And welcome to today's meeting of Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International, different to
Doctors for COVID Ethics, two different groups. This is the former. This group was founded by
Dr. Stephen Frost over three years ago with a desire to pursue truth, ethics, justice,
freedom and health. Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been
a whistleblower and activist. His medical specialty is radiology. Now, this time we
remember Rainer Fulmick, German US lawyer who's been held in unlawfully in German jail since
October of last year and undergoing a show trial in Germany. There is a demonstration on Saturday,
November the 30th, 2024 in Geneva in Switzerland protesting against the treatment of Rainer Fulmick.
And please spread the message. Rainer is a warrior for truth, ethics, justice, freedom and
health. And we also remember now and we send our prayers to Anna de Buissere, another freedom
warrior, lawyer who's got some significant health problems. And any of you who can do anything to
help Anna who's in the UK, well certainly send your prayers. Prayers are powerful. I'm Charles
Covess, the moderator of this group. I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years
ago. And over the last 14 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for
vaccine damage and damage from bad medical advice. Bad medical advice is now the number one killer
in the US. Used to be the third biggest killer behind heart problems and cancer. I'm also the
chief executive of an industrial hemp company. We comprise lots of professions here and we're
from all around the world. Many of us thought that vaccines were okay. Now many of us proudly
say we are passionate anti-vaxxers. Anybody who pushes a vaccine these days with the evidence
that's come out from Stanley, Plotkin and anybody else is now criminally negligent or deliberately
negligent. In fact, not to the word I'm looking for is more than negligent. It's outrageous. The
evidence is absolutely clear. No vaccine ever in history has been properly tested for safety and
efficacy, let alone COVID jabs that are called vaccines that are not vaccines at all. If I am a
passionate anti-vaxxer, if you call me a passionate, if you call me an anti-vaxxer, I will take that
as a badge of honor. And I think all of us should do as well. And I refer you to a website,
inform-me.org set up by Australians as an education site for ordinary people around the world to
properly learn about vaccines and the fraud that they have, that they are. If this is your first
time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat and where you're from. If
you publish anything that you'd like to promote, put that in the chat. Most of us understand we're
in the middle of World War III and that the medical science battle is only one of 12 battle
fronts of the latest world war. Another battlefront is the spiritual war between good and evil.
And Archbishop Vigano's statement issued on the 8th of November after the Trump election victory
is a very powerful message. I urge you all to read that statement. It can be found at Jerome
Corsi's website, godsfivestones.com. There's no time to be tired. I assess we're four and a half
years into a seven year war, maybe a six year war. Maybe we've only got one and a half years to go,
but look after your health and be up for the fight. I certainly am. Stephen Frost is,
I'm sure Astrid, our speaker today is. Most of us understand the development of science and that
the science is never settled. Anyone who tells you the science is settled, as Michael Crichton
famously said, reach for your wallet. The meeting runs for two and a half hours, after which for
those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting. Tom puts the links into the
chat if you're able to join. We will listen to our guest presenters today, Dr. Astrid Stuckeberger,
for as long as Astrid wishes to speak. Could be 15 minutes. It could be an hour and a half,
whatever you want Astrid. We are going to be listening to you intently. Then we have
Q&A. Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asks the first questions for 15 minutes. This is
a free speech environment with appropriate moderating. Free speech is crucially important
in our fight to preserve our human freedoms. If you're offended by anything, be offended. We are
lovingly not interested. We reject the offence industry that requires nobody to say anything
that may offend another. We reject the triggering industry. And just recently I've had people asking
me, I've been told by my staff that I shouldn't be saying that. Right? This is younger staff to
older people saying, you shouldn't be saying that Astrid, Marv, you shouldn't be saying that. That's
another form of censorship everybody. Don't get sucked into it. It's not proper to say that. Don't
get sucked into it. However, we come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear. Fear
is the opposite of love. Fear squashes you and imprisons you. Love on the other hand expands you,
liberates you. These twice weekly meetings are not just talk fests. An extraordinary range of actions
and initiatives have been generated from linkages made by attendees in these meetings. If you have a
solution or a product or links or resources that will help people put the details into the chat,
for example, yesterday I was at an expo and I was exposed to an amazing electronic healing mechanism
that ties in beautifully with Robert O. Young told us two weeks ago that it's not sugar that gives
us energy but electrons. Your body is electric. You know, we are an energy event and you start
to go, wow, that really blew my mind. And yesterday I was on literally an energy charging pad
with copper coils. I will give you the link of it. Some of you may well have experienced this,
another vibrational energizing tool, device made in Switzerland. No, I think designed in Switzerland,
made in Germany. We'll talk about it if we get a chance. But you think about your energy. You know,
we find out this information and go, wow. So keep your mind open. The science is never
settled. The meeting is recorded and is uploaded on the Rumble channel. And now welcome
to our guest presenter Astrid Stuckeberger, PhD. Thank you Astrid for giving us your time. I want
to, for those who didn't receive the invitation for the purposes of the recording, give a little
bit about a bit of background about you, excerpts from your amazing biography. Astrid is an MSc,
Master of Science, a PhD and a PD. She's an international health scientist conducting
and directing research from clinical to epidemiological studies onto science for
policymakers for the past 30 years. She worked with the World Health Organization, Mental Health
Division in her early career, where she conducted secondary analysis of international collaborative
study on cross-cultural diagnosis, with which she obtained a Master of Science at the University of
Geneva. She worked at the University Hospital of Geneva during the 90s. She was Deputy Director of
both the Swiss Research Program on Aging and Deputy Director for the first Interdisciplinary
Research Centre on Gerontology in Switzerland. She obtained a PhD in Public Health. How many books
have you written Astrid? About 10, 12. Depends how you count and I have five on the line, but
I'm so censored I don't even think about publishing them. Nicely, that's beautiful. You
have been censored, you have been squashed, but we can get your books published through Jerome Corsi
and you have been shut down and we are delighted to have you and Astrid has been a
has been a speaker for the Freedom and True Health Movement since this COVID scam started.
So Astrid, you can share your screen if you wish. Welcome, wonderful to have you.
Thank you so much for the introduction, a marvelous introduction.
Yeah, I'm wait, just want to, can you see it? Yes we can. Great, in order to see everything,
if I can keep it like that, is it okay for you? Absolutely. Okay, great. Yeah, so yeah, thank you.
It's always a pleasure to share when there are many people and you know, you don't repeat all
the time. I have made so many presentations public where I tried to be very professional
on the, from 2020, end of 21, 22. I started to think, okay, I have to show I'm professional
and I'm going to do like I always did. I mean, I'm not new to do conferences and public health
yeah, matters and talk with policymakers. So I thought, okay, and now I don't know who is there
exactly and who has seen my presentation before. So I kind of synthesized in four parts this
presentation telling you one important thing is that I'm trying now more and more, because now
we have four years. I mean, I can build a new CV because it's changed so much that we have all
changed our route or our path because we have been censored or my lectures were censored in
even Vanderbilt University censored me in a study abroad course I have since 15 years with American
best schools in Geneva on global health and human rights and development. So the course now,
another course and I'm an expert also on many tribunals as you know, witnessed but also having
written papers for Quebec since 2021 and then with the grand jury of Rainer Plumich then with the
Oslo tour team and that was the tribunal because I'm half Norwegian with the tribunal of Norway,
which was very revealing the way it went, but maybe we haven't talked about it.
Then with Finland, with Greece, with France, I wrote a report very early on in September 21
to say how dangerous the experimental vaccine was with the ethical part, with the data part on the
disease and you know what is in there. So I'm going to try and share the best of the knowledge
I have today. As you say, science is not written in stone and we should not. Humility for me is a
key factor of collaboration and there are many in the circuit who are working and who are so arrogant
that they are actually disclosing really who they are just by being so with really complete
humility I do that and I have thought of yes because you have the word ethics and I must say
ethics has been very dear to me since the beginning. I'm also on a spiritual path and when I
joined the United Nations, I looked for where is ethics in the United Nations and in WHO,
I was part of the ethics research committee for two terms, four years and as an independent expert
and I have a letter from Margaret Chan and even the Korean director general who was probably
murdered, he didn't finish his term, but so I have the ethical research perspective and I will share
here some of that and I did collaboration with them and but otherwise in the whole United Nations
system I want to share that from the beginning because I'm going to go global. Why? Because
you are we are at the middle of something fundamental with the United States you know
election of Trump and his team, he said he would dismantle the United Nations and he would leave
WHO like he already did. So I think and the more I talk and we share the more I see that
many people talk about WHO or the UN but they don't know anything about it and not being a
lawyer but knowing the mechanism of human rights I can help lawyers and I have done this and I will
also share that. So yeah so I wanted to say about ethics as an introduction that in the whole United
Nations system only WHO has an ethics research committee which was totally absent from the
international research on the experimental vaccine. So already there you have a fraud on ethics.
Then you have in the international labor office ILO which is in Geneva, I've worked with them too,
I bring students I was bringing a lot of American students there to visit and
and have lectures there and ILO has a Jesuit position for the director general as advisor.
So this is very interesting for you to know. So in ethics there is also a very small they call it
ethics office in the headquarters in New York apparently it's only they I was told don't even
bother Astrid it's only for when there is a problem with employees because there is a big
problem in the United Nations who is the boss of the boss and it is a huge problem and we will talk
about that. So on the ethical side the one cursor is a religious position of a Jesuit and you know
that the the fake pope is Jesuit and it has been a big battle against the Black Jesuits. Anyway so
I looked into religion and with religious leaders I have been doing inter-religious
I have a spiritual inter-religious TV I can share one day but it's very interesting. Geneva also hosts
the world council of churches so we did events there I was visiting the often the doctor in
charge of the world council churches on medical issues and it's really you know you have the
Catholics who have a seat at the United Nations the holy see is considered the Vatican city is
considered as government so they have what they call an observer seat in the United Nations but in
fact they they correct text and they intervene all the time and I've seen that on women's rights which
I was also an activist on that and on the rights of old people also but anyway so you see that
ethics I always make a triangle ethics can be on the top because it has something rather pure
because you have to discuss and we have to find what is good and not bad what is not harmful
what the person has to keep their autonomy the you know the right to choice of choice and the
justice is very important also that everybody has the the right to a fair trial like not like Reiner
or to have respected rights but that's the general really very general approach to
ethics I always put it on the top and we will develop that but on the left and on the right I
have a graphic I use for students I put human rights on the left down and I put law on on the
on the right and law I have to say that law has hard law and soft law and in the United
Nations it's the same there is obligatory law hard law like the international health regulation
and then you have soft law and human rights is considered a bit like a soft law because you don't
have a mechanism to punish the punishment system in the United Nations is blame game at the office
on the commission of human rights so I just want to make this clear that there are ethics is very
important but it's both in in in law it should be and in human rights and I think it's a very
important discussion in the future you know to disentangle and and construct a better world
when we will dismantle the United Nations so here I have the first I start now with WHO just
explaining what should have happened and the second in B what did not happen and what went wrong
you know from the beginning to the end they never applied and violated their own law and their own
epidemiological system that I was teaching and I was an instructional designer and then trainer
for the international health regulation implementation course for with University
of Georgia Georgetown and Pretoria so then we will go to the global policy level and then
what can we do the legal illegality of global decisions so you where I see a huge problem not
only me but when I was in the United Nations I organized two or three huge events like the
United Nations Open Day I got a prize award for that because it was about aging and I was one of
the choice for politicians in the United Nations so I can understand and help to see you know
where it goes wrong and I hope I can bring some light on that so I will start first with a graphic
I have developed over time to find a sense of coherence you know like we do in epidemiology we
do timelines at the beginning I had many different boxes and just before I put 2022 and 2022 2024 in
the same box because it is all it's all keeping on the same the same rhetoric the same narrative
and the same tyranny so for me the sense of coherence is very clear today that they needed
fear to impose in emergency a law but fear and the fear communication is totally against the ethical
international health regulation communication that we were teaching with CNN anchor Catherine
Fague so we designed that you know and communication the first thing is you don't create fear
because if you create fear you create panic in the population then you create a double problem
triple problem military people know that when they're for the good but here it was really clear to me
that if there was a very evil agenda and the intentional intentional decision to communicate
fear by the image by the words by the fake everything never giving details so for me
that's why I say phase one is fear and they used a virus photoshopped because it's always the same
image and this it is with the biggest scam for me because in the international health regulation
you have to go into details before saying it's a virus and it takes it can take months and months
before really proving that what it is is this it's not something else especially with so many
symptomatology and with a wrong PCR test for diagnostics so the 2020 was the operation
create fear and oblige people to believe in a pandemic a pandemic is not something in WHO that
can just be decided lightly before there were six stages when I was there there were six stages
until you can really say it's a pandemic and WHO could not say it because they were sued in H1N1
by a former Russian country from the east I don't know it's Tajikistan who said we bought
so many tummy flu that we're going to we sue WHO for declaring a pandemic and forcing us in a way
to buy all those treatments that we have to put in the garbage so you see how important it is that
the word they used I was shocked because it takes a lot of guts to say it after one month two months
you know and then of course the infodemic the the the narrative was always the same
from from you know China to Frankfurt in the airport where I was in you know coming back from
Korea to Geneva to anywhere I went it's the same narrative globally so this for me was clear that
it is it is global a global strategy of communication a global strategy of certain fake
science and it's a multi-level crime because they needed that and to to make sure that the whole
public health the global population was sick or even if they're healthy would would even fear
that they are sick without knowing they found this PCR test and I think this is if I can stop
on that for a minute I am an expert on PCR not only in the grand jury of Reiner-Filmi-Schmidt
in Finland I made six pages very synthetic on to prove that it's all wrong but it is the same
algorithm I like to find algorithms otherwise it's a mess so PCR like Kari Muhle said the
Nobel Prize for PCR is a tool for research in a lab when you know what you're looking for
not a diagnostic he said it from the beginning to Fauci even before you know what they call
COVID and we'll come back to that so this this PCR is in a lab and should stay in the lab just
for doing research what they manage to do is to design a tool that where they use this amplification
cycle and they say oh no but we know what we're doing and they managed to sell that in the public
domain to force people to get it and this is not validated it's it's never been validated it's
probably Drosten and Tedros that's what Reiner-Filmi-Schmidt came up with and he sued them
at the very beginning that Drosten from the Charité hospital who has a fake PhD
is not a doctor he and Tedros Ghebreyasu the director general placed by Gavi
Bill Gates in 2016 he was on the board of Gavi before I have the papers but well they decided
that the PCR was the best tool to for the deception it's an algorithm the deception
so the lie and deception in science has been a still going on that the lab is in the public domain
but in a criminal scene the lab stays a lab and does not decide about the causality
of a crime and it is going on and on that the lab is always talking like if they are
a public health experts and they know what they're talking about when they only they are
patrocentric usually labs they're patrocentric and they are only in the lab and they don't do
practical medicine or clinical studies they just obey to someone who tells him we have an autopsy
here you should look at this because we are looking for this or that and they confirm what
they're looking for a big bias in our research science today is that people and that's why I
like Robert Young because when he analyzes things he takes all the 17 microscopes he doesn't take
just one microscope or one thing and yeah I always appreciate it to me yeah so you see if you see that
the test with it's a pandemic of tests like we many of us have said and thanks to this fake test
98 percent of fake positive false positive the statistics of the government and everything was
false the numbers were totally false because the test is false so when you see the curve
of the illnesses it's actually the curve of the fake tests of pcr you have to you know it's always
good to go back to the the the basics because still today people talk of covid and it has never been
proven it is a virus because they never respected the protocol of co and the protocol of co that we
had in the in who is international health regulation is that it's when you suspect a
bacteria or a parasite or a virus you you take the protocol of co and you have four elements I don't
know probably some people I'm repeating but I have to recap it's too important you have to isolate
the agent you have to purify the agent take a picture take pictures and we don't see any
pictures and even there are many who who claim where are the pictures and nobody because it could
be microzima or another and that's what we debate with robert young and others and duff nixon and
others but um so purify isolate purify and then that's important you have to prove the causality
and the fourth the contagiosity and to prove the causality well it's very simple you isolate
that virus you re or the parasite or the bacteria bacteria is more obvious because I'm not sure about
viruses anymore uh that's even montagna at the end of his life said it's debris we we yeah he said
sorry we lied to you so he he did do a testimony privately not to me directly I'm secondhand
information yeah so the causality is important you have to first see the symptoms or the autopsy
and then you look at the cause you look at what what is the link with the causality if somebody
dies on a football match and just you know falls dead like so many have it's it's not a virus I
mean is have you ever seen an infectious disease uh create a footballer elite or olympian just
fall down and dead you know already there you know there's something wrong and and and this is it's
this whole narrative of trying to take shortcuts from the lab to a diagnostic with absolutely no
reflection on the symptoms of a flu if it was a coronavirus and I wrote an article I would show
very quickly after if it is a coronavirus it it is a flu a common flu medical handbook basics
if it is a common flu it goes away it is not deadly and it mutates the coronaviruses
are known to mutate so quickly that never anybody up to when I wrote the article in 2020 in acta
by america up to then no vaccine was ever possible because it mutates we called it the moving target
you know you're trying to you're trying to to take the target and it's already moved because
it's already changed so when they went with this terror with pcr with so many cases on coronavirus
I like to call it coronavirus because what is exactly covered they created this word instead
of saying coronavirus because there is an id in it and it is the devac it means the if you read
it obviously it apparently means a devil so there is a spiritual at all component also in there but
but um this this covet is I don't like the name the coronavirus is is the one symptomatology and
you should describe the symptomatology and then there is the strass curve one or strass curve two
and that is a genetic sequence and if you want to describe it then let's go and talk with people
who sequenced but you see the mess that happened it's such a mess that that with the fear and
emergency they managed to jump all the ethical and all the validation uh measures on and on and they
keep on doing that you know oh suddenly the mpox and it's very dangerous but it's only a makinsley
effect because makinsley is paid by who since 2016 and especially 19 and on to make the agenda
and to make the communication for who private sector infiltration a major so I have you know
some internal whistleblower who have showed me that um so text and terror public health
lockdown tyranny measures absolutely crazy uh you in international health regulation is done so you
don't lock down people because lockdown means kind of business no traveling violation of human
rights etc and they did everything you should not do with no validation I can't believe how much even
the hydrogel was never tested the masks were made in china and they have more gels they are full of
dust and not protective people were getting sick with their children in schools I mean I can take
you one step after the other every measure and I did that in my paper for Quebec it's 130 pages
in french I'll get it translated and published with Charles so anyway so I I'm not going to stay
too long on only that because I have many slides I wanted to show but already there
the fraud and the non-ethical measures not only non-ethical not legal and not justified
is is major I think at every step because the beginning is wrong everything is wrong on the way
so you see the it's like a billiard game it's a pool game it's it's it's a effect but what they
wanted and that's when I understood why they did that is that they wanted absolutely that people
absolutely that people precipitate themselves behavior-wise on the vaccine because they were
so terrified that they accepted and we know that you know in psychological study and mental health
that fear blocks all your emotion and all your reasoning so that they managed in 2020 with terror
to impose and what I didn't understand at the beginning and now it's clear to me is how did
they manage to get the whole world to bow down to a lockdown and the only explanation I got and
still at this point is that they placed or blackmailed or terrorized all the presidents
of states all the focal points of WHO the regional offices they placed you know corrupted people or
they made blackmailing I know they did it with moody in India and then they could impose the
vaccine in the work and people lost their work lost this they they were desperate families broken
down that's what they wanted with the lockdown already isolate people and and break their moral
morality you know their their ethical even yeah their spiritual life I would say almost but in
this research on vaccine what is shocking is that they use the word mRNA which doesn't make sense
I'm sorry Dr. Malamud it doesn't make sense at all that mRNA can suddenly work in three months
because it's new and it's an innovation and on top of it that it is applied on pregnant women which
had major I think it's about 90 I'm sure you invited some experts on that you know miscarriages
massive not declared no no doctor no media talks about it they're all bought in the system so the
only way for me to understand is United Nations Organization and the VHL but here we have the
clinical consent the clinical study is open air in the whole public and this is impossible it's
not a research a research is in a clinical setting 80 people you know who you have any who you're
targeting why and you don't take vulnerable people you don't take anybody who's pregnant because
you are actually intervening on life itself and then development of life so if we look at the
ethical dilemma of the vaccine that I will show you in more detail it is complete
utter fraud on ethics if we can call it like that no validation no justification and not one
in the WHO we were a committee of eight we had to you know a study about you know 20
research who wanted the WHO stamp for each session and we had a big questionnaire to fill in
and in this I can really one day I hope we can go into details with this I can show you how
everything is wrong in this acceptation of this protocol of vaccination it's it's it's up to
it's again a shortcut to impose from the private sector it's a private sector management it is not
at all an ethical scientific or philosophical or legal so we're coming down now once they did that
in 21 WHO started to produce very strange documents like genome editing and like telemedicine and id
id for vaccination and digital data and of course no privacy you know every even the restaurant
knows your status of vaccination this is a total fraud on ethics but you see from 22 on they kept
the the 2020 and 21 program mission and up to today like you you said uh Charles I was in the
pharmacy and a guy said oh I'm coming to get you know any vaccine that is available because
they are still impregnated with this collective fear that the vaccine is going to save their
anxiety and it might uh just the anxiety but not their health so we are now in an eternal pandemic
of fear because the the program mission of this uh covered program mission I would say even today
some doctors talk of the long chronic covered and I'm so upset because they they are propagating
the virus as the business that will keep on for ages if we don't stop them it's a it's it's it's
all a narrative business for me just anyway so you see the digital global the QR code
to the last general assembly they did the pact of the future and in there you have the global digital
compact so they want to impose that on everybody they're really touching life in all its form
from plants to animals with vaccine with anything they can and and to humans of course cash control
I think that's a bit more tough for them you know I you know I heard the conversation before I know
there are some specialists here and we're trouble never let that happen or then I it's not Trump
so we are in a world of standardization of shortcuts on science of very fake words
when a pandemic is not a pandemic because it is not obeying to the rules of the pandemic
track and trace everybody everybody knows where you are with AI and using of course this artificial
non-intelligence I don't like the word intelligence for that to build smart cities internet of things
internet of bodies etc and gene edit it goes from the smallest to the biggest so um yeah I've already
talked a lot but I'm going to go a bit quicker but at least you have a look and you know can take
pictures or whatever you want but so wha what should have happened according to the international
health regulation this is the booklet and let me get a bit of you know history so you you get it
better um everything is based on the management of public health risk which means risk assessment
which mean experts of the domain not it's not just the viruses it's a very small part of all
the risks that the hazards or the risks and the earlier you you intervene and the lesser the curve
so that's the principle of epidemiology and here you have a curve finished but they keep on doing
the pcr statistics that were you know fear-mongering so that was the basis of any epidemiology you have
to stop it early warning and here is an example of all the lessons of pandemic that it's a slide
we used with who I've put it under the vhr slide lecture uh so I did not put the logo but I it is
a who and so those are for example mapping of a status of something moving that you have to map
where the clusters of the outbreak are and we never saw such a map we didn't even see a timeline
just to show you that this is not not correct uh and there are many other methods just an example
now the history is very interesting the history comes from way back in the sanitary conferences
and in the superior council of health of constantinople was one of the head port
from uh turkish and from the commercial life between travel and and business between asia
europe and other countries so it is based more on the commercial life first and that they did not
want to get you know diseases but um it developed very quickly into a sanitary bureau of americas
in 1902 then in 1909 it's uh it's france who has always played a big role in this um like pastor
and etc uh office of international hygiene public hygiene that's where public health comes from
and then the first organization health organization of the league of nations that's
after the second first world war the un was formed in geneva for as a league of nation it still has
doors with the lon on it and in 1948 the world health organization is established after the
second world war and each time it gets bigger and for me it's premeditated that the world health
organization has a constitution and it is what allows it to start changing things in the
constitution of others so 1948 who uh and at the beginning not all the countries were signed and
then little by little more countries signed that's also an interesting um thing and they put the
headquarters in in new york but geneva was and is still today where there are the most agencies
most uh delegations uh and new york is more political in 1951 the vhc adopts the international
sanitary and then in 1969 it's the first international health regulation with only three
disease uh plague cholera and yellow fever and in 19 uh 2005 after striskel one that's when they
need the second one which is the international health regulation 2005 still today valid you see
and from 169 to 2005 until 2024 it's it's a big stretch um you can see there that it goes from
three disease to all public health risks and what is interesting it's and that's what i was teaching
and very careful about case studies of typologies it's tailored responses according to health system
geography points of entry of any risk you know is it by air is it an island it's by water is it a
river etc um and every country has a different health system so of course you cannot take the
same standardization global for every country it's impossible and then from control of borders to
containment at source so you stayed home people who have disease there in their country you close
the borders only of that country we did not see that it was look i have the email of fauchi 1233
from the leak uh fauchi leak and it is saying uh close the united states now it's on the 16 17th
of march 2020 so the orders came with the chinese name uh it could be somebody in chinese in america
but anyway i have the email i can i can share it with you and it seems that it is a global
diktat at the same date the whole world will close down which is impossible because it's containment
at source so they should close the chinese border then the korean then the thai etc um so this is
also not logic okay the all risk approach you don't say it's a virus right away you have to say
what wait wait a minute what is the symptom what are the symptoms this is not a disease of
kovid this is something else and you stop with this pcr which has confused even the medical
community who uses protocols has been completely uh trapped you know i give them credit but i
i'm very sorry for them that they participate to this crime really and then the last it's very
important is the respect of human rights and data protection and privacy etc etc and i was in charge
of exercises on that so we were watching the film outbreak with dusting off man of one and the
students which are adults had to write down what is violating human rights in the film outbreak
and contagion which is an awful film by the way and they had to think exercise their their
sensitivity to human rights and in outbreak there is a massive violation of human rights because
they suddenly the army takes over and we they apply the syracuse principle but it's not said
in the film and anyway so it did you see this was not respected nobody talked of the human
rights of traveler you cannot just tell to all the travelers you can't travel because you're
sick if you're not sick you can travel so they did a operation of coup d'état that is completely
against their own instrument the international health regulation that's the way it was adopted
and it's important because they tried to make adopted the same uh you know what everybody calls
a pandemic treaty but it was it's actually an international agreement they try to make the same
as ihr to pass it with article 19 and 21 of who constitution and this is where you can really see
that uh they can pass a law like this with that constitution and i kept on saying to people but
they're violating their own constitution their function is coordination it's not the rest
so one of the solution is get back to the text see the violation massive uh there's no way but
where is the police of who you see that yeah that's the constitution adopted and that's the page
where you can see that uh if un charter is responsible of who they're violating the
un charter which has the right to privacy the right to assemble you know the right to decide
for your own body etc so and and here is the mode of voting which is totally illegal
also just to show you another fraud it's the article 19 said the mode of voting is two-thirds
of member states who say yes we want this pandemic treaty the whole group of the world
is it has to obey which which means that that member states are not sovereign anymore those
representing us our sovereignty are not independent they are they are operating like
business they're not operating like real member states where who is only a coordinating agency
and they um a country says no it came lately now last year i think it's thanks to the trump
arriving that some countries started to resist anything the united nation was saying in who
yeah that's that's the the those who want they were are you know what is the difference between
69 and 2005 and how massively the human rights came uh as a dignity and the fundamental rights
uh and uh yeah here for example uh dignity human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons in the
article 3.1 and there are many health measures relating to entry of travelers article 31
uh they cannot impose anything to people uh who are traveling without a justification same with
uh treatment personal data has to be private article 45 and the vaccine status is something
that should have been private in the hands of a doctor not in the hands of of uh airplane carrier
or a restaurant or her you know whatever you can name it that's in the website where you can find
this a lot of documents but i'm going to the main thing uh i was involved and that's just show you
in the teaching uh so once they adopted hr 2005 it went into force that's expression entry into force
in 2007 from then on countries were supposed to obey to this obligation of the international health
regulation but as they don't understand epidemiology they they hired us with the
who team um from leon who are the educators trainers and and also from geneva but and i
was there between 2009 my first meeting uh with the who and uh team and until 2012 and in 2013
i also did one for who europe and the countries were supposed to have their regional offices their
epidemiological center and the uh international focal points of ihr supposed to have um understood
how to manage an emergency of international concern a public health emergency so we had
many courses very operative and uh what was incredible is that i for just to show you how much
strange things happened that i i don't have time to mention but here i need to mention
is who headquarters stopped the funding for training countries and regions even if who wanted
it so there were already people and one is bruce plotkin who came to tell me that i have no right
to teach that at the university of geneva and he was a lawyer consultant from the u.s and plotkin
is a name now i see very known i don't know where's bruce but i told him that um universities can
choose what they want to teach and he has no right to tell me what i have to teach or not teach and
and i said everybody should be should know about this that we should do a handbook i was promoting
a handbook so that people can read through it and and it was always censored they wanted to stop
countries being trained for taking care of their own country clearly so that's they they stopped
my summer course school in global health and human rights who had a whole week on international
health regulation so you see that it was already happening when uh bill gates came into who it was
2009 he did a plan of vaccine for 10 years until covid started so that is one of the
uh leaflets there it's bigger but with the course uh this is the third course uh that started in
september and went for a year online and residential and there are many topics you can see uh but very
it was very interesting and i was in charge of emergency management uh organized the teaching
and the typologies and uh communication and human rights that's the core capacities that countries
were supposed to to gather and have and you can see that ethics is in many of them because
ethical behavior is to do good and and to do your best of validation of information you have to
verify this is one of the most important thing that the response after risk assessment can be
an ethical matter as we see today with this the wrong wrong assessment there is there's been no
risk assessment really and the risk communication never fear i will show you so at each of those
points there were failures unfortunately okay and um here i want to show you that an event is the
definitions are very clear there there is always the risk of death and they don't they took of death
uh more of covet but they don't really assess autopsies so and the different
typologies are infectious biological foodborne and biological can be parasite
parasites bacteria and many other agents then chemical this has been completely overlooked
the chemical can be a toxicity that creates an infection and the same with radionuclear
and radiation and you've had robert so we all agree on that that the radiation electrocution
is maybe part of what is going on people could not breathe anymore and we are bioelectric and
they could just send a low frequency microwave impulse and and just those the most weak can
be very very hurt by this as we know with many research like so havana syndrome and all this
okay the pandemic definition also is completely wrong that's what we were teaching that it is
the amount of of deaths and of illnesses that are proven to be the causality of an agent that is the
criteria to do to say there is an epidemic and from one epidemic with many countries many countries
it has to cover the world to be a pandemic but it's never happened really uh and they they went
right to the pandemic and now they said also that any disease that crosses the border
is is a pandemic is is is a disease you don't need to have deaths anymore so tedros they did
crazy things and this is where i can understand the layers of decision making where they had to
corrupt because the whole system is is standardized in the world and hierarchical with the hr so it is
easy to say the chain of reaction of the information and of the tyranny can go right down to the people
and i can see that in the courts when i when the minister of health says no i did not decide it's
who who decided he they give they give up the real truth is that it is it was a dictatorship
it is still okay so the notification has to be done only if it has a certain algorithm and the
algorithm is dependent of this annex tool that nobody talks about because it's a bit boring so
i'm going to go fast but it is we were doing exercise with that so that people could understand
that if birds fall down uh you know are we going to say it's an epidemic and notify it is important
so this is the decision instrument on the right and it says many things but it says that four
diseases shall be notified always and strass you know is part of it then it says always those
diseases are to be alerted and then there are four questions and the four questions is is this public
health impact serious which means serious deaths and diseases assigned to this causality the question
two is is it unusual or unexpected coronavirus are not unusual so they would not have passed that
and there was no impact serious we did not have the number of deaths exactly question three is
there a risk of international spread no if you do a cluster analysis you can see where are death
people or is something unusual nothing was done with that and the fourth is there a risk of trade
travel restriction they created that it this is why hr was good for business normally but they
created the business by frauding this whole algorithm and if the answer is yes to any of the
two you have to notify the event within 24 hours that's what we were training people to do
and nothing was respected this is you know that was the questions a bit more yeah and this is the
what is on the left always a notifiable event and you see severe acute respiratory syndrome so they
had to have something with respiratory syndrome or symptom a potential notifiable event yellow
fever pulmonic plague which cholera etc and then you have to go through the algorithm so
algorithm so that today is questionable i would say and this is the shock room where normally
just to show you how concrete it is a shock room is a strategic health operation center of the vhs
i was taking my students there and it is the room there and every seat has a function and they look
at the big screen with the gfin the global information public health network with the
gis global information system and they get all those clusters information and they mount them up
account like an accountant and then they can declare something they can at least tell the public
yes we are looking at it don't worry it's only in this part of the country and not there it has not
gone on all the thousands of islands of indonesia in one night i mean it's crazy so this is the
specific operation where normally they should take the decision and this is the algorithm
and what is interesting with this is slightly was very important you have to always verify
an event make an assessment reassess again in the next country in the next airport you cannot just
assume a standard virus photoshopped that it's the same everywhere in the world i mean
i mean if you see how ridiculous it is but when when people have fear that that's how it goes yeah
and informal and efficient anyway and this is also alert response it's uh you know
epidemic intelligence they call it and it's all those graphics uh that show how you verify the
source and in the question is what evidence-based information governments informed governance
uh what data did they take who is deciding for the data where is the accountability the transparency
and the ethics in all this regulation so ethics has a big role in any of those graphics especially
with what we lived in the last four years okay so um quickly the uh oh yeah one hour okay i'll take
maybe another half an hour and then no um so now we are on the epidemiological what happened that
should not have happened under who and under the who ethics review committee but even bigger
okay we talked about definition change the research methodology is completely biased
how can you do a control trial study in the whole population you you cannot do it in in
in two months you have to do the methodology nothing worked in this methodology and it's
one of the big bias of anybody coming from a specialty that doesn't respect the scientific
expertise of the engineers the bioelectricians uh you know um people on the ground autopsy
etc and we are supposed to coordinate that in public health but the research methodology on
each of the parts we just discussed has been a big flop uh uh deception the whole way through
the multi-causality pathways and multi-outcome has not really been looked at except i would say for
those who found really the content of the vials because then we started to have a very interesting
uh new narrative of causality and not always this mnRNA spike and always the same rhetoric of the
virus uh and i think i will show you uh where i stand with that at least is in this criminal
investigation we have so many deaths today even vars has gone beyond i don't know how many times
all the deaths from vaccines of the past in your drug vigilance they have started to
censor the numbers so we have to be very vigilant ourselves but the multi-causality pathways goes
through i would say different scenario in research you do hypotheses when you don't know
but in this case i would call uh and i do call for scenarios scenario you know if if you think
it is a virus well here is a scenario of the analysis and where the fraud is and if you see
that the vials have nothing biological then it is another scenario with other experts etc etc i will
come to that but i just want to say so there is no method that is really clearly disclosed by the
pharma definitely not because they are a total conflict of interest they created the research
and they monitor the research and they monitor the results the communication and they don't pay for
the secondary effects and they are bribing the government with contracts and you wonder who is
more a criminal if it's the government or if it's the private sector how can big pharma be such a
cowboy attitude with government or are governments gaining money with that you know anyway a lot of
questions on on the on this method what is going on and of course emergency management communication
okay so uh so that's the article i wrote and i did very quickly a very simple analysis we do in
public health uh you do you compare an event with another event so i compared straskov one and
straskov two and for me it was very clear a straskov one uh went on for eight months it covered
24 countries and there were 790 deaths from straskov one they call it it was never
it was never a pandemic so how come straskov two in two months covers the whole world
only that is is is just crazy so yeah and um and people who got straskov one apparently have
immunity for more than 20 years so the question of of antibodies and immunity is also something
that was totally overlooked uh yeah and then you i need this of course uh i'll show you showed that
there is no more mortality 2020 than any other year and this is curve of the pandemic of tests
that professor raoult uh who was in the is the france is i think one of the the best top
epidemiologists in france and he showed very quickly there is no the curve the epic curve
is over it's over in september 2020 he said it's over and it's not in all the same strains coming
back and that's it uh so here you have the different strains of tests a pandemic of tests
compared to the disease and that's another study yeah and here is the scientific finding of uh
professor joannidis and he made many uh articles very good he was a very helpful because i quote
him all the time and he published in who belton which is extraordinary because the show was
promoting you know pandemic deaths and everything and and joannidis published i think it is a play
game that they would say no but you see we published him so we're not so evil uh something
like that anyway so here i put all my analysis of you know there was no reason to develop a
vaccine if there's no more death and joannidis was one of the key one is in the top nine in the world
uh in epidemiology so we can trust that and now that's the the last part the who ethics guideline
i i collaborated and found the funding to create this um case book on uh international research
which should be really used you know contribute to a case with old people for example you know
ethical dilemma sometimes and you can see everything in red but i could say almost
everything in this content of this book has been violated in the whole drama of the pandemic uh
the defining the research and the terms has not been done it was shortcuts and standardization
of care in a prodigious way uh for example yeah the word pandemic health workers where everybody
everybody could be a health worker and could give this vaccine at one point the diagnostics was the
doctor was out of the diagnostic you know he disappeared it was a tool of uh technology creates
it is the one deciding they started already then now it's ai so and then public health test
everything was wrong anyway then the issue of study design of course there is no design
in testing this experimental vaccine it was everybody no criteria of of no yes who cannot
do it who can do it which you always do in research population um selection of the sample
is very important uh to be right so fraud no conflict of interest it was always conflict of
interest harm and benefit we know now it was not safe it was inefficient and it was even harmful
so standard of care it's impossible to put a standard everywhere in the world then obligation
to inform the participant and the community of the results of a research that was a point in who in
our group that was very new because normally who was never informing about results of research
so it was a special point this has absolutely not been respected it's still today then of course
privacy and confidentiality this is a major breach in everything from an ai is a big problem
all the technology today is it just holds an enormous or enormous risk of data privacy
yeah and professional ethics anyway and the vh communication that's that's the the the slide
we were showing uh that happened with uh stars and uh with h1n1 and he said that's exactly what
we should not do is not to scare people not to say everybody's going to die this creates a total
fear it's what more precious you have in life you have to listen to people you have to show how you
you manage how you you study the cases what happens you have to have a reassurance sorry for
the type typo and say when you don't know it's very important the the clock institute said what
they made a mistake with the cucumber killer i call it it was a sharia collie they put the
foot on the cucumber for deaths in in the clinic in um in in germany in the cork institute and
and they they said it is the the cucumber everybody stopped to buy cucumbers so the spanish
and the peasants who were selling the agriculture went into a big loss of financial loss
and when they call it to come back and said oh no we made a mistake it's it's a grain it's a
fenugreek in in egypt who created it on the market where there were also uh cucumber the whole thing
reversed and the the agriculturist dude um called institute and they won they got subventions and
they got the money back from the european union so this is an extremely interesting case because
they made a mistake they said sorry and they got trust again and it was at that time you know
respected institute not anymore okay and uh just to show you in the timeline of wh show what is
going on now is that the they had in 2020 and 21 they had two types of booklets one is on the
vaccination status the id you know that was already the creation of the qr code etc
they were preparing people and it was for governments it was for policy makers uh for
experts on the ground whatever escrot means and then the other one was on gene editing genome
editing and i must say i did not understand up to not very long ago that why they wanted to to do
this genome editing and i know now that in fact they harvard says they harvard university and
many other scientific bodies say we only know 20 maximum of what is a genome so the decoding of the
genome was not accomplished they said there is junk genomes and there's a hidden genome
and now they come with the crisp r code you know the crisp r cast nine and i had to replace
one of the noble prize and i did an ethical uh speech during a big conference organized by those
some religions uh i think even the holy sea was behind this but i don't care if i can you know
spread ethics it's good and um so what i did i i create i understood that crisp r cast nine is
to go in the genome to cut a piece like a piece of a page in a book of our coding of our genome
to take the the page out and you put one back artificially or you can put many back but you
try and change the information processor of a genome that might might and that's completely
unethical you don't change the code of a genome gene editing therapy i did a you know a book in
regenerative medicine and it's it's impossible the the generation the next generation dies
it is very dangerous to change the genome so what are they doing are they are they trying to
make the end of humanity or my other hypothesis is they're trying to find the real code and
there are even people who said cracking the god code there's of the genome you know they're playing
god they want to replace the human by synthetic biology and engineering that's the the trans
humanist and it's now i understand what they want to do they want to crack down our
at a biohack our frequency our the genome is actually there are this whole group who talks
of a genome as a vibration and as as something in resonance that is completely creating itself all
the time which is very interesting for regenerative medicine anyway it's a big thing so just to show
you that i was in this group of whr health in all policies to show you that they were really into
putting health in all policies the way they wanted it already in 2016 that was 15 and also
in another thing i participated in it's taking innovation and and preparing policy makers to
accept innovation at that time i thought it was for the good but today i see it's absolutely not
for the good and technology and innovation can be really tricky if you don't put ethics in it
and regulation
this is the biggest conflict of interest it is gavi and you have here a very interesting slide
that i found that shows you that gavi has in geneva a six now eight eight floor storage
with all this they have the diagnostics with find and the global fund on one on floor another
floor they have the therapeutics welcome and the head of the former welcome trust is now the head
of research in wh conflict of interest major with the private sector unit aid is also medication
of french group and they are also in the gavi building and then you have uh gavi development
you have you have the whole business to be short you have the whole business of billy who is doing
uh and he is the one who had who was leading the global vaccine action plan and that was in 2016
it was the midterm review of who and he said uh i'm very disappointed because not everybody
is vaccinated up to today and no obsession of eugenic obsession anyway we will get back to that
so this investigation of epidemiology has to go down to the biology yes because we need to
understand two things okay the virus that's uh that's a big thing but i think there are about
200 universities who never found anything that looks like a virus and have been claiming and
they are censored i don't find them i find i don't find the report anymore so um we don't talk about
the virus we talk about the vaccine the vaccine there is two types of researcher there are the
researchers who look at the content in the vial and there are those who look at once the injection
has been put in the body what is the reaction and they look at the blood in the body uh those
vaccinated or not and then you have the third group looking at the autopsy let's put three
um so four typologies and each time you should look at all those typologies
uh that you have a suspect case with symptomatology that you don't understand
all those athletes that died suddenly a french lawyer has made um it's it's a book of i think
900 pages now with the names the date they died the age how etc all sudden death and impossible
to have autopsies anyway so i put the typology missing because that's what's interesting in
science and innovation is not what they're saying it's what is missing that they're not saying
especially when you know they're criminals from the beginning it's there's a logic it's radar
microwave radiation so we have we know there is the do directed energy weapon with all the horrible
things that can happen you know to to maui the two towers but also to people with the habana syndrome
and with all this harassment covert harassment of mental problems are going very far you know
to torture uh we have documents on this it's it's something that is underlooked for the moment
then we have laser satellite all the innovation that you can think of can be put as a potential
risk for the health of people and by the way who had made a document and had a student uh
whose former minister of health in burundi came as a refugee here because he denunciated the tobacco
and he took the topic of the 5g and the phone effect and there were documents in 2004
and now they disappeared so they know we know they know uh and they do it anyway that it has
a health impact so this is the criminal scene in fact you should have experts from all those areas
chemical we have there is a specific expert in who on chemics chemicals it was kirsten
gudschmidt i think it's i don't know if he's there anymore nobody's speaking in the beach shows up
radio nuclear safety was taken by not certain but i they could be the same group it is by the
international uh energy agency in vienna the iaa and they are the ones taking care of radio nuclear
and they have priority in fukushima when there is a radio nuclear event on who very strange why
they don't want who to get in so you know now that it's bill gates maybe no problem but to show you
there are things that they're not logical at all in in in this whole global system and of course
the electromagnetic uh frequency technology we know about that they can really biohack us electric
you know they they can create in a rally headaches with you know just frequencies so it can be
healing but it can also appear disaster okay a natural disaster water environmentalizers
product safety peanut butter with the salmonella can kill people and that was one of the case i
had a river when the industry plant breaks in the water the the fishes can die and then the people
can die this is all things that have been totally overlooked and probably they put everything in
covet to try and keep on the fear in the confusion of the criminal scene okay that is so i come to the
you know conclusion of how i i see the biological level um i've shown this slide and that's what
got me censored by ryan cole and and by the swedish in uh in stockholm and that was in
2020 january 2023 ryan cole came up and stopped me instead that i'm very good but i i don't know
i don't know uh i cannot talk about this or you know that there is no oxide graphene so i i come
from uh reasoning the best reasoning i can and when i got that dr nagazi and then confirmed by
others like dr monteverde in argentina that the content of the vial is has nothing biological
because there is no nitrogen and no phosphor by spectrography you have to show always which
instrument by methodology i thought oh whoa this is a breakthrough it's a breakthrough because the
logic of biology is not the logic of engineering and when you put metal or engineering in the body
of course you have another logic and you have another way of speaking of talking and once we
know that it's not biological we should not even say mrna we should say uh take um it's mimicking
mrna it's mimicking uh biology but it is not biology what it's synthetic we have to find new
names so if it is a those who think it is biology they take the traditional biological names
words and reasoning and they all go to the virus just nobody is trying to change it it's a viral
mania i said that to get from the bush because you know uh it was in geneva he concluded don't
forget the virus and i said can you stop with this viral mania i just we have never discussed all the
causes of all the deaths you know so anyway you see they keep on saying the same narrative tna
mrna spike protein nucleus and so that people cannot verify and we don't have the lab it's not
the lab deciding our life really especially with people who have always used the same microscope
so b is all the other experts i mean you know i'm linked with that i go i even go in their
sessions sometimes late even if i don't understand everything i try to get and grab what i can
transmit later and definitely number one there is an id rf id in the vial that's professor arne
burkert showed that in september 2021 already uh there is metal uh chrome nickel definitely and
more aluminium everywhere there are parasites or these four types that have been identified maybe
more um and then there is of course oxide graphene and the first ones you have showed that is the
quintal columnar with prof. compra is really the first one in almeria university who showed there
is a massive oxygraphene he's a chemist biochemist he can talk he knows what he's talking about
it's not ryan cole who's a pathologist who is doing his own projection you know his conch with
his own glasses of knowledge and of ignorance uh who can decide that he knows the truth this is
was very disturbing you know it's like a religion at the end so of course if you have metal why do
they put metal if there's a rf id why etc i have verified as much as i can uh with the best of the
experts who have a methodology who show which microscope they have and they are really good
and we come to the thing that there is a hybridization and transhumanization
uh uh tests or trial to change the human being and see what happens not everybody has the same
vial we know that there are some who were deadly i know in san diego there was a vial who was
terribly uh deadly and we still don't know everything those are i want to thank them are
the all the the experts that i've talked with and that are great and you have showed something
completely different from their stand of expertise and dr kary madge has been great uh she has
to her life she was the first one to show this very strange parasite who got out of the egg at
the temperature of human being which is the methodology we should use so there are many more
but um i wanted to say say that that those hazards cannot be not considered in a scene
like public health ihr and this is a transhumanist agenda in a way you can go very far we're not
going to maybe we'll debate that for those who want but you know when you do in anti-aging you
you i did a lot of the replacement parts and showed how technology can can almost replace many
of your parts of your body yes and now i understand where is the agenda of singularity group is that
they want to put everything into uh mimicking uh human divine system because they want to
control uh for me that's clear anyway and that's you know if you remember don't forget the zombie
pandemic preparedness plan of the cdc if that's a joke it was not a very good joke
and then finally the global policy level so i hope i i i demonstrated this is really a coup d'état
on the on the world if not i'm going to show you one more two slides um what is to be remembered
it's a systematic violation of our sovereignty and a systematic violation of the own international
texts legal texts to protect human beings whether soft law with human rights or hard law with you
know the right to education the right to health the right to assemble to assembly the rights to
housing the right to food there's so many texts in the united nation that nobody's mentioning and
i'm like oh gosh i think i know why it's that's why that the united nation system is so big i had
to show that and i was teaching that to show how complex it has become because it was not like that
at the beginning so i think they've put in there the whole business now and you can even find yatta
and ikao who are the international headquarters of airplanes monitoring
so you do have in in the united nation system some you know because of in case there is emergency
they have put even the tourist organization you know why would they be in the un but what i put
in red is everything linked to health so you see that who is one agency but u.n.a is a huge one
i mean if the AIDS virus doesn't exist it is a huge scam you know that's because some people are
yeah even even montagne admitted that it was it was a code it was not a virus anyway and so you
have all those agencies you have health at work you have health in migrants you have health everywhere
it's entry door to all life and also animal health oh oh i.e is organization for animal and then you
have animal health in paris a new organization now in green you have law the general assembly
and this is the president's meeting in september in the united nation in new york
uh they have a link to a body that is i'm going to get to the most important is the security
council to understand why it's a dictatorship but you have in green or the international court of
justice the international um a court of justice and you have other international courts standard
like the juanda court etc and um you have the human right commission on in green in the in the low
the low section this is important the head of the kraken of who of the yeah who and the un
is the security council and i you can see that with gaza and they are only the big five have the
right to veto so those who are into politics here i'm sure are going to make a sense out of this
and this is um a product of the second world war and you wonder if the nazi have not taken place
in all those countries to really direct the whole united nation and then uh take our sovereignty
because there is uh china which is a big chunk of the problem as you know uh russia france very big
country with huge uh violation of human rights and sovereignty still going on a usa and uk
so those five permanent uh members of the united nation and security council can decide
of the destiny of the whole united nation which means the destiny of all the members the presidents
and the head ministers of the country this is constructed like um a model a blueprint of all
the ministers of health are there then the ministers of every section of the government
are in the united nation so it's it's very easy to take decisions without us knowing they sign
papers like the pact of the future without even the knowledge of the people they represent
so it's going so far that they now direct uh they say the peace force but there's always war so you
wonder what's going on and then the all everything linked to the court of justice the international
court of justice the international criminal court and the new remberg was taken into the united
nation at the end of the second world war after the trial so at with rhino filmish at the beginning
we said i said we can we cannot rely on this this is it's all directed by the same group
newenberg does not work anymore so the idea now is to take out and to make a new system and that's
why he decided with other lawyers to make the grand jury which would be a free jury uh for the
world which i thought was brilliant that's maybe why he's arrested so you see the secretary general
is decided by the security council and there's not much to say that the real power is is there
really yeah that's for those who want to know they change uh the rest but there's the five permanent
always are there so then there is a tounist uh and then the the p5 the most important always stay there
this is the picture on the wall of the security council room that was very contested it's a
norwegian who made it i don't know why the norway was so involved in all this this first
secretary general and you can see very strange symbols those who like symbol is i invite you
to go and study this and to let us know you know the symbol of the phoenix or you know the dragon
and this dragon in down and and there's some yeah anyway it was i wanted to say that and that's the
creation of who i have many you know 43 international organizations in the lake of
geneva there's 181 states 750 ngo's you have to know that ngo's is one of the most important
business uh bingo we call the business interested ngo's or gongo government ngo's or religious you
know faith-based ngo's who direct uh who go inside and who change the agenda i mean it's
it's your whole family the clinton foundation is in there uh and the carter foundation uh is one
of the NGOs of who or the un etc so that's their sustainable goal you can see all the reverse of
that you know clean water and they can pollute the water well-being and they make us not well so
we know today this new agenda with the wef is really not there for our good and it is intentionally
i have no doubt that it's intentionally made there are too many frauds too many non-ethical
and harmful decisions on the way that are taken and that's smart cities the wef is very much into
that and i want to mention before and uh smart everything the ai agenda is from the itu international
telecommunication union from the un directed by three or four chinese at the beginning of
covid and it's just beside me and they have this in front of them ai for good and they i went to
one of their meetings and i even interviewed the robot i can show you that once try to it's not so
impressive so they're hiding really more yeah and and uh who has um uh nominated uh the how they
call this a diplomat an ambassador for mental health which is ai it's a sophia i think so the
solution is human right is has to you have to we have to get back the human rights as an instrument
that is much stronger and hard law than uh it is now and this is for example it's it's a graphic
we showed a lot in the course in my courses because it's all the rights that exist in paper
right to education right to work right to food with very nice texts the other way is really get
out of the un get out of who or dismantle of course uh but we we were it was at the beginning
and i said you have to have you can have a reservation opposition or you have to exit
but what we have to do is educate people so they understand the importance of
claiming their sovereignty and not letting people sign the papers
so as just three actions uh we did i did one with uh and me and i know from which accepted
we got him the paper um in the prison and it is a declaration on the principle of state sovereignty
and the incompatibility um of the negotiating text of pandemic you know treaty or agreement and
amendment but basically this text is giving you the clues that i develop here is that the key
points of incompatibility with un is that they are violating their own instruments as i said
you and charter free state individuals they also are using our transfer of competency or power of
signature uh without our consent and that's one i think the most important uh and they do that in
a permanent way they don't ask us if they sign papers and we don't even know this factor of the
future for example transfer of sovereignty is impossible because it it changes we have to
change the constitution if you want to give your sovereignty to the united nation you need to
change many texts in your own country so we have to come back to our constitution which normally
should have the sovereignty and the last one is the conflict of interest that is so major that it's
the private sector today for me you know directing the united nation with a cult
not very spiritual and the the wrong side of spirituality and um and it's violating our
representativity and we made um last statement here we made a statement that it is necessary
to put an end to all the intervention of the private parties or entities uh that are in the
un and their actions in the whole system and we said that member states can no longer be bound to
the who constitution with private partners because it's against our constitution and our
sovereignty and we said that we declared null and void everything they have signed and we can go
maybe back to 1948 i don't know but it's something like that and i created a banner uh where i put
all the violations on the right on the left and you can use it uh uh because uh we were at the
rally so i put two banners this one at the rally on first of june with a lot of americans were there
and um i i when i'm telling you i i was talking about that we only had i had only six minutes but
it was maximum and that's the second banner and i changed the text for the rally of saturday so you
have a a primer and you can see uh that we had i mean it's it's crazy story is crazy is extradition
kidnapping is illegal but i looked in the text of the united nation and the convention against
torture and i looked at all the texts that i know the right um the right when you have an
arbitrary detention so i put arbitrary detention since october 13 so we the ring it rings the bell
of an international text you can all go and look at an unlawful arrest of extradition that is
that's his kidnapping then the third torture and cruel inhuman degrading treatment in prison that's
the convention against torture that can be used in prison and then unfair trial and public hearing
that's also a text to be found in many international um texts and then judicial corruption yeah you had
to put this because everything is and it's terrible because they really are torturing him in a nazi
way you know that you know putting chains on his feet and everything refusing that a doctor sees
him because he's sick and the doctor of the prison says he's not sick um terrible he can't
sleep because they put beside his own cell um somebody who's screaming the whole night
and and not banging on the door on his door and so it is everything cruel that you can
imagine they don't dare to go too far and it's that's why we did the rally in in geneva
and i hope that we can manage this and finally i want to quote un peace operation
general romeo d'alére who witnessed the corruption of the united nation very early on
in the rwanda genocide he asked for help he said something is going to happen please
come please call me a cold coffee anan and nobody came and it was a disaster he did a ptsd
uh he tried to commit suicide he was devastated but he when he got better he wrote many books
and he one that is just to have a spiritual touch he said i know there is god because in rwanda i
shook hands with the devil i have seen him i have smelled him and i have touched him i know the
devil exists and therefore i know there is a god and i i think it's very um significant with what's
going on in the world and in the un thank you wow okay yeah i'm sorry it was really long
no well that was it was very good you did a excellent overview very useful for us
to get a deep deeper understanding because based on your many years of experience with the world
health organisation it's important for us to understand this and it's also also important
for us to know that you are a resource for for legal cases now while stephen frost is getting
ready to ask the first set of questions here he is the one question that occurs to me and stephen
will probably ask you this but listening to you astrid makes me think i wonder i wonder whether
there has really been any outbreak of any disease ever you see with the lies that we have received
we are now uncovering the fraud that has been perpetrated on us and stephen keeps saying you
and you've said that as well you know the use of the word pandemic but but you know we've been
told there was an outbreak and we just go along with that well you know do you think there's ever
been a global outbreak of anything number one or indeed a mega outbreak other than normal seasonal
flu astrid that's my that's the thought that occurs to me and i go yeah i don't believe any
of these bastards anymore yeah oh i can agree 100 with you because once you know that the
criminals how they operate and you you have to go backwards you have to go in the past and see what
happened because it's the same propaganda and the media has a huge role to play and now i know that
that it's not possible it's it's impossible to have an outbreak in the whole world at the same
time it's it's you see indonesia has thousands of islands alaska in the middle of nowhere we're
wearing masks i mean how can anything go there and it's it's really when somebody has some group has
intention to harm whether with a war that is built up by the same people the they build the same
terrorist group that they are accusing of you know we know that netanyahu has the israel has made
hamas and and there is something with iran too so it's always the same algorithm they create the
business so they create the fear and then they create the solution that makes people worse so
they keep on the loop of peace and war war and armaments then the same with the virus and
and it's not the virus so yeah i'm going very far i i really question any even the plague even
we know now today that um uh the spanish flu was brought over by uh military who were vaccinated
i don't know what and and that it was uh that or ddt or something else and i have no doubt because
it's always the same and we are not supposed to be uh always in wars and i think real human beings
don't want that i think it's not the same yeah yeah well i think you made a good point go
backwards you know from now with this knowledge we go back and reassess everything all right
steven next 15 minutes are yours hi astrid uh thanks for coming to speak to us and i'm
sorry i was late i was just held up with something um uh i think that um you've diligently gone
through all these uh things that went wrong you know in your the organization which you know well
um the who and may and the un to a lesser extent maybe um but i so it seems to me that nothing
they told us was true it was just a pack of lies the whole thing so i i think it's important that
you go through all this you know in detail and say that everything was wrong that they had previously
said they didn't even stick to their own um pronouncements uh laws whatever uh ethics um and
uh i personally i sense that you too are shocked by what has gone on in the last five years but i was
uh really shocked uh shaken to the core i wasn't afraid but i was struggling to understand i knew
i knew quite early that it was a global coup d'etat otherwise they couldn't have you know you
couldn't have had the same words being spoken in new zealand as in wales for example or in
uh wherever brazil and um and so um the question in my mind is uh i think we need so we've we had
this group and we've had a lot of speakers and so we're in a good position so we've kind of looked
at at the problem or some of us have looked at the problem from a great height if you like or as far
as human beings are capable um and it seems to me that there was no pandemic um there was no disease
called covet 19 there was no novel respiratory disease and and i actually because of this uh
over each if you like in 2020 um i think it's highly probable that pandemics are not possible
so when i was a medical student one of the professors of immunology um he was pretty
well known worldwide i mean but i can't remember his name and he said a deadly virus kills its host
and i said in semi-innocently i said um because i like to ask questions i was very shy but i like
to ask questions and i often saw things which no one else was interested in never mind saw um but
so i said straight away to him i said does that mean that pandemics are not possible
and he said very good stephen i had no idea i had no idea why he said very good i was too shy to ask
so um and um but i now think back to that and he may well have known that the whole thing is a
construct the whole you know the creation of the world of virology and the diminution if you like
of the world of immunology which knew about the brilliant human immune system and all the immune
systems of all animals essentially so in america we've got 72 uh vaccinations necessary by the age
of five i think it is this is just crazy you know this is man man this is hubris of man uh
just another dominant species in a long line of dominant species that's if we believe in
evolution i'm not sure i do so i think the safest thing for us to do is to actually uh
rely on our instincts and uh really think about what we actually know and i don't think we know
very much you know we can we can get uh concord in the air at 69 000 feet doing mac 2.2 but um
and that's amazing and we can naturally well apart from paris of course we can do that without
crashing um and it's a human being's a capable of great things like beishoven and and the great
writers but uh it seems to me that the great mass if you like want to join groups and they
and they like to join cults and cults get out of control and that's why we're in such a mess
and and and there are some people like you and me and others in this group we've got two i think
getting on for 2 000 members um all over the world um we don't like cults and we are terrible cult
members i certainly am i think you are as well astrid so um i just wanted to ask you um why are
there so in these times of great crimes um since 2020 why are there so few whistleblowers at the
who and the united nations why you know it's one thing that they've been taken over but there must
be good people even in the united nations and the who you are blowing the whistle it seems to me
because i don't think even you know people who used to work for the who it's frowned on that
you're talking out i'm sure and so thank you for taking the risks of being a whistleblower but why
are there so few i don't know any of the who whistleblowers do you yeah yeah i must agree
completely with you because it's uh it's shocking what shocked me is that nobody was talking and i
was like what why are they keeping silent and i was shocked that they don't because i realized
the crime very quickly and i thought it was going to go like a blitzkrieg you know very quickly and
no it went on time and on time and yeah so i was i was pretty shocked by that that that's that's
for sure but now the explanation came with time slowly you know i just trying to reason why
they don't even come and tell me you know yeah we know astrid but we cannot talk not even that
and uh and i know many people in geneva really a lot so the one clue which is clear is that the
people who work with the united nation have a pension fund and when they retire uh who decides
for their pension fund in the unen so they can cut their pension uh very quickly and that's one
reason that was given to me by um there are two or three who came to me with time especially once
they retired but always trying to be very discreet and and i submitted that i submitted that idea i
said so why is nobody speaking and she she confirmed it is it is they're afraid but they're afraid for
their money that because it happened to one of the guys in who who was against the wokeism and
transgender agenda and he he said something and they cut off a third of his pension right away
so they have a way to terrorize people and and i that's that's the number one then there is yeah
so why have you not gone why why so you used to work in the who but maybe you've got private
sources of income but but you you speak out anyway you do the right thing no well no i'm i
i mean god god gave put me on the path that was complicated but what was good is i always thought
why am i not employed directly by the un or who so the contracts were consultancy and mandates
uh consultancy and even what i did with hr i was working with them like if i was an employee
it was paid by the to the university and the university paid me yeah and the same thing in
the british military you see so so the doctors the civilian doctors who they relied on to see
the patients because the military doctors didn't want to see any patients so uh but but uh they
were employed by the military they were always employed by an agency and you're a kind of
consultant or contractor so you were precariously employed and i did actually
say this is wrong this this shouldn't you know it's an important so a doctor's signature in the
previous world you know was uh very valuable um and um uh so you could see that the military had
to organize things in my opinion to uh they were not accountable if something went wrong
and neither were the agency so actually get rid of the doctor and that's exactly what happened
to me when i blew the whistle in the british military about uh class a control drugs criminality
but anyway so oh yeah yeah but that's that's the chance that i have today because i see that i can
speak and i actually just i explained i i just gave a lecture of uh educative you see i don't i
don't try to attack anybody personally so where are the others who were employed like you though
that's what i'm trying to say well the the so the who team was some in the headquarters and some
in leon so some left uh i did not keep contact with the the group in leon but in who geneva
you know now it's yeah i could i could cross their path again because i i had other consultancies
and last one was in 2018 um but i never kept a contact uh direct you know like you are in
office and you always say hello so i think most of them uh retired actually you know what that's
what i think is a deliberate construct the whole thing about contractors is a deliberate construct
so that they can hide criminality it's it's a business plan to hide criminality
and so and so you get um so you don't have colleagues like you know who colleagues
you're all uh actually competing against each other for contracts when you think about it
you're kind of only as good as your last contract and and it suits them to have doctors precariously
employed because obviously then they can call the shots and many doctors will go along with it but
you know you're either a doc if you're a doctor then you should do the right thing otherwise you
shouldn't be a doctor or at least that's how i saw it and i thought all the other doctors thought
that but then i realized they didn't and well i think there was a push since um i saw a change
in the the institute of global health in 2014 they started to employ very uh corrupt people and
of course i said something at one point and i really got you know cut off my courses contract
because there were people with the fake cvs who are professor of medicine today and are earning
25 000 a month and they took uh at the head of the institute of global health when i was the best
candidate a guy from france who is working with sanofi and who is promoting the vaccine
so they have prepared uh they have rolled out their team in a very subtle way of corruption
the mafia was already there sure so you've got banks apparently unknown to me i thought hsbc bank
which is one of the biggest banks in the world for example is my bank i thought that um you know the
hsbc had its own employees but it turns out that actually unknown to the public a lot of their work
is done by contractors they bring them in and so they've got plausible deniability all the time
when it comes to crime oh interesting thank you that's that's a but also a new light they also
they create uncertainty and insecurity in the in the highly paid doctors and others you know who
they bring in the banks bring others in um i don't know exactly i don't know the details i
couldn't find them um but uh this is all kind of uh below the surface and nobody knows about it
and it's like uh who financial management is in malaysia yeah but the but the problem is the
contractors are all um they they're all uh competing for contracts essentially but don't
realize it but actually they've got no friends either within they with amongst their colleagues
so that's very good because then you can't and they don't know from one month to the next whether
they'll be working for in the my case the british military um and so there's no kind of camaraderie
or or less camaraderie and so what they don't want of course is people kind of sharing
sharing views and notes yeah so i think we need to look into that i think we need to break this
i think the whole thing about how people are employed is not an accident they've thought
this through and this is the best way to avoid accountability and you can see that that explains
why there are so few whistleblowers as well yeah it's very good yeah it goes with the university
because you know until 21 it was i had this to teach but they were trying always yeah to
i was bringing the money myself with research from the eu from yeah i had many research with
the european union but otherwise it was always contracts with a determined date when i should
have been nominated professor i was a professor and six quite quite often it'd be six months or
less than six it could be a month you know and so people were constantly on their toes it was like
having people on with massive debts you know so they control people with debt but they also
control people by the way they're employed and i think we need to look at them and point it out to
um well switzerland has one of the worst employee protection you can fire somebody with no reason
from one day to the next well yeah and that's important in switzerland because they've got all
these corrupt organizations right so which is probably why switzerland is is so out on its own
in that area but anyway i wanted to ask you about the council council of europe um sorry
stephen that's 15 minutes now for your info oh well well wait a minute i've got another important
one here so um we've got a report uh it's on the internet at the moment of what i think it is was
last week um council of europe reports on the swine flu pandemic and an investigation was
conducted at the council of europe and wolfgang wodarg was responsible for getting that investigation
he was a medical doctor but he was also a politician at the time and he forced the
investigation and the conclusions are there and it's the same nonsense you know so the swine flu
pandemic of 2009 all the time we were suffering in and others around the world were suffering
around the world that document was on the council of europe website website and i thought well there's
a precedent for all this nonsense for for the these crimes and there it is but they they messed it up
in 2009 um but it was the same thing and the council of europe found that i can't remember
the exact words that governments all around the world and the who were responsible for the fraud
of the pandemic of 2009 swine flu and nobody drew attention to this no i couldn't even get wolfgang
wodarg to maybe he wanted to be alive next year you know i can understand that i think so but he
he was kind of not seeing the importance of this document and i couldn't get anybody interested in
but i want to mention it to you because i think it's very important and i think astrid with the
kind of language you speak you know you know understand bureaucrats i think you should go
to the council of europe and say i've got some evidence for you because guess what they very
under the radar julian massange was a guest at the council of europe did you know that
since he's been since he's been released he's been a guest at the council of europe
and he was lauded there he was fated but that was all kept very hush hush i've seen the video i
don't know whether i can find it i haven't heard anybody talking about it um maybe charles did you
know about it no well anyway so the council of europe yeah i've been there um i was invited
for the oviedo anniversary of the oviedo convention on biomedical ethics because i was
collaborating with the council of europe on the ethics and aging for a while but and they're very
good and they're also linked to this european the best human right european court of human rights it
was until now yes thank you for telling me yeah so i think it's really important that you approach
because they actually had julian massage since his release they fated him at the council of
europe i saw the video and he was speaking there and they were clapping and you know
more than clapping they thought he was uh wonderful and that's the council of europe so but they had
this web they've got the website and they had this document up nobody took it down i was told
that they can't take it down because they have to keep it up something some requirement but
you know the report did they write the report or is it what's the um i can't remember it was a uk
guy a guy called flin i think on the swine flu pandemic he was the rapporteur for
i can't remember but i was thinking about the raptor for torture that you were talking about
you know um i think we need to get in touch with the un's use their own institutions against them
un's rapporteur for torture because i think the whole world world has been tortured um
i've got more things to say but i'm a little bit uh anyway so there's a guy called niels melzer and
um prior to 2000 in 2019 i formed a group called doctors for assange and i did it because i saw
that niels melzer the raptor for torture at the special raptor for torture at the united nations
was on their backs was on the government's backs the governments of the uk us uh sweden and australia
for um torture and so i got this group doctors for assange we had 260 um medical doctors around
the world i think it was most of them psychiatrists and we wrote letters to
uh the uk uk government the swedish government the the u.s government and the australian government
and they were kind of notarized that you know they were actually notarized but essentially they were
you know we can prove that the letters existed so they were all told what they were doing we had
eventually we got two two letters in the so i i think the reason i mention is that is because i
think that's another route you know which you could use and maybe others in in the group we could use
we could use all together yeah you know also for writing probably raptor for torture the council
of europe and who else was it i said someone else i'll have a look at the video no niels he's not
he's not a rapporteur anymore unfortunately no he isn't though he was very good he is whoever
succeeded him i think would be trying to do as well as niels melzer did because he helped during
the song definitely definitely helped us doctors who were trying to help the song anyway sorry
charles go ahead niels also made something very interesting he he really did
accept and denunciate the covert harassment you know of the electromagnetic attacks
so i'll just say this astrid i think that the reason this was done was that it so i think the
best way to think of covid was that it's a trojan horse for totalitarianism and i i still think the
chinese communist party have a big part in all this and it's been hidden with all kinds of stories
again of function nonsense in my opinion yeah computer program again of we got so many people
for the chinese communist party and find the people who are so for example our prime minister
chinese communist party biden kamala harris chinese communist come on come on come on
on we go it's 20 minutes over 20 minutes now oh yeah so good well you only got one person
who's hand up so people are waiting for you at the moment there's only one chance don't keep
talking because there's no hands up i'm here i can stay until you want to know why you're so
pushing it so hard when there's only one person who's got a question because people don't put
their hands up until you stop asking questions all right well we'll see hi astrid um there are a
variety of groups you you cover here three of the larger ones are the un the who and and gabby
um do you know who the primary financial sponsors were of the creation of the un
very good very good uh question yeah um you mean financed well that's a very good question but
i think we have to go back to the league of nation because at the league of nation i found the
the documents you can find them on internet if you look uh the league of nation is after it's
during the end of the first world war and there are certain groups only who went in and they were
fine i don't want to i want i i specifically wanted to cover financing you know and i'll i'll
give some comment on it i just wanted yeah oh if you know do you know let me i do and i'll cover
takes me so i'm in full agreement with with steven around it's all lies that they're they're pushing
on us and and there's a giant lack of accountability and and that's where we have to focus on on
accountability and that um and and in this particular case we need to figure out who is
the head of the snake and be focusing there and what you've presented is a large number of groups
which are accurate and many many criminals are part of that but it it rapidly gets into hundreds
of thousands of individuals that are are those criminals so i i think it's really important to
recognize who the top of that those are and uh and so my my question to you is who would you
suggest is the head of the snake or one or two of the heads of the snake
well i i would say that uh it comes to the same as the web um there is the group of kissinger
who is always coming popping up again um but there's also this
it's a difficult question but we're going now into who has premeditated that because
my last conference is on this public i said that this un and legal vision is premeditated by the
same people with the same logic of criminality and of evil for me it's a cult okay i'm going to say
it's it's a cult who is there uh with with a lot of you know like the kathars like the zionists
like the nazi i put all those names go away oh no no but you're right i'm sorry i'm i get some
background noise here so let me let me see what i mean i i cannot i know kissinger it was part of
the beginning of the web he is on many things uh there's also maurice strong maurice strong in the
un was going there as he was he was leading everybody you know and also in the religion
when we had the summit of religious and spiritual leaders in the un in new york in 2000 august
maurice strong was there with cnn ted turner and so you know i'm trying to find that's fine and
and there were there were lots of sort of i would call them senior advisors but but at the core here
and i'm going to go back to the the situation with the rock with the un un was created by the
rockefellers yeah they provided all the base money they supplied the location don't that that
is the head of the snake and i think that that people that people have to really focus there
yeah yeah you're right i can even witness that you can come to geneva and you go on the park
of the un just and it's written the park was given by rockefeller so
glenn you got all this background noise glenn too many women around you glenn correct
all right uh astrid i'm next rockfeller you're right rock child um astrid i'm next and michael
i'm sure you've seen michael recton wald's book on the great reset i've mentioned it here
often for that i know you're not often here but this book which which has got a wonderful chart
i'll put it in the chat and i'll send the details michael recton wald he has got a wonderful chart
in here of all of the players that we're talking about it's cross-referenced including michael
strong including the whole wef movement and it's it's the road scholars and the the the path that
you are articulating for us so here's here is the chart of all these names all these black dots
with people and across the top is the bilderberg group world economic forum um council on foreign
relations club of rome etc etc all these players so that's the answer to glenn's question michael
recton wald's book articulates who they are including the young global leaders for the wef
so that's number one number two the book by william still that we've talked here the new world order
i will email it to you if you haven't seen it we published in 1990 i'll put that into the chat as
well but i'll email it to you wonderful book that goes through this whole journey that we've been
on for the last 3 000 years as to who's playing this game coming now to rhina fulmick and the
demonstration on in geneva on saturday uh it's been put to me that we should organ have a round
table here steven on what do we do to help rhina astrid because you're so close to him
um you know we i keep mentioning it there are people demonstrating outside the prison
what are your thoughts on what you would like to see happening other than shining a light on it you
know like there's a petition hat going on in the uk mark can you put the number the current petition
count the sign as to the petition if you're still here uh but my question with rhina is you know in
one sense nelson mandela was put in solitary confinement for much of 27 years you know and
it surprises me that they haven't killed rhina because we know hundreds of integrative doctors
in america have been knocked off by big pharma we you know we know that and so what are your
thoughts on what can additionally be done for rhina um yeah first i think he is in danger because
uh the way they operate i saw a picture of the psychiatrist it's crazy you think he's it's it's
it's really a madman yeah i'm worried because the nazi mentality is very strong there uh the way they
operate is so i i would suggest that you know what you did for us when you were talking about that
i don't yeah why don't we do that because that's really i would i would join you and you know help
astrid i think i was thinking that actually that was the real reason but but of course the world's
populations were tortured but actually the real reason i thought of the rapporteur for torture
tonight was that we could help uh rhina with him you know get in touch with him and say are you aware
of ryan of fulmic and provide all the evidence you know as we did with doctors prosaag
if you were interested we can do that yeah of course i yeah definitely neil he would be the
right person to to explain the satiety of the mechanics yeah whoever succeeded neil smeltzer
well there might be two now i don't know are there i don't remember who i did not look into who is
so we use their their um instruments against them but at least we record their what's going
on as well because at the moment nothing's being recorded properly but would as long as you did
something at the council of europe you you you explained something so i thought that would be a
brilliant idea no he was invited to the council of europe from australia after his release but
but um but the interesting thing for me was that the council of europe the ones who produced the
report and did the investigation into the swine flu pandemic so-called which wasn't a pandemic
and and so um and then during the song so i began to think well hang on these people
there might be some really good people there because they were not holding back with their
praise of assange but is there a mechanism that we can ask the council of europe to to act
on the human right level we could ask them to conduct an investigation into the the last five
years of covid yeah you know and the present condition because it normally it's the icrc
yes and into um ryan fulmic well what is going on with him he's being psychologically tortured
in germany he's being tortured he's being tortured as a matter of law he's being tortured
physically and psychologically yeah yeah but but um so i've still got contact with all the
psychiatrists so we could do a hatchet job on them okay well i think i think we should we've
only got 10 minutes to go and um estrid i think we really need to do something and round table
perhaps stephen or have a conversation you two um but we're tied for time and i really do want to
do something stephen so let's let's do some plotting okay the more we are the more it it
you know it resonates uh yeah exactly well at the moment nobody's making any fuss except there's a
lot of steven there's a lot of fuss happening there's a demonstration happening you know but
what's the next strategy that we can take you know and what you did with the sands that's that's
that's an excellent idea all right we're tied for time we're only got 10 minutes um jim
hey thank you very much estrid uh great presentation the issue of uh reiner is very
important and one of the one of the documents that he put together was a video with cliff high
and he seems to go and and reiner and cliff high are you familiar with the video presentation
um it's in the it's in the uh chat and it goes over who
or who may be behind this entire issue and i call it a financial bioterror weapon
because in november 2019 goldman sachs the investment banking firm made a 1.5
billion dollar bet in november of 2019 that the entire world economy would collapse by the third
week of march in 2020 and you cited that paper from fauci right before that time frame if
the world economy did collapse they would make 100 billion dollars on that 1.5 billion dollar bet
now anybody who's a financial guy spaces their bets out but if you do it on one day you know
it's fixed they knew it's seemingly they made the bet through bridgewater capital ray dalio
and mark mccormick the the senator mccormick the uh the guy now senator of pennsylvania
his firm bridgewater capital and then they then goldman sachs hired a guy named younger alex
younger the head of mi6 to be part of goldman sachs this certainly seems to to be an intelligence
run financial takedown now i have a little bit of a different take on the sars-cov-2 spike protein
i think it was engineered by the intelligence agencies and there is only one intelligence
agency that has not signed the biological weapons convention or one major one and that's israel
so we really i think we have to be very respectful of israel because they tend to kill people they
don't like but we also have to ask them for the antidotes because if they made this then they may
have genetically specific antidotes and we need to get them before further terror is unleashed
because as you pointed out outbreak is uh was an ebola thing in there it seems to be nidazoxanide
may help with ebola so the question is what do we do for reiner fulmach what do we do for these
people who have been targeted by this global network of financial bioterror and how do we
stop the how do we stop the un understanding that they that hammer schuold was killed
in the past with its plane being shot down
if they're willing to kill and they were going to kill many people how do we stop an organization
like this well yeah i've been thinking a lot about that but the solution is outside the un
it's not in the un but you you already have one scenario it's president trump well dismantle
or not the un and close any collaboration with who so what is going to happen there that for me
that's a very strong signal he has kept on saying he said it again um so the un has to
we we try to do a tribunal outside the un because new york and the criminal court and
the court of justice is in the un so one one thing is to do outside the other one is to use
their own instrument of the court of the international court of justice which is
the the background of the charter of the un and just try at least to to say you are violating
your own law you are under arrest but you know by the people of the world or what you know we have
to create a tribunal something yeah so that's another thing that i think will happen but i
there is a coalition probably the bricks maybe um that are saying no to the un argentina the the
president of argentina has said clearly no to the charter the un in the last general assembly so
there is a coalition of some of the countries that's one of the hope also but do we want the
same government structures again i have a doubt yeah so so that's the answer for the un
for the biotech i want to say the technology not the biological convention i i want to talk about
the biotech because for me there is no doubt that the weaponry that was put in now is tech
it's nanotechnology allied with biology and that they can they can freeze us they can
they can murder us with with frequency medicine frequency laser and everything so for me the the
real weapon of the war is is in the in the danger of what is not disclosed it's is the
frequencies scalar wave armament you know the the laser in the cameras that they have put
everywhere in the in the world this this iod the the lights the light they have put in the
streets or on the cars are are toxic i mean they they have moved like in doping anti-doping they
are they are ahead of us and that's what we have to find for me it is like that you can have acute
radiation and and you can not breathe it's not an infection so don't be afraid of biology it's tech
or it's bacteria bacteria can be can be dangerous and yeah anyway it's it's a whole investigation
that we have to really make clear thank you thank you and i want to mention one thing just one thing
that i don't want to forget that the goldman sachs actually created gavi
uh it um i f f i am the international facility uh financing for immunization in 2004-5 there is a
whole text that i read when i spoke to reiner filmish audition and this is very important
government sacks were sponsoring gavi to make an auction bond go and look at this website i f f i m
and you are financed you'll understand that maybe they're paying governments each time they sell
vaccines tech and for me it's a technology i mean belgate knows what he's doing with virus
technological viruses yeah i f f i am exact thanks jim thank you astrid marv marvin hey astrid i want
to ask you about the the un i followed the un's office on drugs and crime for a decade and they
did great research on the the heroin epidemic 93 percent of the opium was grown in afghanistan it
was being flown into the united states in small airports all over the country and the un was aware
of this 500 billion annual market and they did all this wonderful research but never once did they
confront anyone about this and i just i you know i begin to wonder does the un have the motivation
or the power to do anything to accomplish anything at all what do you think
uh well i was i was an idealist at the beginning and thinking it's marvelous to be with the whole
world and we can have so nice words and but now i see the deception and the lies i think actually
there are groups of very goodwill people human and that's what they're using as an image that
behind there they stop the agenda as they wish so like the first question was who is is they and
yeah there are groups of NGOs like for example there is a something called un watch and i happen
to walk into their office without i made a mistake uh and actually they're zionists and i at that time
it was like 20 years ago i said what what are zionists and i then i saw the plan of zionists and
and i was like really worried i thought my god they are watching the un and intervening so this
group of parasites uh you know around the roe roe the rockfeller raw child the bill de burke all
this but i think there are really a core group who are also in secret societies the freemasons
above the 33 degree are speaking hebrew so i mean when when the experts tell me that i'm like whoa
so it all goes back to something that that um that is actually controlling the narrative
and controlling that things are said but not they can map that they were probably very happy of this
report and then they say oh we can stop it there we can use this so the un is a fantastic uh play
game for people who are evil and you are controlling really everything like maurice strong who's he's
no longer there so i can speak about it thank you thank you thank you mav ryan
good to see you
you're muted ryan oh ryan is there
sorry about that just trying to get my button to work here hi astrid hi ryan my sensor yes
i am not i am not your sensor friend i you know i had a lovely dinner with you in sweden i have
nothing against you personally and i want you to know that and i loved your presentation i
i agree with probably 80 90 percent of it um and this is where i love the opportunity to agree to
disagree and you know and ryan i think that's very yes we need you see we come from love not fear we
need the opportunity to disagree you know right i think i yeah i think astrid's a lovely person
and i appreciate so much of the good things she does um you know what happened in sweden i i wish
people would go back and watch that has astrid's talk was done i didn't push you off the stage i
honestly didn't if you if you go back and look at that moment um we had had a lovely two days in
meetings you had given a great presentation and then there are a few things at the end which were
concerning to the organizers and they asked me if i would diplomatically which i did
agreed to disagree and then it was taken out of context and and so you know in that light you know
do i believe in graphene oxide in the shots no i don't based on science do i think pablo compras
did bad science i know he did um you know there's a lot of sugar in the shots he made graphene and
charcoal from firing his laser for 30 seconds instead of a fraction of a millisecond which
you're supposed to do with that technique so he ended up making charcoal burning the sugars in
the vials he literally burnt the creme brulee burnt the toast and that's why you get a carbon
and an oxygen signal but you can't measure hydrogen with ramen spectroscopy so compress was wrong and
then there you know we were speaking of cults so there's this whole cult of graphene oxide which
unfortunately ignores the fact that we have a dangerous genetic sequence and a dangerous
polyethylene glycol and a dangerous lipid nanoparticle which is why i focus on you know
this dangerous gene therapy genetic technology they're trying to inject into people and one other
note and you know dr burkhardt his group and the austrian physicist group showed contamination of
metals i agree he didn't call them rfid and just based on antenna physics um you know you you could
distribute 30 micrograms of even if there were graphene you can barely get a rice grain rfid
underneath the electrical skin that we have to transmit so you know 30 micrograms distributed
over a whole body doesn't make any sense per antenna physics but anyway i agree to disagree
i respect you astrid i consider you a colleague i appreciate so much of the good policy work that
you do i just think that you know we should agree to disagree on certain things and i just like to
say extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so i again you know a hug from a
distance i have nothing against you astrid so thank you for answering me again thank you i did
not say you know i had a difference of opinion there's a difference there's a difference of
i i would tell you exactly the same i told you on stage when the whole group wanted you to come
and and do the same you're doing now is that you are not an expert in nanotech in electricity
in chemistry you don't know all the 17 microscopes you have not talked to all those groups of experts
that i respect highly and this is why you cannot speak that you know the truth because that would
be very pretentious and you would lose more credibility because you're not doing those
things either that's not your expertise i'm in the debate of i'm in an open space my mind is in
an open space of debate with all the good scientists scientists engineers electricians people who are
highly knowledgeable in frequency etc and you're not sorry you don't know everything so i would
invite you to debate with real experts of nanotech like touche biome like people that i know
who have done this their whole life you cannot know everything brian i do have i do have a
background in astronautical aeronautical engineering and physics so when i when i
read their reports i can look at it and go that's very hypothetical and interesting
but physically impossible and so that's the important aspect of it it's it's the physics
of it doesn't compute and that's you know i've done high level differential equations i appreciate
all that and and and can i say i love it i wish we had two hours to have this conversation
number one number two brian you put an interesting comment in the chat and i think it's worth saying
because we've had people come here you know who say well you made the comment stay in your lane
and astrid you're saying stay in your lane and i think it's a very dangerous thing to say
to anybody stay in their lane because i'm trained as a lawyer you know but i'm like buckminster
fuller ryan i'm sure you've heard of bucky fuller yeah absolutely you know i'm a generalist and
you know there's so much knowledge that's the beauty of this group and other people will
what's the recording here and and staying in our lane is a bad bad idea i want all of us to be
generalists and go wow there's some astrid can i make a comment because i'm a public health is
not the same that somebody who works in a lab and like i said at the beginning and in public health
one of my expertise is doing reviews with all disciplines with all expertise so it's not
something new i'm used to do reviews and mention names even if i'm not expert i have a logic of
the methodology and i use the methodology of many many expertise and disciplines and that's where
i have i have a bonus on this no i i i i i appreciate that hang on steven let ryan say
ryan steven steven hang on ryan wants to respond and then you steven
i i was going to say you know that's great and i appreciate that there's a methodology to it and
there should be i think we all approach it that way and i appreciate your comments on generalism
because i think you know that's very important we if we're expert in one area we can cross apply
those skill sets to many areas i love that construct but at the same time some of the
people that are quoted as quote experts are generalist family docs that are using student
grade microscopes and hallucinating things that aren't present like like dr madhe you know lovely
person i've spoken on stage with her but when she shows things that aren't what she thinks they are
that's where i can say as someone who's looked through a microscope for 30 years that you know
a little stellate trichome from the bottom of an oak leaf contaminating her front room and her slide
is where there are a lot of oak trees that's not a hydra that's the piece of a bottom of a leaf
floating in the air like a pollen and so you know there's a lot of you know interesting ideas and
it's fun to go down those pathways but at the same time i think we need to be very careful as to what
we accept as actual versus you know going to other people and trying to confirm so you know i appreciate
the debate and i think we should keep it open again respect for you astrid i love your presentation i
love what you do with the who stuff the international law i hope you keep that up and i'll agree to
disagree but i still respect you as a person i'm a friend good thank you right brian stavin thank
you ryan all right so i do tend to agree with ryan on the fact that we you know sticking to our
own lane is not the answer to what's happened in the last five years so we need to talk to people
in every discipline just about that human beings indulge in particularly with this problem
because it's so complex and and only through doing that i think will we so people staying in their
lanes constantly in their ravitole will never get anywhere there are so many people who have the
information they're experts in their field but they have no view about anything else and i say
to them but you're a human being surely you've got a view about what you want to happen that's right
how dare you stavin how dare you give any opinions on eating you're not a dietitian
we're going to keep moving thank you ridiculous so i do think that so i can see both sides of the
but i do think that there are very very few uh good doc joiners and doc joiners need to have good
instincts and then hypothesize and good doctors will hypothesize when they've got a very sick
patient in front of them and they need to as well but very few do of course i thought they did
but anyway um i wanted to ask you both no no we got jeremy's no i wanted to ask gastrid and
jeremy sorry um ryan who was it who organized the conference in stockholm which led to
well you say you were sent to us but i just want to know that
uh it's a lake help up it's it's a group of swedish that and i know um what's her
forget the names it was the one girl that i trusted and i i came and she was very sorry for
what happened but um the others i what i yeah lisa yeah lisa yes and i had a meeting with her and
because i was going to sue them because they they censored me completely so i had i have all the
footage i have everything we haven't ran you didn't say you said you spoke to astrid on behalf of
someone else who was that other person uh no i mean at the end of her talk she was done
presentation done and i didn't correct what she said i said there are a lot of opinions you can
go back and watch the video i literally got death threats from the graphene oxide crowd literally
for saying if you ever speak about graphene oxide again you may not be alive which is absurd but i
didn't censor astrid i just on behalf of the organizer said hey there are differences of
opinion here's who are the organizers who were the organizers that's what i wanted to get you
know i'm trying to remember spence last name i don't remember his last name uh lisa was one of
the coordinators um it was a medical freedom group in stockholm there's a well-attended meeting about
1200 people present and it was uh yeah you know dr malone dr burkhardt me uh dr netz were you
speaking on behalf of dr malone that's what i wanted to know no absolutely not no no no no no
no absolutely not no on on behalf of the organizers and the coordinators well the reason i ask uh
ryan is because you've got a little cult going with the is it the international
covid summits you know and i happen to know about those so i was well well steven steven
when we're out of time we've got one more question we're not going to go down this rabbit hole why
are you censoring me tonight because we finished a two and a half hours that's why
i was only going to speak first just say one more sentence charles
bullshit all right give me one sentence i say bullshit because two and a half hours is our
meeting we have to stick to it this is so this so there's a woman called lily i think in california
and there's a guy called roberto who's very nice in and so is lily uh uh but roberto is in um italy
i'm not quite sure how i know that but anyway i met with them and they were asking about the
next international what's the old international covid summit and i said well i think you've got
a little bit of a cult going there with a leader who is directing the cult and i think you need to
get away from that leader i'm not going to mention any names um and guess what lily disappeared and
that's the truth good that was seven sentences yeah and i'll just say it's not a cult it's a
great group meeting with international leaders trying to stop a bad technology from ever
right unfortunately none of these people understands that pandemics are not possible or very likely not
possible and so a lot of the people with whom you associate as i understand it i've got no no
problems but but uh they're preparing for the next pandemic
the group has changed the international crisis somewhat so i would strongly disagree with that
assessment or assertion all right i would i would say that what we're trying to do is stop
up and we're trying to do what astrid's doing stopping extra governmental organizations and
ngos from creating crises that aren't real and and putting fear into the public so that that group is
a strong group of people you know you don't have to agree with everybody in the group but it's a
great group of people trying to work with freedom-fighting parliamentarians around the
world to stop the nonsense and stop the you know plandemic type fear because i agree with you i
mean this wasn't a pandemic by definition and so i'm i'll defend that group because i think there's
some really good people you know i don't agree with everybody in the group all the time either
could i could i just tell you something yeah i was very keen and there seem to be
individuals who aren't politicians operating the background and obviously you know what some of the
books i've read and some of the um directions that uh certain organizations have taken have
been led by you know directed by people like morris strong and i was wondering uh who are these who are
the equivalent who are the new morris strongs in the world and you know who are these figures that
seem to have had such a huge influence on what's been going on and what's been motivating what's
been driving what's the driving force behind these people and what are their real aims and who are
replacing morris strongs now because their influence seems to be way beyond anything of
an ordinary politician that's a tough question that's almost impossible to answer but i what
what i can say and and that was confirmed by the people from the who who come and i say what
how come tedros what what is his motivation what who does he obey to he's just a puppet
but he was already a criminal before he's never been a doctor he's been elected against his own
government so we know that it's a private sector who directs the vhl that uh two people came to me
and said it's a cult so you you know a charge you wanted to be spiritual there is really a cult
behind all this they are meeting in secret they do their rituals they are doing horrible things
and we know that by whistleblowers women who have been victims and there are many now speaking up
and you know i know some personally in such and and so those people have been indoctrinated or
not by a group of secret societies who operate since a long time in europe definitely and in the
u.s probably also either through religion either not but there there are so for me who is the new
one uh difficult because the pope was kissing the hands of uh rockfeller and wachild you know so
that you always come to the same uh type of group but i know in france that the free masonry is
dated since 1700 even switzerland was based on free masonry apparently and and you you know women
are not really accepted in this so i don't know but this is this is what comes really bad the other
thing is when you see that the stern is not really about astrophysics but it is something else and
it's also a cult in the in the science of the smallest and the biggest you know from nasa to
the stern there are things that don't match uh so there is a cult behind that's i have intel from
that and and stern is definitely you can look at the at their plan of research the researcher head
of research said that we are waiting for entities coming out of the portal so you you see what i
mean we are we are working now on many levels and in science you're never allowed to talk like that
i'm doing now but i'm doing it now because it is too important it is something that is beyond
completely uh only what you see it is about beliefs and it's about belief of evil and there
is definitely an evil plan and so maurice strong is not there but the entity is still there some
claim uh like david ike that it is a hive group and that it is hiding behind ai i i don't know
possibility hypothesis i don't know but it is definitely and i have met you know like reme
dahlia said i've smelled it i've smelled evil i've shook their hand i have done that too i have met
some yeah definitely in the un and they're like that it's avatars i i cannot answer better than
that and i don't know if charge wanted to see these names crop up through history and these things
who who are they operating for how have they got to those positions of power that they've
you know changed almost the course of nations and uh without consent and certain individuals
seem to crop up um regularly and he's one of them yeah thank you very much anyway very much
enjoyed it would be really interesting we investigate more and we will find so i'd just
like to uh apologize to ryan if he thinks i was saying anything terrible but all i wanted to say
was you know if there was no pandemic which ryan and i seem to agree on then surely it would be
sensible for medical doctors to think about the possibility that the whole pandemic narrative
for forever has been a fraud and it was constructed through virology through evidence-based
medicine through the diminution diminution of immunology that that was the point i wanted to
make and i don't understand why charles faced with an existential question like that tries to
censor me but anyway there we go we'll make up don't worry fair enough thank you
you
ryan do you have any views on that you think yeah no i think it's a longer discussion i think you
know breaking molds and mindsets takes time it's not that some of these people don't agree with
you i think in private conversation they will i think it's coming public and just the humility
of saying oh maybe i was wrong so i think you're going to see a lot of those individuals come
around to that same point of view publicly i know some of them do hold it privately and i think it's
that fear of you know losing face or whatnot so i think you bring up a great point but ryan why
would they hold it to themselves privately in these circumstances and so i you know i can't
speak for others i don't know i can't i i don't understand their mindset and you know getting
into why they think the way they do i think it's fear i think they they fear losing credibility
with one group and gaining it with another and just trying to figure out how to make that
intellectual transition and that transition in a public way so again i can only speak for myself i
wish i could speak for others i certainly can't so i think it's a very valid question and i've had
these conversations in private with many and you know due to the great work of like danie rancourt
and others many of us have come to the same point of view as you so you know i appreciate that at
least the conversations being had and i think minds are being changed and new opinions are being
formed so that's all i can say i just find it amazing that people are so frightened of
kind of stepping out of line when the whole purpose of what we've been doing for five years
is trying to get to the truth which means in turn you're going to be changing your mind every week
every month and every year and yeah we still have half the world we still have half the world stuck
in that same mindset so again you know moving a battleship on a dime isn't very easy so i do
believe you know we have a new intellectual enlightenment happening scientifically and you
know i think good work of many people here will continue that so i remain hopeful and we'll
continue to you know spread a message you know like like you guys say through love and kindness
so we will just try to continue to have the socratic conversations tickle the neurons of others and
create the cognitive dissonance such that we can arrive at those conclusions amicably and hopefully
positively exactly and in the interest so as close as possible to the truth always even if we
have to eat up all our previous opinions i don't understand why the people are so afraid of changing
their minds but that's me maybe anyway thank you so much steven so i think it'd be good ryan if we
communicate it because you could maybe kind of be a transmitter of information you know to
bring this together and become happy to do so yes happy to do so because i think there's a lot of
misunderstanding within the people who are fighting our common enemies agreed anyway thank you so much
to our guest astrid i think you're a great astrid you have a great authenticity which is why people
listen to you i'm still a bit perplexed as to why as far as i know you're the only whistleblower
from the who that's amazing isn't it yeah i'm shocked i'm shocked myself it's very strange
i feel something like an island on an island in janeva you know with all those people i've met
my whole life and i'm like strange but maybe they're just uh hypnotized hypnotized afraid
they are in their comfort zone and they don't want to move out of it and they retired many people just
left the organization so we don't even know how many are left in the they haven't retired as human
beings hopefully i don't know maybe i don't understand is yeah anyway um so in the medical
profession i i thought uh all the doctors were thinking like me and in 2020 i suddenly realized
i better start listening to myself because i realized all my medical doctor friends had no
idea what was going on i said it's global coup d'etat can't you see that no they couldn't see it
but then of course all this other stuff and then yeah it's it's really the last five years has been
amazing for me amazing which is why i formed this these groups anyway thank you so much yeah no but
it's very important you know why some people got it right away and some people didn't up to this day
and it is even my postman he got it that the vaccine was a scam uh or the people where i go
and put the garbage of you know big boxes and he recognized me and i said well you you got it you
understood everything he understood everything and my brother's doctor and my nephew and niece
they now even if they know they are trapped because they are afraid to say they are afraid
to be sued uh they lose their face there's a whole psychological uh operation they have trapped
people so one of the most important things they did our enemies you know in the broader sense was
to do things which didn't make sense and and eventually i realized that that was the point
the whole the best way to destabilize human beings is to make them get them to believe things which
don't make sense which they know doesn't make sense and guess what that was done with intent i
believe they psychologically tortured populations around the world into a state of stockholm
syndrome they deliberately destroyed the humanity if you like of most human beings
and those people have no self-respect now they're shells of their former selves it's not so much
about the shots it's about the psychological torture and in china in china during the cultural
revolution of 66 to 76 when mao tse-tung died in 76 every chinese person i don't know which year
but i was told by a good source that every chinese citizen was required to kill 20 flies a day
to make china a cleaner place and they they managed yes exactly it didn't make sense but
they all went along with it all the people who weren't dissidents went along with it
and they of course doing something like that they lost and of course and the dissidents were
identified and were imprisoned or killed by the fact you know i'm not killing 20 flies a day
do you see that's ridiculous um but the people who went along with it lost their self-respect
lost their humanity yeah they've studied the brain very well because the mcat ultra you know
programmation and things to have they have really studied the brain really so i think there was
intent to rape the souls of human beings and if you read the universe 25 experiment on mice
admittedly uh have a good read of that and think about the possibility that they were trying to
find a way in mice to take the will of mice to live away from them and they did the same thing
in 2020 with human beings and that is unforgivable but we need to understand it to hold them to
account i'm not saying i'm right but i think it's a possibility a very strong possibility
so a lot of people say the scientists say um oh you know we've got to have a scientific proof for
everything uh the lawyers say we've got to have evidence beyond reasonable doubt we've got to have
evidence beyond you know beyond the balance of probabilities and i'm thinking well no i think
medical doctors in particular should be able to look at things and hypothesize because that's what
you do as a doctor when you've got very sick patient in front of you can't be looking at the
scientific evidence you've got to have it in your head and use it and join the dots and so
um so i think um that's where we are but to finish on a good note um yeah what i i have seen my whole
career because i you know i've been in many disciplines in faculty of medicine but not only
there also with engineers and um is is that the the doctors are used to see only sick people
so that what i call them is patocentric and they have destabilized the patocentricity
they think that they had uh there were doctors or human doctors by by putting together protocols
so the doctors in the five past years have received i guess everywhere in the world you can check
protocols where you don't need to think anymore or programmation of computers and they lost their
that yes exactly they lost their um uh
to think for themselves with ethics and the human contact you know your
symptomatology that absolutely a patient you see how he feels you you listen to the subjectivity
my phd was on subjective health versus objective health and subjective health is the most important
you see so protocols are a bit like artificial intelligence yeah one size fits all fits all
but it takes the um the the the individuality from the individual doctor representing his
individual patient so it dehumanizes they they have no place in the practice of medicine in my
opinion protocols and never did have and the guidelines as well because they could be used
to coerce doctors into into a cult essentially and that's what they got with the with the uh with
the protocols they got a cult a medical cult with all doctors doing the damn same thing with
doctors saying oh no i can't do what i think is best for you because the protocols say i can't
especially in america but it's come to the uk too i just wanted to say one last thing astrid um i think
that our what the the targets for these bastards are god country and family so everything they've
been doing is taking us away from our family to isolate us to thereby take away uh our country and
i think um there's a lot to be said for just going to church even if you're not a christian
and just sitting there so that the politicians can be afraid by the numbers of people going to
church they fear the church and why i think because spirituality frightens them they don't
understand it they have got they have no spirituality they don't understand it
they're frightened of us forming spiritual connections but then family of course is
absolutely key to any society and the country as well and look what's happened to the uk and the
u.s um with kia starmer in power in the uk and uh and biden and kamala harris in in the u.s but
hopefully we're in for better times in the u.s but we'll see what uh trump does anyway thank you so
much yeah no i want to just say yes i agree it's it's one of the core where you you are going now
is that um in fact they're trying to take the place of god because i see a silver lining everywhere
uh when you go to the stern they're doing the bottom of it they want to break the code of god
in the particle physics and subatomic so in transhumanist they want to mimic you know
with robots and they go very far into that they want to do this artificial intelligence which
is mimicking human intelligence which is not true it's impossible it's it's a uh it's a this and
dishonor to even talk about artificial intelligence because it is just the
programmation like robots and and it's the same with the the crisp forecast and the genome they're
trying to crack down the genome code and so you can see in with the cult they're trying to replace
a cult of divine with the cult of god and the frequency medicine when you're praying you're
going high in vibration you can measure that so so i think that it is really an attack and it is really
a spiritual attack on on the divine uh humans that we are and they cannot be divine because to be so
there's something or i i think there is another race here somewhere it's in my hypothesis strong
because i cannot understand how evil you can be to do everything that happened and already before
so artificial intelligence what's the word when you've got one word and the next word contradicts
it essentially i can't remember the name for it now but um it's a way sorry does anyone know
no there's a word for it everyone knows a calendar room uh no no no no mirror
mirror word when you say something and and the second word discounts the first word
they're working against each other oxymoron oxymoronic yeah oxymoronic yeah sorry it just
couldn't come to my mind anyway it's an oxymoron isn't it and artificial intelligence crazy exactly
it's a good good title for a session yes oh the oxymorons yes exactly let's call them oxymorons
yeah exactly oxymorons and inversions we're invited to believe the exact opposite of what is true
or what we think is true anyway very very good thank you so much astrid thank you thank you
thank you and it was a very nice session i'm sorry we could not discuss more but i am ready to come
back and have discussions and also for reiner let's see what we can do yes and hopefully charles
will forgive me for whatever my crime was tonight
but and i will i will talk about you and your support to reiner oh thank you yes please do yes
give me my it makes it more bubbly and nice well yes we need to get in touch with the un
special rapporteur on torture i think and inhumane treatment i think is full title
yeah yeah it's what i put on the poster yes i can send it to you very good thank you so much
thank you to all bye bye bye bye bye