And I'll just do one other thing if I do that to you.
I do this to me.
Okay, go ahead.
Okay, so everybody, welcome to today's discussion of medical doctors for COVID ethics international.
His group was founded by Dr. Stephen Frost of Wales in mid 2021, almost two years ago
during the darkest days of the COVID scam responses with a desire to pursue truth, ethics,
justice, freedom and health.
Stephen has stood up against government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower
and activist.
His medical specialty is cardiology.
Radiology, Charles.
You said cardiology.
Did I?
Gosh, my word says radiology.
I'm pleased to see you're listening.
So Stephen clearly sees through most crappy things and most bullshit.
Sadly, the need for this group is increasing, not decreasing.
The forces of evil globally are not disappearing.
I'm Charles Covets, the moderator of this group.
I'm Australasia's passion provocateur and my jacket is red because red is the color
of passion.
The people who attend this group are indeed passionate about the aims of this group.
I practiced law for 20 years before changing career 30 years ago.
And over the last 11 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine
damage and damage from bad medical advice.
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company here in Melbourne.
We comprise lots of professions, doctors, lawyers, naturopaths, homeopaths, healers,
journalists, engineers, writers, researchers, scientists, filmmakers, dentists, nurses,
investors, financiers, patent experts, professors and educators, primate experts, thinkers,
philosophers, peacemakers and troublemakers.
Brad, you can tell us when you get started as to which group you fall into.
Actually, that's right. We should have the military.
Thank you. We will add the military to this because we do have military and police.
They're very good. Yeah, good.
And we're from the UK, USA, Australia, Canada, Argentina, Sweden, Norway, Borneo, New Zealand,
South Africa, Czech Republic, Germany, Austria and from other places.
If you are from another country, please put it in the chat and we'll happily add you to the list.
If this is your first time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat.
We ask that you show your name on the screen so we know who you are.
If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have a radio or TV show or you have written a book,
put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you and find you.
This group meets at least twice weekly in a true spirit of exploration and discovery to increase
our understanding of what's going on and how to more effectively preserve and fight for truth,
ethics, justice, freedom and health.
Most of us understand that we're in the middle of World War Three and that there are various battle lines as part of this war.
Some of us believe we are in a continuation of World War Two.
Others say we're in the 5G war. Quite like that too.
Most of us understand the development of science.
The wonderful author Michael Crichton wrote,
When someone tells you the science is settled, reach for your wallet.
And Carl Sagan wrote, Science requires an almost complete openness to all ideas.
On the other hand, it requires the most rigorous and uncompromising scepticism.
Interesting distinction between scepticism and cynicism.
That's the whole discussion in itself.
This meeting runs for two and a half hours after which, for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting.
Tom puts the links into the chat if you are able to join.
We will listen to Brad Miller, our guest presenter today, for as long as he wishes to speak.
And then we have Q&A.
If you wish to ask a question, when Brad finishes talking, raise your hand.
Using the Reactions tab on the bottom of your screen, Stephen Frost, by long established tradition, asks the first questions.
There is no censorship.
It's a free speech environment, but we have proper, efficient, effective moderation.
Be patient with the process of the meeting.
Different people have totally different views about what is important, what is relevant, what is nonsense.
Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.
The tragedy is that a majority of people these days would choose security ahead of freedom and then end up with neither.
This group can help you identify your beliefs and perhaps to help you change those that no longer serve you.
This group can help you raise your self-awareness, a crucial factor in your enjoyment and experience of your life.
If you find yourself upset by anything that is said, look inside yourself.
That's where your upset originates.
If you're offended by anything, be offended.
We are genuinely not interested.
We reject the offence industry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another.
I have a list of nine standard responses to someone who claims to be offended by something that I said.
If you want a copy, I'm happy to share it.
I urge you to never apologise to someone who claims to be offended.
Decide to have an open mind.
It's the fastest way to learn.
We come with an attitude and perspective of love, not fear.
Fear is the opposite of love.
Fear squashes you, suppresses you, depresses you.
Love, on the other hand, expands you, energises you, enhances you.
Loving those with different views to your own is a challenge, and we encourage you to embrace that challenge.
If you have a solution or a product that will help people put the details into the chat,
if you have links and resources that will be helpful, put them into the chat.
The meeting is recorded, is published and is uploaded within a few days on the Rumble channel.
I will put the link into the chat.
And now welcome to our guest presenter, Brad Miller, former Lieutenant Colonel,
whom we thank for giving us his time, wisdom and insights.
And we thank Alec Zeck via Shasta Erickson and Tom Quinn for recommending Brad.
And thank you, Stephen, again, for creating this group and for organising our presenter today.
Brad Miller, welcome. We are all ears.
All right. Well, thanks, everyone.
I really appreciate the opportunity to be here.
And I'll start by saying, Charles, you mentioned being a troublemaker.
So what I'm going to tell you today is I share my stories.
I'm going to tell you how I got myself into a little bit of trouble with the US Department of Defense.
That's kind of what we're going to talk about today.
Let me start by saying I'm honoured and delighted to be here participating with all of you.
I'm excited to share a little bit about my story, not because it's about me,
but more because I'm excited to stand shoulder to shoulder with all of you in this fight for freedom.
Everything I say, I'm going to share. It's going to be my own opinions.
I don't necessarily feel the need to provide a disclaimer because I'm not really affiliated
with the US government or the Department of Defense anymore.
But I just want everyone to know that what I'm sharing are my opinions gleaned from my own perspective.
Experiences may vary. There are other people in the military who clearly feel differently or had other experiences.
I'm just going to share what I saw, what I feel, what I think, what I'm passionate about.
My situation is somewhat indicative of how the the injection mandate was implemented.
But I will give the immediate caveat that there are some particulars that are unique to my case
just because of the time of service that I had, the command position that I was in when the mandate was implemented, etc.
I'll explain my situation, how it unfolded.
I'll explain some of the decisions that I made that were perhaps a little bit unique.
And I'll also give some opinions on where I think the military is now in terms of its ability to retain and recruit,
because at least here in the United States, we're hearing a lot about our own military's failure to keep its people and failure to get more people to want to sign up and join.
Why is my story important?
Well, it's not because it's about me, but just because of perhaps the glimpse that I can give from my own perspective as to what has happened in the military over the last couple of years and what continues to happen.
You know, we're starting to see more information come out over the last couple of months that just really drive home the point that this worldwide phenomenon that we've been living through for the past the past two to three years
has largely been executed by the US Department of Defense.
I completely agree with the prefatory comments that said that we are we're currently in a war.
And I think further our own militaries view us as the targets.
So while a lot of people that are here listening may have never been affiliated with the military and certainly many here are not Americans, I still think it's probably important for everyone to understand
the role that the US Department of Defense has played in this, this op. And when I say op, I am specifically referring to a military operation that has been conducted
and and is being conducted against us because I firmly believe that that is what's going on. I don't have any slides today. I'm just going to kind of verbally share my story. So
I'll just have to captivate you with my sonorous voice as I as I get my perspective.
Let me start just with a little bit of an overview. So I graduated from the United States Military Academy, also known as West Point.
And I got out of the Army a couple of months ago. So just over 19 years of active service.
In the US military, if you serve for 20 years of active service, you do qualify for retirement pension. So I was just shy of about nine months away from qualifying for that pension.
I'll explain that more detail as I as I get there, but I just kind of offer you that by way of overview.
I am a former lieutenant colonel. I do not introduce myself as a lieutenant colonel or lieutenant colonel retired because I did not retire and I'm happily resigned. I am proud to have resigned from the military and
I do not regret the decision that I made and I'll explain why as we go forward. I was a battalion commander at the time that the the the vaccine mandate or the injection mandate was implemented.
And when I was relieved of command for failure to comply, I was one of only two battalion commanders across the entire active army out of, I don't know, hundreds of battalion commanders that that was relieved for for failure to comply with the mandate.
By way of a little bit more background. I'll just let you know that I grew up in North Carolina. So southeastern part of the United States.
In the 80s and the 90s when I was growing up and just, you know, for perspective, I'm I'm 43 right now. So growing up in the 80s and the 90s.
North Carolina would have been a conservative Christian area, highly patriotic many of my friends that graduated high school with me or before me.
Join the military in some capacity or another that was very common in the area that I'm from. I did not grow up in a military family, but I did grow up in a patriotic family.
I did not know anyone who had graduated from West Point before I applied and got accepted, but I decided that that's where I wanted to go to school and I decided that
I wanted to at least pursue some years of service in the army. So I ended up at West Point and I want to take just a few minutes to kind of share how that experience shaped me because West Point
really is a special place. It's a great place. It's a hard place to go to school certainly, but it is a great place to go to school if you love your country and if you want to serve.
It's steeped in history in a way that is very unique in the entirety of the United States. Earlier this week, the Academy just celebrated 221 years since its founding.
Even its very location on the bank of the Hudson River is historically important because it was chosen because of its strategic prominence during the War for Independence.
The ever-growing body of graduates from West Point are known collectively as the Long Gray Line and that Long Gray Line has a lot of extremely prominent individuals, individuals like General and later President Eisenhower
General Patton, MacArthur, Robert E. Lee during the American Civil War. Most of the generals on both sides were West Point graduates.
So when you're there, there is this historical gravitas that is just in the air. It's in the water. It's seeped into the buildings over time and you live that.
The motto of West Point is duty, honor, country. You can kind of start to see how for a young man as I'm there as part of this is my formation, my preparation to become a military officer.
You can see how some of these concepts like duty, honor, country might resonate with me. If I were to take duty, honor, country and maybe reword that, I might say that a couple of things that I really learned while I was at West Point was love of country.
Or a commitment to honor and integrity or the responsibility that we all have to do the right thing, particularly as somebody who is preparing to be an officer in the United States Army and potentially placed in positions of great responsibility
and potentially finding oneself in under duress or in extreme situations.
So when I was at the Academy, I would say those things that I just mentioned, love of country, commitment to honor, do the right thing. They're not necessarily things that I learned at the Academy. I mean, I think I grew up with some of those virtues, but they became more real at the Academy.
I mean, they are certainly imbued within every cadet. And when you're there at the Academy, you certainly feel like you are on hallowed ground.
There's a cadet honor code, which is taken very seriously and simply stated. It says a cadet will not lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those who do.
So you can kind of see how later on in my career, when we start seeing about all of these people that are willing to, you know, for lack of a better way of putting it, live a lie or participate in a lie, you can see how I had to question
why some of these people were maybe getting away from things that they had supposedly believed that their entire careers. But we'll talk a little bit more about that. But that's just kind of why I wanted to take a couple of minutes and explain why my four years at the Academy was such a valuable formation for me.
There's actually a cadet prayer that many cadets learn while they're there. And there's a very specific way that I was taught to do that.
And that line boils down to choose the harder right over the easier wrong. Interestingly enough, Alex Zek, another West Point graduate, kind of chose that as the tagline in an interview with the West Point University of New York.
And that's where I found that I was able to do that. And I think that's the most important thing. And I think that's the most important thing.
I was a combat leader when I was younger, later company commander, and then kind of culminating in battalion command, other staff positions that I held along the way. I was in multiple operation positions at various levels.
I served on a four star general staff that was actually in Korea. I served in the front office of a three star admiral. I had two combat deployments to Afghanistan. I spent a year in Honduras.
I spent plenty of other weeks traveling extensively, a lot through Latin America, working with with foreign militaries training some of their individuals.
And I also spent three years in South Korea. So, um, some diverse experiences along the way in my 19 years, a lot of experiences that I, I'm extremely proud of.
I'm proud to be a West Point graduate. I'm proud to have been in the army. I'm proud to have been a battalion commander, but I'm also proud to have, I had the courage and the integrity to walk away from the army when I felt that the army was no longer living up to its charter.
As I move forward, just kind of in my own timeline, we get to kind of where the actual COVID slash COVID injection part of the story comes to bear.
So in 2020, as we were all starting as this as this new term COVID was starting to become part of our everyday lexicon, I was actually in Korea.
And this is interesting because when we first, you know, the, the, the origins of the narrative, of course, led everyone to believe that this, this came from Wuhan.
So a lot of the individuals in Korea, the Korean citizens and also the, the US troops that were stationed in Korea. I mean, everybody was freaking out, just freaking out about just based on what everyone was hearing from the media.
And I will tell you that in late January, early February of, of 2020, I was immediately skeptical of the narrative. Now I'm not, I'm not going to sit here and tell you that I was a genius that had everything figured out from day one.
That is not true. But, but I was very skeptical of what I was hearing. And let me take a moment to explain why.
So earlier in my career, when I was a young captain, starting back about 2007, I had really started to question a lot of what was going on in our world.
A lot of what we were being told in terms of history, a lot of what we were being told in terms of current events, a lot of what I was hearing from my own government, et cetera.
And it was actually very hard for me. So starting in about 2007, I started doing a lot of research and the, the initial catalyst for a lot of this research was specifically 9-11.
And so here I was recently returned from a deployment to Afghanistan where I had deployed 100% believing that I had deployed to Afghanistan, forgotten country.
I believe that while I was over there, I believed that when I came home and then it wasn't until later had nothing to do with my deployment.
It's not like my eyes were woken up on the deployment, but just coming across some other things. I just started to do some research.
You start researching one event that leads you down another rabbit hole.
And then you realize that beneath the surface, there is a, a labyrinthine tunnel complex just from rabbit hole to rabbit hole to rabbit hole to rabbit hole.
And I just never stopped doing research. And in fact, I almost got out of the army probably about 2009 because I found it extremely hard for me to reconcile my service with what I had initially thought my military service was going to be.
Spoiler alert though, I did not get out of the military.
But the reason that I ultimately decided to stay in was because I thought, this is still salvageable. We need good people in the military, we need good people in the government.
And once good people get in charge, the ship will will right itself.
But during this period that I started doing extensive amounts of research, I, I really became enamored with the Constitution for the United States now clearly as a military officer I mean I had taken note to the Constitution I had always taken that very seriously.
But now I was beginning to try and understand some of the bedrock principles of the the origins of our country, some of these republican values that we had supposedly been founded upon but seemingly had had wildly departed from.
And I started to realize that the, the country, the world seemed to be run largely by networks of very powerful people.
And that kind of changed my concept of geopolitics because it seemed that you could no longer look at geopolitics as a simple construct of, you know, states operating in their own interests and then you kind of overlay on top of that non state actors, you know
terrorists, terrorist groups, corporations, whatever.
It seemed that there was a there was a layer to reality within geopolitics that people were not accounting for.
And I began to fear that the United States was hired muscle for some of these cabals of evil.
And I think that's kind of in the in the way that Major General Smedley Butler of the United States Marine Corps had declared when he, he wrote his book you know war is a racket.
And I think our problems today are probably far more expansive than Smedley Butler said you know like 90 years ago.
And I began to see that there seemed to be this, this strategy of tension that was constantly at play through a use of engineered dialectics that kept groups in constant opposition with one another, without the ability to see who is actually pulling the strings.
And that led me to believe over time and many years of research and just trying to figure this out myself.
And so, it led me to believe that a lot of people have an incomplete worldview. And so, they're constantly doing these mental gymnastics in their own head because what they see and what they hear doesn't quite seem to square with reality, or what they're being told, and they can't quite
account for the disconnect.
And I think it's very apparent because I think there's some very deliberate worldview warfare that is going on that keeps people in a constant state of confusion, which in turn is used as a behavior modification tool.
But anyway so so years and years of research. Let me move back in the timeline to early 2020 when I'm in Korea, and I'm immediately skeptical of the narrative.
And I just don't buy it at this point in my life.
Even though I'm a military officer, and I'm proud to be a military officer.
I disbelieve anything the government tells me almost by default.
If the government tells me a, I automatically think, not a. If the government tells me be, I automatically think, not be that is my first position that I'm going to start operating from.
But I didn't exactly know what exactly the truth was, I just kind of felt like well, whatever it is what we're being told is is not true.
I assumed it was an op.
But I assumed it was probably a Western, you know, or a US run up, maybe with Chinese collaboration, or maybe was a Chinese up with us collaboration in either way.
Some of my initial thoughts in the spring of 2020 were.
There's some sort of network over top of both sides, east and west that is kind of pulling the strings. And then later we see that nearly every country in the world adopts these policies that come out through organizations like the WHO.
So who's pulling the strings and basically forcing every country to go along.
In my career in about this time, I got promoted to Lieutenant Colonel and I also got selected for battalion command that I would assume the following year in the summer of 2021.
So in terms of my career I mean this is a great moment for me in the United States Army selection for battalion command is is highly competitive.
It is very prestigious, especially if you get selected for a tactical battalion command in a storied division like the 101st Airborne Division, which is where I commanded, which has a glorious history because I'll go back to World War Two and I mean I'm very proud to have
spent some time commanding within a division like the 101st Airborne Division. So in terms of my career, everything is going very, very well.
But I'm not going to take command until a year later. So in 2020.
My time in Korea is done. And I returned to the United States, and I go do a graduate program at an institution within the army that we call SAMS, SAMS stands for School of Advanced Military Studies.
It's a again it's a selective program you have to specially apply. I did, I got admitted, and, and I show up to do this one year grad program in Kansas, which will be the year before I take battalion command.
And this, this is also a prominent part of the story because obviously that the summer of 2020 to the summer of 2021 there's a lot going on.
Just with with COVID and then we're going to see the advent of the VACs etc.
And I'm preparing to take command and I'm trying to figure out how I'm going to be able to navigate all this. But let me tell you just a little bit about SAMS because this was an important year for me so again, School of Advanced Military Studies.
Ostensibly it exists for a lot of these mid grade officers typically majors but I was a very junior newly penned Lieutenant Colonel that are cerebral thinkers that come to the school to kind of learn how to think strategically but then really work on planning
and operating at that operational level so that level between strategy and tactics.
So, who was created by a retired Brigadier General whose name is Cuba Vashti Sega he was born in Hungary and immigrated with his family to the state to a very young age, went to West Point join the US Army and became known as an innovative thinker almost
immediately. So he convinced when he's a Colonel he convinces army leadership that they need to set up this school that he calls School of Advanced Military Studies.
So he does. The Army believes in his program. He then is appointed as the school's first director.
And within a couple of years of its creation it was created in the in the mid 80s. Within a couple of years of its creation. The, the graduates of the program made a name for themselves first in Panama 89, and then later in Desert Storm particularly
working in a in a plan cell.
Fairly directly under the leadership of General Norman Schwarzkopf, and because these supposedly cerebral thinkers were so instrumental in a lot of the planning that was then executed during Gulf War.
The graduates of the school picked up the name.
The Jedi warriors or Jedi Knights, and the reason is because the Sam's motto is the mind is the key to victory. You know it doesn't take a huge movie buff to go from there to Jedi Knights, etc.
The school embrace that moniker I mean you go to Sam's and they really embrace kind of the whole concept of being known as the Jedi Knights these big brain guys that supposedly
have been trained to think and can operate, kind of at this at this operational level, and can really think in complexity, and can understand and come up with with creative solutions, just understand this cognitive approach to warfare.
So, who was the Sega was was very open in who he wanted as the students in his program. And the word that he used was heretics, I want the army's heretics.
I want the smart guys who understand doctrine masterfully.
These are guys who can try new things they can dispense with what has always been done, and they can be innovative thinkers that are exploring creative solutions to these you know what we call now maybe a wicked problem.
So a huge underlying theme within this course was to constantly challenge your own assumptions, which again I think is great I mean 100% agree with that.
But what I saw in the course I'm surrounded by all these super smart guys and I mean they were very very smart guys.
But when it came to challenging assumptions it always seemed that a lot of these individuals would not go far back enough and challenging foundational assumptions.
There were presuppositions that were clearly never going to be challenged because again, this is the summer of 2020 to the summer of 2021.
And even if just in our off time I mean we're constantly talking about what's going on with coven I mean the, the, the quote unquote vaccines that aren't really vaccines are about to come out.
And it seems that nobody is willing to challenge that underlying presupposition that hey, maybe what we're being told by our own government is not the truth or maybe there's more to it.
Now, now I understand, you know these guys, they go to school every day, and they wear their uniform, you know there's an American flag on the shoulder.
They got a name tape on their uniform that says US Army. It's one thing to be in this in this academic environment, and they talk historically about strategic decisions that were made in the past by military leaders or even government leaders and critique
that academically.
That was totally permitted, but to go one step further and actually view the US government as being potentially malevolent. What I saw was students just were not going to do that, even in their conversations you know one with another.
But anyway so I graduated from Sam's in, in, in 2021.
And this is, this is the end of May in 2021.
And I am going to now move to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and I'm going to take command of my battalion. So when I take command of the battalion it is now June of 2021.
So just to just to kind of figure out where we are in terms of timeline. This is June of 2021.
And the, the mandate will be implemented, August 24 of 2021, and I am very aware of what is going on when I take command, and to put it simply.
I very much understand that I am on borrowed time, and normally command would be for two years. And I, I very much understand that I am not going to be in command for two years but I'm going to take command.
And if this, this mandate ends up going into effect. Then I'm going to force the army to fire battalion commander but I'm going to take command.
I take command on June 10 2021. And I immediately inform my direct supervisor who would be the brigade commander within the 101st Airborne Division, the division is commanded by a two star general beneath the division.
There are about six brigades. Those brigades are commanded by colonels within each brigade. There's a there's a handful of battalions.
And those battalions are commanded by Lieutenant colonels, I command one of those battalions, my direct boss is the brigade commander who's a colonel.
I informed my brigade commander when I took command that, hey, I'm not. I'm not a. I have not taken the coven 19 vaccine. I do not plan to take it. I know people are going to judge me.
I acknowledge that I accept it. I'm not taking it.
So, I'm back now again this is in June, it's not mandatory yet.
He wrote back in an email because I informed him via email and he wrote back and said hey all good. I appreciate you letting me know.
It's not mandatory. No issues with me and to his credit. He never pressured me in any way to take the shot. But again at that time it is not mandatory.
So within my own battalion.
I just taken over.
And so I would have a series of in briefs with my, my staff leaders and then also my subordinate commanders who are the company commander so these are captains who are in charge of the seven companies within my battalion.
And so I informed them as soon as I took command.
Some of the, some of the key things that I wanted them to understand about my leadership and I explained one things I explained to him was, let me just address the, the elephant in the room.
I mean I'm, I'm unvaccinated, and I, I don't care what your position is on that. I'm not here to tell you what to do or what not to do. It's not mandatory I'm not going to tell anyone to take it, you know against your wishes.
And then I also told him.
There's some things that I care a lot about. I care a lot about the Constitution, I care a lot about laws, I care a lot about regulations. I care a lot about operating ethically.
I believe in doing the right thing, consequences be damned.
And I kind of wanted them to understand where I was coming from because I was already kind of realizing that I may not be here long, and, and if I'm not here very long, then my command is going to be entirely reduced down to the fact that I refuse the
2019 shot.
No one's going to care how tactically savvy I was.
No one's going to care, you know about this or that or whatever things that normally would be very important to a commander.
All people are going to care about is that I refuse the shot, and so somewhere along the way I mean I just kind of had to embrace that. I'm only going to be here a short time.
I need people to understand why I think so strongly about this, why I view this ethically why I view this constitutionally and hopefully this will resonate after I'm gone if it doesn't resonate while I'm still here.
So then later when I had my one on one kind of counseling sessions with my subordinate leaders, where I just explained to them as the new battalion commander here my expectations of you, etc.
I believe in operating ethically, you know I believe in doing the right thing because it is the right thing, you know, not just because it's a CIA. Yeah, I mean that's important too but you do the right thing because it is the right thing you know consequences be damned.
And this almost became a mantra, but it's because I wanted to drill this in to my subordinates core so that they would remember it. I mean, truth be told, you know, remember it once I was no longer in command.
Again, this is in, in June, right after I had taken command in July, I remember just things that were coming out in the media.
The writing was on the wall, it was just very obvious that the, the mandate was was was coming sooner rather than later.
I approached my direct supervisor the brigade commander, and I told him once again, I know the writings on the wall, I know this mandate is going to be implemented any day now, just so you know, my, my position has not changed.
If, if this is mandated.
I'm going to stick to my position and I'm not going to take the shot.
And he, I remember he looked me in the eye and he said, I hope it doesn't come to that.
And I was appreciative of that because it communicated to me that he understood the gravitas of the situation, you knew that I understood the gravitas of the situation, but he also was acknowledging my resolve, and that I was was not going to budge, you know,
regardless of what happened to my career.
Then, about that time, but in probably in August probably just before the mandate.
I actually had a one on one meeting with the general so now this would be my boss, two levels up the division commander.
And he was doing interviews with with the new battalion commanders there was nothing unique about that but I was clearly his only unvaccinated battalion commander out of approximately 30 in the entire division, and he knew that believe me I mean he very much knew that I was
unvaccinated. So we had a one on one meeting behind closed doors.
And we talked about it, and we're both very open and to his credit and he was a stickler.
And he would, he would be an extreme stickler once it became mandatory but when I when I had this conversation with him it was probably two weeks before the, the mandate came out, but again the writing was on the wall.
And I told him, you know I'm very clear eyed in my assessment of what my decision to refuse may portend for my career and even my retirement, etc.
And to his credit.
He, he just made sure that I understood what I would potentially be giving up, and I told him yes I mean I understand.
And I had done something similar with my unvaccinated subordinates where I'd kind of brought them all in. When I took command. My battalion was approximately 80% vaccinated.
And, and I spoke in small groups with my unvaccinated populations and I told him, I'm not here to tell you what to do and I'm not even really speaking to you because I also am unvaccinated.
I'm speaking to you as your battalion commander and I'm just pleading with you.
Please have a plan, because any day now this shot may become mandatory, and you just need to know what you're going to do. If you decide you're not going to take it. Great, just understand that may mean the end of your army career you just need to
have a plan for what you're going to do after.
If it becomes mandatory you decide at that point that you are going to take it, then that is your decision I'm not going to tell you what to do one way or the other.
If you're unvaccinated in my opinion, come talk to me in my office behind closed doors and I will I will absolutely tell you what my personal opinions are you know we can talk about your situation, etc.
And, and I had very young soldiers you know 1920 year old soldiers that would come see me behind closed doors, you know one on one in my office and we would talk about their specific situation and what they wanted to do.
For those who may not be familiar with a military environment for a young, young soldier, you know, maybe with a year or so in the military to go visit the battalion commander even even on good terms, regardless of how approachable that battalion commander
may be that's a big deal it's a big deal for a soldier to go seek out the battalion commander, but they did.
They did they took me up on my offer and they would come talk to me and some of them were in my office in tears, because they did not want to take the shot, you know I can remember specifically one whose older brother had taken the shot and had some pretty
significant adverse effects.
And, and was in tears, because you know what that would mean if they in turn you know how to take the shot potentially.
Anyway, fast forward a couple of weeks on August 23 of 2021. The FDA of course, supposedly, approves the, the Pfizer vaccine, you know, I think there was some, some tricky there that we know about and I firmly believe that do D and FDA were
collusion to represent an EU a product is fully licensed through this, this shell game with two different products that were legally distinct.
But in the beginning a lot of people were not aware of that and I also was not aware of that. So even when the mandate came out so on the 23rd.
So Pfizer vaccine is supposedly, you know fully approved by the FDA, the very next day August 24. Do D then implements its mandate.
And I did not know then about this shell game between this Pfizer biointech product and the the community product that I would learn about a couple of months later, but I already was completely against the shots.
I knew that this whole thing was was sinister. I knew that what is an op being perpetrated against the, you know the country by our own government, and I just was not going to be a part of it but I did not know about that kind of that bait and switch with
this community product I didn't know about that yet.
And part of that is because my, my battalion was about to go do some training down in Louisiana where we were going to deploy with our all our equipment, all our personnel and go do some pretty significant training in which we pretty much would have been cut off from
the outside world so there was a lot of information that was coming out in September that I was not aware of until later.
And one of those things that happened was on September 14, Dr. Terry Adderham so again this is September 14 to 2021. So just a couple of weeks after the mandate.
Dr. Terry Adderham, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Services policy produced a memo in which she cited FDA guidance, which regarded the Pfizer biointech and the community injections as interchangeable.
And that the EU a products, which would be the Pfizer biointech could be used as if the doses were the licensed vaccine, or the community.
So, um, so this kind of started to come out and more people were starting to catch on as to what was going on.
Also in September, I had a very good friend of mine from high school, who had gotten sick ostensibly with coven, whatever, but he had gotten to the hospital he was unvaccinated.
He was vaccinated with remdesivir, and he was put on a vent and he died, you know 40 years old.
Now we all know. We all know the protocols that were used during this time period. And, but that kind of hit home because I remember when I heard that he went into the hospital I remember thinking, this is not good because he's not he is now basically behind enemy
So that's what happens from desert here vent. He dies at 40 years old.
So that was another just kind of experience with me that just kind of drove home the point that, you know, we're being targeted we're being targeted by our own, our own government.
So now it's early October.
I was all given direct orders to take the shot, I refuse a couple weeks later I am removed from command I'm officially relieved. When I was officially relieved. I was one of only two battalion commanders across the entire active army to have been relieved out of.
I'm not exactly sure how many times are in the army but I mean it's a couple hundred.
And I was so I was not kicked out of the army but I was relieved of command, and I was sent to go work on the general staff and the division headquarters. I worked there for a couple of months.
And then, in January.
So, January 31 of 2022. The army produced a memo explaining that by July 1 of 2022. The army wanted a fully vaxxed force.
The only exceptions would be the minute number of individuals that have been granted a religious or medical exemption. And I mean and that was just such a small percentage of individuals that had even requested exemptions.
I'm not sure if that's one of those, I never saw a religious exemption.
And the reason is not because I did not have pretty significant religious objections to the shots, I did.
But in my mind, and this is just my own personal opinion.
In my mind, you don't need a medical exemption.
For a product that is not a vaccine that there's no reason for you to take in the first place for a for a product that clearly was created under extremely sinister designs.
And in my mind there are other people who disagree and that's fine there are plenty of people who, who wanted to put in religious exemptions to kind of gum up the works, and I understand that but for me.
If I had sought a religious exemption, it would almost be as if I were conceding that the shots were vaccines, and that they were safe, and that they were effective.
But that my objection was maybe in the way that the research or the production and development were carried out.
But but but that was not the way that I felt.
You know a lot of people had objections about the fetal cell lines etc I did too but for me.
I was never even going to concede the shots were safe or effective, or that they were created for, you know, like, clear true reasons I wasn't going to concede any of that so I wasn't going to play the game, I did not put in for religious exemption.
And I was definitely an outlier for having not put in a religious exemption. I also never attempted to stall to make it to the 20 year mark so at this point I was, I was about, I was almost at 19 years.
But I just wasn't going to stall I was just going to let things play out and just see what happened.
So I decided that I was gonna that I was, I was going to resign, I just felt like at this point I cannot continue to serve in this army I feel that it's going to be a violation of my own of my own principles.
So there's kind of a there's kind of a paradox at play here.
I mean, remaining in uniform would be inimical to my oath to the Constitution and also my loyalty to my own country. And so I actually felt like my patriotic duty was to leave the military and I mean I understand that sounds very patriotic or, you know, very, very, very paradoxical.
You know when it comes to the way that I view patriotism, I mean I'm in full agreement with Mark Twain, you know he said, you support your country always and your government when it deserves it.
And I felt like the situation that I felt like I was in was that the dirty little secret is that being in the military doesn't automatically de facto mean service to the country.
It means service to the government and only means service to country in so far as the government is serving the country as it's you know intended to do when you're in a functioning republic.
And if the military is actively working to destroy the country, then then those two are intention.
And if those two are intention and I'm forced to choose between the military and the country. Then, I mean I have to go with the country because the military exists to support the country not the other way around.
There's a, there's an order of precedents at play there that I just, I wasn't going to pick the military that I felt was working against its own citizens just couldn't do that so I decided I was going to leave.
So, um, I submitted a resignation packet.
And in it I clearly explained why I was going to resign.
And I wrote, I desire to tender my resignation, rather than take the coven 19 vaccine, which I considered to be neither safe nor effective.
In my view, continued service would equate to an unspoken endorsement of what I consider to be an act of medical fraud and misconduct perpetrated on military service members, understanding that the values of senior leaders within the Department of Defense do not align
with my own.
I consider the best course of action at this time to be resignation.
And that is my moral reason for resigning, but if I'm being honest, there was also a practical reason. And that is, if I resigned, I would retain an honorable discharge from the army.
If I were to get kicked out of the army, I could, I could run the risk of receiving some other type of discharge below an honorable discharge that could have employment implications etc.
And I do just want to be, you know, open forthcoming in that there was this moral reason where, at this point, I clearly believe that treason was occurring at this point I understood the the issue with the shell game between the two, the two, you know,
the Pfizer BioNTech and the community products.
I knew that the mandate was clearly unlawful. I was not going to stay in under the command of clearly benevolent leaders at least at the very top of the D.O.D. But there was also that practical reason of, I needed to try and maintain my honorable discharge.
But the truth is, I lost my command, my career and my retirement because of my decision, I mean I knew that would happen.
I was surprised that that was surprising.
But I will say, I left the service of my integrity intact and my oath to the Constitution unbroken. And so I mean I truly believe and still believe that I came out as a winner in that regard and had I stayed in, I would have to ask myself well, did I do it for my career
or did I do it for my retirement so did I do it for some notion of worldly prestige, that I do it for money.
I'm going to be real with myself and just and just tell myself, hey listen, you know, first of all, my loyalty to God is not for sale. My oath to the Constitution is not for sale.
My loyalty to my country and its people, my countrymen is not for sale.
So, on the 15th, 2022, that was my last day in the Army. So, a total of 19 years, three months and 15 days of service, you know, and then about two months later my story kind of started to come out and I had the opportunity to do a couple interviews and meet some amazing people who, again, like all of you are standing up, though few we may be,
against this tyranny all over the world. A couple of things that I do want to highlight just real quick.
Some things that have happened since I got out.
So in January of this year, under pressure from the US Congress.
Under the National Defense Authorization Act, DOD did repeal the mandate, but that is, that is not quite as it seems. I mean they certainly never admitted or acknowledged that it was morally, lawfully, constitutionally or even strategically misguided.
The demo that came out from the Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin still grant, still granted very wide latitude to unit commanders to meet DOD's compelling interests and mission accomplishment, vis-a-vis the health and safety of service members.
So, DOD has certainly left themselves room for, at least in my opinion, reinstitution potentially of this mandate or other mandates.
And even if it wasn't wholesale, it could be done for specific units under whatever guise they concoct.
There have also been shadow policies that have remained in effect since that January 10th, 2023 memo. Unvaxed service members are, I mean their careers are still being impacted, you know, negatively.
And then also, there are so many individuals that were separated from service, they were kicked out, or there are individuals like me that weren't technically kicked out but they left of their own accord.
So there's been talk that DOD may try to bring service members back, and I hear that some of the services are in contact with some of these individuals that were separated, see if they'll come back.
But there's, at least as far as I've seen it, there's no official DOD policy yet that requires that. Now technically I resigned, I was not separated.
So I doubt that I would be invited back but even if I were, why would I go back? There's not a single general or colonel in the army that I would want to work for. And I mean I hate to say that but it is what it is.
I'm just being very direct when I say that. For me to go back, there would have to be the removal and prosecution of senior DOD leaders and a wholesale review of how we got here.
Like just a total realignment of DOD's priorities. And what we see now within DOD is there is an enormous struggle to retain people and then to recruit more. And DOD will give you a lot of reasons as to why that is.
Some of them may even be valid. But here's what you're not going to hear.
The problem that I see is that there are so many people like myself who are either currently serving or who have just gotten out that are actively discouraging others from serving.
There's also what we're seeing is a generational rift in service. So I didn't personally come from a military family, but military service a lot of times is generational.
Sometimes it may be dad served or mom served, kids serve. And sometimes it may even be more than just those two generations. But what we're seeing now is mom or dad who may have done a full career, may have done 20 plus years.
They get out and then it's not just that they fail to actively discourage their children to join. It's that they actively discourage them from joining.
I think that's new. I don't know if we've necessarily seen that, or at least not to this degree in the history of our military before.
So what's my assessment of DOD at this point?
Well, we are now more than 18 months past the mandates implementation.
And at this point, there's so much more information that has come to light. There's so many red flags, question marks.
There's flashing neon lights, etc. And I say, and I don't mince words, those who remain ignorant to what's going on now, I mean, they're willfully ignorant.
I firmly believe that the senior leaders of DOD, as well as other government agencies, are engaged in full unmitigated treason.
This treason, however, is further enabled in DOD by cowards at all levels of command from generals and admirals down to the most junior commanders.
And it's one thing for those that were just naive in the beginning. It may have been true believers. They may have even believed that this mandate was responsible and correct.
If they believe that 18 months ago, I would say, OK, you were naive, but I at least understand.
But right now, I just feel like it's impossible to not have massive questions.
And then try and seek the truth as to what's really going on. Because if you're in the military right now, you kind of have to ask yourself, well, what am I a part of now?
And I'm very hard on commanders because I was one at the time. And I know the responsibility of commanders.
You know, in the United States military, it is commander driven. You know, commanders drive the military and with good reasons.
They hold the authority, their legal authorities. They're vested with these legal authorities through the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
And they are responsible for everything their units do and everything their units fail to do.
You know, it is an awesome responsibility to be a commander in the U.S. military.
But for that reason, and having been one, I'm very, very hard on commanders.
First and foremost, they receive the blame for what has happened, but it doesn't stop there.
I'm not a doctor, but I will tell you that medical doctors all across the military just as on the civilian side, these military doctors are in violation not only of their oath to the Constitution, but also the Hippocratic oath.
Very, very few military doctors stood up and spoke out.
Now there are a few. Lieutenant Colonel Teresa Long, Lieutenant Colonel Pete Chambers, Major Sam Sigaloff.
I've had some correspondents with them, great individuals. They were whistleblowers. They stood up and they said, hey, look at the signals that we're seeing in the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database, or hey, here's what I'm seeing with my patients.
But as a whole, military doctors did not stand up.
Military lawyers. I mean, again, I'm not a lawyer, but military lawyers are to blame. They allowed their commanders, they're supposed to advise their commanders, they allowed their commanders to push unlawful orders without challenge.
And maybe 18 months ago, again, you could chalk it up to naivete. But now there are so many question marks that in my mind, if you're ignorant now, you're willfully ignorant.
And there's another group that I'm very, very hard on. You know, I'm not a military chaplain.
But I was not impressed with the Chaplain Corps as this corpus of individuals that are men and women of God. I'm not saying they're not good people, but they timidly stood by and allowed this evil despotism to take root so extensively.
And, and I feel completely at peace in levying some blame at these groups of individuals because I saw exceptions. They were very, very, very few. But I saw just a few commanders who did stand up.
I saw just a few military doctors who did stand up.
Military lawyers, I don't know, maybe, maybe, I don't know one personally, but maybe there were. But they would be extremely few in number.
But I got a really good friend of mine who's a military chaplain, a really, really, really strong what I would say man of God, who stood up. I mean, he's a true hero, and if all chaplains were like him.
This tyranny with the military would not have taken root, but they're not. I mean, he's a he's a one out of 100 chaplain just to use, you know him as a as an example.
I've got good friends of mine who were still battalion commanders. I have former roommates of mine from West Point. I mean, these are good guys but they're very confused. Otherwise good people.
What's happening in my mind.
They're very confused, even though they may be very, very smart.
They're very confused.
And they are taking the path of least resistance, which in this case is listen to the authority figures, whom they unadvisably trust this confusion permits them the ability to exist within a certain degree of plausible deniability.
And in the beginning this may have been subconscious and they may have been unaware that they were kind of granting themselves this shield of plausible deniability, because of how much confusion there is out there, and because they're in line with what their
supervisors whom they trust are telling them.
But now with so much new information that has come out, and so many question marks and red flags, a military officer who has integrity you know go back to what I said about West Point, a lot of my friends are West Point graduates duty on our country.
You know, the, the adherence to a life of integrity.
A military officer with with integrity should be uncomfortable with what's going on. And if he was a part of it, even, even unknowingly.
He should be looking at himself in the mirror and say hey what's going on because I'm a part of this what I need to figure out what the truth is here, and I feel like they should aggressively seek to undercover the truth, and believe me, I know I'm being hard on
individuals and intentionally so I am not here to say that I was a perfect military officer or that my career was perfect or unblemished. I think I had a good career, I think I was a good military officer.
I was not perfect I'm not a perfect human being, all I'm saying is, I think, at this point I think I made the right decision. And we've all been cowards in our lives, I can look back in my life and say, you know, hey I was a coward at this moment I was a coward at this
moment it doesn't have to be a terminal condition, but these individuals who are being cowards, and I will call them that because I, I want to kind of shake them awake. I want them to stand up and say hey listen I, I can't be a part of this if there's something
nefarious going on I got to figure this out.
And so I got some closing notes here that I just want to want to finish up with as to kind of where I think we are.
There's been so much information that has come out as to how DOD has been the lead agency perpetrating this op, and it, it transcends well beyond just the borders of the United States that's why I think it's so important that we understand what's going on.
And I'm very concerned. DoD is acting far outside of its purview, and it's treating everything as war we spoke about this at the very beginning.
Are we potentially in World War Three, or are we potentially still in World War Two was there never a clear break. Have we remained on a wartime footing ever since World War Two. I mean there are some who make that argument.
There's another way that I look at it too.
You know we look historically in an example like, you know, like, like Prussia, right, so, you know the the quip about Prussia was that it was a, it was a, it was an army with a state, rather than the other way around.
Oh hey you know we have this we have this great army should be sure would be great if we had a country to go with it.
And I feel like if we're not careful. That's where we will find ourselves right now will be a military state, but unlike Prussia or unlike the quintessential example in antiquity, Sparta, you know those individuals knew when you were a man woman or child
you knew what the Spartan ethos was about. I mean from from very very young.
My fear is that we find ourselves in this military state apparatus, but the average citizen doesn't know that they're in a military state. And so everything is being treated as war, but the average citizen doesn't know that a, they're in a war state, and B, their military
this military architecture is targeting them targeting the citizens.
So we're, we potentially have found ourselves within this surreptitiously crafted Neo Prussian architecture and I don't want to extend that that analogy too far but just, again I'm just trying to drive home the point that I think to some degree we're in this,
this covert war state, but it's not just a US war state, because I think that we also live in a, a post Westphalian war post Westphalian world where the concept of the nation state no longer means what it used to mean and this global network of central
bankers or whatever you want to call them I firmly believe that they're out there and they're pulling the strings and they control much of the assets of the world, and they use corporations and they use countries and the governments of those countries, and their
militaries against the people and I think that is exactly what we're seeing right now.
We have to be honest about who are, you know, who's targeting us and, and we have to be willing to fight and again that's why I'm, I'm so appreciative of the time that I had here with you today I feel.
I mean I can't I can't overstate it I just feel so proud to be here with you and standing shoulder to shoulder I think there are reasons in which we can be hopeful.
And I think that I'm a, I'm a believer I think that you know you put God first and you, you do the right thing as I said before kind of this mantra that I had when I was a commander.
You know you do the right thing consequences be damned.
I think evil is is unnatural, I believe it can collapse under its own weight. I think we've got some very very rough times ahead but I think we went in the end I don't know if it'll be on this side or the other side.
But I think we continue to press forward and we look to wake people up and we look for that critical mass of people, and it's not going to be a majority.
I think that's the 50% plus one. We're looking for a very strong, informed and and loud minority and again this story today was not about me.
If I if my story can just be a conduit to get people to understand some of these greater themes.
That's why I'm sharing it not because Brad Miller was a great military officer. Not because Brad Miller is super special.
Brad Miller was a pretty ordinary guy who was maybe placed in an extraordinary set of circumstances, and happened to make a decision and and here we are now.
And let me let me close there.
Very good.
That's great, Brad. That's a great story.
Thank you so much, Brad. Now before we go to Stephen I just want to share a screenshot to reinforce what Brad just shared with you everybody.
So there's the structure that Brad was talking about.
So there's the policymakers up the top.
Probably the circles there should be above the BIS and central banks but nevertheless there's the policymakers, then the distributors, and the national governments are taking orders everybody, and then the policy propagandists DOD.
So, it's a useful pictorial representation of what Brad has just shared with us. Brad well done on standing up for your principles. It's, it's exactly what hasn't happened in Australia, in America, in UK.
And for those who came in a little bit late. It's a total disgrace that the when Andrew Bridgen in the UK Parliament started talking that the walkout was organized so they didn't have to listen to him, I watched that recording.
So that's what we're dealing with everybody list we know what we're dealing with. Over to Stephen.
Sorry I'm trying to look for you Brad I like to, oh hi yeah. So thank you very much for coming on to this call.
So you were talking about these people who, by the way, I absolutely agree I would have done exactly the same as you've done.
You did it with huge dignity.
And your integrity is intact.
So, obviously, you like everybody else has been psychologically tortured by this experience but you've come through it and.
And you're a survivor, you, and you're very strong now.
You've got the moral strength, but the people you're talking about who you were saying were confused, and they were corrupted as well.
I don't think they were confused, I think they knew full well as military officers, and not just military officers, but the ones chosen to command.
And all the generals, the Brigadier General the Major General.
These people must have known that it was wrong to coerce soldiers into taking an experimental shot,
which was under a mandate, a government mandate by a terrible president.
And also they must have known that it was undermining how on earth can a military have as its number one priority that everybody has to take this damned shot.
It doesn't make sense, does it.
So they don't get they don't get fired for anything else, but they get fired for not taking a shot, which is mandated by a corrupt president as far as I can see.
If they're not all corrupt.
So I just wonder what you think.
Yeah, so a couple of things.
So I think they're cowards. That's what I wanted to say.
Sure, sure.
I don't think they confused at all.
They're just cowards.
They're selfish. They do not think of their country, what their country needs.
They shouldn't be in the military. It's treason, treason, treason, treason and treason.
Yeah.
Yeah, so it's pretty interesting because I will tell you this, if there are very few things in life I feel like that can be boiled down to an either or binary.
But having said that, I do think we're kind of in a situation right now where you have individuals who are aware enough of what's going on, and they don't do anything about it, in which case they're absolutely cowardice, or absolutely cowards and at the top, probably, you know, treason.
Or they in the military, you're speaking from that perspective, they completely lack this strategic ability to survey a complex environment, understand this patchwork of dynamic interrelated variables, and then make a cogent determination as to what needs to be done.
So you have individuals who are either not strategic thinkers when that's what we're paying them to do, or they are, they understand completely what's going on, or at least to a great extent, and are still going along with it.
In either case, they are completely disqualified from being in a command position.
Correct.
In the military, 100%.
Correct.
You know?
Yeah.
So I don't want to dilute what I said, Brad. I think you've done the right thing. I'm sorry you've had to go through this experience.
But what a brilliant story for people to understand the terrible psychological torture, which the US military personnel have been subjected to. They've been tortured into a state of Stockholm syndrome.
But I think they knew exactly what was going on. They should have known, whether they were in Stockholm syndrome or not, that it was wrong.
And so that's what I think. Anna is, Anna de Buisere is a lawyer, but she's also been through the West Point equivalent, which is Santa, so she's a military officer.
Okay.
And she, but she's out of the military now, but as she says, they can still call her up at any time, I think.
Although I'm not sure they'd want to call you up. No, I'm joking, Anna.
Actually, I'm not out of the military. I'm still in, but I'm on what's called the unposted list, which means, you know, I haven't got a post, so I'm still in for the next three years, and under a call up liability.
So, hang on, I thought you had finished the military, Anna, but they can still call you up. They can still call me up for the next three years. Yeah, Reserva. Is that Reserva? Yeah, in the Territorial Army.
Yeah. So in the Territorial Army, you can't retire until you're 60 and I'm 57.
Yeah. Well, we didn't expect you to tell us your age, Anna. Sorry? We didn't expect you to tell us your age.
I don't care anymore.
So yeah, I'm under an active call up and in fact, the Chief of General Staff in June of last year made an announcement that Operation Mobilize has commenced, which is, you know, to mobilize the troops for the Ukraine War.
And we were sent a missive saying that we had to warn our families and friends that we could be sent off at any time. And once sent off, we wouldn't be in contact and we wouldn't know where we were being going and when we come back, etc.
We were told to warn our, you know, and I've warned my family and friends and nobody's taking it seriously. And I've spoken to, you know, various senior members in the military and said, well, what is the chance for call up liability and what's my personal call up liability,
and he seems to know what's going on. But that's my current situation.
All right. You had a question, Anna, for Brad.
Okay, so first of all, Brad.
What we all want to know, Anna, is whether you're going to join forces with Brad and bring down these traitors.
Well, absolutely. I was going to say Brad, I resonate with absolutely everything you have said.
It's incredible listening to you because boy do I wish I'd known you all this time throughout all of this.
So I'm going to take a moment to say, first of all, sorry for how I look. I'm not very well. I know I look a complete mess. I'm really wiped out. And I'm not quite able to think straight because I'm really not very well at the moment. So forgive me if I don't.
But yes, Brad, I just want to say.
And your camera's flashing like crazy, Anna, so feel free to turn it off.
Okay, okay. All right. Yeah. So, Brad, you know, I'm a lieutenant. That's as far as I got because I'm territorial army, not regular.
So I've been, you know, pursuing my career and family life at the same time as my military life. But I was actively serving for 10 years, just short of 10 years.
And, you know, one of the pieces of my military training, I will never forget is a nuclear biological chemical warfare.
And, you know, as an army officer, I my job is to identify any such threats. So, for me, the moment that this virus so called virus was released, I immediately thought this is a bio weapon.
That was my immediate thought.
And I went to, you know, that was what I thought in early January 2020 I went down the rabbit hole of researching as much as I could.
And I contacted another army officer friend of mine who was in Beijing at the time.
And we compared the narratives that they were being told in China, he was being told in China and I was being told in the UK.
We spent four hours on the phone analyzing the intelligence that we'd gathered between us and concluded that yes, this was by a warfare, and that we needed to warn the military, and he was going to take it back to his network and I was going to go to mine.
So the next phone call I made was to an SAS officer friend of mine in his early 60s. And I said, This is not a, this is not a chat. This is Intel listen up.
And I delivered Intel to him for an hour and a half. And at the end of it he said, I've got three trusted sources you're one of them. And the other two have said pretty much the same thing, you've, you've given me some new Intel which I'll have to consider.
But yes, I'm going to take this into the military and say we think this is by a warfare, you know, and I'm going to engage some of the brigadiers, and I'll get back to you with a you know with a game plan and I said well I think we've got to go into the MAD and present our, our, you know,
our Intel and challenge them and say, you know, what do you, what do you consider is this, you know, are we now under attack. And if we are, who's attacking us. Is it China, or is it collaboration between China and the US.
But as far as we're concerned the UK is now under attack, a bio warfare attack.
So, since then, I've been trying to find as many military people as possible who are awake, and like you have been absolutely dumbfounded by the lack of officers who have, who seem to have any clue whatsoever about what's going on.
I've only found a handful of them. But what has absolutely surprised me was that all of the people that I trained with at Sandhurst, including a friend of mine who became the commander of the British standing army.
Right. We're clueless, absolutely sport and sold down the, you know, the swanee of the narrative. And I could not believe that these intelligent critical thinking friend of friends of mine had zombie like just followed what was going on.
Right, so I actually called out my friend who is standing, you know, commanding officer the standing army, when they were proposing that the army was being sent into the schools to test the children.
So this is even before the vaccine horror show. This is testing.
And I wrote him and I said stand down.
I said you know you might be my, my senior officer but you are not a lawyer. Oh Brad I should say I'm a lawyer. Right.
So I said to him, you know, I respect you that for your military understanding but you are not a lawyer. This is a breach of the Nuremberg code. It's a prohibited act of unlawful warfare.
It amounts to a grave breach of the Geneva conventions, because this is human experimentation, without fully informed consent, and you're conducting it on the children of this nation.
And you are going to cause serious harm.
And he ghosted me. So I wrote back again and he goes to me and he goes to me and in the end I wrote back to him and I said, you, I don't know why you're ghosting me.
But you know, and I know that I've told you.
And if you carry on, you've now done it against, you know, legal advice you better trot off and get your own independent legal advice. He's never been in touch since I've been completely rejected from my entire officer network.
I think I need mental health treatment I'm a conspiracy nutter, etc. etc. Right. So, the only way I could find fellow soldiers was to go out on the streets to the protests and look around me and see who was military sidle up to each other,
and try and find out where we were. And what astonished me was that the soldiers were there. Right, all ranks from private you know through to sergeants.
Very few offers officers like one or two.
Now the interesting thing is, if you've got a private who recognizes this as bio warfare and recognizes that this is the military and the government attacking their own people.
What the hell is the excuse for generals and brigadiers etc. So I don't buy it I'm with Stephen, I don't buy it that they're confused.
I don't buy it that they couldn't do that simple analysis that you know this is a potential bio warfare threat. You know, it's not out of the extraordinary to think that somewhere someone in the world is going to attack you using a bioweapon.
And I totally agree with you. It's not just the US military attacking the US people. It's the militaries around the world with the government. Now the question then arises, who is telling the military to do this.
Right. Who, who's told the DAD to release this bioweapon on the public.
But going the question I have for you, Brad, is that, you know, given that giving medical treatment without fully informed consent freely given is a prohibited act of unlawful warfare, amounting to a grave breach of the Geneva Convention.
How come every officer doesn't know that this is basic laws and customs of warfare.
And we know from the Second World War, that that was precisely how the German government and the military killed a huge amount of people with lethal injections, you know the euthanasia program.
So this is more of the same on a global scale. All they've done is you know, instead of building concentration camps, they've just had vaccine centers and tell people to get trot along and get injected right.
So it does my head in Brad, I simply cannot understand how army often.
I mean, it is absolutely for me, you know, having been at Santa's you being at West Point, we both know how extraordinarily awesome those organ, you know that that training is brilliant a lot of the, the military commander were, at least they were when I trained back in 88.
And in the 90s, we still had some very, very good military officers. But what I don't understand is how any military officer can't see this.
So over to you. Why don't they recognize this as a grave breach of the Geneva Convention as an unlawful act of war.
Yeah, the cowards.
Is it because they don't know the law.
The cowards, they know something, they must know something's wrong. But what do you think Brad, more important than me. I mean, I agree. I think at this point.
I think there is no longer a valid excuse to be had for anybody at the, at the threshold of intelligence that we require of our military officers. I think the excuse that they don't know that something is massively wrong is entirely invalid, even if they don't know exactly what's wrong.
They must know that something is massively wrong to such a degree that they have to actively try and figure out what's going on. I mean, they should be uncomfortable when they look in the mirror each day and say, I'm not sure that we're the good guys.
And I'm a part of this, I need to figure this out. That's, that's what I wish was going on. So, I have I've said before that I kind of wish. What I think would be an extremely strong voice right now.
Is if individuals that are kind of at my peer group level, you know, other battalion commanders or maybe even brigade commanders kind of at that lieutenant colonel or colonel level. If there were individuals who went along with this and were true believers, and they were to come out now and say, Hey, listen, you can call me naive.
I was, but for whatever reason, I went along with this, I thought it was the right thing to do at the right time and now I see that this was disastrous. This was unlawful. This is probably sinister in its design, and I'm no longer going to go along with it any longer.
And because I went along with it as long as I did, I feel indebted to everyone that I ordered to get the shot I can't believe I went along with this. And as penance to myself I'm going to come out and speak against it and I'm going to tear my rank off and throw it down on my desk and say, I'm out of here.
Unfortunately, we're, we're not seeing that we're not and I think these voices would be incredibly powerful right now.
If they were to come out and say, I went along with this. I was duped I was brainwashed whatever you want to say, but I'm not going along with it any longer.
But we're not seeing that. And there's another point that you made Anna, that is an observation that I've also made. So I've also made that observation where I have 19 year old soldiers that knew that the shots were a threat.
Four star generals and admirals, at least ostensibly did not so we're paying these guys the big bucks right they've got all the education.
And yet, they fail to see the real threat, compared to this, this soldier, whose age is less than half the time, you know, in uniform that the general exactly that yeah.
I want to say something at that point, I was working with a lieutenant colonel who was serving at the time he's now retired, but he, he was a medic, you know he was a medical officer.
And he was served a notice of liability by a captain, a retired captain to say you know this is a breach of the Nuremberg code what the army are doing and stand down cease and desist, so he contacted me and said, I understand some of the medical
issues but I don't really understand the legal issues can you brief me. So I gave him an hour and a half on the Geneva Conventions you know and the Nuremberg code etc. And said you know what are you going to do.
And he said well obviously what I'm trying to do working within is to inform as many of the other officers as possible of what you've told me, you know why as you say why the military lawyers on briefing the commanders and saying this is a breach of the Nuremberg code
Geneva Convention, I've asked that question to where the hell are all the military lawyers, absolute silence from all of them.
And he said, all I can do is do my best from within whenever I hear that someone's mandating it I've got to try and stop them.
And I said well, sir, can you tell me, please tell me that you've had a high level strategic meeting where you've analyzed this as a potential bio warfare threat, because if I were the enemy.
And I created a bio weapon, and I pretended it was a naturally occurring virus, and then I created all kinds of public health measures that I was going to profit from masks tests vaccines whatever which could be another bio weapon they're all bio weapons.
But actually convince people that their health products. All I need to do is deploy that and then stand back and watch them take each other out.
I said please tell me that you've, you've actually discussed that as a potential analysis. And you know what he went absolutely silent.
And he then said you'd like to think they had wouldn't you. Yeah, and I said what you mean you're not having that kind of discussion that can't know. And as you say, not even considering the fact that it was bio warfare.
That suggests to me that that is willful blindness that they're following a narrative because these are strategic thinkers, we are trained to look at all kinds of threats from all kinds of angles, all kinds of possibilities outside the box.
So for them to simply accept the narrative says to me that that was willful, they were in on it, because otherwise they're not fit to command, they're not fit to be an officer.
If they can't analyze it from that point of view, what the hell are they doing.
But I know they were not only not able to understand that the narrative was false, but they then thought it was okay to force people to take injections, experimental injections, without any possibility of informed consent, because not a single doctor in the world knew what was in the damned injections.
Yeah, so informed consent was always impossible. Yeah, but it's an unlawful act of warfare so they've committed unlawful acts of warfare against each other in breach of the laws and customs of war.
So all of those, all of those soldiers who have done that, officers throughout need to be put on trial, because they've broken the laws and customs of war.
They're not fit to serve.
But also they've exposed their countries to treason, and they are traitors.
Yeah.
But, Brad, you were saying that you were, you were very hard on the commanders, I'm very hard on doctors, because they should have known better what was going on.
Sure. And any doctor who says that he didn't understand you know, or, you know, things were very hot in early 2020.
I don't believe them. I really don't because I know what training I had. Yeah. And guess what?
120 doctors, well maybe 110 doctors who qualified with me, decided to have a reunion.
Oh, this was some time ago. I didn't go, but I had the email list.
So I emailed them all in 2020, 2021, 2022, challenged them, gave them information, which they were, in my opinion, absolutely required to respond to.
Not a single friend or medical student in my year responded to me, even privately.
Never mind the group. They just ignored it and carried on with their lives. I don't know, you know, whether they were secretly demolished by it, but I never heard from anybody.
For more information, I gave information, I gave evidence, which should have woken them all up, but didn't wake a single one, not even my friends.
You know, the close friends from those days wrote to me privately. They were terrified of me. They're terrified of you as well, Brett, because you're showing them up.
Yeah, I completely agree with that. Yeah.
So Brad, just to finish then, who do you think has instructed the DOD to do this?
I think it goes back to that, that org chart that we, I ask myself this all the time, but that, that org with Bank of International Settlement, basically the central bankers there at the top and I don't know exactly who it is, but I do believe that there's some sort of,
of global network of extremely evil people who are very powerful and control our governments.
I think that at this point it's clearly evident that that's the case. Yeah, exactly. Who is it? I don't know, but I've seen that org chart before and I 100% agree with it. I mean, I might have some quibbles about who's here, whatever, but just in its totality, I think that is a pretty good graphic representation of what we're looking at.
Okay, I agree. Sorry, last question. Can we pick up and have a separate conversation because I think what we need to do at this stage is gather us officers together who do get what's going on and bring in what we're going to do, because that to me seems to be what's missing because you know now we've worked out what's going on.
What are we going to do next? We need an action plan.
I know you need to form a group with Brad, a US UK group and invite coalition partners and do exactly what we've done here and increase your understanding from a military perspective.
Exactly. Yeah, good idea.
All right, Anna, thank you, brilliant. Before we get to Teresa, hang on one second, Teresa. I want to share that screen and Jerry Brady's here and I just want a quick, quick, quick conversation, Jerry, your perspective on this chart.
Jerry understands very well the functioning of BIS and central banks. Jerry, your view is that the people in the circle should be above the bankers, correct?
Yes, Charles.
Sorry to dump this on you. I didn't prepare you for this, but that's the question.
No, that's fine. No, the history of all of this predates central banking and the Bank of International Settlements. There's no doubt about that. And the second row here is historical links going back way beyond the establishment of most of the central banks and the Bank of International Settlements.
So the second row should be at the top. But then there's historical connections of that row going further back in history, which I could deal with, but it would take a lot of time.
So it's all about history and what has happened. Most of it is driven by utopian ideals, the idea that utopia can be created on Earth. That's what drives everything here. And they justify everything on that basis.
They say we are doing this for the good of everybody.
Yes, what was that quote you put in the chat last week? Utopia is a disease of the mind.
Correct. Utopia is a disease of the mind. It's an infectious disease.
Sure.
That's correct. And that's what drives it all. And the historical basis for everything we're dealing with goes back to that, the birth of utopia and utopian socialism and the 19th century, what happened in the 19th century.
So you've got to understand all of that to understand the evolution of the, let's call them the criminal cabal, the criminal cabal who have fallen for all of this. And they joined forces in the mid 19th century in a very strong and cohesive manner.
And that's linked to the world of eugenics.
So, so Jerry, we're going to keep moving this reason, but can anybody please add into the chat, so that we, we've got it clearly the Bilderberg group should be there the trilateral commission committee of 300 just add them into the chat so that, you know, they're, they're the, they're the players at this level of
criminality that Jerry and everyone's talking about, but it's a, it's a useful, it's a useful chart to keep your thinking and any more, we just keep that number of circles
as accurate as possible so we understand who we're dealing with. So Jerry, thank you for that.
Thank you.
Jerry, Jerry, Jerry. Can I just say very briefly, I'm JJ Ballard, I haven't read his novels for some time, but my memory of them tells me that they're highly relevant to the present situation.
I think that's a good time to read them and report, especially high rise and crash. I think those are highly relevant and but maybe all his books because he is known to be an anti anti big tech author.
And not just big tech, but big, you know, innovation, you know, so in other words innovation and the human species are on a, on a collision course, and you can't have the endless innovation and inability of the human species to adapt to all the changes all at once,
if you understand me, which is exactly the situation we're in at the moment.
So JJ Ballard is a very important author, I suspect. I did read him but I can't quite remember the detail. And another one is William Golding, because his novel Lord of the Rings is about cults and I think that's highly relevant at the present time.
Lord of the Flies, not Lord of the Rings.
Sorry, Lord of the Flies, sorry, yes, that's talking. Yes.
Okay, Theresa.
Hi, thank you, Charles. Thank you, Stephen. Hi Brad, thank you for joining us. Of course.
I had a few moments to write down my question so I think I'll be quicker if I just read it with the preamble and then pose the question to you.
All right, so let's go back to 2020. On the 11th of January, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sequence was released by the Chinese Communist Party onto their servers. It was immediately downloaded all around the world.
Not one country asked for an isolate, not one country double checked the sequence. Immediately all countries rushed to develop a vaccine based on that spike protein, which we now know was highly toxic.
It's ironic actually that the British government have decided to throw out all Huawei telecoms equipment from our networks by 2027. Now there's a queue to the timescale.
On the grounds that it's associated with the Chinese Communist Party, which they say cannot be trusted so it's extremely ironic that they trusted the spike protein sequence.
It's now clear to us all that the so-called vaccines are a sophisticated biological weapon with multiple levels of redundancy. They've got multiple toxicities and mechanisms of death, which will play out over a wide range of timescales from months to years.
We are all being targeted, our freedoms and energy and food supplies too. I believe that here in the UK, they are creating famine, holodomor conditions, and they'll probably do that in Europe as well. I think they're going to Venezuela us.
Everywhere governments have gone rogue against the people, military, law enforcement, judiciary, healthcare, academia, banking, financial systems, mainstream media, social media, every sector of our civilization has been weaponized against us.
Organizing and defending ourselves is on the point of being criminalized. In my own country, I believe that I am already denied the right to defend myself.
All bets are off. My government is trying to kill me. I concluded this three years ago. Soon push will come to shove, the mandates will return and mandatory will become compulsory. I'm certain of it. If you were to take command of the resistance in these circumstances right now, what would you ask of us?
That's a fantastic question.
Great question, yeah.
Yeah, and I probably would. I've actually kind of had this, this inner dialogue with myself you know quite a bit.
Here is a, I'm going to answer to the best I can, but I'm going to answer it by posing a challenge that we have so one of the reasons if there's any, if there's any compelling part of my story, and again it's not because it's about me or whatever but
I constantly have debates with people about is it better to get out of the military, whether it's the US military or whatever military right, is it better to get out or try to work within and there, everyone knows the decision that I made right.
That's not to say that there's not an argument to be made for fighting within the existing military structure. That's not the decision that I made, I almost feel like with with the US military that it's, it's past the point of salvaging, or at least it's so far down that road that in order to salvage it, you would almost have to do like a wholesale restructure and pull a bunch of people out at the very top and, you know, hold tribunals.
So, there, but the problem with these militaries as they exist is they do largely have a monopoly on power right I mean you take the United States which is a very well armed well armed nation in terms of the citizenry.
I mean I have, I mean I've got I've got a closet with plenty, plenty of, of guns, right over there one room away from where I'm seated right now that's not unique in the United States, but I'm President Biden.
Nobody likes the comment, but he's kind of accurate when he says, oh you know you talk about your ar 15 you're going to need an F 15. Well, there's some truth to that so there is this this danger that we have where the, they tend to have a monopoly on power, at least in terms of, you know, hardware,
but then there are these other ways in which they've been attacking us too. So, everyone wants to talk now that the term that is in vogue right now is fifth generation warfare and again the easiest way to describe that is just typically things that are non kinetic, right, it's not bullets
and tanks and bombs, etc.
And I also think that we're in a huge information war and I also think that even more fundamental than that we're in a spiritual war. And so the number one thing that I would ask if I were commander of the resistance is I would start with the foundation,
which means, first we have to recognize that this is a spiritual war that then manifests itself in other ways but there are several layers that are more foundational than like bullets tanks and bombs, and if we don't get this foundation correct.
Then the other part is almost never going to matter so I think it's a part of getting those foundational priorities right and understanding that. And then the rest of the stuff we're just going to have to do a lot of trusting in God and trusting in each other and fighting for liberty
and seeing what we can do. And I think another way.
Another way in which we do that is just seek to bring other people to our side, or, um, you know, I mean I use the word defector, you know, I am trying to cause defections within my friends who are still in the military and kind of, I don't want to say I'm like
conducting psychological warfare on them but what I am trying to do is deliberately try and cast doubt in their minds, like, I need them to be uncomfortable with with where they're at, you know, I need them to be uncomfortable with putting the uniform every day I hate to say that
but again we're back at paradoxes where just because you're putting on a uniform that has your nation's flag on it, and may say you know US Army or whatever on it. That does not mean that you were working for your country, and right now I would say, probably means you're working against your country.
I don't know if that was a great answer to what you said but um but you asked me a real doozy of a question so that's going to stick with me after this and I'm going to keep thinking about it.
Okay, well great come back and tell us when you.
Well, we're going to recording of your question. So we'll just, you should email that to Brad, and he can make that as the foundational purpose of his military group that he's setting up with Anna. Perfect.
There we are.
Good. I am. I am going to take this opportunity just in the chat, I am going to drop my email address because I saw a couple people asking so that way I can just kind of put it out there.
Good. Excellent. Thank you, Teresa. Well done.
Rema.
Thank you.
First of all, Brad I have to tell you that your story touched me very deeply.
I am the widow of the murdered health freedom leader, Major General Albert and double bind the third.
And he retired in 1984 as the head of in school meal, the military and tell it the Army Intelligence and Security Command, and was a brilliant strategic analyst.
Absolutely incredible. And sometime after we married, I said, You have to pay attention to what I'm saying, no matter how uncomfortable it makes you. And he did, and realized that he had drunk the Kool aid, etc and became a warrior for us.
We created the Natural Solutions Foundation, and he went through what you went through without resigning from the army, but giving up the belief system he came of a military family father went to West Point he went to West Point.
And I lived with him through the, the suffering and the reorientation and I congratulate you for being a seeker after truth to the level that your behavior has followed your beliefs, so I just wanted to say that very strongly.
Thank you.
I feel deeply.
Having listened to this story that it's a real hero's journey, whether you want to say that or not.
The question I have to ask is more about the they the treason, the who we've seen the organizational chart.
My own work has is centered around getting us out of who, which I see as the Death Star the juggernaut that is coming over the hill to kill us behind which is the control system of the United Nations we got to get out of that.
And then the control system on that chart at the higher levels. So I want to know, to the extent that you can and will share it. What your assessment of the traders, who they are, what their agenda is, and why we have we globally, and we nationally are being subjected to this intentional
destruction.
Yeah, it's a great question. Um, I often ask myself where it is, you know, the way that I kind of term it is, I think, if the, if we're talking about in the United States we're talking about do D, and other agencies within the government.
I definitely think there is this layer the top where we are seeing willful, open, unmitigated treason.
And then in D o D, that kind of treason is further enabled by a lot of cowardice at all other levels. And it's, it's hard to necessarily discern. Well, where's that demarcation line between those who are, you know, committing treason against us those who know exactly what's going on
I mean they are part of it, etc. And then those who are, they're certainly cowards but maybe not necessarily traders, but it's hard to know it's hard to know exactly where that where that line is or maybe it's a sliding scale you know I don't know.
I'm also curious so one thing that's just kind of interesting just for my own biography is that when I was a brand new lieutenant stationed at Fort Drum, New York and a 10th Mountain Division, my brigade commander was was Colonel Milley, and my division commander
was was Major General Lloyd Austin. So, you know, fast forward about 20 years and you see where they are and you see where I am.
Now, when I was a brand new when I was a brand new second lieutenant, and they were a colonel and a two star general, I mean they had no idea who I was. I mean I was just another, another lieutenant but it is kind of interesting.
But I often ask myself who's who's in Lloyd Austin's ear, and who is telling him what to do.
And I don't exactly know but I know that the the marching orders are coming from, from somebody who feels that they certainly governments, even the, even the mighty US government, you know certainly answers to them.
And also in that regard.
I think that a lot of this tension that is being. I mean I'm just going to say, engineered right now between the West, NATO, and then China and or Russia. I mean I think that's what it is I think these are manufactured conflicts.
That doesn't mean that there's not a lot of real death that's going on in Ukraine I mean I think something's going on there.
I mean there won't necessarily be some violence between us and China I mean that could also happen but I think that it's because both sides are are being controlled I know that there are a lot of people that that think and maybe even hope that China and or Russia is is a foil to the
globalist or the, you know, the New World Order, etc.
I don't, I don't see it that way I think this is an engineered dialectic. And again, just a strategy of tension to keep the two sides going together and and some of these individuals who are really smart on the history of China and Russia I mean know that a lot of money that was
injected decades ago into those two countries, you know came from the West.
So, I wish I knew exactly who was kind of pulling the strings of our leaders, but I do believe it goes back to these cabals that to a large degree, have their fingers and their tentacles throughout much of the world.
Thank you, I have the same basic analysis.
And I'm going to reach out to you at your email and ask you to be a guest on my radio show.
Yes ma'am. Thank you.
That'd be great. I'd love to. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you, Rima. We now have Aletheia now. Aletheia I love your name split into and we've got Aeoltheia like this you know, Aeol be my god.
I love beer.
It's it's Aletheia.
And it's a Greek name but I'm not Greek. And it does mean the actual word of truth.
In a sentence so Brad I just wanted to congratulate you. Coming from a military family myself. Thank you very much for your service.
I am the president and founder of clinical research strategies, my husband and I have a combined 70 years of experience. So we're well into our 50s and 60s in the life sciences sector he actually started in the Department of Defense, working with aerospace
space reliability of jet engines and things like that. So, you know, we're definitely in the space from a life sciences perspective our little boutique group runs clinical research not with a large pharmaceutical companies by any means but we do actually have
Department of Defense clinical trials that we're running right now.
Additionally, I have family members who have served in the military.
My late 19 he's late in his 40s, my brother john served in the military as a sharpshooter. He once he was honorably discharged he became schizophrenic he's severely schizophrenic today.
I also had a nephew, Aaron wheel and who served at Fallujah.
Just unfortunately last September he decided to end his life, which I know that you probably see a lot of military men and women struggle with every day. Once they leave the military.
Additionally, I have a 19 year old nephew, who is actively surgeon serving in the military in the army, so very near and dear to my heart. It's very interesting that I'm both from the clinical research world I am an expert in regulatory science, especially
with the US FDA.
Worldwide governments that have ushered in a bio weapon.
Clearly the patents and things like that.
I think what I would like to hear from you is, is there a way we can leverage network to inform, educate, and be prepared, just like the previous speaker spoke about.
I think a gentleman like you, former officers who have served who clearly should have a network and may have a way to leverage civilians, former military to be prepared for Plan B.
Yeah, so, first of all, thanks for for sharing.
You know, some of your story I do appreciate that.
I mean, you know where I am right now kind of on this side of my army career.
It's actually pretty incredible because I've met a lot of people just in the last couple of months I've kind of gotten into these circles of people who are part of, you know, the resistance.
And a lot of these are are either currently serving members, or their members like me who just left or maybe they just retired or whatever.
And people are starting to realize that we've got to get to know one another and we've got to start to band together because if we if we have a realistic outlook as to what's ahead.
I mean, we're going to need each other. I don't I don't know another better way to put it than we are going to need each other. And there are also a lot of people out there.
And again, I mean, you know, they're friends of mine, and for whatever reason they have not woken up yet.
I mean, I do blame them to some degree. And we spoke about I mean, I do think they're cowards, but it doesn't mean that I have written them off forever.
One thing that I think is good about our side is that we're pretty good about accepting people when they decide to kind of you know wake up and realize, you know, defect to our side.
And I remember how painful it was for me. You know, I mentioned some of my story back in 2007 when I started kind of researching a lot of what's going on and it was almost like I went through a psychologically existential phase where we almost started to question everything you
almost question everything that you believe. And the one thing about people that are the one thing people have to understand about those who are on our side is that by the by virtue of the fact that we're on this side.
We are the ones who are open minded because somewhere in the trajectory of our lives, we had to understand that our worldview that we once possessed did not square with reality.
We couldn't reconcile the two. We had to come to grips with the fact that hey you know what my belief system is somehow incomplete. And I'm going to add that there are things that I believe that are wrong or incomplete, and I'm going to have to change that.
And so I think that we are generally the open minded ones. So, more directly to your question.
I think it's just a matter of.
And this is really hard but I think about this a lot.
It's one forming networks but then it's to outlining clear objectives behind those networks, I think that's really hard because if you say well my objective is to educate people and get the truth out.
Okay, great. That's that's that's great. That is a noble endeavor, but that also is potentially a little bit nebulous so like how you know how are we getting the truth out or what is the specific audience that this specific network is trying to target in
order to educate people etc. So, that's what I would say continue to build networks I think we're doing that but then try and have clear, clear, clearly defined objectives as to what you know this network is designed to do.
What this network is designed to try and achieve.
But Brad, so one of the problems with this group is that we've never really had a clear aims, partly because we didn't understand what the problem was, and until we understood what the problem was as, as well as we could, and it wasn't changing from month to month as it
was.
We just continue to build the group in the hopes that somehow or other the solution would become more and more obvious.
But I do think that, you know, there are people in this group who maybe ought to create their own groups, you know the specialist groups if you like, as opposed to this group which is kind of trying to look at everything you know, or, and keeping the doors open because
the worst thing to do when you're devising strategy as far as I can see, certainly when you're operating as a decent doctor, you, you don't want to close down possibilities, which actually, that is actually the answer.
So you say today for example that's not possible, but you know next week it might be so.
So you need to have a very open mind I think.
Otherwise, the solution which will save us all.
So if so what I'm trying to say is if you're forming a group and you're trying to trying to form a strategy, you know, aims before you form the group if you like.
I think that's asking a bit much at the present time because it's so incredibly complicated and interconnected it's very difficult to decide.
We have no idea either where the solution is going to come from even now but we've got a very good understanding of what's going on I think, you know, broad understanding.
And many of us are not specialists if you like.
But in my case I know about medical ethics.
And so, I don't know how to explain it.
So, so, let me leave that Aletheia we keep going back to you.
Yeah, no, I'm, I'm, I'm more interested in a reconstitution in the US.
And I know it's a, you know, pretty radical way of thinking but it is afforded to us as citizens to take our constitution and our rights back.
So, you know, again, basically I'm a fighter. My husband and I come from a long standing tradition of nonconformity.
And we've been in the muck for a long time, and I was just curious if there was some kind of network that we could begin building for that purpose.
Let me say something about that because I'm so I've been thinking about what, for example, if we just kind of look at it from, you know, the United States, what are we going to do because there are a lot of people that are talking about, you know,
Convention of States or other types of you know Article five conventions, etc.
And there's a movement right now in the Convention of States to form some sort of Convention of States and while I, while I make no comment in support of, or criticism of that particular movement I think in general in the abstract.
A convention would be great now it might be immediately co-opted. I think that's highly realistic but in the abstract. I think that would be great and I have long thought I've been trying to develop this, this a little bit I've even started kind of writing a little
bit about it. I think, and probably other nations may, may, may think the same but within the US we almost need a thorough review, almost what I would call an audit, you would need the meticulous scrutiny of an audit and you need these
thinkers to come together kind of like what happened in the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 but you need these people to come together with the, the intellect and the integrity to do a thorough review of our history our laws, understand our
political and legal systems, and then even the philosophical and perhaps even theological framework behind that, and do a thorough assessment of how did we get here, what went wrong, what you know what do we want to keep what are the bedrock principles of this
country, how do we get back to that or do we do we go to something more, etc etc but I think without that, I think we just continue to meander further and further away from the country that was actually founded.
Thanks Brad. I'll turn it over to others.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Aletheia. We've got three more questions then Stephen and we're finishing in 25 minutes. And then there's a Tom Rodman group for those who have more time and Brad you're most welcome to go over to that when we finish this formal,
this formal past is so people can organize their lives, but some have time thanks Aletheia. Gary Hawkins.
Just a quick question. It was a year ago that Thomas Rents came out with a report from DMED, the counterpart to theirs in the military, which we no longer have access to apparently that 20,000 military people had become sterile after the jabs.
Did you hear anything about that along the way. Thanks.
Good question. So, um, that specific figure, did I hear about that? No, but I will say, and because, you know, I was I was a combat engineer officer you know I, I personally never had access to the DMED system.
I'm aware of what DMED is, and I have had a little bit of correspondence with people like like Dr Sam Sigaloff and and Dr Teresa Long. And so, I am aware of a lot of the, the extreme safety signals I would say that have that have come about through the data.
I do not personally corroborate those because I personally have not seen the data I've seen reports about the data. So I wasn't aware of that that specific sterility figure.
But I do know that there are certain signals in DMED in which we have seen anywhere from 300% increases in some you know health markers to 2000% increases in in other health markers so I do believe that the data does support that there have been substantial increases in.
I mean something that's occurring with the health of the of the troops and the thing about many of you may already be aware of this but the thing about DMED compared to theirs is that DMED is a closed system, because it's just for military personnel so it's considered
to be pretty secure and it's considered to be a good data. Now, there is of course the accusation that has come from, from Thomas Renz and maybe even potentially from Todd calendar as well that alleges that DOD after the original whistleblowers came out that DOD went back and kind of, you know, manipulated some of the numbers.
I think that's quite possible and I hope that that, if so I hope that that comes to light as well and that those individuals are prosecuted for having manipulated this system that is in place specifically to give commanders health signals so that they can actually keep a finger on the pulse of what's happening with, you know, our military readiness.
Very good. I see a comment about, about about Matthew Crawford, so I'm aware of the potential controversy over some of the initial claims. And I've, I'm aware of some of the stuff that Matthew Crawford has come out and said, I don't exactly know who's right there but I think even he also admits that there were
The question is just the extent.
Very good. Thanks. Thanks. But an extra question is, I have both been in the military, first Jim, then Jack.
Hey.
Thanks very much.
Great talk.
Thank you. Thank you.
Yeah, I'm a former flight surgeon.
Lieutenant commander, and also a Wharton MBA.
So, and I can talk offline and I'll email you a couple of questions. This looks like a real. This looks like a depopulation agenda as you pointed out.
It looks like it's authorized at a level above the Joint Chiefs.
I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but the question is, I think it's very difficult to figure out how it's being done.
But it's being done.
And the data is being manipulated.
The question is what, what would authorize them or allow them to conduct this to kill off the United States citizens, slowly to bankrupt them by making them go to hospitals with increasing cancer.
And what regulation or what treaty would allow this to happen.
And do you have any idea on that and then I'll follow up with some other questions. I mean, I would say no, I mean, I would say no. And if we talk about treaties, I also would say, you know, we believe constitutionally there's there's no treaty that can supersede the, the Constitution.
And I think where it gets interesting is, because I think I'm in agreement with what you said so you know you said, I don't think Austin and Milley are making decisions I think they're taking orders that they are then implementing.
How much do they know so many times I have wished that that I could be a fly on the wall in, you know, in whatever whatever forum exists in which they receive their, their, their marching orders right but I don't know to what extent they know or don't know I do believe
that they at least know enough to know that they are willfully engaged in treason against their own force and their own, I mean their own country, I think they absolutely know that.
But no, I don't think there's any, any legal I'm gonna get I'm not a lawyer but I think there's any legal mechanism in place that in any way can explain what has taken place but I do know.
I do know that there are individuals like like Catherine what and Sasha Lottipova who have been very good the last, I don't know maybe three or four months about exposing duties role, and they're much better equipped to probably answer this to me.
But there were, I would almost say like shadow legal frameworks that they tried to create and some of this dates back decades, where you see precedence put in place over time, then enables what happened now I don't think any of that is is.
I mean any that holds water, right. Yeah, I think those were like shadow legal frameworks that were that were put into place but again I'm not, I'm not a lawyer that might have the most developed response to that but but I am.
I do concur that that Austin Milley are not supreme decision makers I think they're absolutely receiving orders but I also think that they are so complicit that their behavior is treasonous.
So, the, the State Department, the intelligence agencies lying to our Joint Chiefs, controlling our controlling. I mean, for all intents and purposes, it really does seem like Biden is is an elderly abused individual being lied to and then unduly influence to make
bankrupt the United States what gives them right to to cover up for Jeffrey Epstein and other intelligence operations.
Do you have any insight as to the oversight of this of the State Department over the military.
I just have a couple of thoughts. One, I think.
I mean I think that I have nothing good to say about the CIA. I mean that doesn't mean that there aren't good people in it but I also think that the, the relationship between the State Department the CIA and also do D and CIA is is a very very very murky one.
And then again, so what I'm going to say right now, these are just some of my thoughts because I asked myself these questions all the time. So, um, so, Biden is president.
What happened with Afghanistan a year ago, so things like that sometimes I wonder if these are gaslighting strategies, if these are almost so ludicrous that they are just meant to increase confusion, and just almost make people question kind of what's going on.
That may not be right but sometimes I wonder some of these things just make no sense. It's almost like, are we are we making ourselves the laughing stock of the world right now, and is this being done deliberately to where Americans almost become ashamed of their own
government, not just because you know you disagree with the politics whoever's in the White House at the moment but you become ashamed of what your, your country now.
So what is right now you know the face of the country. I don't know but sometimes I wonder if that's what it is. I also think that there are some some dialectics of play. So I think we see this constantly I think that there are figures that are propped up,
almost like a like a demagogue that individuals flock to. And that's to kind of keep this, this, this oppositional tension somebody put in the chat earlier you know hegelian dialectic, I think that is that is consistently at play.
And that just keeps. So whether it's in the United States with groups kind of opposing one another, or whether it's a much larger dialectic where you have kind of NATO and then Russian China kind of in opposition towards one another.
I do think that that tension a lot of times is specifically engineered to keep people fighting a, a supposed enemy that is not really their enemy and they don't realize who's kind of pulling the strings above them but again those are just kind of some of my, some of my thoughts
on it, you know, I mean I asked myself a lot of those those exact same questions. Well thanks we'll try to fill you in. Do me a favor if you have some time afterward, take a little break and then come join Tom.
I'll try to do that. That would be great and we can fill you in on some of the stuff that that'd be great. Thank you. Sure. Thanks for all your thanks. Thank you. Thank you, Jim. Our next veteran Jack, Jim and Jack so much like a so much like a puppet show here, bread, we've got everything
right. You can hear me. Yep. Sure can. Okay. Well, Brad I'm also a veteran.
I'm a retired psychologist, and I started my career as a psychologist as an army psychologist.
During the Vietnam War.
They paid my last two years of grad school and I paid them back a three year tour of duty.
Now, what I've discovered in doing all kinds of actors I'm also the National Vice Chair of Veterans for Peace working group on Palestine in the Middle East.
So I've been trying to awaken the American public for the last at least 20 years.
And I find it's very very useful to be a veteran.
I have.
I have a big display on my car including three part three three side sign on the top of the car. So I drive around with all kinds of vulnerability.
When I have my veterans for peace stickers on it on every side.
People will not attack a veteran.
So we have, we have a great cache very important to share as both witnesses and historians, because people will listen to me explaining the actual history of the United States Empire, going way back.
And we are propagandized beginning in probably kindergarten as I recall, saying the Pledge of Allegiance.
And then we learned the Star Spangled Banner.
And if you happen to be an NFL quarterback and you don't stand for the Star Spangled Banner you can lose your job.
That's how this has stuck. It's in, it's in injected into us at a very young age.
And veterans are probably in the strongest position to counteract that.
So use your veteran status and use it to the hilt.
Now, the thing that I am trying to, I see this, this tremendous need to break American loyalty to America, Americans loyalty to America.
We are the greatest country in the world.
As they know, we are the most criminal country in the world.
We are the we are the psychopaths of the world.
And this goes clear back to our beginnings as a veteran talk about the Indian Wars.
How we ethnically cleanse this whole country.
And we tell lies about the first Thanksgiving.
It's just really bizarre.
And then we go to the Vietnam War.
There was no Gulf of Tonkin. That never happened.
And so we have we have freely sacrificed our own people fighting wars that were totally engineered and totally unnecessary for our own welfare wars that we have started, which are a violation of the United Nations Charter.
And it goes from there. It goes to, you know, go up to Central America, the Iran Contra Wars, where we're picking on the little countries that can't defend themselves.
The CIA ran that whole Operation Condor in South America.
You know, we go back to Iraq.
We know, we know about the weapons of mass destruction that never got them existed.
And who's been lying to us about all this? The US media.
It was Judith Miller of the New York Times that was promoting the weapons of mass destruction.
Correct.
I mean, it's been one thing after another.
And it's 9-11, which was an obvious inside job and a very complex, well planned one.
And well calculated and the plans were laid well in advance as they have been laid well in advance for the whole COVID thing.
The use of it. We have been a terrorized population throughout all of my long life.
First, it was the mushroom cloud after World War II.
We're the only ones who ever bombed anyone, any other cities into oblivion.
And not just one, but two. When Japan was actually putting out peace feelers, Japan had no military left.
They had no air defenses left. They had no Air Force left.
They were on their knees. Their supply lines had been completely cut.
And yet we bombed. We dropped the first atomic bombs.
And the second one was probably dropped just to test that technology because it was a different technology.
What the hell is wrong with this country?
We are a psychopathic nation and we care nothing about other lives.
Just like in Ukraine right now. We've read that whole thing about.
And Ukraine is going to lose that war. They were doomed to lose that war right from the beginning.
And we forced Putin to invade.
And how many thousands and thousands of Ukrainian lives have we sacrificed?
Have we sacrificed? I want America to start looking at this.
Jack, can you explain to the people on the group, so at least the members of this group understand, why NATO brought that war upon itself from Russia?
Because I was talking to someone today who was arguing against this.
And I'd be very interested to hear you with your military background.
Just give us a quick summary of what's going on with the rest of Ukraine war.
Well, you have to take it to be honest.
I have to take it clear back to 1991 to the Bush-Gorbachev agreement.
Everybody remembers when the wall came down, the Berlin Wall.
Well, why did that come down? Because Gorbachev agreed to it.
He agreed to allow Germany to become reunited as a Western nation on the condition that we would move, that NATO would never move one inch closer to the Russian border.
Exactly.
And that is documented in the National Archives at George Washington University.
Even though it's not a treaty, according to international attorney Francis Boyle, any agreement negotiated between national leaders, including a foreign minister and or head of state, becomes international law.
You don't have to have a treaty.
So we are a dishonest country. We do not keep our agreements.
Clinton, of course, was the first one to violate that.
He brought three former Warsaw Pact nations into NATO in 1999.
And then Bush, Bush II turned around and brought another several, three or four or five in, I think it was in 2004.
And then in 2008, we tried to, Ukraine and Georgia both petitioned for membership.
And we said we would give a membership, meaning the UN.
NATO said, OK, we'll let you guys in too.
Now, Ukraine has a 1200 mile border with Russia.
I mean, that would be like turning Mexico or Canada over to a declared national enemy.
It's just bizarre.
I mean, we have no respect whatsoever for any other country.
Well said, Jack. We've got John and then I wanted to finish.
No, he had Stephen asked me. There's more.
You have to go then from 1990, 91 when we violated that agreement to 2008, which is very important.
That's when that's when we agreed to let Ukraine and Georgia and Georgia was ready to join NATO.
And they even invaded South Ossetia, which is a buffer state between Georgia and Russia.
Well, the Russian military came in and swatted them down and put an end to that.
But we have just been threatening and threatening and threatening.
In 2014, we overthrew Ukraine's elected government, which was a neutral east-west neutral government.
Now, Putin has been watching this.
He is responsible for the survival and the well-being of his country.
And that's what he's doing.
And he had tried since 2008.
He tried for for all that time, six years or so.
He tried to negotiate a comprehensive security arrangement for Europe, including Russia.
He's completely stonewalled. Nobody would talk to him.
Finally, we were we were moving closer and closer.
We apparently had bio weapons labs there and so forth in Ukraine.
So finally, last year, February, he gave us one last chance to negotiate to honor the Minsk Accords.
What we finally admitted, we never had any intention to honor in the first place.
What kind of a country is this?
It doesn't go.
You said it. Come on. We're stopping.
We've got. Okay. Okay. Well, that's that.
Thank you very much. That's my perception, too.
Okay. Well done, Jack.
Okay, JB. And then last question to Stephen, then we're finishing in four minutes.
All right. I'll try to go quickly. Hello, Brad.
I coached five-year-old soccer with a guy named Brad Miller.
He was good guy, too.
All right. Little bit about me. So, you know, where it's coming from.
I don't trust people.
I think that's how I got here. It's always been my nature.
Maybe it's how I grew up. I don't know.
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to answer that question.
But I've noticed that a lot of people that are on our side from the very beginning,
not the ones that kind of came around through knowledge,
but the ones who initially just had distrust.
Usually had something happen in their past where somebody in a position that was,
you know, they, they would supposedly trust.
Kind of let them down.
So, you know, I think that's where you were.
How long the lead up was what nine months or so,
and then you were out maybe six, seven months ago.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's about right.
Okay.
As you come out into all these groups, I mean, when, when I started getting known,
I started getting contacted by all kinds of people.
Some of them are cool. Some of them have.
Other other intents to use you. You probably know this already.
You've probably been through it already.
I think that's the only thing that's really interesting to me is,
I think that's the number one thing that's,
is that I get a lot of people that have died.
I've been to about five hundred thousand death certificates from
Massachusetts.
That's a lot of people.
It's a lot of people that died,
I can search on anything that's unredacted into a finer fine granularity of
how people died when they died, what they died from, I can,
I can search on anything it's 500,000 death certificates from Massachusetts.
So if you haven't seen what I've done, you could just look at my name.
the same shop. So I was in sales and they put me through more than an MBA cost, well over $40,000
worth of all these trainings in how to manipulate people, learn their personalities, use it against
them, get them to sign eight-figure deals. Raytheon, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, North of Grumman,
those are the companies I worked with and put together seven and eight-figure contracts
with no cogs, no cost of goods sold. So a $10 million contract in software is like a $200 million
contract in hardware. So it's a sizable deal. What did they teach you in either West Point or after
that with regard to not necessarily military strategy, but strategy on how to get deals done,
manipulate people, psychologically get your troops ready? Because we're now dealing with
the populace without any military training or knowledge or anything like that. We have to bring
these people around because it's the fence sitters that win. They will win it for us.
The sides are already chosen, but it's the middle who haven't chosen yet. That's the public opinion
that wins everything. Even if we go to a hot war, we're going to need them. So what kind of training
have you had either West Point or after that? Can you just do a quick, I know we want to go fast. Can
you do that quickly? Yeah. But I don't know that I have anything that's like some wow training or
whatever. Most of the training that I received was taught by good people who were trying to
instill it in other good people. So it just comes down to just hard-nosed leadership. So I don't
know that we learned any real crazy tactics. And I also personally would say when it comes to the
fence sitters, and I kind of alluded to this previously, I don't want to use psychological
warfare on other individuals. When I say psychological warfare, because that's like a
malicious term, what I feel completely comfortable doing though is sowing seeds of doubt with other
individuals because that is done with an eye to the truth, but also in a way that actually benefits
that individual. So I don't view it as malicious. And I also don't really view it as, I mean, I guess
it might be kind of surreptitious or whatever, but it's done with that individual's best interest
in mind. So I would say the same thing. I would say truth is already on our side. And so I don't
think there's anything wrong with sowing seeds of doubt within an individual's existing paradigm.
But again, it's done not for nefarious purposes because we're actually doing it with those
individuals' best interests in mind. And we're doing it because it's the right thing to do. And
because it's in alignment with the truth. So if you guys don't mind, I'll make one more
comment. Sorry, I know it's 631. Number one, it offers on the table, if you want to talk about
strategies of how to conduct campaigns with people and ideas, and there's, you know, you don't go
frontal against an overwhelming force. Everybody else has heard me say this before. How do you
fragment on other issues to draw them from the fight they think they're in? And you pick off a
piece, you can do a fragment strategy with my mask lawsuit, if I could get, like, nobody had
to wear a mask who was speaking to me. If I got a few people to do it, it would have been over.
But somebody would follow me on that. Anyway, there's a lot of strategy and psychology and
all that stuff, if you ever want to talk. And lastly, the funny thing is, as you were just
talking, it's like your manipulation is okay, because you're righteous. That's what everybody
says. Now, I'm not saying it's bad. I agree with you. But the other side is going to say the same
thing. They think they're righteous. But the problem is, they have a false moral foundation
that's not built upon anything shapely or solid. Without the moral foundation of an individual,
they can be conned into thinking any act is righteous. And that's where we are. I don't
care if it's LGBT, BLM, or anything else. Yeah, for sure. But there are also individuals on their
side that are, and it may be more the individuals at the top, but I mean, they know they're being
manipulative. They know that this is all predicated upon lies, etc. Now, are there other individuals
that are probably good people that are just duped and on the other side and are doing what they
think is best? Yes. Yes, correct. There are. All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.
Thank you. That's great. Good job. Thanks, John. Last quick last couple of questions to Stephen
Frost. And then we're finishing and the Tom Rodman link is in the in the chat for those who can get
across there. Stephen. So Brad, you may not know about this. And if you don't, it doesn't matter.
So but I don't know, have you heard about the project for the New American Century? Yes.
And you know, the so this was authored in the late 90s, as I understand it. Yes. And the authors
were Pearl Wolfowitz, Ashcroft, Shani Rumsfeld, you know, the usual brigade, the one with the
mustache, particularly evil. What was his name now? I can't remember anyway. So but the project for
the New American Century, did you know about the line in it, which says, of course, we can't do
any of this without a catastrophic catalyzing event such as Pearl Harbor? Yeah, I think those
are the words, a catastrophic catalyzing event. So Pearl Harbor was one of those. And so and so
in my view, the catalyzing event they were talking about was 9-11. And so they had obviously
foreknowledge. They were talking about the cat and along it came in 2001. And so I just wanted to
ask you so then that gave them a reason to attack to conduct two illegal wars. I'm sorry, you've
been in Afghanistan. I'm not denigrating your part in that. Sure. But so the two wars were
Afghanistan and then Iraq. Iraq was more obviously illegal. But the Afghanistan war, I don't know
whether you know about this, but the first troops went into the coalition of the willing, it was
called. The first troops went into Afghanistan three weeks and five days after 9-11. Yep. Now,
you know, as a military man, you can't deploy forces across the entire world. The other side
of the world literally from the United States to Afghanistan in three weeks and five days.
But they had a, do you remember the operation Safe Syria in Saudi, sorry, in Oman it was.
Mm-hmm. All the forces within where it was the biggest exercise ever, I think, at the time. And
I don't think there's been a big one since. And that was the springboard for going to Afghanistan.
So anyway, that led to the war on terror, which led to terror. You know, that's a kind of misnomer
because there shouldn't be war on terrorism, but you can't have war on a technique. Terrorism,
you know, is a technique of war. So it's a state. So the whole thing was lies. We never addressed
what happened with 9-11. We never even found out the truth about what had happened. And then we've
got this war on viruses in inverted commas, you know. In my view, there was no pandemic ever.
Sure. So I just wondered how we go about educating the public about what has happened. You've got
your doubts about other wars and initiatives, military initiatives. How do we go about educating
the people about these things? I know it's a big question. Yeah, it is. So back to the the PNAC
and the, you know, the catastrophic event, you know, like a, like a new Pearl Harbor. Oh, yes.
The other question was that the same people, is it the same people behind, oh, sorry, the same
people behind PNAC? Is it the same people now? And if so, who are they? Yeah. So I think it is
the same people, whether it's the, whether it's literally the same people or the same groups,
you know, I don't know. But I think it's certainly the same, the same cabal. And so I first heard of
PNAC and I remember that specific verbiage, you know, catalyzing events such as a new Pearl Harbor.
I first came into contact with that in 2005. And that was, and I remember having immediate
question marks. But, you know, when you're inside the, when you're inside the narrative, I mean,
you'll tell yourself anything to believe. The same thing with the very rapid deployments to
Afghanistan. You know, you know that that seems strange, but you know, I mean, you'll tell yourself
anything to reconcile that, that seeming, you know, disconnect there. So then fast forward a
couple of years when I actually started doing more research and then kind of that initial piece that
I had heard maybe two years earlier about PNAC, you know, the project for new American century,
it kind of seemed to make more sense. I think a lot of these things happen in stages. And I think,
I can't remember who it was, but somebody said, you know, 9-11 was planned a long, long time in
advance, the same with COVID, et cetera, et cetera. And I think probably we never would have had a
COVID up without having a 9-11. And in my mind, COVID was infinitely bigger than 9-11. I mean,
we saw what happened with 9-11 and COVID, I mean, we got the whole world to go along and we got the
whole world to go along for a pandemic that, you know, didn't even exist. So, so I think some of
these things, and with PNAC, I almost wonder if that document went out with that kind of
telltale language, you know, for those who have eyes to see and have ears to hear, right?
And I almost wonder if that was a type of predictive programming, just like we see
a lot that happens, you know, and there are people who've done a lot of studying on this,
but it's almost as if these evil networks, they operate on this occult principle that
they have to some degree reveal what they're going to do because then it makes the dark
ritual that much more powerful, you know? And it doesn't necessarily matter what we think about
that stuff if there are very evil people who operate on those principles and they believe
that it makes their, you know, their ritual that much more powerful. And there are people who say,
that's why these predictive programming type instances occur, whether it's with
movies that come out that seemingly detail what is going to happen, you know, a couple of years
later, or there are books or there are TV shows or there are, you know, symbolisms that happen
during the Super Bowl, whatever it is, right? Whatever mechanism they use. And that may also
be a reason why the shots were used because at the end of the day, you go and you roll up your
sleeve and you take a shot. So regardless of whatever coercion may have been used to get you
there, you rolled up your own sleeve and you offered your own arm and you took that shot.
So you consented to it. And I think that, again, there are some of these people that
in these evil networks that believe that when you don't stop them and they tell you what they're
going to do, or when you consent to it, you've consented to being targeted. So maybe that's kind
of what was going on with the whole PNAC thing too. But again, with 9-11 and with COVID, so you
also mentioned the 9-11 Commission, which was a total sham. And it reminds me of the Commission,
I think it was called the Warren Commission, is that right?
Warren Commission, yes. President Kennedy's assassination, yes.
Also a sham, a total sham. And right now, if we allow it, if COVID were to be investigated
right now, if we allow it, it would also be a sham. And so somewhere along the way,
we have to kind of realise that if we don't put a stop to this stuff, it will continue.
Yes, and it will get worse each time.
It will get worse each time. I mean, look what happened with JFK. I mean, you can kill a president
basically in front of the whole world because it was basically televised, right?
And his brother, Robert Kennedy.
Okay, that's it everybody. We're 10 minutes over time. Brilliant,
brilliant, Brad. Great questions everybody. We can go for three hours. Go and continue. Rodman?
One last thing I wanted to tell Brad and you, Charles, because you'll be interested.
Did you know in the United States, the Patriot Act, of course, the libraries in America are very
powerful. They were up in arms over the Patriot Act, one and two, but it still went through.
But did you know now, currently, libraries in the United States of America are weeding,
in inverted commas, weeding books. Librarians are weeding books and the public don't know it.
Excellent. That is excellent to know everybody. Keep your eyes peeled for it.
And also- Weeding books, essentially doing the same burning.
That means, Stephen, very good. So that means Mark Dyer's local action against smart, you know,
15 minute cities, everybody, and 20 minute cities. The interest that we're now paying
attention to local government, the librarians are almost always, Stephen, run by, you know,
the local municipalities. So take- Yes, they're catalogers. They're catalogers.
They're very important people. Mark, that's something that you can do locally. Investigate
the libraries. It's very important and we may not know anything about it.
Yeah. All right, everybody. I'll take that up.
Great. Thank you. Big round of applause for you, Brad.
Go and join the Rodman Group if you can. Thanks, everybody. See you on Tuesday night,
Wednesday. Well done, Shasta, for helping to make all this happen to have Brad here.
Thank you, Brad. Thank you, Shasta, yes.
Getting in touch with Anna, create that military group. It's one more group. There are many groups
that have initiated out of here and we'll be back with you all and keep up the fight, everybody.
We're only halfway through, Brad. We're three years into our six-year war if it doesn't go
longer. So no time to get tired and if you're getting tired, then change your nutrition.
We've got Shasta, we've got lots of nutritional experts here on this call who can help you.
Sorry, Charles, just let me quickly say something. Singapore, right, when the British were going out
from Singapore, were leaving Singapore behind, they made a commitment to Likwanyu that they would
be able to get to Singapore with their military within 24 hours. My father was the brains behind
that. He was in charge of the movements and as Stephen said, with regard to going into Afghanistan,
my father took nine months planning it. Correct. It just doesn't happen in three
weeks and five days, which automatically means there was foreknowledge of 9-11.
Yeah, very good. Agreed. Thanks, everybody. Last chats, please go. Brad, go. Thanks.
Thank you, Brad. If you want to be in touch with someone, Brad, or if you have any ideas, just email me.
Thank you. Okay. Thank you so much. Thanks. Bye. Bye. Thank you, Charles.