1
0:00:00 --> 0:00:09
David, I've made you a co-host. I'll welcome everybody. Stephen, well done for organizing
2
0:00:09 --> 0:00:14
as usual. Great speakers are making us work even more for our supper by having three meetings
3
0:00:14 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction], David, that's very good. It keeps us all on our toes. We are Medical
4
0:00:22 --> 0:00:[privacy contact redaction]ors for COVID Ethics International, founded by Stephen Frost. I'm Charles Cobess. Australasia's
5
0:00:27 --> 0:00:32
passion provocateur. I wear my red jacket because red is color of passion. And you can
6
0:00:32 --> 0:00:36
see Sam Dubay in his red top there. It's a lighter red than me.
7
0:00:36 --> 0:00:42
I'm worried for anger. This is the color of anger, Charles.
8
0:00:42 --> 0:00:50
Very good. So David has presented to us previously and we have a moving population. The recordings
9
0:00:50 --> 0:00:58
are all getting viewed on the Rumble channel, but for, so that particularly newcomers, we
10
0:00:58 --> 0:01:06
welcome newcomers who are recommended by existing participants. The professions here, they have
11
0:01:06 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]ors, lawyers, retired professionals, journalists, engineers, writers, researchers,
12
0:01:14 --> 0:01:[privacy contact redaction]s, financiers, patent experts. And I found from Simon DeWolf yesterday that there's
13
0:01:22 --> 0:01:29
over a thousand patents in bond trading alone. Get that everybody? A thousand patents.
14
0:01:29 --> 0:01:35
Well, many, many more than that. David knows about patents, Charles.
15
0:01:35 --> 0:01:39
Way more than a thousand. That is a gross underestimate.
16
0:01:39 --> 0:01:47
Wow. How amazing. So we're here for increased understanding about the challenges to freedom,
17
0:01:47 --> 0:01:57
truth, justice, health, and ethics. We're here in a true spirit of exploration and discovery.
18
0:01:57 --> 0:02:06
We, if you want anyone added to the list, please send me an email. If any of you produce
19
0:02:07 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]s, newsletters, et cetera, substacks, please put them every week into the chat so we
20
0:02:14 --> 0:02:21
can find them easily. Don't hold back. Share it with the group. Wonderful resources that you're
21
0:02:21 --> 0:02:29
all producing. We will, we, most of us understand we're here in World War III. We go for two and a
22
0:02:29 --> 0:02:36
half hours. And then it goes to a telegram video chat for those who have the time. David,
23
0:02:36 --> 0:02:[privacy contact redaction]an this process?
24
0:02:40 --> 0:02:44
Yeah, I was, I had booked the two and a half hours. So that's, that's what I was planning on,
25
0:02:44 --> 0:02:50
but I'm- No, no, that will, that will be wonderful because we love having the ability to have
26
0:02:50 --> 0:02:58
conversation, discussion, and go deep and help you. And, you know, we're here, as I'm sure,
27
0:02:59 --> 0:03:03
many presenters realise that we're here to help the presenters as well in their great work. So
28
0:03:03 --> 0:03:09
Stephen does a great job picking the presenters. And then we are a resource of over a thousand
29
0:03:09 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]e ready to help if help is needed. David and any presenter who, any presenter who sees
30
0:03:15 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ing, there's no censorship, but there is proper moderation. It's a free speech environment.
31
0:03:21 --> 0:03:26
Free speech is crucial, everybody. That's why we don't support the offence industry. If you're
32
0:03:26 --> 0:03:31
offended by anything that anybody says, that you'd be offended, we're not interested. And in your
33
0:03:31 --> 0:03:38
life, if someone says to you, I'm offended, just never apologise. Never apologise. This offence
34
0:03:38 --> 0:03:[privacy contact redaction]ry is going, is the best way to shut up free speech. When you shut up free speech,
35
0:03:43 --> 0:03:48
you shut up freedom. Without freedom, you are not human. This is a place where you
36
0:03:49 --> 0:03:54
discover what your beliefs are. You perhaps change your beliefs. Many people get upset
37
0:03:54 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]ioned. It is about the development of science. If you have any solutions
38
0:04:01 --> 0:04:05
to anyone's problems, put them in the chat too. If you think a product is fantastic,
39
0:04:06 --> 0:04:10
put it in the chat. But you don't need to have a big debate with somebody. If somebody says,
40
0:04:10 --> 0:04:15
9,000 milligrams of vitamin C is great. And someone else says, no, no, no, that's too much.
41
0:04:15 --> 0:04:22
You don't have to have that debate in the chat. We come from love, not fear. Love expands you.
42
0:04:22 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction]s you. From all of the speakers we've had here, that Stephen has organised,
43
0:04:27 --> 0:04:34
that we've listened to, there is no doubt in my mind that we have a spiritual war on our hands
44
0:04:34 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] our freedom are hitting us at the spiritual level.
45
0:04:40 --> 0:04:48
They don't understand love. We do. And that's the power that we have. And human beings unifying
46
0:04:48 --> 0:04:[privacy contact redaction] an open mind. Your self-awareness is an opportunity here.
47
0:04:55 --> 0:05:03
In terms of your patience level of the Q&A, I moderate that. Each one of us has a different
48
0:05:03 --> 0:05:10
agenda, constantly balancing the needs of the participants here. That's what needs to happen.
49
0:05:10 --> 0:05:15
And we don't have [privacy contact redaction] two and a half hours. This is recorded at the Rumble Channel.
50
0:05:15 --> 0:05:19
I'll put the address in there. Welcome again specifically. If you are new, if you're a
51
0:05:19 --> 0:05:26
virginal visitor or member, please feel free. You don't have to. Introduce yourself in the chat.
52
0:05:26 --> 0:05:32
Tell us about you. And that's about it. David Martin is a superstar. Everyone knows who he is.
53
0:05:32 --> 0:05:38
We're delighted to have you. There's a special event. And David, over to you. Unless Stephen,
54
0:05:38 --> 0:05:43
you want to say anything specific? Yeah, I just wanted to. So David, you might. So the recording
55
0:05:43 --> 0:05:48
wasn't on when you were explaining the picture behind you, but that might be something you would
56
0:05:48 --> 0:05:[privacy contact redaction]e. I don't know. It's up to you. I'm happy to just to recap. The image
57
0:05:55 --> 0:06:02
behind me is the Tree of Life carving, which actually graces the mosque in Ahmedabad, India.
58
0:06:03 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction] a very particularly important phase in my life when I was asked to be there
59
0:06:09 --> 0:06:15
during the Muslim Hindu riots, which resulted in the death of thousands of people.
60
0:06:16 --> 0:06:21
And I was asked to come over and be part of a conversation about how to
61
0:06:22 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ems that would potentially lessen that conflict. And
62
0:06:30 --> 0:06:[privacy contact redaction]ory, some bit of what we did may have had an effect because we haven't
63
0:06:38 --> 0:06:48
had the mass riots since. But the image is the relief of the Tree of Life done in alabaster
64
0:06:48 --> 0:06:55
on the mosque in Ahmedabad and superimposed behind it is our integral accounting wheel,
65
0:06:55 --> 0:07:00
which is how we approach every situation and every problem to try to look at six dimensional
66
0:07:00 --> 0:07:05
analysis of everything, which is a whole nother topic. If you want to learn more about that,
67
0:07:06 --> 0:07:13
you can spend time on the FullyLive Academy, where I have a lot of explanations on that,
68
0:07:13 --> 0:07:19
or on my blog, Inverted Alchemy, either one have a look at integral accounting and you get a picture
69
0:07:20 --> 0:07:26
of what those things are. But to dive in very briefly, for those of you not entirely familiar
70
0:07:26 --> 0:07:31
with the work that I've done, I thought I'd give everybody a very quick background,
71
0:07:31 --> 0:07:39
because I really would value more Q&A this time than monologue. So what I'll do is give you a very
72
0:07:39 --> 0:07:47
quick overview and then we can get into some topical issues that are of import right now and then
73
0:07:47 --> 0:07:56
open up the floor for a more in-depth Q&A. To start off, my background is I have been involved in
74
0:07:57 --> 0:08:04
a number of different fields, largely in finance and international trade. For the last 30 years,
75
0:08:05 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]arted at the University of Virginia when I was on the faculty in the
76
0:08:10 --> 0:08:16
medical school in the departments of radiology and orthopedic surgery. I got my PhD from the
77
0:08:16 --> 0:08:22
University of Virginia and then became the director of the first for-profit clinical
78
0:08:22 --> 0:08:26
trials organization on medical devices in the history of not only the University of Virginia,
79
0:08:26 --> 0:08:[privacy contact redaction]ates. It was the first for-profit corporation ever set up inside of
80
0:08:33 --> 0:08:40
a non-profit university in the Commonwealth of Virginia. That background dovetailed with the
81
0:08:40 --> 0:08:46
other business I was running also at the same time called Mosaic Technologies. Mosaic Technologies was
82
0:08:46 --> 0:08:50
a treaty-restricted technology transfer company that I founded in the late 1980s.
83
0:08:51 --> 0:08:58
Our specific focus was to go into countries that were prohibited from exporting offensive
84
0:08:58 --> 0:09:02
military technologies as a condition of the treaties ending the Second World War
85
0:09:03 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]ications for defense technologies that came out of
86
0:09:09 --> 0:09:15
all of the countries that were given prohibitions after the Second World War. Germany, Italy,
87
0:09:16 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]ern Europe. As the Soviet Union fell apart, we were very actively involved in
88
0:09:22 --> 0:09:27
the dissemination of technologies in the diaspora of engineering coming out of Russia.
89
0:09:28 --> 0:09:35
Then Japan, obviously. I say without any hyperbole that if you use any technology whatsoever,
90
0:09:36 --> 0:09:43
whether it's automotive, telecommunications, or anything in the medical space, the likelihood is
91
0:09:43 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction] on that technology coming into your hands somewhere on this earth.
92
0:09:50 --> 0:09:[privacy contact redaction]atement is not only because of the work through Mosaic Technologies, but in 1998,
93
0:09:55 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]arted a company called MCAM. MCAM was the first and the only of its kind in the United States.
94
0:10:02 --> 0:10:08
It's what we call a GSE, or government-sponsored enterprise. Ours was not government-sponsored,
95
0:10:08 --> 0:10:14
but it was government-sanctioned. What we did was we created the world's first and continuously only
96
0:10:15 --> 0:10:23
means by which companies could use general intangibles as collateral for regulated finance.
97
0:10:23 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]atforms are used to underwrite banking transactions in 168 countries. I often say if
98
0:10:30 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]er, we see it because it is something that is not hyperbolic.
99
0:10:36 --> 0:10:43
Again, that's the way it is. We do the underwriting of intangible assets to make sure that those are
100
0:10:44 --> 0:10:[privacy contact redaction]ions in banking situations in 168 countries.
101
0:10:51 --> 0:11:00
That's what MCAM has done for the last [privacy contact redaction] been involved in a number of things on the
102
0:11:00 --> 0:11:08
capital market side. Jermaine, to this conversation, I was asked in the late 1990s to be very
103
0:11:09 --> 0:11:15
involved in looking at the programs that were at least blurring the line, if not crossing the line,
104
0:11:16 --> 0:11:21
of biological and chemical weapons programs. As we were going through technology transfer issues,
105
0:11:21 --> 0:11:28
it was very common for us to come across technologies that enabled or the overt technologies
106
0:11:28 --> 0:11:33
associated with biological and chemical weapons in all of 122 countries that we were engaged in
107
0:11:33 --> 0:11:39
at the time. As a result of that, whether it was the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in the
108
0:11:39 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]ates, whether it was the National Biological Engineering Programs in Tehran,
109
0:11:43 --> 0:11:[privacy contact redaction]atform that actually gave rise to what became the Euro
110
0:11:55 --> 0:12:01
Tox Conventions, we were very involved in understanding what was going on in the
111
0:12:01 --> 0:12:06
weaponization of nature and the weaponization of chemistry against humanity beginning in the late
112
0:12:06 --> 0:12:16
1990s. That is how we fell into our involvement with coronavirus. My first briefing on coronavirus
113
0:12:16 --> 0:12:23
was officially done for law enforcement intelligence agencies in 2002 going into 2003.
114
0:12:24 --> 0:12:29
When we pointed out that Ralph Barak at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
115
0:12:29 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ion and funding of NIAID had developed what he referred to as an infectious
116
0:12:38 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ive clone of coronavirus. What is important about that to start off this
117
0:12:45 --> 0:12:51
conversation is the use of terminology is quite critical. When you actually develop something
118
0:12:51 --> 0:12:[privacy contact redaction]ive, that is nonsense garble speak for a weapon.
119
0:13:00 --> 0:13:06
That means it's intended to hit a person, it's intended to affect that person, but it's intended
120
0:13:06 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction] a target, not a distribution target. That's why we call it infectious replication
121
0:13:12 --> 0:13:[privacy contact redaction]ive means that it was intended to have a delivery target that was
122
0:13:19 --> 0:13:24
actually something that was intentionally identified against an individual. That's a
123
0:13:24 --> 0:13:30
very important point we're going to get to in a little bit. It's important to realize that in 2002
124
0:13:30 --> 0:13:38
UNC Chapel Hill funded by NIAID developed what became the thing that we now call SARS-CoV.
125
0:13:39 --> 0:13:44
That is not a naturally occurring modification of anything. It never was naturally occurring.
126
0:13:44 --> 0:13:51
Anybody familiar with the coronavirus model prior to 1998 realizes that with the exception
127
0:13:51 --> 0:13:59
of experimentation done by Ralph Barrett funded by NIAID, the primary target of coronavirus
128
0:13:59 --> 0:14:06
research was canine and porcine juvenile gastrointestinal disorders because that's
129
0:14:06 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction] It was not a respiratory and it was not a cardiovascular
130
0:14:11 --> 0:14:18
pathogen. It was a GI pathogen. If you go back to 1990 and look at Pfizer's very first patent
131
0:14:19 --> 0:14:25
on a coronavirus vaccine, you can see the evidence of that in all of the literature associated with
132
0:14:25 --> 0:14:33
Pfizer's first coronavirus patent vaccine in 1990. What happened during the decade of the 90s is
133
0:14:33 --> 0:14:38
Ralph Barrett modified coronavirus using a series of modifications and amplifications
134
0:14:39 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]iomyopathy. Let me just say that one more time. Rabbits
135
0:14:46 --> 0:14:[privacy contact redaction]iomyopathy. That model as a research and experimental model is quite problematic for two
136
0:14:54 --> 0:15:01
reasons. Number one, it defies what is in fact the restrictions that we have on the development of
137
0:15:01 --> 0:15:06
biological weapons because you cannot take a naturally occurring scheduled toxin or pathogen
138
0:15:07 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]ify it so it increases pathogenicity. That is actually an illegal act under 18 U.S. Code
139
0:15:14 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]ions, but most notably section 175. It is illegal to do what he did and it was illegal
140
0:15:21 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]ion violated U.S. Code and is a felony violation which carries
141
0:15:30 --> 0:15:38
a lifetime sentence as well as up to $100 million economic damage if it was involved with an
142
0:15:38 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]itution which in this case it was with the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. This
143
0:15:43 --> 0:15:[privacy contact redaction]ually the foundation and it was important to point out that it was identified as a way to
144
0:15:49 --> 0:15:56
modify both spike protein, the ACE2 receptor proteins and several of the furin cleavage sites
145
0:15:56 --> 0:16:02
and other things which were being modified so that they would actually hit cells of different
146
0:16:02 --> 0:16:[privacy contact redaction] an enormous number of other organ systems involved where
147
0:16:09 --> 0:16:15
coronavirus had once upon a time not had any meaningful clinical effect whatsoever.
148
0:16:16 --> 0:16:24
In 2002, the development of that coronavirus became instrumental in what happened in the fall
149
0:16:24 --> 0:16:33
of 2002 and the spring of 2003 which as you all know was the allegation of the first outbreak
150
0:16:33 --> 0:16:42
of SARS-CoV-1. Now the truth is that SARS-CoV-1 which was patented in April of 2003 by the CDC
151
0:16:43 --> 0:16:52
and the cDNA sequence for the entire sequence of SARS-CoV isolated from humans was patented on the
152
0:16:52 --> 0:17:00
25th of April 2003 by the Center for Disease Control and roughly 50 co-inventors if you believe
153
0:17:00 --> 0:17:05
that I've got a bridge to sell you in the middle of a swamp but the fact of the matter is [privacy contact redaction]e
154
0:17:05 --> 0:17:10
put their, slightly over [privacy contact redaction]ication, many of whom had nothing to
155
0:17:10 --> 0:17:16
do with the alleged invention. What makes that particular date important is two days later
156
0:17:16 --> 0:17:22
the vaccine for SARS-CoV was actually patented by Sequoia Pharmaceuticals.
157
0:17:23 --> 0:17:29
I can tell by looking at everyone's face who has their camera on that that name means nothing to
158
0:17:29 --> 0:17:34
anybody because it doesn't mean anything to anybody because Sequoia Pharmaceuticals wasn't
159
0:17:34 --> 0:17:[privacy contact redaction]ually some shell corporation and if you go back to the provenance of that you
160
0:17:40 --> 0:17:47
can find all kinds of messy trails of financing that have tentacles into and out of Sequoia
161
0:17:47 --> 0:17:54
Pharmaceuticals but two days after the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans patent was
162
0:17:54 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] same virus was also patented. You think operation warp
163
0:18:02 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] figure that one out how on earth can you actually have allegedly a virus isolated
164
0:18:10 --> 0:18:21
on the 25th of April [privacy contact redaction] vaccine trial data filed in a patent for a vaccine
165
0:18:21 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction] same pathogen and once again anybody who thinks that that's even theoretically possible
166
0:18:28 --> 0:18:37
absent the back to the future DeLorean time machine is certainly on the edge of their sanity.
167
0:18:38 --> 0:18:47
What became problematic very quickly is it was clear that the coronavirus outbreak of 2002 going
168
0:18:47 --> 0:18:[privacy contact redaction]an it was not an isolated event and the plan involved anthrax and it involved
169
0:18:55 --> 0:19:01
H1N1 and the reason why we know this is because it was specifically announced in a series of
170
0:19:01 --> 0:19:08
conferences in Slovenia and a series of conferences that took place in India where the linkage
171
0:19:08 --> 0:19:16
between the anthrax the H1N1 and SARS were all brought together as a justification for creating
172
0:19:16 --> 0:19:21
what would become a mandate for medical countermeasures which is a defined term and
173
0:19:21 --> 0:19:27
Pascal back to your work it would be important to make note of the fact that the evolution of
174
0:19:27 --> 0:19:33
the term medical countermeasures as a code word inside of World Health Organization and a code
175
0:19:33 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]atutory engagements medical countermeasures is a military term developed
176
0:19:39 --> 0:19:50
by DARPA and it was part of a combined op that includes anthrax H1N1 and SARS coronavirus and
177
0:19:50 --> 0:19:[privacy contact redaction]e other things but it's important to realize historically
178
0:19:55 --> 0:20:02
that this was all part of a single operation and the operation was driven in large part for two
179
0:20:02 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction]ive number one was that we wanted to have a universal vaccine vector
180
0:20:08 --> 0:20:15
where we used biologic agents and their ability to penetrate the cells as a vaccine vector and
181
0:20:15 --> 0:20:21
coronavirus was chosen by Anthony Fauci to be the preferred mode of delivery of vaccines he figured
182
0:20:21 --> 0:20:26
that if you were going to come up with an HIV vaccine or any other vaccine that coronavirus
183
0:20:26 --> 0:20:[privacy contact redaction] malleable model that could be used to deliver other vaccine agents into the cell
184
0:20:34 --> 0:20:40
thus the focus allegedly on coronavirus however there was another part of the process which
185
0:20:40 --> 0:20:46
became visible to the public and I am not able to talk about the classified phase of this but it
186
0:20:46 --> 0:20:53
became visible to the public in 2005 coincident with the passage of the prep act and other things
187
0:20:53 --> 0:21:03
where DARPA expressly held a conference on the bio weapons capabilities of SARS coronavirus very
188
0:21:03 --> 0:21:10
specifically an entire conference dedicated to the weaponization of coronavirus where Ralph Baric was
189
0:21:10 --> 0:21:17
one of the lead presenters that conference in [privacy contact redaction]ed million dollars
190
0:21:17 --> 0:21:25
of non-competitive grants that went to UNC Chapel Hill and their collaborators and those non-competitive
191
0:21:25 --> 0:21:33
grants were for the express weaponization and p3 program if you look at DARPA's p3 program you'll
192
0:21:33 --> 0:21:40
see all of this detailed but that p3 program which was essentially allegedly developed for
193
0:21:40 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] the only thing it was was anything but that it was actually a way
194
0:21:45 --> 0:21:53
to use the defense department's black programs to develop biological weapons allegedly in
195
0:21:53 --> 0:21:[privacy contact redaction] all of this was done and well documented and the
196
0:21:59 --> 0:22:07
non-competitive grants associated with this in [privacy contact redaction] to this day where there is
197
0:22:07 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ion funding and there has not been any interdiction in the
198
0:22:13 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]ion funding going into this program so it's important to realize that's been going on
199
0:22:18 --> 0:22:26
since 2005 in 2010 a very bizarre thing happened the bizarre thing was a 10-year national science
200
0:22:26 --> 0:22:35
foundation grant entitled Darwinian chemical systems was actually in its 10th year of renewal
201
0:22:35 --> 0:22:[privacy contact redaction]igators associated with Darwinian chemical systems which is the
202
0:22:40 --> 0:22:47
organization that was set up to see if you could get mRNA to write into eukaryotic and other cells
203
0:22:47 --> 0:22:55
DNA that particular program which was called Darwinian chemical systems if you're looking it
204
0:22:55 --> 0:23:04
up that program became a company called Moderna and if you go back and you look at the origins of
205
0:23:04 --> 0:23:10
Moderna a very bizarre thing happens one of the principles of the national science foundation
206
0:23:10 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]s who had no venture capital experience in [privacy contact redaction]ed
207
0:23:17 --> 0:23:24
as co-inventors on the first patent filed by Moderna before Moderna even existed once again
208
0:23:24 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction] money going into a company that has never produced anything we have
209
0:23:30 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction] venture capitalists listed as co-inventors on mRNA as a genetic
210
0:23:38 --> 0:23:45
engineering program both of whom had no experience whatsoever in any form of science or chemistry or
211
0:23:45 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ed in the first patents filed and assigned to Moderna
212
0:23:52 --> 0:23:[privacy contact redaction]ed another one of those moments where it scratches your head with
213
0:23:58 --> 0:24:03
credulity where you sit there and say this was clearly set up for something else and the something
214
0:24:03 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction] the something else was the recognition beginning in 2008 and
215
0:24:09 --> 0:24:17
then finalized in 2010 which was the recognition that if you were going to stabilize mRNA to do its
216
0:24:17 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]or it would be necessary to start modifying some of the
217
0:24:24 --> 0:24:33
nucleosides that go into the compounds associated with everything in the mRNA therapeutic environment
218
0:24:33 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]ion of pseudo-uridine now pseudo-uridine beginning in 2008 but certainly
219
0:24:42 --> 0:24:[privacy contact redaction]io toxic effects and most problematic there were well-documented
220
0:24:50 --> 0:24:57
reasons to assume that it would down regulate interferon 1 the down regulation of interferon
221
0:24:57 --> 0:25:05
1 is super problematic because what it does when it is inside of the cell is it actually is a pro
222
0:25:05 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]s by down regulating interferon 1 you essentially are turning
223
0:25:13 --> 0:25:20
on the switches and the early work in glioblastoma showed that it was universal if you had pseudo-uridine
224
0:25:20 --> 0:25:28
inside of a cell and that cell had any proclivity towards cancer it was a pro-oncogenic agent but it
225
0:25:28 --> 0:25:33
turns out that there was a difficulty in stabilizing mRNA to get it into a living system
226
0:25:33 --> 0:25:39
which is the reason why the University of British Columbia and others got together to start working
227
0:25:39 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]atform that would allow the mRNA to get far enough into the system
228
0:25:46 --> 0:25:[privacy contact redaction]or that would get to the cell so that the pseudo-uridine laced mRNA could get
229
0:25:52 --> 0:25:58
into the cell and that program which is actually something that is also very well documented coming
230
0:25:58 --> 0:26:03
out of the University of British Columbia is the basis upon which we got the polyethylene glycol
231
0:26:03 --> 0:26:09
platform and we got all of the other lipid nanoparticle platforms that are currently used
232
0:26:09 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ion all of this done in 2010 to [privacy contact redaction]
233
0:26:20 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]itute of Virology allegedly isolated through medical sampling
234
0:26:28 --> 0:26:34
a coronavirus alteration from a few miners who were doing bat guano mining
235
0:26:35 --> 0:26:42
in the Guangdong province of China those miners all came down with clinical symptoms that are
236
0:26:42 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction] 100 percent in this case associated with what we call COVID-19
237
0:26:51 --> 0:26:[privacy contact redaction]ing that a novel disease in [privacy contact redaction] that the disease
238
0:26:56 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ually documented in [privacy contact redaction]ually isolated it
239
0:27:03 --> 0:27:11
but what was problematic about that particular sample was according to written records we have
240
0:27:11 --> 0:27:19
from Ralph Baric the sequence for this super pathogenic strain was uploaded onto a server
241
0:27:19 --> 0:27:30
and he then re-engineered that particular pathogen in North Carolina for his work in 2013 and 14
242
0:27:30 --> 0:27:[privacy contact redaction]ober of 2014 after the gain-of-function moratorium was put in place
243
0:27:37 --> 0:27:45
NIAID sent to Ralph Baric an authorization to continue his gain-of-function research listed as
244
0:27:45 --> 0:27:55
such and worse than that modified the name of the project so that it went from an in vitro project
245
0:27:55 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction] so I want you to just sit with that for just a second right we we actually
246
0:28:01 --> 0:28:09
had an in vitro model approved on Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one in 2013 after the gain-of-function
247
0:28:09 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]op this there was a non-action letter that was sent to
248
0:28:17 --> 0:28:23
UNC Chapel Hill to say that because the project was already funded UNC Chapel Hill could continue
249
0:28:23 --> 0:28:31
its gain-of-function research number one and number two do that research in vivo and I want
250
0:28:31 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]ly the chilling effect that it should have during a
251
0:28:37 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction]ually made it more lethal in living systems than we had prior to the gain-of-function
252
0:28:44 --> 0:28:[privacy contact redaction] that wonderful quote which I have to say every time I speak
253
0:28:51 --> 0:29:00
which is Peter Daschek's quote in [privacy contact redaction]ious disease crisis is very real and present
254
0:29:00 --> 0:29:07
and an emergency threshold that is largely ignored to sustain the funding base and once again this is
255
0:29:07 --> 0:29:13
a crime this is a criminal racketeering crime this is not public health to sustain a funding
256
0:29:13 --> 0:29:19
base beyond the crisis we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical
257
0:29:19 --> 0:29:27
countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine a key driver is the media
258
0:29:27 --> 0:29:33
and the economics will follow the hype we need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real
259
0:29:33 --> 0:29:[privacy contact redaction]ors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process that is a quote that is
260
0:29:41 --> 0:29:48
a quote from the National Academy of Sciences meeting published in February of 2016 the quote
261
0:29:48 --> 0:29:56
was at an event in [privacy contact redaction]ic terrorism that's what that
262
0:29:56 --> 0:30:01
is because if what you're doing is saying that you need the media to create the hype to get the
263
0:30:01 --> 0:30:08
public to accept something that is a by definition violation of section [privacy contact redaction] in the
264
0:30:08 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]ates and globally it is a violation of domestic terrorism in every civilized country
265
0:30:15 --> 0:30:23
you cannot terrorize a population into coercion and not violate domestic terrorism statutes in
266
0:30:23 --> 0:30:29
every one of the civilized countries on earth for us that's a very important thing here in the
267
0:30:29 --> 0:30:[privacy contact redaction]ates because it creates an extremely important felony particularly as it relates to
268
0:30:36 --> 0:30:46
what became the underlying argument for what became the current pandemic in [privacy contact redaction] the
269
0:30:46 --> 0:30:50
publication of the work that Ralph Baric and his colleagues did with respect to Wuhan Institute of
270
0:30:50 --> 0:30:57
Virology virus one we're including the modifications that are now associated with what is allegedly SARS
271
0:30:57 --> 0:31:04
COV-2 and the patents on all of those modifications which all predate this outbreak by at least a year
272
0:31:04 --> 0:31:11
and a half every single one of the nucleic acid sequences and every single one of the nucleoside
273
0:31:11 --> 0:31:20
pairings that is associated with the novel SARS COV-2 was published and patented by 2016
274
0:31:21 --> 0:31:29
and the official paper that was published that said SARS COV-[privacy contact redaction]itute of Virology virus one
275
0:31:29 --> 0:31:39
was poised for human emergence was published in 2016. Now what makes the next part of the story
276
0:31:39 --> 0:31:47
problematic is a very bizarre and esoteric piece of U.S. law and that is the Bayh-Dole Act. The Bayh-Dole
277
0:31:47 --> 0:31:55
Act of 1980 which authorized university federally funded research to iner to the economic benefit
278
0:31:55 --> 0:32:02
of the researchers that got federal funding that particular act gives the federal government in the
279
0:32:02 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ates what's called march in right provisions and that just simply means that anyone
280
0:32:08 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction]ually funded by the federal government has the ability to commercially exploit their
281
0:32:13 --> 0:32:18
innovations but at any point that the government determines that it's necessary for them to have
282
0:32:18 --> 0:32:24
access to that technology at that point in time the government has a right to what's called a
283
0:32:24 --> 0:32:33
Fran license a fair reasonable and non-discriminatory license it requires no rights contracts transfers
284
0:32:33 --> 0:32:39
anything else it's a simple right that's granted by statute in the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act. Here comes
285
0:32:40 --> 0:32:49
in the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act. Here comes the problem in 2018 actually in late 2017 we don't have the
286
0:32:49 --> 0:32:[privacy contact redaction] is the evidence of the transfer but in late 2017 and early 2018
287
0:32:55 --> 0:33:02
for some reason the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was asked by NIH to transfer the
288
0:33:02 --> 0:33:11
patent from 2002 to NIH that is an unprecedented move and why the UNC Chapel Hill patent would need
289
0:33:11 --> 0:33:19
to be transferred back to NIH in [privacy contact redaction]anding because the
290
0:33:19 --> 0:33:24
U.S. government already had the march in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act so there's no need to
291
0:33:24 --> 0:33:30
transfer it and when that transfer happened that alerted us to a very significant problem because
292
0:33:30 --> 0:33:38
at the same time the CDC had lied to the United States Patent Office in their entirety of the
293
0:33:38 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]atform that was the coronavirus isolated from humans the CDC had actually violated the
294
0:33:46 --> 0:33:[privacy contact redaction]atutes on patents [privacy contact redaction] to their prosecution of that patent
295
0:33:52 --> 0:33:58
but ironically during the same period of time they renewed the patent light the patent maintenance fees
296
0:33:58 --> 0:34:07
on the SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-1 patent that CDC had had at the time now according to the CDC's official
297
0:34:07 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]-checking you know quoted statement the reason why CDC allegedly filed a patent on coronavirus
298
0:34:15 --> 0:34:20
was allegedly because they wanted to be able to make sure everybody anywhere on earth could research
299
0:34:20 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ications the only problem with that story is that in 2006 and 2007
300
0:34:27 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction]ually was told by the Patent Office that it was not able to patent the coronavirus
301
0:34:34 --> 0:34:39
because it was already in the public domain and the CDC bribed the United States Patent Office to
302
0:34:39 --> 0:34:48
get the patent on coronavirus even though twice it was actually categorically rejected as a
303
0:34:48 --> 0:34:[privacy contact redaction] matter because the matter was already in the public domain so if you want to buy
304
0:34:53 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ory unfortunately the the financial records and then a handwritten
305
0:35:00 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ication which we have in our possession was the final straw that showed
306
0:35:08 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ates Patent Office to issue the patent in the first place
307
0:35:15 --> 0:35:20
and by 2016 they were paying the renewal fees to make sure that the patent was still in place
308
0:35:20 --> 0:35:[privacy contact redaction]ly under their control which gives us the interesting emergence of the most alarming
309
0:35:28 --> 0:35:38
terminology that we saw arise in April of 2019 so remember we're still long before patient one long
310
0:35:38 --> 0:35:43
before any of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 stuff is in the official press or anything else
311
0:35:44 --> 0:35:51
in April of 2019, Moderna amended four patent applications one of which had been pending I
312
0:35:51 --> 0:35:56
believe for nearly seven years and had been multiply rejected but they amended the patent
313
0:35:56 --> 0:36:03
to include the phrase the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.
314
0:36:04 --> 0:36:08
Now for those of you not familiar with the English language let me just point out
315
0:36:09 --> 0:36:15
that there is one operative term in that line that's problematic and the term is release.
316
0:36:18 --> 0:36:23
Sit with that for a second the accidental or intentional release they didn't talk about a
317
0:36:23 --> 0:36:30
leak they didn't talk about oops something might go wrong with a BS4 lab BSL4 lab they actually
318
0:36:30 --> 0:36:33
said accidental or intentional release
319
0:36:38 --> 0:36:44
and if you're not getting it you're not awake that's a problem it's a problem to say that you
320
0:36:44 --> 0:36:49
are going to release a respiratory pathogen in any population at any time for any reason
321
0:36:49 --> 0:36:[privacy contact redaction]ications in April of [privacy contact redaction] same language showed
322
0:36:57 --> 0:37:05
up in September 18th 2019 when the World Health Organization World at Risk publication came out
323
0:37:05 --> 0:37:12
which said that in September of 2019 the country's signatory to the World Health Organization
324
0:37:12 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]an an exercise with the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen
325
0:37:18 --> 0:37:24
so that by September 2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine
326
0:37:24 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction] same phrase that was in the Moderna patents in April of 2019 showed up in
327
0:37:32 --> 0:37:38
September of 2019 in the World Health Organization's World at Risk publication and one day later
328
0:37:39 --> 0:37:45
and I'm not making this up one day later President Trump signed the executive order for the
329
0:37:45 --> 0:37:53
development of DNA-based vaccines as an executive order for the national priority of vaccine
330
0:37:53 --> 0:37:[privacy contact redaction]s operation warp speed started with an executive order on September 19th
331
0:37:59 --> 0:38:09
2019 four months before patient one allegedly happened in China. To add to the problem we have
332
0:38:09 --> 0:38:16
obviously the unfortunate development that took place in November of 2019 when Ralph Baric by his
333
0:38:16 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction] this in writing from Ralph Baric transferred the sequence for this
334
0:38:22 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]ion to Moderna in a material transfer agreement in November of 2019. Now conveniently
335
0:38:30 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]V the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses
336
0:38:35 --> 0:38:43
for the World Health Organization that in February and March of 2020 was the one supposed to be
337
0:38:43 --> 0:38:50
identifying allegedly this novel coronavirus so it's very helpful to have the guy who made it be the
338
0:38:50 --> 0:38:[privacy contact redaction]igating the novelty of it about six and a half months after
339
0:38:56 --> 0:39:02
he's sent a sample of the alleged novel virus that hadn't been determined novel and hadn't been
340
0:39:02 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]ually had the material transferred to Moderna in November of 2019 it
341
0:39:09 --> 0:39:14
wasn't until March that he actually figured out that it was a novel pathogen once again a time
342
0:39:14 --> 0:39:18
machine problem and you'll notice that there are a number of time machine problems here the last of
343
0:39:18 --> 0:39:25
which I want to point to is the very interesting bizarre moment of black wholeness in terms of the
344
0:39:25 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction] on or about the 29th or 30th of January 2020.
345
0:39:33 --> 0:39:40
On January 29th of 2020 Alex Azar had determined that there was not a public health emergency
346
0:39:40 --> 0:39:47
and there was no need to declare one in the United States and then on the 31st or on the 30th he
347
0:39:47 --> 0:39:[privacy contact redaction]ually said the same thing there is no public health emergency we
348
0:39:54 --> 0:40:00
don't need to declare one we're keeping an eye on it etc etc and then on the 31st mysteriously he
349
0:40:00 --> 0:40:06
filed the public health emergency declaration and backdated it to the 29th.
350
0:40:09 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction] want to be clear on this he said it wasn't an emergency he went on national television
351
0:40:16 --> 0:40:23
confirming that it was an emergency and one day later with no material alterations in any information
352
0:40:23 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction] the declaration retroactive to the day that it wasn't an emergency.
353
0:40:30 --> 0:40:37
Now why on earth would you do that? Well the answer is very simple if you go back and look at what the
354
0:40:37 --> 0:40:43
vaccine research organization at NIAID was doing they actually had already started their work and
355
0:40:43 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]y shield to wrap around the beginning of the first formulation
356
0:40:50 --> 0:40:[privacy contact redaction]ion and it turns out somewhere between the 29th and 30th somebody got wind of
357
0:40:56 --> 0:41:02
Alex Azar's stupid comment that said there wasn't an emergency and said hey buddy not only do we
358
0:41:02 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]y shield but you need to backdate your statement so that we get it
359
0:41:07 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]arted. Somewhere between the 29th and 30th we know that that's when the
360
0:41:13 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]ion actually went into production and we have the declaration
361
0:41:18 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction] medical countermeasure liability shields to make sure that they had the
362
0:41:24 --> 0:41:31
ability to cover work that had already commenced before number one there was a pathogen number two
363
0:41:31 --> 0:41:[privacy contact redaction]e of a pathogen and a month before get this right a month before the ICTV was
364
0:41:38 --> 0:41:46
even impaneled to determine that there was a novel pathogen so we have a month between when allegedly
365
0:41:46 --> 0:41:50
there's a novel coronavirus that has not been called the novel coronavirus we have a month
366
0:41:50 --> 0:41:57
between when it was allegedly a national health emergency until we actually have the ICTV ruling
367
0:41:57 --> 0:42:02
on its novelty and the person ruling on its novelty is none other than Ralph Barrett.
368
0:42:04 --> 0:42:08
I mean it's as dumb as having Peter Daschick go investigate a wet lab in China
369
0:42:08 --> 0:42:15
though these things are are are equivalent to having a a bank robber on the steps of a bank
370
0:42:15 --> 0:42:22
holding a bag of money and a gun and being asked by the police to investigate the possibility
371
0:42:22 --> 0:42:28
of somebody robbing the bank. I mean that is how absolutely ludicrous this entire exercise is
372
0:42:28 --> 0:42:34
and that's precisely what happened. We filed our first complaints with the office of the inspector
373
0:42:34 --> 0:42:42
general on all of the things I've just described in the spring of 2020. Under the statute the OIG
374
0:42:42 --> 0:42:[privacy contact redaction] a 90-day response and sitting here today on the 9th of February [privacy contact redaction] not
375
0:42:48 --> 0:42:55
had a single response from any of the OIGs to whom we sent our first racketeering and antitrust
376
0:42:55 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]aints. Throughout the spring and summer of 2020 our focus was to try to get racketeering and
377
0:43:03 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]igations into the collusive behavior and the restraint of trade behavior
378
0:43:10 --> 0:43:16
that was going on as Anthony Fauci beginning in March and April started suppressing all clinical
379
0:43:16 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction] the de facto opening of the possibility of having only an
380
0:43:25 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]ion and only remdesivir as the only way out of this path this this pandemic and that active
381
0:43:32 --> 0:43:39
suppression ironically flies in the face of Ralph Baric's own published information because it turns
382
0:43:39 --> 0:43:45
out that in the early part of the 2010s Ralph Baric found that the zinc ionophore the very same
383
0:43:45 --> 0:43:[privacy contact redaction]ack that very same mechanism was actually an anti-coronavirus
384
0:43:54 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ious intervention. If you used zinc and you used zinc ionophores you actually saved yourself
385
0:44:01 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ers and that was Ralph Baric's own work so the fact that they
386
0:44:07 --> 0:44:14
used Ralph Baric's work to then shut down Ralph Baric's work is another interesting time machine
387
0:44:14 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]um where we know that there's a restraint of trade in 2010 and again in 2012 we know that
388
0:44:21 --> 0:44:26
the NIAID funded and approved research that showed that hydroxychloroquine was effective
389
0:44:26 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ions and once again we were told that it was not effective
390
0:44:32 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ive. We were told that making the entirety of the
391
0:44:42 --> 0:44:51
the overall experience of what became the mechanism of counting the number of infected
392
0:44:51 --> 0:44:[privacy contact redaction]ification of fragments of proteins as the official way of determining how many COVID
393
0:44:59 --> 0:45:08
cases there were. Anthony Fauci by his own admission said that he was not a big fan of any of the work
394
0:45:08 --> 0:45:15
of Kerry Mullis. He had a personal vendetta as well as a professional critique and he had in 2010
395
0:45:15 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]ually done an enormous amount of work to come up with alternatives
396
0:45:22 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] became the entirety of how we nominated whether or not somebody was
397
0:45:31 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction]ed and all of those things were actively suppressed during the spring of 2020
398
0:45:37 --> 0:45:43
so that the only conclusion that could be reached by the late spring is the only way out of this
399
0:45:43 --> 0:45:50
alleged pandemic was a vaccine and that recitation took place across the entire globe where heads of
400
0:45:50 --> 0:45:[privacy contact redaction] out is a vaccine. Now here comes an interesting little glitch.
401
0:45:56 --> 0:46:00
If you're in the United States and I know some of you are and know a lot of you are all over the
402
0:46:00 --> 0:46:07
world there's a very interesting problem and this goes back to once again Pascal's comments on
403
0:46:08 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ual language used to declare a state of emergency and the provenance
404
0:46:16 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ually something that no attorney general in the United States has been
405
0:46:23 --> 0:46:31
able to identify the person that was the one who drafted the executive order or the emergency order
406
0:46:31 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ate. Now it turns out I happen to have the opportunity to experience in
407
0:46:36 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction]ate a situation where they forgot to change the properties section in the document.
408
0:46:44 --> 0:46:[privacy contact redaction] or a PDF file or anything else you actually have to make sure
409
0:46:49 --> 0:46:53
you've edited out the properties section because you want to make sure nobody knows that it was a
410
0:46:53 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ate that was used is not from the state that shut
411
0:47:01 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ate down. That means that every governor who signed any declaration of emergency was in
412
0:47:09 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction] guilty of treason because when you allow a foreign actor and in states the foreign actor is
413
0:47:17 --> 0:47:23
defined as anybody who's not within the state. When you allow a foreign actor to without verification
414
0:47:23 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ate and suspend your constitution that is treason at the state level. The same thing
415
0:47:29 --> 0:47:34
happens at the federal level and it turns out that the provenance of the documents used to shut
416
0:47:34 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ates is something that mysteriously nobody's bothered to ask the question
417
0:47:40 --> 0:47:48
who wrote it. Well it turns out that all you have to do is get a copy of it and look in the property
418
0:47:48 --> 0:47:[privacy contact redaction]ion and you find out that it wasn't written by an elected official and it wasn't written by an
419
0:47:53 --> 0:47:57
appointed official and it wasn't written by any of the people who should have been writing these
420
0:47:57 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]ate and it's pretty important that we start realizing that these are
421
0:48:02 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]e errors that are made by criminals who think they won't get caught and these are the tools
422
0:48:09 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction] use to go after those criminals and I'm actively pursuing that particular one
423
0:48:17 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction] pointed out. So we're working on that one as well.
424
0:48:24 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction]rategy in the summer of 2020 because it was clear that we could
425
0:48:34 --> 0:48:41
not get a single attorney general and we could not get a single prosecutor to have any reasonable
426
0:48:41 --> 0:48:[privacy contact redaction] case which was what would have been the appropriate legal action
427
0:48:49 --> 0:48:57
to take in the summer of 2020. That was before we were putting a modified mRNA into people's arms.
428
0:48:59 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]ion clinical trials, which by the way are a violation of 21
429
0:49:07 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]ion 50.20 to 23 and they're a violation for a very simple rule.
430
0:49:14 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction]-Nurenberg conditions and under every statute of human subjects review,
431
0:49:22 --> 0:49:29
there is an independent IRB requirement and an independent IRB means that the IRB has to be
432
0:49:29 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] approving a protocol has to be impaneled
433
0:49:33 --> 0:49:[privacy contact redaction] no financial interest in the outcome of the study. Not a single
434
0:49:42 --> 0:49:49
IRB in the world for any of the COVID interventions met the legal standard for an independent IRB.
435
0:49:49 --> 0:49:57
To this day, there has not been a single legal clinical trial anywhere in any country on any of
436
0:49:57 --> 0:50:05
these interventions. That is a Nurenberg and a 21 Code of Federal Regulations violation and it must
437
0:50:05 --> 0:50:11
be something that we pay attention to because the absence of an independent IRB means that every
438
0:50:11 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ion that's afforded to every one of the manufacturers of any medical countermeasure
439
0:50:18 --> 0:50:26
go out the window if the independent IRB has not been impaneled. So great news is another angle
440
0:50:26 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ually adding to the criminal racketeering piece because there was actually
441
0:50:31 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] that that had never been done and we have a number of IRBs that have
442
0:50:38 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction]ion clinical trials where we have now heads of IRBs who have shared that
443
0:50:45 --> 0:50:50
information with us as well. So the good news is there is zero independence therefore the 21 Code of
444
0:50:50 --> 0:50:[privacy contact redaction] not been followed therefore none of the immunity shields are actually
445
0:50:57 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]urers. That's all good news because ultimately we'll be able to
446
0:51:03 --> 0:51:09
pierce all of the theoretical liability protections that they think they have because it turns out
447
0:51:09 --> 0:51:13
that the crime is already committed before they started doing the injection.
448
0:51:14 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]ion they knew that they were using pseudo-uridine, they knew they were
449
0:51:19 --> 0:51:25
using PEG, they knew they were using lipid nanoparticles and they knew that all of those
450
0:51:25 --> 0:51:31
things were associated with oncogenic and cardiovascular disease-inducing activities
451
0:51:31 --> 0:51:37
which means that this now becomes a case not only of negligent and willful homicide but it becomes a
452
0:51:37 --> 0:51:[privacy contact redaction]er and I'm going to wrap up on that one in a minute so just put a pin in
453
0:51:42 --> 0:51:49
it because I'm going to come back to it. What we decided to do is start pivoting our legal research
454
0:51:49 --> 0:51:55
into that area and then the CMS and the other mandates came about and as many of you know we
455
0:51:55 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]ed States on the CMS mandate against the government for the
456
0:52:03 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]ice of calling a thing a vaccination which was not a vaccination,
457
0:52:07 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction] of a vaccination. The legal standard by the way if
458
0:52:12 --> 0:52:19
anybody's paying attention in the U.S. was defined in the 1986 act and specifically said that there
459
0:52:19 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]inction between the term vaccination and the term medical
460
0:52:30 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction]ive medical procedure. The fact of the matter is vaccine by
461
0:52:36 --> 0:52:43
definition is abundantly clear that its objective has to be the prevention of infection and the
462
0:52:43 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction] of the matter is these clinical trials that were set up
463
0:52:48 --> 0:52:[privacy contact redaction] any of those but worse still violated the FDA and the
464
0:52:55 --> 0:53:02
CDC's own published standards on vaccine clinical trials all of which required a humoral response
465
0:53:02 --> 0:53:07
as a clinical endpoint or some other immune response as a clinical endpoint. There has never
466
0:53:07 --> 0:53:17
been and there never will be a vaccine clinical trial that has symptom by committee endpoints
467
0:53:17 --> 0:53:22
and this is a symptom by committee endpoint clinical trial which is a at best treatment
468
0:53:22 --> 0:53:29
not a public health measure not a police power and not a vaccine. We brought that case in Utah
469
0:53:29 --> 0:53:35
we brought it in Utah for a very particular reason because in Utah deceptive medical practices
470
0:53:35 --> 0:53:43
by an outside non-licensed agent outside the state of Utah is a class three felony and the
471
0:53:43 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]atutes in Utah shall prosecute any third degree felony crime
472
0:53:52 --> 0:53:[privacy contact redaction]ices and that's why we filed it in Utah. The great news is we filed
473
0:53:57 --> 0:54:04
it there the bad news is that we got a judge an 83 year old judge who having sat on the case for
474
0:54:04 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] six and a half months used the federal register as his official opinion to dismiss the
475
0:54:12 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]eriously two or three days after the department of justice changed the lead counsel
476
0:54:18 --> 0:54:23
for the federal government on the case after it had been sitting moribund for no time at all.
477
0:54:23 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction] the federal government's defense which is the affirmative admission of
478
0:54:28 --> 0:54:[privacy contact redaction]ices and the affirmative admission of their practice of medicine
479
0:54:32 --> 0:54:39
without a license Utah representatives so we do have the felony and we're in in fact engaged in
480
0:54:39 --> 0:54:44
the prosecution of that right now. Now last piece I'm going to talk about is the murder side.
481
0:54:45 --> 0:54:50
It became clear that the department of justice and the ags of the United States and for that
482
0:54:50 --> 0:54:54
matter law enforcement around the world was not going to take the antitrust case and they were
483
0:54:54 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ic terrorism cases and so we decided to go down a much more practical
484
0:55:00 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction] we chose was to start briefing sheriffs and district attorneys
485
0:55:07 --> 0:55:12
to identify somebody who would be willing to go after negligent homicide against the hospitals,
486
0:55:12 --> 0:55:18
hospital organizations, managed care organizations, pharmaceutical distribution outlets including
487
0:55:18 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ores, the CVSs, the Walmarts, everybody else going after negligent homicide
488
0:55:24 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]er against Fauci and Barrick and the others who
489
0:55:31 --> 0:55:[privacy contact redaction]ed this program specifically on a patient profile that is very particular and very
490
0:55:36 --> 0:55:43
unique. The patient profile is somebody who had been injected and within 14 days was admitted to
491
0:55:43 --> 0:55:50
a hospital or a medical center where they were put on remdesivir and killed. There are several
492
0:55:50 --> 0:55:55
thousand of these cases and the reason why these cases are important is because it gives us the
493
0:55:55 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]esy of the 2018 world health organizations rescission of using
494
0:56:01 --> 0:56:08
remdesivir in the Ebola clinical trials in Africa because the fatality rate with remdesivir was 53%.
495
0:56:09 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] that information in 2018, any use of remdesivir has a higher risk
496
0:56:16 --> 0:56:22
profile and is considered to be ultra hazardous activity. That's a legally defined term coming out
497
0:56:22 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] [privacy contact redaction]ous activity resulting in death
498
0:56:33 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]er charges. We now have [privacy contact redaction]ates,
499
0:56:40 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction] several thousand patient cases and we now finally have an intersection where we have the
500
0:56:47 --> 0:56:[privacy contact redaction]ion where we have the nexus of a sheriff and a DA that's willing
501
0:56:54 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]arting in the last several weeks the active negligent
502
0:57:01 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]er cases against a number of folks and that is where we are right now
503
0:57:08 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction] got a 30,[privacy contact redaction]ay
504
0:57:17 --> 0:57:23
and I'm happy to take questions and I know welcome the eagle 88's had his hand up first so I'm going
505
0:57:23 --> 0:57:30
to go to him unless you want to jump in. No no I know you're totally capable of handling
506
0:57:30 --> 0:57:35
Q&A David but you can relax on that because the tradition here is that Stephen
507
0:57:35 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction] at the two and a half. Okay great that's beautiful I'm happy to do any protocol
508
0:57:42 --> 0:57:49
I won't mess with a good thing that's not broken. Beautiful all right well first before Stephen
509
0:57:49 --> 0:57:[privacy contact redaction]erful I wrote down the note a masterful overview
510
0:57:56 --> 0:58:03
a bit more than a helicopter view a whole string of important principles everybody and please go
511
0:58:03 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction]ing because it you sent them out like a machine gun and each one of them
512
0:58:10 --> 0:58:19
as I'm crazily writing notes literally everybody from our respective countries important food for
513
0:58:20 --> 0:58:26
thought thank you so much for sharing that with us Stephen I think I'll let you go
514
0:58:27 --> 0:58:[privacy contact redaction] go. So David thank you very much for coming on and
515
0:58:37 --> 0:58:44
um I wanted to ask you um so there are several uh crimes here I know you you've gone into this
516
0:58:44 --> 0:58:52
in real detail presumably you're choosing the crimes to go after on the basis of how easy it is
517
0:58:52 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] is that right or which crimes so that's one thing second thing
518
0:59:02 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] important for us to uh hold these uh criminals to account
519
0:59:11 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]er treason fraud racketeering crimes against humanity genocide yeah so
520
0:59:18 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]ephen let me let me answer that in a couple dimensions because the dimension makes a difference
521
0:59:25 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] at the core of this particular act of terrorism globally we have a criminal racket
522
0:59:36 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction] formally since 1980 and that is what I would call the
523
0:59:45 --> 0:59:[privacy contact redaction]ured agencies be they the CDC the FDA NIH NIAID any of those
524
0:59:54 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ured agencies are colluding with another corporation that people don't like
525
1:00:00 --> 1:00:05
to call a corporation but it happens to be outed as such which is the university
526
1:00:07 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction] and the Sherman act in the United States
527
1:00:11 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]s were packed passed all across the world in the turn of the last century we were
528
1:00:18 --> 1:00:25
looking at companies and banks inclusion well the companies and banks that are in collusion today
529
1:00:25 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ured agencies and universities universities are nothing more than a money
530
1:00:32 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction]ually launderers money between corporations and governments and it turns
531
1:00:38 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction] a hefty in many cases 40 to 60 percent override on making sure they've scraped
532
1:00:45 --> 1:00:51
enough money off the top to make sure that they can build very fancy buildings and and and do all
533
1:00:51 --> 1:00:[privacy contact redaction] of the matter is that we have the two legs of the stool that
534
1:00:58 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]s before which is captive agencies which are corporations
535
1:01:04 --> 1:01:10
and universities which are corporations which then act in collusion with corporations as we
536
1:01:10 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction] an unholy trinity that continues to operate all of the time and if
537
1:01:18 --> 1:01:26
we don't ultimately break that cabal we will swap one domestic terror campaign for another and it
538
1:01:26 --> 1:01:34
will be this ongoing exercise so so what i'm doing right now is i'm actually making sure that the eye
539
1:01:34 --> 1:01:42
on the prize is break the financial racket which enables this to happen so that we don't have monkey
540
1:01:42 --> 1:01:49
pox and we don't have ebola and we don't have you name it pathogens down the road my criticism of
541
1:01:49 --> 1:01:[privacy contact redaction]e's legal strategy so far has been they're pretending like covid was the problem
542
1:01:57 --> 1:02:02
covid is a symptom of the problem and i'm not saying it's not genocide and i'm not saying it's
543
1:02:02 --> 1:02:08
not a crime what i am saying is that if we don't ultimately have our eye on the prize of the
544
1:02:08 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ural problem we're not going to solve the problem we are going to solve a symptom and swap
545
1:02:14 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ay is very specifically to make sure we've introduced
546
1:02:21 --> 1:02:27
into evidence enough information to get the public to stop pretending that universities are
547
1:02:27 --> 1:02:32
researchers they're not they are money laundering corporations and they are money laundering
548
1:02:32 --> 1:02:38
corporations that are part of a propaganda machine for captive agencies and until we break that cabal
549
1:02:39 --> 1:02:[privacy contact redaction]ually get out of this mess now that doesn't mean that there aren't
550
1:02:45 --> 1:02:51
active crimes that are happening right now and my second focus and you heard me say this i have two
551
1:02:51 --> 1:02:59
eyes second focus my second focus is on making sure we pierce the corporate facade of immunity
552
1:03:01 --> 1:03:08
the reason for that is the minute that pfizer or moderna or astrazeneca or anybody else
553
1:03:08 --> 1:03:14
actually is on the hook for the civil and criminal damages of negligent and willful homicide
554
1:03:15 --> 1:03:21
which bear with them treble damage risk financially they will stop doing this activity
555
1:03:21 --> 1:03:29
because they can't afford to do it the mistake that we have made is we have let them hide behind
556
1:03:29 --> 1:03:35
the illusion that they're protected with immunity and both the prep act in the united states and the
557
1:03:35 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction] one and only one silver bullet and that is criminal fraud during
558
1:03:44 --> 1:03:[privacy contact redaction]ivity if criminal fraud took place that means a felony and fraud took place
559
1:03:52 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]y shields fall and what we're trying to do is get the fastest pathway
560
1:04:00 --> 1:04:07
to get the companies on the hook because if we succeed the words pfizer and moderna
561
1:04:08 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] tense terms that we use a la the terms like american cyanamid pre-bopal
562
1:04:17 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] that we can kill and if we kill the beast then we have a high
563
1:04:27 --> 1:04:33
penalty associated with any other corporation trying to do that so those are the two things
564
1:04:33 --> 1:04:39
that we're doing right now there are a lot of other strategies but steven those are our two priorities
565
1:04:41 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction]even i took a note of that everybody felony plus fraud equals no immunity
566
1:04:47 --> 1:04:[privacy contact redaction] that's correct everybody keep going steven felony plus fraud equals no immunity that's
567
1:04:52 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] so um so do you think so you've talked about racketeering you've also talked about
568
1:05:01 --> 1:05:06
treason but i'm not sure that we're addressing the treason as much as we should be doing because
569
1:05:06 --> 1:05:13
that's the thing that really threatens our way of life rather than the racket but so i'm sorry i
570
1:05:13 --> 1:05:19
you probably cover answered this in your mind but but i'm still struggling to separate the two
571
1:05:19 --> 1:05:25
yeah so so so remember that the the reason why we have racketeering laws is because they're
572
1:05:25 --> 1:05:32
treasonous right remember going back to 1604 and this is exceptionally important and most people
573
1:05:32 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]ory or law don't understand this but the reason why it is so
574
1:05:38 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction] a criminal racketeering organization is because it acts as a supra national
575
1:05:46 --> 1:05:[privacy contact redaction]itutional enforcement because what happens is that in collusion and
576
1:05:54 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ems no longer apply and what you get as pascal alluded to before
577
1:06:02 --> 1:06:08
is you get these supra national non-elected non-accountable entities who are in fact
578
1:06:08 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ating to each other the terms and conditions under which they're going to suspend laws and
579
1:06:15 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]itutions and that problem is at its heart the definition of racketeering yes anytime anytime
580
1:06:24 --> 1:06:29
you do that and that's why i i hear what you're asking and i think it's a really important and
581
1:06:29 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction]ion but you don't have the world health organization without racketeering
582
1:06:37 --> 1:06:44
you it doesn't exist world health organization as a structure is a criminal racket it is a money
583
1:06:44 --> 1:06:51
laundering exercise where privately funded individuals advancing privately funded objectives
584
1:06:51 --> 1:06:[privacy contact redaction] whatsoever or public accountability are making determinations
585
1:06:56 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]itutional to any person who's a signatory any organization is signatory to that
586
1:07:02 --> 1:07:10
organization that by definition is the interlocking directorate definition of the clayton act we know
587
1:07:10 --> 1:07:15
that it is a racket so so i'm not saying one is less or more important but what i'm saying is the
588
1:07:15 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ually make sure we keep an eye on is the fundamental law that says
589
1:07:23 --> 1:07:[privacy contact redaction]ing in criminal collusion is in fact the basis upon
590
1:07:31 --> 1:07:37
which these things are being done and since 1604 since the british decency company charter we have
591
1:07:37 --> 1:07:46
known that that criminal collusion racket is in fact the basis of the problem so it does not mean
592
1:07:46 --> 1:07:52
and i'm not at all suggesting that the treason isn't a laudable legal angle but if we don't go
593
1:07:52 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]itute one form of tyranny for another yeah so the enabling thing
594
1:08:02 --> 1:08:08
is the racketeering you mean there's no question because that you don't you don't have the current
595
1:08:08 --> 1:08:15
world health organization as it's currently configured if we actually would enforce
596
1:08:15 --> 1:08:22
anti-racketeering behavior we have by definition in the world health organization we have a clayton
597
1:08:22 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]orate which is a felony violation of the clayton act and that
598
1:08:30 --> 1:08:38
should be prosecuted because it would put world health organization off the map yeah yeah so so
599
1:08:38 --> 1:08:43
have you covered everything that kathryn what's been pointing to in the united states which is
600
1:08:44 --> 1:08:[privacy contact redaction]atutes okay can i uh sorry uh sorry sorry can i add to david's
601
1:08:54 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction] to add on because we researched this um with lawyers here
602
1:09:01 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction]y from switzerland granted the same whf same organizational
603
1:09:09 --> 1:09:17
crime and gavi so let's this these three here enjoy diplomatic immunity cannot be prosecuted
604
1:09:18 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction] to live well if i have to prove a crime it's a lengthy process
605
1:09:25 --> 1:09:33
but it's easy much easier than that the vienna convention stipulates how governments can avoid
606
1:09:34 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction] a look into it yep when when the who got immunity at that date
607
1:09:43 --> 1:09:[privacy contact redaction] of documents to be submitted the the the charter of incorporation all these things
608
1:09:51 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]atutes point number one it's on wjo's website is i don't know to to to call it to
609
1:10:00 --> 1:10:06
promote uh global health of humanity etc right to protect humanity human dignity all that
610
1:10:06 --> 1:10:14
that's very simple vienna convention says if the nature of the business
611
1:10:15 --> 1:10:23
evidently changed and it has because they promoted globally mrna unregulated uncertified
612
1:10:24 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction]y is worth is nil that's correct okay but you do it
613
1:10:33 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] to to file criminal charges to arrest tedros the whole board
614
1:10:39 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] blue light and the same day lift you and then arrest them same for the web same for gavi
615
1:10:47 --> 1:10:[privacy contact redaction] you don't have to go to a lengthy process where they have defense
616
1:10:55 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] the charges and all this it's very simple the nature of the business has changed and evidence
617
1:11:02 --> 1:11:09
public knowledge that's very simple to prove and the immunity of belief that's it sorry now i
618
1:11:09 --> 1:11:14
appreciate it it's and it's a very good point and the fact of the matter is that's why one of the
619
1:11:14 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]e to do is become exceptionally exceptionally exceptionally
620
1:11:20 --> 1:11:27
savvy around the nuance of corporate anti-competitiveness laws because the fact is
621
1:11:28 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction] said any statement of the intent of the corporation
622
1:11:33 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]atement of the intent no longer applies then all of the derivative acts fall away at the
623
1:11:41 --> 1:11:[privacy contact redaction]y shield that actually we need to have peers so thank you for
624
1:11:47 --> 1:11:56
adding that pascal i appreciate it hang on so so so so that's another level david that's one more
625
1:11:56 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction] one more thing has anyone studied quantum grammar yes okay
626
1:12:09 --> 1:12:13
quantum grammar reveals the fraud of the contract
627
1:12:14 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]e and if you look at the contracts of for me the i'm saying the bad guys
628
1:12:26 --> 1:12:31
like the well clinton hillary and what's her name kamala harris are proficient by the way
629
1:12:31 --> 1:12:38
in quantum grammar coding and that's dangerous um what we call that if it's used by the bad guys
630
1:12:38 --> 1:12:45
you call that if it's used by the bad guys it's dangerous and we have to look also how to decode
631
1:12:45 --> 1:12:[privacy contact redaction]s with the code syntax code of quantum grammar thank you
632
1:12:56 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction] thank you david i'm still not clear about where you so are you um going after
633
1:13:05 --> 1:13:18
are you going after the uh the perpetrators of the um uh the fraud um rather than the
634
1:13:18 --> 1:13:26
pol it seems to me that the 192 governments or thereabouts uh there was a global coup d'etat
635
1:13:26 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction]ess that in your book or you mean that we go through the racketeering
636
1:13:33 --> 1:13:39
and then get to the treason yeah because what will happen steven one of the problems is that
637
1:13:39 --> 1:13:[privacy contact redaction] a very difficult time pursuing criminal charges without prosecutors
638
1:13:48 --> 1:13:53
collaborating with them and unfortunately prosecutors in this particular case are on
639
1:13:53 --> 1:14:04
the take and are incapable of being considered but what can happen is as you do the discovery around
640
1:14:05 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction] in sheriffs and da's in the u.s. as we pursue discovery
641
1:14:13 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]ually unfold information that in and of itself becomes prima facie admission of crimes you
642
1:14:21 --> 1:14:29
have to build this case because you're you're starting with the self-evident nature of the
643
1:14:29 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]s on the table which are a group of unelected individuals conducted a takeover of duly elected
644
1:14:40 --> 1:14:45
authorities all over the world that's a true statement there's no question about it however
645
1:14:45 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction]ion in which that allegation does anything other than serve as an allegation
646
1:14:52 --> 1:14:[privacy contact redaction] the criminality components in the process of some form of prosecution
647
1:14:59 --> 1:15:04
because we can sit here as much as we want and this is a problem that i've had with enormous number of
648
1:15:05 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]e are going yes but it's a self-evident crime we know that
649
1:15:12 --> 1:15:19
it's done absolutely there's no question about it and there is no jurisdictional pathway for any
650
1:15:19 --> 1:15:27
individual or even a group of individuals to take action until we have a prosecution in process
651
1:15:28 --> 1:15:35
where the evidence that becomes surfaced through that prosecution then is presented as prima facie
652
1:15:35 --> 1:15:[privacy contact redaction]epwise process and that's the reason why we're taking
653
1:15:40 --> 1:15:47
the approach we're taking because if we start with the yes there was a coup d'etat yes that
654
1:15:47 --> 1:15:53
coup d'etat was evident and there there is no question that the individual actors are even
655
1:15:53 --> 1:15:59
known to to pretty much everybody now the problem is we do not have a jurisdiction in which any
656
1:15:59 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction]ive prosecution so that's the reason why we're taking
657
1:16:05 --> 1:16:11
this approach so in the second world war they had military tribunals following the second world war
658
1:16:11 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] but you had prosecutors remember you had prosecutors willing to do it in this case we have
659
1:16:17 --> 1:16:23
no prosecutors willing to do it yes but but during the second world war there was no prosecutor
660
1:16:23 --> 1:16:[privacy contact redaction] to wait sorry that's correct and that's my question to
661
1:16:30 --> 1:16:38
you david how do we get to uh how do we get from here to a situation where we have prosecutors
662
1:16:39 --> 1:16:45
like at the at the military tribunals yeah um of course the military complicit in this
663
1:16:45 --> 1:16:49
yeah so well maybe they were in the second world war too oh there's no question
664
1:16:51 --> 1:16:56
so how do we get from here to the equivalent of military tribunals like we saw in this
665
1:16:56 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction] that that elliot ness got to the mob in chicago in the 20s and 30s
666
1:17:07 --> 1:17:15
you make it a financially impalatable condition to maintain the status quo and at that point
667
1:17:15 --> 1:17:22
prosecutors realize that it is in their interest to pursue the law and not pursue the graft there
668
1:17:22 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]ion that until that decision is self-evident in the minds of prosecutors they
669
1:17:28 --> 1:17:35
will take graft every day over the pursuit of the law and what we have to do is make the economics
670
1:17:35 --> 1:17:40
tip in the favor of the law rather than in the favor of the graft and right now they're tipped
671
1:17:40 --> 1:17:48
in the favor of the graph and david how do we how do we make sure the prosecutors prosecute the
672
1:17:48 --> 1:17:53
crimes which we think they should prosecute not what they think when they might actually be
673
1:17:53 --> 1:17:[privacy contact redaction]and me well no question in fact i've lived that very
674
1:17:59 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] two and a half years with every attorney general because the fact of the matter is
675
1:18:04 --> 1:18:09
i've tried to get any attorney general to take the antitrust laws and their response is i don't have
676
1:18:09 --> 1:18:14
staff familiar with the sherman and the clighton act well last time i checked familiarity with a
677
1:18:14 --> 1:18:21
statute does not exonerate somebody from committing a crime i i didn't know that until i found out
678
1:18:21 --> 1:18:27
that every ag decided that if they don't have an office dedicated to that particular line of
679
1:18:27 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]ioning then then suddenly you know the crime can be committed because allegedly they don't have
680
1:18:32 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] is that we're in a situation right now where murder and negligent
681
1:18:41 --> 1:18:47
and reckless homicide are things that prosecutors do understand and one of the things we can do and
682
1:18:47 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction]en i mean i don't know how many people are listening to this and i don't know how many people
683
1:18:50 --> 1:18:[privacy contact redaction] is that the reason why we have the draft indictment that is is on the
684
1:18:57 --> 1:19:04
prosecute now dot io website it looks so softed prosecute now dot i am somebody looks like this
685
1:19:04 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction]ment on that page is because every person can can fill out the
686
1:19:12 --> 1:19:18
form whether they're in the u.s or anywhere in the world and actually say here is the itemized list
687
1:19:18 --> 1:19:25
of the eight felony counts and the eight felony counts need to be in front of every ag as often
688
1:19:25 --> 1:19:[privacy contact redaction] thousands and thousands of people who are actively submitting this because
689
1:19:31 --> 1:19:38
steven to your point there is a war of attrition happening here too as long as the incumbent
690
1:19:39 --> 1:19:48
Pfizer funded exercise is you know the only message that's buying airtime and and and ear time
691
1:19:49 --> 1:19:56
then then we're up against a problem but as long as elected officials particularly in you know
692
1:19:56 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ions where where some part of the law includes some part of elected official
693
1:20:03 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]ed officials become more and more aware that this is felony crimes they're letting happen
694
1:20:10 --> 1:20:17
then we've seen that the tide turns now the good news is that it's only taken me two years
695
1:20:18 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction] ag to agree to set a committee together to pursue this it's only taken me two
696
1:20:25 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction]e that from 1898 to 1911 that's how long it took us to get the clayton act
697
1:20:33 --> 1:20:41
even considered 1898 to 1911 so i'm doing pretty good right i'm two years into something that took
698
1:20:41 --> 1:20:[privacy contact redaction] generation a century ago it took them you know a decade to get to where i am right now
699
1:20:47 --> 1:20:54
that doesn't mean we're succeeding it simply means that this is a war of attrition we must
700
1:20:54 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction]ify our voices so that more people are sending this information to elected
701
1:21:00 --> 1:21:05
officials and law enforcement and we need to continue to do that so that every single one of
702
1:21:05 --> 1:21:12
them knows that the decision that they take this day to not prosecute is a decision that will
703
1:21:12 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction]er to the detriment of them and the society down the road and the more we do it
704
1:21:17 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction]ive it is and we're already seeing the effects of it so i know it's working
705
1:21:22 --> 1:21:28
so we need to hold these criminals to account for destroying our way of life for psychologically
706
1:21:28 --> 1:21:33
torturing populations all over the world it's really important that we hold them to account
707
1:21:33 --> 1:21:41
because if we don't then then they'll do it again that's exactly right and so we need to make sure
708
1:21:41 --> 1:21:48
that we really kill it this time yeah and we have to understand in my view exactly what has happened
709
1:21:48 --> 1:21:[privacy contact redaction] three years and all of us not just the people on the other
710
1:21:55 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] been psychologically tortured so in the context of having been psychologically tortured
711
1:22:01 --> 1:22:06
how can we be sure that we've got it right because if we go down one road it might preclude us going
712
1:22:06 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] in the long term so what i'm trying to say is how do we know
713
1:22:12 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]anding of what has gone on worldwide to to close it all down for them
714
1:22:19 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]anding of what has taken place to be able to close it all
715
1:22:24 --> 1:22:29
down in the future yeah when i think that's where you know there's a number there's a number of
716
1:22:29 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]e who began their awareness of this topic somewhere around late 2019 early 2020 i feel like
717
1:22:39 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction] eating prophet wearing sackcloth because i've been trying to get people to pay attention to
718
1:22:44 --> 1:22:[privacy contact redaction]ually surfaced the cardiomyopathy patents that were coming out
719
1:22:52 --> 1:23:00
of UNC Chapel Hill so i you know but by the evidence of my ineffectiveness because last
720
1:23:00 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]s that i have been absolutely abject failure for 24 years
721
1:23:07 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] of the matter is we're we're i we don't have questions there isn't a question here
722
1:23:14 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] the entities involved we have every corporation we have every person
723
1:23:20 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction] every funding source for every corporation that
724
1:23:24 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]ed the issue is not a matter of the whodunit this is a crime that was
725
1:23:32 --> 1:23:41
done by sociopaths who left talisman next to every body this is not a this is not an investigation
726
1:23:42 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]ually a criminal enforcement action that needs to be taken and what we have to do
727
1:23:49 --> 1:23:[privacy contact redaction]ually focus on what the issue is because as long as we pretend that somehow or
728
1:23:55 --> 1:24:01
another the evidence is the the failure right somehow or another we're waiting for a smoking gun
729
1:24:02 --> 1:24:10
the guns are all smoking we don't have a problem when when you have peter daschick in 2015 admitting
730
1:24:10 --> 1:24:16
to the national academy of sciences that he is going to promote a domestic terrorism campaign
731
1:24:18 --> 1:24:24
you do not need more evidence that is a jailable felony offense under section 802 of the patriot
732
1:24:24 --> 1:24:31
act there is no i i was meaning so how do we it depends on what your view is you know you maybe
733
1:24:31 --> 1:24:40
don't think that ukraine and financial crisis all the others you know food shortages and all
734
1:24:40 --> 1:24:[privacy contact redaction]ions against the farmers in holland yeah whether that's all
735
1:24:45 --> 1:24:51
and the banks you know trying to move towards digital how that that's how do we bring how do
736
1:24:51 --> 1:24:56
we bring all that into it yeah that's why that's why i did the four-hour lecture at the arlington
737
1:24:56 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]itute back in the fall i showed that all of this stuff has been woven together this this goes
738
1:25:04 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] of the 1950s i have every single shred of that woven together
739
1:25:10 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction] a look at that particular lecture at the arlington institute in four hours i
740
1:25:16 --> 1:25:22
talk about that and emp and emf and digital currency and all of the things that are inner
741
1:25:22 --> 1:25:29
woven together every single one of these things every one of them comes back to a criminal
742
1:25:29 --> 1:25:38
racketeering conspiracy which is defined which is clearly in evidence and is in need of prosecution
743
1:25:38 --> 1:25:45
and the problem that i continue to face is that people because of their lack of familiarity
744
1:25:45 --> 1:25:[privacy contact redaction]itutional or jurisdictional questions this is not a
745
1:25:52 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]ion this is a crime and the problem we have is a ton of people
746
1:26:00 --> 1:26:06
are pursuing this as though that the issue is let's pick the jurisdiction let's pick the
747
1:26:06 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]itution let's pick the whatever else you don't do that a bank robber has never been prosecuted
748
1:26:12 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]itutional provision that's not how you prosecute a bank robbery
749
1:26:19 --> 1:26:25
yeah and you don't prosecute genocide and you don't prosecute remember genocide was not prosecuted
750
1:26:25 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]s it was prosecuted under military tribunals we do not have a criminal
751
1:26:35 --> 1:26:40
path that is being pursued other than the ones that i'm pursuing right now and that's what we
752
1:26:41 --> 1:26:[privacy contact redaction]e david's doing a lot of no no hang on just one more point the the lack
753
1:26:48 --> 1:26:54
of education it seems has contributed to all this not correct so how do we nail the people who've
754
1:26:54 --> 1:27:01
been educating or mis-educating our children to believe that the family doesn't matter breaking
755
1:27:01 --> 1:27:07
social bonds with their with their with family with their country you're not allowed to show a
756
1:27:07 --> 1:27:14
british flag in in the uk because that's uh you know too far right um how do we address that in
757
1:27:14 --> 1:27:20
all this because that's really important the lack of education that has occurred in the united
758
1:27:20 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]en don't know anything these days plus uh the danger the known
759
1:27:26 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction] be known the danger of cell phones to children and to adults never mind children so that
760
1:27:33 --> 1:27:39
you've got a population of adults parents who don't know how to protect their children how do
761
1:27:39 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]ess all that those are crimes in my opinion well and that's like i said that's why i did the
762
1:27:44 --> 1:27:[privacy contact redaction]n't seen it i highly recommend it because i put all of the
763
1:27:49 --> 1:27:54
pieces of it together um but anyhow let's let's jump into some of the other questions thank you
764
1:27:54 --> 1:28:02
very much yes yep you're most welcome steven albert hey dave how are you doing um my name my
765
1:28:02 --> 1:28:07
name is albert i go by welcome the eagle i'm here in san jose california and i i feel so antiquated
766
1:28:07 --> 1:28:14
the bears guy uh you know everybody now knows you know oh yeah they you know they throttle they
767
1:28:14 --> 1:28:21
delete reports they you know they do all kinds of shenanigans in bears but it it was you that said
768
1:28:22 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]ed um to also like maintain the database correct and um i was i was hoping
769
1:28:30 --> 1:28:38
to ask you um like where in the federal registry can i can i find details on absolutely in the 1986
770
1:28:38 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction]ion bears is irrelevant for two reasons one is
771
1:28:45 --> 1:28:[privacy contact redaction] all of the medical countermeasures live inside of the cip not inside
772
1:28:53 --> 1:29:02
bears um the countermeasures injury compensation program so so the reason why cdc and fda have
773
1:29:02 --> 1:29:09
hidden behind the bears doesn't matter is because technically they're right until the childhood
774
1:29:09 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]ions there is no reason for bears to count but let's get really
775
1:29:17 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction]ablished under the statute in 1986 and it's very clearly defined
776
1:29:25 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction] to maintain the database it has to be maintained as accurate that's part of the statute
777
1:29:30 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction] an exception you can't say bears is incorrect if you're a pharmaceutical
778
1:29:37 --> 1:29:43
company if you're a pharmaceutical company it is your requirement to maintain its accuracy
779
1:29:43 --> 1:29:49
so that's by statute the other thing and very few people know this is if you go back and read
780
1:29:49 --> 1:29:[privacy contact redaction] on the approval of the 1986 act there was a rate of increase of
781
1:29:57 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ually suspend the [privacy contact redaction]ually a calculated rate of not more i think
782
1:30:06 --> 1:30:13
than 1.7 percent per annum increase of injury and you go back and look it's in the statute itself
783
1:30:14 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ually tells you how many increases have to happen after which congress is required to
784
1:30:21 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ions given under the [privacy contact redaction]ill viable and no one
785
1:30:30 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction]ually prosecuted on that particular point and it is absolutely
786
1:30:36 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] that if we see the number of adverse events that have been
787
1:30:41 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] broken the statutory barrier that was the basis upon which
788
1:30:50 --> 1:30:[privacy contact redaction] was passed and now we've done it with children so that means that we have an ability
789
1:30:57 --> 1:31:04
right now to force a mandatory congressional reconsideration of the entire 86 act and that's
790
1:31:04 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]atute that is not by a theoretical guess or you know a social will or anything else
791
1:31:11 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction]atute has been broken that's awesome dave i just wanted to bring to your
792
1:31:17 --> 1:31:24
attention that i that i follow um you know even on my verza wear website i put on there i'm i'm
793
1:31:25 --> 1:31:[privacy contact redaction] fraud it like an example uh you know 30 percent of all
794
1:31:32 --> 1:31:40
the of all the various reports for covid 19 don't have the age populated in the age field yet yet
795
1:31:40 --> 1:31:48
the age is clearly documented in the narrative section so that's 450 000 reports that don't have
796
1:31:48 --> 1:31:55
that they claim don't have an age populated but i found 300 000 of those reports where the age is
797
1:31:55 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]uff like that or those or 10 percent of all the reports they can't tell
798
1:32:01 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ates it originated from you know and it's like i actually
799
1:32:08 --> 1:32:[privacy contact redaction]ually think that they actually go in and scrub the data
800
1:32:16 --> 1:32:25
like it was once there and they took it off and um you know reiterating what um bobby kennedy said
801
1:32:25 --> 1:32:33
at my church in may of 2021 where he interviewed a bunch of of theirs internal bears people like
802
1:32:33 --> 1:32:40
reps or something where they they they uh said and they calculated that about 150 000 reports
803
1:32:40 --> 1:32:47
had disappeared meaning that they had never even been published so i mean i don't know how much more
804
1:32:47 --> 1:32:53
i could how much more of a of a of an accusation i could say that say i really don't think that
805
1:32:53 --> 1:33:00
bears publishes all legitimate reports that they even receive well and and then add cip which
806
1:33:00 --> 1:33:09
doesn't publish anything which is actually a violation of the um [privacy contact redaction] and you know
807
1:33:09 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction] i encouraged bobby kennedy to make sure he also used the correct
808
1:33:15 --> 1:33:22
designation because anybody um reporting an injury that is actually covered under the prep act which
809
1:33:22 --> 1:33:29
is what all of these injuries are has a cip cip reporting requirement and none of those none of
810
1:33:29 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction]ually in a public format that's actually reliable at all so this is a fundamental
811
1:33:35 --> 1:33:40
statutory issue and i'm glad that you brought it up because it's actually something we do very much
812
1:33:40 --> 1:33:[privacy contact redaction] never read the 86 act increase of adverse event provisions
813
1:33:48 --> 1:33:55
that say that congress is required to look at the growth rate of adverse events and is required to
814
1:33:55 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]ion if it exceeds and it's it's a low number it's i think it's 1.7 or 2 or something
815
1:34:00 --> 1:34:05
like that it's a very very low threshold that requires reconsideration of the act
816
1:34:06 --> 1:34:13
right on a great information david the last the last piece um i just put it in the chat it's this
817
1:34:13 --> 1:34:22
image that says um as of 2011 only initial reports are made public in bears and meaning that before
818
1:34:22 --> 1:34:29
that and i've looked at these older reports uh 2010 and older and i can tell how they basically
819
1:34:29 --> 1:34:36
append the follow-up data to these to the initial report so now that that almost changes the whole
820
1:34:36 --> 1:34:42
bet paradigm when i'm wondering well gee how many of these 1.[privacy contact redaction]e that are in bears are
821
1:34:42 --> 1:34:[privacy contact redaction]s god bless you and uh bait you know keep up the good
822
1:34:50 --> 1:34:55
work god bless you thanks more research more research there for you albert keep working no
823
1:34:55 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] a quick question if you're familiar with the work of jj
824
1:35:04 --> 1:35:16
kui and his um i guess his claim that the lab leak release was was not actually what took place it
825
1:35:16 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] if you are familiar with it and you think your view is consistent with his or you have a
826
1:35:20 --> 1:35:[privacy contact redaction] that's my question thank you i'm not familiar with his specifics but this was not
827
1:35:25 --> 1:35:32
a lag lab leak uh when you use the term accidental or intentional release um it is a release not a
828
1:35:32 --> 1:35:37
leak there's no question that the pathogen that's killing people is actually the chimera that was
829
1:35:37 --> 1:35:43
altered by ralph barrack so it has nothing to do with wuhan institute of virology other than
830
1:35:43 --> 1:35:51
by association but it's not a china thing there's a very simple way we could show this and by the
831
1:35:51 --> 1:35:58
way i've challenged anybody who has any medical facility around them to take um pathology samples
832
1:35:58 --> 1:36:07
of tissue predating the um the alleged patient one in december of [privacy contact redaction] every
833
1:36:07 --> 1:36:14
pathology lab anywhere on earth has frozen samples that go back you know sometimes five to ten years
834
1:36:14 --> 1:36:[privacy contact redaction]atute if there was a crime or anything else and the fact of the matter
835
1:36:20 --> 1:36:29
is it's a very simple thing to do test whether or not you see any of the uh frag fragments in um any
836
1:36:29 --> 1:36:35
pathology reports prior to december 2019 and what you'll find out is this thing has been circulating
837
1:36:35 --> 1:36:42
in the population disseminated likely through a number of vectors um one of the most interesting
838
1:36:42 --> 1:36:49
ones that i've pointed out is that the only two venues into which allegedly we had the introduction
839
1:36:49 --> 1:36:55
of the pathogen was cruise ships and nursing homes what's unique about cruise ships and nursing
840
1:36:55 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]andpoint and and think about this the the public health paradox
841
1:37:04 --> 1:37:11
is that there are two equal environments from the standpoint of public health risk that should have
842
1:37:11 --> 1:37:19
equivalent case counts cruise ships and casinos they are exactly the same as a public health
843
1:37:19 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]s same proximity same everything else the difference
844
1:37:25 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction] central water processing facilities and in nursing homes you
845
1:37:32 --> 1:37:39
have central processing water facilities the likelihood is very high that given the fact that
846
1:37:39 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction] zero case counts from casinos and 100 of early case counts from ships when public health
847
1:37:50 --> 1:37:[privacy contact redaction]ly the same they are identical as a public health vector the likelihood is very
848
1:37:58 --> 1:38:04
high that the release was done on cruise ships and was done in nursing homes not that that's where
849
1:38:04 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]arted having coronavirus but but do you think that once it was released it
850
1:38:09 --> 1:38:15
propagates or it needs to be re-released no no it's continuously released and the real death
851
1:38:15 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]ual data from from from every life insurance company which is
852
1:38:21 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]uarial data and the real clinical pathology data that matter because
853
1:38:27 --> 1:38:35
you know unfortunately the the um i've made this allegation many times there was no excess death
854
1:38:35 --> 1:38:42
in the spring of 2019 there was no excess death in the spring of 2020 it wasn't until we started
855
1:38:42 --> 1:38:[privacy contact redaction]arted dying now that doesn't mean that people did not die in the
856
1:38:49 --> 1:38:56
spring of [privacy contact redaction] excess deaths going on that were anything
857
1:38:56 --> 1:39:05
other than attributable to influenza and there is zero zero excess death in any mortality data from
858
1:39:05 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction]ing people at that point in time we killed people
859
1:39:12 --> 1:39:19
with the modified mrna we did not kill people with coronavirus thank you
860
1:39:19 --> 1:39:[privacy contact redaction]ions john the look-out
861
1:39:29 --> 1:39:37
thanks charles can you hear me okay yep okay um so uh david i've been following your efforts
862
1:39:37 --> 1:39:44
as well as the efforts of uh sasha lotopova and katherine watt um also karen kinkston they've both
863
1:39:44 --> 1:39:52
given presentations here in this forum um prior to my joining this group uh i was following the
864
1:39:52 --> 1:39:58
efforts of reiner fulmick so everybody's doing their own thing um you know i'm always trying
865
1:39:58 --> 1:40:04
to be as much of a team builder as i can i think uh yeah collaboration is is a positive uh quality
866
1:40:04 --> 1:40:11
um i i'm building a little bit maybe on something that steven brought up earlier
867
1:40:11 --> 1:40:18
but uh it seems like um reiner fulmick is uh trying to take his case uh to the icc he's not
868
1:40:18 --> 1:40:27
having much luck that that i've seen um uh sasha and uh katherine they are primarily focused on
869
1:40:27 --> 1:40:35
incriminating evidence the that points at the dod and the federal government karen kinkston solidly
870
1:40:35 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ual uh agreements uh the the idea that pfizer is the head of the snake
871
1:40:43 --> 1:40:49
i think everybody's looking for who to prosecute here who to focus efforts upon and uh i think
872
1:40:49 --> 1:40:[privacy contact redaction]ion of who has standing to sue um yeah that's a big point yeah
873
1:40:56 --> 1:41:04
so um i don't i don't know uh if you know pursuing one or the other of these avenues uh without
874
1:41:04 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]anding is going to necessarily impede another team from going after you know somebody
875
1:41:11 --> 1:41:[privacy contact redaction]ually uh reach but you bring up a good point that um you know that there's no real
876
1:41:17 --> 1:41:24
criminal path here um in my mind i'm trying to kind of resolve a question and i would just
877
1:41:24 --> 1:41:32
appreciate your input on it to the extent that you're familiar uh if between um uh sasha latopova
878
1:41:32 --> 1:41:39
and katherine watt's argument that we should be going after the the dod and karen kinkston's uh
879
1:41:39 --> 1:41:43
equally compelling presentation that we should be going after pfizer do you have an opinion
880
1:41:43 --> 1:41:51
as to which of these two are on a good path or a viable path yeah so let me let me disqualify one
881
1:41:51 --> 1:41:59
right out of the gate and the disqualification is that because of the fact that the crime originated
882
1:41:59 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]ed states is not a signatory and bound by icc as a
883
1:42:05 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction] to the contrary bringing an action as a uh citizen or permanent resident of the united
884
1:42:13 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction]ances considered to be a felony um the icc is not a jurisdiction
885
1:42:22 --> 1:42:31
that is even relevant in this particular case because the crime is actually 100 percent a us
886
1:42:31 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction] gone globally but the crime is a us crime and as a
887
1:42:41 --> 1:42:50
result the icc is irrelevant in this matter there is no chance that you get anywhere um with any
888
1:42:50 --> 1:42:[privacy contact redaction] thing is you could actually put a double jeopardy problem out there
889
1:42:55 --> 1:43:01
by pretending to pursue something there and ultimately getting the icc to fail to take
890
1:43:01 --> 1:43:07
act or dismiss which would prejudice downstream prosecution so that one is a dead on arrival
891
1:43:07 --> 1:43:15
because of the nexus of the crime and the only value there is to stephen's point you could go
892
1:43:15 --> 1:43:23
after genocide you could go after the contractual issues where you know Pfizer and Moderna forced
893
1:43:23 --> 1:43:27
governments into waiving liability issues there's a lot of things you could do at icc but you can't
894
1:43:27 --> 1:43:33
go after the crime there Pfizer is an interesting animal for the simple reason that the actual
895
1:43:33 --> 1:43:40
perpetrator of the crime is not Pfizer the actual perpetrator of the crime in this particular case
896
1:43:40 --> 1:43:46
is a pass-through relationship that Biontech has with Pfizer but the actual dissemination
897
1:43:47 --> 1:43:57
of the agent at the outset was not Pfizer or Biontech it was the unfortunate defense department
898
1:43:57 --> 1:44:05
cover operation out of South Carolina ATI which was the operation warp speed contractor so the
899
1:44:05 --> 1:44:11
official counterparty to the dissemination of the injection was not Pfizer and was not Moderna and
900
1:44:11 --> 1:44:20
was not Biontech it was ATI and ATI is a defense department contractor whose previous contracts
901
1:44:20 --> 1:44:25
were in mis and disinformation for propaganda promulgation from the department of defense
902
1:44:25 --> 1:44:30
that's their pharmaceutical credential that got them the contract to run operation warp speed
903
1:44:31 --> 1:44:[privacy contact redaction]ually a very easy dismissible case if you pursue Pfizer without
904
1:44:40 --> 1:44:48
pursuing ATI and its parent company answer and answer for those of you not familiar with it
905
1:44:49 --> 1:44:54
is essentially compiled off of a bunch of folks that are part of the office of naval research and
906
1:44:54 --> 1:44:59
other forms of special operation and black operation businesses and you have to go after
907
1:44:59 --> 1:45:07
them so a pursuit of the nominal target Pfizer is going to be dismissed on probably ripeness
908
1:45:07 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction]anding that's a terrible place to go and once again prejudicial in the minds of courts
909
1:45:13 --> 1:45:18
the degree to which you want to pursue the department of defense or any of the agencies
910
1:45:18 --> 1:45:23
associated with the department of defense is a mountain that is much much much harder to climb
911
1:45:24 --> 1:45:33
than going after SEC misrepresentations tax fraud misrepresentations or racketeering it is critical
912
1:45:33 --> 1:45:[privacy contact redaction] viable pathway that has a leg to stand on as your primary thrust
913
1:45:40 --> 1:45:49
and I want to come back to your opening comment collaboration is absolutely essential but
914
1:45:50 --> 1:45:56
collaboration can't involve essentially a bunch of people with rocks throwing them randomly in
915
1:45:56 --> 1:46:02
the darkness saying we're working together there has to be a unified approach that says that we're
916
1:46:02 --> 1:46:08
going after a consolidated target and the reason why I'm working with a number of different groups
917
1:46:09 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]ly to your point this is an us proposition this is not a my proposition the reason
918
1:46:15 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction] prosecute now the reason why we work with the davalir law group the reason why we
919
1:46:20 --> 1:46:25
succeeded in getting face masks off of airplanes with the health freedom defense fund using the
920
1:46:25 --> 1:46:31
davalir law group the reason why all those things happen is because we collaborated and we succeeded
921
1:46:31 --> 1:46:37
and the reason why nobody has to wear a face mask on a plane is because collaboration worked but
922
1:46:38 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]ay focused on a laudable and plausible objective
923
1:46:45 --> 1:46:[privacy contact redaction]ions or filing reckless actions are not helping in fact they're
924
1:46:54 --> 1:47:02
prejudicing they're prejudicing the the the the courts around the country who now are citing other
925
1:47:02 --> 1:47:08
opinions based on frivolous and unthoughtful civil actions that have been filed so i'm a big fan
926
1:47:08 --> 1:47:13
of trying to make sure that we go after crimes and i'm a big fan of making sure we do it
927
1:47:13 --> 1:47:22
collaboratively and your point is very well taken thank you thank you john now david so you know will
928
1:47:22 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]op out anytime any of you in a queue i watch this so will
929
1:47:28 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]on will be next before he goes and then we'll have rudek from czech republic great in
930
1:47:33 --> 1:47:[privacy contact redaction]ralia we've got the standing problem a significant standing problem julian gillespie
931
1:47:38 --> 1:47:45
was on this call earlier he's a a lawyer the australian vaccination risks network of which
932
1:47:45 --> 1:47:51
i'm on the committee was thrown out of the federal court because of a corrupt judge literally a
933
1:47:51 --> 1:47:58
corrupt judge and one of the issues that we're all grappling with as are you like the 83 year old
934
1:47:58 --> 1:48:06
judge is that the wrong judge can create bad precedent and then half corrupt judges can rely
935
1:48:06 --> 1:48:12
on that bullshit so it is a real issue and david i as i've said to many people just for those who
936
1:48:12 --> 1:48:17
weren't here before judges will wake up when their grandchildren start dying so that'll be a helpful
937
1:48:18 --> 1:48:22
process yeah so will and then daniel when were you in the because you dropped off too didn't you
938
1:48:22 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction] tell me where you were okay well oh we'll work we'll work
939
1:48:28 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction]on next and then rudek and then daniel tell me who you are after thank you charles
940
1:48:36 --> 1:48:46
can anybody hear me yep i can hear you will okay very good uh hi david um so uh does a patent for
941
1:48:46 --> 1:48:[privacy contact redaction] no no oh okay that's good does a budget line item
942
1:48:57 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ion research prove that viruses exist uh no remember remember let's let's just
943
1:49:05 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction] pause for a second viruses are a model they are a model derived from a broken model from the
944
1:49:15 --> 1:49:23
1950s of dna which also doesn't exist because remember chromosomes exist dna doesn't dna is a
945
1:49:23 --> 1:49:29
model built by watson and crick not and defined by the way by not watson and crick i mean they
946
1:49:29 --> 1:49:38
get credit for it but they didn't actually do it these are models and models are as good as models
947
1:49:38 --> 1:49:44
are they do not represent nature they are an artifact to describe a natural phenomenon
948
1:49:45 --> 1:49:[privacy contact redaction]ication competent intracellular obligate parasite
949
1:49:52 --> 1:50:00
that causes cellular necrosis and symptomatic disease which transmit between hosts via natural
950
1:50:00 --> 1:50:07
modes of exposure we're not talking about i mean this is a a word that supposedly describes
951
1:50:07 --> 1:50:13
something real so that's yeah and then and therein lies therein lies the same problem we have i mean
952
1:50:13 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] the general theory tells us that that allegedly if we want to believe it
953
1:50:19 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] things called atoms and atoms are allegedly made up of protons and neutrons
954
1:50:25 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction]rons but nobody has bothered to test the tiny little theoretical problem with the general
955
1:50:31 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction]ing that somehow neutrons are the byproduct of the decay of supernova
956
1:50:41 --> 1:50:47
and the decay of supernova has a half life of [privacy contact redaction]
957
1:50:47 --> 1:50:[privacy contact redaction] that continually supply every 15 minutes every neutron that lives
958
1:50:53 --> 1:50:58
inside of every atom i mean the problem i'm glad you brought up i'm glad you brought up a test for
959
1:50:59 --> 1:51:06
for the atomic theory because i'm just wondering are you familiar with the settling the virus
960
1:51:06 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]atement it's also sometimes called the virus challenge oh yeah it was proposed by
961
1:51:12 --> 1:51:18
mark bailey kevin corbett and tom cowan they were the principal authors yep yep all right would you
962
1:51:18 --> 1:51:24
consider being a signatory to that because that is basically the purpose of that is to validate or
963
1:51:24 --> 1:51:33
to prove what tom cowan calls the the pillars the basic pillars of virology which remarkably
964
1:51:33 --> 1:51:38
haven't been proven up until this point and they would include isolation and purification
965
1:51:38 --> 1:51:[privacy contact redaction]ron microscope photography genetic sequencing the serum test pcr or or otherwise
966
1:51:47 --> 1:51:53
and the and the proof of pathogenicity yeah would you consider signing up to would you sign the
967
1:51:53 --> 1:51:59
virus challenge oh there's no question and i've i've been i've been i've frequently shared the
968
1:51:59 --> 1:52:04
stage with tom cowan and i love his work and i think what he's doing is phenomenal and i think
969
1:52:04 --> 1:52:09
it doesn't go far enough because i actually have a fundamental problem with all of the models that
970
1:52:09 --> 1:52:14
we've chosen since 1880s when we actually you're saying it doesn't you're saying it doesn't go far
971
1:52:14 --> 1:52:20
enough but you're you're forgive me for interrupting you but i just want to use my time as quickly you
972
1:52:20 --> 1:52:26
know as efficiently as possible but your whole presentation is based on the fundamental assumption
973
1:52:26 --> 1:52:32
you're talking about furan cleavage sites and yeah gain of function research and super pathogenetic
974
1:52:32 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]oxychloroquine is an effective treatment for coronavirus your whole
975
1:52:38 --> 1:52:[privacy contact redaction]ion to no it isn't no it is not it is linguistic
976
1:52:46 --> 1:52:52
only what you're suggesting is an ontological argument that's not being made what i am saying
977
1:52:52 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction] is the evidence of crimes in a dimension in which the crimes occurred
978
1:53:01 --> 1:53:[privacy contact redaction]n't even defined you haven't even you haven't defined the crime scene correctly
979
1:53:06 --> 1:53:13
you've in fact what you've done is you are stipulating to the crime scene as defined by
980
1:53:13 --> 1:53:18
the perp it's ralph barrack uh that that wants us to believe that viruses exist it's anthony
981
1:53:18 --> 1:53:24
fauci that wants us to believe that i don't disagree with you what i'm saying is i also
982
1:53:24 --> 1:53:30
don't acknowledge that debt denominated currency is a form of money but that doesn't make a bank
983
1:53:30 --> 1:53:37
robbery less a bank robbery the argument is a goofy one when it comes to ontological arguments
984
1:53:37 --> 1:53:44
where what you're doing is picking a linguistic model and then pretending that it doesn't exist
985
1:53:44 --> 1:53:50
i don't recognize debt denominated currency but it doesn't change a bank robbery that that analogy
986
1:53:50 --> 1:53:55
doesn't help add clarity i don't think of course it does it's the same thing what you're doing
987
1:53:59 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]en to what david's saying stop cutting across him please you're using a linguistic
988
1:54:05 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]ually agree with you i don't think that the virus model works but i don't think
989
1:54:10 --> 1:54:16
dna works and i don't think adams work because if you actually look at every single one of those
990
1:54:16 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]ly defined so that we would build a chemical rather than a frequency based
991
1:54:24 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction] of the matter is you could pick any one of a number of topics and the
992
1:54:30 --> 1:54:38
only point i'm making will is a very simple one it's a model just like representational currency
993
1:54:38 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction] like laws are a model and if what we're going to do is debate existentially the
994
1:54:45 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction]ence of the absence of a model that's a different conversation but when we are dealing
995
1:54:50 --> 1:54:[privacy contact redaction] to use the language of the realm to deal with the crime
996
1:54:56 --> 1:55:02
David you put you put it brilliantly in one sentence about five minutes ago what did you say
997
1:55:03 --> 1:55:09
that's why we recorded it that's exactly fine again okay will you want to have anything by the
998
1:55:09 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]s and david i love how you're able to handle anything so that's
999
1:55:15 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction]s can handle the questioning because as i said at the start
1000
1:55:20 --> 1:55:[privacy contact redaction] to be able to answer the question you have to be able to answer
1001
1:55:24 --> 1:55:32
upset if they're frameworks you know it's not a problem and i don't have a problem i'm just
1002
1:55:32 --> 1:55:38
saying that if we're going to critique the applicability of the virology model or the
1003
1:55:38 --> 1:55:44
virus model or the terrain model or anything else and my criticism and i've done it with tom
1004
1:55:44 --> 1:55:50
with tom sitting next to me is if you're going to critique models then let's critique models let's
1005
1:55:50 --> 1:55:56
actually go to the base of it. Let's not pretend like the virus versus terrain is interesting,
1006
1:55:56 --> 1:56:02
because it's not interesting. The interesting question is why we've decided in the mid 1800s
1007
1:56:03 --> 1:56:11
to see the world through a descriptive lens where we actually do reductionist analysis of things
1008
1:56:11 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction] particles and then trying to describe how something works.
1009
1:56:16 --> 1:56:22
That is analogous to having anybody take a tapestry and untie every thread, put the threads on the
1010
1:56:22 --> 1:56:28
floor, and then try to find the virgin next to the heart at the well. The fact of the matter is
1011
1:56:28 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]itute an analysis of anything. It constitutes only that what you're doing is
1012
1:56:36 --> 1:56:41
semantic debates, and that's not going to help us deal with this problem until we actually
1013
1:56:41 --> 1:56:[privacy contact redaction]er problem is that we actually have a language
1014
1:56:49 --> 1:56:54
handed to us by the oppressors, and now we're arguing about the nature of language.
1015
1:56:54 --> 1:57:02
It's a code. That's what it is. My last question is, thank you everybody,
1016
1:57:03 --> 1:57:09
for this forum, Charles and Stefan especially. Have you read, David, have you read Mark Bailey's
1017
1:57:09 --> 1:57:17
A Farewell to Virology? Could you also comment on Christine Massey's FOI request?
1018
1:57:17 --> 1:57:[privacy contact redaction]itutions from 40 nations and nobody can find evidence that SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction]s. Thank you.
1019
1:57:25 --> 1:57:31
Yeah, well, I mean, once again, it doesn't exist because there is no such thing even using their
1020
1:57:31 --> 1:57:38
rules on their phenomenology and on their linguistics. There is no such thing as SARS-CoV-2
1021
1:57:39 --> 1:57:46
isolated as an individual anything. Using the evidence that was put before the ICTV
1022
1:57:47 --> 1:57:54
back in February of 2020, it became exceptionally clear that by the time we allegedly had
1023
1:57:54 --> 1:57:59
some sort of definition of what we wanted to call this thing, there were already over 200 variations
1024
1:57:59 --> 1:58:03
of the thing that we were allegedly calling a novel thing, which tells us-
1025
1:58:04 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]ine's FOI says there's zero evidence of the thing.
1026
1:58:07 --> 1:58:12
Yes, but once again, the phylogenetic data, whether you want to accept the model or not,
1027
1:58:13 --> 1:58:19
also shows that the phylogenetic data shows there wasn't a thing. There were a bunch of things that
1028
1:58:19 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction]erized by individuals and it turns out that those things
1029
1:58:24 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction] never been fully isolated because the only technology
1030
1:58:30 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction] right now to look at the thing we call a virus or we call RNA is an assembly of fragments
1031
1:58:38 --> 1:58:[privacy contact redaction] of days, we never get it. Thank you. Thank you. Excellent. Thank you, Will.
1032
1:58:46 --> 1:58:53
We'll have Ruddock and then Daniel Nagazi and then Jim and we've got 26 minutes to go, David. You're
1033
1:58:53 --> 1:58:57
doing well. Now, you're sure you don't need a time to break? I worry about our guest who can go over
1034
1:58:58 --> 1:59:04
Oh, Lord, no, I can go forever. Wow. Okay, Ruddock and then Daniel.
1035
1:59:06 --> 1:59:13
Hi, everybody. Hi, David. Thank you very much for your answer to Will because it's exactly
1036
1:59:13 --> 1:59:[privacy contact redaction]ion so I can ask you something similar. 700 million worldwide will die from COVID
1037
1:59:23 --> 1:59:32
shots by 2028. How did you come up with this number 700 million? Yeah, that was actually
1038
1:59:32 --> 1:59:37
something that the headline is wonderful. If you actually listen to the presentation, you actually
1039
1:59:37 --> 1:59:43
find out that that's not what I said. What I said was using the model that was stipulated that said
1040
1:59:43 --> 1:59:50
we were looking for a 10% population reduction in the decade of vaccines data, which is actually
1041
1:59:50 --> 1:59:55
funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, they called for a 10% population reduction by
1042
1:59:55 --> 2:00:02
2028. And they said it would be achieved through vaccination. And all I said was, if that were in
1043
2:00:02 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction] the case, then that would represent a [privacy contact redaction]ion in the population of
1044
2:00:09 --> 2:00:18
the world. Now, the fact of the matter is, it is my assertion that if we look at what was added in
1045
2:00:18 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]ion, I think we are going to see all cause cardiovascular and cancer
1046
2:00:24 --> 2:00:30
mortalities going to epidemic levels. And I think that's going to happen now. I don't think that
1047
2:00:30 --> 2:00:37
that's going to happen at some indeterminate period down the road. The reason why it was so
1048
2:00:37 --> 2:00:44
important to put a number on that is because people throw around percentages, like 10% of the
1049
2:00:44 --> 2:00:51
population reduced or whatever, and people don't assume that what you're talking about is not just
1050
2:00:51 --> 2:00:[privacy contact redaction]e who are currently walking around on the planet. You're also talking about disruption
1051
2:00:57 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] of this is actually not just how many arms got
1052
2:01:05 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]iovascular disease or cancer or other things. The real problem
1053
2:01:12 --> 2:01:19
is something that we're already seeing in birth rates, where we're literally seeing a cessation
1054
2:01:19 --> 2:01:26
of fertility in an enormous number of populations. So when we put those together, Radik,
1055
2:01:26 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] that 700 million may be, ironically, a low estimate, not a high estimate,
1056
2:01:33 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction] to look at it from a population statistic standpoint, meaning that we are not
1057
2:01:38 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]enishing the population at the rate that we were. Therefore, the actual loss of life
1058
2:01:47 --> 2:01:50
is much higher than what we're talking about because we are actually
1059
2:01:51 --> 2:01:[privacy contact redaction]ion as a consequence of this action. So I'm glad you
1060
2:01:58 --> 2:02:04
brought it up, but I actually am very precise when I use language, and that precision was something
1061
2:02:04 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction] happened. It was an attention-getting headline, I get it, but that's why
1062
2:02:11 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction] to say is something that requires paragraphs of thinking, not headlines.
1063
2:02:17 --> 2:02:24
Excellent, because this was my concern. The number seems to me too low as well.
1064
2:02:24 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction]ions. If you look at the actuarial data coming off
1065
2:02:32 --> 2:02:39
of some of the life insurance modeling right now, we're talking about some people estimating
1066
2:02:39 --> 2:02:[privacy contact redaction] of the population gone in the same time horizon. So I have done
1067
2:02:47 --> 2:02:51
what I've done based on the public statements and just projecting the public statement.
1068
2:02:52 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]ion. Today was announced by WHO,
1069
2:03:01 --> 2:03:11
the avian influenza is in game again. And Tedros was mentioning very clearly that they are worried
1070
2:03:11 --> 2:03:18
about the human transmission, which means only one thing, the bio-weapon again.
1071
2:03:18 --> 2:03:25
Yeah, so that's a good point. And remember that the bivalent strategy with mRNA is the holy grail
1072
2:03:25 --> 2:03:32
that Anthony Fauci has been pursuing since 1986. And the fact that they want to do a combined
1073
2:03:33 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]ion, you need to have a influenza pandemic to make that happen,
1074
2:03:41 --> 2:03:47
because right now the uptake of influenza injections is at an all-time low in the
1075
2:03:47 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction]e aren't falling for the bivalent argument,
1076
2:03:51 --> 2:03:[privacy contact redaction] to create the illusion of an influenza outbreak.
1077
2:03:55 --> 2:03:59
Thanks for pointing that out. Thank you. Thank you too.
1078
2:03:59 --> 2:04:02
Thank you, Radik. Daniel Negazi, who I'm sure you know, David.
1079
2:04:04 --> 2:04:05
Hello. Hello, Daniel.
1080
2:04:05 --> 2:04:13
Thank you very much. I can resolve that previous whether or not viruses exist debate. And it's
1081
2:04:13 --> 2:04:20
actually thanks to a video you did a long time ago, Dr. Martin, that was about your bougainvillea,
1082
2:04:21 --> 2:04:29
the bougainvillea rebels. And where that led to a refinement in my thought was with the issue of
1083
2:04:29 --> 2:04:36
process. So I find myself these days, I think less and less about facts. And I think more and
1084
2:04:36 --> 2:04:42
more in terms of the mathematical integral of facts, which is the process that generates facts.
1085
2:04:43 --> 2:04:50
And then I spend maybe about half my day, mostly during sleeping time, thinking about the mathematical
1086
2:04:50 --> 2:04:[privacy contact redaction]s, which the conclusion I've come to is the reason
1087
2:04:56 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]s. And so how that changes the whether or not there's a virus
1088
2:05:02 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]y process. Well, what can we observe? We observe DARPA. DARPA likes to make
1089
2:05:11 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction]ar Wars type projects. They also like to make hand-sized weapons that
1090
2:05:18 --> 2:05:24
that soldiers can use. They also like to make microscopic weapons. So of the microscopic
1091
2:05:24 --> 2:05:30
weapons, you can have parasites like worms, intestinal parasites, you can have smaller ones
1092
2:05:30 --> 2:05:[privacy contact redaction] theoretical weapon you can make is probably a virus, a self-replicating
1093
2:05:39 --> 2:05:50
segment of DNA or RNA. So in that frame of process, whether or not viruses exist is rather a moot point.
1094
2:05:51 --> 2:05:58
It's more to the point that if viruses didn't exist, an organization like DARPA or whatever
1095
2:05:58 --> 2:06:05
its international equivalent is, would probably try to engineer something smaller than a bacteria
1096
2:06:06 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]er weapon, which is a genetically engineered product,
1097
2:06:13 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction] to look at, you know, just basic, you know, crime scene investigation. Well, who is the
1098
2:06:18 --> 2:06:[privacy contact redaction]er? So the murder are men, women and children around the world. What was the murder
1099
2:06:25 --> 2:06:34
weapon? Engineered device, a genetically engineered device. Now, who is the assailant? So as far as we
1100
2:06:34 --> 2:06:43
can observe, well, the assailant seems to involve DARPA, a very large organization, the NIH, and even
1101
2:06:43 --> 2:06:53
larger than the NIH. So the WHO. Now, as a man on the ground, you know, as men, women and children
1102
2:06:53 --> 2:07:04
around the world, we have to ask ourselves, are we able to reach the head of this monster that is the
1103
2:07:04 --> 2:07:10
assailant that's caused this genetic poisoning of the human species? Are we able to reach a
1104
2:07:10 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ion where we can attack and prosecute the head that sits at the WHO level or even above the
1105
2:07:19 --> 2:07:27
WHO level? Yeah, likely not. So I'm in completely complete agreement with your approach to go after
1106
2:07:27 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction]ates, because the only way we can bring down this monster, if we can't reach the head,
1107
2:07:34 --> 2:07:[privacy contact redaction] to keep chipping away at the toenails, because that's what
1108
2:07:39 --> 2:07:46
we are able to reach as men and women on the ground. And hopefully, by getting at the toenails,
1109
2:07:46 --> 2:07:54
then the toes, then the ankles, we can bring the entire system, the system where the WHO is able to
1110
2:07:54 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction] humanity. That's probably the only path we have in winning this.
1111
2:08:02 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ions, even better if we can go after municipal
1112
2:08:10 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ions and get a quick win in a municipal jurisdiction that sets a precedent for a state,
1113
2:08:15 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ate sets a precedent for the United States, and then the United States can probably
1114
2:08:22 --> 2:08:29
set a precedent for the world. We'll see. But I agree with the approach, going small when
1115
2:08:29 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction] to think in terms of that process. Use the opposite
1116
2:08:35 --> 2:08:42
of what you're countering, what your assailant, what your enemy is. The other thing was,
1117
2:08:42 --> 2:08:[privacy contact redaction]ive, I did notice in the County of Lamont, Alberta, everyone in the town
1118
2:08:53 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction] influenza they've ever seen pass through the entire county
1119
2:09:01 --> 2:09:08
in November of 2019. And what's unique about that situation is throughout the peak of the
1120
2:09:08 --> 2:09:18
pandemic, throughout 2020, no one in that county was positive for COVID-19. That is, people came
1121
2:09:18 --> 2:09:25
into the hospital, but no one came into the hospital with a COVID-[privacy contact redaction]ess, likely because
1122
2:09:25 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]ess in November 2019, which is why they were protected all throughout 2020.
1123
2:09:32 --> 2:09:38
The other clinical note I want to make is that during this pandemic, when I was working,
1124
2:09:39 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction]ious disease that passed through that was called COVID-19
1125
2:09:45 --> 2:09:[privacy contact redaction] a very unique clinical feature, that this is different from every other influenza,
1126
2:09:51 --> 2:09:59
coronavirus, adenovirus infection that I've seen before. And that is the one from 2020 and 2021
1127
2:10:00 --> 2:10:06
caused a lot of pulmonary fluid buildup. And that was clinically different from every other
1128
2:10:06 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]ess that I've seen in my career as an emergency doctor. And what's also interesting is
1129
2:10:12 --> 2:10:21
after being exposed to these unique viral symptoms of a viral illness with a very wet
1130
2:10:22 --> 2:10:29
and very fluid rich profile in terms of causing fluid buildup in the lungs, a day later I had
1131
2:10:29 --> 2:10:36
the runny nose of my life. This wasn't a bacterial sinusitis, I did not have a fever, I just had a
1132
2:10:36 --> 2:10:44
very fluid copious runny nose. But unlike any other runny nose I've had in my entire lifetime,
1133
2:10:44 --> 2:10:[privacy contact redaction]in and then it was resolved. So I can attest to personal experience
1134
2:10:51 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ence of some contagious agent that caused extreme amount of physiologic fluid buildup
1135
2:11:01 --> 2:11:08
that was resolved. Daniel, you've never been psychologically tortured previously, presumably?
1136
2:11:09 --> 2:11:14
No, no, I've never been. I don't think so. But you have been in the last three years, we all have.
1137
2:11:15 --> 2:11:23
Oh, I spent a lot of time at work. So, you know, luckily the job posting I had, I could pick up as
1138
2:11:23 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ually having a good time in 2020-2021 because I was working so
1139
2:11:30 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ually enjoy emergency department work. So as far as the psychological torture goes,
1140
2:11:35 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]arted in September 2021 for me when I was no longer able to work. And that led to
1141
2:11:42 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction]ress because I find emergency medicine quite satisfying mentally, physically,
1142
2:11:51 --> 2:11:[privacy contact redaction] from my work, I'd say my psychological trauma only started in
1143
2:11:57 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction] year, 2021. Yes, but you can be injured. So you can be psychologically tortured
1144
2:12:09 --> 2:12:15
and not realize it. So you might think that you weren't, but and I thought I wasn't, but I think
1145
2:12:15 --> 2:12:23
now I was like everybody else. So they were destroying social bonds, you know, it's very
1146
2:12:23 --> 2:12:29
subtle. Okay, come on, keep going. So we're tied on time. So Daniel, you done?
1147
2:12:32 --> 2:12:38
So what Daniel, David points out, and I remind people that the third Star Wars movie is Daniel,
1148
2:12:38 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction]rategy. And in the third Star Wars movie, the machines of the empire
1149
2:12:46 --> 2:12:51
were brought down by the Ewoks in the forest. Remember all collaborating, David, with their
1150
2:12:51 --> 2:12:[privacy contact redaction]ring to trip down. And it reminds me of the story in the African wilds and a lion
1151
2:12:57 --> 2:13:00
kills an elephant by taking a chunk out of its foot and waiting for it to bleed to death.
1152
2:13:02 --> 2:13:07
Well, and let me just make the observation there is a way to go after the head of the beast,
1153
2:13:07 --> 2:13:[privacy contact redaction]op putting money into Blackrock. Nice. All right, thank you. We've got a couple
1154
2:13:14 --> 2:13:22
more to go. We've got 12 minutes to go. Love it. Jim. Thank you, David. That was a great
1155
2:13:22 --> 2:13:29
presentation. You mentioned Blackrock at the end. That's very important. And that's really
1156
2:13:29 --> 2:13:36
very important. And the universities that you point out their ties as well. I have a particular
1157
2:13:36 --> 2:13:42
fondness of the University of Pennsylvania. They seem to be embedded in this with the development
1158
2:13:42 --> 2:13:49
of the MRI and technology, factcheck.org and reward for two of the highest ranking people
1159
2:13:49 --> 2:13:56
at the University of Pennsylvania. Amy Gutman became the diplomat or ambassador, as well as
1160
2:13:56 --> 2:14:03
David Cohen, ambassador, as well as Zeke Emanuel's brother, Ram, ambassador to Japan diplomatic
1161
2:14:03 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]y, the Department of Defense, seems to be the focus
1162
2:14:08 --> 2:14:14
of this whole thing. And they seem to be driving it through all maybe six eyes, the six eyes
1163
2:14:14 --> 2:14:21
organization. This seems to be similar to the plot of Rainbow Six by Tom Clancy, where a virus or
1164
2:14:21 --> 2:14:28
a spike protein is released and the vaccine is worse. We know that this is DOD in relationship,
1165
2:14:28 --> 2:14:35
and I'm not sure if you're familiar, but I have some information and belief that this spike protein
1166
2:14:35 --> 2:14:41
is racially specific and may not attack certain people, including Larry Fink, including
1167
2:14:42 --> 2:14:[privacy contact redaction]e who invented it may have made it so it doesn't kill them off and
1168
2:14:47 --> 2:14:56
doesn't kill and doesn't make their progeny infertile. Because of the ACE2 receptor binding
1169
2:14:56 --> 2:15:04
is racially specific, it actually repels K26R. So the question becomes, we kind of know who
1170
2:15:04 --> 2:15:08
did this and it wasn't the Chinese. We know it has to do with the Department of Defense and it
1171
2:15:08 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]s over the Department of Defense, which are intelligence
1172
2:15:13 --> 2:15:21
agencies and maybe even some would say demons. The Department of Defense may have made a deal
1173
2:15:21 --> 2:15:26
with the demons. How do we deal with contracts, secret contracts, are supposed to be overseen by
1174
2:15:26 --> 2:15:[privacy contact redaction]or General? How do we deal with secret contracts? How do we hold these
1175
2:15:33 --> 2:15:37
entities responsible when they are seemingly allowed to depopulate the world in a racially
1176
2:15:37 --> 2:15:45
specific manner? Thanks. Well, if we go back to 1914 and we look at the formation of the
1177
2:15:46 --> 2:15:52
collaboration between Booker T. Washington and Andrew Carnegie to set up the Eugenics program,
1178
2:15:54 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]ablishment of the Tuskegee Institute, which most people who are
1179
2:16:01 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction] time dealing with. That Andrew Carnegie and Booker T. Washington
1180
2:16:09 --> 2:16:17
collaborated on the development of the National Eugenics Office. Let that sit in your woke
1181
2:16:17 --> 2:16:21
bucket wherever you want it to sit. The fact of the matter is for an extremely long time,
1182
2:16:22 --> 2:16:30
the answer is that where capital is opaque, power becomes more opaque.
1183
2:16:32 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]ion that the aggregation of power inside of BlackRock is a perfect example,
1184
2:16:43 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction] two decades ago from near bankruptcy to being the
1185
2:16:49 --> 2:16:[privacy contact redaction]anation whatsoever in how that happened. We know that by
1186
2:16:59 --> 2:17:07
2012, automated trading had replaced actual trading as the way equity markets move,
1187
2:17:07 --> 2:17:14
which means price is determined by quantitative load balancing, not by price. There's a whole
1188
2:17:14 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction] been hijacked. The fact of the matter is the Department of Defense
1189
2:17:20 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction]ies thought they had the racket covered until one topic, which has not
1190
2:17:28 --> 2:17:35
been brought up but needs to be brought up, and that was Edward Snowden. When Edward Snowden went
1191
2:17:35 --> 2:17:42
to China and then went to Russia, a very important thing happened and we need to be very clear on
1192
2:17:42 --> 2:17:47
that. It wasn't until just a few years ago that I could even say this out loud because it was
1193
2:17:47 --> 2:17:[privacy contact redaction]ually accidentally became unclassified. Under the book written by
1194
2:17:56 --> 2:18:03
Hank Crompton, Life Inside the Clandestine Service, he was the first person to officially
1195
2:18:03 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]ually took to China and then took to Russia. That file
1196
2:18:13 --> 2:18:17
is the resolution of what was called the Corporate Cover Program.
1197
2:18:19 --> 2:18:26
The Corporate Cover Program is the CIA's means by which it takes people who are affiliated with
1198
2:18:26 --> 2:18:31
corporations and essentially recruits them into being double or triple agents.
1199
2:18:33 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction] a person who allegedly is an executive for GE
1200
2:18:40 --> 2:18:46
or Bank of America or whatever else. Those individuals actually go and under the guise
1201
2:18:46 --> 2:18:[privacy contact redaction]ors, they actually are both espionage for government as well as commercial
1202
2:18:55 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]e don't seem to pay attention to is the resolution name file,
1203
2:19:04 --> 2:19:10
which takes the code names of the assets for the agency and resolves them to the corporate entity
1204
2:19:10 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually are in real life. It's probably the most valuable piece of
1205
2:19:16 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]t and that is the reason why Edward Snowden is still alive in my estimation.
1206
2:19:23 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually took to China and then to Russia the name resolution of every single agent
1207
2:19:32 --> 2:19:[privacy contact redaction]ually under the cover of a corporate identity. Now the reason why this is important is
1208
2:19:38 --> 2:19:44
because when we think of the intelligence agencies, we think of the alphabet soup. We think of the CIA,
1209
2:19:44 --> 2:19:50
we think of the DIA, we think of the ONR, we think of all of these alphabet soups that we've become
1210
2:19:50 --> 2:19:55
familiar with. But what we don't realize is that a significant proportion of what we think of as
1211
2:19:55 --> 2:20:04
corporate executives are also part of a macro intelligence agency and that agency has one fatal
1212
2:20:04 --> 2:20:11
flaw and the fatal flaw is now their identities are known by the Chinese and by the Russians.
1213
2:20:12 --> 2:20:17
And since they are known by the Chinese and by the Russians, the United States has actually been,
1214
2:20:17 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction], decapitated as a prime actor ever since Snowden made it to Russia.
1215
2:20:25 --> 2:20:31
Because the ultimate blackmail that is going to destroy the United States economy and therefore
1216
2:20:31 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]ates power and influence is the resolution of those name recognitions. And the
1217
2:20:36 --> 2:20:[privacy contact redaction]ually publicly disclosed, the economy that we think we know as we know it
1218
2:20:42 --> 2:20:49
that we think we know as we know it will go away. So it's important to realize that the
1219
2:20:49 --> 2:20:55
macro situation, which has nothing to do with the conversations we've had for the last two and a
1220
2:20:55 --> 2:21:02
half hours, the macro conversation is a much larger existential one. And to Daniel's earlier point,
1221
2:21:02 --> 2:21:07
if we don't understand the context in which this is happening, this is a current race against a
1222
2:21:07 --> 2:21:13
reorganization of the collapse officially of Westphalia models of nation states.
1223
2:21:14 --> 2:21:21
We are now going to go into a corporatocracy defined by despotic organizations, which are
1224
2:21:21 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] already achieved that position and what will happen is we'll
1225
2:21:27 --> 2:21:33
accelerate it. And if we really want to know how all this got really off the trail, the fact that
1226
2:21:33 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] Snowden was able to walk out with the name recognition and identity recognition and resolution
1227
2:21:39 --> 2:21:44
of every corporate cover program is the real reason why we can't do anything in this country
1228
2:21:44 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction]ually already compromised. We've got blackmail on absolutely
1229
2:21:49 --> 2:21:[privacy contact redaction] blackmail on everybody, accountability is near impossible in the U.S.
1230
2:21:57 --> 2:22:02
Thank you, David. Master's already done. Jim, here's your challenge, David. You have 10 minutes.
1231
2:22:02 --> 2:22:07
We'll go five minutes to answer. We'll deal with five hands up and we'll finish at the two hour
1232
2:22:07 --> 2:22:13
35 mark. You okay for 10 more minutes? There you go. And I'll do up to a minute question. I'll do a
1233
2:22:13 --> 2:22:18
minute answer. How about that? Perfect. Rapid fire, Lars. Thank you, Jim. Go, Lars.
1234
2:22:20 --> 2:22:27
Thank you. Thank you very much. I'm going to be very brief. I have received, and this is very
1235
2:22:27 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction]ex, I have received a proposal to, I will call it participate in the next phase of the
1236
2:22:39 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction] Let's call it that. It's very dramatic. It's Department of Defense is involved.
1237
2:22:45 --> 2:22:50
I need to talk to you about this. Let me know how I get in contact with you.
1238
2:22:51 --> 2:22:[privacy contact redaction] reach out to Charles and to Stephen and they can put us in touch. Lars,
1239
2:22:56 --> 2:23:06
done. Thank you. Thank you. Lars, well done. Lars and Stephen are in close contact. Very good, Lars.
1240
2:23:10 --> 2:23:14
Well, first of all, thank you, David. I was following your work for quite a while,
1241
2:23:14 --> 2:23:18
actually, well, throughout the pandemic. And thank you for resolving the pandemic.
1242
2:23:21 --> 2:23:29
That too. So since 2020. And thank you for resolving the conundrum about your opinion
1243
2:23:29 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction] very similar opinions. And you and Daniel, both of
1244
2:23:33 --> 2:23:39
you, thank you for speaking up because I remember people were wondering, but because we're short on
1245
2:23:39 --> 2:23:46
time, let me get straight to the comment and question. So it seems to me that we're actually
1246
2:23:46 --> 2:23:[privacy contact redaction]ential thing, even much, much, much deeper than anything we've discussed.
1247
2:23:53 --> 2:23:59
And we are looking at a, we can say mindset and resulting power structure that is thousands of
1248
2:23:59 --> 2:24:06
years old. And we can talk about Roman emperors or the Vatican or the families or the dynasties
1249
2:24:06 --> 2:24:11
or many other things. And they all represent that mindset and they may be competing with each other,
1250
2:24:11 --> 2:24:19
but nonetheless, it's the same mindset. It's a spiritual hunger. And they would stop at nothing
1251
2:24:19 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction] because the urge, their own spiritual deal,
1252
2:24:25 --> 2:24:31
I mean, their own urge is so strong that they will really stop at nothing. They will do violence
1253
2:24:32 --> 2:24:34
and anything like they've done for all history.
1254
2:24:35 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]ion.
1255
2:24:36 --> 2:24:37
Yeah, so your question.
1256
2:24:37 --> 2:24:[privacy contact redaction]ion is, well, first of all, where do you find the courage? Because you should understand
1257
2:24:43 --> 2:24:50
that. So where do you find the courage to go against that? And then how do you think,
1258
2:24:52 --> 2:24:58
how do you think we're going to handle the question of human bad habits? Because all of
1259
2:24:58 --> 2:25:04
that ultimately is supported. Human bad habits are the worst. They are the most important factor.
1260
2:25:05 --> 2:25:13
So Tessa, let me address this. I have never found courage to be a very attractive asset.
1261
2:25:14 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction]ive. And that is when you have an unassailable set of
1262
2:25:23 --> 2:25:[privacy contact redaction]ive, which is what I have been blessed with over my life. The fact of the
1263
2:25:27 --> 2:25:36
matter is, you know, I have been given access to things that are unusual. That access has gone back
1264
2:25:36 --> 2:25:44
to very early in my life. What I find is that the capacity to have confidence in being persistent
1265
2:25:45 --> 2:25:56
is something that is an attribute of humanity that the individuals who are currently controlling the
1266
2:25:56 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]ems find impossible to rationalize. And what I have found
1267
2:26:04 --> 2:26:09
in my own lived experience, and if you've read my book, Cuda 12, you actually would get a direct
1268
2:26:09 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]ions. Having been drawn into the circle of people attempting to
1269
2:26:16 --> 2:26:26
hijack my involvement into the current situation that's unfolding back in 2008, 9, 10, 11,
1270
2:26:27 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction]y said no to the people who were making deals that would
1271
2:26:32 --> 2:26:40
compromise me as an individual and me in my mission. And the fact is that what has won the day
1272
2:26:41 --> 2:26:[privacy contact redaction] given themselves over to a dark agenda,
1273
2:26:48 --> 2:26:52
who are trying desperately to figure out what on earth motivates me because all the things that
1274
2:26:52 --> 2:27:01
motivate them don't seem to work. And that is the reason why I say it is a persistence argument,
1275
2:27:01 --> 2:27:06
not a courage argument. You need to be the last one standing. You don't need to be the most powerful.
1276
2:27:06 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]anding. And that is in fact what humanity has always proven to be
1277
2:27:11 --> 2:27:17
in the face of every form of evil that's ever shown up on this planet. Humanity ultimately has
1278
2:27:18 --> 2:27:28
a residue, a remnant, a small number sometimes, but it always has a few people who stand against
1279
2:27:28 --> 2:27:34
the forces of darkness. And we are the evidence that every time they are the ones that win.
1280
2:27:34 --> 2:27:35
And we will be that again.
1281
2:27:36 --> 2:27:42
Beautifully said, David. Thank you, Tessa. Great question. Big question.
1282
2:27:44 --> 2:27:[privacy contact redaction]ence here, David, is John Bodwin from Massachusetts.
1283
2:27:49 --> 2:27:51
And then we've got Janet and Glenn, and then we're finishing.
1284
2:27:53 --> 2:27:58
Hello. Nice to meet you and thank you. We talked in Twitter spaces maybe a week ago.
1285
2:27:58 --> 2:28:00
Indeed, John. Good to see you.
1286
2:28:00 --> 2:28:07
Yep. So I like everything you're doing. I mean, my whole goal was always Rico in the end. You said
1287
2:28:07 --> 2:28:[privacy contact redaction]e of things that caused me to raise my hand today. One of them you wrote, you said,
1288
2:28:13 --> 2:28:21
unified approach, then you talked about objectives. So again, it's words, right? You're a stickler for
1289
2:28:21 --> 2:28:[privacy contact redaction] through this is not a full frontal or even a flanking
1290
2:28:29 --> 2:28:35
strategy, but more of a multi-point. In that regard, alliances are better than unions.
1291
2:28:35 --> 2:28:[privacy contact redaction], as long as there are intelligent people, if you coordinate your attacks that
1292
2:28:40 --> 2:28:50
are multi-point, we can have multiple fora, multiple legal theories. And each can share
1293
2:28:50 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction]s. If we get to discovery, I doubt I'll get to discovery,
1294
2:29:00 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction] with you, but let's say I do. If I do, I'm going to call you up and call other people
1295
2:29:05 --> 2:29:12
up and say, how can I help you with the discovery that I request? And I think if we all ally in that
1296
2:29:12 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction], we'll be much better. The question I have relates to, well, a couple more things. Number one
1297
2:29:21 --> 2:29:29
is we don't win anything without public opinion in the end. One of my objectives is to ruin
1298
2:29:30 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction]e's trust in government. And therefore I get into the data and I do a lot of Twitter stuff,
1299
2:29:37 --> 2:29:41
spaces, and I try to get people to understand that the government is killing their children.
1300
2:29:41 --> 2:29:[privacy contact redaction]and that, then we'll win public opinion. Then we can start winning over
1301
2:29:46 --> 2:29:54
some of these AGs and so forth. So the question is, have you looked at the various avenues of grand
1302
2:29:54 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction]ate and county level? Yes, we have. In fact, we worked for quite a while with
1303
2:30:02 --> 2:30:09
Dr. Ely out in Washington. Oh, I'm in a group with him. I'm on his team. So we've worked with a number
1304
2:30:09 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction] been trying to impanel similar organizations. And what we have found is that the
1305
2:30:17 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction]ion that we're getting is to have sheriffs and DAs who are at least sympathetic so that the
1306
2:30:26 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction] And so, John, we're big fans of the grand jury
1307
2:30:34 --> 2:30:39
approach, but we want to make sure that the ecosystem is prepared so that we have the
1308
2:30:39 --> 2:30:47
ability to bring a credible law enforcement response to the outcome. We don't want to have
1309
2:30:47 --> 2:30:[privacy contact redaction]e spinning their tires on getting to a point where they have achieved a Pyrrhic victory in
1310
2:30:55 --> 2:31:00
identifying the problem, but not having a jurisdiction willing to do anything about it.
1311
2:31:00 --> 2:31:02
And that's the reason why we're doing this in tandem now.
1312
2:31:04 --> 2:31:10
Thank you, David. Thank you, John. Great question. We're tied for time. Janet and then Glenn.
1313
2:31:16 --> 2:31:17
You muted, Janet.
1314
2:31:20 --> 2:31:[privacy contact redaction]ions. If SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction]s and was a released pathogen,
1315
2:31:29 --> 2:31:34
how do you think it was disseminated and transmitted around the world into different
1316
2:31:34 --> 2:31:[privacy contact redaction] areas that does not, on the face of it, appear to be a
1317
2:31:40 --> 2:31:47
plausible mechanism? Number two, if attorneys general are refusing to prosecute the criminals,
1318
2:31:47 --> 2:31:53
what is the source of the coercion over the attorneys general to prevent them doing their jobs?
1319
2:31:53 --> 2:32:01
Number three, is Snowden a spy? Well, let's start in reverse order. Snowden, yes, he is a spy, and
1320
2:32:02 --> 2:32:09
there's a lot of people who are, and as he has been trained in spycraft and his associations have
1321
2:32:09 --> 2:32:16
been trained in spycraft, there's no question that using a classic definition of involved in
1322
2:32:16 --> 2:32:23
espionage, he is very much involved in espionage. What he also is, is an opportunist who saw an
1323
2:32:23 --> 2:32:[privacy contact redaction]y to make sure that he ensured his future and thus did what he chose to do, which
1324
2:32:31 --> 2:32:37
is to hold the American citizens and the American government hostage by taking information that would
1325
2:32:37 --> 2:32:[privacy contact redaction]ives, and he pulled it off. So no question. On the second question,
1326
2:32:46 --> 2:32:55
um refresh me, I'm sorry, I just, I just lost it. If attorneys general are refusing to prosecute,
1327
2:32:55 --> 2:33:03
what's the source of the coercion to stop them? Yeah, so that's very simple. In the United States,
1328
2:33:03 --> 2:33:[privacy contact redaction] governor, and metaphorically and actually,
1329
2:33:10 --> 2:33:16
attorneys general are political, not judicial, uh oriented people, and if you look at most state
1330
2:33:16 --> 2:33:24
statutes, most states do not in, in involve the attorney general at the criminal prosecutorial
1331
2:33:24 --> 2:33:[privacy contact redaction] Most of those actions are essentially, um, think of them
1332
2:33:31 --> 2:33:38
as general counsel to a corporation rather than law enforcement per se, and we need to understand
1333
2:33:38 --> 2:33:46
that attorneys general are less likely to pursue criminal acts than our district attorneys or US
1334
2:33:46 --> 2:33:54
attorneys or others. So AGs are relatively pointless, and because their futures are largely
1335
2:33:54 --> 2:34:00
linked to political aspiration, they are unwilling to do anything that is not popular, therefore,
1336
2:34:00 --> 2:34:[privacy contact redaction]ion a, an extremely important thing, and that's the hearts and minds
1337
2:34:05 --> 2:34:[privacy contact redaction] to get hearts and minds alongside, so it's politically
1338
2:34:10 --> 2:34:17
expedient to do that. Um, and then your first question. Yeah, the first question was, was if
1339
2:34:17 --> 2:34:22
SARS-CoV-[privacy contact redaction]s and was released, how was it disseminated and transmitted? Yeah, so if you go
1340
2:34:22 --> 2:34:29
back to [privacy contact redaction]ing map of the alleged hot spots of where bat caves
1341
2:34:29 --> 2:34:[privacy contact redaction]culating that was likely to escape, you find quite mysteriously the
1342
2:34:35 --> 2:34:[privacy contact redaction]arted, are you ready with this, in northern Italy, okay, in New York City,
1343
2:34:45 --> 2:34:[privacy contact redaction]s in Marvel comics, in Seattle, Washington, which is another place
1344
2:34:51 --> 2:35:00
we've seen tons and tons of bat caves everywhere, in Guangzhou, uh, China, in areas around Hong Kong,
1345
2:35:00 --> 2:35:[privacy contact redaction] that 2016, every single place where in 2016 we were told
1346
2:35:11 --> 2:35:20
there was a high risk of an outbreak of, of, um, uh, coronavirus outbreak because of this
1347
2:35:20 --> 2:35:28
interspecies transfer, every single place happened to coordinate perfectly, according to Columbia
1348
2:35:28 --> 2:35:33
University's Earth Institute, which is the ones who published the map of where coronavirus was
1349
2:35:33 --> 2:35:38
going to happen, exactly every place they said it was going to happen is exactly where every patient
1350
2:35:38 --> 2:35:[privacy contact redaction]arted. That means that in [privacy contact redaction]map and in all likelihood it
1351
2:35:46 --> 2:35:[privacy contact redaction]ribution of the pathogen through both aerosolized and non-aerosolized
1352
2:35:53 --> 2:36:01
means and because we know that there was a absolute concordance between the 2016 map of
1353
2:36:01 --> 2:36:06
where the outbreak was going to happen to the actual outbreak that allegedly did happen,
1354
2:36:07 --> 2:36:13
we know that the release, not accidental transmission, was the mode of operation.
1355
2:36:13 --> 2:36:18
And Glenn, you get the last question. So you're saying it sprayed around, someone went around?
1356
2:36:18 --> 2:36:26
I'm saying it was literally, I'm saying that the agent that was causing people illness was
1357
2:36:26 --> 2:36:[privacy contact redaction]ributed and it was probably done through waterborne and airborne vectors.
1358
2:36:34 --> 2:36:37
Thank you, Janet. Glenn, last question and then we're going to go.
1359
2:36:38 --> 2:36:44
Thank you, David. Thank you, David. The world is bowing to the waste of your decency and intelligence
1360
2:36:44 --> 2:36:50
along with Judy Michaelvitz. Eight billion people will one day be grateful to your genius and
1361
2:36:51 --> 2:36:[privacy contact redaction] quickly on to Janet's question.
1362
2:36:55 --> 2:37:03
Glenn. Hi. So I appreciate a variety of the things you brought forward, especially some of the
1363
2:37:03 --> 2:37:10
clarity, your use of the laudable and plausible actions and precision of language. My position is
1364
2:37:11 --> 2:37:15
I've been working with a group, a number of people in this group have been part of my team
1365
2:37:15 --> 2:37:23
and I view it that a role that I take on is to try to deliver the complex elements to 85% of the
1366
2:37:23 --> 2:37:30
public, that so much of the data is swarming them and drowning them, that I try to bring things I
1367
2:37:30 --> 2:37:36
think can sit into what I'd call the red pill 101. As part of that, I work directly with
1368
2:37:36 --> 2:37:42
the Satchelarpova and Catherine Watt to bring forward their story and to try to get that
1369
2:37:42 --> 2:37:50
message out and in the public eye. There is a problem with it in that so far we do not yet have
1370
2:37:50 --> 2:37:57
the language, the precision of language where people are picking up on the fact that the
1371
2:37:58 --> 2:38:06
entire vaccine program has not been delivered by Pfizer and FDA, but it has been delivered by
1372
2:38:07 --> 2:38:18
the DOD and the countermeasures segments and Vardar. So far, even with all of us piping up
1373
2:38:18 --> 2:38:[privacy contact redaction] 8 to 12 weeks, still not a single legislator in Congress
1374
2:38:28 --> 2:38:38
is using that phraseology that we can't stop the vaccine because the FDA has no authority to,
1375
2:38:38 --> 2:38:45
that only the DOD and the HHS secretary has that authority and no one is pointing at that
1376
2:38:45 --> 2:38:[privacy contact redaction]ion or even using the phrase the DOD vaccine or DOD countermeasure in a routine way.
1377
2:38:53 --> 2:38:[privacy contact redaction] thought through that vocabulary and is there a suggestion you have
1378
2:38:59 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction]art using including all of our doctors and all of our legislators in Congress?
1379
2:39:06 --> 2:39:11
Well, yeah. What I have encouraged and Zev Zelenko and I worked very tirelessly to try to get
1380
2:39:12 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction]e as possible to use the term bioweapon because we actually were tired of
1381
2:39:17 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction]e debate on whether it was a virus or not or this or that or the other thing. The
1382
2:39:21 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction] of the matter is there was an engineered agent that was distributed to people for active
1383
2:39:27 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction] vaccine because it is absolutely not the appropriate term.
1384
2:39:33 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction]ion and bioweapon. That is a choice that I have made to make sure that I don't
1385
2:39:40 --> 2:39:[privacy contact redaction]ion around that. Christiana Shackelford with Real Reactions,
1386
2:39:47 --> 2:39:52
if you are not familiar with her work, you ought to be. Formerly part of the intelligence community
1387
2:39:52 --> 2:39:58
and Department of Defense, now one of the most active people in the world in trying to highlight
1388
2:39:58 --> 2:40:[privacy contact redaction] worked together for years with the Secretary of Defense and others
1389
2:40:03 --> 2:40:09
to try to raise awareness around this. If you go to realreactions.org, you can find out an enormous
1390
2:40:09 --> 2:40:[privacy contact redaction] been doing over the last considerable amount of time. She
1391
2:40:14 --> 2:40:[privacy contact redaction] two nights ago that was extremely well attended. We have a
1392
2:40:21 --> 2:40:[privacy contact redaction]e who are working on that and I would highly recommend that if you are interested,
1393
2:40:25 --> 2:40:[privacy contact redaction] is in my mind the point of the spear on addressing the fact that this is a
1394
2:40:32 --> 2:40:37
Department of Defense issue that needs to be addressed as such. I would encourage you
1395
2:40:39 --> 2:40:42
to put her on your radar screen if you do not already have her.
1396
2:40:43 --> 2:40:51
Okay, and one other question and that is relating to Whitney Webb who has spotlighted many of the
1397
2:40:51 --> 2:40:[privacy contact redaction] described today and part of her theme is it is not clear we can actually win
1398
2:40:56 --> 2:41:[privacy contact redaction] them. Until we do, we need to be going into protective mode and one way to do that is to go
1399
2:41:02 --> 2:41:10
local and to go offline. I was wondering if you would endorse that theme for the vast majority of
1400
2:41:10 --> 2:41:[privacy contact redaction] get them working towards something that they can be protective and at
1401
2:41:16 --> 2:41:[privacy contact redaction] shielded somewhat from the attacks in the storm. Glenn, I can only answer for myself.
1402
2:41:26 --> 2:41:[privacy contact redaction]ly what I was here to do and I think it involves being in the middle
1403
2:41:32 --> 2:41:[privacy contact redaction] that somewhere on some part of my anatomy is the use by date
1404
2:41:41 --> 2:41:46
and when that expiration comes, it will be old milk, it will smell bad and they will pour it out.
1405
2:41:46 --> 2:41:52
And between now and then, I am pretty sure that I am doing exactly what I am doing and I think
1406
2:41:52 --> 2:41:[privacy contact redaction] that humanity is the sum of us, not the constituent
1407
2:41:58 --> 2:42:05
individuals of us. That means that we need to be in the fray, we need to be working together and
1408
2:42:05 --> 2:42:[privacy contact redaction]ually take positions on the line because if we don't,
1409
2:42:12 --> 2:42:21
I think the moment we see ground to any of this campaign of terror and that includes isolation
1410
2:42:21 --> 2:42:27
and that includes retrenchment, then I think that the other side is one and we have lost.
1411
2:42:28 --> 2:42:[privacy contact redaction]aying in the fight and that does not mean anybody else needs to,
1412
2:42:32 --> 2:42:[privacy contact redaction] I get off this field is carried out on a shield.
1413
2:42:37 --> 2:42:[privacy contact redaction] I get off this field. One last question on the time table.
1414
2:42:43 --> 2:42:50
Transhumanism, is that a worry? Not in the least. Transhumanism,
1415
2:42:50 --> 2:42:[privacy contact redaction]n't figured out what it means to be human. There is a long way between figuring out what it
1416
2:42:55 --> 2:43:03
means to be human and getting to trans anything. We do not have a worry as long as we are not
1417
2:43:03 --> 2:43:[privacy contact redaction]ment of the digital world that is being served up. We will not be slaves
1418
2:43:10 --> 2:43:16
to something that we don't put our own shackles on and the easiest way to deal with transhumanism
1419
2:43:16 --> 2:43:21
is to say no. That's it. Good. Thank you, Glenn. So final,
1420
2:43:22 --> 2:43:29
final, Stephen, no series of questions. Please thank David, I do, but Stephen always is the
1421
2:43:29 --> 2:43:[privacy contact redaction], David. All right, Stephen, last word.
1422
2:43:35 --> 2:43:45
So on the transhumanism, David, you say that we shouldn't go with that, well, we don't,
1423
2:43:45 --> 2:43:[privacy contact redaction]e who are going along with that and don't realize what is going on?
1424
2:43:50 --> 2:43:53
So how do we get them to say no? That's the problem.
1425
2:43:53 --> 2:43:59
Yeah, well, here's the thing. I learned a very long time ago, I had the great opportunity to
1426
2:43:59 --> 2:44:07
deal with a person who was in my life for a couple of decades who dealt with depression.
1427
2:44:08 --> 2:44:[privacy contact redaction]ake as a young person thinking that I was the solution to their problem.
1428
2:44:13 --> 2:44:18
And somehow, if I just put enough time and energy and love and compassion into that,
1429
2:44:18 --> 2:44:[privacy contact redaction] the osmosis of being around my goodness was going to solve their
1430
2:44:23 --> 2:44:24
problem. Yeah.
1431
2:44:24 --> 2:44:27
And guess what? It didn't.
1432
2:44:27 --> 2:44:34
It didn't. My job is very clear. And I think our job collectively is very clear. Our job is to make
1433
2:44:34 --> 2:44:40
sure that ignorance arbitrage does not harm anyone. And that means very specifically,
1434
2:44:40 --> 2:44:[privacy contact redaction]ively and as broadly as possible. But I have long ago given up
1435
2:44:47 --> 2:44:[privacy contact redaction]e because the fact is that facts have never in the history of
1436
2:44:55 --> 2:45:00
humanity, it's ever overcome belief. And this is not going to be the first time that happens.
1437
2:45:01 --> 2:45:[privacy contact redaction]ive is defined. And this goes to Daniel's comment that I'll close
1438
2:45:08 --> 2:45:[privacy contact redaction]ive, the observer and the observed operate as a trinity. And they form the chord
1439
2:45:19 --> 2:45:24
on which the notion of perception will even occur. Forget facts, even perception.
1440
2:45:25 --> 2:45:[privacy contact redaction] a coherent view of the observed, the observer, and the context,
1441
2:45:33 --> 2:45:40
we cannot achieve anything other than the noise of spewing information into the wind.
1442
2:45:41 --> 2:45:[privacy contact redaction]ually try to diversify our context, to diversify the observations,
1443
2:45:49 --> 2:45:56
and to diversify the observed so that as many people as possible can achieve the opportunity
1444
2:45:56 --> 2:46:[privacy contact redaction] access to information. But at the end of the day, the determination of accepting that
1445
2:46:03 --> 2:46:08
information is purely based on the context of the observer. And it is not something that can be
1446
2:46:08 --> 2:46:15
forced on anyone for any reason. No, but we can influence maybe. So for example, if we can
1447
2:46:15 --> 2:46:21
convince the populations around the world that there was no pandemic, in my view, there was no
1448
2:46:21 --> 2:46:28
disease called COVID-19, no new disease, and it's likely that there was no virus in the sense that
1449
2:46:28 --> 2:46:36
you can isolate it. As you said, it's a computer model. So the whole thing was a fraud, in my view.
1450
2:46:37 --> 2:46:[privacy contact redaction]and fraud. So they think there's been a pandemic. One of the questions that's said
1451
2:46:45 --> 2:46:54
is, there's been a pandemic, or use the word pandemic. So do we just do nothing to, how should
1452
2:46:54 --> 2:47:00
I say, to convince people there's been a fraud? So if we say there's no pandemic, do you understand
1453
2:47:00 --> 2:47:07
what I mean? Is it totally useless trying to educate people? Well, no. I mean, like I said,
1454
2:47:07 --> 2:47:13
ignorance arbitrage has been the currency of power systems for a very long time. The selective use
1455
2:47:13 --> 2:47:18
of language, the selective use of information, the selective use of all sorts of things has been
1456
2:47:18 --> 2:47:24
extremely, extremely important. But for example, in the last couple of questions, the question of
1457
2:47:24 --> 2:47:[privacy contact redaction]e. We're using a term around which there is zero, and I mean zero
1458
2:47:32 --> 2:47:[privacy contact redaction]ually means. Is it AI? Is it synthetic? Is it what? What is it? And the
1459
2:47:39 --> 2:47:[privacy contact redaction] of the matter is everybody using the term pretends to be talking about the same language,
1460
2:47:45 --> 2:47:51
and nobody agrees on the common framework under which that term is being used. So the reason why
1461
2:47:51 --> 2:47:56
I don't engage it is not because I'm indifferent towards it. I don't engage it because I don't
1462
2:47:56 --> 2:48:04
fear something that is an illusion. The illusion that we modified plants with, are you ready for
1463
2:48:04 --> 2:48:15
this? GMO plants, if we go back to 1904 and we look at Japanese documents, we know that we were
1464
2:48:15 --> 2:48:24
informed that by using Bacillus thuringiensis, we were going to destroy the GI systems of any person
1465
2:48:24 --> 2:48:34
exposed to BT toxin. That was in 1904 in Japanese literature. The reason why that was never introduced
1466
2:48:34 --> 2:48:41
when we were talking about BT crops in the 60s and 70s is because Americans decided not to read
1467
2:48:41 --> 2:48:51
Japanese. That's it. So the reason why we have now [privacy contact redaction]inal crisis in this country
1468
2:48:51 --> 2:48:57
is because we decided that Japanese as a language was not readable, and therefore we decided not to
1469
2:48:57 --> 2:49:05
take into account documents in 1904 that said if you put BT toxin into any system, what you're going
1470
2:49:05 --> 2:49:[privacy contact redaction]em. Now what's my point? My point is that we don't even do a good
1471
2:49:12 --> 2:49:19
job using the same language. God forbid if we have multiple languages. Exactly. And so the point here
1472
2:49:19 --> 2:49:[privacy contact redaction]e want to get dogmatic about their particular terminology or whatever else,
1473
2:49:26 --> 2:49:33
that's perfectly fine. I will tell you the reason I use the language I use and whether it's
1474
2:49:33 --> 2:49:40
appreciated or not is irrelevant to me. I use the language I use because I am pursuing legal action
1475
2:49:40 --> 2:49:[privacy contact redaction]atutory definitions matter. And if I'm going to use a statutory definition
1476
2:49:47 --> 2:49:54
and I'm going to have a public comment, they are going to match. And whether somebody likes it or not
1477
2:49:54 --> 2:50:00
is absolutely immaterial to me because what I know is that across the last four years I have not had
1478
2:50:00 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction]atement I have made because I have paid the attention to the fact
1479
2:50:09 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction] so that I'm going to continue to focus on the crime at hand.
1480
2:50:16 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction]ephen. We've got to go. Last question. Last please thank David. We haven't got time to
1481
2:50:21 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction]ephen, unmute yourself. Hey everybody. It's lovely to catch up with you
1482
2:50:28 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction] to many, many interactions in the future. David, you cause a brilliant command
1483
2:50:35 --> 2:50:40
of the English language and that's why you're so successful in what you've done tonight and what
1484
2:50:41 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction] a wonderful command of the English language and I really like the
1485
2:50:45 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction] amazing clarity of thought and you're incredibly articulate.
1486
2:50:53 --> 2:50:[privacy contact redaction]ephen. Thank you David everybody. Thank you. Good night. Take care. Good afternoon.
1487
2:50:58 --> 2:51:02
Good evening. Thank you so much David. Bye. Please keep in touch.
1488
2:51:02 --> 2:51:[privacy contact redaction]ease keep in touch.
1489
2:51:08 --> 2:51:13
Thanks everybody. I'll give you one minute to put last messages in. I'll send this chat through to
1490
2:51:14 --> 2:51:20
David. If you want to say nice things to him, any resources you want to put in him. One minute
1491
2:51:20 --> 2:51:28
you've got to put it in the chat. Remember any names you want to add to the invite list,
1492
2:51:28 --> 2:51:34
put them in the chat as well. Chuck and Frosty. I love it. Sammy DeBay.
1493
2:51:37 --> 2:51:[privacy contact redaction] The man who's frostbitten in Wales.
1494
2:51:44 --> 2:51:45
David Martin.
