1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:11
So everybody, welcome to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.
2
0:00:11 --> 0:00:19
And Glenn, you have a short statement to make that is relevant to the Donald Trump attempted
3
0:00:19 --> 0:00:21
assassination attempt.
4
0:00:21 --> 0:00:23
It appears.
5
0:00:23 --> 0:00:24
I do.
6
0:00:24 --> 0:00:29
As I've described to this group, I'm part of the American Patriot Civil Defense Net.
7
0:00:30 --> 0:00:37
Team is linked with the Department of Defense, a very significant and high intel group.
8
0:00:37 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction] shows on Brumble under L4ATV1.
9
0:00:42 --> 0:00:44
And here's a prepared statement.
10
0:00:44 --> 0:00:46
So it's not ad hoc.
11
0:00:46 --> 0:00:49
It was fully prepared, and I'm reading it to you directly.
12
0:00:49 --> 0:00:51
A little update.
13
0:00:51 --> 0:00:59
The shooter in the case of the event with President Trump.
14
0:00:59 --> 0:01:02
His name is Thomas Matthew Crooks.
15
0:01:02 --> 0:01:07
Now that has been reported, but most of the other information about him has been either
16
0:01:07 --> 0:01:10
buried or not misreported.
17
0:01:10 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ributor, manufacturer with five unjailed convictions
18
0:01:17 --> 0:01:23
under his belt in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, per public records.
19
0:01:23 --> 0:01:27
But dates are altered in some of those records.
20
0:01:27 --> 0:01:32
One of Hunter Biden's drug dealer buddies reportedly hired him.
21
0:01:32 --> 0:01:35
He was Hunter Biden's.
22
0:01:35 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ing for Joe Biden, securing and protecting the big guy franchise
23
0:01:41 --> 0:01:46
from the Biden crime family for four more years.
24
0:01:46 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction], Hunter, like father, like son.
25
0:01:52 --> 0:01:55
You can take that to the bank.
26
0:01:55 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction] they did the rigged election, their January 6th
27
0:02:02 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]op from hell and help try framing Trump multiple times.
28
0:02:10 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]ice Department is not well, nor are Soros, Clinton, Biden, Pelosi, Mayorkas, Garland,
29
0:02:19 --> 0:02:22
et cetera, families.
30
0:02:22 --> 0:02:28
So with that one other point around things that are being reported, it is not an inside
31
0:02:28 --> 0:02:39
job with the execution team, meaning the...
32
0:02:39 --> 0:02:40
Blanking out their name.
33
0:02:40 --> 0:02:44
The detail that was covering Trump is very honest.
34
0:02:44 --> 0:02:49
The major failure that we had here was in that ring, there was a local policeman.
35
0:02:49 --> 0:02:51
He was advised that there was somebody on the roof.
36
0:02:51 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]ead of calling it in and calling for backup, he climbed up the ladder, the gunman turned
37
0:02:56 --> 0:02:59
on him and then he fell off the ladder.
38
0:02:59 --> 0:03:04
Other than that, that was a stupid mistake by a local policeman.
39
0:03:04 --> 0:03:07
Other than that, you have righteous people taking the actions.
40
0:03:07 --> 0:03:09
And thank you for the time.
41
0:03:09 --> 0:03:10
Thank you, Glenn.
42
0:03:10 --> 0:03:17
And welcome to today's discussion with Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International.
43
0:03:17 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ephen Frost over three years ago with a desire to pursue
44
0:03:21 --> 0:03:27
truth, ethics, justice, freedom and health and the proper application of law very relevant
45
0:03:27 --> 0:03:29
to today's presenter.
46
0:03:29 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] government and power over the years and has been a whistleblower
47
0:03:32 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]
48
0:03:33 --> 0:03:36
His medical specialty is radiology.
49
0:03:36 --> 0:03:39
I'm Charles Covets, the moderator of this group.
50
0:03:39 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]iced law for 20 years before changing career 31 years ago.
51
0:03:44 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction] 13 years, I've helped parents and lawyers to strategize remedies for vaccine
52
0:03:48 --> 0:03:52
damage and damage from bad medical advice.
53
0:03:52 --> 0:03:56
I'm also the CEO of an industrial hemp company.
54
0:03:56 --> 0:04:01
On the issue of vaccine damage, I note that Stanley Plotkin, a proponent for the last
55
0:04:01 --> 0:04:07
40 years about the amazing safety and efficacy of childhood vaccines, has now co-authored
56
0:04:07 --> 0:04:15
an article acknowledging, acknowledging due to the good work of Del Bigtree and the Highwire
57
0:04:15 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] never been properly tested for safety or efficacy ever.
58
0:04:23 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]and the profound importance of that statement of the fraud
59
0:04:33 --> 0:04:36
that's been perpetrated on humanity from these childhood vaccines.
60
0:04:36 --> 0:04:47
And I urge you all to get hold of the Aaron Ciri article to show to all of your friends
61
0:04:47 --> 0:04:51
who ever say that childhood vaccines are a good idea.
62
0:04:51 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] that I've yet to meet a parent who refused to vaccinate their
63
0:04:59 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]en who regrets that decision.
64
0:05:03 --> 0:05:06
If you know of any, please let me know.
65
0:05:06 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ease let us know.
66
0:05:09 --> 0:05:15
We comprise lots of professionals here and we're from all around the world.
67
0:05:15 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction] time here, welcome and introduce yourself.
68
0:05:18 --> 0:05:19
I apologize for my cough.
69
0:05:19 --> 0:05:22
It's 5 a.m. in the morning here in Melbourne, Australia.
70
0:05:22 --> 0:05:26
I don't know what's happened.
71
0:05:26 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]and we're in the middle of World War III and that the medical science
72
0:05:29 --> 0:05:36
battle is only one of [privacy contact redaction] World War.
73
0:05:36 --> 0:05:41
One of the other battle fronts is the legal front, is the legal, is the proper application
74
0:05:41 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]ale, our guest today, is going to be talking about.
75
0:05:47 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]and that the science is never settled.
76
0:05:51 --> 0:05:56
The meeting runs for two and a half hours after which, for those with the time, Tom
77
0:05:56 --> 0:05:58
Rodman runs a video telegram meeting.
78
0:05:58 --> 0:06:01
Tom puts the links into the chat if you're able to join.
79
0:06:01 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] presenter, Chris Coverdale, for as long as Chris wishes to
80
0:06:05 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] Q&A.
81
0:06:07 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction], by long established tradition, asked the first questions for 15 minutes.
82
0:06:13 --> 0:06:16
If you're offended by anything, be offended.
83
0:06:16 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ed.
84
0:06:17 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ry and we reject the triggering industry.
85
0:06:23 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ry that says don't say a particular thing because it may trigger
86
0:06:28 --> 0:06:29
somebody.
87
0:06:29 --> 0:06:34
We call BS on that proposition.
88
0:06:34 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ive of love, not fear.
89
0:06:38 --> 0:06:40
Fear is the opposite of love.
90
0:06:40 --> 0:06:44
Fear squashes you.
91
0:06:44 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]s you.
92
0:06:46 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] your freedoms.
93
0:06:49 --> 0:06:54
Love on the other hand expands you and liberates you.
94
0:06:54 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]oaded onto the Rumble channel.
95
0:06:58 --> 0:07:05
And now welcome to our presenter, Chris Coverdale, and for the purposes of the recording, for
96
0:07:05 --> 0:07:15
those who didn't receive the meeting invitation, I will tell you about Chris Coverdale.
97
0:07:15 --> 0:07:19
After 25 years running a behavioral science and engineering consultancy firm and four
98
0:07:19 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]igating fraud and corruption in government and large corporations, Chris became
99
0:07:23 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction] in 2002 when he discovered that the UK government had for
100
0:07:30 --> 0:07:33
many decades been deceiving Parliament.
101
0:07:33 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]y's, now His Majesty's military forces and the public over the illegal criminal
102
0:07:39 --> 0:07:42
nature of war and the funding of war.
103
0:07:42 --> 0:07:[privacy contact redaction]ion against war and make war history, Chris Coverdale
104
0:07:48 --> 0:07:52
has had numerous attempts to prevent Britain's leaders and taxpayers from their criminal
105
0:07:52 --> 0:07:59
participation in war, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
106
0:07:59 --> 0:08:06
Since 2017, Chris has been developing a lawful taxation trust method of paying all taxes
107
0:08:06 --> 0:08:11
and financial payments to government into trusts on the condition that public authorities
108
0:08:11 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ees receive proof that none of the money will
109
0:08:16 --> 0:08:21
ever be used for criminal purposes and that the government is acting in full accord with
110
0:08:21 --> 0:08:28
the UN Charter and the UN Declaration on Principles of International Law.
111
0:08:28 --> 0:08:34
And I was a lawyer for 20 years, I was an international tax lawyer.
112
0:08:34 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]s intimately and we are dealing with this as medical doctors for COVID
113
0:08:42 --> 0:08:49
ethics and governments, the behavior of governments and the use of trust is a wonderful, very
114
0:08:49 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ing idea.
115
0:08:50 --> 0:08:54
So, Chris, welcome to the program, to the meeting.
116
0:08:54 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction], thank you for organizing this group.
117
0:08:57 --> 0:08:59
And Chris, we are in your hands.
118
0:08:59 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction] to hearing you and then and then having a great discussion about the
119
0:09:06 --> 0:09:08
issues that you raise over to you.
120
0:09:10 --> 0:09:12
Thank you very much, Charles.
121
0:09:12 --> 0:09:18
One thing and thank you, Alex Craner, for recommending you to speak to us.
122
0:09:18 --> 0:09:23
Alex is a great friend of the program, has presented to us on a number of occasions.
123
0:09:23 --> 0:09:24
So thank you, Alex.
124
0:09:24 --> 0:09:25
Over to you, Chris.
125
0:09:26 --> 0:09:27
Thanks, Charles.
126
0:09:28 --> 0:09:33
OK, well, you've got most of my background there in that intro.
127
0:09:34 --> 0:09:43
So my original management development, organization development and cognitive engineering
128
0:09:43 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]antly focus on solutions.
129
0:09:49 --> 0:09:52
And that's really what I've been doing for the last 20 years.
130
0:09:52 --> 0:09:57
How do we solve the problems we're faced with, the tyranny?
131
0:09:57 --> 0:10:04
So really, what I want to talk about today is several of the solutions that are available
132
0:10:04 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]op our governments and take back control.
133
0:10:10 --> 0:10:18
So in 2002, I was investigating fraud and corruption in the Foreign and Commonwealth
134
0:10:18 --> 0:10:28
Office in London and discovered that we had been deceived for more than 75 years over
135
0:10:28 --> 0:10:30
the illegality of war.
136
0:10:31 --> 0:10:36
Our government had been telling us that what they were doing overseas in relation to
137
0:10:36 --> 0:10:37
was legal.
138
0:10:37 --> 0:10:45
And many times they would say it has been authorized by the UN Security Council operating
139
0:10:45 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]er 7 of the UN Charter.
140
0:10:50 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]arted to look at this and I found that was a lie.
141
0:10:53 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]
142
0:10:55 --> 0:11:01
The UN Security Council can never authorize the use of armed force.
143
0:11:02 --> 0:11:11
The UN Charter, which is the law, international law agreed now between 195 nations, says very
144
0:11:11 --> 0:11:22
clearly in its purposes that we agree never to threaten or to use force and to settle
145
0:11:22 --> 0:11:24
all disputes peacefully.
146
0:11:25 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]atements that we have to make.
147
0:11:29 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]atements in the United Nations Charter to which we are all
148
0:11:35 --> 0:11:36
signed up to.
149
0:11:38 --> 0:11:45
Of course, looking at this and Britain's history, I discovered that I now know that we have
150
0:11:45 --> 0:11:55
fought somewhere between 80 and 85 illegal wars since 1945, killing somewhere between
151
0:11:55 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]e.
152
0:11:58 --> 0:12:04
It's difficult to get the exact numbers, but one way or the other, we have murdered six
153
0:12:04 --> 0:12:11
to nine million men, women and children since we promised never to threaten or to use force.
154
0:12:13 --> 0:12:18
So it was when I discovered that that I was horrified and started to think, well, what
155
0:12:18 --> 0:12:20
are we going to do about this?
156
0:12:21 --> 0:12:25
Now, the first thing we did was, together with some colleagues, tried to take out an
157
0:12:25 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction] in the Royal Courts of Justice in London, an injunction
158
0:12:33 --> 0:12:43
to prevent Tony Blair and the cabinet and the monarch at that time to stop the Iraq
159
0:12:43 --> 0:12:45
War, which was upcoming.
160
0:12:45 --> 0:12:51
This was January 2003, and we eventually went to war in March 2003.
161
0:12:52 --> 0:12:55
Now, unfortunately, they paid no attention to that.
162
0:12:55 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction]ion and they gave two reasons.
163
0:13:01 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] it could be classified as genocide.
164
0:13:07 --> 0:13:16
And the second was, both of which we had put into our argument, the second was that we
165
0:13:16 --> 0:13:23
would not be attacked in London by rogue Iraqi terrorists.
166
0:13:26 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction], once we'd failed in that, the war with Iraq started and we were already at war
167
0:13:33 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction]an.
168
0:13:36 --> 0:13:43
And we were reckoning that we were killing up to 100,[privacy contact redaction]e, men, women and children
169
0:13:43 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] 18 months of the Iraq War in Iraq and probably half that number in Afghanistan.
170
0:13:55 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] unbelievable.
171
0:14:01 --> 0:14:02
So we did a number of things.
172
0:14:02 --> 0:14:09
We had a look at what does the law say in this country?
173
0:14:09 --> 0:14:16
Now, one of the problems that had been raised by many people was that we can't prosecute
174
0:14:16 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]op our leaders based on international law.
175
0:14:20 --> 0:14:27
If an international law is agreed, it only comes into effect in domestic legislation
176
0:14:28 --> 0:14:32
when it has been ratified by Parliament and the monarch.
177
0:14:32 --> 0:14:38
I looked at two of the key laws and the one that had been most recently introduced was
178
0:14:38 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]atute of the International Criminal Court, which set up the International Criminal
179
0:14:45 --> 0:14:47
Court in The Hague.
180
0:14:48 --> 0:14:55
And Britain had ratified that and it had been enacted as the International Criminal Court
181
0:14:55 --> 0:14:57
Act 2001.
182
0:14:57 --> 0:14:58
2001.
183
0:14:59 --> 0:15:07
And also, because we have two different systems of law in Britain, it was the International
184
0:15:07 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]
185
0:15:10 --> 0:15:18
Scottish law is based on Roman law, whereas English and Welsh law is common law, if you like.
186
0:15:20 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction] been brought in.
187
0:15:23 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]ruck me was when I read them, I thought, well, why doesn't anybody apply them?
188
0:15:30 --> 0:15:37
The important thing about the International Criminal Court Act is that it introduced not
189
0:15:37 --> 0:15:44
only a law enforcement, an international law enforcement authority for the first time in
190
0:15:44 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]ory.
191
0:15:45 --> 0:15:47
It had taken 60 years to get it set up.
192
0:15:48 --> 0:16:01
But in Britain, the Queen at that time, the monarch, enacted its interlaw in the UK.
193
0:16:01 --> 0:16:08
And in doing so, she handed over jurisdiction over six crimes to the International Criminal
194
0:16:08 --> 0:16:09
Court in The Hague.
195
0:16:10 --> 0:16:17
She put herself and every British resident and citizen under the jurisdiction of the
196
0:16:17 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction] for six crimes.
197
0:16:21 --> 0:16:23
Now, the six crimes are important.
198
0:16:24 --> 0:16:36
They are war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and conduct ancillary to war crimes,
199
0:16:37 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction] humanity, and conduct ancillary to genocide.
200
0:16:44 --> 0:16:51
Those are the six crimes, universal crimes, that apply around the world and in particular
201
0:16:51 --> 0:16:52
in Britain.
202
0:16:54 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction]arted to look at, well, what do we mean by these crimes?
203
0:16:59 --> 0:17:05
And the definition of the crimes is very clearly laid out in the legislation.
204
0:17:05 --> 0:17:10
But nobody in government or parliament or anywhere else seems to follow it.
205
0:17:11 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] of all, none of the MPs I spoke to at the time had heard about the International
206
0:17:16 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction], which had been passed just a year earlier.
207
0:17:22 --> 0:17:28
It came in in 2001, and I started to investigate it in 2002.
208
0:17:30 --> 0:17:31
They didn't know about it.
209
0:17:32 --> 0:17:39
And it appalled me because looking at the definitions in the legislation, it was quite
210
0:17:39 --> 0:17:47
clear that everything we were doing in Afghanistan and Iraq was not only a number of war crimes,
211
0:17:48 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] humanity.
212
0:17:51 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction] importantly, it met the definition of genocide.
213
0:17:56 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]an and Iraq was that we were killing people because of
214
0:18:04 --> 0:18:08
who they were, not because of anything they had done to us.
215
0:18:10 --> 0:18:11
They committed no crimes.
216
0:18:11 --> 0:18:13
They had attacked no British citizens.
217
0:18:14 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] killing them because our government, together with George Bush's
218
0:18:21 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]ration in America, had decided that they wanted to take over Iraq's resources
219
0:18:30 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]an's resources, and in particular the oil, to move the oil from Central Asia
220
0:18:41 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]an, for access by the Americans.
221
0:18:49 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]ual crimes, the crime of genocide, which we have now committed,
222
0:19:00 --> 0:19:04
seven military genocides since 2001.
223
0:19:04 --> 0:19:15
Every time we attack a country, we are attacking people with high explosive bombs and rockets
224
0:19:15 --> 0:19:21
and missiles and so on, knowing that when they land and explode, local people will be
225
0:19:21 --> 0:19:21
injured and killed.
226
0:19:23 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction] shock and awe attacks on Baghdad and then the attacks on
227
0:19:31 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]ivities that went on led to the deaths of at least
228
0:19:38 --> 0:19:43
100,[privacy contact redaction] 12 months.
229
0:19:45 --> 0:19:53
So that met the crime of genocide and the conditions that one has to prove in court
230
0:19:53 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction] a person of genocide.
231
0:19:59 --> 0:20:09
It's quite interesting that, again, going into the detail of it, I asked up to 35, maybe 40 MPs,
232
0:20:09 --> 0:20:12
did they know about the International Criminal Court Act?
233
0:20:13 --> 0:20:20
Did they know about the International Criminal Court Act elements of crimes regulations?
234
0:20:21 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] issue, and it is the most important of all.
235
0:20:27 --> 0:20:35
What it does is it takes each crime and it defines it in detail, laying out what you have to prove
236
0:20:35 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] a person of genocide by killing or genocide by causing bodily and
237
0:20:43 --> 0:20:51
mental harm or genocide by creating conditions inimitable to life.
238
0:20:53 --> 0:20:57
These are three of the five main subheadings of genocide.
239
0:20:58 --> 0:21:04
Each of them is defined in detail in the legislation, but nobody knows it, nobody follows
240
0:21:05 --> 0:21:07
and certainly not our government lawyers.
241
0:21:09 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] Goldsmith, who was the Attorney General at the time,
242
0:21:13 --> 0:21:16
kept saying that, yes, it would be legal.
243
0:21:16 --> 0:21:26
It had been authorised under Security Council Resolution 678, 687 and 1441.
244
0:21:26 --> 0:21:29
Again, when I looked at that, I found that was rubbish.
245
0:21:30 --> 0:21:35
The Security Council cannot authorise the use of armed force.
246
0:21:37 --> 0:21:43
Article 41 of the UN Charter, one of the most important articles the world has,
247
0:21:43 --> 0:21:51
says quite clearly, the Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of
248
0:21:51 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction]oyed to give effect to its decisions.
249
0:21:57 --> 0:22:02
Now that couldn't be clearer, not involving the use of armed force.
250
0:22:04 --> 0:22:07
But of course, our government ignores that over and over again.
251
0:22:07 --> 0:22:15
And as I say, we fought maybe 83 illegal wars, something like that, since 1945,
252
0:22:15 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]etely.
253
0:22:18 --> 0:22:24
So that was the issue of trying to get someone to pay attention.
254
0:22:24 --> 0:22:32
And really, for many years, we reported these war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide
255
0:22:32 --> 0:22:39
to every police force in Britain, going into police stations or writing to the chief
256
0:22:39 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ables and so on.
257
0:22:41 --> 0:22:45
It was over 300 attempts to do that over a period of six years.
258
0:22:46 --> 0:22:55
Now of those 300 attempts, five of them got as far as the War Crimes and Crimes Against
259
0:22:55 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]
260
0:22:58 --> 0:23:03
Now I'd never heard of that unit, but I became aware of it quite quickly.
261
0:23:03 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction], those five reports got to the War Crimes Unit.
262
0:23:11 --> 0:23:17
And on one day, I was called into the unit and they said, well, look, you've got all
263
0:23:17 --> 0:23:18
this evidence.
264
0:23:18 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ain it to us?
265
0:23:21 --> 0:23:28
So I spent 15 hours, five sessions of three hours at a time, and I was told that I had
266
0:23:29 --> 0:23:36
15 hours, five sessions of three hours at a time with the police officers in that unit,
267
0:23:36 --> 0:23:42
going through all the details of the crimes committed by our leaders, by Tony Blair,
268
0:23:42 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]raw, Gordon Brown, Lord Goldsmith, and the rest of the cabinet, basically,
269
0:23:50 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]aff.
270
0:23:54 --> 0:23:58
So having gone through all the detail, after the first couple of hours, they were pretty
271
0:23:58 --> 0:24:04
cynical about, you know, who is this mad guy reporting war crimes.
272
0:24:05 --> 0:24:08
However, they did listen and we went through it in detail.
273
0:24:09 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]e of hours, they realised, well, there was something to it.
274
0:24:12 --> 0:24:13
This is what the law says.
275
0:24:14 --> 0:24:15
This is what has happened.
276
0:24:15 --> 0:24:17
That is quite obviously a criminal offence.
277
0:24:18 --> 0:24:24
So eventually, they were happy to pass on all the information that we've given them,
278
0:24:25 --> 0:24:29
they said, to the Crown Prosecution Service.
279
0:24:29 --> 0:24:35
Now, in Britain, the Crown Prosecution Service are responsible for prosecuting criminal
280
0:24:35 --> 0:24:36
offences of this nature.
281
0:24:38 --> 0:24:43
The Crown Prosecution Service went through it in some detail, and then the woman who
282
0:24:43 --> 0:24:48
was in charge, a senior member of the Crown Prosecution Service, was promoted to a better
283
0:24:48 --> 0:24:50
job in the north of England.
284
0:24:50 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction], whatever you like to call it, the crime report, was passed to the most
285
0:24:58 --> 0:25:00
junior person in the office.
286
0:25:00 --> 0:25:06
He had it for about six weeks and finally came back to us with a letter from the Crown
287
0:25:06 --> 0:25:12
Prosecution Service saying that the Crown Prosecution Service was responsible for the
288
0:25:12 --> 0:25:18
saying, well, we're not going to go ahead with the prosecution of Blair and Straw,
289
0:25:18 --> 0:25:25
Hoon, Goldsmith, all the rest of the ones that you have reported to us on the grounds
290
0:25:25 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction] not provided evidence of intent to commit war crimes, intent to commit crimes
291
0:25:35 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction] humanity, or intent to commit genocide.
292
0:25:40 --> 0:25:42
And therefore, we're not going to go ahead with it.
293
0:25:43 --> 0:25:48
Now, that was a really poor excuse because it's not for the public or the witnesses to
294
0:25:48 --> 0:25:51
the crimes to prove intent.
295
0:25:51 --> 0:25:54
That is the job of the Crown Prosecution Service.
296
0:25:54 --> 0:26:00
They need to go through the detail and they can't take someone into court and prosecute
297
0:26:00 --> 0:26:06
them unless they are absolutely clear for themselves of what's called the mens rea,
298
0:26:06 --> 0:26:08
the intent to commit genocide.
299
0:26:08 --> 0:26:13
Now, we have provided pages of evidence of intent.
300
0:26:13 --> 0:26:20
We've gone through it in detail and it's quite important to know that there's a document
301
0:26:20 --> 0:26:25
called Accounting for Genocide up on our website which people can have a look at in detail
302
0:26:25 --> 0:26:26
later on.
303
0:26:28 --> 0:26:32
I'll give you the details of the website later.
304
0:26:33 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]e of intent to commit genocide took place, for instance, in Parliament in
305
0:26:42 --> 0:26:51
the debate on March 18, 2003, when Parliament debated whether or not to go to war with Iraq.
306
0:26:52 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] person to speak was obviously Tony Blair.
307
0:26:57 --> 0:27:03
He put the motion to the House and asked everybody to go with it.
308
0:27:06 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction] person to speak was the Foreign Secretary, who was Jack Straw at the time.
309
0:27:12 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ing how he responded.
310
0:27:15 --> 0:27:18
He said, well, we've had a good debate tonight.
311
0:27:20 --> 0:27:24
We know there will be consequences of our decision tonight.
312
0:27:24 --> 0:27:27
Some of our troops will be killed or may be killed.
313
0:27:28 --> 0:27:33
So too will innocent Iraqi civilians.
314
0:27:34 --> 0:27:37
I urge you to vote with the government tonight.
315
0:27:39 --> 0:27:43
Now, if you look at that statement, it is appalling.
316
0:27:44 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]e to do was to kill innocent Iraqi civilians.
317
0:27:49 --> 0:27:57
Genocide is when you kill someone because of their nationality, their ethnicity, their race, or their religion.
318
0:27:58 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]e because of their nationality.
319
0:28:02 --> 0:28:07
So here he was urging Parliament to commit genocide.
320
0:28:08 --> 0:28:16
The horrifying thing for me was that having said that, the debate finished and the MPs trouped
321
0:28:16 --> 0:28:20
through the lobbies, either to vote for it or to vote against it.
322
0:28:21 --> 0:28:32
And the bit that really worried me was that 412 MPs voted in favour of genocide of the Iraqi people,
323
0:28:32 --> 0:28:37
of going to war, of killing men, women and children because of who they were.
324
0:28:39 --> 0:28:41
So it was appalling.
325
0:28:42 --> 0:28:45
But however, nobody else seemed to see that this was a problem.
326
0:28:45 --> 0:28:46
They carried on.
327
0:28:46 --> 0:28:51
As you know, nobody would listen to the anti-war brigade.
328
0:28:52 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]raight away.
329
0:28:56 --> 0:28:58
We weren't able to get on to the mainstream media.
330
0:28:59 --> 0:29:03
And typically, we had a lot of problems.
331
0:29:04 --> 0:29:08
Now, simultaneously to this, trying to do this, I had this question,
332
0:29:08 --> 0:29:14
continuously to this, trying to do this, I had discovered that conduct ancillary to genocide
333
0:29:15 --> 0:29:19
includes any behaviour that is aiding and abetting the crime.
334
0:29:20 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]atute of the International Criminal Court, Article 25, which is the key
335
0:29:28 --> 0:29:35
criminal responsibility article, says quite clearly anyone who aids and abets the crime
336
0:29:35 --> 0:29:37
is committing the crime.
337
0:29:38 --> 0:29:45
And this includes providing the means for the commission of the crime.
338
0:29:46 --> 0:29:50
And so when we looked at what does it mean by providing the means for the commission of the
339
0:29:50 --> 0:29:56
crime, it was quite obviously providing the troops and the weapons and the money,
340
0:29:56 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction] importantly the money, to fight the war and the supplies and the training and everything else.
341
0:30:06 --> 0:30:13
So having discovered that the money was a key issue, I realised that paying tax,
342
0:30:14 --> 0:30:20
would be knowing that it would be used to commit, some of it would be used to commit genocide,
343
0:30:21 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction] ancillary to genocide.
344
0:30:26 --> 0:30:30
So my immediate response was, I've got to stop paying all taxes.
345
0:30:31 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]ies today, by the way, so it is still there.
346
0:30:35 --> 0:30:43
Every time we pay tax, we give our consent to the way the money will be used by the government.
347
0:30:44 --> 0:30:46
And that's the bit that horrified me.
348
0:30:46 --> 0:30:49
So in 2003, I stopped paying tax.
349
0:30:50 --> 0:30:56
And in particular, the big tax in this country that I was paying was the council tax.
350
0:30:56 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]opped paying council tax and income tax and one or two other things.
351
0:31:02 --> 0:31:09
So I did that for nearly 10 years around South London, West London, all around there.
352
0:31:09 --> 0:31:13
And I didn't get into any trouble for it.
353
0:31:13 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] and that sort of thing, but I managed to get out of it and get away.
354
0:31:19 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction], in 19, sorry, 2014, I moved to Rye and Sussex and started the same thing there.
355
0:31:27 --> 0:31:33
And as a result of that, and one other thing that's important, I started because of my
356
0:31:33 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction]igatory abilities, looking at crimes in large organisations in the boardrooms of large
357
0:31:41 --> 0:31:48
organisations and government departments, which I'd been doing for four years from 1998 to 2002.
358
0:31:49 --> 0:31:[privacy contact redaction] quite a lot of experience of exposing myself to the reality of crime.
359
0:31:54 --> 0:32:01
And in 2002, I have quite a lot of experience of exposing, investigating and exposing corruption.
360
0:32:03 --> 0:32:11
When I arrived in Rye, I discovered all sorts of corruption going on in the local council and in
361
0:32:11 --> 0:32:19
the town council and in the area, including with our MP, Amber Rudd, who later became Home Secretary.
362
0:32:19 --> 0:32:29
So I raised that. Now, as soon as I raised that, within 10 days, I was sent to prison,
363
0:32:31 --> 0:32:35
not for raising that, but for willful refusal to pay tax.
364
0:32:38 --> 0:32:44
So I tried again the following year and again the following year I was sent to prison and
365
0:32:44 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction] year they sent me to prison.
366
0:32:48 --> 0:32:50
So they're pretty rough down there, let's put it that way.
367
0:32:52 --> 0:32:57
It was after that that I thought I've got to find a different way around this. This is ridiculous.
368
0:32:57 --> 0:33:03
I'm trying to uphold the law as I see it and no court in the country seems to be able to understand
369
0:33:03 --> 0:33:12
what I'm trying to do or uphold and enforce the law. So that was when I came across the issue or
370
0:33:12 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]s could be used to pay our taxes. The important thing about this
371
0:33:23 --> 0:33:34
is it's a conditional trust, a discretionary revocable conditional trust. Now what I do is
372
0:33:34 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction] for the council saying, yes, I'm very happy to pay it,
373
0:33:41 --> 0:33:47
but only if you prove to me that not a penny of it will be used for a criminal purpose.
374
0:33:48 --> 0:33:54
And in particular, for the criminal purposes of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide.
375
0:33:55 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction] 2000 for terrorism and they've never been able to do that.
376
0:34:04 --> 0:34:14
So since 2017, I've put all my taxes in trust for the year and they have not been able to claim them
377
0:34:14 --> 0:34:18
because they can't prove that none of the money will be used for a criminal purpose.
378
0:34:20 --> 0:34:26
The nice thing about it is it's a revocable trust. So they have until the last day of the financial
379
0:34:26 --> 0:34:35
year. In our case, in this country, taxes are the last day of the tax year is April the 5th.
380
0:34:37 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ee to say you can have the money providing you can and it'll be yours
381
0:34:46 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ee will hand it over to you if you can prove that it's not being used for a criminal
382
0:34:52 --> 0:35:03
purpose. If you don't, however, on April the 6th, the trustee will remove your right to claim the
383
0:35:03 --> 0:35:11
money and pass it to the secondary beneficiary. And the secondary beneficiary is you. In fact,
384
0:35:11 --> 0:35:21
it was me. So in a sense, what it does is it enables them to have a year to claim the money
385
0:35:21 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]opping warfare, stopping the killing and upholding and enforcing the UN Charter
386
0:35:29 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]es of International Law. So far, they've not been able to do that.
387
0:35:36 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction] year and a half or two years now, we've been spreading the word and more and more people are
388
0:35:43 --> 0:35:51
joining in and signing up to these Taxation Trusts, conditional taxation trusts. And I'm
389
0:35:51 --> 0:35:59
pleased to say that it's working. We tell it's working because what happens for me, for instance,
390
0:36:00 --> 0:36:08
every year since 2017, they seem to write off my debt and then start again the following year.
391
0:36:09 --> 0:36:14
So I get all the demands and everything else and summonses and the bailiffs coming around and so on.
392
0:36:15 --> 0:36:23
However, at the end of the year, I get a new demand for the coming year. For instance, this year,
393
0:36:23 --> 0:36:33
having not paid council tax for six years, they sent me a bill saying, according to our records,
394
0:36:33 --> 0:36:43
you owe us £166. So I was quite amused by that. So basically, the £12,000 or thereabouts that I
395
0:36:43 --> 0:36:53
had not paid had been written off. One or two developments to this and the important thing we've
396
0:36:53 --> 0:36:59
now discovered is that we really need to get our companies and corporations to understand that
397
0:36:59 --> 0:37:10
every time they take PAYE, that's pay as you earn from an employee's salary and what's called a
398
0:37:10 --> 0:37:16
national insurance contribution, they take that every month and the company hands it to the revenue
399
0:37:16 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]oms. Now in doing so, the company directors are committing serious crimes of conduct ancillary
400
0:37:25 --> 0:37:31
to genocide. So what we're trying to do, we've got five or six small companies already on board
401
0:37:31 --> 0:37:41
with this, is to get the companies themselves to set up trusts for their employees. In the same way,
402
0:37:41 --> 0:37:49
a conditional revocable discretionary trust for all their employees, for all the payments of PAYE
403
0:37:49 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction] been taken from their salaries during the year are placed in the
404
0:37:55 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction] and at the end of the year, if the government hasn't met the conditions, then the employees get
405
0:38:03 --> 0:38:13
the money back. In addition to that, they get a 12.5% employer's contribution back because that
406
0:38:13 --> 0:38:23
also has been withheld from the government in trust for them to take. So anyway, very briefly,
407
0:38:23 --> 0:38:30
that seems to be a solution that's working. There are one or two other things, perhaps we can talk
408
0:38:30 --> 0:38:37
about them later on, but very briefly, one of the main ways of ensuring that we bring back the power
409
0:38:37 --> 0:38:46
to us is to set up our own corporations as cooperatives and take back control locally over
410
0:38:46 --> 0:38:52
all our affairs. Now, the great benefit that the corporations have is that they write their own
411
0:38:53 --> 0:38:59
article association, their own internal laws, and we can be doing that in every
412
0:38:59 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]ituency in Britain. We're looking at [privacy contact redaction]ituencies and we want 650 cooperatives
413
0:39:10 --> 0:39:19
where we own the local cooperative, we manage and take over the activities from the local councils
414
0:39:19 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]art to run our own affairs. So that's a whole new area that perhaps on another time we can
415
0:39:26 --> 0:39:32
go into more detail on at a later date. And then there are a number of things that we've got to do
416
0:39:32 --> 0:39:38
setting up our local parliaments. One thing that many people don't know is how many people here
417
0:39:38 --> 0:39:46
know how many parliaments there are in Switzerland? Does anybody know? Well, there are all the cantons,
418
0:39:47 --> 0:39:57
if you count those as parliaments. Absolutely. There's 26. 26 cantons and there's one corporate
419
0:39:57 --> 0:40:05
one, so 27 there, but also the communes have their own parliaments. Not all of them have, there's
420
0:40:05 --> 0:40:14
2,100 communes and several of them joined together. So there are in total over 400 parliaments in
421
0:40:14 --> 0:40:21
Switzerland with six and a half million people and their laws and other ways of operating are
422
0:40:21 --> 0:40:29
very important for democracy worldwide. So their parliaments, they get the laws together and they
423
0:40:29 --> 0:40:35
work on it a lot of time, but it doesn't become law until it has been agreed by all the people
424
0:40:35 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction] four years, three years, I think they've only had 12 new laws.
425
0:40:44 --> 0:40:50
Whereas in this country, we've had hundreds. Anyway, I won't go into too much more detail.
426
0:40:50 --> 0:40:55
I think that's briefly telling you about the sort of things that we're doing. There are a lot of
427
0:40:55 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]e solutions that we can go into on some other time. So over to you, Charles.
428
0:41:03 --> 0:41:09
Thank you. Thank you, Chris. And before we get to Stephen, I want to make a couple of points.
429
0:41:10 --> 0:41:18
Please do. I was a tax lawyer for [privacy contact redaction] is, because
430
0:41:18 --> 0:41:24
Chris, we've got people from all around the world here and we use the word trust quite easily and
431
0:41:24 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]s and fixed trusts and revocable trusts. The important thing
432
0:41:32 --> 0:41:39
in using that term all around the world is it's a simple proposition to create a situation where
433
0:41:39 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] for you. There are three things that need to happen. You
434
0:41:46 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] There needs to be property. There needs to be a trustee and there needs to be
435
0:41:53 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]e of that, that most of you would be aware of is a will.
436
0:42:00 --> 0:42:09
Under a will, someone dies, the executives become the trustees. They're holding your assets on
437
0:42:09 --> 0:42:15
behalf of the beneficiaries. That's all. So just picture this pen, and I used to describe this to
438
0:42:15 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]ors, Stephen, back in the mid 1970s when I was explaining trust to them because their income
439
0:42:21 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]oded when Medibank was introduced into Australia, when the practice of medicine became
440
0:42:26 --> 0:42:32
a menage à trois, Chris, where it seems to be a doctor-patient relationship and the government
441
0:42:32 --> 0:42:40
put his nose in. So this is a pen. I can give this to Chris. Chris, I want you to hold this. Stephen,
442
0:42:40 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction]ee of this, trustee to hold this pen for my children.
443
0:42:50 --> 0:42:56
And I'll give a piece of document that makes, appoints you, Chris, Stephen, as the trustee to
444
0:42:56 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]en and their grandchildren. That's all a trust is.
445
0:43:03 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] grasp that concept, you could use a nominee. Many of you've been in financial
446
0:43:08 --> 0:43:15
services, a nominee is somebody who's holding some assets for somebody else. And then what Chris is
447
0:43:15 --> 0:43:21
talking about with discretionary, revocable conditional trusts is that the document that
448
0:43:21 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] has all those provisions in it. So I've worked on [privacy contact redaction] documents and
449
0:43:28 --> 0:43:33
they're very good for death duties. And the Gulbenkians, Stephen, I don't know if you
450
0:43:33 --> 0:43:41
remember that from the UK, the Gulbenkian family through testamentary trusts have controlled
451
0:43:42 --> 0:43:46
resources passing down through generations. That's how the wealthy control their money
452
0:43:46 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]s. So that's what I want. And the one thing I wanted to say, and the second,
453
0:43:51 --> 0:43:58
I think as a proposition, the thought that I had, Chris, when you were going through this,
454
0:43:58 --> 0:44:05
we need to set up in each country for us in this group, and I put this on the recording,
455
0:44:07 --> 0:44:13
we now need to set up a process for tracking new legislation, Chris, because you really
456
0:44:13 --> 0:44:19
raised this point, all this material comes into parliament in Australia, and the citizens are not
457
0:44:19 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]worthy politicians, perhaps. And what we now have to do
458
0:44:24 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]art tracking, set up systems to track every piece of new legislation that comes in,
459
0:44:30 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction] of the politicians in the UK aren't aware of the
460
0:44:36 --> 0:44:42
legislation that's passing, including the International Criminal Court Act. So I've taken
461
0:44:42 --> 0:44:48
note of that, of gosh, that's a very interesting thing of make, and there's a way to track it,
462
0:44:48 --> 0:44:52
because all parliaments publish the new legislation that's coming. So great suggestion,
463
0:44:53 --> 0:44:57
and thank you for the great work you've done, and I honour the courage that you've had in going to
464
0:44:57 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] gone to prison as best I can tell, including Stephen. So Stephen
465
0:45:03 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction], next [privacy contact redaction] you been to prison, Stephen? No, I haven't. No, I haven't.
466
0:45:09 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] put me there, though. Well, yeah, that's a different
467
0:45:13 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]ivity involving Class A controlled drugs in the British
468
0:45:20 --> 0:45:27
military, they were doing it by other means, Charles. I think Chris knows what I mean.
469
0:45:27 --> 0:45:33
So Chris, I remember your name. Thank you, Charles. I remember your name. I was struggling
470
0:45:33 --> 0:45:40
to remember what I remembered you for, and then I found an email by chance yesterday from you,
471
0:45:41 --> 0:45:47
or me to you, I can't remember. So anyway, it brought it back to me that I used to read
472
0:45:47 --> 0:45:54
what you were writing about the legality or illegality of the Iraq War, and I was something
473
0:45:54 --> 0:45:59
of an expert in inverted commas on that too. So I was very interested in what you were
474
0:46:00 --> 0:46:10
writing about. So, but my forte was apparently was David Kelly, Dr David Kelly. Oh, yes. And so I was
475
0:46:10 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ors who broke the narrative, which was that they were trying to put it about
476
0:46:18 --> 0:46:25
via the Hutton Report and the Hutton Inquiry, which purported to be a public inquiry, but we
477
0:46:25 --> 0:46:32
found out it wasn't, and the evidence wasn't being heard under oath. They were trying to put it about
478
0:46:32 --> 0:46:38
that he had committed suicide, but we didn't succeed in getting an inquest, which was our lever.
479
0:46:40 --> 0:46:45
But for legal reasons, essentially, we had to go to the Supreme Court twice, and there's just no
480
0:46:45 --> 0:46:52
way we could do that. But we did change public opinion without an inquest. So in a way, the
481
0:46:52 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction] wasn't needed, ironically, in the end. And so I don't know whether you know me or know my name.
482
0:47:00 --> 0:47:09
Well, I remember now, yes, David Halpin was the key person I was working with. I think there was a
483
0:47:10 --> 0:47:17
David Halpin and somebody what's in in Scotland? No, no, no, he wasn't one of the original. He was
484
0:47:17 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]or. He was in Scotland. He came on later. Oh, yeah, right. Yes, I remember. But the original
485
0:47:23 --> 0:47:31
three were one in South Africa, who he was, so Senate. All right. He was an anesthetist in South
486
0:47:31 --> 0:47:38
Africa, interestingly, and David Halpin in North Devon and me in Wales, North Wales. And so and we
487
0:47:38 --> 0:47:44
were put together by someone who had noticed on the Internet. We didn't know this person. Her name
488
0:47:44 --> 0:47:52
was Rowena Thursby. She found us and contacted us via an intermediary and asked us whether we
489
0:47:52 --> 0:47:57
would consider working together because we were saying not exactly the same thing, but pretty,
490
0:47:57 --> 0:48:05
you know, suggesting that it wasn't suicide. And anyway, I won't go into that. But that's how I knew
491
0:48:05 --> 0:48:16
you. So and so I don't know if you know this, but today I read in the emails, it's amazing what you
492
0:48:16 --> 0:48:23
find if you try to keep your memory and think, keep thinking when you're reading your emails.
493
0:48:23 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]rman was the attorney general. I had forgotten this if I ever knew it, actually.
494
0:48:30 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]rman was the attorney general in 2020. Yeah. And one of the things that was raised in
495
0:48:37 --> 0:48:43
the email, which I saw was that actually she'd written a legal advice as the attorney general,
496
0:48:43 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom government for the lockdowns. Prior to the
497
0:48:51 --> 0:48:58
lockdowns. But nobody's ever seen that legal advice. And the story today was that Suella Braverman was
498
0:48:58 --> 0:49:04
talking about was rowing back essentially and saying that suggesting from a quote which I saw
499
0:49:05 --> 0:49:12
that, you know, that we should never have gone into lockdowns because it was the worst option
500
0:49:12 --> 0:49:20
for this country. Yeah, so she's, but the point was made that she's written the legal advice,
501
0:49:20 --> 0:49:27
which no one's seen. I haven't seen it. I don't know anybody who has. And so if she's rowing
502
0:49:27 --> 0:49:34
back now and she was putting that opinion about back then, and she was ignored by the forces in
503
0:49:34 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom, even though she was the attorney general, that's important because I
504
0:49:39 --> 0:49:47
remember the attorney general's advice was extremely important in, according to Professor
505
0:49:47 --> 0:49:54
Philip Sands, the international law expert at University College London, in his wonderful book
506
0:49:54 --> 0:49:58
Lawless World. I don't know if you know that. Have you read it? I do indeed. Yes, I've talked to him about it.
507
0:49:58 --> 0:50:05
Absolutely. I've talked to him about absolutely wonderful chapter in that book where he talks
508
0:50:05 --> 0:50:13
about the legal advice. So the point is that the legal advice was absolutely crucial in deciding
509
0:50:13 --> 0:50:21
the illegality or otherwise of the Iraq war. And the same point, because I know about that, I knew
510
0:50:21 --> 0:50:29
about today, I knew that the legal advice about the lockdowns in this country is extremely important
511
0:50:29 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ly the same reason. And I hadn't thought of it previously. So we need to get that legal
512
0:50:35 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]rmans somehow or other. I just mentioned it because I think I thought you
513
0:50:41 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ed. Absolutely. I'm definitely interested. It's fundamental. What I've discovered
514
0:50:49 --> 0:50:57
was that some of the legal advice that Lord Goldsmith gave for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars
515
0:50:57 --> 0:51:04
was finally brought out during the Chilcot report. And Chilcot managed to get some of that
516
0:51:04 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ill keeping the legal advice to themselves. The real problem is
517
0:51:11 --> 0:51:18
that the attorney general, he or she sees themselves as the advisor to the government
518
0:51:18 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ainer of the law to the people. And those are two totally different roles.
519
0:51:27 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]aining the law, the laws of war and peace, for instance, nobody has in the last
520
0:51:35 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]e or the armed forces or the civil service or anybody
521
0:51:43 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction], a systemic problem in Britain. But Chris,
522
0:51:49 --> 0:51:54
whether there are laws for it or not, I'm sure there must be something somewhere that the government
523
0:51:55 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]e, correct? That's what people think anyway. Is that codified in law,
524
0:52:02 --> 0:52:08
to your knowledge? Well, yes, it certainly is in terms of 1689 or thereabouts.
525
0:52:09 --> 0:52:13
So the government can't say that they're following the legal advice of the attorney general
526
0:52:13 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]s of the people. So in the lockdowns, for example, and indeed in the
527
0:52:20 --> 0:52:26
Iraq war, you know, the population of this country don't want their taxes to be used for illegal wars.
528
0:52:26 --> 0:52:33
So, yeah, I can't see that the government saying, oh, we followed the legal advice from our attorney
529
0:52:33 --> 0:52:44
general, lessens the problem for them. Can you? It does in the sense that we have a very corrupt
530
0:52:45 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]em, justice system in this country. I always used to believe in it until perhaps
531
0:52:52 --> 0:52:58
some [privacy contact redaction], I get more and more
532
0:53:00 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]ant manipulation of the law to benefit the government and local.
533
0:53:06 --> 0:53:15
Absolutely. The problem is the judges. I never hear any lawyers criticising judges or criticising
534
0:53:16 --> 0:53:22
the possibility that there may be lots of corrupt judges. So they seem to want to defend the legal
535
0:53:22 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]em or they probably know that it's a ticket to lose your licence as a lawyer if you start
536
0:53:27 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]s and the judges. But the fact is the judges are still human beings, whether
537
0:53:32 --> 0:53:38
they're judges or not. And so they've got all the human frailties as far as I'm concerned. And the
538
0:53:38 --> 0:53:45
capacity for them being or the potential for them being bribed or coerced is massive, given the
539
0:53:45 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction], especially when the government is involved in the case. But the government, of
540
0:53:51 --> 0:53:58
course, is the servant of the people. But that seems to get lost. It does so often. I mean,
541
0:53:58 --> 0:54:05
you're so right. I wish they would understand that more people would understand it. However,
542
0:54:05 --> 0:54:13
all the judges, for instance, in the last few years have after Lord Denning, who died in the
543
0:54:13 --> 0:54:23
80s, something like that, not a single judge has repeated the fact that the people are sovereign.
544
0:54:23 --> 0:54:29
They keep saying Parliament is sovereign or the monarch is sovereign or whatever it is.
545
0:54:30 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]e being sovereign. And this is what we have to remind them of again.
546
0:54:36 --> 0:54:41
So the declaration indeed, the four pager rather than 80 pager
547
0:54:44 --> 0:54:49
on the website lays out quite clearly that we are declaring our sovereignty
548
0:54:50 --> 0:54:59
as individual men and women and taking back our power. And the nice thing about the one thing I
549
0:54:59 --> 0:55:14
wanted to add for Charles was to say that the main issue about taxation trusts is that the tax
550
0:55:14 --> 0:55:23
no longer belongs to you when you've put it in trust. So you have paid your tax when you put it
551
0:55:23 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction] for the beneficiary being the government. And the important bit is that you then,
552
0:55:31 --> 0:55:37
if you put on a time limit to it and say you must achieve this by the end of the year,
553
0:55:38 --> 0:55:45
the secondary beneficiary can be you. And you're absolutely right. There's the settler, the trustee
554
0:55:45 --> 0:55:52
and the beneficiary are all part of it. And you cannot be a beneficiary of your own trust. That's
555
0:55:52 --> 0:56:00
illegal and criminal. But you can be a secondary beneficiary if the primary beneficiary doesn't
556
0:56:00 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]e for that, just a quick one, when you're making a will
557
0:56:06 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] your money to your grandson or something and you say, right,
558
0:56:11 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]ed thousand pounds to Johnny, providing he doesn't marry Sally and he
559
0:56:20 --> 0:56:27
joins the family firm by the age of 25. Now, if he meets those conditions and he doesn't marry Sally
560
0:56:27 --> 0:56:32
and he joins the family firm, then he gets a hundred thousand pounds. If he doesn't meet the
561
0:56:32 --> 0:56:40
conditions, the trustees are bound in law to hand the money over to the secondary or tertiary
562
0:56:40 --> 0:56:46
beneficiaries in the will. So that is one of the fundamentals of what we're trying to do here,
563
0:56:46 --> 0:56:54
is to make sure that this is entirely lawful and we are following the system that the top 50,000
564
0:56:54 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]e in Britain follow all the time to hide their money from the taxman in
565
0:57:00 --> 0:57:07
the Cayman Islands or Gersey, Germsey, the Isle of Man, all the other tax havens around the world.
566
0:57:08 --> 0:57:15
And we are using this entirely lawfully in England and Wales and in Scotland.
567
0:57:17 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]em for the benefit of taxpayers and the world as a whole to try and stop war.
568
0:57:28 --> 0:57:37
Chris, when they put you in prison for not paying tax, income tax was it, or council tax?
569
0:57:37 --> 0:57:44
Council tax, willful refusal was the term they used. But couldn't you appeal that on the grounds
570
0:57:44 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]ually, were they saying that the willful refusal extended back many, many years as it did?
571
0:57:51 --> 0:57:58
No, it was just for that year, even though they knew that it had gone back. I mean, in Rye,
572
0:57:58 --> 0:58:01
in that area, it was the first year that I'd appeared in front of them.
573
0:58:02 --> 0:58:09
Yeah, I see. But isn't it a defense that you'd lived in London prior to Rye and that you had
574
0:58:09 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]ly the same alleged criminal offense?
575
0:58:16 --> 0:58:25
Yes, I mean, basically, they pay no attention to my argument at all. So when I got in court,
576
0:58:25 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]ance, in Rye, in Hastings, which is the court for Rye, the judge before she sent me to
577
0:58:34 --> 0:58:40
prison said, I had quoted the International Criminal Court Act and I was trying to uphold
578
0:58:40 --> 0:58:47
and enforce the law. The judge said to me... Even in a civil case, they have to listen to you,
579
0:58:47 --> 0:58:52
and particularly in a criminal case where they're going to, the judge is intending to send you to
580
0:58:52 --> 0:58:59
prison on behalf of the government, you would think that they are absolutely required to listen to
581
0:58:59 --> 0:59:03
you. So why didn't they listen to you? Well, basically, we have one of the most corrupt,
582
0:59:04 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] to say, Southeast, East Sussex and this area is one of the most corrupt in the country
583
0:59:12 --> 0:59:20
and is dominated by the Masonic groups, if you like, in each of the police, the crime prosecution
584
0:59:20 --> 0:59:30
service, the council, the judges and others. Basically, I even had quoted to me when I quoted
585
0:59:30 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] 2001, the judge said to me that doesn't apply in this court.
586
0:59:38 --> 0:59:48
I couldn't believe it. But by the way, it's not a criminal offense. It's a civil offense. It's the
587
0:59:48 --> 0:59:56
only civil offense hangover from the days of debtors prison. Well, how can you send someone
588
0:59:56 --> 1:00:03
to prison for a civil offense? As I say, it's the last thing. I think it's finished now, but certainly
589
1:00:03 --> 1:00:13
I was three years in a row because I had not handed the money to the council. But there was a
590
1:00:13 --> 1:00:19
precedent in London. They hadn't sent you to prison. So how could East Sussex send you to prison?
591
1:00:19 --> 1:00:25
Why didn't your lawyers argue that? Well, first of all, I couldn't afford any lawyers. And secondly,
592
1:00:25 --> 1:00:33
the duty lawyers are all in the pocket of the courts and they refused to argue my case.
593
1:00:34 --> 1:00:39
Yeah, they refused to argue certain things. So in my case, they refused to say certain things that
594
1:00:39 --> 1:00:44
I was begging them to say. And I was very suspicious. Well, one of the things one of my
595
1:00:44 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction] famous lawyers in the country. I don't want to name him. And the
596
1:00:51 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]e hair, by the way, or was it pink? Well, purple pink. So I said to him,
597
1:01:02 --> 1:01:08
do you think it's appropriate that a judge in such a high profile case with you representing me?
598
1:01:09 --> 1:01:17
I said that she comes here with pink hair and dressed as she did, you know, you wouldn't get
599
1:01:17 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction], I'm not a snob, but you know, I think that I think I think the judge maybe
600
1:01:26 --> 1:01:31
should pay attention to the judges should pay attention to the way they dress, because actually,
601
1:01:31 --> 1:01:38
if they don't, they might get judged by the people they're judging. So 15 minutes, they stay. I just
602
1:01:38 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction], he she was asking so she knew exactly who my lawyer was the famous lawyer.
603
1:01:46 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]ed on getting him to to spell out his name to the court.
604
1:01:55 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ly, the whole thing was a farce. And I did notice that the lawyers,
605
1:02:01 --> 1:02:06
you know, not just those lawyers, various lawyers wouldn't argue certain points, which I thought
606
1:02:06 --> 1:02:11
were important. And I and but I couldn't get never got could get an answer as to why not. And
607
1:02:11 --> 1:02:19
I think it was to do with being seen to be critical of the courts. So eventually that that came out,
608
1:02:19 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ually said it looks, you know, I couldn't say that I wanted to withdraw my appeal on access
609
1:02:24 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ed they did that. And they said, I said, Why are you so worried
610
1:02:29 --> 1:02:34
about that? And because they will come after you. They'll think you criticizing the courts. I said,
611
1:02:34 --> 1:02:39
Well, I am criticizing the court. And that's why I'm withdrawing my appeal. That's what the access
612
1:02:39 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ice grounds is. And they said, Oh, well, I said, Why can't I do that? I did do it in the end.
613
1:02:47 --> 1:02:52
But but they said, Oh, the law, the court will come the judge will come after you for costs,
614
1:02:52 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction] you. Outrageous. So so so we did argue that after a big argument. And then
615
1:03:02 --> 1:03:04
but they never came after me because
616
1:03:05 --> 1:03:12
Well, that's very good. You've been more successful than me. I was charged in a case in London,
617
1:03:13 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction] of Appeal when all the protesters were pushed out of
618
1:03:19 --> 1:03:27
Parliament Square. I don't know if you remember that it was about 10 years ago. And the there was
619
1:03:27 --> 1:03:37
eventually there was five different individuals in the case. Three of us were litigants in person,
620
1:03:37 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]ers and solicitors supporting them. Yeah. And Lord
621
1:03:44 --> 1:03:53
Neuberger, who was the head of the court at the time, the Court of Appeal, awarded costs of
622
1:03:53 --> 1:04:02
£133,800. Against you and the three litigants in person and not against any of the others.
623
1:04:03 --> 1:04:11
So there we were three of us, one university professor, myself and one homeless man,
624
1:04:14 --> 1:04:22
supposedly pay £133,[privacy contact redaction]s. And was it ever paid? Luckily, I remembered
625
1:04:22 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] minute, he awarded the cost to the litigants in person. And in the original
626
1:04:30 --> 1:04:37
case, one of the litigants in person was a statement that applied to anybody who visited
627
1:04:37 --> 1:04:45
Parliament Square. And I worked out that roughly there were [privacy contact redaction]e in a year,
628
1:04:45 --> 1:04:51
who either go through Parliament Square or visit Parliament Square or pass by.
629
1:04:52 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] Neuberger, well, I'm assuming that £133,[privacy contact redaction]it between 60 million
630
1:05:01 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]e. Because he'd made the judgment or the order. That's what happened. Love it. All
631
1:05:09 --> 1:05:16
right, we're gonna move on. But you know, Chris, Stephen will come back and there's, there's,
632
1:05:17 --> 1:05:22
there's so many elements to unpack. But one of our attendees, Chris, I won't name him at the moment
633
1:05:22 --> 1:05:28
has asked whether you're willing to adopt him. He wants you to be his dad, and he will work for
634
1:05:28 --> 1:05:37
you for nothing. So there you are. So I will, I will. I love the idea of working for me for nothing.
635
1:05:37 --> 1:05:43
I think the adoption process in this country is a bit dodgy. Well, this this guy would be a useful
636
1:05:43 --> 1:05:49
ally for you to work for. I'm looking for people we've set up a property as an organisation,
637
1:05:49 --> 1:05:54
and we're looking for people who'd like to join us and work on the principle of getting a bit more
638
1:05:54 --> 1:06:00
integrity in public life. That's very good. Very good. And Stephen Frost, well done on your work
639
1:06:00 --> 1:06:07
that you've done. You've clearly stood up for the truth. And the law, the obligation of the duty of
640
1:06:07 --> 1:06:14
lawyers, primarily first, first preference, first requirement of lawyers is their duty to the court.
641
1:06:15 --> 1:06:21
Secondly, to their clients. So, Stephen, you've shone a light on that fraud where
642
1:06:21 --> 1:06:26
that was my training ground. Yeah. Had I not gone through that experience, I wouldn't have been
643
1:06:26 --> 1:06:34
equipped for 2020. Yeah. And David Kelly was part of it anyway. So that's we now have that's that's
644
1:06:35 --> 1:06:41
the gift, isn't it? And look at the gift of COVID is these meetings. Okay, we go to Peter Underground
645
1:06:41 --> 1:06:50
now, Chris, or Peter, you maybe Peter, Peter Underwater. The water indeed here in South Africa.
646
1:06:50 --> 1:07:01
Yeah. Chris, stunning, absolutely stunning presentation. Thank you so much. I will take you
647
1:07:01 --> 1:07:13
back to 1963 when I joined the war office, HMG. And I can tell you, after six months, I discovered
648
1:07:14 --> 1:07:24
the infeccies of what was going on. And I left very quickly. I went off to do other things.
649
1:07:25 --> 1:07:37
I thank you so much. Subsequently, I worked for the citizens advice bureau in UK for 10 years or more.
650
1:07:38 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ick together. Old guys. We're going back a long way.
651
1:07:47 --> 1:08:00
But we work to discover the truth. And you've done that, my friend. And I applaud you in all the work
652
1:08:00 --> 1:08:11
you've done. I'd like to join you, your group. Thank you so much. Delighted. Thank you very much.
653
1:08:11 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction], I joined Shell in 1964 as a management trainee. And I learned
654
1:08:19 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]ry of Defence. We're up to the core.
655
1:08:30 --> 1:08:38
Absolutely. It's horrendous, my friend. It's horrendous. We are working together as a group.
656
1:08:39 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction] add one thing there very quickly?
657
1:08:47 --> 1:08:53
When I was looking at corruption and fraud and corruption between 1998 and 2002,
658
1:08:53 --> 1:09:01
I looked at eight FT100 companies, the boardroom corruption on those eight companies, and seven
659
1:09:01 --> 1:09:09
government departments. And everywhere I looked, I found corrupt practice in spades.
660
1:09:11 --> 1:09:17
It is horrendous. And we've always been brought up to believe that the British government is
661
1:09:18 --> 1:09:23
above all that. And we don't do it. But it's quite the opposite. Yeah, they're the worst.
662
1:09:25 --> 1:09:28
Thank you so much, Chris. Delighted.
663
1:09:32 --> 1:09:40
Who's next? Charles, you're muted. Sorry. Chris, you've got volunteers, plenty coming forward.
664
1:09:40 --> 1:09:45
And that's wonderful. Now Janet is next because she keeps going behind Mark and then Mark Steele.
665
1:09:45 --> 1:09:53
Janet. Yeah, hi. Thank you. Do you consider that the UK government is an accessory to genocide in
666
1:09:53 --> 1:10:01
Gaza? If so, have you taken any steps to remedy that? And if not, are there any steps we can take
667
1:10:01 --> 1:10:08
which could potentially be taken? Yeah, can I just say one thing? That
668
1:10:10 --> 1:10:17
the government itself is not an accessory. The whole point about the International Criminal
669
1:10:17 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ies to individuals. So Rishi Sunak or Boris Johnson or any one of the
670
1:10:27 --> 1:10:33
members of the British government, they are committing crimes of conduct ancillary to
671
1:10:33 --> 1:10:39
genocide, but a government doesn't. Governments are held to account in the International Court
672
1:10:39 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]ice. Individuals are held to account in the International Criminal Court. So we can do
673
1:10:46 --> 1:10:52
something about it. And you're absolutely right. The crime is conduct ancillary to genocide.
674
1:10:53 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction], I'm doing something right now about it. I don't want to talk too much about it until
675
1:10:58 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] all the evidence we need to prove that politicians,
676
1:11:10 --> 1:11:20
civil servants, the monarch and others have committed serious crimes of conduct ancillary
677
1:11:20 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]e don't realize is that the Queen, when she was monarch,
678
1:11:27 --> 1:11:33
every time she sent our troops overseas and they started murdering men, women and children,
679
1:11:33 --> 1:11:41
wherever it was, she committed a crime of conduct ancillary to genocide. That was the times after
680
1:11:41 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] in the UK. Now, normally with the monarch, they are excluded
681
1:11:50 --> 1:11:58
from these crimes unless there is a specific statement in the law which says that they are
682
1:11:58 --> 1:12:08
included. And luckily, Section [privacy contact redaction] makes it quite clear this act
683
1:12:08 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]s of the Crown and all property of the Crown. So do have
684
1:12:15 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]ion 78 and you'll realize that every single member of our government, every
685
1:12:22 --> 1:12:30
corporate taxpayer and banker and others who are handing money over to the government
686
1:12:31 --> 1:12:37
in large quantities for the corporate people is committing a criminal offense of conduct ancillary
687
1:12:37 --> 1:12:44
to genocide. Thank you. Well said. Well said, Chris, and thank you, Janet.
688
1:12:44 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]eele, doing great work, Chris, and I hope you two collaborate intensely. Mark?
689
1:12:52 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]ic to hear your information, Chris, and you are obviously early in the fight against these
690
1:13:00 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]erers. My sorted background is the electronic weaponry deployment 5G in particular, and what I've
691
1:13:13 --> 1:13:22
recently discovered is that the low emission zone networks, these 15 minute zones, are littered with
692
1:13:22 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ems. So we've got these, what are demonstrably not ANP or cameras. They have
693
1:13:33 --> 1:13:41
got laser diodes. There's several of them. There's 24 actually in a weapon and they are category 4.
694
1:13:42 --> 1:13:47
So I've done quite a bit of work with the Blade Runner guys who are cutting them down faster than
695
1:13:47 --> 1:13:54
Mayor Carnage can put them up, but there's a significant environmental risk to this technology.
696
1:13:54 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction] told me that there's no radar there. There is. I have the technicalities of it as well
697
1:14:01 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]ware. So they've said there's no radar, there's no lidar, it's just this ANP or camera.
698
1:14:07 --> 1:14:12
That's completely false. This is fusion technology, extremely dangerous and would
699
1:14:12 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]er. So there's a potential, obviously with the work that you're
700
1:14:20 --> 1:14:25
carrying out in a minute, with the information that I have and the technicalities and the problem
701
1:14:25 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction], it's irrefutable. I can show that these are weapons systems,
702
1:14:31 --> 1:14:38
energy weapons that the current government, Mayor Carnage, we have them in Birmingham,
703
1:14:38 --> 1:14:41
we've got them in Manchester, we've got them in Leeds and these are a latent
704
1:14:42 --> 1:14:49
15 minute city kill box. That's what they're planning. It isn't connected with the contamination
705
1:14:49 --> 1:14:55
that was in the COVID-[privacy contact redaction]ion, which we now have enough evidence to show that that was
706
1:14:55 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ion, but it's a technological play that is absolutely
707
1:15:01 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]ed with the 5G network, 5G wireless body area network. So it was a track trace
708
1:15:10 --> 1:15:16
termination technology that was developed by the DOD for tracking wet well on the battlefield for
709
1:15:16 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]e at the minute, so we've got this very, very serious potential
710
1:15:24 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]e, unfortunately, who were victims of taking that technological injection.
711
1:15:33 --> 1:15:39
It's got a track trace termination technology. It's the graphite ferritic nanometre material antennas
712
1:15:39 --> 1:15:45
that we tracked in this battle space and the future battle space is a 15 minute city. So
713
1:15:46 --> 1:15:50
any sort of information that you need in relation to that to show that the British
714
1:15:50 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]anning a mass murderous genocide. They've already committed genocide.
715
1:15:56 --> 1:16:01
The nanoparticular contaminants that were in the vaccines co-sterilization
716
1:16:01 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]ive parts. The evidence is quite damning in relation to that.
717
1:16:07 --> 1:16:15
So I think, you know, we can really assist with, you know, the work that you've done previously
718
1:16:16 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] and to show that the government are absolutely out of lunch. And unfortunately,
719
1:16:22 --> 1:16:29
your judges, your barristers, they're all target acquired. Most of them have taken the injection.
720
1:16:29 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] of them can be eliminated whenever or however the control as the AI weapon system,
721
1:16:37 --> 1:16:46
it's basically Microsoft's, Microsoft's Azure, which is the Lockheed military 5G military
722
1:16:46 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]atform. It's an AI operating system and it operates all of this type of
723
1:16:50 --> 1:16:57
technology that's installed in street lights, as well as these laser guns and the environmental
724
1:16:57 --> 1:17:05
detriment is significant. Radar in particular, as well as the LIDAR system and I've currently
725
1:17:05 --> 1:17:11
had a number of communications with TFL. I've got an ICU case against them because they've
726
1:17:11 --> 1:17:18
deceived me. It's one of two things. Either they do not know what they have deployed in relation to
727
1:17:18 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]em or they've just lied or don't know what it is. So either
728
1:17:29 --> 1:17:37
way they're stuck between a rock and a hard place. Mark, I really appreciate the work you've been
729
1:17:37 --> 1:17:43
doing there. I think it's excellent. It really is. We need to bring this understanding to the rest
730
1:17:43 --> 1:17:49
of the world and certainly to the England and Wales very rapidly. And I would recommend having
731
1:17:49 --> 1:17:55
a look at the legislation on genocide because you're absolutely right. If you are intentionally
732
1:17:55 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]e, you don't have to say I am deliberately doing it.
733
1:18:03 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]e because of their nationality, because they happen to be
734
1:18:08 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] or anything else, then you can start charging them with conduct ancillary to
735
1:18:15 --> 1:18:22
genocide. The big companies that are putting up these masts. So I would recommend having a
736
1:18:22 --> 1:18:29
look at the detail of the legislation on genocide. It doesn't just apply in war. It applies
737
1:18:29 --> 1:18:37
particularly also to the medical situation that we've been through in the last four years. I think
738
1:18:37 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] five genocides in relation to that in the UK. And I'm sure it
739
1:18:45 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] about every other country that's listening to this programme. Brilliant. Well,
740
1:18:50 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]ic, Chris. I mean, unfortunately, you spent a little bit of time in prison
741
1:18:57 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ance to this crime. But this has been basically, these weapons are being deployed
742
1:19:04 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom, which is treason. So it's treason as well as the
743
1:19:09 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]rably weapon systems that are deployed on top of us.
744
1:19:14 --> 1:19:22
Yes, no, let's go for both of them. Brilliant. So which of those crimes, Charles, in your opinion,
745
1:19:22 --> 1:19:29
and Chris and Mark, so you bring up treason. I agree treason seems to me to be the biggest crime
746
1:19:29 --> 1:19:37
of war. But maybe it's outpunched by genocide or crimes against humanity. What do you think, Chris?
747
1:19:38 --> 1:19:45
And Charles? I'm of that belief, yes. I believe that the legislation, the important bit is that
748
1:19:45 --> 1:19:53
the legislation on genocide has been updated and updated. And in 2001, with the introduction of the
749
1:19:53 --> 1:20:00
elements of crimes regulations, it is now so tight, it is almost difficult to get around it. So I
750
1:20:00 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction] ancillary to genocide as the best route for the moment.
751
1:20:08 --> 1:20:17
Treason tends to be rather generalized and comes from, you know, way back 300, 400 years as well.
752
1:20:17 --> 1:20:23
But Chris, do you think that what's happened in the last four years was treason? Because I do.
753
1:20:23 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction], you don't have to. I've really been focusing on seeing it as genocide.
754
1:20:30 --> 1:20:37
Rather than treason, I think there's more mileage in charging people with conduct ancillary to
755
1:20:37 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction] the International Criminal Court and the ICJ has said what's
756
1:20:43 --> 1:20:51
happening in Gaza is likely to be genocide, we have a greater understanding of that crime
757
1:20:51 --> 1:20:58
around the world. And therefore, let's go with that. Sure. And this one, genocide, are you able
758
1:20:58 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction]ain to us the difference between, I have known this, but it slipped from my mind, genocide
759
1:21:05 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction] humanity. So I don't know whether you know, but Philippe Sands, we mentioned
760
1:21:09 --> 1:21:15
earlier about lawless world and torture team, he wrote a third brilliant book. And that name of
761
1:21:15 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction], West Street. And it was set in a town, Lviv, I think it is called,
762
1:21:23 --> 1:21:31
which has been in Germany, sorry, was it Poland or Ukraine at various times? Or was it Germany? I
763
1:21:31 --> 1:21:38
can't quite remember now. So anyway, on the border and in that town, as it happens, the father of the
764
1:21:38 --> 1:21:47
crime of genocide, the one who became the world expert on genocide was born. And also, weirdly,
765
1:21:47 --> 1:21:54
the father of what he the kind of one who knew knew most about crimes against humanity. He was
766
1:21:54 --> 1:22:04
also born in that city. Did you know that? No. All this is recounted in Professor Philippe Sands is
767
1:22:05 --> 1:22:11
brilliant book, third book that I know of anyway, East Street, West Street. And torture team is a
768
1:22:11 --> 1:22:16
pretty amazing book too. And you know lawless world, you know how good that is. Indeed. Yeah,
769
1:22:16 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction], West Street to you. But problem is, I don't know.
770
1:22:23 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] make one quick comment? It is important to understand the definitions of
771
1:22:29 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] humanity and the definitions of genocide. And that's why I do recommend anybody
772
1:22:35 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] a look at those definitions in the International Criminal
773
1:22:41 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction], Elements of Crimes Regulations 2001. Chris, one thing I think to ask about private
774
1:22:48 --> 1:22:53
prosecutions, because I believe we have a number of people who were maybe able to run a private
775
1:22:53 --> 1:23:00
prosecution like Carnage, Le Maire Cohn. We've also got Matt Hancock. Matt Hancock admitted
776
1:23:00 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] that there was an antenna. There is. It's a graphite ferritic nanometallite
777
1:23:07 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] the spectrum analysis. We know exactly what was in it. We know
778
1:23:13 --> 1:23:22
the DOD patents for it. He's admitted in a WhatsApp post that this did and was an antenna injection.
779
1:23:23 --> 1:23:29
So he's admitted to the crime. And I think a private prosecution, but also the 15 minute
780
1:23:30 --> 1:23:37
city narrative is all about radiation. And one of the things where we heard Carn not long ago
781
1:23:37 --> 1:23:43
talking about this heat temperature increase in cities. This is the ubiquitous increase in
782
1:23:43 --> 1:23:48
radiation emissions from 5G, where they put thousands, hundreds of thousands. I mean,
783
1:23:48 --> 1:23:56
Birmingham City Council put 107,000 100 milliwatt transmitters. One milliwatt will cause a
784
1:23:56 --> 1:24:02
temperature increase. These were 100 milliwatts each. They've got a 10 mile footprint. Now focus
785
1:24:02 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]ay with the aperture, which allows for quality, basically a weapon system, 107,000
786
1:24:10 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction] light in Birmingham, switched on in 2019. So temperature increase
787
1:24:16 --> 1:24:24
and cause a climate emergency. And these radiation levels are catastrophic, not only to, you know,
788
1:24:24 --> 1:24:31
individuals who suffer EHS, but also the environment, small insects, the light emitting
789
1:24:31 --> 1:24:38
diodes or biologically toxic to all life for [privacy contact redaction] of these LEDs.
790
1:24:38 --> 1:24:45
The Kelvin rate is when from the orange lights from 2000 to about six and seven thousand Kelvin
791
1:24:45 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction] lights don't even have a diffuser. So they're not orange. They're very dangerous.
792
1:24:53 --> 1:24:58
They're basically weapon, the weapon systems. They've been designed to cause bodily harm.
793
1:24:58 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] to do something about it. And I think a private criminal
794
1:25:03 --> 1:25:09
prosecution is a very good idea, Mark. Excellent. I'll go with that. If you need my help on it,
795
1:25:09 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] me and I'll do what I can to add something to the case. Brilliant. Fantastic. Thank you very
796
1:25:16 --> 1:25:20
much, Chris and great for your work. It's absolutely brilliant. Charles, the policy and touch. He has
797
1:25:20 --> 1:25:31
all of my details. So, so Mark, you put into the chat and I'll send you the documents in the chat,
798
1:25:31 --> 1:25:37
Chris, but you put into the chat that the judge in your case newspaper article, Mark, and one of the
799
1:25:37 --> 1:25:46
issues I've said often to this group is when judges start losing their loved ones, they will, they will
800
1:25:46 --> 1:25:50
change their tune. And the article that the article that you have posted, Mark, talks about
801
1:25:50 --> 1:25:56
a judge being concerned about these five G towers. How long ago was that article, Mark?
802
1:25:58 --> 1:26:03
In 2018, the government tried to take me to court to gag me. They said I was a conspiracy theorist
803
1:26:03 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]e by telling them that the government planned to kill them.
804
1:26:08 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction] procedure where the government had decided
805
1:26:14 --> 1:26:18
they had to gag me because I was telling people that government were planning to kill them.
806
1:26:19 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction], the light significantly deceived the judge. It became pretty obvious that the
807
1:26:25 --> 1:26:30
expert witnesses that they had on their side didn't understand what five G was. They didn't
808
1:26:30 --> 1:26:35
have it, you know, they were basic electronics guys. So they didn't understand what five G was.
809
1:26:35 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]anding of the antenna design and the weaponization of electromagnetic radiation in
810
1:26:40 --> 1:26:46
it. So the judge, as we got through the case, and they did basically make a fool of themselves
811
1:26:46 --> 1:26:51
quite a number of times, he said, I'm going to read a skeleton argument. My skeleton argument showed
812
1:26:52 --> 1:27:00
that five G's weapon system, it's yet to kill. After that, after the resets and he came back
813
1:27:00 --> 1:27:06
after lunch, he basically said the five G system, see the public have a right to know the five G
814
1:27:06 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] be debated. Money also said was I was an expert in this particular field where the
815
1:27:12 --> 1:27:16
government been saying I was a conspiracy theorist and I'd made it up. And I was telling people that
816
1:27:16 --> 1:27:20
they were trying to kill them. Well, they are trying to kill you. It's pretty obvious now
817
1:27:20 --> 1:27:25
they're trying to kill people. I mean, imagine in 2018, it was a bit off the wall at the time.
818
1:27:27 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]e trying to gather their thoughts in relation to these electronic weapon systems that have been
819
1:27:33 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] furniture. But I knew as early as 2016 that something was very, very
820
1:27:40 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] in relation to the light emitting diodes, the fact of the increase in the optical radiation
821
1:27:48 --> 1:27:54
footprint, as well as the fact that they were built to cause point light source. You never want
822
1:27:54 --> 1:28:01
artificial light and a point light source emission. And what we had were had point light source,
823
1:28:01 --> 1:28:05
what had the head, the lights were cranked to such a degree where they would create the point
824
1:28:05 --> 1:28:14
light source, but they had no diffuser. You have 2200 Kelvin high pressure sodium, which is orange
825
1:28:14 --> 1:28:22
for a reason. The optical radiation emissions is 2200 Kelvin. It has that orange glow. It has a
826
1:28:22 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]op point light source. And what you definitely don't want is pulse with modulated
827
1:28:29 --> 1:28:35
optical radiation emissions because the value of the photon in that range is extremely high.
828
1:28:36 --> 1:28:43
So we had a pulse modulated bare elements, bare optical radiation elements, 450 nanometers
829
1:28:44 --> 1:28:50
at about 6 and 7000 Kelvin. These were weapons. They've deployed weapons on my streets as LED
830
1:28:50 --> 1:28:54
streetlights. And I call that soft kill. It's obviously not going to kill you immediately.
831
1:28:54 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]oyed on the streets of London, these low emission
832
1:29:00 --> 1:29:07
zone guns, these laser guns, they are weapons and can kill you in a heartbeat. They've got massive
833
1:29:07 --> 1:29:15
capacitance inside the laser diodes. I got a bit of intel the other day where they are, you know,
834
1:29:15 --> 1:29:23
anything from 700 milliwatts to 1200 milliwatts, anything over 500 milliwatts, a class four laser.
835
1:29:23 --> 1:29:30
That's the most dangerous laser that can be produced. So you had well over that inside,
836
1:29:30 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction] 24 elements. There's 24 elements in the front of that laser gun.
837
1:29:36 --> 1:29:42
So you've got 24 elements times anything from 700 milliwatts to 1200 milliwatts.
838
1:29:45 --> 1:29:52
One milliwatt. That's the 8-nerve guideline, the 8-nerve guideline, which the government uses as
839
1:29:52 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] for their output for radiation is one milliwatt. And we're talking about 24, 700 or 1200
840
1:30:03 --> 1:30:09
times 24. So don't go so much in the technology. That's you and Chris got to work out because Mark,
841
1:30:09 --> 1:30:14
you're pointing out to us as a question that Stephen asked, what's the difference between
842
1:30:14 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] humanity? Well, it seems to me that these five G-towers are not so
843
1:30:20 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] humanity. And your knowledge on this and how to use that for
844
1:30:27 --> 1:30:34
each of the municipalities that we live in right around the world, you know, everyone, we need to
845
1:30:34 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]and the questions to ask of our local councils. And Chris,
846
1:30:41 --> 1:30:50
your knowledge of the law here working with Mark, I think is going to be very, very, a very powerful
847
1:30:50 --> 1:30:56
combination as well as the guy in the US who's going to be working on this. Okay. Plus Anders.
848
1:30:56 --> 1:31:02
All right, Mark. Great. Great. Sorry. The other issue is in the judges, children and grandchildren
849
1:31:03 --> 1:31:09
dying. That's that's when the judges, Chris, you know, are going to come on and say, wow, I'm now
850
1:31:09 --> 1:31:18
I'm suffering. Now I'm going to take it seriously. So so, you know, it's creating a thought in my mind.
851
1:31:19 --> 1:31:25
Mark Crispin Miller does a wonderful job of each week publishing his sub stack with people who have
852
1:31:25 --> 1:31:33
died suddenly. You know, people who should not have died. And that litany of examples
853
1:31:35 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction] to bring to a judge's attention. Look what's happening and there's no explanation. So,
854
1:31:40 --> 1:31:45
Mark, great work. You two, I'll put you in touch with each other. Thanks. Thanks, Chris.
855
1:31:45 --> 1:31:52
Thank you. Anders. Anders is also on the 5G, 5G battleground. Anders.
856
1:31:55 --> 1:32:05
Yes. Hello. Hello, Chris. I'm a Norwegian guy. We were a team of four Norwegians who filed
857
1:32:06 --> 1:32:17
four cases to the ICC in Haig in May 2021 based on evidence of how the so-called vaccines were
858
1:32:17 --> 1:32:29
killing. And we based the filing on an Israeli filing. I had a contact with a lawyer in Tel Aviv
859
1:32:30 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction], let's say Netanyahu at the time, was dismissed in Haig
860
1:32:43 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]anding because the Knesset had not ratified the
861
1:32:55 --> 1:33:07
new ICC legal matter. It was, let's say, approved halfway but not full way. So,
862
1:33:07 --> 1:33:16
it was not valid. That was the answer from ICC. We filed cases for Norway, for Denmark, for Sweden,
863
1:33:16 --> 1:33:25
for Poland. We had a lot of evidence. After four, five, six months, the last case was dismissed that
864
1:33:26 --> 1:33:33
they are not going to look into it until it was dismissed in the home jurisdiction of, let's say,
865
1:33:33 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction], Denmark, Sweden, etc. The cases in Norway was filed in June 2021 in 17
866
1:33:43 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]s and they were all dismissed by administration in an Oslo
867
1:33:51 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction] by basically saying they don't want to look into it.
868
1:34:01 --> 1:34:08
What we thought at the time was that, okay, there were many other court cases in ICC filed from
869
1:34:08 --> 1:34:14
two different legal teams in England, from Netherlands, from France, from Czech Republic
870
1:34:15 --> 1:34:21
and other countries. And everyone, it was Mike Yeeden was part of one,
871
1:34:22 --> 1:34:33
no case was put in. It was a British-Canadian judge in ICC. ICC is controlled by United Nations.
872
1:34:33 --> 1:34:43
Not a single case has been brought in against Western countries. So what we saw, I think it was
873
1:34:45 --> 1:34:53
2023 or 2022, the ICC by the pressure of politicians, Boris Johnson, etc. through
874
1:34:53 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] in Netherlands, in Hague, they put a court case which got standing against Russia
875
1:35:08 --> 1:35:16
and they kind of made a criminal referral to Putin, but Russia has not subscribed to the court.
876
1:35:17 --> 1:35:27
But ICC even so followed their, let's say, political directive from London.
877
1:35:28 --> 1:35:35
So I would very much like to believe that ICC is a venue which can do something.
878
1:35:36 --> 1:35:42
But let's say we have three, four years of experience and it has proved that it is political.
879
1:35:42 --> 1:35:46
Paul Foss Yes, you're quite right. I mean,
880
1:35:47 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction]e like you doing these things. It's very important. The more
881
1:35:53 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]art reporting the crimes and trying to get a case started, the more likely we are to win
882
1:36:00 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction] add one thing that I think is important in this country? We've done
883
1:36:07 --> 1:36:16
several approaches to the ICC to try to get them to start proceedings against our leaders,
884
1:36:16 --> 1:36:23
starting off with Blair and others. What we were told, and what I've now discovered is important,
885
1:36:23 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]atute, I forget which article it is, it's somewhere between 13 and 19,
886
1:36:32 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction] to take the case in our own country before going to the ICC. And only if our
887
1:36:45 --> 1:36:54
courts are unwilling or unable to take the proceedings forward can we go to the ICC.
888
1:36:54 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]art the case in our domestic courts and only when they
889
1:37:02 --> 1:37:07
have been turned down again and again can we go to the ICC direct.
890
1:37:08 --> 1:37:15
Yeah, the problem is that we did it in a little bit in a different way, but we filed in June 2021
891
1:37:16 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction], but the district court dismissed the case.
892
1:37:25 --> 1:37:29
Yeah, I know. I mean we have very similar problems.
893
1:37:33 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]s are corrupt. So there is the chicken and the egg there. So if we would be able to get
894
1:37:42 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction] and then use that as a base for the ICC,
895
1:37:49 --> 1:37:58
but there were many cases filed in England too, and nobody was accepted. No case was accepted.
896
1:37:58 --> 1:38:07
No, it's been the case all the way down the line. We filed the first one in 2003. 17 senior
897
1:38:07 --> 1:38:16
MPs and lawyers signed the letter to the ICC. It was Ocampo at the time was the prosecutor,
898
1:38:16 --> 1:38:21
and that was turned down. And everything that we've done since then has been turned down.
899
1:38:21 --> 1:38:27
I did get quite an amusing letter from one of the times I went to the ICC. It was addressed,
900
1:38:27 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ale, it was addressed to Christ Coverdale. I thought that was an
901
1:38:33 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ing slip of the tongue. I love it.
902
1:38:37 --> 1:38:48
And also it is a legal possibility. It is under the Rome Charter and otherwise under United Nations,
903
1:38:49 --> 1:38:54
and on the other side it is controlled by British Crown judges.
904
1:38:54 --> 1:38:54
Yep.
905
1:38:56 --> 1:39:05
All right. So where that leads to, and it's a mindset, and Chris, you are both, and Mark,
906
1:39:07 --> 1:39:12
we've got people on this call who have a deep understanding of the human body.
907
1:39:15 --> 1:39:21
Now, the human body is incredibly complicated. There are people on this call who would have all
908
1:39:21 --> 1:39:28
sorts of various opinions about how to solve a problem with your body. On top of that, each
909
1:39:28 --> 1:39:35
body represented on this call live today is different. Chris and Anders and I, we have
910
1:39:35 --> 1:39:45
different bodies. Now, there are seven layers of laws, and what we have to understand is these
911
1:39:45 --> 1:39:54
seven layers, which come from natural law or God's law. That's the 1688 legislation that
912
1:39:54 --> 1:40:00
you're referring to, the monarch's oath at that time that we still have the benefit of. We have
913
1:40:00 --> 1:40:06
natural law, then we have international law, then we have national constitutions, then we have
914
1:40:06 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]itutions, then we have local laws in constitutions, then we have contractual
915
1:40:13 --> 1:40:20
agreements, and the application of law to the interpretation of those contractual agreements.
916
1:40:20 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]op looking for a black and white answer. And in my experience, I've had a law
917
1:40:25 --> 1:40:33
degree now for 51 years. Chris, what you are doing, and the conversation with Anders, I recommend that
918
1:40:33 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction], and Chris with Stephen, Chris with Mark Steele, what lawyers do is they have coffee
919
1:40:41 --> 1:40:50
in the morning, and they go and see King's Council, they go and shoot the breeze. Hey,
920
1:40:50 --> 1:40:55
what are we going to do about these 5G towers? What are we going to do about crimes against humanity?
921
1:40:55 --> 1:41:05
And there will be someone who says, oh, I remember a case back in 1927 that held this, and that
922
1:41:05 --> 1:41:12
won't have been raised by any court. And there's all this vast amount of knowledge, and it's this
923
1:41:12 --> 1:41:19
willingness to dig as Mark has been, as Anders has been, as each one of you has been. And I just want
924
1:41:19 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]and the law is as complex as the human body, and we just keep at it.
925
1:41:26 --> 1:41:35
And every time we lose, it helps us take the next step closer to winning. So it's, you know, and each
926
1:41:35 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]s badly, it gives us another piece of ammunition to raise, to then present to
927
1:41:41 --> 1:41:47
other lawyers and awaken more lawyers so they start to see the fraudulent system that we are part of,
928
1:41:47 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]ors need to be shown the fraudulent nature of the medical system that we're in.
929
1:41:55 --> 1:42:01
I agree, and it's really understanding the system that is important. I've spent most of my time
930
1:42:01 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]and the social system, the governance system, and that the governance
931
1:42:07 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]em in Britain operates differently, and one has to make sure that we dig down deep into finding
932
1:42:14 --> 1:42:22
out what is the underlying cause of the problems, rather than tackling the symptoms. So yes, I'm
933
1:42:22 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]etely with you. So, and with slight nuance there, Chris, can you explain, I love the idea,
934
1:42:29 --> 1:42:37
and it's happening in Australia. You talked about it. I know this is focused on the UK, but
935
1:42:38 --> 1:42:43
there's a different answer to every country, and you know, Tom is in the US, we've got plenty of
936
1:42:43 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]e in the US here, but local municipalities, the Swiss example that you give of 400 parliaments
937
1:42:52 --> 1:43:01
in Switzerland, and Richard Voebs did a presentation on, it was an allegory, if you like,
938
1:43:01 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction]y groups. How practical is that? Because the other principle
939
1:43:08 --> 1:43:14
that I share that I learned from other lawyers is laws without clause aren't laws. So similarly,
940
1:43:14 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction] is of no value if there's no enforcement,
941
1:43:20 --> 1:43:[privacy contact redaction] that we set up that comes, that has declared that Ryan Ofolmik should not be
942
1:43:25 --> 1:43:32
in jail, he is still in jail, because there's no enforcement capability. How do, in the UK,
943
1:43:32 --> 1:43:37
stick to that for the moment, how does a group of people come together to create a new
944
1:43:37 --> 1:43:41
local municipality and ignore the one that's chasing you for money?
945
1:43:43 --> 1:43:48
Yeah, that's a very good question, Charles. I've been working on this for quite some time.
946
1:43:49 --> 1:43:54
I think one of the important things is to look at the models that do work worldwide. Now,
947
1:43:55 --> 1:44:02
the particular one that I'm going for in the UK is called a multi-stakeholder, limited liability,
948
1:44:02 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]atform cooperative. It's a bit of a mouthful, but it's basically, the law changed in
949
1:44:11 --> 1:44:19
Britain in 2014, making it possible for cooperatives to act in the same way that
950
1:44:19 --> 1:44:25
multi-national businesses operate. The big difference being the cooperative is only
951
1:44:25 --> 1:44:31
controlled by its members, whereas the big businesses are only controlled by shareholders.
952
1:44:33 --> 1:44:41
And we need to ensure that, for instance, we tried to set up in the Hastings and Rye constituency,
953
1:44:41 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]y cooperative. Now, providing we set it out, set out the
954
1:44:49 --> 1:44:57
articles of association and we aim at being a cooperative and not a shareholder-owned company,
955
1:44:58 --> 1:45:04
then that model is a very useful one. Now, one of the biggest in the world is in northern Spain
956
1:45:04 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]agon. Now, they have 85,000 members and about 30,[privacy contact redaction]oyees worldwide
957
1:45:15 --> 1:45:22
in 17 different countries. And they were set up and they still are the world's biggest cooperative.
958
1:45:23 --> 1:45:28
Well, they weren't set up that way. They are now the world's biggest cooperative and very effective.
959
1:45:28 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction] their own university, their own courts, their own training systems and education systems,
960
1:45:36 --> 1:45:44
their own hospitals and banks and so on. So bit by bit, they have grown into a self-organizing,
961
1:45:44 --> 1:45:51
self-controlling community. And that's the sort of thing that is quite possible for us to do,
962
1:45:51 --> 1:45:56
particularly now that we've changed the law, making it possible for cooperatives to have the same
963
1:45:57 --> 1:46:08
benefits of limited liability and having business owners or cooperative members alongside
964
1:46:08 --> 1:46:13
individual members. And the great thing is that we can, for instance, in our local co-op,
965
1:46:15 --> 1:46:25
have Shell or BP or somebody join, but they only get one vote in our meetings alongside one vote
966
1:46:25 --> 1:46:32
for every individual member. So it brings back the power to a certain equality locally.
967
1:46:35 --> 1:46:42
Chris, may I say that perhaps building societies originally were set up that way?
968
1:46:43 --> 1:46:49
Yes, I agree. I mean, we need to go back to the old systems that work.
969
1:46:49 --> 1:47:00
Yeah, I'm with you 100%. I always applaud cooperatives and the building societies of old,
970
1:47:00 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]royed them, didn't she?
971
1:47:05 --> 1:47:06
You're right.
972
1:47:08 --> 1:47:13
So, and then Jerry Brady suggests, and Peter Underwood would know this, and some of you will
973
1:47:13 --> 1:47:18
remember the concept of sortition. Chris, have you heard of sortition? Where do you think it's
974
1:47:18 --> 1:47:26
Chris? Have you heard of sortition where leaders are elected by ballot? You nominate for leadership.
975
1:47:27 --> 1:47:35
What that weeds out is the psychopaths. And it's within these cooperatives of Mondragon, everybody.
976
1:47:35 --> 1:47:41
Thank you, Siobhans, for putting the link into the chat. I remember reading about Mondragon a long
977
1:47:41 --> 1:47:52
time ago. So the leadership clearly of Mondragon, it's been going for decades, has worked. It hasn't
978
1:47:52 --> 1:47:59
been taken over by psychopaths. And it can't be because of the nature of its structure.
979
1:48:02 --> 1:48:09
It's individuals, you can only be individual members and corporate members, but you all have
980
1:48:09 --> 1:48:15
one vote. And because of that, and having limited liability, you make your own rules.
981
1:48:16 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction]art, you can't be taken over because there's no shareholding. And that's very important.
982
1:48:24 --> 1:48:31
If you set it up as a cooperative by shares, then somebody with lots of money can come in and buy
983
1:48:31 --> 1:48:38
the shares and take over the cooperative. Yeah. Well, if it's limited liability and a cooperative
984
1:48:38 --> 1:48:46
by guarantee rather than by shares, then you do not have that possibility. Everybody has a
985
1:48:46 --> 1:48:54
guarantee of say, 100 pounds or one pound, whatever it is. But there's no shares to be taken over.
986
1:48:55 --> 1:49:00
Yeah, very good. So everybody think about cooperatives because each country has different
987
1:49:00 --> 1:49:05
laws on cooperatives. It's a great idea. Now, Chris, before we go to Stephen, because we haven't
988
1:49:05 --> 1:49:13
got any hands up, we've got half an hour to go. The other question I want that you've raised
989
1:49:13 --> 1:49:25
it earlier, what's your thinking of creating a process to shine a light on all legislation
990
1:49:25 --> 1:49:33
that's before the parliament? You know, that's the same. I'm thinking about this for Australia.
991
1:49:33 --> 1:49:38
We've got six states, you know, plus the national law. So I would. And it seems to me that there are
992
1:49:38 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]e and finding out the legislation that's coming before parliament is very easy to
993
1:49:44 --> 1:49:49
do. It's all online. It's not hidden. It's just that people don't have time to look at it. But if
994
1:49:49 --> 1:49:56
we set up a process to examine those laws and we shine a light on it, then I think we could
995
1:49:56 --> 1:50:01
stop shitty laws coming into enforcement. What's your, have you looked at that yet?
996
1:50:01 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] indeed. And that was one of the reasons I suggested having a look at how things work in
997
1:50:08 --> 1:50:17
Switzerland, because Switzerland hasn't had an external war in 850 something years. And
998
1:50:19 --> 1:50:25
their lawmaking process is slow and deliberate and careful and cooperative.
999
1:50:26 --> 1:50:35
And they don't have all these lobby groups from big corporations, as far as I can find out,
1000
1:50:37 --> 1:50:46
forcing their attention on our MPs as happens in the UK. They have, for example, so if a law
1001
1:50:46 --> 1:50:52
comes up from one of the cantons, it is discussed in parliament. They have to have a certain amount
1002
1:50:52 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]e sign up to get it going in the first place, rather like California does. And then it
1003
1:51:01 --> 1:51:10
goes to the two parliaments, the equivalent of our House of Commons and House of Lords or Senate and
1004
1:51:11 --> 1:51:19
Congress. It goes to one, they look at it and they cooperate in trying to get it into a format. They
1005
1:51:19 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] a look at it. They bring up any difficulties and make changes
1006
1:51:25 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] And that process happens three times. So in other words,
1007
1:51:33 --> 1:51:40
it's looked at up to six times. And if they still can't get agreement, then it's dropped and will
1008
1:51:40 --> 1:51:45
come back in four or five years time. If they do get agreement, they then have to go out to the
1009
1:51:45 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction] a national referendum on it. And it does not become law until everybody or 51% or
1010
1:51:54 --> 1:52:04
whatever the percentage is, depending on the law, has been agreed by the people. And that's the sort
1011
1:52:04 --> 1:52:13
of process that we need to develop in this country. The party system is really causing us major
1012
1:52:13 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]e are putting the government to oppose the government and the
1013
1:52:23 --> 1:52:30
government opposes the opposition. It's constant competition. And really what we need is cooperation
1014
1:52:30 --> 1:52:38
through and through to come up with a new law which suits everybody, not just the lobbying group or the
1015
1:52:38 --> 1:52:41
energy companies or whoever it is, is putting it forward.
1016
1:52:41 --> 1:52:43
– Yep. Very good.
1017
1:52:43 --> 1:52:50
– So Chris, what went wrong in Switzerland in 2020 then? Because they had lockdowns in Switzerland,
1018
1:52:50 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]and.
1019
1:52:51 --> 1:52:56
– I don't know the answer to that one, I'm afraid. I don't know.
1020
1:52:56 --> 1:53:01
– All right, Peter, and then we'll go to Stephen and we'll finish in half an hour.
1021
1:53:01 --> 1:53:09
– So let me introduce the group to the South African or African concept of Ubuntu.
1022
1:53:09 --> 1:53:10
– Oh, lovely.
1023
1:53:10 --> 1:53:23
– Ubuntu. It is all about cooperation. And working together as a group, I put out my
1024
1:53:24 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction]ay. And it was focused on the wolf pack. Wolf packs
1025
1:53:38 --> 1:53:45
survive because they work cooperatively. That's what I wanted to say.
1026
1:53:45 --> 1:53:54
– Yes, I had a good session. We had the one small town group and Michael Tellinger has been pushing
1027
1:53:54 --> 1:53:58
Ubuntu in this country. And I think it's a brilliant idea. I really do.
1028
1:53:58 --> 1:54:06
– Yeah, absolutely, Chris. I'm with you 100%. I'm sorry, I'm suffering from the
1029
1:54:08 --> 1:54:09
winter.
1030
1:54:09 --> 1:54:12
– You're suffering from what, Peter?
1031
1:54:12 --> 1:54:18
– The winter. We've got a winter here at the moment. It's driving me nuts.
1032
1:54:18 --> 1:54:23
– Well, Peter, I'm so glad. I'm just glad that you didn't say you've got COVID.
1033
1:54:25 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction], I wanted to ask Chris. I think you said, Chris,
1034
1:54:35 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]uff you said, you said there'd been five genocides in the last four
1035
1:54:40 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom. Is that correct?
1036
1:54:43 --> 1:54:48
– Five medical genocides and seven military genocides.
1037
1:54:48 --> 1:54:49
– So what are they then?
1038
1:54:49 --> 1:54:58
– Well, the seven military genocides are Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and then the
1039
1:54:58 --> 1:55:06
support for the Ukraine, the Yemen, and Gaza, Palestine. Those are the seven military genocides.
1040
1:55:07 --> 1:55:13
And the five medical ones are really to do with the COVID response, the
1041
1:55:15 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]ers in the care homes, for instance, the lockdown and the suicides and others that
1042
1:55:22 --> 1:55:30
happen for small businesses and so on. The putting out the DNR, do not resuscitate
1043
1:55:31 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]ions themselves, and I forget the fifth one.
1044
1:55:40 --> 1:55:44
It'll come back to me anyway. So each one of those is a separate
1045
1:55:44 --> 1:55:52
genocide, which has led to the deaths of at least 10,000 British citizens because they were
1046
1:55:52 --> 1:55:56
residents of Britain and not any other reason.
1047
1:55:57 --> 1:56:02
– Well, the other genocide would be that it was a PSYOP. It was a government PSYOP, wasn't it?
1048
1:56:03 --> 1:56:09
That the result of what they did in [privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom,
1049
1:56:09 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]ed Kingdom all around the world, were psychologically tortured by their
1050
1:56:16 --> 1:56:16
own government.
1051
1:56:16 --> 1:56:21
– Not only a PSYOP, but assault, literally assault, Stephen.
1052
1:56:21 --> 1:56:29
– Sure. So people don't understand that human beings are very highly social animals.
1053
1:56:30 --> 1:56:36
We need company. So any government in the world should have been, all the governments in the world
1054
1:56:36 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction] been aware of this, and that lockdowns were against human nature
1055
1:56:42 --> 1:56:48
and therefore harmful. And if you isolate a human being long enough, he or she will die.
1056
1:56:49 --> 1:56:55
Particularly a baby, of course, it's obvious, a child even, but adults will as well. And I don't
1057
1:56:55 --> 1:57:00
know whether you're aware of the, you might be able to use it in one of your private prosecutions,
1058
1:57:00 --> 1:57:07
Chris. You need to cite the very important experiments, the Universe 25 experiments.
1059
1:57:07 --> 1:57:10
– Can you say that again?
1060
1:57:10 --> 1:57:13
– Universe 25 experiments on mice.
1061
1:57:13 --> 1:57:14
– Oh, right.
1062
1:57:14 --> 1:57:27
– And the 25, I thought it related to 2025, but no, apparently the government, the experiment was
1063
1:57:27 --> 1:57:33
so important that they repeated it 25 times to make sure that the results were correct.
1064
1:57:35 --> 1:57:44
So, and what it was about was that they, the mice were essentially, they had very good conditions,
1065
1:57:44 --> 1:57:49
they had as much food and water as they needed, but they weren't allowed, I don't think they were
1066
1:57:49 --> 1:57:59
given too much food. They had space initially, but then the population increased, and then it
1067
1:58:00 --> 1:58:09
became apparent that there was a lack of interest in sex, and thereby the population eventually
1068
1:58:09 --> 1:58:15
started to reduce, but there were a whole group of males who were not interested in reproducing,
1069
1:58:15 --> 1:58:20
and the females, I can't remember all the details now, but it's an extremely important
1070
1:58:20 --> 1:58:29
experiment in my view, and it was allegedly done by an individual, but it was done for the government,
1071
1:58:29 --> 1:58:38
or for governments, and that would fit with the 25 times bit, you know, that, so I think that it
1072
1:58:38 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]ually an exercise in, you know, into getting the mice into a state where they didn't
1073
1:58:46 --> 1:58:50
want to live anymore, and I think that's what the lockdowns were about. They were about causing
1074
1:58:50 --> 1:58:56
human beings so much suffering that they didn't want to live. We have to think about what the
1075
1:58:56 --> 1:59:[privacy contact redaction]e who perpetrated what they did in the last four years,
1076
1:59:02 --> 1:59:07
what was in their minds, and I think anything is possible, and I think that there was a will to
1077
1:59:09 --> 1:59:15
how shall I say, and there is a will to continuing will to isolate human beings from
1078
1:59:15 --> 1:59:21
each other and generations from each other to drive wedges everywhere between human beings,
1079
1:59:21 --> 1:59:27
and this is wrong in my opinion, and we need to call them out on every attempt to turn men
1080
1:59:27 --> 1:59:[privacy contact redaction] men in particular, because the women need protection in times of
1081
1:59:35 --> 1:59:40
lack of safety, so we've always cooperated, men and women, but not just,
1082
1:59:42 --> 1:59:52
the wars that are created by politicians and others between generations, children
1083
1:59:52 --> 1:59:57
who think that because their grandparents, their parents, don't understand computers as well as they,
1084
1:59:58 --> 2:00:04
they are led to believe that that means they can't learn anything from their elders,
1085
2:00:04 --> 2:00:11
that's ridiculous, and similarly the adults, the parents and the grandparents have lost confidence
1086
2:00:12 --> 2:00:16
and they believe all this crap that if they don't understand computers they have nothing to teach
1087
2:00:16 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]en, it's nonsense, absolute nonsense, we need wisdom, and I think that the problem
1088
2:00:24 --> 2:00:33
is exacerbated by these phones, social media, computers, the love of stuff that cannot be
1089
2:00:33 --> 2:00:38
regulated by anybody, because it's so damn complicated for human beings that they don't
1090
2:00:38 --> 2:00:42
know how to regulate it, anything that cannot be regulated in my opinion needs to be put in the bin
1091
2:00:43 --> 2:00:46
because it's bad for human beings and we're seeing that now.
1092
2:00:47 --> 2:00:57
Yes, I fully agree with you, we need action to change the system, it's wrong and it's
1093
2:00:57 --> 2:01:03
causing us immense problems. Sure, education is absolutely key and I don't know how we're going to
1094
2:01:03 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]art is to get a good criminal case going against our leaders for conduct,
1095
2:01:11 --> 2:01:18
ancillary to genocide and that will spread rapidly around the world. I would love to see
1096
2:01:18 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] of genocide and sent to prison and that would have effects
1097
2:01:25 --> 2:01:32
right around the world immediately. Again, perhaps Matt Hancock, prosecuted for conduct,
1098
2:01:32 --> 2:01:42
ancillary to genocide for his role in the COVID-19 experiment. Yes, so in particular I think the
1099
2:01:42 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] been overlooked, the governments are trying to put it about that actually they
1100
2:01:46 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] brought in the lockdowns earlier and it's absolute nonsense. In my opinion as a doctor
1101
2:01:52 --> 2:01:59
there was no pandemic and there was no disease called COVID-19, no respiratory disease, so what
1102
2:01:59 --> 2:02:04
was it about them? Was anything true of what we were told in the last four years? I think not.
1103
2:02:06 --> 2:02:11
I agree and perhaps it's also worth pointing out the Nuremberg code,
1104
2:02:12 --> 2:02:17
yes very important, which is essential in those sort of situations which makes it a criminal offence
1105
2:02:17 --> 2:02:26
if you don't explain to people before having the injection the likely effects. Absolutely and do
1106
2:02:26 --> 2:02:33
you know this? So in my opinion no doctor in the world knew what was in these injections so it's
1107
2:02:33 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]or in the world to obtain informed consent. So why in the world
1108
2:02:38 --> 2:02:45
were they recommending it all over the world, these damn doctors and my colleagues? I'm very angry with
1109
2:02:45 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]ays a big role in everything. But Chris also where were the lawyers?
1110
2:02:53 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction] they were more concerned about getting their law firms into trouble and losing
1111
2:02:59 --> 2:03:06
business than thinking about where this was all going and the effects on their grandchildren and
1112
2:03:06 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]en if they cared. Yeah I agree. I've found the lawyers and law firms and justice system
1113
2:03:14 --> 2:03:21
in this country is right at the seat of the problem. Yeah and look at the Letbe case. I don't know
1114
2:03:21 --> 2:03:26
whether you know about the Letbe case, the nurse in Chester, the counters of Chester? Yeah I don't
1115
2:03:26 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] about it yes. Yeah so that looks like a miscarriage of justice.
1116
2:03:33 --> 2:03:39
We've got the post office thing, what nurse is that about? [privacy contact redaction]e is it went to where
1117
2:03:39 --> 2:03:46
were found guilty of criminal offences. These postmasters and postmistresses you know they
1118
2:03:46 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]worthy and then 800 of them are found guilty of criminal offences
1119
2:03:53 --> 2:03:59
and all the time it was due to a damn computer system which was not you're not allowed to question.
1120
2:04:01 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]ice system that that could happen. It really does. Absolutely.
1121
2:04:07 --> 2:04:15
Rather likely 559 MPs who voted in favor of continuing the bombing of Libya when David
1122
2:04:15 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]arted it three days earlier and [privacy contact redaction]
1123
2:04:28 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction] to say Chris only six MPs turned up to Andrew Bridgens. Yes.
1124
2:04:38 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction] Chris you might be able to help Andrew Bridgen because I
1125
2:04:46 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]ion he only you know allegedly only got [privacy contact redaction] time he
1126
2:04:52 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction] become so. You are so right Stephen you're so right I
1127
2:05:00 --> 2:05:08
Marked that he had 35 000 at the
1128
2:05:11 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]ion and then in the final election he got 1500.
1129
2:05:22 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]ion the previous general election he got 35 000. Yeah. He was a conservative
1130
2:05:33 --> 2:05:39
it was a former labor seat he was in beating his majority it was 20 000 majority I think and
1131
2:05:39 --> 2:05:45
previously it was a labor seat so you can see how successful he was there is no way British people
1132
2:05:45 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]ew Bridgen who was talking from the heart. Absolutely Stephen you're
1133
2:05:52 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction] make finish the point so there's no way the British people would desert
1134
2:05:57 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]e are good people generally of course there are bad eggs
1135
2:06:04 --> 2:06:09
there are bad eggs in every country but but um there's no way they could be so disloyal and
1136
2:06:09 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]ake they wanted to totally humiliate him with a terrible figure for
1137
2:06:16 --> 2:06:23
him and say to him essentially look no one's listening to you Andrew. Can you say Stephen that
1138
2:06:24 --> 2:06:32
the British. The point I want to make is they made a big mistake in making the number so damn small
1139
2:06:32 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]ands numbers that that there's no way that that could
1140
2:06:37 --> 2:06:45
have occurred that's the point. Yeah you are so right Stephen how the hell can we believe in the
1141
2:06:45 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]oral system. Yeah but the British people go to work they all
1142
2:06:55 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction] thing you can do in Britain is cause a fuss about anything so they go to work they don't
1143
2:07:01 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]n't complain no that's the last thing we must do it doesn't matter how long the
1144
2:07:06 --> 2:07:15
queue is if it's a mile long you mustn't complain. Yeah I think the system we can
1145
2:07:15 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ual counting of the votes unfortunately all the papers are destroyed as
1146
2:07:22 --> 2:07:28
soon as it's over we there's no checks on it at all and we have to find a way of checking every
1147
2:07:28 --> 2:07:35
single vote absolutely what happened in that situation the corruption in the voting system
1148
2:07:35 --> 2:07:42
in this country has been going on for at least 25 years since. Agreed absolutely Chris. We've got
1149
2:07:42 --> 2:07:52
an expert on voter fraud in America he's a good he is a absolutely brilliant with computers and
1150
2:07:52 --> 2:07:56
so he's worked out but didn't understand the importance as I understand it but Jerome Corsi
1151
2:07:56 --> 2:08:01
who wrote the book about JFK which came up his assassination which came out recently
1152
2:08:01 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ood the importance of it so he so this guy this brilliant guy working on his own
1153
2:08:08 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]s for New York state yeah so an algorithm by definition
1154
2:08:18 --> 2:08:28
is evidence of fraud yes so and he's we also have evidence of fraud in Scotland for the um the
1155
2:08:28 --> 2:08:38
original um um separation debate um yeah you're right Chris so he worked out how is it happened
1156
2:08:38 --> 2:08:48
in America and so Jerome Corsi he confirms that it's likely that um they use the same method in
1157
2:08:48 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ions to novel Andrew Bridgen for example yes I agree with that
1158
2:08:58 --> 2:09:06
that's amazing I learned a bit about this when I was standing for parliament in 2005 in the Wimbledore
1159
2:09:06 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]ituency uh I then found it out from experience just how corrupt the whole thing is jeez
1160
2:09:17 --> 2:09:24
I'm horrified I I've worked in the citizens of vice bureau for at least 10 years
1161
2:09:24 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]em no I'm completely
1162
2:09:36 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]ake in that [privacy contact redaction]e like me
1163
2:09:43 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]e around the world are very interested in this voting fraud now for the
1164
2:09:48 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]ates yeah yeah you're right Stephen it's frightening my
1165
2:09:55 --> 2:10:03
friend thank god I'm in South Africa it's like the psychopaths who bring their attempt themselves to
1166
2:10:03 --> 2:10:11
the attention of the um police in serial murders you know they just cannot resist taunting the
1167
2:10:11 --> 2:10:15
police and they bring they bring themselves to the attention of the police and start suggesting
1168
2:10:15 --> 2:10:22
things because they want to be they want to achieve notoriety or whatever or or and eventually
1169
2:10:22 --> 2:10:28
they get caught by their own vanity yeah and I think that's what's happened in the case of
1170
2:10:28 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]ew Bridgen's election you're right Stephen you're right my friend but the point is Chris
1171
2:10:33 --> 2:10:40
that we we've worked out that there's something wrong with that election in particular uh and we
1172
2:10:40 --> 2:10:47
need to work out how we can go for certain people who are responsible who are also vulnerable if
1173
2:10:47 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]and me yes well I believe that we we've got to go for the top right now um so I'll come
1174
2:10:56 --> 2:11:02
back to you when we've got that underway yeah Chris you're absolutely right I've just written
1175
2:11:03 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]arma I've tracked this guy for some years now he is a snake in the grass
1176
2:11:15 --> 2:11:21
and I'm going to be writing a a sub stack uh in the next couple of weeks
1177
2:11:21 --> 2:11:33
because I know he's wef there's no doubt about that and he's absolutely committed to globalist
1178
2:11:34 --> 2:11:41
uh attention yes and has anybody on this call noticed Chris have you noticed and Peter for that
1179
2:11:41 --> 2:11:46
matter uh but others as well has anybody looked into starma's eyes and thought those are weird
1180
2:11:47 --> 2:11:55
eyes he looks scared to death he looks absolutely terrified absolutely he's controlled Stephen
1181
2:11:57 --> 2:12:01
he looks as though he's in the headlights and I so he's supposed to be a barrister
1182
2:12:03 --> 2:12:11
I think he's a barrister isn't he or is he a solicitor no he was he was um he was a barrister
1183
2:12:11 --> 2:12:19
he let that guy um jeez uh I can't remember the name yeah he must he must be the most
1184
2:12:19 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction]er I've ever seen them well he let Savile get away he let Jimmy get away
1185
2:12:31 --> 2:12:40
I will never forgive him for doing that yeah I forgot the names uh so yeah exactly
1186
2:12:41 --> 2:12:44
but there was another case that he was instrumental in which was that now um
1187
2:12:45 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction] experience with him um because we reported uh Blair and others for war crimes and
1188
2:12:53 --> 2:12:59
he was the DPP who turned it down yes wasn't actually in his name he got other people to
1189
2:12:59 --> 2:13:07
sign the letter but he was in charge of the DPP when when we tried to prosecute Blair and the
1190
2:13:07 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction] of them for genocide and crimes against humanity yeah and let us not forget as well it's
1191
2:13:13 --> 2:13:19
um so he also got thrown out of a pub by that publican in Bath
1192
2:13:23 --> 2:13:27
do you ever see that I saw the video it was absolutely brilliant
1193
2:13:30 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]aff were absolutely mesmerized they couldn't understand
1194
2:13:34 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]ammer and his crew out you know Christ he's bloody
1195
2:13:41 --> 2:13:47
he am now for God's sake yeah so and also we should say on this call for the record
1196
2:13:48 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]ammer I think it was in a BBC Newsnight program I think it was Kirsty Wark who said where
1197
2:13:55 --> 2:14:01
would you rather be she didn't say Kiers Stammer but it was Kiers where would you rather be uh
1198
2:14:02 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]er he thought absolutely and he said Davos and she smiled it was some kind of
1199
2:14:10 --> 2:14:16
inside joke in the BBC at the public's expense it was just ridiculous you're so right Stevie
1200
2:14:20 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]
1201
2:14:22 --> 2:14:31
yes well we we've got to do some I promise you we will be working on this and um any support we can
1202
2:14:31 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction] of the others into prison could we bring a private prosecution against
1203
2:14:37 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]ammer for um putting the country at risk by saying that he prefers the Davos where the
1204
2:14:45 --> 2:14:51
World Economic Forum meets every January to Westminster that's that's behavior
1205
2:14:52 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]ent with treason as far as I can see well I think there's better evidence of him saying for
1206
2:14:59 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]ance he supports um the Netanyahu's um removal of the food and medical supplies and the food and
1207
2:15:13 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]ies and other things and he thinks that's a good thing
1208
2:15:17 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]atement of genocide in uh in support of um the Israeli government
1209
2:15:25 --> 2:15:33
yes you're so right and Chris I think he was absolute genocide it's Zionism Chris I think he
1210
2:15:33 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]anning a genocide for the anti-vaxxers as well because he said we must we must deal with
1211
2:15:39 --> 2:15:45
the anti-vaxxers and if yes he said we must join with the opposition to do it I'm prepared to do
1212
2:15:45 --> 2:15:52
it sorry with the conservative government at the time uh so dealing with the anti what did he mean
1213
2:15:52 --> 2:15:58
dealing with the anti-vaxxers was he gonna he did say that Stephen I've actually printed that out
1214
2:15:58 --> 2:16:08
in my letter that's coming out recently or in the next couple of weeks he said we have to deal with
1215
2:16:08 --> 2:16:17
the anti-vaxxers yeah that's what I said Peter that's what I said I said that yeah we have to
1216
2:16:17 --> 2:16:26
do what on earth did he mean by deal with them well he meant we have to eliminate them well exactly
1217
2:16:27 --> 2:16:34
that's yes exactly that's what he was kind of a hate crime wasn't it putting thoughts in the
1218
2:16:34 --> 2:16:41
minds of the public you know it's absolutely this is like this is insightful behavior absolutely
1219
2:16:42 --> 2:16:48
absolutely so we already knew that well we did that the British population had been
1220
2:16:49 --> 2:16:55
psychologically tortured so long-term starmer and you know we had Matthias Desmet who's a professor
1221
2:16:55 --> 2:17:01
of psychology or whatever and he was saying that we don't know where this could end you know we
1222
2:17:01 --> 2:17:07
don't know when when there could be atrocities triggered it could happen at any time it was you
1223
2:17:07 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] an atrocity you know killing people uh you know because they
1224
2:17:13 --> 2:17:19
were in a cult essentially I think that's what he was saying he never used the word but but um uh so
1225
2:17:19 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] these atrocities and there's kios dharma uh who's now the prime minister of the UK
1226
2:17:25 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] deal with the antivaxxers absolutely you couldn't make it up
1227
2:17:33 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] Chris we've come to an end Chris you've done very come to a fiery end yeah sorry about that
1228
2:17:40 --> 2:17:46
no no we've come to a wonderful appropriate end inspiring us to all take responsibility for next
1229
2:17:46 --> 2:17:52
steps that need to be taken and Chris you know congratulations on your courage on your willingness
1230
2:17:52 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction]and up for what you believe that many people on this call do the same and listening to
1231
2:17:58 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction] understand that if we want to fight back against
1232
2:18:05 --> 2:18:10
this we need to be willing to suffer now anyone who's gone to war ever any country you know when
1233
2:18:10 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]rage person is in the military when the australians went to world wars one and two
1234
2:18:17 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction] of them suffer we have to be willing to suffer and Chris
1235
2:18:22 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]e to us of the willingness to suffer for your beliefs if you're
1236
2:18:27 --> 2:18:33
not then it's not a belief you're just talking shit so let's not talk shit let's act thank you
1237
2:18:33 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]ephen thank you for organizing thank you again officially I think
1238
2:18:38 --> 2:18:44
actually one of the jobs that's very much underrated in in the present situation which we're in after
1239
2:18:44 --> 2:18:49
four and a half years of this nonsense and long before probably except I wasn't really fully aware
1240
2:18:50 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction] important resources I think are archivists otherwise known as librarians
1241
2:18:58 --> 2:19:03
we need librarians we need them to catalog all this stuff that we've talked about tonight but
1242
2:19:03 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]uff we know in our heads which we can't possibly manage on our own in on our
1243
2:19:09 --> 2:19:16
computers you know and we need to realize this and get some very very good librarians I've been
1244
2:19:16 --> 2:19:23
saying this for some time to document everything and to be able to find it again so remember the
1245
2:19:23 --> 2:19:30
algorithms in the voting fraud in America the importance of those was that they could not only
1246
2:19:30 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]ed identities for one person but that they could hide those identities so that
1247
2:19:36 --> 2:19:42
nobody would find them but guess what when there was a problem in a state or whatever
1248
2:19:43 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]op the counting and then find all these identities secretly so
1249
2:19:51 --> 2:19:57
so even you're so right my friend librarians and what we're talking about all right we've got the
1250
2:19:57 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction] so we can store the information and then pick it up for us
1251
2:20:04 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction] a sixth sense so they know what we want yeah there are
1252
2:20:12 --> 2:20:17
plenty of librarians and they can find the information that is useful to Chris
1253
2:20:17 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]e on this call who are librarians Tom Rodman is JJ Cooey as Tom Rodman points out
1254
2:20:23 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]ors here of information so well they well they haven't made their okay right
1255
2:20:29 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]n't made themselves known Charles well no we don't need to that's the beauty Stephen
1256
2:20:35 --> 2:20:40
of having well no you missed the point Charles because what I'm saying is we need people who can
1257
2:20:40 --> 2:20:45
store the information well create one a point who's going to appoint them no you've made the
1258
2:20:45 --> 2:20:52
point you want government to set up a librarian no thank you no I was trying to explain
1259
2:20:54 --> 2:21:06
20 000 files of data already okay we're finishing Tom go quick I think could I just add one last
1260
2:21:06 --> 2:21:13
thing Charles yep I think it's important that we've got to get past the data phase into action
1261
2:21:13 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] things everybody can do is to stop paying for what's happening stop paying
1262
2:21:20 --> 2:21:28
tax nice beautiful message Tom what do you want to say before we finish oh okay well the telegram
1263
2:21:28 --> 2:21:35
channel is intended for that the hashtags are a way of aggregating data we can export the telegram
1264
2:21:35 --> 2:21:43
to a flat file which I do periodically my telegram my primary telegram account was clobbered for no
1265
2:21:43 --> 2:21:51
apparent reason so I'm telegrams wonderful but I'm still angry at them also um yeah I keep I keep
1266
2:21:51 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] a lot of information in one text file and because you try signal Tom
1267
2:22:00 --> 2:22:07
the signal doesn't have a lot of the features that telegram have has okay but I mean yeah we
1268
2:22:07 --> 2:22:15
got to use everything um okay thank you excellent all right everybody they're out at Chris the fact
1269
2:22:15 --> 2:22:18
that you don't know actions being taken none of us know all the actions that are being taken there
1270
2:22:18 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction]ions being taken and you are an ongoing inspiration keep taking more action
1271
2:22:23 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction]ate is going to create a library sorry yeah Charles I saw three very
1272
2:22:28 --> 2:22:34
important things in my emails today and and other elsewhere um and I thought how am I going to
1273
2:22:34 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction] wish I had somewhere to put this stuff because I know in a week's time I've
1274
2:22:38 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction]etely forgotten about them it may come up I may remember in a week's time I may not good well
1275
2:22:44 --> 2:22:51
you need to be put it in one file put everything in one file learn how to search it Tom that's not
1276
2:22:51 --> 2:22:56
the point so we've got Chris Coverdale he's a bit more organized than me say there are others
1277
2:22:56 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ephen we know you're a genius at certain things and you're
1278
2:23:01 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ing information you need an assistant and there's someone on this call
1279
2:23:06 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ing who's a who's got nothing to do who says I will become Stephen Frost's
1280
2:23:13 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ant okay we're going thanks Chris thanks everybody
1281
2:23:21 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]oring it Charles and then refinding yes that's what your virtual
1282
2:23:27 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ephen you don't pay them money they'll help you because they're inspired
1283
2:23:33 --> 2:23:40
by what you want to create Charles I don't want to computer as my assistant Stephen you have to
1284
2:23:40 --> 2:23:45
want to learn if you don't want to learn IT stuff I mean but if you do want to learn it then
1285
2:23:45 --> 2:23:49
how do you learn it now
