1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:12
So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International and to today's

2
0:00:12 --> 0:00:14
discussion with Dr Robert O. Young.

3
0:00:14 --> 0:00:20
This group was founded by Dr Stephen Frost over three years ago with the desire to pursue

4
0:00:20 --> 0:00:23
truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health.

5
0:00:23 --> 0:00:26
I'm Charles Kovest, the moderator of this group.

6
0:00:26 --> 0:00:32
I am Australasian's passion provocateur and there's lots of passionate people here, including

7
0:00:32 --> 0:00:33
Robert Young.

8
0:00:33 --> 0:00:41
I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago and I've helped parents

9
0:00:41 --> 0:00:46
and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine damage and damage from bad medical advice.

10
0:00:46 --> 0:00:51
Bad medical advice on the latest data off scene is now the number one killer of people

11
0:00:51 --> 0:00:52
in America.

12
0:00:52 --> 0:00:56
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.

13
0:00:56 --> 0:01:00
Stephen Frost over the years has been a whistleblower and activist.

14
0:01:00 --> 0:01:04
His medical specialty is radiology.

15
0:01:04 --> 0:01:08
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world.

16
0:01:08 --> 0:01:10
Many of us thought that vaccines were okay.

17
0:01:10 --> 0:01:15
Now many of us proudly say, yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers.

18
0:01:15 --> 0:01:22
I now count myself in that group and if someone accuses me of being an anti-vaxxer, I say,

19
0:01:22 --> 0:01:28
Yes, I am and I'm proud of it and I would never inject and vaccinate into anybody because

20
0:01:28 --> 0:01:34
Stanley Plotkin has now admitted that no vaccine ever in history has been properly tested for

21
0:01:34 --> 0:01:36
safety or efficacy.

22
0:01:36 --> 0:01:41
I now consider it a badge of honor for all of you who are anti-vaxxers.

23
0:01:41 --> 0:01:45
It's a badge of being awake, not woke.

24
0:01:45 --> 0:01:49
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat

25
0:01:49 --> 0:01:50
and where you're from.

26
0:01:50 --> 0:01:54
If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or like Glenn, you run a radio or TV show, put

27
0:01:54 --> 0:01:58
the links into the chat and keep putting you in there in every meeting because different

28
0:01:58 --> 0:02:01
people come to different meetings.

29
0:02:01 --> 0:02:05
Most of us understand we're in the middle of World War III and the medical science battle

30
0:02:05 --> 0:02:11
is only one of 12 battle fronts of this latest world war.

31
0:02:11 --> 0:02:15
One of the other battle fronts is the spiritual war that we find ourselves in.

32
0:02:15 --> 0:02:16
There's no time to be tired.

33
0:02:16 --> 0:02:21
We're four and a half years into a seven year war in my assessment.

34
0:02:21 --> 0:02:27
Most of us understand the development of science and that the science is never settled.

35
0:02:27 --> 0:02:31
The meeting runs for two and a half hours after which for those with the time Tom Rodman

36
0:02:31 --> 0:02:33
runs a video telegram meeting.

37
0:02:33 --> 0:02:36
Tom puts the links into the chat if you are able to join.

38
0:02:36 --> 0:02:40
We listened to our guest presenter, Dr. Robert O. Young, for as long as Robert wishes to

39
0:02:40 --> 0:02:43
speak and then we have Q&A.

40
0:02:43 --> 0:02:48
Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asks the first questions for 15 minutes.

41
0:02:48 --> 0:02:52
This is a free speech environment with appropriate moderating.

42
0:02:52 --> 0:02:57
Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.

43
0:02:57 --> 0:03:03
Just this week, the Australian government has denied a visa to Candice Owens to come

44
0:03:03 --> 0:03:10
to on a speaking tour to Australia from the States because of some bullshit excuse, literally

45
0:03:10 --> 0:03:11
bullshit excuse.

46
0:03:11 --> 0:03:13
Don't let this person in.

47
0:03:13 --> 0:03:17
And yet at the same time, they're bringing terrorists left, right and centre.

48
0:03:17 --> 0:03:26
So the misinformation and disinformation bill, the MAD bill, the MAD bill has been being

49
0:03:26 --> 0:03:35
pushed by the Australian government again so that only authorized news outlets and politicians

50
0:03:35 --> 0:03:39
are not liable to misinformation or disinformation claims.

51
0:03:39 --> 0:03:44
We must all push back against this nonsense.

52
0:03:44 --> 0:03:46
If you're offended by anything, be offended.

53
0:03:46 --> 0:03:49
We are lovingly not interested.

54
0:03:49 --> 0:03:54
We reject the offence industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another.

55
0:03:54 --> 0:03:57
We also reject the triggering industry.

56
0:03:57 --> 0:04:00
So Robert, don't worry about offending anybody or triggering anybody.

57
0:04:00 --> 0:04:01
We're not interested.

58
0:04:01 --> 0:04:07
However, we come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.

59
0:04:07 --> 0:04:09
Fear is the opposite of love.

60
0:04:09 --> 0:04:11
Fear squashes you and enslaves you.

61
0:04:11 --> 0:04:15
Love, on the other hand, expands you, liberates you.

62
0:04:15 --> 0:04:20
The great challenge of Christian principle is loving those who disagree with us, in fact,

63
0:04:20 --> 0:04:22
loving our enemies.

64
0:04:22 --> 0:04:24
Big challenge.

65
0:04:24 --> 0:04:27
These twice weekly meetings are not just talk fests.

66
0:04:27 --> 0:04:32
An extraordinary range of actions and initiatives have been generated from linkages made by

67
0:04:33 --> 0:04:34
in these meetings.

68
0:04:34 --> 0:04:38
If you have a solution or a product or links or resources that will help people put the

69
0:04:38 --> 0:04:44
details into the chat, Robert, if you can make sure you put your, we've published your

70
0:04:44 --> 0:04:48
website, but Robert, put your website into the chat and all the resources because you've

71
0:04:48 --> 0:04:50
got a lot of resources on your website.

72
0:04:50 --> 0:04:55
The meeting is recorded and is uploaded on the Rumble channel.

73
0:04:55 --> 0:04:59
And now welcome to our guest presenter, Dr. Robert O. Young, formerly.

74
0:05:00 --> 0:05:06
And we thank you, Robert, for again being with us and sharing your genius with us.

75
0:05:06 --> 0:05:13
And for the purposes of the recording, I want to read a short bio of Robert, whose mission

76
0:05:13 --> 0:05:20
is to do all he can to change and save lives with an alkaline diet and lifestyle.

77
0:05:21 --> 0:05:28
And Neil Solomon, former head of research for Johns Hopkins University, said, Dr. Young

78
0:05:28 --> 0:05:34
may be on the threshold of a new biology whose principle, if proven, could revolutionize

79
0:05:34 --> 0:05:37
the biology and medicine worlds.

80
0:05:37 --> 0:05:43
Over the past, that's an end quote, over the past two and a half decade, over nearly 30

81
0:05:43 --> 0:05:47
years, Robert has been widely recognized as one of the top research scientists in the

82
0:05:47 --> 0:05:48
world.

83
0:05:48 --> 0:05:53
Throughout his career, his research has been focused at the cellular level, having a specialty

84
0:05:53 --> 0:05:56
in cellular nutrition.

85
0:05:56 --> 0:06:02
Robert Young has devoted his life to researching the true causes of, quote, disease, end quote,

86
0:06:02 --> 0:06:10
subsequently developing the new biology to help people balance their lives.

87
0:06:10 --> 0:06:16
In 1994, Robert discovered the biological transformation of red blood cells into bacteria

88
0:06:16 --> 0:06:19
and bacteria to red blood cells.

89
0:06:19 --> 0:06:23
He has since documented several such transformations.

90
0:06:23 --> 0:06:27
Robert has devoted his career to the discovery of the missing pieces necessary to complete

91
0:06:27 --> 0:06:31
the larger picture of health.

92
0:06:31 --> 0:06:35
His website is in the chat, drrobertyoung.com.

93
0:06:35 --> 0:06:41
For all of an amazing set of resources, I've visited his website many times.

94
0:06:41 --> 0:06:45
And thank you, Stephen Frost, again, for creating this group and for organizing Robert to speak

95
0:06:45 --> 0:06:47
to us today.

96
0:06:47 --> 0:06:50
Robert, we are all yours.

97
0:06:51 --> 0:06:53
Well, thank you, Charles.

98
0:06:53 --> 0:06:56
I hope everyone can hear my voice.

99
0:06:56 --> 0:06:57
We can.

100
0:06:57 --> 0:07:00
And it's coming through clearly.

101
0:07:00 --> 0:07:01
It is.

102
0:07:01 --> 0:07:07
I'm really always grateful for the opportunities to have a platform to share, you know, my

103
0:07:07 --> 0:07:14
experiences in the last, you know, four plus decades.

104
0:07:14 --> 0:07:15
It's gone really, really fast.

105
0:07:15 --> 0:07:18
I don't feel as probably as old as I look.

106
0:07:18 --> 0:07:27
But the bottom line is, is that I never thought I would be in this place talking about the

107
0:07:27 --> 0:07:35
things I talk about, because most of my life was really spent, at least the early part

108
0:07:35 --> 0:07:39
of my life was spent in amateur and professional sport.

109
0:07:39 --> 0:07:42
And so I have that that competitive edge.

110
0:07:42 --> 0:07:49
I've lost it over the years a little bit, but it sparks up once in a while and reminds

111
0:07:49 --> 0:07:54
me, you know, that it's not such a bad thing to have a little competition.

112
0:07:54 --> 0:08:00
But my father always always would say to me, I was I was a better doubles player than a

113
0:08:00 --> 0:08:03
singles player in tennis.

114
0:08:03 --> 0:08:12
And so I I really enjoy working with others and supporting others and having others support

115
0:08:12 --> 0:08:15
me in whatever I was doing.

116
0:08:16 --> 0:08:22
And I've enjoyed that type of relationship, both in sport and also business.

117
0:08:23 --> 0:08:27
So over the last four decades.

118
0:08:29 --> 0:08:36
I've had some very unique relationships, one of those, of course, you mentioned Dr.

119
0:08:36 --> 0:08:43
Neil Solomon. He was at the at the university.

120
0:08:45 --> 0:08:49
Just trying at Johns Hopkins University at the School of Medicine.

121
0:08:50 --> 0:08:57
And I don't know if you remember him or not, but those who are old enough to remember

122
0:08:58 --> 0:09:04
President Nixon, Nixon, he nominated Neil Solomon for the.

123
0:09:06 --> 0:09:12
For the top doctor of the United States, the surgeon general.

124
0:09:13 --> 0:09:17
And he he told me this personally.

125
0:09:18 --> 0:09:20
Because we work together.

126
0:09:20 --> 0:09:27
And he was the one that got me involved, which back then I innocently didn't know the

127
0:09:27 --> 0:09:30
outcomes of of what the United Nations had.

128
0:09:30 --> 0:09:37
But we actually had a program and and and we had a foundation together.

129
0:09:37 --> 0:09:41
It's called the Interlight Biological Health and Education Foundation.

130
0:09:41 --> 0:09:49
And its purpose was to educate children on health, to educate children on the needs of

131
0:09:50 --> 0:09:55
you know, eating the right kinds of foods that would help build strong bodies.

132
0:09:55 --> 0:10:05
And so he was a great influence early in my career and in in in my 30s.

133
0:10:05 --> 0:10:08
And. He.

134
0:10:10 --> 0:10:17
When he was offered this position as the the top doctor of the United States, he told

135
0:10:18 --> 0:10:22
Richard Nixon that he would do this on one condition.

136
0:10:23 --> 0:10:32
One condition, and that condition was that choice was allowed for all American citizens,

137
0:10:32 --> 0:10:34
that they could choose not only.

138
0:10:36 --> 0:10:40
What was perceived as contemporary medical treatments.

139
0:10:42 --> 0:10:47
They call them traditional or conventional is probably better than traditional

140
0:10:47 --> 0:10:51
traditional I associate with natural.

141
0:10:51 --> 0:10:58
But they would be able to choose the type of care that they wanted, whether they were

142
0:10:58 --> 0:11:05
going to go to a naturopath or whether or not they were going to go to a physician.

143
0:11:06 --> 0:11:07
So they were able to choose.

144
0:11:07 --> 0:11:12
And Nixon said, we can't do that.

145
0:11:12 --> 0:11:19
You know, there's only one type of medical care that can be offered that we need to

146
0:11:19 --> 0:11:22
stand back and support.

147
0:11:22 --> 0:11:25
And that's, you know, Rockefeller medicine.

148
0:11:25 --> 0:11:26
He didn't say it that way.

149
0:11:26 --> 0:11:27
That's the way I said it.

150
0:11:27 --> 0:11:32
OK, I'm not quoting him, but he's he turned down the job.

151
0:11:33 --> 0:11:40
He said, well, then I don't want to be the surgeon general if we cannot offer the

152
0:11:40 --> 0:11:41
not offer.

153
0:11:44 --> 0:11:49
You know, our people a choice and to be educated about that choice.

154
0:11:52 --> 0:11:59
And so I thought that was that was quite an extraordinary thing that he he chose, but

155
0:11:59 --> 0:12:06
he he was he believed in natural approaches rather than chemical approaches.

156
0:12:06 --> 0:12:09
And I think it's important for people to understand.

157
0:12:10 --> 0:12:18
Even more so now, because of the last three and a half, four years and even before that

158
0:12:18 --> 0:12:25
and going forward, when we're dealing and looking at the array of different chemicals.

159
0:12:26 --> 0:12:29
From pesticides, insecticides, herbicides.

160
0:12:30 --> 0:12:36
You know, going on and on that are now found in our foods, even microplastics.

161
0:12:37 --> 0:12:41
That are found in our foods, forever chemicals.

162
0:12:43 --> 0:12:51
You know, this debate between organic and inorganic or non-organic based upon how farming.

163
0:12:51 --> 0:12:53
How farming.

164
0:12:54 --> 0:13:02
Was being done, and that was a that was a concern that I had as well, and I I gained

165
0:13:02 --> 0:13:05
that concern from my father.

166
0:13:08 --> 0:13:14
And I could I thought we were really strange because we never went to the doctor.

167
0:13:15 --> 0:13:22
You know, I can't tell you other than when we went to church, I knew there were doctors

168
0:13:22 --> 0:13:26
there and I knew them by name and called them doctors.

169
0:13:27 --> 0:13:33
But I didn't know why we never visited them for any type of treatments or medicine.

170
0:13:34 --> 0:13:43
And we just never were exposed to regular physicals or when anything seemed to be.

171
0:13:45 --> 0:13:50
Out of balance, you know, running off to the hospital, to the emergency room, or running

172
0:13:50 --> 0:14:00
off to a doctor to or to what now the box stores that are, you know, dispensing pharmaceuticals.

173
0:14:01 --> 0:14:03
Just have never done that.

174
0:14:03 --> 0:14:12
So I've never taken pharmaceuticals and I think my mother, if I had a headache, maybe she gave me

175
0:14:12 --> 0:14:14
some aspirin, but I don't even remember that.

176
0:14:15 --> 0:14:16
I really don't.

177
0:14:17 --> 0:14:25
And so, in fact, it was it was even to the extent that we had no health insurance.

178
0:14:26 --> 0:14:35
And so, you know, the most tragic thing that happened to me was when I was using a little

179
0:14:35 --> 0:14:39
hatchet, I ended up cutting my knee, lacerating my knee.

180
0:14:40 --> 0:14:45
And my dad broke down and says, well, we may need to go to the hospital.

181
0:14:45 --> 0:14:48
And he took me to the emergency room, said, stay here.

182
0:14:48 --> 0:14:49
I'm going in.

183
0:14:50 --> 0:14:52
He walked out saying, we're not going in.

184
0:14:53 --> 0:14:55
And I said, we're going to have to figure out another way.

185
0:14:56 --> 0:14:58
I said, Dad, I'm bleeding here.

186
0:14:58 --> 0:14:59
You know, I'm losing blood.

187
0:14:59 --> 0:15:01
He says, no, we'll patch it up.

188
0:15:01 --> 0:15:02
It's no problem.

189
0:15:03 --> 0:15:04
It's interesting.

190
0:15:04 --> 0:15:09
We passed it up and where there was a scar, there is no scar because there were no stitches.

191
0:15:09 --> 0:15:13
I didn't receive those, but it was a deep laceration.

192
0:15:14 --> 0:15:18
And so I'm not apologetic towards that.

193
0:15:19 --> 0:15:26
And one of my best friends growing up, who was my scoutmaster, he was an orthopedic surgeon.

194
0:15:26 --> 0:15:34
And his language was, hey, you know, kid, you're smart enough to go to medical school.

195
0:15:34 --> 0:15:38
You should become an orthopedic surgeon because there's a lot of money in it.

196
0:15:40 --> 0:15:41
And I said, well, what do you mean?

197
0:15:41 --> 0:15:42
There's a lot of money.

198
0:15:43 --> 0:15:48
And he said, well, I make 250 to 300,000 a year.

199
0:15:48 --> 0:15:50
And this is in the 60s.

200
0:15:50 --> 0:15:54
And he had the biggest house and the best cars and the best cars.

201
0:15:54 --> 0:15:57
And I thought about that and I thought, wow, okay.

202
0:15:57 --> 0:16:05
You know, so doctors go to medical school, you know, I thought to help people, but I guess

203
0:16:06 --> 0:16:08
they also go because the pay is good.

204
0:16:10 --> 0:16:13
And I really wasn't necessarily interested in that.

205
0:16:13 --> 0:16:13
I swear.

206
0:16:14 --> 0:16:16
I kind of chose a different path.

207
0:16:17 --> 0:16:19
And I don't know if what I'm telling you is helpful.

208
0:16:19 --> 0:16:26
But it kind of rounded me out to why the first doctor I ever saw and the last doctor I ever

209
0:16:26 --> 0:16:31
saw was when I was born in the LDS Salt Lake City Hospital.

210
0:16:32 --> 0:16:38
And that's been the extent of my exposure to medical treatments.

211
0:16:38 --> 0:16:45
Now, I think the first doctor I ever saw was Dr. John H.

212
0:16:46 --> 0:16:52
Am I opposed to people having their own doctor?

213
0:16:52 --> 0:16:52
Absolutely.

214
0:16:52 --> 0:16:54
Do I work with doctors?

215
0:16:54 --> 0:16:54
Absolutely.

216
0:16:54 --> 0:16:58
Do I respect, you know, their training?

217
0:17:00 --> 0:17:02
Yes and no, to a certain extent.

218
0:17:02 --> 0:17:07
I mean, I think their training is critical as it relates to anatomy.

219
0:17:08 --> 0:17:12
But I disagree with physiology, their physiology aspects.

220
0:17:12 --> 0:17:21
And so I mean, for a good argument, you know, this whole theory that we metabolize or generate,

221
0:17:21 --> 0:17:27
you know, energy through the breakdown of foods rather than the release of electrical energy

222
0:17:27 --> 0:17:31
is a discussion that really very few people have had.

223
0:17:32 --> 0:17:40
And I think the most important part of the energy cycle is the electron transport chain.

224
0:17:40 --> 0:17:43
That's probably the most accurate thing about it.

225
0:17:43 --> 0:17:45
But our bodies do not run on sugar.

226
0:17:47 --> 0:17:52
I know the theory of, well, you need sugar because your brain cells run on sugar.

227
0:17:52 --> 0:17:53
Absolutely not.

228
0:17:54 --> 0:17:56
Our brain cells are electrical.

229
0:17:57 --> 0:17:59
Our neurons are electrical.

230
0:17:59 --> 0:18:04
They run on electrons and they transport those electrons and they use it.

231
0:18:04 --> 0:18:11
So early in the game in the late 80s, early 90s, I wrote a book called Sick and Tired,

232
0:18:13 --> 0:18:14
Reclaim Your Inner Terrain.

233
0:18:15 --> 0:18:23
And I had gone into testing because I wasn't pleased with the breakdown that the FDA was

234
0:18:23 --> 0:18:30
giving as it relates to, you know, this food has this amount of mineral in it or

235
0:18:31 --> 0:18:32
this amount of sugar in it.

236
0:18:33 --> 0:18:34
But I wanted to look at the whole food.

237
0:18:34 --> 0:18:41
So I would take a food, I would liquefy that food.

238
0:18:42 --> 0:18:49
I wouldn't burn it off like they do as far as the FDA when they're testing pH or if they're

239
0:18:49 --> 0:18:56
testing mineral content of the food, it's literally cremated down to, you know,

240
0:18:56 --> 0:18:58
it's mineral content.

241
0:18:58 --> 0:19:03
The water burns off, the sugar burns off, and it really doesn't give you a correct picture.

242
0:19:03 --> 0:19:09
So I came up with a whole new scale that's based upon the electron

243
0:19:10 --> 0:19:15
concentration of foods and also its pH.

244
0:19:15 --> 0:19:26
So pH and ORP, pH measuring the hydrogen or hydroxyl, the H positive or the OH minus,

245
0:19:27 --> 0:19:32
and also measuring its oxidation reduction potential,

246
0:19:32 --> 0:19:39
realizing that we eat food not for calories, we eat food for energy, life force energy.

247
0:19:40 --> 0:19:46
And that spark I call the life force energy is the electron.

248
0:19:48 --> 0:19:50
And that electron becomes very, very important.

249
0:19:51 --> 0:19:54
And the charge of food becomes very important.

250
0:19:54 --> 0:19:59
And whether or not it donates electrons or it consumes electrons,

251
0:20:00 --> 0:20:04
because people would ask me, why are you against orange juice?

252
0:20:06 --> 0:20:08
I said, I'm not against orange juice.

253
0:20:08 --> 0:20:09
I grew up on orange juice.

254
0:20:09 --> 0:20:12
I like orange juice, you know, and once in a while I have it.

255
0:20:13 --> 0:20:16
But it doesn't provide me any energy.

256
0:20:17 --> 0:20:18
It tastes good.

257
0:20:18 --> 0:20:25
But it is an electron consumer and a proton donor.

258
0:20:26 --> 0:20:30
So orange juice does not provide any life force energy.

259
0:20:30 --> 0:20:36
It may provide some mineral content, but that's another discussion when you're just looking at

260
0:20:36 --> 0:20:41
food for its, whether it donates, you know, electrons or protons.

261
0:20:41 --> 0:20:43
And so that was the case with bananas.

262
0:20:43 --> 0:20:45
We grew up on bananas.

263
0:20:45 --> 0:20:51
And it was the case with the opposite of this, which would be like tomatoes.

264
0:20:51 --> 0:20:55
People would say, well, wait a minute, tomatoes are acidic.

265
0:20:56 --> 0:20:59
And somebody may say, well, they have, you know, another scientist may say, well,

266
0:20:59 --> 0:21:01
they're high in lycopenes.

267
0:21:01 --> 0:21:09
They have a high concentration of antioxidants, you know, and so there's this argument going on.

268
0:21:09 --> 0:21:16
I was just looking at that time in the late 80s, early 90s, is whether or not tomatoes would be

269
0:21:16 --> 0:21:20
an electron donor or an electron scavenger.

270
0:21:21 --> 0:21:24
In other words, you'd lose energy by eating a tomato.

271
0:21:25 --> 0:21:26
That's not the case.

272
0:21:27 --> 0:21:36
So if you have a tomato or if you have a lemon or if you have a lime or if you have a grapefruit

273
0:21:36 --> 0:21:42
and you test its juice, you'll see the test out on a scale of zero to 14, it tests out on the acidic

274
0:21:42 --> 0:21:43
side.

275
0:21:44 --> 0:21:53
But the point here is when I developed the scale, I didn't necessarily develop it based upon that

276
0:21:54 --> 0:21:56
arbitrary zero to 14 pH.

277
0:21:57 --> 0:22:04
I wanted to know if that tomato or if that lemon or that lime or that grapefruit was going to

278
0:22:06 --> 0:22:10
create more toxicity, more acidity or more alkalinity.

279
0:22:11 --> 0:22:18
And the answer to that, it's the net gain for tomatoes, grapefruits, lemons, limes,

280
0:22:18 --> 0:22:26
etc., actually donate life force energy in excess of their acidic components.

281
0:22:27 --> 0:22:32
So they have acidic components, but the net effect is alkalizing.

282
0:22:33 --> 0:22:35
And so I had to create a whole new scale.

283
0:22:35 --> 0:22:40
If you get my book, you'll see this scale and goes, what is he talking about?

284
0:22:41 --> 0:22:47
The scale that goes from positive zero to 100 to negative zero to 100.

285
0:22:47 --> 0:22:52
And I'm talking about this food when it's broken down, it's massacated,

286
0:22:52 --> 0:22:59
will donate life force energy and whether it's contributing because our cells are electrical.

287
0:22:59 --> 0:23:02
Our body is electrical.

288
0:23:02 --> 0:23:07
Cells don't run on carbohydrates, proteins or fats.

289
0:23:07 --> 0:23:14
They run on electricity, electron, and that's the element.

290
0:23:14 --> 0:23:21
So that's an oversimplification a little bit, but I just wanted to explain a little bit about

291
0:23:22 --> 0:23:27
what my thought process is when I'm categorizing food.

292
0:23:27 --> 0:23:35
I have it in certain categories, which is uniquely different than most, if not all the pH scales,

293
0:23:35 --> 0:23:37
ORP scales that are out there.

294
0:23:38 --> 0:23:45
So anyway, whatever your position is on that, I just wanted to clarify some of the early

295
0:23:45 --> 0:23:50
research I was doing on food sciences since my PhD is in nutrition.

296
0:23:50 --> 0:23:56
In fact, I remember my coach, Harry James, at the University of Utah, introduced me to

297
0:23:56 --> 0:24:02
encapsulated nutrition in the form of a capsule in the 60s.

298
0:24:02 --> 0:24:03
I thought it was very strange.

299
0:24:03 --> 0:24:09
I thought it was Space Odyssey 2000, where they'd eat their breakfast or their lunch

300
0:24:09 --> 0:24:10
or dinner and it was in a tablet.

301
0:24:10 --> 0:24:13
Well, there were few people who were able to do that.

302
0:24:13 --> 0:24:16
And I was very fortunate to have a friend who was able to do that.

303
0:24:17 --> 0:24:19
And I was very fortunate to have a friend who was able to do that.

304
0:24:19 --> 0:24:22
Well, they were feeding us that in the 60s.

305
0:24:22 --> 0:24:30
So I got an early start in taking nutritional supplements as something that was recommended

306
0:24:30 --> 0:24:33
by my university coach.

307
0:24:34 --> 0:24:39
Well, I don't know why I started out this way, but I wanted to just introduce you to

308
0:24:41 --> 0:24:45
some of the people who are giants in my world.

309
0:24:45 --> 0:24:51
That I was able to work with or be part of or work in their labs.

310
0:24:52 --> 0:24:54
And I think it was mentioned.

311
0:24:54 --> 0:25:02
One of those which many of you know is is Deusburg and who wrote a very, very important

312
0:25:02 --> 0:25:04
book in the 80s.

313
0:25:04 --> 0:25:07
It's called Inventing the AIDS Virus.

314
0:25:07 --> 0:25:11
Are you all familiar with Peter Deusburg's work?

315
0:25:11 --> 0:25:17
He's a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

316
0:25:17 --> 0:25:23
So Robert, many of us in this group, I would say most are aware of Peter Deusburg and how

317
0:25:23 --> 0:25:24
he was hounded.

318
0:25:25 --> 0:25:30
And actually, I'm extremely interested in what you have to say about Peter Deusburg

319
0:25:31 --> 0:25:33
because they really did hound him.

320
0:25:33 --> 0:25:36
And he was, well, as I understand it, they did hound him.

321
0:25:37 --> 0:25:44
Well, they did hound him and they relegated him from the top floor to the bottom floor.

322
0:25:44 --> 0:25:47
And the same thing happened to my colleague, Luc Montaner.

323
0:25:48 --> 0:25:50
And the same thing happened to him.

324
0:25:52 --> 0:26:00
Yeah, so some of you know part of the story, you know, that story started, you know, in

325
0:26:00 --> 0:26:04
around 2010 to 2011, 2012.

326
0:26:04 --> 0:26:05
But he ended up in China.

327
0:26:06 --> 0:26:10
And he gave up his chair at the University of Paris.

328
0:26:10 --> 0:26:14
But Deusburg, I mean, had a beautiful lab.

329
0:26:14 --> 0:26:18
He was focused on cancer treatment.

330
0:26:19 --> 0:26:22
And that was something that I was focused on.

331
0:26:24 --> 0:26:33
And he got turned aside here because of Robert Gallo and Luc Montaner, who received jointly

332
0:26:33 --> 0:26:41
the Nobel Prize for accrediting them the purified isolation of the HIV virus.

333
0:26:41 --> 0:26:41
Yes.

334
0:26:42 --> 0:26:44
I think that's pretty much...

335
0:26:44 --> 0:26:45
We know that.

336
0:26:45 --> 0:26:46
2008, I think.

337
0:26:46 --> 0:26:50
That's historically the fact, yes.

338
0:26:50 --> 0:26:52
Robert, wasn't that 2008?

339
0:26:52 --> 0:26:53
He won the Nobel Prize.

340
0:26:53 --> 0:26:54
Yes, 2008.

341
0:26:54 --> 0:26:58
Montaner for the discovery of the AIDS virus, I think, as I understood it.

342
0:26:58 --> 0:27:01
Not the AIDS virus, the HIV virus.

343
0:27:01 --> 0:27:04
I mean, yes, sorry, the HIV, I meant that, yes.

344
0:27:04 --> 0:27:05
I meant to say that.

345
0:27:05 --> 0:27:11
It's an important distinction because AIDS is an acronym for acquired immune deficiency,

346
0:27:11 --> 0:27:13
which is really vague.

347
0:27:13 --> 0:27:14
Sorry, I made a big mistake there.

348
0:27:14 --> 0:27:18
But some of the characters were there with Robert Gallo.

349
0:27:19 --> 0:27:24
His subordinate was Fauci.

350
0:27:25 --> 0:27:29
And Fauci actually took Robert Gallo's position

351
0:27:30 --> 0:27:32
when he left.

352
0:27:32 --> 0:27:35
Well, actually, he was convicted of...

353
0:27:35 --> 0:27:39
He was actually asked to leave because of scientific fraud.

354
0:27:39 --> 0:27:45
Here again, I don't know the details of all that, but you don't hear his name much.

355
0:27:45 --> 0:27:48
But he hasn't been around for several decades.

356
0:27:48 --> 0:27:54
But he was part of that whole thing that was going down with HIV.

357
0:27:55 --> 0:28:00
And Deusburg, early in the game, that book was published in 1985.

358
0:28:02 --> 0:28:05
1985, Inventing the AIDS Virus.

359
0:28:05 --> 0:28:10
But it wasn't just about viruses, about HIV.

360
0:28:10 --> 0:28:20
It was also about other viruses like Ebola, Ebola virus or the hepatitis viruses.

361
0:28:20 --> 0:28:26
And he calls them, or at least I call them, I think I'd have to go back and read the book,

362
0:28:26 --> 0:28:28
but I call them phantom viruses.

363
0:28:28 --> 0:28:38
Because as he would state, there has been no purified isolation without contamination

364
0:28:39 --> 0:28:47
representing the...based upon the scientific method, whether it's Robert Koch or if it's

365
0:28:48 --> 0:28:55
Rivers procedures as far as identifying, isolating, or purifying, isolating, and then

366
0:28:55 --> 0:29:03
demonstrating through reinfection or transfection that this entity that you've isolated causes

367
0:29:03 --> 0:29:06
a specific disease with specific symptoms.

368
0:29:08 --> 0:29:15
So from his work, I'm talking about Deusburg now, Peter Deusburg.

369
0:29:16 --> 0:29:20
I was inspired to publish three papers which are available.

370
0:29:21 --> 0:29:30
These three papers are titled, A Second Thought About Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV-AIDS

371
0:29:30 --> 0:29:30
Hypothesis.

372
0:29:32 --> 0:29:38
And I published these finally in the 90s through the work and inspiration

373
0:29:39 --> 0:29:50
of Peter Deusburg and his basic theory and what he was proving that AIDS was caused

374
0:29:50 --> 0:29:52
by chemical poisoning.

375
0:29:55 --> 0:30:00
Now that's important when I'm telling you because chemical poisoning has been going

376
0:30:00 --> 0:30:02
on for a very, very long time.

377
0:30:02 --> 0:30:07
And so back then, of course, the chemical poisoning was based upon the treatment.

378
0:30:08 --> 0:30:15
And back then, the treatment was a Fauci drug, even back then, that was taken off the shelf

379
0:30:15 --> 0:30:17
called AZT.

380
0:30:20 --> 0:30:26
I may be getting in the weeds on this thing, but I'm trying to stay general because I want

381
0:30:26 --> 0:30:30
to bring this around because there's a history of chemical poisoning.

382
0:30:31 --> 0:30:40
So I have made the premise within my abstracts and in my conclusions that there are no sicknesses

383
0:30:40 --> 0:30:41
and diseases.

384
0:30:41 --> 0:30:52
In fact, the book Sick and Tired, which was a predecessor to a book I wrote earlier, was

385
0:30:53 --> 0:30:56
called One Sickness, One Disease, One Treatment.

386
0:30:57 --> 0:31:03
And that was pretty radical in the 80s that these multiplicities of diseases were not

387
0:31:03 --> 0:31:04
diseases at all.

388
0:31:06 --> 0:31:13
And so my foundational theory was that there are no diseases, that there's only states

389
0:31:13 --> 0:31:20
of balance and imbalance, and that what they're calling diseases is not diseases.

390
0:31:20 --> 0:31:28
What they're calling diseases are symptoms or symptomologies that are then being treated

391
0:31:29 --> 0:31:37
rather than the underlying causative factors that are related to context or environment,

392
0:31:37 --> 0:31:40
which includes temperature, ORP, and pH.

393
0:31:41 --> 0:31:50
If you have any imbalance, i.e. sickness or disease, you can find that very simply by

394
0:31:50 --> 0:31:58
just testing with the earlier question before we started recording, what is the ideal pH

395
0:31:58 --> 0:31:59
of the body fluids?

396
0:32:02 --> 0:32:08
And the low range is 7.2, which is actually, if it's in the blood, it would be called

397
0:32:08 --> 0:32:13
which is actually, if it's in the blood, it would be called decompensated acidosis,

398
0:32:13 --> 0:32:23
and it would be an alarming event because it's moved around 0.15 of one point down

399
0:32:24 --> 0:32:29
because you're in a coma at 7.1 and you're dead at 6.9.

400
0:32:30 --> 0:32:32
And we're talking about a pH of the blood.

401
0:32:33 --> 0:32:44
So the regulation of the blood is critical and everything is subject to managing and

402
0:32:44 --> 0:32:46
maintaining that alkaline design.

403
0:32:47 --> 0:32:53
But it's not taught at Harvard, it's not taught at Yale, it's not taught at Oxford,

404
0:32:54 --> 0:33:01
that the stomach is the major contributor of alkalinity that manages the delicate pH

405
0:33:01 --> 0:33:04
balance of all of the body fluids.

406
0:33:04 --> 0:33:05
Do I need to say that again?

407
0:33:09 --> 0:33:15
There is an organ and its main purpose is to manage and maintain the alkaline design

408
0:33:15 --> 0:33:17
of the body fluids.

409
0:33:18 --> 0:33:20
And they don't teach this.

410
0:33:20 --> 0:33:23
It's actually an elective at Oxford University.

411
0:33:24 --> 0:33:30
When I spoke there in 2007, I gave a very similar lecture.

412
0:33:31 --> 0:33:42
But the ideal pH to the thousands is 7.365, never above 7 and never below 7.3.

413
0:33:46 --> 0:33:56
And then I published another paper in 2022, I wrote it earlier than that,

414
0:33:56 --> 0:33:58
called the blood-jerk reaction.

415
0:33:58 --> 0:34:05
Because there's procedures that medical doctors do when the pH of the blood goes excess,

416
0:34:06 --> 0:34:11
compensated alkalosis, where what if the pH goes up to 7.4 or 7.5?

417
0:34:12 --> 0:34:13
What does that mean?

418
0:34:15 --> 0:34:18
Well, interpreted directly, it means you're too acidic.

419
0:34:18 --> 0:34:19
So what do they do?

420
0:34:20 --> 0:34:25
They do an acidic drip to pull the pH down, which is actually

421
0:34:25 --> 0:34:26
not helpful.

422
0:34:27 --> 0:34:32
So I wrote this paper called the Peter Tauter effect.

423
0:34:32 --> 0:34:38
It's called the blood-jerk reaction because when the pH goes up, it's trying to overcompensate

424
0:34:40 --> 0:34:46
for all the waste or acidic metabolic dietary respiratory environmental toxins that are being

425
0:34:46 --> 0:34:51
pushed into what is called the largest organ of the human body called the inner cystidium,

426
0:34:51 --> 0:34:56
which contains the 80% of the extracellular fluids, 20% in the blood.

427
0:34:57 --> 0:34:59
It's called the interstitial fluid.

428
0:34:59 --> 0:35:02
Where does all the waste, how does the blood purify itself?

429
0:35:02 --> 0:35:04
Where does it get rid of its toxins?

430
0:35:04 --> 0:35:08
How does it maintain its alkaline design?

431
0:35:08 --> 0:35:11
Are those things being taught to medical doctors?

432
0:35:11 --> 0:35:12
Unfortunately, not.

433
0:35:14 --> 0:35:16
They understand compensated and they understand

434
0:35:17 --> 0:35:21
acidosis, alkalosis, decompensated acidosis.

435
0:35:21 --> 0:35:25
And then they react to that number rather than understanding

436
0:35:28 --> 0:35:31
the effects of dealing with this.

437
0:35:31 --> 0:35:34
If you're in decompensated acidosis, you're in trouble.

438
0:35:37 --> 0:35:41
The number one cause of death in the United States, which has never reported

439
0:35:42 --> 0:35:43
is systemic sepsis.

440
0:35:43 --> 0:35:49
And systemic sepsis is caused by the overacidification of the interstitial

441
0:35:49 --> 0:35:55
fluids of the inner cystidium that can't get it out through urination or defecation or

442
0:35:55 --> 0:35:57
respiration or perspiration.

443
0:35:57 --> 0:35:58
So guess what?

444
0:35:58 --> 0:36:04
Through hydrostatic pressure, it pushes it back in the blood and the blood starts becoming

445
0:36:04 --> 0:36:04
destroyed.

446
0:36:04 --> 0:36:06
And that's the cause of death.

447
0:36:07 --> 0:36:11
The blood starts becoming destroyed.

448
0:36:12 --> 0:36:17
Urine acidosis of the interstitial fluids of the inner cystidium can be measured.

449
0:36:18 --> 0:36:19
How do you measure it?

450
0:36:22 --> 0:36:24
Does the doctor do a chemistry of the blood?

451
0:36:24 --> 0:36:27
That's 20% of the extracellular fluids.

452
0:36:27 --> 0:36:33
Why don't they do a chemistry of the interstitial fluid, which is 80% of the extracellular

453
0:36:33 --> 0:36:34
fluids?

454
0:36:34 --> 0:36:35
They don't know how to do it.

455
0:36:35 --> 0:36:37
They haven't been trained to do it.

456
0:36:37 --> 0:36:38
They don't have the equipment to do it.

457
0:36:40 --> 0:36:40
Why?

458
0:36:42 --> 0:36:49
I've been doing this testing or having this testing done for two decades.

459
0:36:49 --> 0:36:51
I kept asking that question.

460
0:36:54 --> 0:37:05
So I discovered that if you do a urinalysis, that that urine that you're testing is a product of

461
0:37:05 --> 0:37:07
the interstitial fluids of the inner cystidium.

462
0:37:09 --> 0:37:16
And that the ideal pH of that interstitial fluid is a minimum of 8.4 in a healthy human being.

463
0:37:16 --> 0:37:18
Because what did I do?

464
0:37:18 --> 0:37:19
Do I study sick people?

465
0:37:20 --> 0:37:20
Yes.

466
0:37:20 --> 0:37:22
But I also study healthy people.

467
0:37:26 --> 0:37:29
I want to know what healthy urine looks like.

468
0:37:29 --> 0:37:30
Not that I drink it.

469
0:37:30 --> 0:37:31
I don't.

470
0:37:31 --> 0:37:33
It's a waste product.

471
0:37:33 --> 0:37:34
But I test it.

472
0:37:35 --> 0:37:39
And I test it on its electron-proton concentration.

473
0:37:39 --> 0:37:43
And I test it for its pH.

474
0:37:44 --> 0:37:50
And people that are healthy have a urine pH running between 8.4 to 9,

475
0:37:51 --> 0:37:58
never dropping during human experiments when you eat something you shouldn't or drink something

476
0:37:58 --> 0:38:02
you shouldn't, where it drops below a pH of 7.2.

477
0:38:04 --> 0:38:11
And I had the eureka experience, the eureka's experience when I realized

478
0:38:13 --> 0:38:20
that when the blood started losing alkalinity, when the body fluid, the body interstitial fluid,

479
0:38:20 --> 0:38:27
the body ocean started losing alkalinity, the stomach kicked in and started within its

480
0:38:27 --> 0:38:33
cover cells, drawing off carbon, which is, believe it or not, 90% of your carbon dioxide

481
0:38:33 --> 0:38:34
is not excelled.

482
0:38:34 --> 0:38:46
It's used by the stomach as an element, chloride, not chloride, but the CO2, CO2, carbon dioxide.

483
0:38:47 --> 0:38:51
90% of the carbon dioxide is not respirated, only around 10%.

484
0:38:52 --> 0:38:57
90% is used by the stomach in creating by the cells that are responsible for that,

485
0:38:58 --> 0:39:04
taking water and salt, i.e., why would the doctor ever tell you not to eat salt?

486
0:39:04 --> 0:39:05
That's crazy.

487
0:39:08 --> 0:39:16
Salt is a major element in producing sodium bicarbonate to manage and maintain the alkaline

488
0:39:16 --> 0:39:20
design of the blood, the interstitial fluids, and the intracellular fluids.

489
0:39:22 --> 0:39:27
So once you have this understanding, you start measuring the pH, you become your own doctor,

490
0:39:27 --> 0:39:35
you manage it by supporting the alkaline design of the body the same way those who were being

491
0:39:35 --> 0:39:44
transfected during COVID or in the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic by taking 5 grams of sodium

492
0:39:44 --> 0:39:50
bicarbonate baking soda in 4 ounces of distilled or purified water.

493
0:39:50 --> 0:39:55
And those are the people that survived the transfection or the injection

494
0:39:57 --> 0:40:05
of the so-called phantom virus, the influenza virus. It has never been purified or isolated.

495
0:40:08 --> 0:40:15
So those are the people that are doing better. What we did when I was growing up, I would take

496
0:40:15 --> 0:40:25
a Wilson, unfortunately, aluminum can, drop out the tennis balls, put in the water, and add salt

497
0:40:25 --> 0:40:34
to it. I would drink salt water to replace the salt the body needs in order to maintain its

498
0:40:34 --> 0:40:39
alkaline design. Why? Because when you're exercising, when you're moving your body,

499
0:40:40 --> 0:40:48
you're producing an acid called lactic acid. Who's testing for lactic acid levels in the blood?

500
0:40:48 --> 0:40:52
Who's testing for lactic acid in the interstitial fluid?

501
0:40:54 --> 0:41:01
That acid is never absent in the presence of cancer. And when you reduce lactic acid,

502
0:41:01 --> 0:41:09
you eliminate the risk for cancer. Period. The other acid is citric acid. These are the

503
0:41:09 --> 0:41:14
two acids. So I wanted you just to have a little background, some history.

504
0:41:17 --> 0:41:24
I'm grateful for the associations that I've had with Luc Montaner. We were keynote speakers in

505
0:41:24 --> 0:41:31
Milan. He was talking about functionally structured water, alkaline water, and the significance of

506
0:41:31 --> 0:41:38
that. That's crazy talk from a virologist. You can lose your license if you talk about alkalinity.

507
0:41:40 --> 0:41:47
You know, as a point, functionally structured water, three to five molecule structures that

508
0:41:47 --> 0:41:55
can permeate the cell membrane, these are all very, very important. But Charles, I did provide

509
0:41:56 --> 0:42:00
a slide presentation. You can share your screen, Robert.

510
0:42:01 --> 0:42:08
So I can share that screen. I hope I'm not creating more questions than I'm answering.

511
0:42:08 --> 0:42:12
That could be. That's all right. We love this group.

512
0:42:12 --> 0:42:20
Robert, Rie Montaner, you said you were in Milan with him. That was in February of 2022,

513
0:42:20 --> 0:42:27
was it? Or 2021? No, no, no, I was with him in 2011. I've known him for many, many years.

514
0:42:28 --> 0:42:35
Did you know that he went to Milan about a week before he died?

515
0:42:36 --> 0:42:40
Yeah. Well, before he died, it's very important. And I'll cover that.

516
0:42:40 --> 0:42:46
And I'll show you a picture of this. I've got this here. I want to show you.

517
0:42:49 --> 0:42:54
So I think it's important that people like

518
0:42:54 --> 0:43:08
Duisburg and Luc Montaner be honoured. Absolutely. So, Robert, did Montaner say in Milan

519
0:43:08 --> 0:43:20
one week before he died or was killed? No, no, no, this was 2011. He was not in Milan. He

520
0:43:20 --> 0:43:24
actually returned to Paris. No, he was in Milan just before his death.

521
0:43:25 --> 0:43:33
Yeah, he went from Shanghai back to the university there. He went from there back to Paris.

522
0:43:35 --> 0:43:42
What I'm trying to get to is the question, did he or did he not say that the unvaccinated

523
0:43:42 --> 0:43:46
would save humanity one week before he died or was killed?

524
0:43:46 --> 0:43:51
Well, he said a lot of things, and I think that's one of them. But even more important,

525
0:43:51 --> 0:44:00
he also said, not only just to me in 2011, but he said this publicly several months before he

526
0:44:00 --> 0:44:11
passed, that he had never purified an isolation of HIV. That was number one.

527
0:44:12 --> 0:44:20
Yeah, so how on earth did he win the Nobel Prize officially for the discovery of the HIV virus?

528
0:44:21 --> 0:44:28
Well, he had to come clean on that. I mean, isn't that what people do when they're on their

529
0:44:28 --> 0:44:34
deathbeds or near death? I mean, he wanted to clear the slate on that. In fact, what he did say

530
0:44:35 --> 0:44:45
was that it was not AIDS. This is not an acquired immune deficiency. This is VADES. This is vaccine

531
0:44:45 --> 0:44:58
acquired immune deficiency or damage or dysfunction. This is caused by the vaccine itself is what is

532
0:44:58 --> 0:45:09
causing the immune deficiency. You don't take a vaccine with foreign matter. And Bayshopt knew

533
0:45:09 --> 0:45:14
this. You cannot introduce foreign matter, either animal or human, chemical or otherwise.

534
0:45:15 --> 0:45:21
It'll immediately be rejected and attacked and provides no immunity whatsoever.

535
0:45:21 --> 0:45:30
But compromises the body's ability to be able to maintain, which is most important,

536
0:45:31 --> 0:45:40
because based on my premise, my hypothesis, the body is alkaline by design, but acidic by function

537
0:45:40 --> 0:45:46
and to maintain the alkaline design of the body fluids, which is the responsibility of the stomach,

538
0:45:46 --> 0:45:58
and of course, what we eat. So it's contributing to the things the body needs in order to produce

539
0:45:58 --> 0:46:06
that protection. And that's why those who simply use a natural substance, which cannot be patented

540
0:46:07 --> 0:46:11
or profit on the way that Big Harm has been profiting,

541
0:46:13 --> 0:46:26
and that is patent something like NAHCO3 or CAHCO3. These are calcium, magnesium, potassium,

542
0:46:26 --> 0:46:35
sodium, bicarbonates that are critical to maintaining that alkalinity and that design.

543
0:46:35 --> 0:46:42
But Robert, what you said about Montagnier, surely the most important point from our point of view

544
0:46:43 --> 0:46:49
is to understand that on the one hand, Montagnier accepted the Nobel Prize when he knew

545
0:46:50 --> 0:46:55
that they had awarded him the Nobel Prize for nefarious reasons. Probably he knew that.

546
0:46:55 --> 0:47:00
And you say that he only admitted on his deathbed, but my understanding was that he was chipping

547
0:47:00 --> 0:47:05
away at the official narrative way before his death in 2012.

548
0:47:05 --> 0:47:14
Way before, yes. I mean, he knew. And that's why he wanted to turn the direction of his research

549
0:47:14 --> 0:47:22
away from virology and into, you know, how do we create an environment that's conducive

550
0:47:23 --> 0:47:30
to, you know, cell life? Because the cell life, just like fish in a fish bowl,

551
0:47:31 --> 0:47:37
is only as healthy as the water it swims in. Cells are no different. Cells are only as healthy

552
0:47:37 --> 0:47:43
as the water that they thrive in. And there's very specific measurements of that.

553
0:47:43 --> 0:47:48
So, Robert, there's another story, which is very important. So you've raised some issues here.

554
0:47:48 --> 0:47:54
So Montagnier was approached by Kerry Mullis, no less, the inventor of the PCR technique,

555
0:47:55 --> 0:48:02
for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize 10 years after that invention or whatever you want to call

556
0:48:02 --> 0:48:10
it. Yes, discovery. So in 1993, he got the Nobel Prize for chemistry. He wrote a statement,

557
0:48:11 --> 0:48:18
the HIV virus is the probable cause of AIDS. So this was a state and then he looked as he,

558
0:48:18 --> 0:48:26
but with his own words, I watched the video myself, he said that he tried to find a way of proving

559
0:48:26 --> 0:48:32
that. So he started the paper with that statement. He couldn't find it. To his surprise, he couldn't,

560
0:48:32 --> 0:48:39
or said it was his to his surprise, he couldn't find anything that supported that statement.

561
0:48:40 --> 0:48:48
So he also commented on that. So eventually he came to Montagnier. So Kerry received the Nobel

562
0:48:48 --> 0:48:55
Prize. Let me just finish. So he eventually gets to Montagnier. Robert. Yes, go ahead. So he gets to

563
0:48:55 --> 0:49:02
Montagnier. In Paris, apparently, he was surrounded by his henchmen or whatever, you know, the people,

564
0:49:02 --> 0:49:11
his colleagues. And he asked him about this statement. Could he provide a proof scientifically

565
0:49:11 --> 0:49:19
for that statement? And so Montagnier, according to Kerry Mullis, said, well, he said, said, what

566
0:49:19 --> 0:49:23
about this paper, you know, and Kerry Mullis knew it. He said, no, that's not good enough.

567
0:49:24 --> 0:49:28
And what about this one? Montagnier said, that wasn't good enough either. This is Kerry Mullis

568
0:49:28 --> 0:49:39
speaking. And then he said that Montagnier walked away and left the group. And so he was surprised.

569
0:49:39 --> 0:49:44
I think he said that he was surprised that he walked away with no explanation to his colleagues

570
0:49:44 --> 0:49:49
or anything. So he was unable to answer the question. And I wonder whether Montagnier knew

571
0:49:49 --> 0:49:54
then, well, of course, he probably did know then that it was a fraud. But why did he go along with

572
0:49:54 --> 0:50:00
the fraud and then have a bad conscience later and then start speaking out and then eventually

573
0:50:00 --> 0:50:05
say, one week before he died? It's a very important story, I think.

574
0:50:06 --> 0:50:12
Yeah, it's very important, Stephen. And all I can tell you is what he said to me

575
0:50:13 --> 0:50:20
when I asked him that question. And, you know, why are you no longer at the university?

576
0:50:20 --> 0:50:32
What happened? And he had changed his position with that, and that was what lost him his position.

577
0:50:32 --> 0:50:43
They were trying to protect and cover up the fact that we had the Nobel laureate who won the prize

578
0:50:43 --> 0:50:46
for discovering something that he didn't do.

579
0:50:46 --> 0:50:54
Absolutely. But also, Robert, he probably understood that he was a central lynchpin,

580
0:50:54 --> 0:51:02
if you like, in the whole narrative of virology. But he went along with it. And so I think it's

581
0:51:02 --> 0:51:03
absolutely fascinating.

582
0:51:03 --> 0:51:06
Well, Stephen, can we let Robert do his presentation?

583
0:51:06 --> 0:51:09
Stephen, let Robert do his presentation.

584
0:51:09 --> 0:51:11
Let Robert do his presentation.

585
0:51:11 --> 0:51:22
I think Stephen is on a good point because, you know, Carey Mollis also came to his confession

586
0:51:23 --> 0:51:30
that the PCR test is not a diagnostic tool and was never invented for the detailed study of DNA

587
0:51:30 --> 0:51:36
samples. Consequently, it cannot be used to diagnose infectious disease, period.

588
0:51:38 --> 0:51:38
Correct.

589
0:51:39 --> 0:51:40
He absolutely said that.

590
0:51:40 --> 0:51:42
So those are his words, not my words.

591
0:51:42 --> 0:51:43
Absolutely.

592
0:51:43 --> 0:51:50
I can tell you that Luke believed that too. He knew that. That's why later in his life,

593
0:51:50 --> 0:51:57
when they started pushing this COVID virus, this corona, which stands for

594
0:51:57 --> 0:52:02
coordinated routing nanotechnology.

595
0:52:02 --> 0:52:08
Let me say that again. CO is coordinated routing,

596
0:52:09 --> 0:52:20
corona, C-R-O-R-O-N-A, that's nanotechnology. This was a coordinated effort to literally

597
0:52:21 --> 0:52:28
inject nanotechnology. It was coordinated. It had routing capabilities.

598
0:52:28 --> 0:52:35
Therefore, it could be, you know, out of the mouths of other people like Klaus Schwab

599
0:52:36 --> 0:52:46
and Dr. Noah Harari. They said it themselves, humans are now hackable. No, humans are now

600
0:52:46 --> 0:52:55
hackable. We are currently, with human consciousness support and their resources, we are studying

601
0:52:55 --> 0:53:04
we are studying this coordinated routing nanotechnology that has been injected into

602
0:53:04 --> 0:53:12
or transfected, whether by mosquito, tick, water, air, food, sanitation,

603
0:53:14 --> 0:53:18
painkillers, what have you, nutraceutical, pharmaceuticals, they've got it in everything.

604
0:53:19 --> 0:53:33
They don't list it. This coordinated routing nanotechnology is in 90% of everyone that we have

605
0:53:33 --> 0:53:42
tested. We have the evidence. We're going to have this peer reviewed and published.

606
0:53:43 --> 0:53:51
So, you know, Judy, Judy Mikovits has come a long way on this as well.

607
0:53:54 --> 0:54:02
She understands a new word. I want to introduce a new word to you, not infection, but outfection.

608
0:54:03 --> 0:54:11
Disease is born in us and from us. We have complete control over that if we manage

609
0:54:12 --> 0:54:18
and maintain the internal environment, particularly the body ocean, and it's simple and it's

610
0:54:18 --> 0:54:31
inexpensive. So, you know, she's come a long ways. Terry Mollis came a long ways. I don't think his

611
0:54:31 --> 0:54:40
death was an accident. Absolutely. You know, here again, I think it was a play. Yeah, so he had to

612
0:54:40 --> 0:54:47
be dead and he did die, was killed, in my opinion, in August 2019. Otherwise, 2020 could not have

613
0:54:47 --> 0:54:59
happened if he had been alive. Yeah, yeah. So, just this year, I've written six books, and I tell you

614
0:54:59 --> 0:55:04
that because two of the books are on this coordinated routing technology.

615
0:55:04 --> 0:55:08
Hey, Robert, share the-

616
0:55:08 --> 0:55:15
Triforce is deception. Charity. I mean, we're losing our freedom, folks. So, the Truth Book 1,

617
0:55:15 --> 0:55:22
Truth Book 2, you know, 3 and 4, Let Freedom Ring, based upon, you can figure that one out,

618
0:55:23 --> 0:55:30
but two cancer books. Because cancer is a symptom of what I'm talking about. The body's inability

619
0:55:30 --> 0:55:35
to maintain the alkaline design of the body fluids. It's not a cellular problem.

620
0:55:38 --> 0:55:47
It's an environmental problem. And the two main poisons that cause cancer is lactic and citric

621
0:55:47 --> 0:55:55
acid. Well, there's other ones, but those are the two main ones. And so, I want to give you as much

622
0:55:55 --> 0:56:10
information as I can. And so, this paper I did here again helps you to have some of this

623
0:56:10 --> 0:56:16
information available. Exploring the Alkalarian Lifestyle, a Comprehensive Review of Dr. Robert

624
0:56:16 --> 0:56:24
O. Young's Health Paradigm. So, my methodology is to look at the last 20 years of my life

625
0:56:24 --> 0:56:29
and consolidate this, because I've got over 100 books, I have over 3000 papers,

626
0:56:30 --> 0:56:42
and it's overwhelming. And so, I've limited this down then to these papers. The five most

627
0:56:42 --> 0:56:48
important peer reviewed, now I have to say the six or seven or eighth most important ones

628
0:56:48 --> 0:56:58
that I want to give to all those who hear my voice. I'm not looking for money. I'm looking to educate,

629
0:57:00 --> 0:57:07
not to medicate, but to educate. And so, who had their finger on the magic of life?

630
0:57:08 --> 0:57:16
Was it Gary Mullis? Was it Peter Duisburg? Was it, you know, Luc Montenay?

631
0:57:17 --> 0:57:25
They came, they gradually got there, but not really. And that's why the discovery of the work,

632
0:57:25 --> 0:57:31
especially Lace microzymas from the University of Paris, the medical library there, I wrote this

633
0:57:32 --> 0:57:38
paper and published it, who had their finger on the magic of life. And what we have is a battle

634
0:57:38 --> 0:57:47
here between virology and germ theory mentality, which is based upon a false premise, versus the

635
0:57:47 --> 0:57:55
terrain theory, versus the environmental theory. So, if you look at one of the most important

636
0:57:55 --> 0:58:01
papers that I wrote then, I told you about it, it's called the Newy-Jerk or Blood-Jerk Reaction,

637
0:58:01 --> 0:58:07
A Rise in Alkalinity of the pH. Why does the pH go up before it drops drastically down?

638
0:58:10 --> 0:58:15
No one's answered that. This paper answers this. It's a defensive mechanism

639
0:58:15 --> 0:58:19
to preserve the integrity of the environment so you don't die.

640
0:58:19 --> 0:58:24
If you want to prevent neurological problems, those are symptoms. Heart problems, those are

641
0:58:24 --> 0:58:30
symptoms. You have to protect the environment. You have to protect the fluids of the body.

642
0:58:30 --> 0:58:36
That's why I have this diagram in here. So people can understand that the largest organ of the human

643
0:58:36 --> 0:58:44
body is not the skin, it's the inner-stestidium. And that word inner-stestidium was made up of

644
0:58:44 --> 0:59:02
people in America in 2018, 2019 to describe this organ that is not even known by most people.

645
0:59:03 --> 0:59:10
We learned it in Germany, thank God, to Dr. Enderlin and Dr. Marie Blecker. We learned about

646
0:59:10 --> 0:59:14
the colloidal connective tissue of the shot. I learned about that in the 80s.

647
0:59:15 --> 0:59:24
What was it? That was the largest organ. It's a collection place where the blood can purify

648
0:59:24 --> 0:59:32
itself, the cells can purify itself and protect the body cells that make up our organs and glands

649
0:59:32 --> 0:59:43
and tissues. That's what that paper's about. But I had something happen in early 2021. I was

650
0:59:43 --> 0:59:56
proposed an offering to look at some of the vials that were being injected, the material that was

651
0:59:56 --> 1:00:03
being injected. And so I was given Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vials.

652
1:00:04 --> 1:00:11
And I did research and continue to do research up until about June or July of 2021

653
1:00:14 --> 1:00:20
using different methodology, high resolution, phase contrast,

654
1:00:21 --> 1:00:32
with phase contrast transition or transmission electron microscopy coupled with EDS, electron

655
1:00:33 --> 1:00:39
directed energy, x-ray fluorescence. That's the long version of the name of this technology

656
1:00:39 --> 1:00:45
mirrored together because I wanted to know specifically what was in this. And we're talking

657
1:00:45 --> 1:00:50
nanos. You cannot see this stuff under a compound microscope.

658
1:00:53 --> 1:00:57
Anyone that's saying they're seeing graphene in the blood using dark field and phase contrast

659
1:00:57 --> 1:01:02
that's not coupled to either scanning or transmission electron microscopy

660
1:01:03 --> 1:01:08
is looking at some greater organization, which we'd only know what it was if we were doing

661
1:01:08 --> 1:01:18
quantitative testing. So that would be Raman testing or it would be EDS testing, electron

662
1:01:20 --> 1:01:30
directed energy, DES, directed energy x-ray microscopy testing. And so this abstract then

663
1:01:30 --> 1:01:39
went in and discussing over 20 plus elements that I found in these vaccines.

664
1:01:39 --> 1:01:45
That guess what, folks? They weren't disclosed by any of the pharmaceutical companies.

665
1:01:46 --> 1:01:55
They were non-disclosed. And in fact, when this work came out where they were talking about

666
1:01:56 --> 1:02:07
a peer-reviewed article that was censored by Lancet, 73.9% of autopsies, they wanted to know,

667
1:02:07 --> 1:02:15
was there a direct relationship between the inoculation and the COVID vaccine and doing the

668
1:02:15 --> 1:02:24
autopsy? And of course, they found that, yes, these people were poisoned. They weren't infected.

669
1:02:25 --> 1:02:30
They were poisoned. I'm not going to get into some of these other details here,

670
1:02:30 --> 1:02:35
even though they're interesting, such as the doctrine of pleomorphism, that literally,

671
1:02:36 --> 1:02:44
when you introduce me, this is what I was seeing happening to blood that would actually

672
1:02:44 --> 1:02:53
transform, biologically transform into E. coli, into anthrax, and evolve into yeast.

673
1:02:54 --> 1:02:59
You know what I'm going, wait a minute. I thought yeast and bacteria were their own little species.

674
1:02:59 --> 1:03:06
They're not. They're transformation of anatomical elements that make up our body cells that evolve,

675
1:03:06 --> 1:03:10
just like the food in the refrigerator, but it's not maintained based on temperature.

676
1:03:13 --> 1:03:19
It starts evolving and what shows up? It's a transformation or a pleomorphism of that matter

677
1:03:19 --> 1:03:27
into bacteria, yeast, and mold. And so I described this in 1994 on someone who was diagnosed with

678
1:03:27 --> 1:03:35
Epstein-Barr virus that has never been purified or isolated. That's just a name for a treatment

679
1:03:35 --> 1:03:42
that has nothing to do with a virus and everything to do with the environment or the context. That's

680
1:03:42 --> 1:03:49
how you save lives. Stop treating disease and start paying attention to your internal environment

681
1:03:49 --> 1:03:56
and your external environment. And that was the basis of all this. So I can show you what that

682
1:03:56 --> 1:04:05
looks like. If we looked at it, here's a slide of, I did videotape this, so it's not like I

683
1:04:06 --> 1:04:07
could be accused of.

684
1:04:10 --> 1:04:18
Here it is right here. See if we can turn up the volume here. But what you're seeing are

685
1:04:18 --> 1:04:23
codocytes. These are red blood cells. They're targeted red blood cells. And you're seeing a

686
1:04:23 --> 1:04:31
rod-like bacterium, or could be identified as a bacterium, evolve or transform into

687
1:04:32 --> 1:04:43
a red blood cell. You see, there's memory here. And it's not directed by genetics. It's directed

688
1:04:43 --> 1:04:52
by epigenetics. Genetics does not determine your future, does not determine your life expectancy.

689
1:04:52 --> 1:04:59
It is the epigenetics outside of that environment that determines the life of the cell. And that

690
1:04:59 --> 1:05:07
was awarded to Alexis Carell a Nobel Prize for determining after 20 years of keeping a chicken

691
1:05:07 --> 1:05:13
heart alive for 20 years by changing the environment, maintaining the environment.

692
1:05:15 --> 1:05:22
It was all environmental terrain to keep the chicken heart alive. It was he that discovered

693
1:05:22 --> 1:05:31
he that discovered that a human cell can live forever if you manage and maintain the proper

694
1:05:31 --> 1:05:38
environment. That was an important discovery for me to see because I had no comprehension

695
1:05:39 --> 1:05:45
at that time of Antoine Baillamp. I knew about Enderlin, Gunther Enderlin, the German scientist,

696
1:05:45 --> 1:05:57
but this was his introduction to when everything is cremated and everything is gone or evaporated,

697
1:05:58 --> 1:06:07
what is left? Indestructible matter. This is where life is. Not in the genetics, but in the tiny

698
1:06:07 --> 1:06:13
the tiny nano anatomical elements that make up every living thing.

699
1:06:14 --> 1:06:20
This is what can organize and disorganize. So on the law of physics, nothing can be destroyed.

700
1:06:22 --> 1:06:28
Nothing can be destroyed, only organized or disorganized. So there's no death.

701
1:06:29 --> 1:06:36
There's only transformation. There's only change. There's only change. And when you get that,

702
1:06:36 --> 1:06:42
then you realize that you are in control of the quality and quantity of your life.

703
1:06:44 --> 1:06:51
And so when I was in Paris at the university taking and taking out books that have been

704
1:06:51 --> 1:07:00
down in their archives for hundreds of years and looking at a book that literally brought me to

705
1:07:00 --> 1:07:08
tears called Lace Microzymas and the actual experiments showing biological transformation

706
1:07:08 --> 1:07:19
of which Bayes-Champ battled Pasteur on this and failed. No one understood that matter

707
1:07:19 --> 1:07:25
cannot be created nor can it be destroyed. It could only change its form or function.

708
1:07:25 --> 1:07:31
The original theory for genetic material is right here.

709
1:07:33 --> 1:07:46
That's where they developed this cartoon of our helix. Here again, from this to this

710
1:07:47 --> 1:07:50
to cartoon. This is the original.

711
1:07:55 --> 1:08:07
So how much did Deusburg know? It's hard to say. In fact, he was moving away from the science or

712
1:08:07 --> 1:08:16
the so-called science of virology and phantom. Phantom, phantom, they do not exist, viruses.

713
1:08:16 --> 1:08:25
And we have solicited over 200 institutions around the world, including the FDA, including

714
1:08:25 --> 1:08:33
the CDC, and asking for any evidence based upon the scientific method where they can show

715
1:08:35 --> 1:08:41
that they have purified and isolation for any virus. And we've asked them about HIV,

716
1:08:41 --> 1:08:50
we've asked them about influenza, we've asked them about the cox, the coxes, the monkey pox,

717
1:08:52 --> 1:09:00
and of course the corona. They have no evidence whatsoever. If you want to see those letters,

718
1:09:00 --> 1:09:10
if you want to see them speaking that they have nothing, no evidence that validates the efficacy

719
1:09:10 --> 1:09:18
of virology. It's pretty extreme. Now this is very important. So this came out in October.

720
1:09:20 --> 1:09:28
At least 55 undeclared chemical elements found in COVID-19 vaccine. And the actual...

721
1:09:28 --> 1:09:36
So we had AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm, the Sputnik, Russia, China, all of

722
1:09:36 --> 1:09:48
these. They're all here again using the same technology, the same theory of providing immunity.

723
1:09:48 --> 1:09:54
And here again, what we have is they identified over 55 countries,

724
1:09:54 --> 1:10:03
what we have is they identified over 55 compounds that were not declared on the white sheets of

725
1:10:04 --> 1:10:12
the pharmaceuticals. So we had 55 undeclared chemical elements found in the COVID-19 vaccines

726
1:10:12 --> 1:10:20
and all of them contained all kinds of things from aluminum. The concerning one was the,

727
1:10:20 --> 1:10:27
here among them, undeclared elements were detected 11 of 15 cytotoxic lanthanides

728
1:10:29 --> 1:10:33
that have electronic capabilities and optogenetics capability.

729
1:10:35 --> 1:10:42
So that's quite concerning. That's why I love the fact that Bobby Kennedy

730
1:10:42 --> 1:10:50
is heading up, and I hope this happens, to really look at all this

731
1:10:51 --> 1:11:02
and really change the whole way we deliver health. And take a hard look at the theory that

732
1:11:03 --> 1:11:10
you're not sick, you don't have a disease, you've been chemically poisoned or you've been radiated.

733
1:11:10 --> 1:11:18
And so what have you been poisoned? Well, we identified with that. And so in 2021,

734
1:11:18 --> 1:11:27
I knew that there were over 21 different compounds, elements that were inside these inoculations

735
1:11:28 --> 1:11:34
at different percentages. And I published this. It was actually peer reviewed, took a year to

736
1:11:35 --> 1:11:41
publish it, and it was finally published. And these charts are available. How many people have

737
1:11:41 --> 1:11:49
read this article? Well, before it was published, it was around 1.3 million people. It was a seminal

738
1:11:49 --> 1:12:00
work that was published in 2021, peer reviewed, and then published again in 2022. But you can see,

739
1:12:00 --> 1:12:06
if you go down the list, there's aluminum there, there's copper there, there's titanium there,

740
1:12:08 --> 1:12:14
there's a lot of metals, there's a lot of compounds, polyethylene glycol, etc., etc.

741
1:12:14 --> 1:12:18
That was one of the disclosed elements, but these were the things that were found.

742
1:12:20 --> 1:12:26
I'm going to pass through this. And this technology here, if we see its ability,

743
1:12:26 --> 1:12:33
those lanthanides, if we actually see their capability at the

744
1:12:36 --> 1:12:42
micro and milli micron and milli micron levels, you can actually see some of this

745
1:12:43 --> 1:12:50
self-assembly capability. And this was not only my discovery, but Yale University posted

746
1:12:51 --> 1:12:56
what they had discovered. And I'm going to show that. It's called Tesla-Foresis. And the ability

747
1:12:56 --> 1:13:02
of these elements that were found in the inoculations to literally self-assemble themselves

748
1:13:04 --> 1:13:17
into receivers, transmitters, starting out as nanotechnology. They're called nanobots or nanodots.

749
1:13:17 --> 1:13:26
So using high-resolution scanning and transmission microscopy, we're able to look at

750
1:13:27 --> 1:13:33
some of these elements. We're able to look at aluminum, able to look at graphene, able to look

751
1:13:36 --> 1:13:43
at spike proteins. And spike protein, by the way, is a symptom of cellular breakdown.

752
1:13:44 --> 1:13:55
When cells start losing their surface charge and they start transforming, they become what are

753
1:13:55 --> 1:14:02
called acanthocytes, and that's corrugated like berry-like cells. But then as the process continues,

754
1:14:02 --> 1:14:09
they start spiking, and these vescules break off and become what is known as spike protein.

755
1:14:09 --> 1:14:13
This can happen very easily with chemical and radiation poisoning.

756
1:14:16 --> 1:14:22
We even have this in 3D. So about six to eight months ago, I was introduced to

757
1:14:24 --> 1:14:32
a company, because it's one thing to talk about the pollution or to theorize what happened and

758
1:14:33 --> 1:14:40
how did it happen or why did it happen, but I wanted to find a solution. I'm a solution-oriented

759
1:14:40 --> 1:14:48
scientist. So I was introduced to a product through a gentleman. His name is Matt Hazen.

760
1:14:49 --> 1:14:57
He is the head of a company called Human Consciousness Support. I'm not an officer,

761
1:14:57 --> 1:15:04
I'm not a director. I'm an interested party because I'm interested in myself, my family,

762
1:15:04 --> 1:15:19
my children, and I'm interested in what they had. Using HR10 transmission electron microscopy and

763
1:15:19 --> 1:15:27
coupled with directed energy x-ray fluorescent spectroscopy, he was able to do a very interesting

764
1:15:27 --> 1:15:39
thing. He was able to identify the construct of a mineral called zeolite. I looked at it,

765
1:15:40 --> 1:15:47
and I said, this looks a lot like graphene. I said, graphene is hexagonal,

766
1:15:48 --> 1:15:53
has very similar construct, but the difference is the surface charge. It's positive.

767
1:15:54 --> 1:16:07
The zeta potential of zeolite is negatively charged. It was like a puzzle. I said, oh my

768
1:16:07 --> 1:16:13
heavens, this is good news. This could be the antidote for chemical and radiation poisoning.

769
1:16:13 --> 1:16:29
And so I continued to explore this masterpiece it's called. And just recently, after readjusting

770
1:16:30 --> 1:16:39
the pH and the ORP in a patent that is patent pending right now, I noticed that from the

771
1:16:39 --> 1:16:47
original formulation here to the changes in pH, it increased the zeta potential,

772
1:16:47 --> 1:16:54
increased the surface area, which thus increased the surface charge. And so I started testing

773
1:16:54 --> 1:17:02
other zeolite products out there that were testing positive instead of negative with a low pH

774
1:17:03 --> 1:17:16
around 2.7 to 3.1. And that was altered when I introduced the technology to be able to alter

775
1:17:16 --> 1:17:24
the pH, alter the ORP, alter the structure, increase surface area. And that's what you see

776
1:17:25 --> 1:17:35
here at high resolution. This is high resolution at 0.1 to 0.2 nanometers. This is subatomic,

777
1:17:36 --> 1:17:41
the resolution. Transmission electron microscopy, phase contrast,

778
1:17:43 --> 1:17:51
micrograph at a scale of 2.54 centimeters, so one inch equals 50 nanometers. So this stuff is really,

779
1:17:51 --> 1:17:58
really small, making it transdermal, meaning that you take it under the tongue, it goes right into

780
1:17:58 --> 1:18:02
the interstitial fluid. And the interstitial fluid is this big ocean that carries it through

781
1:18:02 --> 1:18:08
everything else. It can go into the blood, yes, it can go into the interstitial fluid.

782
1:18:09 --> 1:18:16
Then I took the experiment a little bit further. What if I took some aluminum beads or graphene

783
1:18:16 --> 1:18:24
beads and I introduced that to this material? What would happen? Well, it'd act like any

784
1:18:24 --> 1:18:30
electromagnetic with a surface charge of negative, with a surface charge of positive.

785
1:18:30 --> 1:18:38
It literally collected it in its multi-dimensional, you can see it here, its multi-dimensional

786
1:18:39 --> 1:18:48
construct. It's not just theory. That's an illustration, by the way. This is not an

787
1:18:48 --> 1:18:58
illustration. You can see here, two-dimensional, you can see the surface area, and you can see

788
1:18:59 --> 1:19:03
what happens when you introduce a chemical poison.

789
1:19:03 --> 1:19:12
It attracts that. Now, zeolite is indigestible. So if it locks onto it, it's like a net. It

790
1:19:12 --> 1:19:18
collected it, it locks it, and the body's going to get rid of it. And guess what? That was the

791
1:19:18 --> 1:19:26
theory. But it has to be tested. And so we not only tested it, we then published our results,

792
1:19:26 --> 1:19:29
which were also peer-reviewed. A little higher magnification, a little lower

793
1:19:29 --> 1:19:44
magnification. It's another micrograph. This is an illustration of what I saw in the collection.

794
1:19:46 --> 1:19:51
These are graphene or aluminum, titanium. They all look very similar. The only way you can

795
1:19:51 --> 1:19:57
differentiate them is through spectroscopy, using directed energy, x-ray, fluorescent

796
1:19:57 --> 1:20:02
spectroscopy, to be able to identify the difference. So I could have put a lot of

797
1:20:02 --> 1:20:11
bunch of words in there. These are dots. They're nanosides. You can see how small they are

798
1:20:11 --> 1:20:20
collecting onto this. So this is very exciting, because now you have a solution to the pollutions.

799
1:20:21 --> 1:20:30
So the question came up, if it will chelate graphene, will it chelate aluminum? Will it

800
1:20:30 --> 1:20:38
chelate titanium oxide? Will it chelate? And the list went on. And we added up, okay, there's 80,000

801
1:20:39 --> 1:20:44
poisons. Let's take the ones that most people know are the ones that we're most interested in.

802
1:20:45 --> 1:20:48
And we started testing for that. And every single case,

803
1:20:51 --> 1:20:57
masterpiece with this patented zeolite Z, Z standing for zeta potential,

804
1:20:58 --> 1:21:03
adsorbed and then absorbed the material and took it into his body. And guess what happened to

805
1:21:04 --> 1:21:10
the levels? What happened to the levels? I'll come down here.

806
1:21:10 --> 1:21:12
Come back to some of this here in a minute.

807
1:21:15 --> 1:21:23
So fairly what happened in this published paper here? Here we started seeing these levels go down.

808
1:21:25 --> 1:21:33
So the baseline, these were graphene oxide. We also tested for aluminum. You'll see it was added.

809
1:21:33 --> 1:21:40
You'll see it was added. Aluminum here, glyphosate, iron, lindane,

810
1:21:42 --> 1:21:53
phostene, which is burnt, which is a wartime restricted chemical, was used in World War I.

811
1:21:53 --> 1:22:05
Phosphorol octane sulfates and acids. These we saw that in our charts that all the levels

812
1:22:05 --> 1:22:16
started coming down, started coming down after 35 days and after 90 days. Everything that we tested.

813
1:22:17 --> 1:22:23
And so it was quite dramatic. And so I took that information and I said, well, how much

814
1:22:23 --> 1:22:31
is these things coming down? So polypropylene, hydrogel, polyethylene glycol,

815
1:22:33 --> 1:22:41
forever chemicals, microplastics, nanotechnology, titanium, aluminum, etc., etc. How much are they

816
1:22:41 --> 1:22:48
coming down? And in that case, we were seeing here five substances, aluminum,

817
1:22:50 --> 1:22:59
over 50% of the aluminum within 45 to 90 days. I mean, who gets aluminum out of the brain?

818
1:23:00 --> 1:23:05
We're seeing this in hair testing because we're offering hair testing.

819
1:23:05 --> 1:23:14
Because where does aluminum go? Where does titanium oxide go? It goes out through the pores

820
1:23:14 --> 1:23:21
and into the hair. So we can take hair, we can test for it, and we're seeing remarkable results

821
1:23:22 --> 1:23:29
in our beginning testing, in the elimination of the body just throwing away the aluminum.

822
1:23:29 --> 1:23:37
Beginning testing in the elimination of the body just throwing this stuff out. It's being released

823
1:23:39 --> 1:23:47
by simply just taking five drops of Masterpiece Zeolite Z under the tongue twice a day based on a

824
1:23:47 --> 1:23:56
man or a woman who weighs 154 pounds. So if you have a child, it's less. If you have a cat, it's

825
1:23:56 --> 1:24:07
less. But they're being transfected. So it's not my offer because it's not my company.

826
1:24:08 --> 1:24:16
I'm just excited to share this solution because I take it. My family takes it. My children,

827
1:24:16 --> 1:24:25
my grandchildren take this. And it's getting phenomenal results across the board. And so

828
1:24:25 --> 1:24:30
when we're concerned about turbo cancers, which are based on chemical poisoning,

829
1:24:31 --> 1:24:37
and I've listed some of those, aluminum, deriterium, phosting, polyethylene glycol,

830
1:24:38 --> 1:24:45
these numbers are going up because of chemical poisoning. For those who have not been inoculated,

831
1:24:45 --> 1:24:52
it's being transfected through being around someone who has been vaccinated back to Luc

832
1:24:52 --> 1:25:01
Montaner, the vaccinated people can pick up nanotechnology from someone who sneezes, yes? And

833
1:25:01 --> 1:25:07
it could be adsorb and absorbed into the body. But it's now in our water. It's now in our food.

834
1:25:07 --> 1:25:17
It's now in our air and it's being chemtrailed. So back to this, this is, see,

835
1:25:18 --> 1:25:28
look, if you want to do, and there's only three or four places in the state of California where I am,

836
1:25:29 --> 1:25:33
but does this level of testing, not hair testing, we're talking about

837
1:25:35 --> 1:25:43
HR, TAM, and directed energy combined together, spectroscopy. Just for one thin sample,

838
1:25:44 --> 1:25:52
you're going to spend between $1,500 to $5,000 for one test, for one metal.

839
1:25:55 --> 1:26:05
And Los Angeles has a lab, Irvine has a lab, Berkeley has a lab. These labs are there and

840
1:26:05 --> 1:26:09
they will take your business if you want to know if you've been graphinated, if you've been

841
1:26:09 --> 1:26:18
illuminated. And I can give you their names and I can give you their websites so you can go.

842
1:26:19 --> 1:26:26
There are places in England, there are places in Germany. We used a German lab to do a lot of our

843
1:26:26 --> 1:26:34
intracellular testing. And I'm sad to say that they're no longer doing it because they were

844
1:26:34 --> 1:26:40
shut down for doing what they did. There's not a clear licensed lab in the United States

845
1:26:40 --> 1:26:48
that I know of that will do this kind of testing, intracellular testing. But there may be hope.

846
1:26:48 --> 1:26:59
If an individual contacts a university, the work that was done in Spain was done by the

847
1:26:59 --> 1:27:05
University of Seville. So universities have the money to do this because the equipment is very

848
1:27:05 --> 1:27:11
expensive. The combination of that, you're going to spend between $1,000,000 and $1,000,000 and $5,000,000

849
1:27:11 --> 1:27:17
for the kind of equipment that you need to do this kind of testing. So that's why I like this hair

850
1:27:17 --> 1:27:24
testing, folks. And this guy's been doing this for 15 years and he's in England.

851
1:27:24 --> 1:27:32
Okay. And he can take, you just take, you get a packet, you put a little piece of hair, your hair

852
1:27:32 --> 1:27:38
in there from the back, and you send it and you get this super duper report that's going to show

853
1:27:38 --> 1:27:44
all of these chemical poisons, not all of them, but the majority of them. And then you can then

854
1:27:44 --> 1:27:52
retest and see the results of that. Now that would be valuable for someone to have that done. That's

855
1:27:53 --> 1:27:58
called prevention. And maybe someone's already sick and they said, look, I don't have time,

856
1:27:58 --> 1:28:03
I don't have the money, I'm just going to start taking the antidote to the poison.

857
1:28:04 --> 1:28:14
And that's okay too. That's a good way to go. But I just wanted to make you aware of that.

858
1:28:14 --> 1:28:22
Of course, when we're dealing with 5G, we have some good news. Peru is taking down all their 5G

859
1:28:22 --> 1:28:30
towers. The United States needs people in power that says, okay, we're not bowing down to the

860
1:28:30 --> 1:28:41
corporation. 5G is coming totally down, completely. That's important. It's important that you social

861
1:28:41 --> 1:28:49
distance yourself from a lot of this. If you want to be healthy, and of course, that's something

862
1:28:49 --> 1:28:57
that you'll need to consider. Because when we look at the technology and the connection,

863
1:28:57 --> 1:29:02
the cell tower to your brain, why would it be the brain? Because of the nanotechnology,

864
1:29:02 --> 1:29:07
the coordinated routing nanotechnology that's in your brain, that's in your heart,

865
1:29:07 --> 1:29:15
that's in your reproductive organs. It's all been directed. Somebody asked me, why is there so little

866
1:29:16 --> 1:29:26
genetic material in these inoculations? Because it's not about mRNA. MRI is the information to drive

867
1:29:27 --> 1:29:39
the hydrogel, the lipid capsid, to specific bodies, to specific body parts. And that's what it does.

868
1:29:39 --> 1:29:45
So you can take the inoculation, you can tag it with MRI from cell lines from specific organs

869
1:29:45 --> 1:29:51
and glands and drive it to the heart, drive it to the reproductive organs, or drive it to the brain.

870
1:29:52 --> 1:30:00
And that's what's going on there. I do want to show you some Tesla paresis if I can here.

871
1:30:00 --> 1:30:06
Oh, by the way, the weight loss products that people are injecting, it's all loaded with

872
1:30:06 --> 1:30:13
nanotechnology, all loaded with coordinated routing technology. What a way to lose weight.

873
1:30:16 --> 1:30:19
This is what it looks like under fluorescence when it starts organizing.

874
1:30:24 --> 1:30:26
So what else did I want to share with you?

875
1:30:29 --> 1:30:36
Nothing on monkeypox. I mean, that's just another more of the same thing. You may want to look very

876
1:30:36 --> 1:30:42
closely at some of the questions that I hear. Does the stomach digest food? The answer is no.

877
1:30:43 --> 1:30:47
What is the purpose of the stomach? I think I've defined that. Does the stomach produce sodium

878
1:30:47 --> 1:30:55
bicarbonate, potassium bicarbonate, magnesium, calcium in bicarbonate forms? What is the true

879
1:30:55 --> 1:31:00
purpose of the stomach? What is the true purpose of the intestines? Does digestion and the

880
1:31:00 --> 1:31:06
simulation of our food ingested take place in the small intestine? The answer to these questions

881
1:31:06 --> 1:31:11
are no. Is there a digestive system in the human body? Yes, it's called your teeth.

882
1:31:13 --> 1:31:20
What is the true pH of the stomach? True pH should be no less than 7.2, other than when they're

883
1:31:20 --> 1:31:25
testing, they're testing the after effect because the byproduct of the cover cells producing sodium

884
1:31:25 --> 1:31:32
bicarbonate is a waste product called hydrochloric acid, which falls away into the gastric pits and

885
1:31:32 --> 1:31:39
never even touches the food you eat. So the stomach does not digest food.

886
1:31:41 --> 1:31:47
So what is the true ideal pH of the stomach? 7.2 or higher. What is the true pH of the stomach?

887
1:31:47 --> 1:31:53
Well, right now for most people in the way they're living and eating, it's down around 1.5 to 3.

888
1:31:53 --> 1:32:01
That's why the number one symptomology of acidic toxemia is caused by what you eat,

889
1:32:01 --> 1:32:09
what you drink, and what you breathe. So here again, the stomach doesn't digest that piece of

890
1:32:09 --> 1:32:15
meat you eat. And how do we know that? You can do a simple experiment. Eat a piece of corn,

891
1:32:16 --> 1:32:23
don't chew it, swallow it, and watch what comes out the other end. You can do that with spinach.

892
1:32:23 --> 1:32:30
Take spinach leaves, eat them, and watch what comes out. They will not liquefy. Nothing liquefies in

893
1:32:30 --> 1:32:40
the alimentary canal. The stomach doesn't digest it. The pancreas and the gallbladder all secrete

894
1:32:40 --> 1:32:49
a pH of 8.4. Sodium bicarbonate and bile is at a pH of 8.4, which is the ideal pH of the small intestine.

895
1:32:51 --> 1:32:57
That's when you start making healthy stem cells, which are made in the crypts of the small intestine.

896
1:32:58 --> 1:33:06
So that book is called A New Theory, The Physiology of the Stomach. I'm not going to go into it today,

897
1:33:07 --> 1:33:13
but I just want you to make you aware of this. This is what healthy blood should look like

898
1:33:14 --> 1:33:20
under phase contrast using a compound microscope. We're looking at electron microscopy,

899
1:33:21 --> 1:33:26
and I think we just went through this. I wanted to show you Tesla-Faresis.

900
1:33:27 --> 1:33:33
All this is in a report that's been peer reviewed, that has been published, and

901
1:33:34 --> 1:33:42
you can find out more of this information on your analysis or in hair testing to help you monitor

902
1:33:43 --> 1:33:49
the internal environment of your body, which is here again a body of water.

903
1:33:50 --> 1:33:53
A body of water. Let's see if I can find this.

904
1:33:55 --> 1:34:01
So here are some of the papers that we talked about today that I'm going to provide with you.

905
1:34:04 --> 1:34:10
For healthy cats, healthy dogs, any animal can use this solution to the pollution.

906
1:34:10 --> 1:34:22
There's the pH hydrant paper, 4.5 to 9. Purposely set that low point and high point

907
1:34:22 --> 1:34:28
because the range is quite dramatic because of the human diet, the human lifestyle.

908
1:34:29 --> 1:34:37
So for $20, you can get 150 test strips in order to test this out.

909
1:34:40 --> 1:34:46
Charles, can I go back up here and just see if I can find, since I've mentioned it three times,

910
1:34:46 --> 1:34:57
Tesla-Faresis and the organization of nanotechnology into larger constructs.

911
1:34:58 --> 1:35:04
I think it's important for people to see this. This is coming from a major university.

912
1:35:05 --> 1:35:07
I'll see if I can find it here.

913
1:35:08 --> 1:35:11
If it's a major university, it must be a woke university.

914
1:35:14 --> 1:35:26
Yeah. Yeah. So here we go. Here's the Tesla-Faresis video. I think it's important to watch this.

915
1:35:35 --> 1:35:40
Tesla-Faresis, which is a discovery we made several years ago and we've been developing it.

916
1:35:50 --> 1:35:52
We haven't got the sound, Romit.

917
1:35:53 --> 1:35:59
What you're seeing here is activation by frequency, light frequency.

918
1:35:59 --> 1:36:07
There's a lot of nanotubes around, so we decided to use nanotubes. What we discovered

919
1:36:08 --> 1:36:13
was that these nanotubes can actually string together and form wires by themselves on this

920
1:36:13 --> 1:36:26
electric field. This fundamental idea of force acting at a distance that you can have instead of

921
1:36:26 --> 1:36:31
when you've normally built circuits and things like that, you have to have physical contact.

922
1:36:31 --> 1:36:35
Now we're talking about the circuits without actually touching.

923
1:36:42 --> 1:36:48
I realized that a Tesla coil could actually do this if you designed it in a way to create

924
1:36:48 --> 1:36:52
a very strong force field in front of it. That was the engineering aspect.

925
1:36:53 --> 1:36:57
And then once I designed the machine, then all sorts of discoveries started falling out.

926
1:36:59 --> 1:37:04
Tesla-Faresis is one of those things. It's a project that there are just so many avenues,

927
1:37:04 --> 1:37:10
so many things that I think you can do with it. Not just making conductive wires, but taking it

928
1:37:10 --> 1:37:16
in so many different places. Not only just biomedical engineering, but taking it into

929
1:37:16 --> 1:37:22
different industries like silicon ships or exploring different conductive materials.

930
1:37:22 --> 1:37:29
This also ties in just generally in nanotechnologies that self-assembly is very big.

931
1:37:30 --> 1:37:36
That is, if you can get things to build themselves, just as in biology, we build ourselves.

932
1:37:36 --> 1:37:41
When my son saw it, he called them webs. He thought it was like Spider-Man shooting webs out.

933
1:37:41 --> 1:37:44
And it really is. It's very much like a web stringing out together.

934
1:37:45 --> 1:37:47
And that was a surprising finding.

935
1:37:49 --> 1:38:00
So here are some clusters of this nanotechnology that's actually spiking out like antenna,

936
1:38:00 --> 1:38:07
just like in the video, the Tesla-Faresis. It can self-organize itself, which brings me to this

937
1:38:08 --> 1:38:13
quote, humans are now hackable animals. The whole idea that humans have this solar spirit,

938
1:38:13 --> 1:38:20
free will, that's over. Today we have the technology to hack human beings on a massive scale.

939
1:38:20 --> 1:38:23
Everything is being digitized. Everything is being monitored.

940
1:38:24 --> 1:38:29
That was reconfirmed by the World Economic Forum. These technologies will operate within our own

941
1:38:29 --> 1:38:37
biology, our own bodies, within our bodies, and change how we interface with the world.

942
1:38:37 --> 1:38:45
Smart dust based on aluminum, titanium, copper, a lot of different elements, arrays of full

943
1:38:45 --> 1:38:52
computers with antennas, each much smaller than a grain of sand, can now organize themselves inside

944
1:38:52 --> 1:39:02
the body. Here it is inside the body. Here it is inside the body, organizing itself inside the body.

945
1:39:02 --> 1:39:13
Disease X. Here it is inside the body. And so I'm grateful for those other scientists who just

946
1:39:13 --> 1:39:22
published in October, validated my work that I had published in 2021 and then 2022.

947
1:39:23 --> 1:39:32
Really means a lot to the science community because when we're looking at hydrogel,

948
1:39:33 --> 1:39:40
when we're looking at try Panisoma cruce parasites, which we found in the Moderna and also in

949
1:39:40 --> 1:39:49
the Pfizer, and when we looked at this using directed energy X-ray fluorescent,

950
1:39:51 --> 1:40:01
we could actually see this try Panisoma cruce parasite and testing it using

951
1:40:02 --> 1:40:09
EDS, using directed energy X-ray microscopy, what did we see?

952
1:40:10 --> 1:40:17
We found graphene, we found iron, we found copper, we found aluminum encrusted on that,

953
1:40:17 --> 1:40:25
just like barnacles on a boat. This is swimming inside the body. So these are the concerns

954
1:40:26 --> 1:40:36
that I have that people need to wake up to and realize that very simply that sickness and disease

955
1:40:36 --> 1:40:45
are symptoms of an imbalance that is reflected by the internal environment that is out of balance,

956
1:40:45 --> 1:40:54
that can be measured and controlled without taking medications, without taking more chemicals

957
1:40:54 --> 1:41:00
to deal with a particular symptomology, which cannot resolve the chemical poisoning.

958
1:41:00 --> 1:41:07
So I'm going to say it very simply so everybody hears it. You are not sick, you've been poisoned.

959
1:41:12 --> 1:41:20
Very good. Robert, beautifully put, you are not sick, you have been poisoned, and you reinforced

960
1:41:20 --> 1:41:28
what I learned in 1965 when I went to my first naturopath in Melbourne, a long time ago.

961
1:41:29 --> 1:41:36
And Lawrence Armstrong, total genius in his understanding of the body, and I consider you

962
1:41:36 --> 1:41:43
a genius in the understanding of the body, he said the number one cause of, he said disease,

963
1:41:43 --> 1:41:50
but I understand what you're saying, the number one cause of disease is constipation.

964
1:41:51 --> 1:41:57
And so he's often said you are what you eat, but you have reinforced again what I learned

965
1:41:57 --> 1:42:06
in 1965, you are what you don't eliminate. And the fact is that most people are full of crap.

966
1:42:08 --> 1:42:13
Most people are full of crap. And people don't realize that if you don't get it out from the

967
1:42:13 --> 1:42:18
interstitial fluid, the blood's going to push it there, the cells push out their metabolic waste.

968
1:42:19 --> 1:42:23
Anything that's in the blood gets pushed out to that organ. It is an organ.

969
1:42:23 --> 1:42:25
Very good.

970
1:42:25 --> 1:42:31
Germans called it colloidal connective tissue of the shot, the Americans now call it a new organ

971
1:42:31 --> 1:42:39
that they just discovered, really, the interstitium. And here again, we've known about it for 40 plus

972
1:42:39 --> 1:42:46
years. The interstitium or the interstitium? Is it the interstitium or the interstitium?

973
1:42:47 --> 1:42:54
Interstitium. The interstitium or the colloidal connective tissue of the shot,

974
1:42:54 --> 1:43:02
and the fluid that's being compartmentalized and collecting plasma, collecting intracellular

975
1:43:02 --> 1:43:10
fluids from the cells is stored in this matrix, these compartments that are either pushed out

976
1:43:10 --> 1:43:16
into the connective tissue. And that's why when you build up a lot of lactic acid, you feel it in

977
1:43:16 --> 1:43:22
the muscle. The body can't get rid of it, it has to get rid of it through here again, from the

978
1:43:22 --> 1:43:27
interstitial fluid to the lymphatic system out through the pores of the skin or to the kidneys

979
1:43:27 --> 1:43:34
out through urination. So hydration becomes a very, very important thing. And alkalizing becomes very,

980
1:43:34 --> 1:43:39
very important. Yes, you can drink water with your meals. It's the right kind of water. It has to be

981
1:43:39 --> 1:43:45
functionally structured alkaline water that's donating electrons to neutralize the acids of

982
1:43:45 --> 1:43:50
the food that you're eating. That's what's happening in your mouth. Your pH does not go down

983
1:43:51 --> 1:43:59
in the stomach, it goes up. The mouth pH does not go down, it goes up because the salivary glands

984
1:43:59 --> 1:44:07
are trans, they're literally secreting alkalizing compounds that are made by the stomach. And that

985
1:44:07 --> 1:44:13
development brought me to the conclusion that this is a whole organ system. So therefore,

986
1:44:13 --> 1:44:21
I came up with a name. It's called the alko-phile system, alkalizing system. The alko-phile,

987
1:44:22 --> 1:44:30
it includes your salivary glands, it includes your stomach, of course, is the main one that supplies

988
1:44:30 --> 1:44:37
the pancreatic duct, the glands in the pancreas, the lubricant glands in the intestines,

989
1:44:37 --> 1:44:44
the gallbladder is all supplied by the stomach. And this is why upset stomach is the number one

990
1:44:44 --> 1:44:54
symptomology that is experiencing worldwide. And the last thing you want today is a

991
1:44:54 --> 1:45:05
a proton blocker that stops the cover cells from operating because that will lead to a cancerous

992
1:45:05 --> 1:45:13
condition, a degenerative condition. You want to stop eating acidic food, stop drinking acidic water,

993
1:45:13 --> 1:45:23
start hyper-perfusing alkalinity. The ideal pH of water should be minimum 9.5, ideally between 10 and 11.

994
1:45:24 --> 1:45:32
An ORP at negative 450 to 750 millivolts. So you have to be conscious of this. In this idea,

995
1:45:32 --> 1:45:40
you shouldn't drink with your meals, you'll dilute the hydrochloric acid. Boy, you're right on. That's

996
1:45:40 --> 1:45:44
exactly what you want to do, is dilute the hydrochloric acid in the stomach. That's what

997
1:45:44 --> 1:45:49
the body's trying to do, is get rid of that waste product. But for every molecule of hydrochloric

998
1:45:49 --> 1:45:55
acid that's produced, an equal amount of sodium bicarbonate is produced to maintain alkalinity.

999
1:45:55 --> 1:46:01
And the only reason there's hydrochloric acid in the stomach is because the stomach is working

1000
1:46:01 --> 1:46:06
every second, every minute, every day, every week, every month, every year of your life to maintain

1001
1:46:06 --> 1:46:16
that delicate pH balance of the blood at 7.365 to 7.4 of the interstitium fluids

1002
1:46:17 --> 1:46:26
of the interstitium at 8.4 or higher, or the intercellular fluids, which are at around 7.4,

1003
1:46:27 --> 1:46:33
much like some very similar to the blood. The most alkaline places in the body are in the intestines

1004
1:46:35 --> 1:46:42
and in the fluids that surround all of your 72 trillion cells. And using enzymes destroys

1005
1:46:42 --> 1:46:47
that environment. Using probiotics destroys that environment.

1006
1:46:49 --> 1:46:53
The food that empties out of the stomach should be in a liquid alkaline state,

1007
1:46:53 --> 1:46:59
and that's why you have a gallbladder and that's why you have a pancreas. And the reason why there's

1008
1:46:59 --> 1:47:05
problems with liver and gallbladder and with stones in the pancreas and in the gallbladder

1009
1:47:05 --> 1:47:12
is because people do not understand what they're doing to themselves when they don't liquefy their

1010
1:47:12 --> 1:47:19
food. And so on the pH miracle program that's outlined, the alkaline lifestyle that's outlined

1011
1:47:19 --> 1:47:25
in chapter five, chapter 11, that I taught, you know, a lot of the doctors I worked with, including

1012
1:47:26 --> 1:47:35
the famous Tony Robbins, I had him liquefying his food. He still eats broccoli for breakfast.

1013
1:47:36 --> 1:47:44
So liquefy your foods. You know, start moving more to green. Start building healthy blood,

1014
1:47:44 --> 1:47:49
which is done in the crypts of the small intestine, and start raising the pH level.

1015
1:47:49 --> 1:47:55
You're going to feel so much better. And it's one of the reasons I formulated a product called

1016
1:47:55 --> 1:48:00
four salts, because a lot of people need extra help, but you don't want the caking agents and

1017
1:48:00 --> 1:48:06
the aluminum and the chemicals, the anti-caking agents they put in those to keep them, you know,

1018
1:48:06 --> 1:48:13
so they're in a powder form. You need sodium bicarbonate. It's the simple antidote, baking

1019
1:48:13 --> 1:48:20
sodas, the simple antidote to any symptomology. And that supports the stomach. So I put sodium,

1020
1:48:20 --> 1:48:28
potassium, magnesium, and calcium in bicarbonate and bicarbonate form so people could take three

1021
1:48:28 --> 1:48:34
to five grams in the morning before going to bed or any time their pH of the urine drops below

1022
1:48:36 --> 1:48:43
7.2. You can do this. It's so simple. In a small glass of purified alkaline water.

1023
1:48:43 --> 1:48:54
It's something that anybody can do. And it's safe and it's effective. You don't need to be trapped

1024
1:48:54 --> 1:49:01
into this immunity theory and this antibody theory and this genetic theory. And I'd like to

1025
1:49:01 --> 1:49:09
see more people experiment with the fact that our cells are only as healthy as the water they swim

1026
1:49:09 --> 1:49:15
in and the ideal environment for body cells, for liver cells, brain cells, heart cells,

1027
1:49:15 --> 1:49:23
any cell of the body, except for the blood, and the white cells, if they're in the plasma, is at 8.4.

1028
1:49:24 --> 1:49:29
That's the ideal pH. And it can be measured by simply testing the urine.

1029
1:49:29 --> 1:49:37
Robert, that's a great point. So what we've got now, we've got 37 minutes. And I know you can speak

1030
1:49:37 --> 1:49:43
another four hours. Your website is amazing. You've provoked, I think, all of us and everyone

1031
1:49:43 --> 1:49:48
watching this recording. So Stephen, what if it's, Stephen, if we go the next 10 minutes for your

1032
1:49:48 --> 1:49:52
questions, a few other questions, we'll finish. But gosh, we're going to have Robert back to ask

1033
1:49:52 --> 1:49:59
a bucket load of questions because this is, you know, Robert, your life work has been all about

1034
1:49:59 --> 1:50:07
health. And you are laying out what many of us on this call, Danny, you know, other people, experts on

1035
1:50:07 --> 1:50:13
truly understanding this. And so we'll never get to the end of the questions. But we've only got 37

1036
1:50:13 --> 1:50:19
minutes. So Stephen, you go first. And then, yeah, so let's see how many we can get through by the

1037
1:50:19 --> 1:50:25
two and a half hour mark. And then and then please, everyone save the chat. There's a lot of gold in

1038
1:50:25 --> 1:50:34
the chat. And go to Robert's website and start learning and there's no expense. It's just drrobertyoung.com.

1039
1:50:34 --> 1:50:40
I've got just in the last four years, I've published over 600 articles. Yeah, I you know, I just

1040
1:50:40 --> 1:50:46
finished up an article for peer review today. And I'm trying to get this information out,

1041
1:50:46 --> 1:50:51
you know, before they throw me in jail again, you know, so I, you know, it's just it's just

1042
1:50:51 --> 1:50:57
a common practice of these Luciferians and bad actors, they, they think that they can shut me

1043
1:50:57 --> 1:51:02
up on this. But I've published too much, I've written too much, you know, I have thousands

1044
1:51:03 --> 1:51:08
upon thousands of video presentations, I've lectured all over all over the world, from

1045
1:51:09 --> 1:51:17
University to Stanford to Oxford, those videos are available. I want people to have this information

1046
1:51:18 --> 1:51:26
without remuneration without any strings attached, attached. This knowledge should be available

1047
1:51:26 --> 1:51:34
for everyone to empower each human, each of my brothers and sisters, and all of their children,

1048
1:51:34 --> 1:51:40
how to personally take responsibility back for their own health, and the quality of their health

1049
1:51:40 --> 1:51:45
and the quantity of their health, rather than wholesaling that out to people that have been

1050
1:51:45 --> 1:51:52
educated beyond their intelligence. Beautifully said. And last comment before Stephen starts,

1051
1:51:52 --> 1:51:59
Robert, just as you said, we have 72 trillion cells, we had 72 people on the call and it just

1052
1:51:59 --> 1:52:04
dropped to 71. So there you are talking about synchronistic. Stephen over to you.

1053
1:52:06 --> 1:52:13
So Robert, I think, well, I'm very interested in Peter Duisburg, in particular, why was he attacked?

1054
1:52:14 --> 1:52:19
Because the other person who's been attacked, as you know, is Andrew Wakefield, and of course,

1055
1:52:19 --> 1:52:25
he's being proved right now. And Peter Duisburg, in my opinion, was right. And that's why they were

1056
1:52:25 --> 1:52:31
attacking him. Well, let me ask you a question. So hang on, I'm asking you the questions.

1057
1:52:31 --> 1:52:34
Okay, but let me ask everyone the question to think about.

1058
1:52:36 --> 1:52:40
Based on the information you heard today, is that practicing medicine without a license?

1059
1:52:43 --> 1:52:52
What, you you mean? Yeah. Well, I haven't said that. No, no, no, no, but in the state of

1060
1:52:52 --> 1:52:58
California, we know the whole thing's a fraud, Robert. But yeah, what's the license? Who's

1061
1:52:58 --> 1:53:05
awarding the license? You know, that's the problem. It doesn't matter whether you have a license or

1062
1:53:05 --> 1:53:10
you don't have a license. Yeah, but there's no use complaining about it. The law allows you to

1063
1:53:10 --> 1:53:16
practice medicine without a license as long as you do not prescribe legend drugs. I'm trying to get to

1064
1:53:16 --> 1:53:22
the bottom of what Peter Duisburg was saying. So he was saying that AIDS was caused by chemicals.

1065
1:53:23 --> 1:53:31
I have exactly virus. So that's absolutely essential to understand. You don't let me speak.

1066
1:53:32 --> 1:53:36
Oh, go ahead. I'm sorry. I thought you were finished. My apologies. I'm not finished.

1067
1:53:37 --> 1:53:44
So Peter Duisburg clearly was saying things that they didn't like. The question is, you have the

1068
1:53:44 --> 1:53:49
knowledge to know why, or maybe you have the knowledge to know why they didn't like what he

1069
1:53:49 --> 1:53:57
was saying. Well, you told us tonight that he was saying that AIDS was caused by chemicals. Well,

1070
1:53:58 --> 1:54:09
they were saying, and they gave a Nobel Prize to Luke Montagnier for discovering the virus, HIV,

1071
1:54:09 --> 1:54:17
which caused AIDS. That's what they wanted to put about. They were developing virology, shall we

1072
1:54:17 --> 1:54:25
say, at the expense of immunology, let's say that within medicine. But I learned at medical school

1073
1:54:25 --> 1:54:33
that a deadly virus, if one believes in viruses, which I'm not sure I do, kills its host, i.e.

1074
1:54:33 --> 1:54:41
that you can't have a pandemic. So the whole false narrative has been constructed over decades,

1075
1:54:41 --> 1:54:47
it seems, with evidence-based medicine and virology and hiding the immunologists and

1076
1:54:48 --> 1:54:56
people like Gallo and Fauci. So I don't, so Kerry Mullis was protecting Peter Duisburg.

1077
1:54:57 --> 1:55:04
Peter Duisburg was saying that chemicals are causing AIDS, whatever AIDS is.

1078
1:55:05 --> 1:55:13
So it seems to me that AIDS is like COVID-19, the disease doesn't exist. So, and Kerry Mullis

1079
1:55:13 --> 1:55:23
was saying also that his technique must never be used as a diagnostic test for a viral illness.

1080
1:55:25 --> 1:55:31
Luke Montagnier, meanwhile, was not able to answer Kerry Mullis's question.

1081
1:55:31 --> 1:55:37
Could he prove, could he give him a citation for the statement, the HIV virus is the probable

1082
1:55:37 --> 1:55:42
cause of AIDS? These people are all intimately connected, as I understand it. So Gallo

1083
1:55:42 --> 1:55:48
was awarded the Nobel Prize together with Montagnier. And I remember seeing

1084
1:55:49 --> 1:55:54
seeing an interview of the secretary to Montagnier, I think it was,

1085
1:55:54 --> 1:56:03
who was saying that Montagnier was away on holiday and Gallo, and I'm pretty sure I'm

1086
1:56:03 --> 1:56:11
right in this, Gallo rang up the office and spoke to her and tried to get her to send stuff to him.

1087
1:56:11 --> 1:56:18
I'm not sure whether he was, she did send it, but I think that was Gallo and Montagnier and they

1088
1:56:18 --> 1:56:23
end up receiving the Nobel Prize together and Montagnier knows that it was a fraud.

1089
1:56:24 --> 1:56:27
This is really important stuff and we need to put it together.

1090
1:56:30 --> 1:56:36
Well, you know, the reason they can't answer it is because they have no answers.

1091
1:56:36 --> 1:56:40
And that's exactly what we get from the FDA and the CDC when we ask them,

1092
1:56:40 --> 1:56:46
you know, under FOIA request, we say under FOIA request, can you provide us any evidence,

1093
1:56:46 --> 1:56:53
any citations, any published papers, which using the scientific method, they cannot.

1094
1:56:53 --> 1:56:59
The reason they cannot is because it does not exist. But also tonight, Robert, we hear that

1095
1:56:59 --> 1:57:05
you say that Fauci- For managing and controlling the surplus population, as Kissinger said,

1096
1:57:05 --> 1:57:12
of useless eaters, close quote. So we all got Fauci replacing Gallo.

1097
1:57:12 --> 1:57:19
Well, this is a racket, isn't it? It's a racket. It's the anatomy of a racket.

1098
1:57:20 --> 1:57:26
Hey, I didn't have all the pieces of the puzzle. I mean, each piece kind of laid out over a period

1099
1:57:26 --> 1:57:35
of 40 years of being involved in this industry. And, you know, how do you get arrested for

1100
1:57:35 --> 1:57:39
practicing medicine without a license when you're not practicing medicine?

1101
1:57:39 --> 1:57:47
It doesn't matter. Absolutely. Make it up. You know, the main objective here

1102
1:57:48 --> 1:57:53
is censorship. It's censorship. Of course, we know that.

1103
1:57:53 --> 1:57:59
The freedom of speech is taking away the right and control over the human body. That is the

1104
1:57:59 --> 1:58:05
medical model. Yeah, but we know that, Robert, what we don't know and what the public don't know is

1105
1:58:05 --> 1:58:12
the connection between these five men here and someone needs to look at them and dig deep.

1106
1:58:12 --> 1:58:17
I told you what I know. I told you what Luc Montaner said. I told you what

1107
1:58:17 --> 1:58:22
Deusper did. I've been in his lab. I've been at Berkeley. I've been, you know,

1108
1:58:24 --> 1:58:29
asking all the hard questions and being part of that. You know, I understand what he was

1109
1:58:29 --> 1:58:35
up against. I understand that he didn't want any part about it. And he spoke truthfully.

1110
1:58:35 --> 1:58:40
And when you speak the truth and it's not in line with the current protocol,

1111
1:58:42 --> 1:58:49
what happened during COVID? You lose your job or you may even lose your life.

1112
1:58:51 --> 1:58:56
But Robert, what I'm trying to do is draw attention to the connection between these five men,

1113
1:58:56 --> 1:58:59
but it keeps taking his away for some reason. I don't understand.

1114
1:58:59 --> 1:59:04
I'm not taking away. You know, they're all connected. Deusper got out of that connection

1115
1:59:04 --> 1:59:13
in 1983-85. He didn't want any part of it. He spoke out. So his connection was he was actually

1116
1:59:13 --> 1:59:22
an advocate for viral theory and HIV. He was against it. And Luc Montaner, he could not speak

1117
1:59:22 --> 1:59:28
out and didn't speak out and spoke to me in private. I never said anything about this,

1118
1:59:29 --> 1:59:36
this experience of 2011. I mean, I wanted to know why he was at this conference talking about

1119
1:59:36 --> 1:59:44
water technology and alkalization. And he was one of the keynote speakers. I still have the

1120
1:59:44 --> 1:59:50
programs and the evidence that that event actually happened. He was there. 2011, I sat right next to

1121
1:59:50 --> 1:59:57
him. I asked him, I wanted to know how are things going in Paris? I'm not there any longer. You're

1122
1:59:57 --> 2:00:07
not there? The chair of virology at the University of Paris School of Medicine? Where are you? I'm

1123
2:00:07 --> 2:00:15
in China. What are you doing in China? Studying water technology, functionally structured water

1124
2:00:15 --> 2:00:25
technology. As a cure for what? Here again, back to virology again, rather than using chemicals,

1125
2:00:25 --> 2:00:35
using water. But he came off that about two years before he died. And he came out and vocalized

1126
2:00:35 --> 2:00:42
his position on virology and what he had done and what he had not done. And so he confessed

1127
2:00:43 --> 2:00:49
that he had never purified in isolation of HIV period.

1128
2:00:53 --> 2:01:01
So Robert Gallo's gone. So Robert, I'm a medical doctor. So in my opinion,

1129
2:01:04 --> 2:01:10
they had to create virology to do what they did in 2020. It was a construct.

1130
2:01:11 --> 2:01:15
They had to do that for all these so-called

1131
2:01:16 --> 2:01:22
pandemics. Even polio. Polio was another pandemic. There's no polio virus.

1132
2:01:26 --> 2:01:33
So I say as a medical doctor, I hypothesized that actually pandemics are not possible

1133
2:01:34 --> 2:01:40
and that the whole thing about pandemics and gain-of-function research is a fraud. Every

1134
2:01:40 --> 2:01:49
single bit of it. Anyway, that's all I wanted to say. You are right. Congratulations. I'm proud of

1135
2:01:49 --> 2:01:57
you. Thank you. I'm proud to know you. Thank you, Stephen, for speaking up. So very importantly,

1136
2:01:57 --> 2:02:04
Robert, not only was there no pandemic in the COVID years, but it's not possible for there to

1137
2:02:04 --> 2:02:15
be a pandemic in the way that they say. And maybe even more so because viruses don't exist. But we

1138
2:02:15 --> 2:02:19
won't get into that now because we'll have to explain to people. We had enough problems

1139
2:02:20 --> 2:02:23
countering people who were saying, oh, I had COVID. I'll take it with me.

1140
2:02:24 --> 2:02:30
So I would say, well, how did you know you had COVID? Oh, I had this and I had that. And I said,

1141
2:02:30 --> 2:02:36
well, the test was, it should never have been using a test. But the test was fraudulent.

1142
2:02:36 --> 2:02:42
Let me take a couple more questions. I apologize. I'm going to have to leave. I don't know if,

1143
2:02:43 --> 2:02:49
because I have another appointment, but I want to continue this conversation, Stephen. It's an

1144
2:02:49 --> 2:02:59
important conversation to have. All right. So the most important thing to understand, Robert,

1145
2:02:59 --> 2:03:05
is that pandemics are not possible. So the WHO is pushing pandemics. We agree. We agree.

1146
2:03:05 --> 2:03:10
Come on. We agree. He's got to go. We have to hands up. Let's go. Mark.

1147
2:03:10 --> 2:03:20
Hi, Robert. Thank you very much. I'm not a doctor. I'll be brief. First of all, in the UK, where can

1148
2:03:20 --> 2:03:29
you get your hair tested? Okay. I can provide that through you. And I don't know if Matt Hazen's

1149
2:03:29 --> 2:03:35
still on the call or not. He could actually give you a link. If he's here, I would want him to

1150
2:03:35 --> 2:03:41
speak up and give you the link of how you can do that. But if you go to DR Robert Young and send

1151
2:03:41 --> 2:03:49
me your email, I will send you the information plus other information concerning plus all of the

1152
2:03:49 --> 2:03:55
references that I spoke about. So you'll get a PDF file for the scanning and transmission electron

1153
2:03:55 --> 2:04:02
microscopy. Okay, fine. Yeah, that will take care of the other question as well. I'll send you that.

1154
2:04:02 --> 2:04:09
The other question is you mentioned CO2. Yeah, thank you. You mentioned that CO2

1155
2:04:11 --> 2:04:18
is actually not being exhaled. Can you just explain that to me? Because my understanding is that the

1156
2:04:18 --> 2:04:23
CO2... I'm saying that it's being exhaled but only at a rate of 10 to 15 percent. The majority of

1157
2:04:23 --> 2:04:30
CO2 is used by the stomach as one of the elements for producing sodium bicarbonate. So the question

1158
2:04:30 --> 2:04:35
is, what are the elements for producing sodium bicarbonate which maintains the alkaline design

1159
2:04:35 --> 2:04:42
of the body fluids? This is a very, very important point. CO2 is necessary. Robert, just one second.

1160
2:04:42 --> 2:04:51
One second. I like figures. My understanding is we're breathing in 0.04 percent carbon dioxide and

1161
2:04:51 --> 2:05:01
we breathe out 4 percent. So I'm a bit confused. Where is that carbon dioxide going? Because we're

1162
2:05:01 --> 2:05:11
breathing out 17 percent oxygen having consumed or brought in 21 percent. So where is this carbon

1163
2:05:11 --> 2:05:19
dioxide? Are you talking about the body produces carbon dioxide through metabolism? It's a waste

1164
2:05:19 --> 2:05:27
product. So it's a waste product metabolism, CO2. So when you're going through the oxygen

1165
2:05:27 --> 2:05:35
process, CO2 is produced. It's a process of metabolism. The majority of that CO2 is being

1166
2:05:35 --> 2:05:45
used by the stomach to produce a compound of NaHCO3. The formula is NaCl plus H2O plus CO2

1167
2:05:45 --> 2:05:54
equals NaHCO3 plus HCl which is hydrochloric acid. You can read the chemistry. The chemistry

1168
2:05:54 --> 2:06:01
has to be balanced. I agree with you. But any excess that's coming out that the body's producing

1169
2:06:01 --> 2:06:07
is coming from metabolism. Thank you. Beautiful. Thank you very much. Albert.

1170
2:06:07 --> 2:06:15
Robert, how are you doing? Where are you? I'm in the upper.

1171
2:06:17 --> 2:06:23
You want to run a statistic on this? A chart? You're the chart guy. I mean, this guy's done,

1172
2:06:23 --> 2:06:28
by the way, he's done some great work. Albert's a star in statistics.

1173
2:06:30 --> 2:06:36
I'm just a medical biller, Robert. But man, I am so happy that you brought up the two stories that

1174
2:06:37 --> 2:06:44
never cease to amaze me. The chicken heart story, how the guy... Yeah, Alex Carell.

1175
2:06:45 --> 2:06:50
That one. But the even better one is the Beauchamp story. I know you didn't go in

1176
2:06:51 --> 2:06:55
deep here, but one of these days you have to come back and tell us the story of

1177
2:06:57 --> 2:07:03
you being there and how the big French security guy... It's a long story, but I can give you the

1178
2:07:03 --> 2:07:09
abbreviated form, not right now, but if I come back, I'll do that. The reason I'm here today,

1179
2:07:09 --> 2:07:15
I think was encouraged by Andrews. I see his face here. So thank you, Andrews. I mean, I'm honored

1180
2:07:15 --> 2:07:23
to be able to speak, share this. Hopefully, you've learned something new today that you didn't know

1181
2:07:23 --> 2:07:32
before. There's a whole bunch more that can be shared. And I need to thank you and carry on.

1182
2:07:32 --> 2:07:41
Andrews knows my work very well. Albert knows my work. Matt Hazen knows my work. I see Tom up here.

1183
2:07:41 --> 2:07:48
Tom Armstrong knows my work. I've got to run, but God bless you all. Thank you so much for allowing

1184
2:07:48 --> 2:07:57
me to express myself freely. And Stephen, keep up your research going here. And if I can be of any

1185
2:07:57 --> 2:08:02
help with what you're doing to come to some of the conclusions, looks like you're doing it all

1186
2:08:02 --> 2:08:07
yourself anyway. So you're heading in the right direction. That's all I can say. God bless all of

1187
2:08:07 --> 2:08:13
you. You know, and go out and vote. Okay. Thank you, Robert. There's one thing. I think one of

1188
2:08:13 --> 2:08:21
your supporters, Robert, Matt Seema, I think, Seena, seems to think that... He can give you

1189
2:08:21 --> 2:08:27
information on the hair testing. Yeah, I'm just trying to make a point. So,

1190
2:08:27 --> 2:08:33
Matt, I think he's helping you. He seems to think that we were pushing the no virus. I was

1191
2:08:33 --> 2:08:38
saying the opposite of that, but I was interrupted by Charles because I was saying... No, no, you're

1192
2:08:38 --> 2:08:45
not pushing that. No, you were perfectly clear. I got it. But I do think there's a strong possibility

1193
2:08:45 --> 2:08:51
there are no viruses, but now is not the time to be arguing about that because all the

1194
2:08:52 --> 2:08:57
people who are chicken pox and lungs... Read my work on it. The second thought is, which I wrote

1195
2:08:57 --> 2:09:03
in the 90s, talks about that whole issue. It's in three parts. I'll provide it to you for free.

1196
2:09:03 --> 2:09:09
It'll give you some more in-depth. God bless you all. I've got to go. Take care. Thank you, Charles.

1197
2:09:09 --> 2:09:14
Thank you, Stephen. Thank you all for being here today. I hope to see you and talk to you soon.

1198
2:09:14 --> 2:09:18
Okay. Thanks, Robert. Thank you. Bye-bye. Oh, okay.

1199
2:09:20 --> 2:09:27
All right. So we've got 10 more minutes. 12. 12 more minutes if anyone wants to

1200
2:09:27 --> 2:09:34
put their hand up and raise anything. Albert has. Go, Albert. Yeah. Hey, I know he's not here,

1201
2:09:34 --> 2:09:42
but I just wanted to tell him and I'll tell you guys that it doesn't pass me that a special

1202
2:09:42 --> 2:09:50
Dr. Robert O. Young is because of what he knows, but his story, he talks in first person,

1203
2:09:50 --> 2:09:58
like Luke Montagnier told me. I mean, that is amazing when he talks in first person like that.

1204
2:09:58 --> 2:10:04
And it's going to be like, how much longer, how many more years are going to pass where we're

1205
2:10:04 --> 2:10:10
not going to have this firsthand account? And in the same token, how much longer,

1206
2:10:11 --> 2:10:17
you know, will we able, will I'll be able to say like, well, Robert O. Young told me,

1207
2:10:18 --> 2:10:24
you know, another 30, 40 years and, you know, we're going to lose that and just have to read

1208
2:10:24 --> 2:10:30
it in a book. So these are. Albert, I think that's called legacy memory and we're going to lose it,

1209
2:10:30 --> 2:10:37
as you say. So before we lose Peter Duisburg, I'm going to try and get him to come and talk to us.

1210
2:10:38 --> 2:10:42
He's shy about doing interviews, but I don't think it's impossible to persuade him.

1211
2:10:42 --> 2:10:47
Yep. So yeah, I'll just wrap it up. I was just going to say that. And that is the bittersweet,

1212
2:10:47 --> 2:10:54
one of the bittersweet things of this whole pandemic is to get to meet these giants,

1213
2:10:54 --> 2:10:59
Robert O. Young and you guys and a lot of people here. So thank you. Thank you guys so much.

1214
2:11:00 --> 2:11:03
Well done. Albert on your work. Winston.

1215
2:11:07 --> 2:11:13
Winston, you muted. Sorry about that. I just wanted to comment. It seems to me that this

1216
2:11:13 --> 2:11:22
issue of Gallo was talked about by Judy Mikovits sometime ago and following which she,

1217
2:11:23 --> 2:11:29
she got into some trouble with Fauci and then lost her job. So perhaps she could put us straight on

1218
2:11:29 --> 2:11:34
what's happened here, but it seems very interesting.

1219
2:11:34 --> 2:11:41
Well, it's very interesting Winston, that Gallo subsequently did lose his position because of

1220
2:11:41 --> 2:11:48
criminal fraud, as I understand it, or some kind of scientific fraud. So, but why would they do

1221
2:11:48 --> 2:11:55
that to someone who's won a Nobel Prize? Or was it to show him who was boss?

1222
2:11:55 --> 2:12:01
I think that point is very interesting because it does seem as though some one of the people

1223
2:12:01 --> 2:12:08
it does seem as though some one or two people got a Nobel Prize when it wasn't you. So,

1224
2:12:08 --> 2:12:14
but I think Judy Mikovits articulated that if I'm fairly certain about it, she went on at length

1225
2:12:15 --> 2:12:22
on what had happened to her and so on. Yeah, but was she speaking about Gallo and Fauci

1226
2:12:22 --> 2:12:27
and all the rest of them? Yes, yes, yes, yes. It's all related to that. We should get her back then.

1227
2:12:28 --> 2:12:32
Yes, all right. Yeah, yeah.

1228
2:12:34 --> 2:12:41
All right. Well, Charles, yeah. Okay, everybody, we'll take this opportunity. Well done,

1229
2:12:41 --> 2:12:48
Anders, for organizing Robert to be here. We've had him before and it's wonderful the work he does.

1230
2:12:48 --> 2:12:54
Big opportunity for all of you to study, me included, his website, vast amounts of

1231
2:12:54 --> 2:13:01
information and I think it reinforces how little we understand of the body when Ian Brighthope was

1232
2:13:01 --> 2:13:07
on here. It just the debates that go on about the functioning of the body stop being so certain

1233
2:13:07 --> 2:13:14
about what you think is going on in the body because, as I often say, to be uncertain can be

1234
2:13:14 --> 2:13:19
uncomfortable. To be certain is ridiculous. I learned that from an old Chinese saying.

1235
2:13:20 --> 2:13:26
Well, maybe Charles, understanding what's going on in the body is like saying we don't know,

1236
2:13:26 --> 2:13:32
we're mere human beings, but it seems to me that knowing what's going on in the body definitively

1237
2:13:32 --> 2:13:38
is like saying we're going to find out how the universe was created and how it, you know,

1238
2:13:39 --> 2:13:43
like Elon Musk says he's going to another planet. I don't know which planet.

1239
2:13:43 --> 2:13:50
Which planet? Yep, agree. All right, everybody. Thank you for your contributions. Thank you for

1240
2:13:50 --> 2:13:56
the chat. Thank you for being here and we will be back with you on Sunday. Thanks, Stephen.

1241
2:13:57 --> 2:14:05
Thanks, Charles. Oh, early finish tonight, Charles. Yeah, miracle. A miracle. Okay.

1242
2:14:05 --> 2:14:08
It's fine. Thank you so much.