1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:09
David, I've made you a co-host. I'll welcome everybody. Stephen, well done for organizing

2
0:00:09 --> 0:00:14
as usual. Great speakers are making us work even more for our supper by having three meetings

3
0:00:14 --> 0:00:22
a week. But anyway, David, that's very good. It keeps us all on our toes. We are Medical

4
0:00:22 --> 0:00:27
Doctors for COVID Ethics International, founded by Stephen Frost. I'm Charles Cobess. Australasia's

5
0:00:27 --> 0:00:32
passion provocateur. I wear my red jacket because red is color of passion. And you can

6
0:00:32 --> 0:00:36
see Sam Dubay in his red top there. It's a lighter red than me.

7
0:00:36 --> 0:00:42
I'm worried for anger. This is the color of anger, Charles.

8
0:00:42 --> 0:00:50
Very good. So David has presented to us previously and we have a moving population. The recordings

9
0:00:50 --> 0:00:58
are all getting viewed on the Rumble channel, but for, so that particularly newcomers, we

10
0:00:58 --> 0:01:06
welcome newcomers who are recommended by existing participants. The professions here, they have

11
0:01:06 --> 0:01:13
little doctors, lawyers, retired professionals, journalists, engineers, writers, researchers,

12
0:01:14 --> 0:01:22
dentists, financiers, patent experts. And I found from Simon DeWolf yesterday that there's

13
0:01:22 --> 0:01:29
over a thousand patents in bond trading alone. Get that everybody? A thousand patents.

14
0:01:29 --> 0:01:35
Well, many, many more than that. David knows about patents, Charles.

15
0:01:35 --> 0:01:39
Way more than a thousand. That is a gross underestimate.

16
0:01:39 --> 0:01:47
Wow. How amazing. So we're here for increased understanding about the challenges to freedom,

17
0:01:47 --> 0:01:57
truth, justice, health, and ethics. We're here in a true spirit of exploration and discovery.

18
0:01:57 --> 0:02:06
We, if you want anyone added to the list, please send me an email. If any of you produce

19
0:02:07 --> 0:02:14
podcasts, newsletters, et cetera, substacks, please put them every week into the chat so we

20
0:02:14 --> 0:02:21
can find them easily. Don't hold back. Share it with the group. Wonderful resources that you're

21
0:02:21 --> 0:02:29
all producing. We will, we, most of us understand we're here in World War III. We go for two and a

22
0:02:29 --> 0:02:36
half hours. And then it goes to a telegram video chat for those who have the time. David,

23
0:02:36 --> 0:02:39
how long have we got you today so I can plan this process?

24
0:02:40 --> 0:02:44
Yeah, I was, I had booked the two and a half hours. So that's, that's what I was planning on,

25
0:02:44 --> 0:02:50
but I'm- No, no, that will, that will be wonderful because we love having the ability to have

26
0:02:50 --> 0:02:58
conversation, discussion, and go deep and help you. And, you know, we're here, as I'm sure,

27
0:02:59 --> 0:03:03
many presenters realise that we're here to help the presenters as well in their great work. So

28
0:03:03 --> 0:03:09
Stephen does a great job picking the presenters. And then we are a resource of over a thousand

29
0:03:09 --> 0:03:15
people ready to help if help is needed. David and any presenter who, any presenter who sees

30
0:03:15 --> 0:03:21
this recording, there's no censorship, but there is proper moderation. It's a free speech environment.

31
0:03:21 --> 0:03:26
Free speech is crucial, everybody. That's why we don't support the offence industry. If you're

32
0:03:26 --> 0:03:31
offended by anything that anybody says, that you'd be offended, we're not interested. And in your

33
0:03:31 --> 0:03:38
life, if someone says to you, I'm offended, just never apologise. Never apologise. This offence

34
0:03:38 --> 0:03:43
industry is going, is the best way to shut up free speech. When you shut up free speech,

35
0:03:43 --> 0:03:48
you shut up freedom. Without freedom, you are not human. This is a place where you

36
0:03:49 --> 0:03:54
discover what your beliefs are. You perhaps change your beliefs. Many people get upset

37
0:03:54 --> 0:04:00
if their beliefs are questioned. It is about the development of science. If you have any solutions

38
0:04:01 --> 0:04:05
to anyone's problems, put them in the chat too. If you think a product is fantastic,

39
0:04:06 --> 0:04:10
put it in the chat. But you don't need to have a big debate with somebody. If somebody says,

40
0:04:10 --> 0:04:15
9,000 milligrams of vitamin C is great. And someone else says, no, no, no, that's too much.

41
0:04:15 --> 0:04:22
You don't have to have that debate in the chat. We come from love, not fear. Love expands you.

42
0:04:22 --> 0:04:27
Fear contracts you. From all of the speakers we've had here, that Stephen has organised,

43
0:04:27 --> 0:04:34
that we've listened to, there is no doubt in my mind that we have a spiritual war on our hands

44
0:04:34 --> 0:04:40
as well. And those who wish to take away our freedom are hitting us at the spiritual level.

45
0:04:40 --> 0:04:48
They don't understand love. We do. And that's the power that we have. And human beings unifying

46
0:04:48 --> 0:04:55
are a powerful force. So have an open mind. Your self-awareness is an opportunity here.

47
0:04:55 --> 0:05:03
In terms of your patience level of the Q&A, I moderate that. Each one of us has a different

48
0:05:03 --> 0:05:10
agenda, constantly balancing the needs of the participants here. That's what needs to happen.

49
0:05:10 --> 0:05:15
And we don't have 10 hours. We only have two and a half hours. This is recorded at the Rumble Channel.

50
0:05:15 --> 0:05:19
I'll put the address in there. Welcome again specifically. If you are new, if you're a

51
0:05:19 --> 0:05:26
virginal visitor or member, please feel free. You don't have to. Introduce yourself in the chat.

52
0:05:26 --> 0:05:32
Tell us about you. And that's about it. David Martin is a superstar. Everyone knows who he is.

53
0:05:32 --> 0:05:38
We're delighted to have you. There's a special event. And David, over to you. Unless Stephen,

54
0:05:38 --> 0:05:43
you want to say anything specific? Yeah, I just wanted to. So David, you might. So the recording

55
0:05:43 --> 0:05:48
wasn't on when you were explaining the picture behind you, but that might be something you would

56
0:05:48 --> 0:05:55
like to share with people. I don't know. It's up to you. I'm happy to just to recap. The image

57
0:05:55 --> 0:06:02
behind me is the Tree of Life carving, which actually graces the mosque in Ahmedabad, India.

58
0:06:03 --> 0:06:09
It happened to have a very particularly important phase in my life when I was asked to be there

59
0:06:09 --> 0:06:15
during the Muslim Hindu riots, which resulted in the death of thousands of people.

60
0:06:16 --> 0:06:21
And I was asked to come over and be part of a conversation about how to

61
0:06:22 --> 0:06:30
recast the social and the political systems that would potentially lessen that conflict. And

62
0:06:30 --> 0:06:38
as evidenced by history, some bit of what we did may have had an effect because we haven't

63
0:06:38 --> 0:06:48
had the mass riots since. But the image is the relief of the Tree of Life done in alabaster

64
0:06:48 --> 0:06:55
on the mosque in Ahmedabad and superimposed behind it is our integral accounting wheel,

65
0:06:55 --> 0:07:00
which is how we approach every situation and every problem to try to look at six dimensional

66
0:07:00 --> 0:07:05
analysis of everything, which is a whole nother topic. If you want to learn more about that,

67
0:07:06 --> 0:07:13
you can spend time on the FullyLive Academy, where I have a lot of explanations on that,

68
0:07:13 --> 0:07:19
or on my blog, Inverted Alchemy, either one have a look at integral accounting and you get a picture

69
0:07:20 --> 0:07:26
of what those things are. But to dive in very briefly, for those of you not entirely familiar

70
0:07:26 --> 0:07:31
with the work that I've done, I thought I'd give everybody a very quick background,

71
0:07:31 --> 0:07:39
because I really would value more Q&A this time than monologue. So what I'll do is give you a very

72
0:07:39 --> 0:07:47
quick overview and then we can get into some topical issues that are of import right now and then

73
0:07:47 --> 0:07:56
open up the floor for a more in-depth Q&A. To start off, my background is I have been involved in

74
0:07:57 --> 0:08:04
a number of different fields, largely in finance and international trade. For the last 30 years,

75
0:08:05 --> 0:08:10
my academic career started at the University of Virginia when I was on the faculty in the

76
0:08:10 --> 0:08:16
medical school in the departments of radiology and orthopedic surgery. I got my PhD from the

77
0:08:16 --> 0:08:22
University of Virginia and then became the director of the first for-profit clinical

78
0:08:22 --> 0:08:26
trials organization on medical devices in the history of not only the University of Virginia,

79
0:08:26 --> 0:08:33
but the history of the United States. It was the first for-profit corporation ever set up inside of

80
0:08:33 --> 0:08:40
a non-profit university in the Commonwealth of Virginia. That background dovetailed with the

81
0:08:40 --> 0:08:46
other business I was running also at the same time called Mosaic Technologies. Mosaic Technologies was

82
0:08:46 --> 0:08:50
a treaty-restricted technology transfer company that I founded in the late 1980s.

83
0:08:51 --> 0:08:58
Our specific focus was to go into countries that were prohibited from exporting offensive

84
0:08:58 --> 0:09:02
military technologies as a condition of the treaties ending the Second World War

85
0:09:03 --> 0:09:08
and find civilian applications for defense technologies that came out of

86
0:09:09 --> 0:09:15
all of the countries that were given prohibitions after the Second World War. Germany, Italy,

87
0:09:16 --> 0:09:22
much of Eastern Europe. As the Soviet Union fell apart, we were very actively involved in

88
0:09:22 --> 0:09:27
the dissemination of technologies in the diaspora of engineering coming out of Russia.

89
0:09:28 --> 0:09:35
Then Japan, obviously. I say without any hyperbole that if you use any technology whatsoever,

90
0:09:36 --> 0:09:43
whether it's automotive, telecommunications, or anything in the medical space, the likelihood is

91
0:09:43 --> 0:09:49
I have had a direct impact on that technology coming into your hands somewhere on this earth.

92
0:09:50 --> 0:09:55
That statement is not only because of the work through Mosaic Technologies, but in 1998,

93
0:09:55 --> 0:10:02
I started a company called MCAM. MCAM was the first and the only of its kind in the United States.

94
0:10:02 --> 0:10:08
It's what we call a GSE, or government-sponsored enterprise. Ours was not government-sponsored,

95
0:10:08 --> 0:10:14
but it was government-sanctioned. What we did was we created the world's first and continuously only

96
0:10:15 --> 0:10:23
means by which companies could use general intangibles as collateral for regulated finance.

97
0:10:23 --> 0:10:30
Our platforms are used to underwrite banking transactions in 168 countries. I often say if

98
0:10:30 --> 0:10:36
it moves anywhere across a border, we see it because it is something that is not hyperbolic.

99
0:10:36 --> 0:10:43
Again, that's the way it is. We do the underwriting of intangible assets to make sure that those are

100
0:10:44 --> 0:10:50
applicable for regulated capital transactions in banking situations in 168 countries.

101
0:10:51 --> 0:11:00
That's what MCAM has done for the last 25 years. I have been involved in a number of things on the

102
0:11:00 --> 0:11:08
capital market side. Jermaine, to this conversation, I was asked in the late 1990s to be very

103
0:11:09 --> 0:11:15
involved in looking at the programs that were at least blurring the line, if not crossing the line,

104
0:11:16 --> 0:11:21
of biological and chemical weapons programs. As we were going through technology transfer issues,

105
0:11:21 --> 0:11:28
it was very common for us to come across technologies that enabled or the overt technologies

106
0:11:28 --> 0:11:33
associated with biological and chemical weapons in all of 122 countries that we were engaged in

107
0:11:33 --> 0:11:39
at the time. As a result of that, whether it was the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in the

108
0:11:39 --> 0:11:43
United States, whether it was the National Biological Engineering Programs in Tehran,

109
0:11:43 --> 0:11:55
whether it is the programs in the UPACO platform that actually gave rise to what became the Euro

110
0:11:55 --> 0:12:01
Tox Conventions, we were very involved in understanding what was going on in the

111
0:12:01 --> 0:12:06
weaponization of nature and the weaponization of chemistry against humanity beginning in the late

112
0:12:06 --> 0:12:16
1990s. That is how we fell into our involvement with coronavirus. My first briefing on coronavirus

113
0:12:16 --> 0:12:23
was officially done for law enforcement intelligence agencies in 2002 going into 2003.

114
0:12:24 --> 0:12:29
When we pointed out that Ralph Barak at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

115
0:12:29 --> 0:12:38
at the direction and funding of NIAID had developed what he referred to as an infectious

116
0:12:38 --> 0:12:45
replication defective clone of coronavirus. What is important about that to start off this

117
0:12:45 --> 0:12:51
conversation is the use of terminology is quite critical. When you actually develop something

118
0:12:51 --> 0:12:59
which is infectious and replication defective, that is nonsense garble speak for a weapon.

119
0:13:00 --> 0:13:06
That means it's intended to hit a person, it's intended to affect that person, but it's intended

120
0:13:06 --> 0:13:12
to actually have a target, not a distribution target. That's why we call it infectious replication

121
0:13:12 --> 0:13:19
defective. Replication defective means that it was intended to have a delivery target that was

122
0:13:19 --> 0:13:24
actually something that was intentionally identified against an individual. That's a

123
0:13:24 --> 0:13:30
very important point we're going to get to in a little bit. It's important to realize that in 2002

124
0:13:30 --> 0:13:38
UNC Chapel Hill funded by NIAID developed what became the thing that we now call SARS-CoV.

125
0:13:39 --> 0:13:44
That is not a naturally occurring modification of anything. It never was naturally occurring.

126
0:13:44 --> 0:13:51
Anybody familiar with the coronavirus model prior to 1998 realizes that with the exception

127
0:13:51 --> 0:13:59
of experimentation done by Ralph Barrett funded by NIAID, the primary target of coronavirus

128
0:13:59 --> 0:14:06
research was canine and porcine juvenile gastrointestinal disorders because that's

129
0:14:06 --> 0:14:11
where coronavirus had its impact. It was not a respiratory and it was not a cardiovascular

130
0:14:11 --> 0:14:18
pathogen. It was a GI pathogen. If you go back to 1990 and look at Pfizer's very first patent

131
0:14:19 --> 0:14:25
on a coronavirus vaccine, you can see the evidence of that in all of the literature associated with

132
0:14:25 --> 0:14:33
Pfizer's first coronavirus patent vaccine in 1990. What happened during the decade of the 90s is

133
0:14:33 --> 0:14:38
Ralph Barrett modified coronavirus using a series of modifications and amplifications

134
0:14:39 --> 0:14:45
to have it target rabbit cardiomyopathy. Let me just say that one more time. Rabbits

135
0:14:46 --> 0:14:54
cardiomyopathy. That model as a research and experimental model is quite problematic for two

136
0:14:54 --> 0:15:01
reasons. Number one, it defies what is in fact the restrictions that we have on the development of

137
0:15:01 --> 0:15:06
biological weapons because you cannot take a naturally occurring scheduled toxin or pathogen

138
0:15:07 --> 0:15:13
and amplify it so it increases pathogenicity. That is actually an illegal act under 18 U.S. Code

139
0:15:14 --> 0:15:21
several sections, but most notably section 175. It is illegal to do what he did and it was illegal

140
0:15:21 --> 0:15:30
to fund it. That work without question violated U.S. Code and is a felony violation which carries

141
0:15:30 --> 0:15:38
a lifetime sentence as well as up to $100 million economic damage if it was involved with an

142
0:15:38 --> 0:15:43
institution which in this case it was with the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. This

143
0:15:43 --> 0:15:49
is actually the foundation and it was important to point out that it was identified as a way to

144
0:15:49 --> 0:15:56
modify both spike protein, the ACE2 receptor proteins and several of the furin cleavage sites

145
0:15:56 --> 0:16:02
and other things which were being modified so that they would actually hit cells of different

146
0:16:02 --> 0:16:09
origins. We would actually have an enormous number of other organ systems involved where

147
0:16:09 --> 0:16:15
coronavirus had once upon a time not had any meaningful clinical effect whatsoever.

148
0:16:16 --> 0:16:24
In 2002, the development of that coronavirus became instrumental in what happened in the fall

149
0:16:24 --> 0:16:33
of 2002 and the spring of 2003 which as you all know was the allegation of the first outbreak

150
0:16:33 --> 0:16:42
of SARS-CoV-1. Now the truth is that SARS-CoV-1 which was patented in April of 2003 by the CDC

151
0:16:43 --> 0:16:52
and the cDNA sequence for the entire sequence of SARS-CoV isolated from humans was patented on the

152
0:16:52 --> 0:17:00
25th of April 2003 by the Center for Disease Control and roughly 50 co-inventors if you believe

153
0:17:00 --> 0:17:05
that I've got a bridge to sell you in the middle of a swamp but the fact of the matter is 50 people

154
0:17:05 --> 0:17:10
put their, slightly over 50 people put their name on that application, many of whom had nothing to

155
0:17:10 --> 0:17:16
do with the alleged invention. What makes that particular date important is two days later

156
0:17:16 --> 0:17:22
the vaccine for SARS-CoV was actually patented by Sequoia Pharmaceuticals.

157
0:17:23 --> 0:17:29
I can tell by looking at everyone's face who has their camera on that that name means nothing to

158
0:17:29 --> 0:17:34
anybody because it doesn't mean anything to anybody because Sequoia Pharmaceuticals wasn't

159
0:17:34 --> 0:17:40
a company. It was actually some shell corporation and if you go back to the provenance of that you

160
0:17:40 --> 0:17:47
can find all kinds of messy trails of financing that have tentacles into and out of Sequoia

161
0:17:47 --> 0:17:54
Pharmaceuticals but two days after the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans patent was

162
0:17:54 --> 0:18:02
filed by the CDC a vaccine for the exact same virus was also patented. You think operation warp

163
0:18:02 --> 0:18:10
speed was fast figure that one out how on earth can you actually have allegedly a virus isolated

164
0:18:10 --> 0:18:21
on the 25th of April 2003 and two days later have vaccine trial data filed in a patent for a vaccine

165
0:18:21 --> 0:18:28
on the exact same pathogen and once again anybody who thinks that that's even theoretically possible

166
0:18:28 --> 0:18:37
absent the back to the future DeLorean time machine is certainly on the edge of their sanity.

167
0:18:38 --> 0:18:47
What became problematic very quickly is it was clear that the coronavirus outbreak of 2002 going

168
0:18:47 --> 0:18:55
into 2003 was part of a plan it was not an isolated event and the plan involved anthrax and it involved

169
0:18:55 --> 0:19:01
H1N1 and the reason why we know this is because it was specifically announced in a series of

170
0:19:01 --> 0:19:08
conferences in Slovenia and a series of conferences that took place in India where the linkage

171
0:19:08 --> 0:19:16
between the anthrax the H1N1 and SARS were all brought together as a justification for creating

172
0:19:16 --> 0:19:21
what would become a mandate for medical countermeasures which is a defined term and

173
0:19:21 --> 0:19:27
Pascal back to your work it would be important to make note of the fact that the evolution of

174
0:19:27 --> 0:19:33
the term medical countermeasures as a code word inside of World Health Organization and a code

175
0:19:33 --> 0:19:39
word inside of statutory engagements medical countermeasures is a military term developed

176
0:19:39 --> 0:19:50
by DARPA and it was part of a combined op that includes anthrax H1N1 and SARS coronavirus and

177
0:19:50 --> 0:19:55
then later included Ebola and a couple other things but it's important to realize historically

178
0:19:55 --> 0:20:02
that this was all part of a single operation and the operation was driven in large part for two

179
0:20:02 --> 0:20:08
objectives the stated objective number one was that we wanted to have a universal vaccine vector

180
0:20:08 --> 0:20:15
where we used biologic agents and their ability to penetrate the cells as a vaccine vector and

181
0:20:15 --> 0:20:21
coronavirus was chosen by Anthony Fauci to be the preferred mode of delivery of vaccines he figured

182
0:20:21 --> 0:20:26
that if you were going to come up with an HIV vaccine or any other vaccine that coronavirus

183
0:20:26 --> 0:20:34
was the most malleable model that could be used to deliver other vaccine agents into the cell

184
0:20:34 --> 0:20:40
thus the focus allegedly on coronavirus however there was another part of the process which

185
0:20:40 --> 0:20:46
became visible to the public and I am not able to talk about the classified phase of this but it

186
0:20:46 --> 0:20:53
became visible to the public in 2005 coincident with the passage of the prep act and other things

187
0:20:53 --> 0:21:03
where DARPA expressly held a conference on the bio weapons capabilities of SARS coronavirus very

188
0:21:03 --> 0:21:10
specifically an entire conference dedicated to the weaponization of coronavirus where Ralph Baric was

189
0:21:10 --> 0:21:17
one of the lead presenters that conference in 2005 gave rise to several hundred million dollars

190
0:21:17 --> 0:21:25
of non-competitive grants that went to UNC Chapel Hill and their collaborators and those non-competitive

191
0:21:25 --> 0:21:33
grants were for the express weaponization and p3 program if you look at DARPA's p3 program you'll

192
0:21:33 --> 0:21:40
see all of this detailed but that p3 program which was essentially allegedly developed for

193
0:21:40 --> 0:21:45
warfighter readiness and in fact the only thing it was was anything but that it was actually a way

194
0:21:45 --> 0:21:53
to use the defense department's black programs to develop biological weapons allegedly in

195
0:21:53 --> 0:21:59
anticipation of their use in conflict all of this was done and well documented and the

196
0:21:59 --> 0:22:07
non-competitive grants associated with this in 2005 persist to this day where there is

197
0:22:07 --> 0:22:13
zero interdiction in the gain of function funding and there has not been any interdiction in the

198
0:22:13 --> 0:22:18
gain of function funding going into this program so it's important to realize that's been going on

199
0:22:18 --> 0:22:26
since 2005 in 2010 a very bizarre thing happened the bizarre thing was a 10-year national science

200
0:22:26 --> 0:22:35
foundation grant entitled Darwinian chemical systems was actually in its 10th year of renewal

201
0:22:35 --> 0:22:40
when the lead investigators associated with Darwinian chemical systems which is the

202
0:22:40 --> 0:22:47
organization that was set up to see if you could get mRNA to write into eukaryotic and other cells

203
0:22:47 --> 0:22:55
DNA that particular program which was called Darwinian chemical systems if you're looking it

204
0:22:55 --> 0:23:04
up that program became a company called Moderna and if you go back and you look at the origins of

205
0:23:04 --> 0:23:10
Moderna a very bizarre thing happens one of the principles of the national science foundation

206
0:23:10 --> 0:23:17
grant and two venture capitalists who had no venture capital experience in 2010 are listed

207
0:23:17 --> 0:23:24
as co-inventors on the first patent filed by Moderna before Moderna even existed once again

208
0:23:24 --> 0:23:30
a time machine problem we have money going into a company that has never produced anything we have

209
0:23:30 --> 0:23:38
investments going in and we have venture capitalists listed as co-inventors on mRNA as a genetic

210
0:23:38 --> 0:23:45
engineering program both of whom had no experience whatsoever in any form of science or chemistry or

211
0:23:45 --> 0:23:52
biology or anything else but they are listed in the first patents filed and assigned to Moderna

212
0:23:52 --> 0:23:58
before Moderna actually existed another one of those moments where it scratches your head with

213
0:23:58 --> 0:24:03
credulity where you sit there and say this was clearly set up for something else and the something

214
0:24:03 --> 0:24:09
else became very clear very fast the something else was the recognition beginning in 2008 and

215
0:24:09 --> 0:24:17
then finalized in 2010 which was the recognition that if you were going to stabilize mRNA to do its

216
0:24:17 --> 0:24:24
job either as a vaccine or a vaccine vector it would be necessary to start modifying some of the

217
0:24:24 --> 0:24:33
nucleosides that go into the compounds associated with everything in the mRNA therapeutic environment

218
0:24:33 --> 0:24:42
and that was the introduction of pseudo-uridine now pseudo-uridine beginning in 2008 but certainly

219
0:24:42 --> 0:24:50
by 2010 was known to have cardio toxic effects and most problematic there were well-documented

220
0:24:50 --> 0:24:57
reasons to assume that it would down regulate interferon 1 the down regulation of interferon

221
0:24:57 --> 0:25:05
1 is super problematic because what it does when it is inside of the cell is it actually is a pro

222
0:25:05 --> 0:25:13
oncogenic activity in other words by down regulating interferon 1 you essentially are turning

223
0:25:13 --> 0:25:20
on the switches and the early work in glioblastoma showed that it was universal if you had pseudo-uridine

224
0:25:20 --> 0:25:28
inside of a cell and that cell had any proclivity towards cancer it was a pro-oncogenic agent but it

225
0:25:28 --> 0:25:33
turns out that there was a difficulty in stabilizing mRNA to get it into a living system

226
0:25:33 --> 0:25:39
which is the reason why the University of British Columbia and others got together to start working

227
0:25:39 --> 0:25:45
on the lipid nanoparticle platform that would allow the mRNA to get far enough into the system

228
0:25:46 --> 0:25:52
to create a vector that would get to the cell so that the pseudo-uridine laced mRNA could get

229
0:25:52 --> 0:25:58
into the cell and that program which is actually something that is also very well documented coming

230
0:25:58 --> 0:26:03
out of the University of British Columbia is the basis upon which we got the polyethylene glycol

231
0:26:03 --> 0:26:09
platform and we got all of the other lipid nanoparticle platforms that are currently used

232
0:26:09 --> 0:26:18
in the present injection all of this done in 2010 to 2013 in 2013 a very alarming thing took place

233
0:26:20 --> 0:26:27
we know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology allegedly isolated through medical sampling

234
0:26:28 --> 0:26:34
a coronavirus alteration from a few miners who were doing bat guano mining

235
0:26:35 --> 0:26:42
in the Guangdong province of China those miners all came down with clinical symptoms that are

236
0:26:42 --> 0:26:50
largely associated in fact 100 percent in this case associated with what we call COVID-19

237
0:26:51 --> 0:26:56
once again suggesting that a novel disease in 2019 was not possible given the fact that the disease

238
0:26:56 --> 0:27:03
was actually documented in 2013 by the very organization in Wuhan that actually isolated it

239
0:27:03 --> 0:27:11
but what was problematic about that particular sample was according to written records we have

240
0:27:11 --> 0:27:19
from Ralph Baric the sequence for this super pathogenic strain was uploaded onto a server

241
0:27:19 --> 0:27:30
and he then re-engineered that particular pathogen in North Carolina for his work in 2013 and 14

242
0:27:30 --> 0:27:36
and in October of 2014 after the gain-of-function moratorium was put in place

243
0:27:37 --> 0:27:45
NIAID sent to Ralph Baric an authorization to continue his gain-of-function research listed as

244
0:27:45 --> 0:27:55
such and worse than that modified the name of the project so that it went from an in vitro project

245
0:27:55 --> 0:28:01
to an in vivo project so I want you to just sit with that for just a second right we we actually

246
0:28:01 --> 0:28:09
had an in vitro model approved on Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one in 2013 after the gain-of-function

247
0:28:09 --> 0:28:17
moratorium after everybody was told to stop this there was a non-action letter that was sent to

248
0:28:17 --> 0:28:23
UNC Chapel Hill to say that because the project was already funded UNC Chapel Hill could continue

249
0:28:23 --> 0:28:31
its gain-of-function research number one and number two do that research in vivo and I want

250
0:28:31 --> 0:28:37
the chilling effect of that to have exactly the chilling effect that it should have during a

251
0:28:37 --> 0:28:44
moratorium we actually made it more lethal in living systems than we had prior to the gain-of-function

252
0:28:44 --> 0:28:50
moratorium and then of course we have that wonderful quote which I have to say every time I speak

253
0:28:51 --> 0:29:00
which is Peter Daschek's quote in 2015 until an infectious disease crisis is very real and present

254
0:29:00 --> 0:29:07
and an emergency threshold that is largely ignored to sustain the funding base and once again this is

255
0:29:07 --> 0:29:13
a crime this is a criminal racketeering crime this is not public health to sustain a funding

256
0:29:13 --> 0:29:19
base beyond the crisis we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical

257
0:29:19 --> 0:29:27
countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine a key driver is the media

258
0:29:27 --> 0:29:33
and the economics will follow the hype we need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real

259
0:29:33 --> 0:29:41
issues investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process that is a quote that is

260
0:29:41 --> 0:29:48
a quote from the National Academy of Sciences meeting published in February of 2016 the quote

261
0:29:48 --> 0:29:56
was at an event in 2015 but that is a public admission of domestic terrorism that's what that

262
0:29:56 --> 0:30:01
is because if what you're doing is saying that you need the media to create the hype to get the

263
0:30:01 --> 0:30:08
public to accept something that is a by definition violation of section 802 of the Patriot Act in the

264
0:30:08 --> 0:30:15
United States and globally it is a violation of domestic terrorism in every civilized country

265
0:30:15 --> 0:30:23
you cannot terrorize a population into coercion and not violate domestic terrorism statutes in

266
0:30:23 --> 0:30:29
every one of the civilized countries on earth for us that's a very important thing here in the

267
0:30:29 --> 0:30:36
United States because it creates an extremely important felony particularly as it relates to

268
0:30:36 --> 0:30:46
what became the underlying argument for what became the current pandemic in 2016 we have the

269
0:30:46 --> 0:30:50
publication of the work that Ralph Baric and his colleagues did with respect to Wuhan Institute of

270
0:30:50 --> 0:30:57
Virology virus one we're including the modifications that are now associated with what is allegedly SARS

271
0:30:57 --> 0:31:04
COV-2 and the patents on all of those modifications which all predate this outbreak by at least a year

272
0:31:04 --> 0:31:11
and a half every single one of the nucleic acid sequences and every single one of the nucleoside

273
0:31:11 --> 0:31:20
pairings that is associated with the novel SARS COV-2 was published and patented by 2016

274
0:31:21 --> 0:31:29
and the official paper that was published that said SARS COV-2 Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one

275
0:31:29 --> 0:31:39
was poised for human emergence was published in 2016. Now what makes the next part of the story

276
0:31:39 --> 0:31:47
problematic is a very bizarre and esoteric piece of U.S. law and that is the Bayh-Dole Act. The Bayh-Dole

277
0:31:47 --> 0:31:55
Act of 1980 which authorized university federally funded research to iner to the economic benefit

278
0:31:55 --> 0:32:02
of the researchers that got federal funding that particular act gives the federal government in the

279
0:32:02 --> 0:32:08
United States what's called march in right provisions and that just simply means that anyone

280
0:32:08 --> 0:32:13
who is actually funded by the federal government has the ability to commercially exploit their

281
0:32:13 --> 0:32:18
innovations but at any point that the government determines that it's necessary for them to have

282
0:32:18 --> 0:32:24
access to that technology at that point in time the government has a right to what's called a

283
0:32:24 --> 0:32:33
Fran license a fair reasonable and non-discriminatory license it requires no rights contracts transfers

284
0:32:33 --> 0:32:39
anything else it's a simple right that's granted by statute in the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act. Here comes

285
0:32:40 --> 0:32:49
in the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act. Here comes the problem in 2018 actually in late 2017 we don't have the

286
0:32:49 --> 0:32:55
exact date because all we have is the evidence of the transfer but in late 2017 and early 2018

287
0:32:55 --> 0:33:02
for some reason the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was asked by NIH to transfer the

288
0:33:02 --> 0:33:11
patent from 2002 to NIH that is an unprecedented move and why the UNC Chapel Hill patent would need

289
0:33:11 --> 0:33:19
to be transferred back to NIH in 2018 defies any logic and defies any legal standing because the

290
0:33:19 --> 0:33:24
U.S. government already had the march in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act so there's no need to

291
0:33:24 --> 0:33:30
transfer it and when that transfer happened that alerted us to a very significant problem because

292
0:33:30 --> 0:33:38
at the same time the CDC had lied to the United States Patent Office in their entirety of the

293
0:33:38 --> 0:33:46
overall platform that was the coronavirus isolated from humans the CDC had actually violated the

294
0:33:46 --> 0:33:52
federal statutes on patents 35 U.S. code with respect to their prosecution of that patent

295
0:33:52 --> 0:33:58
but ironically during the same period of time they renewed the patent light the patent maintenance fees

296
0:33:58 --> 0:34:07
on the SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-1 patent that CDC had had at the time now according to the CDC's official

297
0:34:07 --> 0:34:15
fact-checking you know quoted statement the reason why CDC allegedly filed a patent on coronavirus

298
0:34:15 --> 0:34:20
was allegedly because they wanted to be able to make sure everybody anywhere on earth could research

299
0:34:20 --> 0:34:26
it without commercial implications the only problem with that story is that in 2006 and 2007

300
0:34:27 --> 0:34:34
the CDC actually was told by the Patent Office that it was not able to patent the coronavirus

301
0:34:34 --> 0:34:39
because it was already in the public domain and the CDC bribed the United States Patent Office to

302
0:34:39 --> 0:34:48
get the patent on coronavirus even though twice it was actually categorically rejected as a

303
0:34:48 --> 0:34:53
unpatentable subject matter because the matter was already in the public domain so if you want to buy

304
0:34:53 --> 0:35:00
if you want to buy the CDC story unfortunately the the financial records and then a handwritten

305
0:35:00 --> 0:35:08
falsified date on the application which we have in our possession was the final straw that showed

306
0:35:08 --> 0:35:14
that the CDC had bribed the United States Patent Office to issue the patent in the first place

307
0:35:15 --> 0:35:20
and by 2016 they were paying the renewal fees to make sure that the patent was still in place

308
0:35:20 --> 0:35:27
and still directly under their control which gives us the interesting emergence of the most alarming

309
0:35:28 --> 0:35:38
terminology that we saw arise in April of 2019 so remember we're still long before patient one long

310
0:35:38 --> 0:35:43
before any of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 stuff is in the official press or anything else

311
0:35:44 --> 0:35:51
in April of 2019, Moderna amended four patent applications one of which had been pending I

312
0:35:51 --> 0:35:56
believe for nearly seven years and had been multiply rejected but they amended the patent

313
0:35:56 --> 0:36:03
to include the phrase the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.

314
0:36:04 --> 0:36:08
Now for those of you not familiar with the English language let me just point out

315
0:36:09 --> 0:36:15
that there is one operative term in that line that's problematic and the term is release.

316
0:36:18 --> 0:36:23
Sit with that for a second the accidental or intentional release they didn't talk about a

317
0:36:23 --> 0:36:30
leak they didn't talk about oops something might go wrong with a BS4 lab BSL4 lab they actually

318
0:36:30 --> 0:36:33
said accidental or intentional release

319
0:36:38 --> 0:36:44
and if you're not getting it you're not awake that's a problem it's a problem to say that you

320
0:36:44 --> 0:36:49
are going to release a respiratory pathogen in any population at any time for any reason

321
0:36:49 --> 0:36:57
and they put that in four patent applications in April of 2019 and the exact same language showed

322
0:36:57 --> 0:37:05
up in September 18th 2019 when the World Health Organization World at Risk publication came out

323
0:37:05 --> 0:37:12
which said that in September of 2019 the country's signatory to the World Health Organization

324
0:37:12 --> 0:37:18
would plan an exercise with the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen

325
0:37:18 --> 0:37:24
so that by September 2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine

326
0:37:24 --> 0:37:32
platform. The exact same phrase that was in the Moderna patents in April of 2019 showed up in

327
0:37:32 --> 0:37:38
September of 2019 in the World Health Organization's World at Risk publication and one day later

328
0:37:39 --> 0:37:45
and I'm not making this up one day later President Trump signed the executive order for the

329
0:37:45 --> 0:37:53
development of DNA-based vaccines as an executive order for the national priority of vaccine

330
0:37:53 --> 0:37:59
development in other words operation warp speed started with an executive order on September 19th

331
0:37:59 --> 0:38:09
2019 four months before patient one allegedly happened in China. To add to the problem we have

332
0:38:09 --> 0:38:16
obviously the unfortunate development that took place in November of 2019 when Ralph Baric by his

333
0:38:16 --> 0:38:22
own written admission and I have this in writing from Ralph Baric transferred the sequence for this

334
0:38:22 --> 0:38:30
injection to Moderna in a material transfer agreement in November of 2019. Now conveniently

335
0:38:30 --> 0:38:35
Ralph Baric was also the member of the ICTV the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses

336
0:38:35 --> 0:38:43
for the World Health Organization that in February and March of 2020 was the one supposed to be

337
0:38:43 --> 0:38:50
identifying allegedly this novel coronavirus so it's very helpful to have the guy who made it be the

338
0:38:50 --> 0:38:56
guy who is actually independently investigating the novelty of it about six and a half months after

339
0:38:56 --> 0:39:02
he's sent a sample of the alleged novel virus that hadn't been determined novel and hadn't been

340
0:39:02 --> 0:39:09
determined a virus he actually had the material transferred to Moderna in November of 2019 it

341
0:39:09 --> 0:39:14
wasn't until March that he actually figured out that it was a novel pathogen once again a time

342
0:39:14 --> 0:39:18
machine problem and you'll notice that there are a number of time machine problems here the last of

343
0:39:18 --> 0:39:25
which I want to point to is the very interesting bizarre moment of black wholeness in terms of the

344
0:39:25 --> 0:39:31
story of this criminality which took place on or about the 29th or 30th of January 2020.

345
0:39:33 --> 0:39:40
On January 29th of 2020 Alex Azar had determined that there was not a public health emergency

346
0:39:40 --> 0:39:47
and there was no need to declare one in the United States and then on the 31st or on the 30th he

347
0:39:47 --> 0:39:54
actually went on television and actually said the same thing there is no public health emergency we

348
0:39:54 --> 0:40:00
don't need to declare one we're keeping an eye on it etc etc and then on the 31st mysteriously he

349
0:40:00 --> 0:40:06
filed the public health emergency declaration and backdated it to the 29th.

350
0:40:09 --> 0:40:16
I just want to be clear on this he said it wasn't an emergency he went on national television

351
0:40:16 --> 0:40:23
confirming that it was an emergency and one day later with no material alterations in any information

352
0:40:23 --> 0:40:29
mysteriously we actually have the declaration retroactive to the day that it wasn't an emergency.

353
0:40:30 --> 0:40:37
Now why on earth would you do that? Well the answer is very simple if you go back and look at what the

354
0:40:37 --> 0:40:43
vaccine research organization at NIAID was doing they actually had already started their work and

355
0:40:43 --> 0:40:50
needed the entirety of the immunity shield to wrap around the beginning of the first formulation

356
0:40:50 --> 0:40:56
of the injection and it turns out somewhere between the 29th and 30th somebody got wind of

357
0:40:56 --> 0:41:02
Alex Azar's stupid comment that said there wasn't an emergency and said hey buddy not only do we

358
0:41:02 --> 0:41:07
need to have the immunity shield but you need to backdate your statement so that we get it

359
0:41:07 --> 0:41:13
for when we actually started. Somewhere between the 29th and 30th we know that that's when the

360
0:41:13 --> 0:41:18
intervention called the current injection actually went into production and we have the declaration

361
0:41:18 --> 0:41:24
retroactive to try to afford medical countermeasure liability shields to make sure that they had the

362
0:41:24 --> 0:41:31
ability to cover work that had already commenced before number one there was a pathogen number two

363
0:41:31 --> 0:41:38
there was any sample of a pathogen and a month before get this right a month before the ICTV was

364
0:41:38 --> 0:41:46
even impaneled to determine that there was a novel pathogen so we have a month between when allegedly

365
0:41:46 --> 0:41:50
there's a novel coronavirus that has not been called the novel coronavirus we have a month

366
0:41:50 --> 0:41:57
between when it was allegedly a national health emergency until we actually have the ICTV ruling

367
0:41:57 --> 0:42:02
on its novelty and the person ruling on its novelty is none other than Ralph Barrett.

368
0:42:04 --> 0:42:08
I mean it's as dumb as having Peter Daschick go investigate a wet lab in China

369
0:42:08 --> 0:42:15
though these things are are are equivalent to having a a bank robber on the steps of a bank

370
0:42:15 --> 0:42:22
holding a bag of money and a gun and being asked by the police to investigate the possibility

371
0:42:22 --> 0:42:28
of somebody robbing the bank. I mean that is how absolutely ludicrous this entire exercise is

372
0:42:28 --> 0:42:34
and that's precisely what happened. We filed our first complaints with the office of the inspector

373
0:42:34 --> 0:42:42
general on all of the things I've just described in the spring of 2020. Under the statute the OIG

374
0:42:42 --> 0:42:48
is required to have a 90-day response and sitting here today on the 9th of February 2023 we have not

375
0:42:48 --> 0:42:55
had a single response from any of the OIGs to whom we sent our first racketeering and antitrust

376
0:42:55 --> 0:43:03
complaints. Throughout the spring and summer of 2020 our focus was to try to get racketeering and

377
0:43:03 --> 0:43:10
antitrust investigations into the collusive behavior and the restraint of trade behavior

378
0:43:10 --> 0:43:16
that was going on as Anthony Fauci beginning in March and April started suppressing all clinical

379
0:43:16 --> 0:43:25
alternatives so that we would have the de facto opening of the possibility of having only an

380
0:43:25 --> 0:43:32
injection and only remdesivir as the only way out of this path this this pandemic and that active

381
0:43:32 --> 0:43:39
suppression ironically flies in the face of Ralph Baric's own published information because it turns

382
0:43:39 --> 0:43:45
out that in the early part of the 2010s Ralph Baric found that the zinc ionophore the very same

383
0:43:45 --> 0:43:54
thing that Dr. Zev Zelenko put in Zstack that very same mechanism was actually an anti-coronavirus

384
0:43:54 --> 0:44:01
infectious intervention. If you used zinc and you used zinc ionophores you actually saved yourself

385
0:44:01 --> 0:44:07
from coronavirus related disorders and that was Ralph Baric's own work so the fact that they

386
0:44:07 --> 0:44:14
used Ralph Baric's work to then shut down Ralph Baric's work is another interesting time machine

387
0:44:14 --> 0:44:21
conundrum where we know that there's a restraint of trade in 2010 and again in 2012 we know that

388
0:44:21 --> 0:44:26
the NIAID funded and approved research that showed that hydroxychloroquine was effective

389
0:44:26 --> 0:44:32
against SARS coronavirus infections and once again we were told that it was not effective

390
0:44:32 --> 0:44:42
after they had determined it was effective. We were told that making the entirety of the

391
0:44:42 --> 0:44:51
the overall experience of what became the mechanism of counting the number of infected

392
0:44:51 --> 0:44:59
through the amplification of fragments of proteins as the official way of determining how many COVID

393
0:44:59 --> 0:45:08
cases there were. Anthony Fauci by his own admission said that he was not a big fan of any of the work

394
0:45:08 --> 0:45:15
of Kerry Mullis. He had a personal vendetta as well as a professional critique and he had in 2010

395
0:45:15 --> 0:45:22
also in 2012 he had actually done an enormous amount of work to come up with alternatives

396
0:45:22 --> 0:45:31
to what in fact became the entirety of how we nominated whether or not somebody was

397
0:45:31 --> 0:45:37
COVID infected and all of those things were actively suppressed during the spring of 2020

398
0:45:37 --> 0:45:43
so that the only conclusion that could be reached by the late spring is the only way out of this

399
0:45:43 --> 0:45:50
alleged pandemic was a vaccine and that recitation took place across the entire globe where heads of

400
0:45:50 --> 0:45:55
state said the only way out is a vaccine. Now here comes an interesting little glitch.

401
0:45:56 --> 0:46:00
If you're in the United States and I know some of you are and know a lot of you are all over the

402
0:46:00 --> 0:46:07
world there's a very interesting problem and this goes back to once again Pascal's comments on

403
0:46:08 --> 0:46:16
the treason issue. The actual language used to declare a state of emergency and the provenance

404
0:46:16 --> 0:46:23
of who wrote that is actually something that no attorney general in the United States has been

405
0:46:23 --> 0:46:31
able to identify the person that was the one who drafted the executive order or the emergency order

406
0:46:31 --> 0:46:36
that shut down any state. Now it turns out I happen to have the opportunity to experience in

407
0:46:36 --> 0:46:43
one particular state a situation where they forgot to change the properties section in the document.

408
0:46:44 --> 0:46:49
You know when you go into Word or a PDF file or anything else you actually have to make sure

409
0:46:49 --> 0:46:53
you've edited out the properties section because you want to make sure nobody knows that it was a

410
0:46:53 --> 0:47:01
template. Well it turns out that the template that was used is not from the state that shut

411
0:47:01 --> 0:47:09
the state down. That means that every governor who signed any declaration of emergency was in

412
0:47:09 --> 0:47:17
fact guilty of treason because when you allow a foreign actor and in states the foreign actor is

413
0:47:17 --> 0:47:23
defined as anybody who's not within the state. When you allow a foreign actor to without verification

414
0:47:23 --> 0:47:29
shut down your state and suspend your constitution that is treason at the state level. The same thing

415
0:47:29 --> 0:47:34
happens at the federal level and it turns out that the provenance of the documents used to shut

416
0:47:34 --> 0:47:40
down countries and states is something that mysteriously nobody's bothered to ask the question

417
0:47:40 --> 0:47:48
who wrote it. Well it turns out that all you have to do is get a copy of it and look in the property

418
0:47:48 --> 0:47:53
section and you find out that it wasn't written by an elected official and it wasn't written by an

419
0:47:53 --> 0:47:57
appointed official and it wasn't written by any of the people who should have been writing these

420
0:47:57 --> 0:48:02
things. It was actually a template and it's pretty important that we start realizing that these are

421
0:48:02 --> 0:48:09
the simple errors that are made by criminals who think they won't get caught and these are the tools

422
0:48:09 --> 0:48:16
that we must use to go after those criminals and I'm actively pursuing that particular one

423
0:48:17 --> 0:48:23
in the state where this issue was first pointed out. So we're working on that one as well.

424
0:48:24 --> 0:48:34
We started changing our legal strategy in the summer of 2020 because it was clear that we could

425
0:48:34 --> 0:48:41
not get a single attorney general and we could not get a single prosecutor to have any reasonable

426
0:48:41 --> 0:48:48
activity to go after the antitrust case which was what would have been the appropriate legal action

427
0:48:49 --> 0:48:57
to take in the summer of 2020. That was before we were putting a modified mRNA into people's arms.

428
0:48:59 --> 0:49:07
The minute we went to the injection clinical trials, which by the way are a violation of 21

429
0:49:07 --> 0:49:13
Code of Federal Regulations section 50.20 to 23 and they're a violation for a very simple rule.

430
0:49:14 --> 0:49:22
Under post-Nurenberg conditions and under every statute of human subjects review,

431
0:49:22 --> 0:49:29
there is an independent IRB requirement and an independent IRB means that the IRB has to be

432
0:49:29 --> 0:49:33
impaneled. The institutional review board approving a protocol has to be impaneled

433
0:49:33 --> 0:49:42
with independent members who have no financial interest in the outcome of the study. Not a single

434
0:49:42 --> 0:49:49
IRB in the world for any of the COVID interventions met the legal standard for an independent IRB.

435
0:49:49 --> 0:49:57
To this day, there has not been a single legal clinical trial anywhere in any country on any of

436
0:49:57 --> 0:50:05
these interventions. That is a Nurenberg and a 21 Code of Federal Regulations violation and it must

437
0:50:05 --> 0:50:11
be something that we pay attention to because the absence of an independent IRB means that every

438
0:50:11 --> 0:50:18
derivative protection that's afforded to every one of the manufacturers of any medical countermeasure

439
0:50:18 --> 0:50:26
go out the window if the independent IRB has not been impaneled. So great news is another angle

440
0:50:26 --> 0:50:31
that we are actually adding to the criminal racketeering piece because there was actually

441
0:50:31 --> 0:50:38
a very clear case on the fact that that had never been done and we have a number of IRBs that have

442
0:50:38 --> 0:50:45
been part of the injection clinical trials where we have now heads of IRBs who have shared that

443
0:50:45 --> 0:50:50
information with us as well. So the good news is there is zero independence therefore the 21 Code of

444
0:50:50 --> 0:50:57
Federal Regulations rules have not been followed therefore none of the immunity shields are actually

445
0:50:57 --> 0:51:03
robust protecting any of the manufacturers. That's all good news because ultimately we'll be able to

446
0:51:03 --> 0:51:09
pierce all of the theoretical liability protections that they think they have because it turns out

447
0:51:09 --> 0:51:13
that the crime is already committed before they started doing the injection.

448
0:51:14 --> 0:51:19
When they did the injection they knew that they were using pseudo-uridine, they knew they were

449
0:51:19 --> 0:51:25
using PEG, they knew they were using lipid nanoparticles and they knew that all of those

450
0:51:25 --> 0:51:31
things were associated with oncogenic and cardiovascular disease-inducing activities

451
0:51:31 --> 0:51:37
which means that this now becomes a case not only of negligent and willful homicide but it becomes a

452
0:51:37 --> 0:51:42
case of premeditated murder and I'm going to wrap up on that one in a minute so just put a pin in

453
0:51:42 --> 0:51:49
it because I'm going to come back to it. What we decided to do is start pivoting our legal research

454
0:51:49 --> 0:51:55
into that area and then the CMS and the other mandates came about and as many of you know we

455
0:51:55 --> 0:52:03
filed the first federal case in the United States on the CMS mandate against the government for the

456
0:52:03 --> 0:52:07
deceptive medical practice of calling a thing a vaccination which was not a vaccination,

457
0:52:07 --> 0:52:12
it did not ever meet the legal standard of a vaccination. The legal standard by the way if

458
0:52:12 --> 0:52:19
anybody's paying attention in the U.S. was defined in the 1986 act and specifically said that there

459
0:52:19 --> 0:52:30
was all sorts of problems with the distinction between the term vaccination and the term medical

460
0:52:30 --> 0:52:36
countermeasure and the term elective medical procedure. The fact of the matter is vaccine by

461
0:52:36 --> 0:52:43
definition is abundantly clear that its objective has to be the prevention of infection and the

462
0:52:43 --> 0:52:48
prevention of transmission and the fact of the matter is these clinical trials that were set up

463
0:52:48 --> 0:52:55
for this injection not only did not test any of those but worse still violated the FDA and the

464
0:52:55 --> 0:53:02
CDC's own published standards on vaccine clinical trials all of which required a humoral response

465
0:53:02 --> 0:53:07
as a clinical endpoint or some other immune response as a clinical endpoint. There has never

466
0:53:07 --> 0:53:17
been and there never will be a vaccine clinical trial that has symptom by committee endpoints

467
0:53:17 --> 0:53:22
and this is a symptom by committee endpoint clinical trial which is a at best treatment

468
0:53:22 --> 0:53:29
not a public health measure not a police power and not a vaccine. We brought that case in Utah

469
0:53:29 --> 0:53:35
we brought it in Utah for a very particular reason because in Utah deceptive medical practices

470
0:53:35 --> 0:53:43
by an outside non-licensed agent outside the state of Utah is a class three felony and the

471
0:53:43 --> 0:53:52
attorney general according to the statutes in Utah shall prosecute any third degree felony crime

472
0:53:52 --> 0:53:57
around deceptive medical practices and that's why we filed it in Utah. The great news is we filed

473
0:53:57 --> 0:54:04
it there the bad news is that we got a judge an 83 year old judge who having sat on the case for

474
0:54:04 --> 0:54:12
almost six and a half months used the federal register as his official opinion to dismiss the

475
0:54:12 --> 0:54:18
case mysteriously two or three days after the department of justice changed the lead counsel

476
0:54:18 --> 0:54:23
for the federal government on the case after it had been sitting moribund for no time at all.

477
0:54:23 --> 0:54:28
The great news is we have the federal government's defense which is the affirmative admission of

478
0:54:28 --> 0:54:32
their deceptive medical practices and the affirmative admission of their practice of medicine

479
0:54:32 --> 0:54:39
without a license Utah representatives so we do have the felony and we're in in fact engaged in

480
0:54:39 --> 0:54:44
the prosecution of that right now. Now last piece I'm going to talk about is the murder side.

481
0:54:45 --> 0:54:50
It became clear that the department of justice and the ags of the United States and for that

482
0:54:50 --> 0:54:54
matter law enforcement around the world was not going to take the antitrust case and they were

483
0:54:54 --> 0:55:00
not going to take the domestic terrorism cases and so we decided to go down a much more practical

484
0:55:00 --> 0:55:07
pathway and the practical pathway we chose was to start briefing sheriffs and district attorneys

485
0:55:07 --> 0:55:12
to identify somebody who would be willing to go after negligent homicide against the hospitals,

486
0:55:12 --> 0:55:18
hospital organizations, managed care organizations, pharmaceutical distribution outlets including

487
0:55:18 --> 0:55:24
all the drug stores, the CVSs, the Walmarts, everybody else going after negligent homicide

488
0:55:24 --> 0:55:31
for them and going after premeditated murder against Fauci and Barrick and the others who

489
0:55:31 --> 0:55:36
actually architected this program specifically on a patient profile that is very particular and very

490
0:55:36 --> 0:55:43
unique. The patient profile is somebody who had been injected and within 14 days was admitted to

491
0:55:43 --> 0:55:50
a hospital or a medical center where they were put on remdesivir and killed. There are several

492
0:55:50 --> 0:55:55
thousand of these cases and the reason why these cases are important is because it gives us the

493
0:55:55 --> 0:56:01
ability to get premeditated murder courtesy of the 2018 world health organizations rescission of using

494
0:56:01 --> 0:56:08
remdesivir in the Ebola clinical trials in Africa because the fatality rate with remdesivir was 53%.

495
0:56:09 --> 0:56:16
Given the fact that we have that information in 2018, any use of remdesivir has a higher risk

496
0:56:16 --> 0:56:22
profile and is considered to be ultra hazardous activity. That's a legally defined term coming out

497
0:56:22 --> 0:56:33
of UK law almost 200 years ago but an extremely or ultra hazardous activity resulting in death

498
0:56:33 --> 0:56:40
becomes the basis for premeditated murder charges. We now have 25 sheriffs in the United States,

499
0:56:40 --> 0:56:47
we have several thousand patient cases and we now finally have an intersection where we have the

500
0:56:47 --> 0:56:54
nexus of a dead body in a jurisdiction where we have the nexus of a sheriff and a DA that's willing

501
0:56:54 --> 0:57:01
to take these prosecutions. We are just starting in the last several weeks the active negligent

502
0:57:01 --> 0:57:08
homicide and premeditated murder cases against a number of folks and that is where we are right now

503
0:57:08 --> 0:57:17
and Charles I trust that we at least got a 30,000 foot flyover of the state of play

504
0:57:17 --> 0:57:23
and I'm happy to take questions and I know welcome the eagle 88's had his hand up first so I'm going

505
0:57:23 --> 0:57:30
to go to him unless you want to jump in. No no I know you're totally capable of handling

506
0:57:30 --> 0:57:35
Q&A David but you can relax on that because the tradition here is that Stephen

507
0:57:35 --> 0:57:42
goes first and last at the two and a half. Okay great that's beautiful I'm happy to do any protocol

508
0:57:42 --> 0:57:49
I won't mess with a good thing that's not broken. Beautiful all right well first before Stephen

509
0:57:49 --> 0:57:56
goes David thank you so much for a masterful I wrote down the note a masterful overview

510
0:57:56 --> 0:58:03
a bit more than a helicopter view a whole string of important principles everybody and please go

511
0:58:03 --> 0:58:10
back and watch the recording because it you sent them out like a machine gun and each one of them

512
0:58:10 --> 0:58:19
as I'm crazily writing notes literally everybody from our respective countries important food for

513
0:58:20 --> 0:58:26
thought thank you so much for sharing that with us Stephen I think I'll let you go

514
0:58:27 --> 0:58:37
first the one the one no no you go first Stephen go. So David thank you very much for coming on and

515
0:58:37 --> 0:58:44
um I wanted to ask you um so there are several uh crimes here I know you you've gone into this

516
0:58:44 --> 0:58:52
in real detail presumably you're choosing the crimes to go after on the basis of how easy it is

517
0:58:52 --> 0:59:01
to to to get further along the road is that right or which crimes so that's one thing second thing

518
0:59:02 --> 0:59:10
which crimes do you think are the most important for us to uh hold these uh criminals to account

519
0:59:11 --> 0:59:18
so mass murder treason fraud racketeering crimes against humanity genocide yeah so

520
0:59:18 --> 0:59:24
so Stephen let me let me answer that in a couple dimensions because the dimension makes a difference

521
0:59:25 --> 0:59:36
um we have at the core of this particular act of terrorism globally we have a criminal racket

522
0:59:36 --> 0:59:45
structure that has been largely in place formally since 1980 and that is what I would call the

523
0:59:45 --> 0:59:53
unholy alliance of captured agencies be they the CDC the FDA NIH NIAID any of those

524
0:59:54 --> 1:00:00
where industry captured agencies are colluding with another corporation that people don't like

525
1:00:00 --> 1:00:05
to call a corporation but it happens to be outed as such which is the university

526
1:00:07 --> 1:00:10
you know when the Clayton act and the Sherman act in the United States

527
1:00:11 --> 1:00:18
and antitrust acts were packed passed all across the world in the turn of the last century we were

528
1:00:18 --> 1:00:25
looking at companies and banks inclusion well the companies and banks that are in collusion today

529
1:00:25 --> 1:00:32
are government captured agencies and universities universities are nothing more than a money

530
1:00:32 --> 1:00:38
laundering facility that actually launderers money between corporations and governments and it turns

531
1:00:38 --> 1:00:45
out that they have a hefty in many cases 40 to 60 percent override on making sure they've scraped

532
1:00:45 --> 1:00:51
enough money off the top to make sure that they can build very fancy buildings and and and do all

533
1:00:51 --> 1:00:58
sorts of other nonsense but the fact of the matter is that we have the two legs of the stool that

534
1:00:58 --> 1:01:04
have not been covered in antitrust acts before which is captive agencies which are corporations

535
1:01:04 --> 1:01:10
and universities which are corporations which then act in collusion with corporations as we

536
1:01:10 --> 1:01:18
understand them to be so we have an unholy trinity that continues to operate all of the time and if

537
1:01:18 --> 1:01:26
we don't ultimately break that cabal we will swap one domestic terror campaign for another and it

538
1:01:26 --> 1:01:34
will be this ongoing exercise so so what i'm doing right now is i'm actually making sure that the eye

539
1:01:34 --> 1:01:42
on the prize is break the financial racket which enables this to happen so that we don't have monkey

540
1:01:42 --> 1:01:49
pox and we don't have ebola and we don't have you name it pathogens down the road my criticism of

541
1:01:49 --> 1:01:56
most people's legal strategy so far has been they're pretending like covid was the problem

542
1:01:57 --> 1:02:02
covid is a symptom of the problem and i'm not saying it's not genocide and i'm not saying it's

543
1:02:02 --> 1:02:08
not a crime what i am saying is that if we don't ultimately have our eye on the prize of the

544
1:02:08 --> 1:02:14
structural problem we're not going to solve the problem we are going to solve a symptom and swap

545
1:02:14 --> 1:02:21
problem for the next problem so my long play is very specifically to make sure we've introduced

546
1:02:21 --> 1:02:27
into evidence enough information to get the public to stop pretending that universities are

547
1:02:27 --> 1:02:32
researchers they're not they are money laundering corporations and they are money laundering

548
1:02:32 --> 1:02:38
corporations that are part of a propaganda machine for captive agencies and until we break that cabal

549
1:02:39 --> 1:02:45
we are not going to actually get out of this mess now that doesn't mean that there aren't

550
1:02:45 --> 1:02:51
active crimes that are happening right now and my second focus and you heard me say this i have two

551
1:02:51 --> 1:02:59
eyes second focus my second focus is on making sure we pierce the corporate facade of immunity

552
1:03:01 --> 1:03:08
the reason for that is the minute that pfizer or moderna or astrazeneca or anybody else

553
1:03:08 --> 1:03:14
actually is on the hook for the civil and criminal damages of negligent and willful homicide

554
1:03:15 --> 1:03:21
which bear with them treble damage risk financially they will stop doing this activity

555
1:03:21 --> 1:03:29
because they can't afford to do it the mistake that we have made is we have let them hide behind

556
1:03:29 --> 1:03:35
the illusion that they're protected with immunity and both the prep act in the united states and the

557
1:03:35 --> 1:03:44
1986 act both of them have one and only one silver bullet and that is criminal fraud during

558
1:03:44 --> 1:03:52
the promulgation of the activity if criminal fraud took place that means a felony and fraud took place

559
1:03:52 --> 1:04:00
then all of the immunity shields fall and what we're trying to do is get the fastest pathway

560
1:04:00 --> 1:04:07
to get the companies on the hook because if we succeed the words pfizer and moderna

561
1:04:08 --> 1:04:17
will in fact be past tense terms that we use a la the terms like american cyanamid pre-bopal

562
1:04:17 --> 1:04:26
right we have to go after the beast that we can kill and if we kill the beast then we have a high

563
1:04:27 --> 1:04:33
penalty associated with any other corporation trying to do that so those are the two things

564
1:04:33 --> 1:04:39
that we're doing right now there are a lot of other strategies but steven those are our two priorities

565
1:04:41 --> 1:04:47
i love it so steven i took a note of that everybody felony plus fraud equals no immunity

566
1:04:47 --> 1:04:52
just that's correct everybody keep going steven felony plus fraud equals no immunity that's

567
1:04:52 --> 1:05:01
correct so um so do you think so you've talked about racketeering you've also talked about

568
1:05:01 --> 1:05:06
treason but i'm not sure that we're addressing the treason as much as we should be doing because

569
1:05:06 --> 1:05:13
that's the thing that really threatens our way of life rather than the racket but so i'm sorry i

570
1:05:13 --> 1:05:19
you probably cover answered this in your mind but but i'm still struggling to separate the two

571
1:05:19 --> 1:05:25
yeah so so so remember that the the reason why we have racketeering laws is because they're

572
1:05:25 --> 1:05:32
treasonous right remember going back to 1604 and this is exceptionally important and most people

573
1:05:32 --> 1:05:38
not familiar with commonwealth history or law don't understand this but the reason why it is so

574
1:05:38 --> 1:05:46
dangerous to have a criminal racketeering organization is because it acts as a supra national

575
1:05:46 --> 1:05:54
concern it suspends constitutional enforcement because what happens is that in collusion and

576
1:05:54 --> 1:06:02
in manipulation the entirety of systems no longer apply and what you get as pascal alluded to before

577
1:06:02 --> 1:06:08
is you get these supra national non-elected non-accountable entities who are in fact

578
1:06:08 --> 1:06:14
dictating to each other the terms and conditions under which they're going to suspend laws and

579
1:06:15 --> 1:06:24
constitutions and that problem is at its heart the definition of racketeering yes anytime anytime

580
1:06:24 --> 1:06:29
you do that and that's why i i hear what you're asking and i think it's a really important and

581
1:06:29 --> 1:06:36
and somewhat nuanced question but you don't have the world health organization without racketeering

582
1:06:37 --> 1:06:44
you it doesn't exist world health organization as a structure is a criminal racket it is a money

583
1:06:44 --> 1:06:51
laundering exercise where privately funded individuals advancing privately funded objectives

584
1:06:51 --> 1:06:56
which have no public interest whatsoever or public accountability are making determinations

585
1:06:56 --> 1:07:02
that are supra constitutional to any person who's a signatory any organization is signatory to that

586
1:07:02 --> 1:07:10
organization that by definition is the interlocking directorate definition of the clayton act we know

587
1:07:10 --> 1:07:15
that it is a racket so so i'm not saying one is less or more important but what i'm saying is the

588
1:07:15 --> 1:07:23
fundamental law that we have to actually make sure we keep an eye on is the fundamental law that says

589
1:07:23 --> 1:07:31
that any unaccountable organization acting in criminal collusion is in fact the basis upon

590
1:07:31 --> 1:07:37
which these things are being done and since 1604 since the british decency company charter we have

591
1:07:37 --> 1:07:46
known that that criminal collusion racket is in fact the basis of the problem so it does not mean

592
1:07:46 --> 1:07:52
and i'm not at all suggesting that the treason isn't a laudable legal angle but if we don't go

593
1:07:52 --> 1:08:02
after the root problem we will substitute one form of tyranny for another yeah so the enabling thing

594
1:08:02 --> 1:08:08
is the racketeering you mean there's no question because that you don't you don't have the current

595
1:08:08 --> 1:08:15
world health organization as it's currently configured if we actually would enforce

596
1:08:15 --> 1:08:22
anti-racketeering behavior we have by definition in the world health organization we have a clayton

597
1:08:22 --> 1:08:30
act prima facie interlocking directorate which is a felony violation of the clayton act and that

598
1:08:30 --> 1:08:38
should be prosecuted because it would put world health organization off the map yeah yeah so so

599
1:08:38 --> 1:08:43
have you covered everything that kathryn what's been pointing to in the united states which is

600
1:08:44 --> 1:08:53
corruption of the laws and statutes okay can i uh sorry uh sorry sorry can i add to david's

601
1:08:54 --> 1:09:00
dr david martin just to add on because we researched this um with lawyers here

602
1:09:01 --> 1:09:09
who is resident here and has immunity from switzerland granted the same whf same organizational

603
1:09:09 --> 1:09:17
crime and gavi so let's this these three here enjoy diplomatic immunity cannot be prosecuted

604
1:09:18 --> 1:09:25
pay no taxes now the best way to live well if i have to prove a crime it's a lengthy process

605
1:09:25 --> 1:09:33
but it's easy much easier than that the vienna convention stipulates how governments can avoid

606
1:09:34 --> 1:09:43
and withdraw immunity have a look into it yep when when the who got immunity at that date

607
1:09:43 --> 1:09:51
it was a list of documents to be submitted the the the charter of incorporation all these things

608
1:09:51 --> 1:10:00
in the charter statutes point number one it's on wjo's website is i don't know to to to call it to

609
1:10:00 --> 1:10:06
promote uh global health of humanity etc right to protect humanity human dignity all that

610
1:10:06 --> 1:10:14
that's very simple vienna convention says if the nature of the business

611
1:10:15 --> 1:10:23
evidently changed and it has because they promoted globally mrna unregulated uncertified

612
1:10:24 --> 1:10:33
injections immediately immediately immunity is worth is nil that's correct okay but you do it

613
1:10:33 --> 1:10:38
the same time you have to to file criminal charges to arrest tedros the whole board

614
1:10:39 --> 1:10:47
arrest blue light and the same day lift you and then arrest them same for the web same for gavi

615
1:10:47 --> 1:10:55
same procedure same that way you don't have to go to a lengthy process where they have defense

616
1:10:55 --> 1:11:02
against the charges and all this it's very simple the nature of the business has changed and evidence

617
1:11:02 --> 1:11:09
public knowledge that's very simple to prove and the immunity of belief that's it sorry now i

618
1:11:09 --> 1:11:14
appreciate it it's and it's a very good point and the fact of the matter is that's why one of the

619
1:11:14 --> 1:11:19
things that i try to encourage people to do is become exceptionally exceptionally exceptionally

620
1:11:20 --> 1:11:27
savvy around the nuance of corporate anti-competitiveness laws because the fact is

621
1:11:28 --> 1:11:33
any statement and as pascal just said any statement of the intent of the corporation

622
1:11:33 --> 1:11:41
if the statement of the intent no longer applies then all of the derivative acts fall away at the

623
1:11:41 --> 1:11:47
same time and that is the immunity shield that actually we need to have peers so thank you for

624
1:11:47 --> 1:11:56
adding that pascal i appreciate it hang on so so so so that's another level david that's one more

625
1:11:56 --> 1:12:06
thing i have to go sorry i have to leave one more thing has anyone studied quantum grammar yes okay

626
1:12:09 --> 1:12:13
quantum grammar reveals the fraud of the contract

627
1:12:14 --> 1:12:26
and the codes are simple and if you look at the contracts of for me the i'm saying the bad guys

628
1:12:26 --> 1:12:31
like the well clinton hillary and what's her name kamala harris are proficient by the way

629
1:12:31 --> 1:12:38
in quantum grammar coding and that's dangerous um what we call that if it's used by the bad guys

630
1:12:38 --> 1:12:45
you call that if it's used by the bad guys it's dangerous and we have to look also how to decode

631
1:12:45 --> 1:12:53
wjo veff and gavi contracts with the code syntax code of quantum grammar thank you

632
1:12:56 --> 1:13:05
very good stave thank you david i'm still not clear about where you so are you um going after

633
1:13:05 --> 1:13:18
are you going after the uh the perpetrators of the um uh the fraud um rather than the

634
1:13:18 --> 1:13:26
pol it seems to me that the 192 governments or thereabouts uh there was a global coup d'etat

635
1:13:26 --> 1:13:33
in march 2020 how do we address that in your book or you mean that we go through the racketeering

636
1:13:33 --> 1:13:39
and then get to the treason yeah because what will happen steven one of the problems is that

637
1:13:39 --> 1:13:48
citizens in any country have a very difficult time pursuing criminal charges without prosecutors

638
1:13:48 --> 1:13:53
collaborating with them and unfortunately prosecutors in this particular case are on

639
1:13:53 --> 1:14:04
the take and are incapable of being considered but what can happen is as you do the discovery around

640
1:14:05 --> 1:14:13
practicable crimes so what we have in sheriffs and da's in the u.s. as we pursue discovery

641
1:14:13 --> 1:14:21
we can actually unfold information that in and of itself becomes prima facie admission of crimes you

642
1:14:21 --> 1:14:29
have to build this case because you're you're starting with the self-evident nature of the

643
1:14:29 --> 1:14:39
facts on the table which are a group of unelected individuals conducted a takeover of duly elected

644
1:14:40 --> 1:14:45
authorities all over the world that's a true statement there's no question about it however

645
1:14:45 --> 1:14:51
there is no jurisdiction in which that allegation does anything other than serve as an allegation

646
1:14:52 --> 1:14:59
until we actually have the criminality components in the process of some form of prosecution

647
1:14:59 --> 1:15:04
because we can sit here as much as we want and this is a problem that i've had with enormous number of

648
1:15:05 --> 1:15:11
of organizations where you know people are going yes but it's a self-evident crime we know that

649
1:15:12 --> 1:15:19
it's done absolutely there's no question about it and there is no jurisdictional pathway for any

650
1:15:19 --> 1:15:27
individual or even a group of individuals to take action until we have a prosecution in process

651
1:15:28 --> 1:15:35
where the evidence that becomes surfaced through that prosecution then is presented as prima facie

652
1:15:35 --> 1:15:40
evidence for the next thing so it is a stepwise process and that's the reason why we're taking

653
1:15:40 --> 1:15:47
the approach we're taking because if we start with the yes there was a coup d'etat yes that

654
1:15:47 --> 1:15:53
coup d'etat was evident and there there is no question that the individual actors are even

655
1:15:53 --> 1:15:59
known to to pretty much everybody now the problem is we do not have a jurisdiction in which any

656
1:15:59 --> 1:16:05
action can be taken until we have an active prosecution so that's the reason why we're taking

657
1:16:05 --> 1:16:11
this approach so in the second world war they had military tribunals following the second world war

658
1:16:11 --> 1:16:17
correct but you had prosecutors remember you had prosecutors willing to do it in this case we have

659
1:16:17 --> 1:16:23
no prosecutors willing to do it yes but but during the second world war there was no prosecutor

660
1:16:23 --> 1:16:30
willing to do it then either so we have to wait sorry that's correct and that's my question to

661
1:16:30 --> 1:16:38
you david how do we get to uh how do we get from here to a situation where we have prosecutors

662
1:16:39 --> 1:16:45
like at the at the military tribunals yeah um of course the military complicit in this

663
1:16:45 --> 1:16:49
yeah so well maybe they were in the second world war too oh there's no question

664
1:16:51 --> 1:16:56
so how do we get from here to the equivalent of military tribunals like we saw in this

665
1:16:56 --> 1:17:05
very very simply the same way that that elliot ness got to the mob in chicago in the 20s and 30s

666
1:17:07 --> 1:17:15
you make it a financially impalatable condition to maintain the status quo and at that point

667
1:17:15 --> 1:17:22
prosecutors realize that it is in their interest to pursue the law and not pursue the graft there

668
1:17:22 --> 1:17:28
is no question that until that decision is self-evident in the minds of prosecutors they

669
1:17:28 --> 1:17:35
will take graft every day over the pursuit of the law and what we have to do is make the economics

670
1:17:35 --> 1:17:40
tip in the favor of the law rather than in the favor of the graft and right now they're tipped

671
1:17:40 --> 1:17:48
in the favor of the graph and david how do we how do we make sure the prosecutors prosecute the

672
1:17:48 --> 1:17:53
crimes which we think they should prosecute not what they think when they might actually be

673
1:17:53 --> 1:17:59
acting to limit the damage do you understand me well no question in fact i've lived that very

674
1:17:59 --> 1:18:04
path for the last two and a half years with every attorney general because the fact of the matter is

675
1:18:04 --> 1:18:09
i've tried to get any attorney general to take the antitrust laws and their response is i don't have

676
1:18:09 --> 1:18:14
staff familiar with the sherman and the clighton act well last time i checked familiarity with a

677
1:18:14 --> 1:18:21
statute does not exonerate somebody from committing a crime i i didn't know that until i found out

678
1:18:21 --> 1:18:27
that every ag decided that if they don't have an office dedicated to that particular line of

679
1:18:27 --> 1:18:32
questioning then then suddenly you know the crime can be committed because allegedly they don't have

680
1:18:32 --> 1:18:41
competence to prosecute it the fact is that we're in a situation right now where murder and negligent

681
1:18:41 --> 1:18:47
and reckless homicide are things that prosecutors do understand and one of the things we can do and

682
1:18:47 --> 1:18:50
listen i mean i don't know how many people are listening to this and i don't know how many people

683
1:18:50 --> 1:18:57
will listen to it but the fact is that the reason why we have the draft indictment that is is on the

684
1:18:57 --> 1:19:04
prosecute now dot io website it looks so softed prosecute now dot i am somebody looks like this

685
1:19:04 --> 1:19:12
the reason why we have the draft indictment on that page is because every person can can fill out the

686
1:19:12 --> 1:19:18
form whether they're in the u.s or anywhere in the world and actually say here is the itemized list

687
1:19:18 --> 1:19:25
of the eight felony counts and the eight felony counts need to be in front of every ag as often

688
1:19:25 --> 1:19:31
as possible and we have thousands and thousands of people who are actively submitting this because

689
1:19:31 --> 1:19:38
steven to your point there is a war of attrition happening here too as long as the incumbent

690
1:19:39 --> 1:19:48
Pfizer funded exercise is you know the only message that's buying airtime and and and ear time

691
1:19:49 --> 1:19:56
then then we're up against a problem but as long as elected officials particularly in you know

692
1:19:56 --> 1:20:03
various jurisdictions where where some part of the law includes some part of elected official

693
1:20:03 --> 1:20:09
as elected officials become more and more aware that this is felony crimes they're letting happen

694
1:20:10 --> 1:20:17
then we've seen that the tide turns now the good news is that it's only taken me two years

695
1:20:18 --> 1:20:25
to get the first ag to agree to set a committee together to pursue this it's only taken me two

696
1:20:25 --> 1:20:33
years and i remind people that from 1898 to 1911 that's how long it took us to get the clayton act

697
1:20:33 --> 1:20:41
even considered 1898 to 1911 so i'm doing pretty good right i'm two years into something that took

698
1:20:41 --> 1:20:47
the last generation a century ago it took them you know a decade to get to where i am right now

699
1:20:47 --> 1:20:54
that doesn't mean we're succeeding it simply means that this is a war of attrition we must

700
1:20:54 --> 1:21:00
increase and amplify our voices so that more people are sending this information to elected

701
1:21:00 --> 1:21:05
officials and law enforcement and we need to continue to do that so that every single one of

702
1:21:05 --> 1:21:12
them knows that the decision that they take this day to not prosecute is a decision that will

703
1:21:12 --> 1:21:17
ultimately in order to the detriment of them and the society down the road and the more we do it

704
1:21:17 --> 1:21:22
the more effective it is and we're already seeing the effects of it so i know it's working

705
1:21:22 --> 1:21:28
so we need to hold these criminals to account for destroying our way of life for psychologically

706
1:21:28 --> 1:21:33
torturing populations all over the world it's really important that we hold them to account

707
1:21:33 --> 1:21:41
because if we don't then then they'll do it again that's exactly right and so we need to make sure

708
1:21:41 --> 1:21:48
that we really kill it this time yeah and we have to understand in my view exactly what has happened

709
1:21:48 --> 1:21:55
exactly what has happened in the last three years and all of us not just the people on the other

710
1:21:55 --> 1:22:00
side have been psychologically tortured so in the context of having been psychologically tortured

711
1:22:01 --> 1:22:06
how can we be sure that we've got it right because if we go down one road it might preclude us going

712
1:22:06 --> 1:22:11
down another more successful road in the long term so what i'm trying to say is how do we know

713
1:22:12 --> 1:22:19
that we have sufficient understanding of what has gone on worldwide to to close it all down for them

714
1:22:19 --> 1:22:24
so we have to have a very good understanding of what has taken place to be able to close it all

715
1:22:24 --> 1:22:29
down in the future yeah when i think that's where you know there's a number there's a number of

716
1:22:29 --> 1:22:39
people who began their awareness of this topic somewhere around late 2019 early 2020 i feel like

717
1:22:39 --> 1:22:44
a locust eating prophet wearing sackcloth because i've been trying to get people to pay attention to

718
1:22:44 --> 1:22:52
this since 1999 when we first actually surfaced the cardiomyopathy patents that were coming out

719
1:22:52 --> 1:23:00
of UNC Chapel Hill so i you know but by the evidence of my ineffectiveness because last

720
1:23:00 --> 1:23:06
time i checked 1999 to 2023 suggests that i have been absolutely abject failure for 24 years

721
1:23:07 --> 1:23:14
um but the fact of the matter is we're we're i we don't have questions there isn't a question here

722
1:23:14 --> 1:23:20
we have the funding we have the entities involved we have every corporation we have every person

723
1:23:20 --> 1:23:24
associated with every corporation we have every funding source for every corporation that

724
1:23:24 --> 1:23:32
information is all collected the issue is not a matter of the whodunit this is a crime that was

725
1:23:32 --> 1:23:41
done by sociopaths who left talisman next to every body this is not a this is not an investigation

726
1:23:42 --> 1:23:49
this is actually a criminal enforcement action that needs to be taken and what we have to do

727
1:23:49 --> 1:23:55
is we have to actually focus on what the issue is because as long as we pretend that somehow or

728
1:23:55 --> 1:24:01
another the evidence is the the failure right somehow or another we're waiting for a smoking gun

729
1:24:02 --> 1:24:10
the guns are all smoking we don't have a problem when when you have peter daschick in 2015 admitting

730
1:24:10 --> 1:24:16
to the national academy of sciences that he is going to promote a domestic terrorism campaign

731
1:24:18 --> 1:24:24
you do not need more evidence that is a jailable felony offense under section 802 of the patriot

732
1:24:24 --> 1:24:31
act there is no i i was meaning so how do we it depends on what your view is you know you maybe

733
1:24:31 --> 1:24:40
don't think that ukraine and financial crisis all the others you know food shortages and all

734
1:24:40 --> 1:24:45
this nonsense you know the the actions against the farmers in holland yeah whether that's all

735
1:24:45 --> 1:24:51
and the banks you know trying to move towards digital how that that's how do we bring how do

736
1:24:51 --> 1:24:56
we bring all that into it yeah that's why that's why i did the four-hour lecture at the arlington

737
1:24:56 --> 1:25:04
institute back in the fall i showed that all of this stuff has been woven together this this goes

738
1:25:04 --> 1:25:10
back to the small war plants act of the 1950s i have every single shred of that woven together

739
1:25:10 --> 1:25:16
and if you go and have a look at that particular lecture at the arlington institute in four hours i

740
1:25:16 --> 1:25:22
talk about that and emp and emf and digital currency and all of the things that are inner

741
1:25:22 --> 1:25:29
woven together every single one of these things every one of them comes back to a criminal

742
1:25:29 --> 1:25:38
racketeering conspiracy which is defined which is clearly in evidence and is in need of prosecution

743
1:25:38 --> 1:25:45
and the problem that i continue to face is that people because of their lack of familiarity

744
1:25:45 --> 1:25:52
with crimes are trying to argue constitutional or jurisdictional questions this is not a

745
1:25:52 --> 1:26:00
constitutional or jurisdictional question this is a crime and the problem we have is a ton of people

746
1:26:00 --> 1:26:06
are pursuing this as though that the issue is let's pick the jurisdiction let's pick the

747
1:26:06 --> 1:26:12
constitution let's pick the whatever else you don't do that a bank robber has never been prosecuted

748
1:26:12 --> 1:26:19
under a constitutional provision that's not how you prosecute a bank robbery

749
1:26:19 --> 1:26:25
yeah and you don't prosecute genocide and you don't prosecute remember genocide was not prosecuted

750
1:26:25 --> 1:26:35
under criminal acts it was prosecuted under military tribunals we do not have a criminal

751
1:26:35 --> 1:26:40
path that is being pursued other than the ones that i'm pursuing right now and that's what we

752
1:26:41 --> 1:26:48
have to do so for example david's doing a lot of no no hang on just one more point the the lack

753
1:26:48 --> 1:26:54
of education it seems has contributed to all this not correct so how do we nail the people who've

754
1:26:54 --> 1:27:01
been educating or mis-educating our children to believe that the family doesn't matter breaking

755
1:27:01 --> 1:27:07
social bonds with their with their with family with their country you're not allowed to show a

756
1:27:07 --> 1:27:14
british flag in in the uk because that's uh you know too far right um how do we address that in

757
1:27:14 --> 1:27:20
all this because that's really important the lack of education that has occurred in the united

758
1:27:20 --> 1:27:26
states and the united kingdom children don't know anything these days plus uh the danger the known

759
1:27:26 --> 1:27:33
danger must be known the danger of cell phones to children and to adults never mind children so that

760
1:27:33 --> 1:27:39
you've got a population of adults parents who don't know how to protect their children how do

761
1:27:39 --> 1:27:44
we address all that those are crimes in my opinion well and that's like i said that's why i did the

762
1:27:44 --> 1:27:49
arlington institute speech if you haven't seen it i highly recommend it because i put all of the

763
1:27:49 --> 1:27:54
pieces of it together um but anyhow let's let's jump into some of the other questions thank you

764
1:27:54 --> 1:28:02
very much yes yep you're most welcome steven albert hey dave how are you doing um my name my

765
1:28:02 --> 1:28:07
name is albert i go by welcome the eagle i'm here in san jose california and i i feel so antiquated

766
1:28:07 --> 1:28:14
the bears guy uh you know everybody now knows you know oh yeah they you know they throttle they

767
1:28:14 --> 1:28:21
delete reports they you know they do all kinds of shenanigans in bears but it it was you that said

768
1:28:22 --> 1:28:30
that they are entrusted um to also like maintain the database correct and um i was i was hoping

769
1:28:30 --> 1:28:38
to ask you um like where in the federal registry can i can i find details on absolutely in the 1986

770
1:28:38 --> 1:28:44
act and thank you for asking this question bears is irrelevant for two reasons one is

771
1:28:45 --> 1:28:53
that um under the prep act all of the medical countermeasures live inside of the cip not inside

772
1:28:53 --> 1:29:02
bears um the countermeasures injury compensation program so so the reason why cdc and fda have

773
1:29:02 --> 1:29:09
hidden behind the bears doesn't matter is because technically they're right until the childhood

774
1:29:09 --> 1:29:17
schedule includes covid injections there is no reason for bears to count but let's get really

775
1:29:17 --> 1:29:25
clear on the fact that bears is established under the statute in 1986 and it's very clearly defined

776
1:29:25 --> 1:29:30
that they have to maintain the database it has to be maintained as accurate that's part of the statute

777
1:29:30 --> 1:29:37
so they do not have an exception you can't say bears is incorrect if you're a pharmaceutical

778
1:29:37 --> 1:29:43
company if you're a pharmaceutical company it is your requirement to maintain its accuracy

779
1:29:43 --> 1:29:49
so that's by statute the other thing and very few people know this is if you go back and read

780
1:29:49 --> 1:29:57
the actual congressional record on the approval of the 1986 act there was a rate of increase of

781
1:29:57 --> 1:30:06
injury that would actually suspend the 86 act it was actually a calculated rate of not more i think

782
1:30:06 --> 1:30:13
than 1.7 percent per annum increase of injury and you go back and look it's in the statute itself

783
1:30:14 --> 1:30:21
and it actually tells you how many increases have to happen after which congress is required to

784
1:30:21 --> 1:30:30
review whether or not the vaccine protections given under the 86 act are still viable and no one

785
1:30:30 --> 1:30:36
to my knowledge no one has actually prosecuted on that particular point and it is absolutely

786
1:30:36 --> 1:30:41
critical that we look at the fact that if we see the number of adverse events that have been

787
1:30:41 --> 1:30:50
reported from 2020 to 2022 we have broken the statutory barrier that was the basis upon which

788
1:30:50 --> 1:30:57
the 1986 act was passed and now we've done it with children so that means that we have an ability

789
1:30:57 --> 1:31:04
right now to force a mandatory congressional reconsideration of the entire 86 act and that's

790
1:31:04 --> 1:31:11
by statute that is not by a theoretical guess or you know a social will or anything else

791
1:31:11 --> 1:31:17
that is the statute has been broken that's awesome dave i just wanted to bring to your

792
1:31:17 --> 1:31:24
attention that i that i follow um you know even on my verza wear website i put on there i'm i'm

793
1:31:25 --> 1:31:32
auditing medical fraud so i like that word fraud it like an example uh you know 30 percent of all

794
1:31:32 --> 1:31:40
the of all the various reports for covid 19 don't have the age populated in the age field yet yet

795
1:31:40 --> 1:31:48
the age is clearly documented in the narrative section so that's 450 000 reports that don't have

796
1:31:48 --> 1:31:55
that they claim don't have an age populated but i found 300 000 of those reports where the age is

797
1:31:55 --> 1:32:01
clearly documented yeah stuff like that or those or 10 percent of all the reports they can't tell

798
1:32:01 --> 1:32:08
us what what state in the united states it originated from you know and it's like i actually

799
1:32:08 --> 1:32:16
think now after all this um auditing i actually think that they actually go in and scrub the data

800
1:32:16 --> 1:32:25
like it was once there and they took it off and um you know reiterating what um bobby kennedy said

801
1:32:25 --> 1:32:33
at my church in may of 2021 where he interviewed a bunch of of theirs internal bears people like

802
1:32:33 --> 1:32:40
reps or something where they they they uh said and they calculated that about 150 000 reports

803
1:32:40 --> 1:32:47
had disappeared meaning that they had never even been published so i mean i don't know how much more

804
1:32:47 --> 1:32:53
i could how much more of a of a of an accusation i could say that say i really don't think that

805
1:32:53 --> 1:33:00
bears publishes all legitimate reports that they even receive well and and then add cip which

806
1:33:00 --> 1:33:09
doesn't publish anything which is actually a violation of the um 2005 prep act and you know

807
1:33:09 --> 1:33:15
i i have encouraged in fact i encouraged bobby kennedy to make sure he also used the correct

808
1:33:15 --> 1:33:22
designation because anybody um reporting an injury that is actually covered under the prep act which

809
1:33:22 --> 1:33:29
is what all of these injuries are has a cip cip reporting requirement and none of those none of

810
1:33:29 --> 1:33:35
those have been actually in a public format that's actually reliable at all so this is a fundamental

811
1:33:35 --> 1:33:40
statutory issue and i'm glad that you brought it up because it's actually something we do very much

812
1:33:40 --> 1:33:48
pay attention to but most people have never read the 86 act increase of adverse event provisions

813
1:33:48 --> 1:33:55
that say that congress is required to look at the growth rate of adverse events and is required to

814
1:33:55 --> 1:34:00
take action if it exceeds and it's it's a low number it's i think it's 1.7 or 2 or something

815
1:34:00 --> 1:34:05
like that it's a very very low threshold that requires reconsideration of the act

816
1:34:06 --> 1:34:13
right on a great information david the last the last piece um i just put it in the chat it's this

817
1:34:13 --> 1:34:22
image that says um as of 2011 only initial reports are made public in bears and meaning that before

818
1:34:22 --> 1:34:29
that and i've looked at these older reports uh 2010 and older and i can tell how they basically

819
1:34:29 --> 1:34:36
append the follow-up data to these to the initial report so now that that almost changes the whole

820
1:34:36 --> 1:34:42
bet paradigm when i'm wondering well gee how many of these 1.5 million people that are in bears are

821
1:34:42 --> 1:34:50
actually now since dead right so um anyways god bless you and uh bait you know keep up the good

822
1:34:50 --> 1:34:55
work god bless you thanks more research more research there for you albert keep working no

823
1:34:55 --> 1:35:04
time for you to die hi hello i just have a quick question if you're familiar with the work of jj

824
1:35:04 --> 1:35:16
kui and his um i guess his claim that the lab leak release was was not actually what took place it

825
1:35:16 --> 1:35:20
just if you are familiar with it and you think your view is consistent with his or you have a

826
1:35:20 --> 1:35:25
disagreement just that's my question thank you i'm not familiar with his specifics but this was not

827
1:35:25 --> 1:35:32
a lag lab leak uh when you use the term accidental or intentional release um it is a release not a

828
1:35:32 --> 1:35:37
leak there's no question that the pathogen that's killing people is actually the chimera that was

829
1:35:37 --> 1:35:43
altered by ralph barrack so it has nothing to do with wuhan institute of virology other than

830
1:35:43 --> 1:35:51
by association but it's not a china thing there's a very simple way we could show this and by the

831
1:35:51 --> 1:35:58
way i've challenged anybody who has any medical facility around them to take um pathology samples

832
1:35:58 --> 1:36:07
of tissue predating the um the alleged patient one in december of 2019 and by the way every

833
1:36:07 --> 1:36:14
pathology lab anywhere on earth has frozen samples that go back you know sometimes five to ten years

834
1:36:14 --> 1:36:20
in many cases preserved by statute if there was a crime or anything else and the fact of the matter

835
1:36:20 --> 1:36:29
is it's a very simple thing to do test whether or not you see any of the uh frag fragments in um any

836
1:36:29 --> 1:36:35
pathology reports prior to december 2019 and what you'll find out is this thing has been circulating

837
1:36:35 --> 1:36:42
in the population disseminated likely through a number of vectors um one of the most interesting

838
1:36:42 --> 1:36:49
ones that i've pointed out is that the only two venues into which allegedly we had the introduction

839
1:36:49 --> 1:36:55
of the pathogen was cruise ships and nursing homes what's unique about cruise ships and nursing

840
1:36:55 --> 1:37:03
homes when from a public health standpoint and and think about this the the public health paradox

841
1:37:04 --> 1:37:11
is that there are two equal environments from the standpoint of public health risk that should have

842
1:37:11 --> 1:37:19
equivalent case counts cruise ships and casinos they are exactly the same as a public health

843
1:37:19 --> 1:37:25
profile same number of physical contacts same proximity same everything else the difference

844
1:37:25 --> 1:37:32
is that on cruise ships you have central water processing facilities and in nursing homes you

845
1:37:32 --> 1:37:39
have central processing water facilities the likelihood is very high that given the fact that

846
1:37:39 --> 1:37:50
we have zero case counts from casinos and 100 of early case counts from ships when public health

847
1:37:50 --> 1:37:58
wise they are exactly the same they are identical as a public health vector the likelihood is very

848
1:37:58 --> 1:38:04
high that the release was done on cruise ships and was done in nursing homes not that that's where

849
1:38:04 --> 1:38:09
allegedly patients started having coronavirus but but do you think that once it was released it

850
1:38:09 --> 1:38:15
propagates or it needs to be re-released no no it's continuously released and the real death

851
1:38:15 --> 1:38:21
count i mean if you look at the actual data from from from every life insurance company which is

852
1:38:21 --> 1:38:27
the only real actuarial data and the real clinical pathology data that matter because

853
1:38:27 --> 1:38:35
you know unfortunately the the um i've made this allegation many times there was no excess death

854
1:38:35 --> 1:38:42
in the spring of 2019 there was no excess death in the spring of 2020 it wasn't until we started

855
1:38:42 --> 1:38:49
injecting people that people started dying now that doesn't mean that people did not die in the

856
1:38:49 --> 1:38:56
spring of 2020 what it does mean is that we did not have excess deaths going on that were anything

857
1:38:56 --> 1:39:05
other than attributable to influenza and there is zero zero excess death in any mortality data from

858
1:39:05 --> 1:39:11
any life insurer until we started injecting people at that point in time we killed people

859
1:39:12 --> 1:39:19
with the modified mrna we did not kill people with coronavirus thank you

860
1:39:19 --> 1:39:23
thank you i mean excellent questions john the look-out

861
1:39:29 --> 1:39:37
thanks charles can you hear me okay yep okay um so uh david i've been following your efforts

862
1:39:37 --> 1:39:44
as well as the efforts of uh sasha lotopova and katherine watt um also karen kinkston they've both

863
1:39:44 --> 1:39:52
given presentations here in this forum um prior to my joining this group uh i was following the

864
1:39:52 --> 1:39:58
efforts of reiner fulmick so everybody's doing their own thing um you know i'm always trying

865
1:39:58 --> 1:40:04
to be as much of a team builder as i can i think uh yeah collaboration is is a positive uh quality

866
1:40:04 --> 1:40:11
um i i'm building a little bit maybe on something that steven brought up earlier

867
1:40:11 --> 1:40:18
but uh it seems like um reiner fulmick is uh trying to take his case uh to the icc he's not

868
1:40:18 --> 1:40:27
having much luck that that i've seen um uh sasha and uh katherine they are primarily focused on

869
1:40:27 --> 1:40:35
incriminating evidence the that points at the dod and the federal government karen kinkston solidly

870
1:40:35 --> 1:40:43
brings up through contractual uh agreements uh the the idea that pfizer is the head of the snake

871
1:40:43 --> 1:40:49
i think everybody's looking for who to prosecute here who to focus efforts upon and uh i think

872
1:40:49 --> 1:40:56
legally it comes down to a question of who has standing to sue um yeah that's a big point yeah

873
1:40:56 --> 1:41:04
so um i don't i don't know uh if you know pursuing one or the other of these avenues uh without

874
1:41:04 --> 1:41:11
proper standing is going to necessarily impede another team from going after you know somebody

875
1:41:11 --> 1:41:17
that they can actually uh reach but you bring up a good point that um you know that there's no real

876
1:41:17 --> 1:41:24
criminal path here um in my mind i'm trying to kind of resolve a question and i would just

877
1:41:24 --> 1:41:32
appreciate your input on it to the extent that you're familiar uh if between um uh sasha latopova

878
1:41:32 --> 1:41:39
and katherine watt's argument that we should be going after the the dod and karen kinkston's uh

879
1:41:39 --> 1:41:43
equally compelling presentation that we should be going after pfizer do you have an opinion

880
1:41:43 --> 1:41:51
as to which of these two are on a good path or a viable path yeah so let me let me disqualify one

881
1:41:51 --> 1:41:59
right out of the gate and the disqualification is that because of the fact that the crime originated

882
1:41:59 --> 1:42:05
from the united states and because the united states is not a signatory and bound by icc as a

883
1:42:05 --> 1:42:13
matter of fact to the contrary bringing an action as a uh citizen or permanent resident of the united

884
1:42:13 --> 1:42:22
states is in fact in some instances considered to be a felony um the icc is not a jurisdiction

885
1:42:22 --> 1:42:31
that is even relevant in this particular case because the crime is actually 100 percent a us

886
1:42:31 --> 1:42:41
crime now crimes by by derivative have gone globally but the crime is a us crime and as a

887
1:42:41 --> 1:42:50
result the icc is irrelevant in this matter there is no chance that you get anywhere um with any

888
1:42:50 --> 1:42:55
prosecution and the worst thing is you could actually put a double jeopardy problem out there

889
1:42:55 --> 1:43:01
by pretending to pursue something there and ultimately getting the icc to fail to take

890
1:43:01 --> 1:43:07
act or dismiss which would prejudice downstream prosecution so that one is a dead on arrival

891
1:43:07 --> 1:43:15
because of the nexus of the crime and the only value there is to stephen's point you could go

892
1:43:15 --> 1:43:23
after genocide you could go after the contractual issues where you know Pfizer and Moderna forced

893
1:43:23 --> 1:43:27
governments into waiving liability issues there's a lot of things you could do at icc but you can't

894
1:43:27 --> 1:43:33
go after the crime there Pfizer is an interesting animal for the simple reason that the actual

895
1:43:33 --> 1:43:40
perpetrator of the crime is not Pfizer the actual perpetrator of the crime in this particular case

896
1:43:40 --> 1:43:46
is a pass-through relationship that Biontech has with Pfizer but the actual dissemination

897
1:43:47 --> 1:43:57
of the agent at the outset was not Pfizer or Biontech it was the unfortunate defense department

898
1:43:57 --> 1:44:05
cover operation out of South Carolina ATI which was the operation warp speed contractor so the

899
1:44:05 --> 1:44:11
official counterparty to the dissemination of the injection was not Pfizer and was not Moderna and

900
1:44:11 --> 1:44:20
was not Biontech it was ATI and ATI is a defense department contractor whose previous contracts

901
1:44:20 --> 1:44:25
were in mis and disinformation for propaganda promulgation from the department of defense

902
1:44:25 --> 1:44:30
that's their pharmaceutical credential that got them the contract to run operation warp speed

903
1:44:31 --> 1:44:40
so you have a nexus problem with actually a very easy dismissible case if you pursue Pfizer without

904
1:44:40 --> 1:44:48
pursuing ATI and its parent company answer and answer for those of you not familiar with it

905
1:44:49 --> 1:44:54
is essentially compiled off of a bunch of folks that are part of the office of naval research and

906
1:44:54 --> 1:44:59
other forms of special operation and black operation businesses and you have to go after

907
1:44:59 --> 1:45:07
them so a pursuit of the nominal target Pfizer is going to be dismissed on probably ripeness

908
1:45:07 --> 1:45:12
and standing that's a terrible place to go and once again prejudicial in the minds of courts

909
1:45:13 --> 1:45:18
the degree to which you want to pursue the department of defense or any of the agencies

910
1:45:18 --> 1:45:23
associated with the department of defense is a mountain that is much much much harder to climb

911
1:45:24 --> 1:45:33
than going after SEC misrepresentations tax fraud misrepresentations or racketeering it is critical

912
1:45:33 --> 1:45:40
in my view to try to get the most viable pathway that has a leg to stand on as your primary thrust

913
1:45:40 --> 1:45:49
and I want to come back to your opening comment collaboration is absolutely essential but

914
1:45:50 --> 1:45:56
collaboration can't involve essentially a bunch of people with rocks throwing them randomly in

915
1:45:56 --> 1:46:02
the darkness saying we're working together there has to be a unified approach that says that we're

916
1:46:02 --> 1:46:08
going after a consolidated target and the reason why I'm working with a number of different groups

917
1:46:09 --> 1:46:15
is because exactly to your point this is an us proposition this is not a my proposition the reason

918
1:46:15 --> 1:46:20
why we have prosecute now the reason why we work with the davalir law group the reason why we

919
1:46:20 --> 1:46:25
succeeded in getting face masks off of airplanes with the health freedom defense fund using the

920
1:46:25 --> 1:46:31
davalir law group the reason why all those things happen is because we collaborated and we succeeded

921
1:46:31 --> 1:46:37
and the reason why nobody has to wear a face mask on a plane is because collaboration worked but

922
1:46:38 --> 1:46:45
to that end it only works when you stay focused on a laudable and plausible objective

923
1:46:45 --> 1:46:54
and filing random civil actions or filing reckless actions are not helping in fact they're

924
1:46:54 --> 1:47:02
prejudicing they're prejudicing the the the the courts around the country who now are citing other

925
1:47:02 --> 1:47:08
opinions based on frivolous and unthoughtful civil actions that have been filed so i'm a big fan

926
1:47:08 --> 1:47:13
of trying to make sure that we go after crimes and i'm a big fan of making sure we do it

927
1:47:13 --> 1:47:22
collaboratively and your point is very well taken thank you thank you john now david so you know will

928
1:47:22 --> 1:47:28
houston was in the orth cuba people drop out anytime any of you in a queue i watch this so will

929
1:47:28 --> 1:47:33
houston will be next before he goes and then we'll have rudek from czech republic great in

930
1:47:33 --> 1:47:38
australia we've got the standing problem a significant standing problem julian gillespie

931
1:47:38 --> 1:47:45
was on this call earlier he's a a lawyer the australian vaccination risks network of which

932
1:47:45 --> 1:47:51
i'm on the committee was thrown out of the federal court because of a corrupt judge literally a

933
1:47:51 --> 1:47:58
corrupt judge and one of the issues that we're all grappling with as are you like the 83 year old

934
1:47:58 --> 1:48:06
judge is that the wrong judge can create bad precedent and then half corrupt judges can rely

935
1:48:06 --> 1:48:12
on that bullshit so it is a real issue and david i as i've said to many people just for those who

936
1:48:12 --> 1:48:17
weren't here before judges will wake up when their grandchildren start dying so that'll be a helpful

937
1:48:18 --> 1:48:22
process yeah so will and then daniel when were you in the because you dropped off too didn't you

938
1:48:22 --> 1:48:28
daniel well put you back in the list just tell me where you were okay well oh we'll work we'll work

939
1:48:28 --> 1:48:36
out so will houston next and then rudek and then daniel tell me who you are after thank you charles

940
1:48:36 --> 1:48:46
can anybody hear me yep i can hear you will okay very good uh hi david um so uh does a patent for

941
1:48:46 --> 1:48:56
a virus prove that viruses exist no no oh okay that's good does a budget line item

942
1:48:57 --> 1:49:05
for gain of function research prove that viruses exist uh no remember remember let's let's just

943
1:49:05 --> 1:49:15
just pause for a second viruses are a model they are a model derived from a broken model from the

944
1:49:15 --> 1:49:23
1950s of dna which also doesn't exist because remember chromosomes exist dna doesn't dna is a

945
1:49:23 --> 1:49:29
model built by watson and crick not and defined by the way by not watson and crick i mean they

946
1:49:29 --> 1:49:38
get credit for it but they didn't actually do it these are models and models are as good as models

947
1:49:38 --> 1:49:44
are they do not represent nature they are an artifact to describe a natural phenomenon

948
1:49:45 --> 1:49:52
i would say that a virus is a replication competent intracellular obligate parasite

949
1:49:52 --> 1:50:00
that causes cellular necrosis and symptomatic disease which transmit between hosts via natural

950
1:50:00 --> 1:50:07
modes of exposure we're not talking about i mean this is a a word that supposedly describes

951
1:50:07 --> 1:50:13
something real so that's yeah and then and therein lies therein lies the same problem we have i mean

952
1:50:13 --> 1:50:18
listen we have the general theory tells us that that allegedly if we want to believe it

953
1:50:19 --> 1:50:25
that allegedly we have things called atoms and atoms are allegedly made up of protons and neutrons

954
1:50:25 --> 1:50:31
and electrons but nobody has bothered to test the tiny little theoretical problem with the general

955
1:50:31 --> 1:50:40
atomic theory suggesting that somehow neutrons are the byproduct of the decay of supernova

956
1:50:41 --> 1:50:47
and the decay of supernova has a half life of 15 minutes but somehow or another we can have

957
1:50:47 --> 1:50:53
supernova that are parsecs away that continually supply every 15 minutes every neutron that lives

958
1:50:53 --> 1:50:58
inside of every atom i mean the problem i'm glad you brought up i'm glad you brought up a test for

959
1:50:59 --> 1:51:06
for the atomic theory because i'm just wondering are you familiar with the settling the virus

960
1:51:06 --> 1:51:12
debate statement it's also sometimes called the virus challenge oh yeah it was proposed by

961
1:51:12 --> 1:51:18
mark bailey kevin corbett and tom cowan they were the principal authors yep yep all right would you

962
1:51:18 --> 1:51:24
consider being a signatory to that because that is basically the purpose of that is to validate or

963
1:51:24 --> 1:51:33
to prove what tom cowan calls the the pillars the basic pillars of virology which remarkably

964
1:51:33 --> 1:51:38
haven't been proven up until this point and they would include isolation and purification

965
1:51:38 --> 1:51:46
yeah scanning electron microscope photography genetic sequencing the serum test pcr or or otherwise

966
1:51:47 --> 1:51:53
and the and the proof of pathogenicity yeah would you consider signing up to would you sign the

967
1:51:53 --> 1:51:59
virus challenge oh there's no question and i've i've been i've been i've frequently shared the

968
1:51:59 --> 1:52:04
stage with tom cowan and i love his work and i think what he's doing is phenomenal and i think

969
1:52:04 --> 1:52:09
it doesn't go far enough because i actually have a fundamental problem with all of the models that

970
1:52:09 --> 1:52:14
we've chosen since 1880s when we actually you're saying it doesn't you're saying it doesn't go far

971
1:52:14 --> 1:52:20
enough but you're you're forgive me for interrupting you but i just want to use my time as quickly you

972
1:52:20 --> 1:52:26
know as efficiently as possible but your whole presentation is based on the fundamental assumption

973
1:52:26 --> 1:52:32
you're talking about furan cleavage sites and yeah gain of function research and super pathogenetic

974
1:52:32 --> 1:52:38
strains and yeah hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for coronavirus your whole

975
1:52:38 --> 1:52:45
presentation is in direct contradiction to no it isn't no it is not it is linguistic

976
1:52:46 --> 1:52:52
only what you're suggesting is an ontological argument that's not being made what i am saying

977
1:52:52 --> 1:53:01
is the evidence that we have is the evidence of crimes in a dimension in which the crimes occurred

978
1:53:01 --> 1:53:06
this is you haven't even defined you haven't even you haven't defined the crime scene correctly

979
1:53:06 --> 1:53:13
you've in fact what you've done is you are stipulating to the crime scene as defined by

980
1:53:13 --> 1:53:18
the perp it's ralph barrack uh that that wants us to believe that viruses exist it's anthony

981
1:53:18 --> 1:53:24
fauci that wants us to believe that i don't disagree with you what i'm saying is i also

982
1:53:24 --> 1:53:30
don't acknowledge that debt denominated currency is a form of money but that doesn't make a bank

983
1:53:30 --> 1:53:37
robbery less a bank robbery the argument is a goofy one when it comes to ontological arguments

984
1:53:37 --> 1:53:44
where what you're doing is picking a linguistic model and then pretending that it doesn't exist

985
1:53:44 --> 1:53:50
i don't recognize debt denominated currency but it doesn't change a bank robbery that that analogy

986
1:53:50 --> 1:53:55
doesn't help add clarity i don't think of course it does it's the same thing what you're doing

987
1:53:59 --> 1:54:05
will listen to what david's saying stop cutting across him please you're using a linguistic

988
1:54:05 --> 1:54:10
framework and i actually agree with you i don't think that the virus model works but i don't think

989
1:54:10 --> 1:54:16
dna works and i don't think adams work because if you actually look at every single one of those

990
1:54:16 --> 1:54:24
models they were exactly defined so that we would build a chemical rather than a frequency based

991
1:54:24 --> 1:54:30
view of reality so the fact of the matter is you could pick any one of a number of topics and the

992
1:54:30 --> 1:54:38
only point i'm making will is a very simple one it's a model just like representational currency

993
1:54:38 --> 1:54:45
is a model just like laws are a model and if what we're going to do is debate existentially the

994
1:54:45 --> 1:54:50
existence of the absence of a model that's a different conversation but when we are dealing

995
1:54:50 --> 1:54:56
with crimes we have to use the language of the realm to deal with the crime

996
1:54:56 --> 1:55:02
David you put you put it brilliantly in one sentence about five minutes ago what did you say

997
1:55:03 --> 1:55:09
that's why we recorded it that's exactly fine again okay will you want to have anything by the

998
1:55:09 --> 1:55:15
way when we have we have guests and david i love how you're able to handle anything so that's

999
1:55:15 --> 1:55:20
wonderful most of our guests can handle the questioning because as i said at the start

1000
1:55:20 --> 1:55:24
to answer the question you have to be able to answer the question you have to be able to answer

1001
1:55:24 --> 1:55:32
upset if they're frameworks you know it's not a problem and i don't have a problem i'm just

1002
1:55:32 --> 1:55:38
saying that if we're going to critique the applicability of the virology model or the

1003
1:55:38 --> 1:55:44
virus model or the terrain model or anything else and my criticism and i've done it with tom

1004
1:55:44 --> 1:55:50
with tom sitting next to me is if you're going to critique models then let's critique models let's

1005
1:55:50 --> 1:55:56
actually go to the base of it. Let's not pretend like the virus versus terrain is interesting,

1006
1:55:56 --> 1:56:02
because it's not interesting. The interesting question is why we've decided in the mid 1800s

1007
1:56:03 --> 1:56:11
to see the world through a descriptive lens where we actually do reductionist analysis of things

1008
1:56:11 --> 1:56:16
by breaking them into the tiniest particles and then trying to describe how something works.

1009
1:56:16 --> 1:56:22
That is analogous to having anybody take a tapestry and untie every thread, put the threads on the

1010
1:56:22 --> 1:56:28
floor, and then try to find the virgin next to the heart at the well. The fact of the matter is

1011
1:56:28 --> 1:56:36
that does not constitute an analysis of anything. It constitutes only that what you're doing is

1012
1:56:36 --> 1:56:41
semantic debates, and that's not going to help us deal with this problem until we actually

1013
1:56:41 --> 1:56:49
address the broader problem. The broader problem is that we actually have a language

1014
1:56:49 --> 1:56:54
handed to us by the oppressors, and now we're arguing about the nature of language.

1015
1:56:54 --> 1:57:02
It's a code. That's what it is. My last question is, thank you everybody,

1016
1:57:03 --> 1:57:09
for this forum, Charles and Stefan especially. Have you read, David, have you read Mark Bailey's

1017
1:57:09 --> 1:57:17
A Farewell to Virology? Could you also comment on Christine Massey's FOI request?

1018
1:57:17 --> 1:57:24
212 institutions from 40 nations and nobody can find evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Thank you.

1019
1:57:25 --> 1:57:31
Yeah, well, I mean, once again, it doesn't exist because there is no such thing even using their

1020
1:57:31 --> 1:57:38
rules on their phenomenology and on their linguistics. There is no such thing as SARS-CoV-2

1021
1:57:39 --> 1:57:46
isolated as an individual anything. Using the evidence that was put before the ICTV

1022
1:57:47 --> 1:57:54
back in February of 2020, it became exceptionally clear that by the time we allegedly had

1023
1:57:54 --> 1:57:59
some sort of definition of what we wanted to call this thing, there were already over 200 variations

1024
1:57:59 --> 1:58:03
of the thing that we were allegedly calling a novel thing, which tells us-

1025
1:58:04 --> 1:58:07
Christine's FOI says there's zero evidence of the thing.

1026
1:58:07 --> 1:58:12
Yes, but once again, the phylogenetic data, whether you want to accept the model or not,

1027
1:58:13 --> 1:58:19
also shows that the phylogenetic data shows there wasn't a thing. There were a bunch of things that

1028
1:58:19 --> 1:58:24
were fragments of things that were characterized by individuals and it turns out that those things

1029
1:58:24 --> 1:58:30
characterized by individuals have in fact never been fully isolated because the only technology

1030
1:58:30 --> 1:58:38
we have right now to look at the thing we call a virus or we call RNA is an assembly of fragments

1031
1:58:38 --> 1:58:46
anyhow. So on the best of days, we never get it. Thank you. Thank you. Excellent. Thank you, Will.

1032
1:58:46 --> 1:58:53
We'll have Ruddock and then Daniel Nagazi and then Jim and we've got 26 minutes to go, David. You're

1033
1:58:53 --> 1:58:57
doing well. Now, you're sure you don't need a time to break? I worry about our guest who can go over

1034
1:58:58 --> 1:59:04
Oh, Lord, no, I can go forever. Wow. Okay, Ruddock and then Daniel.

1035
1:59:06 --> 1:59:13
Hi, everybody. Hi, David. Thank you very much for your answer to Will because it's exactly

1036
1:59:13 --> 1:59:23
answered my question so I can ask you something similar. 700 million worldwide will die from COVID

1037
1:59:23 --> 1:59:32
shots by 2028. How did you come up with this number 700 million? Yeah, that was actually

1038
1:59:32 --> 1:59:37
something that the headline is wonderful. If you actually listen to the presentation, you actually

1039
1:59:37 --> 1:59:43
find out that that's not what I said. What I said was using the model that was stipulated that said

1040
1:59:43 --> 1:59:50
we were looking for a 10% population reduction in the decade of vaccines data, which is actually

1041
1:59:50 --> 1:59:55
funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, they called for a 10% population reduction by

1042
1:59:55 --> 2:00:02
2028. And they said it would be achieved through vaccination. And all I said was, if that were in

1043
2:00:02 --> 2:00:09
fact the case, then that would represent a 700 million person reduction in the population of

1044
2:00:09 --> 2:00:18
the world. Now, the fact of the matter is, it is my assertion that if we look at what was added in

1045
2:00:18 --> 2:00:24
pseudouridine into the injection, I think we are going to see all cause cardiovascular and cancer

1046
2:00:24 --> 2:00:30
mortalities going to epidemic levels. And I think that's going to happen now. I don't think that

1047
2:00:30 --> 2:00:37
that's going to happen at some indeterminate period down the road. The reason why it was so

1048
2:00:37 --> 2:00:44
important to put a number on that is because people throw around percentages, like 10% of the

1049
2:00:44 --> 2:00:51
population reduced or whatever, and people don't assume that what you're talking about is not just

1050
2:00:51 --> 2:00:57
the people who are currently walking around on the planet. You're also talking about disruption

1051
2:00:57 --> 2:01:05
of reproduction. And so the total cost of this is actually not just how many arms got

1052
2:01:05 --> 2:01:12
shots and how many shots resulted in cardiovascular disease or cancer or other things. The real problem

1053
2:01:12 --> 2:01:19
is something that we're already seeing in birth rates, where we're literally seeing a cessation

1054
2:01:19 --> 2:01:26
of fertility in an enormous number of populations. So when we put those together, Radik,

1055
2:01:26 --> 2:01:33
I would suggest that 700 million may be, ironically, a low estimate, not a high estimate,

1056
2:01:33 --> 2:01:38
but you have to look at it from a population statistic standpoint, meaning that we are not

1057
2:01:38 --> 2:01:46
going to be replenishing the population at the rate that we were. Therefore, the actual loss of life

1058
2:01:47 --> 2:01:50
is much higher than what we're talking about because we are actually

1059
2:01:51 --> 2:01:58
succeeding the notion of reproduction as a consequence of this action. So I'm glad you

1060
2:01:58 --> 2:02:04
brought it up, but I actually am very precise when I use language, and that precision was something

1061
2:02:04 --> 2:02:11
that the headline just happened. It was an attention-getting headline, I get it, but that's why

1062
2:02:11 --> 2:02:16
what I have to say is something that requires paragraphs of thinking, not headlines.

1063
2:02:17 --> 2:02:24
Excellent, because this was my concern. The number seems to me too low as well.

1064
2:02:24 --> 2:02:32
I agree. It is merely based on the projections. If you look at the actuarial data coming off

1065
2:02:32 --> 2:02:39
of some of the life insurance modeling right now, we're talking about some people estimating

1066
2:02:39 --> 2:02:47
that we could have a third of the population gone in the same time horizon. So I have done

1067
2:02:47 --> 2:02:51
what I've done based on the public statements and just projecting the public statement.

1068
2:02:52 --> 2:03:00
And the second quick really fast question. Today was announced by WHO,

1069
2:03:01 --> 2:03:11
the avian influenza is in game again. And Tedros was mentioning very clearly that they are worried

1070
2:03:11 --> 2:03:18
about the human transmission, which means only one thing, the bio-weapon again.

1071
2:03:18 --> 2:03:25
Yeah, so that's a good point. And remember that the bivalent strategy with mRNA is the holy grail

1072
2:03:25 --> 2:03:32
that Anthony Fauci has been pursuing since 1986. And the fact that they want to do a combined

1073
2:03:33 --> 2:03:41
influenza plus coronavirus injection, you need to have a influenza pandemic to make that happen,

1074
2:03:41 --> 2:03:47
because right now the uptake of influenza injections is at an all-time low in the

1075
2:03:47 --> 2:03:51
circulating population. So people aren't falling for the bivalent argument,

1076
2:03:51 --> 2:03:55
which is the reason why we have to create the illusion of an influenza outbreak.

1077
2:03:55 --> 2:03:59
Thanks for pointing that out. Thank you. Thank you too.

1078
2:03:59 --> 2:04:02
Thank you, Radik. Daniel Negazi, who I'm sure you know, David.

1079
2:04:04 --> 2:04:05
Hello. Hello, Daniel.

1080
2:04:05 --> 2:04:13
Thank you very much. I can resolve that previous whether or not viruses exist debate. And it's

1081
2:04:13 --> 2:04:20
actually thanks to a video you did a long time ago, Dr. Martin, that was about your bougainvillea,

1082
2:04:21 --> 2:04:29
the bougainvillea rebels. And where that led to a refinement in my thought was with the issue of

1083
2:04:29 --> 2:04:36
process. So I find myself these days, I think less and less about facts. And I think more and

1084
2:04:36 --> 2:04:42
more in terms of the mathematical integral of facts, which is the process that generates facts.

1085
2:04:43 --> 2:04:50
And then I spend maybe about half my day, mostly during sleeping time, thinking about the mathematical

1086
2:04:50 --> 2:04:56
integral of the process that creates facts, which the conclusion I've come to is the reason

1087
2:04:56 --> 2:05:02
to have a process that creates facts. And so how that changes the whether or not there's a virus

1088
2:05:02 --> 2:05:11
debate is when you apply process. Well, what can we observe? We observe DARPA. DARPA likes to make

1089
2:05:11 --> 2:05:18
very large weapons like Star Wars type projects. They also like to make hand-sized weapons that

1090
2:05:18 --> 2:05:24
that soldiers can use. They also like to make microscopic weapons. So of the microscopic

1091
2:05:24 --> 2:05:30
weapons, you can have parasites like worms, intestinal parasites, you can have smaller ones

1092
2:05:30 --> 2:05:39
like bacteria. And the smallest theoretical weapon you can make is probably a virus, a self-replicating

1093
2:05:39 --> 2:05:50
segment of DNA or RNA. So in that frame of process, whether or not viruses exist is rather a moot point.

1094
2:05:51 --> 2:05:58
It's more to the point that if viruses didn't exist, an organization like DARPA or whatever

1095
2:05:58 --> 2:06:05
its international equivalent is, would probably try to engineer something smaller than a bacteria

1096
2:06:06 --> 2:06:12
to cause harm. So now that we have a murder weapon, which is a genetically engineered product,

1097
2:06:13 --> 2:06:18
then we have to look at, you know, just basic, you know, crime scene investigation. Well, who is the

1098
2:06:18 --> 2:06:25
victim in this murder? So the murder are men, women and children around the world. What was the murder

1099
2:06:25 --> 2:06:34
weapon? Engineered device, a genetically engineered device. Now, who is the assailant? So as far as we

1100
2:06:34 --> 2:06:43
can observe, well, the assailant seems to involve DARPA, a very large organization, the NIH, and even

1101
2:06:43 --> 2:06:53
larger than the NIH. So the WHO. Now, as a man on the ground, you know, as men, women and children

1102
2:06:53 --> 2:07:04
around the world, we have to ask ourselves, are we able to reach the head of this monster that is the

1103
2:07:04 --> 2:07:10
assailant that's caused this genetic poisoning of the human species? Are we able to reach a

1104
2:07:10 --> 2:07:19
jurisdiction where we can attack and prosecute the head that sits at the WHO level or even above the

1105
2:07:19 --> 2:07:27
WHO level? Yeah, likely not. So I'm in completely complete agreement with your approach to go after

1106
2:07:27 --> 2:07:33
the states, because the only way we can bring down this monster, if we can't reach the head,

1107
2:07:34 --> 2:07:39
is to go after the toenails. And we have to keep chipping away at the toenails, because that's what

1108
2:07:39 --> 2:07:46
we are able to reach as men and women on the ground. And hopefully, by getting at the toenails,

1109
2:07:46 --> 2:07:54
then the toes, then the ankles, we can bring the entire system, the system where the WHO is able to

1110
2:07:54 --> 2:08:02
enact worldwide a crime against humanity. That's probably the only path we have in winning this.

1111
2:08:02 --> 2:08:10
So to go after the state level jurisdictions, even better if we can go after municipal

1112
2:08:10 --> 2:08:15
jurisdictions and get a quick win in a municipal jurisdiction that sets a precedent for a state,

1113
2:08:15 --> 2:08:22
and then the state sets a precedent for the United States, and then the United States can probably

1114
2:08:22 --> 2:08:29
set a precedent for the world. We'll see. But I agree with the approach, going small when

1115
2:08:29 --> 2:08:35
the assailant is really big. We have to think in terms of that process. Use the opposite

1116
2:08:35 --> 2:08:42
of what you're countering, what your assailant, what your enemy is. The other thing was,

1117
2:08:42 --> 2:08:53
from a clinical perspective, I did notice in the County of Lamont, Alberta, everyone in the town

1118
2:08:53 --> 2:09:01
swore that they had the worst influenza they've ever seen pass through the entire county

1119
2:09:01 --> 2:09:08
in November of 2019. And what's unique about that situation is throughout the peak of the

1120
2:09:08 --> 2:09:18
pandemic, throughout 2020, no one in that county was positive for COVID-19. That is, people came

1121
2:09:18 --> 2:09:25
into the hospital, but no one came into the hospital with a COVID-19 illness, likely because

1122
2:09:25 --> 2:09:32
they all had the illness in November 2019, which is why they were protected all throughout 2020.

1123
2:09:32 --> 2:09:38
The other clinical note I want to make is that during this pandemic, when I was working,

1124
2:09:39 --> 2:09:44
I did notice that the infectious disease that passed through that was called COVID-19

1125
2:09:45 --> 2:09:51
did have a very unique clinical feature, that this is different from every other influenza,

1126
2:09:51 --> 2:09:59
coronavirus, adenovirus infection that I've seen before. And that is the one from 2020 and 2021

1127
2:10:00 --> 2:10:06
caused a lot of pulmonary fluid buildup. And that was clinically different from every other

1128
2:10:06 --> 2:10:12
viral illness that I've seen in my career as an emergency doctor. And what's also interesting is

1129
2:10:12 --> 2:10:21
after being exposed to these unique viral symptoms of a viral illness with a very wet

1130
2:10:22 --> 2:10:29
and very fluid rich profile in terms of causing fluid buildup in the lungs, a day later I had

1131
2:10:29 --> 2:10:36
the runny nose of my life. This wasn't a bacterial sinusitis, I did not have a fever, I just had a

1132
2:10:36 --> 2:10:44
very fluid copious runny nose. But unlike any other runny nose I've had in my entire lifetime,

1133
2:10:44 --> 2:10:50
I took a single dose of Ivermectin and then it was resolved. So I can attest to personal experience

1134
2:10:51 --> 2:11:01
of the existence of some contagious agent that caused extreme amount of physiologic fluid buildup

1135
2:11:01 --> 2:11:08
that was resolved. Daniel, you've never been psychologically tortured previously, presumably?

1136
2:11:09 --> 2:11:14
No, no, I've never been. I don't think so. But you have been in the last three years, we all have.

1137
2:11:15 --> 2:11:23
Oh, I spent a lot of time at work. So, you know, luckily the job posting I had, I could pick up as

1138
2:11:23 --> 2:11:30
much work as possible. So I was actually having a good time in 2020-2021 because I was working so

1139
2:11:30 --> 2:11:35
much. And I actually enjoy emergency department work. So as far as the psychological torture goes,

1140
2:11:35 --> 2:11:42
it only started in September 2021 for me when I was no longer able to work. And that led to

1141
2:11:42 --> 2:11:51
a lot of distress because I find emergency medicine quite satisfying mentally, physically,

1142
2:11:51 --> 2:11:57
and emotionally. So being taken away from my work, I'd say my psychological trauma only started in

1143
2:11:57 --> 2:12:09
September of last year, 2021. Yes, but you can be injured. So you can be psychologically tortured

1144
2:12:09 --> 2:12:15
and not realize it. So you might think that you weren't, but and I thought I wasn't, but I think

1145
2:12:15 --> 2:12:23
now I was like everybody else. So they were destroying social bonds, you know, it's very

1146
2:12:23 --> 2:12:29
subtle. Okay, come on, keep going. So we're tied on time. So Daniel, you done?

1147
2:12:32 --> 2:12:38
So what Daniel, David points out, and I remind people that the third Star Wars movie is Daniel,

1148
2:12:38 --> 2:12:46
the Daniel Nagazi strategy. And in the third Star Wars movie, the machines of the empire

1149
2:12:46 --> 2:12:51
were brought down by the Ewoks in the forest. Remember all collaborating, David, with their

1150
2:12:51 --> 2:12:57
bits of string to trip down. And it reminds me of the story in the African wilds and a lion

1151
2:12:57 --> 2:13:00
kills an elephant by taking a chunk out of its foot and waiting for it to bleed to death.

1152
2:13:02 --> 2:13:07
Well, and let me just make the observation there is a way to go after the head of the beast,

1153
2:13:07 --> 2:13:14
and that is to stop putting money into Blackrock. Nice. All right, thank you. We've got a couple

1154
2:13:14 --> 2:13:22
more to go. We've got 12 minutes to go. Love it. Jim. Thank you, David. That was a great

1155
2:13:22 --> 2:13:29
presentation. You mentioned Blackrock at the end. That's very important. And that's really

1156
2:13:29 --> 2:13:36
very important. And the universities that you point out their ties as well. I have a particular

1157
2:13:36 --> 2:13:42
fondness of the University of Pennsylvania. They seem to be embedded in this with the development

1158
2:13:42 --> 2:13:49
of the MRI and technology, factcheck.org and reward for two of the highest ranking people

1159
2:13:49 --> 2:13:56
at the University of Pennsylvania. Amy Gutman became the diplomat or ambassador, as well as

1160
2:13:56 --> 2:14:03
David Cohen, ambassador, as well as Zeke Emanuel's brother, Ram, ambassador to Japan diplomatic

1161
2:14:03 --> 2:14:08
community. This intelligence community, the Department of Defense, seems to be the focus

1162
2:14:08 --> 2:14:14
of this whole thing. And they seem to be driving it through all maybe six eyes, the six eyes

1163
2:14:14 --> 2:14:21
organization. This seems to be similar to the plot of Rainbow Six by Tom Clancy, where a virus or

1164
2:14:21 --> 2:14:28
a spike protein is released and the vaccine is worse. We know that this is DOD in relationship,

1165
2:14:28 --> 2:14:35
and I'm not sure if you're familiar, but I have some information and belief that this spike protein

1166
2:14:35 --> 2:14:41
is racially specific and may not attack certain people, including Larry Fink, including

1167
2:14:42 --> 2:14:47
George Soros. So the people who invented it may have made it so it doesn't kill them off and

1168
2:14:47 --> 2:14:56
doesn't kill and doesn't make their progeny infertile. Because of the ACE2 receptor binding

1169
2:14:56 --> 2:15:04
is racially specific, it actually repels K26R. So the question becomes, we kind of know who

1170
2:15:04 --> 2:15:08
did this and it wasn't the Chinese. We know it has to do with the Department of Defense and it

1171
2:15:08 --> 2:15:13
has to do with people who are overlords over the Department of Defense, which are intelligence

1172
2:15:13 --> 2:15:21
agencies and maybe even some would say demons. The Department of Defense may have made a deal

1173
2:15:21 --> 2:15:26
with the demons. How do we deal with contracts, secret contracts, are supposed to be overseen by

1174
2:15:26 --> 2:15:32
HHS Office of Inspector General? How do we deal with secret contracts? How do we hold these

1175
2:15:33 --> 2:15:37
entities responsible when they are seemingly allowed to depopulate the world in a racially

1176
2:15:37 --> 2:15:45
specific manner? Thanks. Well, if we go back to 1914 and we look at the formation of the

1177
2:15:46 --> 2:15:52
collaboration between Booker T. Washington and Andrew Carnegie to set up the Eugenics program,

1178
2:15:54 --> 2:16:01
which included the establishment of the Tuskegee Institute, which most people who are

1179
2:16:01 --> 2:16:09
now entirely woke have a hard time dealing with. That Andrew Carnegie and Booker T. Washington

1180
2:16:09 --> 2:16:17
collaborated on the development of the National Eugenics Office. Let that sit in your woke

1181
2:16:17 --> 2:16:21
bucket wherever you want it to sit. The fact of the matter is for an extremely long time,

1182
2:16:22 --> 2:16:30
the answer is that where capital is opaque, power becomes more opaque.

1183
2:16:32 --> 2:16:42
We know without question that the aggregation of power inside of BlackRock is a perfect example,

1184
2:16:43 --> 2:16:49
is a situation where a company went almost two decades ago from near bankruptcy to being the

1185
2:16:49 --> 2:16:59
largest asset holder on earth with no explanation whatsoever in how that happened. We know that by

1186
2:16:59 --> 2:17:07
2012, automated trading had replaced actual trading as the way equity markets move,

1187
2:17:07 --> 2:17:14
which means price is determined by quantitative load balancing, not by price. There's a whole

1188
2:17:14 --> 2:17:20
bunch of things that have been hijacked. The fact of the matter is the Department of Defense

1189
2:17:20 --> 2:17:28
and the intelligence communities thought they had the racket covered until one topic, which has not

1190
2:17:28 --> 2:17:35
been brought up but needs to be brought up, and that was Edward Snowden. When Edward Snowden went

1191
2:17:35 --> 2:17:42
to China and then went to Russia, a very important thing happened and we need to be very clear on

1192
2:17:42 --> 2:17:47
that. It wasn't until just a few years ago that I could even say this out loud because it was

1193
2:17:47 --> 2:17:55
classified until it actually accidentally became unclassified. Under the book written by

1194
2:17:56 --> 2:18:03
Hank Crompton, Life Inside the Clandestine Service, he was the first person to officially

1195
2:18:03 --> 2:18:13
out the file that Edward Snowden actually took to China and then took to Russia. That file

1196
2:18:13 --> 2:18:17
is the resolution of what was called the Corporate Cover Program.

1197
2:18:19 --> 2:18:26
The Corporate Cover Program is the CIA's means by which it takes people who are affiliated with

1198
2:18:26 --> 2:18:31
corporations and essentially recruits them into being double or triple agents.

1199
2:18:33 --> 2:18:40
Those agencies are resolved where you have a person who allegedly is an executive for GE

1200
2:18:40 --> 2:18:46
or Bank of America or whatever else. Those individuals actually go and under the guise

1201
2:18:46 --> 2:18:55
of being corporate actors, they actually are both espionage for government as well as commercial

1202
2:18:55 --> 2:19:03
espionage actors. What most people don't seem to pay attention to is the resolution name file,

1203
2:19:04 --> 2:19:10
which takes the code names of the assets for the agency and resolves them to the corporate entity

1204
2:19:10 --> 2:19:16
and actors that they actually are in real life. It's probably the most valuable piece of

1205
2:19:16 --> 2:19:22
intelligence on the planet and that is the reason why Edward Snowden is still alive in my estimation.

1206
2:19:23 --> 2:19:31
Because he actually took to China and then to Russia the name resolution of every single agent

1207
2:19:32 --> 2:19:38
that is actually under the cover of a corporate identity. Now the reason why this is important is

1208
2:19:38 --> 2:19:44
because when we think of the intelligence agencies, we think of the alphabet soup. We think of the CIA,

1209
2:19:44 --> 2:19:50
we think of the DIA, we think of the ONR, we think of all of these alphabet soups that we've become

1210
2:19:50 --> 2:19:55
familiar with. But what we don't realize is that a significant proportion of what we think of as

1211
2:19:55 --> 2:20:04
corporate executives are also part of a macro intelligence agency and that agency has one fatal

1212
2:20:04 --> 2:20:11
flaw and the fatal flaw is now their identities are known by the Chinese and by the Russians.

1213
2:20:12 --> 2:20:17
And since they are known by the Chinese and by the Russians, the United States has actually been,

1214
2:20:17 --> 2:20:24
in fact, decapitated as a prime actor ever since Snowden made it to Russia.

1215
2:20:25 --> 2:20:31
Because the ultimate blackmail that is going to destroy the United States economy and therefore

1216
2:20:31 --> 2:20:36
the United States power and influence is the resolution of those name recognitions. And the

1217
2:20:36 --> 2:20:42
minute those names are actually publicly disclosed, the economy that we think we know as we know it

1218
2:20:42 --> 2:20:49
that we think we know as we know it will go away. So it's important to realize that the

1219
2:20:49 --> 2:20:55
macro situation, which has nothing to do with the conversations we've had for the last two and a

1220
2:20:55 --> 2:21:02
half hours, the macro conversation is a much larger existential one. And to Daniel's earlier point,

1221
2:21:02 --> 2:21:07
if we don't understand the context in which this is happening, this is a current race against a

1222
2:21:07 --> 2:21:13
reorganization of the collapse officially of Westphalia models of nation states.

1223
2:21:14 --> 2:21:21
We are now going to go into a corporatocracy defined by despotic organizations, which are

1224
2:21:21 --> 2:21:27
multinational in nature. We have already achieved that position and what will happen is we'll

1225
2:21:27 --> 2:21:33
accelerate it. And if we really want to know how all this got really off the trail, the fact that

1226
2:21:33 --> 2:21:39
Edward Snowden was able to walk out with the name recognition and identity recognition and resolution

1227
2:21:39 --> 2:21:44
of every corporate cover program is the real reason why we can't do anything in this country

1228
2:21:44 --> 2:21:49
because this country is actually already compromised. We've got blackmail on absolutely

1229
2:21:49 --> 2:21:55
everybody and because we have blackmail on everybody, accountability is near impossible in the U.S.

1230
2:21:57 --> 2:22:02
Thank you, David. Master's already done. Jim, here's your challenge, David. You have 10 minutes.

1231
2:22:02 --> 2:22:07
We'll go five minutes to answer. We'll deal with five hands up and we'll finish at the two hour

1232
2:22:07 --> 2:22:13
35 mark. You okay for 10 more minutes? There you go. And I'll do up to a minute question. I'll do a

1233
2:22:13 --> 2:22:18
minute answer. How about that? Perfect. Rapid fire, Lars. Thank you, Jim. Go, Lars.

1234
2:22:20 --> 2:22:27
Thank you. Thank you very much. I'm going to be very brief. I have received, and this is very

1235
2:22:27 --> 2:22:36
complex, I have received a proposal to, I will call it participate in the next phase of the

1236
2:22:39 --> 2:22:45
coronavirus project. Let's call it that. It's very dramatic. It's Department of Defense is involved.

1237
2:22:45 --> 2:22:50
I need to talk to you about this. Let me know how I get in contact with you.

1238
2:22:51 --> 2:22:56
You better just reach out to Charles and to Stephen and they can put us in touch. Lars,

1239
2:22:56 --> 2:23:06
done. Thank you. Thank you. Lars, well done. Lars and Stephen are in close contact. Very good, Lars.

1240
2:23:10 --> 2:23:14
Well, first of all, thank you, David. I was following your work for quite a while,

1241
2:23:14 --> 2:23:18
actually, well, throughout the pandemic. And thank you for resolving the pandemic.

1242
2:23:21 --> 2:23:29
That too. So since 2020. And thank you for resolving the conundrum about your opinion

1243
2:23:29 --> 2:23:33
on the viruses. I actually agree. I have very similar opinions. And you and Daniel, both of

1244
2:23:33 --> 2:23:39
you, thank you for speaking up because I remember people were wondering, but because we're short on

1245
2:23:39 --> 2:23:46
time, let me get straight to the comment and question. So it seems to me that we're actually

1246
2:23:46 --> 2:23:52
dealing with an existential thing, even much, much, much deeper than anything we've discussed.

1247
2:23:53 --> 2:23:59
And we are looking at a, we can say mindset and resulting power structure that is thousands of

1248
2:23:59 --> 2:24:06
years old. And we can talk about Roman emperors or the Vatican or the families or the dynasties

1249
2:24:06 --> 2:24:11
or many other things. And they all represent that mindset and they may be competing with each other,

1250
2:24:11 --> 2:24:19
but nonetheless, it's the same mindset. It's a spiritual hunger. And they would stop at nothing

1251
2:24:19 --> 2:24:25
in order to win and to stay in power just because the urge, their own spiritual deal,

1252
2:24:25 --> 2:24:31
I mean, their own urge is so strong that they will really stop at nothing. They will do violence

1253
2:24:32 --> 2:24:34
and anything like they've done for all history.

1254
2:24:35 --> 2:24:36
Quick question.

1255
2:24:36 --> 2:24:37
Yeah, so your question.

1256
2:24:37 --> 2:24:43
So my question is, well, first of all, where do you find the courage? Because you should understand

1257
2:24:43 --> 2:24:50
that. So where do you find the courage to go against that? And then how do you think,

1258
2:24:52 --> 2:24:58
how do you think we're going to handle the question of human bad habits? Because all of

1259
2:24:58 --> 2:25:04
that ultimately is supported. Human bad habits are the worst. They are the most important factor.

1260
2:25:05 --> 2:25:13
So Tessa, let me address this. I have never found courage to be a very attractive asset.

1261
2:25:14 --> 2:25:23
I find persistence to be far more attractive. And that is when you have an unassailable set of

1262
2:25:23 --> 2:25:27
information and perspective, which is what I have been blessed with over my life. The fact of the

1263
2:25:27 --> 2:25:36
matter is, you know, I have been given access to things that are unusual. That access has gone back

1264
2:25:36 --> 2:25:44
to very early in my life. What I find is that the capacity to have confidence in being persistent

1265
2:25:45 --> 2:25:56
is something that is an attribute of humanity that the individuals who are currently controlling the

1266
2:25:56 --> 2:26:04
narrative and controlling the power systems find impossible to rationalize. And what I have found

1267
2:26:04 --> 2:26:09
in my own lived experience, and if you've read my book, Cuda 12, you actually would get a direct

1268
2:26:09 --> 2:26:16
answer to a lot of your questions. Having been drawn into the circle of people attempting to

1269
2:26:16 --> 2:26:26
hijack my involvement into the current situation that's unfolding back in 2008, 9, 10, 11,

1270
2:26:27 --> 2:26:32
what I did very clearly was I simply said no to the people who were making deals that would

1271
2:26:32 --> 2:26:40
compromise me as an individual and me in my mission. And the fact is that what has won the day

1272
2:26:41 --> 2:26:47
is the curiosity from people who have given themselves over to a dark agenda,

1273
2:26:48 --> 2:26:52
who are trying desperately to figure out what on earth motivates me because all the things that

1274
2:26:52 --> 2:27:01
motivate them don't seem to work. And that is the reason why I say it is a persistence argument,

1275
2:27:01 --> 2:27:06
not a courage argument. You need to be the last one standing. You don't need to be the most powerful.

1276
2:27:06 --> 2:27:11
You need to be the last one standing. And that is in fact what humanity has always proven to be

1277
2:27:11 --> 2:27:17
in the face of every form of evil that's ever shown up on this planet. Humanity ultimately has

1278
2:27:18 --> 2:27:28
a residue, a remnant, a small number sometimes, but it always has a few people who stand against

1279
2:27:28 --> 2:27:34
the forces of darkness. And we are the evidence that every time they are the ones that win.

1280
2:27:34 --> 2:27:35
And we will be that again.

1281
2:27:36 --> 2:27:42
Beautifully said, David. Thank you, Tessa. Great question. Big question.

1282
2:27:44 --> 2:27:49
Next example of persistence here, David, is John Bodwin from Massachusetts.

1283
2:27:49 --> 2:27:51
And then we've got Janet and Glenn, and then we're finishing.

1284
2:27:53 --> 2:27:58
Hello. Nice to meet you and thank you. We talked in Twitter spaces maybe a week ago.

1285
2:27:58 --> 2:28:00
Indeed, John. Good to see you.

1286
2:28:00 --> 2:28:07
Yep. So I like everything you're doing. I mean, my whole goal was always Rico in the end. You said

1287
2:28:07 --> 2:28:13
a couple of things that caused me to raise my hand today. One of them you wrote, you said,

1288
2:28:13 --> 2:28:21
unified approach, then you talked about objectives. So again, it's words, right? You're a stickler for

1289
2:28:21 --> 2:28:29
words and so am I. I believe that the way through this is not a full frontal or even a flanking

1290
2:28:29 --> 2:28:35
strategy, but more of a multi-point. In that regard, alliances are better than unions.

1291
2:28:35 --> 2:28:40
And to have, as long as there are intelligent people, if you coordinate your attacks that

1292
2:28:40 --> 2:28:50
are multi-point, we can have multiple fora, multiple legal theories. And each can share

1293
2:28:50 --> 2:29:00
in the creation of the discovery requests. If we get to discovery, I doubt I'll get to discovery,

1294
2:29:00 --> 2:29:05
to be honest with you, but let's say I do. If I do, I'm going to call you up and call other people

1295
2:29:05 --> 2:29:12
up and say, how can I help you with the discovery that I request? And I think if we all ally in that

1296
2:29:12 --> 2:29:21
regard, we'll be much better. The question I have relates to, well, a couple more things. Number one

1297
2:29:21 --> 2:29:29
is we don't win anything without public opinion in the end. One of my objectives is to ruin

1298
2:29:30 --> 2:29:37
people's trust in government. And therefore I get into the data and I do a lot of Twitter stuff,

1299
2:29:37 --> 2:29:41
spaces, and I try to get people to understand that the government is killing their children.

1300
2:29:41 --> 2:29:46
And when they understand that, then we'll win public opinion. Then we can start winning over

1301
2:29:46 --> 2:29:54
some of these AGs and so forth. So the question is, have you looked at the various avenues of grand

1302
2:29:54 --> 2:30:01
juries at the state and county level? Yes, we have. In fact, we worked for quite a while with

1303
2:30:02 --> 2:30:09
Dr. Ely out in Washington. Oh, I'm in a group with him. I'm on his team. So we've worked with a number

1304
2:30:09 --> 2:30:17
of people who have been trying to impanel similar organizations. And what we have found is that the

1305
2:30:17 --> 2:30:26
traction that we're getting is to have sheriffs and DAs who are at least sympathetic so that the

1306
2:30:26 --> 2:30:33
grand jury has the courage to move forward. And so, John, we're big fans of the grand jury

1307
2:30:34 --> 2:30:39
approach, but we want to make sure that the ecosystem is prepared so that we have the

1308
2:30:39 --> 2:30:47
ability to bring a credible law enforcement response to the outcome. We don't want to have

1309
2:30:47 --> 2:30:54
people spinning their tires on getting to a point where they have achieved a Pyrrhic victory in

1310
2:30:55 --> 2:31:00
identifying the problem, but not having a jurisdiction willing to do anything about it.

1311
2:31:00 --> 2:31:02
And that's the reason why we're doing this in tandem now.

1312
2:31:04 --> 2:31:10
Thank you, David. Thank you, John. Great question. We're tied for time. Janet and then Glenn.

1313
2:31:16 --> 2:31:17
You muted, Janet.

1314
2:31:20 --> 2:31:28
Janet. Sorry. Yeah. Yes. Three quick questions. If SARS-CoV-2 exists and was a released pathogen,

1315
2:31:29 --> 2:31:34
how do you think it was disseminated and transmitted around the world into different

1316
2:31:34 --> 2:31:40
populations in geographically distinct areas that does not, on the face of it, appear to be a

1317
2:31:40 --> 2:31:47
plausible mechanism? Number two, if attorneys general are refusing to prosecute the criminals,

1318
2:31:47 --> 2:31:53
what is the source of the coercion over the attorneys general to prevent them doing their jobs?

1319
2:31:53 --> 2:32:01
Number three, is Snowden a spy? Well, let's start in reverse order. Snowden, yes, he is a spy, and

1320
2:32:02 --> 2:32:09
there's a lot of people who are, and as he has been trained in spycraft and his associations have

1321
2:32:09 --> 2:32:16
been trained in spycraft, there's no question that using a classic definition of involved in

1322
2:32:16 --> 2:32:23
espionage, he is very much involved in espionage. What he also is, is an opportunist who saw an

1323
2:32:23 --> 2:32:31
opportunity to make sure that he ensured his future and thus did what he chose to do, which

1324
2:32:31 --> 2:32:37
is to hold the American citizens and the American government hostage by taking information that would

1325
2:32:37 --> 2:32:46
achieve both objectives, and he pulled it off. So no question. On the second question,

1326
2:32:46 --> 2:32:55
um refresh me, I'm sorry, I just, I just lost it. If attorneys general are refusing to prosecute,

1327
2:32:55 --> 2:33:03
what's the source of the coercion to stop them? Yeah, so that's very simple. In the United States,

1328
2:33:03 --> 2:33:09
the attorney general moniker means almost governor, and metaphorically and actually,

1329
2:33:10 --> 2:33:16
attorneys general are political, not judicial, uh oriented people, and if you look at most state

1330
2:33:16 --> 2:33:24
statutes, most states do not in, in involve the attorney general at the criminal prosecutorial

1331
2:33:24 --> 2:33:31
powers that most people think they have. Most of those actions are essentially, um, think of them

1332
2:33:31 --> 2:33:38
as general counsel to a corporation rather than law enforcement per se, and we need to understand

1333
2:33:38 --> 2:33:46
that attorneys general are less likely to pursue criminal acts than our district attorneys or US

1334
2:33:46 --> 2:33:54
attorneys or others. So AGs are relatively pointless, and because their futures are largely

1335
2:33:54 --> 2:34:00
linked to political aspiration, they are unwilling to do anything that is not popular, therefore,

1336
2:34:00 --> 2:34:05
making the popularity question a, an extremely important thing, and that's the hearts and minds

1337
2:34:05 --> 2:34:10
comment that John made before. We have to get hearts and minds alongside, so it's politically

1338
2:34:10 --> 2:34:17
expedient to do that. Um, and then your first question. Yeah, the first question was, was if

1339
2:34:17 --> 2:34:22
SARS-CoV-2 exists and was released, how was it disseminated and transmitted? Yeah, so if you go

1340
2:34:22 --> 2:34:29
back to 2016 and you look at a very interesting map of the alleged hot spots of where bat caves

1341
2:34:29 --> 2:34:35
allegedly had coronavirus circulating that was likely to escape, you find quite mysteriously the

1342
2:34:35 --> 2:34:45
bat cave origin story started, are you ready with this, in northern Italy, okay, in New York City,

1343
2:34:45 --> 2:34:51
where we see tons of bat caves in Marvel comics, in Seattle, Washington, which is another place

1344
2:34:51 --> 2:35:00
we've seen tons and tons of bat caves everywhere, in Guangzhou, uh, China, in areas around Hong Kong,

1345
2:35:00 --> 2:35:10
and mysteriously every single place that 2016, every single place where in 2016 we were told

1346
2:35:11 --> 2:35:20
there was a high risk of an outbreak of, of, um, uh, coronavirus outbreak because of this

1347
2:35:20 --> 2:35:28
interspecies transfer, every single place happened to coordinate perfectly, according to Columbia

1348
2:35:28 --> 2:35:33
University's Earth Institute, which is the ones who published the map of where coronavirus was

1349
2:35:33 --> 2:35:38
going to happen, exactly every place they said it was going to happen is exactly where every patient

1350
2:35:38 --> 2:35:46
allegedly started. That means that in 2016 we had the distribution roadmap and in all likelihood it

1351
2:35:46 --> 2:35:53
involved water and physical distribution of the pathogen through both aerosolized and non-aerosolized

1352
2:35:53 --> 2:36:01
means and because we know that there was a absolute concordance between the 2016 map of

1353
2:36:01 --> 2:36:06
where the outbreak was going to happen to the actual outbreak that allegedly did happen,

1354
2:36:07 --> 2:36:13
we know that the release, not accidental transmission, was the mode of operation.

1355
2:36:13 --> 2:36:18
And Glenn, you get the last question. So you're saying it sprayed around, someone went around?

1356
2:36:18 --> 2:36:26
I'm saying it was literally, I'm saying that the agent that was causing people illness was

1357
2:36:26 --> 2:36:33
disseminated and distributed and it was probably done through waterborne and airborne vectors.

1358
2:36:34 --> 2:36:37
Thank you, Janet. Glenn, last question and then we're going to go.

1359
2:36:38 --> 2:36:44
Thank you, David. Thank you, David. The world is bowing to the waste of your decency and intelligence

1360
2:36:44 --> 2:36:50
along with Judy Michaelvitz. Eight billion people will one day be grateful to your genius and

1361
2:36:51 --> 2:36:54
generosity and ethics. Just quickly on to Janet's question.

1362
2:36:55 --> 2:37:03
Glenn. Hi. So I appreciate a variety of the things you brought forward, especially some of the

1363
2:37:03 --> 2:37:10
clarity, your use of the laudable and plausible actions and precision of language. My position is

1364
2:37:11 --> 2:37:15
I've been working with a group, a number of people in this group have been part of my team

1365
2:37:15 --> 2:37:23
and I view it that a role that I take on is to try to deliver the complex elements to 85% of the

1366
2:37:23 --> 2:37:30
public, that so much of the data is swarming them and drowning them, that I try to bring things I

1367
2:37:30 --> 2:37:36
think can sit into what I'd call the red pill 101. As part of that, I work directly with

1368
2:37:36 --> 2:37:42
the Satchelarpova and Catherine Watt to bring forward their story and to try to get that

1369
2:37:42 --> 2:37:50
message out and in the public eye. There is a problem with it in that so far we do not yet have

1370
2:37:50 --> 2:37:57
the language, the precision of language where people are picking up on the fact that the

1371
2:37:58 --> 2:38:06
entire vaccine program has not been delivered by Pfizer and FDA, but it has been delivered by

1372
2:38:07 --> 2:38:18
the DOD and the countermeasures segments and Vardar. So far, even with all of us piping up

1373
2:38:18 --> 2:38:28
about this at a routine basis for the last 8 to 12 weeks, still not a single legislator in Congress

1374
2:38:28 --> 2:38:38
is using that phraseology that we can't stop the vaccine because the FDA has no authority to,

1375
2:38:38 --> 2:38:45
that only the DOD and the HHS secretary has that authority and no one is pointing at that

1376
2:38:45 --> 2:38:52
direction or even using the phrase the DOD vaccine or DOD countermeasure in a routine way.

1377
2:38:53 --> 2:38:59
So I was wondering if you have thought through that vocabulary and is there a suggestion you have

1378
2:38:59 --> 2:39:06
that everyone should start using including all of our doctors and all of our legislators in Congress?

1379
2:39:06 --> 2:39:11
Well, yeah. What I have encouraged and Zev Zelenko and I worked very tirelessly to try to get

1380
2:39:12 --> 2:39:17
as many people as possible to use the term bioweapon because we actually were tired of

1381
2:39:17 --> 2:39:21
hearing people debate on whether it was a virus or not or this or that or the other thing. The

1382
2:39:21 --> 2:39:27
fact of the matter is there was an engineered agent that was distributed to people for active

1383
2:39:27 --> 2:39:33
harm and killing. I do not use the word vaccine because it is absolutely not the appropriate term.

1384
2:39:33 --> 2:39:39
I use the term injection and bioweapon. That is a choice that I have made to make sure that I don't

1385
2:39:40 --> 2:39:46
infer that there is even a question around that. Christiana Shackelford with Real Reactions,

1386
2:39:47 --> 2:39:52
if you are not familiar with her work, you ought to be. Formerly part of the intelligence community

1387
2:39:52 --> 2:39:58
and Department of Defense, now one of the most active people in the world in trying to highlight

1388
2:39:58 --> 2:40:03
issues like this. She and I have worked together for years with the Secretary of Defense and others

1389
2:40:03 --> 2:40:09
to try to raise awareness around this. If you go to realreactions.org, you can find out an enormous

1390
2:40:09 --> 2:40:14
amount of the work that she and I have been doing over the last considerable amount of time. She

1391
2:40:14 --> 2:40:21
hosted a Twitter space with me just two nights ago that was extremely well attended. We have a

1392
2:40:21 --> 2:40:25
number of people who are working on that and I would highly recommend that if you are interested,

1393
2:40:25 --> 2:40:32
Christiana Shackelford is in my mind the point of the spear on addressing the fact that this is a

1394
2:40:32 --> 2:40:37
Department of Defense issue that needs to be addressed as such. I would encourage you

1395
2:40:39 --> 2:40:42
to put her on your radar screen if you do not already have her.

1396
2:40:43 --> 2:40:51
Okay, and one other question and that is relating to Whitney Webb who has spotlighted many of the

1397
2:40:51 --> 2:40:56
things you have described today and part of her theme is it is not clear we can actually win

1398
2:40:56 --> 2:41:02
against them. Until we do, we need to be going into protective mode and one way to do that is to go

1399
2:41:02 --> 2:41:10
local and to go offline. I was wondering if you would endorse that theme for the vast majority of

1400
2:41:10 --> 2:41:16
the public to at least get them working towards something that they can be protective and at

1401
2:41:16 --> 2:41:25
least shielded somewhat from the attacks in the storm. Glenn, I can only answer for myself.

1402
2:41:26 --> 2:41:32
I think that I am doing exactly what I was here to do and I think it involves being in the middle

1403
2:41:32 --> 2:41:41
of the storm. I suspect that somewhere on some part of my anatomy is the use by date

1404
2:41:41 --> 2:41:46
and when that expiration comes, it will be old milk, it will smell bad and they will pour it out.

1405
2:41:46 --> 2:41:52
And between now and then, I am pretty sure that I am doing exactly what I am doing and I think

1406
2:41:52 --> 2:41:58
that we need to be focused on the fact that humanity is the sum of us, not the constituent

1407
2:41:58 --> 2:42:05
individuals of us. That means that we need to be in the fray, we need to be working together and

1408
2:42:05 --> 2:42:10
as many of us as possible need to actually take positions on the line because if we don't,

1409
2:42:12 --> 2:42:21
I think the moment we see ground to any of this campaign of terror and that includes isolation

1410
2:42:21 --> 2:42:27
and that includes retrenchment, then I think that the other side is one and we have lost.

1411
2:42:28 --> 2:42:31
I am about staying in the fight and that does not mean anybody else needs to,

1412
2:42:32 --> 2:42:37
but I know that the only way I get off this field is carried out on a shield.

1413
2:42:37 --> 2:42:42
That is the only way I get off this field. One last question on the time table.

1414
2:42:43 --> 2:42:50
Transhumanism, is that a worry? Not in the least. Transhumanism,

1415
2:42:50 --> 2:42:55
we haven't figured out what it means to be human. There is a long way between figuring out what it

1416
2:42:55 --> 2:43:03
means to be human and getting to trans anything. We do not have a worry as long as we are not

1417
2:43:03 --> 2:43:10
addicted to the enslavement of the digital world that is being served up. We will not be slaves

1418
2:43:10 --> 2:43:16
to something that we don't put our own shackles on and the easiest way to deal with transhumanism

1419
2:43:16 --> 2:43:21
is to say no. That's it. Good. Thank you, Glenn. So final,

1420
2:43:22 --> 2:43:29
final, Stephen, no series of questions. Please thank David, I do, but Stephen always is the

1421
2:43:29 --> 2:43:33
last word, David. All right, Stephen, last word.

1422
2:43:35 --> 2:43:45
So on the transhumanism, David, you say that we shouldn't go with that, well, we don't,

1423
2:43:45 --> 2:43:50
but what about the people who are going along with that and don't realize what is going on?

1424
2:43:50 --> 2:43:53
So how do we get them to say no? That's the problem.

1425
2:43:53 --> 2:43:59
Yeah, well, here's the thing. I learned a very long time ago, I had the great opportunity to

1426
2:43:59 --> 2:44:07
deal with a person who was in my life for a couple of decades who dealt with depression.

1427
2:44:08 --> 2:44:13
And I made the mistake as a young person thinking that I was the solution to their problem.

1428
2:44:13 --> 2:44:18
And somehow, if I just put enough time and energy and love and compassion into that,

1429
2:44:18 --> 2:44:23
that somehow or another just the osmosis of being around my goodness was going to solve their

1430
2:44:23 --> 2:44:24
problem. Yeah.

1431
2:44:24 --> 2:44:27
And guess what? It didn't.

1432
2:44:27 --> 2:44:34
It didn't. My job is very clear. And I think our job collectively is very clear. Our job is to make

1433
2:44:34 --> 2:44:40
sure that ignorance arbitrage does not harm anyone. And that means very specifically,

1434
2:44:40 --> 2:44:47
our job is to communicate as effectively and as broadly as possible. But I have long ago given up

1435
2:44:47 --> 2:44:55
on the idea of convincing people because the fact is that facts have never in the history of

1436
2:44:55 --> 2:45:00
humanity, it's ever overcome belief. And this is not going to be the first time that happens.

1437
2:45:01 --> 2:45:08
This is a world in which perspective is defined. And this goes to Daniel's comment that I'll close

1438
2:45:08 --> 2:45:19
on. Perspective, the observer and the observed operate as a trinity. And they form the chord

1439
2:45:19 --> 2:45:24
on which the notion of perception will even occur. Forget facts, even perception.

1440
2:45:25 --> 2:45:32
And until we have a coherent view of the observed, the observer, and the context,

1441
2:45:33 --> 2:45:40
we cannot achieve anything other than the noise of spewing information into the wind.

1442
2:45:41 --> 2:45:49
And our job is to actually try to diversify our context, to diversify the observations,

1443
2:45:49 --> 2:45:56
and to diversify the observed so that as many people as possible can achieve the opportunity

1444
2:45:56 --> 2:46:03
to have access to information. But at the end of the day, the determination of accepting that

1445
2:46:03 --> 2:46:08
information is purely based on the context of the observer. And it is not something that can be

1446
2:46:08 --> 2:46:15
forced on anyone for any reason. No, but we can influence maybe. So for example, if we can

1447
2:46:15 --> 2:46:21
convince the populations around the world that there was no pandemic, in my view, there was no

1448
2:46:21 --> 2:46:28
disease called COVID-19, no new disease, and it's likely that there was no virus in the sense that

1449
2:46:28 --> 2:46:36
you can isolate it. As you said, it's a computer model. So the whole thing was a fraud, in my view.

1450
2:46:37 --> 2:46:45
People do understand fraud. So they think there's been a pandemic. One of the questions that's said

1451
2:46:45 --> 2:46:54
is, there's been a pandemic, or use the word pandemic. So do we just do nothing to, how should

1452
2:46:54 --> 2:47:00
I say, to convince people there's been a fraud? So if we say there's no pandemic, do you understand

1453
2:47:00 --> 2:47:07
what I mean? Is it totally useless trying to educate people? Well, no. I mean, like I said,

1454
2:47:07 --> 2:47:13
ignorance arbitrage has been the currency of power systems for a very long time. The selective use

1455
2:47:13 --> 2:47:18
of language, the selective use of information, the selective use of all sorts of things has been

1456
2:47:18 --> 2:47:24
extremely, extremely important. But for example, in the last couple of questions, the question of

1457
2:47:24 --> 2:47:32
transhumanism is a wonderful example. We're using a term around which there is zero, and I mean zero

1458
2:47:32 --> 2:47:39
concordance about what it actually means. Is it AI? Is it synthetic? Is it what? What is it? And the

1459
2:47:39 --> 2:47:44
fact of the matter is everybody using the term pretends to be talking about the same language,

1460
2:47:45 --> 2:47:51
and nobody agrees on the common framework under which that term is being used. So the reason why

1461
2:47:51 --> 2:47:56
I don't engage it is not because I'm indifferent towards it. I don't engage it because I don't

1462
2:47:56 --> 2:48:04
fear something that is an illusion. The illusion that we modified plants with, are you ready for

1463
2:48:04 --> 2:48:15
this? GMO plants, if we go back to 1904 and we look at Japanese documents, we know that we were

1464
2:48:15 --> 2:48:24
informed that by using Bacillus thuringiensis, we were going to destroy the GI systems of any person

1465
2:48:24 --> 2:48:34
exposed to BT toxin. That was in 1904 in Japanese literature. The reason why that was never introduced

1466
2:48:34 --> 2:48:41
when we were talking about BT crops in the 60s and 70s is because Americans decided not to read

1467
2:48:41 --> 2:48:51
Japanese. That's it. So the reason why we have now 40 years of gastrointestinal crisis in this country

1468
2:48:51 --> 2:48:57
is because we decided that Japanese as a language was not readable, and therefore we decided not to

1469
2:48:57 --> 2:49:05
take into account documents in 1904 that said if you put BT toxin into any system, what you're going

1470
2:49:05 --> 2:49:12
to wind up is destroying the GI system. Now what's my point? My point is that we don't even do a good

1471
2:49:12 --> 2:49:19
job using the same language. God forbid if we have multiple languages. Exactly. And so the point here

1472
2:49:19 --> 2:49:25
is this. If people want to get dogmatic about their particular terminology or whatever else,

1473
2:49:26 --> 2:49:33
that's perfectly fine. I will tell you the reason I use the language I use and whether it's

1474
2:49:33 --> 2:49:40
appreciated or not is irrelevant to me. I use the language I use because I am pursuing legal action

1475
2:49:40 --> 2:49:47
where statutory definitions matter. And if I'm going to use a statutory definition

1476
2:49:47 --> 2:49:54
and I'm going to have a public comment, they are going to match. And whether somebody likes it or not

1477
2:49:54 --> 2:50:00
is absolutely immaterial to me because what I know is that across the last four years I have not had

1478
2:50:00 --> 2:50:09
to recite or rescind a single statement I have made because I have paid the attention to the fact

1479
2:50:09 --> 2:50:15
and a simple fact. You have so that I'm going to continue to focus on the crime at hand.

1480
2:50:16 --> 2:50:21
Unmute Stephen. We've got to go. Last question. Last please thank David. We haven't got time to

1481
2:50:21 --> 2:50:28
keep going on this. Stephen, unmute yourself. Hey everybody. It's lovely to catch up with you

1482
2:50:28 --> 2:50:35
and I look forward to many, many interactions in the future. David, you cause a brilliant command

1483
2:50:35 --> 2:50:40
of the English language and that's why you're so successful in what you've done tonight and what

1484
2:50:41 --> 2:50:45
you have been doing. You have a wonderful command of the English language and I really like the

1485
2:50:45 --> 2:50:51
English language and you also have amazing clarity of thought and you're incredibly articulate.

1486
2:50:53 --> 2:50:58
So thank you Stephen. Thank you David everybody. Thank you. Good night. Take care. Good afternoon.

1487
2:50:58 --> 2:51:02
Good evening. Thank you so much David. Bye. Please keep in touch.

1488
2:51:02 --> 2:51:05
Thank you so much David. Bye. Please keep in touch.

1489
2:51:08 --> 2:51:13
Thanks everybody. I'll give you one minute to put last messages in. I'll send this chat through to

1490
2:51:14 --> 2:51:20
David. If you want to say nice things to him, any resources you want to put in him. One minute

1491
2:51:20 --> 2:51:28
you've got to put it in the chat. Remember any names you want to add to the invite list,

1492
2:51:28 --> 2:51:34
put them in the chat as well. Chuck and Frosty. I love it. Sammy DeBay.

1493
2:51:37 --> 2:51:41
Stephen the Frost. The man who's frostbitten in Wales.

1494
2:51:44 --> 2:51:45
David Martin.