Okay, let me introduce Jeremy Willits, dentist. Dentists are wonderful because we, Julie and I,
have a business in dental business mastery and we do a lot of work with dentists and Julie has been,
Julie was the first non-dentist in Australia to own a dental practice, Jeremy. So she's had
thirty-seven years of experience in the dental world and if your dental practice is not working
well, Jeremy, then Julie's for you. Anyway, unmute yourself and you're going to talk to us not about
dentistry, although Sheila might have some good advice to people about what anesthetics to take
when you are, if you don't want jabs, but that's a secondary question. Over to you, Jeremy, what
would you like to share on climate and anything else? Okay, right, I'll just share my screen to
start off with, oh can you switch off your, okay, yeah, can you turn sharing on, right,
okay, let's put sharing on. Jeremy, I'm very impressed to see that you had a haircut for this
meeting. On a Sunday. Let me just reduce you a lot down a bit. Right, okay, so I thought I'd give a
little chat about my understanding of the world where we are, the climate scam and the cycles as
well behind this and the insults to our intelligence, I think, and a basically review of the lying that
governments do to us and the supranational bodies behind them and the risk of potential
civilizational decline that's drawing close. It sounds quite depressing, but the good thing is we
get to start all over again and I think that's what it's all about. So, Jeremy, just do a real
hatchet job on these people. That's right, I don't know. So I think that says it all really, that's my view. I didn't always have this view, I
avoided buying a house early on in our marriage right on the beach because I was worried about the
sea levels changing, but I rapidly realized that this is just so much hocus-pocus and it's not
happening at all. Anyway, and there's, I put lots of slides on here, I'm gonna have to rattle through
them quickly, but I put some slides are better than others, but there's, here we are, there's 50 years of
failed climate doomsday predictions. There's another recap of failed predictions going back to the 60s.
Oh, here's another one that we've been lied to about recently. Where did all the flu cases go to
over COVID? Well, I found that particularly difficult. And then here's another one where
we're told that vaccines are these saving medical interventions. Well, in fact, it's just good
hygiene and plumbing and sanitation, but we don't want to talk about that. So I think, you know, we
have to, critical thinking is in decline. The teaching of critical thinking seems to be
inclined in schools. People don't think for themselves. They'd rather look at a TV and be
told what to think. And I find it very alarming amongst my peer group and friends how few people
actually question. And I've always been one of those people who do question and do ask why.
And I think, you know, the ability to change is a huge benefit for all. Now, this is the thing that
really got me going back in the year 2000. So here we are as your classic climate graph, which is
showing, you know, the temperature increasing with, perhaps it might be due to CO2. And this is
produced by NASA. But actually, this isn't the real data. That's the real data. And they changed it.
So post 2000 is the graph. Pre 2000 was that graph. And I'll just flick it backwards and
forwards for you. So this really got my hackles up. So in other words, they're cooking the books.
And every single climate model you see on the planet is that it's just a model. And we all know
that most models don't work. We've had Ferguson's model for the deaths from COVID. I mean, it's just
the biggest piece of rubbishy code you could ever imagine. You know, a child would have written it.
It was like something out of a computer game. It was absolutely useless code. And they almost
bankrupted the nation on the back of that code. And anyone associated with that should hang their
head in shame. Going forwards, here we have a graph of CO2 and temperature for the last
600 million years. If anyone can show that there's a correlation between temperature and CO2 there,
I'd be very well impressed. This is a geological time period. And as you can see, the one thing
that you can see is there, there is a downtrend line in CO2. 600 million years ago, it was at
6,000 parts per million. Now we're down to about 400. And in the last cold period, it has got very
low indeed, which is quite concerning. Here's another period, another graph, the same information,
just showing you CO2 concentration alone. And we look at the Earth's temperature in relation to
CO2. And one of the things you'll see there is the lowest period of CO2 occurred at around 180
parts per million. And that is where all life on the planet would probably cease to exist,
because there wouldn't be enough for the plants to survive. And so life as we know, it would cease
to exist. The other thing is if you pulled this graph out, you would actually notice that the
rise in CO2 actually follows the rise in the ocean's sea temperature. So the temperature
leads and then the CO2 follows. And that is another huge falsehood which is we're told.
Going forward again, we can see just the decline of atmospheric CO2 and where we are in the present
era. So we are way, way below where we have been in the past. And if anything, you know, I'll get
on to show you shortly that CO2 is the gas of life and we could do with doubling, tripling CO2. And
we will have been, that would be hugely beneficial for humanity. Here's a graph from the last 8,000
years. This is showing how temperature and CO2 seem to be pretty much inversely related. There
isn't a correlation. This is taken from the Greenland Dome ice cores. Everything I got on
here can be found easily. This is all, this is my, I must thank a few people here for and give a few
citations. So Tom on the call was very grateful. He put me in touch with Ted Postal. And Ted Postal
and I think Valentina Sarcova are two absolute great physicists who have really, really cracked
this. And I'll mention some others later on, but the physicists of the world, the planet on the
world are just amazing. And I think you'd really, really struggle to find any solar physicist worth
his salt who would ever put his name down to backing the theory, present theory, global warming.
So here again, we can see that the temperature of the world has been declining. We're actually in a
real cool period at the moment. So they'd like to tell us that we're in a warm period. But obviously
you can see the rise and fall of civilizations, which I'll show earlier, has occurred with the
rise and fall of the temperature. So you can see the Minoan warm period that occurred at a certain
period, sunspots, then the Roman warm period, then the medieval warm period. And now we are at
another period, a slightly warm period at the moment. And what follows where we are is of real
concern. So here we go again. This shows the concentration of CO2 against the temperature.
And again, the CO2 level has only risen recently, in the recent period. But it's got nothing to do
with the industrial age. It was rising way before that. And so we're in a period where we're
here again, is the longest temperature record we have, human temperature record. And this shows
the central England temperature record and the CO2 correlated to it. And there is no correlation.
You can see the central England temperature record is reasonably constant. We've warmed
marginally. But the CO2 has risen dramatically. And actually, if you actually go to the industrial
revolution period, which is, we'd say, 1850s, yeah, it was rising, but it rose a hell of a lot
faster before that than it has since. So again, you can't really correlate CO2 and temperature.
Now, one of the things that's really interesting, I have friends that tell me that the Greenland
ice sheets melting and so on, I'll not be inclined to agree with them. But one of the things they
don't talk about is the movement of magnetic pole. So the polar shift there, there's a little map
for you. You can see how much it's moved. It's moving at about 50 kilometers a year towards
Siberia. And it looks like it's continuing to do so. But again, that's not talked about. But that's
obviously going to have a massive impact. And they could talk about the glaciers receding in Western
Canada. And of course, this may have a lot to do with it. Now, we've been told that there's a climate
apocalypse occurring. And I'm going to go through some of the apocalyptic scenarios they've told us.
And they really are just lying again. So polar bears, they're the icon of the
movement. We've all seen that destitute polar bear. But in fact, the polar bear population
was at real risk in the 50s and 60s. And the population has increased dramatically
over the last 30, 40 years, or 50 years. So the population now is between around 30,000.
I've seen numbers, this one's saying up to 50. So I've seen numbers around 30. Al Gore was born when
there were only 7,000 polar bears around. And now there are about 26,000, which I thought that was
quite an amusing slide. The next one is the chronic heat. Well, the hottest temperature in the
mainland US, the period of peak temperatures was in the 1930s. And this has actually been removed
from the records now. They keep on lowering the temperatures there and raising the temperatures
post 1990. And that's a falsehood. Then if we go around and look at the actual acreage of fires
burnt in the US, you'll see there, but back in the 1930s, when the temperatures were extreme, we had
the acreage burnt was far, far higher. But actually, you'll see this small insect graph.
This is a graph from the 80s to the present day. And they have distorted the data. They have made
the y-axis longer. So it looks like there's a steeper increase. But actually, if you look at
the real long-term graph over 100 years, there's actually been, it's reasonably constant. There
were a lot more forest fires, and now there are less. And if you look at it on a global basis,
this has been reducing considerably for some time. So carbon dioxide has gone up,
and forest fires have gone down. Moving on, oh, we're telling that all the species are dying out.
Again, another falsehood. So let's go and examine this. This is telling us all the
extinctions that have occurred. And a graph like that would suggest is there's loads and
loads of extinctions occurring now. But actually, that's a falsehood as well. Most of the extinctions
occurred during the periods of exploration, especially when the Westerners visiting islands
like New Zealand and Australia and introducing feral animals such as cats and dogs and weasels
and stoats. In actual fact, the rate of decline and the rate of extinctions has been declining
a lot over the last few years. So you can see that actually in the 2000s now,
we're at probably the lowest rate of this extinction. So there goes old Greta's claim again.
So how dare she, not how dare the rest of us. And then we're told about extreme weather deaths.
Actually, it's cold as the killer. And warm is good. More people die of cold than they ever die
of warm. And this is extreme weather deaths. And they've been declining as well over the last
100 years. And that's through human endeavors. So despite some of the worst, some very bad hurricanes
we've had recently, they didn't kill many people compared to 100, 200 years ago.
So now apparently, climate change, the good thing about climate change is the CO2's level
is rising. And that actually is good for plants. Plants grow faster. And they actually retain more
water vapor and more moisture and fertilize the soil more. You wouldn't believe that apparently
CO2 is bad for us. But what people don't realize is actually how much CO2 in the atmosphere there is
and the whole of the whole atmosphere CO2 makes up 0.04%. So it's a tiny, tiny part of the atmosphere.
And then what people don't know, and you ought to maybe question yourself, I ought to do a
raise hands scenario, but we won't. But actually all of human activity is only responsible for a
maximum 6% of all CO2 in the atmosphere. The bulk of the CO2 is released by the warming of the oceans
from the sunlight and the other part is from decaying biomass. And so this idea that
humanity is responsible for really the bulk of CO2 in the atmosphere is a complete fault set.
And it needs to be junked. Here we are. Now the other thing is CO2 is actually,
virtually reached its saturation levels. And you can listen to people like Will Happer who
did a lot of work on the saturation of CO2 and the effect on the upper atmosphere.
And basically we can double CO2 now, or triple it, and it really will have very,
very little effect on the warming of the planet at all. And anyway, it doesn't matter what we do,
we're going to have no effect on the warming of the planet whatsoever. The planet's going to warm
and I'll show you why. And it's going to warm for the next five to six hundred years. And we're a
complete irrelevance. So let's have a look. So what has happened with the increase of CO2? Well,
the increase of CO2 has been good for us. You'll see there's a direct correlation. We've had an
increase in temperature and increase in crop yields. So as the population has increased,
we've been able to feed a lot more people. And if we keep on increasing the CO2, we will
continue to increase crop yields and we will continue to be able to increase and feed more
people. So the Malthusians on the planet have been wrong all the time and they continue to be
wrong because they don't allow for human ingenuity. And that's why they're such a bunch of idiots,
really. Going forwards, this is one of the best graphs. So this has been the effect of the increase
of CO2 over the last hundred years or so. And here you can see the increase of biomass on the planet.
So the planet has actually greened. This is the complete opposite of what you said. You know,
plants are growing in the Sahara, in southern Sahara, everywhere. The amount of biomass is
increased. And that's a very good graph. This is a graph from the CSIRO and you can follow this up
yourself. Again, another lie. You know, here we are just showing where we are at the present global
temperature. So we're actually still pretty cool here, certainly compared to the medieval period.
So I'm sitting here and cold in the kitchen. I could do with a bit more warming at the moment.
You know, you have to sort of, the only time the general population actually even think about it
and critically think is on April 1st. And I think this slide is well placed because
if people actually did sit down and examine what's being the narrative in front of them,
they would really be quite sickened by how they're being lied to. So let's examine the IPCC and see
what they're doing. So the IPCC, you know, they are a terrible organization. They actually produce
the SPM, which is what they call all the governments follow. It's called the summary
for policy makers. And they pursue produce that document in the early 1990s before they had the
data. And that says everything. It means the IPCC document is purely a political document.
It has nothing to do with the actual numbers. And the best person to review on all this is
a chap I must mention is Dr. Tim Ball, who sadly died last year. And he sued Michael Mann. He
called Michael Mann's graph a pack of BS and Michael Mann sued Tim Ball and Michael Mann lost
because it's rubbish. And Michael Mann has done it again recently. He's sued one of the radio
presenters in the US. I think it's Stein and he's lost again, apparently, but not in the
mainstream media. We wouldn't want to draw attention to that. So the IPCC agrees that
temperatures are unusually cool at the moment. So how can they tell us that we've been warming
for all this time? Now they say actually hurricanes, we can't say hurricanes are
worsening. They admit it's with low confidence. What's the other one? Oh, tornadoes. Tornadoes
aren't getting any worse either. So another lie. And then sea levels rises. So sea level rise has
been going on approximately. You can see that about three or four millimetres a year. And it's
going to continue to do that. And some of the sea level rise is obviously easily accounted for just
by movement of the Earth's crust and the movement of mountains and the plate tectonic plate activity.
So I really don't think that's an issue either. Going forward, you can plot the rise and fall of
civilisations by the output of the sun. And this is what we're going to be moving on to next. So
you can see the Minoan warm period, then the Great Dark Ages, then the Roman warm period,
then the European dark age and the medieval warm period, and then the Little Ice Age,
which is the Monda minimum. And then finally, we're coming back out of the Monda minimum,
finished at the late 1700s. And we've been getting warmer, luckily, since then.
And obviously, because we've been coming out of warm periods, you'll have noticed that a lot of
glaciers have been retreating in the Alps and in the Rockies. And that's nothing normal. They'll
grow again. One of the things that we know we have people who travel to Greenland routinely,
as the ice sheet recedes in Greenland, they are finding not only they're finding trees,
which are stumps of trees, so 400 miles north of the present Arctic Circle, they're finding
settlements. So people obviously live there. And even more astounding, they are finding bodies,
but the bodies aren't on the surface. The bodies are buried in graves. And so to be buried in a
grave in that area, they're in the permafrost. So therefore means that area was a lot, lot warmer
earlier again. So here we go. That's another just another recap. And you can see that we're
actually in a cool period here at the moment. We're just coming out of a cool period,
luckily for us. Now, how does that relate to everything that's going on? If CO2 doesn't have
to have anything to do really much with the weather, what does? Well, it's obviously the
big yellow thing in the sky. We all call the sun. And the sun isn't static. They assume the sun is
static, but it doesn't. It moves. And the sun has cycles as well. So just as you've seen the cycles
in civilization, those cycles in civilization are actually driven by the sun cycle. And the sun has
a long, a short cycle, an 11 year cycle, a grand solar cycle, which is 350 to 450 years,
and an even longer cycle, which is about 1,850 years. And you get superimposition of these
cycles. And then on top of that, the sun cycle also has a sunspot cycle. And this is what we're
starting to realize here. And I'm showing here. So this is a graph of the sunspot cycles. And
you'll see we are in a bear market for sunspot cycles. And we've just had a recent peak in the
sunspot cycles in 23, 24. And we're going down again. And we're going to go down seriously in
the 2040s, 2050s going to, I think, our solar cycle 27. So we can expect to start from the 30s,
I think, maybe even sooner, start to get a lot colder. And actually, I think we're going to get
a lot, lot colder this year. It looks like this winter in the North America will probably be one
of the top five coldest on record. So you can quote me on that. I haven't had time to put all
the slides in that I'd like to for you, but I only have limited time to get this prepared.
Now, what's the effect of this? Well, as the sun cycles decrease, so the jet stream becomes affected.
And instead of having a stable jet stream, which we used to recently, we're now starting to get
a wonky and varied jet stream. And we're already getting evidence of this. So this is
giant, let me just go through this. Yeah, I'll go on to that. And we're seeing this because this is
where I live. I've never seen the aurora borrower. So in little sweet jersey earlier this year,
we had a jet stream come down and look what happened. We got this from our house,
which is just amazing. So in my 60 years, I've never seen this before, but this is my first time.
Now, what happened in the Mourner minimum? So this is very relevant to where we are at the moment.
So you can see from this graph that in the Mourner minimum, the whole of Siberia, Northern Europe,
and North America are much, much colder. And we had things like the Thames freezing over,
the Netherlands froze recently, and the Alpine glaciers extended far, far further. Well,
obviously since the Mourner minimum, we've been warming up and therefore you'd expect the Alpine
glaciers and the rocky glaciers and the Greenland ice sheet to pull back. And that's what we've seen.
So here's a little pictorial graph just of the warm periods and the cold periods. So you can see
our current warm periods. So we've got the Mourner minimum, the Dalton minimum, 1880 to 1915.
There's the 1930s, which was the highest periods, the warmest periods with the highest extreme
temperatures in the US. Then we had the 70s. I don't know if any of you are old enough to remember
Leonard Nimoy on the front of Time magazine predicting, you know, we're going to be freezing.
Well, that was why in the 70s. And then at the end of the 70s, we suddenly started to get warm again.
And here we are, we've had a little bit of a warming period with the latest solar cycle.
Now, Valentina Sarkova, who's a physicist in Newcastle, she's an amazing physicist and she
did some amazing research and built a model of solar inertia motion. And this is her model.
And this is the observations of the sun cycles. And basically, she seems to have cracked it.
And both her, Ted Postol does a great review. And I must thank Tom Rodman for
finding me a lot of this material. And another Danish scientist who I come to shortly,
really deserve a huge amount of praise and validation and recognition for what they've done.
So the sun has a cycle and we can see the cycle. So we are just coming to the end of cycle 25 now.
And we're back to drop off a cliff, unfortunately. And you can see the sun cycles here every 11 years
or so. And you can see why we're, you know, we've got a bit warmer in the 80s. I think everyone will
remember 1976 when it got particularly warm in the UK and the sun cycles keep advancing.
Now, where are we in the big scheme of things? We are right here. And this is really,
really, really worrying because it means we're going to go here. So solar cycle 26
is going to be a really, really cold cycle. And that's where we're heading. And I have grave
concerns for everyone and the population of the planet because if we do go into the super cycle,
this will mean we'll have some extreme temperature variations and food reduction will be therefore
be affected. And the reason this is relevant, so we've got the 11 year cycle and in cycles,
you have constructive and destructive interference. So here you can clearly see
some destructive interference because we've got a 350 year cycle coinciding.
So we're going to have a modern minimum coming up shortly. So what does it look like when you
got to say a Monde minimum? Well, that's a good picture of either the Thames or Holland
and people skating. So that's what we've got to look forward to.
And I have grave concerns about this area just here. So it looks like going to get cold. And is
there an indication that it's happening? Well, yes, it's starting to happen. So they had snow in
Africa in the desert not long ago. The other thing that's a real concern as well to coincide
with this is as we have a decrease in solar activity, I'm going to be talking more about the
sun shortly, but as the sun activity decreases with the solar minimums, we seem to get the
because the earth seems to be bombarded more with cosmic rays, we seem to get an increase
in volcanic and earthquake activity. And that seems to be happening as well. And we need to
really be having an intergovernmental panel on how to avoid disasters, not on flipping CO2.
It's the wrong thing. Basically, when you have these periods, you can have a shortage of vegetation
periods, and they could lead to severe food shortages. Now, this is from Valentina. And
she's not the only person who's drawing attention to this. So I'm going to come to some of the
world's great economic forecasters right at the very end because they look at the world in a
different way. And they are also highlighting this grave risk and volcanic risk. So we can look here
at the IPCC prediction, which is a computer model. And I think you really need to view
all their computer models like everyone views AI. If you use AI, you're probably people already
realizing that it's just a large language model. And it's just rubbish in rubbish out, it cannot
think it can produce large volumes of data and correlates, but it cannot think it doesn't have
that human capacity. And the problem with large models is they're basically wrong. They're always
wrong. Not one of their predictions has been right. And if you ask them to model things,
they can't even model a cloud. We all know whether prediction is unpredictable. So how are they going
to predict the whole weather of the climate when they can't predict a cloud? And they can't
certainly can't predict a thunderstorm. And a thunderstorm carries air from the sea temperature
up to 30,000 feet in the atmosphere. And there are tens of thousands of thunderstorms on the
planet every day, and they can't model one. So this is just garbage. And they should they should
fuzz up and say so. So this is their prediction. This is the actual what we're going to be going
through. And you can see the solar cycles carrying on. And we're going to keep on warming, but I'm
going to come to that later on and why we'll keep on warming. So there's no relation really between
carbon dioxide and temperature. The only thing you can say is the carbon increase in carbon dioxide
seems to lag the temperature. And that's reflected from the oceans. And all you need to do is take
a can of beer out of the fridge. When you have a can of beer and you take it out, if you crack the
top off, it starts to fizz. Why does it start to fizz? Because it's starting to warm up. And if you
hold it, it'll fizz even more and the carbon dioxide comes out. So as you subject the oceans
to more heating from the sun, not from global CO2, but from the sun, therefore you'll get more CO2
released. And that's where we are now. So going forwards, this chap is just amazing. And they
really, you know, I don't really have pay any attention to Nobel prizes now. But if anyone
deserves a prize, Dr. Henrik Svensson from the Division of Socialism and Physics at the
Danish National Institute really deserves it because he identified the primary driver,
I believe, behind the formation of clouds and the heating of the planets effectively.
Because he identified it's the fact that the background cosmic rays affect our planets. And
the reason they affect our planets is because it's the radiation from background cosmic radiation
hitting the Earth's upper atmosphere causes, sticks energy into the upper atmosphere,
causing atoms to split and causes cloud and droplet nucleation. And that's what forms clouds.
So if the sun shrinks, then as a direct result of the sun shrinking, the heliosphere will shrink,
which therefore means we're going to get more cosmic radiation hit the planet. If you get more
cosmic radiation hit the planet, you're going to get more clouds. And so
we're going to get more clouds forming, which is going to affect the temperature.
Now, if you go on, I'm going to get come to this a little bit more. I'm just going to mention
Valentina's Arcova again. I put up links here so you can copy and paste the links.
Valentina has basically mapped the world's movement of the sun. And it doesn't revolve
around the middle of itself. It revolves around something called the barycenter,
because the sun is affected by the surrounding planets. So the big planets like Saturn, Neptune,
Uranus, and Jupiter all pull the sun. And so it moves and it rotates around something called
the barycenter. And so the sun is going to keep moving towards us for about the next
600 years. So we're going to keep on warming regardless because of the movement of the sun
towards the earth into the year 2700. And then after that, it'll start to move away.
So here we have an example of what's going on. The sun's rotating in the middle.
And the heliosphere puts out a huge magnetic field which deflects the interstellar wind.
Now, what happens when the sun reduces its activity? Well, you're going to get more wind hitting us.
Now, the really interesting thing is somebody stuck another cloud set up recently. And they
actually, this is from their site. Cloud set is a first of a kind radar system that's more
sensitive to any other way radar weather. It provides a never seen before perspective on clouds.
And it allows us to look into large cloud masses. Well, it's all really good. But if you look over
here, clouds and aerosols affect our climate in ways we do not completely understand. Oh, so there
you go. First sentence, they tell you they don't understand clouds and they don't know how they
form and they can't model them. So what on earth are they doing with all their other models? I mean,
with all their other models. I mean, it's just rubbish. Anyway, so here's a pictorial image of
what the sun's heliosphere does. And that's a good picture of it deflecting the solar wind.
Now, what happens when the cosmic ray hits the upper atmosphere?
You've got trace gases in the upper atmosphere. The cosmic rays come in, they hit and they start
bouncing around. And they cause ionisation. And the ionisation causes a nucleation to occur.
And then you get small droplets attracted to other droplets. And they get bigger and bigger
and bigger. And eventually you get cloud formation. Now, why are clouds important?
They're important because they reflect sunlight. So the more cloud formation you get,
basically the more sunlight you're going to get reflected.
So we can actually measure this. So this can actually be proven because when the cosmic
rays hit the upper atmosphere, they affect beryllium and carbon. So you get, and actual
aluminium as well. So you can measure the beryllium and the carbon, beryllium-10, aluminium-26 and
carbon-14 within the plants and animals and in the Earth's crust and in ice.
So here we go. So the carbon gets sequestered by plants and animals and tree rings. So you can
measure the carbon-14. And the beryllium goes into the water and the clouds. And you can measure it
in the ice record and ice core samples. So let's have a little look. Changes in cloud cover is the
major physical mechanism that causes changes in the Earth's average global mean surface temperature
in all physical theories. So the more clouds you get, the more sunlight you get reflected
and you therefore get a cooler surface temperature. So for an example, a 5% change in the cloud
temperature would roughly equate to a change in temperature of one degree
in the global surface temperature. So in other words, you get feedback mechanisms from the
changes in the cloud to the Earth and amplification to a certain extent of greenhouse gases. Now what
are the greenhouse gases? Well, they talk about methane and they talk about carbon dioxide, but
actually the biggest greenhouse gas is in fact water vapour and therefore clouds. And they can't
even model it. So they can't model the largest driver of the greenhouse gases. So let's move
forwards again. So there's lots of cycles that are going on. So you've got a solar cycle and here you
have a guy called Wolfgang Gleisberg. He noted variations in the Sun's magnetic fields which
are reported to occur every 90 years. Now the Gleisberg cycle is really, really important because the
last time we had the Gleisberg cycle, that's when we had the last dust bowl and a real period of
extreme dryness and we're due another one. It was due in 2023 but I think that's been delayed
by the Tonga volcano which that was a subsea volcano and that put up literally tons of water
vapour into the upper atmosphere. And I think we've been artificially warm for the past two or three
years because of that Tonga volcano. But that effect is now passing and I think we're going to
really find we're going to get hit by some severe cold this coming year, this coming winter.
So here's some other slides. Not only therefore are we at risk of a cold period coming because
of the reduction of the Sun's output and a solar minimum coming, but the problem is we also have
an increase in volcanic activity and we're already starting to see that. So we've got a category 6
volcano but luckily it was a subsea volcano. If we have a big one like a big caldera erupt,
I mean that could wipe out humanity. And they are all moving. The Naples area is moving,
Yellowstone area is moving and it is very concerning that we're seeing an increase
in volcanic activity around the world. Hopefully we don't have anything too bad because if one of
these big ones goes, if we get a V6 volcano go, we'd be heading into a volcanic winter
on top of a solar minimum and that would be very, very bad and detrimental to the whole of humanity.
So as you ought to remember, you know, large volcanoes have affected people before and when
Napoleon invaded Russia, he wasn't defeated by the Russians. He was defeated by a volcano
basically because that was the year without the summer and they starved and they froze to death.
So that was the Tambora volcano and there it is 1816. It put up so much volcanic
activity, volcanic particulates into the atmosphere that
it caused famine and cold across Europe and we had food riots and we could be looking at the
same thing going forwards. You can review all these slides afters, I can't talk about everyone.
In August 24, again, we had a large eruption in Peru. That was a 400-year-old volcanic
volcano which was responsible for one of the largest volcanic eruptions in history and
it erupted 400 years ago and it started moving again. So again, this is the cause for concern
and again, if one of these big boys went up, it would lead to famine and crop failures in
Europe and Russia and around the rest of the world. Now, climate is very interesting because
it's very convenient because this is why I'm sort of trying to bring climate and economics together
now because we've got all these bad things going on and we've also got a system that's just failing
and so you have to wonder why on earth are they picking on carbon dioxide? Well,
our governments are all going bust. We've got a world, an economic crisis and a sovereign debt
crisis right in front of us and so it's very convenient if they can try and tax us a little
bit more. So imagine a world, if you could, where people believe that the temperature of the planet
can be controlled by giving more money to the government. That's basically what it's about.
Now, we're entering a public debt cycle at the moment and you can't get away from it. It happens.
It's just our time. We're living through the fall of the West at the moment. Every civilization has
its time just as Britain ruled the waves and we peaked in the late 20th century,
early 20th century. America's had its time, it's peaking and now it's going to, the World Economic
Center is going to move to China. It's just our time and we can't do anything about that and
unfortunately we have been kicking the can down the road. We've been following modern monetary
theory and QE and all the rest of it and the debt is basically killing us. Europe, I don't know
whether the crisis is going to start in Europe or Japan but it's going to start in one of those
places and because the debt can't be kicked any further and you can already see the rush of the
Europeans into a digital currency simply because they can't pay their debt anymore. No one wants
to buy British debt, no one wants to buy French debt. They've already come out, the finance
ministers of Europe and France saying that oh we might need a bailout from the IMF. It's basically
because no one's buying their debt. The Japanese are different because the Japanese are buying the
Japanese debt so they're slightly, they've got to wave with it for a little while and it's all
internalized but the Europeans, they can't kick the can anymore and so what on earth is coming in
front of us you're asking. So well this is all predicted because there are cycles and on here
I've also put reference to Martin Armstrong who discovered the economic confidence model and just
as there is a solar cycle so we have a pi cycle and an 8.6 year cycle, a 51 year cycle and a 309
year cycle and then a 1075 year cycle and the reason I'm bringing this to your attention is
because obviously all cycles you can get constructive and destructive interference and unfortunately
all these cycles are coinciding the year 2032 and that therefore means we're going to be going
through basically a period of civilizational change. Just as the Roman Empire peaked
with the Roman warming and with their own cycle, Armstrong realized that they had public and
private cycles and a private cycle, we're in a private cycle at the moment and we're coming
in the end to an end of it and this is when people, you know, this is all the gentlemen prefer bonds
and at the moment we're in a cycle where everyone's buying private assets so we're in a commodity
bubble at the moment before that was a not a commodity bubble, we're not in a bubble,
we're in a commodity cycle before that we had the real estate cycle and so on and so forth
and this is where this all happens so you can see here's this is the economic confidence cycle
and you can see how you had the takeover boom in the 80s where you could buy a company,
split it up and sell it and make a lot of money, the best person about Charles will know was
Alan Bond and now we're coming through these cycles now and we're peaking to the end of this
period so everyone basically is going to be dumping their debt and they're going to be buying
companies because people are running away from debt from public debt and the public part of the
economy. Why is this significant? Because we're heading into the next great fall and the rebirth
of civilization on societies, we know it, it's nothing to be, I don't think you should be afraid
of it, it's just a change, we're living through history and we should embrace it and we get to
start again so all of this madness that we've seen with COVID and the WEF and all these
supranational bodies they're all going to crash and burn, they're not going to survive because
the public won't put up with it. I think what they are trying to do is try to steer
and steer us in a new form of society and that's what we have to fight and that's what we have to
be ready for. Yeah that is the end of my presentation, there you go. So that's
quite a lot to get through but I wanted to try and link climate, the changes in climate,
to the changes in civilization and where we're going. The only thing I'd probably like to put
in here at the end actually, let me just go back to my slideshow, there we are, I'd like to
let you know there are a couple of slight places you can go to. The CO2 coalition are amazing,
what they've done that's Will Happer, John Clauser who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in
22 or 23, he was going to give a talk to the IMF and tell them that there was no such thing
as a climate crisis and there never could be and rather than listen to him they de-platformed.
The founder and president of the CO2 coalition, I've nicked many of their slides, I have to give
them credit to them, I have to give credit to climate at Delance, that's another great slide,
I have to give credit to Ted Postle, to Valentina Sarkova, Hack It Financial, they are superb,
because it's one thing to see all this, it's another thing to understand the implications
and also to go and see how you can protect yourself, so I'd strongly recommend people look
at Sean Hackett's work, I'd read Conservative Woman, they're very vulnerable, I'd read Armstrong
Economics every day, I'd read Jerry Brady, he's a real, all these people they are, they question
everything they are, critical thinkers of the 10th order, they're all amazing people and the quality
they work with, the work they put out is exceptional and Jerry is you know one of us and his work is
amazing and they all come at things from different angles but they all basically get to a similar
conclusion. Another huge resource I found from an investing point of view is this website which is
Rosen, Craig and Grozen, it just talks about where we are and the final one I'd say sorry I haven't
put it up is Elliot Gough and the income advisor publication, they're all superb, let me see
yeah so there I've tried to cite Valencia Sarcova so you can look her up, Theodore Postle,
who else I got there, let's go back, oh the other one you should all look at is Tom Nelson, I think
that's what that one is for, Tom is, yeah they are the Tom Nelson podcast, everything I've learned,
you know I started in the year 2000 being a cynic really, realising I was being lied to,
my dad is a physicist and I've always followed the physicists, I've always listened to them but
Tom Nelson podcast is great, he's interviewed so so many great physicists and just ordinary people
like myself who've drawn their own conclusion and gone off and done their research so as a
source of information it's fantastic so I hope you find that helpful and I'm happy to talk to
anybody now, wonderful, Jeremy good job you did that very well in in um
47 minutes, excellent overview and turn your speaker up, speaker, yeah I've got it up yeah I
can hear now, good, is that you Dave Collum, you're looking a bit different with your space
things on but anyway we hand, his hand was up first and then we'll do Dave Collum, Stephen
unless you've got a couple of questions first please, Jeremy thanks so much for speaking to
us about this and it's great that you're citing the evidence and giving credit to these people
who've informed you but why do you think that they kind of persist with or try to persist with this
and why would they choose something that's so not even true you know they're actually trying to say
well this is man is responsible for the global warming when we're actually cooling is that right?
Yeah well no we're an irrelevance, we're not an irrelevance I mean I must say I mean it's great
having Dave on here as well because he's a huge influence, I had great great pleasure driving
through France listening to, educating one of my sons, we listened to his whole conversation on
climate on the Tom Nelson podcast and he was hilarious, yeah Dave Collum's a good um
yeah very good at ranting, yeah so I was um I'd call it education with a smile but it's
getting people to think critically so I mentioned him earlier on I think one of the greats in this
field was um Dr Tim Ball and he as a man of great integrity who took the took the difficult path
he could have decided to bough out of client scientists and not to not take the path he did
but he said no and he fought them and it cost him both financially and professionally I think and
he unfortunately died a year ago I think it wasn't um Dave but he wrote a great book and I'm sorry I
need to put it in here so it's called the deliberate corruption of climate science and it's it it
wanders a little bit but it's a superb work and everyone should reread it because it documents
and you've got all the croft fresh references all the all the citations and it documents everything
from the club of Rome going forwards you know it documents these individuals like Maurice Strang
and the you know these communists and socialists who worked in these supranational bodies to
basically compromise our civilization I believe I think and at the end of the at the end of the day
they're all they're either Malthusians or they are socialists and they just seem to be power
crazed individuals they don't value the power individual they value the power of governments
and large institutions over humanity I can't um work out why they want to do it but they're
you know just psychopaths I guess but Tim Ball's book is brilliant and he documents the whole thing
coming forward in a really good timeline and I wish you could have all listened to him speak I
listened to him a couple of times and it was a great privilege so yeah and um yeah Dave I mean
he's a great me did you look into um so I have one question um so um are you aware of uh the
Russians allegedly hacking into the computers of University of East Anglia I don't know whether
that's true or not but I heard it um I just I just know you that you know that the University
of East Anglia lied and they've made all their stuff up and they just really have that whole
department should be shut down it's a natural disgrace but one person one person allegedly um
resigned over that um and that was Professor Stephen Jones as I remember do you know anything
about that guy no I don't know but Tim Ball spoke about it I mean but you know I'm sure there's a
lot of people there trying to do a lot of good they believe this narrative but it's it's like
the biggest one of the the whole green agenda is one of the biggest misallocations of capital in
human history and we're going to suffer suffer for it hugely and you know you see it in you know
another another classic you know so this is climate all the green energy stuff I mean I'm meant to put
a slide in there just um about I'll put it in afterwards actually for you just the cost of
reduction of a whip of a large turbine it will never ever ever pay for itself it's an impossibility
just because they don't they don't put in the transmission costs they don't put in the build
costs they don't put in the 3 000 to 5 000 tons of cement they don't put in the mine costs the rare
earth cost and the and the thing needs to be oils as well so you know it's just garbage science
and it all sounds good but it just it's never going to work and and and solar are questioned
as well I mean the Chinese are hedging their bets they're building loads of these things but they're
certainly if solar and wind really worked really well why are the Chinese opening two power
coal-fired power stations a week you know there's your answer and they don't use the wind turbines
even though they make just about all of them well I don't know I don't know there's um Jerry will
put us right on this but there's that large um Danish company but you just look at their share
price it's just fallen off a cliff no one's buying wind turbines everyone knows it doesn't work
if it starts with a v jeremy okay thank we'll keep moving because we're at and we're up in 15
have a go so no no and as was first then Dave well we don't have to follow the okay yes we do
and okay thank you it was really great to hear you Jeremy I kind of followed you and you have
most of the same stars like me and I I noticed you you didn't mention the name of uh Piers Corbin the
brother of Jeremiah Corbin oh yeah there's just too many great scientists out there I mean yes
the brilliant physicists there's so many it's the physicists you have to listen to but they've all
been stonewalled he's quite a star let's say he had this idea with this uh just three movement
with the lower magnetism of the earth or the sun let's say so so and then in the 30s a lot of people
are not knowing this because it's been stonewalled and earns back a german scientist he found
a lot of data proving that it was higher co2 in the late 30s and the top was in 1942 it is higher
than now 440 about average parts per million connecting to what Jeremy will showed about the
high temperatures in the 30s so there is a correlation in short term with the co2 to the
temperature but it it kind of dies off with the law of henry henry let's say the thermodynamics
it goes down into the sea in four to six years so in the long term it doesn't show up because
it is dying off in short term and this can be verified with the c12 and c14 let's say carbon
and this question question we don't need your presentation what's the question yes so so what
is your response to what i'm saying now that i'm afraid that the situation in the next 15-20 years
you refer to the fall of the temperature which is predicted by valentine sarkova
which is very likely i would say but the other factor which is behind the increase of food
production is not directly linked to co2 but it's linked to pesticides and fertilizers which is
increasing the no question production what is your comment to that yeah i mean obviously they have a
huge increase as well you know fertilizer use and pesticide use obviously as you know the
mechanization the farming has a massive increase you know the number of people involved in farming
now is just negligible compared to what it was in the 30s so yeah that's had a huge effect as well
without a doubt yeah but how sustainable that is i don't know in especially that's that's that's
thank you anders that's what we have we don't have a climate emergency we have an environmental
emergency and the destruction of our soils yeah and you'd shine a good light on that and it's
very important that's why that book in the 1980s called from soil to psyche and doctors get zero
training on nutrition and so all of there are many experts here on nutrition in this group
and that's what sheila was talking about jeremy the quality of the food that you put into your
body has a huge impact on your thinking ability so wakey wakey everybody okay dave colum you're next
then marv i i tried a lightning round these first of all i'd like to apologize as a member of a
social organization i have let you guys down you should put me on a nice slow and send me off
i've gotten a global brawl that kind of got distracting sheila i have a metaphor for you
think of organism rather than as a thing but as a great barrier reef i think is
yeah really really good i've read your comment i didn't know if you'd see it because i can't read
them um i intermittent fasted for eight years it worked really well for me and you get used to it
you stop getting hungry until dinner time and things like that um the there's one theory of
what happened in in covid which i can't shake is the idea that that that they actually used
covid as an excuse to put the global economy into an induced coma because it was there was evidence
things were starting to get completely nuts and i just wanted to keep that on the on the radar
thomas curs is a guy who who did a nelson podcast he's got a book coming out it might be the best
book of them all when it finally comes out i don't even know the title yet i'm not sure he's picked
it um i agree solar physicists none of them think the climate story is worth a damn um the overt
lying in the field is horrific it's not just michael mann and there's not just a few culprits
it's they just lie their ass off and the question is why it's about it's about trillions of dollars
and and control the population there's got to be one some combination of those two there's a punch
line coming here in a second but uh i think the polar shifts the polar the magnetic pole shift
by some people i respect it could be very important and catastrophic um there's a there's
one thing you and i think we are going into a fourth turning in an economic disaster there's
one thing you missed and that is about two weeks ago bill gates muttered that climate change isn't
what we thought it was and you can say maybe that's just bill he got stoned or something and muttered
i don't think so i think what that was is the first shot across the bow that says oh oh oh
climate change narrative is now in the way of ai because of all the energy consumption of ai
and as a consequence i think they're going to say oh never mind the climate change we need to burn
a lot of coal and a lot of natural gas a lot of everything to uh to to to do our next big scan so
keep your eyes on that i don't think gates's utterance was was random and spontaneous i think
it was i think it was a first shot across the bow nice talk i agreed with everything you said
that's a worry that's amazing that's a worry
all right thank you because we're close to time so thank you dave marvin is next and then for those
with unlimited time you can go to tom rodman thanks dave marv hey jeremy i i'm going to ask
you about this um you know the explosion of human population has occurred because of this
you know the canada ice shelf it melted and that cold fresh water rushed out into the north
atlantic sinks because it's i forget whether i think it's more dense and it created this current
around at the ocean depth and it circles the whole planet and this has created an air conditioning
what stabilized and that's why humans have exploded our population has been controlled for the
200 000 or is it two million years we've been here but in the last 10 000 years now we've got
to nine billion or whatever it is well anyway my point and my question is why we focus on what's
happening on the land i mean it is a tiny i mean if you look at the arable land it's a tiny fraction
of what's happening the average depth of the oceans is three miles yeah that's what's happening on the
planet what the hell we're doing on the land has nothing to do so anyway i like your point about
the sun that's obviously significant but this behavior of the oceans the deep oceans
and we don't talk about that at all i mean that's our so anyway i want to know if you are aware of
that oh yeah i mean i i put this together in about two hours i mean i could talk about agriculture i
could talk about the the ocean oscillations i've got loads of information that you just can't put
it all in there and i sort of wanted to try and link it all together a little bit for you
yeah no you're absolutely right i mean the sun is the big driver though that's it's
you know the uh there's a great on tom nelson again you can listen to lord christopher moncton
he did a great talk recently and i again i'd encourage everyone to listen to that i don't
know if dave's still on the call but if he hasn't listened to it he really should do because he he
goes into the i haven't actually had time to watch i've listened to it but i wanted to go
through the physics and go through the calculations because he you know the work that will have has
done on co2 saturation and then you know the christopher moncton goes on about the laws of
thermodynamics and the um please uh the laws of thermodynamics and basically the fact that they've
made some of the most elementary mathematical miscalculations you can imagine so it's it's a
little bit of my pay grade but um dave i'd strongly recommend you listen to that and and watch it and
go through the maths and um and i'd love to get some of these people to come and talk to us i'd
love ted to talk to us uh because he did such a good presentation which tom you are tom nelson
no uh maybe tom nelson i'd love to get in touch with tom i'd like i can get you in touch with
tom i can get you in touch with him oh that would be amazing because then i could reach out to some
of the other people because i think the person you meant you mentioned he's going to be writing the
book soon um who just said he's going to put damis kurz yeah he's doing a brilliant speech
um he's absolutely brilliant what he did um but yeah little christopher moncton i'd listen to his
uh podcast because he just he just goes through the maths and it's just brilliant so i did a
zero hedge debate against an economist and he totally shot himself in the foot i just let him
talk and he just dug deeper and deeper and deeper in the final blow where he was no feet no toes
no nothing left was when he said civilization will be over by 2038 that's not going oh my god
you should check yourself into a local mental ward yeah all right let's get moving i love your
slides jeremy i'm going to go back through this i just loved your slides it was a wonderful
presentation thank you i'm sorry kind of well it was rostled up quickly because i was on armstrong's
world economic um conference today i just wanted to get the compliment jeremy that's why it was
great because steven put the pressure on you and you performed finishing in four three minutes
have you all got a hard finish tom quickly your question and then steven last question to you
okay yeah we need uh i'll try to get those links out of your you know and post them maybe next
meeting but uh methane i'm saying this because i deal with other people in groups that literally
they'll leave the group because other people don't believe in global warming and they bring up
that methane's much more potent granted it's not around as long so that's something to find a good
argument against that it's not important and then what do you think about uh geoengineering the day
night spring to manipulate the weather by the planes i wanted to hear someone else indicate
they understood that because i think they're diverting the plane paths flight paths to actually
manipulate the weather the commercial airliners well all i can say all i can say on that is they
are all governments around the world are all doing the absolutely worst possible thing they could do
at the worst possible time i mean as you go into these um uh low sunspot activity and the decrease
in the heat of sphere we seem to get an increase in volcanism and that's if we get an increase in
volcanism a significant one and you can see it happening there's been a lot of volcanoes going
off the the the ring of fire has been moving if we get a big one go off so they could be dimming
the sky and then if we get a some major major eruption you know category six volcano go up and
then you're going into volcanic winter and into an extremely uh cold period that's going to severely
affect wheat so um i mean maybe i'll come back and do a little bit more for you because i could
you know i could talk you know um dead day talk very sensible no no jerry that he's he's right about um
uh um bill gates backing off because these data centers need power and unfortunately there's the
cheapest energy molecule on the planet is is natural gas it's really really cheap at the
moment they're all talking you know nuclear is great and it'll probably come and small modular
reactors as well will probably come but they're not going to be there for at least five years
so where on earth are they going to get the energy from to do all of this so they're going to need oil
coal and um natural grass and one of the most interesting things and they've never show is that
the uh and jerry's great for this jerry did a great slide showing the actual world's usage of
oil coal natural gas and fossil fuels and it's just been one upward trend continuing world with
our end and and all right interesting they want to talk about polluters there's one one major
one major um a country on the planet that's actually decreased its uh pollution that's
because it's got a mature mature and decreased its uh greenhouse gases and because it's got a
mature economy and that's the u.s their output has actually been dropping but you know the china and
the um developing and the india are developing so they're exponentially their output is getting
exponential and all that's happened in the west and in europe is that we've basically de-industrialized
there's really nothing of value left in the west now other than the you know intellectual value and
that's debatable under the universities and you know with energy levels now in uk and parts of
europe it's probably six times out of china and india why would any industry set up you know most
of them are leaving any officers leaving the uk i think the germ Germany's slowly being
de-industrialized and their economies are contracted about four percent i think so
they are the driver of the eu and they represent 25 percent of the eu economy and they're in
they're contracting they're in a deflationary spiral now and i don't really see them climbing
out of it too quickly so the all right the eu yeah two and a half hours is up
thank you well please can you connect me with dave and then with tom as well that'd be great and then
i can i'd love to know have a bit more of a chat thank you but you've got dave's email address
no thank you and thank you for sheila for your contribution stepping into the last moment thank
you steven for organizing great job and there is more to talk about and it's an important topic
because it's quite clear from your that the evidence is compelling and the it's all about a
deep population agenda that we in this group know watching this recording people know so speak out
against the climate fraud and on we go everybody we'll see you on tuesday i say one last thing just
for everyone a closing note i managed to get all this information freely off the internet in about
two to three hours so if i can do it anyone can do it and it's not it's not private there's nothing
there's nothing unique about this you can just tell that you know the difference between people
with inquiring minds and critical thinking skills and people without and unfortunately the large
majority are being lied to by the mainstream media and they should hold their head in shame
you know it really is well as john droves has told us jeremy and sheila and all of us here
that critical thinking is not taught logic is not taught at schools anymore and so the two of you
have demonstrated your ability to think as has dave colum as has steven all right thanks for that
final comment we'll see you again bye everybody go to the tom rodman group it's in the chat for
those who who want to who have got time bye for now thank you steven yeah thank you jones so
jeremy thank you very much for presenting to us and i knew you could do it because and all i needed
to hear was 10 minutes of your ranting about two or three weeks ago correct well spotted thanks
everybody thanks jeremy thanks sheila thank you bye bye excellent jeremy and um your wife too
you sheila thanks sheila