governments, we have a corrupt system.
I say to you that taking these shots is a death sentence if you get the wrong shot.
And the wrong shot means there are different batch qualities, different batch strengths,
different genetics that CV mentioned, I presume that's Charles, mentioned genetics.
There are certain types of genes that these jabs will not harm, just like cigarette smoking.
You know that one third of Australia's population are not harmed by cigarette smoking?
Isn't that amazing?
One third.
They have bodies, they have genetics that can eliminate the 4,000 chemicals that are in every
cigarette.
So if you get your genes done and you fall into that category, no, cigarette smoking won't harm you.
That's why everyone knows an auntie or an aunt of 100 years of age who smoked all their lives.
That's why.
So the other example is losing weight.
One third of the population can't lose weight through aerobic exercise because of your genetics,
you have to do resistance work to lose weight.
Let's say you're out there running and running and running, losing no weight.
No, your body type, your genetics, similar with these jabs.
Here's another problem.
Many of the people who say they've had the jabs have, they don't know what they've had.
Number one, number two, we don't know how many of saline solutions.
Number three, 80% of the people that you see haven't fallen over.
So everybody says to you, what's wrong with the jabs?
Thank you, John, for that comment.
I'll save all these chats.
They'll keep putting your thoughts into the chat because, because all I will send you this
recording everybody so you can really listen to it.
So the fact that 80% of people are not apparently damaged.
I want you to think about Shane Warner.
I put it fair and square alone that it was the third jab that killed him.
That Nellie Corder I heard this morning, world's second best golfer,
has got blood clots off the circuit.
Senator Kimberly Kitching, absolutely caused by jabs, have no doubt.
Rod Marsh, jabs.
So people say I had the first jab.
I had the second jab.
Have another booster.
Now I say to these people, so what brand did you have?
I don't know.
So not only is this poison, but then people are going AstraZeneca, Moderna,
J&J, put anything in my body.
I don't care because I think these are safe.
These jabs, not one of them is a vaccine and not one of them is safe nor effective.
And there's all the evidence out of the sudden.
So you then go, Nathalie, and anybody else,
you go to your boss and you say, you know, I'm exempt.
They go, I don't give a shit because the government's giving them money.
And in Canada, I'm dealing with nurses that have set up alternative health systems.
I say to all of you that we need what's going to win this battle is people power,
is human beings because politicians, the police, the police are human,
many of them, except for the mercenaries that were brought in by Daniel Andrews,
that were brought in by other states.
You've seen how evil looking they are.
They are indeed evil.
That's what they brought into the truckers convoy in Canada.
I say to you, we are at a crucial turning point.
I will take these legal actions.
I've had involved in a number of legal actions.
We're taking a case against the FDA.
I'm helping the AVN on each case.
I'm helping litigants in South Australia.
There are many cases that can be run.
And Ryan Fulmick, I'm sure you've heard of Ryan Fulmick.
He says, and you can watch the evidence on the World Council for Health website.
He says the courts around the world are hopelessly corrupted.
And just think about that.
So here we have this problem because you have a judge.
Remember the judges are not doctors and they have brought into the chief health officer.
They go, no, this is safe.
If the chief health officer says this is safe and effective,
or if TGA says it's safe and effective, that's good enough for me.
You better give me compelling reasons why I'm going to go against the government
that appointed me as a judge, despite their oaths of office,
which by the way they are breaching and which by the way,
for which they will be held accountable.
And I'm telling you everybody that if there was a Robert Malone this morning
asked this good question, he said, make a decision.
In the future, are you going to be a defendant or a witness?
Because every politician who has been engaged in supporting this mass murder,
this killing of children, this killing of adults,
the suppression of alternative treatments is guilty of crime.
And I also say to you that it is a crime to put a jab into somebody
without their informed consent.
And you cannot have informed consent because the ingredients
in these jabs have not been made public.
Every single time there's a jab going in, it's without informed consent.
That's where we're at.
So my question to you and to everybody, I'm happy to answer questions now.
My question to you is what's more important to you, health or money?
And we have a member of, we have one of our group of DC,
who shall remain nameless, who is a health professional
in the Victorian public service now out of it because she refused to get jabbed.
There are vast numbers of health professionals, nurses,
allied health practitioners who are out of the system.
And there are people creating new communities to provide services for people.
I'm saying that each one of us has to make this decision.
Are you willing to take the punt on a jab?
And you've got your family around you who say, look, nothing's happened to us.
That's true.
Look at the hundreds of world-class athletes that have died.
I have the link to the air table.
I think I've shared that previously.
691 world-class athletes globally, pictures of each, every single one of them
with serious adverse events and 400 of them dead.
And yet these politicians are saying fourth booster,
fifth booster.
Why are they saying it?
Because they're paid to do so.
Or secondly, like Jeffrey Epstein, they have been compromised
into not going against this poison-injecting narrative.
That's where we are at, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, every one of you have whatever, to whatever extent you've been stopped from working,
you have a legal case available to you.
The question is that those legal cases are one way in which we're fighting against this.
It is people power that is going to win this battle.
And there are many people who will only awaken when their children and grandchildren die.
I'll say that again.
Many people will only wake up when their children and grandchildren die.
And the game plan of these jabs is mass depopulation.
So I don't care.
So anyone who says that what's the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory?
Six months.
Anybody who dares to call me a conspiracy theorist,
I know that they have taken the blue pill.
The blue pill is where you say anything that government says is true.
The red pill from the matrix, of course,
is that you do your own thinking.
I'm about freedom.
You have the freedom.
And I say to you, you have a choice.
Am I going to sacrifice the rest of my life, my future health, for money today for a job?
And that's the choice that each one of us has the freedom to make.
I say to you that you can no longer say,
and by the fact that you're on this call, you already made this decision,
the jab is not for you, that that is an incredibly awake and wise decision.
And the people who have had the jab, if they have not had a saline solution,
and Simon put an interesting note there, but I'll stop for questions.
If you've had a jab and you haven't been damaged or you know people like that,
it could be for a whole bunch of reasons.
Different manufacturing, low strength, particular type of genetics,
and I think the particular genetics, it's quite an interesting question of the types of genetics
that are not impacted by the spike protein.
So it's not the jab, it's the production of spike proteins in your body
that kills your autoimmune system.
Jessica Rose last night said there were three major, major adverse events, everybody.
Write these down.
It's BCD.
BCD.
The three major ones.
Who can guess?
BC, not there's not an A there, BCD.
Sorry.
Come on, your own experiences.
C for cardiac, I'm hoping.
No.
D for death.
D for death, no.
A, BCD.
Clotting, C for clotting.
No.
Yeah, I was going to say coagulation there.
B stands for Bell's palsy.
And guess who was announced with Bell's palsy yesterday?
Footballer, Matthew Lloyd.
Fit, healthy.
The C stands for cancer.
This is all Jessica Rose's magnificent research.
She analyzed the cancer, she analyzed the cancer,
All Jessica Rose's magnificent research.
She analyzes the VAERS database.
By the way, I heard yesterday Simon was on the call, no Simon missed the call.
In 2013, Anthony found she put a stop to the proper restructure of the VAERS database.
He is the criminal of the highest order.
So Bell's palsy, the B, the C, cancer, D, diabetes.
Get that.
Now, what's clearly happening is the people who suffer Bell's palsy,
they can't even imagine that it's the jam that caused these problems.
People having heart attacks.
Oh, Shane Warren, everybody go have a checkup for a heart attack.
Bullshit.
Kimberly Kitching, oh stress, stress, stress.
Bullshit.
But there is a causation problem, everybody.
And I say to you that everyone that you know, give you the example,
everyone that you know who's died of cancer died because of milk.
When they had milk as a baby.
Because they all had milk as a baby, didn't they?
The truth is that correlation is not causation.
But you have a look at the government narrative and the government is paying people,
including funeral directors, to not speak up.
If you can get the truth out of any funeral directors,
they will tell you right around Australia that their fridges are full.
They're building bigger fridges.
But they're not allowed to say that publicly.
All right, enough from me.
So coming back, Natalie, to your answer is three words.
Suck it up.
Become a warrior.
Become a warrior because you are being hard done by anybody who is losing their jobs
because of no exemptions, no management.
It's because your organisation has been corrupted by the government handout.
Well, secondly, they have been gutless to stand up against government unlawful dictates.
You can take them to court, but you start to ask this question.
What I'd rather that you did is to become an activist, to spread the message,
to get people just putting $10 a week.
All we need is 100,000 Australians putting in $10 a week
to run all these cases.
There's over 30 different cases to run, including human rights,
breaches, disabled humanity, because the definition of disabled human,
disabled man or woman includes someone who's going to be.
Yes, Roo?
Um.
What?
Where was I?
Natalie was.
I just suck it up.
So, so the game, the game over 30 different cases that we can be bringing again.
And if any of you know of part of the problem with having one big benefactor,
I've dealt with these people with lots of money.
I've had, I've received money from them for strategy advice.
And the problem with one benefactor who's got lots of money, he says, well,
I'll sit there with my legal team and decide which of these 30 cases to run.
You need to understand the strategies of government are to obfuscate and delay.
Secondly, to run any case, you need the right evidence, the right plaintiff,
the person with the right attitude.
It takes time to put these cases together.
And that's why we need to keep talking to people.
And there's a whole bunch of strategies Simon DeWolf and I are working on,
John Huntley as well.
There are 12 battlefronts to this fight, one of which is legal cases.
The next one is the federal government election.
You have to tell people to not vote liberal, Labour, Greens or Nationals.
They are go last on the list.
It's all the minor parties first.
And then under our, what's it called, proportional voting system,
all those votes get allocated because we have governments behaving unlawfully
and unconstitutionally in this country.
It devastates me.
I'm a member of the Liberal Party.
I am appalled by what the Liberal Party is doing.
I'm appalled that they're not standing behind Neil Angus in his principled stand.
I'm appalled the Liberal Party is not standing for freedom.
I'm appalled the Liberal Party is not standing for personal responsibility for health.
And in fact, everybody, and Tony has been a member of the Liberal Party for 50 plus years.
Here is a document we believe.
This is what the Liberal Party says we believe.
It's a beautiful statement.
Look, it says here, families are the cornerstone of society.
We regard families as the most effective providers of primary welfare,
including the care and education of children.
Families are the cornerstone of this nation's future social stability.
Our greatest objective is the achievement of a humane society.
Humane.
So all of you who've lost your jobs, particularly from Christian organisations, Natalie,
they are frauds.
They are hypocrites.
Our greatest objective is the achievement of a humane society.
We are committed to providing a framework that places families first
and assists them in meeting the challenges of operating in a modern society.
We will do this.
Listen to this.
By encouraging freedom of choice in access to and the provision of first word.
Here's what the first word is.
We will do this by encouraging freedom of choice in access to and provision of health,
education, social welfare and aged care services, lies, lies, but this is published.
Okay.
That's why I carry this around.
Okay.
Questions, everybody.
Anybody.
Put your hands up.
The way to go to reactions.
We'll do them in order.
Simon, is there anything that I've forgotten of substance?
Because Simon spends a lot of time on these big, on these extensive meetings,
17 hours a week of meetings I have on these issues.
So is there anything obvious that I've overlooked that you've been screaming out to say?
Yeah, well, I didn't go to the last one for some reason.
So I missed that one.
But I had a call with the group in Belgium that has about 10,000 members now doing this
parallel health system.
And what I really liked in their approach was saying actually.
Help me, everybody.
Parallel health system.
Just to explain that in a moment.
Simon, keep going.
10,000.
Okay.
And the beautiful thing I thought that they were saying is that it's time for us to convince
the people to take responsibility for their own health and not to say I'm not a doctor.
The government knows better.
But actually, I think it's a lot of a responsibility thing.
And I know it's not the best country for taking responsibility.
But in a way, if you say, you know, I'm not going to let somebody else decide on my health,
my feeling and so on.
But I'm the boss of my own temple.
I think that's a very nice way because they say they're fighting this all the time in Belgium.
People just say, oh, why would I do this?
I don't know anything about it.
Yes, you should know about it.
You should take your own responsibility of your own freedom and your own health.
I thought it was really nice.
Yeah.
Yep.
Very good.
That's all personal responsibility.
Each one of us is personal responsible.
That's why the New England Code said you cannot.
You cannot impose a procedure on a person without their informed consent.
And any form of coercion vitiates informed consent.
And so I am telling you, everybody,
that if you only had the jab because you could not afford to lose your job, that is coercion.
You have not given informed consent.
Is therefore the person who jabbed you committed a crime and the politician
who encouraged that is guilty of inciting a crime.
You can quote me on that.
Next question, John Huntley.
Yeah, I was in Mollies today yesterday chatting with a lady that I know there.
And she's got till the 31st of April to be jabbed or she gets sacked.
That's after 32 years of working there.
Yeah.
So I put her in touch with Maddie Hopkins because Tony Nickolick's too busy shoveling mud.
And he, Maddie's organising a group for the Woolworths,
people who don't want to get jabbed and take young Brad Wheelbarrow, whatever his name is,
to the court over because I wrote to the CEO of Woolworths some time ago telling Brad that
if anyone dies from his mandate, he will be charged with negligent homicide.
And he went ahead with it.
So I just want anyone in Woolworths that got the jab and died to contact me because we will go.
John, I've got a number of Woolworths employees in Victoria who will join that class action.
Okay.
Class action.
Yeah, it's growing.
Brad Banducci, I think is his name.
B-A-N-T.
Wheelbarrow.
Good.
Excellent, John.
Everybody please note any friends that you have in Woolworths and Coles can join in too.
But the Woolworths class action is different to the Coles because they do things in slightly
different ways.
So that's important to note.
Tony.
I just put a note there.
You mentioned a few weeks ago about becoming sick for a day or two after attending a couple
of funerals and you thought that the jabbed people were shedding illnesses.
Yes, there is.
They're shedding spike proteins and that is a risk.
And the homeopathy, the homeopathic remedies that you take, Tony, will be sufficient
protection.
So you don't have to avoid mixing.
And so the question of this shedding problem, it is a problem.
However, the fact is that even if you get jabbed once, twice or three times,
you can take steps, including homeopathy, to help your body to help your body handle
this poison injection.
Now, the problem is it's an mRNA technology that's changing your DNA.
So your DNA is working in particular ways.
What you need to understand, we all need to understand, your body is not a thing.
Your body is a bundle of energy.
And the fact is that you think you're physical, but actually you're made up of atoms, 99.999%
of which are empty space.
That you are just an energy event, mental, physical, spiritual.
And so, and so please, in terms of what Simon said, have taken responsibility to help start
to go to the alternative healing community.
There are people on this call who are in alternative healing modalities.
There are many experts around.
There is vast knowledge around.
I have asked a number of doctors who I respect, including Professor Ian Brighthope.
I asked him the question, to what extent as a percentage does the medical profession
around the world understand the functioning of the human body?
He said less than 2%.
So this is incredibly complicated, your body.
And if you tell yourself, I can heal myself.
And Tony, if you go in and you say, I don't, my body repels all shedding.
When you come into any environment, the power of your mind can enable you to achieve that.
So I certainly wouldn't lock yourself away in Warwick Nabil, no matter how lovely Warwick Nabil is.
Thank you.
Thanks, John.
Oh, am I, can you hear me?
Yep.
Yep, good.
More a statement than a question.
I've got a friend who was here on the weekend and he works in finance law.
And he's been working for himself for quite a long time and he's roughly 58 years old.
He deals with people who can't service their home mortgages.
And, you know, well, losing their homes are under threat of homes.
And he told me on the weekend that as of a couple of years ago, it was 5,000 to 6,000 people a year
that Victoria wide.
They're looking at now this year, 120,000 people coming for that assistance.
And his comment was that, you know, these people, the banks are actually saying to the people,
oh, come and talk to us if you've got problems.
And he's saying, hang on.
So you're going to go back to the people that are bloody telling you this bullshit for help.
They're already sending you down this path.
So yeah, he's saying this year is just going to be a tsunami of what's coming.
And more my comment was, I was just thinking then about, you know, Dan Andrews and all these
shenanigans about, you know, like assisting people with homes and rah rah rah.
And I read stuff on Voice Victoria.
So and Neil may have further words to say on this.
But yeah, it's quite disturbing.
That's all I've got to say.
So that's beautiful.
Very relevant, everybody.
I say to you, if you can't afford to be without work so you get the jab, it's much better to sell
your house, sell your assets so that you can survive for the next one or two years.
Rather, because your house will drop in value enormously.
They're hugely valuable now.
Now, I'm not I'm I'm saying this is the choice that we make.
And every one of you on this call, you are incredibly capable because
my parents left Hungary, came to this country with nothing.
Well, every one of you on this call would be capable of going to Taiwan,
not able to speak the language or go to Philippines, speak English there.
Anyway, you know, you go to every one of you would survive.
Put on your fight for your freedom hat rather than this victim.
What John says is very relevant because if there's going to be so much default,
which there will be, by the way, remember, and Neil, this is most relevant to politicians.
60% of Australians are having a great time under this regime.
Most public servants, politicians, staff of politicians,
calls, woolies, big business, stock market,
infrastructure builders, 60% of voters, everybody.
That's why they're persisting with this criminal behavior.
All right, Simon next.
Just
Sorry, I just lost.
One thing I wanted to say is, well, we are still on the lockdown as I've vaccinated to be able to travel
because I can never, I mean, in three years, I cannot get back to Belgium nor I can come back here.
So now, since I can go there, unvaccinated, I cannot enter unvaccinated.
So I'm still in the lockdown.
But I was thinking it looks a bit like Mr. Ping in China who refused to sell his house.
Maybe you've seen these pictures online and there is like one house in the middle
and you have an enormous field of work surrounded.
It's like, yeah, you have the right to keep your house, but we'll disconnect you from everything.
It feels a bit like getting vaccinated.
You know, we are okay.
We can still have no vaccine, but we cannot access anything anymore.
We fall, you know.
But the thing I wanted to mention is one of the guys there in Belgium actually just had a child
and he's trying to register his child for a birth certificate with a whole list of demands
where he says, you know, these are the rights of my child and they should be respected
or I do not want to sign or have a birth certificate from Belgium.
And it took him about a week to answer and they say, well,
didn't maybe just put it under your mother's name.
They said, no, no, no, my mother is the same.
So they're in a legal battle of making somebody citizen, his daughter in full rights.
I think it's a nice approach.
Well, I'll keep you updated with this.
And I think those rights that I talked about inalienable rights, everybody,
you because you are a man, a woman, you have inalienable rights, 807 years.
Please get that.
You do not have to be a victim.
And the fact that the Victorian Parliament or Australian Parliament says,
we're taking that away from you.
It has no power to do so.
That's what inalienable means, not some trumped up thing that,
well, we can just give it all away unless you voluntarily give it away.
Now, how do I know how do I know this freedom is so important to fight for?
Because the number one sanction that governments have against any of us
for not observing the law is imprisonment, loss of freedom.
And that's why it's so important to understand this.
And the more of us that understand it, the weaker the governments will become.
Simon, do you have one other thing?
Yeah, sorry.
I just want to know also what they said as a lot of people also went on the street in Belgium
and say this has absolutely no value.
He said, I mean, I don't agree.
I think this has some value.
But he says, if it's not on paper, and if you're not really actually doing something,
which has a legal weight, you can all be on the street.
Nothing will change.
And he says in Belgium, I don't know if it's the same in Australia,
there is something like a silent consent.
If you do not object to any proposal proposed law in a certain time frame,
it means that you agree.
Yes, there is the argument of implied consent doesn't apply in Australia so much.
So that if the politicians are proposing something,
if you don't stand up, say, I oppose, then you've been to know that doesn't apply here.
But the WHO published some two months ago, a paper that said,
if we need to get over this informed consenting of parents
consenting to their children being jabbed.
So what the WHO proposed was that the schools make an announcement,
we're going to have vaccination teams coming to the school this week.
If you send your child to school, that is an implied consent.
Okay, that's what they're arguing for.
That is not correct.
It's criminal.
But that's the strategies that they're using to get parents to put this poison into their children.
Thank you, Simon.
And I've got the Peter McCulloch recording the levels of pericarditis,
myocarditis in young boys is through the roof, everybody.
John, by the way, just before we go, we've got Neil here in the Victorian Parliament.
Do any of you, if you want to ask Neil a question, it's wonderful having Neil here.
Please put your hand up as well because Neil's great at answering questions in terms of what's
happening in the Victorian Government.
But put your hand on the reactions, Cheryl May.
So John, next.
Yeah, you're talking about inalienable rights.
The Social Security Act says that your welfare payment is an inalienable right.
But when they brought in the cashless debit card,
the act that said that is the section, I think it's 52 of the Social Security Act does not apply.
And I queried CESPIT, our local member, sorry, Keith Pitt.
I questioned him on that and also on the Constitution, which says you can't discriminate
one area of Australia against another state.
And he says, oh, well, we just ignore that.
This is the attitude they have to legislation.
Yes. So they make their pronouncements.
That's legal.
Okay.
They say we can do that.
Bullshit.
They can't.
But it requires pushback.
And the fastest way to have pushback is to go to the We Are Human, We Are Free.
So everybody, I'll take you to that website or put it in the chat.
We are human.
We are free.org.
Now, the point about that website is there's eight simple steps you take.
You no longer buy anything from Coles or Woolies.
You tell all of your friends, you don't use any major corporations.
You do not conform.
Okay.
The more of us that conform now, as I said to you before, 60% of voters like what's happening,
they're better off.
They're better off.
If you've got a house, I have no faith in the value of your house continuing to rise
inexorably with what John O'Connor shared with us of all these people in distress,
the vast number of houses going on, and then the number of people that are going to be dying
because their population around the planet is going to die because people aren't waking
up quickly enough.
Cheryl, may you have a question for me or for Neil?
Neil, I'll put you on the spot here, but you're good at answering questions.
Look, I guess it was more of a statement than a good that or, yeah.
You said something about whistleblowers.
I'm happy to talk to someone.
Yes, we need whistleblowers.
But yeah, I just, you know, I know you're pressed for time, but you know,
that we can connect or if you can get to someone.
I know I have.
Anyway, I've got a bit of a diary that I've personal journal that I've kind of kept of things,
and I haven't been so active.
I've reached out to one person, but they're too busy to really take it further.
So I am open to speaking to someone and giving an affidavit and to assisting with that.
By the way, just as we're listening, any of you know, anyone who has had any significant
adverse events, we need, we need.
Next Tuesday.
Okay.
I'll give you.
Give me a call.
I'll put my number in the in the chat.
Okay.
Cheryl May, give me a call.
I'll write it down and draw me to call you or text you and you call me when you're ready.
You text me and and I'll call you.
Yes, we need we need whistleblowers.
Everybody.
We need people in hospitals who have got a written memo that says do do this.
I wanted to also tell you.
So Natalie sent me a text to say she's struggling to get back on.
Now I have to be I have to be honest.
Some of my paperwork is in storage because I've had to move and I've got things in storage.
But I do have my diary kind of in point form on a, you know, on a, on a, on a, on a, on a,
I do have my diary kind of in point form on a online document.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thanks, Neil.
I know you've got to go to the next meeting.
Sorry.
That's all right.
Thanks.
Okay.
Sure.
I understand that.
By the way, everybody, please tell anybody who's committed to getting a jab to keep
detailed records of what Cheryl May is saying.
Where you get the jab.
Precisely what time.
Take a photo.
Take a picture of the consent form.
Read the consent form.
Get a photo.
Get a picture of the precise product that's put in the batch number.
You need that evidence.
And how many adverse events?
And and adverse events and anybody.
I guess I guess in my situation, I'll be super quick.
Having worked in GP practice and anyway, I can talk to you more about it, Charles.
A lot of it intuitively, I know it's related.
But of course, with all the gas lighting, they don't acknowledge it.
But I'm happy to talk to you about that and, you know, share all of these things.
But yeah, but you certainly see a lot of trends when you're dealing with people
having similar reactions.
So what we want is for people to do their story of the adverse event,
put their photo on it and send it to their local member.
And and those local members need to be swamped with one page statements.
Here's what happened to me.
And they need to register their adverse events.
There's a couple of excellent websites.
We have talked about them before.
One of them is Vaxharm.net run by Michael Darby.
The COVID medical network is also running a recording system in addition to the DAEN website.
And by the way, anyone can from around the world can report an
address event on the VAERS US system.
VAERS.
Cheryl, may I please send me that text?
Beautiful.
Now on the Legal Fund question, Tim, the question that you've asked is the funds.
Legal Fund's info is on the FOAM website, which is new at FOAM.
What's it?
What's it, John?
You'll know it's in the email.
Tony, you might know.
FOAM online.
Hang on.
Let me just check with Julie.
FOAM online.
Doc.
Charlie?
Found it in the email.
Good.
So there's the Health Alliance.
Health Alliance Australia, Tim, is the one to give the $10 a week.
That's all we need to do.
And what's it?
What's our?
What's the FOAM website?
Is it FOAM group dot online or something like that?
Does that sound right?
FOAM group online.
I'll put that in the thing.
My FOAM group.
Darling?
What's their website?
Foam website?
Foam group.
Foam group dot online.
I got it.
It is FOAM group dot online.
So the Health Alliance Australia details are there.
Very easy to give $10 a week.
Every $10 helps.
Cheryl May, have we done your question?
Beautiful.
That was the main thing because I know you're busy.
Yeah.
Send me a text and I'll have you.
I'm doing it now so you can know.
Thanks.
Natalie, you'll be able to get all of this on the recording.
Thank you.
Tim?
Yeah, just going back a bit to the start of the meeting,
just on the question of the damaging effects of vaccines.
I was just wondering based on the available experience in the meeting,
are there any vaccines that are considered to actually be safe?
Because I'm learning more and more about the damages that vaccines have caused,
which is of course a brand new topic for me as far as the last 6 or 12 months go.
None.
Absolutely none.
They all cause harm.
They have some benefits.
And so a baby that's born today,
if you go to the government website, within 4 hours they're giving it a hepatitis B jab
and a vitamin K jab and we can't find out what's in that vitamin K jab,
sounds good, doesn't it?
We want to give the baby vitamin K.
Why on earth?
God made this baby.
Why would you want to give it a bloody jab?
This is money making 101.
Okay.
That was the opinion I was coming towards but I just wanted to clarify.
And unlike you Tim, a massive learning curve.
I would, yeah, yeah, massive.
So we can't go back, we can only move forward.
The recording I will put onto the phone website everybody.
That's a good idea.
I'll put the link onto there.
So all of you go to the phone, phonegroup.online.
That's where I'll put the recording and the chat.
Alison, here you are.
Lovely to see you.
Yes.
Wurundjeri, why Wurrung land?
Wurundjeri I know is in Melbourne.
Yes, Wurrung is the people.
Gotcha.
Beautiful.
Yeah, the land and the people.
I just had a question that you're saying around the kind of people going with their stories
because my colleague at work had a reaction last weekend.
She had really bad chest pain.
She's only 30, went to the Alfred and they said you have anxiety and tried to get anxiety meds
and she said I do not have anxiety, do an ECG, keep finding it.
And then they came back and actually said no, it is the Pfizer.
And her challenge was how many others have you told that it's anxiety
and sent them on their way when it's actually a reaction?
So I don't know whether she'll speak up
but I just wanted to sort of gently encourage
because her cousin just passed away with a heart thing
and she said it could be genetics like you're saying
and now she's had two, doesn't want the booster.
Not genetics.
No, but Mike, when your family members passed, that's what I was saying.
There are certain people who are harmed by these jabs
and other genetic types who are not.
And the Ashkenazi, Kazarian group,
they are immune from the spike protein production interestingly.
So there's been some heavy duty research done on that.
So Alison, if you get hurt and give me a call, you've got my number.
Okay.
It's in the chat.
I'm happy because Jerry Brady is doing a meeting.
John, it's a meeting with politicians and with...
23rd of March.
23rd of March, thank you, which is next...
What's the date today?
Wednesday, I think.
That's right, it's two weeks.
It's next week.
Today is the 15th, isn't it?
Yeah.
It's tomorrow week and this is a meeting
and Jerry's looking for people who have been injured
who will give their testimony to these politicians
from overseas and locally, okay?
There'll be an online meeting.
Malcolm Roberts is organising it.
Yeah, beautiful.
So Alison, I'm happy to speak to this person.
We need people who, if you know anybody who's been,
had a significant adverse event and particularly
the story that Alison just shared that they tell you,
that they tell you that this is all in your head,
that is important to be shared as well, number one.
Number two, Professor Dolores Cahill says that you need...
You can check for micro blood clots in your iris.
Everybody, that is a test that you can do
and it gives you pre-warning that the clots are forming.
Blood clots, that's where it caused all these heart attacks.
All right, everybody.
We've got the recording.
Natalie has gone again.
Oh, sorry, you were.
Natalie, does that give you a framework
for thinking about all of this?
Yeah, definitely.
And I'll go back and listen to the recording.
Thank you.
And think about all of these.
We've got lots of health professionals
who have chosen to protect their health for their jobs,
even though all these mandates are illegal, okay?
So that's one thing.
We're used to being able to...
We're used to most companies behaving legally.
Well, they're not behaving legally,
they're not behaving lawfully, but what do you do about it?
One of the things that we're working on is we can set up
our own private police force.
Are you aware of that?
Because the police in all states around Australia
are now corporations, we can set up our own.
So if you had a coffee shop and the thugs come in,
we're setting up a model where you just make a phone call.
We've got the thugs here, bang, 10 private police
will come and push the thugs out of the way.
That's the power that we have as people.
And our job, because we're awake,
is to help awaken those who are ready to awaken.
You can't force them to awake.
Those who don't wake up will die.
That's the game we're playing, sadly.
Thank you for being here.
Happy to answer questions.
I'll put my email for those of you who...
If you want to be added onto the phone invitation list
every Friday night at 7 p.m. for one hour, that's there.
So send me an email, I'll add you to that.
Can you make your notifications of meetings more than 15 minutes?
I gave you...
So you weren't paying attention.
I gave you notice last Friday.
You sent me an email this morning at 12.43
for an appointment at one o'clock.
Yes, I know, John.
You and Ernest were on the phone call.
I was just a reminder to people,
because last Friday I said I'm doing a call
because of Natalie at two o'clock today.
Anybody who wants to come and have this conversation
is most welcome.
So I gave you four days notice, John.
Anyway, yes, I should have said...
I said to Julie, what are we going to do?
I know, we sent the phone notice out, so good.
All right, everybody, lovely to meet you.
All those of you who I don't know.
Please, just understand this.
As a human being, you have enormous power,
but you have to claim that power.
You can't play victim as I wish you would.
This is happening.
This is an existential threat.
This is as serious as it gets.
And there's nowhere to run,
because there's all going to be digital identity cards.
This is the game plan.
You go to another country.
They're going to do the same thing.
We have to stand up now.
And the question that Bobby Kennedy posed
in December the 20th,
I just edited his speech that will also be available.
He said this, which hill are you going to die upon?
That's the question.
So you can have this jab and die in your bed,
or you can fight for your inalienable human rights.
You can tell what I'm doing, what John's doing,
Simon's doing, Alison's doing, Tim's doing.
We're doing it.
All right, do not give away your humanity.
Thanks for being with us.
I'll stop this recording.