1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:12
And I'll put Thomas up here.
2
0:00:12 --> 0:00:20
So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International and today's discussion.
3
0:00:20 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ephen Frost over three years ago with the desire to pursue
4
0:00:25 --> 0:00:32
truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health. Stephen has stood up against government and
5
0:00:32 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]leblower and activist. His medical specialty is radiology
6
0:00:39 --> 0:00:46
and overnight while I was sleeping here in Australia, the Julian Assange case decision
7
0:00:46 --> 0:00:52
was handed down. I wonder if while we're doing this recording, if anybody was that was that
8
0:00:52 --> 0:00:59
handed down? Does anybody know? Because Stephen has done a lot of work on this.
9
0:00:59 --> 0:01:05
Yes, I've just got reports Charles. I just got reports today, just minutes ago actually.
10
0:01:05 --> 0:01:11
The case was handed down. He's got time now to appeal again.
11
0:01:11 --> 0:01:14
Okay, thank you. Thank you Peter. Just quickly, I just wanted that for the purpose of this
12
0:01:14 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ephen has fought for Julie and Assange's freedom over the years. I'm Charles Covester,
13
0:01:20 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ralasia's passion provocateur and we love passionate people
14
0:01:26 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]iced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago
15
0:01:31 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction] 13 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine
16
0:01:36 --> 0:01:42
damage and damage from bad medical advice. I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.
17
0:01:42 --> 0:01:47
We comprise lots of professions here and we're from all around the world. Many of us thought
18
0:01:47 --> 0:01:52
that vaccines were okay. Now many of us proudly say, yes, we are passionate anti-vaxxers.
19
0:01:52 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction] time here, welcome and feel free to introduce yourself in the chat
20
0:01:56 --> 0:02:02
and where you're from. If you publish a newsletter or a podcast or you have a radio or TV show
21
0:02:02 --> 0:02:06
or you've written a book, put the links into the chat so we can follow you, promote you
22
0:02:06 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]and we're in the middle of World War III and that the
23
0:02:11 --> 0:02:18
medical science battle is only one of [privacy contact redaction] world war and
24
0:02:20 --> 0:02:25
there's no time to be tired. We're four years into what I think is going to be a seven-year
25
0:02:25 --> 0:02:28
war. I thought it was going to be a six-year war. I think we've got another three years
26
0:02:28 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]and the development of science and that the science
27
0:02:33 --> 0:02:38
is never settled. Anybody who tells you the science is settled, they've got an agenda
28
0:02:38 --> 0:02:44
to sell you. Some of us believe that viruses exist. Some of us believe that viruses are
29
0:02:44 --> 0:02:49
a hoax and some of us are on the fence. And some commentators on this Rumble channel say
30
0:02:49 --> 0:02:56
that anybody who believes that viruses exist is a liar or a fool. So there you are. The
31
0:02:56 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]rong. This meeting runs for two and a half hours after
32
0:03:01 --> 0:03:05
which for those with the time, Tom Rodman runs a video telegram meeting. Tom puts the
33
0:03:06 --> 0:03:10
links into the chat if you're able to join. We will listen to our guest presenter, Dr.
34
0:03:10 --> 0:03:15
Thomas Binder for as long as Thomas wishes to speak and then we have Q&A. Stephen Frost
35
0:03:15 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ablished tradition asks the first questions for 15 minutes. This is a free speech
36
0:03:21 --> 0:03:27
environment. Free speech is crucially important in our fight to preserve our human freedoms.
37
0:03:27 --> 0:03:32
If you're offended by anything, be offended. We are lovingly not interested. We reject
38
0:03:32 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ry that requires nobody to say anything that may offend another. We
39
0:03:38 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ive of love, not fear. Fear is the opposite of love. Fear
40
0:03:44 --> 0:03:51
squashes you. Love on the other hand expands you. Our strength as men and women comes from
41
0:03:52 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] agenda is to divide us in the context of relationships with other
42
0:03:59 --> 0:04:06
human beings, understand that unity is strength. These twice weekly meetings are not just talk
43
0:04:06 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]ions and initiatives have been generated from linkages
44
0:04:11 --> 0:04:16
made by attendees in these meetings. If you have a solution or a product or links or resources
45
0:04:16 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]e, put the details into the chat. The meeting is recorded and is uploaded
46
0:04:20 --> 0:04:26
onto the Rumble channel. And now let me introduce, let me give you the bio. We've agreed that
47
0:04:26 --> 0:04:32
we will include the bio to make life easy for viewers of these recordings. And let me
48
0:04:32 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] quickly about Thomas Binder. And if it was Binder, if it was in
49
0:04:40 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]ralia it would say binder, but it's Binder. And Thomas studied medicine at the University
50
0:04:46 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]orate in immunology and virology, specialised in internal medicine
51
0:04:51 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]iology, has [privacy contact redaction]ics and therapy of respiratory
52
0:04:56 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ions in hospitals and in ICUs. He's been working in his private practice in Switzerland
53
0:05:03 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ood up for the return to scientificity, medicine and humanness in March
54
0:05:11 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]er Saturday evening, 2020, he was arrested in
55
0:05:18 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ice by an anti-terrorist unit after a slanderer had made the allegations he threatened
56
0:05:23 --> 0:05:28
the government and society, was armed and had a psychiatric history, which was all wrong.
57
0:05:28 --> 0:05:35
Yet, he was detained in a closed psychiatry unit for six days because of COVID insanity.
58
0:05:36 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction] member of the Swiss Aletheia Humane Medicine and Science, is a core member
59
0:05:41 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ors for COVID Ethics, a member of the German Physicians and Scientists for Health,
60
0:05:46 --> 0:05:52
Freedom and Democracy, is one of the [privacy contact redaction]s who wrote the Cormann-Droston
61
0:05:52 --> 0:05:58
Review Report, including addendum blogs, articles, talks and interviews you can find on Thomas'
62
0:05:58 --> 0:06:04
personal website. We put this into the chat, thomasbinder.ch. Of course, this was the extension
63
0:06:04 --> 0:06:11
for Switzerland and on ex also known as Twitter at thomas underscore binder. So Thomas, welcome
64
0:06:11 --> 0:06:18
your frequent visitor to here, looking forward to hearing what you have to say to us. Hello,
65
0:06:21 --> 0:06:26
Stephen with your nicely brushed hair and Thomas, we're in your hands.
66
0:06:26 --> 0:06:33
Welcome everybody. Thank you, Stephen, for your invitation and Charles for your kind
67
0:06:33 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ion. I'd like to talk about my experience during the last four years and about my two
68
0:06:40 --> 0:06:47
cents on this Corona pandemic and the injections, of course, and maybe there will be some time
69
0:06:50 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ure as well. Yeah, well, I was confronted with COVID like
70
0:06:58 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] in January [privacy contact redaction]ures and videos from Wuhan that I realized
71
0:07:05 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]y too much. I mean, we saw those hoards running around in penguin suits, cannons
72
0:07:13 --> 0:07:20
mounted on lorries, allegedly spraying disinfectants in the air and people allegedly dying suddenly
73
0:07:20 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]s landed on their hands. So I thought, oh my God, what's this?
74
0:07:27 --> 0:07:34
At that time, of course, I didn't know what was going on. I didn't know what was going
75
0:07:35 --> 0:07:41
on, whether these pictures were directed against the Chinese populace or against the populace
76
0:07:41 --> 0:07:47
of the whole world. But I thought this is very strange. And then there was silence,
77
0:07:47 --> 0:07:52
more or less silence for about a month. And then one morning I woke up and in the news
78
0:07:52 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] now the virus is in Bergamo. Bergamo is in northern Italy and northern Italy is
79
0:07:57 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]er where I live. And I was amazed. I was surprised to see that
80
0:08:05 --> 0:08:12
like, obviously, almost everybody thought, oh, well, we have to do exactly the same as
81
0:08:13 --> 0:08:20
the Chinese did because at the same time, we got messages from Wuhan that the Chinese
82
0:08:22 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction] the virus won. So obviously most people thought that we have
83
0:08:29 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ly the same, install the same insane authoritarian unscientific measures as stated.
84
0:08:37 --> 0:08:44
And I couldn't understand the word. I mean, everything I had learned in medical school
85
0:08:44 --> 0:08:51
during my scientific education, in my practical medical life was suddenly turned upside down.
86
0:08:52 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ors did not inform the public. So I thought, well, it's
87
0:09:02 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]or. So first I wrote emails to better doctors,
88
0:09:09 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]s I knew, politicians I knew to inform them about what's going on. And
89
0:09:14 --> 0:09:19
the spooky thing was I never got any answer, not even an answer like, Thomas, you're crazy
90
0:09:19 --> 0:09:26
or so, just no answer. So as I could not reach out to journalists, I intensified my activities
91
0:09:32 --> 0:09:39
in social media. I wrote blogs. And on the first day before Easter 2020, I wrote a huge
92
0:09:41 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]ained the whole prevailing corona nonsense narrative, that the indications
93
0:09:49 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction] is wrong, test is wrong. Highly likely there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic
94
0:09:56 --> 0:10:03
transmission, that it is irresponsibly panicking the populace with a CFR of 2% while every
95
0:10:04 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]ands that the IFR is important, that is highly likely 100 times or so lower.
96
0:10:13 --> 0:10:19
So that this virus probably is even less dangerous than influenza in the range of its broader
97
0:10:19 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]er coronaviruses and so on and so forth. And this blog was clicked about 20,000
98
0:10:26 --> 0:10:33
times in a day. So I thought, oh, well, I didn't understand why me, an ordinary doctor,
99
0:10:33 --> 0:10:40
should inform Switzerland or maybe half of the world. But well, I did it. And I thought
100
0:10:40 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]ors will come out, this information will spread exponentially
101
0:10:46 --> 0:10:53
and this whole corona nonsense narrative will have crashed within a week. I want you to
102
0:10:53 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]er for a week. But so on Easter Saturday in the evening, I was doing
103
0:11:01 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ice before going on holiday. And at about 10 o'clock, I was
104
0:11:07 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ed by an anti-terrorist squad, 20 policemen. In this whole operation, 60 policemen were
105
0:11:15 --> 0:11:22
involved. And the reason was that the good acquaintance of mine, whom I sent these emails
106
0:11:22 --> 0:11:29
as well, who read my blogs, in these tweets, blogs, etc., he projected threats, threats
107
0:11:32 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction] the government, against the populace. And he called another good acquaintance of
108
0:11:38 --> 0:11:44
mine, the prime minister of the canton of the province where I live in Switzerland.
109
0:11:44 --> 0:11:51
And on the phone, they decided they do not want to call me and they asked me, Thomas,
110
0:11:51 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]and what you want to tell us. Maybe we meet for a corona and you can
111
0:11:57 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ain it to us again. No, they informed the chief of the state police and he started
112
0:12:04 --> 0:12:11
this whole operation. At the same time, they protected the whole government of my province
113
0:12:13 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ation that is opposite to my practice was closed for hours because of
114
0:12:19 --> 0:12:26
this well-known fundamentalist terrorist, Dr. Thomas Pinder. After one hour, they realized
115
0:12:27 --> 0:12:33
all allegations, there were three allegations, were wrong. The allegations were I was a threat,
116
0:12:33 --> 0:12:39
I was armed, I had a psychiatric history. They found out after an hour everything was
117
0:12:39 --> 0:12:45
wrong so they could not even issue an arrest warrant, they could not imprison me. But they
118
0:12:45 --> 0:12:52
did not apologize and send me home. Then they sent a colleague to me that had to check my
119
0:12:53 --> 0:13:00
ability to be imprisoned, although they could not imprison me. And this was an emergency
120
0:13:01 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] imagine already at that time she wore a hardcore FFP2 mask and was shouting
121
0:13:08 --> 0:13:13
put on the mask, put on the mask, the virus, the virus. So this colleague had to check
122
0:13:13 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction]atus and she decided I was corona insane. She invented a new diagnosis and as
123
0:13:20 --> 0:13:27
insanity alone is not enough or involuntary commitment, she decided I must be self-endangering.
124
0:13:28 --> 0:13:35
Although in a tweet some days ago, because everything seemed so spooky to me, I wrote
125
0:13:35 --> 0:13:42
something like I'm 58 years old, sporty, no medication and never ever commit suicide.
126
0:13:43 --> 0:13:50
So I spent six days in closed psychiatry, the first 36 hours in a padded cell. But then
127
0:13:51 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] decided yes, they have to release me. But then in
128
0:13:59 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] diagnosed mania. I would suffer from mania. So the court
129
0:14:07 --> 0:14:13
said okay, you are a doctor, you want to continue to work. So there are two possibilities. Either
130
0:14:13 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]ay in the psychiatric hospital for six weeks to have treated your mania or you can
131
0:14:19 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] and go on and continue to work. But then you have to take a Beli-Fi, a neuroleptic
132
0:14:24 --> 0:14:31
and whether I took it or not was checked by a blood check once per week. So I decided
133
0:14:32 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]yle psychiatry in Switzerland. But I never did
134
0:14:40 --> 0:14:47
something unlawful. Everything I told and wrote from March 2020 on was 100% scientific
135
0:14:49 --> 0:14:54
and evidence based so they could not really do me harm. I continued to work and of course
136
0:14:54 --> 0:15:01
I even intensified to inform the public. So I networked locally in Switzerland. I joined
137
0:15:04 --> 0:15:11
a group of Swiss, a network of Swiss doctors and scientists called Alethea, then later
138
0:15:11 --> 0:15:14
for COVID.
139
0:15:14 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction] to mention one important person that is Suchary Bhakti. Of course I
140
0:15:25 --> 0:15:32
realized immediately that everything is nonsense. But of course as a doctor I could not go public
141
0:15:33 --> 0:15:40
while only searching for 99%. I had to be 200% sure. At that time I found Suchary, I
142
0:15:40 --> 0:15:47
found his YouTube videos. You can look into his eyes and within a second you realize this
143
0:15:49 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction], intelligent and pathetic person. I saw he is telling the same. Later
144
0:15:55 --> 0:16:02
I found Wolfgang Wodarg as well. Those guys gave me the assurance that I was right so
145
0:16:03 --> 0:16:09
that I could go public.
146
0:16:09 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]ands that there was no pandemic of a killer virus.
147
0:16:16 --> 0:16:22
This was mainly an RT-PCR testing pandemic because this of course is the recipe for the
148
0:16:22 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]ing pandemic against any alleged or real disease.
149
0:16:33 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]ress that I am open to debate about everything. Whether there is a virus
150
0:16:41 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]etely sure. I am not completely sure whether it is a testing
151
0:16:48 --> 0:16:55
pandemic by 95%, 99% or 100%. I am also ready to debate about whether there are viruses
152
0:16:56 --> 0:17:03
or not. For the moment I think this debate is not very fruitful because already now when
153
0:17:07 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] the judges and the prosecutors think we are crazy. In the currently accepted
154
0:17:14 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]em alone there are 1001 reasons to unveil this whole nonsense so we do not
155
0:17:28 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]uff. If you tell the judge there are no viruses at all they even think
156
0:17:36 --> 0:17:43
we are more insane. I think this may somewhat divide us. I think we are more likely to be
157
0:17:44 --> 0:17:50
and I think this is not very fruitful in public. We can debate about everything in a closed
158
0:17:50 --> 0:17:56
circle but this is my personal opinion. You can have another opinion of course but this
159
0:17:56 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]ill think there are viruses but I am not absolutely
160
0:18:05 --> 0:18:11
sure of course. I learned during these times that we have to question everything especially
161
0:18:11 --> 0:18:18
in the medical and scientific field of course. The basis of this nonsense narrative of course
162
0:18:19 --> 0:18:26
is the RT-PCR test. Even before this comes to light we have to do the RT-PCR test. We
163
0:18:41 --> 0:18:48
have to do the RT-PCR test. I mean how did we treat the flu and the cold before 2020?
164
0:18:57 --> 0:19:03
Well it is usually a self-limiting disease so we treated ourselves and after 7 days it
165
0:19:03 --> 0:19:10
was over. Sometimes it got worse and maybe day 5 when it got worse we went to the GP
166
0:19:10 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]icating secondary bacteria pneumonia that could still be treated
167
0:19:17 --> 0:19:24
on an outpatient basis with antibiotics and lasted maybe [privacy contact redaction]e
168
0:19:25 --> 0:19:32
were told and only when it got really worse life threatening the GP sent us to the hospital
169
0:19:33 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ed for the causative germ. The GP had just to decide is it highly
170
0:19:42 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]erial infection. But in the very severe life threatening
171
0:19:48 --> 0:19:55
cases we wanted to treat specifically with antiviral drugs so then we must know the causative
172
0:19:56 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]ed. We never tested for a cold or a flu virus before
173
0:20:04 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] only for one of all possible causative germs like they did here. They did
174
0:20:11 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] for influenza they only tested for SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction] asymptomatic
175
0:20:18 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]e of course. This was all totally insane. Then there comes
176
0:20:25 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] of course. PCR is not a test for an infection it is a test for the presence
177
0:20:31 --> 0:20:38
of a certain amount of a certain part of a genome of a causative of a germ. And even
178
0:20:41 --> 0:20:48
if it is 100% sensitive and specific presence of a tiny amount of somebody or a virus is
179
0:20:48 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]ion. The more viruses is around the lower the CTs the
180
0:20:56 --> 0:21:03
higher is the likelihood that this is the causative germ. But the PCR test result must
181
0:21:04 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]ion with other clinical findings of course. And then of all possible
182
0:21:11 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] The Cormann-Drawston testing protocol is the recipe for the worst
183
0:21:24 --> 0:21:31
RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. We could possibly imagine any advanced biochemistry student
184
0:21:33 --> 0:21:40
could do a better one within a day. And then another important if these case numbers are
185
0:21:41 --> 0:21:48
of course they these case numbers could cranked up and down according to the script by changing
186
0:21:49 --> 0:21:56
the sensitivity and the specificity of the test. I mean what many even so called experts
187
0:21:59 --> 0:22:06
allegedly do not even know by now is that a specificity of 99% does not mean 1% of the
188
0:22:06 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]s are false positives and 19% are correct. But that the meaning of specificity is highly
189
0:22:17 --> 0:22:23
dependent on the prevalence of the virus. If the prevalence of the virus is zero close
190
0:22:23 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]s are false positives. I explain it to lay people
191
0:22:31 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction] that is 99% specific in 10,000 men we will get
192
0:22:43 --> 0:22:50
100 positives. And as the prevalence of pregnancy in men is zero all those [privacy contact redaction]s are false
193
0:22:50 --> 0:22:57
positives. And this positivity rate of about 1% is what we saw during the summer when there
194
0:23:00 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction] no coronaviruses around. And this Drosten test was especially bad because
195
0:23:09 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]s with all the coronaviruses. There was a laboratory survey in Germany already
196
0:23:17 --> 0:23:24
in summer [privacy contact redaction] was 98.6%. But this specificity went
197
0:23:25 --> 0:23:32
down to 92.4% in the presence of all the coronaviruses. So it is clear that in the flu in the corona
198
0:23:35 --> 0:23:42
season that the positivity rate goes up. So whether there was SARS-CoV-2 around or not
199
0:23:43 --> 0:23:50
I am not 100% sure. But it is clear that most, most COVID cases were fabricated out of the
200
0:23:56 --> 0:24:03
thin air by mislabelling other diagnosis. Mainly influenza that miraculously disappeared
201
0:24:04 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction] There are many proofs for this. I think that
202
0:24:12 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ure paints a thousand words. Maybe I may share my screen.
203
0:24:23 --> 0:24:30
Yes you can. Can you see it? Yep. This is a 3D picture paints a thousand words. Now
204
0:24:30 --> 0:24:37
this is the ICU bed monitoring of the famous Swiss University ETH. There we see the number
205
0:24:47 --> 0:24:54
of ICU beds. We see the date. Black curve is the total ICU bed occupancy. The green
206
0:24:55 --> 0:25:02
curve are the non-COVID patients and the orange curve are the COVID patients. Now look what
207
0:25:04 --> 0:25:11
happens. Let's look here. In the summer we have the false positivity rate of about 1%.
208
0:25:11 --> 0:25:17
And then suddenly there is an increase of the COVID patients. COVID patients arrive
209
0:25:17 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]? That the green curves myocardial infarctions, pulmonary
210
0:25:24 --> 0:25:31
embolisms, car accidents, etc. would go on straight like this. Maybe someday a little
211
0:25:33 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]pone operations or whatever. But at exactly the same moment
212
0:25:42 --> 0:25:49
when these curves goes up the other curves goes down and die about the same amount. And
213
0:25:49 --> 0:25:56
with the reverse of these two lines curves are almost complete mirror images. And you
214
0:25:59 --> 0:26:05
see that the total number of the ICU bed occupancy stays basically the same. You always have
215
0:26:05 --> 0:26:12
a little bit of hump in the flu season in the winter because then there are acute respiratory
216
0:26:12 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] be mechanically intubated and mechanically
217
0:26:19 --> 0:26:26
ventilated in the ICUs. We see also that we also always had huge spare beds. Here we see
218
0:26:28 --> 0:26:35
the total amount of ICU beds. They were increased to more than 1,500 and during the alleged
219
0:26:35 --> 0:26:42
pandemic of the century they were reduced. But there were always huge spare beds. So
220
0:26:42 --> 0:26:49
there was never any overcrowding of the ICU. So this is really a picture paints a thousand
221
0:26:50 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] proof I already mentioned in summer 2020 and nobody ever should give
222
0:27:00 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]anation for this curve. If you want to explain it in another way you
223
0:27:08 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ate that you are probably God for every patient that arrives in the ICU here he postpones
224
0:27:18 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ion, a car accident or whatever. But I think this is highly unlikely.
225
0:27:25 --> 0:27:32
I think this is really great and such graphs exist for every country. At the same time
226
0:27:33 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ain why there was no overcrowding in any country. For example, in Germany there
227
0:27:39 --> 0:27:46
are about three times more ICU beds per capita than in Switzerland. Whereas in Sweden there
228
0:27:47 --> 0:27:53
are only about half as many per capita as in Switzerland. So if we Swiss are maybe at
229
0:27:53 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction] had enormous reserves while in Sweden they would have had
230
0:28:03 --> 0:28:10
overcrowding of the ICU. But in no country we saw this. So this was mainly a RT-PCR testing
231
0:28:12 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]e who do not believe that this really exists I recommend an article
232
0:28:24 --> 0:28:31
that was published in the New York Times in [privacy contact redaction] Leads
233
0:28:31 --> 0:28:38
to Epidemic That Wasn't. There they describe an alleged whooping cough epidemic in New
234
0:28:39 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]ed positive also with a nonsense PCR test. And
235
0:28:50 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]erial cultures that none actually suffered from pertussis.
236
0:28:57 --> 0:29:04
So this was by 100% a PCR testing epidemic. And this is exactly what happened now. It's
237
0:29:07 --> 0:29:14
amazing that even in the freedom movement, especially the stars, they never talk about
238
0:29:15 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]ill blathering about the lab leak. Of course this chain of function
239
0:29:22 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction] be forbidden of course. But I think these rumors about this lab leak mainly
240
0:29:30 --> 0:29:37
serve to inflate this comparatively harmless virus into a killer virus with propaganda.
241
0:29:39 --> 0:29:46
Basically an endemic of a comparatively harmless cold virus was inflated into a pandemic of
242
0:29:47 --> 0:29:54
a killer virus with PR and PCR. And it's always a good idea to walk in the shoes of the adversary.
243
0:29:57 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]an such this pandemic? If I was not suicidal I would
244
0:30:08 --> 0:30:13
not release a killer virus that could hurt or even kill myself. I would of course choose
245
0:30:13 --> 0:30:20
a comparatively harmless virus or even no virus and inflate it into a killer virus with
246
0:30:20 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]ly what they did. And what threatens of course that the
247
0:30:27 --> 0:30:34
WHO does again at will if the modifications of the IHRs and the pandemic agreement are
248
0:30:34 --> 0:30:41
accepted and ratified in our countries. So it is of utmost importance that we bombard
249
0:30:42 --> 0:30:49
our parliamentarians with this information that they realize what's at stake. So this
250
0:30:51 --> 0:30:58
to the RT-PCR testing pandemic. The other part is insane as well of course. In 2020
251
0:30:58 --> 0:31:05
they came up with the idea of course that we can only overcome this pandemic with a
252
0:31:08 --> 0:31:15
vaccine. The idea to end the pandemic with a vaccine starts long before this modified
253
0:31:19 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]arts with the vaccination itself. There is no need to vaccinate against
254
0:31:27 --> 0:31:34
this comparatively harmless virus. Then we cannot effectively vaccinate against the respiratory
255
0:31:36 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]ion or transmission because the antibodies are in the blood, not
256
0:31:42 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] we can hope with a vaccine against the respiratory
257
0:31:48 --> 0:31:55
virus is to somewhat reduce generalized disease caused by viremia if the virus becomes more
258
0:31:56 --> 0:32:03
spread in the whole body. Then we cannot effectively vaccinate against the permanently
259
0:32:03 --> 0:32:09
mutating virus like coronaviruses because the vaccine always lags behind its variants
260
0:32:09 --> 0:32:16
of course. Especially if you choose only one epitope. Natural immunity of course is always
261
0:32:18 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ain this to lay people like this. Let's say my face
262
0:32:24 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction] you. Then your immune system takes a picture of my face and stores
263
0:32:30 --> 0:32:37
it. If I come around again next season mutated, so let's say with a broken nose, your immune
264
0:32:38 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ill recognizes my face also with a broken nose. But if your immune system only
265
0:32:46 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ure of my nose, only one epitope, and I come around next season with a broken
266
0:32:52 --> 0:32:59
nose, it will not recognize me again. Then of course even if there was a pandemic, of
267
0:33:00 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]ing pandemic with a vaccine. You can only end a testing pandemic
268
0:33:07 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]ing. But even if it was a pandemic, you cannot end a pandemic with a vaccine because
269
0:33:14 --> 0:33:21
a pandemic ends after three months with everybody either immune or dead, while the development
270
0:33:24 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]ing for safety and efficacy of a vaccine lasts ten years. So already this was intellectually
271
0:33:33 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction] Then of course to choose the modified RNA and DNA platform was the apex of incidence.
272
0:33:41 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]arts with the unknown dose. We inject the construction plan for the production
273
0:33:49 --> 0:33:55
of a protein foreign to the body, a prodrug, without having any control over which cells
274
0:33:55 --> 0:34:02
produce it, in what amount, and for how long. There was a guy in the 16th century called
275
0:34:03 --> 0:34:10
Paracelsus who said it's the dose that makes a poison or not a poison. So already because
276
0:34:13 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ive dose of the spike protein was unknown, these vaccines
277
0:34:21 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction] been approved of course. And then the problem, I mean when I heard
278
0:34:29 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]atform, the first thing I did was to look for the receptor on these LNPs,
279
0:34:36 --> 0:34:43
the lipid nanoparticles, who makes them enter only the muscle cells. But I didn't find this
280
0:34:44 --> 0:34:51
receptor. These were deliberately chosen so that this mRNA could be inserted in any cell,
281
0:34:51 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ntal barrier, so even be introduced into the brain
282
0:35:01 --> 0:35:08
cells and in the cells of the embryos and fetuses. And this of course was deliberate.
283
0:35:08 --> 0:35:15
This was intention to harm. There is no doubt about that, no doubt at all. If of course
284
0:35:16 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]atform, this is important that the people understand, it
285
0:35:25 --> 0:35:32
is not only these SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction]ions that are flawed, it's the whole modified RNA
286
0:35:34 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]atform that is basically flawed, because the main toxicity comes from the auto-immune
287
0:35:42 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction] the foreign antigen expressing and then presenting cells.
288
0:35:50 --> 0:35:57
Our white blood cells are policing around, they see these cells carrying, presenting
289
0:35:57 --> 0:36:04
a foreign protein, they think this is an alien, and they attack it. Of course the lipid nanoparticles
290
0:36:05 --> 0:36:12
are themselves toxic. The spike itself is toxic. But if the lipid nanoparticles would
291
0:36:13 --> 0:36:20
be the main toxicity came from the lipid nanoparticles, with every dose the toxicity would increase
292
0:36:22 --> 0:36:29
more or less linearly. If the spike was, the main toxicity came from the spike, the toxicity
293
0:36:30 --> 0:36:35
would highly likely go even down with every shot, because there are more and more neutralizing
294
0:36:35 --> 0:36:42
antibodies. But as we know, especially from the Neuron course work, we know that the toxicity
295
0:36:44 --> 0:36:51
increases exponentially with every shot and with each. And this can only be explained
296
0:36:51 --> 0:36:58
by this auto-immune attack. The immune system gets trained again and again with every shot,
297
0:36:59 --> 0:37:06
so it becomes ever better in attacking and destroying those cells. So I'm convinced
298
0:37:08 --> 0:37:14
that the main toxicity comes from this auto-immune attack. And this is the basic thing of the
299
0:37:14 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]atform. The basic thing is to coerce our body cells to produce and then present
300
0:37:22 --> 0:37:29
a protein foreign to the body. This is completely different than gene therapy where you want
301
0:37:29 --> 0:37:36
to make a cell, for example, to produce insulin or whatever, a protein from our body. This
302
0:37:36 --> 0:37:43
is no problem. But there the problem is that they produce a foreign protein. So this is
303
0:37:43 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction] to refuse all modified RNA and DNA vaccines. This is especially
304
0:37:53 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ion is cheap and rapid, so the pharmaceutical industry
305
0:38:00 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]atform. So this is the reason why this message has
306
0:38:08 --> 0:38:15
to spread. And then, of course, the dosage is much too high. Obviously, if the dose,
307
0:38:19 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ay in the muscle, muscle cells can regenerate. So this auto-immune
308
0:38:28 --> 0:38:35
attack would be no problem. This might work. But as I said, they enter any body cell. And
309
0:38:35 --> 0:38:42
then the dosage is high. Obviously, with physiological dosages, they could not get
310
0:38:42 --> 0:38:49
a good immune response. So the dosage is horrendous. And then, of course, the lipid normal particles
311
0:38:51 --> 0:38:58
itself is toxic, the spike is toxic, and the apex of it, the insanity is what Kevin McKernan
312
0:38:58 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] to found the contamination with functional plasmid DNA from the manufacturing
313
0:39:05 --> 0:39:12
process. So yeah, the idea to vaccinate against this virus was insane. Use this modified RNA
314
0:39:13 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]atform was the apex of insanity. So these are the two basic things everybody
315
0:39:20 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]and. Now, once we have realized it is not about medicine, it is not about
316
0:39:29 --> 0:39:35
science, what is this thing about? I think we can debate about this in the Q&A maybe
317
0:39:35 --> 0:39:42
later. I guess everybody who is present here understands. If you ask me, it is the final
318
0:39:43 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] time in history, the battle of evil versus
319
0:39:50 --> 0:39:57
good, the ruling psychopaths, or maybe we could better call them severe maligno-gnosyists
320
0:39:59 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]s ruled us. In ancient times, they were wearing crowns. Nowadays, they are multi-billionaires.
321
0:40:09 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ory, they have the technical means to totally control
322
0:40:16 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction] us. I am absolutely sure this is the aim of this whole agenda. There is
323
0:40:23 --> 0:40:30
also a spiritual area of course. If you are good people, you have to stand up against
324
0:40:31 --> 0:40:38
this, if not for ourselves, then of course for life, for our children and grandchildren.
325
0:40:38 --> 0:40:45
Maybe I end here and I am ready to take any questions, of course, hard questions of course.
326
0:40:49 --> 0:40:56
Very good. Thomas, wonderful. I have been a professional speaker for 31 years after
327
0:40:58 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] done is to honestly share your experience with the world
328
0:41:08 --> 0:41:15
there, your perspective, and each one of us has a perspective. That is the value of
329
0:41:16 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ain complex ideas. That is what excellent educators
330
0:41:25 --> 0:41:32
do. I learned a long time ago that if somebody does not understand me, that is my fault,
331
0:41:32 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] explained it badly. You have given us a great example
332
0:41:42 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]aining things well to those who do not speak particular languages. I think it
333
0:41:54 --> 0:42:01
is a lesson of being open to hear other experts give different explanations of what is going
334
0:42:02 --> 0:42:09
on. I found it wonderful because in my life I am always looking for great ways to explain
335
0:42:10 --> 0:42:16
other ideas. You did that beautifully. Thank you so much for your honesty around that.
336
0:42:16 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]ions, but as you know, Stephen goes first on the questions. Stephen,
337
0:42:21 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction] 15 minutes? Where are you?
338
0:42:25 --> 0:42:28
Yes, sorry. I did not have my video on. I thought I had it anyway.
339
0:42:28 --> 0:42:35
Thomas, that was really great. I agree with Charles. It was a brilliant exposition by
340
0:42:37 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]or in terms which the public could understand. I think what is special
341
0:42:43 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]ain things so clearly as you have just done and in a second language.
342
0:42:49 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction] language, English. I know how difficult that is because I have
343
0:42:54 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction] worked in Sweden as a doctor. It is really difficult to operate
344
0:42:59 --> 0:43:06
in a second language. I think the reason that what you did shows great empathy. You have
345
0:43:06 --> 0:43:12
put yourself without realising it in the position of all the people who did not understand medicine
346
0:43:12 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]e. It is easy to understand. I think they might struggle with
347
0:43:19 --> 0:43:26
concepts, but the thing that cries out to me, Thomas, first of all, I would like to
348
0:43:26 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] been for a long time. I am really shocked about what happened. I was
349
0:43:32 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]ill shocked now. Not quite about the same things, but about
350
0:43:38 --> 0:43:44
the totality of the nonsense that is being put about. It does seem to me that you said
351
0:43:44 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] attack on human beings ever. I think you did. It does seem to me
352
0:43:51 --> 0:43:58
that progress has not served as well, technological progress, because more or less in the birthplace
353
0:43:58 --> 0:44:05
of technology, we have fallen at the first hurdle. We cannot regulate stuff like computers.
354
0:44:07 --> 0:44:12
So if we do not know how the damn computers work, how on earth are we going to regulate
355
0:44:12 --> 0:44:17
them? That means that humanity is going to be constantly in peril. I just wonder whether
356
0:44:17 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] thought of that. Also, I wanted to ask you about, so I do think that one of the
357
0:44:23 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] four years was rampant psychological torture. It needs to be called
358
0:44:29 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ockholm syndrome. So yes, PCR test pandemic, whatever
359
0:44:37 --> 0:44:44
you want to call it. There was no pandemic in my opinion. In addition to that, these
360
0:44:44 --> 0:44:50
quite inappropriate shots, so-called vaccinations, which were not vaccinations, they said they
361
0:44:50 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ive. It turns out that they never tested for safety and they never
362
0:44:54 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]ed for efficacy. So crazy. We knew that all along, of course. I am just shocked about
363
0:45:01 --> 0:45:08
the mess that we are in. I really think that people think that blindly that they must support
364
0:45:08 --> 0:45:14
computers, because it is progress. But if we cannot manage them, if we cannot manage
365
0:45:14 --> 0:45:20
computers, we need to get rid of them. We need to get rid of them. No matter all the
366
0:45:20 --> 0:45:25
things that we think are good about computers, like learning for ourselves about anything
367
0:45:25 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] to bin that if the dangers are greater than the benefits.
368
0:45:31 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] thought about that, Thomas? If you haven't, it doesn't
369
0:45:34 --> 0:45:38
matter. We can talk about other things.
370
0:45:38 --> 0:45:45
Yes, of course, I fully agree. I mean, this hype about artificial intelligence, I mean,
371
0:45:46 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]s say who is seeking for artificial intelligence? Of course, the ones who have
372
0:45:51 --> 0:45:57
no natural intelligence. And we saw during, we realized during the last four years that
373
0:45:57 --> 0:46:04
the natural intelligence is dying out. I think one of our main problems nowadays is this
374
0:46:05 --> 0:46:12
over-specialization. I mean, I said, if I told an infectious disease, hey, look, look
375
0:46:14 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction] does not prove an infection. Then he answered, oh, I don't
376
0:46:20 --> 0:46:27
know anything about PCR. Ask the PCR guy. And then I tell the PCR guy, hey, this test
377
0:46:28 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ion. He said, oh, I don't understand anything about infection.
378
0:46:32 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ious disease. This is the problem. I think the guys like you, Stephen, and like
379
0:46:37 --> 0:46:44
me, with a broad education, broad experience, who could still see the forest, we are dying
380
0:46:45 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction] a specialist for every leaf, any leaflet of
381
0:46:53 --> 0:47:00
every tree. But the guys who see the forest are dying out. And we see it in all society.
382
0:47:00 --> 0:47:07
It's the same with this diamond nonsense scam. CO2 is a poison. Come on. CO2 is the elixir
383
0:47:08 --> 0:47:15
of life. Decarbonization is dehumanization. It's a death cult. It's amazing how they
384
0:47:18 --> 0:47:25
manage to brainwash the public with this. I like the allegory of Plato's cave. I always
385
0:47:26 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]e are sitting in Plato's cave and on the walls, they are
386
0:47:32 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ed shadows of the symbols. But there is a huge flat screen. And our legacy
387
0:47:39 --> 0:47:46
media, our project, virtual realities on this flat screen, about 9-11 CO2 scam, pandemic
388
0:47:48 --> 0:47:55
scam. Of course, there was no pandemic. It is a testing pandemic. The test makes the
389
0:47:56 --> 0:48:00
appearance that there is a pandemic. But I fully agree. There was no pandemic, of course.
390
0:48:00 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ato's cave. And it is our duty to show the people,
391
0:48:09 --> 0:48:14
hey, there is the exit. There is the exit. You can leave this cave outside. The sun is
392
0:48:14 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]e, kind people, nice people. Leave this damn Plato's
393
0:48:21 --> 0:48:27
cave with these virtual realities. Because if we live in these virtual realities, we
394
0:48:28 --> 0:48:33
have to collide with reality once. And this might even be the end of our species with
395
0:48:33 --> 0:48:36
atomic war or whatever.
396
0:48:36 --> 0:48:41
Absolutely. We look as though we are well on the way after, what is it, like 50 years
397
0:48:41 --> 0:48:47
of the kind of technology that we are talking about. And it is only 100 years ago or so
398
0:48:47 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction] came to the world. And people think it has always been here.
399
0:48:54 --> 0:48:58
And they need to be educated. But the other thing is we have got mind control to contend
400
0:48:58 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]off talk to us. We have had him talk to us before. And he
401
0:49:03 --> 0:49:08
was talking about mind control. And it seemed to me while he was talking, and I think I
402
0:49:08 --> 0:49:14
said it, I meant to say it anyway, that if this level of mind control has gone on, then
403
0:49:14 --> 0:49:21
to solve the problems that we face, we need to first of all deal with the mind control.
404
0:49:21 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction], I agree with you, Thomas. I previously said what you said about over
405
0:49:27 --> 0:49:34
specialisation. It is extremely dangerous to have people who are super specialised,
406
0:49:34 --> 0:49:40
who don't have any idea about the whole which they are dealing with. So in other words,
407
0:49:40 --> 0:49:47
the hyper specialisation in medicine was always going to create a tyranny. Now, if you want
408
0:49:48 --> 0:49:54
to commit a crime, you give people bits of the crime to do, but you don't tell them about
409
0:49:54 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] give them a little bit of it. So do you understand what it is?
410
0:49:59 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ly what has happened. So they have encouraged super specialisation. They
411
0:50:05 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] common sense. Everything has to be worked out so that the computer can
412
0:50:11 --> 0:50:18
sort it out, so you can apply for your passport online. It is all about convenience, allegedly,
413
0:50:19 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]e are losing their freedom by doing everything online and they
414
0:50:25 --> 0:50:30
don't realise it. It is about time that they understood this and we need to explain it,
415
0:50:30 --> 0:50:34
but I don't know what we do about the mind control.
416
0:50:34 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] is this. I can explain the climate scan or the Covid scan
417
0:50:40 --> 0:50:46
for an hour and then I usually get the answer. Yeah, well, it sounds somewhat reasonable,
418
0:50:46 --> 0:50:53
but I refuse to believe it. I refuse to believe that such evil people do exist. This is also
419
0:50:54 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction] to educate them also about the power structure of society. What
420
0:51:01 --> 0:51:08
I call psychopaths or severe malignant narcissists. Nowadays, we are at the height of the age
421
0:51:09 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]arted in the 1970s or so. Of course, at the height of narcissism,
422
0:51:17 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction] all power positions are occupied by severe narcissists. Many of them are not malignant,
423
0:51:25 --> 0:51:31
they are okay, but they are ignorant, arrogant. They have no slightest idea what they are
424
0:51:31 --> 0:51:36
talking about, but at the same time they think they are geniuses. And this, of course, arrogance,
425
0:51:36 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ible mixture that someday had to blow up in our faces.
426
0:51:44 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]e above them, these are the real psychopaths, the multi-billionaires and the
427
0:51:48 --> 0:51:54
multi-trillionaires behind them. The multi-trillionaires are not even public. And
428
0:51:54 --> 0:52:02
of course, they can manipulate them easily. Look at our politicians. These are the most stupid
429
0:52:03 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e I've ever seen. It's incredible. It's incredible. If you look at Boris Johnson,
430
0:52:12 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e, he looks like a clown. It's insane. It's completely insane.
431
0:52:18 --> 0:52:22
He is a clown, Charles. He is a clown.
432
0:52:23 --> 0:52:25
Yeah, sure. Yeah.
433
0:52:26 --> 0:52:30
The narcissism which you talk about, I've also thought about that and I've also spoken,
434
0:52:30 --> 0:52:35
but it's hard to keep all these things in your head. So thank you for reminding me about
435
0:52:35 --> 0:52:41
narcissism. Yeah. And that is encouraged by mobile phones and social media. So the twin
436
0:52:41 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]ions of mobile phones and social media, these are really deadly addictions. If they were
437
0:52:47 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]ions to anything else, they would grab attention worldwide. But oh no, we're talking
438
0:52:53 --> 0:52:57
about CO2, which they don't seem to understand. Life needs.
439
0:53:00 --> 0:53:06
It's just absolutely crazy. And to us, it's like we're constantly being gaslighted.
440
0:53:07 --> 0:53:15
You know, so I recognize myself in your words, Thomas. We've never met. You're Swiss and I'm
441
0:53:15 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction] recognize myself in your disbelief of what's unfolding before us and this
442
0:53:24 --> 0:53:31
unbelievable lack of wisdom. Yes. Gaslighting, of course, is the main technique
443
0:53:31 --> 0:53:39
that the psychopaths use to manipulate us. If you explain this to the public, they come out,
444
0:53:39 --> 0:53:47
you're a crazy conspiracy theorist. Why? Why? They present their agenda on their home
445
0:53:47 --> 0:53:52
pages. On the home page of the UN, you can read agenda 23. On the home page of the World Economic
446
0:53:52 --> 0:53:59
Forum, you can read the great reset. On the home page of the WHO, you can read one half.
447
0:53:59 --> 0:54:06
This all is basically the same. And in the end, it's fascism. This is what we also have to realize.
448
0:54:06 --> 0:54:11
I mean, this is this merger. What is the definition of fascism? It's the merger of
449
0:54:11 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]ly what we see nowadays. But of course, if they call it
450
0:54:17 --> 0:54:24
public-private partnership, this simply sounds better than fascism. They say it's fascism under
451
0:54:24 --> 0:54:33
the term public-private partnership. It's fascism. We have to stand up against fascism. They call us
452
0:54:34 --> 0:54:40
Nazis, neo-Nazis. But in reality, of course, everything is topsy turvy. They are the fascists.
453
0:54:40 --> 0:54:46
This is important. In the end, we must realize public-private partnership is fascism.
454
0:54:47 --> 0:54:54
Yes, exactly. This alone is enough. Thomas, that's brilliant. So, yeah, public-private
455
0:54:54 --> 0:55:00
partnership. So anybody looking at that might be encouraged to think, and they do think, I think,
456
0:55:00 --> 0:55:05
that you've got the best of all possible worlds, you know. You've got all the best of the public
457
0:55:05 --> 0:55:13
bit and the private bit. And you get a partnership of the two. And as you say, it's actually the
458
0:55:13 --> 0:55:20
definition of fascism and totalitarianism. And so as far as I can see, this pandemic,
459
0:55:20 --> 0:55:27
which was not a pandemic, was the Trojan horse. And I think it's the main Trojan horse because it
460
0:55:27 --> 0:55:34
induces fear. It was a Trojan horse for totalitarianism. The other Trojan horses are,
461
0:55:34 --> 0:55:39
well, the climate change agenda and all that nonsense. And then the wars around the world,
462
0:55:39 --> 0:55:47
which make no sense, you know, like Iraq didn't make any sense. You know, well, yeah. And then,
463
0:55:47 --> 0:55:55
of course, Ukraine. But the Israel war, it doesn't make any sense, except it seems to certain people
464
0:55:55 --> 0:56:03
in the USA and in the UK, I have to say. So I think that some, but there's one thing that I think
465
0:56:03 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]e at the moment, if we can only get the message out. So they've used
466
0:56:10 --> 0:56:17
propaganda on us, constantly repeating slogans. I think we need to have a slogan about there not
467
0:56:17 --> 0:56:25
being a pandemic. There was no pandemic. There was no disease COVID-19, in my opinion,
468
0:56:25 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]or in the world should have known and you did know Thomas,
469
0:56:31 --> 0:56:39
and so did I. But yeah, I was I was disbelieving. I knew straight away that it was a fraud.
470
0:56:40 --> 0:56:47
I don't know why, but I just knew. And any doctor in the world should have known that you do not
471
0:56:47 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] Even so previously, I think I'm right in saying,
472
0:56:54 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]esses were diagnosed with a test. It was always by clinical medicine.
473
0:57:02 --> 0:57:09
Well, guess what? They had a fraudulent test. But as you've explained that very well, but one thing
474
0:57:09 --> 0:57:14
you didn't mention, and I think it should be mentioned is that in my opinion, there was no
475
0:57:14 --> 0:57:21
COVID-19. It was improperly diagnosed. There wasn't a single symptom which was pathognomonic
476
0:57:21 --> 0:57:27
for COVID-19. And therefore it should not have been you should not have been tested for COVID-19.
477
0:57:27 --> 0:57:35
And that as far as I know, there are no tests. We didn't diagnose so called viral illnesses with a
478
0:57:35 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction] So flu, for example, no, you wouldn't or a cold, the common cold. No, you wouldn't. You
479
0:57:41 --> 0:57:47
didn't need a test. There were symptoms. And but there were no symptoms in COVID-19,
480
0:57:47 --> 0:57:52
which were pathognomonic for COVID-19. And I'm amazed that so many doctors have missed that.
481
0:57:54 --> 0:58:02
I fully agree. I mean, I'm somewhat careful. I'm not 100% sure. So I'm careful. I said,
482
0:58:02 --> 0:58:10
I'm not sure whether it was by 95, 99 or 100% testing pandemic. But you're right. I mean,
483
0:58:10 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction] never seen any proof that the virus called SARS-CoV-2 produces a disease called COVID-19.
484
0:58:20 --> 0:58:29
And I realized also at the very beginning, I mean, that if you what were the risk factors for COVID,
485
0:58:29 --> 0:58:36
it's where the risk factors to die. And what was the mean age of the people who died from COVID?
486
0:58:37 --> 0:58:46
It was the mean age to die. So it's really possible that 100%, 100%, every case was just
487
0:58:47 --> 0:58:53
mislabelled, mislabelling of all the diagnosis, mainly the flu as the COVID. I fully agree.
488
0:58:53 --> 0:58:58
But there's something else, Thomas, which I think is really important. I'd love to know your answer
489
0:58:58 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So we agree, you and I agree that there was no pandemic. Now, and I say there's no
490
0:59:05 --> 0:59:11
COVID-19 even. But I didn't mean that I'm certain that there's no virus. I do think there's
491
0:59:11 --> 0:59:16
possibility that there are no such thing as viruses. But I don't think it's very helpful at
492
0:59:16 --> 0:59:24
the moment to go into that. But sorry, what was it? What did I just say then? I've done the
493
0:59:24 --> 0:59:29
parenthesis and forgotten what I was going to say. So anyway, what I wanted to say was this,
494
0:59:29 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]ion thing. I think that's a false narrative to encourage people to play into the
495
0:59:36 --> 0:59:44
narrative. The other thing that's really important, I think, is the if there was no pandemic this time,
496
0:59:44 --> 0:59:51
has there ever been a pandemic? Will there ever be a pandemic in the future? I think not. Because I
497
0:59:51 --> 0:59:58
remembered in 2020, that when we were doing medical school, we were told by a single professor
498
0:59:59 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction] So in other words, he was suggesting, I remember asking him,
499
1:00:06 --> 1:00:14
does that mean you can't have a pandemic? And he said, you may be right. So that's extremely
500
1:00:14 --> 1:00:19
important. So they can't frighten us in the future. They shouldn't be able to frighten us in the
501
1:00:19 --> 1:00:26
future. Because our, we should say, Thomas, in my opinion, there is no possibility of a pandemic in
502
1:00:26 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]op fearing this damned pandemic, because they are going to bring it up in the
503
1:00:30 --> 1:00:37
future, because that's one of their main Trojan horses for totalitarianism. I agree. I mean,
504
1:00:37 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]and under a pandemic, the spreading of a deadly
505
1:00:45 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]e was never told that in 2009, the WHO changed the
506
1:00:53 --> 1:01:00
definition of a pandemic by taking out the dangers of the causative germs. So since then,
507
1:01:00 --> 1:01:06
they can declare any seasonal flu or cold wave that's going around the globe a pandemic.
508
1:01:06 --> 1:01:14
Nowadays, they call it PHEIC, Public Health Emergency of Concern. And if you pronounce it,
509
1:01:15 --> 1:01:21
fake, fake. I mean, they are laughing in our faces, guys. They are laughing in our faces.
510
1:01:22 --> 1:01:29
They will produce one fake pandemic after the other. I fully agree, Stephen.
511
1:01:29 --> 1:01:30
David, that's 20 minutes now.
512
1:01:31 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction] point. So in my opinion, Thomas, we agree that the WHO should go. But I say it's
513
1:01:40 --> 1:01:48
not because the WHO is evil, which it is, and Tedros in particular, but all the others for keeping
514
1:01:48 --> 1:01:54
quiet. It's because we don't damn well need them. The WHO because pandemics cannot occur.
515
1:01:54 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction] the whole reason for the last four years. And I think that's what we should push on.
516
1:02:03 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction] forgotten. As you're perfectly right, there can never be a pandemic,
517
1:02:08 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]e, of Ebola. Why? Because we are getting that sick or even dead so rapidly
518
1:02:16 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]s before. So it cannot spread. Only a comparatively harmless
519
1:02:24 --> 1:02:30
germ can spread globally. Yes, you are perfectly right. In that sense, there cannot really be a
520
1:02:30 --> 1:02:36
pandemic of a deadly germ. Yeah, you are absolutely right. And the same professor I mentioned,
521
1:02:36 --> 1:02:42
Thomas, he talked about the deadly virus kills its host. Therefore, there can't be a pandemic.
522
1:02:42 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ion to him. He was emphasizing the interplay, the very important interplay between
523
1:02:49 --> 1:02:55
transmissibility and virulence. So we had the ridiculous situation in the UK that they were
524
1:02:55 --> 1:03:02
gearing up, the government of the UK, outrageously were gearing up to cancel the second Christmas in
525
1:03:02 --> 1:03:10
the row in 2021. And they were talking about the Alpha variant. And Chris Witte, the chief medical
526
1:03:10 --> 1:03:19
officer of England, no less, a complete idiot, but very evil as well. He was talking about the
527
1:03:19 --> 1:03:24
massive transmissibility of the Alpha variant. And I was thinking, well, hang on a minute,
528
1:03:24 --> 1:03:30
that doesn't mean anything if you don't mention the virulence. And, you know, any medical doctor
529
1:03:30 --> 1:03:36
talking about transmissibility, not mentioning the virulence is a liar. Okay, let's go.
530
1:03:37 --> 1:03:43
And then this notion of a second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth wave, of course, this is nonsense as
531
1:03:43 --> 1:03:52
well. These are seasonal viruses. There was SARS-CoV-219, if it was, if it was, and then there
532
1:03:52 --> 1:04:00
comes 2021, 2022. And we are always at least partially immune against the new variants so that
533
1:04:00 --> 1:04:06
we do not die, so that we only get the cold and they are not dangerous. We do not talk about the
534
1:04:06 --> 1:04:15
300,000th flu wave since Homo sapiens, if there is really Homo sapiens, I doubt it,
535
1:04:16 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]t. It is also an absurdity, a second, third, fourth,
536
1:04:24 --> 1:04:34
even Fauci himself proved that in the Spanish flu, most people died from bacterial pneumonia.
537
1:04:34 --> 1:04:42
Fauci himself, there is a paper published in 2007 or so by Fauci et al. Yeah, highly likely
538
1:04:42 --> 1:04:49
there was never such a pandemic. Thank you, that was brilliant from you. The answers were
539
1:04:49 --> 1:04:54
brilliant as well. Thank you so much. And Stephen, Chris Whitty reminds me he went to
540
1:04:54 --> 1:04:59
university to become a witch, but he only got halfway through. You can use that.
541
1:05:01 --> 1:05:07
He went to university to become a what? A witch. A witch. A witch. Oh, right. Only got halfway
542
1:05:07 --> 1:05:15
through. Very good. Okay, all right. On we go to the land of Ireland, Gerry. Thanks, Stephen.
543
1:05:16 --> 1:05:25
Gerry, you're muted. There we go. I'm not now. Thomas, I can categorically state that that was a
544
1:05:25 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]ically intelligent, a really fantastic, intelligently held handle on the COVID pathogenicity
545
1:05:36 --> 1:05:45
hoax. And the reason I can say that with absolute confidence is that my view is that the pandemic
546
1:05:45 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] you spoke, like Stephen, were words that could have come out of my Irish
547
1:05:55 --> 1:06:04
mouth rather than out of your European mouth. I'm a GP from Ireland who, I'm 12 years older than you,
548
1:06:04 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] same thought formation in March of 20. I saw the red flags
549
1:06:16 --> 1:06:21
and I thought there's absolutely no way are those people dying of respiratory failure.
550
1:06:21 --> 1:06:31
Being a GP, I would claim a seniority in a sense that I was on the ground. I was watching the
551
1:06:31 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]e dying and I knew there was no pathogen in my community that could count. There was nobody
552
1:06:37 --> 1:06:46
any sicker than there was the previous 40 years of my winter flu experience. And as I say, the
553
1:06:46 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] that I could recognise that there was no pathogen there. But I also saw that the authorities,
554
1:06:54 --> 1:07:01
the ICGP, the Department of Health were not contradicting the people being shot by a sniper's
555
1:07:01 --> 1:07:09
bullet in Wuhan. There's no way was that a respiratory failure, death. And that was the red flag.
556
1:07:12 --> 1:07:17
As I said, I'd like to compliment you on thinking like I do. It makes you very, very lucky.
557
1:07:18 --> 1:07:24
But what I'd like to ask about, and this is the fantastic thing, I never had the privilege of
558
1:07:24 --> 1:07:30
being committed to a mental hospital. Now, as a GP, I have committed quite a number of people
559
1:07:30 --> 1:07:37
to mental hospitals. And what we would refer to them as a pink forms, we put them in on pink forms.
560
1:07:38 --> 1:07:45
And the remarkable thing, and the thing I want to question about is, you'd be very, very slow,
561
1:07:45 --> 1:07:52
you'd be reticent to actually sign that form, because you really did. It was a horrendous thing
562
1:07:52 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]s, you were very, very convinced that the patient was a danger to
563
1:07:57 --> 1:08:05
themselves or a danger to others. How the hell did they manage to make out that you were a
564
1:08:05 --> 1:08:11
danger to yourself, or that you were a danger to others, or that you were in a manic state,
565
1:08:12 --> 1:08:16
you were a man, you just explained that to me how they came up with that diagnosis.
566
1:08:19 --> 1:08:26
Yeah, well, I think my case explains nicely what's going on. I mean, I guess we all agree that
567
1:08:26 --> 1:08:33
the society was never divided in an amount we see now. And this doesn't happen by accident,
568
1:08:33 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]s means that a huge part of the society is living in a context of delusion,
569
1:08:39 --> 1:08:45
in a cult, in a sect. And of course, everybody says, I am the realist, you, you are the deluded,
570
1:08:45 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction] And in this situation, I always say,
571
1:08:52 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]ion ourselves. And of course, I did this 100 times
572
1:08:57 --> 1:09:02
before I went public, am I absolutely sure that I'm the realist and not the deluded?
573
1:09:02 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]ion we can only answer by looking at the reality as soberly as possible. So this
574
1:09:11 --> 1:09:17
is this was my duty, I just presented the reality as I saw it to the public, so that they could
575
1:09:17 --> 1:09:25
decide who is here the insane and who is not. Insanity means you do not live in the reality,
576
1:09:25 --> 1:09:30
you live in a virtual reality. This is about the definition of insanity. So of course,
577
1:09:30 --> 1:09:36
the corona insane declared me to be the corona insane. And of course, the psychiatrist was also
578
1:09:36 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]etely brainwashed. So he had to invent the diagnosis. And of course, I tweeted maybe
579
1:09:42 --> 1:09:49
until one o'clock in the morning. But this was not mania. I mean, I maybe I was a somewhat hyperactive
580
1:09:49 --> 1:09:56
enlightener, or however you want to call it. But of course, I had this information, I had the urge
581
1:09:56 --> 1:10:02
to spread this information, this had to go out. I mean, this was this was endangering the whole
582
1:10:02 --> 1:10:07
society, the livelihoods and even the lives of many people. So of course, I felt the urge
583
1:10:07 --> 1:10:15
to spread this information. And this, this, he this corona insane psychiatrist thought
584
1:10:15 --> 1:10:21
would be a symptom of mania. I mean, for example, if I was at mania, I always worked, I worked before
585
1:10:21 --> 1:10:26
this, I worked from the day after I was released. If you really have mania, you cannot work as a
586
1:10:26 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]or. And then you will lose all patients very, very rapidly. It's, it's fully I just realized the
587
1:10:35 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ion there. Because in March of 21, I was suspended from the Irish
588
1:10:41 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]er, because I was a danger to my patients. So as I say, I just contradicted myself
589
1:10:49 --> 1:10:55
in the sense that I was deemed a danger to my patients. And that was done with two days notice
590
1:10:55 --> 1:10:59
being brought before the Medical Council, and two days notice being brought before the High Court.
591
1:10:59 --> 1:11:06
So yes, I can well see how we would be seen as a danger. There's another point that I did, again,
592
1:11:06 --> 1:11:13
I'd like to go back on Stephen's idea, you know, this concept of no virus, I think that's a huge,
593
1:11:14 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]art going down. We sure as hell don't need that. You know,
594
1:11:20 --> 1:11:25
whether there's a virus or whether there isn't a virus, there was a pathogenic hoax. The pathogenicity
595
1:11:25 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]ence through propaganda. And then proven as far as they're
596
1:11:32 --> 1:11:39
concerned, by a PCR test, it was 95% wrong. So you know, I think that's important. We've got to keep
597
1:11:39 --> 1:11:47
that in mind. The other thing is, you know, I'd like to point out those pregnancy tests that you're
598
1:11:47 --> 1:11:55
doing on the men, those as a GP, I've done pregnancy tests on men. That sounds crazy.
599
1:11:55 --> 1:11:59
And maybe that's a good reason why I should be committed to a mental hospital. But the fact of
600
1:11:59 --> 1:12:05
the matter is, in certain testicular cancers, offhand, I think it's a seminoma, you actually
601
1:12:05 --> 1:12:13
get HCG being produced by the tumor. So it's oftentimes not a bad idea to do a pregnancy test
602
1:12:13 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]icles before you even send them off. Because by the
603
1:12:17 --> 1:12:22
time they get to the hospital, you look awful smart if you've already diagnosed what the
604
1:12:22 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]ology of the tumor is going to be. So as I say, just bear in mind, any one of those 100 men
605
1:12:29 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction] been a seminoma. That's a matter of interest.
606
1:12:35 --> 1:12:38
I agree. Intelligent comment. Very intelligent comment.
607
1:12:40 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction] for future reference. We're talking about the gain of function. JJ Cooey,
608
1:12:48 --> 1:12:54
I don't know if you actually watch JJ's broadcast meetings here. But JJ, again,
609
1:12:54 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]ion. Again, I think the gain of function can be a bit of a
610
1:12:58 --> 1:13:02
red herring. And it's important that we don't go down that road on Julie. By the same token,
611
1:13:02 --> 1:13:07
there's little doubt as far as I'm concerned that 19 nucleotides were induced into the furin
612
1:13:07 --> 1:13:16
cleavage site of the spike protein. And the function of this was to increase infectivity,
613
1:13:17 --> 1:13:22
transmissibility. And it was during the development, it was actually patented in 2016.
614
1:13:22 --> 1:13:28
And it was during the development of the coronavirus to actually endeavor to get
615
1:13:28 --> 1:13:37
better into the cell for cancer therapeutics. I could well believe how they would increase
616
1:13:37 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ability of the virus without increasing the virulence,
617
1:13:44 --> 1:13:48
because you don't know whether your family are going to get it or not. So I would go along
618
1:13:48 --> 1:13:54
with the idea that some of these viruses were in fact introduced into key sites like New York and
619
1:13:54 --> 1:14:00
that. I don't think they ever got to Selbridge, where I live in Ireland. So what I'm saying is,
620
1:14:02 --> 1:14:07
I think we should keep our mind open to the possibility that there was again function
621
1:14:07 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]ivity. OK, Charles, I've just about finished.
622
1:14:15 --> 1:14:20
OK, very good. I agree. I think I'll leave it at that.
623
1:14:21 --> 1:14:27
Maybe in some hotspot they released something or they turned on five gene specials.
624
1:14:29 --> 1:14:37
Or I don't know. I think so. I think most severe cases we can explain by
625
1:14:38 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]reatment. I mean, we always saw patients with white lungs
626
1:14:49 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]s. Usually they had bacterial pneumonia that we diagnosed too late
627
1:14:55 --> 1:15:02
with multi-organ failure and ARDS and all that stuff. Now imagine what they told the people.
628
1:15:02 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]e, do not go to your GP when you have Covid. Go to your GP when you're healthy
629
1:15:09 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]eria, pneumonia were diagnosed too late. Absolutely. This is probably
630
1:15:18 --> 1:15:25
the main reason for many, at least of the severe cases that were then labeled as Covid in the ICU.
631
1:15:26 --> 1:15:32
We were told not to examine our patients. We were, as GPs, we were told not to bring the patients
632
1:15:32 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ancing. We were told I refuse to do that.
633
1:15:40 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction] amazing for me. This was the most amazing for me to see how our fellow doctors
634
1:15:47 --> 1:15:52
shit their pants because of this alleged killer virus. I mean, if there really was a pandemic of
635
1:15:52 --> 1:15:58
the killer virus, who would treat the patients? Certainly not the doctors. These cowards would
636
1:15:58 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] I was saying at that stage that I would, I was screaming at the
637
1:16:05 --> 1:16:12
ICGP, my academic body, to actually do post mortems on all patients. I'd be very, very happy to see
638
1:16:12 --> 1:16:18
if there were these little blood clots in the alveolar capillaries and that. I would be very,
639
1:16:18 --> 1:16:23
very happy at that. And I was saying, it was too dangerous. And I was saying to my patients,
640
1:16:23 --> 1:16:27
I will open the patients without wearing a mask for post mortem.
641
1:16:27 --> 1:16:29
Okay, come on. We've got to go on. We've got to go on. Come on.
642
1:16:30 --> 1:16:32
Okay. Okay. I finished.
643
1:16:32 --> 1:16:40
Come on. Thank you. Well done. Well done. One of the issues that, that, you know,
644
1:16:41 --> 1:16:47
Thomas, we'll go through the questions, but there is this question, hey, let's have the debate.
645
1:16:47 --> 1:16:52
Thomas, you properly say I'm willing to be questioned on anything. On the other hand,
646
1:16:52 --> 1:16:57
there are some things, imagine having a debate on whether God exists, you know,
647
1:16:57 --> 1:17:03
you know, and, and that, that whole conversation and the same issue. And there's the question of
648
1:17:03 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]ion, or is it useful? It's a wonderful question of opinion. And one of the mistakes that
649
1:17:08 --> 1:17:16
I think I see happen, that's why we have rules of debate and it's good. The repetition is important.
650
1:17:16 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction] this conversation here in these meetings. Some people think it's tiresome,
651
1:17:22 --> 1:17:27
but you don't have to keep saying the same thing. You know, you put, put an idea out there and people
652
1:17:28 --> 1:17:36
think about it. However, however, as I said at the intro, there are [privacy contact redaction] battle lines
653
1:17:37 --> 1:17:42
in this world war that we're in Thomas, you touched on it. We have a spiritual war as well.
654
1:17:43 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]ion of virus or no virus. And those who have a whole
655
1:17:51 --> 1:17:55
firm beliefs won't be convinced one way or the other. And in the meantime, we're being killed
656
1:17:55 --> 1:18:01
left, right and center. It's like, and the whole question of gain of function. It's like discussing
657
1:18:01 --> 1:18:08
the quality of the timber on the deck chairs of the Titanic while the, while the ship's going down.
658
1:18:08 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]ion for each of us, you know, to contemplate Rose.
659
1:18:15 --> 1:18:23
Hey Thomas, I want to take a step back and give you a little history. Can you hear me?
660
1:18:23 --> 1:18:28
Someone's got a lot of background noise that you. I'm sorry. It's me. Yeah. Let me move to a different
661
1:18:28 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]ory in the U S regarding the primary care positions,
662
1:18:36 --> 1:18:42
because number one, this was intentional to remove the primary care positions and go to
663
1:18:42 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] specialties. So this has been going on a very long time in the U S intentionally. And I posted
664
1:18:51 --> 1:19:02
in the chat, my blog regarding the analogy of the blind Indian parable. So I think we have to be
665
1:19:02 --> 1:19:09
very careful in our language that there was an illness and to say that there wasn't COVID.
666
1:19:10 --> 1:19:17
I think the problem is, is it was labeled as a respiratory virus and not a desaturation problem.
667
1:19:17 --> 1:19:24
Now, whether or not it was specifically from the spike proteins, radiation, whatever, it could have
668
1:19:24 --> 1:19:32
been a combination of both, but there were people with severe desaturation issues hitting the
669
1:19:32 --> 1:19:39
hospitals. So we can't discount that. So I think we have to be very careful on how we're addressing
670
1:19:39 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ion to you, Thomas is, I did a deep dive because I said, is there a common
671
1:19:47 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ing the multiple organs? And I jumped on nitric oxide. Some people
672
1:19:54 --> 1:20:00
like to call it nitric oxide, nitric oxide. And in doing my deep dive, I came across the PA in
673
1:20:00 --> 1:20:11
Colorado who is giving the patients L-Arginine in the ER and then inhaling nitric oxide with the ARDS.
674
1:20:11 --> 1:20:16
They were getting better within 24 hours. And he said, Rose, are you aware of the double blind
675
1:20:16 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]itute in Italy, where with a placebo giving L-Arginine,
676
1:20:25 --> 1:20:29
the patients were getting better and decreasing hospitalization by over 50%.
677
1:20:31 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ion to you is, how come there isn't more focus on the nitric oxide angle,
678
1:20:37 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ing whatever, if you want to say it's the spike protein specifically,
679
1:20:42 --> 1:20:48
spike protein with 5G radiation, whatever. Are you seeing any emphasis on this because there
680
1:20:48 --> 1:20:57
was so much legitimacy to it with treatment? Well, there was neglect of any treatment,
681
1:20:57 --> 1:21:03
as you know. I mean, we were told this is an absolutely new disease. This virus is an alien,
682
1:21:04 --> 1:21:10
which was not true. If it was there, it was a member of the well-known coronavirus family.
683
1:21:10 --> 1:21:16
So we knew immediately it is seasonal, usually causes a self-limiting disease.
684
1:21:17 --> 1:21:23
There is cross-immunity against it, all this stuff. Of course, this is one of the possibilities,
685
1:21:23 --> 1:21:31
how you could treat these seriously ill patients from whatever was the causative germ. I agree.
686
1:21:32 --> 1:21:40
But is there any focus now that we know? Now we do not see serious cases. There are no more
687
1:21:40 --> 1:21:46
serious cases of whatever. No more. But we're not reviewing it. And again,
688
1:21:46 --> 1:21:48
I'm looking at, you know, they're going to hit us with something else.
689
1:21:49 --> 1:21:55
So how come we're not focusing on that mechanism for what they hit us next with?
690
1:22:00 --> 1:22:08
In every hospital, we should do a review of the history of all patients who were severely sick
691
1:22:08 --> 1:22:13
and who were killed. We should do a review of all these with the knowledge,
692
1:22:15 --> 1:22:20
if our knowledge, of course, and we would find a lot of things. It's hard to...
693
1:22:20 --> 1:22:26
I think that needs to be on a radar. And I'm dumbfounded that nobody's created the invention
694
1:22:26 --> 1:22:34
for measuring NO. I'm like, you know, we measure oxygen, we measure carbon dioxide,
695
1:22:34 --> 1:22:37
but nobody's come up with a good test for measuring nitric oxide.
696
1:22:40 --> 1:22:40
This is true.
697
1:22:42 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]s, I wanted to sort that out at you because there were so much immense,
698
1:22:48 --> 1:22:54
you know, tangible positive with that. So anyways, it's on your radar. Thank you.
699
1:22:54 --> 1:22:57
Sorry. Sorry. Nitrous oxide is laughing gas.
700
1:22:57 --> 1:23:02
Nitrous oxide is laughing gas.
701
1:23:03 --> 1:23:05
Nitric, Gary, nitric.
702
1:23:07 --> 1:23:09
I think she's talking about nitrous oxide.
703
1:23:09 --> 1:23:10
No, nitric oxide.
704
1:23:13 --> 1:23:15
It's a very subtle answer and we're known for this.
705
1:23:16 --> 1:23:18
Yes. So there is a logic to it.
706
1:23:20 --> 1:23:20
Okay.
707
1:23:20 --> 1:23:26
Well, she used both actually, Charles. So Rose used both nitrous oxide and nitric oxide.
708
1:23:26 --> 1:23:28
So that wasn't helpful.
709
1:23:28 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] one. Yeah.
710
1:23:29 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]ually you don't measure for things. If you're a medical doctor,
711
1:23:32 --> 1:23:38
you don't measure for things like PO2 and all that nonsense. But anyway, that's taken over as
712
1:23:38 --> 1:23:44
well. You look at the patient and you look to see whether the patient is cyanose centrally or otherwise.
713
1:23:46 --> 1:23:48
Okay. Thank you. Rose, Janet.
714
1:23:50 --> 1:23:56
Oh, thank you. I've got two questions. The first one is, you mentioned that the
715
1:23:57 --> 1:24:02
condition of you getting out of the hospital was to agree to take psychotropic drugs under
716
1:24:02 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]ugs and how did that affect you? And how did you manage
717
1:24:08 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]opped? The second question is, I've spoken to some people who have tested
718
1:24:16 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction] when suffering from an upper respiratory tract infection and found it
719
1:24:21 --> 1:24:28
positive. Then when they recover, the PCR then becomes negative. And I'm just wondering how that
720
1:24:28 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]ained. Yeah. Well, of course I know the half life of this drug and they said, so I took,
721
1:24:40 --> 1:24:46
I can, I can state it here. I mean, I took two tablets the day before they checked my blood.
722
1:24:47 --> 1:24:55
But this was enough that my liver, my liver didn't like this Abilify. This was great. So I
723
1:24:55 --> 1:25:02
checked my liver enzymes after three weeks or so. They went up so I could stop it. And at the same
724
1:25:02 --> 1:25:10
time, I could free myself from this state psychiatrist control and change to a private
725
1:25:10 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] because of course the health authorities, they wanted that I see a psychiatrist
726
1:25:17 --> 1:25:24
once per month who had to report to the health authorities if I'm mentally able to treat patients.
727
1:25:25 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]ed for about a year and then I could end this as well. And legally I couldn't do
728
1:25:30 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] to get back my weapon. My alleged arm was my weapon. I got in
729
1:25:40 --> 1:25:46
1980 when I entered Swiss military service. And when I left Swiss military service as a
730
1:25:46 --> 1:25:51
prime lieutenant 15 years ago, I stored it at home. This is usual and legal in Switzerland
731
1:25:51 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]ion. And they found this weapon at home, but this, I could not get back this weapon.
732
1:25:57 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] me about 15,000 Swiss francs for lawyers, for new psychiatric reports and so on and so forth.
733
1:26:07 --> 1:26:14
There's absolutely no chance to become right because of course the prosecutors and the
734
1:26:15 --> 1:26:23
judges are brainwashed as well. So they think I'm insane, of course. And this PCR test,
735
1:26:24 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] with the time, it becomes negative again. I didn't understand the second question.
736
1:26:31 --> 1:26:39
Yeah, well, I spoke to a few people, including one very awake doctor actually. And what she was
737
1:26:39 --> 1:26:47
saying to me was that she got ill with a upper respiratory tract infection and did a PCR,
738
1:26:47 --> 1:26:53
which was positive. And then she waited until she recovered symptomatically, did another PCR,
739
1:26:53 --> 1:26:58
and it was negative. And I spoke to other people who found that same thing. And I'm just thinking,
740
1:26:58 --> 1:27:05
well, if the PCR is actually unreliable, why is it becoming positive when they're symptomatic
741
1:27:05 --> 1:27:09
and negative when they're not symptomatic? Or is it a coincidence?
742
1:27:10 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]etely unreliable. I mean, it is not total nonsense. If a PCR test is done
743
1:27:17 --> 1:27:23
good, it is a parcel in the diagnosis, but it never proves an infection. But if, of course,
744
1:27:23 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] is low, for example, maybe 17, so there is a high amount of this virus on your throat,
745
1:27:32 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]ent with this illness, they can be correct, of course.
746
1:27:41 --> 1:27:48
Here the problem was, does this Cormann-Rosten test cross-react with many other coronaviruses?
747
1:27:48 --> 1:27:57
So, already from this, it was not useful. It is not completely useless, but it's only useful
748
1:27:58 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]ion with other clinical findings, of course.
749
1:28:03 --> 1:28:03
Thank you.
750
1:28:03 --> 1:28:09
Thanks, Janet. Thank you, Janet. And now we have Benjamin. And Benjamin, have you met my
751
1:28:09 --> 1:28:11
alter ego, my bubblehead?
752
1:28:12 --> 1:28:17
You like that, Thomas? That says passion on my chest.
753
1:28:17 --> 1:28:19
Great, great. Looks great.
754
1:28:19 --> 1:28:24
Spot of fun. Thank you, Janet. Benjamin, he calls himself Benjamin, as you know,
755
1:28:24 --> 1:28:29
sometimes hands Benjamin, but anyway, Benjamin for ease of thing. Over to you, Benjamin.
756
1:28:30 --> 1:28:37
Well, thank you. Yeah, the Hans Benjamin is for written, for signing. It's too long.
757
1:28:37 --> 1:28:51
Unfortunately, I was switching on too late, but so we both are Swiss, but we decide to communicate
758
1:28:51 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]s, actually. One was about, as you started the discussion
759
1:28:57 --> 1:29:03
with gas lighting, and I always wondered, and even some psychiatrists even openly say that,
760
1:29:03 --> 1:29:11
oh, actually, you know, that you can consider be deluded, that only actually applies to an
761
1:29:11 --> 1:29:18
individual, but not to a collective. Now, the question is, what if a group or a whole society
762
1:29:18 --> 1:29:25
becomes deluded and an individual isn't? How do you call that? Of course, we know it's called
763
1:29:25 --> 1:29:32
gas lighting, but I mean, it shows that actually it's a very dangerous concept if you don't apply
764
1:29:32 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]ic criteria only to individuals, but not to whole groups.
765
1:29:40 --> 1:29:46
I mean, you certainly have to, and then maybe I may add in this context of what you witnessed,
766
1:29:46 --> 1:29:53
because I witnessed something similar, but I was not independent, but in a working environment. And
767
1:29:54 --> 1:30:02
it essentially, it forced me down the road of deciding either accepting what they were imposing
768
1:30:02 --> 1:30:11
on me with potentially lethal consequences because of heart conditions, and actually, you know,
769
1:30:11 --> 1:30:19
giving up the job. And that was pre-COVID. So, I mean, it shows these totalitarian tendencies,
770
1:30:19 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ually inherent and as you described as being fascist,
771
1:30:24 --> 1:30:32
and which means the coalescence really of powers, right? Because first case is bundle in Latin.
772
1:30:33 --> 1:30:40
So, yeah, so maybe first, and then I have something specific about COVID in Switzerland
773
1:30:40 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]s, maybe, but these are too many questions. Or do you prefer that I ask the
774
1:30:43 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ions also? Maybe Charles does. It has to do with the PCR test, which you mentioned. And
775
1:30:50 --> 1:31:01
actually, I looked at the data in Switzerland during the late stages. That was end of 2021.
776
1:31:02 --> 1:31:12
And then as you may know, Implod, water quality agency in Switzerland, they actually measured the
777
1:31:12 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]ewater and compared it with the positive tests. And so, and they were
778
1:31:20 --> 1:31:24
diverging and everybody was wondering what's actually going on. And it was interesting. It
779
1:31:24 --> 1:31:33
started to diverge precisely at the date when the vaccinated got tested. So, that was in December,
780
1:31:33 --> 1:31:38
and I was suddenly from mainly unvaccinated, suddenly the vaccinated got tested. And sure
781
1:31:38 --> 1:31:44
enough, you've got a wave in quote with the tested ones and no wave averaged over the population,
782
1:31:44 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]ually, in my opinion, was a tremendous proof for actually the inadequacy of the PCR
783
1:31:51 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction], A and B actually, also of the, however you call that treatment, which people took
784
1:31:58 --> 1:32:05
as, you know, called off vaccines. So, I think it was because it really changed over a weekend. It
785
1:32:05 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]amatic and I can't show you the data. I think I sent it to Stephen at some point.
786
1:32:11 --> 1:32:17
So, yeah. So, these are three questions about, you know, this, how do you assess a group,
787
1:32:17 --> 1:32:24
you know, which turns really, you know, when a whole group actually becomes delusioned,
788
1:32:24 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction] for that. B, yes, that these totalitarian tendencies are actually,
789
1:32:32 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ablished already before COVID that a company has, or a university in this case,
790
1:32:38 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]rumentalizing medics for their purpose, you know. And then
791
1:32:45 --> 1:32:52
finally, this issue about the waste water plants. So, thank you.
792
1:32:52 --> 1:32:58
Yes, of course. I mean, the psychopaths managed to impose their psychopathy on the whole society or
793
1:32:59 --> 1:33:04
on a huge part of the society. This is what happened. I mean, of course, there is the
794
1:33:05 --> 1:33:10
gaslighting happens on an individual level, but also on a societal level. I mean,
795
1:33:11 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]and how the Germans could be deluded by Hitler in the 1930s,
796
1:33:21 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]and now what happened. Obviously, the people nowadays, we nowadays
797
1:33:27 --> 1:33:34
are not better or worse than the Germans were in the 1930s. We get deluded by the same,
798
1:33:35 --> 1:33:41
basically the same psychopaths. Then this waste water testing, this is utter pardon bullshit.
799
1:33:43 --> 1:33:51
Well, another proof that there was no pandemic is this. In medical school, at my time, I guess
800
1:33:51 --> 1:33:59
it was in the second year, we learned in something called epidemiology for beginners,
801
1:33:59 --> 1:34:06
we learned that in the case of an epidemic, the first thing you have to do is to establish a
802
1:34:06 --> 1:34:12
cohort, a study cohort that is representative for the society. Maybe in Switzerland, there are
803
1:34:12 --> 1:34:18
nine million inhabitants. This will be about [privacy contact redaction]e, representative for the populace.
804
1:34:18 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]ion serially, test serially with a useful test, not with a PCR test, but antibody
805
1:34:24 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction] Had we done this, we had known already at the end of April that there was no killer virus,
806
1:34:31 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]e already were cross-immune, et cetera, et cetera. Even after four years,
807
1:34:38 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction] in any country. Either you believe that in your health
808
1:34:44 --> 1:34:50
authorities, in your government, there is nobody with the knowledge of a second year medical
809
1:34:50 --> 1:34:58
student, or you must accept that you have been totally fool. Every government knew exactly what
810
1:34:58 --> 1:35:04
they did because if not, the first thing they had to do was to establish such a study cohort.
811
1:35:04 --> 1:35:14
This is how we diagnose and control the pandemic, not with wastewater testing,
812
1:35:14 --> 1:35:20
with PCR. This is utter bullshit. Then of course, they can state, now we have in the wastewater,
813
1:35:20 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] disease, X is positive. This then is enough evidence to start the next
814
1:35:29 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]ion?
815
1:35:37 --> 1:35:49
It was the add-on between corporate fascism or university fascism was established before COVID.
816
1:35:50 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] happened because the academics were…
817
1:36:02 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]arted with the Mont Pelerin Society in 1947,
818
1:36:07 --> 1:36:12
again in Switzerland. All evil comes from Switzerland. I'm sorry about this.
819
1:36:12 --> 1:36:18
All evil organizations are located in Switzerland. They are granted immunity by our criminal
820
1:36:18 --> 1:36:32
government. Then the millionaires took over this MPS and they created hundreds and thousands of
821
1:36:32 --> 1:36:37
NGOs and they took over the universities. Of course, you must, in a revolution,
822
1:36:37 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]art by taking over the universities. What we all learned here is that the so-called
823
1:36:45 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]e, I have the highest respect for the so-called ordinary people,
824
1:36:50 --> 1:36:57
they smell that something is wrong here. While the academicians are the most easy to be deluded. Why?
825
1:36:58 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]ic, they cannot even have the idea to be wrong and not only to be wrong,
826
1:37:05 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]etely wrong. This is the problem. Nowadays, imagine if I was young,
827
1:37:13 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]udy climate science, in the exam you have to write CO2 is a poison
828
1:37:20 --> 1:37:24
and blah, blah, blah. If you do not write it, you do not pass the exam. Of course, this
829
1:37:26 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]arted in the universities and then spread it.
830
1:37:34 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]anned over decades or even over centuries.
831
1:37:39 --> 1:37:45
Also, most people cannot imagine this, but this is the time horizon of these people.
832
1:37:47 --> 1:37:56
I mean, to the last point, I think it's actually accelerating that actually these tendencies have
833
1:37:56 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ified by the funding scheme. I've been on committees deciding what should be funded.
834
1:38:03 --> 1:38:08
I mean, sometimes it's breathtaking. You see how your colleagues actually take decisions.
835
1:38:11 --> 1:38:18
You keep your mouth open. Because of this feedback loop, you get funding, but for that,
836
1:38:18 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ease those who sit on committees or write reviews, which are those who chat around
837
1:38:24 --> 1:38:32
the globe all the time. They are not necessarily the best scientists. It's actually an amplifying
838
1:38:32 --> 1:38:42
circle. Then these things can happen. With climate science, you think why is there no open debate?
839
1:38:42 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]e so narrowly focused? If you actually try to follow this document.
840
1:38:49 --> 1:38:57
Benjamin, that's beautiful. It's a big deal. Last week, remember, we talked about, I think it was,
841
1:38:57 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction] on the side? Jason. No, before last week, the climate movie was in the chat.
842
1:39:04 --> 1:39:09
Wonderful movie. Precisely that point that both of you are talking about. I urge all of you to
843
1:39:09 --> 1:39:16
have a look at it. It's entirely correct that if you don't subscribe to the particular
844
1:39:17 --> 1:39:23
climate narrative, you will not get grants and you won't pass. If you are particularly
845
1:39:23 --> 1:39:29
young, you'd be crazy to, but the experienced scientists that are speaking out, they can't
846
1:39:29 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction] to recognise that. That's why this conversation,
847
1:39:34 --> 1:39:40
it reminds us to look at the climate movie, 90 minutes or 80 minutes, one hour, 21. It's
848
1:39:40 --> 1:39:47
magnificent. I urge you all to watch it. Thank you, Benjamin. Well put. Jim, we're doing well.
849
1:39:47 --> 1:39:54
I urge you all to watch it. Thank you, Benjamin. Well put. Jim, we're doing well. We've got 45
850
1:39:54 --> 1:39:59
minutes to go. We've got to keep moving. Jim. Thank you very much. Great presentation.
851
1:40:01 --> 1:40:10
The issue of whether the COVID does or doesn't exist. Sorry, can you hear me? There you go.
852
1:40:10 --> 1:40:17
Yeah. The issue of the spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in vaccine or virus form.
853
1:40:20 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]s and they made a vaccine with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
854
1:40:27 --> 1:40:38
and that it has an ACE2 receptor that binds to the ACE2 receptors in our bodies and that it has a
855
1:40:38 --> 1:40:48
furon cleavage site and a TMPRSS2 cleavage site and a GP120, which is activated if the furon is
856
1:40:48 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]d. Do you believe that that SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction]s and that it can itself
857
1:40:57 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]icate intracellularly?
858
1:40:59 --> 1:41:08
I know that I do not. Thank you, Jim, for your question. I do know that I do not know the most
859
1:41:08 --> 1:41:17
important things. I'm not absolutely sure, but I think, yes, I think this same modified RNA encodes
860
1:41:17 --> 1:41:26
the spike protein like it is presented to us. And of course, this is toxic. This is toxic. But
861
1:41:26 --> 1:41:34
as I said, I don't think that the main toxicity of the gene transfections comes from the spike
862
1:41:34 --> 1:41:41
but from this autoimmune attack. But I think for the moment, this is my current belief,
863
1:41:41 --> 1:41:48
yes, it's actually belief. I think this modified RNA encodes the spike protein.
864
1:41:49 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction] the research, we have people like Kevin McKernan, whom I trust. He was also in our group
865
1:41:55 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]s who did this external peer review of the common drosten test.
866
1:42:01 --> 1:42:10
I think this is true. That there are differences between vials, this is possible. I mean,
867
1:42:10 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]ion about shedding, for example. I think from theoretical considerations,
868
1:42:19 --> 1:42:27
the delusions would be that this should not be a huge problem if this thing cannot replicate.
869
1:42:27 --> 1:42:31
I don't think that the spike can replicate, but what would be possible? They are working on
870
1:42:32 --> 1:42:39
self-amplifying modified RNA. And what we, of course, do not know is whether in some vials,
871
1:42:39 --> 1:42:46
in some batches, they already tested this. There the counter argument would again be,
872
1:42:47 --> 1:42:54
if I was a psychopath, I would create a targeted bio-weapon, not a bio-weapon that is not
873
1:42:54 --> 1:43:01
untargeted. So I think this is a huge argument against all this spreading, et cetera. Also that
874
1:43:01 --> 1:43:08
chemtrails are very toxic or so. They would detoxify themselves, they would harm and kill
875
1:43:08 --> 1:43:16
themselves. So from this, of course, it is evident also that the virus is not the bio-weapon,
876
1:43:16 --> 1:43:22
the bio-weapon, of course, these are the chain transactions. These are directed, targeted. These
877
1:43:22 --> 1:43:30
I can avoid. Yes. And the spike protein, it was Albert, remember the eagle who did the
878
1:43:30 --> 1:43:39
how bad is my batch, actually showed that it may be the DNA plasmid contaminants that actually make
879
1:43:39 --> 1:43:47
the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within the vaccines, which is very interesting because the mRNA may
880
1:43:47 --> 1:43:54
die off after three hours of being thawed. So the plasmids, the DNA plasmids, of course,
881
1:43:54 --> 1:44:01
don't have to be refrigerated. So that may be a better mechanism of spreading the Jason McClellan
882
1:44:01 --> 1:44:06
designed spike protein within the vaccines. And then there's the same, there's the issue of the
883
1:44:06 --> 1:44:13
spike protein transmitting in exosomes itself as a quote virus or exosome or whatever it is.
884
1:44:13 --> 1:44:21
So, and that in itself may be the toxic bio-weapon and it may have some genetic specificity
885
1:44:21 --> 1:44:29
built into it. And that may be why we were forbidden to take hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin
886
1:44:29 --> 1:44:35
and other things. So does, and, and do you have any opinion upon why we were forbidden?
887
1:44:35 --> 1:44:39
If since, so you agree the spike protein exists and that would be a reason
888
1:44:41 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]oxychloroquine and ivermectin and other medications.
889
1:44:46 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]? Or do you have any other reason why we were forbidden to take those?
890
1:44:50 --> 1:44:54
There was also a legal reason. I mean, in Switzerland and I guess in every country,
891
1:44:55 --> 1:45:02
for one requirement for an emergency use authorization of a new drug is that they are not
892
1:45:02 --> 1:45:08
other therapeutic options, that there are no other therapeutic options. So if there are other
893
1:45:08 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]oxychloroquine, ivermectin or whatever, the hurdles to get
894
1:45:15 --> 1:45:20
emergency use authorization for these genes transfections would be much, would have been much
895
1:45:20 --> 1:45:27
higher. So this, if there is a treatment, if this was generally accepted that there was a
896
1:45:27 --> 1:45:33
treatment of this disease, they could never have been, they could not have allowed this,
897
1:45:34 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]ions. I think this is the main reason. This is the main reason.
898
1:45:39 --> 1:45:47
Yeah. So yes. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, Jim. Tom the Rodman.
899
1:45:50 --> 1:45:56
Okay. Great. Thanks so much for all you've done. And I'm aware that you're in the doctors for COVID
900
1:45:56 --> 1:46:03
ethics group. So you've seen a lot of presentations, but, and your cardiologists. So
901
1:46:05 --> 1:46:10
I'm not good at this question thing. So I'm going to go through a bunch of questions fast and you
902
1:46:10 --> 1:46:19
probably won't remember all of them, but here goes. As the cardiologist, I'm going to go through a
903
1:46:19 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction] you seen evidence of the arterial or venal damage that we saw by Dr. Arne
904
1:46:27 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]t from what he described that as being from the actual spike protein, not from the
905
1:46:34 --> 1:46:44
nucleocapsid of SARS-CoV-2. And then the, what about the white fibrous clots? And is there any news on
906
1:46:44 --> 1:46:55
on those and what those are? And then with respect to myocarditis, is there a routine test that can
907
1:46:55 --> 1:47:01
determine, I mean, I think there is a dye that shows the, that can distinguish between the
908
1:47:01 --> 1:47:10
nucleocapsid from SARS-CoV-2 versus the, the JAB spike. But is that something that you routinely
909
1:47:10 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]? And then maybe just two more questions.
910
1:47:19 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction] Bhakdi, he focuses on the, that the response to our innate or complementary immune
911
1:47:27 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]em is a big problem. You know, the response in particular to the spike protein, either from
912
1:47:35 --> 1:47:42
SARS-CoV-2 or from the JAB. And then, and then somewhat similarly, JJ Cooey,
913
1:47:43 --> 1:47:51
his mantra is that it's not this particular spike protein. It's not all a skein of function work.
914
1:47:51 --> 1:47:59
It really doesn't matter that much as to what the design is. The problem is the generic
915
1:47:59 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction]ion process involving the nanolipid protein, that that's where the damage
916
1:48:06 --> 1:48:11
is. And that's what we have to focus on. That's what we have to stop because it's their new
917
1:48:11 --> 1:48:23
platform for really harming us. And okay, the last question is, and this one's probably more for
918
1:48:23 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction]s, but what, can we figure out what proportion of the damage is caused by the
919
1:48:32 --> 1:48:39
spike and what proportion is caused by just the nanolipid transfection? I guess that's
920
1:48:39 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So yeah, thank you. Great bunch of questions, Tom. Well,
921
1:48:48 --> 1:48:56
I tried to answer shortly. Well, the spike itself is thrombogenic by binding to the ACE2
922
1:48:56 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ivates thrombocytes, thrombocytes aggregation,
923
1:49:02 --> 1:49:11
so thrombosformation. But I think that even greater damage comes from the endothelitis,
924
1:49:11 --> 1:49:19
inflammation of the vessel wall, the cells that take up the mRNA and DNA, and then express and
925
1:49:19 --> 1:49:23
present the spike on their surface and are attacked. These causes endothelial damage and
926
1:49:23 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ivates clotting. This, of course, is, we predicted this first and foremost through
927
1:49:31 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ed this to happen before it happened. Then came the first reports of the
928
1:49:37 --> 1:49:47
central cerebral venous thrombosis, sinus thrombosis, etc. And of course, I see some more
929
1:49:47 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ions, for example, in younger patients. But in a specific case, I cannot state
930
1:49:53 --> 1:50:05
whether it was caused by the gene transfections or not. Because for this, we should have biopsy
931
1:50:05 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] And there, you stated right, Aniburghardt, who was unhappily
932
1:50:17 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] year. It's very sad. A good friend, he developed the methyl for immunohistochemical,
933
1:50:27 --> 1:50:33
finding spike protein and nucleocapsid protein. If you only find the spike, then it's
934
1:50:33 --> 1:50:39
probably caused by the vaccine. And if you find the spike and the nucleocapsid, another surface
935
1:50:39 --> 1:50:47
protein of the virus, then it's caused by the vaccine. In the blood now, there are tests. You
936
1:50:47 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] for the spike and for nucleocapsid, for example, in the blood. There are special
937
1:50:56 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]s. There is one, especially in Germany, who does this.
938
1:51:02 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]ions?
939
1:51:10 --> 1:51:13
What about the white fibrous clots?
940
1:51:16 --> 1:51:24
I guess these huge clots that the embalmers show us, they cannot happen in living humans.
941
1:51:24 --> 1:51:34
Of course, this produces clotting. But not that huge clot. These huge clots are not compatible
942
1:51:34 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] such a huge clot in the vein or an artery of the leg that totally obstructs
943
1:51:42 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]culation, then you have enormous swelling, enormous pain. This is incompatible with life.
944
1:51:49 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] caused by this high precariculable state,
945
1:51:55 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]mortem. These huge clots are produced postmortem.
946
1:52:09 --> 1:52:14
As I mentioned, the spike is toxic, the lipid nanoparticles are toxic. But I'm convinced,
947
1:52:15 --> 1:52:20
we, especially Michael Palmer, wrote in our book that I can highly recommend. You can find it on
948
1:52:20 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]ors for COVID Ethics, Doctors for COVID Ethics.org website, free for download.
949
1:52:28 --> 1:52:34
About mRNA toxicity, it's now translated into Chinese and Italian as well. I can highly recommend
950
1:52:34 --> 1:52:43
this book. There we really make the case that the toxicity comes mainly from the autoimmune
951
1:52:43 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction] it and the foreign antigen producing and expressing cells. Maybe this.
952
1:52:49 --> 1:52:55
Thank you, Tom. Thanks much. Thank you. Thank you, Tom. Excellent questions. Mark.
953
1:52:57 --> 1:53:06
Hi, Thomas. Thank you very much for informing people to give your spine a boost. I thought
954
1:53:06 --> 1:53:17
that was a very excellent piece of advice. I have two questions. I was recently at a governor's
955
1:53:17 --> 1:53:26
meeting at a hospital, and they have decided because they are short on radiologists, that
956
1:53:26 --> 1:53:35
they are going to use AI to support the radiology department. My question is, do you see any downside
957
1:53:35 --> 1:53:41
to the use of the AI to support the radiology department?
958
1:53:47 --> 1:53:54
Well, I guess in areas like radiology, AI may be helpful. Why not? Of course, I mean, it might see
959
1:53:54 --> 1:54:02
something that the AI cannot see. But wait, I mean, we forget all the AI is nonsense. This is a hype.
960
1:54:02 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]icated software, but there is never any intelligence in it.
961
1:54:10 --> 1:54:19
But I'm quite sure this is one of the few areas where sophisticated software can be helpful,
962
1:54:19 --> 1:54:28
of course, by showing things that the AI cannot see. And maybe, you know, in these imaging
963
1:54:28 --> 1:54:37
techniques, there is density you can measure, etc. So it can directly indicate this might be
964
1:54:37 --> 1:54:42
malignant tumor, this looks benign, things like this. This might be helpful, of course.
965
1:54:42 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]s, I hope it does not come from too many radiologists who are
966
1:54:51 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]s now.
967
1:54:55 --> 1:55:01
Well, that, of course, is something that they haven't disclosed. And the hospital was having
968
1:55:01 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]aff, and they had not done an analysis of why people were actually absent.
969
1:55:09 --> 1:55:17
Right. And it's very high. My last question is, I'm a blood donor. And when you give blood,
970
1:55:17 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction] to fill out a very large, long form, right, telling your history, etc.
971
1:55:23 --> 1:55:29
The one thing that doesn't appear on the form is have you had the COVID jabs?
972
1:55:31 --> 1:55:35
Have you any idea why they would not ask that question?
973
1:55:36 --> 1:55:42
I guess in the UK, they ask it now. But they're not completely sure.
974
1:55:42 --> 1:55:48
No, no, no, in the UK, they are not asking any questions about being jabbed. They're asking
975
1:55:48 --> 1:55:53
all sorts of other things. Well, the notion, of course, was these vaccines are effective and
976
1:55:53 --> 1:55:58
safe. And if you ask this, then of course, the people could think, why do they want to know
977
1:55:58 --> 1:56:04
whether I'm vaccinated or not? If it's not effective and safe, why should there be any problem?
978
1:56:04 --> 1:56:11
So I think this is the main reason. I mean, this would make unsecured people, why do they want to
979
1:56:11 --> 1:56:15
ask this? Is there something wrong with this vaccine or not?
980
1:56:16 --> 1:56:26
Right. But Thomas, what they actually do is the blood donor, let's say the department,
981
1:56:26 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]atements on the antibodies that are in the blood. And they make a statement that
982
1:56:33 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction] found antibodies are very high in people that are blood donors. And they have made a
983
1:56:40 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction] blood donors are vaccinated. Now, if they don't ask the
984
1:56:48 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]ion, are you vaccinated? They can't make that statement. Yes, but highly likely. I mean,
985
1:56:54 --> 1:57:04
if 80% are vaccinated, highly likely about 80% of the blood that is donated is effective. Yeah,
986
1:57:04 --> 1:57:11
of course you're right. But this also is a question that comes up often. I mean,
987
1:57:13 --> 1:57:[privacy contact redaction] become problems by receiving blood that are vaccinated? But there also is the delusion
988
1:57:22 --> 1:57:29
argument. I mean, for example, if I was vaccinated, I maybe have 50 litres of body water. And of these
989
1:57:29 --> 1:57:35
50 litres, I give 500 millilitres, I donate 500 millilitres. So this is a delusion,
990
1:57:36 --> 1:57:43
more or less, by a factor of 100. And then these products are processed, stored, etc.
991
1:57:43 --> 1:57:54
So even if all this that I donate would survive, the recipient would only get hundreds of doses of
992
1:57:54 --> 1:58:00
a vaccine from theoretical considerations. So I don't think that blood recipients are
993
1:58:00 --> 1:58:09
really in danger. And especially, the indication for blood reception must be very strict. So only
994
1:58:09 --> 1:58:16
in life-threatening situations. In life-threatening situations, the risk-benefit calculation to get
995
1:58:16 --> 1:58:24
blood maybe by vaccinated or not is of course on the side to get the blood.
996
1:58:27 --> 1:58:33
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mark. All right, two more. And then Stephen, good work. Anders.
997
1:58:37 --> 1:58:44
Yes, hello. I am not a medical doctor, but I've done, let's say, some research the last
998
1:58:44 --> 1:58:59
15 months. And I was in the belief that there was a virus. However, during the research,
999
1:58:59 --> 1:59:07
I found that was not the case. There was a lot of problems to do research because
1000
1:59:07 --> 1:59:13
the information we are told, for example, this narrative of this mRNA and this LNP,
1001
1:59:14 --> 1:59:22
this was supposed to be what is in the jab. But what we do know now is that, well, this LNP,
1002
1:59:22 --> 1:59:[privacy contact redaction]ogel. There are many different types of polymer, and these are highly
1003
1:59:34 --> 1:59:41
problematic because part of them are charged, surface-charged positive. That's one issue.
1004
1:59:42 --> 1:59:51
This has been identified by several scientists, including Dr. Ana Maria Mijajea and also
1005
1:59:51 --> 2:00:01
the La Quinta Colonna and Robert Young. But much worse is that these jabs contain a lot of
1006
2:00:01 --> 2:00:10
graphene oxide and a number of different types of nanometals. And it is confirmed that these are
1007
2:00:11 --> 2:00:20
getting together, becoming crystallized inside the hydrogel. And they are making antennas,
1008
2:00:20 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]ually receiving radio signals from not only 4G, 5G, what I believed was the case,
1009
2:00:32 --> 2:00:46
but also terahertz from the light sources of the LED lamps at home and in the streetlights. And this
1010
2:00:46 --> 2:00:54
type of radiation is, I thought it was the correlation I found rural and metro. There is
1011
2:00:54 --> 2:01:00
an enormous excess mortality in the metro where they have the 5G. And you have an enormous,
1012
2:01:01 --> 2:01:10
well, you have nothing, no excess mortality in upstate New York in, let's say, rural USA for
1013
2:01:11 --> 2:01:18
80-plus year old people, even they were jabbed. So what seems to be the case is that there is
1014
2:01:18 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]s to radiation, and old people, they do not use the phones as much as
1015
2:01:27 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]e. And this is a huge concern. And it seems to be that this is not just what I initially
1016
2:01:35 --> 2:01:44
thought it is about 5G, 4G radiation, but there is a huge damage coming into the body from the
1017
2:01:44 --> 2:01:55
terahertz radiation, from non, very intrusive light energies. And when I started to look at this with
1018
2:01:55 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]e recently, we'd come across, I'm not sure you know about, I think it was
1019
2:02:03 --> 2:02:14
about Barry Trower. He's a 5G military expert in the UK, in Bristol. And he was interviewed by
1020
2:02:14 --> 2:02:23
Rainer Fulmisch. So there is a lot of knowledge about bio, about radiation in order to make
1021
2:02:23 --> 2:02:31
mind control. And this has been known, but now we also see that it is likely that the terahertz
1022
2:02:31 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction] been used for mind control. And this is an area which almost nobody has any skills
1023
2:02:40 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]e look into it. So I just wonder if you have considered
1024
2:02:49 --> 2:02:57
that, let's say, there was not a virus, there was radiation, that's one. Second, this radiation was
1025
2:02:57 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] for the 4G, 5G. I have data for Switzerland. I have data for USA, Canada, Norway,
1026
2:03:04 --> 2:03:11
Sweden, UK. There is an extreme correlation to the radiation. And there is actually an excess
1027
2:03:11 --> 2:03:24
mortality in the elderly in Switzerland in March, April 2020, in USA, in California, in Canada.
1028
2:03:24 --> 2:03:32
But it is following, let's say, the launch of 5G. But what we see now is that this launch of
1029
2:03:32 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]lights, they may have a much worse effect. And we don't really
1030
2:03:43 --> 2:03:51
know everything there because this is something people need to look into it. But to me, this seems
1031
2:03:51 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] you been thinking about that this might be something to look into?
1032
2:04:00 --> 2:04:07
Thank you, Anders. I fully agree that EMF is not healthy. Of course, this is not healthy.
1033
2:04:07 --> 2:04:15
And what I can say is that I never got attacked as strongly as when I mentioned that there is a
1034
2:04:15 --> 2:04:23
strong correlation between 5G antennas and severe COVID cases. I mentioned that in the start. And
1035
2:04:23 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]udy from Barcelona who showed this. But this, of course, does not prove causation.
1036
2:04:30 --> 2:04:35
Correlation does not prove causation. It might be a hint for causation. This correlation might
1037
2:04:35 --> 2:04:46
only be because of course the 5G, this bandwidth is of course also an important part of this
1038
2:04:46 --> 2:04:51
control and surveillance network. They need this huge bandwidth. And they especially need
1039
2:04:52 --> 2:05:00
Elon Musk's satellites so that the whole world is covered. And every human being will one day be
1040
2:05:00 --> 2:05:06
either via smartphone or neural link directly connected to the artificial clouds of the
1041
2:05:07 --> 2:05:16
powers that be. Yeah, so well there I'm not sure whether there, I said before maybe in some
1042
2:05:16 --> 2:05:22
hotspots they released something or maybe they even turned on 5G in a certain specification or
1043
2:05:22 --> 2:05:29
so. I don't know. I'm not sure. What I do not find helpful and what divides us again,
1044
2:05:29 --> 2:05:35
like the theory, like the debate about the theory are there viruses or not, is this
1045
2:05:35 --> 2:05:42
stuff about graphene and the like. I mean, I looked into this and I did not find any evidence,
1046
2:05:43 --> 2:05:49
I did not find 100% evidence that there is graphene. I looked at this Compro experiment
1047
2:05:49 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction] found graphene. But if you look at this study,
1048
2:05:56 --> 2:06:07
if this method works like this, you target the laser on the object and usually you burn this
1049
2:06:07 --> 2:06:15
laser for milliseconds and he burned it for about 40 seconds. So basically he fried what he had under
1050
2:06:15 --> 2:06:24
what he wanted to examine and there was sugar of course and carbon. And this method might have
1051
2:06:24 --> 2:06:31
produced graphene. I'm not totally sure, but I have not seen any convincing report for the presence
1052
2:06:31 --> 2:06:39
of graphene in it. And again, this divides us. I mean, it's the same in 9-11, there are the planers
1053
2:06:39 --> 2:06:47
and the no-planers. And they have a huge war between them. But the only thing that they agree
1054
2:06:47 --> 2:06:54
that of course this nonsense narrative that on 9-11 20 Muslims armed with box cutters overcame
1055
2:06:54 --> 2:07:02
the USA and the laws of nature is nonsense. And that an investigation that deserves the name
1056
2:07:02 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]igation is needed. This is enough in the 9-11 story. And here in the currently accepted
1057
2:07:11 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]em, scientifically belief system, what we know by evidence, this is enough by 1,000 times
1058
2:07:18 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]roy this whole narrative. So I'm very sceptic about this graphene. But it is also possible that
1059
2:07:26 --> 2:07:33
some vials there was something different. This I cannot rule out of course. Thank you Anders.
1060
2:07:33 --> 2:07:38
This is my personal opinion. Thank you Anders. This is a good question, a long question. Anders is
1061
2:07:38 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ion shorter. However, I understand it's always a balance between setting
1062
2:07:44 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ion. So I get that. And I honor the work that you're doing. And I think for
1063
2:07:50 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction] of us, there's different people look at these recordings everybody. Just there's 53
1064
2:07:56 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]e online. The maximum number today was 63. But we know a lot of people watch the recordings
1065
2:08:03 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]e watch different recordings. And for those of you that are here all the time,
1066
2:08:09 --> 2:08:13
you think it's repetitious, but someone who's only watching this recording, you know, for the
1067
2:08:13 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction] you Anders for the first time, this might be a crucial piece of data that
1068
2:08:18 --> 2:08:25
you shared. Same with all of us. So that's the patience that we have to have in these meetings.
1069
2:08:25 --> 2:08:29
So thank you, Anders. We'll have to keep moving. Because we're going to run out of time. We've got
1070
2:08:29 --> 2:08:35
Peter, then Stephen, and thank you everybody for all the resources you put into the chat. Peter.
1071
2:08:38 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction], there's another great reference Anders. I don't know if you've seen it.
1072
2:08:42 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ralia.com.au. There might be some useful resources there Anders.
1073
2:08:50 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ralia.com.au. It's been up for some years. A huge amount of research
1074
2:08:57 --> 2:09:03
by a lady called Lynn McLean. And there might be some stuff there or collaboration Anders that is
1075
2:09:03 --> 2:09:11
useful for you and for others and Mark's deal as well. Peter. Well, Peter might have gone to sleep
1076
2:09:11 --> 2:09:16
because he's in South Africa, Thomas. So it's very late for Peter. In fact, he has gone to sleep.
1077
2:09:17 --> 2:09:18
How about that everybody?
1078
2:09:20 --> 2:09:25
I guess in South Africa, it's about the same as here. Here it's a quarter past 11.
1079
2:09:25 --> 2:09:31
No, I think South Africa, that's true. Or maybe it's another hour later. It might be quarter past
1080
2:09:31 --> 2:09:43
12. All right, Stephen, are you there? Yeah. So, Thomas, so it's great to hear you answering those
1081
2:09:43 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]ions as good as they were so dutifully. So it's important as you understand
1082
2:09:51 --> 2:09:56
that, yes, people watching this video, they hear not just a bit of what you think or what you
1083
2:09:56 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction] four years, but as much as possible. So unfortunately, we do have to
1084
2:10:00 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]e on our side don't understand the importance of that. So
1085
2:10:07 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction] wanted to ask you, in your opinion, so you're a medical doctor, Thomas,
1086
2:10:12 --> 2:10:18
Thomas, and you're a cardiologist specifically, but I think you said in your resume that you
1087
2:10:18 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction] and an immunologist, was it?
1088
2:10:24 --> 2:10:30
Yeah, after finishing medical school, I was not sure whether I should go into research or into
1089
2:10:30 --> 2:10:37
clinic. So I spent one year in the department for immunology and virology, and I wrote my thesis
1090
2:10:37 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]rage knowledge in this field, more than average
1091
2:10:42 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]or. Yeah, maybe this helped me to see the tree. What we also have to
1092
2:10:51 --> 2:11:00
know, of course, I mean, I took the red pill maybe in 2007 or so. I saw the collapse of World Trade
1093
2:11:00 --> 2:11:05
Center Building 7. I think this was the moment when many took the red pill. Then, of course,
1094
2:11:06 --> 2:11:12
I realized the pre-9-11 narrative is nonsense. Then I looked into the climate
1095
2:11:14 --> 2:11:20
scam and all this, and you go down the rabbit hole, of course. So, of course, we have a huge
1096
2:11:20 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction] never forget that there are people around that still believe in everything,
1097
2:11:27 --> 2:11:33
that the legacy media serve them, especially the news. So there is a huge
1098
2:11:34 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ate of knowledge between the people. We must always try to inform the
1099
2:11:41 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ate of knowledge. In people who still believe in
1100
2:11:46 --> 2:11:53
everything, if we confront them with the things we are talking about here, they refuse and we
1101
2:11:53 --> 2:12:01
can never reach them. But there, in such cases, we must spread some doubt. For example, we can show
1102
2:12:02 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction]e, there was in the yellow press, there was the title, intensive care units overcrowded.
1103
2:12:09 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction] besides this, the official curve of the Federal Office of Public Health,
1104
2:12:17 --> 2:12:26
where you see, no, no, the occupancy of the ICU units was 75%. And the same paper five years ago
1105
2:12:26 --> 2:12:35
wrote ICU occupancy only 80%. This is uneconomic. So if you so with something like this, maybe you
1106
2:12:35 --> 2:12:44
can spread some doubt. I remember when my son realized that the story of Santa Claus was a
1107
2:12:44 --> 2:12:55
myth. One day, when Santa Claus left, he said, Papa, did Santa Claus not wear the same shoes
1108
2:12:55 --> 2:13:05
as Uncle Earth had on who left before Santa Claus came in and came back when after Santa Claus had
1109
2:13:05 --> 2:13:13
left? Like this, like we cannot confront the populace with the whole truth. Everybody has
1110
2:13:13 --> 2:13:21
to find it out themselves. Yeah. So in view of the frauds that we've been fed, and we've recently
1111
2:13:22 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction] that. So I don't know whether you know Jerome Causse, but he's the co author of the book
1112
2:13:27 --> 2:13:35
that came out about President Kennedy's assassination. And it seems to be now accepted that we have been
1113
2:13:35 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]us fed a load of lies to the people around the world on a very, very important matter.
1114
2:13:44 --> 2:13:53
But so this was about a so-called medical emergency. But if you remember, we had the swine flu
1115
2:13:53 --> 2:14:01
pandemic in 2009, and that was proved to be a fraud. And there's a document on the Council of Europe's
1116
2:14:03 --> 2:14:08
website. I think it's their website, which of course, Council of Europe is part of the
1117
2:14:08 --> 2:14:15
European Union, one of the, I think, seven institutions. So and that, of course, that was
1118
2:14:15 --> 2:14:19
the brilliant work of Wolfgang Rudolf, who happened to be a politician at the time, but he was a
1119
2:14:19 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]ood that the swine flu thing was a fraud. And essentially, he forced
1120
2:14:27 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]igation into swine flu. And in 2010, there was a report and still up on the internet,
1121
2:14:33 --> 2:14:41
it's been up since 2020 throughout, it's never been taken down. The report is there saying that
1122
2:14:41 --> 2:14:48
the swine flu pandemic was a fraud. So why do you think it was that very, very few people, including
1123
2:14:48 --> 2:14:53
Wolfgang himself, I'm not criticizing Wolfgang, but I'm not criticizing him, but I'm not criticizing
1124
2:14:53 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]e, including Wolfgang himself, I'm not criticizing Wolfgang, you know, maybe he wanted
1125
2:14:58 --> 2:15:06
to live and he knew that it was dangerous for him to say anything further on that. But so we had a
1126
2:15:06 --> 2:15:13
we had a kind of precedent for a fraud, a pandemic fraud. And there it was in black and white,
1127
2:15:13 --> 2:15:19
officially, Council of Europe document saying that the swine flu pandemic fraud
1128
2:15:20 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]e, the same, you know, the pharmaceutical complex,
1129
2:15:28 --> 2:15:34
and politicians and criticized. And yet, nobody seemed to want to know about this,
1130
2:15:34 --> 2:15:39
including Wolfgang didn't seem to understand the importance of those a precedent for fraud.
1131
2:15:39 --> 2:15:42
And nobody paid attention to it. Why do you think that was?
1132
2:15:42 --> 2:15:53
Yes, I agree. It also reminded me instantly on the swine flu scam in 2009. The problem is there was
1133
2:15:53 --> 2:16:02
never a public workup in the legacy media, of course. So most people have no idea what was
1134
2:16:02 --> 2:16:10
going on there. And I think the purpose, this was a kind of blueprint. I guess, as you mentioned,
1135
2:16:10 --> 2:16:16
some of the perpetrators, Ferguson and Raulston were the same already then. And I think the
1136
2:16:16 --> 2:16:22
perpetrators at that time learned two things. First, they have to have total control over the
1137
2:16:22 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction] total control over the narrative. To have total control over the
1138
2:16:29 --> 2:16:34
narrative in the legacy media, obviously, they will combine, but you cannot have total control
1139
2:16:34 --> 2:16:42
over the virus. So they invented this PCR test, who can exist even without the virus to crank up
1140
2:16:42 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]ing to the script. Yeah, well, Wolfgang, of course, as you mentioned,
1141
2:16:48 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]royed the swine flu scam at that time, at least in Europe.
1142
2:16:53 --> 2:16:59
Well, I think he mentioned that, didn't he? I'm not sure. Absolutely. I'm not sure.
1143
2:17:00 --> 2:17:04
He did mention it when I brought it up. I would ask him about it. But I was surprised that he
1144
2:17:04 --> 2:17:10
himself wasn't highlighting that, you know, but as I said, maybe he feared for his life because,
1145
2:17:10 --> 2:17:19
you know, he could understand what was going on was very important, but also very scary. And so
1146
2:17:20 --> 2:17:24
maybe he was thinking, you know, I want to live a bit longer because he looks a happy guy, doesn't he?
1147
2:17:25 --> 2:17:30
I don't know. You have to ask him. But yes.
1148
2:17:30 --> 2:17:37
Yeah, well, I did ask him a few times. I never got a direct answer, but that wasn't a criticism.
1149
2:17:37 --> 2:17:44
I don't know. I also, I already in March or April in Twitter, for example, I posted this Arte
1150
2:17:44 --> 2:17:50
documentation. There is a good documentation by Arte about an hour about this corona scam,
1151
2:17:51 --> 2:17:58
the swine flu scam. And I mean, if you look at this, yeah, of course, I mean, everybody must
1152
2:17:58 --> 2:18:04
realize this was the same scam, basically the same as they did now. I mean, it's the same media hype,
1153
2:18:06 --> 2:18:13
the corruption of everybody by the pharmaceutical industry, that basically the governments were the
1154
2:18:13 --> 2:18:19
the department, the selling department, the propaganda department of the pharmaceutical
1155
2:18:19 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]ry and so on and so forth. Yes. Exactly. Yeah. So it was very strange to me that that
1156
2:18:24 --> 2:18:31
wasn't highlighted because it seemed to me that was one of our strongest cards, the past history
1157
2:18:31 --> 2:18:39
of the pandemics, you know, which I don't think it's possible for pandemics to occur. And by the
1158
2:18:39 --> 2:18:44
way, I wanted to emphasize that the gain of function thing, I don't think they're capable,
1159
2:18:44 --> 2:18:50
obviously, of getting around the deadly virus kills its host stuff. So the higher the, the
1160
2:18:50 --> 2:18:56
deadlier the virus or the more virulent, the less transmissible. So then the damn thing can't,
1161
2:18:57 --> 2:19:05
can't go around the world. So, so the one is. So if it's deadly, which they want, of course,
1162
2:19:05 --> 2:19:13
to kill us. Unfortunately, it won't spread because it kills the host and they have problems with
1163
2:19:13 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]e don't seem to understand it. I'm sure you do. So I wanted to ask you also,
1164
2:19:19 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]ed that, that I was, I think they were saying that I had said there was no virus.
1165
2:19:29 --> 2:19:35
I was very careful not to say that. I said there's no pandemic and there was no COVID-19.
1166
2:19:36 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction] that I said there was no COVID-[privacy contact redaction]ence of all
1167
2:19:42 --> 2:19:48
viruses. That's a different matter altogether. So you can, you know, I can legitimately.
1168
2:19:48 --> 2:19:57
Absolutely. Yes, absolutely. Yes. I concur with everything. I, as I stated, I'm not 100% sure
1169
2:19:57 --> 2:20:06
that not 1% or so of the case. Now you're frozen, Thomas.
1170
2:20:14 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction] be getting late at night. Perhaps that was an important point.
1171
2:20:19 --> 2:20:29
We'll wait patiently for a moment. Usually ends in the person who this happens to
1172
2:20:30 --> 2:20:35
disappear, which he's just done. He has disappeared. We'll wait for a moment so we can
1173
2:20:36 --> 2:20:39
say. I'm already not sure what's happened. I dropped out and I'm back.
1174
2:20:41 --> 2:20:47
You froze. I don't know. So it was particularly important what you were saying. And so they
1175
2:20:47 --> 2:20:53
switched you off. They canceled you, Thomas. We didn't cancel you. They did. You know, our enemies.
1176
2:20:54 --> 2:21:00
So I wanted to ask you, so you know about biology and immunology, albeit some time ago,
1177
2:21:01 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] from a friend of mine in the UK who was an expert on HIV and AIDS,
1178
2:21:08 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction]ive at that time as a nurse, but he was working with a lot of medical doctor
1179
2:21:16 --> 2:21:23
researchers on HIV and he's extremely perceptive, this guy. His name is Kevin Corbett.
1180
2:21:25 --> 2:21:30
I recommend him to you. We were talking last summer about, so I knew about the rise of
1181
2:21:30 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction]s, the power of virologists. But then you happen to mention that the influence
1182
2:21:39 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] declined since the 80s. And I said, oh, that's really interesting. So at the same
1183
2:21:45 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction]s was rising, the influence of immunologists was declining. Well,
1184
2:21:53 --> 2:22:00
immunology, as you know, the immunologists who taught me at least were always saying that it
1185
2:22:00 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction]em. So, you know, if you like praising God, you know, for lack of a better
1186
2:22:06 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction] So and the wonders of the human immune system. And but the virus, so the biology,
1187
2:22:14 --> 2:22:19
it seemed to me, you know, in my simple mind last summer was completely opposed to that. So that's
1188
2:22:19 --> 2:22:26
the anti-human bit, the virology. And the immunology is the pro-human bit, you know, the emphasizing
1189
2:22:26 --> 2:22:32
the spirituality, if you like, the wonder of the universe, the wonder of the human immune system,
1190
2:22:32 --> 2:22:41
the brilliance of it. And the notion in virology that mere human beings, mere human beings can,
1191
2:22:41 --> 2:22:48
you know, meddle with the immune system and trick it into
1192
2:22:49 --> 2:22:54
curing their so-called diseases, you know. So I wondered whether it was a necessary
1193
2:22:56 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]s, to replace them with virologists in order for 2020
1194
2:23:06 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ion about epidemiology and the same question about evidence-based medicine
1195
2:23:13 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ion about genomics, were these all constructed to make, to allow what happened
1196
2:23:20 --> 2:23:27
in 2020 to occur? Obviously, it took time, but that's even more evidence of evil. So was it the
1197
2:23:27 --> 2:23:33
intention of these and super specialization, which you mentioned brilliantly earlier on,
1198
2:23:34 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ors should be beholden to protocols and guidelines?
1199
2:23:45 --> 2:23:50
So diminishing the autonomy of individual doctors, which we were taught at medical school,
1200
2:23:50 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction] defense for the patient against evil. Well, not evil, but yes, you know what I mean.
1201
2:24:00 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]s, you want a doctor who is autonomous, who's an individual, is autonomous,
1202
2:24:05 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]ablishment in any way. They've got rid of that. Apparently, I didn't
1203
2:24:12 --> 2:24:20
ever obey any guideline or protocol. I knew there were protocols, but I just ignored them. I always
1204
2:24:20 --> 2:24:24
did what I thought I would do for my own family. Anyway, Thomas, what do you think?
1205
2:24:24 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]s, Stephen. When I wrote my thesis in immunology and virology in the 1980s,
1206
2:24:33 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]ill one department. Virology and immunology, they were one department.
1207
2:24:40 --> 2:24:46
And somewhat later, they were separated. And since then, I agree, the virologists obviously
1208
2:24:46 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]rage medical doctor has not the slightest idea about immunology,
1209
2:24:53 --> 2:25:03
because as I mentioned, the fundamental duty of our immune system is to recognize non-self and
1210
2:25:03 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction] two lectures of immunology for beginners.
1211
2:25:11 --> 2:25:18
And this is the basic thing of these gene transfections that you choose a foreign antigen,
1212
2:25:18 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction] result in this autoimmune attack. This we had known before this
1213
2:25:27 --> 2:25:35
criminal emergency use authorization. And also, I'm amazed as you, I could not believe how few
1214
2:25:35 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction]e, experts, virologists realized this. I mean, virologists, these are laboratory doctors.
1215
2:25:43 --> 2:25:50
Nowadays, they are not even doctors. Most of them are biologists. Epidemiologists as well.
1216
2:25:50 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction]ors. They are biologists, mathematicians. They are living in the
1217
2:25:56 --> 2:26:05
same virtual modeled world as climate scientists. Epidemiology and climate science is about the same.
1218
2:26:05 --> 2:26:12
They are living in a modeled, artificially intelligent virtual world without any natural
1219
2:26:13 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]ed from reality.
1220
2:26:21 --> 2:26:26
The problem is not the lack of knowledge. It is the illusion of knowledge. And these guys believe
1221
2:26:26 --> 2:26:33
they are geniuses, while in reality they are narcissistic village idiots or maybe better urban
1222
2:26:33 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]e on the countryside are the more intelligent obviously than
1223
2:26:38 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]e in the city. Sorry, Stephen. Yeah.
1224
2:26:43 --> 2:26:46
Charles, why are you interrupting on this? Because it's two and a half hours,
1225
2:26:46 --> 2:26:51
long speeches. And you know the rule, Stephen, less is more.
1226
2:26:54 --> 2:26:59
That's why, because I'm the moderator because two and a half, like gosh, you know, there's 47
1227
2:26:59 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]e left on the call here, Stephen. We don't have endless time.
1228
2:27:02 --> 2:27:06
And Charles, I'm not going to have an argument. Thomas, thank you so much for coming on. Very,
1229
2:27:06 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]ing. And there's another issue that Peter woke up, Peter Underwood.
1230
2:27:11 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]ion and Stephen, you had another 15, 20 minutes.
1231
2:27:16 --> 2:27:22
So I'm not being unkind. I'm always kind. I wasn't saying you were, Charles.
1232
2:27:22 --> 2:27:29
Okay, Peter. Yeah. Thank you, Charles. And thank you, Stephen. I understand your
1233
2:27:29 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction] woken up now. I think Thomas has already answered the question
1234
2:27:38 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]? That's something I discussed with Jerry and many others.
1235
2:27:48 --> 2:27:56
And there's this kind of confusion out there. My sense is that a virus is a
1236
2:27:59 --> 2:28:[privacy contact redaction]ream of something, whether I've read a lot about it and I've never come to a
1237
2:28:09 --> 2:28:15
conclusion. I wanted to ask Thomas, does he think that viruses are reality? Peter, he has answered
1238
2:28:15 --> 2:28:20
that. We're not going to go back on that. Watch the recording. Yeah. We've had plenty of
1239
2:28:20 --> 2:28:23
confusion around that. That's why I put my hand down, Charles.
1240
2:28:23 --> 2:28:33
Well done. And Thomas, excellent, great insights on various questions. So all of us can learn new
1241
2:28:33 --> 2:28:37
ways of expressing ideas. That's the value of these meetings. Thank you, Stephen, for organizing.
1242
2:28:37 --> 2:28:42
Thank you all for being here. Tom Rodman is running, for those of you with endless time,
1243
2:28:42 --> 2:28:50
you can join Tom on his video group. And Stephen and I will discuss whether or not
1244
2:28:50 --> 2:28:[privacy contact redaction]er Sunday for some people. And this is the last day, Stephen,
1245
2:28:57 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction]arted at [privacy contact redaction]arted [privacy contact redaction]ralian
1246
2:29:05 --> 2:29:12
Day- 5 a.m. ends, I started 5 a.m. all through winter. So- Crazy. Crazy. Yeah. And Stephen,
1247
2:29:12 --> 2:29:16
the one thing that Thomas really, Thomas, the one thing you really said that's been really important
1248
2:29:17 --> 2:29:26
and I've taken note of this, amongst many, or clearly public-private partnerships are fascism,
1249
2:29:26 --> 2:29:33
but I loved the comment that the quote, billionaires today, the billionaires today
1250
2:29:33 --> 2:29:42
are the kings of today. That's a lovely metaphor as well. Well, only in their own minds, Charles.
1251
2:29:42 --> 2:29:47
They're not the kings. Indeed. Very good. All right. Thanks everybody for being here.
1252
2:29:47 --> 2:29:52
Thank you, Stephen. We need to remember human hubris. Yeah. Yeah. All right. Well, that's right.
1253
2:29:52 --> 2:29:56
The psychopathic- Thank you, Stephen. Thank you, Charles. Thank you, everybody, for all you are
1254
2:29:56 --> 2:30:02
doing. And venceremos. Thank you so much, Thomas. Some of the things that we were discussing,
1255
2:30:02 --> 2:30:07
I think we need to get out to the public somehow or other. In particular, immunology and
1256
2:30:07 --> 2:30:10
virology, the interplay between those things and how they've been misused.
1257
2:30:11 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction]er and Greek Easter is two weeks after that. I don't think
1258
2:30:17 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction] many Greeks here, Stephen. But anyway, Greek Easter is two weeks later. And so may you get
1259
2:30:22 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction]er eggs delivered by rabbits. How about that? That's an interesting contemplation, isn't it?
1260
2:30:28 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction] a good time. Great to be with you all. Have a couple of-
1261
2:30:32 --> 2:30:40
Charles and I aren't always arguing. So very often, especially in his winter, I praise him for his
1262
2:30:41 --> 2:30:45
sense of duty. Getting up at five o'clock every twice a week.
1263
2:30:47 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction] four, Stephen, twice a week. That's right.
1264
2:30:52 --> 2:31:00
However, it's given me a new appreciation for the current affairs TV hosts who come onto our
1265
2:31:00 --> 2:31:05
screens at six a.m. in the morning or seven a.m. in the morning. And many of them get up at three
1266
2:31:05 --> 2:31:10
a.m. So I'm glad I'm not one of those. And the other is Stephen, the vegetable, the vegetable,
1267
2:31:10 --> 2:31:16
the far, sorry, the market, the markets, they get up at three a.m. to be at the vegetable,
1268
2:31:16 --> 2:31:22
fruit and vegetable markets at five a.m. starts. Amazing. Anyway, everybody who needs sleep.
1269
2:31:22 --> 2:31:[privacy contact redaction]er. Bye for now. Bye, Stephen.
1270
2:31:26 --> 2:31:28
Excellent, Thomas. Thank you so much.
1271
2:31:28 --> 2:31:29
Thanks. Bye bye.
1272
2:31:35 --> 2:31:37
Thanks, everybody. Have a blessed Easter.
1273
2:31:39 --> 2:31:53
Yeah. Thanks, Daria. They may be in me. Oh, gone now.
